Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07 - Traffic Impact Study - Norton East Ranch Ph 1 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR IVORTON EAST RANCH SUBDIVISION PHASE 1 PREPARED FOR NORTON PROPERTIES 2464 SW GLACIER PLACE REDMOND, OR 97756 JULY 2007 BOZ-07004 NORTON EAST RANCH SUBDIVISION PHASE 1 TIS TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 1 SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION I EXISTING CONDITIONS 4 Street Characteristics 4 Traffic Volumes 5 Intersection Capacity 6 TRIP GENERATION 6 TRIP DISTRIBUTION g TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT 11 TRAFFIC IMPACTS 11 Traffic Volumes i l Intersection Capacity 11 Access Conditions 11 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Appendix A—Traffic Volume Data Appendix B—Capacity Calculations—Existing Appendix C—Capacity Calculations—Existing+ Site Appendix D—Turn-Lane Warrants LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Site Location 2 Figure 2. Proposed Site Layout 3 Figure 3. Existing Traffic Volumes 7 Figure 4. Trip Distribution 10 Figure 5. Traffic Assignment 12 Figure 6. Existing+ Site Traffic 13 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Trip Generation, Mode & Classification 7 Table 2. Summary of Capacity Calculation Results 14 ENGINEERING, INC. i TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY NORTON EAST RANCH SUBDIVISION PHASE 1 NORTON EAST RANCH SUBDIVISION PHASE 1 TIS INTRODUCTION This traffic impact study summarizes the potential impacts of the proposed development of Phase 1 of Norton East Ranch Subdivision in Bozeman, Montana. The proposed residential development would be located northwest of the intersection of Huffine Lane and Cottonwood Road. The purpose of this study is to assess the impacts that this development may have on the surrounding transportation system, and to provide recommendations to mitigate any impacts identified. The methodology and analysis procedures used in this study employ the latest technology and nationally accepted standards in the area of site development and transportation impact assessment. Recommendations made in this report are based on professional judgment and these principals. SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The proposed site, currently surrounded by undeveloped property on all four sides, would be situated in the southeast quarter of Section 9, T. 2 S., R. 5 E. The site location is illustrated in Figure 1. At full build-out, the proposed development would include 33 detached single-family houses, 76 single-family townhouses, 3 duplexes, 6 fourplexes, and 193 additional apartment-style dwelling units arranged in clusters ranging from 5 to 50 dwelling units per building. In total, 332 dwelling units would be available upon full buildout. A community center would be developed on Lot 128 on the northwest corner of the site. Access to the site would be provided via extensions of Fallon Street and West Babcock Street west of their existing intersections with Cottonwood Road. As shown by the proposed site layout in Figure 2, the extensions of Fallon Street and West Babcock Street would also provide access to other nearby future developments. ENGINEERING, INC. 1 NORTON EAST RANCH SUBDIVISION PHASE 1 TIS I•�' .I•�l I 3. DURST W RD NORTO RANC 51OVISION ;� J 1 IL r--- i W 8AR K I' F __ a •I• ' I�!�1� ,� /�f w 1• HUFFINE N (US HIGH WA Y 191) . Ir' FIGURE 1 : SITE LOCATION ENGINEERING, INC. 2 NORTON EAST RANCH SUBDIVISION PHASE 1 TIS WEST BABCOCK STREET 90' R/W T COMMUNITY _ "^ """' la••tl a = n. CENTER 13U, I� L I-FA I . 'rst,c�M1 21 U OLD B ST. 60'R/W P1 N M rt ,!i Y M1 u�,f6 ,wl an rt. I�M1 aNS:td n. 3 m tl N a w tl "�M1 t cx 114 xi rTt ° ItlM1 to o: t, o WETLAND/PARK Qyj a 4.02 ACRES mn H*- L ••� 13 "KIU ,tl � sw A� o un w 2.53 A 3 -- - M--�� P. n: '• IJ .gin W,ri :ree,n X.5n tl �N b IgaY.f 10.R. •Y.n VI W A ST. 60'R/W �i.;l.17CK t{ 1a1.�s6 ,m if 'm'•n wNlAn. W yr < S w n nmu IVA V��YQ� ` � >Lwp n aws son aiwe'w.n as is n NI a— s s w 4� ' w, IN a� aR, FALLON STREET 60'R/W FIGURE 2: PROPOSED SITE LAYOUT ENGINEERING, INC. 3 NORTON EAST RANCH SUBDIVISION PHASE 1 TIS EXISTING CONDITIONS STREET CHARACTERISTICS The development of Norton East Ranch Subdivision Phase 1 could directly impact several streets nearby the proposed site. Specifically, the proposed development could affect the operations of the following intersections: ■ Cottonwood Road&Huffine Lane ■ Cottonwood Road&Fallon Street ■ Cottonwood Road& West Babcock Street ■ Cottonwood Road&Durston Road Due to the size of the proposed development and the large distance between major intersections in the area, it is unlikely that site generated traffic would have a significant impact on the operation of any additional intersections. Cottonwood Road is classified as 'a principal arterial in the Bozeman's functional classification system. It is a two-lane north-south roadway that provides access to a variety of rural residential and agricultural properties south of Huffine Lane, and several currently undeveloped properties north of Huffine Lane. Adjacent to the proposed site, Cottonwood Road currently carries approximately 3300 average annual daily traffic (AADT). Huffine Lane (US Highway 191) is a five-lane principal arterial that provides access from Bozeman to Four Corners. It is five lanes wide with two through lanes in each direction and a two-way left-turn lane for its entire length from Bozeman to Four Corners. The speed limit on Huffine Lane is posted at 65 mph west of Cottonwood Road. The intersection of Huffine Lane and Cottonwood Road is currently controlled by a two-phase traffic signal. The northbound and southbound Cottonwood approaches are single-lane approaches, while the eastbound and westbound Huffine Lane approaches have two through lanes and dedicated left-turn lanes. However, this intersection is currently being reconstructed under a different project to provide northbound and southbound dedicated ENGINEERING, INC. 4 NORTON EAST RANCH SUBDIVISION PHASE 1 TIS left-turn lanes. The existing signal is also being modified to incorporate a protected left- turn phase for the eastbound and westbound approaches. Because these improvements are currently under construction and are expected to be complete prior to the development of Norton Ranch Subdivision, these improvements are included as existing conditions in this analysis. Fallon Street is an east-west local street that currently provides access from Fowler Avenue to Cottonwood Road. It is approximately 32 feet wide with a single travel Iane in each direction. The intersection of Cottonwood Road and Fallon Street is currently two-way stop controlled with a stop sign located on the Fallon Street approach. As previously discussed, the development of Norton Ranch Subdivision would include an extension of Fallon Street west of Cottonwood Road. West Babcock Street is an east-west collector street that currently provides access from Main Street to Cottonwood Road. West Babcock Street currently carries approximately 730 AADT just east of Cottonwood Road. The intersection of Cottonwood Road and West Babcock Street is currently two-way stop controlled with a stop sign located on the West Babcock Street approach. As previously discussed, the development of Norton Ranch Subdivision would include an extension of West Babcock Street west of its intersection with Cottonwood Road. Durston Road is an east-west minor arterial that provides access from northeast Bozeman to Love Lane. It currently carries approximately 3500 AADT and 3000 AADT east.and west of Cottonwood Road, respectively. The intersection of Cottonwood Road and Durston Road is currently two-way stop-controlled with stop signs located on the northbound and southbound Cottonwood Road approaches. TRAFFIC VOLUMES Existing traffic conditions were determined by performing manual intersection counts for each of the study area intersections during AM and PM peak hours. The AM and PM peak hours occurred between 7:30 and 8:30 AM and 4:30 PM and 5:30 PM, respectively. Raw count data was adjusted for daily and seasonal variation using 2006 MDT count ENGINEERING, INC. 5 NORTON EAST RANCH SUBDIVISION PHASE 1 TIS adjustment factors. Figure 3 summarizes the resulting AM and PM peak hour taming volumes and detailed traffic count data are included in Appendix A. INTERSECTION CAPACITY Unsignalized intersection capacity calculations were performed for the intersections discussed above using Highway Capacity Software (HCS+), which is based on the procedures contained in Chapter 17 of the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM2000). The signalized intersection of Cottonwood Road and Huffine Lane was analyzed using SIG/Cinema, which is based on the procedures outlined in Chapter 16 of the HCM2000. The HCM2000 defines level-of-service (LOS) as "a quality measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream, generally in terms of such service measures as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions and comfort and convenience." LOS is described using letter designations from A to F, with A being the most favorable operating conditions and F being the worst. Results of the capacity calculations performed for existing conditions show that all approaches to each of the study area intersections currently operate at LOS C or better during both AM and PM peak hours. As previously discussed, the analysis of the intersection of Cottonwood Road and Huffine Lane includes the improvements currently under construction. The results of the capacity calculations for existing conditions are summarized in Table 2 on page 14 and detailed results are included in Appendix B. -TRIP GENERATION An accurate estimate of site-generated traffic must be made in order to analyze the impacts of a new development. This study utilized Trip Generation, 74 Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), the most widely accepted source for determining trip generation rates. One-way vehicular trips generated by the proposed development were estimated using ITE land uses categories 210 (Single-Family Detached Housing), 230 (Residential Condominium/Townhouse) and 220 (Apartment). Because the proposed community center on Lot 128 would generate a relatively small ENGINEERING, INC. 6 NORTON EAST RANCH SUBDIVISION PHASE 1 TIS (3) (3) (2) 0 3 3 IL ' (0)3..