The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20131 Staff Report Staff Report Building J at the Cannery District Application 20131 November 19, 2020 Page 1 of 11 Application No. 20131 Type Site Plan Project Name Building J at the Cannery District Summary Site plan application for the construction of a two-story office building in the Cannery PUD. Zoning B-2 Growth Policy Regional Commercial and Services Parcel Size .45 acres Overlay District(s) None Street Address 211 East Oak Street, Bozeman, MT 59715 Legal Description Imes Addition, S06E, T02 S, Ro06 E, Lot J, Acres .45468, Plat C-41-M Owner Cannery District Partners, LLC, 113 E. Oak Street, Suite 4a, Bozeman, MT 59715 Applicant Same as owner Representative Minarik Architecture, Inc., 2222 NE Oregon, Suite 217, Portland, OR 97232 Staff Planner Sarah Rosenberg Engineer Cody Flammond Noticing Public Comment Period Site Posted Adjacent Owners Mailed Newspaper Legal Ad 10/20-11/4/2020 10/20/2020 10/20/2020 N/A Advisory Boards Board Date Recommendation DRC 11/4/2020 Adequacy Recommendation Approval Decision Authority Director of Community Development Date Full application and file of record: Community Development Department, 20 E. Olive St., Bozeman, MT 59715 DocuSign Envelope ID: 8A4AD643-D04C-40A6-9B95-6641CD3AA523 11/19/2020 Staff Report Building J at the Cannery District Application 20131 November 19, 2020 Page 2 of 11 FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPEAL PROVISIONS CERTIFICATE A) PURSUANT to Chapter 38, Article 2, Bozeman Municipal Code (BMC), and other applicable sections of Ch.38, BMC, public notice was given, opportunity to submit comment was provided to affected parties, and a review of the Site Plan described in this report was conducted. The applicant proposed to the City a Site Plan (SP) to permit a 2-story office building in the B-2 zone district within the Cannery PUD. The purposes of the Site Plan review were to consider all relevant evidence relating to public health, safety, welfare, and the other purposes of Ch. 38, BMC; to evaluate the proposal against the criteria of Sec. 38.230.100 BMC, and the standards of Ch. 38, BMC; and to determine whether the application should be approved, conditionally approved, or denied. B) It appeared to the Director that all parties and the public wishing to examine the proposed Site Plan and offer comment were provided the opportunity to do so. After receiving the recommendation of the relevant advisory bodies established by Ch. 38, Art. 210, BMC, and considering all matters of record presented with the application and during the public comment period defined by Ch. 38, BMC, the Director has found that the proposed Site Plan would comply with the requirements of the BMC if certain conditions were imposed. Therefore, being fully advised of all matters having come before them regarding this application, the Director makes the following decision. C) The Site Plan has been found to meet the criteria of Ch. 38, BMC, and is therefore approved, subject to the conditions listed in this report and the correction of any elements not in conformance with the standards of the Title. The evidence contained in the submittal materials, advisory body review, public testimony, and this report, justifies the conditions imposed on this development to ensure that the Site Plan complies with all applicable regulations, and all applicable criteria of Ch. 38, BMC. On this ______ day of ________________, 2020, Martin Matsen, Director of Community Development, approved with conditions this Site Plan for and on behalf of the City of Bozeman as authorized by Sec. 38.200.010, BMC. D) This Director of Community Development’s project decision may be appealed by filing a documented appeal with and paying an appeal fee to the Clerk of the Commission for the City of Bozeman within 10 working days after the date of the final decision as evidenced by the Director’s signature, following the procedures of Sec. 38.250.030, BMC. DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DocuSign Envelope ID: 8A4AD643-D04C-40A6-9B95-6641CD3AA523 19th November Staff Report Building J at the Cannery District Application 20131 November 19, 2020 Page 3 of 11 Figure 1: Current Zoning Map DocuSign Envelope ID: 8A4AD643-D04C-40A6-9B95-6641CD3AA523 Staff Report Building J at the Cannery District Application 20131 November 19, 2020 Page 4 of 11 Figure 2: Proposed site plan DocuSign Envelope ID: 8A4AD643-D04C-40A6-9B95-6641CD3AA523 Staff Report Building J at the Cannery District Application 20131 November 19, 2020 Page 5 of 11 DocuSign Envelope ID: 8A4AD643-D04C-40A6-9B95-6641CD3AA523 Staff Report Building J at the Cannery District Application 20131 November 19, 2020 Page 6 of 11 Figures 3-6: Building Elevations DocuSign Envelope ID: 8A4AD643-D04C-40A6-9B95-6641CD3AA523 Staff Report Building J at the Cannery District Application 20131 November 19, 2020 Page 7 of 11 ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS Analysis and resulting recommendations based on the entirety of the application materials, municipal codes, standards, plans, public comment, and all other materials available during the review period. Collectively this information is the record of the review. The analysis in this report is a summary of the completed review. Plan Review, Section 38.230.100, BMC In considering applications for plan approval under this title, the Director of Community Development shall consider the following: 1. Conformance with Article 1 - Consistency with the City’s adopted Growth Policy 38.100.040.D Meets Code? Growth Policy Land Use Regional Commercial and Services Yes Zoning B-2 Yes Comments: The proposed use is allowed in the B-2 zone district and meets the underlying growth policy designation. 