Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSoroptimist Park/Bridger Appraisals f' C P P �Imlllll� W.�TIIWW191: unmw MM.�WbvbHmm���N!��OYw. mv mr AW miM�.P.W.mWIMw�WµMMtluuImMJ .N Irv'm ulrvlWrtu SERVICES W�m m� �,wmnnumrem�u�mmmw�u�i auamaroww,r�mlu ummm �m��i �oum i �. P - 0 B O X 1 076 - B OZEMAN , MT 59715 ° ( 406 ) 587 - 5044 COMPLETE APPRAISAL 0 SUMMARY REPORT of Soroptimist Park, a Vacant City Lot 324 E. Main St. Bozeman, Gallatin MT, 59715 As of February 13, 2006 Prepared For Mr. Ron Brey City of Bozeman 411 E. Main St. Bozeman MT, 59715 Prepared by Jerry R. Gossel Certified General Appraiser MT-106 Appraisal Services P.O. Box 1076 Bozeman, MT 59771 and Keith O'Reilly, MAI Certified General Appraiser MT-400 Bridger Appraisals, Inc. P.O. Box 11145 Bozeman, MT 59719 APPRAISAL SERVICES P.Q.Box 1076 406-587-5044 67A Kagy Blvd. 406-587-5481 February 13, 2006 Ron Brey City of Bozeman. 411 E. Main St. Bozeman MT, 59715 Re: Soroptimist Park 324 E. Main St, Bozeman, Gallatin MT, 59715 Dear Mr. Brey : At your request, we have prepared an appraisal for the above referenced property. The purpose of this appraisal is to estimate the market value of the subject property's fee simple estate for business purposes. This appraisal is intended for the use of the client. This is a Complete Appraisal. All applicable research and valuation analyses have been applied. This is a Summary Report as defined by Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice under Standards Rule 2-2(B). This format provides a summary of the appraisal process, subject and market data and valuation analyses. We certify that we have no present or contemplated future interest in the property beyond this estimate of value. Your attention is directed to the Limiting Conditions and Assumptions, located on page 6. Acceptance of this report constitutes an agreement with these conditions and assumptions. February 13, 2006 Page 2 In our opinion, the value of the subject property, as of February 13, 2006, was as follows: Subject Property"As Is" Premise, Fee Simple Estate Value Conclusion $450,000 Further, we estimate the market exposure period necessary for the subject to have achieved this value to be 1-6 months. Respectfully submitted, L,.,--;;Jc-rry R. Go<sel, Keith O'Reilly, MA , NAT -400 TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary of Important Facts and Conclusions.................................................................. ............5 AppraisalScope..............................................................................................^^^^^^^__-_.^.^'^^.-- b Limiting Conditions and Assumptions —^,^.^^.^----.....--`.-^,,^^..,.-----.---._--^. 7 Purposeand Intended Use/User............................. ............................................^......^.................... X T)ofiuiti0Oof Market Value........................................................^'-^..^-.^-^^._--------.—.^. 8 RegionalMap.................................................................................................................................. 9 Market Area, City, Neighborhood, and Location Data................................................................. }0 PropertyDescription....................................................................... _ ......................................... }5 SubiectPhotographs................. ................................................................................................ }7 Assessmentand Taxes ..................................................................................................................20 Zoning............................ ..............................................................................................................2{ Highestand Best Use................... ................................................................................................22 \/n]uo1ion Methodology.......^............................................. ..........................................................22 IncomeApproach........... —........................................ ................................................................24 Direct Capitalization Analysis,.,~.-----_^^^,----.^~—..-------.—,..^^^^.^.---..Z4 PotentialGross Income [pGD......................................^............................................................24 Incomeand Expense Statement................................................................................ ...............3l IncomeApproach Conclusion................^.................................................................................. 34 CootApproach ..................... ........................................................................................................35 CostAnalysis........................................,~.................................................... _.^.^.^^,^..^^.^,^.^... 35 DepreciationAnalysis...................................................................~^^..........^...........................35 CostApproach Conclusion....................................................................................................... 35 FinalReconciliation......................................................... ........................................................... ]7 ValueIndications..................................................................... ^.. ............................ ............. 37 ValueConclusion............. ................................................ ....................................................... 37 CertificationStatement....................................................... .........................................................38 Addenda........................................................................................................................................3g Appraisal Services 4 Summary of Important Facts and Conclusions GENERAL Subject: Soroptimist Park 324 E. Main St. Bozeman, Gallatin MT, 59715 Owner: City of Bozeman Tax Identification: RGH51912 Date of Report: February 15, 2006 Date of Value: February 13, 2006 Property Rights Appraised: Fee Simple Intended Use: Business Intended User(s): Client Appraisal Purpose: Market Value 2005 Taxable Market Value: $72,038.00 Taxes: Exempt/Loeal Government PROPERTY Land Area: Total: 0.22 acres or 9,700 SF Usable: 0.22 acres or 9,700 SF Improvements: None Zoning: B-3, Central Business District Highest and Best Use The highest and best use of the subject, as vacant, is for As Vacant: retail/office development. -VAXUE, '1ND,1C/AT10NS,, Reconciled Value Conclusion: Premise: "As Is" Estate: Fee Simple Value Conclusion: $450,000 Income Approach: $3,870,000.00 Estimated Improvement Cost of Construction: $3,420,000.44 Estimated Land Value: $450,000.00 Appraisal Services 5 Appraisal Scope According to the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice, it is the appraisers responsibility to determine the appropriate scope of work. USPAP defines the scope of work as: The amount and type of information researched and the analysis applied in an assignment. Scope of work includes, but is not limited to, the following: • the degree to which the property is inspected or identified; • the extent of research into physical or economic factors that could affect the property; • the extent of data research; and • the type and extent of analysis applied to arrive at opinions or conclusions. SCOPE OF WORK Appraisal Type: This is a Complete Appraisal. All applicable research and valuation analyses have been applied. Report Type: This is a Summary Report as defined by Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice under Standards Rule 2-2(B). This format provides a summary of the appraisal process, subject and market data and valuation analyses. Inspection: A complete inspection of the improvements and site were made, and photographs were taken. Highest and Best Use Analysis: A complete analysis of highest and best use, both as vacant and as improved, was made. Market Area and Analysis of A complete analysis of market conditions was made, Market Conditions: Valuation Analyse The appraiser estimated the land value through extraction. I. A complete income approach was applied. 