Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout18167 Staff Report - Signed B O Z E M A N MT Staff Report Community Development Osterman Commercial Condos Master Site Plan Review Application: 18167 Tuesday, July 31, 2018 Application No. 18167 Type Master Site Plan(MaSP) Project Name Osterman Commercial Condos Master Site Plan Summary A Master Site Plan(MaSP) application for a two-phase development of two warehouse buildings with office spaces. Zoning M-1 Growth Industrial Parcel Size 70, 698 square feet Policy Overlay District(s) N/A Street Address 760 and 770 Osterman Drive, Bozeman MT, 59715 Legal Description MINOR SUB 41A, S09, T02 S, R06 E, Lot 1A-5A,ACRES 1.623, MINOR SUB 41 B PLAT 41-C Owner Longshot Equity, LLC, 510 West Hemlcok, Bozeman, MT 59718 Applicant Genesis Engineering(Jeremy May), 204 North 11th Ave, Bozeman MT 59715 Staff Planner Melissa Pope Engineer Griffin Nielsen Noticing Public Comment Period Site Posted Adjacent Owners Newspaper Legal Ad 7/13/18—7/30/18 7/12/18 7/11/18 N/A Recommendation Approval with conditions Decision Authority Director of Community Development Date C�2/ Full application and file of record:Community Development Department, 20 E. Olive St., Bozeman, MT 59715 Page 1 of 10 B O Z E M A N MT Staff Report Community Development Osterman Commercial Condos Master Site Plan Review Application: 18167 Tuesday, July 31, 2018 FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPEAL PROVISIONS CERTIFICATE A) PURSUANT to Chapter 38, Article 2, Bozeman Municipal Code (BMC), and other applicable sections of Ch.38, BMC, public notice was given, opportunity to submit comment was provided to affected parties, and a review of the Master Site Plan application described in this report was conducted. The applicant proposed to the City a Master Site Plan (MaSP) for the site layout for a two-phase development of two warehouse buildings with office spaces in an M-1 (light manufacturing) zoning district. The purposes of the Master Site Plan review were to consider all relevant evidence relating to public health, safety, welfare, and the other purposes of Ch. 38, BMC; to evaluate the proposal against the criteria of Sec. 38.230.100 BMC, and the standards of Ch. 38, BMC; and to determine whether the application should be approved, conditionally approved, or denied. B) It appeared to the Director that all parties and the public wishing to examine the proposed Master Site Plan and offer comment were provided the opportunity to do so. After receiving the recommendation of the relevant advisory bodies established by Ch. 38, Art. 210, BMC, and considering all matters of record presented with the application and during the public comment period defined by Ch. 38, BMC, the Director has found that the proposed Master Site Plan would comply with the requirements of the BMC if certain conditions were imposed. Therefore, being fully advised of all matters having come before them regarding this application,the Director makes the following decision. C) The Master Site Plan (MaSP) has been found to meet the criteria of Ch. 38, BMC, and is therefore approved, subject to the conditions listed in this report and the correction of any elements not in conformance with the standards of the Title. The evidence contained in the submittal materials, advisory body review, public testimony, and this report,justifies the conditions imposed on this development to ensure that the MaSP complies with all applicable regulations, and all applicable criteria of Ch. 38, BMC. On this day of /3-0 2018, Martin Matsen, Director of Community Development, approved with conditions this Master Site Plan for and on behalf of the City of Bozeman as authorized by Sec. 38.200.010, BMC. Per Sec. 38.230.140 BMC approval of the final master site plan is effective for not less than three but not more than five years with the initial duration to be specified during the final action of the review authority. The expiration of the entitlement period of this master site plan is on the 7G day of /!V� 2021. The Owners of property subject to the master site plan may seek extensions to not exceed five years.Approval of an extension must be granted if the director of community development determines the criteria of subsection F of this section are met. D) This Director of Community Development's project decision may be appealed by filing a documented appeal with and paying an appeal fee to the Clerk of the Commission for the City of Bozeman within 10 working days after the date of the final decision as evidenced by the Director's signature,following the procedures of Sec. 38,250.030, BMC. DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. 2. Due to the way in which landscaping performance points were awarded for this Master Site Plan application,the Phase 2 site plan must include foundation plantings obscuring not less than 70 percent of the building perimeter, exclusive of entries, per Section 38.550.060 BMC. Page 2 of 10 B O Z E ICI A N MT Staff Report Community Development Osterman Commercial Condos Master Site Plan Review Application: 18167 Tuesday,July 31, 2018 k�'CRY. EF-k flL 3 C47�> Z .� - ..I �r z>. T r`b fflid. 