HomeMy WebLinkAboutThree Parks Master Plan
'Gardner Park
Tuckerman Park
McLeod Park
Master Plans
Prepared For
CITY OF BOZEMAN
Recreation and Parks Advisory Board
13 January 2005
DRAFT
Prepared By
PRUGH & LENON ARCHITECTS
FISCHER & ASSOCIATES
Gardner, Tuckerman, McLeod Parks Master Plan
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
Page
3
2. Gardner Park-History 5
3. Gardner Park--Existing Conditions and Needs Analysis 5
4. Gardner Park-Community Input-Public Meeting #1 7
5. Gardner Park-Recreation and Parks Advisory Board Recommendations 8
Public Meeting #1
6. Gardner Park-Community Input-Public Meeting #2 9
7. Gardner Park-Recreation and Parks Advisory Board Recommendations 9
Public Meeting #2
8. Gardner Park-Gardner Park Nature Conservancy 9
9. Gardner Park-Master Plan Recommendations 10
10. Gardner Park-Project Development and Cost Estimates 11
11. Tuckerman Park-History 14
12. Tuckerman Park- Existing Conditions and Needs Analysis 15
13. Tuckerman Park- Community Input-Public Meeting #1 16
14. Tuckerman Park- Recreation and Parks Advisory Board Recommendations 17
Public Meeting #1
15. Tuckerman Park- Community Input-Public Meeting #2 18
16. Tuckerman Park- Recreation and Parks Advisory Board Recommendations 19
Public Meeting #2
17. Tuckermau Park- Master Plan Recommendations 19
18. Tuckerman Park- Project Development and Cost Estimates 21
19. McLeod Park - History 24
20. McLeod Park-Existing Conditions and Needs Analysis 24
21. McLeod Park - Community Input-Public Meeting #1 26
22. McLeod Park - Recreation and Parks Advisory Board Recommendations 26
Public Meeting #1
23. McLeod Park - Community Input-Public Meeting #2 27
24. McLeod Park - Recreation and Parks Advisory Board Recommendations 28
Public Meeting #2
25. McLeod Park- Master Plan Recommendations 28
26. McLeod Park- Project Development and Cost Estimates 29
27. Conclusion 31
28. Appendix A 32
- 2 -
Gardner, Tuckerman, McLeod Parks Master Plan
Introduction
The Recreation and Parks Advisory Board of the City of Bozeman have determined that master
plans should be developed for Gardner Park, Tuckerman Park and McLeod Park. These plans will
guide long term management of these lands; suggesting appropriate future use and maintenance
levels. Ideally the plans will respond to historical agreements, current needs and community values,
while preserving opportunities to accommodate future community plans and identified needs.
These parks are close in proximity and connected by the City's Mainstreet to the Mountains trail
system. The parks also have characteristics that make them each unique and at the same time,
complimentary to each other. While each park has been studied on an individual basis, their
relationship to each other, to adjacent neighborhoods and the community at-large have necessitated
a holistic approach to the master planning process. These parks are an important element ofthe
neighborhood as well as the community of Bozeman's open space and trail system.
The initial public meeting was designed to open discussion regarding past, current and future use of
the parkland. The second public meeting was designed to solicit response to the draft master plans
for all three parks. The City Recreation and Parks Advisory Board and City Staff provided oversight
and direction regarding public comment, as well as current adopted plans and policies. This
summary document is structured to provide information for each park on an individual basis. The
document also summarizes how the individual master plans contribute to the larger picture of the
park and trail system network within the City of Bozeman.
The plans were developed considering input from the adjacent landowners, the community, the
Recreation and Parks Advisory Board and City Staff. The plans were further informed by adopted
plans and policies, particularly the Parks, Open Space and Trails (POST) plan. The POST plan is a
comprehensive plan for parks and open space in Bozeman and documents community needs and
preferences. This plan documents community preferences. In developing the master plan the
following findings were considered:
. There is broad support for a community wide trail system and support facilities.
. The POST plan recommends short and long term improvements to the Sourdough Creek
Trail including repair and surfacing for pedestrians and bicyclists, adequate parking,
restroom facilities and refuse containers.
. The POST plan indicates that "preserving the naturalness of Sourdough Creek corridor" as
a high priority.
. Extending and upgrading the Main Street to the Mountains Trail is a community priority.
. A survey of the public revealed that the highest facility and maintenance priorities are
bathrooms, landscaping, and garbage collection.
. Although parking was viewed as a middle priority, community access to trails was a high
priority.
. The survey revealed that passive recreation including picnicking and relaxing was the
greatest over all use of the Bozeman park and recreation systems.
. Walking and hiking are the communities highest use activity, engaged in at level higher than
any active recreation use. Extending the trails was of high or very high importance to 72%
ofthe people surveyed.
- 3 -
Gardner, Tuckerman, McLeod Parks Master Plan
The master plan for each ofthe parks was drafted considering both neighborhood and community
input. In instances where preferences of the groups were in conflict, direction was provided by the
City Staff and Citizens Recreation and Parks Advisory Board.
The planning process encouraged involvement and comment from the entire citizenry of Bozeman.
Two advertised public meetings were held. Open briefings with the Recreation and Parks Advisory
Board were conducted. The draft plan (will be) published on the City's web-site. Review comments
will be included in the final document. Community leaders, citizens and special interest groups
should review the document with the understanding that these parks are communal public open
spaces. Long term management should seek an acceptable balance between conservation and
development, while accommodating a wide range of users and uses and at the same time protecting
valuable scenic, natural, cultural and recreational resources. Reaching consensus on a master plan
will be a process of compromise with few individuals likely having all of their expectations fully
met. Ideally, the planning process will arrive at a responsive solution that a large majority of the
community will support.
- 4 -
Gardner, Tuckerman, McLeod Parks Master Plan
Gardner Park-History
Gardner Park, as it is known today, provides a vital link in the park and trail system of Bozeman
and Gallatin Valley. This linear park is bordered to the east by the Gardner Park Subdivision,
Sundance Springs Subdivision and Tuckennan Park to the west, Goldenstein Lane to the south, and
private residential land to the north. Sourdough Creek flows through the wooded park.
The land has passed through many owners since the 1800's and was most likely used for
agricultural and grazing. The creation of the park can be credited to Olga Gardner, who along with
her husband Lawrence, purchased the land in 1972. In 1973, Olga sold the land to G-B Properties
who then created the Gardner Park Subdivision. As part of the subdivision covenants, Olga
Gardner donated Lots 1 of Block 1 and Lot 1 of Block 6 to the public to be preserved as part of
Gardner Park for natural wildlife habitat, footpaths or nature trails for pedestrians, bicycles or cross-
country skiers. (WHAT ABOUT LOT 2?) While the land is technically located in Gallatin County,
Mrs. Gardner donated this parkland to the City of Bozeman. Thanks to her vision, this beautiful
stream corridor and riparian forest has been preserved for wildlife habitat in concert with human
activity.
The Gardner Park subdivision covenants read as follows: Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 6 are
donated to the public to be preserved as part of Gardner Park for natural wildlife habitat, i.e. plants,
trees, birds, animals, etc. Its use is restricted to footpaths or nature trails for pedestrians, bicycles,
or cross country skiers. No motorized vehicles or horses allowed. Use of Lot 1, Block 6 by the
public is restricted to the west side of Sourdough Creek. Parking and picnicking are confined to Lot
1 of Block 1. Shelter or comfort stations will also be located in this area. Every attempt shall be
made to preserve and protect the environment in the area. Disturbance, destruction or damage to all
plant or animal life and their natural habitats, streams, springs, ponds, soil, trees, rocks, etc. is
strictly forbidden. Park users will be requested to follow trails and eliminate litter.
In 1973, G-B Properties amended the covenants to designate Lot 2 of Block 1 as an addition to
Gardner Park.
Development of Sourdough Creek Trail which passes through Gardner Park began in 1978. The
creation of this trail stemmed from the vision of Don Weaver, who along with the Rotary Club
began and completed the trail construction. The Rickenbaugh Memorial Bridge was installed to
create a spur trail connection between Sourdough Creek Trail and Gardner Park Drive. Gary
Vodehnal of the Gallatin Valley Land Trust led the effort and fund raising to complete this project.
Gardner Park-Existine Condition~ and Needs Analvsis
Gardner Park is a 17.72 acre linear park that lies to the west of the Gardner Park subdivision. Its
legal description is as follows:
Located in Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 6 Gardner Park Subdivision, located in
the NE Y.t of Section 30, Township 2 South, Range 6 East, M.P.M. Gallatin County
- 5 -
Gardner, Tuckerman, McLeod Parks Master Plan
Montana. The wooded portion of the park that parallels Sourdough Creek is Lot 1, Block 6;
Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 is partially wooded with the remainder a hayfield.
Approximately one half mile of the Sourdough Creek Trail runs along the western side ofthe creek.
This portion of the trail is a critical north-south leg ofthe Main Street to Mountains trail system,
with both the trail and park ending at the southern border where it intersects Goldenstein Lane. A
trailhead at Gardner Park Drive leads to a spur trail that crosses the Rickenbaugh Memorial Bridge
and intersects the Sourdough Creek Trail. An unofficial swimming hole with a rope tree swing is
located near the bridge. Numerous game trails and social trails run throughout the park. Some
social trails have been blocked off with debris to discourage their use by humans. Benches are sited
along the trail at the creek's edge and there are several interpretive signs along the trail.
A mature forest of riparian vegetation provides habitat for deer, bear, small mammals and birds.
Cottonwood, willow, mountain ash, serviceberry, snowberry and wild rose are among the plant
species found. Views from within the wooded portion of the park are limited to occasional
openings in the vegetation. Generally the user's experience is one of passing through a cottonwood
forest along a stream corridor.
The northeast section of the park, Lots 1 and 2 of Block 1 is generally a hayfield. It is bordered on
the west by a wooded area, to the north, south and east by residential development. This field has
been hayed for over twelve years by a neighbor as a courtesy. Haying the field is not consistent
with park practices and the neighbors were asked to stop the practice. An alternative method for
weed control needs to be developed and there may be a need to mow a section of the park along the
border with the adjoining property owner for the purpose of a fire break There are no built trails
within this section of the park although social trails have been made through the forest, along with
ad hoc stream crossings. There currently are no opportunities for passive recreation within the
hayfield or reason to enter this portion of the park unless to access a social trail. Views to the
mountains from the hayfield do exist, but are interrupted by expansive residential development and
the cottonwood forest to the west. A large, weathered wooden sign announcing Gardner Park is
located within the hayfield. The sign shows its age and does not function well as park signage.
Current uses of the park include walking, running, biking, cross-country skiing, swimming, water
play, fishing, dog walking, bird watching and wildlife viewing. The Recreation and Parks
Department conducted trail user counts for a six-month period from August 20,2001 to March 5,
2002 and for a three-month period from June 24, 2002 to August 28,2002. The six-month count
averaged 429 users per day; the 3-month count averaged 259 users per day. In addition to the
previously established neighborhoods of Gardner Park and Sourdough Creek Subdivisions, newly
developed Sundance Springs and West Meadows Subdivision have added increased user pressures
upon the park and trail. Use ofthe trail, open space, and this trail head is expected to increase as the
community and trail system grows. There is no official parking lot within Gardner Park; park users
who drive their cars park either along the road on Gardner Park Drive or in the parking lot located
in adjacent Tuckerman Park. The current width and curve of Gardner Drive is not adequate to safely
accommodate suitable on-street parking. One undesirable use of the park reported by residents in
the area, is drinking and partying within the secluded, wooded areas of the park.
- 6 -
Gardner, Tuckerman, McLeod Parks Master Plan
In order to relieve the pressures of steadily increasing usage evident in Gardner Park, the following
needs have been identified:
Identity
. Existing park signage is worn and weathered and does not relate to the park. A new sign
consistent with the signage used in other Bozeman parks should replace the old sign at a location'
that better identifies and announces the location of the park.
· Signage to aid enforcement of the City's leash laws for dogs.
Parking
. Provide safe and adequate parking within Gardner Park for park/trail community users.
. Appropriate bear-proof refuse containers and pet servicing devices placed in any future parking
area.
Planting
. Monitor and revegetate disturbed areas as the need arises with appropriate vegetation.
Spatial Use
· Create trail linkages to identified points.
· Protect largest portions of wildlife habitat.
