Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout16 Stormwater Report 12-21-20 STORMWATER DESIGN REPORT FOR: COURTYARD HOTEL BY MARRIOTT BOZEMAN, MT Prepared By: Madison Engineering 895 Technology Blvd Ste 203 Bozeman, MT 59718 (406) 586-0262 DECEMBER 2020 COURTYARD BY MARRIOTT-BOOTHILL STORMWATER DESIGN REPORT A. Introduction The proposed development for the Courtyard Hotel by Marriott will be constructed at 2168 Boot hill Court in Bozeman, MT. The site development consists of one hotel building with 171 guest rooms and associated infrastructure. The following references were used in the preparation of this report: a. COB Design Standards and Specifications Policy, 2004 (DSSP). Addendum #7 b. COB Modifications to Montana Public Works Standard Specifications (MPWSS) B. Stormwater Management The site is located on Lot 4 of Block 2 of Lewis & Clark Subdivision. It is bordered by two existing buildings, Boot hill Court, and Interstate 90. The proposed stormwater management system consists of on-site curb and cutter, curb inlets, conveyance piping, and a retention pond. Runoff is directed from the site into the curb and gutter via downspouts, roof drain piping, and overland sheet drainage. The runoff then enters into curb inlets and stormwater piping, and is then conveyed via piping into the retention pond. The retention pond includes an infiltration mechanism, a 5’ radius gravel infiltrator that is excavated to native gravels, lined with separation fabric, and filled with drain rock. The proposed design reduces the post-development to less than the pre-development runoff rate via total retention. Stormwater run-off was calculated based on the Rational Method and the retention systems were sized per the City of Bozeman’s design standards for a storm intensity of 10-year frequency and a 2-hour duration. The required retention pond storage volume is 6,012 cf. At a 1.5 ft depth, the proposed retention pond has a capacity of 6,133 cf. Stormwater conveyance structures were sized to convey the 25 year, 2-hour storm. The curb and gutter and proposed piping have adequate capacity to convey the flows. The stormwater basins, piping, and system are displayed in the attached Stormwater Exhibit. The stormwater basin, runoff, retention, and conveyance calculations are included in the appendix. A stormwater maintenance plan is included in the appendix. C. Soil Conditions and Groundwater Information The existing site is an empty lot that slopes northward at about 1%. A geotechnical report was conducted for project 2019 by TD&H Engineering. In general, soil conditions consist of a layer of topsoil 0.9 to 1.2 ft thick followed by a layer of silts and clays between 4.0 and 7.2 ft depths, followed by alluvial sandy gravel. Groundwater was encountered on the site and was observed at depths ranging from 4.0 to 7.5 ft below the