The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About17569 Staff Report R 4 Z E M A N MT Staff Report Community Development The Monarch Site Plan Review Application: 17569 Friday, May 25, 2018 Application No. 17569 Type Site Plan Project Name The Monarch Summary A new 7,034 square foot mixed use building with three residential units on the second level, and 4,660 square feet of office on the main and basement levels with associated parking and site improvements. Residential units consist of two 2-bedroom units, and one efficiency unit. Project is located in the B-2M commercial mixed-use district and the Midtown Urban Renewal District. Zoning B-21VI Growth Community Commercial Mixed Use Size 19,30-SF Policy 0.443 Acres Overlay District(s) None Street Address 605 West Peach Legal Description Shonkwiler Add, S01, T02 S, R05 E, Lot 1-A-2, Plat E-4-13, City of Bozeman, Gallatin County Owners Iron Wood Development, 320 West Lamme, Bozeman, MT 59715 Applicant Same as Owner Representative Madison Engineering, LLC, 895 Technology Blvd Suite 203, Bozeman, MT 59718 Staff Planner Garber Engineer Nielsen Noticing Public Comment Period Site Posted Adjacent Owners Mailed 5/08/2018—5/23/2018 5/08/2018 5/08/2018 Advisory Boards Board Date Recommendation DRC 1/03/2018 None Recommendation Approval with conditions Decision Authority Director of Community Development Date /2018 Full application and file of record. Community Development Department, 20 E. Olive St., Bozeman, MT 59715 Page 1 of 8 B O Z E M A N MT Staff Report Community Development The Monarch Site Plan Review Application: 17569 Friday, May 25, 2018 FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPEAL PROVISIONS CERTIFICATE A) PURSUANT to Chapter 38,Article 19, Bozeman Municipal Code(BMC), and other applicable sections of Ch.38, BMC, public notice was given, opportunity to submit comment was provided to affected parties, and a review of the preliminary site plan described in this report was conducted. The applicant proposed to the City a Site Plan to allow the construction of a mixed-use building within the Shonkwiler Addition to Bozeman. The purposes of the Site Plan review were to consider all relevant evidence relating to public health, safety, welfare, and the other purposes of Ch. 38, BMC; to evaluate the proposal against the criteria of Sec. 38.19.100 BMC, and the standards of Ch. 38, BMC; and to determine whether the plan should be approved, conditionally approved, or denied. B) It appeared to the Director that all parties and the public wishing to examine the proposed site plan and offer comment were provided the opportunity to do so. After receiving the recommendation of the relevant advisory bodies established by Ch. 38,Art. 33, BMC, and considering all matters of record presented with the application and during the public comment period defined by Ch. 38, BMC,the Director has found that the proposed site plan would comply with the requirements of the BMC if certain conditions were imposed. Therefore, being fully advised of all matters having come before him regarding this application,the Director makes the following decision. C) The Site Plan has been found to meet the criteria of Ch. 38, BMC, and is therefore approved, subject to the conditions listed in this report and the correction of any elements not in conformance with the standards of the Title. The evidence contained in the submittal materials, advisory body review, public testimony, and this report,justifies the conditions imposed on this development to ensure that the site plan and subsequent construction comply with all applicable regulations, and all applicable criteria of Ch. 38. BMC. On this 1:5 day of ��Y' 2018, Martin Matsen, Director of Community Development, approved with conditions this Site Plan for and on behalf of the City of Bozeman as authorized by Sec. 38.34.010, BMC, Ty approval of this Site Plan shall be effective for twelve(12) months from the date of Plan approval, which is the 3�fday of_W, 2019.At the end of this period the Director may, at the request of the developer, extend the approval in accordance with Ch. 38 Art.19, BMC. D) This Director of Community Development's project decision may be appealed by filing a documented appeal with and paying an appeal fee to the Clerk of the Commission for the City of Bozeman within 10 working days after the date of the final decision as evidenced by the Director's signature,following the procedures of Sec. 38.35.030, BMC. DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPM T CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions,or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval,does not, in any way,create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. Page 2 of 8 B O Z E M A N MT Staff Report Community Development The Monarch Site Plan Review Application: 17569 Friday, May 25, 2018 II _ C t AL. w r [i T r B-2M r4 Lllr.