Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
APPENDIX H_WaterReport_20211027
THE HOMESTEAD AT BUFFALO RUN SITE PLAN WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS WATER DISTRIBUTION DESIGN REPORT February 2022 October 2021 (Original) 02-08-22 PREPARED BY: MMI #: 6475.005 1 Table of Contents 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... 3 2 GENERAL INFORMATION (DEQ 1.1.1) .............................................................................................. 3 3 EXTENT OF WATER WORKS SYSTEM, INCLUDING (DEQ 1.1.2): ................................................. 3 4 ALTERNATE PLANS (1.1.3) ................................................................................................................ 4 5 SITE CONDITIONS (1.1.4) ................................................................................................................... 4 6 WATER USE DATA, INCLUDING (1.1.5): ........................................................................................... 4 7 FLOW REQUIREMENTS (1.1.6) .......................................................................................................... 7 8 SOURCES OF WATER SUPPLY (1.1.7) ............................................................................................. 7 9 PROPOSED TREATMENT PROCESSES (1.1.8) ................................................................................ 7 10 SEWAGE SYSTEM AVAILABLE (1.1.9) ......................................................................................... 7 11 WASTE DISPOSAL (1.1.10) ............................................................................................................ 8 12 AUTOMATION (1.1.11) .................................................................................................................... 8 13 PROJECT SITES (1.1.12) ................................................................................................................ 8 14 FINANCING (1.1.13) ......................................................................................................................... 8 15 FUTURE EXTENSIONS (1.1.14) ...................................................................................................... 8 APPENDICES Appendix A Location Map (by Vogel & Associates) & Site Plan Appendix B Distribution System Map (from City of Bozeman GIS Infrastructure Viewer) Appendix C As-Built Plans (from Meadow Creek Subdivision by Engineering, Inc.) Appendix D Water Model Calibration Info Appendix E WaterCAD Results Appendix F NRCS Soils Report Appendix G Geotechnical Report 2 Prepared by: Morrison-Maierle, Inc. 2880 Technology Blvd. W. Bozeman, Montana 59771 Phone: (406) 587-0721 Fax: (406) 922-6702 Written By: JAU Checked By: MEE, LRH Approved By: JRN Project No.: 6475.005 N:\6475\005 - Buffalo Run - Site Plan\04 Design\Reports\Water Design Report\BuffaloRunWaterReport.docx 3 Buffalo Run Site Plan Preliminary Water Distribution Design Report 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report provides a basis for design of the Buffalo Run Site Plan water distribution system. The water distribution system serving the Buffalo Run Site will be designed and installed in accordance with the Montana Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) Circular No. 1; Montana Public Works Standard Specifications (MPWSS); The City of Bozeman Modifications to MPWSS; City of Bozeman Water Facility Plan; and the City of Bozeman Fire Service Line Standard. The design report is to verify that there is adequate volume and pressure to supply domestic and fire service for all the buildings in the proposed development. The following design report follows the section numbering of Circular DEQ-1-Standards for Water Works (2018 Edition) Section 1.1, Engineer’s Report. 2 GENERAL INFORMATION (DEQ 1.1.1) a. The proposed Buffalo Run Site Plan is located off Kurk Drive between S 31st Ave and Fowler Ln. This project has been annexed and zoned into the City of Bozeman, Montana. See the vicinity map for location details. This project involves extending approximately 6,400 feet of a new 8 -inch Class 51 DIP water pipe into the proposed development. The new 8-inch main will tie into the existing 8-inch water main along Kurk Drive and to the existing 8” water main located on Meah Lane, creating a looped system within the development. Each building will be serviced by domestic water services and buildings requiring a fire service will have a separate fire service. The project proposes thirteen (13) fire hydrant assemblies. b. The proposed water main infrastructure will be served by the City of Bozeman. c. Project Developer: Buffalo Run Bozeman, LLC 5400 Fowler Lane Bozeman, Mt 59718 d. System Owner: City of Bozeman PO Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 3 EXTENT OF WATER WORKS SYSTEM, INCLUDING (DEQ 1.1.2): The proposed water main extension is an extension of the City of Bozeman water infrastructure in the area. The water main extension is proposed to serve the Buffalo Run Site Plan which Buffalo Run Bozeman, LLC plans to construct a 237-unit multi-family apartment community and a clubhouse (see the attached Site Plan in Appendix A for details). The project will tie into two existing 8” mains located at the east boundary of the site located on Kurk Drive and Meah Lane to create a looped distribution system within the project 4 development. The new 8” mains will connect to fire hydrants spaced throughout the development that will provide fire protection to the project. A 16” distribution main within fowler is being constructed with the project as it is part of the Water Facilities Master Plan for the City of Bozeman. Each of the proposed buildings and the proposed clubhouse will be serviced by City of Bozeman water system. Domestic service sizes range from 1-inch to 2-inch, while fire services are 6-inch. These water main extensions will serve the buildout of the property. The water mains shall be extended to the property boundaries within proposed public rights-of-way to provide potential service connection for adjacent properties. 4 ALTERNATE PLANS (1.1.3) The alignment of the proposed main was chosen to meet the layout of the proposed development. No alternate plans were considered due to the limited availability of existing infrastructure to connect to. 5 SITE CONDITIONS (1.1.4) The property for the proposed development is currently an improved rural property which slopes gently to the north with existing grades of less than 4% and mostly Turner loam and Hyalite-Beaverton complex deposits (USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Web Soil Survey) as shown in Appendix E. A site-specific geotechnical report has been done for the Buffalo Run Site Plan Application by Rawhide Engineering Inc, dated March 16, 2020. The site is favorable for the building foundation construction. The geotechnical report was included as Appendix F. The groundwater levels onsite range between approximately 1 and 5 feet below existing grade based on well monitoring performed from March 2020 to July 2020. The groundwater flows generally from the south to the north based on general groundwater flow in the valley. The groundwater at this site is likely variable based on seasonal precipitation and irrigation practices. 6 WATER USE DATA, INCLUDING (1.1.5): The water distribution system serving the proposed project will be designed and installed in accordance with the Montana Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) Circular No. 1; Montana Public Works Standard Specifications (MPWSS); the City of Bozeman Modifications to MPWSS; City of Bozeman Water Facility Plan; and the City of Bozeman Design Standards and Specifications Policy. The following section addresses the design capacity and flow requirements discussed in Section 8 of DEQ – 1. The water main extension for the Buffalo Run Site Plan will service twenty-nine (29) apartment buildings and one (1) clubhouse. The capacity requirement for the water main extension is calculated as follows: 5 Residential Demands: 237 dwelling units (DU) Population = ~500 persons (237 DU x 2.11 people/DU) Design Values from Bozeman Design Standards, March 2020 Version 2.11 People per DU 170 gallons per day (GPD) per person (Average Day Demand) Maximum Day Demand Peaking Factor = 2.3 Maximum Hour Demand Peaking Factor = 3.0 Table 1: Water Demand Summary BUILDING TOTAL DU AVG DAY DEMAND (GPD) MAX DAY DEMAND (GPD) PEAK HOUR DEMAND (GPD) BLD A 24 8,609 19,801 25,827 BLD B 30 10,761 24,750 32,283 BLD C 30 10,761 24,750 32,283 BLD D 30 10,761 24,750 32,283 BLD E 22 7,891 18,149 23,673 BLD F 22 7,891 18,149 23,673 BLD G 5 1,794 4,126 5,382 BLD H 22 7,891 18,149 23,673 BLD I 2 717 1,649 2,151 BLD J 4 1,435 3,300 4,305 BLD K 5 1,794 4,126 5,382 BLD L 5 1,794 4,126 5,382 BLD M 2 717 1,649 2,151 BLD N 4 1,435 3,300 4,305 BLD O 2 717 1,649 2,151 DUPLEX 1 /A/B 2 717 1,649 2,151 DUPLEX 2 /A/B 2 717 1,649 2,151 DUPLEX 3 /A/B 2 717 1,649 2,151 DUPLEX 4 /A/B 2 717 1,649 2,151 DUPLEX 5 /A/B 2 717 1,649 2,151 DUPLEX 6 /A/B 2 717 1,649 2,151 DUPLEX 7 /A/B 2 717 1,649 2,151 DUPLEX 8 /A/B 2 717 1,649 2,151 DUPLEX 9 /A/B 2 717 1,649 2,151 DUPLEX 10 /A/B 2 717 1,649 2,151 DUPLEX 11 /A/B 2 717 1,649 2,151 6 Table 1: Water Demand Summary DUPLEX 12 /A/B 2 717 1,649 2,151 DUPLEX 13 /A/B 2 717 1,649 2,151 DUPLEX 14 /A/B 2 717 1,649 2,151 TOTALS 237 85,012 195,528 255,036 Residential Demand Total Conversions (gallons/minute): ADD = 85,012 GPD = 59.0 GPM MDD = 195,528 GPD = 135.8 GPM MHD = 309,914 GPD = 177.1 GPM Community Clubhouse Demands: Assumptions: (4) employees work out of the clubhouse 1/3 of the total population use the clubhouse per day = 500/3 = 167 people ADD = (4 Employees)(13 GPD) + (167 users/day)(3 GPD) = 553 GPD = 0.39 GPM MDD = 2.3 x ADD = 2.3 x 0.39 = 0.90GPM MHD = 3.0 x ADD = 3.0 x 0.39 = 1.17GPM Irrigation Demands: Based on the City of Bozeman’s Integrated Water Resources Plan September 2013, the 170 GPD per person includes all water use including irrigation. Total Domestic Demands: ADD: 59.0 GPM + 0.39 GPM = 59.39 GPM MDD: 135.8 GPM + 0.90 GPM = 136.70 GPM MHD: 177.1 GPM + 1.17 GPM = 178.27 GPM Fire Flow The total water demand for the system includes the Maximum Daily Demand and the maximum required fire flow of 1,500 GPM which based on the 26,570 SF (Building Type D) building of Type V-A Construction and sprinkler systems designed to meet NFPA 13R requirements. Table B105.1(2) of Appendix B of the International Fire Code requires 3,000 GPM fire flow for a building without sprinklers and allows 75% reduction for buildings with fire sprinklers. The reduced flow was calculated to be 750 GPM; however, the minimum flow allowed per code is 1,500 GPM for sprinklers meeting NFPA 13R requirements. For the purpose of this report, our model includes a fire flow demand of 1,500 GPM. The Maximum Daily Demand is calculated by multiplying the Average Daily Demand by a peaking factor of 2.3 as described above. Therefore, the following fire flow demand