ground surface at the time of the geotechnical investigation. The proposed retention pond was designed to have the bottom of the pond elevation above the observed groundwater surface. The observed groundwater elevation in Test Pit #3 was 4.25 ft below the existing surface. The pond bottom elevation is approximately 1.5 ft below existing grade at the lowest point, putting the bottom of the pond about 2.75 ft above the observed groundwater elevation. The proposed buried gravel infiltration system was designed to extend into native gravels to facilitate infiltration. Seasonal high groundwater fluctuations can be estimated via a comparison of groundwater monitoring data for a nearby project about 1 mile to the northwest, the Palisades Condominiums, located near the corner of Catamount St and Warbler Way. Groundwater monitoring was conducted in the spring and summer of 2020, and groundwater fluctuated less than a foot over the recorded measurements. It is anticipated that groundwater will fluctuate similarly at the Courtyard Hotel Site, within a foot above the observed measurements of the Geotechnical report. The Palisades Condominium groundwater monitoring information is included in the Appendix. D. Treatment and 0.5” Storm Requirement All the drainage basins flow into the retention pond, sized to totally retain the 10 year-2 hour storm, which has an intensity of 0.41 in/hr, exceeding the 0.5” volume. Appendices A. Stormwater Calculations B. Stormwater Maintenance Plan C. Stormwater Exhibit D. Palisades Groundwater Monitoring for Comparison Appendix A: Stormwater Calculations 25-year Flows for Sizing of Conveyance Structures: Drainage Basin No. Total Area (SF) IMPERVIOUS (SF) C = 0.9 ROOF (SF) C=0.9 LANDSCAPED (SF) C = 0.2 Weighted C Basin Length (ft) Slope % Tc (min) Cf = 1.1 i 25-yr (in/hr) Q 25 (cfs)Drians To: Pre-Developed Basins Existing 130,964 0 0 130,964 0.20 500 1 38 1.05 0.63 Ditch Post-Developed Basins A 22,244 10,872 4,928 6,444 0.70 100 1 5 3.83 1.36 Pond B 43,575 23,160 5,267 15,148 0.66 250 1 5 3.83 2.51 Pond C 65,145 35,248 10,503 19,394 0.69 350 2 8 2.83 2.93 Pond Subtotal 130,964 69,280 20,698 40,986 Manual estimates Courtyard by Marriott Peak flow calculations Drainage Areas Page 1 of 1 Allowable Pavement Encroachment Given: T =9 feet (max per city) W =1.5 feet Ts =7.5 feet Sw =0.0625 ft/ft Sx =0.03 ft/ft a =0.59 inches d =3.24 inches n =0.015 Sw/Sx =2.08 T/W =6 Capacity for Gutter equations: Where: Qs = Discharge within the Roadway above the depressed section (cfs) Qw = Discharge within the depressed (gutter) section (cfs) Cf = 0.56 for English units Sx = Pavement cross slope (ft/ft) Ts = Width of flow in the roadway above depressed section So = Gutter longitudinal slope (ft/ft) Sw = Gutter depression cross slope (ft/ft) T = Spread (ft) W = Width of gutter depression (ft) Capacity solution