Gardner Park-Communitv Input/October 1, 2003/Public Meetin2 #1
The first public meeting was held October 1, 2003 to introduce the planning process, and to gather
public opinion and preferences for development within Gardner Park. Twenty-seven members of
the community attended; five of which identified themselves as residents of the Gardner Park
Subdivision. The resources, issues, and opportunities to be considered in the master planning
process of the park were discussed and outlined. Meeting participants were asked to indicate their
preference for each opportunity listed on the chart. A survey was also distributed to each individual
to determine how they ranked certain values identified by the design team consultants. Additional
comments were received for a two-week period following the meeting. These comments addressed
issues such as public access, natural resource protection, habitat enhancement, passive recreation,
safety, parking and miscellaneous. Detailed information about the public meeting can be found in
the meeting report submitted to the Recreation and Parks Advisory Board on November 3, 2003.
A brief summary of the meeting is as follows:
Results of the Master Planning opportunities group exercise:
Good Idea Bad Idea
--Continue agricultural use in hayfield --Create parking area in hayfield
-- Enhance/repair stream bank --Create passive picnic area in hayfield
--Control weeds --Loop trails in NE quadrant
--Allow dogs in park; must be on leash --Separate bikelhike trails
--Educate trail users on trail etiquette --Fewer trails to protect songbirds
Fair Idea
--Fishing access
--ADA compliance
- 7 -
Gardner, Tuckerman, McLeod Parks Master Plan
Results ofthe Values Survey are as follows in order of importance as relates to Gardner Park:
1.Tie Natural Resource Protection tied with Habitat Enhancement
I.Tie Habitat Enhancement
2. Passive Recreation, ego Walking, jogging, bicycling, etc.
3. Preserving Views
4. Respect Privacy
5. Public Access
6. Trail C01111ectivity
7. Active Recreation, ego Softball, tot lot, soccer, etc.
Gardner Park-Recreation and Parks Advisory Board Recommendations
The October 1, 2003 public meeting report was presented to the Recreation and Parks Advisory
Board on November 3,2003. Due to the complexity of the information and public opinion, a list of
hot point issues was generated by the design team and given to members of the board for
consideration. The Board voted for the formation of a subcommittee to conduct an in-depth study
ofthe report and hot point issues, meet with the design consultants and provide them with
recommendations endorsed by the Board for development of the park's master plan. Following are
the issues identified and the Board's recommendations (board recommendations are seen in italics
beneath issue).
Gardner Park Issues/Advisory Board Responses:
1. What level of development should occur in NE quadrant of Gardner Park (currently the
hayfield), i.e. picnic area?
1. The NE quadrant should not remain a hayfield Tree planting/reforestation, picnic
area, possible parking area, trails connecting to existing trails should be considered.
2. Is it important to loop trails within the park?
2. Loop trail in NE quadrant to connect hayfield area to rest of park; possibly along
road?
3. Should a small parking lot be considered?
3. Additional parking is needed to support use of this park and trails by the larger
Bozeman community. Parking may be developed either in hayfield area or at
Rickenbaugh Bridge trailhead.
4. How should dogs be controlled within the park?
4. Existing sign should be removed and replaced with smaller sign consistent with other
park signage. Location was not determined, i. e. leave in current location or move to
Rickenbaugh Bridge trailhead?
5. Additional Board Recommendations
5. Put picnic table by creek at Rickenbaugh Bridge.
Create trail connection within Goldenstein ROW from Sourdough Trail to Gardner Park
Drive.
6. Designate Gardner Park as community park.
- 8 -
Gardner, Tuckerman, McLeod Parks Master Plan
Gardner Park~Communitv Input/Mav 19. 2004/Public Meetine: #2
The second public meeting, May 19,2004, was held to update the community on the process to
date, the factors considered in creating the Master Plan and to present the draft Master Plan. Those
who attended had an opportunity to respond to the recommended improvements. Twenty members
of the community attended; ten of which identified themselves as residents of the Gardner Park
Subdivision. The following is a summary of public comment.
1. Do not designate Gardner Park as a community park.
2. Do not put in a parking lot.
3. Increased traffic within the neighborhood will be caused by building a parking lot.
4. A parking lot in this location will be an invitation to people looking for a place to
drink and party.
5. Do not install picnic tables within the park.
6. Why not build a 4 to 6 car parking lot by existing Rickenbaugh Bridge Trailhead.
7. The park land was given to the City by a Warranty Deed that stipulated parking and
picnicking could only occur in Lots 1 or 2, Block 1. To change Restrictive Covenants
requires a signature by every lot owner.
8. There has been no city maintenance of the hayfield in 25 years.
Gardner Park~Recreation and Parks Advisory Board Recommendations
The May 19,2004 public meeting report and modifications to the draft Master Plan as directed from
City Staff were presented to the Board on June 10, 2004. City Staff recommended maintaining the
improvements to Gardner Park outlined in the May 19, 2004 draft Master Plan. It was decided the
final Master Plan document would be brought to the Board prior to City Commission review.
Gardner Park~Gardner Park Nature Conservancy
Residents of Gardner Park Subdivision formed the Gardner Park Nature Conservancy in response to
the draft Master Plan presented at the May 19,2004 public meeting. Strong opposition was voiced
against the proposed location for parking area, picnic table and vegetative screening within Lots 1
and 2, Block 1. The Gardner Park Nature Conservancy group was formed to sponsor a perpetual
deed restriction on Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 in Gardner Park Subdivision prohibiting without limitation
comfort stations, fences, storage sheds, roads, parking areas, tables, and other permanent or
temporary structures. Enforcement of this perpetual deed restriction may be enforced by the
homeowners or the homeowners association within Gardner Park Subdivision. Gardner Park
Nature Conservancy would agree to help maintain the park with responsibilities for weed control,
mowing, picking up of litter, vandalism and fire. The group would also remove the existing sign in
favor of a more suitable sign to be replaced at the city's discretion. Gardner Park Nature
Conservancy would also make a donation earmarked for a future parking lot to be constructed near
or at the existing trailhead on Gardner Park Drive, or if preferred, would physically help build a
parking lot to agreed upon specifications. Ifthe City Commission is willing to accept these
recommendations staff will be directed to draft a formal agreement outlining the details of this
arrangement.
- 9 -
Gardner, Tuckerman, McLeod Parks Master Plan
Gardner Park-Master Plan Recommendations
The following Master Plan recommendations are made with evaluation of neighborhood comment,
the role of the park as a community wide amenity and final direction from City Staff where issues
were in conflict. Exhibit A illustrates in plan view, the end result of the Master Plan
recommendations. The prime recommendation is to designate Gardner Park as a Community Park
and develop and manage this park consistent with City standards. While the park has a history of
functioning as a valued neighborhood resource, its role in the Main Street to Mountains trail system
provides a vital trail link for the community. The fact that the trail runs through a riparian forest
increases its value and for both human and wildlife usage. The wishes of Olga Gardner, as
described in the Gardner Park covenants, have been respected as far as recreational usage of the
trail.
Activities will continue to be confined to passive types of recreation such as walking/running,
bicycling, picnicking, and fishing. Motorized vehicles, with the exception of motorized wheelchairs
or park maintenance equipment, will be prohibited from using any trail within the park. Specific
improvements are outlined below according to the categories described under the existing
conditions and needs analysis.
Identity
. The existing sign located in Lot 2 of Block 1, currently referred to as the "hayfield" is in a state of
disrepair and does not relate to the park. A new sign consistent with the signage used in other
Bozeman parks should replace the old sign and should be placed in a location that relates to other
future park improvements such as a parking lot near the Rickenbaugh Bridge trailhead.
. Dogs running offleash have become more problematic with increased park users. Install
additional signage to reinforce and educate users about the City leash laws.
. Signage prohibiting motorized vehicles from using park trails.
Parking
. Parking for users entering the park at the Rickenbaugh Bridge trailhead has been limited to on-
street parking. Long term use of the park, trails and open spaces system by the Bozeman
community is expected to grow. In order to serve the overall community, adequate support services
including parking should be provided. Although development of parking in Gardner Park is a lower
priority than the parking expansion at the Tuckerman Park trailhead, the opportunity to sensitively
site parking near this trailhead should be preserved. Locating these functions in this location is
. consistent with the current POST plan. Lack of parking creates a safety issue for pedestrians and
automobiles alike. A parking lot designed to accommodate 4 cars plus a handicapped space, should
be at or near the Rickenbaugh Bridge trailhead. A bear-proof trash receptacle and pet servicing
station should be located at the parking area. The improvements should be designed to minimize
visual impacts to neighbors.
Planting
. Revegetate areas disturbed by development of parking area or areas being degraded by human
activity with plant species appropriate for ecosystem.
· Weed control.
- 10 -
Gardner, Tuckerman, McLeod Parks Master Plan
Spatial Use
· A Class III trail as described in the POST Plan from the parking lot at the Rickenbaugh Trailhead
through the northeast quadrant of the park should be developed to create an informal loop that
extends into Lots 1 and 2, Block 1. This loop trail could incorporate and improve the social trails
that already exist within this quadrant. Careful evaluation of the trail alignment through the densely
forested area is critical to create this trail loop with minimal disturbance.
. Currently there is not a safe pedestrian access from Sourdough Trail to the intersection of Gardner
Park Drive and Goldenstein Road. During future widening of Goldenstein Road, this trail
connection could be built within the road right-of-way.
. There is currently an opening from Sourdough Trail to Goldenstein Road. This connection poses
potential danger by allowing both adults and children to enter the road. This opening should be
blocked off to stop pedestrians at this point. The portion of trail that lies parallel to Goldenstein
Road should be realigned to the north, through the wooded area as part of the connection to the trail
in Tuckerman Park. The existing trail should be removed and revegetated.
· Social trails currently exist within the park, these should be allowed to remain unless determined
to be the cause of degradation of the forest.
· Designate the largest portion of forest west of the parking area as wildlife habitat.
· Add a picnic table to the area adjacent to Rickenbaugh Bridge and the existing rope swing.
. The existing foot bridges crossing Sourdough Creek mid point on the trail should be repaired and
reconstructed to City of Bozeman adopted standards.
. Prohibit motorized vehicles of any kind with the exception of handicapped carts or park
maintenance equipment from using any trail within the park.
Gardner Park-Proiect Development and Cost Estimates
Capital Improvements/Additions
Generally listed in order of priority and logical phasing
3
Activi
Place picnic table at Rickenbaugh Bridge and & stabilize adjacent
bank Realign trail south end of ark awa from Goldenstein Rd.
Provide parking lot, bear-proof trash receptacle and pet servicing
station. Revegetate area disturbed by parking lot construction.
Replace ark sign near Rickenbau h Brid e trailhead.
Develop Class III trail loop from Rickenbaugh Bridge parking area
throu h northeast quadrant of ark.
Phase
1
2
Maintenance
The following park maintenance items identified and suggested services providers are listed below.
Level of maintenance is based upon park classification types outlined by the Department of
Recreation and Parks. Generally these parks are passive; requiring maintenance at a Level IV level
of service. However, the small areas of improvement, such as trailheads, trails and parking areas
will require a additional attention.