�_j i R_ 5(3) (79)131 <•-57(115) ,.�.1. 1 2 95 .`, DURS TON RD ((,66)(5)(115) AADT=3000 AADT=3500 _ mus-.:rol::a f 1 f i•F!P a l (111)(5) l` 211 g 9(17) 33(17) t r I .@ 115 10) (166)(31 W BA COCK S CD FA I IL(123)(10) r 224 21 I I I i f �l" 15(13) 117 14 HUFFINE kll HIGH WA HIWA Y 1 i) ' _.(197) (18) J �w F �(1Q�4)(39)(38) 49 63 ,i (122)111 W 37(69) (996)962—► i•-614(1025) X=AM PEAK (25)63 17(56) ()C) = PM PEAK 49 39 57 (51)(38)(35) FIGURE 3: EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES ENGINEERING, INC. NORTON EAST RANCH SUBDIVISION PHASE 1 TIS number of trips during the peak hours, most of which would be internal trips, this land use was not included in the trip generation estimates. Table 1 summarizes the trip generation rates and calculations. Table 1. Trip Generation,Mode&Classification � }��,►• ; � � N'o'c�'� f� . i; _ e„�eelc� ',"�,,� :�. oa4 �:�' ;Yt3?:eak'$o,fr"'}��`=:�t.: Single-Family Detached Housing(1) 33.0 375 189 187 33 8 25 40 25 15 Internal Capture 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Alternate Mode(External) 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 New External Personal Vehicle 375 188 187 33 8 25 40 25 15 Residential Condominituarrownhouse(2) 82.0 542 211 271 44 7 1 31 51 34 17 Internal Capture 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Alternate Mode(External) 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 New External Personal Vehicle 542 271 271 44 7 37 51 34 1 17 Apartment(3) 217.0 1455 727 728 110 22 88 137 89 48 Internal Capture 0% 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Alternate Mode(&-temal) 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 New External Personal Vehicle 1455 727 1 728 110 22 88 1 137 89 48 � ��4yyu• eunal„j,,�.°p,. y ' i:� t `�'` ` � 0�+�'�ta''0 ��n6lYa� L turcA� ''J: }• . � a 'ro, -,k• fit^ •� f To 1 eo- �d2 al V 7°e n"s Ni 7yy' (1) Single-Family Detached Housing-Land Use210• Units Dwelling Units Average Weekday: Ln(T)=0.92 Ln(X)+2.71 (50%entering,50%eating) Peak Hour of the Adjacent Street One Hour between 7 and 9 AM: T-0.70(X)+9.43 (25%entering,75%exiting) Peak Hour of the Adjacent Street,One Hour between 4 and 6 PM; Ln('T)=0.90 Ln(X)+0.53 (63%entering,37%exiting) (2) Residential Condominium/Townhouse-Land Use230• Units Dwelling Units Average Weekday: Ln(T)=0.85 Ln(X)+2.55 (5061,entering,500/6 exiting) Peak Hour of the Adjacent Street,One Hour between 7 and 9 AM: Ln(T)=0.80 La(X)+0.26 (17%entering,83%exiting) Peak Hour of the Adjacent Street,One Hour between 4 and 6 PM Ln(T)=0.82 Ln())+0.32 (67%entering,33%exiting) (3) Apartment-Land Use220• Units Dwelling Units Average Weekday: T-6.01 M+150.35 (50%entering,50%exiting) Peak Hour of the Adjacent Street,One Hour between 7 and 9 AM: T-0.49M+3,73 (20%entering,80%exiting) Peak Hour of the Adjacent Strew,One Hour between 4 and 6 PM; T-0.55M+17.65 (65%entering,35%exiting) •71ip Generation,7rh Edliilion,Institute of Transportation Engineers,2003 ITE trip generation data provides an estimate of the total number of trips that would be generated by the development. However, in order to estimate the net number of new external trips made by personal vehicles, adjustments are often made to account for internal capture trips,pass-by trips, and trips made by alternate modes. Internal capture trips are those that are made from one on-site development to another using internal roadways. As previously discussed, it is expected that a small number of internal capture trips would be generated between the residential areas and the proposed community center on Lot 128. However, it was assumed that these trips would be negligible in the overall analysis of traffic generated by the proposed subdivision. ENGINEERING, INC. $ NORTON EAST RANCH SUBDIVISION PHASE 1 TIS Pass-by trips are trips made to a development as a secondary destination, but the primary trip path is on the adjacent street system. Pass-by trips are primarily attracted by commercial type land uses, such as fast-food restaurants or gas station/convenience stores. Because residential developments rarely generate any pass-by trips, this trip type was also assumed to be negligible for the purposes of this analysis. Typically, it is also important to estimate the number of trips that would be made by alternate- modes of travel (pedestrian, bicycle, and transit). A common practice is to assume that 3% to 5% of the total number of trips generated by a residential subdivision would be made by alternate modes. These trips would not involve passenger vehicles accessing the site. However, since the proposed development would be located on the outskirts of Bozeman, and to add a measure of conservatism to the study, it was assumed that all trips generated by the proposed Norton East Ranch Subdivision Phase 1 would be vehicular trips. As shown by the results in Table 1, it is estimated that the proposed development would generate approximately 2372 new external personal vehicle trips during the average weekday. Approximately 187 (37 entering and 150 exiting) of those trips would be generated during the AM peak hour and 228 (148 entering and 80 exiting) would be generated during the PM peak hour. TRIP DISTRIBUTION Trip distribution is an estimate of site-generated trip origin and destination locations, which can be determined by several methods from computerized travel demand models to simple inspection of existing traffic volumes. For this study, the trip distribution was based on the distribution assumed for other nearby developments, as well as the distribution of existing traffic volumes. The trip distribution for the proposed Norton East Ranch Subdivision Phase 1 is shown in Figure 4. ENGINEERING, INC. T 9 NORTON EAST RANCH SUBDIVISION PHASE I TIS J 'AI I to, m 0 2% T,T.T=, DURSTON RD -:1-S7 S-9 17% by -2y, H. P444-141,441 Hl -]--H:;i W BABCOCK * ST 8% FAI OA/J SLI 5% x 0-01 —1 3LT Z9� HUFFINE (US HIGHWAY 1 21 % No ol ce) FIGURE 4: TRIP DISTRIBUTION ENGINEERING, INC. 10 _ NORTON EAST RANCH SUBDIVISION PHASE 1 TIS TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT Assignment of site traffic to the street system and site access points is dependent upon a number of factors. In this case, directional distribution of primary purpose trips and the physical attributes of the surrounding street system were considered to arrive at the total site traffic assignment. Figure 5 shows the AM and PM peak hour traffic assignments for full development of the proposed Norton East Ranch Subdivision Phase 1. TRAFFIC IMPACTS TRAFFIC VOLUMES In order to determine the level of impact at access points and intersections, it is necessary to combine existing background traffic with site-generated traffic. Figure 6 shows AM and PM peak hour turning volumes for site traffic at full build-out added to existing background traffic. INTERSECTION CAPACITY After site-generated traffic was added to existing background traffic, capacity calculations were again performed for the study area intersections. Results of all the capacity calculations are summarized in Table 2 and detailed results for the combination of existing and site-generated traffic are included in Appendix C. As shown by the results in Table 2, all study area intersections would continue to operate at LOS C or better, even with the addition of traffic generated by the proposed Norton East Ranch Subdivision Phase 1. The additional traffic would result in minor increases in delay on some of the approaches, but all approaches would continue to operate at acceptable levels of service. ACCESS CONDITIONS Access conditions, including sight distance and approach geometry, were evaluated for full development of the subdivision. As previously discussed, access to the proposed ENGINEERING, INC. 11 NORTON EAST RANCH SUBDIVISION PHASE 1 TIS ` (3)1 F-%, 6(25) ..0 n• E DURS TON RD I (2) (14) •W W •LI•Sll:y I 1 1•^E, EP F'P� E ���---•��� 7)(11) 4 2 I3( ) I10 12 �'�)(6) W BA COCK ST-far- 2 40 r) i (32) 10 HUFFINE N (US HIGHWA Y > l) - -(60)(40) I_ tM L, tl4Y I I (1 (2) (35) —31 4 66 X=AM PEAK 16(65) (X) =PM PEAK 1 (4) FIGURES: TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT ENGINEERING, INC. 12 NORTON EAST RANCH SUBDIVISION PHASE 1 TIS (3) (3) (2) 0 I3 3 f I (0)3 W 5(3)�} (79)135,--i F—57(115) / -(29)7 1r--117(120) I 2 121 DURSTOIN RD 68) 5 (129) c .•a:w .w1��ffl N (122)(5) O t i to uI 213 8 n !T 9(17) 1e 33(17) ��) 127 (172) (31) r L _ + -- W BA «d gum i ��• (f1.J)I(2yI64)( ) 21 (8)12 �)1 w � 4(1) Ire 15(63) YS 14 HUFFINE N (US HIGHWA Y 1 """p 60)(237) 1) (18) .•+� .