HomeMy WebLinkAboutCIP Project Report 2018 to 2022 (2) Fiscal Years 2018-2022
Capital Improvements
Program
1
2
City of Bozeman, Montana
Adopted
Capital Improvements Program
For Fiscal Years 2018-2022
Presented And Adopted during Public Meetings held
November 2016 – February 2017
City Commission
Carson Taylor, Mayor
Cynthia Andrus, Deputy Mayor
Jeff Krauss, Commissioner
Chris Mehl, Commissioner
I-Ho Pomeroy, Commissioner
Chris Kukulski, City Manager
Anna Rosenberry, Assistant City Manager
Robin Crough, City Clerk
3
4
Contents
CITY OF BOZEMAN - Vision, Mission, and Goals ..................................................................... 7
Adopted Work Plan – Adopted at the Commission Meeting held April 11, 2011 .................... 8
What is a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Why Adopt One? .................................... 9
Definition of Capital Improvement: ......................................................................................... 9
The City’s Charter Requirements ............................................................................................ 9
Municipal Code Requirements ............................................................................................. 10
State Law Requirements ........................................................................................................ 10
City’s CIP Process—Calendar ............................................................................................... 11
City’s CIP Process – Ranking Criteria ................................................................................... 11
General Fund Criteria ....................................................................................................... 12
Our Current Facilities and their Condition: ......................................................................... 113
Level of Service (LOS) Standards ......................................................................................... 113
Policies for the Physical Development of our Community ................................................... 113
Our Community’s Ability to Pay for Planned Improvements ................................................ 113
SUMMARY……………………………………………………………………………......................... 15
ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR DISTRICT……………………………………………………………. 17
BUILDING INSPECTION CIP………………………………………………………………………….. 51
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CIP …………………………………………………………………..55
FIRE EQUIPMENT & CAPITAL FUND CIP…………………………………………………………….63
FIRE IMPACT FEE CIP………………………………………………………………………………….71
FORESTRY-TREE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT CIP…………………………………………………..77
GENERAL FUND CIP……………………………………………………………………………………85
LIBRARY DEPRECIATION FUND CIP………………………………………………………………. 161
PARKING CIP…………………………………………………………………………………………..171
SOLID WASTE FUND CIP……………………………………………………………………………..187
STORM WATER FUND CIP…………………………………………………………………………...199
5
STREET & CURB RECONSTRUCTIONS……………………………………………………………...227
STREET IMPACT FEE CIP …………………………………………………………………………….249
STREET MAINTENANCE DISTRICT CIP.…………………………………………………………... 299
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUND CIP ……………………………………………………………....337
WASTEWATER FUND CIP…………………………………………………………………………….339
WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE CIP……………………………………………………………………375
WATER FUND CIP……………………………………………………………………………………..385
WATER IMPACT FEE CIP……………………………………………………………………………. 441
6
CITY OF BOZEMAN - Vision, Mission, and Goals
Vision: Bozeman, Montana: The most livable place.
Mission: To enhance the quality of life through excellence in public service.
Goals:
1. Encourage and promote opportunities for citizenship.
2. Provide and communicate quality customer service.
3. Build a strong team of staff, elected officials and citizens.
4. Anticipate future service demands and resource deficiencies and be proactive in
addressing them.
5. Develop a visually appealing and culturally rich community.
6. Commit to a strong financial position.
7. Provide excellent and equitable public services which are responsive to the
community within available resources.
7
City of Bozeman 2016-2017 Priorities
On February 29, 2016, the City Commission adopted the following items as their top
priorities for staff to focus on accomplishing in the coming year.
Adopted Priorities:
1. Joint Law & Justice Center
2. Story Mill Landfill
3. Unified Development Code Rewrite
4. Vision & Strategic Plan
5. 2017 Legislative Agenda
6. Parks & Maintenance District
7. Broadband Expansion
8. Impact Fee Update
8
What is a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Why Adopt One?
One of the primary responsibilities of local government is to properly preserve,
maintain, and improve a community’s stock of buildings, streets, parks, water and sewer
lines, and equipment. Planning for these capital improvements is a matter of prudent
financial management, as well as sound development practice.
At times of rapid growth, as we are experiencing once again, the need for expanded
public facilities and services is at its peak. A carefully developed CIP plans for these
expansions and communicates our intent to citizens and the development community. In
times of economic contraction, like the past prolonged recession, capital improvements were
often put off (deferred) as a way of trimming budgets. While this can be appropriate in
cases, an annual analysis and focus on necessary capital improvements helps to ensure that
capital deferrals, and their impact on the community, are fully vetted.
Definition of Capital Improvement:
The CIP includes any planned expenditure of $10,000 or greater, that results in the
acquisition of an asset with a useful life of 1 year or more.
There are a couple of “exceptions” or “extensions” of this definition that we have found
helpful and necessary in past years:
• General Planning Documents (master plans, community surveys, etc.) are NOT
included in our CIP;
• Specific plans that involve pre-engineering or preliminary design of facilities are
often (but not always) included in the CIP.
• Software purchases that could potentially be “software as a service”. Cloud
based services are beginning to replace our purchase of outright software and
hardware. In the CIP, we have treated the software projects as a capital outlay
purchase, although a “service” type solution may actually be chosen during the
bidding/proposal process.
The City’s Charter Requirements
In Article 5.06 of the adopted City Charter, the City Manager is responsible for
preparing and submitting a multi-year capital program to the City Commission no later than
December 15 for the ensuing fiscal year. The plan must be revised and extended each year
with regard to projects not yet completed. This plan is required to include:
1. A clear general summary of contents;
2. Identification of the long-term goals of the community;
3. A list of all capital improvements and other capital expenditures which are
proposed to be undertaken during the fiscal years next ensuing, with appropriate supporting
information as to the necessity for each;
9
4. Cost estimates and recommended time schedules for each improvement or other
capital expenditure;
5. Method of financing upon which each capital expenditure is to be reliant;
6. The estimated annual cost of operating and maintaining the facilities to be
constructed or acquired;
7. A commentary on how the plan addresses the sustainability of the community or
region of which it is a part; and
8. Methods to measure outcomes and performance of the capital plan related to the
long-term goals of the community.
Municipal Code Requirements
Because the City has engaged in a Capital Improvement Program process for more than two
decades, it has come to be relied upon as an important part of our annual budgeting
process. Customarily adopted before the budget development process begins, Capital
Improvement items form the basis of department budget requests. In addition, the
Municipal Code allows for the “re-appropriation” of prior year budget amounts for Capital
Improvement Plan items that have been budgeted but not completed.
Bozeman Municipal Code §2.06.160(C) – BUDGET ADMINISTRATION AND
OVERSIGHT
C. Through the annual appropriation resolution each year, the city commission will
authorize and re-appropriate the unexpended balance of capital improvement
program items and building repair and maintenance items previously budgeted
which have not been completed.
State Law Requirements
In addition to our local requirements for an annual CIP, State Law requires the City to
maintain a Capital Improvement Plan for our Development Impact Fee programs.
Under Montana Code Annotated (MCA), this Capital Improvement Plan provides the
schedules and cost projections required under MCA §7-6-1602(2)(k)(i-iv):
7-6-1602. Calculation of impact fees -- documentation required -- ordinance or
resolution -- requirements for impact fees. (1) For each public facility for which an
impact fee is imposed, the governmental entity shall prepare and approve a service
area report.
(2) The service area report is a written analysis that must: …
(k) have a component of the budget of the governmental entity that:
(i) schedules construction of public facility capital improvements to serve
projected growth;
(ii) projects costs of the capital improvements;
(iii) allocates collected impact fees for construction of the capital improvements;
and
10
(iv) covers at least a 5-year period and is reviewed and updated at least every 2
years
City’s CIP Process—Calendar
Each year, we begin the process of updating our Capital Improvements Plan in September.
The process is completed when the Commission adopts a final budget with capital items
approved, usually in the following August.
September:
• Departments make requests for new CIP items.
• Staff reviews existing CIP projects and makes note of any changes.
October/November:
• City Manager and staff meet to review new and existing projects; modify any timing,
cost or revenue estimates.
• Impact Fee Advisory Committee receives and reviews proposed Impact Fee CIP
schedules and forwards comments to City Commission.
November/December:
• City Manager presents Draft CIP to City Commission prior to December 15th.
• City Commission holds public hearings, takes public comment and adopts CIP Plan
for ensuing fiscal year.
January:
• Adopted CIP is integrated into City Manager’s Recommended Budget for ensuing
fiscal year.
June:
• Commission, via adopting a final budget, appropriates dollars for CIP projects for the
fiscal year.
City’s CIP Process – Ranking Criteria
Prior to 2008, the City had not formally adopted criteria upon which the Capital
Improvement Plan projects would be ranked or rated for funding approval. It was often
unclear to city staff and members of the public as to what the important elements or factors
for funding were.
In the fall of 2008, for preparation of the Fiscal Year 2010-2014 CIP, we developed criteria
used to score the capital projects and equipment in the General Fund. Because the General
Fund contains, by far, the largest quantity and diversity of projects requested, we believed
that specific expressed criteria could be helpful in making decisions for the plan. The
Criteria were approved by the Commission, and have been used since that time.
11
General Fund Criteria
Criteria Rating Notes Project
Score
1. Level of Service Up to 20
pts
20 - Corrects a health or safety hazard or prevents a
critical breakdown of an existing city facility or
equipment.
15 - Repairs, rehabilitates, or replaces physically
deteriorated or functionally obsolete existing city facility
or equipment.
10 - Brings an area up to the basic level of service as
identified in an adopted city wide plan.
5 – Expands an approved City service.
0 – Other.
2. Operating Budget
Impact
Up to 10
pts
10 - Provides a significant decrease in city operating
and/or maintenance expenses.
5 – Has a neutral or small impact on operating and/or
maintenance expenses.
0 – Provides a significant increase in city operating
requirements.
3. Service Area Up to 10
pts
10 – Direct Benefit to entire city.
5 – Direct benefit to roughly half city or indirect benefit
to entire city.
2 – Direct benefit to small area of the city or indirect
benefit to several areas.
4. Departmental
Priority
Up to 10
pts
10 – Critical to Department’s Mission
7 – High
3 – Moderate
0 – Questionable/Very Difficult to Complete
5. Commission
Work Plan
Up to 10
pts
10 – Identified project in Adopted Commission Work Plan
5 – Contributes to an identified project in the Adopted
Commission Work Plan.
0 – Not identified in Adopted Commission Work Plan.
6. Municipal
Climate Protection
(Municipal Climate
Action Plan – MCAP)
Up to 5
pts
5 – Is recommended by MCAP and will accomplish a
stated MCAP goal.
3 – Will assist in meeting MCAP goal.
0 – No relation to MCAP.
7. Seasonal Use Up to 5
pts
5 – Year Round.
3 – Six to Eleven months per year.
1 – Five or fewer months per year.
TOTAL Up to 70
pts.
12
Our Current Facilities and their Condition:
The City has a number of long-range (20-year) facility plans:
• Water Treatment & Distribution Facilities
• Wastewater Collection & Treatment Facilities
• Stormwater Collection & Treatment Facilities
• Fire Station, Equipment & Staffing
• Police Station & Staffing
• Parks, Recreation, Trails & Open Space
• Transportation System Plan
These studies examine the condition and placement of existing facilities, area growth
projections and pattern, regulatory changes, and possible funding mechanisms. The plans
analyze various alternatives and make recommendations for implementation.
Level of Service (LOS) Standards
Most of the City’s long range plans establish level of service standards. These standards are
critical to planning for the needs of future city residents. In some cases, such as water
quality or wastewater discharge, these standards are often established or guided by outside
regulating bodies. The CIP does not frequently reference specific LOS, but the underlying
facility and staffing plans will contain detailed discussions of levels of service, and how the
City should address increasing or decreasing levels of service through infrastructure and
staffing recommendations.
Policies for the Physical Development of our Community
The City’s Unified Development Code (UDC) is a combination of both Subdivision and Zoning
regulations for development within the City. The Code is subject to amendment by the
Commission, after public notices and hearings are held. The UDC applies to both private
and city-owned projects. The City is currently underway with “The Bozeman Code Update,”
a public process to update the City’s Unified Development Code (UDC). The UDC covers a
diverse range of topics, including, zoning, design standards, subdivisions, wetland, and
permit review procedures. The key feature of the update is to translate the community's
expectations for development as expressed in the Community Plan into a concise and
useable set of regulations.
Our Community’s Ability to Pay for Planned Improvements
In a community with relatively high cost of living, the ability of citizens to afford the needed
utility rate, fee, and assessment levels is of concern. At the same time, the City strives to
keep existing facilities properly maintained — and not pass deferred maintenance costs and
problems on to future generations.
The City has adopted a Utility Rate Studies for Water and Wastewater services. These
studies give us an indication of how and when utility rates must be increased to pay for the
13
needed water and wastewater system improvements.
For General Fund (Administration, Parks, Recreation, Library, Police, and Fire) facilities and
Street construction, the City does not have the ability to easily increase tax levels for
funding. Any tax levy increase must be approved by the City’s voters, and maximum debt
levels are established by state law.
In November 2007, the City of Bozeman voters approved a 4 mill perpetual levy to establish
a Fire Equipment and Capital Replacement fund. This fund was added to the CIP plan, and
funds our needs to replace fire engines, our ladder truck, and other capital improvements to
fire stations.
In the summer of 2015, the city successfully created a city-wide Arterial & Collector Street
Special District, under the special district laws of the state. The District is meant to fund
street maintenance and (re)construction on Arterial & Collector streets that is NOT eligible
to be funded by impact fees. The CIP includes a 5-year plan for capital projects for this new
district.
14
SU
M
M
A
R
Y
‐
AL
L
FU
N
D
S
.
Am
e
n
d
e
d
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
Pl
a
n
FY
1
8
F
Y
1
9
F
Y
2
0
F
Y
2
1
F
Y
2
2
TO
T
A
L
SC
H
E
D
U
L
E
D
PR
O
J
E
C
T
S
Unscheduled
Ar
t
e
r
i
a
l
an
d
Co
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
3,
9
3
4
,
3
4
5
$
1,
0
9
0
,
4
2
1
$
2,
9
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
82
5
,
0
0
0
$
75
0
,
0
0
0
$
9,
4
9
9
,
7
6
6
$
13,464,146
$
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
In
s
p
e
c
t
i
o
n
Fu
n
d
‐
$
20
9
,
3
5
4
$
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$
20
9
,
3
5
4
$
325,000
$
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
10
0
,
0
0
0
$
29
2
,
2
1
5
$
28
,
0
0
0
$
10
,
8
0
0
$
‐
$
43
1
,
0
1
5
$
‐
$
Fi
r
e
Eq
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
& Ca
p
i
t
a
l
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
5
3
0
,
5
0
0
$
25
0
,
0
0
0
$
25
0
,
0
0
0
$
‐
$
‐
$
1,
0
3
0
,
5
0
0
$
2,660,500
$
Fi
r
e
Im
p
a
c
t
Fe
e
50
,
0
0
0
$
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$
50
,
0
0
0
$
4,600,000
$
Fo
r
e
s
t
r
y
57
,
0
0
0
$
10
5
,
0
0
0
$
28
,
0
0
0
$
‐
$
‐
$
19
0
,
0
0
0
$
210,000
$
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
Fu
n
d
1,
9
6
5
,
4
9
6
$
2,
0
1
6
,
8
6
0
$
1,
3
0
2
,
0
8
5
$
87
0
,
0
0
0
$
18
,
9
2
3
,
7
0
0
$
25
,
0
7
8
,
1
4
1
$
10,320,183
$
Li
b
r
a
r
y
De
p
r
e
c
i
a
t
i
o
n
90
,
0
0
0
$
25
0
,
0
0
0
$
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$
34
0
,
0
0
0
$
‐
$
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
29
0
,
0
0
0
$
40
0
,
7
7
9
$
31
0
,
0
0
0
$
28
0
,
0
0
0
$
45
,
0
0
0
$
1,
3
2
5
,
7
7
9
$
2,310,000
$
So
l
i
d
Wa
s
t
e
Co
l
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
& Re
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
43
0
,
0
0
0
$
30
0
,
0
0
0
$
56
0
,
0
0
0
$
23
8
,
0
0
0
$
25
0
,
0
0
0
$
1,
7
7
8
,
0
0
0
$
‐
$
St
o
r
m
Wa
t
e
r
Ut
i
l
i
t
y
65
0
,
0
0
0
$
65
0
,
0
0
0
$
65
0
,
0
0
0
$
65
0
,
0
0
0
$
65
0
,
0
0
0
$
3,
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
125,000
$
St
r
e
e
t
& Cu
r
b
Re
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
s
2,
1
7
8
,
3
7
5
$
1,
5
7
4
,
6
2
5
$
59
5
,
5
0
0
$
54
3
,
0
0
0
$
74
2
,
5
0
0
$
5,
6
3
4
,
0
0
0
$
13,157,375
$
St
r
e
e
t
Im
p
a
c
t
Fe
e
11
,
9
2
0
,
0
4
9
$
2,
3
4
0
,
4
2
1
$
6,
9
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2,
3
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
1,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
24
,
4
8
5
,
4
7
0
$
36,236,584
$
St
r
e
e
t
Ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
2,
3
7
8
,
9
0
0
$
1,
7
4
8
,
5
0
0
$
1,
9
7
7
,
1
0
0
$
2,
4
0
2
,
5
0
0
$
2,
1
4
6
,
7
8
9
$
10
,
6
5
3
,
7
8
9
$
3,401,210
$
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$
Wa
s
t
e
w
a
t
e
r
Fu
n
d
2,
7
0
2
,
5
0
0
$
1,
6
6
9
,
8
7
0
$
1,
2
7
7
,
5
0
0
$
1,
1
8
2
,
5
0
0
$
1,
6
0
2
,
5
0
0
$
8,
4
3
4
,
8
7
0
$
16,034,333
$
Wa
s
t
e
w
a
t
e
r
Im
p
a
c
t
Fe
e
1,
4
4
0
,
0
0
0
$
2,
9
8
5
,
0
0
0
$
6,
0
9
0
,
0
0
0
$
80
0
,
0
0
0
$
80
0
,
0
0
0
$
12
,
1
1
5
,
0
0
0
$
6,018,035
$
Wa
t
e
r
Fu
n
d
3,
5
1
7
,
2
0
0
$
4,
6
4
1
,
9
2
0
$
2,
0
6
2
,
4
8
0
$
8,
8
3
6
,
6
0
0
$
10
,
3
6
3
,
4
0
0
$
29
,
4
2
1
,
6
0
0
$
3,464,439
$
Wa
t
e
r
Im
p
a
c
t
Fe
e
3,
7
9
0
,
0
0
0
$
1,
9
8
6
,
0
1
0
$
14
,
1
4
5
,
7
2
9
$
6,
7
0
5
,
0
0
0
$
2,
2
4
5
,
0
0
0
$
28
,
8
7
1
,
7
3
9
$
164,590,604
$
To
t
a
l
36
,
0
2
4
,
3
6
5
$
22
,
5
1
0
,
9
7
5
$
39
,
0
7
6
,
3
9
4
$
25
,
6
6
8
,
4
0
0
$
39
,
5
1
8
,
8
8
9
$
16
2
,
7
9
9
,
0
2
3
$
276,917,409
$
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
d
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
$3
6
,
0
2
4
,
3
6
5
$2
2
,
5
1
0
,
9
7
5
$3
9
,
0
7
6
,
3
9
4
$2
5
,
6
6
8
,
4
0
0
$3
9
,
5
1
8
,
8
8
9
$1
6
2
,
7
9
9
,
0
2
3
$276,917,409
$0
$5
0
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
5
0
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
5
0
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$3
0
0
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
FY
2
1
FY
2
2
TO
T
A
L
SC
H
E
D
U
L
E
D
PR
O
J
E
C
T
S
Unscheduled
Su
m
m
a
r
y
‐
Al
l
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
& Eq
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
15
16
Ar
t
e
r
i
a
l
& Co
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
Fu
n
d
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
Pl
a
n
Fi
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
Su
m
m
a
r
y
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Ye
a
r
FY
1
7
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
F
Y
2
0
F
Y
2
1
F
Y
2
2
Unscheduled
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
Re
s
e
r
v
e
Ba
l
a
n
c
e
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
1,
0
0
5
,
6
0
0
$
1,
0
7
0
,
6
0
0
$
(7
8
3
,
2
4
5
)
$
24
8
,
4
4
4
$
(4
8
7
,
0
0
4
)
$
895,839
$
Pl
u
s
:
As
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
1,
0
9
5
,
0
0
0
$
2,
0
8
0
,
5
0
0
$
2,
1
2
2
,
1
1
0
$
2,
1
6
4
,
5
5
2
$
2,
2
0
7
,
8
4
3
$
2,
2
5
2
,
0
0
0
$
‐$
Le
s
s
:
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
d
CI
P
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Co
s
t
s
(1
,
0
3
0
,
0
0
0
)
$
(3
,
9
3
4
,
3
4
5
)
$
(1
,
0
9
0
,
4
2
1
)
$
(2
,
9
0
0
,
0
0
0
)
$
(8
2
5
,
0
0
0
)
$
(7
5
0
,
0
0
0
)
$
(13,464,146)$
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Ye
a
r
‐En
d
Ca
s
h
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
1,
0
7
0
,
6
0
0
$
(7
8
3
,
2
4
5
)
$
24
8
,
4
4
4
$
(4
8
7
,
0
0
4
)
$
89
5
,
8
3
9
$
2,
3
9
7
,
8
4
0
$
(13,464,146)$
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
Ba
l
a
n
c
e
of
Pa
y
b
a
c
k
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
‐
$
‐
$
(2
,
5
4
4
,
6
6
6
.
0
0
)
$
(2
,
6
7
7
,
6
6
6
)
$
(2
,
6
7
7
,
6
6
6
)
$
(3
,
1
7
7
,
6
6
6
)
$
(3,177,666)$
SIF
0
3
6
‐
Pa
y
b
a
c
k
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
‐
$
(1
,
2
7
8
,
0
0
0
)
$
‐
$
SIF
0
4
6
‐
Ga
l
l
a
t
i
n
Co
u
n
t
y
SI
D
(6
0
0
,
0
0
0
)
$
SIF
0
7
3
‐
Pa
y
b
a
c
k
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
(404,000)$
SIF
0
7
6
‐
Pa
y
b
a
c
k
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
(5
0
0
,
0
0
0
)
$
SIF
0
8
0
‐
Ga
l
l
a
t
i
n
Co
u
n
t
y
SI
D
(3
3
3
,
3
3
3
)
$
SIF
0
8
0
‐
Pa
y
b
a
c
k
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
(3
3
3
,
3
3
3
)
$
SIF
1
0
5
‐
Pa
y
b
a
c
k
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
(1,240,000)$
SIF
1
0
9
‐
Ga
l
l
a
t
i
n
Co
u
n
t
y
Pa
y
b
a
c
k
/
S
I
D
(1
3
3
,
0
0
0
)
$
SIF
1
1
3
‐
Pa
y
b
a
c
k
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
(2
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
)
$
SIF
1
1
7
‐
Pa
y
b
a
c
k
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
(2
2
5
,
0
0
0
)
$
En
d
i
n
g
Ba
l
a
n
c
e
of
Pa
y
b
a
c
k
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
‐
$
(2
,
5
4
4
,
6
6
6
)
$
(2
,
6
7
7
,
6
6
6
)
$
(2
,
6
7
7
,
6
6
6
)
$
(3
,
1
7
7
,
6
6
6
)
$
(3
,
1
7
7
,
6
6
6
)
$
(4,821,666)$
A ss
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
s
Ma
d
e
fo
r
Re
v
e
n
u
e
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
s
:
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Ye
a
r
FY
1
7
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
FY
2
1
FY
2
2
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
An
n
u
a
l
As
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
56
5
,
0
0
0
$
1,
0
9
5
,
0
0
0
$
2,
0
8
0
,
5
0
0
$
2,
1
2
2
,
1
1
0
$
2,
1
6
4
,
5
5
2
$
2,
2
0
7
,
8
4
3
$
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
An
n
u
a
l
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
95
.
0
%
90
%
2%
2%
2%
2%
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
1,
0
9
5
,
0
0
0
$
2,
0
8
0
,
5
0
0
$
2,
1
2
2
,
1
1
0
$
2,
1
6
4
,
5
5
2
$
2,
2
0
7
,
8
4
3
$
2,
2
5
2
,
0
0
0
$
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
%
10
0
.
0
%
10
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
Pl
u
s
:
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
0.
0
%
0.
0
%
0.0
%
0.
0
%
0
.
0
%
0.0%
To
t
a
l
% De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
10
0
.
0
%
10
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
1,
0
9
5
,
0
0
0
$
2,
0
8
0
,
5
0
0
$
2,
1
2
2
,
1
1
0
$
2,
1
6
4
,
5
5
2
$
2,
2
0
7
,
8
4
3
$
2,
2
5
2
,
0
0
0
$
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
CU
R
R
E
N
T
14
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
9,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
4,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
FY
1
8
F
Y
1
9
F
Y
2
0
F
Y
2
1
F
Y
2
2
U
n
s
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
d
Ar
t
e
r
i
a
l
& Co
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
17
CI
P
PR
O
J
E
C
T
FU
PR
O
J
.
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
PR
O
J
E
C
T
NA
M
E
Unscheduled
FY
2
1
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
FY22
Ar
t
e
r
i
a
l
& Co
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
St
r
e
e
t
s
SI
F
0
3
6
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
CO
T
T
O
N
W
O
O
D
(B
A
B
C
O
C
K
TO
DU
R
S
T
O
N
)
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
*
$1
,
2
7
8
,
0
0
0
SI
F
0
3
9
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
FE
R
G
U
S
O
N
& DU
R
S
T
O
N
(I
N
T
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
)
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$4
5
1
,
2
4
4
SI
F
0
4
6
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
OA
K
(N
E
W
HO
L
L
A
N
D
TO
FE
R
G
U
S
O
N
)
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
*
$6
0
0
,
0
0
0
SI
F
0
5
7
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
OA
K
(F
L
A
N
D
E
R
S
MI
L
L
TO
RY
U
N
S
O
N
WA
Y
)
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$500,000
SI
F
0
5
8
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
OA
K
& N 27
T
H
(I
N
T
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
)
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$122,146
SI
F
0
6
1
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
OA
K
& FE
R
G
U
S
O
N
(I
N
T
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
)
‐
SI
G
N
A
L
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$2
6
9
,
0
6
6
SI
F
0
6
2
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
DU
R
S
T
O
N
(F
O
W
L
E
R
TO
FE
R
G
U
S
O
N
)
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$7
5
7
,
4
2
1
SI
F
0
6
3
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
FO
W
L
E
R
& BA
B
C
O
C
K
(I
N
T
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
)
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$400,000
SI
F
0
7
3
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
FO
W
L
E
R
& DU
R
S
T
O
N
(I
N
T
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
)
‐
SI
G
N
A
L
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
*
$404,000
SI
F
0
7
4
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
OA
K
& DA
V
I
S
(I
N
T
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
)
‐
RO
U
N
D
A
B
O
U
T
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$3
5
2
,
3
0
2
SI
F
0
7
6
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
FO
W
L
E
R
CO
N
N
E
C
T
I
O
N
(H
U
F
F
I
N
E
TO
OA
K
)
‐
DE
S
I
G
N
(I
N
C
L
U
D
E
S
3
IN
T
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
S
)
*
$5
0
0
,
0
0
0
SI
F
0
8
0
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
FE
R
G
U
S
O
N
(B
A
X
T
E
R
TO
OA
K
)
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
*
$6
6
6
,
6
6
6
SI
F
0
8
6
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
BA
X
T
E
R
& CO
T
T
O
N
W
O
O
D
(I
N
T
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
)
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$500,000
SI
F
0
9
8
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
OA
K
& CO
T
T
O
N
W
O
O
D
(I
N
T
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
)
‐
RO
U
N
D
A
B
O
U
T
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$548,000
SI
F
1
0
4
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
CO
T
T
O
N
W
O
O
D
& BA
B
C
O
C
K
(I
N
T
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
)
‐
SI
G
N
A
L
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$2
8
7
,
0
6
7
SI
F
1
0
5
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
CO
T
T
O
N
W
O
O
D
(D
U
R
S
T
O
N
TO
OA
K
)
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
*
$1,240,000
SI
F
1
0
8
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
S 3R
D
AN
D
GR
A
F
‐
SI
G
N
A
L
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
18
CI
P
PR
O
J
E
C
T
FU
PR
O
J
.
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
PR
O
J
E
C
T
NA
M
E
Unscheduled
FY
2
1
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
FY22
SI
F
1
0
9
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
OA
K
(R
O
U
S
E
TH
R
O
U
G
H
CA
N
N
E
R
Y
DI
S
T
R
I
C
T
)
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
*
$1
3
3
,
0
0
0
SI
F
1
1
0
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
MA
N
L
E
Y
& GR
I
F
F
I
N
(I
N
T
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
)
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$4
0
0
,
0
0
0
SI
F
1
1
1
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
HI
G
H
L
A
N
D
(M
A
I
N
TO
KA
G
Y
)
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
& DE
S
I
G
N
*
$5,000,000
SI
F
1
1
2
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
HI
G
H
L
A
N
D
& MA
I
N
IN
T
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
IM
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
$3
0
,
0
0
0
SI
F
1
1
3
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
GR
I
F
F
I
N
(7
T
H
TO
RO
U
S
E
)
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
*
$2
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
SI
F
1
1
4
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
FO
W
L
E
R
CO
N
N
E
C
T
I
O
N
(H
U
F
F
I
N
E
TO
OA
K
)
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
*
$3,750,000
SI
F
1
1
5
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
CO
L
L
E
G
E
(1
1
T
H
TO
19
T
H
)
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$550,000
SI
F
1
1
6
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
BR
I
D
G
E
R
DR
& ST
O
R
Y
MI
L
L
RD
(I
N
T
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
)
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$200,000
SI
F
1
1
7
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
ST
O
R
Y
MI
L
L
(G
R
I
F
F
I
N
TO
BR
I
D
G
E
R
)
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
*
$2
2
5
,
0
0
0
SI
F
1
1
8
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
BA
B
C
O
C
K
(1
1
T
H
AV
E
TO
19
T
H
AV
E
)
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
*
$750,000
SI
F
1
2
1
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
BA
X
T
E
R
& DA
V
I
S
(I
N
T
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
)
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$5
0
0
,
0
0
0
SI
F
1
2
5
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
CO
L
L
E
G
E
(1
1
T
H
TO
19
T
H
)
‐
DE
S
I
G
N
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
SI
F
1
3
4
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
OA
K
(C
O
T
T
O
N
W
O
O
D
TO
FL
A
N
D
E
R
S
MI
L
L
)
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$250,000
Su
m
m
a
r
y f or
Ar
t
e
r
i
a
l
& Co
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
St
r
e
e
t
s
(30
it
e
m
s
)
To
t
a
l
s
by
ye
a
r
:
$8
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
7
5
0
,
0
0
0
$3
,
9
3
4
,
3
4
5
$13,464,146
FY
2
1
FY22
FY
1
8
Unscheduled
FY
2
0
$2
,
9
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
,
0
9
0
,
4
2
1
FY
1
9
19
CIP Project Fund
Arterial & Collector Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF036
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Cottonwood (Babcock to Durston) - Construction*
FY18
$1,278,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The project consists of finishing Cottonwood Road from Babcock to Durston to a five lane urban arterial standard.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Future developments which impact this intersection
area may not be allowed to proceed until improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this
element functioning as intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those
elements of the street network that are in place. Cottonwood is also failing in this section because of heavy traffic and subbase
degradation. Failure to complete this section will likely result in large maintenance expenses.
How is capacity affected by this project: This project increases capacity directly by adding additional lanes, dedicated bike lanes
and sidewalks.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Cottonwood serves as an important element in Bozeman's west side street system
and serves as a primary north-south corridor on the west side of the City.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Conformance with the Transportation Master Plan is attained.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: A Payback District or SID may be created to leverage other
stakeholders.
Are there other affected projects: Cottonwood corridor street improvements, intersection improvements at Cottonwood and
Babcock and Cottonwood and Durston.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
SID, payback district, incremental construction by adjacent development.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
This project will expand the capacity of our street network and improve safety for drivers and pedestrians. Facilitates development currently
occurring in this part of the city and network performance overall.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs. Added maintenance costs
are expected if this project is not completed within the next 2-3 years.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($1,278,000) and the Arterial & Collector District ($1,278,000). A development payback district
may be created to reimburse Arterial & Collector District for any local share (project related) costs that may be allocated to future
developments (estimated at $1,278,000).
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
20
CIP Project Fund
Arterial & Collector Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF039
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Ferguson & Durston (Intersection) - Construction
FY18
$451,244
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Installation of a roundabout at the intersection of Ferguson and Durston
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: The level of service at this intersection has degraded to
unacceptable levels. Future developments which impact this intersection area may not be allowed to proceed until improvements
are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this element functioning as intended.
How is capacity affected by this project: This intersection is currently 4-way stop controlled. Replacing it with a roundabout will
greatly increase it's capacity.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Connectivity already exists at this location, it is capacity that is affected.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: The Level of Service (LOS) Standard (BMC) and conformance with
the Transportation Master Plan are attained.
Are there other affected projects: The Ferguson Road Improvement project.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Accept the current level of service (do nothing). Alternative financing could be provided by creating an SID or Payback District.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased capacity at this intersection. Facilitates development currently occurring in this part of the city and network performance overall.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($1,804,976) and the Arterial & Collector District ($451,244).
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
21
CIP Project Fund
Arterial & Collector Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF046
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Oak (New Holland to Ferguson) - Construction*
FY18
$600,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Complete To 5-Lane Arterial Standard
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Future developments in this area may not be allowed to
proceed until these improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this element functioning as
intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those elements of the street
network that are in place.
How is capacity affected by this project: This project increases capacity directly by adding additional lanes, dedicated bike lanes
and sidewalks.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Connectivity already exists at this location, it is capacity which is being expanded.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Conformance with the Transportation Master Plan is attained.
Are there other affected projects: Oak Street Cottonwood to Ferguson, Intersection improvements at Oak and Ferguson and
Oak and Fowler.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Construct segment by segment as adjacent parcels develop.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased capacity, connectivity and safety in this corridor, both for motorized vehicles as well as bicycles and pedestrians.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project will be funded by Street Impact Fees ($1,400,000) and Arterial & Collector District financing for local improvements attributed to
Gallatin County - creation of Special Improvement District ($600,000). The Special Improvement District will re-pay the Arterial & Collector
District Fund.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
22
CIP Project Fund
Arterial & Collector Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF057
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Oak (Flanders Mill to Ryunson Way) - Construction
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$500,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project is the completion of the street segment of Oak St, from Flanders Mill to Ryunson Way, to a five-lane urban principal
arterial standard. Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Future developments in this area may
not be allowed to proceed until these improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this
element functioning as intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those
elements of the street network that are in place. How is capacity affected by this project: This project increases capacity directly
by constructing new segments of arterial roadway and by adding additional lanes, dedicated bike lanes and sidewalks. How is
connectivity affected by this project: Completes an important east-west link between Ferguson and Cottonwood. What
regulations or standards are attained with this project: Conformance with the Transportation Master Plan is attained. How is this
project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: A payback District or SID may be created to leverage other
stakeholders. Are there other affected projects: Intersection improvements at Oak and Cottonwood, Oak and Flanders Mill, Oak
and Ferguson, Oak Street &New Holland to Ferguson.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Construct segment by segment as adjacent parcels develop.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased capacity, connectivity and safety in this corridor, both for motorized vehicles as well as bicycles and pedestrians.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($1,000,000) the Arterial & Collector District ($500.000) and local participation. The Flander's Mill
development is expected to be a partner in the construction of the segments adjacent to their development.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
23
CIP Project Fund
Arterial & Collector Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF058
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Oak & N 27th (Intersection) - Construction
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$122,146
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Installation of a signal at the intersection of Oak and N 27th.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: The level of service at this intersection has degraded to
unacceptable levels. Future developments which impact this intersection area may not be allowed to proceed until improvements
are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this element functioning as intended.
How is capacity affected by this project: This intersection is currently 2-way stop controlled. Replacing it with a signal will greatly
increase it's capacity.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Connectivity already exists at this location, it is capacity that is affected.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: The Level of Service (LOS) Standard (BMC) and conformance with
the Transportation Master Plan are attained.
Are there other affected projects: Oak Street corridor projects and North 27th Street improvements project.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Accept the current level of service (do nothing). Secure additional financing by creating an SID or Payback District.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased capacity at this intersection. Facilitates development currently occurring in this part of the city and network performance overall.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($488,584) and the Arterial & Collector District ($122,146).
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
24
CIP Project Fund
Arterial & Collector Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF061
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Oak & Ferguson (Intersection) - Signal Construction
FY18
$269,066
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Installation of a signal at the intersection of Oak and Ferguson. Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of
this project to the operation: Future developments which impact this intersection area may not be allowed to proceed until
improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this element functioning as intended. The
incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those elements of the street network that
are in place. How is capacity affected by this project: Development which is currently occurring as well as projects which already
have approval make it clear that this intersection will no longer meet the city's LOS standard. Installation of a signal at this
intersection will increase it's capacity and assist in improving the LOS at nearby intersections. How is connectivity affected by this
project: Facilitates the extension of Oak Street to the west of Ferguson Road where it currently does not exist, and will
eventually make the connection with Cottonwood Road. What regulations or standards are attained with this project: The Level
of Service (LOS) Standard (BMC) and conformance with the Transportation Master Plan are attained. Are there other affected
projects: Oak Street projects and Ferguson Road projects are affected.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Accept the current level of service (do nothing). Secure additional financing by creating an SID or Payback District.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased capacity at this intersection. Facilitates development currently occurring in this part of the city and network performance overall.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($1,076,265) and Arterial & Collector District ($269,066).
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
25
CIP Project Fund
Arterial & Collector Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF062
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Durston (Fowler to Ferguson) - Construction
FY18 FY19
$757,421
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Complete Durston Rd, from Cottonwood to Fowler, to a three-lane urban minor arterial standard
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Future developments in this area may not be allowed to
proceed until these improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this element functioning as
intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those elements of the street
network that are in place.
How is capacity affected by this project: This project directly increase capacity by adding additional lanes, dedicated bike lanes and
sidewalks.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Connectivity already exists at this location, it is capacity that is affected.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Conformance with the Transportation Master Plan is attained.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: A payback District or SID may be created to leverage other
stakeholders.
Are there other affected projects: Intersection improvements at Durston & Ferguson, Durston & Fowler, Durston & Flanders Mill.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Construct segment by segment as adjacent parcels develop.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased capacity and safety in this corridor, both for motorized vehicles as well as bicycles and pedestrians.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($757,421) and the Arterial & Collector District ($757,421). A payback district may be created to
reimburse both funds for any local share (project related) costs that may be allocated to future developments.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
26
CIP Project Fund
Arterial & Collector Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF063
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Fowler & Babcock (Intersection) - Construction
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$400,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Install a traffic signal, roundabout, or other adequate traffic control device at the intersection of Fowler and Babcock.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Peak hour level of service for northbound traffic is
degrading due to lack of north-south connectivity in the network.
How is capacity affected by this project: This intersection is currently 1-way stop controlled. Replacing it with a signal or
roundabout will greatly increase it's capacity.
How is connectivity affected by this project: East-west connectivity already exists at this location. North-south connectivity is still
lacking.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: The Level of Service (LOS) Standard (BMC) and conformance with
the Transportation Master Plan are attained.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: A Payback District or SID may be created to leverage other
stakeholders.
Are there other affected projects: Fowler corridor improvements.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Identified in the 2007 Transportation Plan Update. Includes installation of a traffic signal, roundabout or other adequate traffic control device
when warrants are met.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased capacity and safety at this intersection.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($1,600,000) and the Arterial & Collector District ($400,000).
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
27
CIP Project Fund
Arterial & Collector Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF073
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Fowler & Durston (Intersection) - Signal Construction*
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$404,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Install a signal at the intersection of Fowler and Durston Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of
this project to the operation: Current LOS is acceptable. How is capacity affected by this project: This intersection is currently 1-
way stop controlled. Replacing it with a signal or roundabout will greatly increase it's capacity. How is connectivity affected by
this project: East-west connectivity already exists at this location. North-south connectivity is still lacking. What regulations or
standards are attained with this project: The Level of Service (LOS) Standard (BMC) and conformance with the Transportation
Master Plan are attained. Are there other affected projects: Fowler corridor street improvements.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Accept the current level of service (do nothing). Alternative financing could be provided by creating an SID or Payback District.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Improves an important connecting element in the network.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($1,616,000) and the Arterial & Collector District ($404,000). A development payback district may
be created to reimburse Arterial & Collector District for any local share (project related) costs that may be allocated to future developments
(estimated at $404,000).
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
28
CIP Project Fund
Arterial & Collector Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF074
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Oak & Davis (Intersection) - Roundabout Construction
FY18
$352,302
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Install a roundabout at the intersection of Oak and Davis. Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of
this project to the operation: Peak hour level of service for northbound traffic is degrading due to lack of north-south
connectivity in the network. Geometric deficiencies will be addressed. How is capacity affected by this project: This intersection
is currently 1-way stop controlled. Replacing it with a roundabout will greatly increase it's capacity. How is connectivity affected
by this project: East-west connectivity already exists at this location. North-south connectivity is still lacking. What regulations or
standards are attained with this project: The Level of Service (LOS) Standard (BMC) and conformance with the Transportation
Master Plan are attained. Are there other affected projects: Oak Street corridor improvements and Fowler corridor
improvements.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Accept the current geometry and level of service.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased capacity and safety at this intersection.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($1,409,206) and the Arterial & Collector District ($352,302).
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
29
CIP Project Fund
Arterial & Collector Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF076
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Fowler Connection (Huffine to Oak) - Design (Includes 3 Intersections)*
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Design Fowler from Huffine to Oak to an urban minor arterial standard, including three intersections.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Future developments which impact this intersection
area may not be allowed to proceed until improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this
element functioning as intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those
elements of the street network that are in place.
How is capacity affected by this project: This project directly increase capacity by adding additional travel lanes, dedicated bike
lanes and sidewalks and making improvements to the intersections.
How is connectivity affected by this project: This project completes an important north-south connection on the west side of
town.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: The Level of Service (LOS) Standard (BMC) and conformance with
the Transportation Master Plan are attained.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: A Payback District or SID may be created to leverage other
stakeholders.
Are there other affected projects: Intersection improvements at Fowler and Durston and Fowler and Oak.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Construct segment by segment as adjacent parcels develop.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
This project will complete an important north-south connection, expand the capacity of our street network and improve safety for drivers and
pedestrians.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($500,000) and the Arterial & Collector District ($500,000). A development payback district may
be created to reimburse Arterial & Collector District for any local share (project related) costs that may be allocated to future developments
(estimated at $500,000).
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21
$500,000
FY22
30
CIP Project Fund
Arterial & Collector Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF080
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Ferguson (Baxter to Oak) - Construction*
FY18
$666,666
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Complete Ferguson from Baxter to Oak to a two lane urban collector standard with bike lanes, curb and gutter, boulevards,
parking and sidewalks.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Future developments in this area may not be allowed to
proceed until these improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this element functioning as
intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those elements of the street
network that are in place.
How is capacity affected by this project: This project increases capacity directly by constructing a new roadway which includes
dedicated bike lanes and sidewalks.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Completes an important north-south link between Baxter and Oak.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Conformance with the Transportation Master Plan is attained.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: A payback District or SID may be created to leverage other
stakeholders.
Are there other affected projects: Intersection of Ferguson and Oak.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Construct segment by segment as adjacent parcels develop.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased capacity, connectivity and safety in this corridor, both for motorized vehicles as well as bicycles and pedestrians.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($333,333), Gallatin County ($333,333), and a developer contribution ($333,333). This budget
assumes that A&C funds will be used to cover the both the County portion and the developer contribution, both to be paid back with SID or
payback agreement.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
31
CIP Project Fund
Arterial & Collector Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF086
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Baxter & Cottonwood (Intersection) - Construction
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$500,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Improve the intersection at Baxter and Cottonwood. Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of
this project to the operation: Current LOS is acceptable. How is capacity affected by this project: This intersection is currently 1-
way stop controlled. Replacing it with a signal or roundabout will greatly increase it's capacity. How is connectivity affected by
this project: East-west connectivity already exists at this location. North-south connectivity is still lacking. What regulations or
standards are attained with this project: The Level of Service (LOS) Standard (BMC) and conformance with the Transportation
Master Plan are attained. Are there other affected projects: Cottonwood corridor improvements and Baxter corridor
improvements.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Identified in the 2007 Transportation Plan Update. Includes installation of a traffic signal, roundabout or other adequate traffic control device
when warrants are met.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased capacity and safety at this intersection.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($2,000,000) and the Arterial & Collector District ($500,000).
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
32
CIP Project Fund
Arterial & Collector Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF098
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Oak & Cottonwood (Intersection) - Roundabout Construction
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$548,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Installation of a roundabout at the intersection of Oak and Cottonwood. Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this
project to the operation: Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this element functioning as intended. The
incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those elements of the street network that
are in place. How is capacity affected by this project: Capacity will be greatly increased on the network as a whole as this
intersection is currently 3-legged, rural and stop controlled on Cottonwood (Harper Puckett). How is connectivity affected by
this project: This improvement will complete an important north-south connection on Cottonwood. What regulations or
standards are attained with this project: The Level of Service (LOS) Standard (BMC) and conformance with the Transportation
Master Plan are attained. Are there other affected projects: Cottonwood Road Improvements, Oak Street Improvements.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Not installing the intersection improvement at the same time as the construction of the intersecting streets. Secure additional financing by
creating an SID or Payback District.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased capacity and safety at this intersection.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($2,192,000) and the Arterial & Collector District ($548,000).
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
33
CIP Project Fund
Arterial & Collector Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF104
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Cottonwood & Babcock (Intersection) - Signal Construction
FY18
$287,067
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Cottonwood and Babcock. Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this
project to the operation: Future developments which impact this intersection area may not be allowed to proceed until
improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this element functioning as intended. The
incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those elements of the street network that
are in place. How is capacity affected by this project: This intersection is currently 2-way stop controlled. Replacing it with a
signal will greatly increase it's capacity. How is connectivity affected by this project: Connectivity exists at this location, it is
capacity which is being increased. What regulations or standards are attained with this project: The Level of Service (LOS)
Standard (BMC) and conformance with the Transportation Master Plan are attained. Are there other affected projects:
Cottonwood corridor improvement projects.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Accept the current level of service (do nothing). Alternative financing could be provided by creating an SID or Payback District.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
This project will expand the capacity of our street network, improve safety for drivers and pedestrians and increase capacity at this
intersection. Facilitates development currently occurring in this part of the city and network performance overall.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($1,148,269) and the Arterial & Collector District ($287,067).
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
34
CIP Project Fund
Arterial & Collector Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF105
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Cottonwood (Durston to Oak) - Construction*
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$1,240,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Complete the construction of Cottonwood Road from Durston Road to Oak Street to a five-lane urban arterial standard.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Future developments which impact this intersection
area may not be allowed to proceed until improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this
element functioning as intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those
elements of the street network that are in place.
How is capacity affected by this project: This project increases capacity directly by adding additional lanes, dedicated bike lanes
and sidewalks.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Cottonwood Rd serves as an important element in Bozeman's west side street
system and serves as a primary north-south corridor on the west side of the city.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Conformance with the Transportation Master Plan is attained.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: A Payback District or SID may be created to leverage other
stakeholders.
Are there other affected projects: Cottonwood corridor street improvements, intersection improvements at Cottonwood and
Durston and Cottonwood and Oak.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Construct segment by segment as adjacent parcels develop.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
This project will expand the capacity of our street network and improve safety for drivers and pedestrians. Facilitates development currently
occurring in this part of the city and network performance overall.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($1,240,000) and the Arterial & Collector District ($1,240,000). A dev105elopment payback
district may be created to reimburse Arterial & Collector District for any local share (project related) costs that may be allocated to future
developments (estimated at $1,240,000).
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
35
CIP Project Fund
Arterial & Collector Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF108
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
S 3rd and Graf - Signal Construction
FY18 FY19
$200,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Signal construction at S 3rd and Graf Describe the criticality (i.e., importance)
of this project to the operation: Future developments which impact this intersection area may not be allowed to proceed until
improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this element functioning as intended. The
incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those elements of the street network that
are in place. How is capacity affected by this project: This is currently a stop controlled intersection. Installation of a roundabout
will directly increase capacity. How is connectivity affected by this project: Connectivity already exists at this location, it is
capacity which is being expanded. What regulations or standards are attained with this project: The Level of Service (LOS)
Standard (BMC). Are there other affected projects: Graf Street corridor improvements.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Accept the existing level of service, create an SID for financing.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased capacity and safety at this intersection.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($800,000) and the Arterial & Collector District ($200,000).
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
36
CIP Project Fund
Arterial & Collector Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF109
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Oak (Rouse through Cannery District) - Construction*
FY18 FY19
$133,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project consists of improving Oak from Rouse through the Cannery District to include curb, gutter, sidewalks, and a turning
lane to provide a complete arterial street standard. The Cannery District will be responsible for the cost of curb, gutter, and
sidewalk along their property frontage as well as the turn lane to access two drive accesses that allow a left turn movement from
Oak Street into the Cannery District.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Future developments in this area may not be allowed to
proceed until these improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this element functioning as
intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those elements of the street
network that are in place.
How is capacity affected by this project: This project directly increase capacity by adding additional lanes, dedicated bike lanes and
sidewalks.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Connectivity already exists at this location, it is capacity that is affected.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: Left turn traffic safety will be improved upon installation of left turn
lanes. Pedestrian safety will be improved.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Conformance with the Transportation Master Plan is attained.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: A payback District or SID may be created to leverage other
stakeholders. Cash-in-lieu of infrastructure is anticipated to be contributed from the Cannery District developer to cover the
cost of the left turn lanes needed for their drive accesses as well as the cost of curb, gutter, and sidewalk adjacent to their
property.
Are there other affected projects: Oak Street Corridor improvements
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased capacity and safety in this corridor, both for motorized vehicles as well as bicycles and pedestrians. There will be substantial
pedestrian traffic between the Fairgrounds and the Cannery District. Additionally, the traffic impact study for the Cannery District indicated the
need for left turn lanes for their drive accesses. As the City's transportation master plan identifies the need to upgrade the Oak Street
Corridor to an arterial standard, this is an opportunity to partner with the Cannery District developer to complete a portion of the Oak Street
improvements.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($133,000), the Arterial & Collector District ($133,000), and Cannery District Developer share
($133,000). A development payback district or SID may be created to reimburse the Arterial & Collector District for the County’s (project
related) costs.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
37
CIP Project Fund
Arterial & Collector Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF110
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Manley & Griffin (Intersection) - Construction
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Intersection control at Manley & Griffin
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Future developments which impact this intersection
area may not be allowed to proceed until improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this
element functioning as intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those
elements of the street network that are in place.
How is capacity affected by this project: This intersection is currently 1-way stop controlled. Replacing it with a signal will greatly
increase it's capacity.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Connectivity already exists at this location, it is capacity which is being expanded.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: The Level of Service (LOS) Standard (BMC) and conformance with
the Transportation Master Plan are attained.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: A Payback District or SID may be created to leverage other
stakeholders.
Are there other affected projects: Griffin corridor improvements
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Accept the current LOS
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased capacity and safety at this intersection.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
Street Impact Fees ($1,600,000) and Arterial & Collector District ($400,000).
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$400,000
FY21 FY22
38
CIP Project Fund
Arterial & Collector Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF111
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Highland (Main to Kagy) - Construction & Design*
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$5,000,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Upgrade Highland, from Main to Kagy.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Future developments in this area may not be allowed to
proceed until these improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this element functioning as
intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those elements of the street
network that are in place.
How is capacity affected by this project: This project directly increase capacity by adding additional lanes, dedicated bike lanes and
sidewalks.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Connectivity already exists at this location, it is capacity that is affected.What
regulations or standards are attained with this project: Conformance with the Transportation Master Plan is attained.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: A payback District or SID may be created to leverage other
stakeholders.
Are there other affected projects: Intersection improvements at Highland and Kagy, Highland and Ellis and Highland and Main
Street.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased capacity and safety in this corridor, both for motorized vehicles as well as bicycles and pedestrians.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($5,000,000) and the Arterial & Collector District ($5,000,000). A payback district may be
created to reimburse both funds for any local share (project related) costs that may be allocated to future developments.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
39
CIP Project Fund
Arterial & Collector Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF112
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Highland & Main Intersection Improvements
FY18
$30,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Improve intersection control at Highland & Main
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Future developments which impact this intersection
area may not be allowed to proceed until improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this
element functioning as intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those
elements of the street network that are in place.
How is capacity affected by this project: Adding additional phases and improving geometry will increase capacity for deficient
movements at this intersection.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Connectivity already exists at this location, it is capacity which is being expanded.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: The Level of Service (LOS) Standard (BMC) and conformance with
the Transportation Master Plan are attained.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: A Payback District or SID may be created to leverage other
stakeholders.
Are there other affected projects: Highland Boulevard corridor improvements.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Accept the existing level of service, create an SID for financing.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased capacity and safety at this intersection.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
Street Impact Fees ($150,000), Arterial & Collector District ($30,000)
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
40
CIP Project Fund
Arterial & Collector Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF113
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Griffin (7th to Rouse) - Construction*
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Construct W Griffin corridor improvements from N. 7th to Rouse to an urban minor arterial standard
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Future developments which impact this intersection
area may not be allowed to proceed until improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this
element functioning as intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those
elements of the street network that are in place.
How is capacity affected by this project: Designed improvements will improve LOS at the key intersections and will increase
capacity in the corridor as a whole.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Connectivity already exists at this location, it is capacity which is being expanded.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: The Level of Service (LOS) Standard (BMC) and conformance with
the Transportation Master Plan are attained.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: A Payback District or SID may be created to leverage other
stakeholders.
Are there other affected projects: Intersection improvements at Griffin and 7th and Griffin and Rouse.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Accept the current level of service (do nothing).
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
This project will expand the capacity of our street network and improve safety for drivers and pedestrians. Facilitates development currently
occurring in this part of the city and network performance overall.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($3,000,000) and the Arterial & Collector District ($2,000,000). A development payback district or
SID may be created to reimburse Arterial & Collector District for any local share (project related) costs that may be allocated to future
developments (estimated at $2,000,000).
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$2,000,000
FY21 FY22
41
CIP Project Fund
Arterial & Collector Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF114
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Fowler Connection (Huffine to Oak) - Construction*
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$3,750,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Complete the section of Fowler from Huffine to Oak
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Future developments which impact this intersection
area may not be allowed to proceed until improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this
element functioning as intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those
elements of the street network that are in place.
How is capacity affected by this project: Allows for extension of Fowler Avenue, which will directly increase capacity.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Extends an important north-south corridor on the west side of the city.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Conformance with the Transportation Master Plan are attained.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: A Payback District or SID may be created to leverage other
stakeholders.
Are there other affected projects: Intersection improvements on Fowler at Huffine, Babcock, Durston and Oak.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Wait for adjacent development to occur and construct the road incrementally.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Completes an important north-south link in the transportation network which reduces demand on other adjacent corridors.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($3,750,000) and the Arterial & Collector District ($3,750,000). A payback district may be created
to reimburse the Arterial & Collector District for any local improvements.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
42
CIP Project Fund
Arterial & Collector Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF115
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
College (11th to 19th) - Construction
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$550,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Complete College, from 19th to 11th, to a principal arterial standard.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Functionality of the network at large is dependent on
this element functioning as intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on
those elements of the street network that are in place.
How is capacity affected by this project: This project increases capacity directly by adding additional lanes, dedicated bike lanes
and sidewalks and by improving intersection LOS.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Connectivity already exists at this location, it is capacity which is being expanded.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: The Level of Service (LOS) Standard (BMC) and conformance with
the Transportation Master Plan are attained.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: Urban funds could be used on this section of College.
Are there other affected projects: Intersections of College/11th and College/8th.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Accept the current configuration
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
This project will expand the capacity of our street network and improve safety for drivers and pedestrians.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
None
FUNDING SOURCES
50% Street Impact Fees & 50% Arterial & Collector District.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
43
CIP Project Fund
Arterial & Collector Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF116
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Bridger Dr & Story Mill Rd (Intersection) - Construction
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$200,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Intersection design at Bridger and Story Mill
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Future developments which impact this intersection
area may not be allowed to proceed until improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this
element functioning as intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those
elements of the street network that are in place.
How is capacity affected by this project: Adding additional phases and improving geometry will increase capacity for deficient
movements at this intersection.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Connectivity already exists at this location, it is capacity which is being expanded.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Conformance with the Transportation Master Plan are attained.
Are there other affected projects: Story Mill, Griffin to Bridger Drive.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Accept the current LOS
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased capacity and safety at this intersection.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($800,000) and the Arterial & Collector District ($200,000).
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
44
CIP Project Fund
Arterial & Collector Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF117
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Story Mill (Griffin to Bridger) - Construction*
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Improve Story Mill from Griffin to Bridger
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Future developments which impact this intersection
area may not be allowed to proceed until improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this
element functioning as intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those
elements of the street network that are in place.
How is capacity affected by this project: This project directly increases capacity by adding additional travel lanes, dedicated bike
lanes and sidewalks.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Connectivity already exists at this location, it is capacity which is being expanded.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Conformance with the Transportation Master Plan are attained.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: A Payback District or SID may be created to leverage other
stakeholders.
Are there other affected projects: Intersection improvements to Story Mill and Bridger Drive.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Wait for adjacent development to occur and construct the road incrementally.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Improves an important north-south link in the transportation network which reduces demand on other adjacent corridors.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($225,000) and the Arterial & Collector District ($225,000). An Sid or payback district may be
created to recover the local share.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21
$225,000
FY22
45
CIP Project Fund
Arterial & Collector Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF118
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Babcock (11th Ave to 19th Ave) - Construction*
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Improve Babcock from 11th to 19th)
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Future developments which impact this intersection
area may not be allowed to proceed until improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this
element functioning as intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those
elements of the street network that are in place.
How is capacity affected by this project: This project increases capacity directly by adding additional lanes, dedicated bike lanes
and sidewalks.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Connectivity already exists at this location, it is capacity which is being
expanded. What regulations or standards are attained with this project:
Conformance with the Transportation Master Plan are attained.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: A Payback District or SID may be created to leverage other
stakeholders.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Wait for adjacent development to install the improvements section by section.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Allows for improvements to be made to the corridor at a time more favorable to the City
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($750,000) and the Arterial & Collector District ($750,000). An SID or payback district may be
created to pay for some local share improvements.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
$750,000
46
CIP Project Fund
Arterial & Collector Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF121
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Baxter & Davis (Intersection) - Construction
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Install a roundabout at Baxter & Davis
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Future developments in this area may not be allowed to
proceed until these improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this element functioning as
intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those elements of the street
network that are in place.
How is capacity affected by this project: This intersection is currently 4-way stop controlled. Replacing it with a roundabout will
greatly increase it's capacity.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Connectivity already exists at this location, it is capacity that is affected.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Conformance with the Transportation Master Plan and Level of
Service Standard is attained.
Are there other affected projects: Baxter Lane Corridor Improvements.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
This project will expand the capacity of our street network, improve safety for drivers and pedestrians and increase capacity at this
intersection. Facilitates development currently occurring in this part of the city and network performance overall.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($2,000,000) and the Arterial & Collector District ($500,000).
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$500,000
FY21 FY22
47
CIP Project Fund
Arterial & Collector Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF125
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
College (11th to 19th) - Design
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Design College, from 19th to 11th, to a principal arterial standard. Evaluate upgrading 11th to an Arterial Collector (from a local
street). Including adding bike lanes, pedestrian crossings and removing parking.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Functionality of the network at large is dependent on
this element functioning as intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on
those elements of the street network that are in place.
How is capacity affected by this project: This project increases capacity directly by adding additional lanes, dedicated bike lanes
and sidewalks and by improving intersection
LOS. How is connectivity affected by this
project: Connectivity already exists at this location, it is capacity which is being expanded.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: The Level of Service (LOS) Standard (BMC) and conformance with
the Transportation Master Plan are attained.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: Urban funds could be used on this section of College.