for the four buildings is as follows: Total Fire Flow = 136.70 GPM + 1,500 GPM = 1,636.70 GPM 7 7 FLOW REQUIREMENTS (1.1.6) Modeling Procedure Water modeling was performed using WaterCAD (Connect Edition 10.03.03.72) software to assess expected performance of the extensions on the distribution network. Water supply from the existing City water system has been modeled using reservoirs and pumps at boundary locations mimic distribution system output. Pump curves were developed using model outputs received from the City of Bozeman at varying flow rates during a maximum daily demand scenario. Use hydraulic model flow data (or fire flow results) represented using a reservoir and pump supply is a commonly used method to build a stand-alone model without reproducing the complete distribution system. Flows modeled at Hydrants #2112 (located on Kurk Drive, approximately 250 feet west of S 30th Ave) and #2108 (located on west Meah Lane) were used for calibration (Appendix C). The total water demand for the system includes the maximum daily demand and the required fire flow of 1,500 GPM as determined by the Insurance Services Office (ISO) criteria. The maximum daily demand is calculated by multiplying the average daily demand by a peaking factor of 2.3. The minimum pressure used for pipe main sizing was 35 PSI during normal uses and no less than 20 PSI residual pressure during fire hydrant full flow condition at any supply node. A “C” of 130 was used for the Hazen Williams pipe roughness factor. Modeling Results The model’s results indicate that proposed 8-inch distribution mains for the Buffalo Run Site will supply the needed maximum daily domestic flow with fire flow while maintaining above 20-psi residual pressure at all points within the modeled area. Pressure during MDD ranges from 31 to 48 PSI. During a MDD plus Fire Flow scenario (at Hydrant H-8) residual pressures ranged from 28 to 35 PSI (see the WaterCAD model results located in Appendix D for additional information). An automated fire flow analysis at all proposed hydrants was performed as well. The maximum fire flow available at all hydrant nodes was calculated during the maximum daily demand scenario. Based on this result, the minimum fire flow available was calculated to be 1,601 GPM at Hydrant H-12. This exceeds the 1,500 minimum fire flow requirement. 8 SOURCES OF WATER SUPPLY (1.1.7) Water is supplied from City of Bozeman 9 PROPOSED TREATMENT PROCESSES (1.1.8) Non-applicable 10 SEWAGE SYSTEM AVAILABLE (1.1.9) The area is served by the City of Bozeman wastewater treatment facility 8 11 WASTE DISPOSAL (1.1.10) Non-applicable 12 AUTOMATION (1.1.11) Non-applicable 13 PROJECT SITES (1.1.12) The development is bounded by Meadow Creek Subdivision Phase 1 to the east, vacant land to the north, Fowler Lane and vacant land to the west, and an improved rural property to the south. The wastewater at the site will be conveyed to the City of Bozeman wastewater treatment facility. 14 FINANCING (1.1.13) Non-applicable 15 FUTURE EXTENSIONS (1.1.14) No future extension will be needed. A APPENDIX A VICINITY MAP & PROPOSED SITE PLAN Blackwood RoadFowler RoadSouth 27thAvenue Kurk Drive South 28thAvenue South 29thAvenue South 29thAvenue South 30thAvenue Meah Lane Blackwood Road South 27 thAvenue Subject Site B APPENDIX B DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM MAP (from City of Bozeman GIS Infrastructure Viewer) VERIFY SCALE! THESE PRINTS MAY BE REDUCED. LINE BELOW MEASURES ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING. MODIFY SCALE ACCORDINGLY! 2020COPYRIGHT © MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., SHEET NUMBER PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER DATEDESCRIPTIONNO.BY N:\6475\002 - TOPO AND BOUNDARY SURVEY\ACAD\EXHIBITS\2020_PRELIMWATERSEWERDISTRIBUTION.DWG PLOTTED BY:LEE HAGEMAN ON Jul/25/2020 REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE: Q.C. REVIEW DATE: BY: 2880 Technology Blvd West Bozeman, MT 59718 406.587.0721 www.m-m.net engineers surveyors planners scientists MorrisonMaierle BUFFALO RUN SUBDIVISION BOZEMAN MONTANA EXISTING WATER DISTRIBUTION MAP (FROM CITY OF BOZEMAN GIS MAPPER) 6475.002 EX-1 LRH 07/2020 BUFF A L O R U N SUBDI VI SI O N KURK DR MEAH LNS 30TH AVEBLACKWOOD DRS 31ST AVEMEAD O W C R E E K SUBDI VI SI O N PHAS E 1 C APPENDIX C AS-BUILT PLANS (from Meadow Creek Subdivision by Engineering, Inc.) D APPENDIX D WATER MODEL CALIBRATION INFO CITY OF BOZEMAN Fire Flow Request Form PHONE (406) 582-3200 FAX (406) 582-3201 Date: July 14th, 2020 Pressure Zone: South Hydrant GIS ID#: 2108, 2109, 2111, 2112 Adjacent Main: 8-inch DIP (In Kurk Dr and Meah Lane) Location Request: Buffalo Run Development Bozeman Infrastructure Viewer Website: https://gisweb.bozeman.net/Html5Viewer/?viewer=infrastructure The results of the fire flow information that you requested are as follows: Hydrant ID#: 2108 Maximum Day Demand Available Fire Flow at 20 psi: 2983.28 gpm Maximum Day Demand Minimum Pressure: 36.79 psi Hydrant ID#: 2109 Maximum Day Demand Available Fire Flow at 20 psi: 3130.47 gpm Maximum Day Demand Minimum Pressure: 37.57 psi Hydrant ID#: 2111 Maximum Day Demand Available Fire Flow at 20 psi: 3228.61 gpm Maximum Day Demand Minimum Pressure: 43.36 psi Hydrant ID#: 2112 Maximum Day Demand Available Fire Flow at 20 psi: 2649.11 gpm Maximum Day Demand Minimum Pressure: 43.96 psi If you have questions or need further information feel free to email. Data Disclaimer: Water distribution information is calculated using hydraulic modeling software and is subject to variation. Actual field conditions may vary. This information is provided to the requestor for evaluation purposes only, without warranty of any kind, including, but not limited to any expressed or implied warranty arising by contract, stature, or law. In no event regardless of cause, shall the City be liable for any direct, indirect, special, punitive or consequential damages of any kind whether such damages arise under contract, tort, strict liability or inequity. HOME OF MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY GATEWAY TO YELLOWSTONE PARK Hydrant Elevation: 5017.16 GIS Hydrant # Available Flow (gpm) Residual Pressure (psi) Residual Pressure (ft)2108 0 40.03 92.47 200 39.59 91.45 400 39.01 90.11 600 38.34 88.57 800 37.56 86.76 1,000.00 36.64 84.64 1,200.00 35.56 82.14 1,400.00 34.34 79.33 1,600.00 32.98 76.18 1,800.00 31.49 72.74 2,000.00 29.86 68.98 2,200.00 28.11 64.93 2,400.00 26.22 60.57 2,600.00 24.21 55.93 2,800.00 22.07 50.98 3,000.00 19.81 45.76 3,200.00 17.42 40.24 3,400.00 14.92 34.47 3,600.00 12.29 28.39 3,800.00 9.55 22.06 4,000.00 6.68 15.43 4,200.00 3.7 8.55 4,400.00 0.61 1.41 4,438.57 0 0.00 Hydrant Curve 0510152025303540450 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000Residual Pressure (psi)Available Flow (gpm)Hydrant Curve 2108Data Disclaimer: Water distribution information is calculated using hydraulic modeling software and is subject to variation. Actual field conditions may vary. This information is provided to the requestor for evaluation purposes only, without warranty of any kind, including, but not limited to any expressed or implied warranty arising by contract, stature, or law. In no event regardless of cause, shall the City be liable for any direct, indirect, special, punitive or consequential damages of any kind whether such damages arise under contract, tort, strict liability or inequity. Hydrant Elevation: 4998.63 GIS Hydrant # Available Flow (gpm) Residual Pressure (psi) Residual Head (ft)2112 0 47.21 109.06 200 46.67 107.81 400 45.86 105.94 600 44.82 103.53 800 43.55 100.60 1,000.00 42.02 97.07 1,200.00 40.22 92.91 1,400.00 38.18 88.20 1,600.00 35.88 82.88 1,800.00 33.35 77.04 2,000.00 30.58 70.64 2,200.00 27.58 63.71 2,400.00 24.34 56.23 2,600.00 20.88 48.23 2,800.00 17.2 39.73 3,000.00 13.3 30.72 3,200.00 9.18 21.21 3,400.00 4.84 11.18 3,600.00 0.29 0.67 3,612.29 0 0.00 Hydrant Curve ‐10010203040500 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000Residual Pressure (psi)Available Flow (gpm)Hydrant Curve 2112Data Disclaimer: Water distribution information is calculated using hydraulic modeling software and is subject to variation. Actual field conditions may vary. This information is provided to the requestor for evaluation purposes only, without warranty of any kind, including, but not limited to any expressed or implied warranty arising by contract, stature, or law. In no event regardless of cause, shall the City be liable for any direct, indirect, special, punitive or consequential damages of any kind whether such damages arise under contract, tort, strict liability or inequity. E APPENDIX E WATERCAD RESULTS Buffalo Run Water Model ReportNetwork SchematicOverall SchematicPage 1 of 4027 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-16662/8/2022WaterCAD[10.03.03.72]Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center6475.005_WaterModel.wtg Buffalo Run Water Model Report Average Daily Demand Scenario Reservoir Table - Time: 0.00 hours Hydraulic Grade(ft) Flow (Out net)(gpm)Is Active?Elevation(ft)Label 4,998.630.00True4,998.63R-1 5,017.1659.72True5,017.16R-3 Pump Table - Time: 0.00 hours Pump Head (ft) Flow (Total) (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (Discharg e)(ft) Hydraulic Grade (Suction) (ft) Downstrea m Pipe Status (Initial ) Pump Definition Elevatio n (ft) Label 0.000.005,108.704,998.63P-73OnHydrant21124,998.63PMP-1 91.5659.725,108.725,017.16P-75OnHydrant21085,017.16PMP-2 Page 2 of 3027 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2/8/2022 WaterCAD[10.03.03.72]Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center6475.005_WaterModel.wtg Buffalo Run Water Model Report Average Daily Demand Scenario Junction Table - Time: 0.00 hours Is Active?Pressure(psi)Hydraulic Grade(ft) Demand(gpm)Elevation(ft)Label True485,108.700.004,998.63J-1 True485,108.700.004,997.60J-2 True495,108.700.004,995.50J-3 True495,108.690.004,996.30J-4 True485,108.680.004,996.70J-5 True485,108.680.004,996.70J-6 True495,108.690.004,996.43J-7 True485,108.690.004,997.23J-9 True495,108.680.004,996.40J-10 True475,108.680.005,000.85J-11 True465,108.690.005,001.80J-12 True475,108.690.005,000.20J-13 True445,108.700.005,008.00J-14 True445,108.680.005,006.90J-15 True445,108.680.005,006.90J-16 True465,108.680.005,001.37J-17 True445,108.680.005,006.50J-18 True435,108.700.005,008.20J-20 True435,108.700.005,008.42J-21 True445,108.710.005,008.00J-22 True405,108.720.005,017.16J-23 True485,108.680.004,996.83J-24 True475,108.690.005,000.50J-25 True495,108.690.004,996.43J-26 True495,108.680.004,996.25J-27 True475,108.690.005,000.86J-28 True485,108.680.004,997.40J-29 True485,108.680.004,998.50J-30 True485,108.680.004,998.30J-31 True455,108.680.005,003.53J-32 True455,108.680.005,005.75J-33 True455,108.680.005,004.60J-34 True465,108.690.005,002.45J-35 True445,108.680.005,005.99J-36 True485,108.690.004,998.60J-37 True485,108.690.004,996.80J-38 True485,108.690.004,997.30J-39 True455,108.690.005,004.40J-40 