- 11 -
Gardner, Tuckerman, McLeod Parks Master Plan
Maintenance Item Service Provider Paidfor by
Weed control per Level IV Park City of Bozeman City of Bozeman
Maintenance Classification
Trees: pruning, fertilizer per Level IV City of Bozeman City of Bozeman
Park Maintenance Classification
Trail tread surface maintenance per GVLT/Noon Rotary City of Bozeman
Class I standard
Refuse removal per Level IV Park City of Bozeman City of Bozeman
Maintenance Classification
Watering/well equipment maintenance City of Bozeman City of Bozeman
Electrical service to well City of Bozeman City of Bozeman
Park furniture, signage, bridges, City of Bozeman City of Bozeman
equipment Level IV maintenance
Parking lot maintenance- Level 2 City of Bozeman City of Bozeman
Maintenance/resupply pet servicing City of Bozeman City of Bozeman
device supplies
Reference Cost Estimate (2004)
GARDNER PARK COST ESTIMATE
QTY UNIT ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT$ TOTAL $
PHASE I
1 LS Stabilize Stream Bank Plants and rocks $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00
1 EA Picnic Table Near Bridge $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00
1 EA New Park Sign Budget $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00
1 LS Realign trail @ south end of park $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00
Sub Total $ 8,000.00
Contingency 20% $ 1,600.00
Sub Total Phase I $ 9,600.00
Design10% $ 960.00
Total Phase I $ 10,560.00
PHASE II
Parking Lot-6 spaces City Standards
100 SF Strip Stockpile & Replace Topsoil $ 6.00 $ 600.00
73 CY Grading Parking Area $ 4.00 $ 292.00
1950 SF Paving Asphalt $ 1.25 $ 2,438.00
32 LF Culvert 12" $ 30.00 $ 960.00
6 EA Tire Stops $ 150.00 $ 1,500.00
2 EA HC Signs $ 200.00 $ 400.00
1 LS Storm Drainage Budget $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00
1 EA Signage Budget $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00
1 EA Trash Receptacle-Bear proof $ 600.00 $ 600.00
Landscape Revegetation
2500 SF Native Lawn Seed-construction disturbance Grade Prep and Seed $ 0.50 $ 1,250.00
Sub Total $ 10,740.00
Contingency 20% $ 2,148.00
- 12 -
Gardner, Tuckerman, McLeod Parks Master Plan
Sub Total Phase II $ 12,888.00
Design10% $ 1,289.00
Total Phase II $ 14,177.00
PHASE III
1300 LF Construct Class III Trail Loop City Std, min. 18" wide $ 3.00 $ 3,900.00
Subtotal $ 3,900.00
Contingency 20% $ 780.00
Subtotal Phase III $ 4,680.00
Design10% $ 468.00
Total Phase III $ 5,148.00
Total All Phases $ 29,885.00
- 13 -
Gardner, Tuckerman, McLeod Parks Master Plan
Tuckerman Park-History (ADD REVISED HISTORY PROVIDED BY TUCKERMANS)
The site of Tuckerman Park was for many years a bull pasture and then a quiet hayfield. Its
ownership has changed numerous times since the 1800's; however, it was not until 1966 when its
fate was destined to change from agricultural/grazing use to modem day development. In 1966, the
owner of that time, Vera McLeod, sold the land to Carter Williams of Great Falls, MT. Williams
was the owner of Sour Dough Creek Properties. Thus began the dispute between development and
open space advocates.
At that time Sour Dough Creek Properties began the process of subdividing the land for residential
development there was considerable opposition from some members of the community toward the
development of this land. The land was sold once again to Don Hanna. Hanna worked through the
Master Planning and Entitlement process, facing the same opposition as Sour Dough Creek
Properties. He ultimately sold the land to Potter Clinton in 1997. Potter Clinton continued the
subdivision process proposing a phased master plan. As plans for Phase II drew closer to approval
by the Bozeman City Commission, it became clear that houses would be built immediately west of
Gardner Park. In 1999 open space advocates focused their attention on these 14 acres west of
Gardner Park. Russ and Lisa Tuckerman came to the forefront and began the grass roots fund-
raising effort that ultimately purchased 10.02 acres of this valuable land. The Tuckerman's
generously donated $50,000 to the fund and worked with the City of Bozeman, helped raise the
public awareness of this opportunity to preserve the land as open space/parkland. The original
purchase price for the 14 acres was $783,000. This amount of money was deemed to high for the
city to justify. Negotiations with Potter Clinton resulted in an agreement to purchase 10.02 acres,
with redesign of the plat. The new design would create ten lots aligned along Morning Sun Drive,
the developer would relocate Nash Spring Creek to the east, and the 10.02 acres west of Gardner
Park would be available for purchase. The next obstacle was agreement on the sales price. With
price reductions generated by professional consultants working on the creek relocation, reduced
real estate commissions and lot price increases, a loan from the Federal Land & Water
Conservation Fund, of matching funds from the City of Bozeman, donated by private citizens the
land was purchased price this valuable piece of land as open space/parkland. The park was
dedicated Tuckerman Park on National Trails Day, June 16,2001.
Parkland Improvement Funds were approved April 4, 2002 for construction of a foot bridge across
the north end of Nash Spring Creek and 150 feet of Class 1 trail to provide a connection to
Sourdough Creek Trail. Intent ofthis plan was to provide public access to west side of creek and in
turn prevent park land west of Nash Spring Creek from becoming the de facto backyard to
Sundance Springs residents adjacent to the park.
Opposition to this plan arose from Sundance Springs residents who felt the trail would be too close
to their adjacent lots. They also expressed a fear of dogs running into yards, people approaching too
close to their property and causing an invasion of privacy. Residents have stated that no fences are
allowed in the subdivision covenants, although through research of the covenants, it was found that
rear yard fences are allowed. As a result of this opposition from Sundance Springs residents, the
approved plans were shelved until a master plan for the park was created.
- 14 -
Gardner, Tuckerman, McLeod Parks Master Plan
Tuckerman Park-Existing Conditions and Needs Analysis
Tuckerman Park is a 10.02 acre park that provides a critical buffer between Sourdough Creek to the
east as it passes through Gardner Park and Sundance Springs Subdivision to the west. Sundance
Springs private open space bounds the park to the north; Goldenstein Lane forms the southern edge
of the park and provides vehicular access into the park. Its legal description is as follows:
NW'i4 Section 30 Township 2 South, Range 6 East, P.M.M., Gallatin County, Montana
Lot 11 of Sundance Springs Subdivision, located in Bozeman MT
Nash Spring Creek runs north-south through the west edge of the park. The creek was relocated by
Potter Clinton Development as part of their subdivision. This was not the first time the creek had
been moved. The original creek had been moved and straightened decades ago and resembled a
ditch. Today's alignment has created a creek with meanders, planting of willow starts, cottonwood
and golden willow trees along its banks with fish reappearing in the improved habitat.
The existing vegetation found in the park is largely remnants of the historic hayfield. Pasture
grasses, weeds such as thistle, and cottonwood seedlings can be found. A few blue spruce trees
have been planted near the small parking area. The general feeling of the park is one of openness,
with expansive views in all directions but the east where the riparian forest of Gardner Park is
located.
Wildlife is often seen within the park. Deer, raccoons, small mammals, birds are common.
Historically, elk, moose and bear frequented the area prior to development.
To this point, little development has occurred in the park. An 8-car gravel parking lot is located on
the south end of the park. This lot serves both Tuckerman and Gardner Park. A trail parallel to
Goldenstein Lane connects the parking lot to Sourdough Creek Trail and Gardner Park to the east.
To the west, the trail crosses a footbridge over Nash Spring Creek and passes through Sundance
Springs private open space to Morning Sun Drive. The trail further west has not been maintained
and ends at the boundary of Sundance Springs Subdivision. A social trail leading northeast from
the parking lot has been created as people head toward an opening into Gardner Park. A memorial
bench in memoriam ofF. Weber Bradley was placed in 2001 at the southwest comer of the park's
boundary and Lot 10 of Sundance Springs. The location of this bench is only a matter of feet from
private property. There is currently no access across the creek or easement across Sundance
Springs private open space to access the west side ofthe park and the memorial bench.
In order to provide for the pressures of increased usage that are evident in Tuckerman Park, the
following needs have been identified:
Identity
. A new sign consistent with the signage used in other Bozeman parks should be installed near the
entrance to the parking area.
· Standard trail linkage markers.
. Signage to aid enforcement of the City's leash laws for dogs.
- 15 -
Gardner, Tuckerman, McLeod Parks Master Plan
· Appropriate park fumiture, bear proof refuse containers and pet servicing devices placed in
appropriate locations.
Parking/Screening
· Expansion of the parking area as increased capacity is indicated.
· Utilize planting to provide parking lot screening for adjacent neighbors.
Planting
· Develop water source for irrigation of new plantings.
· Additional evergreen trees in areas where evergreens are existing.
· Enhance riparian planting along creek.
· Restore prairie grassland habitat.
Spatial Use
· Provide public and maintenance access to west side of creek.
· Create trail linkage to existing Sourdough Creek trail.
· Provide opportunities for interaction with Nash Spring Creek.
· Provide comfort station, trash receptacles and pet servicing devices.
· Provide areas for picnicking and seating.
Tuckerman Park-Community Input/October 1. 2003/Public Meeting #1
The first public meeting was held October I, 2003 to gather public opinion and preferences for
development within Tuckerman Park. Twenty-seven members of the community attended; eight of
which identified themselves as residents of Sundance Springs Subdivision. The resources, issues,
and opportunities to be considered in the master planning process of the park were discussed and
outlined. Meeting participants were asked to indicate their preference for each opportunity listed on
the chart. A survey was also distributed to each individual to determine how they ranked certain
values identified by the design team consultants. Additional comments were received for a two-
week period following the meeting. These comments addressed issues such as public access,
natural resource protection, habitat enhancement, passive recreation, safety, parking and
miscellaneous. Detailed information about the public meeting can be found in the meeting report
submitted to the Recreation and Parks Advisory Board on November 3, 2003.
A brief summary of the meeting is as follows:
Results of the Master Planning opportunities group exercise:
Good Idea Bad Idea
-- Trail enhancements, i.e. shade, benches -- Trail enhancements, i.e. shade, benches
--Screen/buffer to private land --North-south trail through park
--Expand Main S1. to Mountains trail --Picnic areas
--Trail access to water --Expand parking
--Plant vegetation at creek --Interpretation, i.e. signs
--Trail to west off Goldenstein Road --Fishing on west side of creek
--Weed control
--Spur trails into park
--Restore prairie habitat
--ClassifY land for conservation vs. recreation
Fair Idea
--Expand Main S1. to Mountains trail
- 16 -
Gardner, Tuckerman, McLeod Parks Master Plan
--Buffer trail from subdivision
--Create access to natural amenities
--Enhance habitat
Results ofthe Values Survey are as follows in order of importance as relates to Tuckerman Park:
1. Natural Resource Protection
2. Habitat Enhancement
3. Public Access
4. Preserving Views
5. Passive Recreation, ego Walking, jogging, bicycling, etc.
6. Respect Privacy
7. Trail Connectivity
8. Active Recreation, ego Softball, tot lot, soccer, etc.
Tuckerman Park~Recreation and Parks Advisory Board Recommendations
The October 1,2003 public meeting report was presented to the Recreation and Park Advisory
Board on November 3, 2003. Due to the complexity of the information and public opinion, a list of
hot point issues was generated by the design team and given to members of the Board for
consideration. The Board voted to form a subcommittee to conduct an in-depth study of the report
and hot point issues, meet with the design consultants and provide them with recommendations
endorsed by the Board for development of the park's master plan. Following are the issues and
Board's recommendations (Board recommendations are seen in italics beneath issue).
Tuckerman Park Issues/ Advisory Board Responses:
1. Should land be classified for conservation vs. recreation?
1. Park should be classifiedfor passive recreation with conservation and enhancement
of natural areas.
2. What level of development within Tuckerman Park should be considered?
2. Trails, planting, comfort station with structure, seating areas.
3. Should Tuckerman Park be considered a "neighborhood" park vS. "community" park?
3. Tuckerman Park is designated a "community" park and should be developed
consistent with community park standards outlined in the POST plan.
4. Should opportunities for passive recreation be developed, i.e. picnic areas, benches?
4. Opportunities for passive recreation should be developed, i. e. picnic areas, benches,
creek access, comfort station?
5. Should there be public access to both the west and east sides of Nash Spring Creek?
5. There should be public access to both the west and east sides of Nash Spring Creek;
begin negotiations with Sundance Springs to gain easements through southwest and
northwest private open space for access to west side of creek. Allow social trail to
develop on west side of creek; no gravel trail on west side.
6. Should fishing be allowed from west side of Nash Spring Creek?
6. This was not addressed.
7. Should Webb Bradley Memorial bench be relocated within Tuckerman Park?
7. Relocate Webb Bradley Memorial bench to location east of Nash Spring Creek.
8. How should dogs be controlled within the park?
- 17 -
Gardner, Tuckerman, McLeod Parks Master Plan
8. Ticketing offenders for (~fJ-leash violations is not feasible. Install signage to
demarcate property line of park.
9. Is it important to loop trails and create cOlmections to adjacent trails by developing a
north-south trail within the park?
9. It is important to loop trails and create connections to adjacent trails by developing a
north-south trail east of Nash Spring Creek; mow trail initially, monitor pedestrian
usage and sh?ft alignment if needed before installing gravel trail. Ask Sundance Springs
for public access through their private open space to create connection north of
Tuckerman Park to Gardner Park.
10. Should the parking area be enlarged? Should improvements such as comfort station,
trash receptacle & dog "poop" bags be provided?
10. Parking lot design should allow for future expansion. Improvements such as toilet
facility, trash receptacle & dog "poop" bags should be provided and located adjacent to
the parking lot in the southeast corner of the park.
Tuckerman Park-Community Input/Mav 19, 2004/Public Meetine: #2
The second public meeting, May 19,2004, was held to update the community on the process to
date, the factors considered in creating the Master Plan and to present the draft Master Plan. Those
who attended had an opportunity to respond to the recommended improvements. Twenty members
of the community attended; six of which identified themselves as residents of Sundance Springs
Subdivision. The following is a summary of public comment.