Are there other affected projects: Intersections of College/11th and College/8th.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Accept the current configuration
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
This project will expand the capacity of our street network and improve safety for drivers and pedestrians.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
50% Street Impact Fees & 50% Arterial & Collector District.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21
$100,000
FY22
48
CIP Project Fund
Arterial & Collector Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF134
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Oak (Cottonwood to Flanders Mill) - Construction
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$250,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project is the completion of the street segment of Oak St, from Cottonwood to Flanders Mill, to a five-lane urban principal
arterial standard.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Future developments in this area may not be allowed to
proceed until these improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this element functioning as
intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those elements of the street
network that are in place.
How is capacity affected by this project: This project increases capacity directly by constructing new segments of arterial roadway
and by adding additional lanes, dedicated bike lanes and sidewalks.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Completes an important east-west link between Ferguson and Cottonwood.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Conformance with the Transportation Master Plan is attained.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: A payback District or SID may be created to leverage other
stakeholders.
Are there other affected projects: Intersection improvements at Oak and Cottonwood, Oak and Flanders Mill, Oak and
Ferguson, Oak Street New Holland to Ferguson.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Construct segment by segment as adjacent parcels develop.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased capacity, connectivity and safety in this corridor, both for motorized vehicles as well as bicycles and pedestrians.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($1,300,000), Arterial & Collector District of $250,000 for the local share adjacent to the City
park, and an additional $250,000 from School District #7.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
49
50
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
In
s
p
e
c
t
i
o
n
Fu
n
d
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
Pl
a
n
Fi
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
Su
m
m
a
r
y
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Ye
a
r
FY
1
7
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
F
Y
2
0
F
Y
2
1
F
Y
2
2
U
n
s
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
d
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
Re
s
e
r
v
e
Ba
l
a
n
c
e
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
20
0
,
0
0
0
$
17
9
,
5
0
0
$
19
2
,
1
0
0
$
(4
,
0
2
4
)
$
9,
8
6
8
$
24,454 $
Pl
u
s
:
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
In
s
p
e
c
t
i
o
n
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
12
,
0
0
0
$
12
,
6
0
0
$
13
,
2
3
0
$
13
,
8
9
2
$
14
,
5
8
6
$
15,315 $ ‐$
Le
s
s
:
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
d
CI
P
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Co
s
t
s
(3
2
,
5
0
0
)
$
(2
0
9
,
3
5
4
)
$
(325,000)$
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Ye
a
r
‐En
d
Ca
s
h
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
17
9
,
5
0
0
$
19
2
,
1
0
0
$
(4
,
0
2
4
)
$
9,
8
6
8
$
24
,
4
5
4
$
39,769 $
As
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
s
Ma
d
e
fo
r
Re
v
e
n
u
e
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
s
:
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Ye
a
r
FY
1
7
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
F
Y
2
0
F
Y
2
1
F
Y
2
2
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
An
n
u
a
l
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
In
s
p
e
c
t
i
o
n
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
2,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2,
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2,
2
0
5
,
0
0
0
$
2,
3
1
5
,
2
5
0
$
2,431,013
$
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Gr
o
w
t
h
in
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
‐
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
2,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2,
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2,
2
0
5
,
0
0
0
$
2,
3
1
5
,
2
5
0
$
2,
4
3
1
,
0
1
3
$
2,552,563
$
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
%
0.
6
%
0.
6
%
0.
6
%
0
.
6
%
0
.
6
%
0
.
6
%
Pl
u
s
:
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
%
0.
0
%
0.
0
%
0.
0
%
0
.
0
%
0
.
0
%
0
.
0
%
To
t
a
l
% De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
0.
6
%
0.
6
%
0.
6
%
0
.
6
%
0
.
6
%
0
.
6
%
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
12
,
0
0
0
$
12
,
6
0
0
$
13
,
2
3
0
$
13
,
8
9
2
$
14
,
5
8
6
$
15,315
$
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
CU
R
R
E
N
T
35
0
,
0
0
0
30
0
,
0
0
0
25
0
,
0
0
0
20
0
,
0
0
0
15
0
,
0
0
0
10
0
,
0
0
0
50
,
0
0
0
0
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
In
s
p
e
c
t
i
o
n
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
& Eq
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
B
i
l
d
i
It
i
R
51
CI
P
PR
O
J
E
C
T
FU
PR
O
J
.
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
PR
O
J
E
C
T
NA
M
E
Unscheduled
FY
2
1
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
FY22
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
In
s
p
e
c
t
i
o
n
BI
0
1
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
IN
S
P
ST
A
F
F
VE
H
I
C
L
E
‐
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
S
$325,000
GF
1
9
9
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
IN
S
P
E
C
T
I
O
N
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
RE
C
O
N
F
I
G
U
R
A
T
I
O
N
‐
PH
A
S
E
2
$2
0
9
,
3
5
4
$2
0
9
,
3
5
4
$325,000
Su
m
m
a
r
y f or
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g In
s
p ec
t
i
o
n
(2 it
e
m
s
)
To
t
a
l
s
by
ye
a
r
:
$325,000
FY
2
1
FY22
FY
1
8
Unscheduled
FY
2
0
$2
0
9
,
3
5
4
FY
1
9
52
CIP Project Fund
Building Inspection
PROJECT NUMBER
BI01
DEPARTMENT
BUILDING INSPECTION
PROJECT NAME
STAFF VEHICLE - REPLACEMENTS
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$325,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This item is for the scheduled replacement of Building Inspection vehicles based on age and use of the vehicle. Vehicles will be
replaced according to the City's Vehicle Replacement policy; generally, 150,000 miles/20 years before replacement of non-
emergency vehicles. This program will address the long term vehicle needs of the Building Division by allowing careful replacement
of vehicles as vehicle conditions and department needs warrant. Right now, all vehicles are in use by Department staff, averaging
approximately 5,000 miles per year. Vehicle Mileage updated October 2015. There are no maintenance issues or significant
problems to report. We do regular maintenance and service all of our vehicles and always fix small stuff before it becomes a big
problem.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Utilize vehicles beyond the recommendations of the vehicle use policy; consider replacements of different model of vehicle.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Based on the age and use of the vehicle a new vehicle will be purchased as replacement. In the past, vehicles were replaced after 5 years. We
are stretching the useful life within the division to match the newly-revised vehicle purchase/replacement policy.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Generally, annual operating and maintenance costs are expected to decrease when older vehicles are replaced with newer ones. More fuel
efficiency and lower repair costs are financial benefits.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Building Inspection Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
53
CIP Project Fund
Building Inspection
PROJECT NUMBER
GF199
DEPARTMENT
BUILDING INSPECTION
PROJECT NAME
PROFESSIONAL BUILDING RECONFIGURATION - Phase 2
FY18 FY19
$209,354
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The City is responding to growth by adding staff to meet the increased demand for services in our community. We have also
reorganized divisions (Community Development) and created other divisions (Stormwater) to improve efficiency and better serve
our community. In order to accommodate this grow, we need to remodel the Stiff Building. In FY16 the City Commission
approved a Phase 1 of the remodel that will provide a better use of existing space by relocating certain functions to the basement
and reclaiming unused square footage. Approval of Phase II would allow the consolidation of Community Development (Planning
and Building) together on one floor and the consolidation of Public Works Services (Engineering, GIS and Stormwater) together
on another floor. This will allow better coordination of staff and better service to our public. Phase 1 is anticipated to be
completed late spring of 2016.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue to operate as we are today
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Community Development would be able to consolidate its operations and services to allow for an integrated customer-focused service delivery
model. It will also provide Public Works with the ability to collocate its services in the Stiff Building. Finally it will help the City to take a planned
and efficient approach to building utilization and service optimization.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
No additional operating costs anticipated for building reconfiguration.
FUNDING SOURCES
Building Inspection, Community Development, General Fund, Parking, Water
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
54
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Fu
n
d
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
Pl
a
n
Fi
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
Su
m
m
a
r
y
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Ye
a
r
FY
1
7
F
Y
1
8
F
Y
1
9
F
Y
2
0
F
Y
2
1
F
Y
2
2
U
n
s
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
d
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
Re
s
e
r
v
e
Ba
l
a
n
c
e
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
2
0
6
,
0
0
0
$
14
1
,
8
8
4
$
12
0
,
4
6
5
$
(9
1
,
5
9
8
)
$
(3
7
,
8
4
2
)
$
34
,
7
4
9
$
Pl
u
s
:
Lo
n
g
Ra
n
g
e
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
Re
s
t
r
i
c
t
e
d
Ca
s
h
58
,
9
4
8
$
Pl
u
s
:
Co
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
Ov
e
r
l
a
y
Re
s
t
r
i
c
t
e
d
Ca
s
h
53
,
7
0
2
$
Pl
u
s
:
En
t
r
y
w
a
y
Co
r
r
i
d
o
r
Re
s
t
r
i
c
t
e
d
Ca
s
h
19
,
6
8
7
$
Pl
u
s
:
Te
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y
Re
s
t
r
i
c
t
e
d
Ca
s
h
3,
5
4
7
$
Pl
u
s
:
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
‐
$
78
,
5
8
1
$
80
,
1
5
3
$
81
,
7
5
6
$
83
,
3
9
1
$
85
,
0
5
9
$
Pl
u
s
:
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
Fu
n
d
/
O
t
h
e
r
Co
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
Le
s
s
:
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
d
CI
P
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Co
s
t
s
(2
0
0
,
0
0
0
)
$
(1
0
0
,
0
0
0
)
$
(2
9
2
,
2
1
5
)
$
(2
8
,
0
0
0
)
$
(1
0
,
8
0
0
)
$
‐
$
‐$
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Ye
a
r
‐En
d
Ca
s
h
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
14
1
,
8
8
4
$
12
0
,
4
6
5
$
(9
1
,
5
9
8
)
$
(3
7
,
8
4
2
)
$
34
,
7
4
9
$
11
9
,
8
0
7
$
As
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
s
Ma
d
e
fo
r
Re
v
e
n
u
e
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
s
:
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Ye
a
r
FY
1
7
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
F
Y
2
0
F
Y
2
1
F
Y
2
2
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
An
n
u
a
l
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
1,
0
5
5
,
3
4
4
$
1,
0
5
5
,
3
4
4
$
1,
0
7
6
,
4
5
1
$
1,
0
9
7
,
9
8
0
$
1,
1
1
9
,
9
3
9
$
1,
1
4
2
,
3
3
8
$
(E
x
c
l
u
d
e
s
in
t
e
r
f
u
n
d
tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
)
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Gr
o
w
t
h
in
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
‐
2%
2%
2%
2%
2%
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
1,
0
5
5
,
3
4
4
$
1,
0
7
6
,
4
5
1
$
1,
0
9
7
,
9
8
0
$
1,
1
1
9
,
9
3
9
$
1,
1
4
2
,
3
3
8
$
1,
1
6
5
,
1
8
5
$
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
%
7.
3
%
7.
3
%
7
.
3
%
7
.
3
%
7
.
3
%
7
.
3
%
Pl
u
s
:
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
%
0.
0
%
0.
0
%
0
.
0
%
0
.
0
%
0
.
0
%
0
.
0
%
To
t
a
l
% De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
7.
3
%
7.
3
%
7
.
3
%
7
.
3
%
7
.
3
%
7
.
3
%
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
77
,
0
4
0
$
78
,
5
8
1
$
80
,
1
5
3
$
81
,
7
5
6
$
83
,
3
9
1
$
85
,
0
5
9
$
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
CU
R
R
E
N
T
35
0
,
0
0
0
30
0
,
0
0
0
25
0
,
0
0
0
20
0
,
0
0
0
15
0
,
0
0
0
10
0
,
0
0
0
50
,
0
0
0
0
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
&
Eq
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
55
CI
P
PR
O
J
E
C
T
FU
PR
O
J
.
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
PR
O
J
E
C
T
NA
M
E
Unscheduled
FY
2
1
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
FY22
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
CD
0
1
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
D
VE
H
I
C
L
E
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
$2
8
,
0
0
0
CD
0
2
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
PL
A
N
/
G
R
O
W
T
H
PO
L
I
C
Y
UP
D
A
T
E
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
CD
0
3
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
D
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
HA
R
D
W
A
R
E
$1
0
,
8
0
0
CD
0
5
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
D
CO
P
I
E
R
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
$3
5
,
0
0
0
GF
1
9
9
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
RE
C
O
N
F
I
G
U
R
A
T
I
O
N
‐
PH
A
S
E
2
$2
5
7
,
2
1
5
Su
m
m
a
r
y f or
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y De
v
e
l
o
p me
n
t
(5 it
e
m
s
)
To
t
a
l
s
by
ye
a
r
:
$1
0
,
8
0
0
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
FY
2
1
FY22
FY
1
8
Unscheduled
FY
2
0
$2
8
,
0
0
0
$2
9
2
,
2
1
5
FY
1
9
56
CIP Project Fund
Community Development
PROJECT NUMBER
CD01
DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT NAME
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Replacement of the current vehicle, a 2003 Honda CRV purchased in 2005 (asset # 3283). The vehicle is used by Planning Staff for
site visits to projects, posting notices on-site, in-town meetings, and driving to meetings or conferences within Montana and other
department activities (WL01-WL32) . Replacement would be with a fuel efficient medium size vehicle, possibly a hybrid.
Anticipated upcoming maintenance cost of approximately $1,000 for repairs to make dash lights operational. *Previous Year Plans,
this item was number: GF064
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue to operate the existing vehicles with increasing maintenance costs.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Provide functional transportation with reduced maintenance costs. Because of the age of the existing vehicle, maintenance costs are likely to
increase to keep it functional. Recent repairs include power windows and routine maintenance. The vehicle needs numerous minor repairs,
including dashboard lights, that continue to be deferred.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: No new costs are expected as maintenance is already performed on the existing vehicle. However,
maintenance and repair costs are anticipated to increase due to the age of the vehicle.
FUNDING SOURCES
Community Development Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$28,000
FY21 FY22
57
CIP Project Fund
Community Development
PROJECT NUMBER
CD02
DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT NAME
COMMUNITY PLAN/GROWTH POLICY UPDATE
FY18
$100,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This is the second-year of funding for the development of the Growth Policy (aka Community Plan). Previous plans have
projected forward based on primarily local population and land use data. However, the economy is very different today and
changes nationally and locally are happening quickly. We need a market analysis to look at what is under-served in Bozeman
commercially/industrially, where trends are headed nationwide, and how Bozeman fits into the larger trade area. Outlying
communities can now support their own services which used to be provided by Bozeman, e.g. medical care and shopping. Our
industrial lands are positioned to old economy infrastructure, e.g. rail. What kind of industry do we want (coordinate with Econ
Dev plan), what does it need for land and infrastructure, and where do we put it to support industry? Regardless of any other
action, access to land is a limiting factor. We need to begin to identify substantial expansion areas for industrial and commercial
spaces. There is a substantial change in demographics happening with rapid aging, deferred onset of household formation, and
smaller households. This is not matching well with the housing stock in the area. The myth of the rural west continues to hold on
even though most of the population of Gallatin County has been urbanized for over 20 years. The perception of Bozeman as a
“rich” place is directly countered by the high level of poverty. In order to allow for constructive conversations and allow elected
officials to make informed decisions, we need better insights on our population: is poverty based on students with low incomes,
retirees on fixed incomes, and/or working households with low wages? New policies should be based on current data and
projections for the future which will require extensive research and analysis. Another cost as part of the project will be continued
public engagement. Our best practices of the past have resulted in a very small percentage of the population participating in
decisions that will affect the future of the community. We plan to build on the public outreach for the Strategic Plan: and, we are
seeking funding to use programs such as mySidewalk/Mindmixer, On line City Hall, and/or Metroquest to allow electronic
participation in the process to reach out to a larger portion of the community and different segments of the community.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None. This update was directed by the City Commission during consideration of status of plan during FY 2015. In addition, Montana requires
that the plan be assessed every five years to determine the need for an update.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
This project, at this time, would be able to benefit from the upcoming Strategic Plan process the city is planning to undertake. By utilizing results
of public outreach, the growth policy update will take less time and cost less. In addition, the growth policy update will include the gathering and
analysis of data such as demographics, residential and commercial square footage absorption rates, job growth, and other economic and
demographic data that will support the development of the new Economic Development Plan.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Plan will be updated/re-evaluated in 5 years. Potential future costs that may be associated with implementation of policies incorporated within
the plan which in the past has included subarea plans or neighborhood plans.
FUNDING SOURCES
Community Development Restricted Cash Accounts, Community Development Fund, General Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
58
CIP Project Fund
Community Development
PROJECT NUMBER
CD03
DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT NAME
COMPUTER HARDWARE
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Replace computer hardware; replacements planned for years FY18 and FY20 did not meet the CIP capital threshold and will be
included in budget requests for those years.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Keeping computer hardware current diminishes the need for service calls and also facilitates the production of planning review by ensuring
computers are able to run effective updated software.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
IT support, software updates
FUNDING SOURCES
Community Development Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21
$10,800
FY22
59
CIP Project Fund
Community Development
PROJECT NUMBER
CD05
DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT NAME
Copier Replacement
FY18 FY19
$35,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Replace combination copier/scanner. This is an essential primary work tool for Community Development for production of staff
reports, intake of applications, and many other daily duties. The coper is shared with Public Works. The anticipated service life for
this type of equipment under the use conditions and loads is five years of less. Mechanical failure are becoming more common
with the existing machine.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
A lease may be an alternative. Experience with leasing has not been particularly positive. Efforts to continue with increasing maintenance may
extend service life some but there are associated costs financially and with lost productivity during breakdowns. Given the level of time sensitive
deadlines for the department substantial and frequent down times are not acceptable.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Enable departments to continue to produce and process applications and materials.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
No additional expenses are anticipated. Standard operating expenses are included in the annual budgets and are not anticipated to change
substantially.
FUNDING SOURCES
General fund, planning fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
60
CIP Project Fund
Community Development
PROJECT NUMBER
GF199
DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT NAME
PROFESSIONAL BUILDING RECONFIGURATION - Phase 2
FY18 FY19
$257,215
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The City is responding to growth by adding staff to meet the increased demand for services in our community. We have also
reorganized divisions (Community Development) and created other divisions (Stormwater) to improve efficiency and better serve
our community. In order to accommodate this grow, we need to remodel the Stiff Building. In FY16 the City Commission
approved a Phase 1 of the remodel that will provide a better use of existing space by relocating certain functions to the basement
and reclaiming unused square footage. Approval of Phase II would allow the consolidation of Community Development (Planning
and Building) together on one floor and the consolidation of Public Works Services (Engineering, GIS and Stormwater) together
on another floor. This will allow better coordination of staff and better service to our public. Phase 1 is anticipated to be
completed late spring of 2016.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue to operate as we are today
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Community Development would be able to consolidate its operations and services to allow for an integrated customer-focused service delivery
model. It will also provide Public Works with the ability to collocate its services in the Stiff Building. Finally it will help the City to take a planned
and efficient approach to building utilization and service optimization.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
No additional operating costs anticipated for building reconfiguration.
FUNDING SOURCES
Building Inspection, Community Development, General Fund, Parking, Water
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
61
62
Fi
r
e
Eq
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
& Ca
p
i
t
a
l
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
Pl
a
n
Fi
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
Su
m
m
a
r
y
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Ye
a
r
FY
1
7
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
F
Y
2
0
FY
2
1
FY22 Unscheduled
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
Re
s
e
r
v
e
Ba
l
a
n
c
e
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
67
5
,
7
0
0
$
1,
0
2
8
,
8
8
1
$
86
6
,
4
0
0
$
99
5
,
4
6
0
$
1,
1
3
2
,
1
0
0
$
1,526,474 $
Pl
u
s
:
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
Ta
x
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
4 Mi
l
l
s
35
3
,
1
8
1
$
36
8
,
0
1
9
$
37
9
,
0
6
0
$
38
6
,
6
4
1
$
39
4
,
3
7
4
$
402,261 $ ‐$
Pl
u
s
:
An
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
Gr
a
n
t
Re
v
e
n
u
e
‐
$
Le
s
s
:
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
d
CI
P
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Co
s
t
s
‐
$
(5
3
0
,
5
0
0
)
$
(2
5
0
,
0
0
0
)
$
(2
5
0
,
0
0
0
)
$
(2,660,500)$
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Ye
a
r
‐En
d
Ca
s
h
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
1,
0
2
8
,
8
8
1
$
86
6
,
4
0
0
$
99
5
,
4
6
0
$
1,
1
3
2
,
1
0
0
$
1,
5
2
6
,
4
7
4
$
1,928,735 $
As
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
s
Ma
d
e
fo
r
Re
v
e
n
u
e
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
s
:
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Ye
a
r
FY
1
7
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
FY
2
1
FY22
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
An
n
u
a
l
Ta
x
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
35
7
,
3
0
0
$
35
7
,
3
0
0
$
36
8
,
0
1
9
$
37
9
,
0
6
0
$
38
6
,
6
4
1
$
394,374 $
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
An
n
u
a
l
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
3%
3%
2%
2%
2%
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
35
7
,
3
0
0
$
36
8
,
0
1
9
$
37
9
,
0
6
0
$
38
6
,
6
4
1
$
39
4
,
3
7
4
$
402,261 $
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
%
10
0
.
0
%
10
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
10
0
.
0
%
100.0%
Pl
u
s
:
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
0.
0
%
0.
0
%
0.
0
%
0.
0
%
0.
0
%
0.0%
To
t
a
l
% De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
10
0
.
0
%
10
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
10
0
.
0
%
100.0%
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
35
7
,
3
0
0
$
36
8
,
0
1
9
$
37
9
,
0
6
0
$
38
6
,
6
4
1
$
39
4
,
3
7
4
$
402,261 $
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
3,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
2,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
2,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
1,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
1,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
50
0
,
0
0
0
0
Fi
r
e
Eq
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
& Ca
p
i
t
a
l
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
s
63
CI
P
PR
O
J
E
C
T
FU
PR
O
J
.
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
PR
O
J
E
C
T
NA
M
E
Unscheduled
FY
2
1
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
FY22
Fi
r
e
Eq
u
i
p
& Ca
p
i
t
a
l
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
FE
0
6
FI
R
E
RA
D
I
O
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
PR
O
G
R
A
M
$2
5
0
,
0
0
0
$2
5
0
,
0
0
0
FE
0
7
FI
R
E
LI
G
H
T
DU
T
Y
VE
H
I
C
L
E
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
S
$1
3
0
,
0
0
0
FE
0
8
FI
R
E
FI
R
E
ST
A
T
I
O
N
#1
RE
M
O
D
E
L
$2,400,000
FE
1
0
FI
R
E
SE
L
F
‐CO
N
T
A
I
N
E
D
BR
E
A
T
H
I
N
G
AP
P
A
R
A
T
U
S
(S
C
B
A
)
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
S
$4
0
0
,
5
0
0
FE
1
1
FI
R
E
BO
I
L
E
R
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
AT
FI
R
E
ST
A
T
I
O
N
#1
$260,500
Su
m
m
a
r
y f or
Fi
r
e
E q ui
p & Ca
p it
a
l
Re
p la
c
e
m
e
n
t
(5 it
e
m
s
)
To
t
a
l
s
by
ye
a
r
:
$5
3
0
,
5
0
0
$2,660,500
FY
2
1
FY22
FY
1
8
Unscheduled
FY
2
0
$2
5
0
,
0
0
0
$2
5
0
,
0
0
0
FY
1
9
64
CIP Project Fund
Fire Equip & Capital Replacement
PROJECT NUMBER
FE06
DEPARTMENT
FIRE
PROJECT NAME
Radio Replacement Program
FY18 FY19
$250,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This plan allows for aging fire portable radios to be replaced, including all of the software, programming and peripheral
accessories. This is a planned replacement of radios at the end of their predicted usable life, estimated between eight and ten
years. This will provide for seamless communication and response capabilities as the radios become less reliable and repair is no
longer a financially prudent option. Radios are an essential item in the operation of the Bozeman Fire Department. Fire radios
must be available for fire use 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. These radios are assigned to the three stations, all apparatus, and
management staff and are used daily. The decision was made during FY-17 CIP discussions to postpone scheduled replacements
of Fire Department radios due to uncertain plans of the Gallatin County 911 Center. Since this decision one year ago, a test was
conducted with Bozeman Fire and Bozeman Police Department. The test utilized an 800 MHz radio system to evaluate its use as
a potential upgrade from the current radio system. The results of the test were extremely positive, with noted improvements
related to in-building coverage and city wide coverage. Since the test, the 911 advisory board has voted to move forward with a
4 phase plan to upgrade the radio system in Gallatin County. Phase 1 would call for the City of Bozeman to move to an 800 MHz
digital trunked radio system.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
We still have the option of backing out of the 800 MHz system, however in doing so we would need to re-visit with 911 and the 911 Advisory
Board about other potential solutions for Bozeman Fire. If Bozeman Fire were to back out and Bozeman Police still move forward, we would
lose the ability to communicate effectively with each other, something that creates a major safety concern for both parties. In order to maintain
consistency in public safety operations, both departments should remain on the same radio system.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Clear and dependable communication allows for quick and efficient emergency deployment and the required level of firefighter safety. The
portable radio project addresses a planned replacement program that existed in the CIP prior to the decision to move to 800 MHz radios. The
purchase improves our ability to communicate within the city, particularly inside of larger buildings such as the high school, hospital, and big box
retailers. We potentially may see some trade in value or resale value for some of the replaced units depending on their condition.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
As these are replacement radios we anticipate very little increases operating costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Fire Equipment & Capital Replacement Fund - with possible reimbursement by Gallatin County 911 System.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$250,000
FY21 FY22
65
CIP Project Fund
Fire Equip & Capital Replacement
PROJECT NUMBER
FE07
DEPARTMENT
FIRE
PROJECT NAME
LIGHT DUTY VEHICLE REPLACEMENTS
FY18
$130,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
As of October 1, 2016 the Bozeman Fire Department has a fleet of light duty vehicles that consist of 9 total vehicles, 7 SUVs and
2 Pickups. The department currently has 8-day staff members who are assigned to these vehicles with the extra vehicle being
utilized as a fire investigation and plow vehicle used for plowing operations at Fire Station 3 / Gallatin County Dispatch. 4 vehicles
are for primary responders. Having mechanical issues or failures with these vehicles is unacceptable and creates gaps and failures
in the department’s response and operational procedures. 4 vehicles fall into the non-essential category. These members are
primarily day staff personnel. The Bozeman Fire Department is proposing to purchase two (2) new Ford Explorer Interceptors
and one (1) new 3/4-ton pickup truck in FY-18 at a total cost of $130,000. This purchase would allow us to ensure that all 4 of
our essential chief officer positions are in dependable and reliable vehicles and allow us to re-organize our remaining fleet for the
other 4 staff positions. In approximately 7 years (FY-2025) we believe it would be time to replace the 4 vehicles that are assigned
to our non-essential positions. At the same time our new FY-18 purchases, coupled with the Ford Explorer purchased in FY-16,
would be at the halfway point of their life span with an estimated 56,000 – 63,000 miles and we would look to push these vehicles
down to our non-essential positions and place our essential positions in new vehicles. This strategy allows for us to plan for a 14-
year service life for a fire department vehicle and keep our essential staff in reliable equipment. This is a plan that we have
modeled after our water department.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Could continue to utilize existing vehicles longer, however, many of these vehicles are emergency response vehicles for the Fire Department
and are not reliable for 24/7/365 use.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
The Department will have adequate, properly sized vehicles for emergency response and other operational functions. Leaves nothing
unscheduled and is a $110,000 reduction from last years CIP plan.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Newer vehicles are expected to be more fuel efficient and reliable for 24/7 response.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Fire Equipment & Capital Replacement Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
66
Fi
r
e
D
e
p ar
t
m
e
n
t
L
i
g ht
V
e
h
i
c
l
e
R
e
p la
c
e
m
e
n
t
s
As
s
e
t
#
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Ma
k
e
/
F
e
a
t
u
r
e
s
Mo
d
e
l
Yr
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Mi
l
e
a
g
e
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
FY21 Unscheduled FY22
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
l
y
As
s
i
g
n
e
d
to
Un
i
t
#
30
7
6
Ch
e
v
y
Su
r
b
u
r
b
a
n
20
0
2
14
6
,
2
0
9
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
wi
t
h
a 4x
4
,
SU
V
st
y
l
e
,
mi
d
‐
si
z
e
d
,
co
d
e
‐ca
p
a
b
l
e
(l
i
g
h
t
s
&
si
r
e
n
s
)
ve
h
i
c
l
e
.
$4
0
,
0
0
0
Fi
r
e
Ma
r
s
h
a
l
l
F3
32
4
7
Ch
e
v
y
Ta
h
o
e
20
0
4
14
0
,
4
6
4
4
x
4
,
SU
V
st
y
l
e
,
mi
d
‐si
z
e
d
ve
h
i
c
l
e
,
wi
t
h
em
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
li
g
h
t
i
n
g
,
ra
d
i
o
s
,
MD
T
.
Em
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
Ma
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
St
a
f
f
Ca
p
t
a
i
n
F4
27
6
4
Ch
e
v
y
Ta
h
o
e
20
0
0
13
0
,
6
6
8
4
x
4
,
SU
V
st
y
l
e
,
mi
d
‐si
z
e
d
ve
h
i
c
l
e
,
wi
t
h
em
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
li
g
h
t
i
n
g
,
ra
d
i
o
s
,
MD
T
.
$4
0
,
0
0
0
Op
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
Ch
i
e
f
F2
31
5
3
Ch
e
y
Su
b
u
r
b
a
n
20
0
3
10
9
,
9
9
4
T
o
be
re
p
l
a
c
e
d
wi
t
h
Fo
r
d
In
t
e
r
c
e
p
t
o
r
$5
0
,
0
0
0
Ba
t
a
l
l
i
o
n
Ch
i
e
f
BC
1
33
3
2
Ch
e
v
y
Ta
h
o
e
20
0
7
71
,
5
3
0
4
x
4
,
SU
V
st
y
l
e
,
mi
d
‐si
z
e
d
ve
h
i
c
l
e
,
wi
t
h
em
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
li
g
h
t
i
n
g
,
ra
d
i
o
s
,
MD
T
.
Fi
r
e
In
s
p
e
c
t
o
r
F6
33
6
3
Do
d
g
e
Du
r
a
n
g
o
20
0
7
44
,
4
0
2
Fi
r
e
In
s
p
e
c
t
o
r
F7
32
7
5
Fo
r
d
F1
5
0
20
0
5
41
,
9
5
0
Pl
o
w
i
n
g
/
F
i
r
e
In
v
e
s
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
s
/
P
r
e
v
e
nt
i
o
n
Tr
u
c
k
U4
31
5
8
Ch
e
v
y
Si
l
v
e
r
a
d
o
‐
Cr
e
w
Ca
b
20
0
3
32
,
9
7
9
Tr
a
i
n
i
n
g
Of
f
i
c
e
r
F5
15
3
5
Fo
r
d
Tr
u
c
k
19
9
3
17
,
9
7
9
Ha
z
m
a
t
B1
38
1
6
Fo
r
d
In
t
e
r
c
e
p
t
o
r
20
1
6
1,
5
2
4
Fi
r
e
Ch
i
e
f
F1
32
6
0
Tr
a
i
l
e
r
20
0
4
Ha
z
m
a
t
HM
T
$1
3
0
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
s
67
CIP Project Fund
Fire Equip & Capital Replacement
PROJECT NUMBER
FE08
DEPARTMENT
FIRE
PROJECT NAME
FIRE STATION #1 REMODEL
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$2,400,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The purpose of this project is to address the structural deficiencies identified in a 2012 study completed by Nishkian Monks, and
to expand and remodel the aging station. The remodel will increase the facility size and functionality and decrease maintenance
costs and increase energy efficiency. We need additional office space for our fire inspectors and Battalion Chiefs, along with
sleeping quarters for the Battalion Chief. We currently have common sleeping and restroom areas which does not allow for
privacy or separation for members of opposite gender. The station remodel will include sleeping quarters, bathrooms, and living
spaces for firefighters of either sex. All standard areas commonly found in modern stations will be included in this facility such as
kitchen space, office space and physical training area. The remodel of this station should completed in conjunction with the boiler
replacement as multiple walls will have to be opened up during the boiler replacement and replacement of aging windows and
doors would help the efficiency of the new boiler.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue with utilizing the existing station in its current condition. Cost of construction could be reduced via the use of some alternative
structural stabilization materials but these plans would need to be evaluated to ensure they meet the city design criteria. An assessment of
retrofitting and remodel cost should be weighed against new construction cost.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
This project would significantly improve the living conditions and operational functionality of the Station: It remedies the hazards identified in
Nishkian Monks study, decreases ongoing maintenance costs compared to the existing facility, new construction will be “green” and more
energy efficient, creates sleeping and office space for Battalion Chiefs and Fire Inspectors, separate and equal bath and sleeping facilities for
employees of both genders, on-site physical fitness area.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Operating cost should maintain similar to what is currently budgeted. Although the facility will be getting larger, a more energy efficient facility
will balance with the increase in size.
FUNDING SOURCES
Would be constructed concurrently with FE11 - Boiler Replacement at Fire Station #1. Total Cost, including Boiler, is $2.7 Million. Depending
on features of the project, the Fire Equipment & Capital Replacement, and potentially Impact Fees, could be used to pay for this project. The
department will seek grant money for this project again in FY-18 but this should not be considered a high probability as we did not qualify for
grant funding in FY-17.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
68
CIP Project Fund
Fire Equip & Capital Replacement
PROJECT NUMBER
FE10
DEPARTMENT
FIRE
PROJECT NAME
Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) Replacements
FY18
$400,500
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The fire department currently owns 35 self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) manufactured by Dragger and purchased in
2008. SCBA can be broken down into two distinct pieces, the actual breathing apparatus itself and the air cylinder. The
expected replacement cycle for SCBA apparatus is normally 10 to 12 years while the cylinders have a life span of 15 years. While
the current SCBA are still 2 years away from their expected end of service life there are a number of reasons for requesting to
replace these units ahead of schedule. We are seeing a reoccurring failure of what is known as the sentinel on the SCBA
apparatus. The sentinel is the electronic brain that runs everything on the SCBA, thus any problem with it requires the SCBA be
removed from service and sent out for repairs. Many of the sentinels are going bad for reasons that have not been determined
by Dragger. They are not being damaged by crews due to use or exposure. The average cost to ship an SCBA to the factory for
repair of a sentinel is $1500. We are requesting funds to purchase two high pressure air compressors for Fire Station 1 & 2,
giving us the ability to safely and efficiently fill high pressure SCBAs in the future.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
The current SCBAs could be used for another two years before reaching their expected end of service life. The downside to this is we will
need to incur the cost of hydrostatically testing the air cylinders in the upcoming budget cycle and will lose all potential resale value on the
existing units. If the decision is made to continue with the use of the current SCBA we would need to repair any units currently out of service.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Firefighters use SCBA’s to enter hazardous atmospheres in all aspects of their jobs; firefighting, confined space entry, and hazmat response. The
health and safety of our personnel, as well as the ability of our fire department to perform its function, is greatly dependent on these units. The
new SCBA units are safer than current units as they are certified for chemical, biological, and radiological emergencies.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
The department spends about $5,000 annually on SCBA maintenance. Yearly checks and certification is required regardless of SCBA age
although maintenance costs would decline with new units as replacement parts would not be needed.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Fire Equipment & Capital Replacement Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
69
CIP Project Fund
Fire Equip & Capital Replacement
PROJECT NUMBER
FE11
DEPARTMENT
FIRE
PROJECT NAME
BOILER REPLACEMENT AT FIRE STATION #1
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$260,500
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project is most ideally timed with the Station #1 Remodel in the Fire Equipment Capital Replacement Fund. The old steam
boiler at Fire Station #1 has reached the end of its useful cycle. The fact that the unit is no longer serving the old City Hall means
that is working even less efficient because it is now oversized. The condition of the system's pipes were found to be severely
corroded and in poor condition. An engineer was hired to size the boiler for servicing only Fire Station #1 and to assess other
features of the 1964 vintage system. Three options were proposed to upgrade the system for both building comfort and energy
efficiency, with two of those options being viable solutions. Option 3 proposed in the study, a variable refrigerant volume system,
is the most efficient and has the best payback and would be the best option for the newly remodeled fire station. This project
significantly effects building occupant comfort/quality (PM05) and potentially generates emergency and non-emergency repairs
(PM01-3). Costs are from the 2011 study and could be outdated. Further discussion about this replacement and the fire station 1
remodel need to occur in the next 12 months to fine tune this project.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Replacement of the current boiler with another steam boiler is an option but would require the opening of multiple walls throughout the
building to replace the older steam lines. Three options were reviewed and a summary report for each option was included in the analysis done
by the engineer, CTA Engineers. The project includes boiler replacement, distribution line replacement, and changing out the old pneumatic
controls with a digital control system. This information allows for proper sizing of the boiler. It’s best to replace the boiler as part of the
planned improvements for the building if the renovation is going to be done in the near future.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
The proposed option will better address the variable heating needs of the building – work areas, living areas, and fire bays. The proposed system
is designed for the current configuration of the building and could be supplemented to handle the additional square footage proposed when the
dorm area of the station is increased. The proposed system is in line with the Municipal Climate Action Plan. Planning for the replacement of the
current boiler prior to failure of the unit will be most cost effective.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
The recommended system would result in an approximate $9,000 per year in energy savings at current utility rates. The payback would be
about 28 years.
FUNDING SOURCES
Fire Equipment and Capital Replacement
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
70
Fi
r
e
Im
p
a
c
t
Fe
e
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
Pl
a
n
Fi
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
Su
m
m
a
r
y
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Ye
a
r
FY
1
7
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
F
Y
2
0
F
Y
2
1
F
Y
2
2
Unscheduled
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
Re
s
e
r
v
e
Ba
l
a
n
c
e
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
1,
2
5
9
,
6
0
1
$
1,
5
4
6
,
5
0
1
$
1,
8
5
8
,
7
5
1
$
2,
2
3
9
,
1
1
4
$
2,
6
3
8
,
4
9
4
$
3,057,844 $ ‐$
Pl
u
s
:
Im
p
a
c
t
Fe
e
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
31
1
,
9
0
0
$
36
2
,
2
5
0
$
38
0
,
3
6
3
$
39
9
,
3
8
1
$
419,350
$
440,317 $ ‐$
Pl
u
s
:
FI
F
0
7
En
g
i
n
e
#4
‐
Vo
t
e
r
Ap
p
r
o
v
e
d
Bo
n
d
Pl
u
s
:
FI
F
0
6
St
a
t
i
o
n
#4
‐
Vo
t
e
r
Ap
p
r
o
v
e
d
Bo
n
d
Le
s
s
:
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
d
CI
P
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Co
s
t
s
(2
5
,
0
0
0
)
$
(5
0
,
0
0
0
)
$
(4,600,000)$
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Ye
a
r
‐En
d
Ca
s
h
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
1,
5
4
6
,
5
0
1
$
1,
8
5
8
,
7
5
1
$
2,
2
3
9
,
1
1
4
$
2,
6
3
8
,
4
9
4
$
3,
0
5
7
,
8
4
4
$
3,498,161 $
As
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
s
Ma
d
e
fo
r
Re
v
e
n
u
e
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
s
:
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Ye
a
r
FY
1
7
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
F
Y
2
1
F
Y
2
2
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
An
n
u
a
l
Fi
r
e
Im
p
a
c
t
Fe
e
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
31
1
,
9
7
3
$
34
5
,
0
0
0
$
36
2
,
2
5
0
$
38
0
,
3
6
3
$
399,381
$
419,350 $
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
An
n
u
a
l
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
0.
0
%
5%
5%
5%
5%5%
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
31
1
,
9
7
3
$
36
2
,
2
5
0
$
38
0
,
3
6
3
$
39
9
,
3
8
1
$
419,350
$
440,317 $
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
%
10
0
.
0
%
10
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
Pl
u
s
:
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
Fi
r
e
Ca
p
a
c
i
t
y
Ex
p
a
n
s
i
o
n
CI
P
0.
0
%
0.
0
%
0.
0
%
0.
0
%
0
.
0
%
0.0%
To
t
a
l
% De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
10
0
.
0
%
10
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
31
1
,
9
7
3
$
36
2
,
2
5
0
$
38
0
,
3
6
3
$
39
9
,
3
8
1
$
419,350
$
440,317 $
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
5,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
4,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
4,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
3,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
3,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
2,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
2,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
1,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
1,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
50
0
,
0
0
0
0
Fi
r
e
Im
p
a
c
t
Fe
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
71
CI
P
PR
O
J
E
C
T
FU
PR
O
J
.
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
PR
O
J
E
C
T
NA
M
E
Unscheduled
FY
2
1
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
FY22
Im
p
a
c
t
Fe
e
s
Fi
r
e
FI
F
0
6
FI
R
E
IF
FI
R
E
ST
A
T
I
O
N
#4
$3,900,000
FI
F
0
7
FI
R
E
IF
FI
R
E
EN
G
I
N
E
,
ST
A
T
I
O
N
#4
$700,000
FI
F
0
8
FI
R
E
IF
IM
P
A
C
T
FE
E
ST
U
D
Y
‐
FI
R
E
$5
0
,
0
0
0
$5
0
,
0
0
0
$4,600,000
Su
m
m
a
r
y f or
Im
p ac
t
Fe
e
s
Fi
r
e
(3 it
e
m
s
)
To
t
a
l
s
by
ye
a
r
:
$5
0
,
0
0
0
$4,600,000
FY
2
1
FY22
FY
1
8
Unscheduled
FY
2
0
FY
1
9
72
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Fire
PROJECT NUMBER
FIF06
DEPARTMENT
FIRE IF
PROJECT NAME
FIRE STATION #4
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$3,900,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project was identified as a priority in the adopted 2006 Fire Protection Master Plan but should be better defined in the 2017
update as the city has changed a lot since 2006. While we won’t have the updates to the master plan for another 6-8 months we
anticipate that it will recommend a fourth fire station in the next 5 years thus we are scheduling this in FY-22 for planning
purposes. Once we have the Master Plan update back this section will need to be re-addressed before making additional plans.
Portions of the City are located such that our response time exceeds four to six minutes for fire and medical emergencies. Land
acquisition costs are not included in the proposed budget number. While the City currently owns the site on the southwest
corner of 19th Avenue and Graf Street, which was identified as an ideal site for a station in 2006, that is subject to change with
the 2016 Master Plan update.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
The budget number associated with this project is the same as the cost of Fire Station 3. A smaller station may be an option for this project and
looking at building in areas where the city currently owns property could also reduce the cost of construction. Delaying the building of the
station is an option but would require an understanding that some areas are going to be subject to longer than normal response times. Other
options to be evaluated from 2017 Fire Protection Master Plan.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
The completion of this project would enhance our ability to respond to growing parts of the community within a time frame that has been
historically acceptable to the citizens of Bozeman. The additional station also has the potential to have a positive impact on our ISO rating and
encourage additional growth in areas of the city.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating & Maintenance Costs: Impact Fees can not be spent on operations and maintenance costs. The City’s General Fund will bear
the annual operating and maintenance expenses associated with this facility, estimated at $1,600,000, including all crew personnel.
FUNDING SOURCES
75% Fire Impact Fees ($2,925,000), 25% Voter Approved Bond ($975,000.)
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
73
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Fire
PROJECT NUMBER
FIF07
DEPARTMENT
FIRE IF
PROJECT NAME
FIRE ENGINE, STATION #4
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$700,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project is the purchase of an engine and accompanying equipment for use out of new Fire Station 4. It will be necessary to
have this engine at the Station when it opens. There is an estimated 12 month lead time in delivery of this type of equipment, thus
this would need to be ordered a year before the opening of Fire Station 4. This estimated cost is for the apparatus and the
majority of the equipment needed for service delivery.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
It may be valuable for ISO purposes to evaluate the purchase of a quint apparatus which is a Fire Engine with a ladder mounted on it that is
smaller than Ladder 1. We also could use the 2006 Pierce reserve engine at Station 4. This would leave city with only one reserve fire engine
to cover for 4 front line apparatus, a 1989 Pierce. The 2006 Pierce could require updates to make the apparatus serviceable as front line
apparatus, but it is already 11 years into its current service life. There is also the option to purchase a used piece of apparatus.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Purchase of this unit will adequately equip Station #4 for fire and other emergency responses.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating & Maintenance Costs: Impact Fees can not be used for annual operating and maintenance costs. The City’s General Fund will
pay for the increased fuel, maintenance and insurance costs associated with this engine, estimated at $30,000 per year.
FUNDING SOURCES
75% Fire Impact Fees ($525,000), 25% Voter Approved Bond ($175,000).
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
74
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Fire
PROJECT NUMBER
FIF08
DEPARTMENT
FIRE IF
PROJECT NAME
IMPACT FEE STUDY - FIRE
FY18
$50,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
An update of our current Fire Impact Fee calculation should be completed. It will be most helpful to have this done after we make
an update to our Fire Service Master Plan, which is expected to take place in FY17.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None. Statute requires an update to this calculation.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Compliance with state law; accuracy in the amount of fee being charged.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
None.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Fire Impact Fees
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
75
76
Tr
e
e
Ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
Fu
n
d
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
Pl
a
n
Fi
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
Su
m
m
a
r
y
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Ye
a
r
FY
1
7
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
F
Y
2
0
F
Y
2
1
F
Y
2
2
UNSCHEDULED
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
Re
s
e
r
v
e
Ba
l
a
n
c
e
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
15
9
,
0
0
0
$
50
,
6
6
3
$
29
,
5
6
8
$
(3
0
,
1
0
1
)
$
(3,161)
$
61,578 $ ‐$
Pl
u
s
:
Tr
e
e
Mt
c
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
26
,
6
6
3
$
35
,
9
0
6
$
45
,
3
3
1
$
54
,
9
4
1
$
64,739
$
74,727 $ ‐$
Le
s
s
:
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
d
CI
P
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Co
s
t
s
(1
3
5
,
0
0
0
)
$
(5
7
,
0
0
0
)
$
(1
0
5
,
0
0
0
)
$
(2
8
,
0
0
0
)
$
‐$ (210,000)$
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Ye
a
r
‐En
d
Ca
s
h
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
50
,
6
6
3
$
29
,
5
6
8
$
(3
0
,
1
0
1
)
$
(3
,
1
6
1
)
$
61,578
$
136,305 $ (210,000)$
As
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
s
Ma
d
e
fo
r
Re
v
e
n
u
e
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
s
:
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Ye
a
r
FY
1
7
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
F
Y
2
0
F
Y
2
1
F
Y
2
2
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
An
n
u
a
l
Tr
e
e
Mt
c
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
59
2
,
5
0
0
$
59
2
,
5
0
0
$
59
8
,
4
2
5
$
60
4
,
4
0
9
$
610,453
$
616,558 $
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
An
n
u
a
l
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
‐
At
t
r
i
b
u
t
e
d
to
An
n
e
x
a
t
i
o
n
s
1%
1%
1%
1%1%
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
59
2
,
5
0
0
$
59
8
,
4
2
5
$
60
4
,
4
0
9
$
61
0
,
4
5
3
$
616,558
$
622,723 $
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
%
3.
2
%
4.
5
%
6.
0
%
7
.
5
%
9
.
0
%
1
0
.
5
%
Pl
u
s
:
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
1.
3
%
1.
5
%
1.
5
%
1
.
5
%
1
.
5
%
1
.
5
%
To
t
a
l
% De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
4.
5
%
6.
0
%
7.
5
%
9
.
0
%
1
0
.
5
%
1
2
.
0
%
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
26
,
6
6
3
$
35
,
9
0
6
$
45
,
3
3
1
$
54
,
9
4
1
$
64,739
$
74,727 $
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
CU
R
R
E
N
T
25
0
,
0
0
0
20
0
,
0
0
0
15
0
,
0
0
0
10
0
,
0
0
0
50
,
0
0
0
0
Tr
e
e
Ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
& Eq
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
77
CI
P
PR
O
J
E
C
T
FU
PR
O
J
.
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
PR
O
J
E
C
T
NA
M
E
Unscheduled
FY
2
1
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
FY22
Tr
e
e
Ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
FO
R
0
7
FO
R
E
S
T
R
Y
FO
R
E
S
T
R
Y
VE
H
I
C
L
E
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
S
$2
8
,
0
0
0
FO
R
1
0
FO
R
E
S
T
R
Y
ST
U
M
P
GR
I
N
D
E
R
$2
4
,
0
0
0
FO
R
1
1
FO
R
E
S
T
R
Y
LO
G
LO
A
D
E
R
& TR
U
C
K
$1
0
5
,
0
0
0
FO
R
1
2
FO
R
E
S
T
R
Y
VE
H
I
C
L
E
FO
R
FO
R
E
S
T
R
Y
SU
P
E
R
I
N
T
E
N
D
E
N
T
$3
3
,
0
0
0
FO
R
1
3
FO
R
E
S
T
R
Y
AE
R
I
A
L
LI
F
T
/ BU
C
K
L
E
T
TR
U
C
K
$210,000
$5
7
,
0
0
0
$1
0
5
,
0
0
0
$2
8
,
0
0
0
$210,000
Su
m
m
a
r
y f or
Tr
e
e
Ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
(5 it
e
m
s
)
To
t
a
l
s
by
ye
a
r
:
$5
7
,
0
0
0
$210,000
FY
2
1
FY22
FY
1
8
Unscheduled
FY
2
0
$2
8
,
0
0
0
$1
0
5
,
0
0
0
FY
1
9
78
CIP Project Fund
Tree Maintenance District
PROJECT NUMBER
FOR07
DEPARTMENT
FORESTRY
PROJECT NAME
Forestry Vehicle Replacements
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This is a request to replace a 1999 Ford 1/2 ton pickup truck. #2728 has 95,000 miles and the clutch needs replacement.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue to use and repair existing vehicle. As directed by Commission.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Replacing this pickup will provide the Forestry division with more reliable truck, improve safety, lower exhaust emissions, tow trailers with its
tow package, and work as needed.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Operating costs (maintenance and fuel/oil) of a newer vehicle are expected to be lower.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Tree Maintenance District Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$28,000
FY21 FY22
79
CIP Project Fund
Tree Maintenance District
PROJECT NUMBER
FOR10
DEPARTMENT
FORESTRY
PROJECT NAME
STUMP GRINDER
FY18
$24,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This is a request to replace a 1996 Vermeer stump grinder. This would be a scheduled replacement of an department forestry
equipment that is nearing 20 years of age. Forestry needs a larger, and more modern stump grinder. Additional info: #2671 –
1996 Vermeer 630B Stump Grinder
350 Hours Replace All Wiring Replace Cutter Belts
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue to use existing equipment. As directed by Commission.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Replacing this equipment will provide the Forestry division with an larger and more reliable piece of equipment. Also it will improve
productivity and will be safer for the operator. Trade in on new purchase or put in public auction.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Normal maintenance and upkeep.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Tree Maintenance District Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
80
CIP Project Fund
Tree Maintenance District
PROJECT NUMBER
FOR11
DEPARTMENT
FORESTRY
PROJECT NAME
LOG LOADER & TRUCK
FY18 FY19
$105,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This a request to replace a 2001 Ford F650. Forestry is moving up an unscheduled request to FY19. This piece of Forestry
equipment is both unsafe and impractical. Additional info: #3125 – 2001 Ford F650, National Crane N50, Palift Hydraulic Dump,
10,000 miles/1100 hours. Hydroboost Brake System Repairs, Leaky Rear Seals, transmission slip, GVWR 26000 Max – 24500 lbs.
empty. Not True Forestry style Equipment.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue to use existing vehicle. As directed by Commission.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Replacing this Forestry equipment will provide better production and improved safety to the operator. This truck and crane was pieced
together and is over its safe gvwr nearly empty. Replace for a true urban Forestry log and brush loader. Trade in or public auction the whole
thing. No other City department can use it or any part of it.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Tree Maintenance District Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
81
CIP Project Fund
Tree Maintenance District
PROJECT NUMBER
FOR12
DEPARTMENT
FORESTRY
PROJECT NAME
Vehicle for Forestry Superintendent
FY18
$33,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
½ Ton pickup or suv for the Forestry superintendent. New position added in FY17 in support of the Urban Forestry
Management Plan.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Lease or purchase Toyota Prius hybrid
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
As described in the Urban Forestry Plan.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Normal maintenance and upkeep.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Tree Maintenance District
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
82
CIP Project Fund
Tree Maintenance District
PROJECT NUMBER
FOR13
DEPARTMENT
FORESTRY
PROJECT NAME
Aerial Lift / Bucket Truck
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$210,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Replace 2001 #3069 C7500 HI-Ranger bucket truck. This Forestry equipment is nearing its 20 year anniversary. 11,000
miles/4,000 hours. This truck has been the main workhorse for the division and is showing its wear. Replacement would give us a
modern truck with a higher working height and new safety items.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue to use existing vehicle. As directed by the commission.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Replacement of this equipment provides the division with a more reliable bucket truck. Improves operator safety, lowers exhaust emissions, and
gives us the overall working height we need for the City's largest trees. Sell by public auction the existing bucket truck.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Tree Maintenance District Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
83
84
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
Fu
n
d
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
Pl
a
n
Fi
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
Su
m
m
a
r
y
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Ye
a
r
FY
1
7
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
F
Y
2
0
F
Y
2
1
F
Y
2
2
Unscheduled
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
Ba
l
a
n
c
e
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
75
0
,
7
6
0
$
‐
$
29
2
,
0
7
1
$
45
,
8
8
3
$
(8
,
6
9
8
)
$
38
5
,
6
3
1
$
Plu
s
:
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
Fu
n
d
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
87
2
,
8
2
1
$
1,
0
2
6
,
1
7
2
$
1,1
8
2
,
5
0
4
$
1,
1
9
4
,
3
2
9
$
1,2
0
6
,
2
7
2
$
‐$
Plu
s
:
Ad
d
e
d
Mi
l
l
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
GF
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
:
2 Mi
l
l
s
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$
Plu
s
:
50
%
of
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
Fu
n
d
Ca
s
h
Ca
r
r
y
o
v
e
r
(e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
)
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$
Plu
s
:
GF
2
3
1
‐
Ce
m
.
Ir
r
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
‐
Re
s
e
r
v
e
Us
e
d
fo
r
Gr
a
n
t
Ma
t
c
h
20
0
,
0
0
0
$
20
0
,
0
0
0
$
Plu
s
:
GF
2
8
2
‐
Pu
r
c
h
a
s
e
of
Pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
Ad
j
a
c
e
n
t
to
Ci
t
y
Ha
l
l
,
Re
s
e
r
v
e
Us
e
d
56
0
,
0
0
0
$
Plu
s
:
GF
2
8
6
‐
Ve
t
e
r
a
n
s
Ce
m
e
t
e
r
y
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
‐
Re
s
e
r
v
e
Us
e
d
88
,
0
0
0
$
40
,
0
0
0
$
45
,
0
0
0
$
Plu
s
:
GF
2
7
5
‐
Fi
b
e
r
Op
t
i
c
Co
n
d
u
i
t
,
Mi
l
l
Le
v
y
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
(~
0
.
3
mi
l
l
s
)
25
,
0
0
0
$
25
,
0
0
0
$
25
,
0
0
0
$
25
,
0
0
0
$
25,00 0
$
Plu
s
:
GF
2
8
0
‐
St
o
r
y
Ma
n
s
i
o
n
Se
w
e
r
Re
p
a
i
r
,
fr
o
m
St
o
r
y
Ma
n
s
i
o
n
Fu
n
d
18
,
0
0
0
$
Plu
s
:
GF
0
5
2
‐
Po
l
i
c
e
No
n
‐Pa
t
r
o
l
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
,
fr
o
m
Do
n
a
t
i
o
n
18
,
0
0
0
$
Plu
s
:
Bo
n
d
Is
s
u
e
:
In
d
o
o
r
/
O
u
t
d
o
o
r
Aq
u
a
t
i
c
s
Fa
c
i
l
i
t
y
16
,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
Plu
s
:
Sw
i
m
Ce
n
t
e
r
/
B
o
g
e
r
t
Bo
n
d
Is
s
u
e
(w
i
t
h
Aq
u
a
t
i
c
s
Fa
c
i
l
i
t
y
qu
e
s
t
i
o
n
)
1,
4
0
2
,
0
0
0
$
Plu
s
:
In
t
e
r
c
a
p
Lo
a
n
‐
GF
2
6
6
St
o
r
y
Mi
l
l
Pa
r
k
Ce
n
t
e
r
Im
p
s
.
18
8
,
5
0
0
$
Plu
s
:
In
t
e
r
c
a
p
Lo
a
n
‐
GF
2
0
6
,
GF
2
5
4
Br
o
n
k
e
n
& Ro
s
e
Pa
r
k
Im
p
s
.
37
5
,
2
4
6
$
Plu
s
:
In
t
e
r
c
a
p
Lo
a
n
‐
GF
2
6
0
,
GF
2
6
1
Sp
o
r
t
s
Co
m
p
l
e
x
Im
p
s
.
43
1
,
5
0
0
$
Plu
s
:
GF
2
5
7
‐
Do
n
a
t
i
o
n
fr
o
m
Ba
r
a
c
u
d
a
Sw
i
m
Te
a
m
50
,
0
0
0
$
Le
s
s
:
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
d
CI
P
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Co
s
t
s
(8
0
0
,
7
6
0
)
$
(1
,
9
6
5
,
4
9
6
)
$
(2
,
0
1
6
,
8
6
0
)
$
(1
,
3
0
2
,
0
8
5
)
$
(8
7
0
,
0
0
0
)
$
(1
8
,
9
2
3
,
7
0
0
)
$
(10,320,183)$
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Ye
a
r
‐En
d
Ca
s
h
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
‐
$
29
2
,
0
7
1
$
45
,
8
8
3
$
(8
,
6
9
8
)
$
38
5
,
6
3
1
$
59
5
,
2
0
3
$
As
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
s
Ma
d
e
fo
r
Re
v
e
n
u
e
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
s
:
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
FY
2
1
FY
2
2
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
An
n
u
a
l
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
Fu
n
d
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
28
,
3
5
4
,
7
4
6
$
28
,
3
5
4
,
7
4
6
$
28
,
6
3
8
,
2
9
3
$
28
,
9
2
4
,
6
7
6
$
29
,
2
1
3
,
9
2
3
$
29
,
5
0
6
,
0
6
2
$
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Gr
o
w
t
h
in
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
Fu
n
d
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
Fu
n
d
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
28
,
3
5
4
,
7
4
6
$
28
,
6
3
8
,
2
9
3
$
28
,
9
2
4
,
6
7
6
$
29
,
2
1
3
,
9
2
3
$
29
,
5
0
6
,
0
6
2
$
29
,
8
0
1
,
1
2
3
$
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
%
2.
6
%
2.
6
%
3.
0
%
3.
5
%
4.
0
%
4.0 %
Pl
u
s
:
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
%
0.
4
%
0.
5
%
0.
5
%
0.
0
%
0.0%
To
t
a
l
% De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
3.
0
%
3.
5
%
4.
0
%
4.
0
%
4.0%
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
87
2
,
8
2
1
$
1,
0
2
6
,
1
7
2
$
1,1
8
2
,
5
0
4
$
1,
1
9
4
,
3
2
9
$
1,2
0
6
,
2
7
2
$
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
CU
R
R
E
N
T
20
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
18
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
16
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
14
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
12
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
10
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
8,0
0
0
,
0
0
0
6,0
0
0
,
0
0
0
4,0
0
0
,
0
0
0
2,0
0
0
,
0
0
0
0
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
Fu
n
d
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
& Eq
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
85
PR
O
J
.