True485,108.690.004,997.20J-41 True485,108.700.004,998.63J-42 True495,108.690.004,995.80J-46 True455,108.690.005,003.58J-47 True465,108.680.005,001.25J-48 True445,108.680.005,007.10J-49 True445,108.680.005,006.50J-50 Page 3 of 3027 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2/8/2022 WaterCAD[10.03.03.72]Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center6475.005_WaterModel.wtg Buffalo Run Water Model Report Average Daily Demand Scenario Junction Table - Time: 0.00 hours Is Active?Pressure(psi)Hydraulic Grade(ft) Demand(gpm)Elevation(ft)Label True475,108.680.005,000.34J-51 True445,108.680.395,008.00J-52 True445,108.680.005,006.20J-53 True325,108.656.005,035.00J-54 True445,108.680.005,006.50J-55 True445,108.680.005,007.00J-56 True485,108.680.004,997.10J-57 True485,108.680.004,997.17J-58 True405,108.660.505,017.25J-59 True405,108.660.505,017.25J-60 True475,108.680.004,999.10J-61 True395,108.670.505,018.50J-62 True395,108.670.505,018.27J-63 True395,108.670.505,017.50J-64 True345,108.635.505,030.00J-65 True475,108.680.004,999.20J-66 True465,108.680.005,002.00J-67 True475,108.680.004,999.90J-68 True395,108.670.505,018.75J-69 True395,108.670.505,019.25J-70 True325,108.547.505,035.30J-71 True325,108.655.505,034.75J-72 True455,108.680.005,004.03J-73 True445,108.680.005,006.75J-74 True465,108.680.005,002.88J-75 True325,108.607.505,034.00J-76 True495,108.690.004,995.70J-77 True405,108.670.505,017.00J-78 True495,108.690.004,995.45J-79 True405,108.670.505,017.00J-80 True495,108.690.004,995.50J-81 True395,108.670.505,017.75J-82 True495,108.690.004,995.70J-83 True395,108.670.505,017.75J-84 True475,108.690.004,999.73J-85 True455,108.690.005,003.75J-86 True335,108.655.505,031.75J-87 True475,108.690.005,000.28J-88 True475,108.680.005,001.18J-89 True335,108.607.505,032.00J-90 True475,108.690.004,999.70J-91 True455,108.690.005,004.00J-92 True465,108.690.005,001.58J-93 True445,108.690.005,006.00J-94 True465,108.690.005,002.81J-95 Page 4 of 3027 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2/8/2022 WaterCAD[10.03.03.72]Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center6475.005_WaterModel.wtg Buffalo Run Water Model Report Average Daily Demand Scenario Junction Table - Time: 0.00 hours Is Active?Pressure(psi)Hydraulic Grade(ft) Demand(gpm)Elevation(ft)Label True325,108.681.005,034.80J-96 True465,108.690.005,003.43J-97 True325,108.681.255,035.00J-98 True455,108.690.005,004.80J-99 True325,108.680.505,035.40J-100 True455,108.690.005,003.95J-101 True325,108.681.005,035.10J-102 True465,108.690.005,003.40J-103 True445,108.690.005,007.30J-104 True445,108.700.005,006.08J-105 True315,108.691.255,036.30J-106 True475,108.690.005,000.43J-107 True335,108.680.505,032.00J-108 True485,108.690.004,998.60J-109 True345,108.681.255,031.00J-110 True345,108.680.505,030.00J-111 True405,108.670.505,017.00J-112 True485,108.690.004,997.00J-113 True405,108.670.505,017.00J-114 True485,108.690.004,996.61J-115 True395,108.690.505,017.50J-116 Page 5 of 3027 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2/8/2022 WaterCAD[10.03.03.72]Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center6475.005_WaterModel.wtg Buffalo Run Water Model Report Average Daily Demand Scenario Hydrant Table - Time: 0.00 hours Pressure(psi)Hydraulic Grade(ft) Demand(gpm)Elevation(ft)Label 475,108.680.004,999.40H-1 495,108.690.004,996.55H-2 485,108.680.004,997.41H-3 445,108.690.005,007.00H-4 455,108.690.005,003.90H-5 445,108.690.005,006.70H-6 465,108.680.005,001.65H-7 445,108.680.005,006.20H-8 445,108.680.005,007.00H-9 435,108.700.005,008.40H-10 485,108.700.004,998.30H-11 485,108.680.004,998.60H-12 455,108.680.005,005.00H-13 Page 6 of 3027 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2/8/2022 WaterCAD[10.03.03.72]Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center6475.005_WaterModel.wtg Buffalo Run Water Model Report Average Daily Demand Scenario Pipe Table - Time: 0.00 hours Velocity(ft/s)Flow(gpm)Hazen-Williams C MaterialDiameter(in) Stop NodeStart NodeLength (Scaled)(ft) Label 0.1523.01130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-2J-1112P-1 0.1523.01130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-3J-294P-2 0.1523.01130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-4J-3105P-3 0.1524.03130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-115J-4168P-4 0.1523.53130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-113J-11554P-5 0.1523.03130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-38J-11354P-6 0.1422.53130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-9J-3833P-7 0.1422.52130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-83J-921P-8 0.1422.02130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-46J-8332P-9 0.1421.51130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-81J-4637P-10 0.1321.01130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-79J-8154P-11 0.1320.51130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-77J-7954P-12 0.1320.01130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-10J-77136P-13 0.1320.01130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-5J-1065P-14 0.057.81130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-58J-5127P-15 0.057.31130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-57J-5850P-16 0.046.81130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-24J-57206P-17 0.046.81130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-6J-2465P-18 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-7J-453P-19 0.0812.20130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-29J-574P-20 0.0711.70130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-31J-2954P-21 0.0711.20130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-30J-319P-22 0.045.70130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-66J-3050P-23 0.045.69130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-61J-665P-24 0.035.19130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-68J-6154P-25 0.034.69130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-11J-6854P-26 0.15-23.42130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-35J-2897P-27 0.035.00130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-103J-3562P-28 0.035.00130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-12J-10377P-29 0.034.99130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-93J-1221P-30 0.034.99130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-88J-93123P-31 0.00-0.51130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-91J-8848P-32 0.00-0.51130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-85J-915P-33 0.00-0.51130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-37J-85107P-34 0.00-0.51130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-41J-3735P-35 0.01-1.02130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-39J-466P-36 0.01-1.52130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-109J-3995P-37 0.02-2.77130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-13J-10978P-38 0.02-2.77130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-107J-1343P-39 0.02-3.27130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-25J-10710P-40 0.02-3.27130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-40J-25189P-41 0.23-35.45130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-105J-40109P-42 0.23-36.70130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-14J-10595P-43 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-15J-3624P-44 0.00-0.01130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-16J-153P-45 Page 7 of 3027 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2/8/2022 WaterCAD[10.03.03.72]Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center6475.005_WaterModel.wtg Buffalo Run Water Model Report Average Daily Demand Scenario Pipe Table - Time: 0.00 hours Velocity(ft/s)Flow(gpm)Hazen-Williams C MaterialDiameter(in) Stop NodeStart NodeLength (Scaled)(ft) Label 0.034.19130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-89J-1117P-46 0.02-3.31130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-17J-8910P-47 0.02-3.31130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-75J-17102P-48 0.07-10.81130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-32J-7544P-49 0.0812.61130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-73J-3239P-50 0.0812.61130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-34J-7332P-51 0.057.11130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-33J-3479P-52 0.00-0.39130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-16J-3360P-53 0.00-0.40130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-55J-16208P-54 0.00-0.41130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-18J-5516P-55 0.00-0.41130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-53J-1857P-56 0.04-6.41130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-49J-53167P-57 0.000.01130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-20J-148P-58 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-21J-2084P-59 0.23-36.71130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-22J-14203P-60 0.23-36.71130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-23J-22256P-61 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-10H-110P-62 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0H-3J-2410P-63 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0H-7J-1710P-64 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0H-8J-1819P-65 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0H-10J-209P-66 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0H-5J-259P-67 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0H-6J-126P-68 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0H-2J-910P-69 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0H-4J-710P-70 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0H-11J-226P-71 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0H-9J-1510P-72 0.000.00200.0Ductile Iron40.0PMP-1J-147P-73 0.000.00200.0Ductile Iron40.0R-1PMP-135P-74 0.0259.72200.0Ductile Iron40.0J-23PMP-241P-75 0.0259.72200.0Ductile Iron40.0PMP-2R-342P-76 0.15-23.01130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-42J-1119P-77 0.15-23.01130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-23J-421,140P-78 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-27J-524P-79 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-26J-426P-80 0.1523.42130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-32J-28223P-81 0.00-0.51130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-46J-41118P-82 0.2132.17130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-47J-40115P-83 0.1218.14130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-97J-4736P-84 0.1116.89130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-95J-97148P-85 0.1015.89130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-35J-9587P-86 0.016.81130.0Ductile Iron16.0J-51J-6239P-87 0.016.42130.0Ductile Iron16.0J-48J-5166P-88 0.016.41130.0Ductile Iron16.0J-50J-48361P-89 