+ mea aer •a a «�s i , (1 1)(41)(73) 1 9 53 129 (153)119 53(114) i (998)962 (1025) X=AM PEAK (25)83 ►—17(56) PM PEAK Ir 49 40 57 (51)(42)(35) FIGURE 6: EXISTING + SITE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, INC. 13 NORTON EAST RAN(H SUBDIVISION PHASE 1 TIS Table 2. Summary of Capacity Calculation Results r�r ,I - Lei i i t rf 1 M a�MAMPB 41 SvM EB 18.0 B 0.748 17.9 B 0.748 Cottonwood Rd WB 13.6 B 0.449 13.8 B 0.462 &Huff ne Ln NB 24.1 C 0.261 24.2 C 0.262 SB 25.1 C 0.434 26.5 C 0.536 EB r,L9 lsia 12.2 B 0.150 Cottonwood Rd WB 11.5 B 0.040 14.8 B 0.070 &Fallon St NB -- -- -- 8.0 A 0.010 SB 7.5 A 0.020 7.6 A 0.020 EB ffil.xT 11.9 B 0.130 Cottonwood Rd WB 11.9 B 0.140 14.5 B 0.200 &W Babcock St NB -- -- -- 7.8 A 0.010 SB 7.5 A 0.010 7.6 A 0.010 EB 7.4 A 0.000 7.4 A 0.000 Cottonwood Rd WB 8.1 A 0.110 8.1 A 0.120 &Durston Rd NB 12.4 B 0.240 12.8 B 0.290 SB 16.4 C 0.040 17.2 C 0.050 � � r ''Y+�:r ,`:ea t ,' r,..YWMI � , a1F sting 20U _ . Cis�angs ' fi erse¢fion o c1t: RID;la"yj ` J-vgMM ; cY.�, ;�D; atva EB 18.0 B 0.707 20.0 C 0.756 Cottonwood Rd WB 17.7 B 0.713 18.9 B 0.758 &Huffine Ln NB 24.3 C 0.300 24.4 C 0.321 SB 25.4 C 0.475 25.8 C 0.523 EB ARWA XMI _: 11.1 B 0.070 Cottonwood Rd WB 11.5 B 0.050 17.6 C 0.130 &Fallon St NB -- -- -- 7.7 A 0.060 SB 7.8 A 0.010 8.0 A 0.010 EB B W*A bWW 5 11.3 B 0.070 Cottonwood Rd WB 10.5 B 0.060 12.8 B 0.100 &W Babcock St NB -- -- -- 7.6 A 0.040 SB 7.7 A 0.000 7.8 A 0.000 EB 7.6 A 0.000 7.6 A 0.000 Cottonwood Rd WB 7.7 A 0.100 7.8 A 0.130 &Durston Rd NB 14.0 B 0.350 15.4 C 0.410 SB 13.2 B 0.020 14.3 B 0.020 ENGINEERING, INC. 14 NORTON EAST RANCH SUBDIVISION PHASE 1 TIS Norton East Ranch Subdivision Phase 1 would be provided via extensions of West Babcock Street and Fallon Street. At their intersections with Cottonwood Road, these proposed access points would have level grades and adequate sight distance for exiting vehicles. The extensions of these two roadways should be designed to match the existing roadway sections on the east side of Cottonwood Road. The access points were also evaluated to determine if dedicated left-turn lanes would be warranted on Cottonwood Road at its intersections with West Babcock Street or Fallon Street. This analysis was based on the procedures outlined in Chapter 28 of the Traffic Engineering Manual, published by the Montana Department of Transportation (MDT). As shown by the turn-lane warrant calculations in Appendix D, it was determined that a left-turn lane would not be warranted at either of these intersections for the combination of existing and site-generated traffic volumes. However, dedicated turn-lanes should be considered again in the future as a method for providing additional capacity to these intersections as the surrounding area develops and traffic volumes increase. i CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Analysis of trip generation estimates, traffic assignments, and capacity calculations show that the development of Norton East Ranch Subdivision Phase 1 alone would have minimal impacts on traffic operations on the surrounding roadway system. The intersection improvements currently under construction at the intersection of Cottonwood Road and Huffine Lane would provide enough capacity to accommodate traffic generated by Norton East Ranch Subdivision Phase 1. Although no significant impacts were identified, the following improvements should be made to accommodate traffic generated by the proposed subdivision: ■ As previously discussed, the extensions of West Babcock Street and Fallon Street should be constructed to match the typical sections of the existing roadways on the east side of Cottonwood Road. ENGINEERING, INC. 15 NORTON EAST RANCH SUBDIVISION PHASE 1 TIS • For consistency with existing traffic control, stop signs should be placed on the new West Babcock Street and Fallon Street approaches to their intersections with Cottonwood Road. ■ Stop signs should also be placed on the north-south internal roadways at their intersections with West Babcock Street and Fallon Street. • All traffic control improvements should be designed and constructed in accordance with City of Bozeman standards and the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), 2003 Edition. If the above improvements are implemented as recommended, traffic should continue operate safely and efficiently despite the addition of traffic generated by Phase I of Norton East Ranch Subdivision. ENGINEERING, INC. 16 APPENDIX A TRAFFIC V0LUME DATA ENGINEERING, BUZ, 1300 North Transtech Way Billings,MT 59102 Adiusted, Peak Only lidersecrioisC011HIFile Name : Huffine_Cottonwood_AM_03080i Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 3/8/2007 Page No : 1 _ -Groups Printed-Unshifted-Bank 1 -Bank 2 Cottonwood Road Huffine Lane Gottonwood Road Huffine Lane Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right I Thru Left Peds App.Taal Right Thru Left Peds App. Right Thru Left Peds App.Tow Right ThN Left Peds App.Tclal Int Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 07:30 AM 22 7 23 0 52 10 126 9 0 145 12 10 8 0 30 13 241 23 1 278 505 07:45 AM 35 16 17 0 68 15 186 2 0 203 15 10 11 0 36 28 291 41 1 361 668 Total 57 23 40 0 120 25 312 11 0 348 27 20 19 0 66 41 532 64 2 639 1173 08:00 AM 1 33 15 12 0 60 9 159 3 0 171 20 9 16 0 45 19 229 24 0 272 548 08:15 AM 18 11 11 0 40 3 143 3 0 149 10 10 14 0 34 23 201 23 1 248 471 Grand Total 108 49 63 0 220 37 614 17 0 668 57 39 49 0 145 83 962 111 3 1159 2192 Apprch% 49.1 22.3 28.6 0 5.5 91.9 2.5 0 39.3 26.9 33.8 0 7.2 83 9.6 0.3 Total% 4.9 2.2 2.9 0 10 1.7 28 0.8 0 30.5 2.6 1.8 2.2 0 6.6 3.8 43.9 5.1 0.1 52.9 Unshifted 103 49 61 0 213 37 600 17 0 654 56 39 47 0 142 81 941 104 3 1129 2138 %Unshifted 95.4 100 96.8 0 98.8 100 97.7 100 0 97.9 98.2 100 95.9 0 97.9 97.6 97.8 93.7 100 97.4 97.5 Bank 1 5 0 2 0 7 0 14 0 0 14 1 0 2 0 3 2 21 7 0 30 54 %Bank 1 4.6 0 3.2 0 3.2 0 2.3 0 0 2.1 1.8_ 0 4.1 0 2.1 2.4 2.2 6.3 0 2.6 2.5 Bank 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 %Bank 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cottonwood Road Out In Total 180 213 393 7 7 14 0 0 0 187 220 407 103 49 61 0 ?f g0ft 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 10B 49 63 0 Right Thru Left Peds 2_ i m o0 cno� {- J I W W O O 0 V 00 V _ NOA fD Orttl nL'n o w2 3/8/2007 07:30 AM 3/8/2007 08:15 AM 2NO M OD (o t Unshifted i.-Ci n Bank 400v m o n N M o o M 0) Bank 2__ o ��o rl 09i c u w:4 o- NO000 oOmN- +1 T F' Left Thru Ri ht Peds 47 39 56 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 491 391 571 0 147 1421294 2 30 0149 145 Out In Total 0 oa ENGINEERING, I`vC. 1300 North Transtech Way Adjusted Peak Onl Billings,MT59102 t Y Intersection coiintFile Name : Huffine_Cottonwood_PM_0308M Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 3/8/2007 Page No : 1 Groups Printed-Unshifted-Bank 1 -Bank 2 Cottonwood Raod Huffine Lane Cottonwood Road Huffine Lane Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right ThrU Left Peds App.Total Ri ht Thru Left Peds App.rotas Right Thru Left Peds App.rale� Right Thru Left Peds LA.,Tclet IM.Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 I.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 1.0 1.0_ 1.0 1.0 04:30 PM 32 7 13 0 52 12 264 13 0 289 4 7 13 0 24 6 199 28 0 233 598 04:45 PM 39 8 7 0 54 15 206 14 0 235 11 9 6 0 26 4 234 22 0 260 575 Total 1 71 15 20 0 106 1 27 470 27 0 524 15 16 19 0 50 10 433 50 0 493 1173 05:00 PM 45 13 6 0 64 25 256 11 1 293 10 15 22 1 48 8 302 43 0 353 758 05:15 PM 38 11 12 0 61 17 299 18 0 334 10 7 10 0 27 7 263 29 0 299 721 Grand Total 154 39 38 0 231 69 1025 56 1 1151 35 38 51 1 125 25 998 122 0 1145 2652 Apprch% 66.7 16.9 16.5 0 6 89.1 4.9 0.1 28 30.4 40.8 0.8 2.2 87.2 10.7 0 Total% 5.8 1.5 1.4 0 8.7 2.6 38.7 2.1 0 43.4 1.3 1.4 1.9 0 4.7 0.9 37.6 4.6 0 43.2 Unshifted 153 39 37 0 229 68 1011 55 1 1135 35 37 50 1 223 25 985 122 0 1132 2619 %Unshifted 99.4 100 97.4 0 99.1 98.6 98.6 98.2 100 98.6 100 97.4 98 100 98.4 100 98.7 100 0 98.9 98.8 Bank 1 1 0 1 0 2 1 14 1 0 16 0 1 1 0 2 0 13 0 0 13 33 %Bank 1 0.6 0 2.6 0 0.9 1.4 1.4 1.8 0 1.4 0 2.6 2 0 1.6 0 1.3 0 0 1.1 1.2 Bank 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 %Bank 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Gollorrwood Raod out In Total 227 229 458 2 2 4 a 0 0 0 229 231 460 153 39 37 0 I�0 �,u� 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 i5d 39 36 0 Right Thru Left Peds Th l �p -ICI c I Ala 0�61J T I'-N N iQVV J iT T O O 0 m 2 c2 o m North O o oo v M o m rn F-/ 3/8/2007 04:30 PM 4-�o o c m e 3/6/2007 05:15 PM 2 uNi o.91 _3 S N O O Ln N t N w 7 6 z p n Unshifted _ vr000 " Bank N 0 c2 N o o o o Bank 2 0 1 0 4, T F+ Left Thru Ri ht Peds 50 37 35 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 511 381 35L 1 119 123 ;242 0 0 0 120 125 245 Out In Total r tt ood oad ENGINEERING, IL..Z. 1300 North Transtech Way Adjusted, Peak Only Billings,MT 59102 Intersection count File Name Cottonwood_Fallon_AM_03010, Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 3/1/2007 Page No : 1 Groups Printed-Unshifted-Bank 1 -Bank 2 Cottonwood Road Fallon Street Cottonwood Road Southbound Westbound Northbound Start Time Thru Left I Peds I App.Total Ri ht Left j Peds A .Total Ri ht Thru Pads A .Total -Int.-To-tad Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 07:30 AM 38 5 0 43 0 5 0 5 2 30 0 32 80 07:45 AM 78 4 0 82 1 3 0 4 5 33 0 38 124 Total 116 9 0 125 1 8 0 9 7 63 0 70 204 08:00 AM 69 9 0 78 1 5 0 6 0 31 0 31 115 08:15 AM 39 3 0 42 2 2 0 4 7 23 0 30 76 Grand Total 224 21 0 245 4 15 0 19 14 117 0 131 395 Apprch% 91.4 8.6 0 21.1 78.9 0 10.7 89.3 0 Total% 56.7 5.3 0 62 1 3.8 0 4.8 ; 3.5 296 _ 0 33.2 Unshifted 224 21 0 245 4 15 0 19I 14 117 0 131 395 %Unshifted 100_ 100 0 100 100 100 0 100f 100_ 100 0 100 100 Bank 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 %Bank1 0 0 0 _ 0_ __ 0 0 0 0 0 _ 0 0_ 0 U Bank 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 %Bank 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cottonwood Road Out In Total Woo 366 f 0 r11 0 9! 