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
PR
O
J
E
C
T
NA
M
E
FY
1
8
Unscheduled FY22
RA
T
I
N
G
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
FY21
CI
P
PR
O
J
E
C
T
FU
N
D
:
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
Fu
n
d
So
r
t
e
d
by
De
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
an
d
Ra
t
i
n
g
GF
2
3
1
CE
M
E
T
E
R
Y
CE
M
E
T
E
R
Y
IR
R
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
PR
O
J
E
C
T
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
44
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
GF
0
8
3
CE
M
E
T
E
R
Y
BA
C
K
H
O
E
42
$1
1
0
,
0
0
0
GF
1
1
6
CE
M
E
T
E
R
Y
CE
M
E
T
E
R
Y
VE
H
I
C
L
E
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
S
34
$4
5
,
0
0
0
GF
2
6
8
CE
M
E
T
E
R
Y
SO
U
T
H
W
E
S
T
MO
N
T
A
N
A
VE
T
E
R
A
N
'
S
CE
M
E
T
E
R
Y
$360,000
34
$8
8
,
0
0
0
$4
0
,
0
0
0
$4
5
,
0
0
0
GF
2
5
2
CE
M
E
T
E
R
Y
CE
M
E
T
E
R
Y
CO
L
U
M
B
A
R
I
U
M
$5
0
,
0
0
0
32
$5
5
,
0
0
0
GF
0
1
0
CE
M
E
T
E
R
Y
CE
M
E
T
E
R
Y
MO
W
E
R
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
S
$1
6
,
0
0
0
25
$1
6
,
0
0
0
$1
6
,
0
0
0
GF
2
7
5
EC
O
N
O
M
I
C
DE
V
E
FI
B
E
R
OP
T
I
C
CO
N
D
U
I
T
AN
D
VA
U
L
T
S
$25,000
$2
5
,
0
0
0
$25,000
29
$2
5
,
0
0
0
$2
5
,
0
0
0
$2
5
,
0
0
0
GF
2
4
5
FA
C
I
L
I
T
Y
‐
CH
EN
E
R
G
Y
PR
O
J
E
C
T
S
– CI
T
Y
HA
L
L
43
$7
5
,
0
0
0
GF
1
0
3
FA
C
I
L
I
T
Y
‐
CH
AM
E
R
I
C
A
N
'
S
WI
T
H
DI
S
A
B
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
AC
T
(A
D
A
)
CO
M
P
L
I
A
N
C
E
IM
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
$10,000
$1
0
,
0
0
0
42
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
GF
2
7
2
FA
C
I
L
I
T
Y
‐
CH
SI
T
E
SE
C
U
R
I
T
Y
UP
G
R
A
D
E
‐
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
LO
C
K
S
$1
5
,
0
0
0
37
$1
5
,
0
0
0
$1
5
,
0
0
0
$1
5
,
0
0
0
GF
2
4
1
FA
C
I
L
I
T
Y
‐
CH
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
OF
CI
T
Y
HA
L
L
AC
CO
N
D
E
N
S
I
N
G
UN
I
T
–
RO
O
F
TO
P
36
$5
0
,
0
0
0
GF
2
7
4
FA
C
I
L
I
T
Y
‐
CH
CI
T
Y
HA
L
L
‐
BO
Z
E
M
A
N
CR
E
E
K
BR
I
D
G
E
IM
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
$2
5
,
0
0
0
35
GF
2
1
9
FA
C
I
L
I
T
Y
‐
CH
AD
D
I
T
I
O
N
TO
CI
T
Y
HA
L
L
,
CO
N
S
O
L
I
D
A
T
I
O
N
OF
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$5,500,000
28
GF
2
7
1
FA
C
I
L
I
T
Y
‐
CH
CI
T
Y
HA
L
L
NE
W
PA
R
K
I
N
G
LO
T
$250,000
23
GF
2
7
3
FA
C
I
L
I
T
Y
‐
PR
O
F
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
‐
EL
E
C
T
R
I
C
A
L
UP
G
R
A
D
E
$7
5
,
0
0
0
50
GF
0
0
1
FA
C
I
L
I
T
Y
‐
PR
O
F
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
EL
E
V
A
T
O
R
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
$66,600
33
GF
1
9
9
FA
C
I
L
I
T
Y
‐
PR
O
F
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
RE
C
O
N
F
I
G
U
R
A
T
I
O
N
‐
PH
A
S
E
2
27
$3
5
,
7
7
9
GF
1
5
7
FA
C
I
L
I
T
Y
‐
SC
SE
N
I
O
R
CE
N
T
E
R
EL
E
V
A
T
O
R
$68,000
37
GF
2
0
3
FA
C
I
L
I
T
Y
‐
SC
BO
Z
E
M
A
N
SE
N
I
O
R
SO
C
I
A
L
CE
N
T
E
R
EX
T
E
R
I
O
R
EN
V
E
L
O
P
E
IM
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
.
$6
4
,
7
5
0
32
PW
0
1
‐
S
FA
C
I
L
I
T
Y
‐
SH
SH
O
P
S
FA
C
I
L
I
T
Y
EX
P
A
N
S
I
O
N
PL
A
N
38
$1
0
,
0
0
0
86
PR
O
J
.
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
PR
O
J
E
C
T
NA
M
E
FY
1
8
Unscheduled FY22
RA
T
I
N
G
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
FY21
GF
2
8
2
FA
C
I
L
I
T
Y
‐CH
PU
R
C
H
A
S
E
OF
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
AD
J
A
C
E
N
T
TO
CI
T
Y
HA
L
L
$5
6
0
,
0
0
0
21
GF
2
2
7
FI
N
A
N
C
E
ER
P
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
/ UP
G
R
A
D
E
"S
U
N
G
A
R
D
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
/ UP
G
R
A
D
E
"
$333,333
50
GF
2
2
4
FI
N
A
N
C
E
SU
N
G
A
R
D
AN
A
L
Y
T
I
C
S
NO
W
CO
G
N
O
S
BI
(B
U
S
I
N
E
S
S
IN
T
E
L
L
I
G
E
N
C
E
)
WE
B
‐BA
S
E
D
RE
P
O
R
T
I
N
G
SU
I
T
E
37
$3
4
,
3
4
0
GF
0
8
0
I.
T
.
RE
M
O
T
E
CL
O
S
E
T
SW
I
T
C
H
E
S
,
RO
U
T
E
R
AN
D
WI
R
E
L
E
S
S
AP
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
$40,000
$4
0
,
0
0
0
50
$4
0
,
0
0
0
$4
0
,
0
0
0
$4
0
,
0
0
0
GF
2
6
5
I.
T
.
GE
N
E
R
A
L
FU
N
D
SE
R
V
E
R
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
50
$4
0
,
0
0
0
$3
6
,
0
0
0
GF
1
9
6
I.
T
.
RO
O
F
T
O
P
CO
O
L
I
N
G
UN
I
T
FO
R
TH
E
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
DA
T
A
CE
N
T
E
R
$20,000
47
GF
2
2
9
I.
T
.
IS
C
S
I
ST
O
R
A
G
E
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
47
$4
0
,
0
0
0
GF
0
6
2
I.
T
.
PE
R
S
O
N
A
L
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
(P
C
)
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
$50,000
$4
3
,
0
0
0
45
$4
8
,
0
0
0
$5
5
,
0
0
0
$5
7
,
0
0
0
GF
2
3
3
I.
T
.
VE
H
I
C
L
E
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
$99,000
38
GF
2
6
3
I.
T
.
PO
L
I
C
E
VI
D
E
O
EV
I
D
E
N
C
E
ST
O
R
A
G
E
AN
D
BA
C
K
U
P
$40,000
$5
0
,
0
0
0
32
GF
1
9
9
I.
T
.
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
RE
C
O
N
F
I
G
U
R
A
T
I
O
N
‐
PH
A
S
E
2
27
$1
3
1
,
5
8
1
GF
1
1
5
PA
R
K
S
PA
R
K
VE
H
I
C
L
E
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
S
$105,000
63
$4
5
,
0
0
0
$3
0
,
0
0
0
GF
2
6
0
PA
R
K
S
SP
O
R
T
S
CO
M
P
L
E
X
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
OF
'P
R
O
J
E
C
T
RE
L
A
T
E
D
'
CO
T
T
O
N
W
O
O
D
RO
A
D
AR
E
A
WA
T
E
R
&
WA
S
T
E
W
A
T
E
R
IM
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
45
$3
6
4
,
0
0
0
GF
2
6
1
PA
R
K
S
SP
O
R
T
S
CO
M
P
L
E
X
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
OF
'P
R
O
J
E
C
T
RE
L
A
T
E
D
'
OA
K
ST
R
E
E
T
AR
E
A
WA
T
E
R
IM
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
45
$6
7
,
5
0
0
GF
0
3
4
PA
R
K
S
LA
R
G
E
DE
C
K
MO
W
E
R
$58,000
43
$9
0
,
0
0
0
$5
8
,
0
0
0
GF
2
7
8
PA
R
K
S
GR
I
F
F
I
N
AT
ST
O
R
Y
MI
L
L
PA
R
K
RO
A
D
IM
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
‐
.2
6
MI
L
E
$260,000
42
GF
2
7
9
PA
R
K
S
ST
O
R
Y
MI
L
L
RO
A
D
IM
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
‐
.1
7
MI
L
E
$170,000
42
GF
2
8
0
PA
R
K
S
ST
O
R
Y
MA
N
S
I
O
N
SE
W
E
R
RE
P
A
I
R
$1
8
,
0
0
0
42
GF
2
8
1
PA
R
K
S
BO
Z
E
M
A
N
PO
N
D
PA
R
K
& AA
S
H
E
I
M
BA
L
L
F
I
E
L
D
S
RO
A
D
EX
P
A
N
S
I
O
N
‐
.1
7
MI
L
E
& .0
9
MI
L
E
$260,000
42
GF
2
5
4
PA
R
K
S
25
T
H
ST
R
E
E
T
FR
O
M
OA
K
TO
TS
C
H
A
C
H
E
$2
8
7
,
0
0
0
40
87
PR
O
J
.
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
PR
O
J
E
C
T
NA
M
E
FY
1
8
Unscheduled FY22
RA
T
I
N
G
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
FY21
PW
0
3
PA
R
K
S
VE
H
I
C
L
E
MA
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
DE
S
I
G
N
& ST
O
R
A
G
E
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
38
$5
0
,
0
0
0
GF
0
3
1
PA
R
K
S
PA
R
K
IM
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
GR
A
N
T
S
$150,000
37
$1
5
0
,
0
0
0
GF
0
8
4
PA
R
K
S
PA
R
K
S
RE
S
T
R
O
O
M
UP
G
R
A
D
E
S
$3
2
,
0
0
0
$470,000
37
$8
0
,
0
0
0
GF
0
9
2
PA
R
K
S
PL
A
Y
G
R
O
U
N
D
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
37
$7
0
,
0
0
0
$8
0
,
0
0
0
GF
1
9
0
PA
R
K
S
4 ‐WH
E
E
L
E
R
AT
V
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
$14,000
37
GF
2
0
5
PA
R
K
S
PR
O
S
T
PL
A
N
UP
D
A
T
E
35
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
GF
2
5
0
PA
R
K
S
SP
L
A
S
H
PA
D
S
$195,700 $180,250
35
GF
2
5
3
PA
R
K
S
TU
R
F
SW
E
E
P
E
R
$3
8
,
0
0
0
35
GF
2
7
0
PA
R
K
S
SN
O
W
PL
O
W
I
N
G
VE
H
I
C
L
E
$75,000
28
$7
0
,
0
0
0
GF
1
0
8
PA
R
K
S
PA
R
K
SI
D
E
W
A
L
K
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
S
$208,000
27
GF
2
0
6
PA
R
K
S
BR
O
N
K
E
N
PA
R
K
PA
T
H
W
A
Y
$8
8
,
2
4
6
27
GF
1
4
8
PA
R
K
S
BM
X
PA
R
K
I
N
G
LO
T
$85,000
25
GF
1
9
1
PA
R
K
S
UP
G
R
A
D
E
SO
F
T
B
A
L
L
CO
M
P
L
E
X
LI
G
H
T
I
N
G
$825,000
22
GF
1
9
5
PA
R
K
S
AE
R
A
T
O
R
19
$3
2
,
0
0
0
GF
1
6
5
PO
L
I
C
E
PA
T
R
O
L
MO
T
O
R
C
Y
C
L
E
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
S
$30,000
66
$3
0
,
0
0
0
GF
0
5
3
PO
L
I
C
E
PA
T
R
O
L
VE
H
I
C
L
E
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
$195,000
$1
2
2
,
0
0
0
$661,000
63
$1
2
4
,
0
0
0
$1
8
9
,
0
0
0
$1
9
2
,
0
0
0
GF
1
6
6
PO
L
I
C
E
PO
R
T
A
B
L
E
RA
D
I
O
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
S
57
$2
5
0
,
0
0
0
$2
5
0
,
0
0
0
GF
2
6
2
PO
L
I
C
E
PO
L
I
C
E
K9
$17,000
47
GF
2
3
5
PO
L
I
C
E
EV
I
D
E
N
C
E
BA
R
CO
D
I
N
G
SY
S
T
E
M
$11,000
45
GF
0
5
2
PO
L
I
C
E
PO
L
I
C
E
‐
NO
N
‐PA
T
R
O
L
VE
H
I
C
L
E
S
$20,000
$1
8
,
0
0
0
$465,000
38
GF
1
4
0
RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
LI
N
D
L
E
Y
CE
N
T
E
R
PA
R
K
I
N
G
LO
T
RE
N
O
V
A
T
I
O
N
47
$5
2
,
0
0
0
GF
1
3
7
RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
SW
I
M
CE
N
T
E
R
‐
FA
C
I
L
I
T
Y
RE
P
A
I
R
S
AN
D
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
S
$947,000
45
GF
0
5
6
RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
DE
S
I
G
N
& CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
IN
D
O
O
R
/
O
U
T
D
O
O
R
FA
M
I
L
Y
AQ
U
A
T
I
C
S
CE
N
T
E
R
$16,500,000
44
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
GF
2
3
8
RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
BO
G
E
R
T
PO
O
L
RE
N
O
V
A
T
I
O
N
$455,000
40
GF
2
0
9
RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
LI
N
D
L
E
Y
CE
N
T
E
R
FU
L
L
UP
G
R
A
D
E
:
RE
S
T
R
O
O
M
S
,
WI
N
D
O
W
S
,
SI
D
I
N
G
,
KI
T
C
H
E
N
,
RO
O
F
,
FL
O
O
R
I
N
G
38
$2
1
7
,
7
4
5
88
PR
O
J
.
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
PR
O
J
E
C
T
NA
M
E
FY
1
8
Unscheduled FY22
RA
T
I
N
G
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
FY21
GF
2
6
6
RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
ST
O
R
Y
MI
L
L
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
CE
N
T
E
R
UP
G
R
A
D
E
:
HV
A
C
,
EL
E
C
T
R
I
C
A
L
,
FI
R
E
PR
O
T
E
C
T
I
O
N
$1
8
8
,
5
0
0
37
Su
m
m
a
r
y
fo
r
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
Fu
n
d
(6
6
it
e
m
s
)
To
t
a
l
s
by
ye
a
r
:
$1
,
9
6
5
,
4
9
6
$
2
,
0
1
6
,
8
6
0
$
1
,
3
0
2
,
0
8
5
$8
7
0
,
0
0
0
$10,320,183
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
FY
2
1
Unscheduled FY22 $18,923,700
89
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF001
DEPARTMENT
FACILITY - PROF
PROJECT NAME
PROFESSIONAL BUILDING ELEVATOR REPLACEMENT
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$66,600
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The elevator in the Professional Building is a three stop Otis elevator. The elevator was installed when the second floor was
added in 1972. Since the City purchased the building we have remodeled several areas on both the main floor and second floor –
the elevator remains original and is approaching 44 years of continued use. The elevator is to the point where many technological
improvements have been made in elevator technology and a change out would yield both improved service and some reductions
in energy costs. The elevator is inspected annually and is still safe although there are some inherent problems with the operation
of the elevator. Of the four elevators owned by the City, this system experiences the most downtime. One big problem is the
leveling systems and the way the rails and tracks are mounted in the building. The elevator will malfunction and require resetting
if it loaded heavy to one side. A new car and track system would solve the nuisance trips associated with this aging elevator.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue to maintain and adjust the elevator operating systems throughout the year.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increase reliability and reduced maintenance costs. Some electrical savings associated with improved electric motors.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund and Building Inspection Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:33
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):15
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):5
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):2
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):3
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):0
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):3
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20 FY21 FY22
90
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF010
DEPARTMENT
CEMETERY
PROJECT NAME
CEMETERY MOWER REPLACEMENTS
FY18
$16,000
FY19
$16,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Ongoing cemetery mower replacement program. Scheduled on a five year replacement program, with the oldest cemetery
mower now being 5 years old. These mowers are used to complete the mowing 53+ acres of turf inside and outside the
cemetery which include mowing of the open space, trails, and the weekly mowing through the headstones.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Keep older mowers for extended periods of time, which has been done as we moved to a 5 year replacement program instead of a 3 year
program.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Less down time; Decreased repair /maintenance costs; High trade –in value; Increased productivity; Less emissions.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Routine maintenance, oil changes, fuel.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% General Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:25
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):5
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):5
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):2
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):7
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):0
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):3
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):3
FY20
$16,000
FY21 FY22
91
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF031
DEPARTMENT
PARKS
PROJECT NAME
PARK IMPROVEMENT GRANTS
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The General Fund contributes funds every other year towards improving park infrastructure through implementation of park
master plans. This grant program is a matching funds program in which the City receives a minimum 1 to 1 match from the
recipient. The Commission has established a formal grant policy by resolution. By switching to every other year, and also
increasing the allocation, bigger projects can be accomplished, though these projects will take more time to complete. For FY20,
parks department is interested in partnering with a local group for a Pickleball courts construction project.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Handle park equipment and improvement requests on an adhoc basis, as various donors or service groups bring them forward. Allocate more
or fewer dollars to the program.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
This matching funds program provides critical infrastructure to the park system by utilizing the talents of our community members through
matching funds, donations, labor in lieu of and numerous specialized services. All of the above can be used as a match in this program
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: New infrastructure and facilities bring on increased maintenance and labor costs. The
nature of each project funded will determine the continued costs. Some projects have very low ongoing costs, others have
relatively higher costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% General Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:37
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):10
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):5
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):5
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):7
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):7
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):0
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):3
FY20
$150,000
FY21
$150,000
FY22
92
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF034
DEPARTMENT
PARKS
PROJECT NAME
LARGE DECK MOWER
FY18 FY19
$90,000
Unscheduled
$58,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The mower request in FY18 would be an addition of a large-deck sports turf mower, anticipated to be needed for additional
parkland used for athletics, such as: Enterprise Park (formerly Lerner Park), Oak Springs Park, Adam Bronken Sports Complex,
and the eventual 80 acre Bozeman Sports Complex, slated to open in 2018. All of which are on the City’s west side. The City
currently maintains over 150 acres of Formal Turf in the parks system.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue to repair as break downs occur, Replace mowers as they breakdown, Lease mowers on a 3 - year program.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Proper mowing of sports fields and formal parks are imperative to safety. Regular replacement will reduce maintenance costs and decrease the
number of breakdowns we have been experiencing. Well mowed parks are an important reflection on our City and how it is perceived by
visitors and citizens. New mowers will be more reliable, safer, productive, and will reduce the workload on the vehicle maintenance shop
personnel. Well maintained sports fields have proven to be a vital component to the economic growth of our community, by attracting regional
and state tournaments to Bozeman.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Improve scheduling of mowing and increase crew efficiency because of reliable
equipment.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% General Fund.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:43
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):15
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):10
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):5
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):7
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):0
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):3
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):3
FY20 FY21
$58,000
FY22
93
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF052
DEPARTMENT
POLICE
PROJECT NAME
POLICE - NON-PATROL VEHICLES
FY18
$18,000
FY19 Unscheduled
$465,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The police department has unmarked (non-patrol) vehicles used by command staff, detectives and some support positions. Some
of these vehicles are used for support operations, such as animal control, community resource officer, code compliance, etc.
Command and detective vehicles are assigned and used to respond to emergency calls for command/control or investigations.
Generally vehicle replacement of these vehicles involves buying used, lower mileage vehicles with some trade-in with higher
mileage vehicles nearing the end of their useful life. Decisions on when to rotate these vehicles is usually high miles and track
history of maintenance concerns. The FY18 vehicle is for a new detective position that will currently be using a car with 121,000
miles on it that is beginning to have some maintenance concerns. This car will have an estimated 130,000 miles at the time of
replacement. The FY22 vehicle is to replace a Blazer that is not ideal for police operation, has already shown maintenance
concerns, and currently has 65,000 miles with an estimated 100,000 at time of replacement. The $465,000 unscheduled amount
represents non-patrol (unmarked) vehicles that will need replacing after FY23.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Adopt the Water Fund Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for Fiscal Years 2018-2022.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
This plan involves two replacements over 5 year period and will provide a means to respond and control major events and investigation of
violent and complex crimes.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund; Use of Police Donation to replace a vehicle in FY18.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:38
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):15
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):5
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):5
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):5
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):0
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):3
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20 FY21
$20,000
FY22
94
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF053
DEPARTMENT
POLICE
PROJECT NAME
PATROL VEHICLE REPLACEMENT
FY18
$122,000
FY19
$124,000
Unscheduled
$661,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This plan allows for a number of patrol cars to be replaced each year, including all of the necessary vehicle equipment (top lights,
sirens, radio, mobile data terminals, video cameras, electronic reporting / ticketing systems, etc.) Costs are based on actual costs
in FY17 of $61,000 per vehicle and anticipated increases in FY18 and beyond. Patrol vehicles are an essential item in the
operation of the Bozeman Police Department, being the primary tool used for over 50,000 Response to Calls each year. Police
vehicles must be available for police patrol and emergency call response 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. These vehicles are used
to respond to both emergency and non-emergency calls for service, investigate vehicle crashes, conduct traffic enforcement and
for general patrol duties. These patrol vehicles average approximately 20,000 miles annually. Vehicles earmarked for replacement
will have a minimum estimated 110,000 miles per vehicle, which with police emergency response tends to be the rough time
when police vehicles are no longer safe for emergency response. An additional 11 patrol vehicles will need replacement after
FY23.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
This helps us plan for safe and reliable emergency response vehicles for patrol use, as well as projected lower annual maintenance costs. This
program would allow for the replacement of older, higher mileage patrol cars that become less reliable and more costly to repair. Equipment
components mounted inside the car can sometimes be transferred from the old car to the new car, depending on the condition. These
replacements continue to bring the department closer to 100% matching Ford SUV patrol vehicles.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
These are replacement vehicles. Recurring costs frequently decline as newer cars replace older ones. Maintenance costs have
stabilized due to regularly scheduled service, even though calls for service have increased and additional officers have been hired.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% General Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:63
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):20
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):10
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):10
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):10
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):5
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):3
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20
$189,000
FY21
$192,000 $195,000
FY22
95
Po
l
i
c
e
V
e
h
i
c
l
e
D
e
t
a
i
l
s
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Nu
m
b
e
r
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Mi
l
e
a
g
e
As
s
e
t
#
Ma
k
e
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
Un
s
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
dNotes
FY
2
0
FY
2
1
FY
2
2
GF
0
5
2
12
2
,
0
0
0
31
3
8
02
Ch
e
v
y
Im
p
a
l
a
$1
8
,
0
0
0
Mileage Oct16
12
5
,
0
0
0
16
1
7
89
Fo
r
d
Tr
u
c
k
$0
Mileage Oct16
11
9
,
0
0
0
29
7
9
01
Ch
e
v
y
Im
p
a
l
a
$0
Mileage Oct16
15
7
,
0
0
0
32
8
0
05
Ch
e
v
y
Im
p
a
l
a
$0
Mileage Oct16
10
5
,
0
0
0
26
9
6
99
Do
d
g
e
Da
k
o
t
a
$0
Mileage Oct16
11
2
,
0
0
0
32
7
4
01
Do
d
g
e
Du
r
a
n
g
$0
Mileage Oct16
35
,
0
0
0
37
2
4
04
Ch
e
v
y
Su
b
u
r
b
a
$0
Mileage Oct16
10
6
,
0
0
0
34
8
0
08
Ch
e
v
y
Up
l
a
n
d
e
$0
Mileage Oct16
37
,
0
0
0
37
6
0
07
To
y
o
t
a
Si
e
n
n
a
$0
Mileage Oct16
35
,
0
0
0
36
7
9
10
Ch
e
v
y
Im
p
a
l
a
$2
0
,
0
0
0
Mileage Oct16
37
,
0
0
0
37
3
9
13
Ch
e
v
y
Im
p
a
l
a
$2
0
,
0
0
0
Mileage Oct16
39
,
0
0
0
36
8
0
11
Ch
e
v
y
Im
p
a
l
a
$2
0
,
0
0
0
Mileage Oct16
41
,
0
0
0
33
8
1
08
Ch
e
v
y
Im
p
a
l
a
$2
0
,
0
0
0
Mileage Oct16
49
,
0
0
0
36
7
8
10
Ch
e
v
y
Ma
l
i
b
u
$2
0
,
0
0
0
Mileage Oct16
55
,
0
0
0
33
8
3
08
Ch
e
v
y
Im
p
a
l
a
$2
0
,
0
0
0
Mileage Oct16
52
,
0
0
0
33
8
4
08
Ch
e
v
y
Im
p
a
l
a
$2
0
,
0
0
0
Mileage Oct16
44
,
0
0
0
36
7
7
10
Ch
e
v
y
Ma
l
i
b
u
$2
0
,
0
0
0
Mileage Oct16
13
0
,
0
0
0
32
3
0
04
Do
d
g
e
Da
k
o
t
a
$2
0
,
0
0
0
Mileage Oct16
66
,
0
0
0
31
5
1
03
Ch
e
v
y
Im
p
a
l
a
$2
0
,
0
0
0
Mileage Oct16
63
,
0
0
0
34
3
8
08
Ch
e
v
y
Im
p
a
l
a
$2
0
,
0
0
0
Mileage Oct16
60
,
0
0
0
34
4
3
08
Ch
e
v
y
Im
p
a
l
a
$2
0
,
0
0
0
Mileage Oct16
55
,
0
0
0
34
4
5
08
Ch
e
v
y
Im
p
a
l
a
$2
0
,
0
0
0
Mileage Oct16
84
,
0
0
0
33
7
4
06
Fo
r
d
Ex
p
l
o
r
e
r
$2
0
,
0
0
0
Mileage Oct16
43
,
0
0
0
36
8
1
10
Fo
r
d
Es
c
a
p
e
$2
0
,
0
0
0
Mileage Oct16
83
,
0
0
0
33
8
2
08
Ch
e
v
y
Im
p
a
l
a
$2
0
,
0
0
0
Mileage Oct16
75
,
0
0
0
31
4
0
09
Ch
e
v
y
Im
p
a
l
a
$2
0
,
0
0
0
Mileage Oct16
96
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Nu
m
b
e
r
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Mi
l
e
a
g
e
As
s
e
t
#
Ma
k
e
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
Un
s
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
dNotes
FY
2
0
FY
2
1
FY
2
2
GF
0
5
2
6,
0
0
0
37
9
0
15
GM
C
Si
e
r
r
a
$3
0
,
0
0
0
Mileage Oct16
0
17
Fo
r
d
In
t
e
r
c
e
p
t
$5
5
,
0
0
0
Mileage Oct16
64
,
0
0
0
33
6
8
07
Ch
e
v
y
Tr
a
i
l
b
l
a
z
Mileage Oct16
$2
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
GF
0
5
3
88
,
0
0
0
35
9
0
11
Ch
e
v
y
Im
p
a
l
a
$6
1
,
0
0
0
Mileage Oct 16
90
,
0
0
0
35
8
9
11
Ch
e
v
y
Im
p
a
l
a
$6
1
,
0
0
0
Mileage Oct 16
69
,
0
0
0
34
9
9
09
Ch
e
v
y
Im
p
a
l
a
$6
2
,
0
0
0
Mileage Oct 16
68
,
0
0
0
36
2
7
12
Ch
e
v
y
Im
p
a
l
a
$6
2
,
0
0
0
Mileage Oct 16
54
,
0
0
0
36
2
8
12
Ch
e
v
y
Im
p
a
l
a
Mileage Oct 16
$6
3
,
0
0
0
57
,
0
0
0
35
9
5
11
Ch
e
v
y
Im
p
a
l
a
Mileage Oct 16
$6
3
,
0
0
0
59
,
0
0
0
36
3
0
12
Ch
e
v
y
Im
p
a
l
a
Mileage Oct 16
$6
3
,
0
0
0
88
,
8
0
6
33
7
0
07
Ch
e
v
y
Im
p
a
l
a
Mileage Oct 16
27
,
0
0
0
37
4
2
15
Fo
r
d
In
t
e
r
c
e
p
t
$6
6
,
0
0
0
Mileage Oct 16
32
,
0
0
0
36
6
1
13
Ch
e
v
y
Im
p
a
l
a
$6
6
,
0
0
0
Mileage Oct 16
22
,
0
0
0
37
4
0
15
Fo
r
d
In
t
e
r
c
e
p
t
$6
6
,
0
0
0
Mileage Oct 16
22
,
0
0
0
37
4
1
15
Fo
r
d
In
t
e
r
c
e
p
t
$6
6
,
0
0
0
Mileage Oct 16
10
,
0
0
0
40
3
7
16
Fo
r
In
t
e
r
c
e
p
t
o
r
$6
6
,
0
0
0
Mileage Oct 16
8,
0
0
0
40
3
8
16
Fo
r
d
In
t
e
r
c
e
p
t
$6
6
,
0
0
0
Mileage Oct16
4,
0
0
0
40
3
9
16
Fo
r
d
In
t
e
r
c
e
p
t
$6
6
,
0
0
0
Mileage Oct16
27
,
0
0
0
36
6
0
13
Ch
e
v
y
Ta
h
o
e
$6
6
,
0
0
0
Mileage Oct 16 – K9
45
,
0
0
0
36
9
7
14
Fo
r
d
In
t
e
r
c
e
p
t
Mileage Oct 16
$6
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
40
,
0
0
0
36
5
9
13
Ch
e
v
y
Im
p
a
l
a
Mileage Oct 16
$6
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
37
,
0
0
0
36
9
9
14
Fo
r
d
In
t
e
r
c
e
p
t
Mileage Oct 16
$6
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
44
,
0
0
0
36
9
8
14
Fo
r
d
In
t
e
r
c
e
p
t
Mileage Oct 16
$6
4
,
0
0
0
45
,
0
0
0
36
3
1
12
Ch
e
v
y
Ta
h
o
e
Mileage Oct 16 – K9
$6
4
,
0
0
0
40
,
0
0
0
36
9
6
14
Fo
r
d
In
t
e
r
c
e
p
t
Mileage Oct 16
$6
4
,
0
0
0
$1
4
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
2
4
,
0
0
0
$
1
8
9
,
0
0
0
$
1
9
2
,
0
0
0
$9
5
3
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
s
$2
1
5
,
0
0
0
97
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF056
DEPARTMENT
RECREATION
PROJECT NAME
DESIGN & CONSTRUCT INDOOR/OUTDOOR FAMILY AQUATICS CENTER
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Indoor/Outdoor Aquatics Center. This item was identified as a “Top Ten Capital Facility Recommendation” in the PROST plan,
adopted October 2007. The design phase in FY18 includes the preliminary design of the Family Aquatics Center. This project will
need to be approved by the voters. It is estimated that an election would be offered in the fall of 2021.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Do not build a community aquatics center.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Community Benefits of an Aquatics Center: safe and healthy place for families to play, connected families, strong vital involved community, and
increased community programs.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual operating and maintenance costs to include additional aquatic staff: Cost undetermined at this time.
FUNDING SOURCES
Bond and General Fund.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:44
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):10
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):0
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):10
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):8
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):8
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):3
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20 FY21
$100,000 $16,500,000
FY22
98
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF062
DEPARTMENT
I.T.
PROJECT NAME
PERSONAL COMPUTER (PC) REPLACEMENT
FY18
$43,000
FY19
$48,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This is a general item for replacement of personal computers and Servers for General Fund related jobs and services. (Enterprise
and Special Revenue fund services pay for their own pc’s and servers.) As of FY17, Personal Computers moved to a 5 year
rotation before rotation. PC Replacements are one of the primary drivers of Help Desk Calls (PM01 & WL01) - aging computers
can have more software and technical conflicts, and replaced PC's often require user support for newer versions of software, etc.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Not replace computer/server hardware as frequently.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
City technology needs will be better met and the IT department will be able to more efficiently support employees and citizens.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
FUNDING SOURCES
100% General Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:45
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):15
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):7
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):8
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):10
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):0
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):0
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20
$55,000
FY21
$57,000 $50,000
FY22
99
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF080
DEPARTMENT
I.T.
PROJECT NAME
REMOTE CLOSET SWITCHES, ROUTER AND WIRELESS AP REPLACEMENT
FY18
$40,000
FY19
$40,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Wan Site end of life replacements for switches and router throughout City to include City Hall, Professional Building, City Shops,
Landfill, L&J, Library, WWTP, WTP, Swim Center, Beall Park, Cemetery. Smaller sites will be consolidated in one year. FY 15 -
Prof-Building, Vehicle Maint. This equipment is critical to the City's technology network, supporting all of the department's
performance measures related to system "uptime" (PM02-PM06) and workload measures related to number of hours the
network and various software is "in service" (WL02-W06).
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Maintain current switches without critical support or maintenance.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Maintain uptime for all WAN locations throughout the City to include phone services as well as data.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund – with costs shared with Enterprise, as location warrants.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:50
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):15
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):10
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):10
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):10
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):0
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):0
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20
$40,000
FY21
$40,000 $40,000
FY22
100
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF083
DEPARTMENT
CEMETERY
PROJECT NAME
BACKHOE
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This piece of equipment would replace the current cemetery backhoe (2001- 2969 hours) that is used for burials an average of 2
times per week. This is the main piece of equipment utilized for cemetery burials.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue to utilize the older backhoe and repair and maintain as necessary. Potentially, borrow from another department.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased reliability and safety for staff and the families relying on cemetery services. The old cemetery backhoe could potentially be transitioned
to the Parks Division.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Operating and repair costs are expected to be lower than the existing vehicle.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% General Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:42
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):20
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):5
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):2
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):10
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):0
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):0
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20
$110,000
FY21 FY22
101
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF084
DEPARTMENT
PARKS
PROJECT NAME
PARKS RESTROOM UPGRADES
FY18
$32,000
FY19 Unscheduled
$470,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project is the general replacement and upgrading of the City Park’s public restroom facilities. Other restrooms that need to
be replaced- and/or built are: ; Rose Park ($80,000) in FY 21; Beall Park ($40,000)and a new addition, the Softball Complex
($300,000 - Large Facility plus Concession Stand), BMX- Westlake Park ($130,000) are unscheduled.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue to try to maintain existing facilities. The Rose and BMX Park projects will provide restroom facilities in areas where currently none
exist. The BMX project potentially could be part of the Midtown Urban Renewal District.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Ease and efficiency of maintaining new restrooms; increased cleanliness of public facilities.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Operating and repair costs are expected to be lower than the existing facilities.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% General Fund, BMX Park funding possible from TIF
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:37
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):15
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):5
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):5
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):7
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):0
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):0
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20 FY21
$80,000
FY22
102
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF092
DEPARTMENT
PARKS
PROJECT NAME
PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT
FY18 FY19
$70,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The following playground equipment will eventually need to be replaced due to its age and condition: Replacement will bring
equipment up to today’s standards and reduce safety and liability concerns. Jarrett Park (FY19) and Christie Park (FY20) are
identified as the playgrounds that need replacement, in that priority. In general, safety recommendations for playgrounds address:
playground site elements, sight lines, equipment features and materials, surfacing materials, hardware, paints and finishes, and any
other hazards that might be present. Playground repairs require same-day response given their critical safety implication.
Currently, the Parks Division inspects and maintains 21 playgrounds city-wide and assists with another 18 HOA- maintained
playgrounds with monthly inspections and recommendations. Since last year, new playgrounds have been constructed at The
Lakes at Valley West, Meadow Creek Park (formerly known as Ainsworth Park), Legends, and the Bozeman Pond expansion.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Keep existing equipment in place, maintain as we go
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased safety for community members.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Minimal.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% General Fund.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:37
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):15
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):5
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):2
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):7
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):5
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):0
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):3
FY20
$80,000
FY21 FY22
103
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF103
DEPARTMENT
FACILITY - CH
PROJECT NAME
AMERICAN'S WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) COMPLIANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FY18
$10,000
FY19
$10,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Replace or install ADA upgrades in various city-owned buildings. Work examples include: door hardware, handrails, parking
signage and stalls, building access, etc. The Facilities Superintendent has been working with the ADA advisory committee to
provide recommendations to the City on priority order for any upgrades or improvements that may be identified to make our
facilities and programs more accessible. This money has been used, and will continue to be used to improve accessibility as
demonstrates a commitment from the City to address ADA issues. Based on the initial review of the work to be done the dollar
amount should be increased in order to complete the improvements within the needed timeframe.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
When remodels are initiated on buildings they are brought up to current ADA requirements as per regulations. There are changes to the ADA
that took effect in March 2011. We will continue to make upgrades as changes are made to buildings but this budget item would accelerate the
compliance for city buildings.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
It has been the policy of the city to meet the full spirit of the law as outlined in the ADA regulations. By taking the initiative to bring all our
buildings up to current standards we can provide a positive example to the community in meeting the needs of people with restricted or limited
mobility.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
No significant costs are anticipated with these improvements.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% General Fund.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:42
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):20
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):5
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):5
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):7
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):0
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):0
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20
$10,000
FY21
$10,000 $10,000
FY22
104
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF108
DEPARTMENT
PARKS
PROJECT NAME
PARK SIDEWALK REPLACEMENTS
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Sidewalks Identified for replacement due to deteriorating cement, missing sections and heaving from weather and tree roots.
New sidewalks must meet or exceed city code. Replacing the old sidewalk will result in a safer sidewalk year round and enable
the sidewalk plows to better meet the snow removal municipal code. Costs of approximately $11.75 square foot for rip and
replace. Project 1: $120,000 - Southside Park - replace 730' of sidewalk along South 5th Avenue and along West Alderson Street
with new 6' (six foot) wide concrete sidewalk, and the related retaining wall. Project 2: $88,000 - Cooper Park - replace the
sidewalk around the entire block approximately 1875' total. This sidewalk serves as a main route to and from the University.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased safety for community members and efficiency of operation (plowing)
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: no estimate at this time
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:27
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):15
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):5
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):2
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):0
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):0
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):0
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20 FY21
$208,000
FY22
105
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF115
DEPARTMENT
PARKS
PROJECT NAME
PARK VEHICLE REPLACEMENTS
FY18 FY19
$45,000
Unscheduled
$105,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Parks Department utilizes vehicles for mowing, fertilization, irrigation, inspections, snow plowing and repairs of the city parks,
comprising over 150 acres of formal turf and 220 acres of natural parkland. All vehicles are utilized until service related down-
time for equipment and staff become problematic or safety is compromised. FY19 represents a one ton replacement. Dodge has
ceased making parts for 2001 1-ton that is currently in the Parks fleet. The two current 1-tons in the Park fleet are used for
plowing parking lots, ice rinks, hauling garbage, stone, and trail fines among other duties. The addition in FY20 of $30,000 is for a
½ ton fleet vehicle to replace the 1991 Dodge with 5 year repair costs of #3,018. The unscheduled is for continued replacement
of aging fleet vehicles which include an additional 1-ton, a hybrid car and an additional ½ ton. A detailed listing of the replacement
plan, with vehicle mileage, has been sent to Finance. Mileage updated October 2016.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
This insures safe and reliable vehicles for park use.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: These are replacements; recurring costs frequently decline as newer cars replace older
ones. 5 year average on repairs to the Parks fleet - $3,276 per vehicle.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% General Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:63
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):20
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):10
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):10
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):10
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):5
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):3
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20
$30,000
FY21 FY22
106
Pa
r
k
s
V
e
h
i
c
l
e
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
s
-
D
e
t
a
i
l
s
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Nu
m
b
e
r
As
s
e
t
#
Ma
k
e
Mo
d
e
l
Yr
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Mi
l
e
a
g
e
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
Unscheduled Notes
FY
2
0
FY
2
1
FY
2
2
GF
1
1
5
32
5
1
DO
D
G
E
20
0
1
19
9
,
3
8
2
$30,000 10/2016MILEAGE
26
9
1
FO
R
D
19
9
0
19
9
,
1
6
5
10/2016MILEAGE
25
0
3
Ye
l
l
o
w
J
e
e
p
P
l
o
w
C
J
-
5
19
7
6
19
7
,
0
6
5
$0
Wa
t
e
r
T
r
u
c
k
w
i
t
h
l
i
g
h
t
19
4
,
3
7
0
$0
16
0
8
FO
R
D
19
8
6
18
7
,
8
6
1
$30,000 10/2016MILEAGE
55
6
1
FO
R
D
19
9
7
18
7
,
3
8
6
10/2016MILEAGE
32
5
2
CH
E
V
Y
1
/
2
T
O
N
19
9
9
16
7
,
7
2
7
10/2016MILEAGE
16
9
1
DO
D
G
E
19
8
5
16
5
,
9
1
2
$30,000 10/2016MILEAGE
24
9
JE
E
P
19
7
8
16
1
,
8
2
5
10/2016MILEAGE
49
7
LO
A
D
S
T
E
R
D
U
M
P
19
7
6
14
5
,
4
1
8
10/2016MILEAGE
26
6
5
FO
R
D
E
X
P
L
O
R
E
R
19
9
6
14
2
,
9
1
3
10/2016MILEAGE
13
7
3
DO
D
G
E
19
9
1
14
1
,
4
1
9
10/2016MILEAGE
$3
0
,
0
0
0
31
1
6
FO
R
D
R
A
N
G
E
R
19
9
8
12
9
,
2
1
6
10/2016MILEAGE
31
6
1
FO
R
D
1
T
O
N
W
/
P
U
P
20
0
0
12
2
,
1
7
3
10/2016MILEAGE
31
6
0
FO
R
D
3
T
O
N
20
0
0
11
9
,
9
8
5
10/2016MILEAGE
19
9
9
CH
E
V
R
O
L
E
T
19
9
6
11
6
,
4
0
8
10/2016MILEAGE
31
1
7
Bl
u
e
D
o
d
g
e
1
5
0
0
R
a
m
19
9
8
11
1
,
7
4
1
$0
25
3
0
Em
i
l
y
'
s
T
r
u
c
k
C
h
e
v
y
3
19
9
7
10
5
,
0
3
8
$0
35
0
3
GM
C
(
W
H
I
T
E
)
20
1
0
79
,
4
1
4
10/2016MILEAGE
53
9
2
Bl
u
e
J
e
e
p
P
l
o
w
76
,
9
4
5
$0
30
2
2
DO
D
G
E
3
/
4
T
O
N
20
0
1
66
,
4
9
2
$15,000 10/2016MILEAGE
107
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Nu
m
b
e
r
As
s
e
t
#
Ma
k
e
Mo
d
e
l
Yr
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Mi
l
e
a
g
e
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
Unscheduled Notes
FY
2
0
FY
2
1
FY
2
2
GF
1
1
5
35
0
2
GM
C
(
W
H
I
T
E
)
20
1
0
62
,
0
7
2
10/2016MILEAGE
36
2
4
GM
C
P
I
C
K
U
P
20
1
2
37
,
9
2
7
10/2016MILEAGE
30
2
3
DO
D
G
E
1
T
O
N
W
/
D
20
0
1
37
,
6
9
7
$4
5
,
0
0
0
10/2016MILEAGE
33
2
7
GM
C
3
/
4
T
O
N
(
M
O
W
20
0
6
28
,
8
6
7
10/2016MILEAGE
34
4
9
GM
C
1
T
O
N
D
U
M
P
20
0
8
25
,
5
3
5
10/2016MILEAGE
37
6
7
GM
C
P
I
C
K
U
P
20
1
5
11
,
2
0
3
10/2016MILEAGE
$4
5
,
0
0
0
$
3
0
,
0
0
0
$
0
$105,000
To
t
a
l
s
108
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF116
DEPARTMENT
CEMETERY
PROJECT NAME
CEMETERY VEHICLE REPLACEMENTS
FY18 FY19
$45,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Cemetery Vehicle Replacement Plan - the Cemetery Department utilizes 1-Ton trucks for operations and maintenance of the
Sunset Hills Cemetery. Asset# 1213 - 1989 1Ton 4x4, *41,155 miles - is critical to providing prompt burial services roughly twice
a week and sanding/plowing cemetery roads. While it has relatively low miles, it has extremely low fuel economy (460 engine)
which drives our recommendation to replace this 28 year old vehicle. *Mileage as of 11/2016.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Keep maintaining #1213 until a new replacement is funded or replacement parts are no longer available.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
This insures safe and reliable vehicles for cemetery use.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: These are replacements; recurring costs frequently decline as newer cars replace older
ones
FUNDING SOURCES
100% General Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:34
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):10
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):5
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):2
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):7
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):0
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):5
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20 FY21 FY22
109
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF137
DEPARTMENT
RECREATION
PROJECT NAME
SWIM CENTER - FACILITY REPAIRS AND REPLACEMENTS
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The Swim Center requires numerous repair and equipment replacements which would be added to the Bond initiative for the
Indoor/Outdoor Aquatics Center. These items include - gutter replacement/$150,000; deck tile replacement/$142,000; removal
of ceiling tiles and grid and basic cosmetic improvements $120,000; HVAC unit replacement/$360,000; resurface pool/$140,000;
and replacement of front furnace $35,000.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
These projects will help to ensure that we are able to maintain a safe and functional facility. The pool is extremely well utilized and repairs and
replacements are necessary over time in order to continue to serve the community. Our energy consumption is currently being analyzed to
determine the cost savings associated with an HVAC system designed for any aquatic environment.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
No additional annual operating and maintenance costs
FUNDING SOURCES
Bond
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:45
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):15
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):7
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):5
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):3
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):7
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):3
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20 FY21
$947,000
FY22
110
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF140
DEPARTMENT
RECREATION
PROJECT NAME
LINDLEY CENTER PARKING LOT RENOVATION
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Curb and overlay the parking lot at the Lindley Center and include ADA parking stalls. Install parking lot lights and bases, a
dumpster pad and dumpster enclosure fence. This project aligns with section 10.10.1 of the PROST plan (adopted October 2007)
that recommends that City parks, recreation facilities and trails are accessible to the greatest extent possible. Includes permit fees.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Sealing and striping lot and not installing lights
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Comply with city codes, allow for more cars to be parked in the lot at a time, more organized parking which will make the lot safer and reduced
liability, lights will help with public safety and parking lot/facility security, ADA spots will be designated which will make the lot accessible, the
dumpster would be enclosed.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual operating and maintenance costs to include stripping and periodic overlays.
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:47
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):13
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):5
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):10
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):9
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):5
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):0
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20 FY21
$52,000
FY22
111
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF148
DEPARTMENT
PARKS
PROJECT NAME
BMX PARKING LOT
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$85,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Installation of parking lot at Westlake BMX park, for which a design plan was completed in 2008.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Do not install a parking lot
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Also access for Children’s Memorial Park and Christmas tree drop off area.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Minimal. Clean-up, possible snow plowing, painting lines every few years
FUNDING SOURCES
100% General Fund, possible funding from TIF
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:25
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):10
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):5
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):2
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):3
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):0
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):0
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20 FY21 FY22
112
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF157
DEPARTMENT
FACILITY - SC
PROJECT NAME
SENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The elevator at the Bozeman Senior Social Center is a three stop Otis elevator. The elevator was installed in early 1980 and is at
the point where many technological improvements have been made in elevator technology. A change out would yield both
improved service and some reductions in energy costs. While the elevator is inspected annually and is safe, it is used heavily by
the members of the Senior Center. Planning ahead for the replacement of the elevator will be more cost effective and avoid
unnecessary down time during the replacement process. The elevator maintenance contractor has recommended this be the first
elevator replaced by the City.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue to maintain and adjust the elevator operating systems as needed. Wait to replace the elevator until it physically breaks down or
continue to monitor the operation and hold off on the replacement until the routine repair and maintenance costs exceed acceptable limits
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Improved operations and reduced maintenance for the elevator most needed by a special population. Small reduction in annual energy costs.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund -
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:37
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):15
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):7
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):2
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):5
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):0
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):3
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20 FY21
$68,000
FY22
113
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF165
DEPARTMENT
POLICE
PROJECT NAME
PATROL MOTORCYCLE REPLACEMENTS
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$30,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Originally in FY15, we identified the need to trade in 3 higher mileage motorcycles for 2 new motorcycles for our traffic division,
at a total end-price of $60,000. Authorization was given to purchase one of the two motorcycles, which resulted in trading in two
2003 Harley Motorcycles for one new Harley motorcycle. We are moving this replacement to FY21, as we currently are only
fielding one trained motorcycle officer. If fully trained and operationally ready to deploy 2nd patrol motorcycle, we will trade in a
2002 Harley Davidson Motorcycle for a new motorcycle. With trade in value and re-use of the police radio, the total cost will be
$30,000. The end result of this purchase will leave the department with 2 new primary patrol motorcycles fully outfitted. Patrol
motorcycles are an essential item in the traffic enforcement division, used for a portion of the over 13,000 traffic stops, crashes,
and citations each year. These motorcycles are used from March to October each year and are responsible for a portion of the
response to both emergency and non-emergency calls for service, investigate accidents, conduct traffic enforcement and general
patrol duties.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
This ensures safe and reliable emergency response vehicles for patrol use, as well as lower annual maintenance costs. For the traffic division to
be effective, this equipment must be kept in top operating condition. Police motorcycles are available for police patrol use during the day and
when the city streets are clear enough to ride.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Maintenance costs are stable due to regularly scheduled service. Officers assigned to the motorcycle division are also assigned to
their own motorcycle.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% General Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:66
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):20
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):10
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):10
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):10
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):10
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):3
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):3
FY20 FY21
$30,000
FY22
114
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF166
DEPARTMENT
POLICE
PROJECT NAME
PORTABLE RADIO REPLACEMENTS
FY18 FY19
$250,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The department has been in conversations and planning with Gallatin County 9-1-1 to improve radio communication that has
become an operational and safety concern. Regardless of the final improvements to infrastructure, one of the identified needs for
replacement is subscriber units (portable radios used by officers and mobile radios used in emergency response vehicles).The
replacement of these subscriber units (radios) are a major stop to improving communications and responses capabilities. These
radios are an essential item in the operation of the Bozeman Police Department, being a critical communication tool used for
over to 50,000 Response to Calls each year. Police radios must be available for police use 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. These
radios are individually assigned, allowing for greater longevity, and department-wide communication in the event of a need for
major response. These costs are based on 78 portable radios at $6,000 per radio and 39 mobile radios at $5,500 per radio.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Regardless of the infrastructure improvements, the existing radios are 10 years old and beginning to reach the end of their effectiveness.
Additionally, the existing radios are not dual-band and will not operate with a planned move to VHF/encrypted operations as part of
infrastructure improvement plans. Some phasing of purchases could be done with a focus on patrol officers / patrol cars / remaining emergency
responders over a maximum 3 year period.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
This ensures safe and reliable emergency communication and response. Program allows for a planned and predictable need for equipment
replacement. Clear and dependable communication allows for quick and efficient deployment and the required level of officer safety.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
FUNDING SOURCES
100% General Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:57
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):20
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):10
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):10
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):7
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):5
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):0
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20
$250,000
FY21 FY22
115
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF190
DEPARTMENT
PARKS
PROJECT NAME
4-WHEELER ATV REPLACEMENT
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$14,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Replace the ATV (2000 Yamaha Grizzly) used for sidewalk snow removal and is the main piece of equipment that is used to spray
approx 300 acres with herbicides and biostimulants for the Parks Division.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue to use the 2000 Yamaha Grizzly and repair as needed.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Maximize efficiency, minimize down time, proactive replacement of aging equipment.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Routine maintenance
FUNDING SOURCES
100% General Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:37
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):15
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):5
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):5
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):7
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):0
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):0
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20 FY21 FY22
116
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF191
DEPARTMENT
PARKS
PROJECT NAME
UPGRADE SOFTBALL COMPLEX LIGHTING
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$825,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Replace the current lights at the Softball Complex with appropriate stadium lights. Estimate provided by MUSCO, would be bid at
the time of construction. Existing lights have light spillage and this is the only way to make the lights Dark Skies Compliant.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Keep existing lights
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
The new lights can offer 50% less light spillage and glare and reduce energy costs by up to 50%. Additionally, upgraded lights could help to
reduce or eliminate complaints regarding light pollution.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Reduction in electrical use.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% General Fund, or fundraising by user groups - Cost estimates range from $750,000 to $825,000 in August 2012.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:22
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):10
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):6
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):2
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):0
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):0
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):3
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):1
FY20 FY21 FY22
117
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF195
DEPARTMENT
PARKS
PROJECT NAME
AERATOR
FY18 FY19
$32,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
An additional aerator into Parks and Recreation inventory of turf equipment. This would be used to maintain the 150+ acres of
turf in the park inventory. This piece of equipment would be used extensively at the new Sports Complex and other venues on
the west side of town. (Adam Bronken Sports Complex and Oak Springs Park) The Toro Pro-Core aerator is efficient,
productive and coincides with water conservation efforts and safe playing athletic fields.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue to operate with one aerator.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Proactively and aggressively aerate parks and sports fields within the City to create safer and healthier turf that uses less water.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
FUNDING SOURCES
100% General Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:19
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):5
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):5
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):5
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):3
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):0
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):0
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):1
FY20 FY21 FY22
118
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF196
DEPARTMENT
I.T.
PROJECT NAME
ROOFTOP COOLING UNIT FOR THE PROFESSIONAL BUILDING DATA CENTER
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Replacement of the current APC cooling system in the professional building - dedicated to the Data Center. When the
current unit fails, we will need to replace it ASAP. The current until is more than 10 years old and has been relaible in the recent
past.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Keep using the current 10 year old system and spend $6,000 to replace bearings.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
We would have a system that is properly sized for the room and heat load. The new system would be more energy efficient. We will use the
old system as a backup system in the event the new system is down for repairs.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
1 Year warranty out of the gate with roughly $100 per year for Freon replacement and maintenance. Repairs and issues beyond
basic maintenance after the first year would have to be paid at that time.
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:47
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):20
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):7
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):5
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):7
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):0
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):3
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20 FY21
$20,000
FY22
119
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF199
DEPARTMENT
I.T.
PROJECT NAME
PROFESSIONAL BUILDING RECONFIGURATION - Phase 2
FY18 FY19
$131,581
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The City is responding to growth by adding staff to meet the increased demand for services in our community. We have also
reorganized divisions (Community Development) and created other divisions (Stormwater) to improve efficiency and better
serve our community. In order to accommodate this grow, we need to remodel the Stiff Building. In FY16 the City Commission
approved a Phase 1 of the remodel that will provide a better use of existing space by relocating certain functions to the basement
and reclaiming unused square footage. Approval of Phase II would allow the consolidation of Community Development (Planning
and Building) together on one floor and the consolidation of Public Works Services (Engineering, GIS and Stormwater) together
on another floor. This will allow better coordination of staff and better service to our public. Phase 1 is anticipated to be
completed late spring of 2016.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue to operate as we are today
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Community Development would be able to consolidate its operations and services to allow for an integrated customer-focused service delivery
model. It will also provide Public Works with the ability to collocate its services in the Stiff Building. Finally it will help the City to take a planned
and efficient approach to building utilization and service optimization.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
No additional operating costs anticipated for building reconfiguration.
FUNDING SOURCES
Building Inspection, Community Development, General Fund, Parking, Water
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:27
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):15
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):0
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):2
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):5
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):0
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):0
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20 FY21 FY22
120
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF199
DEPARTMENT
FACILITY - PROF
PROJECT NAME
PROFESSIONAL BUILDING RECONFIGURATION - Phase 2
FY18 FY19
$35,779
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The City is responding to growth by adding staff to meet the increased demand for services in our community. We have also
reorganized divisions (Community Development) and created other divisions (Stormwater) to improve efficiency and better
serve our community. In order to accommodate this growth, we need to remodel the Stiff Building. In FY16 the City Commission
approved Phase 1 of the remodel which will provide better use of existing space by relocating certain functions to the basement
and repurposing unused square footage. Approval of Phase II would allow the consolidation of Community Development
(Planning and Building) together on one floor and the consolidation of Public Works Services (Engineering, GIS and Stormwater)
together on another floor. This will allow better coordination of staff and better service to our public.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue to operate as we are today
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Community Development would be able to consolidate its operations and services to allow for an integrated customer-focused service delivery
model. It will also provide Public Works with the ability to collocate its services in the Stiff Building. Finally it will help the City to take a planned
and efficient approach to building utilization and service optimization.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
No additional operating costs anticipated for building reconfiguration.
FUNDING SOURCES
Building Inspection, Community Development, General Fund, Parking, Water
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:27
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):15
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):0
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):2
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):5
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):0
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):0
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20 FY21 FY22
121
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF203
DEPARTMENT
FACILITY - SC
PROJECT NAME
BOZEMAN SENIOR SOCIAL CENTER EXTERIOR ENVELOPE IMPROVEMENTS.
FY18
$64,750
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project will replace portions of the building envelope of the Bozeman Senior Center that are in need of replacement due to
the age and heavy use of the facility. Work will include the replacement of the rough board siding with cement-based clapboard
siding. Additionally, new soffit and fascia will be installed where needed to keep birds from entering the attic. Gutter sections that
are leaking and torn away will be replaced and rotting entrance columns on the northeast side will be replaced. There are also
unprotected areas of the foundation where missing insulating foam is not providing moisture protection.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
It is most efficient and economical to do this work at the same time, but it could be phased.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
This is a highly utilized and important public resource. The building is over 30 years old and is showing its age. The roof and west side of the
building envelope was replaced after the 2010 hail damage and this project will complete the restoration of the building envelope minus the
windows. In addition to improving the overall appearance of the building, the new materials will have a longer life expectancy and protect the
condition of the building. There has been some water leaking in through the windows in the basement and the new gutters will be set up so that
the water from the roof does not drain into the window wells keeping the water from getting into the building.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
The completion of this project will reduce current maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% General Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:32
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):15
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):5
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):2
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):5
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):0
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):0
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20 FY21 FY22
122
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF205
DEPARTMENT
PARKS
PROJECT NAME
PROST PLAN UPDATE
FY18 FY19
$100,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Update the 2007 Parks Recreation Open Space Trail (PROST) Plan. The current plan is nearing 10 years old. Since adoption, the
city has grown in size, new park properties have come into the system, and local demographics may have changed. This project
anticipates hiring an outside party to update the Plan that will take into consideration the updated Community Plan.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Do not update the plan.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
The update would record and reference new and accurate information that has been developing over the last 10 years.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:35
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):15
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):0
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):5
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):10
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):0
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):0
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20 FY21 FY22
123
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF206
DEPARTMENT
PARKS
PROJECT NAME
BRONKEN PARK PATHWAY
FY18
$88,246
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Installation on new sidewalk for pedestrian traffic between Durston and Classical Way along Cottonwood Road. This project will
align with the new sidewalk that is currently being constructed along Durston, spanning the entire length of Bronken Park.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Do not construct the sidewalk.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Safe pedestrian travel that for park and school users.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Plowing.
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:27
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):10
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):5
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):2
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):5
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):0
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):0
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20 FY21 FY22
124
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF209
DEPARTMENT
RECREATION
PROJECT NAME
LINDLEY CENTER FULL UPGRADE: RESTROOMS, WINDOWS, SIDING, KITCHEN, ROOF, FLOO
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project is the combination of requests for upgrade of the Restrooms ($55,000), Window Replacement ($24,200), Siding
Replacement ($26,400), Kitchen Upgrade ($55,000), East Roof Insulation ($26,400), Floor support ($13,970), Roof support
($16,775) . This is a heavily used community center that could benefit from substantial improvements.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
As suggested by the Commission
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
1. Brings restroom up to current ADA requirements; 2. Brings restroom up to current City of Bozeman building codes; 3. Improves sanitation
in the restrooms and kitchen facilities; 4. Rehabs and secures the building envelope for years to come; 5. Reduced energy consumption from
improved windows and insulation. 6. Addresses deficiencies that were identified in the 2014 structural analysis and 2012 facility condition
inventory.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Minimal.
