Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
014 Appendix M - Water Design Report
SRX BLOCK 5 LOT 2 WATER IMPROVEMENTS WATER MAIN EXTENSION BASIS OF DESIGN REPORT August 2022 PREPARED BY: MMI #: 5659.019 2 Table of Contents 1.1.1 General Information .......................................................................................... 3 1.1.2 Extent of Water Works System, including: ......................................................... 3 1.1.3 Alternate Plans .................................................................................................. 3 1.1.4 Site Conditions .................................................................................................. 3 1.1.5 Water Use Data ................................................................................................ 4 1.1.6 Flow requirements ............................................................................................. 5 1.1.7 Sources of Water Supply ................................................................................... 5 1.1.8 Proposed Treatment Processes: ....................................................................... 5 1.1.9 Sewage System Available ................................................................................. 5 1.1.10 Waste Disposal ................................................................................................. 5 1.1.11 Automation……………………………………………………………………………..6 1.1.12 Project Sites……………………………………………………………………………6 1.1.13 Financing……………………………………………………………………………….6 1.1.14 Future Extensions ............................................................................................. 6 APPENDICES Appendix A South Range Crossing Subdivision Water System Improvements – Design Report, May 2023 Prepared by: Morrison-Maierle, Inc. 2880 Technology Blvd. W. Bozeman, Montana 59771 Phone: (406) 587-0721 Fax: (406) 922-6702 Written By: CMS Checked By: MEE Approved By: MEE PROJECT NO.: 5659.019 3 1.1 Engineer’s Report The following Design Report follows the section numbering of Circular DEQ-1 Standards for Water Works, 2018 Section 1.1, Engineer’s Report. 1.1.1 General Information a. SRX Residential Pods occupy Block 5 Lot 2 of South Range Crossing Subdivision Phase I is east of Canter Ave and south of Lot 1. This project is located within the City of Bozeman, Montana. Block 5 Lot 2 has 2 residential pods which each have 8 single family homes and 1 carriage unit. Each single family home will be serviced by a ¾” domestic water service and each carriage unit will be serviced by two ¾” domestic water services. b. The proposed water main infrastructure will be served by the City of Bozeman. c. Project Developer: SRX, LLC PO Box 11890 Bozeman, MT 59719 d. System Owner: City of Bozeman PO Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 59771 1.1.2 Extent of Water Works System, including: a. The proposed water service connections will connect existing 3/4” water service stubs that connect to an existing 8” water main that is owned by the City of Bozeman. The water service connection is proposed to serve the buildings with domestic water. This property is zoned REMU, (Residential Emphasis Mixed Use) per the City of Bozeman’s zoning map. b. There are no special provisions for extending the water works system. 1.1.3 Alternate Plans The alignment of the proposed services was chosen to meet the layout of the proposed residential pods. 1.1.4 Site Conditions a. The proposed site has existing grades of less than 4% slope. The site also has Blackmore silt loam and Meadowcreek loam (USDA Soil Survey). 4 b. The ground water flows generally from the south to the north based on general groundwater flow in the valley. The groundwater depth at this site is likely seasonally varied. 1.1.5 Water Use Data The water distribution system serving the proposed project will be designed and installed in accordance with the Montana Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) Circular No. 1; Montana Public Works Standard Specifications (MPWSS); the City of Bozeman Modifications to MPWSS; and the City of Bozeman Design Standards and Specifications Policy. The following section addresses the design capacity and flow requirements discussed in Section 8 of DEQ - 1. Domestic water demand for the proposed development will be based on Block 5 Lot 2 being a residential area. The assumptions for the site is as follows: Residential Demands: · 20 dwelling units (DU) · 2.17 people/DU (City of Bozeman Wastewater Collection Facilities Plan Update Final, June 2015) · Population = 44 (20 dwelling units x 2.17 people/DU) South Range Crossing Subdivision Water System Improvements Design Report, May 2023 The average per capita per day use for residential units was extrapolated from the City of Bozeman 2014 Water Conservation Plan to be 87 gallons per capita per day. 87 gallons per day (GPD) per person (Average Day Demand) Maximum Day Demand Peaking Factor = 2.3 Maximum Hour Demand Peaking Factor = 3.0 Based on these criteria the demands predicted for the project are: Average Day Demand Average Day Demand = 44 persons x 87 gpd = 3,828gpd or 2.66gpm Maximum Day Demand Maximum Day Demand = 2.3 x Average Day Demand = 3,828gpd x 2.3 = 8,804.4gpd or 6.11gpm Maximum Hour Demand Maximum Hour Demand = 3.0 x Average Day Demand = 3,828gpd x 3.0 = 11,484gpd or 7.98gpm 5 Predicted Average Daily Flow From SRX Subdivision The South Range Crossing Subdivision Water System Improvements Design Report, (Morrison Maierle, Inc., May 2023), lists the water demand projections for townhomes/build to rent units, see Table 1 below. Table 1: Water Demand Projections from South Range Crossing The original report provided in Appendix A, uses a flow rate of 189 gal/unit. Using these assumptions, the predicted flows for Block 5 Lot 2 is as follows: Predicted Average Daily Flow = 20 units x 189 gpd/unit = 3,780 gpd or 2.63gpm Predicted Maximum Day Flow = 3,780 gpd (2.3) = 8,694 gpd or 6.04gpm Predicted Maximum Day Flow = 3,780 gpd (3.0) = 11,340 gpd or 7.88gpm 1.1.6 Flow requirements The proposed flow for the building is almost identical to the demand predicted by the original SRX report. For this reason, the water system at SRX will have adequate capacity to handle the flows from the clubhouse building. 1.1.7 Sources of Water Supply Water is supplied from City of Bozeman. 1.1.8 Proposed Treatment Processes: Non-applicable. 1.1.9 Sewage System Available The area is served by the City of Bozeman wastewater treatment facility 1.1.10 Waste Disposal Non-applicable. 6 1.1.11 Automation Non-applicable. 1.1.12 Project Sites a. The project site has been zoned REMU by the City of Bozeman. b. The existing site is bound by Canter Avenue on the west and Lot 1 on the north. c. The wastewater at the site will be conveyed to the City of Bozeman wastewater treatment facility. 1.1.13 Financing Non-applicable. 1.1.14 Future Extensions No future extension will be needed. SOUTH RANGE CROSSING SUBDIVISION WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS DESIGN REPORT May 2023 PREPARED BY: MMI #: 5659.011 5/23/2023 N:\5659\011 -YTI Development\04 Design\Reports\Water\WaterDesignReport\5659.011_WaterDesignReport.docx Table of Contents 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY......................................................................................................................1 2 GENERAL INFORMATION (DEQ 1.1.1)..............................................................................................1 3 EXTENT OF WATER WORKS SYSTEM (DEQ 1.1.2): .......................................................................2 4 ALTERNATE PLANS (1.1.3) ...............................................................................................................2 5 SITE CONDITIONS (1.1.4)...................................................................................................................2 6 WATER USE DATA (1.1.5):.................................................................................................................3 7 FLOW REQUIREMENTS (1.1.6)..........................................................................................................5 8 SOURCES OF WATER SUPPLY (1.1.7).............................................................................................6 9 PROPOSED TREATMENT PROCESSES (1.1.8) ...............................................................................6 10 SEWAGE SYSTEM AVAILABLE (1.1.9).........................................................................................6 11 WASTE DISPOSAL (1.1.10)............................................................................................................6 12 AUTOMATION (1.1.11)....................................................................................................................6 13 PROJECT SITES (1.1.12)................................................................................................................6 14 FINANCING (1.1.13).........................................................................................................................6 15 FUTURE EXTENSIONS (1.1.14)......................................................................................................6 APPENDICES Appendix A Vicinity Map Appendix B Distribution System Map (City of Bozeman GIS Infrastructure Viewer) Appendix C As-built Drawings Appendix D Water Model Calibration Appendix E WaterCAD Results Appendix F NRCS Soils Report Appendix G Geotechnical Report Appendix H Corrosivity Analysis Appendix I Water and Sewer Layout Written By: RSN Checked By: MEE, LRH Approved By: JRN Project No.: 5659.011 1 South Range Crossing Subdivision Water System Design Report 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report provides a basis for design of the South Range Crossing Subdivision (SRX) water distribution system. The water distribution system serving SRX will be designed and installed in accordance with the Montana Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) Circular No. 1; Montana Public Works Standard Specifications (MPWSS); The City of Bozeman Modifications to MPWSS; City of Bozeman Water Facility Plan; and the City of Bozeman Fire Service Line Standard. The design report is provided to show that there is adequate volume and pressure to supply domestic and fire service for all the buildings in the proposed development. The following design report follows the section numbering of Circular DEQ-1-Standards for Water Works (2022 Edition) Section 1.1, Engineer’s Report. 2 GENERAL INFORMATION (DEQ 1.1.1) a. The proposed SRX Subdivision encompasses a total of 38.41 acres and is generally located at the southeast corner of Graf Street and South 19th Avenue. The property is within the boundaries of the City of Bozeman, Montana and was annexed in August of 2006. The property is zoned REMU (Residential Emphasis Mixed Use). See the vicinity map (Exhibit A) for additional location details. The following is the legal description for the property: Lot 1, Block 2 of Minor Subdivision 494. Located in the NW1/4 and SW1/4 of Section 24, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, P.M.M., City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana The property has historically been utilized for agricultural purposes but has been inactive recently. Existing groundwater in the area is relatively shallow, and the results of ground water monitoring completed in 2022 are included in Appendix B. The existing water infrastructure which surrounds the site is owned and operated by the City of Bozeman. There is an existing 12” water main located within Graf Street with two 8” stubs to the property, an existing 8” water main within South 15th Avenue with two 8” stubs to the property and an existing 8” water main extending north from Blackwood Groves Subdivision within Canter Avenue. See Appendix C for nearby as-built drawings. b. The proposed water main infrastructure within SRX will be deeded to City of Bozeman upon completion and acceptance. The subdivision will also be served by an extension of the City of Bozeman’s sanitary sewer collection system. 