1. How much are we going to allow people to encroach on wildlife that live or move
through this area?
2. The sensitive wildlife is already gone. Species such as white tail deer and bear have
adapted to the presence oftrails and human activity.
3. This park should be a natural open space only.
4. Why do we need a bathroom in this park? There are currently none located along the
Main Street to Mountains trail system.
.5. Why not locate the comfort station within McLeod Park?
6. Move comfort station to area east of parking lot.
7. Do not provide benches or picnic tables.
8. Why not relocate the Fredrick Memorial bench to northwest comer of Gardner Park?
9. Do not provide trash cans. Bears are an issue with trash cans.
10. Why designate this park as a community park? Why not designate a community trail
instead?
11. Simplify the trails.
12. Unleashed dogs are still a big issue to adjacent homeowners.
13. Fire control is an issue and periodic mowing may be required in dry years to reduce
fuel loads.
- 18 -
Gardner, Tuckerman, McLeod Parks Master Plan
Tuckerman Park-Recreation and Parks Advisory Board Recommendations
The May 19,2004 public meeting report and modifications to the draft Master Plan as directed from
City Staff were presented to the Recreation and Park Advisory Board on June 10,2004. City Staff
recommended minor changes to trail alignment and maintaining the improvements to Tuckerman
Park contained in the May 19,2004 draft Master Plan. It was decided the final Master Plan
document would be brought to the Board once legal easement agreements for access to the west
side of Nash Spring Creek were finalized between the City and Sundance Springs Homeowners
Association. This easement information will be presented to the City Commission for their review
and consideration during the final approval process. If the Commission agrees to the concept of the
easements they will direct staff to draft the appropriate language and bring the easement back to the
City Commission for final approval..
Tuckerman Park-Master Plan Recommendations
The following Master Plan recommendations are made with evaluation of neighborhood comment,
the role of the park as a community wide amenity and final direction from City Staff where issues
were in conflict. Exhibit A illustrates in plan view, the end result of the Master Plan
recommendations. The prime recommendation is to designate Tuckerman Park as a Community
Park, ensure public access within the entire park and discourage encroachment of private uses.
With the increased residential development in the area, Tuckerman Park will help disperse the
increasing number of trail users along Sourdough Creek Trail. A North-South trail through the park
will not only create a loop trail to Sourdough Creek Trail, it will offer an alternative trail experience
as it passes through grasslands. Opportunities to interact with the water can be achieved by aligning
the trail near the creek. Activities will be confined to passive types of recreation such as
walking/running, bicycling, picnicking, and fishing. Motorized vehicles of any kind with the
exception of handicapped carts or park maintenance equipment will be prohibited from using any
trail within the park.
Specific improvements are outlined below according to the categories described under the existing
conditions and needs analysis.
Identity
. A new sign consistent with the signage used in other Bozeman parks should be installed near the
entrance to the parking area.
· Standard trail linkage markers.
· Identify west and north boundary of park with signage.
· Dogs running off leash have become more problematic with increased park users. Install
additional signage to reinforce and educate users about the City leash laws.
· Signage prohibiting motorized vehicles from using park trails.
Parking/Screening
. Expansion ofthe parking area as increased capacity is indicated. Additional parking can be
achieved by expansion east of the existing evergreen trees. Maximum size of lot to accommodate
20 vehicles plus 4 handicapped spaces.
· Utilize planting to provide parking lot screening for adjacent neighbors.
- 19 -
Gardner, Tuckerman, McLeod Parks Master Plan
Planting
· Develop water source for irrigation of new plantings.
. Plant evergreens and deciduous trees in groupings near parking area. Integrate new planting with
existing evergreen trees and parking lot configuration.
. Plant additional evergreen trees on west edge of park where Sourdough Creek Trail emerges from
forest. Place trees in relationship to existing trees to create informal groupings.
. Enhance riparian planting along creek to improve stream habitat and to provide screening of
adjacent neighbors from park users. Planting to comply with approved planting plan which
describes general location of planting and specific plant species and sizes.
. Promote "donor" program for tree planting. Species to be consistent with native species and will
be reviewed by Parks Department and Forestry Department for compliance with approved planting
plan which describes general location of planting and specific species and sizes. Approval by Parks
Department must be obtained prior to any planting operation by citizen donor.
· Weed control
Spatial Use
· Provide public and maintenance access to west side of creek with a legal agreement between the
City and Sundance Springs Homeowners Association granting a public easement through private
open space located at the southeast corner ofthe subdivision. No formal trails west ofthe creek will
be built, although social trails are likely to appear.
. Create trail linkage from parking area to realigned Sourdough Creek traiL Mow trail first year,
build Class I trail the second year after trail usage patterns re-assessed.
· Align trail near creek at certain points.
· Provide two picnic tables or benches along traiL
· Provide comfort station east of parking lot expansion area as developed to serve the overall
community of Bozeman.
. Provide bear-proof trash receptacle and pet servicing station at existing parking lot.
· Relocate memorial bench to location east of Nash Spring Creek; location to be along new trail
alignment. Orient bench in same direction as original location.
· Allow social trail to develop on east and west sides of creek.
· Allow fishing from both sides of creek
. Discourage encroachment of improvements or maintenance of park lands on the west side of the
creek by the adjacent residences to ensure public land remains public.
. Prohibit motorized vehicles of any kind with the exception of motorized wheel chairs or park
maintenance equipment from using any trail within the park.
- 20-
Gardner, Tuckerman, McLeod Parks Master Plan
Tuckerman Park~Proiect Develoument and Cost Estimates
Capital Improvements/Additions
Generally listed in order of priority and logical phasing
Phase
1
2
3
4
Activi
Move memorial bench. Mow trail & spurs. Define west and north
property line of park with signage. Install bear proof trash receptacle and
pet servicing station at existing parking lot. Install dog on leash signage.
Add evergreen trees to existing evergreens at Sourdough Creek trail
intersection.
Develop well for irrigation. Complete planting west of the creek.
Build Class I trail & spurs after trail usage pattern evaluated; develop
spur "nodes" with seating, picnic tables, and planting. Realign
existin trails north & south ends of ark.
Install Plants along east side of Nash S ring Creek.
Enlarge Parking Lot, Install Comfort Station/Toilet. Plant
evergreens and deciduous trees for screening. Add park identity
signage.
Maintenance
The following park maintenance items identified and suggested services providers are listed below.
Level of maintenance is based upon park classification types outlined by the Department of
Recreation and Parks.
Maintenance Item Service Provider Paid for by
Weed control per Level IV Park City of Bozeman City of Bozeman
Maintenance Classification
Trees: pruning, fertilizer per Level IV City of Bozeman City of Bozeman
Park Maintenance Classification
Trail maintenance Year 1: mowing GVL T/Rotary Club City of Bozeman
Trail tread surface maintenance per GVLT/Rotary Club City of Bozeman
Class I standard
Refuse removal per Level IV Park City of Bozeman City of Bozeman
Maintenance Classification
Watering/well equipment maintenance City of Bozeman City of Bozeman
Electrical service to well City of Bozeman City of Bozeman
Park furniture, signage, bridges, City of Bozeman City of Bozeman
equipment maintenance per Level IV
Park Maintenance Classification
Parking lot maintenance City of Bozeman City of Bozeman
Comfort station/toilet maintenance- City of Bozeman City of Bozeman
Class 2 maintenance
Maintenance/re-supply pet servicing City of Bozeman City of Bozeman
devices
- 21 -
Gardner, Tuckerman, McLeod Parks Master Plan
Reference Cost Estimate (2004)
TUCKERMAN PARK COST ESTIMATE
QTY UNIT ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT $ TOTAL $
PHASE I
1 EA Relocate Memorial Bench $ 300.00 $ 300.00
12 EA Define Park Edge Simple Markers, 100' o.C. $ 150.00 $ 1,800.00
1 EA Trash Receptacle-bear proof $ 600.00 $ 600.00
1 EA Dog Bag Dispenser $ 500.00 $ 500.00
5 EA Conifer Trees at Sourdough Trail $ 275.00 $ 1,375.00
Subtotal $ 4,575.00
Contingency 20% $ 915.00
Sub Total Phase I $ 5,490.00
Design10% $ 549.00
Total Phase I $ 6,039.00
PHASE II & III
1 LS Irrigation Well Budget $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00
125 EA Shade Trees at Nash Creek $ 250.00 $ 31,250.00
200 EA Shrubs at Nash Creek $ 40.00 $ 8,000.00
130 EA Drip Irrigate Trees $ 100.00 $ 13,000.00
200 EA Drip Irrigate Shrubs $ 60.00 $ 12,000.00
1500 LF Trail City Std, 6' wide $ 7.50 $ 11,250.00
350 LF Trail Spurs City Std, 6' wide $ 7.50 $ 2,625.00
1 LS Realign trail @ north end of park $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00
1 EA Benches $ 800.00 $ 800.00
2 EA Picnic Tables $ 1,000.00 $ 2,000.00
Subtotal $ 92,125.00
Contingency 20% $ 18,425.00
Su total Phases II & III $ 110,550.00
Design10% $ 1 ,055.00
Total Phases II & III $ 121,605.00
PHASE IV
Trailhead
1 EA Park Sign Budget $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00
2 EA Park Warning Signage $ 1,200.00 $ 2,400.00
200 CY Strip Stockpile & Replace Topsoil $ 6.00 $ 1,200.00
200 CY Grading $ 4.00 $ 800.00
11140 SF Pave Parking Lot City Standard $ 1.25 $ 13,925.00
4 EA HC Signs $ 200.00 $ 800.00
22 EA Tire Stops $ 150.00 $ 3,300.00
1 LS Storm Drainage Budget $ 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00
1 LS Comfort Station Budget, Bozeman Style $ 150,000.00 $ 150,000.00
0 Utility Services Assume available $ $
Landscape Trail Head
7 EA Conifer Trees $ 275.00 $ 1,925.00
13 EA Deciduous $ 250.00 $ 3,250.00
20 EA Drip Irrigate Trees $ 100.00 $ 2,000.00
3000 SF Seed Reclamation $ 0.50 $ 1,500.00
1 LS Irrigation Well $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00
- 22-
--.--
Gardner, Tuckerman, McLeod Parks Master Plan
- 23 -
Subtotal $ 197,600.00
Contingency 20% $ 39,520.00
Sub Total $ 237,120.00
Design10% $ 23,712.00
Total Phase IV $ 260,832.00
Total All Phases $ 388,476.00
Gardner, Tuckerman, McLeod Parks Master Plan
McLeod Park-Historv
McLeod Park was once part of the agricultural/grazing land characteristic of the more rural land
found south of Bozeman today. Since the 1800's, this land has passed through the hands of
numerous families. Vera McLeod however, is the one who started the change. In 1966, Mrs.
McLeod sold the land where current day Sourdough Creek and Sundance Springs Subdivisions exist
to Carter Williams of Great Falls. Williams' company, Sourdough Creek Properties, created the
Sourdough Creek subdivision. During the platting process, 7.74 acres was dedicated in December
1968 to park land for public use. Gallatin County currently owns the park land.
McLeod Park-Existing Conditions and Needs Analvsis
McLeod Park is bordered to the north and west by Sour Dough Creek Subdivision. Sundance
Springs Subdivision private open space creates the south and east borders of the park. Its legal
description is as follows:
Located in Subdivision No.1 of Sour Dough Creek Properties, in portions ofthe SW Vt
Section 19 and the NW Vt Section 30. T.2S. R. 6E., and in SE Vt Section 24, and NE Vt of
Section 25, T.2S., R.5E., M.P.M.Between Southeast corner of Sour Dough Creek
Subdivision & Northwest edge of Sundance Springs Subdivision.
Views are expansive to the mountains in every direction; the impression of the park itself is one of a
hayfield where little development has occurred. The terrain is generally flat, with no steep grades.
The southwest portion of the park is fairly wet at this time, although much ofthe park remains wet
during normal precipitation years.
A perimeter trail built by the noon Rotary Club and GVL T runs along the east and south edges of
the park. Trail construction could not begin until many feet of barbed wire fencing was removed
from the perimeter of McLeod Park. This was achieved through the work of volunteers committed
to trails, parks and open space. The resulting sections of trail now provide a connection between the
north and west legs ofthe Sundance Springs Trail system and more importantly, a connection
between neighborhoods and Sacajawea Middle School. The trail alignment is somewhat awkward
due to abrupt turns at the corners of the property lines between the park and Sundance Spring Trail.