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:38
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):15
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):5
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):5
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):5
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):0
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):3
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20
$217,745
FY21 FY22
125
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF219
DEPARTMENT
FACILITY - CH
PROJECT NAME
ADDITION TO CITY HALL, CONSOLIDATION OF SERVICES
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$5,500,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project would relocate the functions currently housed in the Stiff Building (Community Development/Engineering/IT/Building
Inspection) into an expansion of City Hall on Lamme Street.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Keep operations at the Stiff Building.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Centralizing more services in one location at City Hall will improve efficiency of staff and make it easier for citizens to conduct business with
the City.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
The new facility should have lower operating costs than the Stiff Building.
FUNDING SOURCES
Potential Funding Sources include: General Fund, Enterprise Fund (for public works), Building Inspection Fund (Building Inspection
Division), sale of the Stiff Building. This is a very rough estimate, based on building square footage and current construction costs.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:28
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):12
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):3
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):2
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):3
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):0
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):3
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20 FY21 FY22
126
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF224
DEPARTMENT
FINANCE
PROJECT NAME
SUNGARD ANALYTICS NOW COGNOS BI (BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE) WEB-BASED REPORTIN
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Web-based report authoring tool used to build sophisticated, multi-page, multi-query reports using data from SunGard.
Seamlessly integrates Microsoft Excel, enabling users to explore and analyze data in a familiar environment using skills they
already have. Includes enhanced e-mailing and report publishing capabilities, in addition to access by mobile devices including iPads
& iPhones.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue to use SunGard QREP product, which requires a higher level of training and expertise for end-users. QREP is no longer being
developed/enhanced and IBM software support is scheduled to end on April 30, 2018
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
An increased ability to push more big data out to a bigger audience and to empower novice users to collect and analyze the tremendous amount
of data in SunGard.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Ongoing annual maintenance cost = $3,280
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund, although enterprise funds would continue to be big users, especially GIS
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:37
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):15
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):5
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):5
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):7
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):0
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):0
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20
$34,340
FY21 FY22
127
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF227
DEPARTMENT
FINANCE
PROJECT NAME
ERP REPLACEMENT / UPGRADE "SUNGARD REPLACEMENT / UPGRADE"
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$333,333
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Replacing/upgrading the current system installed in 1999. This is the system that runs all the financial, community development,
land records, utility and business license applications.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue running current SunGard package. Use SunGard.net (NaviLine EDGE) as an improvement to the current system, but not a full
replacement.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Simplified package. Easier to integrate the various applications/programs. Easier to pull out information for end users. Easier compilation of
Commission reports and packets for Community Development.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Unknown. Dependent on the option chosen.
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund 33%; Water Fund 33%; Wastewater Fund 33%
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:50
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):20
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):5
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):10
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):10
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):0
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):0
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20 FY21 FY22
128
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF229
DEPARTMENT
I.T.
PROJECT NAME
ISCSI STORAGE REPLACEMENT
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
All of the virtual servers that reside at these two buildings use these devices as their storage device. These are critical pieces of
infrastructure.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Don't replace and not have warranty.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Allows us to keep our critical pieces of infrastructure running well and under warranty.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:47
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):20
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):5
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):7
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):10
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):0
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):0
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20
$40,000
FY21 FY22
129
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF231
DEPARTMENT
CEMETERY
PROJECT NAME
CEMETERY IRRIGATION PROJECT
FY18
$200,000
FY19
$200,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Phased Project to move irrigation of cemetery and park lands off treated municipal supply onto raw surface supply previously
decreed to irrigate cemetery lands from the Story Mill Ditch .The planned improvements dramatically reduces the amount of man
hours required to monitor watering during season. Improved irrigation system reduces/eliminates water loss and water is applied
in the most efficient manner maximizing the use of the resource. FY 16: Phase I Monitoring and Pre-Design Feasibility Analysis: •
Historic Flows of Sourdough Creek to measure reliability • Ditch survey to understand overflow and flooding issues • Headgate
assessment and repair/replace • Cost assessment for City to operate and maintain diversion works, pump and screen • Haggerty
Fields Extension. FY 17: Phase II Design for Irrigation of Cemetery Lands • Inlet structure and piping • Pump house • Main and
laterals • Electrical • Irrigation System Components. FY 18:* Phase III Installation of Diversion Works Project to Cemetery Lands.
FY 19:* Phase IV Extension to Haggerty Fields •Design •Installation.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue to use treated water for cemetery land irrigation.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
The Parks & Rec Department would no longer pay for large quantities of treated water for irrigation. It protects and preserves the City’s most
valuable decreed surface water right and makes available for sale treated water that would otherwise have irrigated the cemetery. The treated
water that is no longer applied to the cemetery and parks irrigation would be available for sale to new water customers enabling future growth
and/or improving the reliability of the City’s water supplies for use in times of drought. Makes available approximately 258 AF of treated water,
valued at $1,548,000.00 available for retail sale for approximately 1,121 SF homes or 2,080 MF homes. Reduces numbers of seasonal workers
required to be hired by Parks Department and increases the reliability of domestic water supplies in times of drought.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Pump replacement. It is yet to be determined what additional operations and maintenance costs would be associated with the
project during FY 19-21 at this time. This is due to the fact that the feasibility study that will be completed in FY 17 and will
identify various alternatives and costs of each alternative will inform future operations and maintenance costs during FY 19-21.
Upon completion of the feasibility study, an alternative will be selected and projected operations and maintenance costs can be
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund. *If awarded, grant funding through the Bureau of Reclamation’s WaterSMART Program would offset total project
costs.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:44
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):15
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):10
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):5
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):3
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):5
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):3
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):3
FY20 FY21 FY22
130
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF233
DEPARTMENT
I.T.
PROJECT NAME
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$99,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Replacement of IT Vehicles. If our current vehicle is still running well and maintenance costs are not high, we would keep them
beyond what is shown here. 2005
Chevy Colorado with 38K
1999 Dodge Truck with 105K
1999 Jeep Cherokee with 73K
1995 Dodge Truck with 67K
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Buy new or Do nothing.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Provide functional transportation with reduced maintenance costs.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Minimal
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:38
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):15
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):5
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):5
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):5
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):0
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):3
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20 FY21 FY22
131
IT
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
De
t
a
i
l
s
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Nu
m
b
e
r
As
s
e
t
#
Ma
k
e
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Mi
l
e
a
g
e
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
FY
2
1
FY
2
2
Un
s
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
d
No
t
e
s
GF
2
3
3
17
8
4
'9
5
Do
d
g
e
Da
k
o
t
a
67
,
0
0
0
$2
3
,
0
0
0
If
ou
r
cu
r
r
e
n
t
vehicle is still
ru
n
n
i
n
g
we
l
l
an
d
maintenance
co
s
t
s
ar
e
no
t
high we would
ke
e
p
it beyond 2020
GF
2
3
3
26
9
7
'9
9
Je
e
p
Ch
e
r
o
k
e
e
73
,
0
0
0
$2
3
,
0
0
0
GF
2
3
3
27
0
7
'9
9
Do
d
g
e
Da
k
o
t
a
10
5
,
0
0
0
$3
0
,
0
0
0
GF
2
3
3
32
7
3
'0
5
Ch
e
v
y
Co
l
o
r
a
d
o
38
,
0
0
0
$2
3
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
s
$9
9
,
0
0
0
We
d
n
e
s
d
a
y
,
De
c
e
m
b
e
r
07
,
20
1
6
Pa
g
e
1 of
1
132
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF235
DEPARTMENT
POLICE
PROJECT NAME
EVIDENCE BAR CODING SYSTEM
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$11,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This evidence barcode system is a mix of software and hardware that provides a secure and efficient method of entering, tracking
and managing evidence. This system includes the bar code reader, label printer, labels, software and software licenses, initial
training and 1st year of maintenance to handle the existing 10,000+ items of evidence and input and control of evidence gathered
from this point forward. This barcode system is an essential addition to a new facility that integrates technology with design
improvements and improve overall efficiency of the evidence process.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Can continue with existing process which is not efficient and is difficult to use for conducting inventories and audit processes and involves
increased staff time. This plan includes coordination with Gallatin County to pay for 50% of this need and only if this is not resolved by formal
bond issue passing by City and Gallatin County citizens in November 2016.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Improved integrity of evidence control for prosecution, to minimize existing staff time and to improve overall management of all property held
as evidence. Extremely important with potential move to a new facility in FY18/FY19, if approved.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
$2,500 ANNUAL MAINTENANCE FEE
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:45
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):15
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):5
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):5
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):10
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):5
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):0
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20 FY21 FY22
133
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF238
DEPARTMENT
RECREATION
PROJECT NAME
BOGERT POOL RENOVATION
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Bogert Pool is beginning to show its wear faster every year. This project would replace the coping around the pool that is
cracked in several areas and the pool gutters that are cracking, crumbling, and/or lifting from the pool edge. All of the leaks that
could be patched without digging up the bottom of the pool have been patched. There is minimal leaking in the return pipes to
the pool but we recommend repairing the leaks in the returning piping that were identified in May of 2015, before the pool is
blasted with sand or high pressure water, prepped, and resurfaced. The retaining wall is going to be replaced with a wrought iron
fence to allow more visibility to the facility at night and provide more structure, as the current wall is weakening. The sections of
the decking in front of the locker rooms have sunken over the years and will also be replaced. The Bogert Pool renovation or
replacement with an alternate water feature would be added to the Bond Initiative for the Indoor/Outdoor Aquatic Center.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
A new gutter system would mitigate entrapment issues caused by the current gutter system. The current gutters are disintegrating between the
gutter and the ledge of the pool where there gutter sits. Several gutter tiles need to be re-adhered to the pool ledge every spring and often
during the pool season. If a tile is still attached but loose, it can easily be pulled from the wall. Several of the gutter tiles have been replaced
through the years. In many places, a space was not left between the tiles. This doesn’t allow the water to flow into the gutter system for optimal
water circulation. The surface of the pool is currently being patched with hydraulic cement in areas where the plaster is coming up. A new
surface would work to protect the structure of the pool. Making these repairs to Bogert would extend the life of the pool for many years.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
No additional costs would be associated with these repairs.
FUNDING SOURCES
Bond
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:40
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):20
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):5
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):5
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):7
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):0
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):0
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):3
FY20 FY21
$455,000
FY22
134
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF241
DEPARTMENT
FACILITY - CH
PROJECT NAME
Replacement of City Hall AC Condensing Unit – Roof Top
FY18 FY19
$50,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The roof-top air conditioning condensing unit at City Hall is original to the building (1980) and is reaching the end of its useful
service life. This unit is critical to the temperature control for all office and public areas at City Hall.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue to maintain the current unit until parts and refrigerant are no longer available.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Reduced maintenance, increased efficiency and improved operation.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
None.
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:36
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):15
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):5
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):5
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):5
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):0
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):3
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):3
FY20 FY21 FY22
135
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF245
DEPARTMENT
FACILITY - CH
PROJECT NAME
Energy Projects – City Hall
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
City Hall is a LEED-Silver certified building and is currently underperforming. A recent Energy Star Portfolio Manager review
found that City Hall scored a 30 on a scale of 1 to 100, indicating that the energy performance of the building has declined as
equipment has aged or been replaced, and spaces modified. Retro-commissioning improves efficiency of a building’s equipment
and systems; often resolving problems that occurred during design or construction, or those that develop over time. It is a
system-wide evaluation of opportunities to improve energy performance and occupant comfort. City Hall was first
commissioned in 2008 following the remodel. Many issues were addressed at that time, but certain problems related to the
heating hot water system balance were not due to budget constraints. The commissioning report recommended replacement of
24 fin tube balancing valves and control valves on unit heaters. These components are negatively impacting the operation and
efficiency of heating and cooling systems. Building Commissioning was again identified as a need in the 2014 McKinstry Investment
Grade Audit. This project addresses the mechanical upgrades first identified in the commissioning report from 2008 allowing for a
retro-commission for the building following the mechanical upgrades and AC Condensing Unit replacement.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Improved HVAC system operations and reduced utility costs, based on the known conditions, McKinstry estimates that commissioning would
save at least $2,400 per year. The occupants of the building should experience more even temperatures and improved building airflow and
ventilation. Additional savings may be possible, but not fully understood until all the recommended improvements are identified.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
None
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:43
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):15
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):5
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):5
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):7
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):3
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):3
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20 FY21
$75,000
FY22
136
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF250
DEPARTMENT
PARKS
PROJECT NAME
Splash Pads
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$180,250
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
There are two proposed Splash Pad Projects: 1, The installation of a Splash Pad at the Sports Park (Baxter Road), estimated cost
$195,700 2. The installation of an Interactive Water Feature at Story Mill Community Park, estimated cost $180,250. This plan
will give the community two larger Splash Pads / Water Features located in large Community Parks at different ends of the City.
Story Mill Community Park in the East and Sports Park in the West.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Do not install splash pads.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Can help reduce children’s fear of water. Adds community water features that have no admittance fee allowing people of all socio economic
status to enjoy a public aquatics amenity. Geographically separates two installations to best serve the entire community.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Some additional water costs and maintenance will be required. Additional maintenance is estimated at 0.2 FTE
FUNDING SOURCES
Numerous funding options include TOP Bond money, General Fund cash reserves, Park Improvement Grant money, or
combining into an Aquatics Bond vote.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:35
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):8
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):5
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):7
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):7
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):5
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):0
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):3
FY20 FY21
$195,700
FY22
137
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF252
DEPARTMENT
CEMETERY
PROJECT NAME
CEMETERY COLUMBARIUM
FY18
$50,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Adding two (eighty niche each) columbariums to the Sunset Hills Cemetery with the first one scheduled FY18. These additional
columbariums would be installed within the same area as the existing columbariums. Currently, the second columbarium is
approximately 80% sold.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Do not add any columbariums to the cemetery and cease or put on hold the program once the second columbarium is full.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Continuation on a long standing cemetery service, along with ease and minimal maintenance.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Minimal if any.
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:32
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):5
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):7
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):5
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):7
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):0
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):3
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20 FY21
$55,000
FY22
138
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF253
DEPARTMENT
PARKS
PROJECT NAME
Turf Sweeper
FY18
$38,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Sweeper for turf that pulverizes aeration cores, sweeps excess grass and leaves, verticuts and flail mows as well. Also has
hydraulic dumping capacity.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue to use the Toro sweeper until it is done
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
True 4-in 1 machine that keeps parks and fields free of debris and excess material that could smother the grass.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Fuel for the tractor
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:35
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):15
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):5
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):5
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):7
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):0
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):0
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):3
FY20 FY21 FY22
139
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF254
DEPARTMENT
PARKS
PROJECT NAME
25th street from Oak to Tschache
FY18
$287,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Extend 25th street from Oak street to Tschache street along the western border of Rose Park.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Do not build the street or instead build a 10 foot shared use asphalt path in its place.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Coincides with the Transportation plan; increased vehicular flow;
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Increased costs for snow plowing and street sweeping
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund, with any necessary paybacks from adjacent property developers.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:40
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):10
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):5
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):10
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):5
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):5
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):0
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20 FY21 FY22
140
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF260
DEPARTMENT
PARKS
PROJECT NAME
SPORTS COMPLEX - CONSTRUCTION OF 'PROJECT RELATED' COTTONWOOD ROAD AREA
FY18 FY19
$364,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
As owner of the Sports Park property, the City is required to construct a number of street, water, and sewer improvements. In
approval of the Sports Park purchase, $1,778,000 was approved in TOP Bond funding for these infrastructure improvements:
Baxter Lane, Cottonwood Road, Durston/Cottonwood Intersection, Flanders Mill Road (including ditch), and Oak Street. We
estimate that the Bond Funding will not be sufficient to cover the Cottonwood Road (or Oak Street) improvements. We
anticipate needing to build the project-related portions of the Cottonwood Road street-related improvements with Arterial
& Collector District dollars. The related water and sewer-line improvements will need to come from the General Fund. Our
original cost estimates from the Spring of 2014 have been increased by 15% to estimate construction inflation costs.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Delay the improvements.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Proper construction of the adjacent street, water, and sewer improvements, in concert with our development regulations. Better access and
amenities for the Sports Park.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
The City's Street Maintenance Funds will maintain the street surface, once constructed. The utilities will maintain the pipes once
installed.
FUNDING SOURCES
GENERAL FUND.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:45
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):10
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):5
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):5
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):10
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):10
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):0
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20 FY21 FY22
141
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF261
DEPARTMENT
PARKS
PROJECT NAME
SPORTS COMPLEX - CONSTRUCTION OF 'PROJECT RELATED' OAK STREET AREA WATER IM
FY18 FY19
$67,500
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
As owner of the Sports Park property, the City is required to construct a number of street, water, and sewer improvements.
Approval of the Sports Park purchase, $1,778,000 was approved in TOP Bond funding for these infrastructure improvements:
Baxter Lane, Cottonwood Road, Durston/Cottonwood Intersection, Flanders Mill Road (including ditch), Oak Street. We
estimate that the Bond Funding will not be sufficient to cover the Oak Street (or Cottonwood road) improvements. The project-
related portions of the Oak Street area street improvements will be built with Arterial Collector District dollars. Associated
water-line improvements will need to be paid for by the General Fund. Our original cost estimates from the Spring of 2014 have
been increased by 15% to estimate construction inflation costs.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Delay the improvements.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Proper construction of the adjacent street, water, and sewer improvements, in concert with our development regulations. Better access and
amenities for the Sports Park.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
The City's Street Maintenance Funds will maintain the street surface, once constructed. The utilities will maintain the pipes once
installed.
FUNDING SOURCES
GENERAL FUND.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:45
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):10
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):5
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):5
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):10
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):10
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):0
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20 FY21 FY22
142
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF262
DEPARTMENT
POLICE
PROJECT NAME
POLICE K9
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$17,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Police K9 (canine dogs) are an instrumental tool for police operations. The department has two trained K9 teams (handler and
dog) for operations that provide assistance with drug interdiction, search ability for suspect s committing crimes in buildings or
helping locate and identify suspects that have left or fled a crime scene. A trained K9 generally has a maximum of 7-8 years where
the dog is healthy and capable of serving. In FY17, one of two dogs deployed has reached that useful operational timeline, while
the remaining K9 has another 5 years of operational capability. This cost includes full purchase, training of the new K9 handler
(officer) and shipping/transport of the K9 to Bozeman.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Alternative funding is being pursued to limit or even eliminate this cost. Two K9 teams are the minimum needed to sustain public safety
operations.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Continued ability to have K9 on-duty or available to investigate and secure prosecution of criminal activity in Bozeman.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
The operational costs of K9 each year are part of existing budget considerations. This item has not historically been place in CP,
but as the costs of full purchase has risen, this in now being added.
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:47
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):20
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):5
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):7
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):10
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):0
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):0
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20 FY21 FY22
143
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF263
DEPARTMENT
I.T.
PROJECT NAME
Police Video Evidence Storage and Backup
FY18
$50,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
We are currently generating around 1 Terabyte of data per month with the in car video systems and will be out of space for
storage in the next 12-18 months. It is critical information that grows rapidly. We are trying to get ahead of the growth by
purchasing a 5 year solution out of the gate that can be expanded as needed into the future for growth and the possibility of body
cameras. The FY 22 amount relates to the increased storage needed related to body camera files.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Will allow us to continue to safely store, access and backup crucial evidentiary data without concern of running out of storage space.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund or Grant Money
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:32
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):5
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):5
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):10
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):7
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):0
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):0
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20 FY21
$40,000
FY22
144
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF265
DEPARTMENT
I.T.
PROJECT NAME
GENERAL FUND SERVER REPLACEMENT
FY18 FY19
$40,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Replacement of physical servers.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Virtualize if possible instead of buying physical servers
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Keep our server infrastructure under warranty and in good working condition for required performance.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:50
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):20
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):5
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):10
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):10
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):0
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):0
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20 FY21
$36,000
FY22
145
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF266
DEPARTMENT
RECREATION
PROJECT NAME
STORY MILL COMMUNITY CENTER UPGRADE: HVAC, ELECTRICAL, FIRE PROTECTION
FY18
$188,500
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project will make the necessary improvements to the following systems: HVAC, Electrical, and Fire Protection due to the
renovation and change in use of the existing Story Mill Community Center interior space to accommodate five full time Parks and
Recreation Department staff offices and a Recreation Leader work space to accommodate up to 11 part item Recreation Division
staff members. Architectural fees included.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Bringing the new office space up to code, occupant safety, and occupant comfort.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Routine maintenance.
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:37
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):15
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):5
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):5
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):7
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):0
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):0
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20 FY21 FY22
146
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF268
DEPARTMENT
CEMETERY
PROJECT NAME
Southwest Montana Veteran's Cemetery
FY18 FY19
$88,000
Unscheduled
$360,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
First phase of the Southwest Montana Veteran's Cemetery which includes design, earth work, sidewalks and retaining walls to
form the 'backbone' for the Veteran group to start fundraising. Phase two potentially could be the 5500 square foot stamped
concrete plaza and phase three could be the installation of the first columbarium. Phases 2 and 3 potentially be funded with a 50%
match from the veteran's groups for the concrete and the first columbarium.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Reduce the City's capital input and rely on the various Veteran groups for the funding.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
A true veteran's cemetery will help the veteran's realize their benefits upon their death. Currently, there are over 70,000 veterans in southwest
Montana, who upon their death, would have to be interred in Helena or Laurel to realize the benefit.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Future phasing might be required, depending on the fundraising capabilities of the various veteran group in southwest Montana.
FUNDING SOURCES
50% General Fund and funds from various veteran's groups.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:34
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):5
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):2
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):5
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):7
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):10
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):0
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20
$40,000
FY21
$45,000
FY22
147
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF270
DEPARTMENT
PARKS
PROJECT NAME
Snow Plowing Vehicle
FY18 FY19
$70,000
Unscheduled
$75,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The eventual replacement of the 1992 MT articulating tractor, which does the bulk of the sidewalk snow removal for the Parks
Division, encompassing over 17 miles of sidewalks and three routes to plow. The newest cost saving measure is to share the cost
of a vehicle with Streets. The advantage of the co-op is that Parks needs the vehicle in the winter for plowing and Streets in the
summer for right of way mowing. The Parks and Cemetery divisions are responsible for snow removal on the majority of
sidewalks, paths, accesses and trails that the City is responsible for. The addition of Oak Spring Park, Adam Bronken sidewalk and
the Bozeman Pond expansion has necessitated moving up the request for an additional snow removal vehicle into FY19 instead of
FY20.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Repair and maintain the 1992 MT as needed.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Less down time and maintenance/repair costs. A new MT tractor will be able to support more implements, less emissions and better fuel
economy, faster more efficient use of time which will be a factor with the expanding sidewalk and trail snow removal routes as more parks
come on board such as Bozeman Pond expansion, sports Complex and Story Mill Community Park.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual operating and maintenance costs: better fuel economy and less emissions = less maintenance and operating costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% General Fund for Parks but cost share with Street Maintenance District
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:28
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):15
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):5
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):5
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):7
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):0
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):0
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):1
FY20 FY21 FY22
148
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF271
DEPARTMENT
FACILITY - CH
PROJECT NAME
City Hall New Parking Lot
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$250,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Convert existing lot west of City Hall into a new parking lot.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue to use the underutilized lot West of City Hall as a community garden.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Parking at City Hall is very limited due to space constraints, this has an impact on City staff, the general public, and visiting guests. Additional
parking spaces in the West lot should take pressure off of street parking around City Hall as well as allow staff to parking in the same lot. This
will free up the East side parking lot for general public during normal business hours. A new lot will also provide a safer parking environment to
the public during large meetings that take place at City Hall after hours.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
General annual cost for items such as: lamp replacement, line stripping, asphalt reseal, snow removal, and landscaping.
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund or Downtown TIF District Funding
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:23
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):5
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):5
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):5
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):3
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):0
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):0
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20 FY21 FY22
149
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF272
DEPARTMENT
FACILITY - CH
PROJECT NAME
Site Security upgrade - Building Locks
FY18
$15,000
FY19
$15,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Currently the City has approximately 64 Trilogy keyless access locks. Of the 64 units, 18 are wireless units. The remaining 46
hardwired units require physical access with a cable & laptop to make updates for staffing access changes. This project will
upgrade the hardwire units to wireless over a period of time.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue as we currently operate.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Moving to a wireless system means all updates can be performed using the City wide network. The advantages to this system is the better
utilization of staff hours by reducing the required man hours per access update. Depending on the access level required for a staff member, it
could mean accessing 50 individual locks for a single access change.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
General maintenance cost, battery change-outs.
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:37
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):15
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):5
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):2
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):10
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):0
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):0
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20
$15,000
FY21
$15,000
FY22
150
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF273
DEPARTMENT
FACILITY - PROF
PROJECT NAME
Professional Building - Electrical Upgrade
FY18
$75,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The current main electrical distribution gear is original to the building, due to the age of he electrical equipment it has very
limited upgradability as our electrical load increase with this building. An electrical system evaluation is currently underway that
will provide the support details required to make any necessary upgrades to the electrical distribution system.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Do nothing and run the risk in the event of a major failure. The electrical gear is at the age that replacement parts might not be available.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
The age of the electrical distribution gear means that it is difficult or impossible to get any required replacement parts in the event of a major
failure. The IT servers in this building support public safety operations and need to be upgradable and dependable as City's operations continue
to grow. One of the main distribution panels is a single phase panel that has been wired to be functioning as a 3 phase panel. By today's National
Electrical Codes, this in not a recommended practice.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
N/A
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:50
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):20
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):5
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):10
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):10
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):0
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):0
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20 FY21 FY22
151
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF274
DEPARTMENT
FACILITY - CH
PROJECT NAME
City Hall - Bozeman Creek Bridge Improvements
FY18
$25,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Creek bank erosion around the City Hall pedestrian bridge needs to be fortified to reduce the risk of a catastrophic failure that
could impact the operation of the bridge along with access to City Hall. In recent years the bank has eroded back a couple of feet
which has impacted the irrigation system, bridge abutments, and sidewalk dirt compaction.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
If the erosion from Bozeman Creek is not stopped, it will impact the main East sidewalk to City Hall and could cause major structural bridge
safety concerns.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
N/A
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:35
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):15
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):5
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):3
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):7
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):0
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):0
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20 FY21 FY22
152
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF275
DEPARTMENT
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT NAME
Fiber Optic Conduit and Vaults
FY18
$25,000
FY19
$25,000
Unscheduled
$25,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Future City conduit policy will drive the future investment in city owned conduit.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Do nothing, reduce or increase CIP investment.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Provides funding for the purchase of fiber conduit and vaults in furtherance of a future conduit policy
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Cost of design and installation
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:29
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):5
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):5
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):2
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):7
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):7
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):0
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):3
FY20
$25,000
FY21
$25,000 $25,000
FY22
153
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF278
DEPARTMENT
PARKS
PROJECT NAME
Griffin at Story Mill Park road improvement - .26 mile
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$260,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This represents funding the City's 1/2 portion of the East Griffin Road construction as it abuts to Story Mill Community Park.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Construction of a woonerf type road section (or alternative park type road). More accomodating to pedestrian traffic depending on future
development by the property owners adjacent south side E Griffin.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Safe vehiclular an dpedestrian access to municpal facilities.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:42
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):15
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):5
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):5
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):7
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):5
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):0
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20 FY21 FY22
154
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF279
DEPARTMENT
PARKS
PROJECT NAME
Story Mill Road Improvement - .17 mile
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$170,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This represents funding the City's 1/2 portion of the Story Mill Road construction as it abuts to Story Mill Community Park.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
No alternatives considered.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Safe vehicular and pedestrian access to municipal facilities.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:42
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):15
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):5
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):5
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):7
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):5
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):0
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20 FY21 FY22
155
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF280
DEPARTMENT
PARKS
PROJECT NAME
Story Mansion sewer repair
FY18
$18,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The service line from the sewer main to the mansion is in need of repairs. The sewer is frequently backing up into the facility.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Do not repair. Continue to clean-up and maintain.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Will fix a significant operational problem for this rented facility
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
This repair will yield lower operational costs for maintenance.
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund or Story Mansion Special Revenue Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:42
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):15
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):5
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):5
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):7
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):5
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):0
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20 FY21 FY22
156
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF281
DEPARTMENT
PARKS
PROJECT NAME
Bozeman Pond Park & Aasheim ballfields road expansion - .17 mile & .09 mile
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$260,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This represents funding the City's required portion of 1/2 necessary to build Fowler Road adjacent to Bozeman Pond Park
Expansion and Aasheim ballfields.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Waiting to acquire the ROW at the intersection of Fowler and Babcock before constructing these road sections.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Safe vehicular and pedestrian access to municipal parks.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:42
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):15
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):5
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):5
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):7
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):5
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):0
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20 FY21 FY22
157
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF282
DEPARTMENT
FACILITY-CH
PROJECT NAME
Purchase of Property Adjacent to City Hall
FY18
$560,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Purchase property adjacent to existing City Hall for future use.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Do not purchase property.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Dependant on the immediate and long term uses of the property.
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:21
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):5
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):5
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):5
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):3
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):0
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):0
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):3
FY20 FY21 FY22
158
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
PW01 - SH
DEPARTMENT
FACILITY - SH
PROJECT NAME
SHOPS FACILITY EXPANSION PLAN
FY18 FY19
$10,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The construction of the new Vehicle Maintenance Shop at the Lower Yards on Rouse Avenue in FY10/FY11 was Phase I in
expanding and improving our ability to service equipment, store vehicles, and provide work space for Public Works, Parks, and
Facility services. Questions remain about the long-term plan for construction, location, and expansion for: Streets, Sign & Signal,
Forestry, Water/Sewer Operations, Solid Waste Collection & Recycling, Facilities, and Parks & Cemetery departments. This
project would develop a master plan.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Most of the reconfiguration for the existing buildings is now complete. Also the improvements for the Laurel Glen building are complete and
that building is being used for Water/Sewer operations. This work would assess future needs for the departments at the current Shop location
at 814 N. Bozeman. We could also determine whether there is space for additions at both the 814 N. Bozeman location and the new Vehicle
Maintenance building site at 1812 N. Rouse.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
FUNDING SOURCES
From related divisions: General Fund 20% ($10,000), Water Fund 20% ($10,000), Wastewater Fund 20% ($10,000), Street
Maintenance Fund 20% ($10,000), Solid Waste Fund 20% ($10,000).
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:38
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):15
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):3
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):5
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):7
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):0
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):3
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20 FY21 FY22
159
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
PW03
DEPARTMENT
PARKS
PROJECT NAME
Vehicle Maintenance Building Design & Storage Construction
FY18 FY19
$50,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Design and construct vehicle storage
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Having equipment, especially winter equipment, inside
and ready to go extends the life, produces less emissions by not having to warm up and shortens response time.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: All of our rolling stock and equipment.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: The difference in getting in a motor grader that is parked inside vs. one that is
parked outside in -20 degree weather is enormous. Equipment stays in better shape. Much less wear and tear on drivetrain and
hydraulics. Easily adds an hour of productivity to every shift.
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Equipment continues to degrade from the sun and
exposure.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: By being located next to existing city property, we could
t t h lt ii fl ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Not build and only use for outdoor storage.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Large inside storage for several departments. Equipment would be located next to current Vehicle Maintenance Shop. Good access onto
Rouse and Griffin. Early morning shift equipment could be stored here so as not to disturb the neighbors in this mostly zoned Industrial area.
With this building, Streets could switch to producing our own brine solution for pre wet of the sand. We wouldn't have to use mag chloride
which is about 4-5 times more expensive than salt brine. Gallatin County has expressed interest in buying brine from us.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Normal building maintenance. Possibly heat with waste oil from the Shops. Possibly heat with wood chips from Forestry.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project totals $200,000. It will be split evenly 4 ways: Water Fund ($50,000), Wastewater Fund ($50,000), Street
Maintenance ($50,000), and Parks ($50,000).
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:38
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):10
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):10
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):5
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):5
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):0
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):3
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY20 FY21 FY22
160
Li
b
r
a
r
y
De
p
r
e
c
i
a
t
i
o
n
Re
s
e
r
v
e
Fu
n
d
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
Pl
a
n
Fi
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
Su
m
m
a
r
y
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Ye
a
r
FY
1
7
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
F
Y
2
0
F
Y
2
1
F
Y
2
2
Unscheduled
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
Re
s
e
r
v
e
Ba
l
a
n
c
e
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
2
5
9
,
0
0
0
$
20
9
,
0
0
0
$
15
7
,
3
5
7
$
(5
3
,
5
1
8
)
$
(1
3
,
6
1
2
)
$
27,093 $
Pl
u
s
:
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
An
n
u
a
l
Un
s
p
e
n
t
Ap
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
i
o
n
s
38
,
3
5
7
$
39
,
1
2
4
$
39
,
9
0
7
$
40,705
$
41,519 $ ‐$
Pl
u
s
:
Li
b
r
a
r
y
Fo
u
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
fo
r
Bo
o
k
m
o
b
i
l
e
Le
s
s
:
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
d
CI
P
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Co
s
t
s
(5
0
,
0
0
0
)
$
(9
0
,
0
0
0
)
$
(2
5
0
,
0
0
0
)
$
‐
$
‐
$
‐$ ‐$
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Ye
a
r
‐En
d
Ca
s
h
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
20
9
,
0
0
0
$
15
7
,
3
5
7
$
(5
3
,
5
1
8
)
$
(1
3
,
6
1
2
)
$
27,093
$
68,612 $
As
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
s
Ma
d
e
fo
r
Re
v
e
n
u
e
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
s
:
FY
1
8
F
Y
1
9
F
Y
2
0
F
Y
2
1
F
Y
2
2
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
An
n
u
a
l
Li
b
r
a
r
y
Bu
d
g
e
t
1,
9
6
0
,
0
0
0
$
2,
0
1
8
,
8
0
0
$
2,
0
5
9
,
1
7
6
$
2,
1
0
0
,
3
6
0
$
2,
1
4
2
,
3
6
7
$
2,185,214 $
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Am
o
u
n
t
of
Bu
d
g
e
t
le
f
t
Un
u
s
e
d
0.
3
%
1.
9
%
1.
9
%
1.
9
%
1.9%1.9%
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
An
n
u
a
l
Un
s
p
e
n
t
Ap
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
i
o
n
s
5,
8
8
0
$
38
,
3
5
7
$
39
,
1
2
4
$
39
,
9
0
7
$
40,705
$
41,519 $
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Bu
d
g
e
t
Am
o
u
n
t
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
%
10
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
Pl
u
s
:
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
%
0.
0
%
0.
0
%
0.
0
%
0.0%0.0%
To
t
a
l
% De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
10
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
38
,
3
5
7
$
39
,
1
2
4
$
39
,
9
0
7
$
40,705
$
41,519 $
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
CU
R
R
E
N
T
30
0
,
0
0
0
25
0
,
0
0
0
20
0
,
0
0
0
15
0
,
0
0
0
10
0
,
0
0
0
50
,
0
0
0
0
Li
b
r
a
r
y
De
p
r
e
c
i
a
t
i
o
n
Fu
n
d
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
& Eq
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
161
CI
P
PR
O
J
E
C
T
FU
PR
O
J
.
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
PR
O
J
E
C
T
NA
M
E
Unscheduled
FY
2
1
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
FY22
LI
B
1
2
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
PE
D
E
S
T
R
I
A
N
AC
C
E
S
S
‐
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
PA
R
K
I
N
G
LO
T
$3
0
,
0
0
0
LI
B
1
3
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
RE
C
O
N
F
I
G
U
R
A
T
I
O
N
OF
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
SP
A
C
E
LI
B
1
4
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
IM
P
L
E
M
E
N
T
A
T
I
O
N
OF
LA
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
MA
S
T
E
R
PL
A
N
LI
B
2
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
SE
C
U
R
I
T
Y
SY
S
T
E
M
FO
R
TH
E
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
‐
CO
S
T
UN
K
N
O
W
N
,
AN
T
I
C
I
P
A
T
E
D
FO
R
FY
1
8
LI
B
2
1
Li
b
r
a
r
y
TA
S
K
CH
A
I
R
S
FO
R
PU
B
L
I
C
AN
D
ST
A
F
F
$2
0
,
0
0
0
LI
B
2
2
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
NE
W
CA
R
P
E
T
FO
R
TH
E
PU
B
L
I
C
AR
E
A
OF
TH
E
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
.
$2
3
0
,
0
0
0
LI
B
2
3
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
2 CO
P
I
E
R
S
:
CH
I
L
D
R
E
N
'
S
DE
P
T
AN
D
ST
A
F
F
WO
R
K
R
O
O
M
$2
0
,
0
0
0
LI
B
2
4
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
(2
)
SE
L
F
‐CH
E
C
K
KI
O
S
K
FO
R
MA
I
N
AN
D
SE
C
O
N
D
FL
O
O
$4
0
,
0
0
0
Su
m
m
a
r
y f or
Li
b
r
a
r
y De
p re
c
i
a
t
i
o
n
Re
s
e
r
v
e
(8 it
e
m
s
)
To
t
a
l
s
by
ye
a
r
:
$9
0
,
0
0
0
FY
2
1
FY22
FY
1
8
Unscheduled
FY
2
0
$2
5
0
,
0
0
0
FY
1
9
162
CIP Project Fund
Library Depreciation Reserve
PROJECT NUMBER
LIB12
DEPARTMENT
LIBRARY
PROJECT NAME
PEDESTRIAN ACCESS - LIBRARY PARKING LOT
FY18
$30,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Re-design and construction of pedestrian-friendly features in the Library Parking lot. Patrons parking on the west side of the
parking lot have to cross through vehicle traffic and around curbing/medians to access the Library entrance. In addition, proposed
renovations of the old Harrington Building adjacent to the Library have included adding a pedestrian pathway, crossing from
Wallace to the Library parking lot. This improvement to pedestrian access to the parking lot is expected to have consequences
for how many people will be crossing through this heavily used lot. Accessability requirements for line-of-travel and the need to
navigate the existing curbs are a concern. Some parking spaces may have to be eliminated. A revised site plan has been completed
by WTI with estimated construction costs for Phase I of $50,000 and Phase II at $30,000 – Downtown TIF participating in an
amount of TBD, with the balance coming from the Library Depreciation Reserve. The Library Foundation will also participate by
providing the funds needed for changes to the landscaping.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Leave parking lot configuration the way it is - without a pedestrian path from Wallace.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Improved safety for pedestrians trying to access the Library or cross the library property.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
None.
FUNDING SOURCES
Library Depreciation Reserve - with possible contribution from the Downtown Tax Increment District.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
163
CIP Project Fund
Library Depreciation Reserve
PROJECT NUMBER
LIB13
DEPARTMENT
LIBRARY
PROJECT NAME
RECONFIGURATION OF EXISTING BUILDING SPACE
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The Library’s Strategic Plan for 2013-2017 includes reviewing current Library space usage and ensuring that we are using it as
efficiently and effectively as possible. We are working with local architect, Rob Pertzborn, (funded by the Foundation) to see
what options we have for possibly reconfiguring some of our existing space, i.e. the Computer Training Lab and the Foundation
offices. The Strategic Plan also calls for more space that can be used by local businesspeople and patrons for planning and creative
purposes. We have begun meeting with the architect but no decisions have been made and the project is still in initial phases, so
no dollar amount has been determined yet.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Leaving the interior space utilization as it currently exists.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
The Library’s two public meeting rooms are booked months in advance, so people ask the Library staff for quiet space to have small meetings
frequently. One of our goals is to have a public work space that would include a 3-D printer and other materials conducive to creativity. That
could only be accomplished by making some changes to the current space configuration, and would answer the requests from the public.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
FUNDING SOURCES
Library Depreciation Reserve
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
164
CIP Project Fund
Library Depreciation Reserve
PROJECT NUMBER
LIB14
DEPARTMENT
LIBRARY
PROJECT NAME
IMPLEMENTATION OF LANDSCAPE MASTER PLAN
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The Library currently has no completed Grounds Master Plan; although there are plans for the installation of memorial benches
and trees. We want to work with a landscape architect to develop a plan that will replace high-maintenance plants with low-
maintenance, drought-resistant plantings that will enhance the Library’s grounds and maintain the Library’s appearance as a
community jewel. This would also complement the landscaping that has been done by the owners of the Harrington building on
south Wallace, adjacent to the Library’s west property line, and accommodate any upgrades to the parking lot that would be
made this year (LIB12). Because the project is in the initial phases, there is no estimate of cost yet.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Maintain the current grounds appearance.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
The Library staff gets regular complaints and comments from our customers regarding the weeds in the ‘dog bones” of the parking lot, and the
sometimes unkempt flower beds and grounds. City Facilities staff do their best to keep the grounds mowed but weeding the current rocky
spaces is almost impossible due to their design. The current plantings are high-maintenance and time-intensive, which makes keeping them
healthy and attractive very difficult. We would like to keep the Library’s appearance up and remain a place that community members are proud
of; a landscaping master plan will help us do that.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
FUNDING SOURCES
Library Depreciation Reserve
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
165
CIP Project Fund
Library Depreciation Reserve
PROJECT NUMBER
LIB20
DEPARTMENT
LIBRARY
PROJECT NAME
Security System for the Library - cost unknown, anticipated for FY18
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Installation of a security system with cameras for the Library’s interior, lobby, and exterior. This will be an agenda item for
discussion during an upcoming Library Board meeting.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue without security system
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased safety of Library customers and staff; increased security for the many thousands of dollars of materials, equipment and art in the
Library.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
FUNDING SOURCES
Library Depreciation Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
166
CIP Project Fund
Library Depreciation Reserve
PROJECT NUMBER
LIB21
DEPARTMENT
Library
PROJECT NAME
Task chairs for public and staff
FY18
$20,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Purchase 75 task chairs to replace worn out public and staff chairs that were purchased ten years ago and have been in constant
use since then.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue to use chairs that are currently in use until they disintegrate.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Ensure comfort and safety of the staff and patrons in need of appropriate seating.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
FUNDING SOURCES
Library Depreciation Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
167
CIP Project Fund
Library Depreciation Reserve
PROJECT NUMBER
LIB22
DEPARTMENT
LIBRARY
PROJECT NAME
New carpet for the public area of the Library.
FY18 FY19
$230,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Replace worn carpeting in Library on both floors, in public areas.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Library patrons and staff will continue to walk on worn carpet.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
The 10-yr. old carpet is beginning to show a great deal of wear from the 1000-1500 people a day who come through the library. It will have to
be replace at some point for both aesthetic reasons and as a safety precaution.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
FUNDING SOURCES
Library Depreciation Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
168
CIP Project Fund
Library Depreciation Reserve
PROJECT NUMBER
LIB23
DEPARTMENT
LIBRARY
PROJECT NAME
2 copiers: Children's Dept and staff workroom
FY18 FY19
$20,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Place a small color copier in the Children's Department and replace the aging black & white printer in the staff workroom until it
quits.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Place a small color copier in the Children's Department and replace the aging black & white printer in the staff workroom until it quits.
Continue to provide only black & white copies to public in Children’s; use the existing black & white printer in the staff workroom until it quits.
According to the service rep, we will not be able to get parts for the machine after the next year.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Patrons of the Children’s department have asked for color printing for some time and will be pleased to have this service. A new color printer
in the staff workroom will help Library staff complete work efficiently.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
FUNDING SOURCES
Library Depreciation Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
169
CIP Project Fund
Library Depreciation Reserve
PROJECT NUMBER
LIB24
DEPARTMENT
LIBRARY
PROJECT NAME
(2) Self-check kiosk for Main and Second floo
FY18
$40,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
We need to put a self-check kiosk on the second floor to accommodate people who want to check their materials out
themselves and leave, rather than waiting in line to use the self-check machines on the first floor. This is in response to numerous
patron requests. It will lessen the burden on circulation staff and serve the patrons more efficiently.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue to have no self-check machines upstairs and send everyone to the first floor Circulation desk or two kiosks.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Less dependence on Library staff and greater efficiency for Library patrons.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
FUNDING SOURCES
Library Depreciation Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
170
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
Fu
n
d
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
Pl
a
n
Fi
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
Su
m
m
a
r
y
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Ye
a
r
FY
1
7
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
F
Y
2
0
F
Y
2
1
F
Y
2
2
Unscheduled
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
Ba
l
a
n
c
e
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
16
6
,
6
1
6
$
17
6
,
6
1
6
$
19
0
,
7
1
6
$
14
6
,
2
4
2
$
17
4
,
8
6
2
$
12
5
,
9
1
4
$
Ca
s
h
In
Lie
u
of
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
Pl
u
s
:
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
‐
$
44
,
1
0
0
$
46
,
3
0
5
$
48
,
6
2
0
$
51
,
0
5
1
$
53
,
6
0
4
$
‐$
Pl
u
s
:
Do
w
n
t
o
w
n
TI
F
In
t
e
r
e
s
t
Co
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
10
,
0
0
0
$
10
,
0
0
0
$
10
,
0
0
0
$
10
,
0
0
0
$
10
,
0
0
0
$
10
,
0
0
0
$
Pl
u
s
:
TI
F
Co
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
fo
r
pa
r
k
i
n
g
lo
t
re
d
e
s
i
g
n
an
d
im
p
r
o
v
.
‐
$
25
0
,
0
0
0
$
30
0
,
0
0
0
$
28
0
,
0
0
0
$
17
0
,
0
0
0
$
Pl
u
s
:
Ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
TI
F
Co
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
Re
q
u
e
s
t
‐
$
‐
$
Le
s
s
:
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
d
CI
P
Co
s
t
s
(a
d
j
u
s
t
e
d
)
‐
$
(2
9
0
,
0
0
0
)
$
(4
0
0
,
7
7
9
)
$
(3
1
0
,
0
0
0
)
$
(2
8
0
,
0
0
0
)
$
(4
5
,
0
0
0
)
$
(2,310,000)$
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Ye
a
r
‐En
d
Ca
s
h
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
17
6
,
6
1
6
$
19
0
,
7
1
6
$
14
6
,
2
4
2
$
17
4
,
8
6
2
$
12
5
,
9
1
4
$
14
4
,
5
1
7
$
As
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
s
Ma
d
e
fo
r
Re
v
e
n
u
e
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
s
:
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Ye
a
r
FY
1
7
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
F
Y
2
1
F
Y
2
2
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
An
n
u
a
l
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
Fu
n
d
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
70
0
,
0
0
0
$
70
0
,
0
0
0
$
73
5
,
0
0
0
$
77
1
,
7
5
0
$
81
0
,
3
3
8
$
85
0
,
8
5
4
$
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Gr
o
w
t
h
in
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
‐
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
70
0
,
0
0
0
$
73
5
,
0
0
0
$
77
1
,
7
5
0
$
81
0
,
3
3
8
$
85
0
,
8
5
4
$
89
3
,
3
9
7
$
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
%
0.
0
%
0.
0
%
6.
0
%
6.
0
%
6
.
0
%
6
.
0
%
Pl
u
s
:
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
%
0.
0
%
6.
0
%
0.
0
%
0.
0
%
0
.
0
%
0
.
0
%
To
t
a
l
% De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
0.
0
%
6.
0
%
6.
0
%
6.
0
%
6
.
0
%
6
.
0
%
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
‐
$
44
,
1
0
0
$
46
,
3
0
5
$
48
,
6
2
0
$
51
,
0
5
1
$
53
,
6
0
4
$
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
CU
R
R
E
N
T
2,5
0
0
,
0
0
0
2,2
5
0
,
0
0
0
2,0
0
0
,
0
0
0
1,7
5
0
,
0
0
0
1,5
0
0
,
0
0
0
1,2
5
0
,
0
0
0
1,0
0
0
,
0
0
0
75
0
,
0
0
0
50
0
,
0
0
0
25
0
,
0
0
0
0
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
Fu
n
d
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
171
CI
P
PR
O
J
E
C
T
FU
PR
O
J
.
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
PR
O
J
E
C
T
NA
M
E
Unscheduled
FY
2
1
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
FY22
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
Fu
n
d
GF
1
9
9
PA
R
K
I
N
G
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
RE
C
O
N
F
I
G
U
R
A
T
I
O
N
‐
PH
A
S
E
2
$3
5
,
7
7
9
P0
0
1
PA
R
K
I
N
G
WI
L
L
S
O
N
LO
T
RE
D
E
S
I
G
N
$3
0
0
,
0
0
0
P0
0
4
PA
R
K
I
N
G
SU
R
F
A
C
E
PA
R
K
I
N
G
LO
T
HA
R
D
W
A
R
E
&
SO
F
T
W
A
R
E
SY
S
T
E
M
S
$1
5
,
0
0
0
$1
5
,
0
0
0
$1
5
,
0
0
0
$15,000
P0
1
2
PA
R
K
I
N
G
AR
M
O
R
Y
LO
T
RE
D
E
S
I
G
N
AN
D
IM
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
$2
5
0
,
0
0
0
P0
1
3
PA
R
K
I
N
G
BL
A
C
K
(C
A
R
N
E
G
I
E
)
LO
T
RE
D
E
S
I
G
N
&
IM
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
$410,000
P0
1
4
PA
R
K
I
N
G
PA
R
K
I
N
G
GA
R
A
G
E
CR
A
C
K
MA
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
AN
D
RE
P
A
I
R
$5
,
0
0
0
$0
$5
,
0
0
0
$2
0
,
0
0
0
$5
,
0
0
0
$20,000
P0
1
5
PA
R
K
I
N
G
PA
R
K
I
N
G
GA
R
A
G
E
RO
O
F
PR
O
J
E
C
T
$400,000
P0
1
6
PA
R
K
I
N
G
PU
R
C
H
A
S
E
OF
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
FO
R
FU
T
U
R
E
PA
R
K
I
N
G
FA
C
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
IN
TH
E
DO
W
N
T
O
W
N
PA
R
K
I
N
G
DI
S
T
R
I
C
T
.
$1,500,000
P0
1
7
PA
R
K
I
N
G
RO
U
S
E
PA
R
K
I
N
G
LO
T
RE
‐DE
S
I
G
N
AN
D
IM
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
$2
8
0
,
0
0
0
P0
2
0
PA
R
K
I
N
G
PA
R
K
I
N
G
VE
H
I
C
L
E
LE
A
S
E
S
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$10,000
P0
2
1
PA
R
K
I
N
G
PO
R
T
A
B
L
E
RA
D
I
O
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
$2
0
,
0
0
0
P0
2
2
PA
R
K
I
N
G
PA
R
K
I
N
G
GA
R
A
G
E
AN
D
CI
T
A
T
I
O
N
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
$2
5
0
,
0
0
0
P0
2
3
PA
R
K
I
N
G
PA
R
K
I
N
G
GA
R
A
G
E
SE
C
U
R
I
T
Y
CA
M
E
R
A
S
$2
5
,
0
0
0
Su
m
m
a
r
y f or
Pa
r
k
i
n
g Fu
n
d
(13
it
e
m
s
)
To
t
a
l
s
by
ye
a
r
:
$2
8
0
,
0
0
0
$
4
5
,
0
0
0
$2
9
0
,
0
0
0
$2,310,000
FY
2
1
FY22
FY
1
8
Unscheduled
FY
2
0
$3
1
0
,
0
0
0
$4
0
0
,
7
7
9
FY
1
9
172
CIP Project Fund
Parking Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF199
DEPARTMENT
PARKING
PROJECT NAME
PROFESSIONAL BUILDING RECONFIGURATION - Phase 2
FY18 FY19
$35,779
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The City is responding to growth by adding staff to meet the increased demand for services in our community. We have also
reorganized divisions (Community Development) and created other divisions (Stormwater) to improve efficiency and better serve
our community. In order to accommodate this growth, we need to remodel the Stiff Building. In FY16 the City Commission
approved a Phase 1 of the remodel that will provide a better use of existing space by relocating certain functions to the basement
and reclaiming unused square footage. Approval of Phase II would allow the consolidation of Community Development (Planning
and Building) together on one floor and the consolidation of Public Works Services (Engineering, GIS and Stormwater) together
on another floor. This will allow better coordination of staff and better service to our public. Phase 1 is anticipated to be
completed late spring of 2016.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue to operate as we are today
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Community Development would be able to consolidate its operations and services to allow for an integrated customer-focused service delivery
model. It will also provide Public Works with the ability to collocate its services in the Stiff Building. Finally it will help the City to take a planned
and efficient approach to building utilization and service optimization.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
No additional operating costs anticipated for building reconfiguration.
FUNDING SOURCES
Building Inspection, Community Development, General Fund, Parking, Water
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
173
CIP Project Fund
Parking Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
P001
DEPARTMENT
PARKING
PROJECT NAME
Willson Lot Redesign
FY18 FY19
$300,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Improve the parking lot layout, set-backs, landscaping, signage, lighting, required storm water treatment infrastructure
requirements and parking kiosk.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Keep lot as is
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Improved functioning of parking lot
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Minimal
FUNDING SOURCES
Parking Fund and TIF Contribution
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
174
CIP Project Fund
Parking Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
P004
DEPARTMENT
PARKING
PROJECT NAME
Surface Parking Lot Hardware & Software Systems
FY18 FY19
$15,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
It is highly likely the Downtown Parking Lots will be transitioned to a fee lots. This will require the purchase and installation of
pay-and-display kiosks for each parking lot estimated to cost $60,000. The pads and vehicle protection will be installed as a part of
each surface lot’s redesign.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Do not convert lots to pay lots; continue the current practice of permit holders and free 2-hour parking.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Citizens using the surface lots will pay for the actual time they use the facilities. Revenue from parking charges can be used to support the
parking operations and fund additional parking assets. This equipment will improve the efficiency of parking officers monitoring parking rules in
the downtown.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Minor operational costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
Parking Fund and TIF Contributions
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$15,000
FY21
$15,000
FY22
$15,000
175
CIP Project Fund
Parking Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
P012
DEPARTMENT
PARKING
PROJECT NAME
Armory Lot Redesign and Improvements
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project is scheduled after the completion of the Etha Hotel construction project. Layout, set-backs, landscaping, signage,
lighting, sidewalks, and storm water treatment facilities are being planned.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Keep the lot as is.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Better functioning and safer parking lot layout. Will reduce a significant amount of untreated stormwater runoff. Increased revenue and parking
asset coordination through the implementation of pay kiosks.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
New asphalt will require less maintenance, but plantings and landscaping will require additional maintenance.
FUNDING SOURCES
Parking Fund and TIF Contributions - the Etha Hotel may also help fund these improvements.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21
$250,000
FY22
176
CIP Project Fund
Parking Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
P013
DEPARTMENT
PARKING
PROJECT NAME
Black (Carnegie) Lot Redesign & Improvements
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$410,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Improve the parking lot with layout, set-backs, landscaping, signage, lighting, sidewalks, and required storm water treatment
infrastructure. This site may provide an important location for a regional underground storm water retention and treatment
system under the parking surface.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Keep the lot as is.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Better functioning and safer parking lot layout. Will reduce a significant amount of untreated stormwater runoff. Increased revenue and parking
asset coordination through the implementation of pay kiosks.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
New asphalt will require less maintenance, but plantings and landscaping will require additional maintenance.
FUNDING SOURCES
Parking Fund and TIF Contribution. Potential for Stormwater program funding.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
177
CIP Project Fund
Parking Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
P014
DEPARTMENT
PARKING
PROJECT NAME
Parking Garage Crack Maintenance and Repair
FY18
$5,000
FY19
$20,000
Unscheduled
$0
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Includes laser measuring of deck gaps and routine repairs and patching of concrete deck surfaces. Structural gap repair is
anticipated every 3 years with routine caulking in between.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Moving to an every other year gap maintenance or reducing the frequency of structural gap filling (not advised).
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Will extend the life of the parking garage deck surfaces.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
None
FUNDING SOURCES
Parking Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$5,000
FY21
$5,000
FY22
$20,000
178
CIP Project Fund
Parking Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
P015
DEPARTMENT
PARKING
PROJECT NAME
Parking Garage Roof Project
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$400,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Construction in the downtown core has increased demand for parking space in the Garage. The demand for additional space is
anticipated with construction projects both planned and underway. The top floor of the garage has limited use during the winter
months as snow removal is difficult due to limited clearances. Installing a roof on the top floor would allow for maximum
utilization of the garage year around.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased utilization of the Parking Garage in all weather conditions.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
FUNDING SOURCES
Parking Fund and TIF Contributions
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
179
CIP Project Fund
Parking Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
P016
DEPARTMENT
PARKING
PROJECT NAME
Purchase of property for future parking facilities in the Downtown Parking District.
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$1,500,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The Downtown Strategic Parking Management Plan was adopted by the Parking omission and City Commission in July 2016. The
plan outlines 26 strategies to address current and future parking issue in the Downtown. Over the next year, the Parking
Commission will be working with city staff, downtown stakeholders and the community at large on next steps based on the
adopted plan. The acquisition and construction of future parking assets (surface and structured) is a fundamental component.
Costs and locations of those needed assets are not know, but our current Black (Carnegie) Parking lot was appraised at $1.5 M in
2011.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Adequate parking resources are critical for the economic health and vibrancy of the Downtown Bozeman.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Additional lot maintenance each year/season.
FUNDING SOURCES
Parking Fund, Bonds, TIF, Loans, SID
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
180
CIP Project Fund
Parking Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
P017
DEPARTMENT
PARKING
PROJECT NAME
Rouse Parking Lot Re-design and Improvements
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Rouse Lot Improvements – Layout, set-backs, landscaping, signage, lighting, sidewalks, and stormwater treatment facilities. These
improvements are separate from any creek restoration project and will only involve the surface lot.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Maintain current configuration.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Better functioning and safer parking lot layout. Increased revenue and parking asset coordination through the implementation of pay kiosks.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
New asphalt will require less maintenance, but plantings and landscaping will require additional maintenance.
FUNDING SOURCES
Parking Fund, TIF contribution for lot improvements.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$280,000
FY21 FY22
181
CIP Project Fund
Parking Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
P020
DEPARTMENT
PARKING
PROJECT NAME
Parking Vehicle Leases
FY18
$10,000
FY19
$10,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
In the fall of 2016, the Parking Division transitioned from utilizing old Police vehicles to leased Prius hybrids. Initial indications are
that these vehicles will work exceptionally well for parking enforcement duties and will reduce the fuel consumption and
maintenance costs when compared to the retired patrol vehicles.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue to use retired patrol vehicles, lease hybrid vehicles at $280/mp. 12,000 mile annual usage. Purchase new cars.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Low cost vehicles that are suitable for the Parking Enforcement function; re-use of police vehicles once they are no longer suitable for first-
responder use.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Anticipating maintenance requirements for used police vehicles is difficult at best as their age and condition were the primary reasons they were
replaced in the PD. Maintenance and operations for leased vehicles would be limited to oil changes and fuel costs and would be significantly
lower than the current fleet.
FUNDING SOURCES
Parking Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$10,000
FY21
$10,000
FY22
$10,000
182
CIP Project Fund
Parking Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
P021
DEPARTMENT
PARKING
PROJECT NAME
Portable Radio Replacement
FY18 FY19
$20,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This replacement project is dependent on the technology determination for the City’s police and fire departments. We
recommend using the same platform (digital trunked) as police and fire, and the cost of the units will be similar to those specified
for that system.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue the use of the current portables to the point of failure. Purchase less expensive models.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
These portable radios are the primary means of emergency communications with 9-1-1 and police units. Providing the Parking Enforcement
Officers with reliable push-to-talk communications improves safety and efficiency of staff by ensuring they are in immediate contact should they
need help themselves or need to report an emergency during their patrols.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Routine maintenance and battery replacements.
FUNDING SOURCES
Parking Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
183
CIP Project Fund
Parking Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
P022
DEPARTMENT
PARKING
PROJECT NAME
Parking Garage and Citation Equipment
FY18
$250,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The parking garage equipment (barrier gates, card readers, ticket machines and pay stations) were purchased and installed in
2008. As the parking garage is not staffed, this equipment must be highly reliable and operate with limited staff intervention. Too
often breakdowns strand parking customers in the garage until the gates are forced open, driven through, or are opened manually
by staff. These malfunctions anger customers and diminish trust in the facility and of local government operations in general.
Additionally, hotels using the garage for parking are requesting equipment to provide validation tickets for their customers. Our
current system does not allow this capability in an affordable package. New technology and user interfaces will improve reliability
and customer experience and allow for increased revenue through more reliable equipment operation and enforcement. The
Parking Commission reordered the priorities previously listed in the CIP to accommodate tax increment funding and fund the
replacement of the garage equipment and citation software (thought to be a software as service purchase).