2 c. Project Developer: Providence Development, LLC PO Box 4082 Bozeman, MT 59772 System Owner: City of Bozeman PO Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 59771 3 EXTENT OF WATER WORKS SYSTEM (DEQ 1.1.2): The proposed water main extensions within the property are extensions of the City of Bozeman water infrastructure in the area. SRX will tie into five existing water mains to create a looped distribution system with the project development. Tie in locations are as follows: 8” water main within South 15th Avenue o Existing 8” stub to property at intersection of Brookdale Drive o Existing 8” stub to property at intersection of Alder Creek Drive o Existing 8” stubs in missing section of 15th Avenue between Alder Creek Subdivision and Graf Street 8” water main at Canter Avenue o Existing 8” stub south of the project location (Blackwood Groves Subdivision) 12” water main within Graf Street o Existing 8” stub to property at intersection of Canter Avenue Fire protection will be provided by hydrants placed within the development at recommended spacing intervals and supplied by the new 8” mains proposed. This project involves installing 8-inch Class 51 DIP water pipe, new fire hydrants, new fire service lines, and new domestic water services. Services will range in size from 1-inch to 6- inches, depending on projected future building design. See Appendix E for proposed water main layout schematic. These water main extensions will serve the entire buildout of the property but may be phased to accommodate phased buildouts of the subdivision. There are no plans to provide water main extension stubs for future supply as this property is bounded by existing water infrastructure. 4 ALTERNATE PLANS (1.1.3) No alternate plans were considered. 5 SITE CONDITIONS (1.1.4) The SRX property is currently undeveloped agricultural land which gently slopes from south to north with existing grades of less than 4% and mostly Meadowcreek loam and Blackmore silt loam deposits (USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Web Soil Survey) as shown in Appendix F. 3 A site-specific geotechnical report has been completed for SRX by Rawhide Engineering Inc and is included as Appendix G. Seasonally-high groundwater levels onsite range between approximately 1 and 3 feet below existing grade based on well monitoring performed from May 2022 to August 2022. The groundwater flows generally from the south to the north based on generally observed groundwater flows in Bozeman. A corrosivity test was performed using soil samples collected during the geotechnical investigation. Three of the four corrosivity soil samples had very similar scores ranging from 35 to 38, recommending ductile water mains to be wrapped with V-Bio® Enhanced Polyethylene Encasement. The fourth corrosivity soil sample had a score of 49, recommending metallized zinc coating or cathodic protection may be necessary. 6 WATER USE DATA, INCLUDING (1.1.5): The water distribution system serving the proposed project will be designed and installed in accordance with the Montana Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) Circular No. 1 (DEQ-1); Montana Public Works Standard Specifications (MPWSS); the City of Bozeman Modifications to MPWSS; City of Bozeman Water Facility Plan; and the City of Bozeman Design Standards and Specifications Policy (and all addenda thereto). The following section addresses the design capacity and flow requirements discussed in Section 8 of DEQ-1. The water main extension for SRX will service the complete buildout of the property. The capacity requirement for the water main extension is calculated as follows: SRX is zoned REMU, and the 2017 Bozeman Water Facility Plan lists an average day demand of 684 gallons per acre per day. While this value may be appropriate for master planning, it does not reflect the uses envisioned for this specific project as it appears significantly low based on a gallon per capita or dwelling unit basis. In order to review the validity of the 684 gallons per acre per day, we reviewed City of Bozeman plans and documents and found the latest data for detailed per capita water use in a technical memorandum that was completed as part of the City of Bozeman 2014 Water Conservation Plan. The average per capita per day use for residential units was extrapolated from this information to be 87 gallons per capita per day. Using an estimated 2.17 people per dwelling unit, 87 gallons per capita per day, and 684 gallons per acre per day results in 3.6 dwelling units per acre. This value is lower than the expected density for this development. The Unified Development Code and the City of Bozeman Design Standards were utilized to develop a more accurate estimate of water use. Unlike other residential zoning districts, the REMU zoning district does not have a minimum density requirement; however, the form and intensity standards suggest a relative high density. For comparison purposes, the R-4 zoning district has a minimum density of 8 units per acre. The design standards identify a density of 10.4 dwelling units per acre for REMU zoned property. Based on this information, the water use is estimated to be 1,963 gallons per acre per day (10.4 dwelling units x 2.17 people per unit x 87 gallons per capita per day). Although the property is zoned REMU, the uses for each lot are known. Water main extensions for SRX are proposed to service 100 townhomes, 185 units of build-to-rent, and 3.77 acres of commercial use. As stated above, the dwelling units will use a population of 2.17 capita per unit and 87 gallons per capita per day. According to City of Bozeman Design Standards, Table V-2, the average day demand for commercial is 2,400 GPD per acre. The expected demand for these water main extensions is in the following paragraphs: 4 Peaking factors were applied to expected average daily demands in accordance with Design Values from City of Bozeman Design Standards, March 2020 Version, including: Maximum Day Demand (MDD) Peaking Factor = 2.3 Maximum Hour (Peak Hour) Demand (PHD) Peaking Factor = 3.0 Townhome Demands: 100 dwelling units (DU) Population = ~217 persons (100 DU x 2.17 people/DU) ADD = 217 persons x 87 GPD per person = 18,879 GPD = 13.11 GPM MDD = 18,879 GPD x 2.3 = 43,422 GPD = 30.15 GPM PHD = 18,879 GPD x 3.0 = 56,637 GPD = 39.33 GPM Build-To-Rent Demands: 185 dwelling units (DU) Population = ~402 persons (185 DU x 2.17 people/DU) ADD = 402 persons x 87 GPD per person = 34,974 GPD = 24.29 GPM MDD = 34,974 GPD x 2.3 = 80,440 GPD = 55.86 GPM PHD = 34,974 GPD x 3.0 = 104,922 GPD = 72.86 GPM Commercial Use Demand: ADD = 3.77 acres X 2,400 gallons per acre per day = 9,048 GPD = 6.28 GPM MDD = 9,048 GPD X 2.3 = 20,810 GPD = 14.45 GPM PHD = 9,048 GPD X 3.0 = 27,144 GPD = 18.85 GPM Table 1. Water demand Planned Use Acres Dwelling Units Average Demand (gpd/unit) Average Daily Demand for Module (gpd) Maximum Daily Demand for Module (gpm) Peak Hour Demand (gpm) Townhomes/ Build to Rent 34.64 285 189 53,865 86.03 112.22 Commercial 3.77 -- 2,400 9,048 14.45 18.85 Total 38.41 62,913 100.5 131.1 Fire Flow The total water demand for the system includes the maximum required fire flow of 1,500 GPM plus domestic MDD. Maximum fire flow demands are based on the 26,570 SF (Building Type D) building of Type V-A Construction and sprinkler systems designed to meet NFPA 13R 5 requirements. Table B105.1(2) of Appendix B of the International Fire Code requires 3,000 GPM fire flow for a building without sprinklers and allows 75% reduction for buildings with fire sprinklers. The reduced flow was calculated to be 750 GPM; however, the minimum flow allowed per code is 1,500 GPM for sprinklers meeting NFPA 13R requirements. For the purpose of this report, our model includes a fire flow demand of 1,500 GPM. The Maximum Daily Demand is calculated by multiplying ADD by a peaking factor of 2.3 as described above. Therefore, the following fire flow demand for the four buildings is as follows: Total Fire Flow = MDD + Fire Flow = 100.5 GPM + 1,500 GPM = 1,600.5 GPM 7 FLOW REQUIREMENTS (1.1.6) Modeling Procedure Water modeling was performed using WaterCAD (Connect Edition 10.03.03.72) software to assess expected performance of the proposed water infrastructure network. Water supply from the existing City water system was simulated using reservoirs and pumps at boundary locations. Pump curves were developed using model outputs received from the City of Bozeman at varying flow rates during a maximum daily demand scenario. Using hydraulic model flow data (or fire flow results) represented using a reservoir and pump supply is a commonly used method to build stand-alone models of distribution systems without reproducing the entire distribution system. Flows modeled at Hydrants #2680 (located on Alder Creek Drive and South 15th Ave) and #3177 (located on Canter Avenue and Cambridge Drive) were used for calibration and modeling purposes (Appendix D). The minimum residual pressure required at any node in the network is 35 PSI during normal uses (MDD scenario) and 20 PSI during a combined MDD plus fire flow condition. A “C” of 130 was used for the Hazen Williams pipe roughness factor as required by the City of Bozeman Design Standards. 6 Modeling Results The model’s results indicate that proposed 8-inch distribution mains for SRX will supply the required demands for the project during a MDD plus Fire Flow scenario while maintaining pressure above 20-psi at all points within the modeled area. Pressure during the ADD, MDD and PHD scenarios with solely domestic demands ranges from 38 to 60 PSI. It was observed that pressure drops from ADD to PHD were negligible. This is to be expected as the calibration data provided shows very low pressure drop during smaller flow conditions. For example, the hydrant curve from Hydrant 2680 provided from the City of Bozeman only shows a pressure drop of 0.33 psi at a flow of 200 gpm. An automated fire flow analysis was performed to evaluate available supply at all proposed hydrants within the proposed network. This scenario included the MDD scenario in addition to fire flow demands. Based on this analysis, the minimum fire flow available within the network was calculated to be 1,763 GPM at Hydrant H-13. This exceeds the minimum fire flow requirement of 1,500 GPM. 8 SOURCES OF WATER SUPPLY (1.1.7) Water is supplied from City of Bozeman. 9 PROPOSED TREATMENT PROCESSES (1.1.8) No treatment processes are proposed. 10 SEWAGE SYSTEM AVAILABLE (1.1.9) The area is served by the City of Bozeman wastewater treatment facility. 11 WASTE DISPOSAL (1.1.10) This item is not applicable to the SRX project. 12 AUTOMATION (1.1.11) This item is not applicable to the SRX project. 13 PROJECT SITES (1.1.12) SRX is bounded by Graf Street to the north, Alder Creek Subdivision Phase 5 to the east, Blackwood Groves Subdivision to the south and South 19th Avenue to the west. 14 FINANCING (1.1.13) This item is not applicable to the SRX project. 