•RSION RD13 �V;,PBACrr�S't — m-PL1 _ F r LoguNtl a 0 Planning P'gcet t Parcels � � ■ �� ` Roads Alleys 0 Zoning Dislricls .1 - � _f ;ik, The Monarch cey a�e�xcr,-� Proposed Site Plan Application 17.563 Submitted 12/06/2017 B O Z E M A N h17 Ptannmq PROJECT LOCATION Page 3 of 8 B O Z E M A N MT Staff Report Community Development The Monarch Site Plan Review Application: 17569 Friday, May 25, 2018 ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS Analysis and resulting recommendations are based on the entirety of the application materials, municipal codes, standards, plans, public comment, and all other materials available during the review period. Collectively this information is the record of the review. The analysis in this report is a summary of the completed review. Plan Review. Section 38.19.100, BMC In considering applications for plan approval under this title,the advisory boards and City Commission shall consider the following: 1. Conformance to and consistency with the City's adopted growth policy(38.01.040 C) Meets Code? Growth Policy Land Community Commercial Mixed Use Yes Use Zonin B-2M, Community Business District-Mixed Yes Comments: The uses are allowed within the zoning district.The property is within the City's municipal service area and otherwise complies with the goals and objectives of the growth policy. Staff did not identify any conflicts between the proposed use,the zoning, and the growth policy at this time. 2. Conformance to this chapter,including the cessation of any current violations Meets Code? (38.34.160) Current Violations None Yes Comments: The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way,create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman —Municipal Code or state law. 3.Conformance with all other applicable laws,ordinances,and regulations(38.01.080) Meets Code? Conflicts None Yes Condominium ownership N/A N/A Comments:The City will evaluate the plans against the requirements of the International Building Code(IBC)during building permit review. The applicant must provide professional services for construction inspection and post-construction certifications from their project professionals that the project was constructed according to plan and specification. The applicant must prepare plans and specifications for any fire service line in accordance with the City's Fire Service Line Policy. The plans must be prepared by a Professional Engineer and be provided to and approved by the City Engineer prior to initiation of construction of the fire service or fire protection system.The applicant must also provide Professional Engineering services for construction inspection, post-construction certification and preparation of mylar record drawings. Fire service plans, and domestic services 4"or larger, must be a standalone submittal, separate from the site plan application. City of Bozeman applications for service must be completed by the applicant. 4. Relationship of site plan elements to conditions both on and off the property Meets Code? (38.19.100) Neighborhood Compatibility Yes Design and arrangement of plan to produce an efficient,functionally organized and cohesive Yes 1 development Design and arrangement of plan in harmony with topography, water bodies, vegetation, Yes contributing to the overall aesthetics Conform with local historical or landmark designation requirements, including the N/A Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (NCOD) Relationship to other plans(subdivision/master site 1 Amended Plat of Shonkwiler's l Yes Ian, PUD, etc.) I Addition to Bozeman Comments: Project is within a minor subdivision within Shonkwiler's Addition to Bozeman. Page 4 of 8 MT Staff Report Community Development The Monarch Site Plan Review Application: 17569 Friday, May 25, 2018 5.The impact of the proposal on the existing and anticipated traffic and parking conditions Meets Code? (38.24.010 and 38.25.010) Street vision Yes l Yes Snow storage Yes Traffic Impact Study Not required Transportation grid Yes Yes /LOS I I adequate to serve site Comments: The Engineering Division did not require a Traffic Impact Study for this site plan application -Parking Required Provided total Yes Total 0 21 ADA 1 1 Reduction N/A N/A N/A Bicycle 1 7 8 Yes Comments: This application has provided 21 parking spaces for use between the commercial and residential uses. Pursuant to Section 38.25.040.A.6.d,the minimum parking requirements do not apply. The application is not exceeding the maximum number of spaces at 21. The bicycle parking requirements for B-2M are 1 per unit plus 1 per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area commercial for a total of 7 spaces.The Cora 4508 Bike rack proposed holds 8 bicycles. 