00 flip Legend b `L-- OFanning Projects selection Parcels Apt, Roads J ^Alleys C3 ZDni ng Dist icG 1 '� -n,Limits ..t Cry Y Bti[¢ema n ou�� Osterman Commercial Condos PI3'inl y�Ybb'I Proposed Master Site Plan Application 18167 Submitted 04/11/2018 B O Z E M A N MT t n.�,-tsu+eat � Plancl-g Figure 1: Vicinity Map of 760 and 770 Osterman Drive Page 3 of 10 Staff Report Community Development Osterman Commercial Condos Master Site Plan Review Application: 18167 Tuesday,July 31, 2018 ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS Analysis and resulting recommendations are based on the entirety of the application materials, municipal codes, standards, plans, public comment, and all other materials available during the review period. Collectively this information is the record of the review. The analysis in this report is a summary of the completed review. Plan Review, Section 38.230.100, BMC In considering applications for plan approval under this title, the Director of Community Development shall consider the following: 1.Conformance to and consistency with the City's adopted growth policy Meets Code? 38.100.040 B Growth Policy Land Industrial Yes Use Zoning M-1flight manufacturing district Yes Comments:The uses are allowed within the zoning district with the approval of this application, pursuant to Section 38.310 of the Bozeman Municipal Code.The property is within the City's municipal service area and otherwise complies with the goals and objectives of the growth policy. No conflicts between the proposed uses,zoning compliance and the growth policy are identified. 2.Conformance to this chapter, including the cessation of any current Meets Code? violations 38.200.160 Current Violations None Yes Comments: The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval,does not, in any way,create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. 3.Conformance with all other applicable laws,ordinances,and regulations Meets Code? 38.100.080 Conflicts None Yes Condominium ownership NA NA Comments: Private neighborhood bylaws, covenants,conditions and restrictions are not administered or enforced by the City of Bozeman. Applications are reviewed and evaluated against the Bozeman Municipal Code. No conflicts with the conformance with laws, ordinances and building regulations have been identified during the Master Site Plan review. 4. Conformance with special review criteria for applicable permit types as Meets Code? specified in article 2 Type Master Site Plan Yes Comments: NA 5.Conformance with zoning provisions of article 3 38.230.100 Meets Code? Permitted uses 38.310 Warehouse and office Yes Form and inte sity standards 38.320 Yes Zoning M-1 Setbacks Structures Parking/ Yes feet Loading Front 20 20 Rear 3 NA Page 4 of 10 MT Staff Report Community Development Osterman Commercial Condos Master Site Plan Review Application: 18167 Tuesday,July 31, 2018 Side 3 NA Alley NA NA Watercourse 35 Wetland NA Block Frontage I Other Defers to setbacks in 38.320 Yes Comments: 38.510.030.H block frontage standards for industrial zones require planting areas between the sidewalk and the building or parking area that must be at least 20' in depth. The applicant requested a deviation from this standard to a 15' planting setback. The request was reviewed and approved by the Planning Division due to the low-volume and low-visibility nature of Osterman Drive. It was determined that the 35'watercourse setback is required. Relationship to adjacent properties standards 38.520.030(light and air access and Yes privacy)and angled setback plane 38.360.030 Applicable zonespecific or overlay standards 38.330-340 NA Building Height M-1 Requirements 38.320.010-.060 Yes Lot NA Allowed 100% -coverage Height NA Allowed 45' Yes Comments: NA General land use standards and requirements 38.350 Yes A Iicable supplemental use criteria 38.360 NA Supplemental NA NA uses/t e Comments: Proposed uses are permitted. Wireless facilities 38.370 NA Affordable Housing 38.380.010 NA NA Affordable housing plan NA Comments: NA 6a(1).Conformance with the community design provisions of article 4: Meets Code? Transportation facilities and access 38.400 Street vision Yes Yes Secondary access NA Traffic Impact NA Transportation grid adequate Yes Yes Stud /LOS to serve site _ Comments:A Traffic Impact Study was not required by the Engineering Division. Street dedication NA Yes Drive access locations and widths Yes Number of drive accesses 1 Yes Street easements NA Special Improvement Districts NA NA Comments: NA 6a(2).Conformance with the community design provisions of article 4: Meets Code? Pedestrian and vehicular ingress and egress 38.400 Design of the pedestrian and vehicular circulation systems to assure that pedestrians Yes and vehicles can move safely and easily both within the site and between properties Page 5 of 10 MT Staff Report Community Development Osterman Commercial Condos Master Site Plan Review Application: 18167 Tuesday,July 31, 2018 and activities within the neighborhood area Vehicle accesses to site 1 Yes Pedestrian access locations Yes Site vision triangles Yes Fire lanes,curbs,signage and striping Yes Non-automotive transportation and circulation systems,design features