366 0 0 0 2241 211 0 Thru Left Peds 1 L+ I r 0 North 3/1/2007 07:30 AM a l m 3/1/20D7 08:15 AMcl Unshifted "o o o Bank 1 v Bank 2 a N 0 0 0 0 V A O O Thru _Right Peds 117 14 0 0 0 0 T31 23 00230 Out In Total ottonvmd C .Road ENGINEERING, Mid, 1300 North Transtech Way Adjusted, Peak OnlyBillings,MT 59102 Intersection Count File Name : Cottonwood_Fallon_PM_030107 Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 3/1/2007 Page No : 1 Groups Printed-Unshined-Bank 1 -Bank 2 Cottonwood Road Fallon Street Cottonwood Road Southbound Westbound Northbound Start Time Thru Left Peds A .Total Ri ht Left Peds A .Total Right I Thru Peds f A .Total Int.Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.0 1 1.01 1.01 04:30 PM 22 2 0 24 1 1 0 2 5 36 0 41 67 04:45 PM 1 30 2 0 32 0 7 0 7 4 38 0 42 81 Total 52 4 0 56 1 8 0 9 9 74 0 83 148 05:00 PM 32 5 0 37 0 5 0 5 6 66 0 72 114 05:15 PM 39 1 0 40 0 0 0 0 3 57 0 60 100 Grand Total 123 10 0 133 1 13 0 14 18 197 0 215 362 Apprch% 92.5 7.5 0 7.1 92.9 0 8.4 91.6 0 Total% 34 2.8 0 36.7 0.3 3.6 0 3.9 5 54.4 0 59.4 Unshined 123 10 0 133 1 13 0 14 18 197 0 215 362 %Unshiftedl 100 100 0 100 100 100 _ 0 100 100 100 0 100 100 Bank 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 %Bank 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bank 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 %Bank 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 Cottonwood Road Out In Total 198 133 331 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 198 133 331 123 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 123 10 0 Thru Left Peds 1 4 t P4 F o.65® o NorthS m o o 3/1/2007 04:30 PM o o 3/1/2007 05:15 PM r m ' S Unshined Bank 1 D 2 Bank aooC, A ASC N O O N I Thru RI ht Peds 197 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 197 18 0 136 215 351 0 0 0 0 0 0 136 _ 215 351 Out ln o Total Cottonwood ENIVI 1iEERING, IL _Z. 1300 North Transtech Way Adjusted, Peak Only Billings,MT 59102 Lrtersection Cou,&le Name : Cottonwood_Babcock AM 03010' Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 3/1/2007 Page No : 1 Grou s Printed-Unshifted-Bank 1 -Bank 2 Cottonwood Road West Babcock Street Southbound Westbound No bound Cottonwood Road rth Start Time Thru Left Peds A .Total Ri ht Left Peds App.Total Ri ht I Thru Peds A .Total Int.Total Factor 1.0 1 1.0 1.0 0.95 0.95 0.95 07:30 AM 42 0 0 42 0 3 1 1.1 1 2 6 1.0 07:45 AM 71 3 0 74 2 0 27 72 Total 113 3 10 0 11 4 36 0 40 125 0 116 2 12 0 14 5 62 — 0 67 197 08:00 AM 61 4 0 65 6 16 p 08.0 AM 37 1 0 38 1 L 29 0 32 119 Grand Total 211 8 0 238 g 5 0 24 0 26 70 APPrch% 96.3 3.7 0 33 0 115 0 125 386 21.4 78.6 0 92 p Total% 54_7 2.1 0 56.7 2.3 8.5 0 1 29.8 p Unshifted 211 8 0 -- -219 9 89 0 42 10 115 0 32.4 %Unshifted 100 100 0 100 100 100 p 100 386 Bank 1 p p 0 - -- 100 100 100 0 100 100 %Bank 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 Bank 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° 00 Op pp 0 0 0 0 0 0 /°Bank 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 onwoo oa Out In Total 124 219 343 0 0 p '" 0 01 0 124 2i9 343 211 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 211 8 0 Thru Left Peds 1 L+ 0 I = °°oom'-� 3/1/20070730AM KO 0 0 3H/2007 08:15 AM �- a v S Unshifted r� 0 0 u N O O N Bank 1 vCr Bank 2 $ m • '" o 0 0 0 0� 0000�^ Thr Ri ht Peds 115 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 115 10 0 244 125 369 0 0 0 0 0 0 244 125 369 Out In Tota! -7 wood d ENGINEERING, INC. 1300 North Transtech Way d Billings,MT59102 usted, Peak Only Intersection CouF, lle Name : Cottonwood_Babcock_PM_030107 Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 3/1/2007 Page No : 1 Groups Printed-Unshifted-Bank 1 -Bank 2 Cottonwood Road West Babcock Street Cottonwood Road Southbound Westbound Northbound Start Time Thru Left Peds App.Total Right Left Peds App.Total Right Thru Peds App.Total Ed..Total Incl..Total Int.Total _ Factor 1.01 1.01 0.951 0.951 0.951 1.01 1.01 1.0 04:30 PM 23 0 0 23 2 4 0 6 5 32 0 37 0 66 66 04:45 PM 25 0 0 25 6 4 0 10 7 30 0 37 0 72 72 Total 48 0 0 48 8 8 0 16 12 62 0 74 0 138 138 05:00 PM ' 29 3 0 32 6 5 0 11 11 54 0 65 0 108 108 05:15 PM 34 2 0 36 3 4 0 7 8 50 0 58 0 101 101 Grand Total 111 5 0 116 17 17 0 34 31 166 0 197 0 347 347 Apprch% 95.7 4.3 0 50 50 0 15.7 84.3 Total% 32 1.4 0 33.4 4.9 4.9 0 9.8 8.9 47.8 56.8 0 100 Unshifted 111 5 0 116 17 17 0 34 31 16B 197 0 0 347 %Unshifted 100 100 0 100 100 100 0 100 '100 100 0 100 0 0 _ 100 Bank 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 %Bank 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bank 2 0 0 0 0 —6—0 0 0 0 0 _ 0 0 0 0 Bank 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cottonwood Road Out In Total 18M99 99 0 0 16 Thru Left Pads 1 � O orth L rnoorn N N ^ J 00-4 W12007 04:30 PM 00 m 3/1/2007 05:15 PM r _ Unshifted 410 o:i A o o A= 8 Bank 1 v » M Bank 2 D -t w0000 o � 0000°t Thru R ht 166 31 0 0 0 0 166 31 12810Ii0 128 Out In Total .o 0 Id Road EnE WERVMFGEKEI %VF fir• 1300 North Transtech Way Adjusted, Peak Only Billings,MT 59102 Intersection COrrnFile Name Durston_Cottonwood AM_03080 Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 3/8/2007 Page No : 1 - -- Groups Printed-Passen er-Trucks-Buses Cottonwood Road Durston Road Cottonwood Road Durston Road Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Rght Thru Left other p i,,., R ht Thru Left Other P_To., R ht Thru Left Other Factor _1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Tow 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 ��TF., ant total 07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 3 16 19 0 38 18 0 5 0 23 21 30 1 0 52 113 07:45 AM , 0 1 3 0 4 0 9 39 0 48 31 1 7 0__ 39 21 37 1 0 59 150 Total ! 0 1 3 0 4 3 25 58 0 86 49 1 12 0 62 42 67 2 0 111 263 08:00 AM I 0 0 0 0 0 1 20 36 0 57L 8 0 33 fq 7 0 0 63 153 08:15 AM 1 0 2 0 0 2 1 12 17 0 30 11 0 331 1 0 37 102 Grand Total 0 3 3 0 6 5 57 111 0 173 31 0 1285 3 0 211 518 Apprch% 0 50 50 0 2.9 32.9 64.2 0 24.2 0 1.4 0Total% 0 0.6 0.6 0 1.2 _ 1 11 21.4 0 33.4 6 0 24.7 1 0.6 0 40.7Passenger 0 3 3 0 6 5 56 107 0 168 30 0 124 3 0 208 506Passers er 0 100 100 0 100 100 98.2 9G.4 0 97.1 96.8 100 96.8 0 96.9 100 0 98.6 97.7Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 5 3 0 1 0 4 0 0 2 11Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.8 3.6 0 2.9 32 0 3.2 0 3.1 0Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0.9 _ 2.1%BusesI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.1 ottonw oa Out In Total 10 6 16 0 0 6 0 0 0 10 5 - 16 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f n 0 3 3 0 f7ht iru I L► Other s PIrl Ir m NN ocn r-� 2 North cno O CoN. - O z N N H- ► 3/8/2007 07:30 AM �- o- 3/8/2007 08:15 AM 2 '-n4 o �" m N o m Passenger -40 N m o O m m Trucks- - �- o A v m 0 0 0 0 Buses O 1 O ;° 0000 m- ou -fi' Left Tn I Other 30 0 1 0 0 0 31 0 183 124 307 n pn, 4 4 8 � f� V,UL 0 0 p 6� 187 128 3'15 p7 Out tto !^ oadotai ?j to I ENGINEERING, IN4. 1300 North Tronstech Way Adjusted, Peak Only Billings,MT 59102C 1 Y Mtersection COu/1C ile Name : Durston_Cottonwood_PM_03080r Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 3/8/2007 Page No : 1 Groups Printed-Passe n er-Trucks-Buses Cottonwood Road Durtson Road Cottonwood Road Durtson Road Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time R ht Thru Left I Other I App.Total Rght Thru Left Other Apo.Talal R ht I Thru I Left I other I Apo.Total R ht Thru Left I Other I App,Total Int Total Factor 1.0 1 1.0 I 1.0 1 1.01 0.95 1 0.95 10.95 0.95 1 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 04:30 PM 1 1 0 0 2 1 17 17 0 35 19 3 12 0 34 7 23 0 0 30 101 04:45 PM 1 1 0 0 2 0 25 22 0 47 30 1 13 0 44 4 19 0 0 23 116 Total 2 2 0 0 4 1 42 39 0 82 49 4 25 0 781 11 42 0 0 531 217 05:00 PM 1 1 0 0 2 2 33 25 0 60 36 0 19 0 55 4 23 0 0 27 144 05:15 PM 0 0 2 0 2 0 40 40 0 80 30 1 22 0 53 11 14 0 0 25 160 Grand Total 3 3 2 0 8 3 115 104 0 222 115 5 66 0 186 26 79 0 0 105 521 Apprch% 37.5 37.5 25 0 1.4 51.8 46.8 0 61.8 2.7 35.5 0 24.8 75.2 0 0 Total % 0.6 0.6 0.4 0 1.5 0.6 22.1 20 0 42.6 22.1 1 12.7 0 35.7 5 15.2 0 0 20.2 Passenger 3 3 2 0 8 3 114 103 0 220 114 5 66 0 185 26 75 0 0 101 514 %Passenger 100 100 100 0 10.0_ 100 99.1 99 0 99.1 99.1 100 100 0 99.5 100 94.9 0 0 96.2 98.7 Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 6 %Trucks 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0.9 1 0 0.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.1 0 0 3.8 1.2 Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 %Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.9 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 Cottonwood Road Out- In Total 8 loll 18 0 0 0 ' � p o a o 6 e 6 3 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 2 0 Rght Thru Left Qther .64 O33".00 � H I S �p. O ^WOO W Oa-.Ja�.C. North O! Pl o o o �c-/ 3/8/2007 04:30 PM s 3 3/8/2007 05:15 PM 2 u,o a N N 0 0 N CD t Passenger c o ro o O c� o Trucks a o W a000 Buses ^^S �� 7 A A s �71 00 OO °p+Of-a N I qo Left Thru Rohl Other 68 51 114 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Sol 51 11 0 1]133 185 317 0 1 1 i 188 318 Out in Total N F � I y. , Ul lEl-I I I �,, .w 7 i 4 r 77 ' Lj , • L'• _ gnm 11 110 -T. 1 u 'j y 66 •. � Ski, � � Y illill-lit vltll'4�1 l `7f y t r t t • t 1 °�t,`ryyt IW7:f rpm = IN IN sQ rr — Fi INN pq jXf "LI�1 j., _: sal •4 �, 's •^ 7 s� � ,, �,�� �• - tj 031 r Cif ill ;4 r' — - f Mill I ME E t r i• - C--I1 l r , .'_'ji�i..j �, ''r Y •c ,� i�y� 'q` ' C r rF 1 �,r"s J r-!.P1 ;1` - :� :� i 'r� ram;r•''7 i •� ! • �x S i ."