15 FUTURE EXTENSIONS (1.1.14) No future extensions are anticipated. A APPENDIX A VICINITY MAP ©COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., SHEET NUMBER PROJECT NO.DRAWN BY: FLD WK. BY: CHK. BY: DATE: 2022 Plotted by lee hageman on Nov/14/2022N:\5659\011 -YTI Development\ACAD\Exhibits\5659.011 - SRX-Vicinity Map.dwgSOUTH RANGE CROSSING VICINITY MAP BOZEMAN MONTANA 5659.011 EX-A JCW JCW MEE 11/2022engineers surveyors planners scientists MorrisonMaierle 2880 Technology Blvd West Bozeman, MT 59718 Phone: 406.587.0721 www.m-m.net 200SOUTH 19TH AVENUESOUTHBRIDGE SUB.PHASE1LOT 1BLK 4LEGAL DESCRIPTION GRAF STREET YELL O W S T O N E T H E O L O GI C A L INSTI T U T E MI N O R S U B 4 9 4 LOT 1, B L O C K 2 - 3 8. 4 1 A C SUMMER WAY LANEBROOKDALE DR ALDER CREEK DR SOUTHBRIDGE DR LOT 1BLK 5PUBLICPARKPUBLICPARKLOT AMINORSUB 235ALOT 3MINORSUB 235ALOT 2MINORSUB 235LOT 3, BLK 1MINOR SUB 494LOT 3, BLK 1MINOR SUB 494LOT 4, B L K 1 MINOR S U B 4 9 4 ALLISON SUBANNEX, S24, T02 S,R05 E, ACRES40.217, SE4NW4ALDER CREEKSUBDIVISION PH-5ALDER CREEKSUBDIVISION PH-5ALDER CREEKSUBDIVISIONPH-5ALLISON SUB ANNEX,S24, T02 S, R05 E, TRBEING IN ALLISONANNEX NE4SW47.653AC COS 792ALDER CREEKSUBDIVISIONPH-5OPEN SPACELOT 38 BLOCK 15LOT 37 LOT 36 LOT 35 LOT 34 LOT 33 LOT 32 LOT 31 LOT 30 LOT 29 LOT 28 PARK 9 LOT 27 LOT 26 LOT 25 LOT 24 LOT 23 LOT 22 LOT 21 LOT 20 LOT 38 BLOCK 14BLOCK 20BLACKWO O D G R O V E S S U B . S24, T02 S , R 0 5 E , A C R E S 117.47, S2S W 4 L E S S R W S E C 24 & N2N 2 N W 4 S E C 2 5 BOZEMAN COMMUNI T Y P L A N FUTURE L A N D U S E : RESIDENT I A L MIXED US E BOZE M A N C O M M U N I T Y PLAN F U T U R E L A N D USE: U R B A N NEIGH B O R H O O D BOZE M A N C O M M U N I T Y PLAN F U T U R E L A N D USE: U R B A N NEIGH B O R H O O D BOZE M A N C O M M U N I T Y PLAN F U T U R E L A N D USE: U R B A N NEIGH B O R H O O D BOZE M A N C O M M U N I T Y PLAN F U T U R E L A N D USE: U R B A N NEIGH B O R H O O D BOZE M A N C O M M U N I T Y PLAN F U T U R E L A N D USE: U R B A N NEIG H B O R H O O D A Tract of land being the SW1/4NW1/4 and the NW1/4SW1/4 of Section 24, Excepting therefrom that portion conveyed to the State of Montana in Bargain and Sale Deed recorded June 30, 1964 in Book 146 of Deeds, Page 24, Records of Gallatin County, located in the NW1/4 and SW1/4 of Section 24, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, P.M.M., City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana,being more fully described as follows: Beginning at a point on the east line of said Lot 1 and lying S89°31'54" W a distance of 30.00 feet from the Center-West 1/16th corner of section 24 and being the True Point of Beginning; thence S0°17'12" E along the east line of said Lot 1 Block 2 of Minor Subdivision No. 494, for a distance of 1329.88 feet to a point being the southeast corner of said Lot 1 and also a point on the east-west south 1/16th line of said section 24; thence S88°58'32"W along the south line of said lot 1 for a distance of 1307.81 feet to the section line common to sections 23 and 24, T.2S.,R.5E.,P.M.; thence N00°42'16" W along said section line for a distance of 1368.09 feet to the intersection of the centerline of Graf Street extended per Yellowstone Theological Institute Minor Subdivision 494; thence along the said centerline the following (3) courses: thence N89°05'08" E for a distance of 1050.01 feet; thence along a tangent curve to the left with a radius of 300.00 feet, a central angle of 26°09'42", an arc length of 136.98 feet thence; along a compound curve to the right with a radius of 300.00 feet, a central angle of 26°56'09", an arc length of 141.04 feet; thence S0°09'49"E for a distance of 97.21 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Said Lot 1 having 41.38 acres, along with and subject to any easements.SOUTH 15TH AVESOUTH RANGE CROSSING SUBDIVISION - VICINITY MAP BLOCK 2 BLOCK 2 LOT 1 LOT 2 LOT 3 LOT 4 LOT 5 LOT 6 LOT 1 LOT 2 LOT 3 LOT 4 LOT 5 LOT 6PARK 16 OS E OS F B APPENDIX B DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM MAP (CITY OF BOZEMAN GIS INFRASTRUCTURE VIEWER) 18,0560.6 Miles This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for, or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. Users of this information should review or consult the primary data and information sources to ascertain the usability of the information. Feet 2,1040 Legend 1,052 Location 2,104 11/11/2022 Created By: Created For: Date: South Range Crossing Mains Active Abandoned Street Names City Limits Project Location C APPENDIX C AS-BUILT PLANS PROJECTLOCATIONSHEET INDEXCOVER SHEET & INDEXYELLOWSTONE THEOLOGICAL INSTITUTE GRAF STREET IMPROVEMENTSBOZEMAN, MTCIVIL ENGINEERING BY:MADISON ENGINEERING895 TECHNOLOGY BOULEVARD, SUITE 203BOZEMAN, MT 59718(406) 586-0262 (406) 586-5740 FAXVICINITY MAPNTS BOZEMAN, MONTANAAUGUST 2016PROJECT OWNER:YELLOWSTONETHEOLOGICAL INSTITUTEPO BOX 1347 BOZEMAN, MT 59741 (406) 404-1600YELLOWSTONE THEOLOGICAL INSTITUTEGRAF STREET IMPROVEMENTSTRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING BY:MARVIN & ASSOCIATES1300 NORTH TRANSTECH WAYBILLINGS, MT 59102(406) 655-4550 (406) 655-4991 FAXAS BUILT ONLYSOUTH 19TH STREET S. 15th AVENUEGRAF STREETFUTURE PRIVATE DRIVEDO NOTDISTURBWETLANDSDO NOTDISTURBWETLANDSAS BUILT HYDRANTNW BOLTELEV. 4983.57AS BUILTHYDRANT NWBOLT ELEV. 4981.92AS BUILT HYDRANTNW BOLTELEV. 4983.191 inch =0SCALE50 feet100'25' 50'WATER MAIN EXT. PLANWATER MAIN PROFILEDATUMNAVD 88C4.0WATER IMPROVEMENTSWATERSHEETMADISON ENGINEERING 895 TECHNOLOGY BLVD. STE. 203 BOZEMAN, MT 59718 (406) 586-0262 (406) 586-5740 FAX YELLOWSTONE THEOLOGICAL INSTITUTE GRAF STREET IMPROVEMENTS BOZEMAN, MTYTIAS BUILT D APPENDIX D WATER MODEL CALIBRATION INFO CITY OF BOZEMAN Fire Flow Request Form PHONE (406) 582-3200 FAX (406) 582-3201 Date September 28, 2022 Location South 40 Future Project Pressure Zone South (HGL 5125) GIS Hydrant ID# 2680 Adjacent Main Size 8-inch DI Model Scenario Maximum Day Demand, Steady State, Fire Flow Reference 2017 Water Facility Plan Update1 Hydrant Curves An Excel Spreadsheet with hydrant curves has been provided for the requested location Requested Location via the Bozeman Infrastructure Viewer2 If you have questions or need further information feel free to email. Data Disclaimer: Water distribution information is calculated using hydraulic modeling software and is subject to variation. Actual field conditions may vary. This information is provided to the requestor for evaluation purposes only, without warranty of any kind, including, but not limited to any expressed or implied warranty arising by contract, stature, or law. In no event regardless of cause, shall the City be liable for any direct, indirect, special, punitive or consequential damages of any kind whether such damages arise under contract, tort, strict liability or inequity. HOME OF MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY GATEWAY TO YELLOWSTONE PARK 1 https://www.bozeman.net/home/showpublisheddocument/4977/636420174896170000 2 https://gisweb.bozeman.net/Html5Viewer/?viewer=infrastructure GIS Hydrant # Available Flow (gpm) Residual Pressure (psi)2680 0 48.55 200 48.22 400 47.68 600 46.95 800 46.03 1,000.00 44.94 1,200.00 43.68 1,400.00 42.27 1,600.00 40.7 1,800.00 38.97 2,000.00 37.1 2,200.00 35.1 2,400.00 32.95 2,600.00 30.65 2,800.00 28.2 3,000.00 25.6 3,200.00 22.84 3,400.00 19.95 3,600.00 16.91 3,800.00 13.72 4,000.00 10.4 4,200.00 6.94 4,400.00 3.33 Hydrant Curve 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000Residual Pressure (psi)Available Flow (gpm) Hydrant Curve 2680 Data Disclaimer: Water distribution information is calculated using hydraulic modeling software and is subject to variation. Actual field conditions may vary. This information is provided to the requestor for evaluation purposes only, without warranty of any kind, including, but not limited to any expressed or implied warranty arising by contract, stature, or law. In no event regardless of cause, shall the City be liable for any direct, indirect, special, punitive or consequential damages of any kind whether such damages arise under contract, tort, strict liability or inequity. CITY OF BOZEMAN Fire Flow Request Form PHONE (406) 582-3200 FAX (406) 582-3201 The results of the fire flow information that you requested are as follows: Cambridge Drive/South 15th Hydrant #3179 Static- 48psi , Residual- 40psi Hydrant #3177 Pitot- 36psi Flowing 1010 GPM on a 2.5” nozzle. The test was performed on 10/7/2022. If you have questions or need further information feel free to email. Data Disclaimer: Water distribution information is calculated using hydraulic modeling software and is subject to variation. Actual field conditions may vary. This information provided to the requestor for evaluation purposes only, without warranty of any kind, including, but not limited to any expressed or implied warranty arising by contract, stature, or law. In no event regardless of cause, shall the City be liable for any direct, indirect, special, punitive or consequential damages of any kind whether such damages arise under contract, tort, strict liability or inequity. E APPENDIX E WATERCAD RESULTS South Range Crossing - Water Model Report Revision 1 - March 2023 Network Schematic Overall Layout Page 1 of 2427 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 3/14/2023 WaterCAD [10.03.03.72] Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center5659.011_PreliminaryWaterModel_202210.wtg South Range Crossing - Water Model Report Average Daily Demand Scenario Reservoir Table - Time: 0.00 hours Hydraulic Grade (ft) Flow (Out net) (gpm) Is Active?Elevation (ft) Label 4,998.5743.68True4,998.57R-1 (N/A)(N/A)False5,116.28R-2 Pump Table - Time: 0.00 hours Pump Head (ft) Flow (Total ) (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (Discharg e) (ft) Hydraulic Grade (Suction) (ft) Downstre am Pipe Is Active ? Pump Definition Elevatio n (ft) Label 111.5843.685,110.154,998.57P-131TrueHYD #26804,998.57PMP-1 (N/A)(N/A)(N/A)(N/A)P-113FalseHYD #31775,005.40PMP-2 Page 2 of 2427 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 3/14/2023 WaterCAD [10.03.03.72] Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center5659.011_PreliminaryWaterModel_202210.wtg South Range Crossing - Water Model Report Average Daily Demand Scenario Junction Table - Time: 0.00 hours Pressure (psi) Hydraulic Grade (ft) Demand (gpm) Elevation (ft) Label 595,110.140.004,974.69J-1 585,110.140.004,975.73J-2 605,110.140.004,971.84J-3 595,110.140.004,972.95J-4 595,110.140.004,973.01J-5 595,110.140.004,974.82J-6 575,110.140.004,977.48J-7 575,110.140.004,977.96J-8 575,110.140.004,979.35J-9 565,110.140.004,980.40J-11 575,110.140.004,979.30J-12 565,110.140.004,979.98J-15 575,110.140.004,978.63J-16 565,110.140.004,981.03J-17 555,110.140.004,982.02J-18 555,110.140.004,983.10J-19 525,110.140.004,990.27J-23 515,110.140.004,991.54J-24 515,110.140.004,991.66J-26 525,110.140.004,989.54J-28 545,110.140.004,986.05J-29 555,110.140.004,982.87J-30 555,110.140.004,982.73J-31 435,110.141.585,009.75J-32 545,110.140.004,986.48J-33 425,110.141.585,013.69J-34 525,110.140.004,989.86J-36 515,110.140.004,992.14J-37 405,110.141.975,017.67J-39 385,110.141.315,021.76J-40 525,110.140.004,989.57J-41 525,110.140.004,989.59J-42 525,110.140.004,990.03J-43 525,110.140.004,990.28J-45 525,110.140.004,990.11J-46 535,110.140.004,987.99J-47 545,110.140.004,985.13J-48 555,110.140.004,982.63J-49 