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue to use the current equipment and interfaces.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Parking customers will experience improved payment options and reliability in the operation of the garage. Garage revenue will increase as the
gates will operate more regularly. Staff will spend less time repairing equipment and responding to calls for malfunctioning gates and payment
machines. Public trust in the garage and parking operations will most likely improve while equipment damage and vandalism will likely decrease.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Standard maintenance agreements
FUNDING SOURCES
Parking Fund, TIF
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
184
CIP Project Fund
Parking Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
P023
DEPARTMENT
PARKING
PROJECT NAME
Parking Garage Security Cameras
FY18
$25,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Presently Bridger Park has two video cameras coving the exit gates on Mendenhall and Black Streets. The cameras, while high
quality, do not provide adequate security of the garage. It has been the plan to install additional cameras in key locations, but we
have been limited by the speed of our internet connection. The installation of fiber in the garage has provided the needed
bandwidth to install additional cameras to provide security on all levels and the stairwells.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue to monitor only the exit gates.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased security. We anticipate the installation of additional cameras will provide an important deterrence and will help the police to identify
vehicles and those who choose to commit acts of vandalism and other criminal behavior. We may also receive additional reimbursements form
the courts for damaged equipment if the parties responsible can be identified.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Maintenance for vandalized cameras and equipment.
FUNDING SOURCES
Parking Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
185
186
So
l
i
d
Wa
s
t
e
Co
l
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
& Re
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
Pl
a
n
Fi
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
Su
m
m
a
r
y
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Ye
a
r
FY
1
7
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
F
Y
2
0
F
Y
2
1
F
Y
2
2
Unscheduled
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
Re
s
e
r
v
e
Ba
l
a
n
c
e
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
14
5
,
0
0
0
$
31
,
7
1
0
$
60
,
2
5
6
$
24
1
,
7
2
9
$
187,275
$
480,099 $ ‐$
Pl
u
s
:
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
43
6
,
7
1
0
$
45
8
,
5
4
6
$
48
1
,
4
7
3
$
50
5
,
5
4
7
$
530,824
$
557,365 $ ‐$
Le
s
s
:
Ca
r
r
y
o
v
e
r
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
fr
o
m
FY
1
6
(4
4
0
,
0
0
0
)
$
Le
s
s
:
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
d
CI
P
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Co
s
t
s
(1
1
0
,
0
0
0
)
$
(4
3
0
,
0
0
0
)
$
(3
0
0
,
0
0
0
)
$
(5
6
0
,
0
0
0
)
$
(238,000)
$
(250,000)$
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Ye
a
r
‐En
d
Ca
s
h
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
31
,
7
1
0
$
60
,
2
5
6
$
24
1
,
7
2
9
$
18
7
,
2
7
5
$
480,099
$
787,465 $ ‐$
As
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
s
Ma
d
e
fo
r
Re
v
e
n
u
e
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
s
:
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Ye
a
r
FY
1
7
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
F
Y
2
0
F
Y
2
1
F
Y
2
2
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
An
n
u
a
l
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
3,
3
5
9
,
3
0
9
$
3,
3
5
9
,
3
0
9
$
3,
5
2
7
,
2
7
4
$
3,
7
0
3
,
6
3
8
$
3,888,820
$
4,083,261 $
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
An
n
u
a
l
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
in
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
‐
5.
0
%
5.
0
%
5
.
0
%
5
.
0
%
5
.
0
%
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
3,
3
5
9
,
3
0
9
$
3,
5
2
7
,
2
7
4
$
3,
7
0
3
,
6
3
8
$
3,
8
8
8
,
8
2
0
$
4,083,261
$
4,287,424 $
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
%
13
.
0
%
13
.
0
%
1
3
.
0
%
1
3
.
0
%
1
3
.
0
%
1
3
.
0
%
Pl
u
s
:
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
0.
0
%
0.
0
%
0.
0
%
0
.
0
%
0
.
0
%
0
.
0
%
To
t
a
l
% De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
13
.
0
%
13
.
0
%
1
3
.
0
%
1
3
.
0
%
1
3
.
0
%
1
3
.
0
%
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
43
6
,
7
1
0
$
45
8
,
5
4
6
$
48
1
,
4
7
3
$
50
5
,
5
4
7
$
530,824
$
557,365 $
No
t
e
:
20
1
2
Ra
t
e
St
u
d
y
id
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
s
$3
6
7
,
0
0
0
in total annual
de
p
r
e
c
i
a
t
i
o
n
ex
p
e
n
s
e
.
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
CU
R
R
E
N
T
60
0
,
0
0
0
50
0
,
0
0
0
40
0
,
0
0
0
30
0
,
0
0
0
20
0
,
0
0
0
10
0
,
0
0
0
0
So
l
i
d
Wa
s
t
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
& Eq
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
187
CI
P
PR
O
J
E
C
T
FU
PR
O
J
.
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
PR
O
J
E
C
T
NA
M
E
Unscheduled
FY
2
1
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
FY22
So
l
i
d
Wa
s
t
e
SW
3
2
CO
L
L
E
C
T
I
O
N
FR
O
N
T
LO
A
D
TR
U
C
K
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
$2
7
0
,
0
0
0
SW
3
6
CO
L
L
E
C
T
I
O
N
SI
D
E
LO
A
D
TR
U
C
K
‐
NE
W
(A
D
D
I
T
I
O
N
A
L
RO
U
T
E
)
$2
9
0
,
0
0
0
SW
3
8
CO
L
L
E
C
T
I
O
N
SI
D
E
LO
A
D
TR
U
C
K
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
OF
AS
S
E
T
#3
3
6
7
$3
0
0
,
0
0
0
SW
4
2
CO
L
L
E
C
T
I
O
N
ST
O
R
A
G
E
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
$1
3
0
,
0
0
0
SW
4
5
CO
L
L
E
C
T
I
O
N
TO
T
E
DE
L
I
V
E
R
Y
TR
U
C
K
$3
8
,
0
0
0
SW
4
6
CO
L
L
E
C
T
I
O
N
GR
A
P
P
L
E
TR
U
C
K
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
SW
4
9
CO
L
L
E
C
T
I
O
N
SI
D
E
LO
A
D
TR
U
C
K
‐
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
OF
AS
S
E
T
#3
4
5
2
$3
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
3
8
,
0
0
0
$4
3
0
,
0
0
0
$3
0
0
,
0
0
0
$5
6
0
,
0
0
0
So
l
i
d
Wa
s
t
e
SW
4
7
SO
L
I
D
WA
S
T
E
SO
L
I
D
WA
S
T
E
RA
T
E
ST
U
D
Y
$50,000
SW
4
8
SO
L
I
D
WA
S
T
E
TR
O
M
M
E
L
SC
R
E
E
N
$200,000 $250,000
Su
m
m
a
r
y f or
So
l
i
d
Wa
s
t
e
(9 it
e
m
s
)
To
t
a
l
s
by
ye
a
r
:
$2
3
8
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
$4
3
0
,
0
0
0
FY
2
1
FY22
FY
1
8
Unscheduled
FY
2
0
$5
6
0
,
0
0
0
$3
0
0
,
0
0
0
FY
1
9
188
CIP Project Fund
Solid Waste
PROJECT NUMBER
SW32
DEPARTMENT
COLLECTION
PROJECT NAME
Front Load Truck Replacement
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This truck is a replacement for an existing front-load truck currently collecting residential and commercial refuse.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: This equipment is critical to the operation of the Solid
Waste Division. Customer depend on refuse removal on their collection day
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: Efficiency is improved with this equipment on the chassis side with increased fuel
efficiency and emission reductions
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: This equipment will be used in the collection of refuse for Bozeman
customers.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Leasing a front-load truck.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: We will be forced to use existing equipment longer leading to higher
repair costs and longer downtime of trucks not on route. Can lead to declining customer confidence resulting in loosing customer accounts.
Reliable equipment to ensure routes completed in an efficient manner. Maintenance costs of new equipment will be lower.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Average maintenance costs: $10,000/year
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Solid Waste Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$270,000
FY21 FY22
189
CIP Project Fund
Solid Waste
PROJECT NUMBER
SW36
DEPARTMENT
COLLECTION
PROJECT NAME
Side Load Truck - New (Additional Route)
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Side Load Truck - New (Additional Route)
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: This equipment is critical to the operation of the Solid
Waste Division. Customers depend on refuse removal on their collection day
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: Efficiency is improved with this equipment on the chassis side with increased fuel
efficiency and emission reductions. The packer mounted on the chassis also see improvements thru better operator agronomics
with joystick controls and better packer function options.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: This equipment will be used in the collection of refuse for Bozeman
customers
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Leasing a side-load truck
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: We will be forced to use existing equipment longer leading to higher
repair costs and longer downtime of trucks not on route. Can lead to declining customer confidence resulting in loosing customer accounts.
Reliable equipment to ensure routes completed in an efficient manner. Maintenance costs of new equipment will be lower.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual operating and maintenance costs = $30,000
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Solid Waste Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$290,000
FY21 FY22
190
CIP Project Fund
Solid Waste
PROJECT NUMBER
SW38
DEPARTMENT
COLLECTION
PROJECT NAME
Side Load Truck Replacement of Asset #3367
FY18 FY19
$300,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This truck is a replacement for an existing side-load truck currently collecting residential refuse.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: This equipment is critical to the operation of the Solid
Waste Division. Customer depend on refuse removal on their collection day.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: Efficiency is improved with this equipment on the chassis side with increased fuel
efficiency and emission reductions. The packer mounted on the chassis also see improvements thru better operator ergonomics
with joystick controls and better packer function options.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: This equipment will be used in the collection of refuse for Bozeman
customers
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Leasing a side-load truck
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: We will be forced to use existing equipment longer leading to higher
repair costs and longer downtime of trucks not on route. Can lead to declining customer confidence resulting in loosing customer accounts.
Reliable equipment to ensure routes completed in an efficient manner. Maintenance costs of new equipment will be lower.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual operating and maintenance costs = $30,000
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Solid Waste Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
191
CIP Project Fund
Solid Waste
PROJECT NUMBER
SW42
DEPARTMENT
COLLECTION
PROJECT NAME
Storage Building
FY18
$130,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Solid Waste Storage Building
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Allows us to store containers indoors out of Sunlight,
container can be left in stack form and be assembled as needed. We have about 2,000 containers in stock. Also house all the
repair items such as lids, wheels for each size for totes and dumpsters.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue to store items outside
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: We continue to work outdoors in poor weather conditions to assemble
600 totes as they are off loaded. If totes are not assembled quickly, it becomes impossible to pull them apart, as the totes are stacked together.
Protect equipment from the elements of weather; All of our containers can be stored inside, not collecting water, exposure to sun and be less
visible to adjacent properties.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Operating costs, electricity for lights = < $1,000/ year
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Solid Waste Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
192
CIP Project Fund
Solid Waste
PROJECT NUMBER
SW45
DEPARTMENT
COLLECTION
PROJECT NAME
Tote Delivery Truck
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This truck is a replacement for an existing tote delivery truck
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: This truck is critical in the execution of container
management. Totes need to be delivered to new customers, exchange of totes for customers and removal of totes.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: Used for the tote management of Solid Waste customers
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Leasing a truck
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Will have an significant impact on the daily operation of the Solid Waste
Division. The Solid Waste Division can continue to deliver, exchange and remove customer tote requests.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Maintenance costs $1,000/year
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Solid Waste Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21
$38,000
FY22
193
CIP Project Fund
Solid Waste
PROJECT NUMBER
SW46
DEPARTMENT
COLLECTION
PROJECT NAME
Grapple Truck
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Truck with articulating arm with clam shells that will pick up large items and place into dump box
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Work can still be done by hand, increasing risk of back
injury .
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: Efficiency is accomplished thru our work comp rates.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: This equipment will be used in the collection of bulky item and brush
removal.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Leasing a grapple truck
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: We continue to collect these large items by hand. Equipment would be
used to pick up large bulky items and brush. Currently we manually load these items by hand.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Maintenance cost: $6,000 per year
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Solid Waste Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21
$200,000
FY22
194
CIP Project Fund
Solid Waste
PROJECT NUMBER
SW47
DEPARTMENT
SOLID WASTE
PROJECT NAME
Solid Waste Rate Study
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Solid Waste Rate Study - including an analysis of revenue requirements, funding depreciation, and cost recovery by customer class.
The most recent rate study was completed in 2013 and should be updated.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue with current rates.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Customers will be appropriately charged for their garbage and recycling services. Full cost accounting, rates based on cost of services.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
NA
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Solid Waste Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
$50,000
195
CIP Project Fund
Solid Waste
PROJECT NUMBER
SW48
DEPARTMENT
SOLID WASTE
PROJECT NAME
Trommel Screen
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
A screen that can separate out garbage from finished compost and separate the size of compost.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: This is the final stage of the composting process.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: Currently we do not have the ability to accomplish this task.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Rental of this equipment is not available
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: We continue to stockpile. The Solid Waste Division can market the
finished compost product.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
NA
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Solid Waste Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
$200,000
196
CIP Project Fund
Solid Waste
PROJECT NUMBER
SW49
DEPARTMENT
COLLECTION
PROJECT NAME
Side Load Truck - Replacement of Asset #3452
FY18
$300,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Side Load Truck - Replacement of Asset #3452
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: This equipment is critical to the operation of the Solid
Waste Division. Customers depend on refuse removal on their collection day.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: Efficiency is improved with this equipment on the chassis side with increased fuel
efficiency and emission reductions. The packer mounted on the chassis also see improvements thru better operator ergonomics
with joystick controls and better packer function options.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: This equipment will be used in the collection of refuse for Bozeman
customers
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Leasing a side-load truck
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: We will be forced to use existing equipment longer leading to higher
repair costs and longer downtime of trucks not on route. Can lead to declining customer confidence resulting in loosing customer accounts.
Reliable equipment to ensure routes completed in an efficient manner. Maintenance costs of new equipment will be lower.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual operating and maintenance costs = $30,000
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Solid Waste Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
197
198
St
o
r
m
Wa
t
e
r
Ut
i
l
i
t
y
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
Pl
a
n
Fi
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
Su
m
m
a
r
y
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Ye
a
r
FY
1
7
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
F
Y
2
0
F
Y
2
1
F
Y
2
2
Unscheduled
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
Re
s
e
r
v
e
Ba
l
a
n
c
e
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
48
9
,
0
0
0
$
37
5
,
9
0
1
$
33
2
,
0
5
7
$
30
6
,
3
9
8
$
299,469
$
311,832 $
Pl
u
s
:
St
o
r
m
Wa
t
e
r
Ut
i
l
i
t
y
Fe
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
58
8
,
5
0
1
$
60
6
,
1
5
6
$
62
4
,
3
4
1
$
64
3
,
0
7
1
$
662,363
$
682,234 $
Le
s
s
:
FY
1
6
Ca
r
r
y
o
v
e
r
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
(1
5
1
,
6
0
0
)
$
Le
s
s
:
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
d
CI
P
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Co
s
t
s
(5
5
0
,
0
0
0
)
$
(6
5
0
,
0
0
0
)
$
(6
5
0
,
0
0
0
)
$
(6
5
0
,
0
0
0
)
$
(650,000)
$
(650,000)$ (125,000)$
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Ye
a
r
‐En
d
Ca
s
h
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
37
5
,
9
0
1
$
33
2
,
0
5
7
$
30
6
,
3
9
8
$
29
9
,
4
6
9
$
311,832
$
344,066 $ (125,000)$
As
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
s
Ma
d
e
fo
r
Re
v
e
n
u
e
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
s
:
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Ye
a
r
FY
1
7
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
FY21 FY22
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
An
n
u
a
l
St
o
r
m
Wa
t
e
r
Ut
i
l
i
t
y
Re
v
e
n
u
e
1,
3
0
7
,
7
8
0
$
1,
3
0
7
,
7
8
0
$
1,
3
4
7
,
0
1
3
$
1,
3
8
7
,
4
2
4
$
1,429,047
$
1,471,918 $
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
An
n
u
a
l
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
‐
At
t
r
i
b
u
t
e
d
to
Gr
o
w
t
h
3%
3%
3%
3%3%
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
An
n
u
a
l
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
‐
Ra
t
e
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
0%
0%
0%
0%0%
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
1,
3
0
7
,
7
8
0
$
1,
3
4
7
,
0
1
3
$
1,
3
8
7
,
4
2
4
$
1,
4
2
9
,
0
4
7
$
1,471,918
$
1,516,075 $
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
%
45
.
0
%
45
.
0
%
4
5
.
0
%
4
5
.
0
%
4
5
.
0
%
4
5
.
0
%
Pl
u
s
:
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
0.
0
%
0.
0
%
0.
0
%
0.
0
%
0
.
0
%
0.0%
To
t
a
l
% De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
45
.
0
%
45
.
0
%
4
5
.
0
%
4
5
.
0
%
4
5
.
0
%
4
5
.
0
%
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
58
8
,
5
0
1
$
60
6
,
1
5
6
$
62
4
,
3
4
1
$
64
3
,
0
7
1
$
662,363
$
682,234 $
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
70
0
,
0
0
0
60
0
,
0
0
0
50
0
,
0
0
0
40
0
,
0
0
0
30
0
,
0
0
0
20
0
,
0
0
0
10
0
,
0
0
0
0
FY
1
7
F
Y
1
8
F
Y
1
9
F
Y
2
0
F
Y
2
1
F
Y
2
2
U
n
s
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
d
St
o
r
m
Wa
t
e
r
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
199
CI
P
PR
O
J
E
C
T
FU
PR
O
J
.
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
PR
O
J
E
C
T
NA
M
E
Unscheduled
FY
2
1
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
FY22
St
o
r
m
Wa
t
e
r
Fu
n
d
ST
R
M
0
4
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
AN
N
U
A
L
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
PI
P
E
RE
H
A
B
I
L
I
T
A
T
I
O
N
AN
D
DR
A
I
N
A
G
E
PR
O
J
E
C
T
DE
S
I
G
N
$2
5
,
0
0
0
$2
5
,
0
0
0
$2
5
,
0
0
0
$2
5
,
0
0
0
$25,000
ST
R
M
1
0
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
AN
N
U
A
L
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
SY
S
T
E
M
EN
H
A
N
C
E
M
E
N
T
PR
O
J
E
C
T
DE
S
I
G
N
$2
5
,
0
0
0
$2
5
,
0
0
0
$2
5
,
0
0
0
$2
5
,
0
0
0
$25,000
ST
R
M
1
3
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
AN
N
U
A
L
PI
P
E
RE
H
A
B
I
L
I
T
A
T
I
O
N
S
AN
D
DR
A
I
N
A
G
E
PR
O
J
E
C
T
S
$3
2
5
,
0
0
0
$1
0
5
,
0
0
0
$1
7
5
,
0
0
0
$1
7
5
,
0
0
0
$325,000
ST
R
M
2
0
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
SY
S
T
E
M
EN
H
A
N
C
E
M
E
N
T
PR
O
G
R
A
M
‐
S BL
A
C
K
AN
D
E CL
E
V
E
L
A
N
D
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
ST
R
M
2
1
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
SY
S
T
E
M
EN
H
A
N
C
E
M
E
N
T
PR
O
G
R
A
M
‐
S BO
Z
E
M
A
N
AN
D
E
CL
E
V
E
L
A
N
D
$7
5
,
0
0
0
ST
R
M
2
6
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
TV
VA
N
RE
F
U
R
B
I
S
H
M
E
N
T
$125,000
ST
R
M
3
1
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
SY
S
T
E
M
EN
H
A
N
C
E
M
E
N
T
PR
O
G
R
A
M
‐
N 9T
H
AN
D
W VI
L
L
A
R
D
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
ST
R
M
3
2
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
SY
S
T
E
M
EN
H
A
N
C
E
M
E
N
T
PR
O
G
R
A
M
‐
LA
N
G
H
O
R
AN
D
WE
S
T
R
I
D
G
E
$7
5
,
0
0
0
ST
R
M
3
3
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
SY
S
T
E
M
EN
H
A
N
C
E
M
E
N
T
PR
O
G
R
A
M
‐
N 11
T
H
AN
D
W KO
C
H
$75,000
ST
R
M
3
4
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
SY
S
T
E
M
EN
H
A
N
C
E
M
E
N
T
PR
O
G
R
A
M
‐
N RO
U
S
E
AN
D
E PE
A
C
H
$7
5
,
0
0
0
ST
R
M
3
6
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
SY
S
T
E
M
EN
H
A
N
C
E
M
E
N
T
PR
O
G
R
A
M
‐
11
T
H
AN
D
DI
C
K
E
R
S
O
N
$50,000
ST
R
M
3
7
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
SY
S
T
E
M
EN
H
A
N
C
E
M
E
N
T
PR
O
G
R
A
M
‐
WE
S
T
RI
D
G
E
$7
5
,
0
0
0
ST
R
M
3
8
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
SY
S
T
E
M
EN
H
A
N
C
E
M
E
N
T
PR
O
G
R
A
M
‐
PE
A
C
H
AN
D
4T
H
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
ST
R
M
3
9
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
SY
S
T
E
M
EN
H
A
N
C
E
M
E
N
T
PR
O
G
R
A
M
‐
MA
I
N
AN
D
BO
Z
E
M
A
N
$7
5
,
0
0
0
ST
R
M
4
0
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
SY
S
T
E
M
EN
H
A
N
C
E
M
E
N
T
PR
O
G
R
A
M
‐
MA
I
N
AN
D
BL
A
C
K
$7
5
,
0
0
0
ST
R
M
4
1
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
SY
S
T
E
M
EN
H
A
N
C
E
M
E
N
T
PR
O
G
R
A
M
‐
MA
I
N
AN
D
RO
U
S
E
$7
5
,
0
0
0
ST
R
M
4
2
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
SY
S
T
E
M
EN
H
A
N
C
E
M
E
N
T
PR
O
G
R
A
M
‐
MA
S
O
N
AN
D
TR
A
C
Y
$2
5
,
0
0
0
200
CI
P
PR
O
J
E
C
T
FU
PR
O
J
.
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
PR
O
J
E
C
T
NA
M
E
Unscheduled
FY
2
1
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
FY22
ST
R
M
4
3
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
DI
G
I
T
A
L
UN
I
V
E
R
S
A
L
CA
M
E
R
A
‐
DU
C
$7
0
,
0
0
0
ST
R
M
4
4
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
SY
S
T
E
M
EN
H
A
N
C
E
M
E
N
T
PR
O
G
R
A
M
‐
MA
I
N
AN
D
WI
L
L
S
O
N
$7
5
,
0
0
0
ST
R
M
4
5
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
SY
S
T
E
M
EN
H
A
N
C
E
M
E
N
T
PR
O
G
R
A
M
‐
MA
I
N
AN
D
3R
D
$7
5
,
0
0
0
ST
R
M
4
6
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
SY
S
T
E
M
EN
H
A
N
C
E
M
E
N
T
PR
O
G
R
A
M
‐
MA
I
N
AN
D
GR
A
N
D
$7
5
,
0
0
0
ST
R
M
4
7
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
SY
S
T
E
M
EN
H
A
N
C
E
M
E
N
T
PR
O
G
R
A
M
‐
MA
I
N
AN
D
TR
A
C
Y
$7
5
,
0
0
0
ST
R
M
4
8
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
AN
N
U
A
L
PE
D
E
S
T
R
I
A
N
RA
M
P
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
PR
O
G
R
A
M
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$100,000
ST
R
M
4
9
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
SY
S
T
E
M
EN
H
A
N
C
E
M
E
N
T
PR
O
G
R
A
M
‐
11
T
H
AN
D
AL
D
E
R
S
O
N
$50,000
$6
5
0
,
0
0
0
$650,000
$6
5
0
,
0
0
0
$6
5
0
,
0
0
0
$6
5
0
,
0
0
0
$125,000
Su
m
m
a
r
y f or
St
o
r
m
Wa
t
e
r
Fu
n
d
(24
it
e
m
s
)
To
t
a
l
s
by
ye
a
r
:
$6
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
5
0
,
0
0
0
$6
5
0
,
0
0
0
$125,000
FY
2
1
FY22
FY
1
8
Unscheduled
FY
2
0
$6
5
0
,
0
0
0
$6
5
0
,
0
0
0
FY
1
9
201
CIP Project Fund
Storm Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
STRM04
DEPARTMENT
STORMWATER
PROJECT NAME
Annual Stormwater Pipe Rehabilitation and Drainage Project Design
FY18
$25,000
FY19
$25,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The hiring of a qualified firm to complete engineering design for scheduled pipe rehabilitation and drainage projects.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Allows staff to complete projects on time by having the
discretion to assign design work to external consultants when internal engineering services are not available.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: Design work is combined with other Public Work projects
when possible, such as road reconstructions and utility replacements.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Internal engineering staff complete design work when available.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Professional design and timely completion of scheduled pipe and drainage projects.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
N/A
FUNDING SOURCES
Stormwater Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$25,000
FY21
$25,000
FY22
$25,000
202
CIP Project Fund
Storm Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
STRM10
DEPARTMENT
STORMWATER
PROJECT NAME
Annual Stormwater System Enhancement Project Design
FY18
$25,000
FY19
$25,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The hiring of a qualified firm to complete engineering design for scheduled system enhancement projects.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Allows staff to complete projects on time by having the
discretion to assign design work to external consultants when internal engineering services are not available.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: Design work is combined with other Public Work projects
when possible, such as road reconstructions and utility replacements.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Internal engineering staff complete design work.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Professional design and timely completion of scheduled system enhancement projects.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
N/A
FUNDING SOURCES
Stormwater Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$25,000
FY21
$25,000
FY22
$25,000
203
CIP Project Fund
Storm Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
STRM13
DEPARTMENT
STORMWATER
PROJECT NAME
Annual Pipe Rehabilitations and Drainage Projects
FY18
$105,000
FY19
$175,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The hiring of a contractor to complete infrastructure repairs and improvement projects, increasing the stormwater system's
structural integrity and conveyance capacity.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Allows staff to focus on the operation and maintenance
of the stormwater system.
How is capacity affected by this project: The capacity of the stormwater system will be increased through the upsizing of pipes.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: Decreased likelihood of road failure, flooding, environmental
degradation, and a drop in level-of-service to rate payers.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: Funds may be saved and accumulated over a multi-year
period or joined with other water/sewer pipe rehabilitation projects. A determination on how to allocate funds will occur
annually during the CIP process.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
City staff complete pipe rehabilitation and drainage projects, reducing the resources applied towards system maintenance.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Proactive approach to the repair and replacement of stormwater infrastructure that has or is likely to fail, increasing system efficiency and
customer service.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
N/A
FUNDING SOURCES
Stormwater Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$175,000
FY21
$325,000
FY22
$325,000
204
CIP Project Fund
Storm Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
STRM20
DEPARTMENT
STORMWATER
PROJECT NAME
Stormwater System Enhancement Program - S Black And E Cleveland
FY18 FY19
$100,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Installation of an in-line stormwater sediment, trash, and oil separation unit
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Treatment unit is an industry standard practice and the
best suited treatment option given the drainage area's size, land use, and pollutants of concern.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: Decreased pollutant loading into Bozeman Creek, reducing liabilities
associated with environmental non-compliance, community health, and aquatic ecosystem degradation.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Measurable step toward the City's goal of delisting Bozeman Creek
from the Montana DEQ's list of impaired waterbodies. Also, the project will be credited under the City's MS4 Discharge Permit,
which requires the implementation of practices, programs, and technologies that reduce local waterway degradation caused by
stormwater.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continued discharge of untreated stormwater into Bozeman Creek.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Provides stormwater treatment and permit compliance
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Semi-annual maintenance completed by crews using existing equipment. The workflow includes the vacuuming and disposal of settled debris,
pollutants, and trash, which takes approx. 1-hour to complete per unit.
FUNDING SOURCES
Stormwater Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
205
CIP Project Fund
Storm Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
STRM21
DEPARTMENT
STORMWATER
PROJECT NAME
Stormwater System Enhancement Program - S Bozeman And E Cleveland
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Installation of an in-line stormwater sediment, trash, and oil separation unit
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Treatment unit is an industry standard practice and the
best suited treatment option given the drainage area's size, land use, and pollutants of concern.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: Decreased pollutant loading into Bozeman Creek, reducing liabilities
associated with environmental non-compliance, community health, and aquatic ecosystem degradation.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Measurable step toward the City's goal of delisting Bozeman Creek
from the Montana DEQ's list of impaired waterbodies. Also, the project will be credited under the City's MS4 Discharge Permit,
which requires the implementation of practices, programs, and technologies that reduce local waterway degradation caused by
stormwater.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continued discharge of untreated stormwater into Bozeman Creek.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Provides stormwater treatment and permit compliance
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Semi-annual maintenance completed by crews using existing equipment. The workflow includes the vacuuming and disposal of settled debris,
pollutants, and trash, which takes approx. 1-hour to complete per unit.
FUNDING SOURCES
Stormwater Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$75,000
FY21 FY22
206
CIP Project Fund
Storm Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
STRM26
DEPARTMENT
STORMWATER
PROJECT NAME
Stormwater TV Van Refurbishment
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$125,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Refurbishment of existing Stormwater TV van routinely completed every 5 years to replace worn parts and remain consistent
with new technology.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: This equipment is critical in assessing structural failures
in the City's underground stormwater system.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: Stormwater InfrastructureHow is efficiency improved with this
equipment: Allows the City to identify troubled areas and allocate resources to fix.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: Significantly improves operation efficiency, budget allocation, and
project planning.
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Existing equipment breaks down and is not functional.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Purchase a new TV Van at an estimated cost of $250,000.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Provides for the timely replacement of critical maintenance equipment.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Decrease in maintenance costs
FUNDING SOURCES
Stormwater Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
207
CIP Project Fund
Storm Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
STRM31
DEPARTMENT
STORMWATER
PROJECT NAME
Stormwater System Enhancement Program - N 9th And W Villard
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Installation of an in-line stormwater sediment, trash, and oil separation unit
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Treatment unit is an industry standard practice and the
best suited treatment option given the drainage area's size, land use, and pollutants of concern.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: Decreased pollutant loading into Bozeman Creek, reducing liabilities
associated with environmental non-compliance, community health, and aquatic ecosystem degradation.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Measurable step toward the City's goal of delisting Bozeman Creek
from the Montana DEQ's list of impaired waterbodies. Also, the project will be credited under the City's MS4 Discharge Permit,
which requires the implementation of practices, programs, and technologies that reduce local waterway degradation caused by
stormwater.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continued discharge of untreated stormwater into Bozeman Creek.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Provides stormwater treatment and permit compliance
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Semi-annual maintenance completed by crews using existing equipment. The workflow includes the vacuuming and disposal of settled debris,
pollutants, and trash, which takes approx. 1-hour to complete per unit.
FUNDING SOURCES
Stormwater Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$100,000
FY21 FY22
208
CIP Project Fund
Storm Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
STRM32
DEPARTMENT
STORMWATER
PROJECT NAME
Stormwater System Enhancement Program - Langhor And Westridge
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Installation of an in-line stormwater sediment, trash, and oil separation unit
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Treatment unit is an industry standard practice and the
best suited treatment option given the drainage area's size, land use, and pollutants of concern.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: Decreased pollutant loading into Bozeman Creek, reducing liabilities
associated with environmental non-compliance, community health, and aquatic ecosystem degradation.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Measurable step toward the City's goal of delisting Bozeman Creek
from the Montana DEQ's list of impaired waterbodies. Also, the project will be credited under the City's MS4 Discharge Permit,
which requires the implementation of practices, programs, and technologies that reduce local waterway degradation caused by
stormwater.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continued discharge of untreated stormwater into Bozeman Creek.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Provides stormwater treatment and permit compliance
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Provides stormwater treatment and permit compliance
FUNDING SOURCES
Stormwater Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$75,000
FY21 FY22
209
CIP Project Fund
Storm Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
STRM33
DEPARTMENT
STORMWATER
PROJECT NAME
Stormwater System Enhancement Program - N 11th And W Koch
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Installation of an in-line stormwater sediment, trash, and oil separation unit
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Treatment unit is an industry standard practice and the
best suited treatment option given the drainage area's size, land use, and pollutants of concern.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: Decreased pollutant loading into Bozeman Creek, reducing liabilities
associated with environmental non-compliance, community health, and aquatic ecosystem degradation.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Measurable step toward the City's goal of delisting Bozeman Creek
from the Montana DEQ's list of impaired waterbodies. Also, the project will be credited under the City's MS4 Discharge Permit,
which requires the implementation of practices, programs, and technologies that reduce local waterway degradation caused by
stormwater.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continued discharge of untreated stormwater into Bozeman Creek.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Provides stormwater treatment and permit compliance
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Provides stormwater treatment and permit compliance
FUNDING SOURCES
Stormwater Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
$75,000
210
CIP Project Fund
Storm Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
STRM34
DEPARTMENT
STORMWATER
PROJECT NAME
Stormwater System Enhancement Program - N Rouse And E Peach
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Installation of an in-line stormwater sediment, trash, and oil separation unit
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Treatment unit is an industry standard practice and the
best suited treatment option given the drainage area's size, land use, and pollutants of concern.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: Decreased pollutant loading into Bozeman Creek, reducing liabilities
associated with environmental non-compliance, community health, and aquatic ecosystem degradation.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Measurable step toward the City's goal of delisting Bozeman Creek
from the Montana DEQ's list of impaired waterbodies. Also, the project will be credited under the City's MS4 Discharge Permit,
which requires the implementation of practices, programs, and technologies that reduce local waterway degradation caused by
stormwater.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continued discharge of untreated stormwater into Bozeman Creek.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Provides stormwater treatment and permit compliance
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Semi-annual maintenance completed by crews using existing equipment. The workflow includes the vacuuming and disposal of settled debris,
pollutants, and trash, which takes approx. 1-hour to complete per unit.
FUNDING SOURCES
Stormwater Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$75,000
FY21 FY22
211
CIP Project Fund
Storm Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
STRM36
DEPARTMENT
STORMWATER
PROJECT NAME
Stormwater System Enhancement Program - 11th and Dickerson
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Installation of an in-line stormwater sediment, trash, and oil separation unit
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Treatment unit is an industry standard practice and the
best suited treatment option given the drainage area's size, land use, and pollutants of concern.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: Decreased pollutant loading into Bozeman Creek, reducing liabilities
associated with environmental non-compliance, community health, and aquatic ecosystem degradation.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Measurable step toward the City's goal of delisting Bozeman Creek
from the Montana DEQ's list of impaired waterbodies. Also, the project will be credited under the City's MS4 Discharge Permit,
which requires the implementation of practices, programs, and technologies that reduce local waterway degradation caused by
stormwater.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continued discharge of untreated stormwater into Bozeman Creek.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Provides stormwater treatment and permit compliance
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Provides stormwater treatment and permit compliance
FUNDING SOURCES
Stormwater Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
$50,000
212
CIP Project Fund
Storm Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
STRM37
DEPARTMENT
STORMWATER
PROJECT NAME
Stormwater System Enhancement Program - West ridge
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Installation of an in-line stormwater sediment, trash, and oil separation unit
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Treatment unit is an industry standard practice and the
best suited treatment option given the drainage area's size, land use, and pollutants of concern.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: Decreased pollutant loading into Bozeman Creek, reducing liabilities
associated with environmental non-compliance, community health, and aquatic ecosystem degradation.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Measurable step toward the City's goal of delisting Bozeman Creek
from the Montana DEQ's list of impaired waterbodies. Also, the project will be credited under the City's MS4 Discharge Permit,
which requires the implementation of practices, programs, and technologies that reduce local waterway degradation caused by
stormwater.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continued discharge of untreated stormwater into Bozeman Creek.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Provides stormwater treatment and permit compliance
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Provides stormwater treatment and permit compliance
FUNDING SOURCES
Stormwater Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21
$75,000
FY22
213
CIP Project Fund
Storm Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
STRM38
DEPARTMENT
STORMWATER
PROJECT NAME
Stormwater System Enhancement Program - Peach and 4th
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Installation of an in-line stormwater sediment, trash, and oil separation unit
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Treatment unit is an industry standard practice and the
best suited treatment option given the drainage area's size, land use, and pollutants of concern.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: Decreased pollutant loading into Bozeman Creek, reducing liabilities
associated with environmental non-compliance, community health, and aquatic ecosystem degradation.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Measurable step toward the City's goal of delisting Bozeman Creek
from the Montana DEQ's list of impaired waterbodies. Also, the project will be credited under the City's MS4 Discharge Permit,
which requires the implementation of practices, programs, and technologies that reduce local waterway degradation caused by
stormwater.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continued discharge of untreated stormwater into Bozeman Creek.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Provides stormwater treatment and permit compliance
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Provides stormwater treatment and permit compliance
FUNDING SOURCES
Stormwater Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21
$100,000
FY22
214
CIP Project Fund
Storm Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
STRM39
DEPARTMENT
STORMWATER
PROJECT NAME
Stormwater System Enhancement Program - Main and Bozeman
FY18 FY19
$75,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Installation of an in-line stormwater sediment, trash, and oil separation unit
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Treatment unit is an industry standard practice and the
best suited treatment option given the drainage area's size, land use, and pollutants of concern.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: Decreased pollutant loading into Bozeman Creek, reducing liabilities
associated with environmental non-compliance, community health, and aquatic ecosystem degradation.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Measurable step toward the City's goal of delisting Bozeman Creek
from the Montana DEQ's list of impaired waterbodies. Also, the project will be credited under the City's MS4 Discharge Permit,
which requires the implementation of practices, programs, and technologies that reduce local waterway degradation caused by
stormwater.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continued discharge of untreated stormwater into Bozeman Creek.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Provides stormwater treatment and permit compliance
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Semi-annual maintenance completed by crews using existing equipment. The workflow includes the vacuuming and disposal of settled debris,
pollutants, and trash, which takes approx. 1-hour to complete per unit.
FUNDING SOURCES
Stormwater Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
215
CIP Project Fund
Storm Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
STRM40
DEPARTMENT
STORMWATER
PROJECT NAME
Stormwater System Enhancement Program - Main and Black
FY18 FY19
$75,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Installation of an in-line stormwater sediment, trash, and oil separation unit
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Treatment unit is an industry standard practice and the
best suited treatment option given the drainage area's size, land use, and pollutants of concern.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: Decreased pollutant loading into Bozeman Creek, reducing liabilities
associated with environmental non-compliance, community health, and aquatic ecosystem degradation.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Measurable step toward the City's goal of delisting Bozeman Creek
from the Montana DEQ's list of impaired waterbodies. Also, the project will be credited under the City's MS4 Discharge Permit,
which requires the implementation of practices, programs, and technologies that reduce local waterway degradation caused by
stormwater.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continued discharge of untreated stormwater into Bozeman Creek.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Provides stormwater treatment and permit compliance
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Semi-annual maintenance completed by crews using existing equipment. The workflow includes the vacuuming and disposal of settled debris,
pollutants, and trash, which takes approx. 1-hour to complete per unit.
FUNDING SOURCES
Stormwater Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
216
CIP Project Fund
Storm Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
STRM41
DEPARTMENT
STORMWATER
PROJECT NAME
Stormwater System Enhancement Program - Main and Rouse
FY18 FY19
$75,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Installation of an in-line stormwater sediment, trash, and oil separation unit
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Treatment unit is an industry standard practice and the
best suited treatment option given the drainage area's size, land use, and pollutants of concern.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: Decreased pollutant loading into Bozeman Creek, reducing liabilities
associated with environmental non-compliance, community health, and aquatic ecosystem degradation.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Measurable step toward the City's goal of delisting Bozeman Creek
from the Montana DEQ's list of impaired waterbodies. Also, the project will be credited under the City's MS4 Discharge Permit,
which requires the implementation of practices, programs, and technologies that reduce local waterway degradation caused by
stormwater.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continued discharge of untreated stormwater into Bozeman Creek.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Provides stormwater treatment and permit compliance
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Semi-annual maintenance completed by crews using existing equipment. The workflow includes the vacuuming and disposal of settled debris,
pollutants, and trash, which takes approx. 1-hour to complete per unit.
FUNDING SOURCES
Stormwater Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
217
CIP Project Fund
Storm Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
STRM42
DEPARTMENT
STORMWATER
PROJECT NAME
Stormwater System Enhancement Program - Mason and Tracy
FY18
$25,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Installation of an in-line stormwater sediment, trash, and oil separation unit
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Treatment unit is an industry standard practice and the
best suited treatment option given the drainage area's size, land use, and pollutants of concern.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: Decreased pollutant loading into Bozeman Creek, reducing liabilities
associated with environmental non-compliance, community health, and aquatic ecosystem degradation.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Measurable step toward the City's goal of delisting Bozeman Creek
from the Montana DEQ's list of impaired waterbodies. Also, the project will be credited under the City's MS4 Discharge Permit,
which requires the implementation of practices, programs, and technologies that reduce local waterway degradation caused by
stormwater.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continued discharge of untreated stormwater into Bozeman Creek.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Provides stormwater treatment and permit compliance
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Provides stormwater treatment and permit compliance
FUNDING SOURCES
Stormwater Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
218
CIP Project Fund
Storm Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
STRM43
DEPARTMENT
STORMWATER
PROJECT NAME
Stormwater Digital Universal Camera - DUC
FY18
$70,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Stormwater Digital Universal Camera
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: This camera is critical to accessing the condition of the
sewer main along with the Pipeline Assessment program we use. Our goal is to inspect the entire collection system once every 5
years.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: The Digital Universal Camera (DUC) is a semi-autonomous, high
resolution digital CCTV side scanning camera designed for rapid and detailed condition assessment of our wastewater system.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: This camera allows us to TV the main non-stop will allows us to increase the
amount of pipe we TV in a day up to 5 to 10 times more than the traditional stop and go method that we now use.
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: As we gain more miles of main every year we will have to
adjust our goal of every main being televised once every five years to six or seven with the current stop and go technology we use.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: The condition assessment of our mains is critical in
determining the priority of sewer main replacement.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue to use the stop and go method (SAG) and take longer to TV the mains. We have a goal to TV the entire system every 5 years, this is
getting harder to do with the increasing growth of our collection system.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
This camera allows us to TV the main non-stop will allows us to increase the amount of pipe we TV in a day up to 5 to 10 times more than the
traditional stop and go method that we now use.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Placing electronic equipment in raw sewage is hard to predict costs I believe there will be little or no more costs than our present camera.
FUNDING SOURCES
Stormwater Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
219
CIP Project Fund
Storm Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
STRM44
DEPARTMENT
STORMWATER
PROJECT NAME
Stormwater System Enhancement Program - Main and Willson
FY18
$75,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Installation of an in-line stormwater sediment, trash, and oil separation unit
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Treatment unit is an industry standard practice and the
best suited treatment option given the drainage area's size, land use, and pollutants of concern.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: Decreased pollutant loading into Bozeman Creek, reducing liabilities
associated with environmental non-compliance, community health, and aquatic ecosystem degradation.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Measurable step toward the City's goal of delisting Bozeman Creek
from the Montana DEQ's list of impaired waterbodies. Also, the project will be credited under the City's MS4 Discharge Permit,
which requires the implementation of practices, programs, and technologies that reduce local waterway degradation caused by
stormwater.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continued discharge of untreated stormwater into Bozeman Creek.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Provides stormwater treatment and permit compliance
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Semi-annual maintenance completed by crews using existing equipment. The workflow includes the vacuuming and disposal of settled debris,
pollutants, and trash, which takes approx. 1-hour to complete per unit.
FUNDING SOURCES
Stormwater Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
220
CIP Project Fund
Storm Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
STRM45
DEPARTMENT
STORMWATER
PROJECT NAME
Stormwater System Enhancement Program - Main and 3rd
FY18
$75,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Installation of an in-line stormwater sediment, trash, and oil separation unit
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Treatment unit is an industry standard practice and the
best suited treatment option given the drainage area's size, land use, and pollutants of concern.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: Decreased pollutant loading into Bozeman Creek, reducing liabilities
associated with environmental non-compliance, community health, and aquatic ecosystem degradation.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Measurable step toward the City's goal of delisting Bozeman Creek
from the Montana DEQ's list of impaired waterbodies. Also, the project will be credited under the City's MS4 Discharge Permit,
which requires the implementation of practices, programs, and technologies that reduce local waterway degradation caused by
stormwater.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continued discharge of untreated stormwater into Bozeman Creek.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Provides stormwater treatment and permit compliance
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Semi-annual maintenance completed by crews using existing equipment. The workflow includes the vacuuming and disposal of settled debris,
pollutants, and trash, which takes approx. 1-hour to complete per unit.
FUNDING SOURCES
Stormwater Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
221
CIP Project Fund
Storm Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
STRM46
DEPARTMENT
STORMWATER
PROJECT NAME
Stormwater System Enhancement Program - Main and Grand
FY18
$75,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Installation of an in-line stormwater sediment, trash, and oil separation unit
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Treatment unit is an industry standard practice and the
best suited treatment option given the drainage area's size, land use, and pollutants of concern.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: Decreased pollutant loading into Bozeman Creek, reducing liabilities
associated with environmental non-compliance, community health, and aquatic ecosystem degradation.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Measurable step toward the City's goal of delisting Bozeman Creek
from the Montana DEQ's list of impaired waterbodies. Also, the project will be credited under the City's MS4 Discharge Permit,
which requires the implementation of practices, programs, and technologies that reduce local waterway degradation caused by
stormwater.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continued discharge of untreated stormwater into Bozeman Creek.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Provides stormwater treatment and permit compliance
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Semi-annual maintenance completed by crews using existing equipment. The workflow includes the vacuuming and disposal of settled debris,
pollutants, and trash, which takes approx. 1-hour to complete per unit.
FUNDING SOURCES
Stormwater Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
222
CIP Project Fund
Storm Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
STRM47
DEPARTMENT
STORMWATER
PROJECT NAME
Stormwater System Enhancement Program - Main and Tracy
FY18
$75,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Installation of an in-line stormwater sediment, trash, and oil separation unit
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Treatment unit is an industry standard practice and the
best suited treatment option given the drainage area's size, land use, and pollutants of concern.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: Decreased pollutant loading into Bozeman Creek, reducing liabilities
associated with environmental non-compliance, community health, and aquatic ecosystem degradation.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Measurable step toward the City's goal of delisting Bozeman Creek
from the Montana DEQ's list of impaired waterbodies. Also, the project will be credited under the City's MS4 Discharge Permit,
which requires the implementation of practices, programs, and technologies that reduce local waterway degradation caused by
stormwater.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continued discharge of untreated stormwater into Bozeman Creek.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Provides stormwater treatment and permit compliance
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Semi-annual maintenance completed by crews using existing equipment. The workflow includes the vacuuming and disposal of settled debris,
pollutants, and trash, which takes approx. 1-hour to complete per unit.
FUNDING SOURCES
Stormwater Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
223
CIP Project Fund
Storm Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
STRM48
DEPARTMENT
STORMWATER
PROJECT NAME
Annual Pedestrian Ramp Replacement Program
FY18
$100,000
FY19
$100,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This annual program provides funding to continue upgrading pedestrian ramps to ADA compliance
How is connectivity affected by this project: A curb/pedestrian ramp provides an accessible route that people with disabilities can
use to safely transition from a roadway to a curbed sidewalk and vice versa.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: Without access to properly developed ramps onto sidewalks, people
with disabilities are forced to risk their personal safety by traveling in the street.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Upgrading CoB pedestrian ramps will allow the City to be in
compliance with Title II of the ADA and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Section 504).
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: The cost of this project will be 1/2 street maintenance fund
and 1/2 stormwater fund. Cost split is appropriate because typically pedestrian ramp improvements also require replacement of
stormwater inlets and catch basins.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue with existing infrastructure, and not meet current ADA regulatory standards
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Upgrading the curb ramps will increase safety for community members and visitors with disabilities.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
No additional operating costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
50% Street Maintenance Fund & 50% Stormwater Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$100,000
FY21
$100,000
FY22
$100,000
224
CIP Project Fund
Storm Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
STRM49
DEPARTMENT
STORMWATER
PROJECT NAME
Stormwater System Enhancement Program - 11th and Alderson
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Installation of an in-line stormwater sediment, trash, and oil separation unit
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Treatment unit is an industry standard practice and the
best suited treatment option given the drainage area's size, land use, and pollutants of concern.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: Decreased pollutant loading into Bozeman Creek, reducing liabilities
associated with environmental non-compliance, community health, and aquatic ecosystem degradation.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Measurable step toward the City's goal of delisting Bozeman Creek
from the Montana DEQ's list of impaired waterbodies. Also, the project will be credited under the City's MS4 Discharge Permit,
which requires the implementation of practices, programs, and technologies that reduce local waterway degradation caused by
stormwater.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continued discharge of untreated stormwater into Bozeman Creek.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Provides stormwater treatment and permit compliance
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Provides stormwater treatment and permit compliance
FUNDING SOURCES
Stormwater Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
$50,000
225
226
St
r
e
e
t
an
d
Cu
r
b
Re
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
s
Fu
n
d
50
4
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
Pl
a
n
Fi
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
Su
m
m
a
r
y
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Ye
a
r
FY
1
7
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
F
Y
2
0
F
Y
2
1
F
Y
2
2
Unscheduled
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
Re
s
e
r
v
e
Ba
l
a
n
c
e
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
74
,
2
0
9
$
(6
5
3
,
6
3
7
)
$
(4
1
6
,
2
3
8
)
$
(6
0
2
,
5
3
8
)
$
(6
7
,
0
9
9
)
$
375,300
$
Pl
u
s
:
St
r
e
e
t
Ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
As
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
67
3
,
7
7
3
$
70
0
,
9
9
3
$
71
5
,
0
1
3
$
72
9
,
3
1
3
$
74
3
,
8
9
9
$
758,777
$
Pl
u
s
:
SI
D
fo
r
We
s
t
Ol
i
v
e
‐
SC
R
0
3
‐
15
%
23
6
,
7
5
6
$
Pl
u
s
:
SI
D
fo
r
So
u
t
h
Gr
a
n
d
‐
SC
R
0
4
‐
75
%
1,
5
8
8
,
7
8
1
$
Pl
u
s
:
SI
D
fo
r
We
s
t
Li
n
c
o
l
n
‐
SC
R
2
0
‐
75
%
12
6
,
0
0
0
$
Pl
u
s
:
SI
D
fo
r
So
u
t
h
Tr
a
c
y
‐
SC
R
0
9
‐
50
%
67
3
,
3
1
3
$
Pl
u
s
:
SI
D
fo
r
So
u
t
h
Bl
a
c
k
‐
SC
R
0
8
‐
75
%
40
1
,
6
2
5
$
Pl
u
s
:
SI
D
fo
r
No
r
t
h
Tr
a
c
y
‐
SC
R
1
0
‐
50
%
24
1
,
5
0
0
$
Pl
u
s
:
SI
D
fo
r
No
r
t
h
17
t
h
‐
SC
R
1
6
‐
75
%
511,875
$
Le
s
s
:
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
d
CI
P
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Co
s
t
s
(1
,
6
3
8
,
3
7
5
)
$
(2
,
1
7
8
,
3
7
5
)
$
(1
,
5
7
4
,
6
2
5
)
$
(5
9
5
,
5
0
0
)
$
(5
4
3
,
0
0
0
)
$
(742,500)
$
(13,157,375)$
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Ye
a
r
‐En
d
Ca
s
h
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
(6
5
3
,
6
3
7
)
$
(4
1
6
,
2
3
8
)
$
(6
0
2
,
5
3
8
)
$
(6
7
,
0
9
9
)
$
37
5
,
3
0
0
$
903,452
$
As
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
s
Ma
d
e
fo
r
Re
v
e
n
u
e
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
s
:
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Ye
a
r
FY
1
7
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
F
Y
2
1
F
Y
2
2
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
An
n
u
a
l
St
r
e
e
t
As
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
Re
v
e
n
u
e
4,
3
4
6
,
9
2
0
$
4,
4
3
3
,
8
5
8
$
4,
5
2
2
,
5
3
6
$
4,
6
1
2
,
9
8
6
$
4,
7
0
5
,
2
4
6
$
4,799,351
$
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
An
n
u
a
l
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
‐
At
t
r
i
b
u
t
e
d
to
An
n
e
x
a
t
i
o
n
s
2%
2%
2%
2%
2%
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
4,
3
4
6
,
9
2
0
$
4,
5
2
2
,
5
3
6
$
4,
6
1
2
,
9
8
6
$
4,
7
0
5
,
2
4
6
$
4,
7
9
9
,
3
5
1
$
4,895,338
$
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
St
r
e
e
t
& Cu
r
b
CI
P
%
15
.
5
%
15
.
5
%
1
5
.
5
%
1
5
.
5
%
1
5
.
5
%
1
5
.
5
%
Pl
u
s
:
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
Re
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
& Cu
r
b
s
0.
0
%
0.
0
%
0.
0
%
0.
0
%
0
.
0
%
0.0%
To
t
a
l
% De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
15
.
5
%
15
.
5
%
1
5
.
5
%
1
5
.
5
%
1
5
.
5
%
1
5
.
5
%
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
67
3
,
7
7
3
$
70
0
,
9
9
3
$
71
5
,
0
1
3
$
72
9
,
3
1
3
$
74
3
,
8
9
9
$
758,777
$
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
CU
R
R
E
N
T
14
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
12
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
10
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
8,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
6,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
4,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
2,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
0
St
r
e
e
t
Re
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
227
CI
P
PR
O
J
E
C
T
FU
PR
O
J
.
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
PR
O
J
E
C
T
NA
M
E
Unscheduled
FY
2
1
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
FY22
St
r
e
e
t
& Cu
r
b
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
Fu
n
d
SC
R
0
1
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
AN
N
U
A
L
CU
R
B
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
&
CO
N
C
R
E
T
E
RE
P
A
I
R
PR
O
G
R
A
M
$6
0
,
0
0
0
$6
0
,
0
0
0
$6
0
,
0
0
0
$6
0
,
0
0
0
$60,000
SC
R
0
3
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
W OL
I
V
E
(8
T
H
TO
TR
A
C
Y
)
‐
DE
S
I
G
N
AN
D
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$1,441,125
SC
R
0
4
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
S GR
A
N
D
(O
L
I
V
E
TO
HA
Y
E
S
)
‐
DE
S
I
G
N
AN
D
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$2
,
1
1
8
,
3
7
5
SC
R
0
5
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
N GR
A
N
D
(M
E
N
D
E
N
H
A
L
TO
PE
A
C
H
)
‐
DE
S
I
G
N
AN
D
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$989,625
SC
R
0
7
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
S 3R
D
(O
L
I
V
E
TO
CL
E
V
E
L
A
N
D
)
‐
DE
S
I
G
N
AN
D
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$1,548,750
SC
R
0
8
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
S BL
A
C
K
(C
O
L
L
E
G
E
TO
S CU
L
‐DE
‐SA
C
)
‐
DE
S
I
G
N
AN
D
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$5
3
5
,
5
0
0
SC
R
0
9
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
S TR
A
C
Y
(B
A
B
C
O
C
K
TO
CO
L
L
E
G
E
)
‐
DE
S
I
G
N
AN
D
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$1
,
3
4
6
,
6
2
5
SC
R
1
0
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
N TR
A
C
Y
(V
I
L
L
A
R
D
TO
PE
A
C
H
)
‐
DE
S
I
G
N
AN
D
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$4
8
3
,
0
0
0
SC
R
1
1
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
S 4T
H
AV
E
(C
O
L
L
E
G
E
TO
BA
B
C
O
C
K
)
‐
DE
S
I
G
N
AN
D
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$1,295,000
SC
R
1
2
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
W KO
C
H
(8
T
H
TO
TR
A
C
Y
)
‐
DE
S
I
G
N
AN
D
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$1,438,500
SC
R
1
3
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
S 6T
H
(B
A
B
C
O
C
K
TO
CL
E
V
E
L
A
N
D
)
‐
DE
S
I
G
N
AN
D
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$1,758,750
SC
R
1
4
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
S 5T
H
(O
L
I
V
E
TO
HA
Y
E
S
)
‐
DE
S
I
G
N
AN
D
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$2,121,000
SC
R
1
5
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
W HA
R
R
I
S
O
N
(T
R
A
C
Y
TO
6T
H
)
‐
DE
S
I
G
N
AN
D
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$1,084,125
SC
R
1
6
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
N 17
T
H
(D
U
R
S
T
O
N
TO
EN
D
)
‐
DE
S
I
G
N
AN
D
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$682,500
SC
R
1
7
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
W CO
L
L
E
G
E
(8
T
H
TO
11
T
H
)
‐
DE
S
I
G
N
AN
D
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$530,250
SC
R
1
8
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
LI
N
D
L
E
Y
(K
O
C
H
TO
OL
I
V
E
)
‐
DE
S
I
G
N
AN
D
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$420,000
SC
R
1
9
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
DA
V
I
S
(C
H
U
R
C
H
TO
PL
U
M
)
‐
DE
S
I
G
N
AN
D
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$530,250
228
CI
P
PR
O
J
E
C
T
FU
PR
O
J
.
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
PR
O
J
E
C
T
NA
M
E
Unscheduled
FY
2
1
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
FY22
SC
R
2
0
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
W LI
N
C
O
L
N
(G
R
A
N
D
TO
WI
L
S
O
N
)
‐
DE
S
I
G
N
AN
D
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$1
6
8
,
0
0
0
Su
m
m
a
r
y f or
St
r
e
e
t
& Cu
r
b
Re
p la
c
e
m
e
n
t
Fu
n
d
(18
it
e
m
s
)
To
t
a
l
s
by
ye
a
r
:
$5
4
3
,
0
0
0
$
7
4
2
,
5
0
0
$2
,
1
7
8
,
3
7
5
$13,157,375
FY
2
1
FY22
FY
1
8
Unscheduled
FY
2
0
$5
9
5
,
5
0
0
$1
,
5
7
4
,
6
2
5
FY
1
9
229
CIP Project Fund
Street & Curb Replacement Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
SCR01
DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
PROJECT NAME
Annual Curb Replacement & Concrete Repair Program
FY18
$60,000
FY19
$60,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
When a pedestrian ramp is installed, many times the adjacent curbs need to be replaced in order to get drainage to not stop at
the new ramp. Smaller curb repairs can be necessary rather than replacing a whole block.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Medium
How is capacity affected by this project: Control of stormwater is improved, facilitates better street sweeping
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: Broken curbs can be hazardous to vehicle tires
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Replacing dilapidated curbs to meet current standards
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: Can be combined with ADA ramp replacement work and
inlet replacement work
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue current operations
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
This will allow completion of smaller projects instead of waiting for an entire block to be repaired
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Cost of Materials
FUNDING SOURCES
Street & Curb Replacement Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$60,000
FY21
$60,000
FY22
$60,000
230
CIP Project Fund
Street & Curb Replacement Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
SCR03
DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
PROJECT NAME
W Olive (8th to Tracy) - Design and Construction
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$1,441,125
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Reconstruction of West Olive St from 8th to Tracy, including repairs to failed curbs and gutters
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: The street is already in a failing condition and continues
to function; however, eventually the street will become deteriorated to a point where it is unfeasible to maintain and keep open
to public use.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: This project will provide a city standard street section, with ADA
compliant pedestrian ramps, pavement markings, and signage which will improve pedestrian safety. Also, new asphalt and
drainage improvements will eliminate potholes and minimize ice build up.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: ADA compliance and MS4 permit compliance.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: For planning purposes, project estimates West Olive to
function as a Major Collector, which would require a 15% contribution from property owners via a Special Improvement District
Assessment.
Are there other affected projects: This project will trigger water, sewer, and storm drain improvements projects within the
reconstruction area.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Enhances safety and drainage, preserves pavement
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
None
FUNDING SOURCES
Street and Curb Replacement Fund - 85%. Local SID - 15%.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
231
CIP Project Fund
Street & Curb Replacement Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
SCR04
DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
PROJECT NAME
S Grand (Olive to Hayes) - Design and Construction
FY18
$2,118,375
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Reconstruction of South Grand Street from Olive to Hayes, including repairs to failed curbs and gutters.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: The street is already in a failing condition and continues
to function; however, eventually the street will become deteriorated to a point where it is unfeasible to maintain and keep open
to public use.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: This project will provide a city standard street section, with ADA
compliant pedestrian ramps, pavement markings, and signage which will improve pedestrian safety. Also, new asphalt and
drainage improvements will eliminate potholes and other pavement irregularities.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: ADA compliance and MS4 permit compliance.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: For planning purposes, project estimates South Grand to
function as a Local Street, which would require a 75% contribution from property owners via a Special Improvement District
Assessment.