0.046.41130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-49J-505P-90 Page 8 of 3027 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2/8/2022 WaterCAD[10.03.03.72]Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center6475.005_WaterModel.wtg Buffalo Run Water Model Report Average Daily Demand Scenario Pipe Table - Time: 0.00 hours Velocity(ft/s)Flow(gpm)Hazen-Williams C MaterialDiameter(in) Stop NodeStart NodeLength (Scaled)(ft) Label 0.070.39135.0Copper1.5J-52J-51143P-91 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0H-12J-4840P-92 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-50H-1316P-93 0.616.00135.0Copper2.0J-54J-5325P-94 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-56J-55188P-95 0.200.50135.0Copper1.0J-59J-5756P-96 0.200.50135.0Copper1.0J-60J-5856P-97 0.200.50135.0Copper1.0J-62J-6134P-98 0.200.50135.0Copper1.0J-63J-3134P-99 0.200.50135.0Copper1.0J-64J-2934P-100 0.565.50135.0Copper2.0J-65J-3058P-101 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-67J-6660P-102 0.200.50135.0Copper1.0J-69J-6834P-103 0.200.50135.0Copper1.0J-70J-1134P-104 0.777.50135.0Copper2.0J-71J-3385P-105 0.565.50135.0Copper2.0J-72J-3437P-106 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-74J-7331P-107 0.777.50135.0Copper2.0J-76J-7551P-108 0.200.50135.0Copper1.0J-78J-7755P-109 0.200.50135.0Copper1.0J-80J-7955P-110 0.200.50135.0Copper1.0J-82J-8155P-111 0.200.50135.0Copper1.0J-84J-8355P-112 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-86J-85116P-113 0.565.50135.0Copper2.0J-87J-8839P-114 0.777.50135.0Copper2.0J-90J-8951P-115 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-92J-91119P-116 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-94J-9357P-117 0.181.00135.0Copper1.5J-96J-9524P-118 0.231.25135.0Copper1.5J-98J-9728P-119 0.0914.03130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-99J-47154P-120 0.0913.53130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-101J-9994P-121 0.0812.53130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-35J-101165P-122 0.200.50135.0Copper1.0J-100J-9928P-123 0.181.00135.0Copper1.5J-102J-10128P-124 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-104J-103107P-125 0.231.25135.0Copper1.5J-106J-10543P-126 0.200.50135.0Copper1.0J-108J-10741P-127 0.231.25135.0Copper1.5J-110J-10943P-128 0.200.50135.0Copper1.0J-111J-3941P-129 0.200.50135.0Copper1.0J-112J-3855P-130 0.200.50135.0Copper1.0J-114J-11355P-131 0.000.50130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-116J-11555P-132 Page 9 of 3027 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2/8/2022 WaterCAD[10.03.03.72]Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center6475.005_WaterModel.wtg Buffalo Run Water Model Report Maximum Daily Demand Scenario Reservoir Table - Time: 0.00 hours Hydraulic Grade(ft) Flow (Out net)(gpm)Is Active?Elevation(ft)Label 4,998.630.00True4,998.63R-1 5,017.16137.17True5,017.16R-3 Pump Table - Time: 0.00 hours Pump Head (ft) Flow (Total) (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (Discharg e)(ft) Hydraulic Grade (Suction) (ft) Downstrea m Pipe Status (Initial ) Pump Definition Elevatio n (ft) Label 0.000.005,108.464,998.63P-73OnHydrant21124,998.63PMP-1 91.40137.175,108.565,017.16P-75OnHydrant21085,017.16PMP-2 Page 10 of 3027 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2/8/2022 WaterCAD[10.03.03.72]Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center6475.005_WaterModel.wtg Buffalo Run Water Model Report Maximum Daily Demand Scenario Junction Table - Time: 0.00 hours Is Active?Pressure(psi)Hydraulic Grade(ft) Demand(gpm)Elevation(ft)Label True485,108.460.004,998.63J-1 True485,108.450.004,997.60J-2 True495,108.450.004,995.50J-3 True495,108.440.004,996.30J-4 True485,108.390.004,996.70J-5 True485,108.380.004,996.70J-6 True485,108.440.004,996.43J-7 True485,108.410.004,997.23J-9 True485,108.390.004,996.40J-10 True475,108.380.005,000.85J-11 True465,108.410.005,001.80J-12 True475,108.440.005,000.20J-13 True435,108.480.005,008.00J-14 True445,108.380.005,006.90J-15 True445,108.380.005,006.90J-16 True465,108.380.005,001.37J-17 True445,108.380.005,006.50J-18 True435,108.480.005,008.20J-20 True435,108.480.005,008.42J-21 True435,108.510.005,008.00J-22 True405,108.560.005,017.16J-23 True485,108.380.004,996.83J-24 True475,108.440.005,000.50J-25 True485,108.440.004,996.43J-26 True495,108.390.004,996.25J-27 True475,108.400.005,000.86J-28 True485,108.390.004,997.40J-29 True485,108.380.004,998.50J-30 True485,108.380.004,998.30J-31 True455,108.380.005,003.53J-32 True445,108.380.005,005.75J-33 True455,108.380.005,004.60J-34 True465,108.410.005,002.45J-35 True445,108.380.005,005.99J-36 True485,108.410.004,998.60J-37 True485,108.420.004,996.80J-38 True485,108.440.004,997.30J-39 True455,108.440.005,004.40J-40 True485,108.410.004,997.20J-41 True485,108.470.004,998.63J-42 True495,108.410.004,995.80J-46 True455,108.420.005,003.58J-47 True465,108.380.005,001.25J-48 True445,108.380.005,007.10J-49 True445,108.380.005,006.50J-50 Page 11 of 3027 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2/8/2022 WaterCAD[10.03.03.72]Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center6475.005_WaterModel.wtg Buffalo Run Water Model Report Maximum Daily Demand Scenario Junction Table - Time: 0.00 hours Is Active?Pressure(psi)Hydraulic Grade(ft) Demand(gpm)Elevation(ft)Label True475,108.380.005,000.34J-51 True435,108.360.905,008.00J-52 True445,108.380.005,006.20J-53 True325,108.2513.805,035.00J-54 True445,108.380.005,006.50J-55 True445,108.380.005,007.00J-56 True485,108.390.004,997.10J-57 True485,108.390.004,997.17J-58 True395,108.301.155,017.25J-59 True395,108.301.155,017.25J-60 True475,108.380.004,999.10J-61 True395,108.331.155,018.50J-62 True395,108.331.155,018.27J-63 True395,108.331.155,017.50J-64 True345,108.1312.655,030.00J-65 True475,108.380.004,999.20J-66 True465,108.380.005,002.00J-67 True475,108.380.004,999.90J-68 True395,108.331.155,018.75J-69 True395,108.331.155,019.25J-70 True315,107.7117.255,035.30J-71 True325,108.2212.655,034.75J-72 True455,108.380.005,004.03J-73 True445,108.380.005,006.75J-74 True465,108.380.005,002.88J-75 True325,107.9817.255,034.00J-76 True495,108.400.004,995.70J-77 True405,108.311.155,017.00J-78 True495,108.400.004,995.45J-79 True405,108.321.155,017.00J-80 True495,108.410.004,995.50J-81 True395,108.321.155,017.75J-82 True495,108.410.004,995.70J-83 True395,108.331.155,017.75J-84 True475,108.410.004,999.73J-85 True455,108.410.005,003.75J-86 True335,108.2412.655,031.75J-87 True475,108.410.005,000.28J-88 True465,108.380.005,001.18J-89 True335,107.9817.255,032.00J-90 True475,108.410.004,999.70J-91 True455,108.410.005,004.00J-92 True465,108.410.005,001.58J-93 True445,108.410.005,006.00J-94 True465,108.410.005,002.81J-95 Page 12 of 3027 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2/8/2022 WaterCAD[10.03.03.72]Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center6475.005_WaterModel.wtg Buffalo Run Water Model Report Maximum Daily Demand Scenario Junction Table - Time: 0.00 hours Is Active?Pressure(psi)Hydraulic Grade(ft) Demand(gpm)Elevation(ft)Label True325,108.402.305,034.80J-96 True455,108.420.005,003.43J-97 True325,108.392.885,035.00J-98 True455,108.420.005,004.80J-99 True325,108.371.155,035.40J-100 True455,108.410.005,003.95J-101 True325,108.392.305,035.10J-102 True455,108.410.005,003.40J-103 True445,108.410.005,007.30J-104 True445,108.460.005,006.08J-105 True315,108.412.885,036.30J-106 True475,108.440.005,000.43J-107 True335,108.381.155,032.00J-108 True485,108.440.004,998.60J-109 True335,108.392.885,031.00J-110 True345,108.381.155,030.00J-111 True405,108.331.155,017.00J-112 True485,108.420.004,997.00J-113 True405,108.331.155,017.00J-114 True485,108.420.004,996.61J-115 True395,108.421.155,017.50J-116 Page 13 of 3027 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2/8/2022 WaterCAD[10.03.03.72]Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center6475.005_WaterModel.wtg Buffalo Run Water Model Report Maximum Daily Demand Scenario Hydrant Table - Time: 0.00 hours Pressure(psi)Hydraulic Grade(ft) Demand(gpm)Elevation(ft)Label 475,108.390.004,999.40H-1 485,108.410.004,996.55H-2 485,108.380.004,997.41H-3 445,108.440.005,007.00H-4 455,108.440.005,003.90H-5 445,108.410.005,006.70H-6 465,108.380.005,001.65H-7 445,108.380.005,006.20H-8 445,108.380.005,007.00H-9 435,108.480.005,008.40H-10 485,108.450.004,998.30H-11 475,108.380.004,998.60H-12 455,108.380.005,005.00H-13 Page 14 of 3027 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2/8/2022 WaterCAD[10.03.03.72]Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center6475.005_WaterModel.wtg Buffalo Run Water Model Report Maximum Daily Demand Scenario Pipe Table - Time: 0.00 hours Velocity(ft/s)Flow(gpm)Hazen-Williams C MaterialDiameter(in) Stop NodeStart NodeLength (Scaled)(ft) Label 0.3452.86130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-2J-1112P-1 0.3452.86130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-3J-294P-2 0.3452.86130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-4J-3105P-3 0.3555.20130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-115J-4168P-4 0.3554.05130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-113J-11554P-5 0.3452.90130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-38J-11354P-6 0.3351.75130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-9J-3833P-7 0.3351.75130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-83J-921P-8 0.3250.60130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-46J-8332P-9 0.3249.43130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-81J-4637P-10 0.3148.28130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-79J-8154P-11 0.3047.13130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-77J-7954P-12 0.2945.98130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-10J-77136P-13 0.2945.98130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-5J-1065P-14 0.1117.93130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-58J-5127P-15 0.1116.78130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-57J-5850P-16 0.1015.63130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-24J-57206P-17 0.1015.63130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-6J-2465P-18 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-7J-453P-19 0.1828.05130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-29J-574P-20 0.1726.90130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-31J-2954P-21 0.1625.75130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-30J-319P-22 0.0813.10130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-66J-3050P-23 0.0813.10130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-61J-665P-24 0.0811.95130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-68J-6154P-25 0.0710.80130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-11J-6854P-26 0.34-53.82130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-35J-2897P-27 0.0711.48130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-103J-3562P-28 0.0711.48130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-12J-10377P-29 