., r. IF �P t 1 1 1{v r 1. ur k Fc � '� v � 7� � _ •r Ell Sri _ Q' •1 n � tf f �• r lop" - 4 i — ��it;. �+,?; is _ { �� •` t. � lit- R tJ2� •� � at r n 3 t M• .7i r'I �•�a��..�a!•�•�.. �l ~711 ��13 fp 1 J � �T�''j 1' t c � ,r i. /•• j 4 j�cf r � •t � i C' q,'j r rt� ��, �II� - ,• � It , �.............. e a.r:•�qY r�� of , 7!4;,� fi. ■�,.11 �' �'• ;,•. L i �• � 4 ru• f jF.�. � tf .S' d' �.�7� F• I 7 N Y l( .iis• � 1 •�7•/1a ,y�;�a� jai( _ I �1 r -jl^+.11.7 ii•>.._.. 7�y 7 t f R t )Jlx r� t t fR 7 o j:t if !•t�*� ,1,•h{ �,�i;• �,w•` _ ' •t .., � 2 4 ,d � +.fit} ,Y� Y�S � ' tit ,�•r, �Y� ;� � - i � f If, :j rFps t_,. � _ �✓+.i y, l,y: �,,j c� APPENDIX B CAPACITY CALCULATIONS - EXISTING HCM Analysis Summar Y . Y Existing (2007) Huffine Ln/Cottonwood Rd Area Type:Non CBD DMR 04/10/2007 Analysis Duration: 15 mins. AM Peak Hour Case: Cottonwood-Huffine-EX-AM Lanes Geometry:Movements Serviced by Lane and Lane Widths (feet) !Approach';Outbound! Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 _ Lane 6 EB 3 2 L i 12.0 T 12.0 ; TR 12.0 j I WB 3 I 2 L 12.0 T i 12.0 TR 12.0 i - NB 2 1 L 12.0 TR I 12.0 j 1 I SB 2 1 L 12.0 TR 12.0 East West ; North South Data L T R _L T R L T R L T R Movement Volume v h 111 962 83 17 614 37 49 39 57 63 49 108 PHF 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.82 i 0.82 I 0.82 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 _0.81 0.81_ Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 2 _� 2 2 2 2 2 3 1 3 j 3 Lane Grou s L TR L TR L ; TR L_ TR i Arrival T e 3 3 3 j 3 �_ 3 3 31 3 RTOR Vol( ph) 8 4 6 11 _Peds/Hour 3 0 _ 0 0 %Grade 0 0 0 0 i Buses/Hour 0 I _ 0 _ 0 0 j Parkers/Hour(LeftlRight) I _ Signal Settings:Pretimed Operational Analysis Cycle Length: 80.0 Sec _ Lost Time Per Cycle: 13.0 Sec _ Phase: i 1 2 3 I 4 i 5 6 j 7 8 Ped Only EB L LTP i -- WB L LTP NB LTP j SB I LTP _ ' Green 7.0 1 40.0 20.0 � 0 L Yellowy All Red 3.0 0.0 3.5 1.5 3.5 1 1.5 I � Ca a ity Analysis Results Approach: Lane Cap v/s g/C i Lane v/c Delay Delay QrQiip EB L er 269 0.000 0.563 nu ati 18.0 ! LBOS * L ro 153 0.079 0.087 L 0.329 8.5 A * TR 1733 0.374 I 0.500 TR 0.748 19.0 B I � WB I L er 102 0.000 0.563 13.6 B L ro 155 0.012 0.087 L 0.082 9.5 A TR 1756 0.225 0.500 TR 0.449 13.7 B I NB L 275 0.055 0.250 L 0.218 23.9 C 24.1 C TR 426 0.065 0.250 TR 0.261 24.2 C SB 1. L 316 0.062 0.250 L 0.247 24.1 C 25.1 i C * TR 415 0.108 0.250 TR 0.434 25.5 C Intersection:Delay= 17.7sec/veh Int.LOS=B Xc 0.67 * Critical Lane Group 2:(v/s)Crit=0.56 SIG/Cinema v3.08 Page 1 HCM Summary Results Existing(2007) Huffine Ln/Cottonwood Rd DMR. 04/10/2007 AM Peak Hour Case: Cottonwood-Huffine-EX-AM i I Lane Group I Approach Delay l Delay Lane ; X (sec/ I (sec/ 49 App Grp v/s v/c veh) LOS veh) I LOS i 108I63 EB L er I 0.00� 18.0 B I -� I *L ro 0.08 1 0.33 M, 8.5 A 1 — 37 � '* TR ' 0.37 0.75 19.0 B ' I ' —614 17 - ---- - --- -- -- -- - - � WB L er 0.00 13.6 B -- - t-- -- - - i L ro 0.011 0.08#� 9.5 A - 1 TR 0.22 0.45 I 13.7 B J -- -- - --- --- - - - -- --- ----- - ----- ---- - -- 962 - NB L 0.05 0.22 23.9 C 24.1 C 83 ' TR 0.07 ' 0.26 ; 24.2 C -' 49 157 39 SB L 0.061 0.25 24.1 C 25.1 C j-- 2 3 -- I' I-- * TR 0.11 0.43 ; 25.5 C '- ' J 7 3 0139 4 2 19 I' 4 2 L - � Int. 0.561 0.67 I 17.7 B - I * Critical Lane Group #Left Movement Total SIG/Cinema 0.08 Page 2 NETSIM Summary Results Existing(2007) Huffine Ln/Cottonwood Rd DMR 04/10/2007 AM Peak Hour Case: Cottonwood-Huffine-EX-AM Queues Spillback in Per Lane ; Average Worst Lane ! Lane Avg/Maxi Speed (% of Peak 49 ,App Group 11 (veh) (mph) ' Period) 108 i 63 EB L ' I I 3 / 5 i 12.0 0.0 '- -' I� TR ' 8 / 10 13.5 0.0 I — 37 —614 jAll 1 13.4 0.0 ---------- --- -- --- - -- ----- --------- - -- - --- i—�— WB L i 1 / 1 19.0 0.0 iti'a -- ---- -- - �., --�—--�--- ------------ TR— 5/ 5 14.7 0.0 , ------ -- --- ---- --- --- - -- -- - ---- -- ------ ---- _ 1 14.9 i 0.0 832 + I NB L 1 / 3 j 4.8 0.0 , ,i . 4 �' ( TR_ 1 / 2 17.8 ' 0.0 I —i 49 i 57 39 All 13.3 0.0 SB L 2/ 3 4.1 0.0 1 2 3 ,11 _, TR I 2/ 3 19.6 0.0 i I I 7 3 0139 4 2119 �' 4 2 All 14.1 0.0 Intersect. 13.9 SIG/Cinema v3.08 Page 3 HCM Analysis Summary Existing(2007) Huffine Ln/Cottonwood Rd Area Type:Non CBD DMR 04/10/2007 Analysis Duration: 15 mins. PM Peak Hour Case: Cottonwood-Huffine-EX-PM Lanes I Geometry:Movements Serviced by Lane and Lane Widths (feet) 1 - - lApproach;Outboudi Lane 1 ( Lane 2 I Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 i Lane 6 I EB 3 2 I L 12.0 T f 12.0 TR 12.0L�- WB 3 2 L I 12.0 T i 12.0 TR 12.0 i NB 2 1 I L 12.0 TR 12.0 SB 2 1 L 12.0 TR 12.0 East West North I South Data L T R L T R L i T R L T R Movement Volume v h) 122 998 25 56 1025 69 51 38 I 35 38 1 39 154 PHF 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heav Vehicles 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 Lane Groups L TR L TR L TR L TR Arrival Type 3 3 3 3 3 I 3 i 3 3 RTOR Vol v h 3 7 4 15 Peds/Hour 0 1 1 0 %Grade 0 0 0 0 Buses/Hour 0 0 0 0 Parkers/Hour(LeftIRight) --- -=- --- I --- -- -" --- --' Signal Settings:Pretimed Operational Analysis Cycle Length: 80.0 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle:13.0 Sec i Phase: 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 7 I 8 I Ped Only EB L LTP WB L LTP NB LTP I SB I LTP Green 7.0 40.0 20.0 i 0 Yellow All Red 3.0 j 0.0 3.5 1.5 I 3.5 1.5 j Ca a ity Analysis Results Approach: Lane Cap v/s g/C Lane v/c Delay Delay ati� Cp pn Grou EB L er 111 0.000 0.563 18.0 B * L ro 156 0.084 0.087 L 0.566 19.2 B TR 1782 0.353 0.500 TR 0.707 17.9 B i WB L er 113 0.000 0.563 17.7 B L ro 156 0.036 0.087 L 0.242 11.2 B I * TR 1772 0.357 0.500 TR 0.713 19.0 B I NB ' L 260 0.075 0.250 L 0.300 24.6 C 24.3 C TR 434 0.061 0.250 TR 0.244 24.1 C SB L 324 0.032 0.250 L 0.130 23.3 C 25.4 C * TR 415 ( 0.119 0.250 TR 0.475 25.8 C Intersection:Delay= 18.8 sec/veh Int.LOS=B Xc 0.67 *Critical Lane Group 2(v/s)Crit=0.56 SIG/Cinema v3.08 Page 1 HCM Summary Results I y Existing(2007) Huffine Ln/Cottonwood Rd DMR 04/10/2007 PM Peak Hour Case: Cottonwood-Huffine-EX-PM I Lane Group Approach i I Delay i Delay Lane i X (sec/ (sec/ ; 39 - ! j App Grp v/s ' v/c veh) LOS veh) LOS 154138 I EB L er 0.00 : 18 .0 B * i I + r 4 I L ro 0.081 0.57#, 19.2 B ; TR 1 0.351 0.71 17.9 1 B 1 69 --1025 4 56 •y- -------------------- - ---------------------- WB L er 0.00 17.7 B '---_______ L ro 0.04 € 0.24#' 11.2 B I _----------- TR 0.36 0.71 18.0 B ---- - - - ------------- --------------------- 122 A� 998 —► i NB L .071 0.30 24.6 C 24.3 C 25 I i I TR 0.061 0.24 24.1 C i s.' i 11 �► I I� 51 135 I 38 tSB L 0.03 1 0.13 23.3 C 25.4 C z c 3 I * TR 0.121 0.47 ' 25.8 C 7 3 0 39 4 2' 19 j� 4 2 I ! i Int. 0.561 0.67 1 18.8 I B t * Critical Lane Group #Left Movement Total SIG/Cinema v3.08 Page 2 NETSIM Summary Results _ Y Existing(2007) Huffine Ln/Cottonwood Rd DMR 04/10/2007 PM Peak Hour Case: Cottonwood-Huffine-EX-PM Queues Spillback in I Per Lane Average Worst Lane ' Lane Avg/Max ! Speed ! (%of Peak 39 App Group` (veh) (mph) Period) 154138 EB L 4 t 7 ! 6.5 0.0 ' 1 TR 8/ 11 13.0 0.0 — 69 1 �-1025 56 All12.0 0.0 ---------------------- +------------ --- -- -- - L iE ! - - --- --WB . . ' ----------- TR 8/ 11 13.1 0.0 !-------------------� ---- --------------- -- 122 A All ! 13.2 0.0 998 —► 25 NB ' L 1 / 3 5.3 0.0 ' j ! ► A TR 2/ 3 1 15.4 0.0 51 ; 35 38 All 12.2 0.0 I 2 3 — SB L 1 / 3 6.1 0.0 - J TR 2/ 3 16.4 1 0.0 7 3 0 39 4 2 19 4 2' All 14.5 0.0 !' Intersect. 12.7 SIG/Cinema v3.08 Page 3 �J "�..Y vvuuva a wb... .. a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY feral Information Site Information .nal st DMR Intersection Cottonwood Rd&Fallon St Agency/Co. Engineering, Inc. Jurisdiction Bozeman Date Performed 41912007 Analysis Year Existina(2007 nal sis Time Period AM Peak Hour Project Description BOZ-07004-Notion East Sub EastNVest Street: Fallon St North/South Street: Cottonwood Rd Intersection Orientation: Alorth-South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound (Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume(veh/h) 117 14 21 224 Peak-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 0.86 0.86 0.75 0.75 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR(veh/h) 0 136 16 28 298 0 'Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- — 0 — — 6Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal 0 0 IMinor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 15 4 %-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.79 1.00 0.79 Ay Flow Rate,HFR(veh/h) 0 0 0 18 0 5 (Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound (Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration. LT LR r(veh/h) 28 23 C(m)(veh/h) 1441 578 V/C 0.02 0.04 95%queue length 0.06 0.12 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.5 11.5 LOS A B Approach Delay(s/veh) — — 11.5 Approach LOS — — B Copyright 0 20D5 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+- Version 5.21 Generated: 4/9/2007 5:30 PM Iwo-Way Stop Control Page 1 of TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY feral Information Site Information Analyst JDMR Intersection Cottonwood Rd&Fallon St Agency/Co. JEngineering,Inc. Jurisdiction Bozeman Date Performed 141912007 Analysis Year Existing M0 ) Analysis Time Period JPM Peak Hour Project Description BOZ-07004-Norton East Sub EastWest Street: Fallon St North/South Street: Cottonv,,00d Rd Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume(veh/h) 197 18 10 123 Peak-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 0.75 0.75 0.83 0.83 1.00 (Hourly Flow Rate,HFR(veh/h) 0 262 24 12 148 0 (Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — -- 0 — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R '^lume(veh/h) 13 1 