Gutter Capacity - Drainage Basin A Gutter Capacity - Drainage Basin B So =0.0100 So =0.0050 Qs =2.33 cfs Qs =1.65 cfs Eo =0.42 cfs Eo =0.42 cfs Q =4.04 cfs Q =2.86 cfs A =1.215 sf A =1.215 sf V =3.33 ft/s V =2.35 ft/s Gutter Capacity - Drainage Basin C So =0.0100 Qs =2.33 cfs Eo =0.42 cfs Q =4.04 cfs A =1.215 sf V =3.33 ft/s BASIN Gutter Capacity (cfs) 25 Yr Design Flow (cfs) Capacity greater than 25- yr flow? A 4.04 1.36 Yes B 2.86 2.51 Yes C 4.04 2.93 Yes Summary Gutter Capacity Calculations The gutter capacity is adequate for each drainage area. Courtyard by Marriott SWQQQ QEQoW 0 S E1 QQ 2 1 O3 8 S3 5 X f S STSn CQ   1 8/3 XW XWo 11T/W /SS1 /SS1E             Page 1 of 1 Basins A, B & C East Jordan Iron Works Orifice Flow Calculations: From Manufacturer's Website Where: Q = Flow (cfs) A = Open area in grate (in^2) d = Depth of water over grate (in) C = Rating Coefficient C = 0.0108 *From Manufacturer A = 225 in^2 *From Shop Drawing Submittal d = 4 in *City Maximum Q =4.86 cfs Basin Flows Basin A - Q 25 1.36 cfs Basin B - Q 25 2.51 cfs Basin C - Q 25 2.93 cfs Summary The Proposed Curb Inlets have sufficient capacity to convey the peak flows Courtyard by Marriott Orifice Type (Sag) Curb Inlet Capacity Calculations 𝑄=𝐶∗𝐴∗√𝑑 Courtyard Hotel by Marriott-Boothill Stormwater Pipe Capacity Summary Pipe Contributing Basin Inflow Q(25) (cfs)Pipe Size Pipe Slope Pipe Capacity (cfs) 1 A 1.36 12" 0.50% 3.9 2 A, B 3.87 12" 0.50% 3.9 3 C 2.93 12" 0.50% 3.9 RD 1 Southwest Roof Drain Areas* 0.50 6" 0.50% 0.6 RD 2 Southeast Roof Drain* 0.35 6" 0.50% 0.6 RD 3 Northern Roof Drain* 0.29 6" 0.50% 0.6 RD 4 Parking Canopy Roof Drain* 0.02 4" 0.50% 0.2 *Roof drain flows provided by mechanical engineer DA Q(25) (cfs) A 1.36 B 2.51 C 2.93 CIRCULAR CHANNEL Manning's Eqn.1.486 A R2/3 S1/2 n Diameter,do (in) =12.0 Enter Value Diameter,do (ft) =1.00 Units =1.486 n =0.009 Slope, S (ft/ft)0.005 Depth, y (ft) Theta (rad) Area, A (ft2) Wetted Perimeter, P (ft) Hydraulic Radius, R (ft) Top Width, T (ft) Hydraulic Depth, D (ft) Section Factor, Z (ft5/2) Q (cfs) Q (gpm) Q (gpd - 8 hour day) V (ft/s) Energy, E = V2/2g (ft) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.05 0.90 0.01 0.45 0.03 0.44 0.03 0.00 0.0 7.8 3764.5 1.2 0.02 0.10 1.29 0.04 0.64 0.06 0.60 0.07 0.01 0.1 34.1 16366.5 1.9 0.05 0.15 1.59 0.07 0.80 0.09 0.71 0.10 0.02 0.2 79.4 38105.9 2.4 0.09 0.20 1.85 0.11 0.93 0.12 0.80 0.14 0.04 0.3 143.0 68648.9 2.8 0.13 0.25 2.09 0.15 1.05 0.15 0.87 0.18 0.06 0.5 223.7 107382.8 3.2 0.16 0.30 2.32 0.20 1.16 0.17 0.92 0.22 0.09 0.7 319.8 153516.1 3.6 0.20 0.35 2.53 0.24 1.27 0.19 0.95 0.26 0.12 1.0 429.4 206123.9 3.9 0.24 0.40 2.74 0.29 1.37 0.21 0.98 0.30 0.16 1.2 550.4 264171.6 4.2 0.27 0.45 2.94 0.34 1.47 0.23 0.99 0.34 0.20 1.5 680.3 326526.0 4.4 0.30 0.50 3.14 0.39 1.57 0.25 1.00 0.39 0.25 1.8 816.6 391960.2 4.6 0.33 0.55 3.34 0.44 