Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWater & Sewer Design Report 06-28-2021 DESIGN REPORT WATER AND SANITARY SEWER FALLON CONDOMINIUMS Prepared for: Norton Properties, LLC 63020 NE Lower Meadow Road, Suite #200 Bend, OR 97702 Prepared by: Project Number: 200860 June 2021 Design Report - Page 2 of 7 INTRODUCTION The proposed Fallon Apartments project includes the construction of 22 condominium units on Lots 1 and 2, Block 14 of Norton Ranch Subdivision, Phase 4. The property is fronted on three sides by City streets with Pond Lily Drive, Fallon Street, and Water Lily Drive being adjacent to the west, north and east property boundaries, respectively. Water and sanitary sewer mains are located within Pond Lily Drive, Fallon Street, and Water Lily Drive, surrounding the subject property. WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM The water main extension plan involves a proposed 8” D.I.P. water main that would connect at two points to the existing 8” water main in Pond Lily Drive and Water Lily Drive along the southern portion of the property as shown on the civil plan set. 3/4” and 1.5” copper water services will be extended off of this 8” water main to proposed condominium buildings. It should be noted that there are existing water and fire services stubbed into the property from Pond Lily Drive and Water Lily Drive as shown on the civil plan set. The existing service stubs are not located in a feasible location to serve the buildings given the site layout and will be abandoned at the main. A WaterCAD analysis is enclosed (Appendix A of this report) analyzing the main installed with this project. The connection to the existing system is modeled as a pump with characteristics matching pressure/flow data from the existing hydrant at the intersection of Water Lily Drive and Fallon Street. This existing flow data, provided by the City of Bozeman, was used to approximate the pressure and flow for the water main the project area. Water Distribution System Demands The design parameters used herein are according to the City of Bozeman Design Standards and Specifications Policy (DSSP) dated May 2017. Average Daily Residential Usage = 170 gallons per capita per day Average Population Density = 2.17 persons/dwelling unit Design Report - Page 3 of 7 Minimum Fire Hydrant Flow = 1,500 gpm Residual Pressure Required = 20 psi for Fire Flow Average Day Demand (Peaking Factor = 1.0) Maximum Day Demand (Peaking Factor = 2.3) Peak Hour Demand (Peaking Factor = 3.0) Water Demands (11 dwelling units) Average Day Demand = 22 d.u. x 2.17 persons/d.u. x 170 gpcpd = 8,116 gpd = 5.64 gpm Maximum Day Demand = 5.64 gpm x 2.3 = 12.97 gpm Peak Hour Demand = 5.64 gpm x 3.0 = 16.92 gpm Water Distribution System Hydraulic Analysis A water distribution model was created using WaterCAD Version 6.5 for demand forecasting and describing domestic and fire protection requirements. In order to model the system, each junction node of the water distribution system was assessed a demand based on its service area. The table shown below quantifies the demands placed at the junction nodes and calculates the demands for Average Day, Maximum Day and Peak Hour within the project. The peaking factor for each case is 1.0, 2.3 and 3.0 respectively. Refer to the site layout in Appendix A for node locations. Static, residual and pitot pressures were provided by the City of Bozeman Water Department for Hydrant #2407 on the 8” water main in Fallon Street at the SW corner of the intersection with Water Lily Drive. Email correspondence with the City of Bozeman Water Department regarding the hydrant data is provided in Appendix A of this report for reference. Location Hydrant # Static Pressure Pitot Pressure Residual Pressure Fallon Street / Water Lily Drive 2407 58 # 54 # 48 # Design Report - Page 4 of 7 Pump Curve Calculations: Pump #1 (Hydrant at Water Lily and Fallon) Static Pressure (Ps) = 58 Pitot Pressure (Pp)= 48 Residual Pressure (Pr) = 54 Qf = 1575 Q=Qf*((Ps-P)/(Ps-Pr))(0.54) Pressure Flow Head 54 1575.00 124.62 49 2440.39 113.08 44 3097.97 101.54 39 3653.38 90.00 34 4144.60 78.46 29 4590.53 66.92 24 5002.27 55.38 19 5386.95 43.85 14 