Are there other affected projects: This project will trigger water, sewer, and storm drain improvements projects within the
reconstruction area.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Enhances safety and drainage, preserves pavement
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
None
FUNDING SOURCES
Street and Curb Replacement Fund - 25%. Local SID - 75%.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
232
CIP Project Fund
Street & Curb Replacement Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
SCR05
DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
PROJECT NAME
N Grand (Mendenhal to Peach) - Design and Construction
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$989,625
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Reconstruction of North Grand from Mendenhal to Peach, including repairs to failed curbs and gutters.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: The street is already in a failing condition and continues
to function; however, eventually the street will become deteriorated to a point where it is unfeasible to maintain and keep open
to public use.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: This project will provide a city standard street section, with ADA
compliant pedestrian ramps, pavement markings, and signage which will improve pedestrian safety. Also, new asphalt and
drainage improvements will eliminate potholes and minimize ice build up.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: ADA compliance and MS4 permit compliance.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: For planning purposes, project estimates North Grand will
function as a Local Street, which would require a 75% contribution from property owners via a Special Improvement District
Assessment.
Are there other affected projects: This project will trigger water, sewer, and storm drain improvement projects within the
reconstruction area.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Enhances safety and drainage, preserves pavement
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
None
FUNDING SOURCES
Street and Curb Replacement Fund - 25%. Local SID - 75%.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
233
CIP Project Fund
Street & Curb Replacement Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
SCR07
DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
PROJECT NAME
S 3rd (Olive to Cleveland) - Design and Construction
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$1,548,750
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Reconstruction of South 3rd Ave from Olive to Cleveland, including repairs to failed curbs and gutters.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: The street is already in a failing condition and continues
to function; however, eventually the street will become deteriorated to a point where it is unfeasible to maintain and keep open
to public use.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: This project will provide a city standard street section, with ADA
compliant pedestrian ramps, pavement markings, and signage which will improve pedestrian safety. Also, new asphalt and
drainage improvements will eliminate potholes and minimize ice build up.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: ADA compliance and MS4 permit compliance.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: For planning purposes, project estimates S 3rd to function
as a Minor Collector, which would require a 50% contribution from property owners via a Special District Assessment.
Are there other affected projects: This project will trigger water, sewer, and storm drain improvement projects within the
reconstruction area.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Enhances safety and drainage, preserves pavement
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
None
FUNDING SOURCES
Street and Curb Replacement Fund - 50%. Local SID - 50%.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
234
CIP Project Fund
Street & Curb Replacement Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
SCR08
DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
PROJECT NAME
S Black (College to S Cul-De-Sac) - Design and Construction
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Reconstruction of South Black from College to the Cul-de-Sac, including repairs to failed curb and gutters.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: The street is already in a failing condition and continues
to function; however, eventually the street will become deteriorated to a point where it is unfeasible to maintain and keep open
to public use.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: This project will provide a city standard street section, with ADA
compliant pedestrian ramps, pavement markings, and signage which will improve pedestrian safety. Also, new asphalt and
drainage improvements will eliminate potholes and other pavement irregularities.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: ADA compliance and MS4 permit compliance.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: For planning purposes, project estimates South Black to
function as a Local Street, which would require a 75% contribution from property owners via a Special Improvement District
Assessment.
Are there other affected projects: This project will trigger water, sewer, and storm drain improvements projects within the
reconstruction area.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Enhances safety and drainage, preserves pavement
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
None
FUNDING SOURCES
Street and Curb Replacement Fund - 25%. Local SID - 75%.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$535,500
FY21 FY22
235
CIP Project Fund
Street & Curb Replacement Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
SCR09
DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
PROJECT NAME
S Tracy (Babcock to College) - Design and Construction
FY18 FY19
$1,346,625
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Reconstruction of South Tracy Street from Babcock to College, including repairs to failed curbs and gutters.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: The street is already in a failing condition and continues
to function; however, eventually the street will become deteriorated to a point where it is unfeasible to maintain and keep open
to public use.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: This project will provide a city standard street section, with ADA
compliant pedestrian ramps, pavement markings, and signage which will improve pedestrian safety. Also, new asphalt and
drainage improvements will eliminate potholes and minimize ice build up.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: ADA compliance and MS4 permit compliance.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: For planning purposes, project estimates South Tracy to
function as a Minor Collector, which would require a 50% contribution from property owners via a Special Improvement District
Assessment.
Are there other affected projects: This project will trigger water, sewer, and storm drain improvement projects within the
reconstruction area.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Enhances safety and drainage, preserves pavement
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
None
FUNDING SOURCES
Street and Curb Replacement Fund - 50%. Local SID - 50%.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
236
CIP Project Fund
Street & Curb Replacement Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
SCR10
DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
PROJECT NAME
N Tracy (Villard to Peach) - Design and Construction
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Reconstruction of North Tracy Street from Villard to Peach, including repairs to failed curbs and gutters.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: This project will decrease street maintenance costs,
increase public safety and improve the condition of our public streets.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: This project will provide a city standard street section, with ADA
compliant pedestrian ramps, pavement markings, and signage which will improve pedestrian safety. Also, new asphalt and
drainage improvements will eliminate potholes and other pavement irregularities.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: ADA compliance and MS4 permit compliance.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: For planning purposes, project estimates North Tracy to
function as a Minor Collector, which would require a 50% contribution from property owners via a Special Improvement District
Assessment.
Are there other affected projects: This project will trigger water, sewer, and storm drain improvements projects within the
reconstruction area.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Enhances safety and drainage, preserves pavement
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
None
FUNDING SOURCES
Street and Curb Replacement Fund - 50%. Local SID - 50%.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21
$483,000
FY22
237
CIP Project Fund
Street & Curb Replacement Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
SCR11
DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
PROJECT NAME
S 4th Ave (College to Babcock) - Design and Construction
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$1,295,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Reconstruction of South 4th Ave from College to Babcock, including repairs to failed curbs and gutters.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: The street is already in a failing condition and continues
to function; however, eventually the street will become deteriorated to a point where it is unfeasible to maintain and keep open
to public use.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: This project will provide a city standard street section, with ADA
compliant pedestrian ramps, pavement markings, and signage which will improve pedestrian safety. Also, new asphalt and
drainage improvements will eliminate potholes and minimize ice build up.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: ADA compliance and MS4 permit compliance
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: For planning purposes, project estimates South 4th to
function as a Local Street, which would require a 75% contribution from property owners via a Special Improvement District
Assessment.
Are there other affected projects: This project will trigger water, sewer, and storm drain improvement projects within the
reconstruction area.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Enhances safety and drainage, preserves pavement
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
None
FUNDING SOURCES
Street and Curb Replacement Fund - 25%. Local SID - 75%.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
238
CIP Project Fund
Street & Curb Replacement Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
SCR12
DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
PROJECT NAME
W Koch (8th to Tracy) - Design and Construction
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$1,438,500
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Reconstruction of West Koch Street from 8th to Tracy, including repairs to failed curbs and gutters.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: The street is already in a failing condition and continues
to function; however, eventually the street will become deteriorated to a point where it is unfeasible to maintain and keep open
to public use.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: This project will provide a city standard street section, with ADA
compliant pedestrian ramps, pavement markings, and signage which will improve pedestrian safety. Also, new asphalt and
drainage improvements will eliminate potholes and minimize ice build up.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: ADA compliance and MS4 permit compliance.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: For planning purposes, project estimates West Koch to
function as a Minor Collector, which would require a 50% contribution from property owners via a Special Improvement District
Assessment.
Are there other affected projects: This project will trigger water, sewer, and storm drain improvements projects within the
reconstruction area.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Enhances safety and drainage, preserves pavement
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
None
FUNDING SOURCES
Street and Curb Replacement Fund - 50%. Local SID - 50%.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
239
CIP Project Fund
Street & Curb Replacement Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
SCR13
DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
PROJECT NAME
S 6th (Babcock to Cleveland) - Design and Construction
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$1,758,750
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Reconstruction of South 6th Ave from Babcock to Cleveland, including repairs to failed curbs and gutters.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: The street is already in a failing condition and continues
to function; however, eventually the street will become deteriorated to a point where it is unfeasible to maintain and keep open
to public use.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: This project will provide a city standard street section, with ADA
compliant pedestrian ramps, pavement markings, and signage which will improve pedestrian safety. Also, new asphalt and
drainage improvements will eliminate potholes and minimize ice build up.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: ADA compliance and MS4 permit compliance.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: For planning purposes, project estimates South 6th to
function as a Local Street, which would require a 75% contribution from property owners via a Special Improvement District
Assessment.
Are there other affected projects: This project will trigger water, sewer, and storm drain improvement projects within the
reconstruction area.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Enhances safety and drainage, preserves pavement
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
None
FUNDING SOURCES
Street and Curb Replacement Fund - 25%. Local SID - 75%.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
240
CIP Project Fund
Street & Curb Replacement Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
SCR14
DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
PROJECT NAME
S 5th (Olive to Hayes) - Design and Construction
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$2,121,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Reconstruction of South 5th Ave from Olive to Hayes, including repairs to failed curbs and gutters.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: The street is already in a failing condition and continues
to function; however, eventually the street will become deteriorated to a point where it is unfeasible to maintain and keep open
to public use.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: This project will provide a city standard street section, with ADA
compliant pedestrian ramps, pavement markings, and signage which will improve pedestrian safety. Also, new asphalt and
drainage improvements will eliminate potholes and minimize ice build up.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: ADA compliance and MS4 permit compliance.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: For planning purposes, project estimates South 5th to
function as a Minor Collector, which would require a 50% contribution from property owners via a Special District Assessment.
Are there other affected projects: This project will trigger water, sewer, and storm drain improvement projects within the
reconstruction area.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Enhances safety and drainage, preserves pavement
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
None
FUNDING SOURCES
Street and Curb Replacement Fund - 50%. Local SID - 50%.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
241
CIP Project Fund
Street & Curb Replacement Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
SCR15
DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
PROJECT NAME
W Harrison (Tracy to 6th) - Design and Construction
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$1,084,125
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Reconstruction of West Harrison from Tracy to 6th, including repairs to failed curbs and gutters.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: The street is already in a failing condition and continues
to function; however, eventually the street will become deteriorated to a point where it is unfeasible to maintain and keep open
to public use.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: This project will provide a city standard street section, with ADA
compliant pedestrian ramps, pavement markings, and signage which will improve pedestrian safety. Also, new asphalt and
drainage improvements will eliminate potholes and minimize ice build up.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: ADA compliance and MS4 permit compliance.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: For planning purposes, project estimates West Harrison to
function as a Local Street, which would require a 75% contribution from property owners via a Special Improvement District
Assessment.
Are there other affected projects: This project will trigger water, sewer, and storm drain improvements projects within the
reconstruction area.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Enhances safety and drainage, preserves pavement
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
None
FUNDING SOURCES
Street and Curb Replacement Fund - 25%. Local SID - 75%.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
242
CIP Project Fund
Street & Curb Replacement Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
SCR16
DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
PROJECT NAME
N 17th (Durston to End) - Design and Construction
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Reconstruction of North 17th Ave from Durston to Waggon Wheel Trailer Park, including repairs to failed curbs and gutters.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: The street is already in a failing condition and continues
to function; however, eventually the street will become deteriorated to a point where it is unfeasible to maintain and keep open
to public use.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: This project will provide a city standard street section, with ADA
compliant pedestrian ramps, pavement markings, and signage which will improve pedestrian safety. Also, new asphalt and
drainage improvements will eliminate potholes and minimize ice build up.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: ADA compliance and MS4 permit compliance.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: For planning purposes, project estimates North 17th to
function as a Local Street, which would require a 75% contribution from property owners via a Special Improvement District
Assessment.
Are there other affected projects: This project will trigger water, sewer, and storm drain improvement projects within the
reconstruction area.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Enhances safety and drainage, preserves pavement
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
None
FUNDING SOURCES
Street and Curb Replacement Fund - 25%. Local SID - 75%.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
$682,500
243
CIP Project Fund
Street & Curb Replacement Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
SCR17
DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
PROJECT NAME
W College (8th to 11th) - Design and Construction
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$530,250
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Reconstruction of West College from 8th to 11th, including repairs to failed curbs and gutters.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: The street is already in a failing condition and continues
to function; however, eventually the street will become deteriorated to a point where it is unfeasible to maintain and keep open
to public use.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: This project will provide a city standard street section, with ADA
compliant pedestrian ramps, pavement markings, and signage which will improve pedestrian safety. Also, new asphalt and
drainage improvements will eliminate potholes and minimize ice build up.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: ADA compliance and MS4 permit compliance.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: For planning purposes, project estimates College to
function as a Major Collector, which would require a 15% contribution from property owners via a Special Improvement District
Assessment.
Are there other affected projects: This project will trigger water, sewer, and storm drain improvements projects within the
reconstruction area.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Enhances safety and drainage, preserves pavement
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
None
FUNDING SOURCES
Street and Curb Replacement Fund - 85%. Local SID - 15%.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
244
CIP Project Fund
Street & Curb Replacement Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
SCR18
DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
PROJECT NAME
Lindley (Koch to Olive) - Design and Construction
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$420,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Reconstruction of Lindley from Koch to Olive, including repairs to failed curbs and gutters
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: The street is already in a failing condition and continues
to function; however, eventually the street will become deteriorated to a point where it is unfeasible to maintain and keep open
to public use.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: This project will provide a city standard street section, with ADA
compliant pedestrian ramps, pavement markings, and signage which will improve pedestrian safety. Also, new asphalt and
drainage improvements will eliminate potholes and minimize ice build up.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: ADA compliance and MS4 permit compliance.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: For planning purposes, project estimates Lindley to
function as a Local Street, which would require a 75% contribution from property owners via a Special Improvement District
Assessment.
Are there other affected projects: This project will trigger water, sewer, and storm drain improvement projects within the
reconstruction area.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Enhances safety and drainage, preserves pavement
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
None
FUNDING SOURCES
Street and Curb Replacement Fund - 25%. Local SID - 75%.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
245
CIP Project Fund
Street & Curb Replacement Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
SCR19
DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
PROJECT NAME
Davis (Church to Plum) - Design and Construction
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$530,250
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Reconstruction of Davis from Church to Plum, including repairs to failed curbs and gutters
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: The street is already in a failing condition and continues
to function; however, eventually the street will become deteriorated to a point where it is unfeasible to maintain and keep open
to public use.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: This project will provide a city standard street section, with ADA
compliant pedestrian ramps, pavement markings, and signage which will improve pedestrian safety. Also, new asphalt and
drainage improvements will eliminate potholes and minimize ice build up.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: ADA compliance and MS4 permit compliance.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: For planning purposes, project estimates Davis to function
as a Local Street, which would require a 75% contribution from property owners via a Special Improvement District Assessment.
Are there other affected projects: This project will trigger water, sewer, and storm drain improvement projects within the
reconstruction area.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Enhances safety and drainage, preserves pavement
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
None
FUNDING SOURCES
Street and Curb Replacement Fund - 25%. Local SID - 75%.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
246
CIP Project Fund
Street & Curb Replacement Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
SCR20
DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
PROJECT NAME
W Lincoln (Grand to Wilson) - Design and Construction
FY18 FY19
$168,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Reconstruction of West Lincoln, from Grand to Wilson, including repairs to failed curbs and gutters.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: The street is already in a failing condition and continues
to function; however, eventually the street will become deteriorated to a point where it is unfeasible to maintain and keep open
to public use.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: This project will provide a city standard street section, with ADA
compliant pedestrian ramps, pavement markings, and signage which will improve pedestrian safety. Also, new asphalt and
drainage improvements will eliminate potholes and minimize ice build up.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: ADA compliance and MS4 permit compliance.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: For planning purposes, project estimates Lincoln to
function as a Local Street, which would require a 75% contribution from property owners via a Special Improvement District
Assessment.
Are there other affected projects: This project will trigger water, sewer, and storm drain improvements projects within the
reconstruction area.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Enhances safety and drainage, preserves pavement
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
None
FUNDING SOURCES
Street and Curb Replacement Fund - 25%. Local SID - 75%.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
247
248
St
r
e
e
t
Im
p
a
c
t
Fe
e
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
Pl
a
n
Fi
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
Su
m
m
a
r
y
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Ye
a
r
FY
1
7
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
FY21 FY22 Unscheduled
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
Re
s
e
r
v
e
Ba
l
a
n
c
e
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
13
,
1
7
2
,
0
0
0
$
8,
5
4
8
,
4
2
6
$
(2
4
7
,
8
7
3
)
$
69
1
,
6
4
4
$
(2,764,422)
$
(1,473,291)$
Pl
u
s
:
Im
p
a
c
t
Fe
e
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
2,
3
8
8
,
9
0
1
$
3,
1
2
3
,
7
5
0
$
3,
2
7
9
,
9
3
8
$
3,
4
4
3
,
9
3
4
$
3,616,131
$
3,796,938 $ ‐$
Pl
u
s
:
Ur
b
a
n
Fu
n
d
s
:
Le
s
s
:
Ca
r
r
y
o
v
e
r
FY
1
6
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
(2
,
0
6
7
,
0
0
0
)
$
Le
s
s
:
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
d
CI
P
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Co
s
t
s
(4
,
9
4
5
,
4
7
5
)
$
(1
1
,
9
2
0
,
0
4
9
)
$
(2
,
3
4
0
,
4
2
1
)
$
(6
,
9
0
0
,
0
0
0
)
$
(2,325,000)
$
(1,000,000)$ (36,236,584)$
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Ye
a
r
‐En
d
Ca
s
h
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
8,
5
4
8
,
4
2
6
$
(2
4
7
,
8
7
3
)
$
69
1
,
6
4
4
$
(2
,
7
6
4
,
4
2
2
)
$
(1,473,291)
$
1,323,647 $ (36,236,584)$
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
Ba
l
a
n
c
e
of
Pa
y
b
a
c
k
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
‐
$
(1
,
4
3
6
,
0
0
0
)
$
(1
,
4
3
6
,
0
0
0
)
$
(1
,
4
3
6
,
0
0
0
)
$
(1,436,000)
$
(1,436,000)$
Gr
a
f
St
r
e
e
t
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
(1
,
4
3
6
,
0
0
0
)
$
SIF
1
0
2
‐
Pa
y
b
a
c
k
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
SIF
1
1
1
‐
Pa
y
b
a
c
k
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
SIF
1
1
8
‐
Pa
y
b
a
c
k
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
SIF
1
2
9
‐
Pa
y
b
a
c
k
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
En
d
i
n
g
Ba
l
a
n
c
e
of
Pa
y
b
a
c
k
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
(1
,
4
3
6
,
0
0
0
)
$
(1
,
4
3
6
,
0
0
0
)
$
(1
,
4
3
6
,
0
0
0
)
$
(1
,
4
3
6
,
0
0
0
)
$
(1,436,000)
$
(1,436,000)$
As
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
s
Ma
d
e
fo
r
Re
v
e
n
u
e
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
s
:
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Ye
a
r
FY
1
7
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
FY21 FY22
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
An
n
u
a
l
St
r
e
e
t
Im
p
a
c
t
Fe
e
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
2,
3
8
8
,
9
0
1
$
2,
9
7
5
,
0
0
0
$
3,1
2
3
,
7
5
0
$
3,
2
7
9
,
9
3
8
$
3,443,93 4
$
3,616,131 $
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
An
n
u
a
l
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
0.
0
%
5%
5%
5%
5%5%
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
2,
3
8
8
,
9
0
1
$
3,
1
2
3
,
7
5
0
$
3,2
7
9
,
9
3
8
$
3,
4
4
3
,
9
3
4
$
3,616,131
$
3,796,93 8 $
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
%
10
0
.
0
%
10
0
.
0
%
10
0
.
0
%
10
0
.
0
%
100.0 %100.0 %
Pl
u
s
:
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
St
r
e
e
t
Ca
p
a
c
i
t
y
Ex
p
a
n
s
i
o
n
CI
P
0.
0
%
0.
0
%
0.
0
%
0.
0
%
0.0%0.0%
To
t
a
l
% De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
10
0
.
0
%
10
0
.
0
%
10
0
.
0
%
10
0
.
0
%
100.0 %100.0 %
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
2,
3
8
8
,
9
0
1
$
3,
1
2
3
,
7
5
0
$
3,2
7
9
,
9
3
8
$
3,
4
4
3
,
9
3
4
$
3,616,131
$
3,796,93 8 $
*N
o
t
e
:
Th
i
s
sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
no
lo
n
g
e
r
co
n
t
a
i
n
s
th
e
po
r
t
i
o
n
s
of
pr
o
j
e
c
t
costs
th
a
t
wi
l
l
be
pa
i
d
by
ot
h
e
r
so
u
r
c
e
s
,
wi
t
h
th
e
ex
c
e
p
t
i
o
n
of
Fe
d
e
r
a
l
Ur
b
a
n
Fu
n
d
s
.
Se
e
th
e
"F
u
n
d
i
n
g
So
u
r
c
e
s
"
di
s
c
u
s
s
i
o
n
at
th
e
bottom of
ea
c
h
pr
o
j
e
c
t
it
e
m
sh
e
e
t
.
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
CU
R
R
E
N
T
45
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
40
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
35
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
30
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
25
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
20
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
15
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
10
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
5,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
0
St
r
e
e
t
Im
p
a
c
t
Fe
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
249
CI
P
PR
O
J
E
C
T
FU
PR
O
J
.
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
PR
O
J
E
C
T
NA
M
E
Unscheduled
FY
2
1
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
FY22
Im
p
a
c
t
Fe
e
s
St
r
e
e
t
s
SI
F
0
0
1
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
AN
N
U
A
L
RI
G
H
T
OF
WA
Y
AC
Q
U
I
S
I
T
I
O
N
$2
5
0
,
0
0
0
$2
5
0
,
0
0
0
$2
5
0
,
0
0
0
$2
5
0
,
0
0
0
$250,000
SI
F
0
0
9
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
KA
G
Y
(W
I
L
L
S
O
N
TO
19
T
H
)
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$8,000,000
SI
F
0
3
6
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
CO
T
T
O
N
W
O
O
D
(B
A
B
C
O
C
K
TO
DU
R
S
T
O
N
)
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$1
,
2
7
8
,
0
0
0
SI
F
0
3
9
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
FE
R
G
U
S
O
N
& DU
R
S
T
O
N
(I
N
T
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
)
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$1
,
8
0
4
,
9
7
6
SI
F
0
4
6
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
OA
K
(N
E
W
HO
L
L
A
N
D
TO
FE
R
G
U
S
O
N
)
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$1
,
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
SI
F
0
5
7
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
OA
K
(F
L
A
N
D
E
R
S
MI
L
L
TO
RY
U
N
S
O
N
WA
Y
)
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$1,000,000
SI
F
0
5
8
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
OA
K
& N 27
T
H
(I
N
T
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
)
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$488,584
SI
F
0
6
1
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
OA
K
& FE
R
G
U
S
O
N
(I
N
T
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
)
‐
SI
G
N
A
L
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$1
,
0
7
6
,
2
6
5
SI
F
0
6
2
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
DU
R
S
T
O
N
(F
O
W
L
E
R
TO
FE
R
G
U
S
O
N
)
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$7
5
7
,
4
2
1
SI
F
0
6
3
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
FO
W
L
E
R
& BA
B
C
O
C
K
(I
N
T
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
)
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$1,600,000
SI
F
0
7
3
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
FO
W
L
E
R
& DU
R
S
T
O
N
(I
N
T
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
)
‐
SI
G
N
A
L
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$1,616,000
SI
F
0
7
4
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
OA
K
& DA
V
I
S
(I
N
T
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
)
‐
RO
U
N
D
A
B
O
U
T
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$1
,
4
0
9
,
2
0
6
SI
F
0
7
6
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
FO
W
L
E
R
CO
N
N
E
C
T
I
O
N
(H
U
F
F
I
N
E
TO
OA
K
)
‐
DE
S
I
G
N
(I
N
C
L
U
D
E
S
3
IN
T
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
S
)
$5
0
0
,
0
0
0
SI
F
0
8
0
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
FE
R
G
U
S
O
N
(B
A
X
T
E
R
TO
OA
K
)
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$3
3
3
,
3
3
3
SI
F
0
8
6
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
BA
X
T
E
R
& CO
T
T
O
N
W
O
O
D
(I
N
T
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
)
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$2,000,000
SI
F
0
9
8
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
OA
K
& CO
T
T
O
N
W
O
O
D
(I
N
T
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
)
‐
RO
U
N
D
A
B
O
U
T
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$2,192,000
SI
F
1
0
2
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
S 11
T
H
AV
E
(K
A
G
Y
BL
V
D
TO
GR
A
F
ST
EX
T
E
N
S
I
O
N
)
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
*
$1
,
6
0
0
,
0
0
0
250
CI
P
PR
O
J
E
C
T
FU
PR
O
J
.
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
PR
O
J
E
C
T
NA
M
E
Unscheduled
FY
2
1
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
FY22
SI
F
1
0
4
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
CO
T
T
O
N
W
O
O
D
& BA
B
C
O
C
K
(I
N
T
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
)
‐
SI
G
N
A
L
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$1
,
1
4
8
,
2
6
9
SI
F
1
0
5
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
CO
T
T
O
N
W
O
O
D
(D
U
R
S
T
O
N
TO
OA
K
)
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$1,240,000
SI
F
1
0
6
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
TR
A
N
S
P
O
R
T
A
T
I
O
N
DE
M
A
N
D
MA
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
CO
N
T
R
A
C
T
$5
0
,
0
0
0
$5
0
,
0
0
0
SI
F
1
0
8
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
S 3R
D
AN
D
GR
A
F
‐
SI
G
N
A
L
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$8
0
0
,
0
0
0
SI
F
1
0
9
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
OA
K
(R
O
U
S
E
TH
R
O
U
G
H
CA
N
N
E
R
Y
DI
S
T
R
I
C
T
)
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$1
3
3
,
0
0
0
SI
F
1
1
0
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
MA
N
L
E
Y
& GR
I
F
F
I
N
(I
N
T
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
)
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$1
,
6
0
0
,
0
0
0
SI
F
1
1
1
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
HI
G
H
L
A
N
D
(M
A
I
N
TO
KA
G
Y
)
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
& DE
S
I
G
N
*
$5,000,000
SI
F
1
1
2
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
HI
G
H
L
A
N
D
& MA
I
N
IN
T
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
IM
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
$1
2
0
,
0
0
0
SI
F
1
1
3
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
GR
I
F
F
I
N
(7
T
H
TO
RO
U
S
E
)
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$3
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
SI
F
1
1
4
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
FO
W
L
E
R
CO
N
N
E
C
T
I
O
N
(H
U
F
F
I
N
E
TO
OA
K
)
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$3,750,000
SI
F
1
1
5
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
CO
L
L
E
G
E
(1
1
T
H
TO
19
T
H
)
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$550,000
SI
F
1
1
6
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
BR
I
D
G
E
R
DR
& ST
O
R
Y
MI
L
L
RD
(I
N
T
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
)
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$800,000
SI
F
1
1
7
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
ST
O
R
Y
MI
L
L
(G
R
I
F
F
I
N
TO
BR
I
D
G
E
R
)
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$2
2
5
,
0
0
0
SI
F
1
1
8
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
BA
B
C
O
C
K
(1
1
T
H
AV
E
TO
19
T
H
AV
E
)
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
*
$750,000
SI
F
1
1
8
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
BA
B
C
O
C
K
(1
1
T
H
AV
E
TO
19
T
H
AV
E
)
‐
DE
S
I
G
N
*
$2
5
0
,
0
0
0
SI
F
1
2
1
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
BA
X
T
E
R
& DA
V
I
S
(I
N
T
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
)
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$2
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
SI
F
1
2
2
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
BA
B
C
O
C
K
& FE
R
G
U
S
O
N
(I
N
T
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
)
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$8
0
0
,
0
0
0
SI
F
1
2
3
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
BR
I
D
G
E
R
DR
& ST
O
R
Y
MI
L
L
RD
(I
N
T
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
)
‐
DE
S
I
G
N
*
$200,000
SI
F
1
2
5
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
CO
L
L
E
G
E
(1
1
T
H
TO
19
T
H
)
‐
DE
S
I
G
N
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
SI
F
1
2
7
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
FO
W
L
E
R
RI
G
H
T
OF
WA
Y
PU
R
C
H
A
S
E
$1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
251
CI
P
PR
O
J
E
C
T
FU
PR
O
J
.
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
PR
O
J
E
C
T
NA
M
E
Unscheduled
FY
2
1
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
FY22
SI
F
1
2
8
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
KA
G
Y
(W
I
L
L
S
O
N
TO
HI
G
H
L
A
N
D
)
‐
DE
S
I
G
N
$500,000
SI
F
1
2
9
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
KA
G
Y
(W
I
L
L
S
O
N
TO
HI
G
H
L
A
N
D
)
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
*
$6,000,000
SI
F
1
3
0
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
KA
G
Y
(1
9
T
H
TO
WI
L
L
S
O
N
)
IN
T
E
R
I
M
IM
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
$5
0
0
,
0
0
0
SI
F
1
3
1
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
S 3R
D
AN
D
GR
A
F
‐
SI
G
N
A
L
DE
S
I
G
N
$1
5
0
,
0
0
0
SI
F
1
3
2
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
ST
O
R
Y
MI
L
L
(G
R
I
F
F
I
N
TO
BR
I
D
G
E
R
)
‐
DE
S
I
G
N
$5
0
,
0
0
0
SI
F
1
3
3
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
GR
I
F
F
I
N
CO
R
R
I
D
O
R
DE
S
I
G
N
$2
5
0
,
0
0
0
SI
F
1
3
4
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
OA
K
(C
O
T
T
O
N
W
O
O
D
TO
FL
A
N
D
E
R
S
MI
L
L
)
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$1,300,000
SI
F
1
3
5
ST
R
E
E
T
IF
OA
K
(F
E
R
G
U
S
O
N
TO
RY
U
N
S
O
N
WA
Y
)
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
Su
m
m
a
r
y f or
Im
p ac
t
Fe
e
s
St
r
e
e
t
s
(45
it
e
m
s
)
To
t
a
l
s
by
ye
a
r
:
$2
,
3
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
1
,
9
2
0
,
0
4
9
$36,236,584
FY
2
1
FY22
FY
1
8
Unscheduled
FY
2
0
$6
,
9
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
,
3
4
0
,
4
2
1
FY
1
9
252
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF001
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Annual Right Of Way Acquisition
FY18
$250,000
FY19
$250,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Annual allocation available for right-of-way purchases as they become available.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Purchasing additional right-of-way can be critical to
expanding the capacity of streets in the city.
How is capacity affected by this project: Additional right-of-way is directly related to capacity expansion. In all cases the only
reason additional R/W is required is that the existing roadway is being expanded.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Purchasing additional right-of-way may be critical to connecting elements of the
transportation network.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Conformance with the City Transportation Master Plan is obtained.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: Purchase of R/W is often a prerequisite for construction of
the critical elements of the transportation network.
Are there other affected projects: All of the other street impact fee projects could potentially be affected by R/W acquisition.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Condemn property for right-of-way; pay court costs as well as appraised value of property. Time consuming for city staff and a relatively
expensive process. Wait for adjacent property owners to dedicate R/W as part of the annexation/development process.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Provides dollars for the purchase of necessary right-of-way as it becomes available on the market. Avoids the expensive condemnation process
where possible or having to wait for voluntary dedications.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating & Maintenance Costs: Street Impact Fees can not be spent on operating and maintaining facilities. There is expected to be a
very minimal, incremental cost to the Street Maintenance District from this expenditure.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Street Impact Fees
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$250,000
FY21
$250,000
FY22
$250,000
253
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF009
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Kagy (Willson to 19th) - Construction
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$8,000,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project consists of reconstructing Kagy Boulevard from the intersection of S 19th Ave to Willson Ave to a 4 lane urban
arterial standard.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Future developments which impact this intersection
area may not be allowed to proceed until improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this
element functioning as intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those
elements of the street network that are in place.
How is capacity affected by this project: This project directly increase capacity by adding additional travel lanes, dedicated bike
lanes and sidewalks and making improvements to the intersections.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Kagy serves as an important element of Bozeman's perimeter street system
connecting Highland Blvd., Willson Ave, and S. 19th. It also serves as the primary access to Montana State University and the
University's major athletic facilities.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: The Level of Service (LOS) Standard (BMC) and conformance with
the Transportation Master Plan are attained.
Are there other affected projects: Intersection Improvements at Kagy & 19th, Kagy & 7th, Kagy & 11th, Kagy & Willson.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
SID, Urban funds, incremental construction by adjacent development.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Kagy is a State Urban Route and is eligible for expenditure of State urban funds designated annually for the City of Bozeman; however, the
availability of urban funds cannot match the pace of the City's transportation improvement needs. The need for this project comes from
increased traffic due to growth in the Bozeman area and the project is eligible for Impact Fee Funds. Use of Street Impact Funds enables the
community to leverage the available State Urban transportation funds to complete projects and address more of its pressing transportation
needs.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($8,000,000) and Urban Funds ($8,000,000). A Payback District or SID may be able to created to
leverage other stakeholders.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
254
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF036
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Cottonwood (Babcock to Durston) - Construction
FY18
$1,278,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The project consists of finishing Cottonwood Road from Babcock to Durston to a five lane urban arterial standard.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Future developments which impact this intersection
area may not be allowed to proceed until improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this
element functioning as intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those
elements of the street network that are in place. Cottonwood is also failing in this section because of heavy traffic and subbase
degradation. Failure to complete this section will likely result in large maintenance expenses.
How is capacity affected by this project: This project increases capacity directly by adding additional lanes, dedicated bike lanes
and sidewalks.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Cottonwood serves as an important element in Bozeman's west side street system
and serves as a primary north-south corridor on the west side of the City.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Conformance with the Transportation Master Plan is attained.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: A Payback District or SID may be created to leverage other
stakeholders.
Are there other affected projects: Cottonwood corridor street improvements, intersection improvements at Cottonwood and
Babcock and Cottonwood and Durston.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
SID, payback district, incremental construction by adjacent development.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
This project will expand the capacity of our street network and improve safety for drivers and pedestrians. Facilitates development currently
occurring in this part of the city and network performance overall.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs. Added maintenance costs
are expected if this project is not completed within the next 2-3 years.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($1,278,000) and the Arterial & Collector District ($1,278,000). A development payback district
may be created to reimburse Arterial & Collector District for any local share (project related) costs that may be allocated to future
developments (estimated at $1,278,000).
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
255
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF039
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Ferguson & Durston (Intersection) - Construction
FY18
$1,804,976
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Installation of a roundabout at the intersection of Ferguson and Durston
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: The level of service at this intersection has degraded to
unacceptable levels. Future developments which impact this intersection area may not be allowed to proceed until improvements
are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this element functioning as intended.
How is capacity affected by this project: This intersection is currently 4-way stop controlled. Replacing it with a roundabout will
greatly increase it's capacity.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Connectivity already exists at this location, it is capacity that is affected.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: The Level of Service (LOS) Standard (BMC) and conformance with
the Transportation Master Plan are attained.
Are there other affected projects: The Ferguson Road Improvement project.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Accept the current level of service (do nothing). Alternative financing could be provided by creating an SID or Payback District.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased capacity at this intersection. Facilitates development currently occurring in this part of the city and network performance overall.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($1,804,976) and the Arterial & Collector District ($451,244).
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
256
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF046
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Oak (New Holland to Ferguson) - Construction
FY18
$1,400,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Complete To 5-Lane Arterial Standard
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Future developments in this area may not be allowed to
proceed until these improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this element functioning as
intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those elements of the street
network that are in place.
How is capacity affected by this project: This project increases capacity directly by adding additional lanes, dedicated bike lanes
and sidewalks.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Connectivity already exists at this location, it is capacity which is being expanded.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Conformance with the Transportation Master Plan is attained.
Are there other affected projects: Oak Street Cottonwood to Ferguson, Intersection improvements at Oak and Ferguson and
Oak and Fowler.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Construct segment by segment as adjacent parcels develop.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased capacity, connectivity and safety in this corridor, both for motorized vehicles as well as bicycles and pedestrians.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project will be funded by Street Impact Fees ($1,400,000) and Arterial & Collector District financing for local improvements attributed to
Gallatin County - creation of Special Improvement District ($600,000). The Special Improvement District will re-pay the Arterial & Collector
District Fund.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
257
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF057
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Oak (Flanders Mill to Ryunson Way) - Construction
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$1,000,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project is the completion of the street segment of Oak St, from Flanders Mill to Ryunson Way, to a five-lane urban principal
arterial standard. Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Future developments in this area may
not be allowed to proceed until these improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this
element functioning as intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those
elements of the street network that are in place. How is capacity affected by this project: This project increases capacity directly
by constructing new segments of arterial roadway and by adding additional lanes, dedicated bike lanes and sidewalks. How is
connectivity affected by this project: Completes an important east-west link between Ferguson and Cottonwood. What
regulations or standards are attained with this project: Conformance with the Transportation Master Plan is attained. How is this
project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: A payback District or SID may be created to leverage other
stakeholders. Are there other affected projects: Intersection improvements at Oak and Cottonwood, Oak and Flanders Mill, Oak
and Ferguson, Oak Street - New Holland to Ferguson.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Construct segment by segment as adjacent parcels develop.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased capacity, connectivity and safety in this corridor, both for motorized vehicles as well as bicycles and pedestrians.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($1,000,000) the Arterial & Collector District ($500,000) and local participation. The Flander's Mill
development is expected to be a partner in the construction of the segments adjacent to their development.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
258
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF058
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Oak & N 27th (Intersection) - Construction
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$488,584
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Installation of a signal at the intersection of Oak and N 27th.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: The level of service at this intersection has degraded to
unacceptable levels. Future developments which impact this intersection area may not be allowed to proceed until improvements
are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this element functioning as intended.
How is capacity affected by this project: This intersection is currently 2-way stop controlled. Replacing it with a signal will greatly
increase it's capacity.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Connectivity already exists at this location, it is capacity that is affected.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: The Level of Service (LOS) Standard (BMC) and conformance with
the Transportation Master Plan are attained.
Are there other affected projects: Oak Street corridor projects and North 27th Street improvements project.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Accept the current level of service (do nothing). Secure additional financing by creating an SID or Payback District.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased capacity at this intersection. Facilitates development currently occurring in this part of the city and network performance overall.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($488,584) and the Arterial & Collector District ($122,146).
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
259
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF061
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Oak & Ferguson (Intersection) - Signal Construction
FY18
$1,076,265
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Installation of a signal at the intersection of Oak and Ferguson. Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the
operation: Future developments which impact this intersection area may not be allowed to proceed until improvements are in
place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this element functioning as intended. The incomplete transportation
network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those elements of the street network that are in place. How is capacity
affected by this project: Development which is currently occurring as well as projects which already have approval make it clear
that this intersection will no longer meet the city's LOS standard. Installation of a signal at this intersection will increase it's
capacity and assist in improving the LOS at nearby intersections. How is connectivity affected by this project: Facilitates the
extension of Oak Street to the west of Ferguson Road where it currently does not exist, and will eventually make the connection
with Cottonwood Road. What regulations or standards are attained with this project: The Level of Service (LOS) Standard
(BMC) and conformance with the Transportation Master Plan are attained. Are there other affected projects: Oak Street projects
and Ferguson Road projects are affected.</div>
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Accept the current level of service (do nothing). Secure additional financing by creating an SID or Payback District.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased capacity at this intersection. Facilitates development currently occurring in this part of the city and network performance overall.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($1,076,265) and Arterial & Collector District ($269,066).
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
260
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF062
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Durston (Fowler to Ferguson) - Construction
FY18 FY19
$757,421
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Complete Durston Rd, from Cottonwood to Fowler, to a three-lane urban minor arterial standard
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Future developments in this area may not be allowed to
proceed until these improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this element functioning as
intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those elements of the street
network that are in place.
How is capacity affected by this project: This project directly increase capacity by adding additional lanes, dedicated bike lanes and
sidewalks.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Connectivity already exists at this location, it is capacity that is affected.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Conformance with the Transportation Master Plan is attained.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: A payback District or SID may be created to leverage other
stakeholders.
Are there other affected projects: Intersection improvements at Durston & Ferguson, Durston & Fowler, Durston & Flanders Mill.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Construct segment by segment as adjacent parcels develop.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased capacity and safety in this corridor, both for motorized vehicles as well as bicycles and pedestrians.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($757,421) and the Arterial & Collector District ($757,421). A payback district may be created to
reimburse both funds for any local share (project related) costs that may be allocated to future developments.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
261
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF063
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Fowler & Babcock (Intersection) - Construction
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$1,600,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Install a traffic signal, roundabout, or other adequate traffic control device at the intersection of Fowler and Babcock.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Peak hour level of service for northbound traffic is
degrading due to lack of north-south connectivity in the network.
How is capacity affected by this project: This intersection is currently 1-way stop controlled. Replacing it with a signal or
roundabout will greatly increase it's capacity.
How is connectivity affected by this project: East-west connectivity already exists at this location. North-south connectivity is still
lacking.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: The Level of Service (LOS) Standard (BMC) and conformance with
the Transportation Master Plan are attained.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: A Payback District or SID may be created to leverage other
stakeholders.
Are there other affected projects: Fowler corridor improvements.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Identified in the 2007 Transportation Plan Update. Includes installation of a traffic signal, roundabout or other adequate traffic control device
when warrants are met.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased capacity and safety at this intersection.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($1,600,000) and the Arterial & Collector District ($400,000).
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
262
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF073
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Fowler & Durston (Intersection) - Signal Construction
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$1,616,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Install a signal at the intersection of Fowler and Durston Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of
this project to the operation: Current LOS is acceptable. How is capacity affected by this project: This intersection is currently 1-
way stop controlled. Replacing it with a signal or roundabout will greatly increase it's capacity. How is connectivity affected by
this project: East-west connectivity already exists at this location. North-south connectivity is still lacking. What regulations or
standards are attained with this project: The Level of Service (LOS) Standard (BMC) and conformance with the Transportation
Master Plan are attained. Are there other affected projects: Fowler corridor street improvements.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Accept the current level of service (do nothing). Alternative financing could be provided by creating an SID or Payback District.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Improves an important connecting element in the network.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($1,616,000) and the Arterial & Collector District ($404,000). A development payback district may
be created to reimburse Arterial & Collector District for any local share (project related) costs that may be allocated to future developments
(estimated at $404,000).
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
263
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF074
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Oak & Davis (Intersection) - Roundabout Construction
FY18
$1,409,206
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Install a roundabout at the intersection of Oak and Davis. Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the
operation: Peak hour level of service for northbound traffic is degrading due to lack of north-south connectivity in the network.
Geometric deficiencies will be addressed. How is capacity affected by this project: This intersection is currently 1-way stop
controlled. Replacing it with a roundabout will greatly increase it's capacity. How is connectivity affected by this project: East-
west connectivity already exists at this location. North-south connectivity is still lacking. What regulations or standards are
attained with this project: The Level of Service (LOS) Standard (BMC) and conformance with the Transportation Master Plan are
attained. Are there other affected projects: Oak Street corridor improvements and Fowler corridor improvements.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Accept the current geometry and level of service.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased capacity and safety at this intersection.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($1,409,206) and the Arterial & Collector District ($352,302).
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
264
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF076
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Fowler Connection (Huffine to Oak) - Design (Includes 3 Intersections)
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Design Fowler from Huffine to Oak to an urban minor arterial standard, including three intersections.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Future developments which impact this intersection
area may not be allowed to proceed until improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this
element functioning as intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those
elements of the street network that are in place.
How is capacity affected by this project: This project directly increase capacity by adding additional travel lanes, dedicated bike
lanes and sidewalks and making improvements to the intersections.
How is connectivity affected by this project: This project completes an important north-south connection on the west side of
town.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: The Level of Service (LOS) Standard (BMC) and conformance with
the Transportation Master Plan are attained.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: A Payback District or SID may be created to leverage other
stakeholders.
Are there other affected projects: Intersection improvements at Fowler and Durston and Fowler and Oak.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Construct segment by segment as adjacent parcels develop.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
This project will complete an important north-south connection, expand the capacity of our street network and improve safety for drivers and
pedestrians.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($500,000) and the Arterial & Collector District ($500,000). A development payback district may
be created to reimburse Arterial & Collector District for any local share (project related) costs that may be allocated to future developments
(estimated at $500,000).
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21
$500,000
FY22
265
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF080
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Ferguson (Baxter to Oak) - Construction
FY18
$333,333
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Complete Ferguson from Baxter to Oak to a two lane urban collector standard with bike lanes, curb and gutter, boulevards,
parking and sidewalks.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Future developments in this area may not be allowed to
proceed until these improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this element functioning as
intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those elements of the street
network that are in place.
How is capacity affected by this project: This project increases capacity directly by constructing a new roadway which includes
dedicated bike lanes and sidewalks.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Completes an important north-south link between Baxter and Oak.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Conformance with the Transportation Master Plan is attained.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: A payback District or SID may be created to leverage other
stakeholders.
Are there other affected projects: Intersection of Ferguson and Oak.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Construct segment by segment as adjacent parcels develop.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased capacity, connectivity and safety in this corridor, both for motorized vehicles as well as bicycles and pedestrians.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($333,333), Gallatin County ($333,333), and a developer contribution ($333,333). This budget
assumes that A&C funds will be used to cover the both the County portion and the developer contribution, both to be paid back with SID or
payback agreement.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
266
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF086
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Baxter & Cottonwood (Intersection) - Construction
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$2,000,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Improve the intersection at Baxter and Cottonwood. Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation:
Current LOS is acceptable. How is capacity affected by this project: This intersection is currently 1-way stop controlled.
Replacing it with a signal or roundabout will greatly increase it's capacity. How is connectivity affected by this project: East-west
connectivity already exists at this location. North-south connectivity is still lacking. What regulations or standards are attained
with this project: The Level of Service (LOS) Standard (BMC) and conformance with the Transportation Master Plan are attained.
Are there other affected projects: Cottonwood corridor improvements and Baxter corridor improvements.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Identified in the 2007 Transportation Plan Update. Includes installation of a traffic signal, roundabout or other adequate traffic control device
when warrants are met.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased capacity and safety at this intersection.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($2,000,000) and the Arterial & Collector District ($500,000).
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
267
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF098
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Oak & Cottonwood (Intersection) - Roundabout Construction
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$2,192,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Installation of a roundabout at the intersection of Oak and Cottonwood. Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this
project to the operation: Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this element functioning as intended. The
incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those elements of the street network that
are in place. How is capacity affected by this project: Capacity will be greatly increased on the network as a whole as this
intersection is currently 3-legged, rural and stop controlled on Cottonwood (Harper Puckett). How is connectivity affected by
this project: This improvement will complete an important north-south connection on Cottonwood. What regulations or
standards are attained with this project: The Level of Service (LOS) Standard (BMC) and conformance with the Transportation
Master Plan are attained. Are there other affected projects: Cottonwood Road Improvements, Oak Street Improvements.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Not installing the intersection improvement at the same time as the construction of the intersecting streets. Secure additional financing by
creating an SID or Payback District.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased capacity and safety at this intersection.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($2,192,000) and the Arterial & Collector District ($548,000).
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
268
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF102
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
S 11th Ave (Kagy Blvd to Graf St Extension) - Construction*
FY18
$1,600,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Complete S 11th, from Kagy to Graf, to an urban collector standard, including sidewalks, curb and gutter, and bike lanes.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Functionality of the network at large is dependent on
this element functioning as intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on
those elements of the street network that are in place.
How is capacity affected by this project: This project increases capacity directly by constructing a new roadway which includes
dedicated bike lanes and sidewalks.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Completes an important north-south connection south of Kagy.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Conformance with the Transportation Master Plan are attained.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: A payback District or SID may be created to leverage other
stakeholders
Are there other affected projects: Intersections of 11th and Kagy and 11th and Graf.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Construct segment by segment as adjacent parcels develop.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
This project will expand the capacity of our street network and improve safety for drivers and pedestrians.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($1,600,000), with a portion reimbursed by a payback district for improvements that are related to
adjacent properties.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
269
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF104
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Cottonwood & Babcock (Intersection) - Signal Construction
FY18
$1,148,269
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Cottonwood and Babcock. Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this
project to the operation: Future developments which impact this intersection area may not be allowed to proceed until
improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this element functioning as intended. The
incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those elements of the street network that
are in place. How is capacity affected by this project: This intersection is currently 2-way stop controlled. Replacing it with a
signal will greatly increase it's capacity. How is connectivity affected by this project: Connectivity exists at this location, it is
capacity which is being increased. What regulations or standards are attained with this project: The Level of Service (LOS)
Standard (BMC) and conformance with the Transportation Master Plan are attained. Are there other affected projects:
Cottonwood corridor improvement projects.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Accept the current level of service (do nothing). Alternative financing could be provided by creating an SID or Payback District.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
This project will expand the capacity of our street network, improve safety for drivers and pedestrians and increase capacity at this
intersection. Facilitates development currently occurring in this part of the city and network performance overall.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($1,148,269) and the Arterial & Collector District ($287,067).
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
270
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF105
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Cottonwood (Durston to Oak) - Construction
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$1,240,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Complete the construction of Cottonwood Road from Durston Road to Oak Street to a five-lane urban arterial standard.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Future developments which impact this intersection
area may not be allowed to proceed until improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this
element functioning as intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those
elements of the street network that are in place.
How is capacity affected by this project: This project increases capacity directly by adding additional lanes, dedicated bike lanes
and sidewalks.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Cottonwood Rd serves as an important element in Bozeman's west side street
system and serves as a primary north-south corridor on the west side of the city.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Conformance with the Transportation Master Plan is attained.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: A Payback District or SID may be created to leverage other
stakeholders.
Are there other affected projects: Cottonwood corridor street improvements, intersection improvements at Cottonwood and
Durston and Cottonwood and Oak.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Construct segment by segment as adjacent parcels develop.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
This project will expand the capacity of our street network and improve safety for drivers and pedestrians. Facilitates development currently
occurring in this part of the city and network performance overall.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($1,240,000) and the Arterial & Collector District ($1,240,000). A development payback district
may be created to reimburse Arterial & Collector District for any local share (project related) costs that may be allocated to future
developments (estimated at $1,240,000).
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
271
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF106
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Transportation Demand Management Contract
FY18
$50,000
FY19
$50,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Explore the potential for reducing vehicle demand on the network at peak hours by flexible start times, work from home
incentives etc. Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: This project is important because the
funding available to increase capacity by building physical improvements to the network is unlikely to ever be sufficient. This
project supplements that effort. How is capacity affected by this project: By reducing overall demand on the network How is this
project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: 33% Impact Fee, 33% Montana State University, 33% Western
Transportation Institute Are there other affected projects: This project has the potential to impact the network at large.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Do nothing
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
May improve peak hour LOS in many locations by directly reducing demand
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
None
FUNDING SOURCES
Three-year commitment with Western Transportation Institute and MSU. FY17 was the first year of funding. FY18 & FY19 are the remaining
years. 33% Impact Fee, 33% Montana State University, 33% Western Transportation Institute
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
272
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF108
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
S 3rd and Graf - Signal Construction
FY18 FY19
$800,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Signal construction at S 3rd and Graf Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Future
developments which impact this intersection area may not be allowed to proceed until improvements are in place. Functionality
of the network at large is dependent on this element functioning as intended. The incomplete transportation network in this
vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those elements of the street network that are in place. How is capacity affected by this
project: This is currently a stop controlled intersection. Installation of a roundabout will directly increase capacity. How is
connectivity affected by this project: Connectivity already exists at this location, it is capacity which is being expanded. What
regulations or standards are attained with this project: The Level of Service (LOS) Standard (BMC). Are there other affected
projects: Graf Street corridor improvements.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Accept the existing level of service, create an SID for financing.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased capacity and safety at this intersection.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($800,000) and the Arterial & Collector District ($200,000).
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
273
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF109
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Oak (Rouse through Cannery District) - Construction
FY18 FY19
$133,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project consists of improving Oak from Rouse through the Cannery District to include curb, gutter, sidewalks, and a turning
lane to provide a complete arterial street standard. The Cannery District will be responsible for the cost of curb, gutter, and
sidewalk along their property frontage as well as the turn lane to access two drive accesses that allow a left turn movement from
Oak Street into the Cannery District.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Future developments in this area may not be allowed to
proceed until these improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this element functioning as
intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those elements of the street
network that are in place.
How is capacity affected by this project: This project directly increase capacity by adding additional lanes, dedicated bike lanes and
sidewalks.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Connectivity already exists at this location, it is capacity that is affected.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: Left turn traffic safety will be improved upon installation of left turn
lanes. Pedestrian safety will be improved.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Conformance with the Transportation Master Plan is attained.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: A payback District or SID may be created to leverage other
stakeholders. Cash-in-lieu of infrastructure is anticipated to be contributed from the Cannery District developer to cover the
cost of the left turn lanes needed for their drive accesses as well as the cost of curb, gutter, and sidewalk adjacent to their
property.
Are there other affected projects: Oak Street Corridor improvements
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased capacity and safety in this corridor, both for motorized vehicles as well as bicycles and pedestrians. There will be substantial
pedestrian traffic between the Fairgrounds and the Cannery District. Additionally, the traffic impact study for the Cannery District indicated the
need for left turn lanes for their drive accesses. As the City's transportation master plan identifies the need to upgrade the Oak Street
Corridor to an arterial standard, this is an opportunity to partner with the Cannery District developer to complete a portion of the Oak Street
improvements.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($133,000), the Arterial & Collector District ($133,000), and Cannery District Developer share
($133,000). A development payback district or SID may be created to reimburse the Arterial & Collector District for the County’s (project
related) costs.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
274
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF110
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Manley & Griffin (Intersection) - Construction
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Intersection control at Manley & Griffin
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Future developments which impact this intersection
area may not be allowed to proceed until improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this
element functioning as intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those
elements of the street network that are in place.
How is capacity affected by this project: This intersection is currently 1-way stop controlled. Replacing it with a signal will greatly
increase it's capacity.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Connectivity already exists at this location, it is capacity which is being expanded.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: The Level of Service (LOS) Standard (BMC) and conformance with
the Transportation Master Plan are attained.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: A Payback District or SID may be created to leverage other
stakeholders.
Are there other affected projects: Griffin corridor improvements.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Accept the current LOS
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased capacity and safety at this intersection.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
Street Impact Fees ($1,600,000) and Arterial & Collector District ($400,000).
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$1,600,000
FY21 FY22
275
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF111
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Highland (Main to Kagy) - Construction & Design*
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$5,000,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Upgrade Highland, from Main to Kagy.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Future developments in this area may not be allowed to
proceed until these improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this element functioning as
intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those elements of the street
network that are in place.
How is capacity affected by this project: This project directly increase capacity by adding additional lanes, dedicated bike lanes and
sidewalks.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Connectivity already exists at this location, it is capacity that is affected.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Conformance with the Transportation Master Plan is attained.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: A payback District or SID may be created to leverage other
stakeholders.
Are there other affected projects: Intersection improvements at Highland and Kagy, Highland and Ellis and Highland and Main
Street.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased capacity and safety in this corridor, both for motorized vehicles as well as bicycles and pedestrians.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($5,000,000) and the Arterial & Collector District ($5,000,000). A payback district may be
created to reimburse both funds for any local share (project related) costs that may be allocated to future developments.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
276
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF112
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Highland & Main Intersection Improvements
FY18
$120,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Improve intersection control at Highland & Main
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Future developments which impact this intersection
area may not be allowed to proceed until improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this
element functioning as intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those
elements of the street network that are in place
How is capacity affected by this project: Adding additional phases and improving geometry will increase capacity for deficient
movements at this intersection.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Connectivity already exists at this location, it is capacity which is being expanded.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: The Level of Service (LOS) Standard (BMC) and conformance with
the Transportation Master Plan are attained.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: A Payback District or SID may be created to leverage other
stakeholders.
Are there other affected projects: Highland Boulevard corridor improvements
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Accept the existing level of service, create an SID for financing.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased capacity and safety at this intersection.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Street Impact Fees
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
277
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF113
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Griffin (7th to Rouse) - Construction
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Construct W Griffin corridor improvements from N. 7th to Rouse to an urban minor arterial standard
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Future developments which impact this intersection
area may not be allowed to proceed until improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this
element functioning as intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those
elements of the street network that are in place.
How is capacity affected by this project: Designed improvements will improve LOS at the key intersections and will increase
capacity in the corridor as a whole.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Connectivity already exists at this location, it is capacity which is being expanded.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: The Level of Service (LOS) Standard (BMC) and conformance with
the Transportation Master Plan are attained.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: A Payback District or SID may be created to leverage other
stakeholders.
Are there other affected projects: Intersection improvements at Griffin and 7th and Griffin and Rouse.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Accept the current level of service (do nothing).
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
This project will expand the capacity of our street network and improve safety for drivers and pedestrians. Facilitates development currently
occurring in this part of the city and network performance overall.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($3,000,000) and the Arterial & Collector District ($2,000,000). A development payback district or
SID may be created to reimburse Arterial & Collector District for any local share (project related) costs that may be allocated to future
developments (estimated at $2,000,000).
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$3,000,000
FY21 FY22
278
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF114
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Fowler Connection (Huffine to Oak) - Construction
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$3,750,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Complete the section of Fowler from Huffine to Oak Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation:
Future developments which impact this intersection area may not be allowed to proceed until improvements are in place.
Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this element functioning as intended. The incomplete transportation
network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those elements of the street network that are in place. How is capacity
affected by this project: Allows for extension of Fowler Avenue, which will directly increase capacity. How is connectivity
affected by this project: Extends an important north-south corridor on the west side of the city. What regulations or standards
are attained with this project: Conformance with the Transportation Master Plan are attained. Are there other affected projects:
Intersection improvements on Fowler at Huffine, Babcock, Durston and Oak.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Wait for adjacent development to occur and construct the road incrementally.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Completes an important north-south link in the transportation network which reduces demand on other adjacent corridors.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($3,750,000) and the Arterial & Collector District ($3,750,000). A Payback District or SID may be
created to reimburse the Arterial & Collector District for any local improvements.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
279
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF115
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
College (11th to 19th) - Construction
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$550,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Complete College, from 19th to 11th, to a principal arterial standard.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Functionality of the network at large is dependent on
this element functioning as intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on
those elements of the street network that are in place.
How is capacity affected by this project: This project increases capacity directly by adding additional lanes, dedicated bike lanes
and sidewalks and by improving intersection LOS
How is connectivity affected by this project: Connectivity already exists at this location, it is capacity which is being expanded.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: The Level of Service (LOS) Standard (BMC) and conformance with
the Transportation Master Plan are attained.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: Urban funds could be used on this section of College.
Are there other affected projects: Intersections of College/11th and College/8th.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Accept the current configuration
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
This project will expand the capacity of our street network and improve safety for drivers and pedestrians.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
None
FUNDING SOURCES
50% Street Impact Fees & 50% Arterial & Collector District.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
280
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF116
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Bridger Dr & Story Mill Rd (Intersection) - Construction
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$800,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Intersection control at Bridger and Story Mill. Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Future
developments which impact this intersection area may not be allowed to proceed until improvements are in place. Functionality
of the network at large is dependent on this element functioning as intended. The incomplete transportation network in this
vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those elements of the street network that are in place. How is capacity affected by this
project: Adding additional phases and improving geometry will increase capacity for deficient movements at this intersection.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Connectivity already exists at this location, it is capacity which is being expanded.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Conformance with the Transportation Master Plan are attained. Are
there other affected projects: Story Mill, Griffin to Bridger Drive</div>
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Accept the current LOS
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased capacity and safety at this intersection.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($800,000) and the Arterial & Collector District ($200,000).
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
281
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF117
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Story Mill (Griffin to Bridger) - Construction
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Improve Story Mill from Griffin to Bridger
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Future developments which impact this intersection
area may not be allowed to proceed until improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this
element functioning as intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those
elements of the street network that are in place.
How is capacity affected by this project: This project directly increases capacity by adding additional travel lanes, dedicated bike
lanes and sidewalks.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Connectivity already exists at this location, it is capacity which is being expanded.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Conformance with the Transportation Master Plan are attained.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: A Payback District or SID may be created to leverage other
stakeholders.