2. A cost approach was applied to the improvements as stated in the highest and best use analysis. 3. Then the developers cost of the improvements was subtracted from the appraiser's estimation of value through the income approach to determine a land value that is considered to be financially feasible to a developer. Income Approach Estimated Development Cost of Improvements Estimated Land Value Appraisal Services 6 Limiting Conditions and Assumptions Acceptance of and/or use of this report constitutes acceptance of the following limiting conditions and assumptions; these can only be modified by written documents executed by both parties. This appraisal is to be used only for the purpose stated herein. While distribution of this appraisal in its entirety is at the discretion of the client, individual sections shall not be distributed; this report is intended to be used in whole and not in part. No part of this appraisal, its value estimates or the identity of the firm or the appraiser(s)may be communicated to the public through advertising,public relations, media sales, or other media. All files, work papers and documents developed in connection with this assignment are the property of Appraisal Services. Information, estimates and opinions are verified where possible, but cannot be guaranteed. Plans provided are intended to assist the client in visualizing the property; no other use of these plans is intended or permitted. No hidden or unapparent conditions of the property, subsoil or structure, which would make the property more or less valuable, were discovered by the appraiser(s) or made known to the appraiser(s).No responsibility is assumed for such conditions or engineering necessary to discover them. Unless otherwise stated, this appraisal assumes there is no existence of hazardous materials or conditions, in any form, on or near the subject property. Unless stated herein,the property is assumed to be outside of areas where flood hazard insurance is mandatory. Maps used by public and private agencies to determine these areas are limited with respect to accuracy. Due diligence has been exercised in interpreting these maps, but no responsibility is assumed for misinterpretation. Good title, free of liens, encumbrances and special assessments is assumed. No responsibility is assumed for matters of a legal nature. Necessary licenses,permits, consents, legislative or administrative authority from any local, state or Federal government or private entity are assumed to be in place or reasonably obtainable. It is assumed there are no zoning violations, encroachments, easements or other restrictions which would affect the subject property, unless otherwise stated. The appraiser(s) are not required to give testimony in Court in connection with this appraisal. If the appraisers are subpoenaed pursuant to a court order, the client agrees to pay the appraiser(s) our regular per them rate plus expenses. Appraisals are based on the data available at the time the assignment is completed. Amendments/modifications to appraisals based on new information made available after the appraisal was completed will be made, as soon as reasonably possible, for an additional fee. Appraisal Services 7 Purpose and Intended Use/User The purpose of this appraisal is to develop an opinion of Market Value of the property of interest. The Intended Use of this appraisal is for business purposes, subject to the stated Scope of Work,purpose of the appraisal, reporting requirements of this appraisal report form, and Definition of Market Value. No additional Intended Users are identified by the appraisal. Definition of Market Value The definition of"Market Value", as defined by the Office of the Comptroller of Currency ((ACC) under 12 CPR, Part 34, Subpart C-Appraisals, 34.42 Definitions, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FRS) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation in compliance with Title X1 of FIRREA, as well as by the Uniform Standards of Appraisal Practice as promulgated by the Appraisal Foundation, is as follows. Market value means the most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller each acting prudently and knowledgeably, and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition is the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby, I, Buyer and seller are typically motivated; 2. Both parties are will informed or well advised, and acting in what they consider their own best interest; 3. A reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market; 4. Payment is made in terms of cash in U.S. dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto;.and 5. The price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale. Appraisal Services 8 Regional Map GLACI DANIELS SHERIDAN, LINCOLN �� TOOLE � HILL k PHILLIPS .m VALLLY RgDSEV T FLATHEAD _FPTJNDERAI . �.,� BLAME JL •" SANDERS LAKE TETDN CHOUTEAU ( RICHIAND� MCCONE LL"4VIS CASCAbE r .� J "Y DA%SON 1 AN PERGUS PETRq gAfIF1ELD .Y�.__1 � MISSOULA.. CLARK ,`_ a JUDITH B SIN � LEUM y _,,_ �. L� -I PRAIRIE PggPlE'LLw , I�EAGHER MUSSEL. GRANITEM BROAD- IANq SHELL FALLgN! RAVALLI JEEfER-FATE T L ROSEBUD COSTER SON YELLOWSTONE w 1N PARK GRASS fi, rE;I �.. P00ER CARTER MADISON ,' BIG HORN J RIVER Bozeman Appraisal Services 9 Market Area, City, Neighborhood, and Location Data The four forces that influence value in a market are social, economic, governmental, and environmental. This analysis identifies the characteristics that influence value trends in the past and that may affect values in the future. Bozeman,the county seat, is located in the southwest portion of the state in Gallatin County. The county area is 2,510 square miles. Billings,the state's largest city, is located 150 miles to the east; Butte is located approximately 80 miles to the west. Helena, the capitol, is located 90 miles to the north. Gallatin County is one of the fastest growing areas in the state. Social Influences In the market area analysis,the social characteristics that influence property values include: population density, which is important in central business districts and high-rise residential neighborhoods; skill levels or employment categories, which are important in industrial or high- technology districts; age levels, which is important in residential neighborhoods; house-hold size; employment status, including types of unemployment; extent of crime; extent of litter; quality and availability of educational, medical, social, recreational, cultural, and