5749.53 32.31 9 6093.60 20.77 4 6421.86 9.23 DEMAND JUNCTION NODE DWELLING UNITS (D.U.) POPULATION (RES.) 2.17 PEOPLE PER D.U. AVERAGE DAY GPM (170 GALLONS PER DAY PER PERSON) MAX. DAY GPM PEAK HOUR GPM DJ 1 11 24 2.8 6.5 8.5 DJ 2 11 24 2.8 6.5 8.5 Total 22 48 5.64 12.96 16.91 *See Demand Junction Map for more information on which lots contribute to each Demand Junction. This flow/pressure information was used to develop relationships between static head and flow at the tie in point to the existing water main. This relationship was simulated in the WaterCAD model, where it is modeled as a pump with characteristics matching pressure/flow data from the existing hydrant. The pump was placed in Fallon Street, north of the tie in point of the proposed water main and is connected to a reservoir which acts as a source of water. The elevation of the Design Report - Page 5 of 7 reservoir is fixed at the elevation of the pump. The input data and the pump curve are included in Appendix A of this report. Water Distribution System Design Summary The model shows that the existing water distribution system provides adequate flow and pressure for the proposed project. The modeled connection point (pump) in Fallon Street supplied sufficient pressure to the system. All of the junction nodes in the water model read 20 psi. The proposed 8-inch, D.I.P. water main in Fallon Street provides adequate capacity to serve the project. The flows and pressures within the system for the Peak Hour Demands were generated using WaterCAD and can be found in Appendix A of this report. The capacity of the system to meet fire flow requirements was tested by running a steady state fire flow analysis for all junctions. The model shows that the junction at this existing hydrant satisfies fire flow constraints (residual pressure > 20 psi, flow rate > 1500 gpm), while providing service to the condominium buildings at peak hour. The results of the analysis at peak hourly flow are given in Appendix A of this report. SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM An existing 8” sanitary sewer main is located in Water Lily Drive along the eastern boundary of the property, as shown on the civil plans. A proposed 8” sanitary sewer main will be extended from this main into the property, with a proposed manhole at each end of the main, as shown on the civil plan set. 13 of the proposed units will be serviced by 4” sewer services connected to this new main. Similar to the water main configuration, there are existing sewer services stubbed into the property from Pond Lily Drive and Water Lily Drive as shown on the civil plan set. The existing service stubs would serve five (3) of the proposed units. There is also an exiting sewer service stub from Fallon Street, which would serve the 3-plex unit located on the northern portion of the property. Lastly, a proposed 8” sanitary sewer main is required to serve the three (3) proposed units on the northern portion of the property. This proposed main would connect to the existing 8” sanitary Design Report - Page 6 of 7 sewer manhole, located in Water Lily Drive outside the northeastern corner of the property. The proposed 8” sanitary sewer main will be extended from this manhole westward through Fallon Street and terminate with a proposed manhole located within Fallon Street. Three (3) of the proposed units will be serviced by 4” sewer services connected to this new main. Sanitary Sewer Design Load The population estimates of 2.17 people per dwelling unit, and residential flow rate of 64.4 gpcd used herein are according to the City of Bozeman Design Standards and Specifications. The peaking factor for the design area is determined using the formula provided in the City of Bozeman Design Standards and Specifications. The proposed main extension will be 8-inch and shall be sized to flow at no more than 75% of capacity for peak hour conditions. The greater of the two proposed sewer main extensions was evaluated, being the southernmost sewer main serving 13 of the proposed units. Using the city average of 2.17 persons per household the equivalent population is calculated. Connection: Equivalent Population = (2.17 