Are there other affected projects: Intersection improvements to Story Mill and Bridger Drive.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Wait for adjacent development to occur and construct the road incrementally.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Improves an important north-south link in the transportation network which reduces demand on other adjacent corridors.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($225,000) and the Arterial & Collector District ($225,000). An SID or payback district may be
created to recover the local share.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21
$225,000
FY22
282
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF118
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Babcock (11th Ave to 19th Ave) - Design*
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Design the Babcock (11th to 19th) street upgrade
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Future developments which impact this intersection
area may not be allowed to proceed until improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this
element functioning as intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those
elements of the street network that are in place.
How is capacity affected by this project: This project increases capacity directly by adding additional lanes, dedicated bike lanes
and sidewalks.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Connectivity already exists at this location, it is capacity which is being expanded.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Conformance with the Transportation Master Plan are attained.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: A Payback District or SID may be created to leverage other
stakeholders.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Wait for adjacent development to install the improvements section by section.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Allows for improvements to be made to the corridor at a time more favorable to the City
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Street Impact Fees. A payback district may be able to reimburse for design costs.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21
$250,000
FY22
283
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF118
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Babcock (11th Ave to 19th Ave) - Construction*
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Improve Babcock from 11th to 19th)
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Future developments which impact this intersection
area may not be allowed to proceed until improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this
element functioning as intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those
elements of the street network that are in place.
How is capacity affected by this project: This project increases capacity directly by adding additional lanes, dedicated bike lanes
and sidewalks.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Connectivity already exists at this location, it is capacity which is being
expanded.What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Conformance with the Transportation Master Plan are
attained.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: A Payback District or SID may be created to leverage other
stakeholders.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Wait for adjacent development to install the improvements section by section.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Allows for improvements to be made to the corridor at a time more favorable to the City
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($750,000) and the Arterial & Collector District ($750,000). An SID or payback district may be
created to pay for some local share improvements.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
$750,000
284
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF121
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Baxter & Davis (Intersection) - Construction
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Install a roundabout at Baxter & Davis
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Future developments in this area may not be allowed to
proceed until these improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this element functioning as
intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those elements of the street
network that are in place.
How is capacity affected by this project: This intersection is currently 4-way stop controlled. Replacing it with a roundabout will
greatly increase it's capacity.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Connectivity already exists at this location, it is capacity that is affected.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Conformance with the Transportation Master Plan and Level of
Service Standard is attained.
Are there other affected projects: Baxter Lane Corridor Improvements.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
This project will expand the capacity of our street network, improve safety for drivers and pedestrians and increase capacity at this
intersection. Facilitates development currently occurring in this part of the city and network performance overall.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($2,000,000) and the Arterial & Collector District ($500,000).
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$2,000,000
FY21 FY22
285
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF122
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Babcock & Ferguson (Intersection) - Construction
FY18
$800,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Install intersection improvements at Babcock & Ferguson
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Future developments which impact this intersection
area may not be allowed to proceed until improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this
element functioning as intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those
elements of the street network that are in place.
How is capacity affected by this project: This is currently a four-legged intersection with stop control on the Babcock Street
approaches (east and west legs). Installation of a signal at this intersection will directly increase capacity.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Connectivity already exists at this location, it is capacity which is being expanded.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: The Level of Service (LOS) Standard (BMC) and conformance with
the Transportation Master Plan are attained.
Are there other affected projects: Corridor improvements to Babcock and Ferguson.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Accept the current level of service (do nothing). Alternative financing could be provided by creating an SID or Payback District.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
This project will expand the capacity of our street network, improve safety for drivers and pedestrians and increase capacity at this
intersection. Facilitates development currently occurring in this part of the city and network performance overall.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
The total cost of this project is $1,000,000. This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($800,000) and a developer contribution ($200,000).
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
286
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF123
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Bridger Dr & Story Mill Rd (Intersection) - Design*
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$200,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Intersection design at Bridger and Story Mill
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Future developments which impact this intersection
area may not be allowed to proceed until improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this
element functioning as intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those
elements of the street network that are in place.
How is capacity affected by this project: Adding additional phases and improving geometry will increase capacity for deficient
movements at this intersection.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Connectivity already exists at this location, it is capacity which is being expanded.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Conformance with the Transportation Master Plan are attained.
Are there other affected projects: Story Mill, Griffin to Bridger Drive.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Accept the current LOS
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased capacity and safety at this intersection.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
NA
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($800,000) and the Arterial & Collector District ($200,000). An SID or payback district may be
created to recover the local share.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
287
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF125
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
College (11th to 19th) - Design
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Design College, from 19th to 11th, to a principal arterial standard. Evaluate upgrading 11th to an Arterial Collector (from a local
street). Including adding bike lanes, pedestrian crossings and removing parking.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Functionality of the network at large is dependent on
this element functioning as intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on
those elements of the street network that are in place.
How is capacity affected by this project: This project increases capacity directly by adding additional lanes, dedicated bike lanes
and sidewalks and by improving intersection LOS
How is connectivity affected by this project: Connectivity already exists at this location, it is capacity which is being expanded.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: The Level of Service (LOS) Standard (BMC) and conformance with
the Transportation Master Plan are attained.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: Urban funds could be used on this section of College
Are there other affected projects: Intersections of College/11th and College/8th.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Accept the current configuration
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
This project will expand the capacity of our street network and improve safety for drivers and pedestrians.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
50% Street Impact Fees & 50% Arterial & Collector District.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21
$100,000
FY22
288
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF127
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Fowler Right of Way Purchase
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Purchase the right of way on Fowler (Durston to Annie)
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Future developments which impact this intersection
area may not be allowed to proceed until improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this
element functioning as intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those
elements of the street network that are in place.
How is capacity affected by this project: Allows for extension of Fowler Avenue, which will directly increase capacity.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Extends an important north-south corridor on the west side of the city.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Conformance with the Transportation Master Plan are attained.
Are there other affected projects: Fowler corridor improvements.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Do nothing, wait for adjacent development to dedicate the R/W
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Allows for improvements to be made to the corridor at a time more favorable to the City.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
NA
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Street Impact Fees
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21
$1,000,000
FY22
289
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF128
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Kagy (Willson to Highland) - Design
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$500,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Design Kagy, from Willson to Highland, including the intersections at Sourdough & Kagy and Highland & Kagy.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Future developments which impact this intersection
area may not be allowed to proceed until improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this
element functioning as intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those
elements of the street network that are in place.
How is capacity affected by this project: This project increases capacity directly by adding additional lanes, dedicated bike lanes
and sidewalks and by improving intersection LOS.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Connectivity already exists at this location, it is capacity which is being expanded.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: The Level of Service (LOS) Standard (BMC) and conformance with
the Transportation Master Plan are attained.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: A Payback District or SID may be created to leverage other
stakeholders.
Are there other affected projects: Intersections at Sourdough/Church and Highland.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Wait for adjacent development to install the improvements section by section.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
This project will expand the capacity of our street network and improve safety for drivers and pedestrians. Facilitates development currently
occurring in this part of the city and network performance overall.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
None
FUNDING SOURCES
Design is 100% impact fee eligible.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
290
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF129
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Kagy (Willson to Highland) - Construction*
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$6,000,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Complete Kagy, from Willson to Highland, including the intersections at Sourdough & Kagy and Highland & Kagy.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Future developments which impact this intersection
area may not be allowed to proceed until improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this
element functioning as intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those
elements of the street network that are in place.
How is capacity affected by this project: This project increases capacity directly by adding additional lanes, dedicated bike lanes
and sidewalks and by improving intersection LOS.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Connectivity already exists at this location, it is capacity which is being expanded.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: The Level of Service (LOS) Standard (BMC) and conformance with
the Transportation Master Plan are attained.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: A Payback District or SID may be created to leverage other
stakeholders.
Are there other affected projects: Intersections at Sourdough/Church and Highland.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Wait for adjacent development to install the improvements section by section.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
This project will expand the capacity of our street network and improve safety for drivers and pedestrians. Facilitates development currently
occurring in this part of the city and network performance overall.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is eligible for Urban funds. A payback district or SID could be created to recover a portion of the local share.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
291
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF130
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Kagy (19th to Willson) Interim Improvements
FY18
$500,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Intersection improvements at Kagy and 7th, Kagy and 11th and Kagy and 19th, minor geometric improvements such as Two Way
Left Turn Lane (TWLTL).
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: The LOS on Kagy has degraded far beyond what is
acceptable. Peak hour backups are now stretching across the entire corridor between 19th and Willson, affecting adjacent
roadways and the overall performance of the network.
How is capacity affected by this project: Improvements will improve LOS at the key intersections which will increase capacity.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Connectivity already exists in this area, it is capacity that is being increased.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: The Level of Service (LOS) Standard (BMC).
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: At the present time there is no viable way to leverage
these funds with other stakeholders.
Are there other affected projects: Kagy corridor improvements.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Do nothing, wait until the full project can be funded.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Will provide some improvement to capacity and LOS on Kagy until the full project can be built.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Street Impact Fees
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
292
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF131
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
S 3rd and Graf - Signal Design
FY18
$150,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Signal design at S 3rd and Graf
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Future developments which impact this intersection
area may not be allowed to proceed until improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this
element functioning as intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those
elements of the street network that are in place.
How is capacity affected by this project: This is currently a stop controlled intersection. Installation of a roundabout will directly
increase capacity.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Connectivity already exists at this location, it is capacity which is being expanded.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: The Level of Service (LOS) Standard (BMC).
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: A Payback District or SID may be created to leverage other
stakeholders.
Are there other affected projects: Graf Street corridor improvements.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Accept the existing level of service, create an SID for financing.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased capacity and safety at this intersection.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
Design is 100% Impact fee eligible.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
293
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF132
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Story Mill (Griffin to Bridger) - Design
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Story Mill design from Griffin to Bridger
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Future developments which impact this intersection
area may not be allowed to proceed until improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this
element functioning as intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those
elements of the street network that are in place.
How is capacity affected by this project: This project directly increases capacity by adding additional travel lanes, dedicated bike
lanes and sidewalks.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Connectivity already exists at this location, it is capacity which is being expanded.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Conformance with the Transportation Master Plan are attained.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: A Payback District or SID may be created to leverage other
stakeholders.
Are there other affected projects: Intersection improvements to Story Mill and Bridger Drive.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Wait for adjacent development to occur and construct the road incrementally.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Improves an important north-south link in the transportation network which reduces demand on other adjacent corridors.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
NA
FUNDING SOURCES
Design is 100% impact fee eligible.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$50,000
FY21 FY22
294
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF133
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Griffin Corridor Design
FY18 FY19
$250,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Design W Griffin corridor improvements from N. 7th to Rouse to an urban minor arterial standard
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Future developments which impact this intersection
area may not be allowed to proceed until improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this
element functioning as intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those
elements of the street network that are in place.
How is capacity affected by this project: Designed improvements will improve LOS at the key intersections and will increase
capacity in the corridor as a whole.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Connectivity already exists at this location, it is capacity which is being expanded.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: The Level of Service (LOS) Standard (BMC) and conformance with
the Transportation Master Plan are attained.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: A Payback District or SID may be created to leverage other
stakeholders.
Are there other affected projects: Intersection improvements at Griffin and 7th and Griffin and Rouse.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Accept the current level of service (do nothing). Alternative financing could be provided by creating an SID or Payback District.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
This project will expand the capacity of our street network and improve safety for drivers and pedestrians. Facilitates development currently
occurring in this part of the city and network performance overall.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
Design is 100% impact fee eligible.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
295
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF134
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Oak (Cottonwood to Flanders Mill) - Construction
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$1,300,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project is the completion of the street segment of Oak St, from Cottonwood to Flanders Mill, to a five-lane urban principal
arterial standard.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Future developments in this area may not be allowed to
proceed until these improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this element functioning as
intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those elements of the street
network that are in place.
How is capacity affected by this project: This project increases capacity directly by constructing new segments of arterial roadway
and by adding additional lanes, dedicated bike lanes and sidewalks.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Completes an important east-west link between Ferguson and Cottonwood.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Conformance with the Transportation Master Plan is attained.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: A payback District or SID may be created to leverage other
stakeholders.
Are there other affected projects: Intersection improvements at Oak and Cottonwood, Oak and Flanders Mill, Oak and
Ferguson, Oak Street New Holland to Ferguson.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Construct segment by segment as adjacent parcels develop.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased capacity, connectivity and safety in this corridor, both for motorized vehicles as well as bicycles and pedestrians.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($1,300,000), Arterial & Collector District of $250,000 for the local share adjacent to the City
park, and an additional $250,000 from School District #7.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
296
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Streets
PROJECT NUMBER
SIF135
DEPARTMENT
STREET IF
PROJECT NAME
Oak (Ferguson to Ryunson Way) - Construction
FY18 FY19
$100,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project is the completion of the street segment of Oak St, from Ferguson to Ryunson Way, to a five-lane urban principal
arterial standard. Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Future developments in this area may
not be allowed to proceed until these improvements are in place. Functionality of the network at large is dependent on this
element functioning as intended. The incomplete transportation network in this vicinity is putting unnecessary demand on those
elements of the street network that are in place. How is capacity affected by this project: This project increases capacity directly
by constructing new segments of arterial roadway and by adding additional lanes, dedicated bike lanes and sidewalks. How is
connectivity affected by this project: Completes an important east-west link between Ferguson and Cottonwood. What
regulations or standards are attained with this project: Conformance with the Transportation Master Plan is attained. How is this
project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: A payback District or SID may be created to leverage other
stakeholders. Are there other affected projects: Intersection improvements at Oak and Cottonwood, Oak and Flanders Mill, Oak
and Ferguson, Oak Street -New Holland to Ferguson.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Construct segment by segment as adjacent parcels develop.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased capacity, connectivity and safety in this corridor, both for motorized vehicles as well as bicycles and pedestrians.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Incremental increases in sweeping, plowing and general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project is funded by Street Impact Fees ($100,000) and developer contribution.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
297
298
St
r
e
e
t
Ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
Pl
a
n
Fi
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
Su
m
m
a
r
y
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Ye
a
r
FY
1
7
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
F
Y
2
0
F
Y
2
1
F
Y
2
2
Unscheduled
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
Re
s
e
r
v
e
Ba
l
a
n
c
e
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
(4
8
1
,
0
1
4
)
$
(2
8
2
,
6
3
4
)
$
(3
7
7
,
5
2
9
)
$
18
9
,
7
7
9
$
560,924
$
539,757 $
Pl
u
s
:
St
r
e
e
t
Mt
c
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
1,
1
0
1
,
9
4
4
$
1,
5
9
0
,
1
0
5
$
1,
6
2
1
,
9
0
7
$
1,
6
5
4
,
3
4
6
$
1,
6
8
7
,
4
3
3
$
1,721,181 $ ‐$
Pl
u
s
:
Ga
s
Ta
x
69
3
,
9
3
6
$
69
3
,
9
0
0
$
69
3
,
9
0
0
$
69
3
,
9
0
0
$
693,900
$
693,900 $
Le
s
s
:
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
d
CI
P
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Co
s
t
s
(1
,
5
9
7
,
5
0
0
)
$
(2
,
3
7
8
,
9
0
0
)
$
(1
,
7
4
8
,
5
0
0
)
$
(1
,
9
7
7
,
1
0
0
)
$
(2
,
4
0
2
,
5
0
0
)
$
(2,146,789)$ (3,401,210)$
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Ye
a
r
‐En
d
Ca
s
h
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
(2
8
2
,
6
3
4
)
$
(3
7
7
,
5
2
9
)
$
18
9
,
7
7
9
$
56
0
,
9
2
4
$
539,757
$
808,049 $
As
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
s
Ma
d
e
fo
r
Re
v
e
n
u
e
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
s
:
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Ye
a
r
FY
1
7
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
FY21 FY22
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Un
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
d
An
n
u
a
l
St
r
e
e
t
Mt
c
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
3,
6
7
3
,
1
4
7
$
3,
6
7
3
,
1
4
7
$
4,
0
7
7
,
1
9
3
$
4,
1
5
8
,
7
3
7
$
4,241,912
$
4,326,75 0 $
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
An
n
u
a
l
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
‐
At
t
r
i
b
u
t
e
d
to
An
n
e
x
a
t
i
o
n
s
‐
2%
2%
2%
2%2%
An
n
u
a
l
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
in
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
Ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
‐
9%
0%
0%
0%0%
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
3,
6
7
3
,
1
4
7
$
4,
0
7
7
,
1
9
3
$
4,
1
5
8
,
7
3
7
$
4,
2
4
1
,
9
1
2
$
4,326,75 0
$
4,413,285 $
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
%
20
.
0
%
30
.
0
%
3
9
.
0
%
3
9
.
0
%
3
9
.
0
%
3
9
.
0
%
Pl
u
s
:
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
10
.
0
%
9.
0
%
0.
0
%
0
.
0
%
0.0% 0.0%
To
t
a
l
% De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
30
.
0
%
39
.
0
%
3
9
.
0
%
3
9
.
0
%
3
9
.
0
%
3
9
.
0
%
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
1,
1
0
1
,
9
4
4
$
1,
5
9
0
,
1
0
5
$
1,
6
2
1
,
9
0
7
$
1,
6
5
4
,
3
4
6
$
1,687,433
$
1,721,181 $
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
CU
R
R
E
N
T
4,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
3,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
3,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
2,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
2,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
1,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
1,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
50
0
,
0
0
0
0
St
r
e
e
t
Ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
& Eq
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
299
CI
P
PR
O
J
E
C
T
FU
PR
O
J
.
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
PR
O
J
E
C
T
NA
M
E
Unscheduled
FY
2
1
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
FY22
St
r
e
e
t
Ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
PW
0
4
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
ON
CO
R
N
E
R
OF
AS
P
E
N
&
RO
U
S
E
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
ST
R
7
1
‐18
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
ST
R
E
E
T
MA
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
MI
L
L
& OV
E
R
L
A
Y
FY
1
8
$9
6
7
,
6
0
0
ST
R
7
1
‐19
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
ST
R
E
E
T
MA
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
MI
L
L
& OV
E
R
L
A
Y
FY
1
9
$5
5
4
,
5
0
0
ST
R
7
1
‐20
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
ST
R
E
E
T
MA
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
MI
L
L
& OV
E
R
L
A
Y
FY
2
0
$8
0
8
,
1
0
0
ST
R
7
1
‐21
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
ST
R
E
E
T
MA
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
MI
L
L
& OV
E
R
L
A
Y
FY
2
1
$9
6
4
,
0
0
0
ST
R
7
1
‐22
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
ST
R
E
E
T
MA
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
MI
L
L
& OV
E
R
L
A
Y
FY
2
2
$913,329
ST
R
7
2
‐18
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
ST
R
E
E
T
MA
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
CH
I
P
SE
A
L
FY
1
8
$1
8
5
,
3
0
0
ST
R
7
2
‐19
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
ST
R
E
E
T
MA
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
CH
I
P
SE
A
L
FY
1
9
$8
2
7
,
0
0
0
ST
R
7
2
‐20
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
ST
R
E
E
T
MA
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
CH
I
P
SE
A
L
FY
2
0
$9
1
3
,
0
0
0
ST
R
7
2
‐21
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
ST
R
E
E
T
MA
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
CH
I
P
SE
A
L
FY
2
1
$9
0
2
,
5
0
0
ST
R
7
2
‐22
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
ST
R
E
E
T
MA
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
CH
I
P
SE
A
L
FY
2
2
$727,460
PW
0
3
PU
B
W
O
R
K
S
AD
M
I
N
VE
H
I
C
L
E
MA
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
DE
S
I
G
N
&
ST
O
R
A
G
E
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$5
0
,
0
0
0
ST
R
5
3
PU
B
W
O
R
K
S
AD
ME
N
D
E
N
H
A
L
L
& BA
B
C
O
C
K
ST
R
E
E
T
S
C
A
P
E
$2,076,210
ST
R
0
1
ST
R
E
E
T
S
OP
RE
P
L
A
C
E
#1
5
3
9
‐
2W
D
19
9
0
FO
R
D
RA
N
G
E
R
$1
6
,
0
0
0
ST
R
0
1
ST
R
E
E
T
S
OP
RE
P
L
A
C
E
#2
7
4
9
‐
19
9
7
FO
R
D
1 TO
N
MA
N
U
A
L
TR
A
N
S
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
F3
5
0
$4
5
,
0
0
0
ST
R
2
0
ST
R
E
E
T
S
OP
AN
N
U
A
L
BI
K
E
PA
T
H
IM
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
$2
5
,
0
0
0
$2
5
,
0
0
0
$2
5
,
0
0
0
$2
5
,
0
0
0
$25,000
ST
R
2
2
ST
R
E
E
T
S
OP
GR
A
D
E
R
LE
A
S
E
$4
0
,
0
0
0
$4
0
,
0
0
0
$4
0
,
0
0
0
$4
0
,
0
0
0
$40,000
ST
R
3
0
ST
R
E
E
T
S
OP
AN
N
U
A
L
ME
D
I
A
N
& BO
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
MA
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
$5
5
,
0
0
0
$5
5
,
0
0
0
$5
5
,
0
0
0
$5
5
,
0
0
0
$55,000
ST
R
3
4
ST
R
E
E
T
S
OP
SW
E
E
P
E
R
S
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$100,000
ST
R
3
5
ST
R
E
E
T
S
OP
RE
G
E
N
E
R
A
T
I
V
E
AI
R
SW
E
E
P
E
R
$250,000
ST
R
3
8
ST
R
E
E
T
S
OP
MI
N
I
LO
A
D
E
R
$9
0
,
0
0
0
300
CI
P
PR
O
J
E
C
T
FU
PR
O
J
.
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
PR
O
J
E
C
T
NA
M
E
Unscheduled
FY
2
1
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
FY22
ST
R
4
0
ST
R
E
E
T
S
OP
DU
M
P
TR
U
C
K
WI
T
H
PL
O
W
& SA
N
D
E
R
‐
2
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
ST
R
4
0
ST
R
E
E
T
S
OP
DU
M
P
TR
U
C
K
WI
T
H
PL
O
W
& SA
N
D
E
R
‐
1
$1
8
0
,
0
0
0
ST
R
4
9
ST
R
E
E
T
S
OP
SA
N
D
E
R
S
$1
6
,
0
0
0
$1
6
,
0
0
0
$1
6
,
0
0
0
$1
6
,
0
0
0
$16,000
ST
R
5
0
ST
R
E
E
T
S
OP
PL
O
W
S
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$10,000
ST
R
5
6
ST
R
E
E
T
S
OP
TA
C
K
OI
L
DI
S
T
R
I
B
U
T
I
O
N
UN
I
T
$9
0
,
0
0
0
ST
R
5
8
ST
R
E
E
T
S
OP
TA
N
D
E
M
AX
L
E
DU
M
P
TR
U
C
K
WI
T
H
PL
O
W
& SA
N
D
E
R
$2
3
0
,
0
0
0
$250,000
ST
R
6
2
ST
R
E
E
T
S
OP
RE
P
L
A
C
E
#2
7
5
1
‐
WA
T
E
R
TR
U
C
K
$1
6
0
,
0
0
0
ST
R
6
3
ST
R
E
E
T
S
OP
RE
P
L
A
C
E
SI
G
N
A
L
AT
BA
B
C
O
C
K
& WI
L
S
O
N
$750,000
ST
R
6
4
ST
R
E
E
T
S
OP
ST
E
E
L
DR
U
M
RO
L
L
E
R
& TR
A
I
L
E
R
$1
2
0
,
0
0
0
ST
R
6
7
ST
R
E
E
T
S
OP
CO
V
E
R
E
D
ST
O
R
A
G
E
AT
SH
O
P
S
CO
M
P
L
E
X
$100,000
ST
R
7
3
ST
R
E
E
T
S
OP
RE
P
L
A
C
E
SK
I
D
ST
E
E
R
$8
0
,
0
0
0
ST
R
7
4
ST
R
E
E
T
S
OP
PA
I
N
T
TR
U
C
K
$225,000
ST
R
6
8
ST
R
E
E
T
S
SI
G
N
RE
C
T
A
N
G
U
L
A
R
RA
P
I
D
FL
A
S
H
I
N
G
BE
A
C
O
N
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$10,000
Su
m
m
a
r
y f or
St
r
e
e
t
Ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
(34
it
e
m
s
)
To
t
a
l
s
by
ye
a
r
:
$2
,
4
0
2
,
5
0
0
$
2
,
1
4
6
,
7
8
9
$2
,
3
7
8
,
9
0
0
$3,401,210
FY
2
1
FY22
FY
1
8
Unscheduled
FY
2
0
$1
,
9
7
7
,
1
0
0
$1
,
7
4
8
,
5
0
0
FY
1
9
301
CIP Project Fund
Street Maintenance District
PROJECT NUMBER
PW03
DEPARTMENT
PUBWORKS ADMIN
PROJECT NAME
Vehicle Maintenance Design & Storage Construction
FY18 FY19
$50,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Design and construct vehicle storage
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Having equipment, especially winter equipment, inside
and ready to go extends the life, produces less emissions by not having to warm up and shortens response time.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: All of our rolling stock and equipment.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: The difference in getting in a motor grader that is parked inside vs. one that is
parked outside in -20 degree weather is enormous. Equipment stays in better shape. Much less wear and tear on drivetrain and
hydraulics. Easily adds an hour of productivity to every shift.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: By being located next to existing city property, we could
aggregate the lots giving even more useful space.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Not build and only use for outdoor storage.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Equipment continues to degrade from the sun and exposure. Large inside
storage for several departments. Equipment would be located next to current Vehicle Maintenance Shop. Good access onto Rouse and
Griffin. Early morning shift equipment could be stored here so as not to disturb the neighbors in this mostly zoned Industrial area. With this
building, Streets could switch to producing our own brine solution for pre wet of the sand. We wouldn't have to use mag chloride which is
about 4-5 times more expensive than salt brine. Gallatin County has expressed interest in buying brine from us.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Normal building maintenance. Possibly heat with waste oil from the Shops. Possibly heat with wood chips from Forestry.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project totals $200,000. It will be split evenly 4 ways: Water Fund ($50,000), Wastewater Fund ($50,000), Street Maintenance ($50,000),
and Parks ($50,000).
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
302
CIP Project Fund
Street Maintenance District
PROJECT NUMBER
PW04
DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
PROJECT NAME
Property on Corner of Aspen & Rouse
FY18
$100,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Property Purchase to expand shops area and potentially offices. This is an opportunity to make more land available for project
PW01-SH - Shops Expansion.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Do not purchase the property. Wait to purchase at a later date.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Larger contiguous land area for City Shops. The Shops Expansion project has been a scheduled CIP for a number of years. This item could
bring an important piece of land into that project area, making a better-functioning property at Rouse and Tamarack.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Building Maintenance would be needed to keep the existing structure useful.
FUNDING SOURCES
Split 33/33/33 between Water, Wastewater and Street Maintenance Funds.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
303
CIP Project Fund
Street Maintenance District
PROJECT NUMBER
STR01
DEPARTMENT
STREETS OP
PROJECT NAME
Replace #1539 - 2WD 1990 Ford Ranger
FY18 FY19
$16,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Replace #1539 -2WD 1990 Ford Ranger With Hybrid Sedan. We would buy one of the Public Works lease hybrids. Their lease
ends August
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Currently when we need to do inspections, inventories,
GIS, training trips or take several people on route training, we use several vehicles or make several trips. A hybrid sedan to
replace the truck would be much more useful.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: Streets, luminaires, sidewalks, curbs, signs.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: Able to carry up to 4 people at a time in a hybrid sedan.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: For inventories, GIS, training trips and route training. Would be
available to other departments as needed.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Drive it until it dies.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Poor use of time. Excessive emissions. Continued use of two vehicles
when a 4 passenger car would work. A much more useable year round vehicle. Better fuel mileage and lower emissions.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Normal routine maintenance.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Street Maintenance District Revenue
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
304
CIP Project Fund
Street Maintenance District
PROJECT NUMBER
STR01
DEPARTMENT
STREETS OP
PROJECT NAME
Replace #2749 - 1997 Ford 1 Ton Manual Transmission F350
FY18 FY19
$45,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Replace #2749 - 1997 Ford 1 Ton Manual Transmission F350
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Setting up and mobilizing to the job site is done with
this truck and a trailer. Being able to leave the truck hooked up to the trailer during the project helps with transporting and also
utilizing the smallest work area in neighborhoods. Single pieces of equipment scattered over blocks in the core not only
inconveniences the residents where we are working but affects the surrounding blocks as well.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: Streets and alleys.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: Mainly used to haul large equipment to the job site. Without this truck
operating reliably, we have to drive equipment to the site which can take a paver or skid steer more than an hour to travel
through town.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: Pulling large trailers and normal one ton uses.
Are there other affected projects: This truck is used to haul equipment to paving projects.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Drive it until it dies.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: More people and more equipment used to complete projects.
A much more useable year round truck. Better fuel mileage and lower emissions. We are spending about $.90 per mile on maintenance and
repairs. A new vehicle spends about $.05 per mile on M&R. Anytime M&R exceed $.50 per mile, it is time to consider removing the truck from
the fleet.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Normal routine maintenance.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Street Maintenance District Revenue
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
305
CIP Project Fund
Street Maintenance District
PROJECT NUMBER
STR20
DEPARTMENT
STREETS OP
PROJECT NAME
Annual Bike Path Improvements
FY18
$25,000
FY19
$25,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This item would provide for bike-related infrastructure including (but, not limited to) racks, signs, striping, curb-cuts, and
separated pathways.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Medium.
How is capacity affected by this project: The Greater Bozeman Area Transportation Plan (2007 Update) Section 5.4
Recommended Bicycle Facility Improvements outlines many facilities. The Bozeman Area Bicycle Advisory Board (BABAB) gave
the City their top 2 priorities: They are listed with City Engineering cost estimates: North 11th Ave - Mendenhall to Durston,
$14,500: Willson Ave - Main Street to Kagy Blvd, $54,300.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Enhanced.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: Allows for safer bike usage.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Conformance with Transportation Plan recommendations.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: Can be combined with street re-surfacing projects.
Are there other affected projects: Can be coordinated with street re-surfacing projects.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue with existing infrastructure.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Safety will likely be improved.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
No additional operating costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Street Maintenance Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$25,000
FY21
$25,000
FY22
$25,000
306
CIP Project Fund
Street Maintenance District
PROJECT NUMBER
STR22
DEPARTMENT
STREETS OP
PROJECT NAME
Grader Lease
FY18
$40,000
FY19
$40,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This is a request to establish at a minimum a 20 year replacement schedule for our graders. Currently our fleet is comprised of a
1994, 1998, 2003, 2007, and 2014.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Grading the residential streets is critical to safe travel of
our citizens. Pulling the snow out from the curb so it can be blown into trucks and hauled away is important to parking in the
downtown and other business areas.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: Streets.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: With all wheel drive our productivity increases. Newer equipment has less
breakdowns and better fuel economy which means less time in the shop and fueling during a shift.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: Grading local streets.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: The old grader would be traded in or auctioned.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Budget 250k every 5 years to purchase. Cut back on our use of graders in the residential areas. Continue to use what we have and replace
when we have complete failure.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Although the industry standard schedules a 15 year replacement, we
believe our extensive preventative maintenance schedule will allow us to get 20 years out of a grader. Much more reliable and fuel efficient
equipment.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Decrease in costs due to newer equipment.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Street Maintenance Revenue
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$40,000
FY21
$40,000
FY22
$40,000
307
CIP Project Fund
Street Maintenance District
PROJECT NUMBER
STR30
DEPARTMENT
STREETS OP
PROJECT NAME
Annual Median & Boulevard Maintenance
FY18
$55,000
FY19
$55,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This is a request for money to be used for maintaining and upgrading our medians.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Making our currently unmaintained medians into weed free low maintenance show pieces. We are partnering internally with the Water
Conservation Manager and externally with MSU to design and install low water easily maintained medians. Also contract out the maintenance
on our established medians.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
None. Lower water use means lower utility costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Street Maintenance District Revenue
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$55,000
FY21
$55,000
FY22
$55,000
308
CIP Project Fund
Street Maintenance District
PROJECT NUMBER
STR34
DEPARTMENT
STREETS OP
PROJECT NAME
Sweepers
FY18
$100,000
FY19
$100,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This is for leasing or purchasing through the MACI (Montana Air and Congestion Initiative) equipment purchase program. These
are mechanical sweepers that if necessary can be operated without using water. The next sweeper we would replace is our 2005
model with 59,000 miles and 9372 hours. It is scheduled for an elevator replacement next year and we would like to replace
rather than repair at a cost of $15,000. Industry standards show it is best to replace municipal sweepers at 5 years. We are able
to get about 10 years due to our excellent maintenance program.
Describe the criticality of this project to the operation: The City's MS4 Stormwater Permitting requires sweeping up sand and
dirt before it can enter waterways. Clean streets/ bike lanes are a quality of life issue. We are required to meet the goal of
sweeping all local streets twice per year, monthly sweeping of all arterial and collector roadways and weekly sweeping of Main
Street, most bike lanes weekly during the summer. Heavy development activity requires additional sweeping in construction areas.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: Streets, parking lots, Stormwater intakes and Bozeman's air quality.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: Sweepers are very high maintenance as they age. Leases terms for sweepers are
a maximum of 5 years due to life expectancy. We are currently in the 3rd year of one lease. This additional sweeper lease would
replace our oldest sweeper a 2006.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: We submit every year to the Montana Department of
Transportation's (MDT) Montana Air and Congestion Initiative (MACI) equipment purchase program for sweepers. With this
program, MACI pays for 87% and we pay 13% for a sweeper. If we are chosen, we would use our lease payment to fund our
share of the cost which would be ~$34,000.
Other affected projects: Stormwater contractor compliance, spring and fall street cleaning, pre sweep for pavement painting.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Budget 250k every year until all sweepers are replaced. Cut back on our sweeping There are no local contractors at this time. Continue to use
what we have.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Major repairs. Downtime and not being able to complete sweeping
routes. Increased discharge to waterways and increase in particulate mater, reducing air quality. Much improved operations. Better air quality.
Improved storm water discharge.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
None.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Street Maintenance District Revenue
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$100,000
FY21
$100,000
FY22
$100,000
309
CIP Project Fund
Street Maintenance District
PROJECT NUMBER
STR35
DEPARTMENT
STREETS OP
PROJECT NAME
Regenerative Air Sweeper
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$250,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Regenerative Air Sweeper
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: We have had demonstrations of these sweepers and
their ability to get the fine particles off of the pavement is noticeable. As air quality and Stormwater discharge regulations tighten,
we may be forced to use regenerative type sweepers or at the very least have one in our fleet to do the final sweeping pass to
get the <1 micron particles that can become airborne.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: Streets.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: Rather than make several passes with our mechanical sweepers, an RA sweeper
could get it done in one pass. The one drawback is that RA sweepers can not be used below freezing. They need water at all
times.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: Possible MDT MACI funds.
Are there other affected projects: Compliance with Stormwater permitting.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Only use mechanical sweepers which discharge dust when sweeping.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: All sweeping operations.
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Continue to make several passes and never getting the fine particles.
We could improve our discharge into the storm water system. Spring sweeping of the winter sand would generate less dust therefore
eliminating complaints from citizens and DEQ.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Normal sweeper maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Street Maintenance District
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
310
CIP Project Fund
Street Maintenance District
PROJECT NUMBER
STR38
DEPARTMENT
STREETS OP
PROJECT NAME
Mini Loader
FY18
$90,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This request is for a mini loader that would be used for sidewalk maintenance, removal, and repair. Will also be used in curb
repairs and alley maintenance. Using a smaller loader allows us to only close the parking lane and keep traffic flowing. Loader
will accept attachments such as bucket, bucket with thumb, brooms and plows that we already have.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: It would be useful in tight situations where a full size
loader wouldn't fit, such as when the mini excavator is being used and material needs to be moved off site.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: This loader will accept many attachments that we already have,
such as brooms, sweepers, and plows.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: Currently we are using full size loaders for repairs. It will be safer and more
efficient to use equipment sized for the smaller jobs.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: Anywhere a loader is needed this can be used. It is safer in the tight
situations to use smaller equipment.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: This loader would be available for use in other departments.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
No comparable equipment is available for rent.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Wear and tear on our large loaders. Tying up the large loaders on
smaller jobs when the loader can be used on asphalt and gravel road projects.
This loader will give us another piece of equipment that will utilize our attachments. The compact size will allow us to get in spaces that we
wouldn’t normally be able to access.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Routine maintenance.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Street Maintenance District Revenue
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
311
CIP Project Fund
Street Maintenance District
PROJECT NUMBER
STR40
DEPARTMENT
STREETS OP
PROJECT NAME
Dump Truck With Plow & Sander - 1
FY18
$180,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The 1990 Dump truck will be 28 years old with 82,000 in town miles and over 10,000 hours. Parts have been discontinued. We
have had to patch the leaking gas tank because a replacement is not available. When the other rusted spots start leaking we will
be forced to park the truck. The motor is so tired that we are removing the plow this winter because it doesn’t have the power
to plow and sand uphill. We average about $1,200 per year in repairs and maintenance. The running and floor boards are rusted
through but we are able to cover them with old mud flaps to make it drivable. Parts availability will be what stops this truck.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Single axle dump trucks are used on smaller projects in
the summer including alley maintenance, asphalt patching and debris pickup. In the winter these trucks are the only equipment
we can safely and efficiently plow the narrow streets. We are able to haul snow in tight quarters also.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: This will replace a 1990 underpowered gasoline engine dump truck
that averages about 3 MPG when used for plowing operations. The FY21 request will replace a 1993 underpowered gasoline
engine dump truck.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: The new truck could be fueled with alternative fuels such as Biodiesel. Estimates
show that the 1990 spews over 30 tons of CO2 into the air per year and by removing this from our fleet will help us reach our
goal of reducing municipal greenhouse emissions 15% below 2000 levels by 2020.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: Much more reliable, safer and environmentally friendly than our
current model. This truck will be used in all aspects of our operations.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: Could be used by other departments.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue with 1990 model.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Chance of catastrophic failure of the underpowered gasoline trucks.
Efficiency, less emissions, safety, fuel savings and more reliable equipment.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Less than current model.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Street Maintenance District Revenue
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
312
CIP Project Fund
Street Maintenance District
PROJECT NUMBER
STR40
DEPARTMENT
STREETS OP
PROJECT NAME
Dump Truck With Plow & Sander - 2
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The 1993 Dump truck will be 25 years old with 51,025 in town miles and over 5400 hours. Parts have been discontinued. We
had to replace the fuel tank with a used diesel tank (new tanks no longer available) and since have spent over $4,000 on fuel
related repairs. Over the past 5 years we have spent almost $16,000 in repairs. Fuel issues and parts availability will be what
stops this truck.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: The new truck could be fueled with alternative fuels
such as Biodiesel. Estimates show that the 1993 spews over 30 tons of CO2 into the air per year and by removing this from our
fleet will help us in our goal of reducing municipal greenhouse emissions 15% below 2000 levels by 2020.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: This will replace a 1993 underpowered gasoline engine dump truck
that averages about 3 MPG when used for plowing operations.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: The new truck could be fueled with alternative fuels such as Biodiesel which is
more fuel efficient with less emissions.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: Much more reliable, safer and environmentally friendly than our
current model. This truck will be used in all aspects of our operations.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue with 1993 model.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Chance of catastrophic failure of the underpowered gasoline trucks.
Efficiency, less emissions, safety, fuel savings and more reliable equipment.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Less than current model.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Street Maintenance District Revenue
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21
$200,000
FY22
313
CIP Project Fund
Street Maintenance District
PROJECT NUMBER
STR49
DEPARTMENT
STREETS OP
PROJECT NAME
Sanders
FY18
$16,000
FY19
$16,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Sanders are used in a very corrosive and abrasive environments. We rebuild the conveyor and hydraulic system in the first 4
years. If we don’t have a have a catastrophic failure in the next 2-3 years, the V box and structural components start to fail in the
7th year. By replacing the sander every 8 years (we now have 8 sanders), we can avoid having a season ending failure. Sanders are
about 6 months out when ordering so we would never get a new one in the same season that we needed a replacement. We
have two different sizes so we could run them until they fail during a major storm and then have one of each size sitting here.
The problem with that is the new sanders would be aging without being used. Using this method we could have two failures in
one year and be short one sander.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: If we can't put down sand or deicer during the winter,
we fail to service our citizens. Not being able to control the quantity, means we are either putting down too much or too little
product. Too much sand and we increase our spring sweeping and too little sand and the crashes increase.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: Less down time during a storm for repairs. Less preseason maintenance needed
with newer more reliable equipment. Able to more accurately control quantities.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: Sanding in the winter.
Are there other affected projects: Everyone that has to stop or get up a hill in the winter are affected by whether our sanders are
operating.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Sanders wear out every 5 years, depending on the winter. We have
seven sanders, so we will make them last 7 years. Major breakdowns in the middle of winter can put a sander out of service for weeks if not
months. More reliable sanders. Less failures in the middle of a storm.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Decrease in maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Street Maintenance District Revenue
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$16,000
FY21
$16,000
FY22
$16,000
314
CIP Project Fund
Street Maintenance District
PROJECT NUMBER
STR50
DEPARTMENT
STREETS OP
PROJECT NAME
Plows
FY18
$10,000
FY19
$10,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This is to replace the worn plow blades.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Critical to have fully operational plows. With as much
as a 90 day delivery time to replace a plow, it is important to replace them before they fail.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: We have 7 large plows so they will be on a 7 year replacement
schedule.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: When the moldboard of the plow gets bent after several years of use, it is very
difficult to bolt on a replacement cutting edge. If they are not tight to the cutting edge surface they face early failure and require
replacement at inopportune times.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: Plowing snow.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Failure during a snowstorm and possibility of not getting a replacement
during the winter season. A much more efficient plow operation. Less time spent replacing cutting edges that prematurely break.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
None
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Street Maintenance District Revenue
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$10,000
FY21
$10,000
FY22
$10,000
315
CIP Project Fund
Street Maintenance District
PROJECT NUMBER
STR53
DEPARTMENT
PUBWORKS ADMIN
PROJECT NAME
Mendenhall & Babcock Streetscape
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$2,076,210
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Conduct Streetscape Improvements Along Mendenhall & Babcock (On Hold For SID Development)
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
FUNDING SOURCES
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
316
CIP Project Fund
Street Maintenance District
PROJECT NUMBER
STR56
DEPARTMENT
STREETS OP
PROJECT NAME
Tack Oil Distribution Unit
FY18
$90,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The 1971 Distributor will be 47 years old, mileage and hours are unknown as the meters quit working accurately long ago, and
parts for the truck and oil distributor unit have been discontinued. Due to lack of available parts, we recently had to convert the
rear axle to a wet system. Parts are no longer available for the pre heat system. Therefore, someone has to come in early to heat
the oil so we can spray tack oil after 8. The distributor is a two man system. One drives and the other rides on the back to
engage the clutch for the tack oil. Not a safe way to spray oil. Application rates on the unit are controlled by the speed of the
truck. The guy riding on back has to yell to the driver to speed up or slow down as needed. We have only spent ~$2,500 on this
truck in the last 5 years because parts are not available. We have been jury-rigging burners and drive trains to get it to work one
more time. We think there is some interest in donating this to a museum if we do get a replacement.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Critical to our paving operation. If our 1971 unit failed
in the middle of a job, we couldn't continue to pave.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: This is used to spray tack oil on asphalt patches and paving.
Currently we are using the 1971 unit or doing it by hand with our patch truck.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: Less chance for an oil spill. Able to calibrate to dispense the exact amount
needed for the job. Not having to have workers ride on the back of the unit to engage the spray bar. Currently in order to
control the amount of tack oil being put down, the operator on the back of the truck hand signals to the driver to go faster or
slower as needed. This means the driver is constantly watching his mirrors instead of the road.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: Used for tack oil for paving, mill and overlays and large patches.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: Patching and paving for other departments.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue to use what we have when it runs.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Chance of equipment failure during operations. More reliable and safer
unit. Less chance of major spill.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Costs will be less with the newer unit.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Street Maintenance District Revenue
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
317
CIP Project Fund
Street Maintenance District
PROJECT NUMBER
STR58
DEPARTMENT
STREETS OP
PROJECT NAME
Tandem Axle Dump Truck With Plow & Sander
FY18
$230,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This is a request to replace a 1994 tandem axle truck with 128,000 miles and over 11,000 hours.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: It is very important that we get the arterials and
collectors done before 8 AM. When a tandem axle 10 yard truck is down for any period of time, the backup is a 1990 gas engine
single axle 4 yard truck which takes twice as long to finish a route if it stays in operation for the entire shift. Not acceptable to
our customers.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: All streets and alleys. With the widening of multiple collectors and
arterials, the continued need for a larger capacity truck to finish plow and sanding routines is critical to maintaining our service to
the traveling public.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: During paving operations, being able to haul twice as much asphalt cuts down on
the number of trips to the asphalt plant. This make she paving crew more efficient and uses less fuel.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: Plowing, sanding, hauling and paving.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: The 1994 truck would be used as a backup in the winter
and still be used for paving instead of a single-axle truck.
Are there other affected projects: Snow plowing, snow hauling and paving.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue with no tandem back up in the winter. Run single axle 4 yard dump trucks with asphalt operations
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Hope that none of our tandem axle trucks break down during a storm or
paving operations.
Reliability, efficiency, less emissions and safety.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Less than the current model.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Street Maintenance District Revenue
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
$250,000
318
CIP Project Fund
Street Maintenance District
PROJECT NUMBER
STR62
DEPARTMENT
STREETS OP
PROJECT NAME
Replace #2751 - Water Truck
FY18
$160,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This request is to replace a 1995 water truck (#2751) with 500,000 miles. This truck is used in the summer to water and also
apply dust control to gravel streets. Also used to wash concrete medians. In the winter it can be used for de-icer or to apply
anti-icing before a storm.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Very important in the maintenance of our gravel roads.
Without a water truck, the roads would become washboard and all the gravel fines would end up in the ditch. If we couldn't
apply dust control, air quality would suffer in the neighborhoods.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: All streets, gravel and paved.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: The new water truck will be an automatic transmission so that all CDL license
holders can drive. Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 383.95c now requires that if you test for your CDL in an
automatic truck then you can not drive a manual transmission truck. Because we need our new recruits to pull a trailer while
testing, we can not test with our current water truck because it can't tow a trailer.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: Watering gravel roads, washing streets and concrete medians, and
applying de-icer.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: Occasionally, water trucks become available in the MACI
program. We will pursue if they become available in the MACI equipment program.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Let employees hired before 2015 drive it until it dies. Lease or rent.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: It has a manual transmission and with CDL laws making you test in the
type of transmission that you will drive, new employees can't test in it and therefore, can't operate it.
Everyone can drive it, less down time due to failures, more fuel efficient and less emissions.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Routine maintenance.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Street Maintenance District Revenue
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
319
CIP Project Fund
Street Maintenance District
PROJECT NUMBER
STR63
DEPARTMENT
STREETS OP
PROJECT NAME
Replace Signal At Babcock & Wilson
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$750,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Upgrade Signal At Babcock & Wilson
How is capacity affected by this project: Underground conduit is full and failing. Pedestrian functions should be upgraded to new
type such as count down and vibratory tactile.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: This signal can't have Opticom for fire trucks
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Also should conform with ADA.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Leave as is until failure.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Fire department can use Opticom to pass through the light. ADA requirements would be met. Room for future expansion in the conduit.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Routine maintenance.
FUNDING SOURCES
Arterial and Collector Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
320
CIP Project Fund
Street Maintenance District
PROJECT NUMBER
STR64
DEPARTMENT
STREETS OP
PROJECT NAME
Steel Drum Roller & Trailer
FY18
$120,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This is a request for a larger roller for our paving operations.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: This roller will allow us to get better compaction
therefore, giving a better finished product. Milling and paving salvageable portions of our local roadways is a key strategy for
extending the life of existing local streets until they can be reconstructed.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: Paved streets.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: The roller we currently have is for smaller projects and tighter areas.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: Compacting asphalt paving projects.
Are there other affected projects: In house paving projects.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Rent if/when available. Lease. Rental rates are $1000.00 per week without a trailer.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: If a rental roller is not available, we can't pave local streets. Best paving
possible for longer pavement life. Improve PCI.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Normal maintenance.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Street Maintenance District Revenue
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
321
CIP Project Fund
Street Maintenance District
PROJECT NUMBER
STR67
DEPARTMENT
STREETS OP
PROJECT NAME
Covered Storage At Shops Complex
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$100,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Covered Storage At Shops Complex
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Getting equipment parked inside greatly extends the life
of the equipment.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: All of our rolling stock and equipment.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: The difference in getting in a motor grader that is parked inside vs. one that is
parked outside in -20 degree weather is enormous. Equipment stays in better shape. Much less wear and tear on drivetrain and
hydraulics. Easily adds an hour of productivity to every shift.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: Equipment and vehicle storage.
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Equipment continues to degrade from the sun and
exposure.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: At the proper site we could build one big enough to house
other departments equipment. Project is split 50% Street Maintenance Fund, 20% Water Fund, & 25% Wastewater Fund.
Are there other affected projects: Depends where this building is located.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Keep parking millions of dollars’ worth of equipment outside.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Better equipment management.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Normal building maintenance.
FUNDING SOURCES
50% Street Maintenance Fund, 25% Water Fund, 25% Wastewater Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
322
CIP Project Fund
Street Maintenance District
PROJECT NUMBER
STR68
DEPARTMENT
STREETS SIGN
PROJECT NAME
Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon
FY18
$10,000
FY19
$10,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This request is for a rectangular rapid flashing beacon.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: We get several requests a year for these and would like
to have one ready to install. These would be similar to the unit installed on Kagy at 7th avenue.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: Crosswalks.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: RRFB's have shown to increase visibility of pedestrians in crosswalks which in
turn increases safety of the pedestrian.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: High pedestrian use intersections.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: In the past we have had the Bozeman School District and
the Bozeman Police Foundation contribute to the cost of these.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Not having a unit in stock may increase the time to respond to requests.
By having one on hand, we are able to install it in the same construction season it is requested without waiting for a budget cycle.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
None.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Street Maintenance District Revenue
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$10,000
FY21
$10,000
FY22
$10,000
323
CIP Project Fund
Street Maintenance District
PROJECT NUMBER
STR71-18
DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
PROJECT NAME
Street Maintenance Mill & Overlay FY18
FY18
$967,600
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Mill & Overlay Story Mill Rd (Bridger Dr to Caddie Ct), Lincoln St (19th to S 11th), Grant (S 6th to Willson), Willson (Kagy to
Babcock), Church (Story to Olive), Church (Babcock to Davis), College (8th to 11th), and Lamme (Church to Broadway).
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: High
How is capacity affected by this project: We plan to mill and overlay 3.8 miles in FY18, 2.4 miles in FY19, 2.4 miles in FY20, 2.7
miles in FY21, and 2.8 miles in FY22.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: Pavement preservation, mitigation of failed pavement sections.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: Potential for bike lane striping enhancements with some
projects
Are there other affected projects: Coordination needed with any utility replacement projects.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increases the lifespan of streets within the City of Bozeman
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
This project results in a net decrease in overall maintenance costs over the lifecycle of all pavements.
FUNDING SOURCES
Street Maintenance Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
324
CIP Project Fund
Street Maintenance District
PROJECT NUMBER
STR71-19
DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
PROJECT NAME
Street Maintenance Mill & Overlay FY19
FY18 FY19
$554,500
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Mill & Overlay S 23rd Ave (College to Main), Babcock (Main to 11th), Koch (23rd to 11th), and S 20th Ave (Koch to Babcock)
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: High.
How is capacity affected by this project: We plan to mill and overlay 3.8 miles in FY18, 2.4 miles in FY19, 2.4 miles in FY20, 2.7
miles in FY21, and 2.8 miles in FY22.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: Pavement preservation, mitigation of failed pavement sections.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: Potential for bike lane striping enhancements with some
projects.
Are there other affected projects: Coordination needed with any utility replacement projects.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increases the lifespan of streets within the City of Bozeman
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
This project results in a net decrease in overall maintenance costs over the lifecycle of all pavements.
FUNDING SOURCES
Street Maintenance Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
325
CIP Project Fund
Street Maintenance District
PROJECT NUMBER
STR71-20
DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
PROJECT NAME
Street Maintenance Mill & Overlay FY20
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Mill & Overlay Tamarack (7th to Rouse), Aspen (7th to 5th), Peach (7th to Rouse), N 5th Ave (Peach to Tamarack), N 3rd
(Peach to Tamarack), and Willson (Main to Cottonwood).
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: High.
How is capacity affected by this project: We plan to mill and overlay 3.8 miles in FY18, 2.4 miles in FY19, 2.4 miles in FY20, 2.7
miles in FY21, and 2.8 miles in FY22.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: Pavement preservation, mitigation of failed pavement sections.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: Potential for bike lane striping enhancements with some
projects
Are there other affected projects: Coordination needed with any utility replacement projects.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increases the lifespan of streets within the City of Bozeman
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
This project results in a net decrease in overall maintenance costs over the lifecycle of all pavements.
FUNDING SOURCES
Street Maintenance Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$808,100
FY21 FY22
326
CIP Project Fund
Street Maintenance District
PROJECT NUMBER
STR71-21
DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
PROJECT NAME
Street Maintenance Mill & Overlay FY21
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Mill & Overlay Durston (Hanson St to 7th) and Simmental Way.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: High.
How is capacity affected by this project: We plan to mill and overlay 3.8 miles in FY18, 2.4 miles in FY19, 2.4 miles in FY20, 2.7
miles in FY21, and 2.8 miles in FY22.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: Pavement preservation, mitigation of failed pavement sections
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: Potential for bike lane striping enhancements with some
projects
Are there other affected projects: Coordination needed with any utility replacement projects.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increases the lifespan of streets within the City of Bozeman
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
This project results in a net decrease in overall maintenance costs over the lifecycle of all pavements.
FUNDING SOURCES
Street Maintenance Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21
$964,000
FY22
327
CIP Project Fund
Street Maintenance District
PROJECT NUMBER
STR71-22
DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
PROJECT NAME
Street Maintenance Mill & Overlay FY22
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Mill & Overlay S 3rd from Goldenstein to Kagy) and Griffin (7th to Rouse)
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: High.
How is capacity affected by this project: We plan to mill and overlay 3.8 miles in FY18, 2.4 miles in FY19, 2.4 miles in FY20, 2.7
miles in FY21, and 2.8 miles in FY22.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: Pavement preservation, mitigation of failed pavement sections
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: Potential for bike lane striping enhancements with some
projects
Are there other affected projects: Coordination needed with any utility replacement projects.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increases the lifespan of streets within the City of Bozeman
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
This project results in a net decrease in overall maintenance costs over the lifecycle of all pavements.
FUNDING SOURCES
Street Maintenance Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
$913,329
328
CIP Project Fund
Street Maintenance District
PROJECT NUMBER
STR72-18
DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
PROJECT NAME
Street Maintenance Chip Seal FY18
FY18
$185,300
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Chip Seal Highland Blvd, Ellis St, Old Highland Blvd, Kenyon Dr (Josephine to the end), O’Connell Dr, Berthot Dr, Chambers Dr,
Baxter Dr, Knaab Dr, Lomas Dr.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Medium-high.
How is capacity affected by this project: We plan to chip seal 4.4 miles in FY18, 18.7 miles in FY19, 15.6 miles in FY20, 19.3 miles
in FY21, and 13.7 miles in FY22.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: Pavement preservation.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: Potential for bike lane striping enhancements with some
projects.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increases the lifespan of streets within the City of Bozeman
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
This project results in a net decrease in overall maintenance costs over the lifecycle of all pavements.
FUNDING SOURCES
Street Maintenance Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
329
CIP Project Fund
Street Maintenance District
PROJECT NUMBER
STR72-19
DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
PROJECT NAME
Street Maintenance Chip Seal FY19
FY18 FY19
$827,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Chip Seal W Oak (Ferguson to 19th), Ferguson (Fallon to Oak), Babcock (Meagher to Main), Fowler (Garfield to Babcock),
Resort Dr (Huffine to Babcock), Fallon (Ferguson to Fowler), Laramie Dr, Granite Ave, Laredo Dr, Prairie Ave, Laredo Dr,
Golden Valley Dr, Pondera Ave, E Granite Ave, Powder River Ave, Treasure Ave, Stillwater Ave, Ginella Way, Sheridan Pl, S
Sweetgrass Ave, Broadwater St, Choteau Ave, Teton Ave, Sheridan Ave (Broadwater to Durston), N Sweetgrass Ave, Meagher
(Babcock to Oak), Flathead Ave, N Sanders Ave, Mineral Ave, Toole St (Ferguson to the end), Cascade St (Ferguson to the end),
Carbon St, Diamond St, Sunstone St (Ferguson to Sanders), Moonstone Dr (Ferguson to Sanders), Annie St (Ferguson to Hanson
St), Renova Ln (Ferguson to the end), Tanzanite Dr, Opal St, Agate Ave, Bur Ave, Laduke St, Pin Ave, Yellowstone Ave (Durston
to Oak), Palm St, Potosi St, Jardine Ave, Pipestone St, Corwin St, Beaverhead St.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Medium-high.
How is capacity affected by this project: We plan to chip seal 4.4 miles in FY18, 18.7 miles in FY19, 15.6 miles in FY20, 19.3 miles
in FY21, and 13.7 miles in FY22.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: Pavement preservation
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: Potential for bike lane striping enhancements with some
projects.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increases the lifespan of streets within the City of Bozeman
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
This project results in a net decrease in overall maintenance costs over the lifecycle of all pavements.
FUNDING SOURCES
Street Maintenance Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
330
CIP Project Fund
Street Maintenance District
PROJECT NUMBER
STR72-20
DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
PROJECT NAME
Street Maintenance Chip Seal FY20
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Chip Seal W Beall St (25th to 15th), N 23rd Ave, N 22nd Ave (Beall to Durston), N 21st Ave (Beall to Durston), N 20th Ave
(Main to Durston), N 18th Ave, N 17th Ave (Beall to Durston), N 16th Ave, N 15th Ave (Main to Patrick), Kagy (19th west),
Stockman Way, S 22nd Ave, Remington Way, S 11th (Kagy to Opportunity Way), Opportunity Way, Graf (19th to 27th), Golden
Sun Dr, S 27th Ave (Blackwood to Graf), Parkway Ave, Kurk Dr, S 31st Ave, S 30th Ave, S 29th Ave, S 28th Ave, S 26th Ave,
Meah Ln, Parkway Ave, S Tracy Ave, Hill St, Highland Ct, Spring Creek Dr (3rd to Tracy), Circle Dr, S 15th Ave, Summer View
Ln, Spring Ridge Dr, Madrona Ln, S 11th Ave, Hidden Springs Ln, Summerset Dr, Hillcrest Dr, Gardenbrook Ln, Alder Creek Dr,
Cambridge Dr, Fieldstone Dr, Fieldstone Dr W, Concord Dr, Lexington Dr, Park Pl, Oxford Dr, Cornell Dr, Stanford Dr,
Princeton Pl, Dartmoth Dr, Silverwood Dr, Heritage Dr.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Medium-high.
How is capacity affected by this project: We plan to chip seal 4.4 miles in FY18, 18.7 miles in FY19, 15.6 miles in FY20, 19.3 miles
in FY21, and 13.7 miles in FY22.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: Pavement preservation
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: Potential for bike lane striping enhancements with some
projects.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increases the lifespan of streets within the City of Bozeman
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
This project results in a net decrease in overall maintenance costs over the lifecycle of all pavements.