0.0711.48130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-93J-1221P-30 0.0711.48130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-88J-93123P-31 0.01-1.17130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-91J-8848P-32 0.01-1.17130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-85J-915P-33 0.01-1.17130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-37J-85107P-34 0.01-1.17130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-41J-3735P-35 0.01-2.35130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-39J-466P-36 0.02-3.50130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-109J-3995P-37 0.04-6.37130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-13J-10978P-38 0.04-6.37130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-107J-1343P-39 0.05-7.52130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-25J-10710P-40 0.05-7.52130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-40J-25189P-41 0.52-81.44130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-105J-40109P-42 0.54-84.32130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-14J-10595P-43 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-15J-3624P-44 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-16J-153P-45 Page 15 of 3027 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2/8/2022 WaterCAD[10.03.03.72]Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center6475.005_WaterModel.wtg Buffalo Run Water Model Report Maximum Daily Demand Scenario Pipe Table - Time: 0.00 hours Velocity(ft/s)Flow(gpm)Hazen-Williams C MaterialDiameter(in) Stop NodeStart NodeLength (Scaled)(ft) Label 0.069.65130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-89J-1117P-46 0.05-7.60130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-17J-8910P-47 0.05-7.60130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-75J-17102P-48 0.16-24.85130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-32J-7544P-49 0.1828.96130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-73J-3239P-50 0.1828.96130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-34J-7332P-51 0.1016.31130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-33J-3479P-52 0.01-0.94130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-16J-3360P-53 0.01-0.94130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-55J-16208P-54 0.01-0.94130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-18J-5516P-55 0.01-0.94130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-53J-1857P-56 0.09-14.74130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-49J-53167P-57 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-20J-148P-58 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-21J-2084P-59 0.54-84.32130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-22J-14203P-60 0.54-84.32130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-23J-22256P-61 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-10H-110P-62 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0H-3J-2410P-63 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0H-7J-1710P-64 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0H-8J-1819P-65 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0H-10J-209P-66 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0H-5J-259P-67 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0H-6J-126P-68 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0H-2J-910P-69 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0H-4J-710P-70 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0H-11J-226P-71 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0H-9J-1510P-72 0.000.00200.0Ductile Iron40.0PMP-1J-147P-73 0.000.00200.0Ductile Iron40.0R-1PMP-135P-74 0.04137.17200.0Ductile Iron40.0J-23PMP-241P-75 0.04137.17200.0Ductile Iron40.0PMP-2R-342P-76 0.34-52.85130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-42J-1119P-77 0.34-52.85130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-23J-421,140P-78 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-27J-524P-79 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-26J-426P-80 0.3453.82130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-32J-28223P-81 0.01-1.17130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-46J-41118P-82 0.4773.92130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-47J-40115P-83 0.2741.68130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-97J-4736P-84 0.2538.81130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-95J-97148P-85 0.2336.51130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-35J-9587P-86 0.0215.63130.0Ductile Iron16.0J-51J-6239P-87 0.0214.74130.0Ductile Iron16.0J-48J-5166P-88 0.0214.74130.0Ductile Iron16.0J-50J-48361P-89 0.0914.74130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-49J-505P-90 Page 16 of 3027 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2/8/2022 WaterCAD[10.03.03.72]Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center6475.005_WaterModel.wtg Buffalo Run Water Model Report Maximum Daily Demand Scenario Pipe Table - Time: 0.00 hours Velocity(ft/s)Flow(gpm)Hazen-Williams C MaterialDiameter(in) Stop NodeStart NodeLength (Scaled)(ft) Label 0.160.90135.0Copper1.5J-52J-51143P-91 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0H-12J-4840P-92 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-50H-1316P-93 1.4113.80135.0Copper2.0J-54J-5325P-94 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-56J-55188P-95 0.471.15135.0Copper1.0J-59J-5756P-96 0.471.15135.0Copper1.0J-60J-5856P-97 0.471.15135.0Copper1.0J-62J-6134P-98 0.471.15135.0Copper1.0J-63J-3134P-99 0.471.15135.0Copper1.0J-64J-2934P-100 1.2912.65135.0Copper2.0J-65J-3058P-101 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-67J-6660P-102 0.471.15135.0Copper1.0J-69J-6834P-103 0.471.15135.0Copper1.0J-70J-1134P-104 1.7617.25135.0Copper2.0J-71J-3385P-105 1.2912.65135.0Copper2.0J-72J-3437P-106 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-74J-7331P-107 1.7617.25135.0Copper2.0J-76J-7551P-108 0.471.15135.0Copper1.0J-78J-7755P-109 0.471.15135.0Copper1.0J-80J-7955P-110 0.471.15135.0Copper1.0J-82J-8155P-111 0.471.15135.0Copper1.0J-84J-8355P-112 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-86J-85116P-113 1.2912.65135.0Copper2.0J-87J-8839P-114 1.7617.25135.0Copper2.0J-90J-8951P-115 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-92J-91119P-116 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-94J-9357P-117 0.422.30135.0Copper1.5J-96J-9524P-118 0.522.88135.0Copper1.5J-98J-9728P-119 0.2132.24130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-99J-47154P-120 0.2031.09130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-101J-9994P-121 0.1828.79130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-35J-101165P-122 0.471.15135.0Copper1.0J-100J-9928P-123 0.422.30135.0Copper1.5J-102J-10128P-124 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-104J-103107P-125 0.522.88135.0Copper1.5J-106J-10543P-126 0.471.15135.0Copper1.0J-108J-10741P-127 0.522.88135.0Copper1.5J-110J-10943P-128 0.471.15135.0Copper1.0J-111J-3941P-129 0.471.15135.0Copper1.0J-112J-3855P-130 0.471.15135.0Copper1.0J-114J-11355P-131 0.011.15130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-116J-11555P-132 Page 17 of 3027 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2/8/2022 WaterCAD[10.03.03.72]Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center6475.005_WaterModel.wtg Buffalo Run Water Model Report Max Day + Fire Flow Reservoir Table - Time: 0.00 hours Hydraulic Grade(ft) Flow (Out net)(gpm)Is Active?Elevation(ft)Label 4,998.630.00True4,998.63R-1 5,017.160.14True5,017.16R-3 Pump Table - Time: 0.00 hours Pump Head (ft) Flow (Total) (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (Discharg e)(ft) Hydraulic Grade (Suction) (ft) Downstrea m Pipe Status (Initial ) Pump Definition Elevatio n (ft) Label 0.000.005,108.774,998.63P-73OnHydrant21124,998.63PMP-1 91.610.145,108.775,017.16P-75OnHydrant21085,017.16PMP-2 Page 18 of 3027 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2/8/2022 WaterCAD[10.03.03.72]Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center6475.005_WaterModel.wtg Buffalo Run Water Model Report Max Day + Fire Flow Junction Table - Time: 0.00 hours Is Active?Pressure(psi)Hydraulic Grade(ft) Demand(gpm)Elevation(ft)Label True485,108.770.004,998.63J-1 True485,108.770.004,997.60J-2 True495,108.770.004,995.50J-3 True495,108.770.004,996.30J-4 True485,108.770.004,996.70J-5 True485,108.770.004,996.70J-6 True495,108.770.004,996.43J-7 True485,108.770.004,997.23J-9 True495,108.770.004,996.40J-10 True475,108.770.005,000.85J-11 True465,108.770.005,001.80J-12 True475,108.770.005,000.20J-13 True445,108.770.005,008.00J-14 True445,108.770.005,006.90J-15 True445,108.770.005,006.90J-16 True465,108.770.005,001.37J-17 True445,108.770.005,006.50J-18 True445,108.770.005,008.20J-20 True435,108.770.005,008.42J-21 True445,108.770.005,008.00J-22 True405,108.770.005,017.16J-23 True485,108.770.004,996.83J-24 True475,108.770.005,000.50J-25 True495,108.770.004,996.43J-26 True495,108.770.004,996.25J-27 True475,108.770.005,000.86J-28 True485,108.770.004,997.40J-29 True485,108.770.004,998.50J-30 True485,108.770.004,998.30J-31 True465,108.770.005,003.53J-32 True455,108.770.005,005.75J-33 True455,108.770.005,004.60J-34 True465,108.770.005,002.45J-35 True445,108.770.005,005.99J-36 True485,108.770.004,998.60J-37 True485,108.770.004,996.80J-38 True485,108.770.004,997.30J-39 True455,108.770.005,004.40J-40 True485,108.770.004,997.20J-41 True485,108.770.004,998.63J-42 True495,108.770.004,995.80J-46 True465,108.770.005,003.58J-47 True475,108.770.005,001.25J-48 True445,108.770.005,007.10J-49 True445,108.770.005,006.50J-50 Page 19 of 3027 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2/8/2022 WaterCAD[10.03.03.72]Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center6475.005_WaterModel.wtg Buffalo Run Water Model Report Max Day + Fire Flow Junction Table - Time: 0.00 hours Is Active?Pressure(psi)Hydraulic Grade(ft) Demand(gpm)Elevation(ft)Label True475,108.770.005,000.34J-51 True445,108.770.005,008.00J-52 True445,108.770.005,006.20J-53 True325,108.770.005,035.00J-54 True445,108.770.005,006.50J-55 True445,108.770.005,007.00J-56 True485,108.770.004,997.10J-57 True485,108.770.004,997.17J-58 True405,108.770.005,017.25J-59 True405,108.770.005,017.25J-60 True475,108.770.004,999.10J-61 True395,108.770.005,018.50J-62 True395,108.770.005,018.27J-63 True395,108.770.005,017.50J-64 True345,108.770.005,030.00J-65 True475,108.770.004,999.20J-66 True465,108.770.005,002.00J-67 True475,108.770.004,999.90J-68 True395,108.770.005,018.75J-69 True395,108.770.005,019.25J-70 True325,108.770.005,035.30J-71 True325,108.770.005,034.75J-72 True455,108.770.005,004.03J-73 True445,108.770.005,006.75J-74 True465,108.770.005,002.88J-75 True325,108.770.005,034.00J-76 True495,108.770.004,995.70J-77 True405,108.770.005,017.00J-78 True495,108.770.004,995.45J-79 True405,108.770.005,017.00J-80 True495,108.770.004,995.50J-81 True395,108.770.005,017.75J-82 