1.67 0.26 0.99 0.44 0.30 2.1 956.6 459150.7 4.8 0.36 0.60 3.54 0.49 1.77 0.28 0.98 0.50 0.35 2.4 1097.2 526669.2 5.0 0.38 0.65 3.75 0.54 1.88 0.29 0.95 0.57 0.41 2.8 1235.3 592964.0 5.1 0.40 0.70 3.96 0.59 1.98 0.30 0.92 0.64 0.47 3.0 1367.3 656327.6 5.2 0.42 0.75 4.19 0.63 2.09 0.30 0.87 0.73 0.54 3.3 1489.2 714839.5 5.3 0.43 0.80 4.43 0.67 2.21 0.30 0.80 0.84 0.62 3.6 1596.4 766256.2 5.3 0.43 0.85 4.69 0.71 2.35 0.30 0.71 1.00 0.71 3.7 1682.9 807783.2 5.3 0.43 0.90 5.00 0.74 2.50 0.30 0.60 1.24 0.83 3.9 1740.6 835500.2 5.2 0.42 0.95 5.38 0.77 2.69 0.29 0.44 1.77 1.02 3.9 1754.9 842333.8 5.1 0.40 1.00 6.28 0.79 3.14 0.25 0.00 3.6 1633.7 784185.4 4.6 0.33 Pipe Flows Contributing Basin Pipe 1 1.36 cfs *Basin A Pipe 2 3.87 cfs *Basin A + B Pipe 3 2.93 cfs *Basin C Summary:The proposed pipes have adequate capacity to convey the 25 year flows Q = 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 Depth (ft) Q (CFS) V (ft/s) E (ft) ydo T THETA CIRCULAR CHANNEL - 6" Roof Drain Piping Manning's Eqn.1.486 A R2/3 S1/2 n Diameter,do (in) =6.0 Enter Value Diameter,do (ft) =0.50 Units =1.486 n =0.009 Slope, S (ft/ft)0.005 Depth, y (ft) Theta (rad) Area, A (ft2) Wetted Perimeter, P (ft) Hydraulic Radius, R (ft) Top Width, T (ft) Hydraulic Depth, D (ft) Section Factor, Z (ft5/2) Q (cfs) Q (gpm) Q (gpd - 8 hour day) V (ft/s) Energy, E = V2/2g (ft) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.03 0.90 0.00 0.23 0.02 0.22 0.02 0.00 0.0 1.2 592.9 0.7 0.01 0.05 1.29 0.01 0.32 0.03 0.30 0.03 0.00 0.0 5.4 2577.6 1.2 0.02 0.08 1.59 0.02 0.40 0.05 0.36 0.05 0.00 0.0 12.5 6001.3 1.5 0.04 0.10 1.85 0.03 0.46 0.06 0.40 0.07 0.01 0.1 22.5 10811.5 1.8 0.05 0.13 2.09 0.04 0.52 0.07 0.43 0.09 0.01 0.1 35.2 16911.7 2.0 0.06 0.15 2.32 0.05 0.58 0.09 0.46 0.11 0.02 0.1 50.4 24177.3 2.3 0.08 0.18 2.53 0.06 0.63 0.10 0.48 0.13 0.02 0.2 67.6 32462.5 2.5 0.09 0.20 2.74 0.07 0.68 0.11 0.49 0.15 0.03 0.2 86.7 41604.4 2.6 0.11 0.23 2.94 0.09 0.74 0.12 0.50 0.17 0.04 0.2 107.1 51424.6 2.8 0.12 0.25 3.14 0.10 0.79 0.13 0.50 0.20 0.04 0.3 128.6 61729.9 2.9 0.13 0.28 3.34 0.11 0.84 0.13 0.50 0.22 0.05 0.3 150.6 72311.7 3.0 0.14 0.30 3.54 0.12 0.89 0.14 0.49 0.25 0.06 0.4 172.8 82945.2 3.1 0.15 0.33 3.75 0.14 0.94 0.14 0.48 0.28 0.07 0.4 194.6 93386.0 3.2 0.16 0.35 3.96 0.15 0.99 0.15 0.46 0.32 0.08 0.5 215.3 103365.1 3.3 0.17 0.38 4.19 0.16 1.05 0.15 0.43 0.36 0.10 0.5 234.5 112580.2 3.3 0.17 0.40 4.43 0.17 1.11 0.15 0.40 0.42 0.11 0.6 251.4 120677.8 3.3 0.17 0.43 4.69 0.18 1.17 0.15 0.36 0.50 0.13 0.6 265.0 127217.9 3.3 0.17 0.45 5.00 0.19 1.25 0.15 0.30 0.62 0.15 0.6 274.1 131583.0 3.3 0.17 0.48 5.38 0.19 1.35 0.14 0.22 0.88 0.18 0.6 276.4 132659.3 3.2 0.16 0.50 6.28 0.20 1.57 0.13 0.00 0.6 257.3 123501.5 2.9 0.13 Pipe Flows Southwest Roof Drain 0.50 cfs *Flows provided by the Mechanical Engineer Southeast Roof Drain 0.35 cfs *Flows