Wooden totems have been installed by GVL T at the trailheads, although signs identifying the park
do not clearly exist. Signs indicating dogs must be on a leash and no motorized vehicles are located
at the perimeter of the park. There are no interior trails other than the game or periodic social trail.
The public uses the park's perimeter trail for walking, running, biking, cross-country skiing,
viewing wildlife, and dog-walking.
Gary V odenhal of GVL T is involved in a community service project with students from Sacajawea
Middle School. The students have built and installed bird boxes, planted willow starts along
Mathew Bird Creek which runs east of the park. The use of this park as an outdoor science
laboratory provides tremendous benefit to the park and to the education ofthe students;
continuation of and fostering of such partnerships is highly encouraged.
- 24-
Gardner, Tuckerman, McLeod Parks Master Plan
The park does provide habitat for birds and small mammals, although the vegetation is fairly
homogeneous. Vegetation within the park is largely comprised of pasture grasses. The wetter
portions of the park could offer an opportunity to diversify the habitat by introducing native, water-
loving grasses, sedges and rushes. Allowing access into the wetter areas by way of a sensitively
placed trail leading to a wooden viewing deck would provide a different type of experience for
users, and expanded educational opportunities. There are no trees within the interior or along the
perimeter; as a result, no opportunity to rest in the shade exists.
A gravel parking area does exist at the northwest end of the park within the platted Right-of-Way at
the end of Sundance Road. Access to the parking area is through Sour Dough Creek Subdivision.
The lot is obscure and difficult to find unless familiar with the neighborhood. The county laid pit
run in this area to prevent trash trucks from getting stuck as they turned around at this point. There
are future plans to add gravel. Qwest (formerly U.S. West) has a 10 foot telecommunications
easement along the perimeter of the park.
In order to provide for the pressures of increased usage that are anticipated from adjacent residential
development, the following needs have been identified:
Identity
. Signage consistent with the signage used in other Bozeman parks should be installed to establish
its identity.
· Standard trail linkage markers.
· Interpretive signs to compliment the ongoing environmental education program.
· Conduct survey to identify property pins.
· Signage to aid enforcement of the City's leash laws for dogs.
. Appropriate park furniture, bear proof refuse containers and pet servicing devices placed in
appropriate locations.
. Signage prohibiting motorized vehicles from using park trails.
Parking
. Improved maintenance and completion of the parking area surface with additional pit run if
needed and gravel.
Planting
· Develop water source for irrigation of new tree and shrub plantings.
· Plant shade trees in limited, designated areas.
· Enhance wetland planting.
Spatial Use
· Create interior trail.
. Provide opportunities for interaction with wetland habitat.
· Provide areas for seating.
· Prohibit motorized vehicles of any kind with the exception of handicapped carts or park
maintenance equipment from using any trail within the park.
- 25 -
Gardner, Tuckerman, McLeod Parks Master Plan
McLeod Park-Community Input/October 1. 2003/Public Meeting #1
The first public meeting was held October 1, 2003 to gather public opinion and preferences for
development within Tuckerman Park. Twenty-seven members of the community attended; 3 of
which identified themselves as residents of Sour Dough Creek Subdivision. Resources, issues, and
opportunities to be considered in the master planning process of the park were discussed and
outlined. Meeting participants were asked to indicate their preference for each opportunity listed on
the chart. A survey was also distributed to each individual to determine how they ranked certain
values identified by the design team consultants. Additional comments were received for a two-
week period following the meeting. These comments addressed issues such as public access,
natural resource protection, habitat enhancement, passive recreation, safety, parking and
miscellaneous. Detailed information about the public meeting can be found in the meeting report
submitted to the Recreation and Parks Advisory Board on November 3,2003.
A brief summary ofthe meeting is as follows:
Results of the Master Planning opportunities group exercise:
Good Idea
--Environmental education
-- Wetland creation
-- Improve habitat
-- Weed control
--Plant trees/shrubs
--Continue community service projects w/students
--Stream restoration
--Create more direct school route in loop w/Sundance Trail
Bad Idea
--Active Recreation
--Boardwalks
Fair Idea
--Revegetation with natives
-- Trails
Results of the Values Survey are as follows in order of importance as relates to McLeod Park:
1. Natural Resource Protection
2. Habitat Enhancement
3. Preserving Views
4. Trail Connectivity
5.Tie Passive Recreation--eg. Walking, jogging, bicycling, etc.
5.Tie Public Access
6. Respect Privacy
7. Active Recreation-eg. Softball, tot lot, soccer, etc.
McLeod Park-Recreation and Parks Advisory Board Recommendations
The October 1, 2003 public meeting report was presented to the Recreation and Parks Advisory
Board on November 3,2003. Due to the complexity ofthe information and public opinion, a list of
hot point issues was generated by the design team and given to members of the board for
consideration. The Board voted to form a subcommittee to conduct an in-depth study ofthe report
and hot point issues, meet with the design consultants and provide them with recommendations
endorsed by the Board for development of the park's master plan. Following are the issues and
board's recommendations (Board recommendations are seen in italics beneath issue).
- 26-
Gardner, Tuckerman, McLeod Parks Master Plan
McLeod Park Issues:
1. Should land be classified for conservation vs. recreation?
1. Park land should be classifiedfor recreation.
2. What level of development should occur in McLeod Park? Trails/boardwalks within
park, passive recreation areas, i.e. picnic area, shade, seating?
2. Trails/boardwalks within park, passive recreation areas, i.e. picnic area, shade,
seating; tot lot, practice fields should be developed in dryer zones.
3. Should McLeod Park be considered a "neighborhood" park vs. "community" park?
3. McLeod Park should be designated a "neighborhood" park.
4. Should wetland creation be considered within park?
4. Habitat should be enhanced within the park.
5. Is there a need for active play space?
5. There is a need for active play space; no recreation areas are designated within this
residential area.
6. Should trail connections be improved to provide more direct route to school?
6. Trail connections made through the park to provide more direct route to school was
not determined.
7. Should parking area be developed more? Signage to direct users to parking?
7. Parking area should be further developed to increase parking capacity, install trash
cans. Signage to direct users to parking was not determined~although discussion about
McLeod Park being a "neighborhood" park seemed to infer that most users will come
from the area or will already know about the parking area without it being
"advertised".
8. How should dogs be controlled within the park?
8. Dogs should be controlled within the park through owner responsibility; doggie
"poop" bags could be located at parking areas.
McLeod Park-Community Input/May 19. 2004/Public Meetin!! #2
The second public meeting, May 19,2004, was held to update the community on the process to
date, the factors considered in creating the Master Plan and to present the draft Master Plan. Those
who attended had an opportunity to respond to the recommended improvements. Twenty members
of the community attended; none of which identified themselves as residents of Sour Dough Creek
Subdivision. The following is a summary of public comment.
1. Trails look parallel; don't duplicate trails. Consider creating inner loop that passes next
to designated wetland area. Simplify trail system within park.
2. Mow area for practice soccer field.
3. The county is planning to add natural fines into existing parking area.
4. There is an existing bench along the north-south leg of the existing trail.
- 27-
Gardner, Tuckerman, McLeod Parks Master Plan
McLcod Park-Recreation and Parks Advisory Board Recommendations
The May 19,2004 public meeting report and modifications to the draft Master Plan as directed from
City Staff were presented to the board on June 10,2004. City Staff recommended minor changes to
trail aligmncnt and maintaining the improvements to McLeod Park contained in the May 19,2004
draft Master Plan. It was decided the final Master Plan document would be brought to the Board
prior to City Commission review.
McLeod Park-Master Plan Recommendations
The following Master Plan recommendations are made with evaluation of neighborhood comment,
the role of the park as a community wide amenity and final direction from City Staff where issues
were in conflict. Exhibit B illustrates in plan view, the end result of the Master Plan
recommendations. There was a good deal of interest from the Recreation and Parks Advisory
Board that the City of Bozeman to enter discussions with the county to form an agreement allowing
the city to take over maintenance and/or ownership of the park. The second main recommendation
is to designate McLeod Park as a Neighborhood Park. Although the Recreation and Parks Advisory
Board recommended development of active recreation areas within drier areas of the park, the City
Staff indicated passive recreation as their preference. Passive recreation use is consistent with
public input received at the initial public meeting. Therefore, activities and improvements proposed
are confined to passive types of recreation such as walking/running, bicycling, picnicking, and
fishing. Motorized vehicles of any kind with the exception of handicapped carts or park
maintenance equipment will be prohibited from using any trail within the park.
If the City Commission is interested in taking over McLeod Park from the County and the County is
willing to approve the change. The City Commission will direct staff to negotiate an agreement
with the County to take over responsibility of the park.
Specific improvements are outlined below according to the categories described under the existing
conditions and needs analysis.
Identity
· Signage identifying McLeod Park placed within the park. Current signage does not clarify the
park's location.
. Signage consistent with the signage used in other Bozeman parks should be installed at the
corner of Wagon Wheel and Sundance Drive.
· Standard trail linkage markers.
· Interpretive signs describing the wetlandlbird habitat to reinforce educational opportunities.
· Conduct survey to identify and clarify location of property pins.
· Signage to aid enforcement of the City's leash laws for dogs.
. Appropriate park furniture, bear proof refuse containers and pet servicing devices placed in
appropriate locations.
· Signage prohibiting motorized vehicles from using park trails.
Parking
· Improve maintenance and completion of the parking area surface with pit run as needed and
gravel. The current condition of the parking area does not provide a stable surface
- 28-
Gardner, Tuckerman, McLeod Parks Master Plan
Planting
. Develop water source for irrigation of new plantings.
. Plant shade trees adjacent to bench located along interior trail.
. Enhance wetland planting in wet zones to improve habitat and provide educational opportunity.
· Weed control
Spatial Use
· Ease trail aligmnent at southeast comer of park.
. Create interior trail linkage from existing perimeter trail into park. Align interior trail along edge
of potential wetland area. Avoid spur trails.
. Provide wood platform along edge of wetland to provide overlook and year round enjoyment and
interaction with wetland habitat.
. Provide bench and bear proof trash receptacle and a pet servicing device along interior trail.
. The existing bridge should be reconstructed to City of Bozeman standards.
. Prohibit motorized vehicles of any kind with the exception of handicapped wheelchairs or park
maintenance equipment from using any trail within the park.
McLeod Park-Proiect Development and Cost Estimates
Capital Improvements/Additions
Generally listed in order of priority and logical phasing
2
Activi
Conduct survey to locate property pins. Evaluate extent and condition of
"wetlands". Mow interior trail. Complete development of existing parking
area. Install park sign at comer of Wagon Wheel & Sundance Drive. lnstall
do leash and no motorized vehicles si na e.
Build trail after trail usage pattern evaluated. Develop seating "node"
with bench, trash receptacle, et servicing device and trees.
Enhance wetland planting. Construct wood platforms to provide
o ortunit for wetland observation/education.
Phase
1
3
Maintenance
The following park maintenance items identified and suggested services providers are listed below.
Level of maintenance is based upon park classification types outlined by the Department of
Recreation and Parks. All City of Bozeman involvement is contingent on the City taking over
responsibility of maintenance of the park from the County.