to enhance convenience and safety across parking lots and streets, including, but not limited to paving atterns, rade differences, landscaping and lighting Crosswalks Yes Curb ramps Yes Pedestrian lighting NA Comments: There is an existing sidewalk network that is integrated with the City. There are no known obstructions to the site vision triangles. Curbing, striping and gutters on Osterman Drive were installed previously as required by the Engineering Department. Stamped asphalt will be installed to provide connection between both buildings on site. 7-foot walkways were required where parking spaces are adjacent to the walkway. Adequate connection and integration of the pedestrian and vehicular transportation Yes systems to the systems in adjacent development and the general community Access easements I NA NA Dedication of right-of-way or easements necessary for pedestrian, shared use NA pathway and similar transportation facilities Comments: Not required for this application. 6a(3)Loading and Unloading areas Meets Code? Loading and unloading area re uirements 38.540.080 NA Loading and unloading NA NA First Berth (min.70 feet NA NA length, 12 feet in width and 14 feet in height) Additional Berths(min.45 l NA NA feet length) Comments: Not applicable at this time. 615 Community design and element provisions 38.410 Meets Code? Lot and block standards 38.410.040 NA Rights of way for pedestrians alternative block delineation NA Comments: NA Provisions for utilities including efficient public services and utilities 38.410.050-060 Yes Municipal infrastructure requirements Yes Easements(City and public utility rights-of-way etc. Yes Water,sewer,and stormwater Yes Other utilities electric, natural gas, communications Yes CIL of water Yes Comments:A payment of$2,400.00 for cash in lieu of water rights was received by the City on 7/17/2018, check number 1221. Site Surface Drainage and stormwater control 38.410.080 Yes Location,design and capacity Yes Landscaping er 38.410.080.H Yes Page 6 of 10 MT Staff Report Community Development Osterman Commercial Condos Master Site Plan Review Application: 18167 Tuesday,July 31, 2018 Comments: Grading and drainage plan was reviewed and approved by the Engineering Division. -Grading 38.410.080 Yes Maximum 1:4 slope requirements met Yes Comments: NA 6c. Park and recreation requirements 38.420 Meets Code? Enhancement of natural environment NA Wildlife habitat or feeding area preservation NA Maintenance of public park or public opens ace access NA Park/Recreational area design NA Parkland Cash-in-lieu for maximum known density not to exceed 12 NA units/acre(ac.). ac. X units/ac. X 0.03 ac.= ac. Cash donation in-lieu T NA NA Improvements in-lieu i NA NA Comments: Parkland dedication is not applicable to this application. 7a-c. Conformance with the project design provisions of Article 5, Meets Code? Compatibility, Design and Arrangement Compatibility with,and sensitivity to,the immediate environment of the site and the NA adjacent neighborhoods and other approved development relative to architectural design, building mass, neighborhood identity, landscaping, historical character, orientation of buildings on the site and visual integration Block Frontage Standards 38.510 Yes Building Design 38.530 Yes Open space 38.520.060 NA Location and design of service areas and mechanical equipment 38.520.070 NA Comments: 38.510.030.H block frontage standards for industrial zones require planting areas between the sidewalk and the building or parking area that must be at least 20' in depth. The applicant requested a deviation from this standard to a 15' planting setback. The request was reviewed and approved by the Planning Division due to the low-volume and low-visibility nature of Osterman Drive. Design and arrangement of the elements of the plan (e.g., buildings,circulation,open Yes space and landscaping, etc.)so that activities are integrated with the organizational scheme of the community, neighborhood, and other approved development and produce an efficient,functionally organized and cohesive development Relationship to adjacent properties 38.520.030 s Yes Non-motorized circulation and design 38.520.040 Yes Vehicular circulation and parking 38.520.050 Yes Comments: NA Design and arrangement of elements of the plan(e.g., buildings circulation,open Yes space and landscaping, etc.)in harmony with the existing natural topography, natural water bodies and water courses,existing vegetation, and to contribute to the overall aesthetic quality of the site configuration Site Planning and Design Elements 38.520 Comments: Building footprint and site layout has maintained a 35'watercourse setback as required by the review authority. Page 7 of 10 Staff Report Community Development Osterman Commercial Condos Master Site Plan Review Application: 18167 Tuesday,July 31, 2018 7d.Conformance with the project design provisions of Article 5, Landscaping Meets Code? including the enhancement of buildings,appearance of vehicular use, open space and pedestrian area and the preservation of replacement of natural vegetation Submittal requirements for landscape plans 38.220.100 Yes -Mandatory landscaping 38.550.050 Yes