575,110.140.004,979.45J-50 435,110.141.315,011.71J-51 435,110.141.585,011.44J-52 415,110.141.785,015.54J-53 385,110.141.315,021.40J-54 405,110.140.925,018.38J-55 495,110.140.004,996.30J-56 Page 3 of 2427 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 3/14/2023 WaterCAD [10.03.03.72] Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center5659.011_PreliminaryWaterModel_202210.wtg South Range Crossing - Water Model Report Average Daily Demand Scenario Junction Table - Time: 0.00 hours Pressure (psi) Hydraulic Grade (ft) Demand (gpm) Elevation (ft) Label 395,110.141.315,019.21J-58 395,110.141.315,018.91J-59 525,110.150.004,989.47J-60 535,110.150.004,988.65J-61 415,110.141.645,015.40J-64 445,110.142.105,008.43J-66 445,110.141.715,008.07J-67 575,110.140.004,978.67J-68 455,110.141.575,005.79J-69 465,110.141.575,003.23J-70 465,110.141.575,003.37J-71 585,110.140.004,977.03J-72 455,110.141.575,005.71J-73 465,110.142.895,003.39J-75 605,110.140.004,972.29J-80 595,110.140.004,973.14J-85 585,110.140.004,976.88J-86 565,110.140.004,980.22J-87 505,110.150.004,994.44J-89 445,110.141.845,009.59J-90 435,110.141.315,010.26J-91 425,110.141.315,012.65J-92 405,110.150.925,017.71J-93 595,110.140.004,974.84J-94 595,110.140.004,973.44J-96 595,110.140.004,973.23J-97 565,110.140.004,980.02J-98 535,110.150.004,988.65J-99 525,110.150.004,989.04J-100 525,110.140.004,990.33J-101 525,110.140.004,989.81J-102 525,110.140.004,990.28J-103 545,110.140.004,985.55J-104 565,110.140.004,980.59J-105 575,110.140.004,979.30J-106 565,110.140.004,979.58J-107 585,110.140.004,977.10J-108 555,110.140.004,984.03J-109 535,110.140.004,986.51J-110 535,110.140.004,988.57J-111 565,110.140.004,981.41J-112 585,110.140.004,975.72J-113 Page 4 of 2427 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 3/14/2023 WaterCAD [10.03.03.72] Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center5659.011_PreliminaryWaterModel_202210.wtg South Range Crossing - Water Model Report Average Daily Demand Scenario Hydrant Table - Time: 0.00 hours Pressure (psi) Hydraulic Grade (ft) Demand (gpm) Elevation (ft) Label 535,110.140.004,987.54H-3 565,110.140.004,980.77H-4 505,110.140.004,993.93H-6 495,110.140.004,997.72H-7 495,110.140.004,997.17H-8 495,110.140.004,997.69H-9 515,110.140.004,993.17H-10 535,110.140.004,988.24H-11 515,110.140.004,991.61H-12 495,110.140.004,996.11H-13 545,110.140.004,984.57H-14 535,110.140.004,988.63H-15 535,110.140.004,986.96H-16 535,110.140.004,986.67H-17 555,110.140.004,983.08H-18 Page 5 of 2427 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 3/14/2023 WaterCAD [10.03.03.72] Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center5659.011_PreliminaryWaterModel_202210.wtg South Range Crossing - Water Model Report Average Daily Demand Scenario Pipe Table - Time: 0.00 hours Velocity (ft/s) Flow (gpm) Hazen- William s C MaterialDiamet er (in) Stop Node Start Node Length (Scaled) (ft) Has User Defined Length? Label 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron12.0J-2J-1488FalseP-1 0.02-6.23130.0Ductile Iron12.0J-80J-2321FalseP-2.1 0.02-6.23130.0Ductile Iron12.0J-3J-8092FalseP-2.2 0.02-6.23130.0Ductile Iron12.0J-4J-3339FalseP-3 0.02-6.23130.0Ductile Iron12.0J-5J-419FalseP-4 0.046.22130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-6J-2125FalseP-5 0.011.79130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-8J-755FalseP-7 0.011.79130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-9J-8127FalseP-8 0.02-3.32130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-107J-11276FalseP-10.1 0.02-3.32130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-9J-10734FalseP-10.2 0.03-4.57130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-12J-106170FalseP-11.2 0.05-7.82130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-50J-12109FalseP-12.1 0.03-4.24130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-16J-50122FalseP-12.2 0.023.04130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-17J-9207FalseP-15 0.011.20130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-18J-1745FalseP-16 0.00-0.11130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-109J-1899FalseP-17 0.045.53130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-101J-2334FalseP-18 0.045.53130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-24J-10197FalseP-19 0.010.94130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-111J-28102FalseP-20 0.010.94130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-29J-111170FalseP-21 0.01-2.22130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-112J-3074FalseP-22 0.034.22130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-26J-2452FalseP-23 0.01-2.22130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-11J-11256FalseP-24 0.011.58130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-34J-11058FalseP-25 0.00-0.54130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-30J-29259FalseP-28 0.011.69130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-31J-30111FalseP-30 0.011.58130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-32J-3159FalseP-31 0.000.11130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-33J-31259FalseP-32 0.01-1.48130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-29J-33111FalseP-34 0.011.16130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-36J-28115FalseP-36 0.01-0.81130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-37J-36156FalseP-37 0.011.97130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-39J-3667FalseP-40 0.011.31130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-40J-37138FalseP-41 0.05-8.54130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-41J-2388FalseP-42 0.06-9.46130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-42J-4169FalseP-43 0.07-11.10130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-43J-42141FalseP-44.1 0.0812.41130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-43J-1027FalseP-44.2 0.08-12.41130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-103J-102252FalseP-46.1 0.08-12.42130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-45J-1037FalseP-46.2 0.09-13.73130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-46J-4527FalseP-47 0.0812.07130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-47J-46142FalseP-48 0.068.71130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-48J-10410FalseP-49.2 0.023.59130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-105J-4989FalseP-51.1 0.023.58130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-50J-10562FalseP-51.2 Page 6 of 2427 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 3/14/2023 WaterCAD [10.03.03.72] Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center5659.011_PreliminaryWaterModel_202210.wtg South Range Crossing - Water Model Report Average Daily Demand Scenario Pipe Table - Time: 0.00 hours Velocity (ft/s) Flow (gpm) Hazen- William s C MaterialDiamet er (in) Stop Node Start Node Length (Scaled) (ft) Has User Defined Length? Label 0.01-1.31130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-48J-51164FalseP-52 0.011.58130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-52J-115169FalseP-53 0.01-1.78130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-47J-53164FalseP-54 0.01-1.31130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-24J-54164FalseP-55 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-56J-23338FalseP-56 0.01-0.92130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-41J-55106FalseP-57 0.01-1.31130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-43J-58106FalseP-59 0.01-1.31130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-45J-59106FalseP-60 0.16-25.80130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-60J-46178FalseP-61 0.17-26.72130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-61J-60105FalseP-62 0.1116.95130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-15J-61782FalseP-65 0.011.64130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-64J-42142FalseP-66 0.01-2.10130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-116J-66169FalseP-68 0.011.71130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-67J-49164FalseP-69 0.011.10130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-68J-11119FalseP-70 0.012.00130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-69J-6874FalseP-71 0.000.43130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-108J-6958FalseP-72(1) 0.000.42130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-70J-10879FalseP-72(2) 0.01-1.15130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-71J-70240FalseP-73 0.02-2.72130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-72J-7173FalseP-74 0.022.47130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-73J-7264FalseP-75 0.010.90130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-68J-73166FalseP-76 0.03-5.19130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-7J-72145FalseP-77 0.023.26130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-75J-12222FalseP-79 0.046.46130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-94J-16222FalseP-85.1 0.022.89130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-113J-94133FalseP-85.2 0.02-2.89130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-113J-7598FalseP-87 0.04-6.24130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-85J-562FalseP-89 0.04-6.24130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-15J-86140FalseP-91 0.000.01130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-98J-1545FalseP-92.1 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-87J-9855FalseP-92.2 0.28-43.68130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-99J-6145FalseP-93.1 0.28-43.68130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-100J-9928FalseP-93.2 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-89J-61277FalseP-94 0.011.84130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-90J-17142FalseP-95 0.011.31130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-91J-18164FalseP-96 0.011.31130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-92J-19165FalseP-97 0.01-0.92130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-60J-93106FalseP-98 0.01-2.10130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-26J-28131FalseP-101 0.000.01130.0Ductile Iron12.0J-97J-546FalseP-103.1 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron12.0J-96J-9730FalseP-103.2 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-97H-418FalseP-104 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-98H-314FalseP-105 0.0710.70130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-16J-15157FalseP-108 Page 7 of 2427 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 3/14/2023 WaterCAD [10.03.03.72] Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center5659.011_PreliminaryWaterModel_202210.wtg South Range Crossing - Water Model Report Average Daily Demand Scenario Pipe Table - Time: 0.00 hours Velocity (ft/s) Flow (gpm) Hazen- William s C MaterialDiamet er (in) Stop Node Start Node Length (Scaled) (ft) Has User Defined Length? Label (N/A)(N/A)130.0Ductile Iron16.5PMP-2R-288FalseP-112 (N/A)(N/A)130.0Ductile Iron16.5J-56PMP-2127FalseP-113 0.021.58130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-110J-3313FalseP-115 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0H-6J-1108FalseP-116 0.01-2.12130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-26J-37140FalseP-117 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-112H-1532FalseP-118 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0H-16J-1079FalseP-119 