Maintenance Item Service Provider Paidfor bv
Weed control per Level IV Park City of Bozeman Gallatin County
Maintenance Classification
Trees: pruning, fertilizer control per City of Bozeman Gallatin County
Level IV Park Maintenance
Classification
Interior trail maintenance Year 1; GVL T/Noon Rotary Gallatin County
- 29-
Gardner, Tuckerman, McLeod Parks Master Plan
mowmg
Existing perimeter trail tread surface GVL TINoon Rotary Gallatin County
maintenance per Class III standard
Refuse removal per Level IV Park City of Bozeman Gallatin County
Maintenance Classification
Park furniture, signage City of Bozeman Gallatin County
Parking area maintenance Gallatin County Gallatin County
Maintenance /resupply pet servicing City of Bozeman Gallatin County
device
Reference Cost Estimate (2004)
MCLEOD PARK
QTY UNIT ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT $ TOTAL $
PHASE I
1 EA Site Survey Budget $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00
83 CF Parking Area Pit Run $ 7.50 $ 623.00
1 EA Park Sign $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00
Sub Total $ 5,123.00
Contingency 20% $ 1,025.00
Sub Total Phase I $ 6,148.00
Design10% $ 615.00
Total Phase I $ 6,763.00
PHASE II
1050 LF Trail City Std, 6' wide $ 7.50 $ 7,875.00
1 EA Bench $ 800.00 $ 800.00
1 EA Dog Bag Dispenser $ 500.00 $ 500.00
1 EA Trash Receptacle-bear proof $ 600.00 $ 600.00
9 EA Shade Trees $ 250.00 $ 2,250.00
Sub Total $ 12,025.00
Contingency 20% $ 2,405.00
Sub Total Phase II $ 14,430.00
Design10% $ 1,443.00
Total Phase II $ 15,873.00
PHASE III
432 SF Wood Platform 12'x36 $ 30.00 $ 12,960.00
6 EA Interpretive Signs Budget $ 8,000.00 $ 48,000.00
56000 SF Wetland& Habitat Enhancements Budget $ 2.00 $ 112,000.00
Sub Total $ 172,960.00
Contingency 20% $ 34,592.00
Sub Total Phase III $ 207,552.00
Design10% $ 20,755.00
Total Phase III $ 228,307.00
Total All Phases $ 250,943.00
~ 30 -
Gardner, Tuckerman, McLeod Parks Master Plan
Conclusion
The greatest value of these three parks is their contribution to the overall community shaping of the
City's open space and trail system. In developing a long range master plan the leadership must
consider the land's history, present day needs and values and future needs. Past agreements and
overall community values reflected in adopted plans and policies must be respected. The
preferences and interests of individual neighborhoods and adjacent property owners must be
considered but not to the exclusion of overall community values. As plans for these three parks
were developing, the objectives of adjacent property owners were at times in conflict with overall
community goals and values. City Staff and the City Recreation and Park Advisory Board supported
the consultant team's efforts to develop solutions that would have support of the overall community.
The master plan recommendations contained in this document reflect thoughtful response to a very
challenging and complex problem. The master plan describes improvements that are appropriate for
long~range management and development of the parklands. The plans preclude development of
active recreation facilities and uses in all three parks. The improvements proposed balance
community access and enjoyment with management and enhancement of natural and biological
resources.
~ 31 -
Gardner, Tuckerman, McLeod Parks Master Plan
APPENDIX A
- 32-
MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION MEETING
OF THE CITY COMMISSION
BOZEMAN, MONTANA
March 28, 2005
*****************************
The Commission of the City of Bozeman met in work session in the Commission Room, Municipal
Building, on Monday, March 28, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. Present were Mayor Andrew Cetraro, Commissioner
Jeff Krauss, Commissioner Marcia Youngman, Commissioner Steve Kirchhoff, Commissioner Lee Hietala,
City Manager Chris Kukulski, Assistant City Manager Ron Brey, Director of Public_Service pebbieArkell,
Director of Finance Anna Rosenberry, Planning Director Andy Epple, City Attorney Paul Luwe and Clerk of
the Commission Robin Sullivan.
The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance and a moment of silence.
Public comment
Ms. Carol Armstrong expressed interest in the Story Mansion. She noted that her husband's family
home in California has been turned over to a museum, and she provided contact information on that facility.
She voiced her interest in seeing the Story Mansion be an asset to the community and open to the public
for various events.
Mr. Russ Tuckerman, 43 Gardner Park Drive, stated he is thrilled that one of the items on this work
session is review of the Three Parks Master Plan. He noted that he has invested time and money in this
process over the past six years and has information readily available for this discussion.
Ms. Robin Wolcott gave a presentation on behalf of the 400 members of the Sacajawea Audobon
Society. She voiced concern about the proposed Three Parks Master Plan, stating that the Sourdough Trail
goes through a riparian area that serves as a magnet for migratory birds and a nesting place in the summer.
She has personally seen 148 species along the trail, which is more than one-third of all bird species
recorded in Montana. She noted that in 2001, plans were approved for the park west of Sourdough Trail,
with the purpose of that park being to provide a wildlife corridor and protect the creeks; approval of this
master plan would be contrary to that purpose. She feels the proposed parking lot, picnic tables, trails and
comfort sation would be detrimental to the existing habitat and result in the loss of prime wildlife habitat.
She noted that during the community input meetings, natural resource protection and habitat enhancement
were identified as the two top priorities. Unfortunately, the proposed new trails, especially those that form
loops, make the area more accessible for disturbances that destroy the habitat. She also finds the picnic
tables, comfort station and parking lots out of place in a wildlife corridor. She concluded by encouraging
the Commission to not approve a master plan that does not protect the natural resources and provide for
habitat enhancement, noting that the existing trail and bridge are examples of enhancement without
development.
Mr. Richard Wolcott noted he lives along Sourdough Trail. He contributed toward the purchase of
Tuckerman Park under the representation that it would serve as a buffer and natural corridor to protect the
creek and Sourdough Trail. The proposed master plan is contrary to how those funds were solicited and
stated that, if this plan is approved as submitted, he feels he is entitled to a refund of his monies.
Mr. Ron Kaiser, member of the Sundance Springs Homeowners' Association board, stated he has
been involved in the master planning process for the past two or three years since two of the three parks
are adjacent to their subdivision. He noted the plan reflects a collaborative effort, particularly since a
number of viewpoints were brought to the table. He stressed that, while no one views this document as
perfect, it is a good compromise and, collectively, the Association is happy with the outcome. He noted an
easement for public access to the west side of the creek has been included, and voiced a commitment to
work with the Audobon Society in creating plantings to support the bird habitat and replace the habitat to
the north that has been lost through development. He encouraged the Commission to adopt the master
plan as soon as possible so that trees can be planted and improvements made this summer.
03-28-05 work
- 2 -
Mr. Cory Lawrence, 4510 Morning Sun Drive, stated he lives adjacent to Tuckerman Park. He noted
that he became involved because of his concern for the safety of his children, particularly since the leash
law is not obeyed. He feels that the master plan provides'protection for the wildlife habitat and trail corridor
and encouraged approval.
Ms. Sue Livers, Morning Sun Drive, stated she lived in Gardner Park for thirty years and now lives
in Sundance Springs. Her experiences have revealed that living on the east side of Sourdough Trail is
substantially different from living on the west side. She noted that on the Gardner Park side, the trail was
a wonderful place for four legged wildlife and an incredible place to walk. On the Sundance Springs side,
she has enjoyed sitting on her patio and listening to the many different kinds of birds and watching the
various kinds of aviary wildlife that dwell in that area. She concluded by encouraging the Commission to
approve a master plan that keeps Tuckerman Park pristine and protected for the "gentle wildlife."
Ms. Ann Bryan stated she has been involved with the master plan process from the Gardner Park
side. She expressed her appreciation for the amount of effort and time that have been put into the planning
process over a long period of time. She voiced her interest in having the easement and deed restriction of
the parking lot in Gardner Park Subdivision reviewed by the City Attorney so that adoption of the master plan
can move forward. She indicated her support for a master plan that allows the wildlife to remain and yet
allow the citizens and residents of the community to enjoy the area.
Mr. Ralph Walton stated he lives on Morning Sun Drive, having moved to Bozeman a little over a
year ago. He has watched with interest the process of developing this master plan and the amount of work
that has gone into it, and asked that the Commission adopt the plan.
Review of grant application for Justice Assistance Grant Program (JAG) ~ to fund costs of acauirina
a transport vehicle for tactical team personnel and eauipment
Included in the Commissioners' packets was a memo forwarding information on the grant
application.
Director of Public Safety Mark Tymrak noted that once a year the Montana Board of Crime Control
receives federal grant monies for distribution throughout the state. The grant application for this year's
allocation is a joint application with Gallatin County for a replacement vehicle for the tactical team personnel
and equipment. The vehicle will replace a mid 1980s ambulance that has been converted to a transport
vehicle, painted black and used for the past twelve years. It is now worn out and is no longer reliable. He
cautioned that the grant is in the amount of $20,497; and any costs over that amount are to be split between
the City and the County.
No publiC comment was received on this grant application.
Mayor Cetraro thanked Director of Public Safety Tymrak for presentation of the grant application.
Review of Three Parks Master Plan
Included in the Commissioners' packets were a memo from Superintendent of Facilities and Lands
James Goehrung forwarding information on the Three Parks Master Plan, a copy of the master plan for
Gardner Park, Tuckerman Park and McLeod Park, and a letter from the Board of Directors for the Sundance
Springs Residential Homeowners Association.
Superintendent Goehrung referenced the maps of the three parks posted for Commission viewing,
noting that there are several issues on which staff is seeking Commission input prior to preparing the final
master plans for public hearing and adoption. He stressed that, once adopted, this Three Parks Master Plan
will serve as guidance in the decision-making process for development and maintenance of Gardner Park,
Tuckerman Park and McLeod Park, adjacent parks located in the southeast quadrant of the city.
The Superintendent highlighted McLeod Park, noting that this is a county park and, as a result,
Gallatin County contributed $1,000 to this master planning process. Key issues include keeping this a
natural area because of the wetlands, and lack of parking and other amenities in the area. Under this plan,
some trail connections are to be provided through this natural area, and the City will be responsible for its
03-28-05 work
- 3 -
maintenance. He asked if the Commission wants City staff to enter into discussions with the County about
compensation for this maintenance.
Superintendent Goehrung next addressed Gardner Park, noting that parking facilities were originally
proposed on Lots 1 and 2 to provide access to the trail head that ties this park to the bridge and the
Sourdough Trail. The resident of Gardner Park are opposed to converting those two lots to a parking lot
and, since cars currently park along the narrow road, staff is proposing a parking lot with six spaces at
another site within the subdivision. The residents have indicated a willingness to provide an easement in
the new location and to fund development of the parking lot. The draft of the easement, prepared by a
private attorney, includes restrictions on future activities for Lots 1 and 2, Block 1.
The Superintendent turned his attention to Tuckerman Park, which is located in Sundance Springs
Subdivision. He stressed that many compromises have been made in the plan now being considered by
the Commission. He noted that two acres of the ten-acre park are located along the west side of Nash
Spring Creek, and that parcel is currently landlocked. In 2002, a bridge was proposed across th creek, to
provide access to that two-acre parcel; however, those plans were abandoned until after a master plan has
been adopted. Key issues for this park include the wildlife corridor, bird habitat, possible access to the two-
acre parcel through an easement through the Sundance Springs private open space and
landscaping/screening to delineate the park boundary. The Superintendent noted that the residents have
asked that if the easement is created, it be with the stipulations that there be no bridge, no signage and no
delineation of the easement, that the existing memorial bench be removed and that native grasses and
plantings for wildlife and bird habitat be planted. Other issues include trail locations and amenities such as
a parking lot and comfort station.
Commissioner Youngman stated she feels the plans for McLeod Park and Gardner park make sense
and provide for the public interest. On the other hand, she does not support the plan for Tuckerman Park,
based on her eleven years of history with that park and subdivision. She gave a history of the Sundance
Springs Subdivision process, which began in 1994. She noted that when this subdivision was first
proposed, residents in the area opposed it; and, through its approval, the Commission ensured a strong
corridor of open space buffering Sourdough Trail and Gardner Park was provided and that any impacts on
wildlife habitat were mitigated. She also noted that the open space in the development was consolidated
and, at that time, it was anticipated the public access would be provided through that space. She stated
that, through a community effort, the City acquired the ten acres in the southeast park that is now
Tuckerman Park, apd school children and Commissioners helped plant 200 trees and bushes to start
restoring the native vegetation. Unfortunate.ly, few of those trees and bushes survived because they were
not watered regularly; and she wishes to ensure that any future plantings are watered for several years until
they become well established. She appreciates the compromise that has been made by the residents in
the area and the efforts of the Recreation and Parks Advisory Board; however, she does not feel that either
the public or the eco system benefits are adequate. She recognized that, while that portion of the park west
of the creek was to remain as natural open space, a trail has been created through use. She recognized
the importance of protecting the bird habitat and suggested that signage be installed to educate those who
wish to continue using the trail and that attention be drawn to the leash law. She is concerned that the plan
as drafted is stacked toward enhancing the privacy of the properties that abut it and away from public
benefit. She is also concerned about the proposed restroom, noting that such a structure would detract from
the natural viewshed corridor.
Commissioner Youngman voiced concern about the private property encroachments into the
parkland on the west side of the creek, noting that sod overlaps into the parkland on several properties,
further intruding into the buffer for wildlife. She noted that under the conditions for approval of Sundance
Springs Subdivision, the back portions of the lots were to be in drought resistant native vegetation; and that
is not occurring. She concluded by asking that this plan be revised in a manner that can be supported by
both the surrounding neighborhoods and the public and that enjoyed by the birds.