True495,108.770.004,995.70J-83 True395,108.770.005,017.75J-84 True475,108.770.004,999.73J-85 True455,108.770.005,003.75J-86 True335,108.770.005,031.75J-87 True475,108.770.005,000.28J-88 True475,108.770.005,001.18J-89 True335,108.770.005,032.00J-90 True475,108.770.004,999.70J-91 True455,108.770.005,004.00J-92 True465,108.770.005,001.58J-93 True445,108.770.005,006.00J-94 True465,108.770.005,002.81J-95 Page 20 of 3027 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2/8/2022 WaterCAD[10.03.03.72]Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center6475.005_WaterModel.wtg Buffalo Run Water Model Report Max Day + Fire Flow Junction Table - Time: 0.00 hours Is Active?Pressure(psi)Hydraulic Grade(ft) Demand(gpm)Elevation(ft)Label True325,108.770.005,034.80J-96 True465,108.770.005,003.43J-97 True325,108.770.005,035.00J-98 True455,108.770.005,004.80J-99 True325,108.770.005,035.40J-100 True455,108.770.005,003.95J-101 True325,108.770.005,035.10J-102 True465,108.770.005,003.40J-103 True445,108.770.005,007.30J-104 True445,108.770.005,006.08J-105 True315,108.770.005,036.30J-106 True475,108.770.005,000.43J-107 True335,108.770.005,032.00J-108 True485,108.770.004,998.60J-109 True345,108.770.005,031.00J-110 True345,108.770.005,030.00J-111 True405,108.770.005,017.00J-112 True485,108.770.004,997.00J-113 True405,108.770.005,017.00J-114 True495,108.770.004,996.61J-115 True395,108.770.005,017.50J-116 Page 21 of 3027 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2/8/2022 WaterCAD[10.03.03.72]Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center6475.005_WaterModel.wtg Buffalo Run Water Model Report Max Day + Fire Flow Fire Flow Report - Time: 0.00 hours Is Fire Flow Run Balanced? Junction w/ Minimum Pressure (System) Pressure (Calculated Residual) (psi) Pressure (Residual Lower Limit) (psi) Fire Flow (Available)(gpm) Fire Flow (Needed)(gpm) Satisfies Fire Flow Constraints? Label TrueJ-5433202,001.751,500.00TrueH-1 TrueJ-7134202,269.821,500.00TrueH-2 TrueJ-5434201,753.691,500.00TrueH-3 TrueJ-7127202,609.191,500.00TrueH-4 TrueJ-10830202,425.761,500.00TrueH-5 TrueJ-7129202,226.141,500.00TrueH-6 TrueJ-9032201,935.271,500.00TrueH-7 TrueJ-5431201,676.141,500.00TrueH-8 TrueJ-7131201,770.021,500.00TrueH-9 TrueJ-10629202,488.931,500.00TrueH-10 TrueJ-7127203,069.841,500.00TrueH-11 TrueJ-5431201,722.861,500.00TrueH-12 TrueJ-5431201,717.921,500.00TrueH-13 Page 22 of 3027 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2/8/2022 WaterCAD[10.03.03.72]Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center6475.005_WaterModel.wtg Buffalo Run Water Model Report Peak Hour Demand Scenario Reservoir Table - Time: 0.00 hours Hydraulic Grade(ft) Flow (Out net)(gpm)Is Active?Elevation(ft)Label 4,998.630.00True4,998.63R-1 5,017.16178.92True5,017.16R-3 Pump Table - Time: 0.00 hours Pump Head (ft) Flow (Total) (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (Discharg e)(ft) Hydraulic Grade (Suction) (ft) Downstrea m Pipe Status (Initial ) Pump Definition Elevatio n (ft) Label 0.000.005,108.284,998.63P-73OnHydrant21124,998.63PMP-1 91.28178.925,108.445,017.16P-75OnHydrant21085,017.16PMP-2 Page 23 of 3027 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2/8/2022 WaterCAD[10.03.03.72]Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center6475.005_WaterModel.wtg Buffalo Run Water Model Report Peak Hour Demand Scenario Junction Table - Time: 0.00 hours Is Active?Pressure(psi)Hydraulic Grade(ft) Demand(gpm)Elevation(ft)Label True475,108.280.004,998.63J-1 True485,108.260.004,997.60J-2 True495,108.250.004,995.50J-3 True485,108.240.004,996.30J-4 True485,108.150.004,996.70J-5 True485,108.150.004,996.70J-6 True485,108.240.004,996.43J-7 True485,108.200.004,997.23J-9 True485,108.160.004,996.40J-10 True465,108.150.005,000.85J-11 True465,108.190.005,001.80J-12 True475,108.240.005,000.20J-13 True435,108.300.005,008.00J-14 True445,108.140.005,006.90J-15 True445,108.140.005,006.90J-16 True465,108.150.005,001.37J-17 True445,108.140.005,006.50J-18 True435,108.300.005,008.20J-20 True435,108.300.005,008.42J-21 True435,108.360.005,008.00J-22 True395,108.440.005,017.16J-23 True485,108.150.004,996.83J-24 True475,108.240.005,000.50J-25 True485,108.240.004,996.43J-26 True485,108.150.004,996.25J-27 True465,108.180.005,000.86J-28 True485,108.150.004,997.40J-29 True475,108.150.004,998.50J-30 True485,108.150.004,998.30J-31 True455,108.150.005,003.53J-32 True445,108.140.005,005.75J-33 True455,108.150.005,004.60J-34 True465,108.190.005,002.45J-35 True445,108.140.005,005.99J-36 True475,108.190.004,998.60J-37 True485,108.200.004,996.80J-38 True485,108.240.004,997.30J-39 True455,108.240.005,004.40J-40 True485,108.190.004,997.20J-41 True475,108.290.004,998.63J-42 True495,108.190.004,995.80J-46 True455,108.210.005,003.58J-47 True465,108.150.005,001.25J-48 True445,108.150.005,007.10J-49 True445,108.150.005,006.50J-50 Page 24 of 3027 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2/8/2022 WaterCAD[10.03.03.72]Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center6475.005_WaterModel.wtg Buffalo Run Water Model Report Peak Hour Demand Scenario Junction Table - Time: 0.00 hours Is Active?Pressure(psi)Hydraulic Grade(ft) Demand(gpm)Elevation(ft)Label True475,108.150.005,000.34J-51 True435,108.121.175,008.00J-52 True445,108.140.005,006.20J-53 True325,107.9318.005,035.00J-54 True445,108.140.005,006.50J-55 True445,108.140.005,007.00J-56 True485,108.150.004,997.10J-57 True485,108.150.004,997.17J-58 True395,108.011.505,017.25J-59 True395,108.011.505,017.25J-60 True475,108.150.004,999.10J-61 True395,108.061.505,018.50J-62 True395,108.061.505,018.27J-63 True395,108.071.505,017.50J-64 True345,107.7316.505,030.00J-65 True475,108.150.004,999.20J-66 True465,108.150.005,002.00J-67 True475,108.150.004,999.90J-68 True395,108.061.505,018.75J-69 True385,108.061.505,019.25J-70 True315,107.0422.505,035.30J-71 True325,107.8816.505,034.75J-72 True455,108.150.005,004.03J-73 True445,108.150.005,006.75J-74 True465,108.150.005,002.88J-75 True325,107.4922.505,034.00J-76 True495,108.170.004,995.70J-77 True395,108.031.505,017.00J-78 True495,108.180.004,995.45J-79 True395,108.041.505,017.00J-80 True495,108.190.004,995.50J-81 True395,108.051.505,017.75J-82 True495,108.190.004,995.70J-83 True395,108.051.505,017.75J-84 True475,108.190.004,999.73J-85 True455,108.190.005,003.75J-86 True335,107.9116.505,031.75J-87 True475,108.190.005,000.28J-88 True465,108.150.005,001.18J-89 True335,107.4922.505,032.00J-90 True475,108.190.004,999.70J-91 True455,108.190.005,004.00J-92 True465,108.190.005,001.58J-93 True445,108.190.005,006.00J-94 True465,108.200.005,002.81J-95 Page 25 of 3027 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2/8/2022 WaterCAD[10.03.03.72]Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center6475.005_WaterModel.wtg Buffalo Run Water Model Report Peak Hour Demand Scenario Junction Table - Time: 0.00 hours Is Active?Pressure(psi)Hydraulic Grade(ft) Demand(gpm)Elevation(ft)Label True325,108.173.005,034.80J-96 True455,108.210.005,003.43J-97 True325,108.153.755,035.00J-98 True455,108.200.005,004.80J-99 True315,108.131.505,035.40J-100 True455,108.200.005,003.95J-101 True325,108.163.005,035.10J-102 True455,108.190.005,003.40J-103 True445,108.190.005,007.30J-104 True445,108.270.005,006.08J-105 True315,108.193.755,036.30J-106 True475,108.240.005,000.43J-107 True335,108.131.505,032.00J-108 True475,108.240.004,998.60J-109 True335,108.163.755,031.00J-110 True345,108.131.505,030.00J-111 True395,108.061.505,017.00J-112 True485,108.210.004,997.00J-113 True395,108.071.505,017.00J-114 True485,108.210.004,996.61J-115 True395,108.211.505,017.50J-116 Page 26 of 3027 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2/8/2022 WaterCAD[10.03.03.72]Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center6475.005_WaterModel.wtg Buffalo Run Water Model Report Peak Hour Demand Scenario Hydrant Table - Time: 0.00 hours Pressure(psi)Hydraulic Grade(ft) Demand(gpm)Elevation(ft)Label 475,108.160.004,999.40H-1 485,108.200.004,996.55H-2 485,108.150.004,997.41H-3 445,108.240.005,007.00H-4 455,108.240.005,003.90H-5 445,108.190.005,006.70H-6 465,108.150.005,001.65H-7 445,108.140.005,006.20H-8 445,108.140.005,007.00H-9 435,108.300.005,008.40H-10 485,108.260.004,998.30H-11 475,108.150.004,998.60H-12 455,108.150.005,005.00H-13 Page 27 of 3027 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2/8/2022 WaterCAD[10.03.03.72]Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center6475.005_WaterModel.wtg Buffalo Run Water Model Report Peak Hour Demand Scenario Pipe Table - Time: 0.00 hours Velocity(ft/s)Flow(gpm)Hazen-Williams C MaterialDiameter(in) Stop NodeStart NodeLength (Scaled)(ft) Label 0.4468.94130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-2J-1112P-1 0.4468.94130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-3J-294P-2 0.4468.94130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-4J-3105P-3 0.4672.00130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-115J-4168P-4 0.4570.50130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-113J-11554P-5 0.4469.00130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-38J-11354P-6 0.4367.50130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-9J-3833P-7 0.4367.50130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-83J-921P-8 0.4266.00130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-46J-8332P-9 0.4164.47130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-81J-4637P-10 0.4062.97130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-79J-8154P-11 0.3961.47130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-77J-7954P-12 0.3859.97130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-10J-77136P-13 0.3859.97130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-5J-1065P-14 0.1523.39130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-58J-5127P-15 0.1421.89130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-57J-5850P-16 0.1320.39130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-24J-57206P-17 0.1320.39130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-6J-2465P-18 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-7J-453P-19 0.2336.58130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-29J-574P-20 0.2235.08130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-31J-2954P-21 0.2133.58130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-30J-319P-22 0.1117.08130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-66J-3050P-23 0.1117.08130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-61J-665P-24 0.1015.58130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-68J-6154P-25 0.0914.08130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-11J-6854P-26 0.45-70.20130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-35J-2897P-27 0.1014.97130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-103J-3562P-28 0.1014.97130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-12J-10377P-29 0.1014.97130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-93J-1221P-30 