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-108H-149FalseP-120 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-106H-1710FalseP-121 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-113H-188FalseP-122 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-105H-1110FalseP-124 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-104H-1010FalseP-125 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-103H-99FalseP-126 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-102H-89FalseP-127 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-101H-732FalseP-128 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-111H-1310FalseP-129 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-109H-1232FalseP-130 0.01-43.68130.0Ductile Iron40.0PMP-1J-100154FalseP-131 0.01-43.68130.0Ductile Iron40.0R-1PMP-1115FalseP-132 0.046.24130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-85J-86296FalseP-140 Page 8 of 2427 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 3/14/2023 WaterCAD [10.03.03.72] Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center5659.011_PreliminaryWaterModel_202210.wtg South Range Crossing - Water Model Report Maximum Daily Demand Scenario Reservoir Table - Time: 0.00 hours Hydraulic Grade (ft) Flow (Out net) (gpm) Is Active?Elevation (ft) Label 4,998.57100.28True4,998.57R-1 (N/A)(N/A)False5,116.28R-2 Pump Table - Time: 0.00 hours Pump Head (ft) Flow (Total ) (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (Discharg e) (ft) Hydraulic Grade (Suction) (ft) Downstre am Pipe Is Active ? Pump Definition Elevatio n (ft) Label 111.48100.2 85,110.054,998.57P-131TrueHYD #26804,998.57PMP-1 (N/A)(N/A)(N/A)(N/A)P-113FalseHYD #31775,005.40PMP-2 Page 9 of 2427 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 3/14/2023 WaterCAD [10.03.03.72] Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center5659.011_PreliminaryWaterModel_202210.wtg South Range Crossing - Water Model Report Maximum Daily Demand Scenario Junction Table - Time: 0.00 hours Pressure (psi) Hydraulic Grade (ft) Demand (gpm) Elevation (ft) Label 595,110.000.004,974.69J-1 585,110.000.004,975.73J-2 605,110.000.004,971.84J-3 595,110.000.004,972.95J-4 595,110.000.004,973.01J-5 585,109.990.004,974.82J-6 575,109.990.004,977.48J-7 575,109.990.004,977.96J-8 575,109.990.004,979.35J-9 565,109.990.004,980.40J-11 575,109.990.004,979.30J-12 565,110.000.004,979.98J-15 575,110.000.004,978.63J-16 565,109.990.004,981.03J-17 555,109.990.004,982.02J-18 555,109.990.004,983.10J-19 525,109.990.004,990.27J-23 515,109.990.004,991.54J-24 515,109.990.004,991.66J-26 525,109.990.004,989.54J-28 545,109.990.004,986.05J-29 555,109.990.004,982.87J-30 555,109.990.004,982.73J-31 435,109.993.635,009.75J-32 535,109.990.004,986.48J-33 425,109.993.635,013.69J-34 525,109.990.004,989.86J-36 515,109.990.004,992.14J-37 405,109.994.535,017.67J-39 385,109.993.015,021.76J-40 525,109.990.004,989.57J-41 525,110.000.004,989.59J-42 525,110.000.004,990.03J-43 525,110.010.004,990.28J-45 525,110.010.004,990.11J-46 535,110.000.004,987.99J-47 545,110.000.004,985.13J-48 555,110.000.004,982.63J-49 565,110.000.004,979.45J-50 435,110.003.015,011.71J-51 435,110.003.635,011.44J-52 415,110.004.095,015.54J-53 385,109.993.015,021.40J-54 405,109.992.125,018.38J-55 495,109.990.004,996.30J-56 Page 10 of 2427 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 3/14/2023 WaterCAD [10.03.03.72] Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center5659.011_PreliminaryWaterModel_202210.wtg South Range Crossing - Water Model Report Maximum Daily Demand Scenario Junction Table - Time: 0.00 hours Pressure (psi) Hydraulic Grade (ft) Demand (gpm) Elevation (ft) Label 395,110.003.015,019.21J-58 395,110.013.015,018.91J-59 525,110.020.004,989.47J-60 535,110.030.004,988.65J-61 415,110.003.775,015.40J-64 445,110.004.835,008.43J-66 445,110.003.935,008.07J-67 575,109.990.004,978.67J-68 455,109.993.615,005.79J-69 465,109.993.615,003.23J-70 465,109.993.615,003.37J-71 585,109.990.004,977.03J-72 455,109.993.615,005.71J-73 465,109.996.655,003.39J-75 605,110.000.004,972.29J-80 595,110.000.004,973.14J-85 585,110.000.004,976.88J-86 565,110.000.004,980.22J-87 505,110.030.004,994.44J-89 435,109.994.235,009.59J-90 435,109.993.015,010.26J-91 425,109.993.015,012.65J-92 405,110.022.125,017.71J-93 585,109.990.004,974.84J-94 595,110.000.004,973.44J-96 595,110.000.004,973.23J-97 565,110.000.004,980.02J-98 535,110.050.004,988.65J-99 525,110.050.004,989.04J-100 525,109.990.004,990.33J-101 525,110.000.004,989.81J-102 525,110.000.004,990.28J-103 545,110.000.004,985.55J-104 565,110.000.004,980.59J-105 575,109.990.004,979.30J-106 565,109.990.004,979.58J-107 575,109.990.004,977.10J-108 545,109.990.004,984.03J-109 535,109.990.004,986.51J-110 535,109.990.004,988.57J-111 565,109.990.004,981.41J-112 585,109.990.004,975.72J-113 Page 11 of 2427 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 3/14/2023 WaterCAD [10.03.03.72] Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center5659.011_PreliminaryWaterModel_202210.wtg South Range Crossing - Water Model Report Maximum Daily Demand Scenario Hydrant Table - Time: 0.00 hours Pressure (psi) Hydraulic Grade (ft) Demand (gpm) Elevation (ft) Label 535,110.000.004,987.54H-3 565,110.000.004,980.77H-4 505,109.990.004,993.93H-6 495,109.990.004,997.72H-7 495,110.000.004,997.17H-8 495,110.000.004,997.69H-9 515,110.000.004,993.17H-10 535,110.000.004,988.24H-11 515,109.990.004,991.61H-12 495,109.990.004,996.11H-13 545,109.990.004,984.57H-14 535,109.990.004,988.63H-15 535,109.990.004,986.96H-16 535,109.990.004,986.67H-17 555,109.990.004,983.08H-18 Page 12 of 2427 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 3/14/2023 WaterCAD [10.03.03.72] Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center5659.011_PreliminaryWaterModel_202210.wtg South Range Crossing - Water Model Report Maximum Daily Demand Scenario Pipe Table - Time: 0.00 hours Velocity (ft/s) Flow (gpm) Hazen- William s C MaterialDiamet er (in) Stop Node Start Node Length (Scaled) (ft) Has User Defined Length? Label 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron12.0J-2J-1488FalseP-1 0.04-14.32130.0Ductile Iron12.0J-80J-2321FalseP-2.1 0.04-14.32130.0Ductile Iron12.0J-3J-8092FalseP-2.2 0.04-14.32130.0Ductile Iron12.0J-4J-3339FalseP-3 0.04-14.32130.0Ductile Iron12.0J-5J-419FalseP-4 0.0914.32130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-6J-2125FalseP-5 0.034.12130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-8J-755FalseP-7 0.034.12130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-9J-8127FalseP-8 0.05-7.62130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-107J-11276FalseP-10.1 0.05-7.62130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-9J-10734FalseP-10.2 0.07-10.48130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-12J-106170FalseP-11.2 0.11-17.97130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-50J-12109FalseP-12.1 0.06-9.75130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-16J-50122FalseP-12.2 0.047.02130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-17J-9207FalseP-15 0.022.79130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-18J-1745FalseP-16 0.00-0.22130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-109J-1899FalseP-17 0.0812.74130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-101J-2334FalseP-18 0.0812.74130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-24J-10197FalseP-19 0.012.18130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-111J-28102FalseP-20 0.012.18130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-29J-111170FalseP-21 0.03-5.09130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-112J-3074FalseP-22 0.069.72130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-26J-2452FalseP-23 0.03-5.09130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-11J-11256FalseP-24 0.023.63130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-34J-11058FalseP-25 0.01-1.19130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-30J-29259FalseP-28 0.023.90130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-31J-30111FalseP-30 0.023.63130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-32J-3159FalseP-31 0.000.27130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-33J-31259FalseP-32 0.02-3.37130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-29J-33111FalseP-34 0.022.66130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-36J-28115FalseP-36 0.01-1.87130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-37J-36156FalseP-37 0.034.53130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-39J-3667FalseP-40 0.023.01130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-40J-37138FalseP-41 0.13-19.61130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-41J-2388FalseP-42 0.14-21.72130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-42J-4169FalseP-43 0.16-25.50130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-43J-42141FalseP-44.1 0.1828.51130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-43J-1027FalseP-44.2 0.18-28.51130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-103J-102252FalseP-46.1 0.18-28.51130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-45J-1037FalseP-46.2 0.20-31.52130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-46J-4527FalseP-47 0.1827.72130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-47J-46142FalseP-48 0.1320.00130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-48J-10410FalseP-49.2 0.058.22130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-105J-4989FalseP-51.1 0.058.22130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-50J-10562FalseP-51.2 Page 13 of 2427 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 3/14/2023 WaterCAD [10.03.03.72] Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center5659.011_PreliminaryWaterModel_202210.wtg South Range Crossing - Water Model Report Maximum Daily Demand Scenario Pipe Table - Time: 0.00 hours Velocity (ft/s) Flow (gpm) Hazen- William s C MaterialDiamet er (in) Stop Node Start Node Length (Scaled) (ft) Has User Defined Length? Label 0.02-3.01130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-48J-51164FalseP-52 0.023.63130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-52J-115169FalseP-53 0.03-4.09130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-47J-53164FalseP-54 0.02-3.01130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-24J-54164FalseP-55 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-56J-23338FalseP-56 0.01-2.12130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-41J-55106FalseP-57 0.02-3.01130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-43J-58106FalseP-59 0.02-3.01130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-45J-59106FalseP-60 0.38-59.25130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-60J-46178FalseP-61 0.39-61.36130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-61J-60105FalseP-62 0.2538.92130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-15J-61782FalseP-65 0.023.77130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-64J-42142FalseP-66 0.03-4.83130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-116J-66169FalseP-68 0.033.93130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-67J-49164FalseP-69 0.022.53130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-68J-11119FalseP-70 0.034.59130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-69J-6874FalseP-71 0.010.98130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-108J-6958FalseP-72(1) 