Responding to Commissioner Kirchhoff, Superintendent of Facilities and Lands James Goehrung
stated that the concerns of the Recreation and Parks Advisory Board include the issues he identified above,
with the language in the proposed easement being a key issue. He suggested that, until the Commission
indicates whether it is willing to consider an easement, he does not feel additional staff time should be spent
on reviewing that document. He then noted that there is already an easement along Goldenstein Lane, and
that will remain in place.
03-28-05 work
- 4 -
Commissioner Krauss noted that he has participated in maintenance of the Sourdough Trail and the
development of other trails in the area over the years. He recognized the natural tension between the public
who want access to the trails and parks and the residents of the area who want to keep the area as wildlife
habitat. He noted that the trail in the two-acre portion of the park was established in an effort to maintain
a presence in that public area. He stressed the importance of ensuring that any trail on the west side of the
creek be small and that the natural bird habitat be restored and protected.
Commissioner Krauss observed that what was formerly swamp to the north is now developed with
condominiums, making it more critical to restore the bird habitat in Tuckerman Park and to minimize trail
traffic in that area. He stressed that this parkland, however, is not a private wildlife preserve or an extension
of back yards. He finds that this master plan is not too intrusive; rather, it allows for the social trail that has
been created and provides a couple places to sit and enjoy the park. He also finds the parking area and
restrooms appropriate, particularly since this site is at the southern terminus of the Sourdough Trail and is
located in an urban setting.
Commissioner Krauss noted that the neighbors in Sundance Springs need to agree to maintain the
planting, and stated he is pleased that the Audobon Society is willing to recommend the types of plantings
needed to enhance the bird habitat. He concluded by noting that, while he might prefer to have more public
access to the western portion of Tuckerman Park, he feels the master plan is a good compromise and he's
willing to proceed.
Commissioner Kirchhoff stated he feels the master plans for McLeod Park, Gardner Park and
Tuckerman Park are fine as proposed. He noted, however, that ensuring survival of the new vegetation to
naturalize the two acres of Tuckerman Park west of the creek is essential. He concluded by acknowledging
that these plans are the result of significant public input and compromise, and indicated he is willing to move
them forward to the pUblic hearing process.
Commissioner Hietala stated he feels it is appropriate to have public facilities at the south end of
Sourdough Trail. He also supports the proposed parking area and picnic tables. He recognized the amount
of work that has gone into these master plans and voiced his support.
Commissioner Krauss encouraged the development of a specific plan for the parking area in
Gardner Park, and that the plan be included in the master plan for the park.
Superintendent of Facilities and Lands Goehrung stated he has been in contact with the engineering
firm that is working on the plans for the parking lot. He acknowledged that these plans are weighted toward
the neighborhood concerns, but stressed that the residents have made a strong commitment to involvement
in the long-term maintenance. He then indicated his biggest concern is the encroachments, particularly into
Tuckerman Park. He noted that in one instance, a property owner is mowing all of the way to the creek and
another has denuded the site of natural vegetation to the creek and proVided a landscaped yard well beyond
the property boundary.
Commissioner Krauss suggested these situations should be subject to code enforcement or one that
the property owners address within their association. He then noted that the sooner everyone reaches
agreement and natural plantings are done, the greater the potential that new residents will comply with the
covenants of the development and not encroach into the parkland.
As a result of this review, Superintendent Goehrung indicated he will get this master plan scheduled
for final hearing as soon as possible.
Informal review - Weissman Concept Planned Unit Development lZ-05016) and Pre-application for
Weissman Subdivision lP-05002) - subdivide approximatelv 3 acres at 1237 North Rouse Avenue into
five lots. and allow redevelopment of sites through rehabilitation of existing structures and
construction of new structures
Included in the Commissioners' packets was a memo forwarding information on the proposed
subdivision and planned unit development for the Weissman site located at 1237 North Rouse Avenue.
Distributed just prior to the meeting was an e-mail message from JP Pomnichowski forwarding an
excerpt from the comments she made during the Planning Board's review of this application.
03-28-05 work
"'".~
CITY OF BOZEMAN
RECREA rlON DEPARTMEr
1211 W. Main P.O. Box 1230 Bozem<=..
. Phone: (406) 587-4724
James Goehrung
Supt. FaciIitieslPublic Lands
Al Stiff Professional Bldg.
,j!i'\; ?n:~": ?::'/~[;
,-.'.~ ,....~'~
"""' ~_.......
( ,:~._.. J ;') ,
c.; _f
ZOD;!!
Minutes of the Recreation and Parks Advisory Board
October 14, 2004
Presen t;
Board: Terry Baldus, Anne Banks, Gene Brooks, D'avid Cook, Sandy Dodge,
Kate Gardner, Joanne Jennings, Mary Vant Hull
city: James Goehrung, Jeff Krauss
Other: Judy Blackmore; Rob Pertzborn and Qeb Smith, Three Parks
landscape architects; Three Parks neighbors: wally and Pat Johnson,
Shirley Galsford, Gloria Lindemeier, Scott Dehiendorf, Russ Tuckerman,
Brian Landsverk, Eric Livers, Cory Lawrence, Peg and David Engel, Ron
Kaiser, Richard and Robin Wolcott, Karin Caroline (former city planner)
The minutes were approved as corrected.
Open public comment: Judy Blackmore asked for more inforination and
opportunity for public input on the proposed Lindley Park pavilion.
(Memo sent with packet.)
Three Parks Master Plan: Rob Pertzborn and Deb Smith presented the
latest version of the plan. It was noted that the County has provided
$1000 for the McLeod Park part of the plan and will have the
opportunity to comment on it. James stated that this is a twenty-year
plan, not to be implemented in its entirety immediately'. The document
will be available on the city website. The Sundance'Springs easement
has been drafted and sent to city sta~f.
Jeff reported that a tentative agreement with the Gardner Park
homeowners includes no parking lot on lots 1 and 2; a six car lot with
two of the six spaces for handicapped to be built just south of the
Gardner Park trailhead; the city is pursuing the 'tax deed for lots 1
and 2 but will not develop them in any way; the neighbors will help
take care of weeds, litter and signage.
The Sundance homeowners are proposing a south end access to the west
side of Nash Spring creek in Tuckerman Park, but no bridge, no trail
and no signage. The Webb Bradley bench will be relocated to the east
side of the creek. The homeowner~ will ,instal~ and irrigate planting
along the west creek bank in the park.
McLeod Park: responsibilities for maintenance will be worked out, with
the county. James doesn't want to discuss this with the county until
after the board has made its recommendation and the city commission has
approved it.
The Sundance homeowners' letter and Russ Tuckerman's revised history
were presented. Russ elaborated on this, particularly on the financial
aspects, including use of park improvement funds.
Public comment on the Three Parks plan: Karin Caroline questioned the
need for an easement across the Sundance Sprtngs open space: as
commonly held open space it should be open to the public. The question
of whether the pond would be open arose, with liability an issue. Ron
Kaiser asked why the Sundance trail easements were dedicated to the
city. Karin suggested that this was for maintenance access. James'
stated that Debbie Arkell said that open space held in common by a
hbmeowners' association was like commercial open space a~d could be
closed to the public. A trail easement from the northeast end of
Tuckerman Park across about 50 feet of Sundanceopen space to the
"brushpile" blocking entrance to the Sourdough Trail was discussed
inconclusively. .
Terry moved, seconded by David, that the Three ,Parks plan be adopted,
with the inclusion of Russ's history and the deletion of snow removal
on the trails by the city, remarks about teenage behavior, and mention
of electric "carts" (motorized wheelchairs or other ADA language to be
substituted) .
James 'then requested a number of additions to the plan, including
reference to a twenty-year time period, levels of service for
maintenance, a McLeod Park maintenance agreement, and prioritization of
park improvements. Other recommendations included keeping the hayfield
in lots 1 and 2 of Gardner Park natural and an opinion by city legal
staff on public access to open space.
The motion to accept was defeated and the plan sent back to reflect
these recommendations.
Proposed revisions to Unified Development Ordinance: Sandy reviewed
these (sent out with packet). Moved by David, passed, that the
recommendations be approved, including the statement on the growth
policy.
PROST Plan update: Dave Skelton, who was unable to be present, sent a
written report which was passed out.
CTEP report: Anne discussed briefly the letter of support for a
ped/bike trail along College Ave., extending along Huffine Lane to
Ferguson. (Sent out with packet.)
GVLT report: Anne presented this in ,Gary Vodehnal's absence (attached).
There was no commissioner's report.
Subdivision R~view: Sandy passed out maps and reviewed briefly our
comments on a tentative plan for the Aspens at, Bridger Creek.
We again recommended against annexation and rezoning of property
immediately north of the East Gallatin Recreation Area, currently shown
in the 2020 Plan as park, open space and recreation land.
Southside Tennis Courts: Terry reported that the concrete surface has
been poured and the fence will go up soon, to be ready for hockey.
FOR Parks: Mary reported that the art show, which required a great deal
of volunteer time and effort, had netted only $1000, but lots of
publicity. She also ,noted that a sign showing the location of the
regional park can't be installed until the final plat for Baxter
Meadows has been filed.
Activities committee: Sandy noted that Sue had suggested adding the
recreation and parks philosophy'statements to the website. He hopes
that the city will be able to take over the website in the next year.
~,,/
~~':.--~~
~:."'-::-'
~'~:;!,,-~;1, ~~~-;=';
~ ~.~ '-'~ .. ~. .. _ 1. "f "lG1Jlf-
CITY OF BOZEMAN
RECREATION OEPARTME
1211 W. Main P.O. Box 1230 Bozem
Phone: (406) 587-4724
James Goehrung
Supt. Facilities/Public Lands
Al Stiff Professional Bldg.
Minutes of the Recreation and Parks Advisory Board
November 11, 2004
Present:
Board: Teny Baldus, Anne Banks, Gene Brooks, David Cook, Sandy
Dodge, John Harper, Joanne Jennings, Cindy Memin, Mary Vani Hull,
Bob Wade
City: Jesse Blaylock, Eric Seagrave, James Goehrung, Tracy Oulman
Other: Three Parks: Rob Pertzborn, Ron Kaiser; Judy Blackmore
Minutes: The minutes were approved as submitted.
Nominating committee: Bob and Terry will prepare a slate; there was
discussion over whether this should be done before new members are
appointed to the board or afterward. Members whose terms end at year's
end and who want to continue to serve should contact Robin Sullivan.
Three Parks: Sandy clarified various items raised as concerns at last
month's meeting:
· We can ask the city commission for clarification of legal issues (e.g.
public access to homeowners' association's open space) but cannot
make them conditions of approval.
· We can recommend that James negotiate with the county on
ownership/development and maintenance of McLeod Park but can't
direct him to do so.
· The twenty'year time frame for the park master plans is not an
expiration date
· We can only make recommendations on park issues: if other players
negotiate park settlements (e.g. location of the Gardner Park parking
lot, access to and development of the west side of Nash Spring Creek,
the status of McLeod Park)), we can only recommend to the
commission that they accept or reject these.
Anne expressed dismay at the removal of the board from most of the
process of determining park location, design and uses. An inconclusive
discussion of the board's role followed.
TO: James Goehrung
FR: Joby Sabol
DT: 11 November 2004
RE: Plans for the Gardner Park trailhead parking lot
To follow are the specifications for a parking lot at the trailhead located near the junction
of Gardner Park Drive and Sourdough Creek Drive as designed by TD & H following a
site inspection in September. The specs were outlined as if they were building this for
the city.
Construction:
· 18" CSP Culvert - 15 feet long
· 200 sq yd gravel parking lot (9" excavation, geotextile placement, 18" uncrushed
gravel sub-base, 4" crushed base course surface)
· Cleanup
All planning, execution and costs for materials would be provided by the Gardner Park
Nature Conservancy, a nonprofit corporation of neighbors on Gardner Park Drive and
vicinity. Attached please find a drawing of the proposed parking lot.
Our idea is to schedule the actual building of the parking lot on National Trails Day,
provided the city and county approve of our plan. We understand that the city of
Bozeman and/or the Park Advisory Board will install the appropriate signage for the
parking lot and trailhead as time and resources permit. We agree to provide weed
control, mowing and litter pick up as needed.
Please advise if there is the possibility of the master plan for Gardner Park being
separated from the three parks master plan as we are seeking city commission approval in
a timely manner so that we may organize the financial and material resources for this
project.
TO: James Goehrung, Jeff Krauss
FR: Joby Sabol
RE: Gardner Park Nature Conservancy proposal to the City of Bozeman
DT: November 11, 2004
In consideration of the placement of a perpetual deed restriction to protect open
space and wildlife habitat on Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 in Gardner Park Subdivision as set
forth below, the Gardner Park Nature Conservancy, a nonprofit corporation of Gardner
Park residents and neighbors, will design and construct an approved parking lot next to
the existing trailhead on Gardner Park Drive as shown on Exhibit A.