0.1014.97130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-88J-93123P-31 0.01-1.53130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-91J-8848P-32 0.01-1.53130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-85J-915P-33 0.01-1.53130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-37J-85107P-34 0.01-1.53130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-41J-3735P-35 0.02-3.06130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-39J-466P-36 0.03-4.56130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-109J-3995P-37 0.05-8.31130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-13J-10978P-38 0.05-8.31130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-107J-1343P-39 0.06-9.81130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-25J-10710P-40 0.06-9.81130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-40J-25189P-41 0.68-106.23130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-105J-40109P-42 0.70-109.98130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-14J-10595P-43 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-15J-3624P-44 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-16J-153P-45 Page 28 of 3027 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2/8/2022 WaterCAD[10.03.03.72]Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center6475.005_WaterModel.wtg Buffalo Run Water Model Report Peak Hour Demand Scenario Pipe Table - Time: 0.00 hours Velocity(ft/s)Flow(gpm)Hazen-Williams C MaterialDiameter(in) Stop NodeStart NodeLength (Scaled)(ft) Label 0.0812.58130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-89J-1117P-46 0.06-9.92130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-17J-8910P-47 0.06-9.92130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-75J-17102P-48 0.21-32.42130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-32J-7544P-49 0.2437.78130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-73J-3239P-50 0.2437.78130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-34J-7332P-51 0.1421.28130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-33J-3479P-52 0.01-1.22130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-16J-3360P-53 0.01-1.22130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-55J-16208P-54 0.01-1.22130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-18J-5516P-55 0.01-1.22130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-53J-1857P-56 0.12-19.22130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-49J-53167P-57 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-20J-148P-58 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-21J-2084P-59 0.70-109.98130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-22J-14203P-60 0.70-109.98130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-23J-22256P-61 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-10H-110P-62 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0H-3J-2410P-63 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0H-7J-1710P-64 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0H-8J-1819P-65 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0H-10J-209P-66 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0H-5J-259P-67 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0H-6J-126P-68 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0H-2J-910P-69 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0H-4J-710P-70 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0H-11J-226P-71 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0H-9J-1510P-72 0.000.00200.0Ductile Iron40.0PMP-1J-147P-73 0.000.00200.0Ductile Iron40.0R-1PMP-135P-74 0.05178.92200.0Ductile Iron40.0J-23PMP-241P-75 0.05178.92200.0Ductile Iron40.0PMP-2R-342P-76 0.44-68.94130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-42J-1119P-77 0.44-68.94130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-23J-421,140P-78 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-27J-524P-79 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-26J-426P-80 0.4570.20130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-32J-28223P-81 0.01-1.53130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-46J-41118P-82 0.6296.42130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-47J-40115P-83 0.3554.37130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-97J-4736P-84 0.3250.62130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-95J-97148P-85 0.3047.62130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-35J-9587P-86 0.0320.39130.0Ductile Iron16.0J-51J-6239P-87 0.0319.22130.0Ductile Iron16.0J-48J-5166P-88 0.0319.22130.0Ductile Iron16.0J-50J-48361P-89 0.1219.22130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-49J-505P-90 Page 29 of 3027 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2/8/2022 WaterCAD[10.03.03.72]Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center6475.005_WaterModel.wtg Buffalo Run Water Model Report Peak Hour Demand Scenario Pipe Table - Time: 0.00 hours Velocity(ft/s)Flow(gpm)Hazen-Williams C MaterialDiameter(in) Stop NodeStart NodeLength (Scaled)(ft) Label 0.211.17135.0Copper1.5J-52J-51143P-91 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0H-12J-4840P-92 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-50H-1316P-93 1.8418.00135.0Copper2.0J-54J-5325P-94 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-56J-55188P-95 0.611.50135.0Copper1.0J-59J-5756P-96 0.611.50135.0Copper1.0J-60J-5856P-97 0.611.50135.0Copper1.0J-62J-6134P-98 0.611.50135.0Copper1.0J-63J-3134P-99 0.611.50135.0Copper1.0J-64J-2934P-100 1.6916.50135.0Copper2.0J-65J-3058P-101 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-67J-6660P-102 0.611.50135.0Copper1.0J-69J-6834P-103 0.611.50135.0Copper1.0J-70J-1134P-104 2.3022.50135.0Copper2.0J-71J-3385P-105 1.6916.50135.0Copper2.0J-72J-3437P-106 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-74J-7331P-107 2.3022.50135.0Copper2.0J-76J-7551P-108 0.611.50135.0Copper1.0J-78J-7755P-109 0.611.50135.0Copper1.0J-80J-7955P-110 0.611.50135.0Copper1.0J-82J-8155P-111 0.611.50135.0Copper1.0J-84J-8355P-112 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-86J-85116P-113 1.6916.50135.0Copper2.0J-87J-8839P-114 2.3022.50135.0Copper2.0J-90J-8951P-115 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-92J-91119P-116 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-94J-9357P-117 0.543.00135.0Copper1.5J-96J-9524P-118 0.683.75135.0Copper1.5J-98J-9728P-119 0.2742.05130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-99J-47154P-120 0.2640.55130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-101J-9994P-121 0.2437.55130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-35J-101165P-122 0.611.50135.0Copper1.0J-100J-9928P-123 0.543.00135.0Copper1.5J-102J-10128P-124 0.000.00130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-104J-103107P-125 0.683.75135.0Copper1.5J-106J-10543P-126 0.611.50135.0Copper1.0J-108J-10741P-127 0.683.75135.0Copper1.5J-110J-10943P-128 0.611.50135.0Copper1.0J-111J-3941P-129 0.611.50135.0Copper1.0J-112J-3855P-130 0.611.50135.0Copper1.0J-114J-11355P-131 0.011.50130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-116J-11555P-132 Page 30 of 3027 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2/8/2022 WaterCAD[10.03.03.72]Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center6475.005_WaterModel.wtg Pump: PMP-2 at time 00:00:00.00 Relative Speed Factor: 1.000 Pump Status: On Scenario: Calibration-H-8 Head Head operating point Efficiency Efficiency operating pointHead (ft)90.00 80.00 70.00 60.00 50.00 40.00 30.00 20.00 10.00 0.00 Efficiency (%)100.0 90.0 80.0 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 Flow (gpm) 4,5004,0003,5003,0002,5002,0001,5001,0005000 Pump: PMP-1 at time 00:00:00.00Relative Speed Factor: 1.000Pump Status: OnScenario: ADDHeadHead operating pointHead (ft)110.00100.0090.0080.0070.0060.0050.0040.0030.0020.0010.000.00Flow (gpm)4,0003,5003,0002,5002,0001,5001,0005000 F APPENDIX F NRCS SOILS REPORT United States Department of Agriculture A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local participants Custom Soil Resource Report for Gallatin County Area, Montana Buffalo Run Natural Resources Conservation Service July 20, 2020 Preface Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas. They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers. Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand, protect, or enhance the environment. Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions. The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations. Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/ portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center (https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nrcs) or your NRCS State Soil Scientist (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/contactus/? cid=nrcs142p2_053951). Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or underground installations. The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require 2 alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 3 Contents Preface....................................................................................................................2 How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5 Soil Map..................................................................................................................8 Soil Map................................................................................................................9 Legend................................................................................................................10 Map Unit Legend................................................................................................11 Map Unit Descriptions.........................................................................................11 Gallatin County Area, Montana.......................................................................13 448A—Hyalite-Beaverton complex, moderately wet, 0 to 2 percent slopes....................................................................................................13 457A—Turner loam, moderately wet, 0 to 2 percent slopes.......................15 510B—Meadowcreek loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes......................................16 References............................................................................................................18 4 How Soil Surveys Are Made Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length, and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other biological activity. Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA. The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a specific location on the landscape. Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented by an understanding of the soil-vegetation-landscape relationship, are sufficient to verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries. Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units). Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil 5 scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and research. The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map. The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape, and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the soil-landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at specific locations. Once the soil-landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded. These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color, depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil typically vary from one point to another across the landscape. Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other properties. While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field-observed characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management. Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same kinds of soil. Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example, soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date. After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and Custom Soil Resource Report 6 identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings, fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately. Custom Soil Resource Report 7 Soil Map The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit. 8 9 Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map 50544305054480505453050545805054630505468050547305054430505448050545305054580505463050546805054730493480 493530 493580 493630 493680 493730 493780 493830 493880 493930 493480 493530 493580 493630 493680 493730 493780 493830 493880 493930 45° 38' 46'' N 111° 5' 2'' W45° 38' 46'' N111° 4' 39'' W45° 38' 35'' N 111° 5' 2'' W45° 38' 35'' N 111° 4' 39'' WN Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 12N WGS84 0 100 200 400 600 Feet 0 30 60 120 180 Meters Map Scale: 1:2,220 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet. Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Map Unit Polygons Soil Map Unit Lines Soil Map Unit Points Special Point Features Blowout Borrow Pit Clay Spot Closed Depression Gravel Pit Gravelly Spot Landfill Lava Flow Marsh or swamp Mine or Quarry Miscellaneous Water Perennial Water Rock Outcrop Saline Spot Sandy Spot Severely Eroded Spot Sinkhole Slide or Slip Sodic Spot Spoil Area Stony Spot Very Stony Spot Wet Spot Other Special Line Features Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Gallatin County Area, Montana Survey Area Data: Version 24, Jun 4, 2020 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Aug 3, 2009—Sep 1, 2016 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Custom Soil Resource Report 10 Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 448A Hyalite-Beaverton complex, moderately wet, 0 to 2 percent slopes 5.8 27.8% 457A Turner loam, moderately wet, 0 to 2 percent slopes 13.6 65.2% 510B Meadowcreek loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes 1.4 7.0% Totals for Area of Interest 20.8 100.0% Map Unit Descriptions The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit. A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils. Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or Custom Soil Resource Report 11 landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties and qualities. Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement. Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series. Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas. These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups. A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example. An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example. Custom Soil Resource Report 12 Gallatin County Area, Montana 448A—Hyalite-Beaverton complex, moderately wet, 0 to 2 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 56sq Elevation: 4,450 to 5,300 feet Mean annual precipitation: 15 to 19 inches Mean annual air temperature: 39 to 45 degrees F Frost-free period: 90 to 110 days Farmland classification: Farmland of local importance Map Unit Composition Hyalite and similar soils: 70 percent Beaverton and similar soils: 20 percent Minor components: 10 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Hyalite Setting Landform: Alluvial fans, stream terraces Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Loamy alluvium Typical profile A - 0 to 5 inches: loam Bt1 - 5 to 9 inches: clay loam Bt2 - 9 to 17 inches: silty clay loam 2Bt3 - 17 to 26 inches: very cobbly sandy clay loam 3C - 26 to 60 inches: very cobbly loamy sand Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high (0.20 to 0.57 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 48 to 96 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 5 percent Available water storage in profile: Low (about 4.4 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 3e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e Hydrologic Soil Group: C Ecological site: Upland Grassland (R043BP818MT) Hydric soil rating: No Custom Soil Resource Report 13 Description of Beaverton Setting Landform: Alluvial fans, stream terraces Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Alluvium Typical profile A - 0 to 5 inches: cobbly loam Bt - 5 to 21 inches: very gravelly clay loam Bk - 21 to 25 inches: very cobbly coarse sandy loam 2Bk - 25 to 60 inches: extremely cobbly loamy coarse sand Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 48 to 96 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 15 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water storage in profile: Low (about 3.7 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 4s Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6s Hydrologic Soil Group: B Ecological site: Upland Grassland (R043BP818MT) Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Meadowcreek Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Stream terraces Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Ecological site: Subirrigated (Sb) 15-19" p.z. (R044XS359MT) Hydric soil rating: No Beaverton Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Stream terraces, alluvial fans Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Ecological site: Shallow to Gravel (SwGr) 15-19" p.z. (R044XS354MT) Hydric soil rating: No Custom Soil Resource Report 14 457A—Turner loam, moderately wet, 0 to 2 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 56tb Elevation: 4,300 to 5,200 feet Mean annual precipitation: 15 to 19 inches Mean annual air temperature: 39 to 45 degrees F Frost-free period: 90 to 110 days Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated Map Unit Composition Turner and similar soils: 85 percent Minor components: 15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Turner Setting Landform: Stream terraces Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Alluvium Typical profile A - 0 to 6 inches: loam Bt - 6 to 12 inches: clay loam Bk - 12 to 26 inches: clay loam 2C - 26 to 60 inches: very gravelly loamy sand Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 48 to 96 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 15 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water storage in profile: Low (about 5.4 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 3e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e Hydrologic Soil Group: B Ecological site: Loamy (Lo) LRU 44B-B (R044BB032MT) Hydric soil rating: No Custom Soil Resource Report 15 Minor Components Meadowcreek Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Stream terraces Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Ecological site: Subirrigated (Sb) 15-19" p.z. (R044XS359MT) Hydric soil rating: No Beaverton Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Alluvial fans, stream terraces Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Ecological site: Shallow to Gravel (SwGr) 15-19" p.z. (R044XS354MT) Hydric soil rating: No Turner Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Stream terraces Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Ecological site: Silty (Si) 15-19" p.z. (R044XS355MT) Hydric soil rating: No 510B—Meadowcreek loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 56vt Elevation: 4,200 to 5,950 feet Mean annual precipitation: 12 to 18 inches Mean annual air temperature: 39 to 45 degrees F Frost-free period: 90 to 110 days Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated Map Unit Composition Meadowcreek and similar soils: 85 percent Minor components: 15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Meadowcreek Setting Landform: Stream terraces Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Alluvium Custom Soil Resource Report 16 Typical profile A - 0 to 11 inches: loam Bg - 11 to 25 inches: silt loam 2C - 25 to 60 inches: very gravelly sand Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 4 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 24 to 42 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to slightly saline (0.0 to 4.0 mmhos/cm) Available water storage in profile: Low (about 5.1 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 2e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e Hydrologic Soil Group: C Ecological site: Subirrigated (Sb) LRU 44B-Y (R044BY150MT) Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Blossberg Percent of map unit: 10 percent Landform: Terraces Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Ecological site: Wet Meadow (WM) 15-19" p.z. (R044XS365MT) Hydric soil rating: Yes Beaverton Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Alluvial fans, stream terraces Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Ecological site: Shallow to Gravel (SwGr) 15-19" p.z. (R044XS354MT) Hydric soil rating: No Custom Soil Resource Report 17 References American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing. 24th edition. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS-79/31. Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States. Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States. Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States. National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries. Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_054262 Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053577 Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053580 Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands Section. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical Report Y-87-1. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/ home/?cid=nrcs142p2_053374 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/ detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084 18 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nrcs/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nrcs142p2_054242 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/? cid=nrcs142p2_053624 United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_052290.pdf Custom Soil Resource Report 19 G APPENDIX G GEOTECHNICAL REPORT