0.010.98130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-70J-10879FalseP-72(2) 0.02-2.63130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-71J-70240FalseP-73 0.04-6.24130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-72J-7173FalseP-74 0.045.67130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-73J-7264FalseP-75 0.012.06130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-68J-73166FalseP-76 0.08-11.91130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-7J-72145FalseP-77 0.057.49130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-75J-12222FalseP-79 0.0914.85130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-94J-16222FalseP-85.1 0.046.64130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-113J-94133FalseP-85.2 0.04-6.64130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-113J-7598FalseP-87 0.09-14.32130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-85J-562FalseP-89 0.09-14.32130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-15J-86140FalseP-91 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-98J-1545FalseP-92.1 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-87J-9855FalseP-92.2 0.64-100.28130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-99J-6145FalseP-93.1 0.64-100.28130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-100J-9928FalseP-93.2 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-89J-61277FalseP-94 0.034.23130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-90J-17142FalseP-95 0.023.01130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-91J-18164FalseP-96 0.023.01130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-92J-19165FalseP-97 0.01-2.12130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-60J-93106FalseP-98 0.03-4.84130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-26J-28131FalseP-101 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron12.0J-97J-546FalseP-103.1 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron12.0J-96J-9730FalseP-103.2 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-97H-418FalseP-104 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-98H-314FalseP-105 0.1624.60130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-16J-15157FalseP-108 Page 14 of 2427 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 3/14/2023 WaterCAD [10.03.03.72] Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center5659.011_PreliminaryWaterModel_202210.wtg South Range Crossing - Water Model Report Maximum Daily Demand Scenario Pipe Table - Time: 0.00 hours Velocity (ft/s) Flow (gpm) Hazen- William s C MaterialDiamet er (in) Stop Node Start Node Length (Scaled) (ft) Has User Defined Length? Label (N/A)(N/A)130.0Ductile Iron16.5PMP-2R-288FalseP-112 (N/A)(N/A)130.0Ductile Iron16.5J-56PMP-2127FalseP-113 0.043.63130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-110J-3313FalseP-115 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0H-6J-1108FalseP-116 0.03-4.88130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-26J-37140FalseP-117 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-112H-1532FalseP-118 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0H-16J-1079FalseP-119 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-108H-149FalseP-120 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-106H-1710FalseP-121 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-113H-188FalseP-122 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-105H-1110FalseP-124 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-104H-1010FalseP-125 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-103H-99FalseP-126 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-102H-89FalseP-127 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-101H-732FalseP-128 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-111H-1310FalseP-129 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-109H-1232FalseP-130 0.03-100.28130.0Ductile Iron40.0PMP-1J-100154FalseP-131 0.03-100.28130.0Ductile Iron40.0R-1PMP-1115FalseP-132 0.0914.32130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-85J-86296FalseP-140 Page 15 of 2427 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 3/14/2023 WaterCAD [10.03.03.72] Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center5659.011_PreliminaryWaterModel_202210.wtg South Range Crossing - Water Model Report Max Day + Fire Flow Scenario Reservoir Table - Time: 0.00 hours Hydraulic Grade (ft) Flow (Out net) (gpm) Is Active?Elevation (ft) Label 4,998.57100.28True4,998.57R-1 (N/A)(N/A)False5,116.28R-2 Pump Table - Time: 0.00 hours Pump Head (ft) Flow (Total ) (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (Discharg e) (ft) Hydraulic Grade (Suction) (ft) Downstre am Pipe Is Active ? Pump Definition Elevatio n (ft) Label 111.48100.2 85,110.054,998.57P-131TrueHYD #26804,998.57PMP-1 (N/A)(N/A)(N/A)(N/A)P-113FalseHYD #31775,005.40PMP-2 Page 16 of 2427 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 3/14/2023 WaterCAD [10.03.03.72] Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center5659.011_PreliminaryWaterModel_202210.wtg South Range Crossing - Water Model Report Max Day + Fire Flow Scenario Fire Flow Report - Time: 0.00 hours Is Fire Flow Run Balanced? Junction w/ Minimum Pressure (System) Pressure (Calculate d Residual) (psi) Pressure (Residual Lower Limit) (psi) Fire Flow (Available) (gpm) Fire Flow (Needed) (gpm) Satisfies Fire Flow Constraints? Label TrueJ-403101,956.610.00TrueH-3 TrueJ-403201,923.530.00TrueH-4 TrueJ-342801,797.580.00TrueH-6 TrueJ-542701,800.240.00TrueH-7 TrueJ-582901,877.540.00TrueH-8 TrueJ-402901,988.260.00TrueH-9 TrueJ-402801,980.590.00TrueH-10 TrueJ-403201,946.210.00TrueH-11 TrueJ-402701,859.950.00TrueH-12 TrueJ-402901,763.100.00TrueH-13 TrueJ-403201,867.990.00TrueH-14 TrueJ-403001,835.990.00TrueH-15 TrueJ-403301,879.810.00TrueH-16 TrueJ-403301,907.860.00TrueH-17 TrueJ-403401,924.330.00TrueH-18 Page 17 of 2427 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 3/14/2023 WaterCAD [10.03.03.72] Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center5659.011_PreliminaryWaterModel_202210.wtg South Range Crossing - Water Model Report Peak Hour Demand Scenario Reservoir Table - Time: 0.00 hours Hydraulic Grade (ft) Flow (Out net) (gpm) Is Active?Elevation (ft) Label 4,998.57130.90True4,998.57R-1 (N/A)(N/A)False5,116.28R-2 Pump Table - Time: 0.00 hours Pump Head (ft) Flow (Total ) (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (Discharg e) (ft) Hydraulic Grade (Suction) (ft) Downstre am Pipe Is Active ? Pump Definition Elevatio n (ft) Label 111.40130.9 05,109.974,998.57P-131TrueHYD #26804,998.57PMP-1 (N/A)(N/A)(N/A)(N/A)P-113FalseHYD #31775,005.40PMP-2 Page 18 of 2427 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 3/14/2023 WaterCAD [10.03.03.72] Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center5659.011_PreliminaryWaterModel_202210.wtg South Range Crossing - Water Model Report Peak Hour Demand Scenario Junction Table - Time: 0.00 hours Pressure (psi) Hydraulic Grade (ft) Demand (gpm) Elevation (ft) Label 585,109.880.004,974.69J-1 585,109.880.004,975.73J-2 605,109.880.004,971.84J-3 595,109.880.004,972.95J-4 595,109.880.004,973.01J-5 585,109.880.004,974.82J-6 575,109.880.004,977.48J-7 575,109.880.004,977.96J-8 565,109.880.004,979.35J-9 565,109.880.004,980.40J-11 565,109.880.004,979.30J-12 565,109.890.004,979.98J-15 575,109.880.004,978.63J-16 565,109.880.004,981.03J-17 555,109.880.004,982.02J-18 555,109.880.004,983.10J-19 525,109.880.004,990.27J-23 515,109.880.004,991.54J-24 515,109.880.004,991.66J-26 525,109.880.004,989.54J-28 545,109.880.004,986.05J-29 555,109.880.004,982.87J-30 555,109.880.004,982.73J-31 435,109.884.745,009.75J-32 535,109.880.004,986.48J-33 425,109.884.745,013.69J-34 525,109.880.004,989.86J-36 515,109.880.004,992.14J-37 405,109.885.915,017.67J-39 385,109.883.935,021.76J-40 525,109.880.004,989.57J-41 525,109.880.004,989.59J-42 525,109.890.004,990.03J-43 525,109.900.004,990.28J-45 525,109.900.004,990.11J-46 535,109.890.004,987.99J-47 545,109.880.004,985.13J-48 555,109.880.004,982.63J-49 565,109.880.004,979.45J-50 425,109.883.935,011.71J-51 435,109.894.745,011.44J-52 415,109.895.345,015.54J-53 385,109.883.935,021.40J-54 405,109.882.765,018.38J-55 495,109.880.004,996.30J-56 Page 19 of 2427 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 3/14/2023 WaterCAD [10.03.03.72] Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center5659.011_PreliminaryWaterModel_202210.wtg South Range Crossing - Water Model Report Peak Hour Demand Scenario Junction Table - Time: 0.00 hours Pressure (psi) Hydraulic Grade (ft) Demand (gpm) Elevation (ft) Label 395,109.883.935,019.21J-58 395,109.903.935,018.91J-59 525,109.930.004,989.47J-60 525,109.940.004,988.65J-61 415,109.884.925,015.40J-64 445,109.886.305,008.43J-66 445,109.885.135,008.07J-67 575,109.880.004,978.67J-68 455,109.884.715,005.79J-69 465,109.884.715,003.23J-70 465,109.884.715,003.37J-71 575,109.880.004,977.03J-72 455,109.884.715,005.71J-73 465,109.888.675,003.39J-75 605,109.880.004,972.29J-80 595,109.880.004,973.14J-85 585,109.880.004,976.88J-86 565,109.890.004,980.22J-87 505,109.940.004,994.44J-89 435,109.885.525,009.59J-90 435,109.883.935,010.26J-91 425,109.883.935,012.65J-92 405,109.932.765,017.71J-93 585,109.880.004,974.84J-94 595,109.880.004,973.44J-96 595,109.880.004,973.23J-97 565,109.890.004,980.02J-98 525,109.960.004,988.65J-99 525,109.970.004,989.04J-100 525,109.880.004,990.33J-101 525,109.890.004,989.81J-102 525,109.900.004,990.28J-103 545,109.880.004,985.55J-104 565,109.880.004,980.59J-105 565,109.880.004,979.30J-106 565,109.880.004,979.58J-107 575,109.880.004,977.10J-108 545,109.880.004,984.03J-109 535,109.880.004,986.51J-110 525,109.880.004,988.57J-111 565,109.880.004,981.41J-112 585,109.880.004,975.72J-113 Page 20 of 2427 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 3/14/2023 WaterCAD [10.03.03.72] Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center5659.011_PreliminaryWaterModel_202210.wtg South Range Crossing - Water Model Report Peak Hour Demand Scenario Hydrant Table - Time: 0.00 hours Pressure (psi) Hydraulic Grade (ft) Demand (gpm) Elevation (ft) Label 535,109.890.004,987.54H-3 565,109.880.004,980.77H-4 505,109.880.004,993.93H-6 495,109.880.004,997.72H-7 495,109.890.004,997.17H-8 495,109.900.004,997.69H-9 505,109.880.004,993.17H-10 535,109.880.004,988.24H-11 515,109.880.004,991.61H-12 495,109.880.004,996.11H-13 545,109.880.004,984.57H-14 525,109.880.004,988.63H-15 535,109.880.004,986.96H-16 535,109.880.004,986.67H-17 555,109.880.004,983.08H-18 Page 21 of 2427 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 3/14/2023 WaterCAD [10.03.03.72] Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center5659.011_PreliminaryWaterModel_202210.wtg South Range Crossing - Water Model Report Peak Hour Demand Scenario Pipe Table - Time: 0.00 hours Velocity (ft/s) Flow (gpm) Hazen- William s C MaterialDiamet er (in) Stop Node Start Node Length (Scaled) (ft) Has User Defined Length? Label 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron12.0J-2J-1488FalseP-1 0.05-18.68130.0Ductile Iron12.0J-80J-2321FalseP-2.1 0.05-18.68130.0Ductile Iron12.0J-3J-8092FalseP-2.2 0.05-18.68130.0Ductile Iron12.0J-4J-3339FalseP-3 0.05-18.68130.0Ductile Iron12.0J-5J-419FalseP-4 0.1218.68130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-6J-2125FalseP-5 0.035.38130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-8J-755FalseP-7 0.035.38130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-9J-8127FalseP-8 