commercial services; and presence of community organizations. According to the Census and Economic Information Center, Montana Department of Commerce, the population of Montana in 2003 was 917,621. According to the 2000 Census, the population of Gallatin County was 67,831 residents, and Bozeman was 27,509 residents. Woods and Poole Economics estimated the population of Gallatin County in 2004 at 75,637, which make it the fastest growing county in Montana. According to the Economic Information Center the population of Bozeman in 2003 was 30,753. The census figures include some students as heads of household and fluctuations in university enrollment may affect the population data. Gallatin County has a well-educated work force. Of the county adult population over 25 years of age, 41%have college degrees; in Bozeman, that number increases to 49.5x/®. Gallatin County has experienced steady population growth in recent decades. More than 90% of the population lives in Bozeman or within 30 minutes of Bozeman. The age distribution for Gallatin County in 2000 is as follows: under 10, 11.7%; 10-19, 15.2%; 20-29, 21.9%, 30-39%®; 40-49, 16.0%; and 60 & over, 11.4%. The age distribution for Bozeman in 1990 is as follows: under 10, 11.4%; 10-19, 15.7%; 20-29, 31.2%; 30-39, 16%; 40-49, 9.3%; and 60 & over, 11.4%. The average persons per household in Gallatin County for 2000 were 2.46 and for 1990 were 2.50. The average persons per household in Bozeman for 1990 were 2.27. According to the Montana Employment & Labor Trends Quarterly; the civilian labor force of Gallatin County in December of 2000 was 43,401, the number of employed workers was 42,114, and the number of unemployed was 1,287, with an unemployment rate of 3.0%. The civilian labor force in December of 2001 was 44,329, the number of employed workers was 42,937, and the number of unemployed was 1,053, with an unemployment rate of 1.2%. Appraisal Services 10 The historical unemployment rates are as follows: Year Montana% Gallatin County% 2004 3.84 2.39 2003 4.4 2.5 2002 4.6 2.7 2001 4.6 2.5 2000 4.9 2.7 1999 5.2 2.9 1998 5.6 3.0 1996 5.3 2.6 1994 5.1 2.3 1992 6.9 5.4 The Bozeman Police Division, with 43 law enforcement officers and 7 civilian employees, provides law enforcement protection to city residents and visitors. The department has a community policing philosophy and has implemented many positive programs over the past few years. In 2001,the number of crimes in Bozeman is as follows: homicide, 3; robbery, 7; assault, 12; burglary, 106; larceny, 1071, vehicle theft, 109; and rape, 24. Gallatin County has 32 schools in 16 school districts, offering educational programs from kindergarten through high school. Gallatin County's total enrollment of students, including private school numbers is 10,942. Montanan State University is one of two university systems within the state. During the 2005 fall semester, 12,300 students were enrolled at MSU-Bozeman. The university offers baccalaureate degrees in 50 fields, master's degrees in 40 fields and doctorates in 13 fields. Bozeman has a full range of medical professionals, several clinics,two urgent care clinics, a low- income clinic, and a modern short-term acute care hospital. There are approximately 100 doctors and 35 dentists, 114 practical and 377 registered nurses in the community. The number of increasing passenger boarding at Gallatin Field Airport is an indication of strength in the tourism and recreation in Gallatin County. Bozeman is a destination point to Yellowstone National Park, which continues to attract over 3 million visitors each year. The alpine skiing is excellent with Bridger Bowl located 15 miles north of town and Big Sky, a destination resort ski area, located 50 miles south of town. Both ski areas offer beginner to expert ski runs. There are numerous cross-country ski trails in the area. The area is known for its fishing on three rivers,the Gallatin, the Jefferson, and the Madison, which form the Missouri River. Access to the Yellowstone River in Park County is 25 miles cast of Bozeman. There are 48 religious organizations in the Bozeman area representing a variety of affiliations and denominations. Bozeman has more than 70 motels/hotels with 1,400 rooms and more than 50 restaurants. Appraisal Services 1 I Economic Influences Economic considerations relate to the financial capacity of a market area's occupants and their ability to rent or own property, to maintain it in an attractive and desirable condition, and to renovate it when needed. The economic characteristics include; mean and median household income, per capita income, income distribution, extent of owner occupancy,property rent levels and trends, property value levels and trends, vacancy rates for various types of property, and amount of development. The economy in Gallatin County and Bozeman is broad based and diverse, with 3,400 establishments employing over 41,000 people. Major sectors of the economy, in addition to Montana State University, include recreation, retail trade, agriculture, services, manufacturing, and natural resource-based industry such as mining and forestry. Growing segments within these sectors are technology-based, and sports and recreation-based businesses that find university resources and an educated and recreational active labor force to be significant assets. The area's largest employer is Montana State University, which employs approximately 3,500 personnel. Employment numbers indicate that retail trade employee's make-up 26% of the covered labor force, with government at 20%, and services at 25%. Manufacturing is the next largest segment, employing 9% of the covered labor force. In 1999 the median household income for Montana was $33,024 with a per capita income of $17,151. The median household income for Bozeman was $32,156 with a per capita income of $16,104. Housing statistics for 2000 are as follows; Residential housing units in Montana 412,633, and for Bozeman 10,877. The persons per household in Montana were 2.45 and Bozeman was 2.26 with the homeownership rate in Montana of 69.1% and Bozeman was 42.9%. Residential housing starts in Bozeman for single-family and multi family units were as follows: 1997, 309; 1998, 423; 1999, 546; 2000, 415; 2001, 422; 2002, 526; 2003, 612; 2004, 881. Source: City of Bozeman Planning Office. The average apartment rental prices in Bozeman as of May 2005 were: 1 bedroom $300-$500; 2 bedrooms $500-$795; 3 bedrooms $65041000. The average studio rental was $275-$400. The average house rental was: 2 bedrooms $600-$850 and 3 bedrooms $80041,200. Source: Peak Property Management. According to the City of Bozeman Building Division the new construction valuation, including both residential and commercial for Bozeman: 2000 $81.2 million 2001 $78.9 million 2002 $85.8 million 2003 $133.1 million 2004 $144.2 million Appraisal Services 12 Governmental Influences Governmental considerations relate to laws, regulations, and property taxes that affect properties in the market area and the administration and enforcement of zoning laws, building codes, and housing and sanitary codes. The governmental characteristics include;property tax burden relative to services provided compared with other areas in the community; special assessments; zoning, building, and housing codes; quality of public services, such as fire and police