k-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 1.00 0.50 i curly Flow Rate,HFR(de h/h) 0 0 0 26 1 0 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR V(veh/h) 12 28 C(m)(veh/h) 1268 580 Vlc 0.01 0.05 95%queue length 0.03 0.15 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.8 11.5 LOS A B Approach Delay(s/veh) — — 11.5 Approach LOS — — B C,-••sight 0 2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+Tm Version 5.21 Generated: 4/9/2007 5:31 PN Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of I TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY -lerai Information Site Information ,gal st 'DA/,R Intersection Cottonwood Rd&W Babcock St Agency/Co. Engineetinq, Inc. Jurisdiction Bozeman Date Performed 41912007 Analysis Year Existing 2007 final sis Time Period AM Peak Hour Project Description BOZ-07004-Norton East Sub EastNVest Street: W Babcock St North/South Street: Cottonwood Rd Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period(hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume(veh/h) 115 10 8 211 Peak-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 0.78 0.78 0.74 0.74 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR(veh/h) 0 147 12 10 285 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 - -- 0 - - Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 ILanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 V nfiguration TR LT stream Signal 0 0 (Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R plume veh/h) 33 9 ,-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.48 1.00 0.48 irly Flow Rate,HFR(veh/h) 0 0 0 68 0 18 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR IDela .Queue Length,and Level of Service 4pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR V(veh/h) 10 86 C(m)(veh/h) 1433 609 C 0.01 0.14 95%queue length 0.02 0.49 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.5 11.9 LOS A B Approach Delay(s/veh) - - 11.9 4pproach LOS - - B Copyright®2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+IR Version 5.21 Generated: 4/9/2007 5:25 PM TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY feral Information Site Information .al st JDMR Intersection Cottonwood Rd&W Babcock St enc /Co. lEngineering, Inc, Jurisdiction Bozeman Date Performed 141912007 Analysis Year Existin (2007 Analysis Time Period IPM Peak Hour Project Description BOZ-07004-Norton East Sub EasL=est Street: W Babcock St North/South Street: Cottonwood Rd Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period(hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R 'Volume(veh/h) 166 31 5 111 Peak-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 0.76 0.76 0.81 0.81 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR(veh/h) 0 218 40 6 137 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 0 - — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT (Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 17 17 k-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.77 1.00 0.77 Ay Flow Rate,HFR(veh/h) 0 0 0 22 0 22 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 configuration LR Dela ,Queue Length,and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 (Lane Configuration LT LR ✓(veh/h) 6 44 C(m)(veh/h) 1316 699 ✓/c 0.00 0.06 95%queue length 0.01 0.20 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.7 10.5 ILOS A B Approach Delay(s/veh) — — 10.5 Approach LOS — — B Copyright®2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+- Version 5.21 Generated: 419/2007 5:27 PM file:#CADocuments,and Qeltinac\T)Reaunr\T,ncal 4Pttinuc\TPmn\n7.k1 1 R()tmn 4/Q/'?007 IWU-way 3wP UOntrOl Page 1 of) TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY -feral Information Site Information A st IDMR Intersection Cottonwood Rd&Durston Rd Agency/Co. Engineering, inc. Jurisdiction Bozeman Date Performed 41912007 Analysis Year lExisting 2007) nai sis Time Period AMPeakHour Project Description BOZ-07004-Nodon East Sub EastNVest Street: Durston Road pNoh/South Street: Cottonwood Rd Intersection Orientation: East-West Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound (Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume(veh/h) 3 135 73 1ii 57 5 Peak-Hour Factor,PHF 0,84 0.84 0.84 0.76 0.76 0.76 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR(veh/h) 3 160 86 146 75 6 (Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 _ 3 Median Type Undivided IRT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 IMinor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R plume veh/h 31 2 95 3 3 0 :-Hour Factor PHF 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.38 0.38 0.38 dy Flow Rate,HFR(veh/h) 37 2 115 7 7 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 (Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Dela ,Queue Length,and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Pane Configuration - LTR LTR LTR LTR If(veh/h) 3 146 154 14 C(m)(veh/h) 1523 1314 639 330 ale 0.00 0.11 0.24 0.04 35%queue length 0.01 0.37 0.94 0.13 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.4 8.1 12.4 16.4 LOS A A 8 C Approach Delay(s/veh) — -- 12.4 16.4 Approach LOS — 8 C Copyright 0 2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+na Version 5.21 Generated: 4/9/2007 5:17 PM +usv 1 Vl TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY " Feral Information Site Information e y OMR Knal ction en /Co. Cottonwood Rd&Durston Rd En Intersection , Inc. ction Bozeman Date Performed 41912007 is Year nal sis Time Period PM Peak Hour Existing 2007 Project Descri tion BOZ-07004-Norton East Sub Easuvvest Street: Durston Road North/South Street: Cottonwood Rd Intersection Orientation: East-West [Study Period hrs): 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Moverent Westbound 1 2 3 4 5 6 L olume(veh/h) R L(veh/h) 0 79 26 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 104 115 3 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.69 0.69 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR(veh/h) 0 0.69 89 29 150 166 4 Percent Heavy Vehicles 4 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 Lanes D 1 0 0 Configuration LTR L 0 1 0 TR Upstream Signal 0 0 rMovennent Street Northbound 8 Southbound 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R (veh/h 66 5 115our Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 2 3 3 -ly Flow Rate, HFR(veh/h) 77 12 1.00 1.00 5 135 2 3 3.,:ent Heavy Vehicles 1 1 1 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 Flared Approach 0 N N Storage 0 RT Channelized 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Dela Queue Length,and Level of Service pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound M t 1 8 ovemen 4 7 9 10 11LTR 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR (veh/h) 0 .150 C (m)(veh/h) 217 8 1395 1476 615 /c 445 0.00 0.10 "14.0 0.02 95%queue length 0.00 0.34 0.05 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.6 7,7 13.2 LOS A A B Approach Delay(s/veh) _pproach LOS 13.2 Copyright®2005 Universlty of Florida,All Rights Reserved13 HCS+mm Version 5.21 Generated: 4192007 5:19 PM fileWCADocuments and SettingsMeagor\Local Settings\Temp\u2k1096.tmn A/o/')nn•7 APPENDIX C CAPACITY CALCULATIONS - EXISTING + SITE :,��� ,5-.M'} .?f' �� �i'1���1;'{i- ,3t,,, �r �`;d �+ .y1� .k�+, y2 G...•�j,,,�,�'7� �� �. 'er^'.Mt: ti�e'I...F��:. ��j$ .:��,s':7�. - j,srl_�ti1�:�.����fi' `�`.r!i4`*uS�'.:{.CjJr�Sfi<"r' 'I't�l`£i�` :Sjs�-i+'?;1}54: .�.•: :,��i4��'��;J,t�.�;�i�.t�ii�`..Y'�:�i.{��-�'���'-�`�e Existing+Site Huffine Ln/Cottonwood Rd Area Type:Non CBD D.J. Clark 7/23/2007 Analysis Duration: 15 mins. AM Peak Hour Case: COTTONWOOD-=FINE-EX+SITE-AM Lanes Geometry:Movements Serviced by Lane and Lane Widths (feet) Approach Outbound Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 EB 3 2 L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 WB 3 2 L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 NB 2 1 L 12.0 TR 12.0 SB 2 1 L 12.0 TR 12.0 East West North South Data L T R. L T R. L T R. L T R Movement Volume h) 119 962 83 17 614 53 49 40 57 129 53 139 PHF 0.80 0.80 0.90 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 %Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 Lane Groups L TR L TR L TR L TR Arrival e 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 RTOR Vol h 8 5 6 13 Peds/Hour 3 0 0 0 %Grade 0 0 0 0 Buses/Hour 0 0 0 0 Parkers/Hour(LeARight) - --- -- --- -- -- -- - Signal Settings:Pretimed Operational Analysis Cycle Length: 80.0 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle:13.0 Sec Phase: 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Ped Only EB L LTP WB L LTP NB LTP SB LTP Green 7.0 40.0 20.0LJ 0 Yellowl All Red 3.01 0.01 3.5 1 1.5 3.5 1 1.5 Capacity Analysis Results Approach: Lane Ca v/s g/C Lane v/c Delay Delay -APP Group Ratio Ratio - cmwp Ratio v EB L er 261 0.000 0.563 17.9 B- * L ro 153 0.085 0.087 L 0.360 9.0 A * TR 1733 0.374 0.500 TR 0.748 19.0 B WB L er 102 0.000 0.563 13.8 B L ro 155 0.012 0.087 L 0.082 9.5 A TR 1750 0.231 0.500 TR 0.462 13.9 B NB L 240 0.063 0.250 L 0.250 24.2 C 24.2 C _ TR 427 0.066 0.250 TR 0.262 24.2 C SB L 316 0.126 0.250 L 0.503 26.2 C 26.5 C * TR 412 0.134 0.250 TR 0.536 26.7 C Intersection:Delay=18.3 sec/veh Int.LOS=B Xc 0.71 *Critical Lane Group 2(v/s)Crit=0.59 SIG/Cinema v3.08 Page 1 Existing+Site Huffine Ln/Cottonwood Rd D.J. Clark 7/23/2007 AM Peak Hour Case: COTTONWOOD-HUFFINF--EX+SITE-AM Lane Group Approach Delay Delay Lane X (sec/ (Sec/ 53 App:Grp v/s v/c veh) LOS veh) LOS 139 1129 � EB Lper --0.00 17.9 B Lpro _0.09 0.36 9.0 A TR 0.37 0.75 19.0 B 1 53 4 1 614 1 17 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WB Lper 0.00 13.8 B - - - - - Lpro, 0.01 0.084 9.5 A UYINKNOWN TR 0.23 0.46 13.9 B - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i 19 962 NB L 0.06 0.25 24.2 C 24.2 C 83 TR 0.07 0.26 24.2 C 49 157 40 FSB L 0.13 0.50 26.2 C 26.5 C 2 3 11 TR 0.13 0.54 26.7 C t 7 3 0 39 4 219 1 1 4 2 0.59 0.71 18.3 B Critical Lane Group #Left Movement Total SIG/Cinema v3.08 Page 2 AV�;ic;A , ;is z g! ll Existing+Site Huffine Ln/Cottonwood Rd D.J. Clark 7/23/2007 AM Peak Hour Case: COTTONWOOD-HLTr-'FINT----EX-4-SITr---AM Queues Spillback in Per Lane Average Worst Lane Lane Avg/Max Speed (%of Peak 53 App Group (veh) Period) 139�129 EB L 3 / 5 10.1 0.0 TR 7/ 9 9 13.7 0.0 1 53 614 17 All 13.3 0.