0.06-9.95130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-107J-11276FalseP-10.1 0.06-9.95130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-9J-10734FalseP-10.2 0.09-13.68130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-12J-106170FalseP-11.2 0.15-23.45130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-50J-12109FalseP-12.1 0.08-12.72130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-16J-50122FalseP-12.2 0.069.16130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-17J-9207FalseP-15 0.023.64130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-18J-1745FalseP-16 0.00-0.29130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-109J-1899FalseP-17 0.1116.63130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-101J-2334FalseP-18 0.1116.62130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-24J-10197FalseP-19 0.022.85130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-111J-28102FalseP-20 0.022.85130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-29J-111170FalseP-21 0.04-6.64130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-112J-3074FalseP-22 0.0812.69130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-26J-2452FalseP-23 0.04-6.64130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-11J-11256FalseP-24 0.034.74130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-34J-11058FalseP-25 0.01-1.55130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-30J-29259FalseP-28 0.035.09130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-31J-30111FalseP-30 0.034.74130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-32J-3159FalseP-31 0.000.35130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-33J-31259FalseP-32 0.03-4.39130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-29J-33111FalseP-34 0.023.47130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-36J-28115FalseP-36 0.02-2.44130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-37J-36156FalseP-37 0.045.91130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-39J-3667FalseP-40 0.033.93130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-40J-37138FalseP-41 0.16-25.60130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-41J-2388FalseP-42 0.18-28.36130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-42J-4169FalseP-43 0.21-33.28130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-43J-42141FalseP-44.1 0.2437.21130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-43J-1027FalseP-44.2 0.24-37.21130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-103J-102252FalseP-46.1 0.24-37.21130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-45J-1037FalseP-46.2 0.26-41.14130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-46J-4527FalseP-47 0.2336.18130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-47J-46142FalseP-48 0.1726.10130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-48J-10410FalseP-49.2 0.0710.74130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-105J-4989FalseP-51.1 0.0710.73130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-50J-10562FalseP-51.2 Page 22 of 2427 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 3/14/2023 WaterCAD [10.03.03.72] Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center5659.011_PreliminaryWaterModel_202210.wtg South Range Crossing - Water Model Report Peak Hour Demand Scenario Pipe Table - Time: 0.00 hours Velocity (ft/s) Flow (gpm) Hazen- William s C MaterialDiamet er (in) Stop Node Start Node Length (Scaled) (ft) Has User Defined Length? Label 0.03-3.93130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-48J-51164FalseP-52 0.034.74130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-52J-115169FalseP-53 0.03-5.34130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-47J-53164FalseP-54 0.03-3.93130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-24J-54164FalseP-55 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-56J-23338FalseP-56 0.02-2.76130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-41J-55106FalseP-57 0.03-3.93130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-43J-58106FalseP-59 0.03-3.93130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-45J-59106FalseP-60 0.49-77.33130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-60J-46178FalseP-61 0.51-80.09130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-61J-60105FalseP-62 0.3250.81130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-15J-61782FalseP-65 0.034.92130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-64J-42142FalseP-66 0.04-6.30130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-116J-66169FalseP-68 0.035.13130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-67J-49164FalseP-69 0.023.30130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-68J-11119FalseP-70 0.045.99130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-69J-6874FalseP-71 0.011.28130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-108J-6958FalseP-72(1) 0.011.28130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-70J-10879FalseP-72(2) 0.02-3.43130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-71J-70240FalseP-73 0.05-8.14130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-72J-7173FalseP-74 0.057.40130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-73J-7264FalseP-75 0.022.69130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-68J-73166FalseP-76 0.10-15.54130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-7J-72145FalseP-77 0.069.77130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-75J-12222FalseP-79 0.1219.38130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-94J-16222FalseP-85.1 0.068.67130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-113J-94133FalseP-85.2 0.06-8.67130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-113J-7598FalseP-87 0.12-18.69130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-85J-562FalseP-89 0.12-18.69130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-15J-86140FalseP-91 0.000.01130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-98J-1545FalseP-92.1 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-87J-9855FalseP-92.2 0.84-130.90130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-99J-6145FalseP-93.1 0.84-130.90130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-100J-9928FalseP-93.2 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-89J-61277FalseP-94 0.045.52130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-90J-17142FalseP-95 0.033.93130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-91J-18164FalseP-96 0.033.93130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-92J-19165FalseP-97 0.02-2.76130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-60J-93106FalseP-98 0.04-6.32130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-26J-28131FalseP-101 0.000.01130.0Ductile Iron12.0J-97J-546FalseP-103.1 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron12.0J-96J-9730FalseP-103.2 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-97H-418FalseP-104 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-98H-314FalseP-105 0.2032.10130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-16J-15157FalseP-108 Page 23 of 2427 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 3/14/2023 WaterCAD [10.03.03.72] Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center5659.011_PreliminaryWaterModel_202210.wtg South Range Crossing - Water Model Report Peak Hour Demand Scenario Pipe Table - Time: 0.00 hours Velocity (ft/s) Flow (gpm) Hazen- William s C MaterialDiamet er (in) Stop Node Start Node Length (Scaled) (ft) Has User Defined Length? Label (N/A)(N/A)130.0Ductile Iron16.5PMP-2R-288FalseP-112 (N/A)(N/A)130.0Ductile Iron16.5J-56PMP-2127FalseP-113 0.054.74130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-110J-3313FalseP-115 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0H-6J-1108FalseP-116 0.04-6.37130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-26J-37140FalseP-117 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-112H-1532FalseP-118 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0H-16J-1079FalseP-119 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-108H-149FalseP-120 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-106H-1710FalseP-121 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-113H-188FalseP-122 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-105H-1110FalseP-124 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-104H-1010FalseP-125 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-103H-99FalseP-126 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-102H-89FalseP-127 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-101H-732FalseP-128 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-111H-1310FalseP-129 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-109H-1232FalseP-130 0.03-130.90130.0Ductile Iron40.0PMP-1J-100154FalseP-131 0.03-130.90130.0Ductile Iron40.0R-1PMP-1115FalseP-132 0.1218.69130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-85J-86296FalseP-140 Page 24 of 2427 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 3/14/2023 WaterCAD [10.03.03.72] Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center5659.011_PreliminaryWaterModel_202210.wtg F APPENDIX F NRCS SOILS REPORT United States Department of Agriculture A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local participants Custom Soil Resource Report for Gallatin County Area, MontanaNatural Resources Conservation Service November 14, 2022 Preface Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas. They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers. Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand, protect, or enhance the environment. Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions. The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations. Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/ portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center (https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nrcs) or your NRCS State Soil Scientist (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/contactus/? cid=nrcs142p2_053951). Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or underground installations. The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require 2 alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 3 Contents Preface....................................................................................................................2 How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5 Soil Map..................................................................................................................8 Soil Map................................................................................................................9 Legend................................................................................................................10 Map Unit Legend................................................................................................11 Map Unit Descriptions.........................................................................................11 Gallatin County Area, Montana.......................................................................13 350B—Blackmore silt loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes......................................13 510B—Meadowcreek loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes......................................14 4 How Soil Surveys Are Made Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length, and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other biological activity. Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA. The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a specific location on the landscape. Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented by an understanding of the soil-vegetation-landscape relationship, are sufficient to verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries. Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units). Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil 5 scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and research. The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map. The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape, and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the soil-landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at specific locations. Once the soil-landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded. These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color, depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil typically vary from one point to another across the landscape. Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other properties. While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field-observed characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management. Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same kinds of soil. Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example, soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date. After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and Custom Soil Resource Report 6 identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings, fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately. Custom Soil Resource Report 7 Soil Map The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit. 8 9 Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map 505461050546805054750505482050548905054960505503050551005055170505461050546805054750505482050548905054960505503050551005055170495100 495170 495240 495310 495380 495450 495520 495100 495170 495240 495310 495380 495450 495520 45° 39' 1'' N 111° 3' 47'' W45° 39' 1'' N111° 3' 25'' W45° 38' 41'' N 111° 3' 47'' W45° 38' 41'' N 111° 3' 25'' WN Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 12N WGS84 0 100 200 400 600 Feet 0 45 90 180 270 Meters Map Scale: 1:3,040 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet. Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Map Unit Polygons Soil Map Unit Lines Soil Map Unit Points Special Point Features Blowout Borrow Pit Clay Spot Closed Depression Gravel Pit Gravelly Spot Landfill Lava Flow Marsh or swamp Mine or Quarry Miscellaneous Water Perennial Water Rock Outcrop Saline Spot Sandy Spot Severely Eroded Spot Sinkhole Slide or Slip Sodic Spot Spoil Area Stony Spot Very Stony Spot Wet Spot Other Special Line Features Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Gallatin County Area, Montana Survey Area Data: Version 26, Aug 30, 2022 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Aug 3, 2009—Sep 1, 2016 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Custom Soil Resource Report 10 Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 350B Blackmore silt loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes 0.2 0.5% 510B Meadowcreek loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes 39.2 99.5% Totals for Area of Interest 39.4 100.0% Map Unit Descriptions The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit. A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils. Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however, Custom Soil Resource Report 11 onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties and qualities. Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement. Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series. Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas. These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups. A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example. An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example. Custom Soil Resource Report 12 Gallatin County Area, Montana 350B—Blackmore silt loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 56q7 Elevation: 4,850 to 5,550 feet Mean annual precipitation: 18 to 22 inches Mean annual air temperature: 37 to 43 degrees F Frost-free period: 80 to 95 days Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland Map Unit Composition Blackmore and similar soils:90 percent Minor components:10 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Blackmore Setting Landform:Stream terraces Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Parent material:Calcareous loess Typical profile A - 0 to 10 inches: silt loam Bt - 10 to 27 inches: silty clay loam Bk1 - 27 to 42 inches: silt loam Bk2 - 42 to 60 inches: silt loam Properties and qualities Slope:0 to 4 percent Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches Drainage class:Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high (0.20 to 0.57 in/hr) Depth to water table:More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding:None Frequency of ponding:None Calcium carbonate, maximum content:30 percent Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 11.4 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 4e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e Hydrologic Soil Group: C Ecological site: R043BP818MT - Upland Grassland Group Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Bowery Percent of map unit:5 percent Landform:Stream terraces, alluvial fans Down-slope shape:Linear Custom Soil Resource Report 13 Across-slope shape:Linear Ecological site:R044BB032MT - Loamy (Lo) LRU 01 Subset B Hydric soil rating: No Blackmore Percent of map unit:3 percent Landform:Stream terraces Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Ecological site:R043BP820MT - Upland Shrubland Group Hydric soil rating: No Brodyk Percent of map unit:2 percent Landform:Stream terraces Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Ecological site:R044BB030MT - Limy (Ly) LRU 01 Subset B Hydric soil rating: No 510B—Meadowcreek loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 56vt Elevation: 4,200 to 5,950 feet Mean annual precipitation: 12 to 18 inches Mean annual air temperature: 39 to 45 degrees F Frost-free period: 90 to 110 days Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated Map Unit Composition Meadowcreek and similar soils:85 percent Minor components:15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Meadowcreek Setting Landform:Stream terraces Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Parent material:Alluvium Typical profile A - 0 to 11 inches: loam Bg - 11 to 25 inches: silt loam 2C - 25 to 60 inches: very gravelly sand Properties and qualities Slope:0 to 4 percent Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches Custom Soil Resource Report 14 Drainage class:Somewhat poorly drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table:About 24 to 42 inches Frequency of flooding:None Frequency of ponding:None Maximum salinity:Nonsaline to slightly saline (0.0 to 4.0 mmhos/cm) Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 5.1 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 2e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e Hydrologic Soil Group: C Ecological site: R044BP815MT - Subirrigated Grassland Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Blossberg Percent of map unit:10 percent Landform:Terraces Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Ecological site:R044BP815MT - Subirrigated Grassland Hydric soil rating: Yes Beaverton Percent of map unit:5 percent Landform:Stream terraces, alluvial fans Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Ecological site:R044BP818MT - Upland Grassland Hydric soil rating: No Custom Soil Resource Report 15 G APPENDIX G GEOTECHNICAL REPORT H APPENDIX G CORROSIVITY ANALYSIS South Range Crossing Dipra Consequence Score Sheet (in)(points)Classification (points)(ft)(points)(yes/no)(points) Onsite <24 0 Routine 0 <10 0 Yes 0 0 Total PointsLocation Pipe Diameter Location Depth of Cover Alternate Water Supply N:\5659\011 -YTI Development\04 Design\Calcs\Corrosivity\5659.011_South Range_CorrosivityScoreSheets.xlsx 1 of 2 South Range Crossing Dipra Corrosivity Likelihood Score Sheet (ohm-cm)(points)(ppm)(points)(%)(points)(yes/no)(points)(s.u.)(points)(ppm)(points)(mv)(points)Yes/No (points) TP-1 979 25 124 8 >15 5 yes 5 7.7 0 48 4 292 0 Yes 2 49 TP-2 1600 19 48 0 >15 5 yes 5 7.6 0 56 4 287 0 Yes 2 35 TP-5 1410 22 20 0 >15 5 yes 5 7.5 0 29 4 288 0 Yes 2 38 TP-6 1620 19 27 0 >15 5 yes 5 7.8 0 28 4 284 0 Yes 2 35 Total PointsSample Bi-Metallic ConsiderationsRedox PotentialSulfide IonsPHGround Water InfluenceMoisture ContentChloridesResistivity N:\5659\011 -YTI Development\04 Design\Calcs\Corrosivity\5659.011_South Range_CorrosivityScoreSheets.xlsx 2 of 2 TP-1 TP-2, and TP-6 TP-5 5 < 500 ohm-cm 30 500 - 1000 ohm-cm 25 > 1000 - 1500 ohm-cm 22 > 1500 - 2000 ohm-cm 19 > 2000 - 3000 ohm-cm 10 > 3000 - 5000 ohm-cm 5 > 5000 ohm-cm 0 > 100 ppm = positive 8 50 - 100 ppm = trace 3 < 50 ppm = negative 0 > 15% = Wet 5 5 - 15% = Moist 2.5 < 5% = Dry 0 Pipe below the water 5 table at any time pH 0 - 4 4 pH > 4 - 6 1 pH 6 - 8, with sulfides and low or negative redox 4 pH > 6 0 positive ( 1 ppm)4 trace ( > 0 and < 1 ppm) 1.5 negative ( 0 ppm) 0 = negative 2 = positive 0 - 100 mv 1 = positive > 100 mv 0 Connected to noble metals 2 (e.g. copper) - yes Connected to noble metals 0 (e.g. copper) - no TOTAL POSSIBLE POINTS Cinders, Mine Waste, Peat Bog, Landfill, Fly Ash, Coal RESISTIVITY CHLORIDES MOISTURE CONTENT GROUND WATER INFLUENCE pH SULFIDE IONS REDOX POTENTIAL BI-METALLIC CONSIDERATIONS Known Corrosive Environments POINTS 30 8 5 5 4 4 2 2 60 21 * Soils with Known Corrosive Environments shall be assigned 21 points or the total of points for Likelihood Factors, whichever is greater. Likelihood Score Sheet TABLE 2 – > – > MAXIMUM POSSIBLE POINTS LIKELIHOOD FACTOR 6 DIPRA and Corrpro again listened to the needs of utility operators and recognized the differences between long, large diameter, straight-run transmission mains and the more complicated networks of distribution pipelines that bring water to our neighborhoods and businesses. The result provides a more practical solution for pipeline networks that comprise the distribution systems within a utility’s service area. The use of V-Bio® enhanced polyethylene encasement in conjunction with metallized zinc provides water operators with an effective alternative to controlling corrosion in distribution systems. 3” to 24” 0 30” to 36” 8 42” to 48” 12 54” to 64” 22 Routine (Fair to good access, minimal traffic/other utility 0 consideration, etc.) Moderate (Typical business/ residential areas, some right 8 of way limitations, etc.) Difficult (Subaqueous crossings, downtown metropolitan business areas, 20 multiple utilities congestion, swamps, etc.) 0 to 10 feet depth 0 > 10 to 20 feet depth 3 > 20 feet depth 5 Alternate supply available - no 3 Alternate supply available - yes 0 TOTAL POSSIBLE POINTS PIPE SERVICE LOCATION: Construction-Repair Considerations DEPTH OF COVER CONSIDERATIONS ALTERNATE WATER SUPPLY POINTS 22 20 5 3 50 Consequence Score Sheet TABLE 3 The revised DDM® recognizes the practical differences in corrosion control needs between transmission mains and distribution systems. MAXIMUM POSSIBLE POINTS CONSEQUENCE FACTOR