protection, schools, and other governmental services; and environmental regulations. In 1921,the city of Bozeman adopted a Commissioner-Manager form of government. The day- to-day operations of local government are administered by the City Manager. All department heads are responsible to the City Manager, who is in turn responsible to the City Commission. Five commissioners are elected at large for four-year overlapping terms. The City Judge, the only other elected official, is also elected at large for a four-year term. The city provides water and sewer services that is supported by user fees. Garbage collection and landfill operations costs are covered by an annual assessment of property-owners. Through its general taxing authority, the City of Bozeman also provides library, parks, cemetery, street, and tree maintenance services. The Bozeman City/County Planning Offices respectively advises the Bozeman City Commission, Gallatin County Commission and Bozeman City/County Planning Boards on matters within the planning jurisdictional area. The staff reviews subdivision requests, annexation requests, Master Plan amendments, zone changes; conditional uses, and makes recommendations to the respective bodies. The staff is also responsible for carrying out long range, comprehensive planning programs. The Department administers the Bozeman area-zoning ordinance, which contains provisions for site review and planned unit-development. The planning staff administers all housing-programs and historic preservation. Environmental Influences Environmental considerations consist of any natural or man-made features that are contained in or affect the market area and its location, including: building size, type, density, and maintenance; topographical features (terrain and vegetation); open space; nuisances and hazards from nearby facilities; the adequacy of public utilities; the existence and upkeep of vacant lots; general maintenance;the attractiveness and safety of routes into an out of the area; effective ages of properties; changes in property use and land use patterns; microclimate characteristics (temperature, wind, humidity, snowfall, etc.); environmental liabilities (landslides, floods, etc.); and access to public transportation, schools, stores and services establishments, parks and recreational facilities,house of worship, and workplaces. The Gallatin Valley is surrounded by several mountain ranges and thousands of acres of national forest land, where trail systems and wilderness areas abound. Two of the entrances to Yellowstone Park, America's oldest and best-known park are within a 90-mile drive of Bozeman. Yellowstone National Park can be enjoyed year round and Glacier National Park is a short-days drive to the west, Appraisal Services 13 Bozeman is near ten national forests that accommodate a variety of outdoor recreational experiences. There are several areas that are designed to accommodate the needs of people with disabilities, families with small children, and senior citizens. Many organizations and Recreation Department use public lands and city/county facilities to conduct programs. The city of Bozeman supports 23 parks and recreation areas, 19 of which are owned by the city. The city maintains 17 public tennis courts with three public parks are converted to outdoor ice skating rinks in the winter. Bozeman's climate reflects its mountain valley location. Summers are pleasant, characterized by warm days, coot nights, and an abundance of sunshine. Hot weather and humid conditions are infrequent. Bozeman is located in one of the few regions in the country where the average summer climate is comfortable due to the moderate combined heat and humidity. The average high temperatures for the summers are in the 70's and 80's; the average low temperatures are in the mid 40's and low 50's. The autumn high daily temperature is 70 degrees until the middle of October then between 20 and 50 degrees in October and November. 'The average monthly high and low temperatures for December, January and February are 35 and 16, 31 and 11, and 37 and 17 degrees. The average temperatures for spring are between 53 and 72 degrees. The average snowfall for Bozeman is 73.1 inches. Appraisal Services 14 Property Description SITE Information Sources: City of Bozeman, deed, assessment records, inspection Total Site Size: 0.22 acres or 9,700 SF Usable Site Size: 0.22 acres or 9,700 SF Corner Lot: The site is a corner lot. Visibility: Good Shape: Rectangular *S TREE T 1 • I Xr. k y 3 -f 7 36 35 —44 33 3 V!+ } 50 ,29 .�8 :t f �� 29 201., a. t` rf' xF 9 Road Frontage/Access: 64.67 Feet with Good access. The average depth is 150 Feet . Topography: Mostly level Drainage: Appears Adequate utilities, Electricity: Northwestern Energy Sewer: City Water: City Natural Gas: Northwestern Energy Adequacy: Average Site Improvements: None Appraisal Services 15 Landscaping: Average Flood Zone: The subject is located in an area mapped by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The subject is Not located in a flood hazard zone. FEMA Map Number: 30002800120 FEMA Map Date: July 15, 1988 FEMA Zone Classification: X Easements: The appraiser viewed the site and reviewed the zoning map, subdivision plat, and deed. The appraiser did not observe any adverse easements affecting the marketability of the site. Encroachments: The appraiser did not observe any encroachments affecting the marketability of the site. Appraisal Services 16 Subject Photographs r""�✓ tr{w e �j �� ,", ll /�U � e , ri i Front: 324 E. Main St, Appraisal. Services 17 w�1/�/" a Side: 324 E. Main St. Appraisal Services 18 Street; 324 E. Main St. Appraisal Services 19 Assessment and Taxes The State of Montana, through the Department of Revenue, is responsible for valuing all taxable and real property. The Montana Department of Revenue is composed of six divisions: The Customer Service Division is designed to provide centralized and consistent customer service, revenue collection, and document processing for the department and for state agency partners. The Business and Income Taxes Division oversees audits and verifies compliance with Montana tax law for all taxes, and completes appraisals and assessments of industrial and centrally assessed property. The Property Assessment Division is responsible for the valuation and assessment of real and personal property throughout the state for property tax purposes. The division is comprised of a central office located in Helena and six regions. There is a local DOR office located in each county seat within the regional areas. The Resource Management Division provides service and support to the department by integrating Human Resources, Payroll and Benefits, Education and Training, Liquor Distribution, Accounting, Purchasing, and Facilities and Asset Management. The Information Technology Division provides service in the area of data support, applications support, technology support, and user assistance that enables the department to meet its business objectives. The Director's Office supports the agency's director and is composed of six work units. The basic function for each unit is: • Legal Services supervises the overall legal efforts of the department, which includes rules,policies, bankruptcy, disclosure officer and the Office of Dispute Resolution. • Tax, Policy& Research is responsible for