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WB L 1 13.3 0.0 TR 51 6 14.4 0.0 - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --z— ---V- 119 All 14.3 0.0 962 83 N13 L l / 3 5.2 0.0 TR 2/ 3 16.4 0.0 a. 49 57 40 All 13.1 0.0 SB L 3 / 5 4.8 0.0 1 2 3 '111 TR 3 / 6 16.0 0.0 7 3 0 39=7 4 4 2 19 111� 4 2 All 12.2 0.0 Intersect. 13.4 SIG/Cinema v3.08 Page 3 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst D.J. CIaI* Intersection Cottonwood Rd&Fallon St Agency/Go. Engineering, Inc. Jurisdiction Bozeman Date Performed 711712007 Analysis Year Existing+Site Analysis Time Period 4M Peak Hour Project Description BOZ-07004-Norton East Sub East/West Street: Fallon St (North/South Street: Cottonwood Rd Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 15 127 14 21 264 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.75 0.75 0.75 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR(veh/h) 13 8 67 18 3 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- — 0 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 IMlnor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume(veh/li) 12 8 61 15 3 4 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.79 0.79 0.79 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 28 352 2 17 147 16 (veh/h) (Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 IRT Channelized 0 0 (Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Dela , Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v(veh/h) 17 28 26 88 C(m) (veh/h) 1216 1428 394 590 v/C 0.01 0.02 0.07 0.15 95%queue length 0.04 0.06 0.21 0.52 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.0 7.6 14.8 12.2 LOS A A B B Approach Delay(s/veh) — — 14.8 12.2 approach LOS — _ B B i ;opydght 0 2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.2 Generated: 7/23/2007 2:52 PM iWU vvay JI.UP k—OM I Page 1 of1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst D.J. Clark Intersection Cottonwood Rd&W Babcock Agency/Co. Engineering, Inc. St urisdiction Bozeman Date Performed 7/17/2007 Analysis Year Existing+Site Analysis Time Period M Peak Hour p ct Description BOZ-07004-Norton East Sub /West Street: WBabcockSt North/South Street: Cottonwood Rd section Orientation: North-South Stud Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume(veh/h) 10 127 10 8 213 4 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.74 0.74 0.74 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR(veh/h) 18 13 44 68 6 18 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 0 _ _ Median Type Undivided TT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 17 12 40 33 3 9 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.48 0.48 0.48 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 10 287 5 12 162 12 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v(veh/h) 12 10 92 75 C (rn) (veh/h) 1281 1415 471 594 lc 0.01 0.01 0.20 0.13 95% queue length 0.03 0.02 0.72 0.43 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.8 7.6 14.5 11.9 LO S A A B B pproach Delay(s/veh) — — 14.5 11.9 .Approach LOS — — B B .;opyright 0 2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+Tm Version 5.2 Generated: 7/23/2007 2:50 PM Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY F;nalyst neral Information Site Information D.J. Clark Intersection Cottonwood Rd&Durston Rd o. Engineering, Inc. Jurisdiction Bozeman rmed 711712007 nal sis Year ime Period Y Existing+Site M Peak Hour scri tion BOZ-07004-Norton East Sub Street: Durston Road North/Soulheet: Cottonwood Rd Orientation: East-West Stud Pers : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Ad ustments Mabr Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 b L 6 T R L T R olume (veh/h) 3 135 74 117 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 57 5 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.76 0.76 0.76 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 3 160 88 153 75 6 Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 — — 3 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Movement 7 8 944WSouthbound L T R olume(veh/h) 34 2 °eak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.82 0.82 0.82 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR(veh/h) 41 2 146 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 Lanes 0 0 1 Configuration 0 0 1 0LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 (Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR v(veh/h) 3 153 189 LTR 14 C (m)(veh/h) 1523 1312 189 v/c 0.00 0.12 647 3100.29 95%queue length 0.05 0.01 0 39 1 21 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.4 8.1 12.8 0.14 LOS A A 17.2 Approach Delay(s/veh) i3 C -- 12.8 Approach LOS _ 17.2 ?ydght®2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+True C Version 5.2 Generated: 7/23/2007 2:50 PM )i ^is f :�+a2iy - .n. ' Existing+Site Huffine Ln/Cottonwood Rd Area Type:Non CBD D.J. Clark 7/17/2007 Analysis Duration: 15 mins. PM Peak Hour Case: COTTON-2 Lanes Geometry:Movements Serviced by Lane and Lane Widths (feet) -Approach Outbound Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 EB 3 2 L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 WB 3 2 L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 NB 2 1 L 12.0 TR 12.0 SB 2 1 L 1 12.0 1 TR 12.0 East West North South Data L T R L T R L T R L T R Movement Volume( h) 153 998 25 56 1025 134 51 42 35 73 41 171 PlF 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.90 0.90 0.90 %Heavy Vehicles 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 Lane Groups L TR L TR L TR L '1R Arrival Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 RTOR Vol h 3 12 4 17 Peds/Hour 0 1 1 0 %Grade 0 0 0 0 Buses/Hour 0 0 0 0 Parkers/Hour(Leffl Right) -- -- __ I Signal Settings:Pretimed Operational Analysis Cycle Length: 80.0 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle:13.0 Sec Phase: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Ped Only EB L LTP WB L LTP NB LTP SB UP Green 7.0 40.0 20.0 0 Yellow All Red 3.0 0.0 1 3.5 1 1.51 3.51 1.5 Ca aci Anal sis Results A roach: Lane Ca V/s g/C Lane v/c Delay Delay EB L er 94 0.198 0.563--App-- Group Ratio Ratio Group Ratiov 20.0 C * L ro 156 0.087 0.087 L 0.756 34.4 C TR 1782 0.353 0.500 TR 0.707 17.9 B WB L er 113 0.000 0.563 18.9 B L ro 156 0.036 0.087 L 0.242 11.2 B * TR 1759 0.379 0.500 TR 0.758 19.2 B NB L 243 0.080 0.250 L 0.321 24.7 C 24.4 C TR 436 0.065 0.250 TR 0.259 24.2 C SB L 322 0.063 0.250 L 0.252 24.2 C 25.8 C * TR 415 0.131 0.250 TR 0.523 26.5 C Intersection:Delay=20.3 seo/veh Int.LOS=C Xc 0.71 *Critical Lane Group �(v/s)Crit-0.60 SIG/Cinema v3.08 Page 1 di �sha�F,il :,+yrJ�.'�; ••xei� �i'{Yt"u7:, h �`,�y.`a�4f' I sh>•�� ii;; �' 41 y '.'(w..YT' •i. �./. tf k '��i� tA` ,�S,.tY�r .��t +.k ya. ���•i, �.��. - {i1+�M.'�i �'�j "rk••`r 7 �f �, �+ ;1 �+� ,,;��9�� �,�t '�;�i •���'',f� 3 � �r 4.;�� _�'7itr Pz`SJ+s�'�;+�`',�,�,�. •� il �d �•�k ?�.`r j��4' '�i,'� k ;i�' �Y1�5 ;"l �9t?V�� �'ir. vt3. �s���n�" r{�.�:ar�i d.,-�',. c. . �,..i �K'• .. a.�,� {9�� �y - i �- - - -.a`�+t8!c�6�'k`4.�f�,��h',.:_«�'W:.�'e. 7trwltij�#1�CC: � .�� ..?..-' ��•aos'y'.- ,.i��������a}:.. Existing+Site Huffine Ln/Cottonwood Rd Ts D.J. Clark 7/17/2007 PM Peak Hour Case: COTTON-2 Lane Group Approach Delay Delay I Lane X (sec/ (sec/ 41 App Grp v/s v/c vela) LOS veh) LOS 171 73 EB L per 0.20 20.0 C I ; 4 *L pro 0.09 0.76 34.4 C '+ TR 0.35 0.71 17.9 B I L 134 1025 ' I 56 •z- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WB L er 0.00 18.9 B - -_ L ro 0.04 0.24 11.2 B 'qi - r ' t Mpc * TR 0.38 0.76 19.2 B - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - _ - - - - 153 .1 998 25 -z NB L 0.08 0.32 24.7 C 24.4 C I TR 0.06 0.26 24.2 C 51 j 35 r ' 42 SB L 0.06 0.25 24.2 C 25.8 C 1 2 3 TR 0.13 0.52 26.5 C 7 3 0 39 4 219 III 4 2 Int. 0.60 0.71 20.3 C *Critical Lane Group #Left Movement Total SIG/Cinema v3.08 Page 2 vu ., Existing+Site Huffine Ln/Cottonwood Rd D.J. Clark 7/17/2007 PM Peak Hour Case: COTTON-2 Queues Spillback in Per Lane Average Worst Lane Lane Avg/Max Speed (%of Peak 41 App Group (veh) (mph) Period) 171 73 EB L 7/11 3.6 0.0 TR 7/ 9 13.7 0.0 t-134 L = 1025 ' r 56 All 10.5 0.0 - - - - - - - - - - �- WB L 1 / 3 12.4 0.0 TR 8/11 12.7 0.0 153 T All 12.7 0.0 998 25 NB L 1 / 3 5.1 0.0 TR 1 / 3 15.6 0.0 5 I 1 135 42 All 12.1 0.0 SB L 1 / 3 5.6 0.0 1 2 ♦ 3 IJI TR 2/ 5 17.9 0.0 7 3 0 39 4 2 19 III 4 2 All 14.4 0.0 Intersect. 