The perpetual deed restriction would provide the following:
THAT no structures or improvements would be made, placed, or located upon
Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Gardner Park Subdivision, except for social trails, this perpetual
deed restriction excludes without limitation, comfort stations, fences, storage sheds,
roads, parking areas, tables, and other permanent or temporary structures. This perpetual
deed restriction may be enforced by the Gardner Park Nature Conservancy local
homeowners or the homeowners association of Gardner Park Subdivision.
The GPNC, together with the Homeowners Association, agrees to help maintain
the park with responsibilities for weed control, mowing, picking up of litter, vandalism
and fire. As well, the group will take down the existing sign in favor of a more suitable
sign to be replaced at the city's discretion.
The design and construction described above would be made complete upon the
recording of a deed restriction as set forth above. Our hope is to construct the parking lot
on National Trails Day.
-<--
-,~ ,'': '~
. -' ,.' -. ;: '. ,'" ~ '\,
. \
.' "\-....'''''.....
S'.' 'UND.. '..... '.--- :--.A.--.' -ro...-;.""Ti",.-C. --~"
......s t. l<' I~~" S~
To: James Goerhung
Superintendent of Parks
City of Bozeman
From: Sundance Springs Residential Owners Association (SSROA)
Board of Directors
Re: SSROA Policy on Encroachment by Residents in Tuckern1an Park
Date: April 25, 2005
As we have discussed, the SSROA Board of Directors has a strict policy on non-
encroachment into Sundance Spring open space throughout our subdivision. We have
effectively utilized verbal and written warnings, fines, and when necessary property liens
to discourage Sundance Spring residents from covenant violations. Based upon that
experience, we would recommend the following joint policy between SSROA and the
City of Bozeman in response to any encroachment into Tuckern1an Park:
1. If the SSROA Board of Directors becomes aware of an encroachment, it will
contact the resident as soon as possible and provide a verbal warning to correct
the encroachment violation. If the City observes an encroachment (or receives a
complaint of such) it should contact one of the below representatives who will
initiate a verbal warning.
2. If the resident who is responsible for the encroachment cannot be reached, or does
not correct the violation within 10 days, the SSROA will formally contact the
responsible resident by registered mail stating that they have 30 days from the
mailing of the notice to correct the violation or be assessed a monthly fine. The
Board's current policy for covenant violations is a monthly fine of $50.00.
3. lfthe encroachment is still not removed after 90 days from the date of the written
warning, SSROA will pay for the cost of removing the encroachment by a private
contractor. The cost of any privately contracted removal services will be
recovered by the SSROA through a combination of fines, cost reimbursement by
the resident, and if necessary property liens.
If the City notes or receives complaints of any violations, they should contact Secretary
to the Board Carrie Lawrence (994-9239), or Board members Ron Kaiser (556-8256) and
Anders Lewendal (582-5802).
Pnd nHi,.,.,.,. ll:nv 17Q'\ Q(\'7("oft"Jon r-.An.nbn'.1 ':::Q7-"71 Llnh. OQ.d. Q...,1.R .;ol1nAQ1'\{"p.~nT'lT'P""~"h^(!,rFiYhf"\trn.~H ('(\tT'!
S..-ri. "'T'l'o... ..... . m.....,.. ........... '. It. .' .. .N... ..C........ ...'I::::!..... '.
L u......l;. .....:'~...G'1~' ," :...II:)
"'5 _l> i.. _, N - c; s ,. ,
April 6, 2005
Mr. James Goerhung
Superintendent of Parks
City of Bozeman
P.O. Box 1230
Bozeman, Montana 59771
Re: City Commissioner's Work Session Comments On McCloudlGardner/Tuckennan
Parks Master Plan
Dear Mr. Goerhung:
In an effort to offer constructive resolutions to the issues raised and move towards the
adoption of the above referenced master plan, inclusive of the easement approved by the
Sundance Springs Residential Owners Association, we would like to respond to how we
as a homeowners association can address some of the concerns expressed by the City
Commissioner's on their Monday, March 28th work session.
1. Commitment to Maintain Plantings in Tuckerman Park Until Established~We
have had discussions with the Sundance Springs residents along the park, and
they agree to work cooperatively with the City to maintain the plants by watering,
etc. in order that the root structure of the plants are well established. If problems
occur with the plantings due to drought or pests, they agree to work towards a
solution with the City.
2. Shared Responsibility to Ensure No Encroachment into Park~As a homeowners
board, we are very vigilant towards backyard encroachment into Sundance
Springs open space. Our covenants grant the board the authority to assess fines
against residents of the subdivision, and place a lien on their home until paid. We
have exercised this enforcement option in the past on covenant violations. We
suggest that we develop with the City a planned and shared response to park
encroachment, including the assessment of fines by the homeowners board. We
have generally found these fines and liens to be very effective at correcting the
problem. We do not want our residents to encroach in any way into any of the
surrounding parks or open space.
3. Duration ofEasement~Some concern was expressed that a 30 year easement was
not long enough. Since the specific language of the easement was approved by a
majority vote of the homeowners, any change would require a similar vote.
Because the outcome of such a vote cannot be guaranteed, we suggest that the
easement could include a 30 year renewal clause, expressing our intent to renew
but requiring a majority vote in 30 years.
Post Office Box 1795 Bozeman, Montana 5977\ 406.994.9238 sundancespringshoa@hotmail.com
4. Shared Effort in Weed Management~We would suggest a planned and
cooperative weed management policy with the City for the surrounding parks.
While we have developed a weed management policy for our own open space, we
are greatly influenced by the surrounding parks. Any burning or spraying policy
should be coordinated with the City on its approach and cost.
Additionally, we would like to clarify that while the proposed easement was referenced
as a "maintenance easement" during the presentation to the Commissioners, it was
approved by ballot to the residents of Sundance Springs as an easement providing "public
access". If that is not sufficiently clear in the draft of the easement provided to you, then
we suggest appropriate revisions to provide for the use by public access.
We would like to meet with you after you have had time to consider our suggestions to
begin discussions to design and implement some of the policies referenced in this letter.
Sincerely,
Sundance Springs Home Owners Association
Board of Directors
cc. Rob Pertzborn
Clerk of the Commission
Susan Swimley
Post Office Box 1795 Bozeman, Montana 59771 406.994.9238 sundancespringshoa@hotmail.com
Memorandum of Agreement
The undersigned property owners, being owners of Lots 1 through 10 in Phase 3 of the
Sundance Spring subdivision, agree to work cooperatively with the City of Bozeman (the
"City") to establish native tree and shrub plantings along the west side of Nash Spring
Creek in Tuckerman Park, for the purpose of establishing a bird habitat with the
assistance of the Audubon Society_Said Lots are immediately adjacent to Tuckerman
Parks, and are best positioned to plant, water and maintain trees and shrubs planted along
the west side of Nash Spring Creek.
Upon approval of the master plan and easement across Sundance Springs open space by
the City Commissioners, the undersigned owners agree to pledge to purchase trees and
shrubs in the below amounts, of a species determined by the City, to be planted behind
their Lots along the west side if Nash Spring Creek in Tuckerman Park. Said plantings
will be done in coordination with the City.
The undersigned owners furthermore agree to water the plantings from their Lots, and
maintain the plantings in coordination with the City, during a minimum of one year from
the date of planting to help ensure their survival. If problems develop with any of the
plantings, the Lot owners will coordinate with the City any particular remedy_
This Agreement is signed and dated /1/1cwt~ i '1" ,Rt'Z'S-
Lot If) ~~~-
LocL ~ /?
Loc.L ~ ~
, SlJO ~ j ~tW. -!...!
t t:fbo~ too6 ~
\\
Lot-+- ''',-~[ a..f! t;>'-- :~ ~'.(2"\..-c~
('/ -~- /) "')
Lot~ '"-7'-j"Cf?k~ ~~~
Lot0 E /~
"
I ) (m) I tSl>
is;o ~'tOOD
() SiJt)~ \\NJ
)
ICQ:).~
Lot
/C7rc)
~-:;~.-"
. . 1--./j' Oy)
/ c-- CA.'
11)cD- (Dee.
Total
'f 0 5<'7.:/-';) c; ozr-z.,
,
Acknowledged by the City of Bozeman:
Easement
Sundance Springs Residential Owners' Association, Inc. henceforth, "Grantor", being
the owner of real property located at the northeast comer of Morning Sun Drive and
Goldenstein Road, Bozeman, Montana as depicted on Exhibit A, attached hereto and
incorporated by reference herein, grants, subject to the terms and conditions set forth
herein, unto the City of Bozeman, a Montana Municipality, henceforth, "Grantee", a
public access easement, over Grantor's land as described herein.
Grantor grants to Grantee an easement approximately 65 feet in length for pedestrian
foot traffic, generally depicted on Exhibit A. Said easement shall commence on
Grantor's west boundary of Nash Spring Creek and thence shall proceed westerly to a
point 25 feet west of the bridge crossing Nash Spring Creek, and thence will extend to a
point 30 feet south of the southeast property pin of Lot 10, Phase 3, of the Sundance
Springs Subdivision. Said easement shall be approximately 25 feet in width.
In consideration for such easement, the Grantee agrees to the following terms and
conditions during the term of this agreement:
1. The Grantee will not build, or allow to be built, a bridge aCrOSS Nash Spring
Creek along the length of Tuckennan Park;
2. The Grantee shall not post signage, or allow signage to be posted, indicating such
easement or access, and will prohibit the construction or delineation of any type,
including but not limited to mowing or alteration of the natural grasses for a trail
installed along the west side of Nash Spring Creek the length of Tuckerman Park;
3. The Grantee agrees to remove the existing bench located on the west side of Nash
Spring Creek located in Tuckennan Park and reclaim such area with native
grasses, and shall not install or allow to be installed any future bench, picnic
bench, Or other improvement along the west side of Nash Spring Creek the length
of Tuckerman Park.
If any condition or term stated herein is violated, Grantor may terminate this
easement by mailing a Notice to Grantee notifying Grantee of the violation and
terminating the easement.
The easement granted herein shall terminate 30 years from October 1,2004. This
easement may be renewed for an additional period with the written mutual consent of the
Grantor and Grantee.
[signatures to follow]
EXHIBIT A
r
~
iP
CJ
~
fLJ
I
~
LOT 1 0, PHASE 3
~
NORTH
l"--..----
, -
NASH SPRING CREEK
SSROA OPEN SPACE
AREA OF EASEMENT --...
" .,--- _'______H A
:~;~----~:r~
I I 25' ~
/ ~',
BRIDGE J'- '- ~-=-
------------~-
TRAIL
GOLDENSTEIN ROAD
2"d
9528-955-90v
..Jas~e>l UO(:j
eS5:S0 VO 02 ~n8
SV~-'b~9E
January 10, 2005
Mr. James Goerhung
Superintendent of Facilities and Lands
City of Bozeman
P.O. Box 1230
Bozeman, Montana 59771
Subject: Master Plan Easement and Bench Relocation
Dear Mr. Goerhung:
It is our understanding that the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board is scheduled to
meet January 13th to review a draft of the Master Plan for Gardner, McCloud and
Tuckerman Parks and possibly forward the document to the City Commissioners for
adoption. As you know, part of the Master Plan contemplates an easement across
Sundance Springs open space, including the relocation of a bench currently along the
west side of Nash Spring Creek.
Ifthe Master Plan and easement is approved as drafted, the SSROA agrees to provide the
resources and personnel to remove the bench and relocate it, as well as reclaim the
existing location with native grasses. We hope this finalizes one of the remaining
clements associated with the Master Plan.
Sincerely,
Sundance Springs Residential Owners Association (SSROA)
Board of Directors
cc. Sandy Dodge
Rob Pertzborn
'PAct {)f"flr>,"" PA'V 1 iO" A('w.""TTl~~n f\Annbn":lo t;;.Q7/1 AnI; OQ,1 Q?~~ ~ITn{hm,..pcn:t"in(,H~hl"\':I(,;'l'h^hy\Q,il "......t"<,
GARDNER PARK
TUCKERMAN PARK
R.~.ed 4 Oct. 2004
PROPOSED MASTER PLAN
IMPROVEMENTS
.
8CALE: r . 200'-0" '
Revl.ed 4 Oct. 2004
.
PROPOSED MASTER PLAN
IMPROVEMENTS
8CALE: ,. . 200'.0'