provided by the Mechanical Engineer Northern Roof Drain 0.29 cfs *Flows provided by the Mechanical Engineer Summary:The proposed pipes have adequate capacity to convey the 25 year flows Q = 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 Depth (ft) Q (CFS) V (ft/s) E (ft) ydo T THETA CIRCULAR CHANNEL - 4" Roof Drain Piping Manning's Eqn.1.486 A R2/3 S1/2 n Diameter,do (in) =4.0 Enter Value Diameter,do (ft) =0.33 Units =1.486 n =0.009 Slope, S (ft/ft)0.005 Depth, y (ft) Theta (rad) Area, A (ft2) Wetted Perimeter, P (ft) Hydraulic Radius, R (ft) Top Width, T (ft) Hydraulic Depth, D (ft) Section Factor, Z (ft5/2) Q (cfs) Q (gpm) Q (gpd - 8 hour day) V (ft/s) Energy, E = V2/2g (ft) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.02 0.90 0.00 0.15 0.01 0.15 0.01 0.00 0.0 0.4 201.1 0.6 0.01 0.03 1.29 0.00 0.21 0.02 0.20 0.02 0.00 0.0 1.8 874.2 0.9 0.01 0.05 1.59 0.01 0.27 0.03 0.24 0.03 0.00 0.0 4.2 2035.5 1.2 0.02 0.07 1.85 0.01 0.31 0.04 0.27 0.05 0.00 0.0 7.6 3667.0 1.4 0.03 0.08 2.09 0.02 0.35 0.05 0.29 0.06 0.00 0.0 12.0 5736.0 1.6 0.04 0.10 2.32 0.02 0.39 0.06 0.31 0.07 0.01 0.0 17.1 8200.3 1.7 0.05 0.12 2.53 0.03 0.42 0.06 0.32 0.09 0.01 0.1 22.9 11010.4 1.9 0.05 0.13 2.74 0.03 0.46 0.07 0.33 0.10 0.01 0.1 29.4 14111.2 2.0 0.06 0.15 2.94 0.04 0.49 0.08 0.33 0.11 0.01 0.1 36.3 17441.9 2.1 0.07 0.17 3.14 0.04 0.52 0.08 0.33 0.13 0.02 0.1 43.6 20937.2 2.2 0.08 0.18 3.34 0.05 0.56 0.09 0.33 0.15 0.02 0.1 51.1 24526.3 2.3 0.08 0.20 3.54 0.05 0.59 0.09 0.33 0.17 0.02 0.1 58.6 28132.9 2.4 0.09 0.22 3.75 0.06 0.63 0.10 0.32 0.19 0.03 0.1 66.0 31674.1 2.4 0.09 0.23 3.96 0.07 0.66 0.10 0.31 0.21 0.03 0.2 73.0 35058.8 2.5 0.10 0.25 4.19 0.07 0.70 0.10 0.29 0.24 0.03 0.2 79.6 38184.3 2.5 0.10 0.27 4.43 0.07 0.74 0.10 0.27 0.28 0.04 0.2 85.3 40930.8 2.5 0.10 0.28 4.69 0.08 0.78 0.10 0.24 0.33 0.05 0.2 89.9 43149.1 2.5 0.10 0.30 5.00 0.08 0.83 0.10 0.20 0.41 0.05 0.2 93.0 44629.6 2.5 0.10 0.32 5.38 0.09 0.90 0.10 0.15 0.59 0.07 0.2 93.7 44994.7 2.4 0.09 0.33 6.28 0.09 1.05 0.08 0.00 0.2 87.3 41888.6 2.2 0.08 Pipe Flows Parking Canopy Roofdrain 0.02 cfs *Flows provided by the Mechanical Engineer Summary:The proposed pipes have adequate capacity to convey the 25 year flows Q = 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 Depth (ft) Q (CFS) V (ft/s) E (ft) ydo T THETA Courtyard Hotel by Marriott Lot 4 Block 2 of Lewis and Clark Commercial Subdivision Stormwater Detention/Retention Calculations 11/3/2020 Calculation of Required Volume for Storm Detention Pond (Reference: Bozeman Stormwater Master Plan - 1982) Design Rainfall Freq. 10 year (see page III - 5 of master plan) IDF coefficient a 0.64 IDF coefficient b IDF coefficient n 0.65 Post-development Calculations C Areas (ft2):Landscaping 40,986 0.20 Roof Area 20,698 0.90 Impervious 69,280 0.90 Total: 130,964 total area: 3.007 acres composite C: 0.68 Retention