the preparation of legislative fiscal notes that affect revenue,the analysis of legislative proposals affecting the department, and department economic data analysis. • Budget Analyst provides ongoing oversight of the department budget. • Communications manages the department's communication activities, including information dissemination, media relations, document editing, stakeholder relations, website maintenance, public involvement and special events. Appraisal Services 20 • Internal Quality Manager is responsible for providing management with information about the adequacy and the effectiveness of its system of internal controls and quality of its operations with established standards and management expectations. • Administrative Support assists all units in the Director's Office with administrative responsibilities including,preparing for legislative committees, editing correspondence and finalizing mass mailings. The property tax is determined by multiplying the property's value by a tax rate. The Montana Legislature sets the tax rate. The taxable value is then multiplied by the mill levy. The local tax jurisdictions, city and county government, school districts, and other public services influence the mill levy. The general property tax equation is: Value x Tax Rate=Taxable Value Taxable Value x Mill Levy= General Property Tax The Property Assessment Division is responsible for determining the value of real property throughout the state for property tax purposes. State Law requires the Department of Revenue's Property Assessment Division to reappraise property periodically. Assessor Parcel#: RGH51912 Year: 2005 Taxes: Exempt/Local Government 2005 Taxable Market Value: $72,038.00 Zoning Zoning Classification:B-3 General Description: Central Business District Conformance: The subject site is vacant Zoning Change: Not Likely Source: Bozeman Zoning Regulations Lot Coverage/Floor Area: Entire lot, exclusive of required yards and parking,may be occupied by the principle and accessory units Lot Area: No minimum size Lot Width: No minimum width Yards: No minimum yards, except a 7 foot yard on Babcock and Mendenhall Streets Building Height: 55 Feet in the core area, 70 feet outside of the core area Appraisal Services 21 Highest and Best Use Highest and best use may be defined as: The reasonably probable and legal use of vacant land or improved property, which is physically possible, appropriately supported, financially feasible, and that results in the highest value.I • Permissible Use. What uses are permitted by zoning and other legal restrictions? • Possible Use. To what use is the site physically adaptable? • Feasible Use. Which possible and permissible use will produce any net return to the owner of the site? • Maximally Productive. Among the feasible uses which use will produce the highest net return, (i.e., the highest present worth)? Highest and Best Use "As Vacant" The highest and best use of the subject, as vacant, is for retail/office development. The main level could be used for retail and the second level could be used for office. The intent of the B-3 Central Business District is to provide a central area for the community's business, government services, and cultural activities. The City of Bozeman defines the "core area" as the area between Grand and Rouse and the alleys one-half block north and south from Main Street. The intent of the Central Business District's "core area" is to encourage high volume,pedestrian- orientated uses in ground floor space. A commercial retail/office building is considered to be the ideal improvement as it is located in the"core area". Valuation Methodology Two of the three basic approaches were used to arrive at an estimate of market value. They were: • The Cost Approach • The Income Approach The appraisal process concludes with the Final Reconciliation of the values derived from the approaches applied for a single estimate of market value. Different properties require different means of analysis and lend themselves to one approach over the others. In this appraisal: The appraiser estimated the land value through extraction. 4. A complete income approach was applied. 5. A cost approach was applied to the improvements as stated in the highest and best use analysis. Appraisal Services 22 6. Then the developers cost of the improvements was subtracted from the appraiser's estimation of value through the income approach to determine a land value that is considered to be financially feasible to a developer Income Approach Estimated Development Cost of Improvements Estimated Land Value Appraisal Services 23 Income Approach The Income Approach to value is based on the present worth of the future rights to income. This type of analysis considers the property from an investor's point of view,the basic premise being that the amount and quality of the income stream are the basis for value of the property. Direct Capitalization Analysis The steps involved in capitalizing the subject's net operating income are as follows: Develop the subject's Potential Gross Income (PGI) through analysis of the subject's actual historic income and an analysis of competitive current market income rates. Estimate and deduct vacancy and collection losses to develop the Effective Gross Income (EGI). Develop and subtract operating expenses to derive the Net Operating Income (NOI). Develop the appropriate capitalization rate (R,,,). ➢ Divide the net operating income by the capitalization rate for an estimate of value through the income approach. Potential Gross Income (PG1) Market Rent In order to determine if the subject's rents we have researched the following rental data. Appraisal Services 24 COMPARABLE LEASE 1 Property Type: Retail-Commercial Lessor: Brigitte Tuller Address: I East Main St.,Bozeman Lessee: Bridger Kitchens Terms: NNN ConRrmed By: Ross Wenger Term: 15 Yr Renewable every 5 Confirmed With: Shannon Lundgren/Bridger Yrs Kitchens SITE DATA Location: Good Site Topography: Level Parking: Adequate Zoning: B-3 Central Business District Access: Good Corner: Main&Tracy Electric: NorthWestern Energy Water&Sewer: City Gas: NorthWestern Energy IMPROVEMENT DATA Gross Building Area(SF): 2200 Year Built: 100+Yrs.Remodel 2000 Lease Rate: $1 9.00/SF Condition: Good IMAGES ra�n� ii � ��""'"'"' �" i/�/it/i r/✓r/ i c i ,,,y o �� ✓iii i/ i/ / r� ✓ 4 j h k " �r ice✓ � arrr `""*-�. 'r°^�.:, ��,y ` �`�, .,�.`�.� /r �� ✓ �� ��l a "`` � ✓/ � r �/ � /air �� � d. ,���"` � � i / u�✓�/r ✓ a// a ��� /1 / �'/✓��fir'✓ � '"'� ^`y' �`,a., """".. r % i ✓ ijsfi/�acCa✓r /° ;�"�)lr�� II ���� ;i 1�� �r J✓�i ��i,�y' l/r/r �rfai���r�'�r"����l�rr�/�iTl✓' r.,� w. „` r!�' �� irlJii/rr✓1 r/� �u / , ✓+rrir ��� y ri . Fl/J / I sir✓r r� rr� a�r, i /rr r u /��✓rV . �i��u/1")r ✓ r��r,���r �f. n �f l�I�i�J)�r/y�'��1�/���✓/✓r � r ,,,; �;, 9„ ;4^^,.. ' � ���rnr//li �ir �+d rr�r rr�d �'� rv/ � ��i��rl/�(�%�T r/ii/ ✓ i' x `^^�, �' ir, !a�ifn�%/� �' /`�� � �r✓��i�%r✓w �� � ('��fl';�4 /li%err L r �. �' %ll�'�r(� /ws����a%rri✓r/r u��r:��✓gym, � j ry���;'� l/r��ym � ji r ,�✓��/cif r�//r��,-l�r^(P,fi�la�� � 7ip��J+�V�/�f�fr �2�°x �`�-. ;s v ,°;.� �, y,%✓ ;1 f >` ��err✓lraGy� 1 rr a a�� r/ygit/yr( �r�"�' '.,. ,,,,� L;,„ .�',,, , ��' r ,,;;,, , i � nr / irir`hr�l�//�i'ul✓�D��x/rI��{y r l��� f)�,��/�r/1�in'��r���ii�,✓/;i�/r��74iu,�'�nai�r r��✓a��� l ,,, � r -, �e +Fi r ✓WWI" ✓ri�rlf//�k� lr�r^r�G«j� �u�1: rYl�rx��� w r�i�i�rf��/rr ✓ !