11.8 SIG/Cinema v3.08 Page 3 LVl.1 %..U1111.U1 Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nalyst D.J. Clark 01ntersekctionnenc /Co. Cottonwood Rd&Fallon St Engineennq, Inc. Bozeman Date Performed 711712007 nal sis Time Period PM Peak Hour Existing+Site Project Descri tion BOZ-07004-Norton East Sub East/West Street: Fallon St North/South Street: Cottonwood Rd Intersection Orientation: North-South Stud Period hrs : 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Major Street Northbound Movement Southbound 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/h) 60 237 18 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 10 145 11 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.83 0.83 0.83 (veh//h)OUrly Flow Rate, HFR 6 4 35 26 16 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 _ _ 0 Median Type M — — Undivided RT Channelized 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR U stream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Movement Westbound 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 6 4 32 weak-Hour Factor, 13 8 1 PHF iourly 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.50 0.50 0.50 (veh/h)Flow Rate, HFR 174 12 13 80 316 24 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 0 0 Flared Approach N 0 Storage N D 0 RT Channelized 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 1 C 0 onfiguration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Movement Eastbound 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR (veh/h) LTR 80 12 44 45 C(m) (veh/h) 1399 1230 329 634 /c 0.06 0.01 0.13 0.07 95% queue length 0.18 0.03 0.46 0.23 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.7 8.0 17.6 11.1 LOS A A C B pproach Delay(s/veh) _ _ Approach LOS 17.6 11.1 ,right®2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved C B HCS+TIA Version 5.2 Generated: 7/23/2007 2:02 PM rage lotl TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst D.J. Clark I Intersection Cottonwood Rd& W Babcock Agency/Co. Engineering, Inc. St Date Performed 711712007 urisdiction Bozeman Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour naI sis Year Existing+Site Project Description BOZ-07004-Norton East Sub East/West Street: W Babcock St North/South Street: Cottonwood Rd Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume(veh/h) 40 172 31 5 122 17 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.81 0.81 0.81 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 6 (veh/h) 24 22 15 22 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 _ _ 0 _ — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR .Upstream Signal 0 1 0 [olume inor Street Eastbound Westbound ovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R (veh/h) 10 6 22 17 12 17 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.77 0.77 0.77 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 6 150 20 52 226 40 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 (Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 IRT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration I LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th,and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound (Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v(veh/h) 52 6 59 41 C(m) (veh/h) 1420 1310 518 608 vlc 0.04 0.00 0.11 0.07 95%queue length 0.11 0.01 0.38 0.22 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.6 7.8 12.8 11.3 LOS A A 8 8 Approach Delay(s/veh) — — 12.8 113 Approach LOS _ _ B 8 .pyright 0 2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.2 Generated: 7/23/2007 2:05 PM f le'//l ,'\Dn(-..i1mPntc and CP++ineyLAA 1aa 1.AT ^n 1 (�n1+i....n�T.« «�..r11�11n+.,«« 1VV YY-Y JwP k_0nrr0i Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Foncy/Co. neral Information Site Information lyst D.J. Clark Intersection Cottonwood Rd&Durston Rd Engineering, Inc. urisdiction Bozeman Performed 711712007 nalysis Year Existing+Site al sis Time Period PM Peak Hour Project Description BOZ-07004-Norton East Sub East/West Street: Durston Road North/South Street: Cottonwood Rd Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 79 29 129 115 3 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0,88 0.69 0.69 0.69 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 0 89 32 186 166 4 Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 68 5 129 2 3 3 I�i 'eak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 .dourly Flow Rate, HFR KFIared 79 5 151 2 3 3 t Heavy Vehicles 1 1 1 0 0 0 t Grade(%) 0 0 Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR D L Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v(veh/h) 0 186 235 8 C (m)(veh/h) 1395 1473 579 394 /c 0.00 0.13 0.41 0.02 95% queue length 0.00 0.43 1.96 0.06 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.6 7.8 15.4 14.3 LOS A A C 8 pproach Delay(s/veh) — — 15.4 14.3 pproach LOS — — C 8 i yright 0 2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+Tm Version 5.2 Generated: 7/23/2007 2:08 PM rI_-i/rN %,-. . - - i APPENDIX D TURN-LANE WARRANTS VO—OPPOSING VOLUME (VPH) DURING DESIGN HOUR C w a Ln m O O O O O O O O O p y•i'i34yric;'ti'C{•, 'F� r r} •f'.Fi.y..'.y y y.y,Ft_ .y ,y,: y y y s- is` ,,���i':`..i':S� ,. �+c7+-,'Fi "•34'Fi'f'4':4- CSLi:i'j'ti'Fici'.'Ci3i2ti:�i'f`i'f'F� 4'�,'i'F�i'1i'i�u�4S C F•Yy;}yy Fixh'FS7 ''i�S?�+Yi�iY'• tii,y�4x�•',`i�4 5F -}ys�y :Yz? :`y,_y C Y ;F'a x 4• 4 4 S i• :` y`y"y z,. zy:y zy :r••;;� .y-y.-y ys Fy-y., y` �,y,y"y `: �;�;.�•i_;�?.z, i�'y� Szjy-i' U``':i}y'x 'yi`i'y`''LsS:F?�'Fh':'F4YiY,;'ri�i;: .h:4�.Yi�4Yii'F�'Nr��'Fyrh'F{4'yi i��Y�•f�ity°�i••5 4y-y:,,•}4:fi•:tiS"i?+. ,Yi'1i'r'4';: Z -'I(•- . 3 Y 4y?•r x'f 7 �iFy Yy r•Y`� .Ft y'Z• cy zt t Yy :,F LL' y yXy s-}.y f psi L. 4.i-i 4 i' C.. }4., �.rY�dY�� r4''4 fit�ys4.;1i•�:;s:3E�'}i3h: , Y 7 C y x?. O m __ r O y ? l �# t • .hhf"3 '••�m � :i:���T: sirsil/tYS��r_�:.7a•F�i•C)ii'rf�xh2y�'FitJ.C�.}•'y`.Ft.F t t�.�TqJ y ty ij;F�yy.iix T`: s>:'t"h h..i .1.- y zy�y T h�:h� i_ �i_ _ r rl 4�J•F Y•�y7`• I � :r3'3F� a 4 i f x i�Yr �i ,+ i;ry,�,. y T': +'r#• ,�•r •�i'J"�..,r Szi.T..�,r_�..y_ '-•I .3'L;,.-?r.:�a_3_ ;•_a:3'. �:a:�,t'i'{'Cs��.'f•}�'i'�i� ry iiY�4 F i'ea�'F �1•�T•.,�- I•Yt trt.i, r"' p �• r, G. --I y.a:. "?>. 3:4 i. ",_?_a i3�{y S�..�L,F9 p �.ji.'_ � t:i-'t�;}y>.piy.g•F tiir•F x2: y- i L � y }F s. 't: ii_t L,' zT" yh ,,:ri yi. iT C i:;_' C —I ;'',h; i t?s x :4,r t' ' i F%•. ' F}3 7 Fps, J 0 yx: 7 iv `r✓.. T-yi'��s z " ,Fs- w i'•h.4:_ h: i:T:,tYi'}j'7is L7s�,'f-''=.y• C :',,,,yy� fRy T7tiixiy .,-iei-4�4 'y"t, zyi' :iz}i�y r i.y i'ti C x Y>? F•} i•• N f�•l :y i 4 fy. .i v 1xa ii z, 9''' h •f f YZ,^ yzzyy )�F.•T;�r3J'x'�� �tY =3t'i•77',,ty i' h.i^i ^'Gi i-4'y�iy.4 C T ""'� Z ' 'Ft"=t4�t�'Fi:s+ :y�.Y�Y7:1z_ '- �'•l'f 7 ?yl,fh'h.'X�i'f�31i•z'}`+• .,� ,t•F}q�) # .t. y D �" ))7 !_ 3�,ij �1;' �F4iYir•y �'' i -}.r•- .0 y-).f F Z u. y? .i-'+:i.y •i.y `t'_4.4Y•F x z ,.4�1 , � �}��'��.�'r,t'FL9L'fZ'F F• 'i4'i Y�° d x F•.`,`i•i}g.y Fi.'�`�;};•..y- � n NY?, }:pyy.• -y,g s;s,.rT.r.F4.;;.,LLrr�, ,�+,Y+t,,,�+.•�s ;T3„' Zi p .Tziz4 i2i'L.F�;F;Fiy i`>L:,•�iy>.'FP,�y.zN:F • 'i i?.^y`y M _C C:) iri•-'yFY m '�t�}zy xy�-r.r�'Fh°h.•3'a y'y. ,F t .y. +''ix�4q! r y� s'`iYtL�i�'-t'Si?k'�'i'Z`i\y.,'I 7LY4'�L�S'Lxy>•'•ty" v � tliS"•f F�•�4r'� „�t'�''Y•C2�t ',?,`T:y,y 'y ?.•P cn Z o ate° O M c Z cn m Z m 'r1 Z � o � r � c'e' n, m ctD D C to rr+m =m N Z -•I 00 / c 0o R1 v = 'n Z m m M N m Z rrl N p -� z Z m Cl) z < � n V/ W N N D Q -i N n = V mSr � O -nm ui :c Z 2 �rrl Z O O rn +� rr*l -4 g N rn = M n Z-1 C p _ vz o _ Cc�= ixoF^c� DgN�c r'm -i cm o Z voi1g C0 rmoo a O x -n p m>rrl � v rC-) G C -irn "loc r '12 -4 y1 mZmC < N �2.o0 - a N ZAP^ m m mmg .. mp r- 3 rm >� rn � my = CA -i � � Z ul rn 0 Z z m < s "� -a -� 0aX ►.� o � nm m 4zra m o mmm •a S� r r- n -4 p C) rm Aay n = m qm0 6� ©p z g0S rn -a mmitn -i J orrn > Z ym 41 In� m N N r •ri v 0 1 1 r rtA rl O -1 0 -a z a = OTC mr- rn y C z z z czr" H OOOZ jagwanoN 3aVaJ-.LV SN01103S83-M e)i•8z 28.4(8) INTERSECTIONS AT-GRADE November 2000 n !- S 7 tJ W �bO i- Q o W 3 o N J J W W W W Z a: FW- = JJm O O ~ U' W F Q =W O = W~ �� W � - W cl w La W ~ OK Z O > •! N Z zw = < < zy � N a vor O J Lee" WE 0 - !i ~la 0 Z<4O N F-0. La s La Ln N .. Q z J W O 4 Q c ' it >Q X U a �OJ W v W ; W W W W .! S H j wW' �r F• W J Q Z V O y V' O iA F 'v > ;W W 3 ,2 W O I- z1.1 J V OF="" W F J 00 NUJ Q zcc W >00 rW QW O Z b U O W C > 0 z m Z O p �- O OOWO O N J QZ = S 2 P > Z 2 S =d>^ (� = QzQ > = W O WOy W y ZJ (O_ J jr DLa U OZ ZA O ta W !� O W W C O z e ri WaQ N z it O z O U z N Z LJ to m Li Z m z o 0o Ix o _ O z UJ o0 F- O �' O �. I— Z N LLJ a:J V) J / J L t � ono = W N tm u) 00 > CC 0 IL O o`o / W LL U) 2 W O Y� ,tii4iti'4r �ii Z ONP O ``f.4:•'4 4. ,i,�i� ,y J'`:, P) 0• 1 V 0 O� �O �.4�5.� S ti�cM Sao 4;'' J /0 S��•� At•, YiF,_ .f y+L / W O Fl1 :� ° 4 4"k4j4j O ,d,_ > ,4.:1.r`=t4" ��4'Sa.",.:+�e•: j'J.".t{�•�'L1' cc <;y7.7y71. ,i$y7s ' =<sd l'1?J,it O _z _,.s. .ice",}'.4'4'k"k; 4i�:7.y"4 t• e, }' ,.-t-4J t n W {.�^4�4`?I•J ?gtf:.f1?(.c'' 'tl¢,�"�.5 4^4' ... r•�. O U �"' .,:_�i:,,,{ 7_ 1•{.1•t e4tt F 49.i•ikykF.•,,, ?J"•d,� k" N '":'ZJ'i6'tiS� sF`{J.tiJ.f{a��,`•��j J• 4y J.{I.�J-..�,{.J.tiy�i:�l•�J.4::5%Stisij.{: LL J.1.4rkc f +a.vt',J'I ie 4{,'Sc,FS=.J•7F`bjd' `{{. .{ 7l.1^4J,if'4s Z L ^',_i='� �fj.`i,$4•?r�f,�J,�<I-f=4:•f'�4� ry ci.�kip�S71.ii, ZI.i1'erJ.7.i•i:•{-.ti•{.�%a,4. 1{'�,t.}. cc5.4r! , J •`jiL.R4_.41.�,t�4J.4r.J•! �i�ii'•4441.<=�j y�jF�J i J.`1¢4y4-ki 54y j,ks,4"<.2 J.4ik,.l.�i ui M �i' .4i..{,ki.i:4�..c .5.1,45•`JJ•�,i`l•` t{•`J•tii��•�<J.4 J`,I4J' 41. 4y'�S$,}�J.'±`si+�i'=i.{.�f,�itii,•i'sy"SiZ: i y}4J 5:'Z-�r<'.i<{u"4i�: r 4r•-4`r 5'•r '4:is i i h"i ; f� {i' 2'+ O `SIiJ'`y4y'4J'�yk{.j,4j<+� 4j,`j a.F�.T�(ft y�45�•J J•7'""5Z't/.kl�i•�IiL• y4$<l.i.,{.F4_•_ �c` 4i,is H 1 0 s j�+ {'i. �` j isi:r:.: �!- �f_� �`f„s.<j �_�. {�<jJ,jJ•�� Q i�i•f kJ` r. .j.`j!•`}•ij4�.-.ti.`'jy4y�^tt'�5,�` c J•f% �`ii 1•t c.� y4J.!•<'a'•f::1� {%i:�'.ri• a4' 4" r. 4" {.2 � '^. I O <'' S y (.�j { '`j- �' }i}•``! !,- ��. Y.M�jJ.,J•js s`':S<{b tti V- IJJ F•'- y41•SS•iFs 77iiF{ygYi•+ rs7J•?t7Ftf.?7f7t•�t{4J'�J ;;{:7;7{;4fi7;.=?�'_r*7=s7J•J•r?'•77s7-a7z:il5j� £�j='�]. ,1,1Z4' �.,•,.,a.s-, �S,`�J.F. ,J 4J• O O O O O O coti tD LO c to O O N .- 8nOH NOIS30 ONIaf10 (HdA) 3Wf1-IOA ONISOddO—OA