Yard Yes Additional screening NA -Parking lot screening Yes Interior parking lot landscape Yes Off-street loading spaces screening NA Street frontage NA Street median island NA -Acceptable landscape materials Yes Protection of landscape areas Yes Irrigation: plan,water source, system Underground irrigation type Trees for residential adjacency NA Performance points 15 NA City rights-of-way and parks Yes Tree plantings for boulevard ROW, drought-resistant seed Yes Public ROW boulevard strips Yes Irrigation and maintenance provisions for ROW Yes State ROW landscaping NA Additional I NA NA Fencing and walls NA I NA Comments: 15 landscaping points were required and 22 were provided.Adequate interior parking lot landscaping was provided in the parking islands and landscaped areas immediately adjacent to the lot 1,100-sf required for 55 parking spaces). Pedestrian area landscaping, including pathways and internal circulation 38.520.040 Yes Internal roadway landscaping 38.520.050 NA Open s ace landscaping 38.520.060 NA Service area and mechanical equipment landscaping and screening 38.520.070 NA Comments: Service area and mechanical equipment landscaping will be addressed at the time of individual site plan application for the buildings on site. The applicant and owner were advised that an opaque or semi- opaque horizontal cover or screen must be used to mitigate unsightly views into the trash enclosure may be required during the design of the building in phase 2,depending on the building design and its relationship/orientation to the trash enclosure. 7e.Conformance with the project design provisions of Article 5, Open Space Meets Code? Open Space NA Total required 1414 square feet 2%lot area NA Total provided NA Comments: Usable commercial open space not required in industrial zones. 7f.Conformance with the project design provisions of Article 5, Lighting Meets Code? 38.570 Building-mounted lighting (cutoff and temperature) Yes Page 8 of 10 MT Staff Report Community Development Osterman Commercial Condos Master Site Plan Review Application: 18167 Tuesday,July 31, 2018 Site lighting (supports,cutoff and temperature) NA Minimum light trespass at property line Yes Comments: The Lumark"XTOR"Crosstour LED light fixtures mounted around the building and the Lumark Crosstour LED Floodlight Kit angled downward meet the lighting standards. 7g.Conformance with the project design provisions of Article 5, Signage Meets Code? 38.560 Allowed (sq.ft/building NA NA Proposed (sq.ft) NA Comments: No signage is approved with the approval of this application. A sign permit is required for the installation of all si na e. 8a-c.Conformance with environmental and open space objectives in articles 4- 6 Meets Code? Enhancement of natural environment: Integrated stormwater, LID, removal of Yes inappropriate fill Grading Yes On-site retention/detention Yes Comments: The grading and drainage plan was reviewed and approved by the En ineerin Division. Drainage design Yes Stormwater maintenance plan 38.410.030.A Yes Stormwater feature: landscaping amenity, native species,curvilinear, 75%live Yes vegetation Comments: The stormwater maintenance plan is recorded at the county clerk and recorder. Watercourse and wetland protections and associated wildlife habitats Yes If the development is adjacent to an existing or approved public park or public open NA space area, have provisions been made in the plan to avoid interfering with public access to and use of that area Comments: Watercourse zone plantings are on the Landscape plan. 9. Conformance with the natural resource protection provisions of articles 4.6 Meets Code? 1 Watercourse setback 38.410.100 Yes Watercourse setback plantingIan Yes Flood lain regulations 38.600 NA Wetland regulations 38.610 NA Comments: Watercourse zone plantings are on the Landscape plan. 10. Other related matters,including relevant comment from affected parties Meets Code? 38.220 Public Comment No Yes Comments:A public notice period was executed as per Section 38.220.420. Details regarding dates the noticing requirements were conducted can be found on page 1 of this staff report document. No public comment was received. 11. If the development includes multiple lots that are interdependent for Meets Code? circulation or other means of addressing requirement of this title,whether the lots are either: Configured so that the sale of individual lots will not alter the approved configuration or use of the property or cause the development to become nonconforming OR Are the subject of reciprocal and perpetual easements or other agreements to which the City is a party so that the sale of Page 9 of 10 Staff Report Osterman Commercial Condos Master Site Plan Review Application: 18167 Tuesday,July 31, 2018 individual lots will not cause one or more elements of the development to become nonconforming. 38.410.060 Subdivision Exemption NA NA Required Easements NA NA Reciprocal access and NA NA NA shared parking easement Mutual access easement NA and agreement Comments: NA 12. Phasing of development 38.230.020.13 including buildings and Meets Code? infrastructure Phasing Yes #of phases Two(2) Yes Comments: Two phases are proposed. Page 10 of 10