2. Conformance with Article 1 - All other applicable laws, ordinances, and regulations (38.100.080) Condominium ownership Yes Comments: The subject property is located within the Cannery District PUD and meets all criterion set forth in the Design Manual. 3. Conformance with Article, including the cessation of any current violations (38.200.160) Meets Code? Current Violations None Yes Comments: There are no violations on the property 4. Conformance with Article 2 - Submittal material (38.220) requirements and plan review for applicable permit types (38.230) Meets Code? Site Plan Yes Submittal requirements 38.220.100 Yes Phasing of development 38.230.020.B NA NA Comments: The site plan criteria are met with this project. All appropriate documents and plans were submitted with the application. 5. Conformance with Article 3 - Zoning Provisions (38.300) Meets Code? Permitted uses 38.310 Offices Yes Form and intensity standards 38.320 Zoning: B-2 Setbacks (feet) Structures Parking / Loading Yes Front Mixed NA Rear 10 10 Side 5 10 Alley NA NA Comments: The proposed setbacks meet all B-2 zone district standards. Lot coverage 44.8% Allowed 100% Yes DocuSign Envelope ID: 8A4AD643-D04C-40A6-9B95-6641CD3AA523 Staff Report Building J at the Cannery District Application 20131 November 19, 2020 Page 8 of 11 Building height 44’ Allowed 35’-5” Yes Comments: The building height meets B-2 zone standards. Applicable zone specific or overlay standards 38.330-40 NA Comments: This project is not in an overlay district or special district General land use standards and requirements 38.350 Yes Comments: All encroachments are in conformance to standards. Applicable supplemental use criteria 38.360 NA Supplemental uses/type NA NA Comments: There are no additional uses proposed for this project Wireless facilities 38.370 NA Affordable Housing 38.380.010 NA Affordable housing plan NA Comments: There is no affordable housing component or wireless facility proposed with this project. 6a. Conformance with Article 4 - Community Design Provisions: Transportation Facilities and Access (38.400) Meets Code? Streets 38.400.010 Yes Street and road dedication 38.400.020 NA Access easements NA Level of Service 38.400.060 Yes Transportation grid adequate to serve site Yes Comments: No streets or roads are constructed with this development. The Cannery District infrastructure along East Oak was completed previously Sidewalks 38.400.080 Yes Comments: Sidewalks are constructed from Oak Street to the development Drive access 38.400.090 Access to site: 1 Yes Fire lanes, curbs, signage and striping Yes Comments: Access is from East Oak Street through a drive aisle that exists in the development. Street vision triangle 38.400.100 Yes Transportation pathways 38.400.110 NA Pedestrian access easements for shared use pathways and similar transportation facilities NA Public transportation 38.400.120 NA Comments: No pedestrian easements are provided with this application. Much of the pedestrian infrastructure already exists. 6b. Conformance with Article 4 – Community Design Provisions: Community Design and Elements (38.410) Meets Code? Neighborhood centers 38.410.020 NA Comments: No neighborhood center is required Lot and block standards 38.410.030-040 Yes Midblock crossing: rights of way for pedestrians alternative block delineation NA Comments: The underlying lot meets lot and block standards. DocuSign Envelope ID: 8A4AD643-D04C-40A6-9B95-6641CD3AA523 Staff Report Building J at the Cannery District Application 20131 November 19, 2020 Page 9 of 11 If the development is adjacent to an existing or approved public park or public open space area, have provisions been made in the plan to avoid interfering with public access to and use of that area NA Provisions for utilities including efficient public services and utilities 38.410.050-060 Yes Easements (City and public utility rights-of-way etc.) Yes Water, sewer, and stormwater Yes Other utilities (electric, natural gas, communications) Yes CIL of water Yes Comments: CILWR was approved by the Engineering and was paid by the applicant. Municipal infrastructure requirements 38.410.070 NA Comments: NA Grading & drainage 38.410.080 Yes Location, design and capacity of stormwater facilities Yes Stormwater maintenance plan Yes Landscaping: native species, curvilinear, 75% live vegetation 38.410.080.H Yes Comments: Reviewed and approved by Engineering. Watercourse setback 38.410.100 NA Watercourse setback planting plan 38.410.100.2.f NA 6c. Conformance with Article 4 – Community Design Provisions: Park and Recreation Requirements (38.420) Meets Code? Parkland requirements 38.420.020.A .52 ac. X 10 units/ac. X 0.03 ac.