persons/dwelling unit)(13 units) = 28 persons Harmon Formula: Peaking Factor = (18 + P0.5)/(4 + P0.5) where: P = Population in thousands Peaking Factor = (18 + 0.0280.5)/(4 + 0.0280.5) Peaking Factor = 4.45 Assumed infiltration rate = 150 gallons/acre/day = 150 (2.099 acres) = 315 gal/day The peak flow rate is calculated by multiplying the City's design generation rate of 64.4 gallons per capita per day by the population, multiplying by the peaking factor, and adding the infiltration rate: Peak Flow Rate = 64.4 gpcpd (28 persons) (4.45) + 315 gpd = 8,339 gpd = 5.79 gpm = 0.013 cfs The capacity of an 8-inch main is checked using Manning’s Equation: Design Report - Page 7 of 7 Qfull = (1.486/0.013)AR2/3S1/2 For an 8-inch PVC main: Manning's n = 0.013 for PVC Pipe Minimum Slope = 0.004 ft/ft A = area = (3.14/4)d 2 = (3.14/4)(8/12)2 = 0.34907 ft2 P = perimeter = 2(3.14)r = 2(3.14)(4/12) = 2.0944 ft R = hydraulic radius = A/P = 0.34907/2.0944 = 0.16667 ft R2/3 = 0.30105 ft S = 0.004 ft/ft S1/2 = 0.0632 ft/ft Qfull = (1.486/0.013)(0.34907)(0.30105)(0.0632) = 0.7592 cfs Connection: Q/Qfull = 0.013 /0.7592 = 0.0171 or 1.71% Based on these calculations, an 8-inch sewer line has adequate capacity to carry the design flows for the project. It should be noted that the downstream sanitary sewer discharge is received by the Norton Ranch Lift Station, which is currently at capacity. It is understood that upgrades to the Norton Ranch Lift Station are currently in the design review phase, which has prepared by HDR. The proposed upgrades to the lift station would significantly increase the capacity of the lift station to allow for this development. It is understood that approval of the future infrastructure plans cannot be issued until the lift station updates are complete. We respectfully request that site plan review is allowed to proceed on the assumption the that lift station upgrades will be completed this Summer. APPENDIX A WaterCAD Model Results Scenario: BaseP8P6P5P3P1DJ2DJ1J-5J-4J-1J-17J-18WATER LILY AND FALLON HYDRANTR-2Page 1 of 127 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-16666/30/2021WaterCAD[10.03.03.72]Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center200860_WaterCAD.wtg FlexTable: Junction Table Pressure (psi) Hydraulic Grade (ft) Demand (gpm) Demand Collection ZoneElevation (ft) LabelID 584,951.790<Collection: 0 items><None>4,817.34J-133 594,951.799<Collection: 1 items><None>4,815.87DJ235 594,951.799<Collection: 1items><None>4,815.68DJ137 584,951.790<Collection: 0 items><None>4,816.97J-439 584,951.790<Collection: 0items><None>4,817.78J-541 594,951.790<Collection: 0 items><None>4,815.99J-1775 594,951.790<Collection: 0 items><None>4,815.68J-1877 Page 1 of 127 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 6/30/2021 WaterCAD [10.03.03.72]Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center200860_WaterCAD.wtg FlexTable: Pipe Table Flow (gpm) Minor Loss Coefficient (Local) Hazen-Williams C MaterialDiameter (in) Stop NodeStart NodeLength (Scaled) (ft) Label -170.000130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-5J-4120P5 -60.000130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-4J-1263P6 -170.000130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-17J-5183P4 -170.390130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-18J-1742P3 170.000130.0Ductile Iron6.0J-18WATER LILYAND FALLONHYDRANT23P2 170.000130.0Ductile Iron99.0 WATER LILY AND FALLON HYDRANT R-233P1 -110.000130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-4DJ196P7 -20.000130.0Ductile Iron8.0DJ1DJ2263P8 -60.000130.0Ductile Iron8.0J-1DJ296P9 Length (UserDefined)(ft) Velocity(ft/s) 1200.11 2620.04 2270.11 320.11 270.19 10.00 960.07 2630.01 960.04 Page 1 of 127 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 6/30/2021 WaterCAD [10.03.03.72]Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center200860_WaterCAD.wtg FlexTable: Pump Table Pump Head (ft) Flow (Total) (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (Discharge) (ft) Hydraulic Grade (Suction) (ft) Status (Initial)Pump DefinitionElevation (ft) Label 133.85174,951.804,817.95OnWater Lil and Fallon Hydrants-4,817.95 WATER LILY AND FALLON