� r�'"� �1�'Jr�'� '.`c � (r��Y! �� r v M� t� �� pr ✓y,,. rm n.� .,� /1 /I r T rx N it ✓«�. �r✓Jd✓� caa � ,��l r��� �r u(r� '�1 � nb '^�i" N'�" �"� ��:. a.�r. l M 7 RIW 0 �Ye U P/ �""Gnbef rvS Vr ��� mF�✓ � �1� �l Yl ' 1 �. �� rw iiii%%ii✓ if����/j�%0/%�G%l/a 0/////i� .,,�.,�, i�,,,,,�%1/��i��/%� �/%✓,.h.> ✓ i iio„',✓i riii iii NOTES Owner Pays T&1 @Value Software—www.atvalue.coin Appraisal Services 25 Cols pARABLE LEAST;2 Property Type: Retail-Commercial Lessor: Mike Delaney Address: 101 E.Main St.,Bozeman Lessee: Meridian Terms: NNN Confirmed By: Keith O'Reilly,MAl Term: 5 Yr. Confirmed With: Mike Delaney SITE DATA Location: Good Site Topography: Level Parking: Adequate Zoning: B-3 Central Business Access: Good District Corner. Main&Black Electric: NorthW extern Energy Water&Sewer: City Gas: NorthW estern Energy IMPROVEMENT DATA Gross Building Area(SF): 2600 Year Built: 100+ Lease Bate: $1 7,00/SF Condition: Good IMAGES / 1 fill j� Fry is % it i J "..'+`...^^--�,... f �kr%$ I J � /r ii r //, /% % i,, NoTEs This is a true net lease with the tenant paying all expenses. The lease was renewed in April 2003 for 5 years,the new lease was a 14.9%increase over the previous lease. @Value Software—www.atvalue.corn Appraisal Services. 26 COMPARABLE LEASE 3 Property Type:. Retail-Commercial Lessor: The 777 Main Bldg Address: 777 E.Main St.,Bozeman Lessee: Rocky Mountain Roasting Co. Terms: NNN Confirmed By: Keith O'Reilly,MAI Term: 10 Yr. Confirmed With: Mike Delane SITE DATA Location: Good Site Topography: Level Parking: Adequate Zoning: B-2 Central Business Access: Good District Corner: No Electric: NorthWestern Energy Water&Sewer: City Gas: North Western Energy IMPROVEMENT DATA Gross Building Area(SF): 2792 Year Built: 2001 Lease Rate: $17.00+2%Gross Sales Condition: Good IMAGES m 1uyro m+m�ar , �/t` F' / 1// / //r i a/f�l q �/�I ✓ '✓i/ r n ✓i //✓ , O/ �f,/"Art/ IC✓��!j� �� /i((l/.�✓ %i/�/r�,"il %/i��liirR�i IJ/rN �rn9rmvn '1nrn�rrvmmag F � //,//./ / �/ gs6 Jr1N���/fr^'r //////f�i��/�ir///llr//�/f%/ �// I/%%/ro///r/ 1�%/j/i� �/l/Jf.�rt/j"`//� / l/ /r r.///✓i�J// / f/ / ,^// /�Si di�j/ r`Jr / rl%+x'✓/ r 1 w5�' ✓ / dA'�1F4&4wX�, /�l/lI/✓��%� 1fiiTJ7^� ///r j/ �J/ r� ///fdiyf /�/l it//r��// .wj/ /i /// // i //, !0/��1 ✓ /�//i/J i i/lr ��l��i Wh�rn;,,, � l/%�i��r/� r7 //;r /i�� �r�d�1��l F ✓/�mwr /%i// // l/�^r�1 ��f � / r/Gi //r'+ ,. "ii (//�/� ci ,„,v fii, / ,gl ,.,wart �, / /y/ % r 1;rr/// /r � / // ✓/ / /� � � l / ip j✓jrT1rU9, /.,74D,✓, ilk// /G%!/� i J� ,. w ri Ir NMI NOTES This is a true NNN lease with the tenant paying all expenses. Lease began in 2002 with a CPl%increase. @Value Software—www.atvaluie.com Appraisal Services 27 COMPARABLE LEASE 4 Property Type::. Office Lessor: Jerry:Locati Address: 402 E.Main St. Suite 202, Lessee: D.A. Davidson Bozeman Terms: NNN Confirmed By: Keith O'Reilly,MAI Term: SYr. Confirmed With: Jerry Locati. SITE DATA Location: Good Site Topography: Level Parking: Adequate Zoning: B-3 Central Business Access: Good District Corner: Main&Rouse Electric: NorthWestern Energy Water&Sewer: City Gas: NorthWestern Energy IMPROVEMENT DATA Gross Building Area(SF): 2665 Year Built: 1994 Lease Rate: $17.00/SF Condition: Good IMAGES j ff M 1���� � ///��/�U//X� P�uV1iINW ✓a�1��llr//�� w , / 1 / NOTES @Value Software—www.atvalue.com Appraisal Services 28 Comparable Rents Map ' 114 or apw" a ! Subiect � . u ; . z i 8 Ga ' a� rQ d • , Appraisal Services 29 Comparable Rent Adjustment Grid :Analyst:Ross Wenger Subject Comparable I Comparable 2 Comparable 3 Comparable 4 Avant Courier Meridian Roasting Co. Blackwood Building Address 1 East Main St 101 E.Main St. 777 E.Main St 402 E.Main St.#202 city MT MT MT MT Lease Rate $19,00 $17.50 $17.00 $1700 Lessee Name Bridger Kitchens Meridian-Audi Rock Mountain D.A.Davidson Lessor Name Brigitte Tuller De!a�e &Co The 777 Main Bldg Locab Conditions of Lease] %Adjustment 0.00✓ 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Economic Trends 2/1312006 1/0/1900 110(1900 1/0/1900 110/1900 %Adjustment 0.00% 0% 0% 0% 0% Adjusted Rent $19.00 $17.50 $17.00 $17.00 Location Good Good Good Good Good Comparison %Ad'ustment 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% $Adlustment $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0'00 Gross Building Area 18000 2200 2600 2792 2665 1 %tkjdustrnent� 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% $ Adjustment l $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 MOO Final Adjusted Rent $19.00 $17.60 $17.00 $17.00 Net Adjustments $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Range&Average Low:$17.00,High:$19.00,Average:$17.63 Reconciled Rent $18.00 Market Rent Reconciliation The comparable rents were reconciled using the comparables above. The comparable leases were considered to be similar properties and were adjusted for their differences. In this market the unit of measurement for commercial office buildings is by the square foot. Based on the above analysis, we have reconciled a value of$18 per square foot for commercial retail and $17 per square foot for commercial office. Income Projection Income Projection Property Name Soroptimist Park Analyst Jerry R.Gossel Property Address 324 E.Main St. Finn Appraisal Services MT,59715 Date 2/13/2006 Size Number Income Market Contract Rent %of Tenant (SF) of Units Type Rent Rent Applied Income Total I 1st Floor Retail 9,000 1 $/SFNear $18,00 Market $162,000 51,4% 2 2nd Floor Office 9,000 1 $/SFNear $17.00 Market $153,000 48.6% Totals 18,000 2 Potential Gross Income $315,000 Vacancy&Collection Loss 10% Effective Gross Income $305,550 Other Income $0 Total Effective Gross Income $306,550 Effective Gross Income Per SF $16.98----1 Appraisal Services 30 Vacancy and Collection Loss Based on a review of the market conditions and the subject's operating history we have projected vacancy and collection loss at 3.0%. Income and Expense Statement Income Summary and Expense Projection Income Amount % of Total Effective Gross Income: Section 1 $305,550 100% Total Effective Gross Income Per SF: $16.98 Expense Type %or$ Amount Per SF Management %of EGI 5.00% $15,278 $0.85 Total Expenses: $15,278 $0.86 Expense Ratio: 5% Not Operating Income: $290,273 Net Operating Income Per SF: $16.13 Capitalization Rate The capitalization rate is the factor that coverts the stabilized net operating income (NOI) to a present value. It is the ratio of net income to value or sale price. NOI—. Sale Price = Capitalization Rate For example, if a property sells for $500,000, and has a stabilized NOI of$50,000,the indicated capitalization rate is 10%. Market Extracted Rates The table below details capitalization rates extracted from the market. Comparable Property Capitalization Rates Address ci!y Sale Price Date NOI Cap Rate 2407 W. Main St. Bozeman $1,150,000 05/18/05 $98,900 8.6% 1709 W.College St. Bozeman $1,740,000 02/19103 $140,800 8,1% 1122 E.Main St. Bozeman $450,000 09/01105 $27,450 61% Band of Investment This technique utilizes lender and real estate investor investment criteria to develop, or synthesize a capitalization rate. There are four key inputs necessary for this method: I. The loan-to-value ratio (M) 2. The mortgage interest rate (i) 3. The loan term (n) 4. The equity cap rate or equity dividend rate (RE) The mortgage variables are used to build the mortgage constant (Rm), which