= .3 ac. NA Cash donation in lieu (CIL) 38.420.030 NA Improvements in-lieu NA Comments: No residential component, no parkland required. Park Frontage 38.420.060 NA Park development 38.420.080 NA Recreation pathways 38.420.110 NA Park/Recreational area design NA Comments: No residential component, no parkland required. 7a. Conformance with Article 5 – Project Design: Block Frontage Standards (38.510) Meets Code? Block frontage classification Mixed Yes Departure criteria Non NA Comments: Mixed block frontage applies to Oak Street and the internal drives to the west and north of the proposed project. All criterion is met. 7b. Conformance with Article 5 – Project Design: Site Planning and Design Elements (38.520) Meets Code? Design and arrangement of the elements of the plan (e.g., buildings, circulation, open space and landscaping, etc.) so that activities are integrated with the organizational scheme of the community, neighborhood, and other approved development and produce an efficient, functionally organized and cohesive development Yes Relationship to adjacent properties 38.520.030 Yes DocuSign Envelope ID: 8A4AD643-D04C-40A6-9B95-6641CD3AA523 Staff Report Building J at the Cannery District Application 20131 November 19, 2020 Page 10 of 11 7d. Conformance with Article 5 – Parking (38.540) Meets Code? Parking requirements residential 38.540.050.A.1 NA Yes Reductions residential 38.540.050.A.1.b NA Parking requirements nonresidential 38.540.050.A.2 46 Reductions nonresidential 38.540.050.A.2.c Joint –use: 25 Provided off-street 41 Provided on-street NA Bicycle parking 38.540.050.A.4 12 Yes Comments: Parking throughout the Cannery District is joint use. A phased parking plan is provided with this application and all parking requirements have been met. Loading and uploading area requirements 38.540.080 NA First berth – minimum 70 feet length, 12 feet in width, 14 feet in height NA Additional berth – minimum 45 feet length NA Comments: NA 7e. Conformance with Article 5 – Landscaping (38.550) Meets Code? Mandatory landscaping requirements 38.550.050 Yes Yes Drought tolerant species 75% required Yes Parking lot landscaping Yes Additional screening Yes Street frontage Yes Street median island NA Non-motorized circulation and design systems to enhance convenience and safety across parking lots and streets, including, but not limited to paving patterns, pathway design, landscaping and lighting 38.420.040 Yes Comments: Much of the pedestrian infrastructure exists in the Cannery District. Additional pedestrian circulation is provided as a sidewalk from Oak Street to the building and site. Design of vehicular circulation systems to assure that vehicles can move safely and easily both within the site and between properties and activities within the general community 38.420.050 Yes Internal roadway design 38.520.050.D NA Comments: The vehicular circulation system that services the site is already constructed On-site open space 38.520.060 Total required NA NA Total provided NA NA Comments: the site is less than 1 acre, no commercial open space is required. Location and design of service areas and mechanical equipment 38.520.070 Yes Comments: Mechanical equipment is covered by parapets on the roof and structural screening on the ground. 7c. Conformance with Article 5 – Project Design: Building Design (38.530) Meets Code? Compatibility with, and sensitivity to, the immediate environment of the site and the adjacent neighborhoods and other approved development 38.530.030 Yes Building massing and articulation 38.530.040 Yes Building details, materials, and blank wall treatments 38.530.050-070 Yes Comments: The building meets building design standards set forth in both Article 5 and the Cannery District PUD Design Manual DocuSign Envelope ID: 8A4AD643-D04C-40A6-9B95-6641CD3AA523 Staff Report Building J at the Cannery District Application 20131 November 19, 2020 Page 11 of 11 Acceptable landscape materials Yes Protection of landscape areas Yes Irrigation: plan, water source, system type Yes Residential adjacency NA Comments: Landscaping meets standards from both the BMC and those set by the PUD. Landscaping of public lands 38.550.070 NA Comments: NA 7f. Conformance with Article 5 – Signs (38.560) Meets Code? Allowed SF/building 38.560.060 Yes Proposed SF/building Comments: NA 7g. Conformance with Article 5 – Lighting (38.560) Meets Code? Site lighting (supports, cutoff, footcandles, temperature) 38.570.040 Yes Building-mounted lighting (supports, cutoff, footcandles, temperature) 38.570.040.B Yes Comments: Lighting meets standards. 8. Conformance with Article 6 – Natural Resource Protection Meets Code? Floodplain regulations 38.600 NA Wetland regulations 38.610 NA Comments: NA 9. Relevant Comment from Affected Parties (38.220) Meets Code? Public Comment Yes Comments: Public comment was conducted. No comment was received. 10. Division of Land Pertaining to Subdivisions (38.240-Part 4) Meets Code? Subdivision exemptions NA Required easements NA Comments: NA DocuSign Envelope ID: 8A4AD643-D04C-40A6-9B95-6641CD3AA523