6. Pedestrian and vehicular ingress and egress(38.19.100) Meets Code? Safe and easy movement Yes Pedestrian access locations Yes Site vision triangles Yes Fire lanes,curbs,si na a and striping Yes Vehicle access to site Shared Yes -Special Improvement Districts No Waiver N/A Yes Comments: There is a 30.5-foot drive aisle, accessed off West Peach Street that is shared with the commercial building to the west. The shared drive aisle is located on a 35-foot access and utility easement. A 5-foot pedestrian sidewalk runs between the building and the drive aisle connecting the site to the street grid and pedestrian sidewalk. The main level commercial spaces have direct pedestrian connections from the front fagade of the building to the public right of way. Non-automotive transportation and circulation systems design features to enhance safety and Yes convenience Adequate connection and integration of the pedestrian and vehicular transportation systems Yes Comments: The property is integrated with local bicycle pathway systems and routes, as well as a City standard sidewalk encompassing the property and connecting the surrounding area. Dedication of right-of-way or easements necessary for streets and similar transportation facilities N/A Comments:All rights-of-way exist and no dedication was required. 7. Landscaping, including the enhancement of buildings,the appearance of vehicular use, Meets Code? open space,and pedestrian areas,and the preservation or replacement of natural vegetation (38.26.010-100) Submittal requirements for landscape plans 38.41.100 Yes Mandatory landscaping Yes Yard Yes Additional screening Yes Parking lot screening Yes _Off-street loading spaces screenin N/A Street frontage Yes Street median island N/A Acceptable landscape materials Yes Page 5 of 8 BOZ E MANMT Staff Report Community Development The Monarch Site Plan Review Application: 17569 Friday, May 25, 2018 Protection of landscape areas Yes -Irrigation:plan, water source, system type Municipal water, high efficiency drip system Trees for residential adjacency Yes Performance points B-2M 23 Yes City rights-of-way and parks Yes Tree plantinggs for boulevard ROW, drought-resistant seed Yes Public ROW boulevard strips Yes -Irrigation and maintenance provisions for ROW Yes State ROW landscaping N/A Additional I None N/A Fencing and walls N/A Comments: This site plan meets the required number of performance points by providing 23 points. There is residential adjacency to the north, which will be screened by a hedgerow. The boulevard strip along West Peach is narrow, so the boulevard trees will be planted behind the property line. 8. Open space(38.27.020) Meets Code? Enhancement of natural environment N/A Wildlife habitat or feeding area preservation N/A Maintenance of public park or public open space access N/A Recreational area design N/A -Open s ace Yes Parkland Cash-in-lieu for maximum known density not to exceed 12 units/acre(ac.). Yes 3 units/ac. X 0.03 ac.=0.09 ac. Cash donation in-lieu Yes, $5,096.52 Yes Improvements in-lieu N/A N/A Comments: Parkland: Historically the zoning for this lot has been the B-2 and then B-2M commercial districts. No previous parkland dedication was required or received prior to this application.The applicant proposed a cash-in-lieu (CIL)of parkland proposal that was reviewed and approved by the City Commission on May 7, 2018.The cash payment was received by -Community Development on May 11, 2018 satisfying the parkland requirement. 9. Building location and height(38.19.100) Meets Code? B-2M Requirements 38.10.010.060 Yes Lot 16.4% Allowed 100%-Yards coverage -Height 391911 Allowed 60'or 5 stories,whichever is less Yes Comments: Building height of 39'-9"is proposed at 2.5 stories,or 2 stories with a basement.The height meets the limitations of the Code. 10.Setbacks(38.10.050) Meets Code? Zoning B-2M Yards feet Structures Parkin /Loading Yes Front 10, N/A Rear 10, 5' Side 5' 5' Alley N/A N/A Watercourse N/A Entryway corridor N/A Block Frontage Mixed 10' minimum front setback Yes Page 6 of 8 MT Staff Report Community Development The Monarch Site Plan Review Application: 17569 Friday,May 25, 2018 Comments: All setback requirements for the mixed block frontage and code have been met. 11. Lighting(38.23.150) Meets Code? -Build in -mounted lighting cutoff and temperature) N/A Site lighting (supports,cutoff and temperature) N/A Minimum light trespass at property line N/A Comments: No exterior lighting proposed. 