is the total amount of the payments made in one year, expressed as a percentage of the original loan amount. Appraisal Services 31 Payments x 12/Original Loan Amount= Mortgage Constant(Rm) The equity cap rate is the annual return to the investor, expressed as a percent of the original amount invested. The annual return to the investor is also known as the equity dividend rate; it is the profit remaining after debt service and all other expenses. After Debt Service Profit/Equity Investment=Equity Cap Rate (RE) Note that the equity cap rate is not the same (usually,that is) as the equity yield rate. The equity yield rate reflects the total return to the investor over the life of the investment. Factors such as appreciation and mortgage pay down affect and usually increase this return to a point higher than the equity dividend rate. In markets where substantial appreciation is expected, investors will often accept a low or even negative equity dividend rate, anticipating a compensating payoff when the property is eventually sold. In markets where little appreciation is expected,much more weight is given to the annual equity dividend. Formula: RmxM =rate RE X (1-M) =rate =Cap Rate (PI-0) Debt Coverage Ratio Analysis This technique develops a capitalization rate based on typical mortgage terms. There are four variables necessary for this method: 1. The loan-to-value ratio (M) 2. The mortgage interest rate (i) 3. The loan term(n) 4. The debt coverage ratio (DCR) Items I through 3 are discussed above under the Band of Investment section. In this method it is also used to develop the mortgage constant (Rm). The debt coverage ratio is the factor by which income exceeds debt on an annual basis. Formula: Debt Coverage Ratio x Loan to Value Ratio x Mortgage Constant= R,, or: DCR x M x Rm =& We have researched mortgage rates and terms typical of the subject market segment for the Bozeman area. The table below details the Band of Investment and Debt Coverage Ratio Analyses calculations. Appraisal Services 3,2 Capitalization Rate Calculations Capitalization Rate Variables Mortgage Interest Rate 8.00% Loan Term 20 Years Loan To Value Ratio 70% Debt Coverage Ratio 1.10 Equity Dividend Rate 7.00% Band of Investment Analysis Mortgage Constant Loan Ratio Contributions 0.100372808 x 70.0%® = 7.03% Equity Dividend Rate Equity Ratio 7.00% x 30% = 2.10% Band of Investment Capitalization Rate = 9.13% Debt Coverage Ratio Analysis Debt Coverage Ratio x Loan to Value Ratio x Mortgage Constant 1.10 x 70.0% x 0.10037 0.07729 Debt Coverage Ratio 2apitalization Rate = 7.73% Capitalization Rate Summary and Conclusion Capitalization Rate Reconciliation Indicator Capitalization Rate Comparable Properties 6.1% -8.6% Band of Investment 9.13% Debt C2y2ra2e Ratio 7.73% Reconciled Capitalization Rate 7.50% Capitalization to Value Income Capitalization Per Unit Per SF Potential Gross Income $315,000 $315,000 $17.50 Vacancy&Collection Loss (3.0%) $9,450 $9,450 $0.53 Effective Gross Income $305,550 $306,550 $16.98 Expenses(5.0%) $15,278 $15,278 $0.85 Net Operating Income $290,273 $290,273 $16.13 Capitalization Rate 7.50% 7.50% 7.50% Indicated Value $3,870,300 $3,870,300 $215.02 Rounded $3,870,000 $3,870,000 $215.00 Appraisal Services 33 Income Approach Conclusion Based on the analysis detailed above, we have reconciled to an income approach value of $3,870,000 , as of February 13, 2006, subject to the Limiting Conditions and Assumptions of this appraisal. Appraisal Services 34 Cost Approach The Cost Approach is based on the principle of substitution-that a prudent and rational person would pay no more for a property than the cost to construct a similar and competitive property, assuming no-undue delay in the process. The applied process is as follows: Estimate the replacement cost of the building and site improvements Estimate the physical, functional and/or external depreciation accrued to the improvements Sum the depreciated value of the improvements with the value of the land for an indication of value Cost Analysis The next step in the Cost Approach is to estimate the replacement cost of the buildings and site improvements. The replacement cost of the subject site and building improvements are based on Marshall & Swift Valuation Service along with local contractors and suppliers. Off-street parking was calculated from the City of Bozeman's Unified Development Ordinance. The Unified Development Ordinance contains the standards and procedures for all subdivisions and land development within Bozeman, including parking requirements. Soft Costs Where appropriate, we have included the following soft costs: • Engineering • Architectural • Permits and Legal • Marketing & Leasing Commissions • Contingency • Developer's Profit Depreciation Analysis Depreciation may be defined as any loss of value from any cause. There are three general areas of depreciation: physical deterioration, functional obsolescence and external obsolescence. Depreciation may be curable or incurable, the test being that money spent to cure the depreciation be gained in value. If the depreciation costs more to fix than will be gained in value, then the depreciation is considered incurable. The subject would be considered new construction,thus no physical depreciation was taken. Cost Approach Conclusion Based on the analysis detailed on the following page, we have reconciled to a cost approach value of$3,420,000, as of February 13, 2006, subject to the Limiting Conditions and Assumptions of this appraisal. Appraisal Services 35 Building Improvements 7 1 Cost Section 1 of 1 Item Unit Type Cast Quanti Total Building Improvements Sq. Ft. $145.00 18,000 $2,610,000 $2,610,000 Per SF GBA $145.00 Site Improvements Item Unit Type Cost Quantity Total $0 $0 $2,610,000 Per SF GBA $145.00 Soft Costs Item Percent Type Total Engineering ................................. 5.0% % Building Cost $130,500 Architectural ................................. 10.0%u % Building Cost $261,000 Permits&Legal .................................................................................... $0 Leasin .................................. $0 $391,500 Contingency @ 2.0% $52,200 Entrepreneurial Profit 10.0%m $261,000 $3,314,700' Per SF GBA $184.15 Cost Allocation TotalBuilding Costs ............................. .............................. ............ ........... $3,314,700 Total Site Costs .................................................... $0 Depreciation Component Effective Age Life Percent Amount Physical Depreciation: Building 0 70 0% $0 Physical Depreciation: Site 0 1 0% $0 Functional Obsolescence Building .................. .......... .................... 0%Q $0 External Obsolescence Building .................. ......... .................... 0% $0 $0 $3,314,700 Per SF GBA $184.15 Land Value LandValue .................................................................................... $0 Off Site Parkin ...................................................................... ............. $105,000 $3,419,700 $3,420,000 Per SF GBA $190.00 @Value SoClwwe—wwwatvalue.com Appraisal Services _ 36 Final Reconciliation The process of reconciliation involves the analysis of each approach to value. The appraiser estimated the land value through extraction, 7. A complete income approach was applied. 8. A cost approach was applied to the improvements as stated in the highest and best use analysis. 