Pond Calculations: Q = CIA C = 0.68 (post-development) I = 0.41 in/hr (10-yr, 2-hr storm) A = 3.01 acres Q =0.83 cfs required retention storage (ft3) =6,012 ft3 Volume held between contours: Cumulative Contour Area (ft2) Delta V (ft3) Volume (ft3) 4716.50 1523 4717.0 3338 1,215 1,215 4717.5 5142 2,120 3,335 4718.00 6049 2,798 6,133 Design storage at 1.5' depth (ft3) =6,133 Retention pond COB.xls Appendix B: Stormwater Maintenance Plan Courtyard Hotel by Marriott-Boothill Storm Water Maintenance Plan Owner’s responsibility for routine inspection and maintenance: 1. Perform quarterly inspection of and keep the curb and gutter, curb cut, sidewalk chase, curb inlets, conveyance piping and round rock drainage swale areas free of leaves, rocks, sediment, and other debris. 2. Re-sod or seed damaged or maintained areas immediately. 3. Retention Pond: Perform yearly inspection of the retention pond and remove sediment if it accumulates to 3” above design grade. Keep the pond free of trash and other debris. 4. Stormwater facilities shall be maintained by the owner or other responsible party in a condition so that the facilities will function as designed. 5. Waste shall be disposed of from maintenance of facilities in accordance with applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. 7. The owner or other responsible party shall create and maintain records of installation and maintenance and repair for the life of the development and shall be made available to the engineering department upon request. 8. Owner to maintain and fund Operation and Maintenance of facilities. Owner, Courtyard Hotel Appendix C: Stormwater Exhibit B O O T H I L L C O U R T UP UP FITNESS036 MECH/WH/FIRE026 POOLEQUIPMENT028 POOLCHEMICAL029 POOL/SPA032 MEETINGROOM041 LOBBY019 RECEPTION017 LUGGAGE015 COMP/TELECOM016 ELEVATORLOBBY190 EMPLOYEEBREAKROOM006 LINEN007 LAUNDRY193 WORKROOM012 SALESOFFICE013 MANAGERSOFFICE014 CRATE018 BAR020 FOOD PREP021 MEETINGROOMSTORAGE031 DHU027 POOLVEST.033 CORRIDOR034 ENTRYVESTIBULE001 LOUNGE042 VEST.035 ELECTRICAL025 KING128 KING130KING132KING134KING136 PUBLICSPACE138 QUEEN/QUEENACC. R.I.S.139 QUEEN/QUEENACC. R.I.S.137 QUEEN/QUEEN135 STAIR 2152 STAIR 1150 EMP.RESTROOM005 FIRERISER WATERHEATER MECHANICAL RESTROOM044 PREFUNCTIONAREA039 MEETINGROOM040 WOMENS127 MENS129 GUESTLAUNDRY141 VESTIBULE142 QUEEN/QUEEN133 ICE140 ELEV.EQUIP.143 LINEN144 BASIN A 22,244 SF IMPERVIOUS = 10,872 SF ROOF = 4,928 SF LANDSCAPED = 6,444 SF C = 0.70 BASIN B 43,575 SF IMPERVIOUS = 23,160 SF ROOF = 5,267 SF LANDSCAPED = 15,148 SF C = 0.66 BASIN C 65,145 SF IMPERVIOUS = 35,248 SF ROOF = 10,503 SF LANDSCAPED = 19,394 SF C = 0.69 COURTYARD HOTEL BY MARRIOTT FFE 4723.00 LEGEND 1" = 0 SCALE 30' 601530 EXHIBITMADISON ENGINEERING 895 TECHNOLOGY BLVD, STE 203, BOZEMAN, MT 59718 PHONE (406) 586-0262 COURTYARD BY MARRIOTT STORMWATER EXHIBIT