HYDRANT Page 1 of 127 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 6/30/2021 WaterCAD [10.03.03.72]Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center200860_WaterCAD.wtg Pump Definition Detailed Report: Water Lil and Fallon Hydrants- Element Details 73ID Notes Water Lil and Fallon Hydrants- Label Pump Curve Head(ft)Flow(gpm) 124.621,575 113.082,440 101.543,098 90.003,653 78.464,145 66.924,591 55.385,002 43.855,387 32.315,749 20.776,094 9.236,421 Pump Efficiency Type Best Efficiency Point Pump Efficiency Type %100.0Motor Efficiency %100.0BEP Efficiency FalseIs Variable Speed Drive? gpm0BEP Flow Transient (Physical) lb·ft²0.000Inertia (Pump and Motor)SI=25, US=1280Specific Speed rpm0Speed (Full)TrueReverse Spin Allowed? Page 1 of 227 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 6/30/2021 WaterCAD [10.03.03.72]Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center200860_WaterCAD.wtg Pump Definition Detailed Report: Water Lil and Fallon Hydrants- Page 2 of 227 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 6/30/2021 WaterCAD [10.03.03.72]Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center200860_WaterCAD.wtg Fire Flow Node FlexTable: Fire Flow Report Junction w/ Minimum Pressure (Zone) Pressure (Calculated Residual) (psi) Pressure (Residual Lower Limit) (psi) Flow (Total Available) (gpm) Flow (Total Needed) (gpm) Fire Flow (Available) (gpm) Fire Flow (Needed) (gpm) Label DJ220202,3931,5002,3931,500J-1 J-120202,4081,5082,3991,500DJ2 J-120202,4651,5082,4571,500DJ1 J-120202,5481,5002,5481,500J-4 J-120202,8131,5002,8131,500J-5 J-520203,8141,5003,8141,500J-17 J-520204,3031,5004,3031,500J-18 Page 1 of 127 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 6/30/2021 WaterCAD [10.03.03.72]Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center200860_WaterCAD.wtg 1 R Hudock From:Erin Shane <Eshane@BOZEMAN.NET>Sent:Friday, March 5, 2021 4:39 PMTo:R HudockSubject:Request for Hydrant Data - Fallon Street Ryan, The results of the fire flow test you requested are as follows: Static –58, Residual –54, Pitot -48 flowing 1160 GPM on a 2.5” nozzle. The test was performed at Waterlily / Fallon on 3/5/2021. If you have questions or need further information feel free to email. Have a great weekend! From:R Hudock <rhudock@chengineers.com> Sent:Thursday, March 4, 2021 9:48 AM To:Erin Shane <Eshane@BOZEMAN.NET> Subject:Request for Hydrant Data -Fallon Street CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Erin, Hoe you have been well!We are working on a condo project at a property located between Pond Lily Drive and Water Lily Drive, just south of Fallon Street in the Norton Ranch Phase 4 Subdivision.I’ve attached a copy of our topo survey drawing for reference. For this project we will need to extend a water main into the property from Fallon Street.It looks like there’s a hydrant just north of the property off of Fallon Street.At you convenience, would you be able to provide us with any hydrant test data that you have in the vicinity of this property?This would help us tremendously for the water main design. Thanks a ton Erin!We really appreciate it! Best, Ryan Hudock, P.E. www.chengineers.com 2 "This message and/or attachment contains confidential information. Distribution of this information must be only to those of C&H Engineering and Surveying, Inc employees or individuals contractually approved to receive this information.If you are not the addressee and/or are not authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose,forward, print or take any action based on this message or any information herein.If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message." City of Bozeman emails are subject to the Right to Know provisions of Montana’s Constitution (Art. II, Sect. 9) and may be considered a “public record” pursuant to Title 2, Chpt. 6, Montana Code Annotated. As such, this email, its sender and receiver, and the contents may be available for public disclosure and will be retained pursuant to the City’s record retention policies. Emails that contain confidential information such as information related to individual privacy may be protected from disclosure under law.