9. Then the developers cost of the improvements was subtracted from the appraiser's estimation of value through the income approach to determine a land value that is considered to be financially feasible to a developer Income Approach Estimated Development Cost of Improvements Estimated Land Value Value Indications Income Approach $3,870,000 Estimated Development Cost of Improvements -$3,4202000 Estimated Land Value $450,000 Value Conclusion Based on the data and analyses developed in this appraisal, we have reconciled to the following value conclusions, as of February 13, 2006, subject to the Limiting Conditions and Assumptions of this appraisal. Reconciled Value Conclusion Premise: "As Is" Estate. Fee Simple Value Conclusion: $450,000 Appraisal Services 37 Certification Statement We certify that, to the best of our knowledge and belief- • The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. • The reported analyses, opinions and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and are my personal, unbiased professional analyses, opinions and conclusions. • We have no present or contemplated future interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and we have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved. • Our compensation is not contingent upon the reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client,the amount of the value estimate, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event. • Our analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed and this report has been prepared in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP). • We have made a personal inspection of the property that is the subject of this report. • No one provided significant professional assistance in the development of the conclusions contained in this report. • We certify sufficient competence to appraise this property through education and experience, in addition to the internal resources of the appraisal firm. • The value conclusion(s) and other opinions expressed herein are not based on a requested minimum value, a specific value or approval of a loan. Appraisal Services 38 Addenda JERRY R. GOSSEL Appraisal Services 67A West Kagy Blvd, P.O. Box 1076 Bozeman, Montana 59771 Facsimile: (406) 587-5481 Telephone: (406) 587-5044 E-Mail:jgoss@avicom.net APPRAISAL EXPERIENCE Appraisal Services, Bozeman, Montana Owner 1985 to Present Certified General Real Estate Appraiser- Certificate#106 Licensed in State of Montana January 1992 Small Business Administration, Helena, Montana Commercial 1986 to Present Veterans Administration, Fort Harrison, Montana Residential 1986 to Present US Bank Bozeman, Bozeman, Montana Residential and Commercial 1985 to Present Norwest Bank, Bozeman, Montana Residential and Commercial 1983 to Present First Security Bank, Bozeman, Montana Residential and Commercial 1983 to Present Trans America Relocation Service, Walnut Creek, California Residential 1983 to Present Home Equity Relocation, San Mateo, California Residential 1982 to Present Merrill Lynch Relocation Management, Inc., Bellevue, Washington Residential 1982 to Present Federal Housing Administration, Helena, Montana Residential 1977 to Present Federal National Mortgage Assn., Los Angeles, California Approved 1975 to Present Federal Home Loan Banking Board Approved 1975 to Present American Bank, Bozeman, Montana Residential and Commercial 1973 to Present Lender Services, Inc., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Residential. 1993 to Present Appraisal Services 39 Ot, SaOTA.13S TbsTuiddV t,661 SMuPf V.J.I.V.-K `001m"Tcjjo spi-epuels I-euOissajaicl E661 JOqtuPOz)CI OE-E6#Qs.InOD ftTOURUTJ E661 mquiojdaS SOOIAJ,?S '4JOmION HHJ 'SS-.IOZ)tIS UT SIOUPB(I 1661 joqopo sonbiuqooj put, XSojouiuuoj 'sjdgouoD 0661 -T3q-M3OC[ vyj`V-N[ 'Z# osinoD Ouisitldd-V Xijodoijolwoul 0661 JOqTUaAON V-j-1-V-N 'I#osmoD 2ursivjddV ,Cjjodojd oulooul 0661 jaqojno V*J*T*V'N '00POLI'd JO SPJBPu-elS IBUOISSOJoid 8861 Xlunu-Bf OuismiddV olvisg [-eaW juiTuopjsoXjo st-edTouud 1,L61 to[ osinoo 'sjosielddV omsg jm-djo XialaoS 'TLsTeiddV IvIluopIso-d Noavona3 IVNOISS3=IONd Z961 018961 uoiTeljsiuiLupv ssouisnq :.ioFvW wo7(j qjnoS 's IIL,_q xnOTS 'i5oTjoo-eurisnOnV OOOZ 019661 xnoioS Xl!amj - juoLud0jQA3(j UeU-rnH T-qjjuOH- -S-9 73LMjuOW ,u-ew3zOU ,uL,-LuOzOg - Ojels vueitlow lulsoid 01 000z juatudoJOA-ICI PlIq0/3311013S XjjUrej - 3jLIpjpU'eD 'S'W 72UL'Itlow 'UPTUOZOU IUL'Uiz)zoq - ;DjrjseUmUOw N ►uvonmi ivwdo=i 9L61 01 EL61 uosjodsajuS al-eisj ILo-d ,eu,eluow luutuozog 'Salmoi?v P;)Ilufl 0861 01 9L61 iodoj3A3Cj puu uosjods.,)jvS z)jtjsFj Tvo-d ull-eluow Iu-euI3zOq 'XjjLO-d Imijug S86 T 01086 lj,,)dol;)AOCI PUP SOTUS OJUISa ILION '.I;)310jg 'JQUm0-0:) -eLmTUOW 'u'Ru-TOZOU ',�ITt'O-d)1;)OJD SulJdS, JUOUICtOJOAQ(I Put SOTUS OWISH TL'a-d 33N31M3dXa 31VISR IV32 EL61 01 ZL61 IBI'3JQuIUlOD Pue P11110PISO-d 'Pjo)jr(j ,4jnoS ')�10 plduU 'uoijvgsTuiUJpv ss3uisnq 11-etuS 6L61 01 €L61 -IO)IOjq eu'eTUOW 'sTTP,4 TeO."D 'uBO'T V s0uIA'RS IRIOPM is-Ili IuO'sOJ.l 010661 IL'IIUI?P!s3X PumuoIN 'sBuillIq 'opjmXjjunoj TUOS@Jd 01 E661 lul-WOU-TWOD pun TIIIIOMSa-d 'e"TuOW 'SNS 019 ' -ug UJOIsO� X)IS 219 Tu3s;DJd O1 E66 T [elluMSO-d ,Cos-iq maN 'lomv-1 junoW '=iAlaS lioddnS a20-goW I IV S30TAloS jusiLjddV 9Lt9-989 (900 9 1 L69 VLmTUOW 'uuUT3zO 9 U-Z QJITIS 'QALIG tunipTaIS EZOZ J30PURW qoupjg sbmjplo� ostuoG wim.iocLioD jujjd-eD ;)2?a2fpow P0111V S33N3N3:13H IuOPISZ)Jd ISM - SJ;)Sitiddv-eorV u-mozog IlounoD uoti'"010-d ooXoldTuE[ sooiAioS isi-l-IlInW umozoil siolpeoN jo PJLoq urmazos sloll-eow jo uo pe loossv muluow opapjpueD siosiuiddV 3o_4 lugpu3d;)puljo uolluloossV I-euoIlLX SdIHSN3SW3W t,OOZ Xxonlq-iA Xjjjjqa!,jiosiUjddV slootloS jusmiddV StU,'DISXS laIR(I 10OSST-Now ivooZ Xxeruqz)d V,j*I-V,N- owpdfl o3jimid pauoissDjoidjo spjupuulS uuojlufl ZOOZ fmruqoq tIOILIOSO-d OTU-TOUOOg PtM ssouisnq jo n-ming ,,-eU-eIUOW Ul OUTISOAUI,,NOOITtlo ;)IWOUOOF[-eUelUON ZOOZ ZOOZ Xnruqoj ooijoaij Iasi-e.TddV puoissOjoid jo spnepu% uuojlufl slooqoS IvsiaiddV stuolsXS LIeCl 3loossi-NoW I OOZ Xnn-iqz)j ssoullAk p;)dxFf seiosi-eiddV a-qi OOOZX.iun.iqoj soiqlgjo ;)poopueooilo-eidjusividdVIBuoissojoicljospjupuelSuuoj!UfI snsiujddV I-ein-d pup sioBrurN uuuj jo Xloiooq u-eojjouV 31ql OOOZ Xnruqz)j nuiwoS �oojjno oiwouOng OOOZ qoxeosoN oituouooH pue ssouisnqjo nL,;Dmg 'UjnOSSlW - RUejUOWJO XII'SJOATufl OqL 6661 joqoloo -v-j-l-v-M- sjuotuojinbo�j psTeJddV GIIH ILTUOPISON Mug 6661 joqoloo V'A'l'V'N- sju3LuojmbQ-d But ug-I jivj p 8661 kmniqojuoijrziFejjdvo atuooul I-esiaiddV mz)iAO-d of uoilonpanul sloo7goS ItsividdV sLu3lsXS ulu(I loossiNoW L661Xjenjqo.q soiqlgjo ;)poDpuuaz)llouidjusiujddVjeuoissajoidjospjupu-elS sj,gsl-ejdd,V I-ein-d puu sjoiNmeW miul JO XIOTOOS Unliouiv 341, L661 Quruqoj IPU'Luz)S VORO OTUIOuOO9 L661 -qon;Dso-a onuoum-4 DuL, ss3uisng jo nvoxng lulnosstW -UUeTUOWJO XIISJOAlufl OT4,1 9661 ioquioo3(l juuimoS joo-qoS ;Dj-ejsFj Iro-d uol-ToW - ,olouuoD 5661 qojPW V,j,I*V*N lsisXj-euV ulna jo�jmW S6,61 f-mn-iqoj XOUTUIOS NOOlInO 9661 17661 3unfV*TI*V*X'sj-9mJddV odooS pollturl t,661 qOlb'W (IfIH 'SUOII'PuOD 172lu3Tuuoj'AUF[ t661 nun altilpsul IesieiddV dV-dfl m;)K Zt, sooiAloS fesi'RuddV mtr-88c (90tr) t I L6 S tuBTuo `oPP-12log 901 xog O d juoprsox,j `uopur 'e g ooh opt'ui?log %I aQIF A 916E-989 (got) S i L6S 'euvTuo `uMzozog uz w Is723 80Z 'o-eluog oanug uruuozog jo g XjpnooS lsjij