12. Provisions for utilities, including efficient public services and facilities(38.21.030, 38.23.050, 38.23.060,38.23.070) Meets Code? Municipal infrastructure requirements Yes Easements(utility rights-of-way etc. Yes Water, sewer, and stormwater Yes Other utilities electric, natural as,communications) Yes CIL of water N/A Comments: Municipal infrastructure serves the subject property. The Engineering Division reviewed the utility connections and found compliance with the City's standards. Cash-in-lieu of water rights was paid on May 21, 2018 per the Engineering Division determination. 13.Site surface drainage(38.23.080) Meets Code? Drainage design Yes _ Stormwater maintenance plan(38.23.030.A) Yes Stormwater feature: landscaping amenity, nativespecies,curvilinear, 75% live vegetation Yes Comments: Stormwater and site surface drainage was reviewed and approved by the Engineering Division. Drainage is accomplished through a combination of a retention pond and storm sewer drains. 14. Loading and unloading areas(38.23.140) Meets Code? Loading and unloading N/A N/A Comments: No off-street loading facilities are required or proposed. 15.Grading (38.23.080) Meets Code? Grading Yes On-site retention/detention Yes Comments: Grading and drainage plans conform to the standards set forth in the Site Development Standards. 16. Signage(38.28.010) Meets Code? Allowed (sq.ft)/buildin N/A N/A Proposed (sq.ft N/A Comments: No signage was proposed with this application.The City requires a sign permit for on-premises signs that demonstrates compliance zoning standards prior to installation of any si na e. 17.Screening (38.21.050 and 38.26.050) Meets Code? Mechanical equipment screening _ Yes Additional screening N/A Comments: Mechanical equipment screening consists of a combination of solid corrugated metal panels that match the corrugated metal panel siding and a solid parapet. 18,Overlay district provisions(38.16.010, 38.17.010,38.18.010) Meets Code? Neighborhood Conservation N/A Entryway N/A Casino N/A Page 7 of 8 B Q Z E M A N MT Staff Report Community Development The Monarch Site Plan Review Application: 17569 Friday, May 25, 2018 Comments: This property is not within any overlay districts. i 19.Other related matters, including relevant comment from affected parties(38.40.010) Meets Code? Public Comment None Yes Comments: Noticing requirements were fulfilled and in compliance with UDC Section 38.40.030. No public comment was received during the comment period. Specific public notice dates can be found on page 1 of this staff report. 20. If the development includes multiple lots that are interdependent for circulation or Meets Code? other means of addressing requirement of this title,whether the lots are either: Configured so that the sale of individual lots will not alter the approved configuration or use of the property or cause the development to become nonconforming OR Are the subject of reciprocal and perpetual easements or other agreements to which the City is a party so that the sale of individual lots will not cause one or more elements of the development to become nonconforming. (38.23.060) Required Easements N/A Yes Reciprocal access and Yes #of lots served 2 Yes shared parking easement Mutual access easement N/A #of lots served N/A N/A and agreement Comments: The amended subdivision plat of Shonkwiler's Addition lots 1-A-1 and 1-A-2(Plat E-4-13)contains a 35'wide access and utility easement that serves both lots. This is a shared access easement, but not a shared parking easement, each lot has its own parking facilities. There is also a perpetual use easement(document#2565868)that allows both lots access to the dumpster pad and enclosure. 21. Compliance with article 43 of chapter 38 of the Bozeman Municipal Code Meets Code? (38.43.010) Affordable Housing N/A N/A Comments: This requirement is not applicable to the subject application since the apartment units will be for rent. 22. Phasing of development(38.41,080) Meets Code? Phasing N/A #of phases N/A Yes Comments: No phasing is proposed. Page 8 of 8