FUNDING SOURCES
Street Maintenance Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$913,000
FY21 FY22
331
CIP Project Fund
Street Maintenance District
PROJECT NUMBER
STR72-21
DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
PROJECT NAME
Street Maintenance Chip Seal FY21
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Chip Seal Laurel Glen Streets, Trout Meadows Rd, Fen Way, Catamount St (Davis Ln to N 27th), Sora Way, Sundew Ln,
Blackbird Dr (Lori Ln to Catamount), Warbler Way, Catalyst St, Floxtail St, Downy Ln, Savannah St, Catkin Ln, Hamilton Ct,
Marlyn Ct, N 27th Ave (Cattail to Catamount), Cattail St (Davis Ln to Ferguson), Kimberwicke St, Thoroughbred Ln, Farrier Ln,
Andalusian Ave, Arabian Ave, McCafferty St, Equestrian Ln (Harper Puckett to Arabian), Danube St, Draft Horse Dr, Lasso Ave,
N Ferguson Ave (Baxter to Cattail), Equestrian Ln (Lasso to Vaquero Pkwy), Galloway St, Bosal St, Milkhouse Ave (Equestrian to
Kimberwicke), Gallatin Green Blvd, Vaquero Pkwy (Equestrian to Kimberwicke), Lolo Way (Caspian to Marias), Lemhi Trail Dr
(Caspian to Marias), Marias Ln, Caspian Ave (Lemhi Trail Dr to Monida), Monida, Tschache Ln (Caspian to N 27th), Spring View
Ct, Autumn Grove St, Westwind Way, Winter Park St, Windward Ave, Breeze Ln, Hunters Way (Oak to Tschache), Santana Ct,
Buckrake Ave (Oak to Sartain St), Sartain St, Gale Ct, Tempest Ct, Brisk Ct, Leeward Ct, Breeze Ln, Turbulence Ln, Hedgerow
Ct, Trade Wind Ln (Santana Ct), N 27th (Oak to Baxter), Thomas Dr.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Medium-high.
How is capacity affected by this project: We plan to chip seal 4.4 miles in FY18, 18.7 miles in FY19, 15.6 miles in FY20, 19.3 miles
in FY21, and 13.7 miles in FY22.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: Pavement preservation
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: Potential for bike lane striping enhancements with some
projects.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increases the lifespan of streets within the City of Bozeman
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
This project results in a net decrease in overall maintenance costs over the lifecycle of all pavements.
FUNDING SOURCES
Street Maintenance Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21
$902,500
FY22
332
CIP Project Fund
Street Maintenance District
PROJECT NUMBER
STR72-22
DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
PROJECT NAME
Street Maintenance Chip Seal FY22
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Chip Seal the streets in the Legends at Bridger Creek subdivision, Valley West subdivision, Flanders Creek subdivision, and the
Traditions subdivision – phase 1.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Medium-high.
How is capacity affected by this project: We plan to chip seal 4.4 miles in FY18, 18.7 miles in FY19, 15.6 miles in FY20, 19.3 miles
in FY21, and 13.7 miles in FY22.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: Pavement preservation
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: Potential for bike lane striping enhancements with some
projects.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increases the lifespan of streets within the City of Bozeman
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
This project results in a net decrease in overall maintenance costs over the lifecycle of all pavements.
FUNDING SOURCES
Street Maintenance Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
$727,460
333
CIP Project Fund
Street Maintenance District
PROJECT NUMBER
STR73
DEPARTMENT
STREETS OP
PROJECT NAME
Replace Skid Steer
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This to replace our 2003 Skid Steer with 1750 hours. Used mainly in paving operations with the cold planer attached. This is very
important in our operation but is also very hard on the equipment. In the last 5 years we have spent over $26,000 in repairs.
Down time during these repairs has been weeks and that interferes with our ability to finish asphalt repairs in a timely manner.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: This is used on every paving project.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: Streets and Alleys.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: Streets uses the skid steer in all aspects of milling, paving and gravel work.
When we don't have the skid steer up and running we are using larger equipment using more fuel. Working in tight spaces is
more difficult with a full size loader.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: All aspects of the Streets operation.
Are there other affected projects: Mill and overlays.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Keep running the one we have.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: More down time and less use when it is needed. Less downtime
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
None.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Street Maintenance District Revenue
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21
$80,000
FY22
334
CIP Project Fund
Street Maintenance District
PROJECT NUMBER
STR74
DEPARTMENT
STREETS OP
PROJECT NAME
Paint Truck
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$225,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Pavement marking renewal is a yearly operation because we use environmentally friendly water borne paint. The disadvantage to
latex paint is that it has to be renewed at least annually. Currently we have MDT paint for us and due to their busy schedule it is
not always done as early in the season as we would like. We are now waiting until mid to late summer to get the double yellow
center lines, bike lane lines, skip lines and fog lines painted. MDT's crew is not as dialed in to the needs and wants of our citizens
so we are not getting the quality that we and our city is used to.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Very important to not have to depend on another
agency to get our painting done. Fresh pavement markings are critical to the traveling public.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: Streets.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: Our crews would get it done in a more timely manner with less mistakes.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: Painting pavement markings.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue to have MDT paint for us when it is convenient for their schedule and weather permitting. Contract out the painting.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Continue to rely on others to get our painting done. Public outcry when
markings are not visible at night or in inclement weather. Producing a quality product that we don't always get with our current MOU with
MDT. Being able to paint when we want and as often as we want.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
This will need to be stored inside and we will have to make room for that in our current buildings.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Street Maintenance District Revenue
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
335
336
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
Fu
n
d
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
Pl
a
n
Fi
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
Su
m
m
a
r
y
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Ye
a
r
FY
1
7
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
F
Y
2
0
F
Y
2
1
F
Y
2
2
UNSCHEDULED
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
Re
s
e
r
v
e
Ba
l
a
n
c
e
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
‐
$
‐
$
63
,
0
0
0
$
63
,
0
0
0
$
63,000
$
63,000 $
Pl
u
s
:
In
t
e
r
n
a
l
Al
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
/
B
i
l
l
i
n
g
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
‐
$
63
,
0
0
0
$
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$
‐$ ‐$
Le
s
s
:
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
d
CI
P
Co
s
t
s
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Ye
a
r
‐En
d
Ca
s
h
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
‐
$
63
,
0
0
0
$
63
,
0
0
0
$
63
,
0
0
0
$
63,000
$
63,000 $
A ss
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
s
Ma
d
e
fo
r
Re
v
e
n
u
e
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
s
:
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Ye
a
r
FY
1
7
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
F
Y
2
0
F
Y
2
1
F
Y
2
2
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
An
n
u
a
l
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Mt
c
Bi
l
l
i
n
g
s
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$
‐$
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
An
n
u
a
l
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Mt
c
Al
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$
‐$
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$
‐$
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
%
5.
5
%
3.
5
%
7.
1
%
0
.
0
%
0
.
0
%
0
.
0
%
Pl
u
s
:
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
(D
e
c
r
e
a
s
e
)
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
‐2.
0
%
3.
6
%
‐7.
1
%
0
.
0
%
0
.
0
%
0
.
0
%
To
t
a
l
% De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
3.
5
%
7.
1
%
0.
0
%
0
.
0
%
0
.
0
%
0
.
0
%
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$
‐$
No
t
e
:
Th
e
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
Fu
n
d
is
an
internal service fun d
th
a
t
op
e
r
a
t
e
s
en
t
i
r
e
l
y
fr
o
m
co
s
t
re
c
o
v
e
r
y
paid by City Departments.
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
it
e
m
s
ar
e
fu
n
d
e
d
as
ne
e
d
e
d
,
wi
t
h
o
u
t
the accumulation
of
an
y
re
s
e
r
v
e
fo
r
ca
p
i
t
a
l
.
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
0 0 0 1 1 1 1
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
& Eq
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
337
338
Wa
s
t
e
w
a
t
e
r
Fu
n
d
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
Pl
a
n
Fi
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
Su
m
m
a
r
y
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Ye
a
r
FY
1
7
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
F
Y
2
0
F
Y
2
1
F
Y
2
2
Unscheduled
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
Re
s
e
r
v
e
Ba
l
a
n
c
e
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
1
,
3
5
4
,
4
5
5
$
1,
6
2
5
,
9
9
2
$
1,
0
9
9
,
4
0
6
$
1,
6
7
0
,
7
2
7
$
2,
7
0
1
,
6
5
4
$
3,896,834 $ ‐$
Pl
u
s
:
Wa
s
t
e
w
a
t
e
r
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
2,
1
1
2
,
5
3
8
$
2,
1
7
5
,
9
1
4
$
2,
2
4
1
,
1
9
1
$
2,
3
0
8
,
4
2
7
$
2,
3
7
7
,
6
8
0
$
2,449,010 $ ‐$
Le
s
s
:
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
d
CI
P
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Co
s
t
s
(1
,
8
4
1
,
0
0
1
)
$
(2
,
7
0
2
,
5
0
0
)
$
(1
,
6
6
9
,
8
7
0
)
$
(1
,
2
7
7
,
5
0
0
)
$
(1
,
1
8
2
,
5
0
0
)
$
(1,602,500)$ (16,034,333)$
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Ye
a
r
‐En
d
Ca
s
h
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
1,
6
2
5
,
9
9
2
$
1,
0
9
9
,
4
0
6
$
1,
6
7
0
,
7
2
7
$
2,
7
0
1
,
6
5
4
$
3,
8
9
6
,
8
3
4
$
4,743,344 $ (16,034,333)$
As
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
s
Ma
d
e
fo
r
Re
v
e
n
u
e
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
s
:
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Ye
a
r
FY
1
7
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
FY
2
1
FY22
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
An
n
u
a
l
Wa
s
t
e
w
a
t
e
r
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
8,
4
5
0
,
1
5
1
$
8,
4
5
0
,
1
5
1
$
8,
7
0
3
,
6
5
6
$
8,
9
6
4
,
7
6
5
$
9,233,708
$
9,510,719 $
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
An
n
u
a
l
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
0.
0
%
3%
3%
3%
3%3%
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
8,
4
5
0
,
1
5
1
$
8,
7
0
3
,
6
5
6
$
8,
9
6
4
,
7
6
5
$
9,
2
3
3
,
7
0
8
$
9,510,719
$
9,796,041 $
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
%
25
.
0
%
25
.
0
%
2
5
.
0
%
2
5
.
0
%
2
5
.
0
%
2
5
.
0
%
Pl
u
s
:
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
0.
0
%
0.
0
%
0.
0
%
0.
0
%
0.0%0.0%
To
t
a
l
% De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
25
.
0
%
25
.
0
%
2
5
.
0
%
2
5
.
0
%
2
5
.
0
%
2
5
.
0
%
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
2,
1
1
2
,
5
3
8
$
2,
1
7
5
,
9
1
4
$
2,
2
4
1
,
1
9
1
$
2,
3
0
8
,
4
2
7
$
2,377,680
$
2,449,010 $
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
CU
R
R
E
N
T
18
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
16
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
14
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
12
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
10
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
8,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
6,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
4,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
2,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
0
Wa
s
t
e
w
a
t
e
r
Fu
n
d
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
& Eq
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
339
CI
P
PR
O
J
E
C
T
FU
PR
O
J
.
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
PR
O
J
E
C
T
NA
M
E
Unscheduled
FY
2
1
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
FY22
Wa
s
t
e
w
a
t
e
r
Fu
n
d
PW
0
4
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
ON
CO
R
N
E
R
OF
AS
P
E
N
&
RO
U
S
E
$0
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
WW
0
7
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
AN
N
U
A
L
WA
S
T
E
W
A
T
E
R
PI
P
E
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
PR
O
G
R
A
M
‐
DE
S
I
G
N
$2
2
,
5
0
0
$2
2
,
5
0
0
$2
2
,
5
0
0
$2
2
,
5
0
0
$22,500
WW
0
8
‐18
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
WA
S
T
E
W
A
T
E
R
PI
P
E
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
PR
O
G
R
A
M
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
IN
20
1
8
$1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
WW
0
8
‐19
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
WA
S
T
E
W
A
T
E
R
PI
P
E
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
PR
O
G
R
A
M
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
IN
20
1
9
$1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
WW
0
8
‐20
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
WA
S
T
E
W
A
T
E
R
PI
P
E
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
PR
O
G
R
A
M
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
IN
20
2
0
$1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
WW
0
8
‐21
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
WA
S
T
E
W
A
T
E
R
PI
P
E
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
PR
O
G
R
A
M
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
IN
20
2
1
$1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
WW
0
8
‐22
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
WA
S
T
E
W
A
T
E
R
PI
P
E
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
PR
O
G
R
A
M
‐
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
IN
20
2
2
$1,000,000
WW
2
7
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
AN
N
U
A
L
WA
T
E
R
S
H
E
D
ST
U
D
Y
& ST
R
E
A
M
MO
D
E
L
I
N
G
$6
0
,
0
0
0
$6
0
,
0
0
0
$6
0
,
0
0
0
$6
0
,
0
0
0
$60,000
GF
2
2
7
FI
N
A
N
C
E
ER
P
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
"S
U
N
G
A
R
D
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
/
U
P
G
R
A
D
E
"
$333,333
PW
0
3
PU
B
W
O
R
K
S
AD
M
I
N
VE
H
I
C
L
E
MA
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
DE
S
I
G
N
&
ST
O
R
A
G
E
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$5
0
,
0
0
0
ST
R
6
7
ST
R
E
E
T
S
OP
CO
V
E
R
E
D
ST
O
R
A
G
E
AT
SH
O
P
S
CO
M
P
L
E
X
$50,000
WW
5
4
Wa
s
t
e
w
a
t
e
r
Op
RE
P
L
A
C
E
#1
7
8
3
‐
19
9
5
FO
R
D
DU
M
P
TR
U
C
K
$9
5
,
0
0
0
WW
6
5
Wa
s
t
e
w
a
t
e
r
Op
DI
G
I
T
A
L
UN
I
V
E
R
S
A
L
CA
M
E
R
A
‐
DU
C
$7
0
,
0
0
0
WW
8
6
Wa
s
t
e
w
a
t
e
r
Op
WH
E
E
L
E
D
EX
C
A
V
A
T
O
R
$151,000
WW
3
9
WR
F
SA
N
D
B
L
A
S
T
& PA
I
N
T
CL
A
R
I
F
I
E
R
DR
I
V
E
S
AN
D
BE
A
C
H
E
S
$9
0
,
0
0
0
$9
0
,
0
0
0
WW
4
2
WR
F
PR
I
M
A
R
Y
CL
A
R
I
F
I
E
R
CO
V
E
R
$1,500,000
WW
4
5
WR
F
FI
N
A
L
& SE
C
O
N
D
A
R
Y
CL
A
R
I
F
I
E
R
LA
U
N
D
E
R
CO
V
E
R
S
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
WW
4
9
WR
F
RO
L
L
‐OF
F
ST
O
R
A
G
E
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
& PO
S
S
I
B
L
E
2N
D
SC
R
E
W
PR
E
S
S
EN
C
L
O
S
U
R
E
$6
0
0
,
0
0
0
WW
5
0
WR
F
RE
F
R
I
G
E
R
A
T
E
D
AU
T
O
M
A
T
I
C
SA
M
P
L
E
R
$1
0
,
0
0
0
340
CI
P
PR
O
J
E
C
T
FU
PR
O
J
.
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
PR
O
J
E
C
T
NA
M
E
Unscheduled
FY
2
1
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
FY22
WW
5
3
WR
F
PO
S
I
T
I
V
E
DI
S
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
LO
B
E
PU
M
P
S
$5
0
,
0
0
0
WW
5
8
WR
F
CH
I
P
SE
A
L
AN
D
TO
P
C
O
A
T
WR
F
AS
P
H
A
L
T
$4
7
,
3
7
0
WW
6
6
WR
F
OD
O
R
CO
N
T
R
O
L
FO
R
OL
D
PR
E
T
R
E
A
T
M
E
N
T
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
$4
0
,
0
0
0
WW
6
9
WR
F
WR
F
FA
C
I
L
I
T
Y
R&
R
$5
0
,
0
0
0
$5
0
,
0
0
0
$5
0
,
0
0
0
$5
0
,
0
0
0
$50,000
WW
7
0
WR
F
WR
F
FA
C
I
L
I
T
Y
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
&
OP
T
I
M
I
Z
A
T
I
O
N
$5
0
,
0
0
0
$5
0
,
0
0
0
$5
0
,
0
0
0
$5
0
,
0
0
0
$50,000
WW
7
1
WR
F
WR
F
FA
C
I
L
I
T
Y
MA
S
T
E
R
PL
A
N
UP
D
A
T
E
$2
5
0
,
0
0
0
WW
7
6
WR
F
TH
I
R
D
PR
E
T
R
E
A
T
M
E
N
T
SC
R
E
E
N
$3
0
0
,
0
0
0
WW
7
8
WR
F
SE
R
V
E
R
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
AT
WR
F
(W
R
F
C
T
R
L
B
A
K
)
$10,000
WW
7
9
WR
F
WR
F
IM
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
FO
R
EN
E
R
G
Y
SU
S
T
A
I
N
A
B
I
L
I
T
Y
$4,000,000
WW
8
0
WR
F
LA
G
O
O
N
VA
L
V
E
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
IN
LI
F
T
#3
,
CL
E
A
N
OU
T
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
ON
SL
U
D
G
E
LI
N
E
TO
LA
G
O
O
N
;
PU
M
P
,
VA
L
V
E
S
AN
D
PI
P
I
N
G
TO
PU
M
P
SL
U
D
G
E
BA
C
K
FR
O
M
TH
E
SM
A
L
L
LA
G
O
O
N
$5
0
,
0
0
0
WW
8
1
WR
F
ME
M
B
R
A
N
E
RO
O
F
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
ON
OL
D
DI
G
E
S
T
E
R
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
(D
I
G
1 & 2)
$6
0
,
0
0
0
WW
8
3
WR
F
UF
A
T
GR
A
V
I
T
Y
TH
I
C
K
E
N
E
R
DR
I
V
E
AN
D
AR
M
S
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
$400,000
WW
8
4
WR
F
SE
R
V
E
R
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
AT
WR
F
(W
R
F
C
T
R
L
P
R
I
)
$10,000
WW
8
5
WR
F
WR
F
PR
O
C
E
S
S
UP
G
R
A
D
E
S
TO
IM
P
R
O
V
E
NU
T
R
I
E
N
T
RE
C
O
V
E
R
Y
$10,000,000
Su
m
m
a
r
y f or
Wa
s
t
e
w
a
t
e
r
Fu
n
d
(33
it
e
m
s
)
To
t
a
l
s
by
ye
a
r
:
$1
,
1
8
2
,
5
0
0
$
1
,
6
0
2
,
5
0
0
$2
,
7
0
2
,
5
0
0
$16,034,333
FY
2
1
FY22
FY
1
8
Unscheduled
FY
2
0
$1
,
2
7
7
,
5
0
0
$1
,
6
6
9
,
8
7
0
FY
1
9
341
CIP Project Fund
Wastewater Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF227
DEPARTMENT
FINANCE
PROJECT NAME
ERP Replacement "SunGard Replacement/Upgrade"
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$333,333
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
ERP Replacement "SunGard Replacement/Upgrade"
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue running current SunGard package. Use SunGard.net (Naviline EDGE) as an improvement to the current system, but not a full
replacement.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Simplified package. Easier to integrate the various applications/programs. Easier to pull out information for end users. Easier compilation of
Commission reports and packets for Community Development.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Unknown. Dependent on the option chosen.
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund 33%; Water Fund 33%; Wastewater Fund 33%
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
342
CIP Project Fund
Wastewater Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
PW03
DEPARTMENT
PUBWORKS ADMIN
PROJECT NAME
Vehicle Maintenance Design & Storage Construction
FY18 FY19
$50,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Design and construct vehicle storage
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Having equipment, especially winter equipment, inside
and ready to go extends the life, produces less emissions by not having to warm up and shortens response time.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: All of our rolling stock and equipment.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: The difference in getting in a motor grader that is parked inside vs. one that is
parked outside in -20 degree weather is enormous. Equipment stays in better shape. Much less wear and tear on drivetrain and
hydraulics. Easily adds an hour of productivity to every shift.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: By being located next to existing city property, we could
aggregate the lots giving even more useful space.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Not build and only use for outdoor storage.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Equipment continues to degrade from the sun and exposure. Large inside
storage for several departments. Equipment would be located next to current Vehicle Maintenance Shop. Good access onto Rouse and
Griffin. Early morning shift equipment could be stored here so as not to disturb the neighbors in this mostly zoned Industrial area. With this
building, Streets could switch to producing our own brine solution for pre wet of the sand. We wouldn't have to use mag chloride which is
about 4-5 times more expensive than salt brine. Gallatin County has expressed interest in buying brine from us.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Normal building maintenance. Possibly heat with waste oil from the Shops. Possibly heat with wood chips from Forestry.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project totals $200,000. It will be split evenly 4 ways: Water Fund ($50,000), Wastewater Fund ($50,000), Street Maintenance ($50,000),
and Parks ($50,000).
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
343
CIP Project Fund
Wastewater Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
PW04
DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
PROJECT NAME
Property on Corner of Aspen & Rouse
FY18
$100,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Property Purchase to expand shops area and potentially offices. This is an opportunity to make more land available for project
PW01-SH - Shops Expansion.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Do not purchase the property. Wait to purchase at a later date.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Larger contiguous land area for City Shops. The Shops Expansion project has been a scheduled CIP for a number of years. This item could
bring an important piece of land into that project area, making a better-functioning property at Rouse and Tamarack.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Building Maintenance would be needed to keep the existing structure useful.
FUNDING SOURCES
Split 33/33/33 between Water, Wastewater and Street Maintenance Funds.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21
$0
FY22
$0
344
CIP Project Fund
Wastewater Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
STR67
DEPARTMENT
STREETS OP
PROJECT NAME
Covered Storage At Shops Complex
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$50,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Covered Storage at Shops Complex
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Getting equipment parked inside greatly extends the life
of the equipment.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: All of our rolling stock and equipment.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: The difference in getting in a motor grader that is parked inside vs. one that is
parked outside in -20 degree weather is enormous. Equipment stays in better shape. Much less wear and tear on drivetrain and
hydraulics. Easily adds an hour of productivity to every shift.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: Equipment and vehicle storage.
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Equipment continues to degrade from the sun and
exposure.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: At the proper site we could build one big enough to house
other department’s equipment. Project is split 50% Street Maintenance Fund, 20% Water Fund, & 25% Wastewater Fund.
Are there other affected projects: Depends where this building is located.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Keep parking millions of dollars’ worth of equipment outside.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Equipment continues to degrade from the sun and exposure. Better
equipment management.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Normal building maintenance.
FUNDING SOURCES
50% Street Maintenance Fund, 25% Water Fund, 25% Wastewater Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
345
CIP Project Fund
Wastewater Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
WW07
DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
PROJECT NAME
Annual Wastewater Pipe Replacement Program - Design
FY18
$22,500
FY19
$22,500
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This item provides for design work to be completed every-other year, in anticipation of the Annual System Upgrades.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Annual wastewater pipe replacement projects minimize
service interruptions or main breaks attributable to aging infrastructure.
Are there other affected projects: Annual Wastewater Pipe Replacement Program project would be delayed if not done.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Provides survey work needed for design of necessary sewer system maintenance work.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
NA
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Wastewater Utility Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$22,500
FY21
$22,500
FY22
$22,500
346
CIP Project Fund
Wastewater Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
WW08-18
DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
PROJECT NAME
Wastewater Pipe Replacement Program - Construction in 2018
FY18
$1,000,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project would complete design, bid and begin construction in the Spring/Summer of 2018. Priority will be places on the
sewer segment on S Grand from Olive to Hayes to coincide with the S Grand street reconstructions scheduled for FY18. The
remaining balance will be used to continue sewer replacements on segments identified as needing repairs. The condition of the
sewer system is analyzed nightly to account for daily updates from the Wastewater Operations Department.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Provides for the construction of necessary wastewater system maintenance work.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
This project results in a net decrease in overall maintenance costs over the lifecycle of all pipes.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Wastewater Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
347
CIP Project Fund
Wastewater Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
WW08-19
DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
PROJECT NAME
Wastewater Pipe Replacement Program - Construction in 2019
FY18 FY19
$1,000,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project would complete design, bid and begin construction in the Spring/Summer of 2019. Priority will be places on the
sewer segment on S Tracy from College to Babcock to coincide with the S Tracy street reconstructions scheduled for FY19. The
remaining balance will be used to continue sewer replacements on segments identified as needing repairs. The condition of the
sewer system is analyzed nightly to account for daily updates from the Wastewater Operations Department.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Provides for the construction of necessary wastewater system maintenance work.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
This project results in a net decrease in overall maintenance costs over the lifecycle of all pipes.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Wastewater Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
348
CIP Project Fund
Wastewater Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
WW08-20
DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
PROJECT NAME
Wastewater Pipe Replacement Program - Construction in 2020
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project would complete design, bid and begin construction in the Spring/Summer of 2020. Priority will be places on the
sewer segment on S Black from College to the Cul-De-Sac to coincide with the S Black street reconstructions scheduled for
FY20. The remaining balance will be used to continue sewer replacements on segments identified as needing repairs. The
condition of the sewer system is analyzed nightly to account for daily updates from the Wastewater Operations Department.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Provides for the construction of necessary wastewater system maintenance work.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
This project results in a net decrease in overall maintenance costs over the lifecycle of all pipes.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Wastewater Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$1,000,000
FY21 FY22
349
CIP Project Fund
Wastewater Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
WW08-21
DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
PROJECT NAME
Wastewater Pipe Replacement Program - Construction in 2021
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project would complete design, bid and begin construction in the Spring/Summer of 2021. Priority will be places on the
sewer segment on N Tracy from Villard to Peach to coincide with the N Tracy street reconstructions scheduled for FY21. The
remaining balance will be used to continue sewer replacements on segments identified as needing repairs. The condition of the
sewer system is analyzed nightly to account for daily updates from the Wastewater Operations Department.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Provides for the construction of necessary wastewater system maintenance work.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
This project results in a net decrease in overall maintenance costs over the lifecycle of all pipes.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Wastewater Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21
$1,000,000
FY22
350
CIP Project Fund
Wastewater Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
WW08-22
DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
PROJECT NAME
Wastewater Pipe Replacement Program - Construction in 2022
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project would complete design, bid and begin construction in the Spring/Summer of 2022. Priority will be places on the
sewer segment on N 17th from Durston to the end to coincide with the N 17th street reconstructions scheduled for FY22. The
remaining balance will be used to continue sewer replacements on segments identified as needing repairs. The condition of the
sewer system is analyzed nightly to account for daily updates from the Wastewater Operations Department.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Provides for the construction of necessary wastewater system maintenance work.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
This project results in a net decrease in overall maintenance costs over the lifecycle of all pipes.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Wastewater Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
$1,000,000
351
CIP Project Fund
Wastewater Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
WW27
DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
PROJECT NAME
Annual Watershed Study & Stream Modeling
FY18
$60,000
FY19
$60,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Develop a comprehensive, multi-year watershed study and computer model for the East Gallatin River, which would enable the
City and DEQ to better determine stream load allocations and develop a more scientifically valid TMDL for the river segment we
discharge to. This will require annual field sample collection, laboratory analytical work, and detailed computer modeling using
calibrated and validated datasets.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Crucial tool to inform MPDES discharge permit
negotiations and compliance with MT numeric nutrient regulations
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Future MPDES discharge permit compliance.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: Leverages cooperative relationship with Gallatin Local
Water Quality District in the performance of field sampling activities.
Are there other affected projects: Project has significant potential to affect scope of future upgrades to WRF to meet numeric
nutrient limitations imposed by DEQ Circular 12A and implemented through future MPDES discharge permits. Stream modeling
may reduce or eliminate the need for future upgrades dependent upon the results of ongoing data collection and model
calibrations. Modeling could identify that assimilative capacity is available in the East Gallatin River or that the EGR is nutrient
limited. Model also essential to identify nutrient trade opportunities which could be a significant MPDES compliance tool.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Not undertake this work and risk having to accept the TMDL and waste load allocations the DEQ has proposed in their original draft
documents. This decision could greatly limit our ability to appeal future nutrient limitations and could result in non-compliance.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
This watershed study will greatly enhance the City’s understand of our impact on the East Gallatin River and enable us to more successfully
negotiate future permit limits with the DEQ.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
None, unless additional stream sampling is desired in subsequent years.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Wastewater Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$60,000
FY21
$60,000
FY22
$60,000
352
CIP Project Fund
Wastewater Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
WW39
DEPARTMENT
WRF
PROJECT NAME
Sandblast & Paint Clarifier Drives and Beaches
FY18
$90,000
FY19
$90,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Sandblast and paint old clarifier drives, beaches, baffles and weirs.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: The old final clarifiers were installed in the late 1980's
and need to be painted to extend their useful life.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: Final Clarifiers.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: Painting the clarifier drives will preserve the infrastructure and delay
the purchase of new stainless drives.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Do nothing
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Not painting the clarifier drives will speed their deterioration which may
result in failure of the drives before plans can be made to replace them. Replace lost & chipping paint on old clarifiers to prevent further
deterioration of existing infrastructure. These clarifiers have not been painted since they were installed in 1985.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
No new operating costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Wastewater Funds
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
353
CIP Project Fund
Wastewater Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
WW42
DEPARTMENT
WRF
PROJECT NAME
Primary Clarifier Cover
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$1,500,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Install a geodesic dome cover with 8 foot side walls on the 3 primary clarifiers. The installation would include a door, two
skylights and a vent tube. The clarifier drive motor and controls would have to be explosion proof.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Not having to use all the primary clarifiers during the
winter would allow larger particulate carbon to be flushed into the Bio-Trains postponing the purchase of supplemental carbon
to reduce the total nitrogen in the facility effluent. Covering the primary clarifiers would allow the capturing of odors from the
raw sewage they contain and direct these odors to treatment equipment. These odors are now reaching the residences near the
facility and Springhill Road.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: The three Primary Clarifiers.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: Not having to use all the primary clarifiers during the winter would allow larger
particulate carbon to be flushed into the Bio-Trains postponing the purchase of supplemental carbon to reduce the total nitrogen
in the facility effluent.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: This equipment is used to reduce odors and improve the efficiency of
the BNR process reducing nutrient discharges to the river.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Do nothing
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Odors from raw sewage are not contained within the facilities
boundaries and drift to near by neighbors and traffic on Springhill Road. Enclosing the primary clarifiers will trap these odors so they can be
eliminated on the property. The Bozeman WRF is limited in the amount of carbon needed to remove nitrates with the BNR process. Covering
the primary clarifiers will allow more carbon to be utilized by the process improving nutrient removal year round. Covering the primary
clarifiers will allow odor control & eliminate cleaning & painting. Cleaning & painting of all railings and catwalks is an on-going maintenance issue
to remove grease & droppings deposited by birds. Covers on primary clarifiers would allow some clarifiers not to be used during the winter
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Only maintenance of odor control would be additional.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Wastewater Funds
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
354
CIP Project Fund
Wastewater Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
WW45
DEPARTMENT
WRF
PROJECT NAME
Final & Secondary Clarifier Launder Covers
FY18
$200,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Cover effluent launder of one final clarifier to eliminate algal growth in the launder.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Secondary Launder Covers will reduce the algae in the
clarifier launders to a level that they will need only to be cleaned only once or twice a year. Currently there is a brush system
installed on the skimmer arm that needs to be maintained constantly to insure proper operation. Some brushes can fall into the
clarifier and could damage the clarifier drive or get stuck in the waste sludge piping.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: Final Clarifiers.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: It will eliminate the man hours needed to maintain the brush system now in
place and prevent clarifier damage.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: It will eliminate the man hours needed to maintain the brush system
now in place and prevent clarifier damage.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue using a brush system to reduce the amount of algal growth. This method requires continual maintenance and there is a risk of brushes
breaking off and falling into the clarifier. This could block the wasting hopper in the clarifier.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: The man hours used to maintain the brush system can be put to better
use and possible infrastructure damage could be eliminated. Elimination of the brush system with its maintenance and dangers. Maintenance on
the launder would be cut to twice a year for a quick manual cleaning allowing operators to spend time on other duties.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
None. Would actually cut operating costs (time and materials)
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Wastewater Funds
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
355
CIP Project Fund
Wastewater Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
WW49
DEPARTMENT
WRF
PROJECT NAME
Roll-Off Storage Building Construction & Possible 2nd Screw Press Enclosure
FY18
$600,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Construction of a roll-off building and possible 2nd screw press enclosure.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Currently, an enclosed area consisting of concrete
blankets suspend by cables and heated with torpedo heaters keeps the roll-offs from freezing in the truck storage building, where
they are stored over night during the winter. The addition would return the needed space in the truck storage building and
would reduce heating costs by using the exhaust air from the solids handling building.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: Less energy would be used if an extension to the roll-off loading area was built
that could use exhaust air from the solids dewatering building to heat it.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: Storing roll-offs, polymer totes and possibly housing a screw press.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Construction of a roll-off loading bay extension for roll-off storage and possibly a screw press enclosure.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Higher energy costs associated with heating a make shift storage area in
the truck storage building. Increased safety risks associated with using and fueling torpedo heaters inside a building. This addition to the existing
roll-off loading area would serve as storage for the sludge roll-offs to keep them from freezing and reduce odors. This addition will also be
available to house a second screw press and polymer tote storage.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
This addition could be heated with exhaust air from the Solids Handling Building, reducing costs. If a screw press was also housed in this
addition, electrical costs for pumping and press operation would be additional.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Wastewater Funds
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
356
CIP Project Fund
Wastewater Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
WW50
DEPARTMENT
WRF
PROJECT NAME
Refrigerated Automatic Sampler
FY18
$10,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Purchase a new refrigerated sampler for the influent, primary, and effluent.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: If the refrigerated sampler fails, samples have to be
taken manually every two hours and flow proportioned. This sample is not representative of the time period from 12:30 am until
7:00 am because the plant is unmanned during that time and no samples are taken. The manual samples are taken during the
highest loading on the facility and could result in an effluent limit violation.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: Manual sampling could induce errors that would make the composite sample
more or less concentrated that could result in a violation. An operator's time that would be spent doing other testing or
inspecting the facility is now collecting and measuring samples manually.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: Two of the three refrigerated samplers at the facility sample the in and
out going flows that are required to be tested for the facilities Discharge Monitoring Report.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Keep repairing old samplers until they fail.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: The refrigerated samplers have been repaired several times by replacing
worn out parts but if the computer control components fail the repair costs will be much higher. The samplers we are using have been in
service since 2000 and we have been replacing worn out parts. We need to start replacing them before the circuit boards fail.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
None
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Wastewater Funds
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
357
CIP Project Fund
Wastewater Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
WW53
DEPARTMENT
WRF
PROJECT NAME
Positive Displacement Lobe Pumps
FY18
$50,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The positive displacement lobe pumps will replace the older wasting pumps that cannot provide the necessary wasting rates.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Being able to remove the required amount of
microorganisms (WAS) from the Bio-Trains is a key factor in maintaining the facility's effluent quality. If the sludge in the wasting
hoppers in final clarifiers one thru three cannot be remove at a rate fast enough to keep the sludge from going anaerobic then
secondary phosphorus release will occur.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: The wasting system from Final Clarifiers numbers one, two, and
three would be serviced by these pumps.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: Positive displacement lobe pumps have a wider range of pumping speeds then
the current pumps in service on this system. Maintenance costs less and they are also easier to maintain then the older pumps.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: Pump WAS to the RST's at a rate that would maintain the proper F/M
ratio and prevent secondary phosphorus.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Do nothing.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: A decrease in facility effluent quality and an increase in pump
maintenance and cost. Controlling mixed liquor inventory is critical to producing high quality effluent. If solids in the mixed liquor cannot be
removed fast enough, total suspended solids will increase in the effluent which will also increase the total phosphorus to the river.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
No new operating costs. Replacement of the lobe pump may actually increase efficiency.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Wastewater Funds
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
358
CIP Project Fund
Wastewater Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
WW54
DEPARTMENT
Wastewater Operations
PROJECT NAME
Replace #1783 - 1995 Ford Dump Truck
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project will replace a 1995 Ford Dump Truck that has 25,396 miles on it.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: This dump truck would be used to haul material for the water,
storm and sanitary sewer departments. And can be loaned to the street department for their operations.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: Efficiency is improved due to a more reliable dump truck that can cut down on
the amount of trips we make by having multiple truck on site.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue to use older vehicle which is becoming unreliable and costly to maintain.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Will be a more fuel efficient and lower emissions vehicle. The new vehicle will improve safety of the crews, there would be lower repair costs
and it would help maintain current operations levels.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Using an older piece of equipment that becomes more unreliable.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Wastewater Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$95,000
FY21 FY22
359
CIP Project Fund
Wastewater Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
WW58
DEPARTMENT
WRF
PROJECT NAME
Chip Seal and Topcoat WRF Asphalt
FY18 FY19
$47,370
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Chip Seal and topcoat WRF Asphalt to keep it from deteriorating.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Without chip sealing and topcoat the asphalt will
deteriorate sooner requiring replacement.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: The 4.894 acres of asphalt at the WRF facility needs to be
protected to extend its useful life. Chip seal 0.402 acres and topcoat 4.492 acres.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: Protect the existing asphalt to extend its useful life.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Do nothing.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Deferring the chip seal and topcoat will allow the asphalt to deteriorate
sooner requiring its replacement sooner at a much higher cost to the City. Chip seal and topcoat will protect the existing City infrastructure.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
None
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Wastewater Funds
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
360
CIP Project Fund
Wastewater Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
WW65
DEPARTMENT
Wastewater Operations
PROJECT NAME
Digital Universal Camera - DUC
FY18
$70,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Digital Universal Camera
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: This camera is critical to accessing the condition of the
sewer main along with the Pipeline Assessment program we use. Our goal is to inspect the entire collection system once every 5
years.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: The Digital Universal Camera (DUC) is a semi-autonomous, high
resolution digital CCTV side scanning camera designed for rapid and detailed condition assessment of our wastewater system.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: This camera allows us to TV the main non-stop will allows us to increase the
amount of pipe we TV in a day up to 5 to 10 times more than the traditional stop and go method that we now use.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue to use the stop and go method (SAG) and take longer to TV the mains. We have a goal to TV the entire system every 5 years, this is
getting harder to do with the increasing growth of our collection system.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: As we gain more miles of main every year we will have to adjust our goal
of every main being televised once every five years to six or seven with the current stop and go technology we use.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Placing electronic equipment in raw sewage is hard to predict costs I believe there will be little or no more costs than our present camera.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Wastewater Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
361
CIP Project Fund
Wastewater Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
WW66
DEPARTMENT
WRF
PROJECT NAME
Odor Control For Old Pretreatment Building
FY18
$40,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Odor Control For Old Pretreatment Building
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Old Pretreatment Building odor (raw sewage) is vented
out the roof of the building next to Springhill Road which generates odor complaints. The open channel containing the raw
sewage emits corrosive gases into the building.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: Protect equipment in the building and reduced odor complaints.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Do nothing and run the risk of more odor complaints. Lack of enclosed and heated storage in the facility requires equipment to be parked in
the old pretreatment building. Equipment stored there is exposed to the corrosive atmosphere.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Continuation of odor complaints and the corrosion of unprotected metal
in the Old Pretreatment Building. Foul air from the sewer system coming into the old pretreatment building needs to be collected and treated.
This treatment will eliminate the odor complaints and corrosive atmosphere.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
No additional operating costs if another inline fan is not needed.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Wastewater Funds
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
362
CIP Project Fund
Wastewater Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
WW69
DEPARTMENT
WRF
PROJECT NAME
WRF Facility R&R
FY18
$50,000
FY19
$50,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
WRF Facility R&R
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Repair and replacement of equipment is an ongoing job
at the Bozeman WRF. These funds would be used to repair or replace equipment that fails unexpectedly in an emergency
situation.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: Any unscheduled repair or replacement of equipment within the
facility that would keep the facility running properly.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: An unforeseen mechanical failure needs to be remedied quickly to protect the
quality of facility effluent discharged into the East Gallatin.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: To repair or replace any equipment that fails and could compromise
facility performance.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Not having this fund would defer other needed maintenance.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Without these funds available repair or replacement of failed equipment
would depend on budgeted funds that may be allocated already. Most processes run 24/7 and have backup systems but when the first system
fails there is no backup system and repairs need to be made immediately. Not all repairs or equipment failures can be predicted and budgeted as
a capital improvement project.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
None
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Wastewater Funds
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$50,000
FY21
$50,000
FY22
$50,000
363
CIP Project Fund
Wastewater Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
WW70
DEPARTMENT
WRF
PROJECT NAME
WRF Facility Engineering & Optimization
FY18
$50,000
FY19
$50,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
WRF Facility Engineering & Optimization
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: This will allow engineering to be completed on needed
projects and to study plant optimization options before spending money on equipment that might not be needed or the proper
type.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: The entire facility
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: Additionally, this will allow studies to be conducted to make sure the proposed
plant optimizations will actually improve the effluent quality at a reasonable expense.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: This will allow engineering to be completed on needed projects and to
study plant optimization options before spending money on equipment that might not be needed or the proper type.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Order replacement or upgrades to equipment that may not be sized correctly or made of the proper materials. Proceed with optimization
projects without knowing if the project will actually improve plant performance.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Not having this will impede engineering needed for emergency projects
that will come up unexpectedly. It will allow for engineering studies of operational problems to find the most efficient way to correct the
problem. The advantage of having funds available to do engineering studies before any project is started will make sure that the right equipment
is purchased and that it will perform properly. Optimization studies will predict actual cost/benefit over time to make sure the city is spending
its money efficiently.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Currently unknown
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Wastewater Funds
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$50,000
FY21
$50,000
FY22
$50,000
364
CIP Project Fund
Wastewater Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
WW71
DEPARTMENT
WRF
PROJECT NAME
WRF Facility Master Plan Update
FY18
$250,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Facility Master Plan Update
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: The Master Plan Update will compare past predictions
of the loadings on the City's Water Reclamation Facility with current loadings.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: New projections will be made using these data trends to determine the best
course of action and sequencing of projects to meet the needs of the facility.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: The entire facility will be effected by this plan because it will plan for
facility expansion, side stream treatment and odor control among other things.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Not being proactive in predicting the best way to accommodate future loading at the Bozeman WRF will not fulfill the city’s needs to meet
future discharge limits.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: If the update plan is not conducted future needs of the facility may not be
scheduled in an logical manner or even recognized. Financial expenditures and bond obligations could be incurred without sound justification.
Bozeman’s rapid population growth dictates a review of the WRF’s treatment processes to make sure they will meet requirements now and in
the future. Establishing a clear incremental improvement process will prevent mistakes and eliminate inefficient spending of funds. New permit
and water quality regulations require an update of the master plan to ensure compliance over the next 15 years.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
No additional costs
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Wastewater Funds
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
365
CIP Project Fund
Wastewater Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
WW76
DEPARTMENT
WRF
PROJECT NAME
Third Pretreatment Screen
FY18 FY19
$300,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Purchase a third pretreatment screen and the engineering to properly install it.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: The two installed pretreatment screens are running
24/7 so there is no redundancy to the system.
How is capacity affected by this project: Adding a third screen will increase the capacity of pretreatment to handle increased
flows without bypassing the screens.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Preventing the clogging of pipes and pumps will preserve the effluent
quality of the facility.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: All equipment downstream of the screens will be better protected.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: Pipes and pumps that are not plugged run more efficiently and require less
energy to run.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: To protect the facility infrastructure.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Do nothing and run the risk of having to bypass the existing screens because they cannot handle the load coming into the plant.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Do nothing and run the risk of having to bypass the existing screens
because they cannot handle the load coming into the plant. Protecting downstream infrastructure by not having to bypass the screens.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Additional cost of electricity for the motors on the screen.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Wastewater Funds
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
366
CIP Project Fund
Wastewater Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
WW78
DEPARTMENT
WRF
PROJECT NAME
Server Replacement at WRF (WRFCTRLBAK)
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Replace the WRF server WRFCTRLBAK
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Wastewater Funds
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
$10,000
367
CIP Project Fund
Wastewater Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
WW79
DEPARTMENT
WRF
PROJECT NAME
WRF Improvements for Energy Sustainability
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$4,000,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Energy Recovery (Methane Cogeneration) Project Design and Construction
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: To generate electricity for excess methane gas, reduce
the carbon footprint of the facility and to add captured exhaust heat to the facility's heat loop.
How is connectivity affected by this project: This project supports the sustainability and green goals of the city.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: The carbon foot print of the Water Reclamation Facility will be
reduced.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: To generate electricity for excess methane gas and reduce the carbon footprint
of the facility.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: To generate electricity for excess methane gas, reduce the carbon
footprint of the facility and to add captured exhaust heat to the facility's heat loop. How is this project leveraged with other
stakeholders/projects/funds: The initial study for the project could identify other stakeholders such as Northwestern Energy.
Are there other affected projects: The facility could reduce its carbon footprint by using methane as an onsite fuel to generate
electricity. This would support the sustainability goals of the city.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue to flare our excess digester methane.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: To continue to flare excess methane and not benefit from the generated
electricity, reduced carbon footprint or additional captured heat.
Current plant excess methane gas will be captured and utilized to reduce plant operating costs. It supports the City's Municipal Climate Action
Plan goals.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Once construction is funded, this project will reduce energy costs of the facility.
FUNDING SOURCES
Wastewater Fund, other grants or community partners.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
368
CIP Project Fund
Wastewater Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
WW80
DEPARTMENT
WRF
PROJECT NAME
Lagoon Valve Replacement in Lift #3, Clean Out Replacement on Sludge Line to Lagoon; Pump, valves
FY18
$50,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Replace valves that cannot be opened or closed because of struvite deposits (replace 4 valves, blind flange 6 others). Replace
cleanouts in the sludge lagoon line so their orientation allows a complete cleaning of the sludge line. Put in pump valves and
piping so that sludge from the little lagoon can be pumped back through the pipe going out to the small lagoon.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: If the screw press fails or if a digester needs to be
emptied quickly Digester #3 has only a limited amount of storage so the sludge will need to be stored in the small lagoon. The
system serving the small lagoon needs to be fully functional.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: The small lagoon, the sludge line to the lagoon, Digester #3 and
the screw press.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: The small lagoon can be filled and mixed properly. The sludge line to the lagoon
can be cleaned in less time. Sludge in the small lagoon can be pumped back to Digester #3 and the screw press for dewatering
without having to be trucked back.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: This CIP supports the small lagoon sludge storage and the piping that
gets the sludge to and from the lagoon.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Do nothing and not be able to control flow to the small lagoon or even mix it. Sludge line to the small lagoon will not be cleaned properly.
Sludge pumped to the small lagoon will have to be trucked back to Digester #3.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Not being able to control flow to the small lagoon or even mix it. Sludge
line to the small lagoon will not be cleaned properly. Sludge pumped to the small lagoon will have to be trucked back to Digester #3. The small
lagoon can be used to store sludge when needed. The sludge line to the lagoon can be cleaned in less time. Sludge in the small lagoon can be
pumped back to Digester #3 and the screw press for dewatering without having to be trucked back.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
No additional costs unless positive displacement is used to pump sludge back to Digester #3.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Wastewater Funds
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
369
CIP Project Fund
Wastewater Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
WW81
DEPARTMENT
WRF
PROJECT NAME
Membrane Roof Replacement on Old Digester Building (Dig 1 & 2)
FY18
$60,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Repair or replacement of membrane roof covering on old digester building.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: The extent of damage to the roof is not known. Just
outside the door to the roof you step on the roof membrane and it is like walking on a thin water bed. An inspection and a
repair or replacement to the roof membrane needs to be conducted in the near future prevent damage to the buildings roof.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: The old digester building roof and infrastructure below.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: Protect the old digester building roof and equipment in the room
below.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Do nothing and see if more ceiling leaks occur.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Possible more damage to the old digester building roof. There has been
water under the roof membrane for several years (since 2004) and the extent of damage to the roof is unknown. Repair or replacement of the
roof membrane would stop the leaks that pour water into the room below during rain events.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
No additional costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Wastewater Funds
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
370
CIP Project Fund
Wastewater Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
WW83
DEPARTMENT
WRF
PROJECT NAME
UFAT Gravity Thickener Drive and Arms Replacement
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Replacement of the gravity thickener deteriorating mechanism.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: The gravity Thickener thickens elutriated fermented
sludge before it is sent to the digester thus increasing detention time in the digesters.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: The Gravity Thickener is second stage of the UFAT system that
generates Volatile Fatty Acids that are an energy source for the Phosphorus Accumulating Organisms. These POA's are what
remove the phosphorus from the wastewater.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: The gravity Thickener thickens elutriated fermented sludge before it is sent to
the digester thus increasing detention time in the digesters.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: To thicken sludge before is pumped to the digester which increases
the digester efficiency.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: The failure of the gravity thickener and UFAT system. Installation
planning and purchase of the drive and arms will allow a scheduled shutdown rather than a quick fix when the drive fails.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
No additional costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
Not known at this time.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
$400,000
371
CIP Project Fund
Wastewater Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
WW84
DEPARTMENT
WRF
PROJECT NAME
Server Replacement at WRF (WRFCTRLPRI)
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Replace the WRF server WRFCTRLPRI
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Wastewater Funds
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
$10,000
372
CIP Project Fund
Wastewater Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
WW85
DEPARTMENT
WRF
PROJECT NAME
WRF Process Upgrades to Improve Nutrient Recovery
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$10,000,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The study and construction of nutrient recovery processes to capture nitrogen and phosphorus from anaerobically digested
sludge.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Recovery of the limiting element phosphorus, in the
form of struvite, is critical to the production of food. The present market value of recovered phosphorus (struvite) is
approximately $200 to $300 dollars a ton but its value will increase as the easily minable phosphorus rock deposits are depleted.
How is capacity affected by this project: Nutrient recovery will reduce the nutrient load on the facility from the screw press
supernatant that has to be returned to the head of the facility for treatment therefore increasing its capacity.
How is connectivity affected by this project: This project supports the sustainability and green goals of the city.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Nutrient recovery will reduce the nutrient load on the facility from
the screw press supernatant that has to be returned to the head of the facility for treatment. Reducing the load will increase the
facility efficiency so that the effluent quality will be maintained.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: Nutrient recovery will reduce the nutrient load on the facility from the screw
press supernatant that has to be returned to the head of the facility for treatment therefore increasing its capacity.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: The recovery and reuse of nutrients from the waste stream would
complete the phosphorus nutrient cycle and support the sustainability goals of the city. The use of this nutrient recovered
fertilizer would reduce the possibility of groundwater contamination.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: The initial study for the project could identify other
stakeholders.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Do nothing and loose a commodity that is a bi-product of anaerobic digestion
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Not proceeding with nutrient recovery falls short of the sustainability
goals of the City. The production of magnesium ammonium phosphate to be sold as a slow release fertilizer will recycle limited nutrients back
into the ecosystem. This process will reduce the nitrogen and phosphorus in our side stream returning to the head of the plant which will in
turn reduce the loading on the process.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Maintenance and operating costs that will be off set by income from the sale of the slow release fertilizer.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Wastewater Funds
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
373
CIP Project Fund
Wastewater Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
WW86
DEPARTMENT
Wastewater Operations
PROJECT NAME
Wheeled Excavator
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$151,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This would be a trac hoe excavator with wheels instead tracks.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: It is a critical piece of machinery in our department.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: Water, sewer, and stormwater
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: Because it can move more dirt quicker.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: Can be split with water.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue to use smaller equipment.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Continue using smaller equipment that task longer to do the work due
to it's size. Increased productivity with larger excavator.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
N/A
FUNDING SOURCES
50% Water Fund, 50% Wastewater Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
374
Wa
s
t
e
w
a
t
e
r
Im
p
a
c
t
Fe
e
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
Pl
a
n
Fi
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
Su
m
m
a
r
y
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Ye
a
r
FY
1
7
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
F
Y
2
0
F
Y
2
1
F
Y
2
2
Unscheduled
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
Re
s
e
r
v
e
Ba
l
a
n
c
e
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
1,
4
7
9
,
0
0
0
$
(1
3
5
,
9
1
2
)
$
(3
5
4
,
7
6
2
)
$
12
7
,
4
4
6
$
673,763
$
1,287,397 $ ‐$
Pl
u
s
:
Im
p
a
c
t
Fe
e
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
1,
1
0
3
,
5
0
0
$
1,
2
2
1
,
1
5
0
$
1,
2
8
2
,
2
0
8
$
1,
3
4
6
,
3
1
8
$
1,413,634
$
1,484,315 $ ‐$
Pl
u
s
:
Lo
a
n
s
fo
r
WW
I
F
1
1
,
WW
I
F
2
0
2,
1
8
5
,
0
0
0
$
5,
2
9
0
,
0
0
0
$
Pl
u
s
:
De
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
Co
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
Fr
o
m
WW
I
F
2
6
63
1
,
8
3
7
$
Le
s
s
:
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
d
CI
P
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Co
s
t
s
(3
,
3
5
0
,
2
4
9
)
$
(1
,
4
4
0
,
0
0
0
)
$
(2
,
9
8
5
,
0
0
0
)
$
(6
,
0
9
0
,
0
0
0
)
$
(800,000)
$
(800,000)$ (6,018,035)$
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Ye
a
r
‐En
d
Ca
s
h
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
(1
3
5
,
9
1
2
)
$
(3
5
4
,
7
6
2
)
$
12
7
,
4
4
6
$
67
3
,
7
6
3
$
1,287,397
$
1,971,713 $
As
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
s
Ma
d
e
fo
r
Re
v
e
n
u
e
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
s
:
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Ye
a
r
FY
1
7
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
FY21 FY22
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
An
n
u
a
l
Wa
s
t
e
w
a
t
e
r
Im
p
a
c
t
Fe
e
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
1,
1
0
3
,
5
0
0
$
1,
1
6
3
,
0
0
0
$
1,
2
2
1
,
1
5
0
$
1,
2
8
2
,
2
0
8
$
1,346,318
$
1,413,634 $
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
An
n
u
a
l
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
0.
0
%
5%
5%
5%
5%5%
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
1,
1
0
3
,
5
0
0
$
1,
2
2
1
,
1
5
0
$
1,
2
8
2
,
2
0
8
$
1,
3
4
6
,
3
1
8
$
1,413,634
$
1,484,315 $
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
%
10
0
.
0
%
10
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
Pl
u
s
:
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
Wa
s
t
e
w
a
t
e
r
Ca
p
a
c
i
t
y
Ex
p
a
n
s
i
o
n
CI
P
0.
0
%
0.
0
%
0.
0
%
0.
0
%
0.0%0.0%
To
t
a
l
% De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
10
0
.
0
%
10
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
1,
1
0
3
,
5
0
0
$
1,
2
2
1
,
1
5
0
$
1,
2
8
2
,
2
0
8
$
1,
3
4
6
,
3
1
8
$
1,413,634
$
1,484,315 $
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
CU
R
R
E
N
T
7,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
6,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
5,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
4,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
3,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
2,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
1,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
0
Wa
s
t
e
w
a
t
e
r
Im
p
a
c
t
Fe
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
375
CI
P
PR
O
J
E
C
T
FU
PR
O
J
.
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
PR
O
J
E
C
T
NA
M
E
Unscheduled
FY
2
1
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
FY22
Im
p
a
c
t
Fe
e
s
Wa
s
t
e
w
a
t
e
r
WW
I
F
1
1
WW
IM
P
A
C
T
FE
FR
O
N
T
ST
R
E
E
T
IN
T
E
R
C
E
P
T
O
R
$2
,
1
8
5
,
0
0
0
WW
I
F
2
0
WW
IM
P
A
C
T
FE
N FR
O
N
T
A
G
E
RD
IN
T
E
R
C
E
P
T
O
R
$5
,
2
9
0
,
0
0
0
WW
I
F
2
2
WW
IM
P
A
C
T
FE
E
S
DA
V
I
S
‐FO
W
L
E
R
IN
T
E
R
C
E
P
T
O
R
(D
U
R
S
T
O
N
RD
TO
W OA
K
ST
)
$778,035
WW
I
F
2
4
WW
IM
P
A
C
T
FE
DA
V
I
S
LA
N
E
(L
I
F
T
ST
A
T
I
O
N
)
$1,200,000
WW
I
F
2
7
WW
IM
P
A
C
T
FE
E
S
SO
U
T
H
UN
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
DI
S
T
R
I
C
T
/
C
A
T
T
A
I
L
CR
E
E
K
BA
S
I
N
‐
S 15
T
H
AV
E
TO
WI
L
L
O
W
WA
Y
TO
W LI
N
C
O
L
N
ST
$7
9
5
,
0
0
0
WW
I
F
3
1
WW
IM
P
A
C
T
FE
E
S
DA
V
I
S
LN
LI
F
T
ST
A
T
I
O
N
,
IN
T
E
R
C
E
P
T
O
R
,
AN
D
FO
R
C
E
MA
I
N
$6
4
5
,
0
0
0
WW
I
F
3
2
WW
IM
P
A
C
T
FE
HI
D
D
E
N
VA
L
L
E
Y
(L
I
F
T
ST
A
T
I
O
N
)
$3,240,000
WW
I
F
3
3
WW
IM
P
A
C
T
FE
DA
V
I
S
LN
LI
F
T
ST
A
T
I
O
N
DE
B
T SE
R
V
I
C
E
$8
0
0
,
0
0
0
$800,000
$8
0
0
,
0
0
0
$8
0
0
,
0
0
0
$800,000
Su
m
m
a
r
y f or
Im
p ac
t
Fe
e
s
Wa
s
t
e
w
a
t
e
r
(8 it
e
m
s
)
To
t
a
l
s
by
ye
a
r
:
$8
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
8
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
,
4
4
0
,
0
0
0
$6,018,035
FY
2
1
FY22
FY
1
8
Unscheduled
FY
2
0
$6
,
0
9
0
,
0
0
0
$2
,
9
8
5
,
0
0
0
FY
1
9
*
*
*
376
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Wastewater
PROJECT NUMBER
WWIF11
DEPARTMENT
WW IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
Front Street Interceptor
FY18 FY19
$2,185,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project consists of construction of ~8,500 LF 18", 21", 24" sewer pipe from manhole E0304 to C0524.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Without this wastewater interceptor development in
the vicinity of Bozeman Deaconess Health Services as well as the remainder of The Village Downtown property will not be able
to occur.
How is capacity affected by this project: The downstream portion of the existing sewer is already at capacity. Additional capacity is
needed to serve future development in the vicinity of Bozeman Deaconess Hospital and lands to the south.
How is connectivity affected by this project: This interceptor provides sewer for Upper Bozeman Creek Basin.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: There are no risk or safety issues mitigated by this project.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Conformance with the City's Wastewater Master Plan.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: It is estimated that 70% of this project costs will be due to
capacity expansion and will be eligible for Wastewater Impact Fees. The remaining 30% of the project costs will need to be
provided by a "local share" contribution or other source.
Are there other affected projects: This project will provide sewer capacity in the area of Bozeman Deaconess Health Services.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Limit development to only that capacity of the existing sewer.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
This project will significantly increase the service area and capacity of the trunk sewer.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Impact fees can not fund operating and maintenance costs. The city’s wastewater utility will pay for
these costs, which are estimated to be a small increment of the city’s system as a whole.
FUNDING SOURCES
70% Wastewater Impact Fees = $1,529,864 30% Wastewater Impact Fees for Local Share = $655,656, recovered via payback district(s).
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
*
377
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Wastewater
PROJECT NUMBER
WWIF20
DEPARTMENT
WW IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
N Frontage Rd Interceptor
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project will replace or parallel 11,500' of the North Frontage Road interceptor between Springhill Rd and Bridger Dr.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Portions of the interceptor are at or very near capacity
and unless improvements are made it will be at or over capacity when the tributary obligated areas are developed.
How is capacity affected by this project: Directly increases collection capacity in the southeast and east parts of the city.
Development in the southeast part of town within the Community Plan Boundary as well as the east part of town will be
tributary to this North Frontage Road Interceptor.
How is connectivity affected by this project: This project will provide capacity to new development within the existing city limits.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Conformance with the City's Wastewater Master Plan.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: It is estimated that 70% of this project costs will be due to
capacity expansion and will be eligible for Wastewater Impact Fees. The remaining 30% of the project costs will need to be
provided by a "local share" contribution or other source.
Are there other affected projects: There are potentially a great number of private development projects which will not be able to
proceed due to the lack of wastewater collection capacity.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Limit future development in the area.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
If constructed to the line sizes master planned in the City’s Wastewater Facilities plan, capacity will be provided for future growth tributary to
this main.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Impact fees can not fund operating and maintenance costs. The city’s wastewater utility will pay for
these costs, which are estimated to be a small increment of the city’s system as a whole.
FUNDING SOURCES
Wastewater Impact Fees, with local share recovered via payback district(s)
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$5,290,000
FY21 FY22
*
378
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Wastewater
PROJECT NUMBER
WWIF22
DEPARTMENT
WW IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
Davis-Fowler Interceptor (Durston Rd to W Oak St)
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$778,035
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project will replace or parallel 2700' of the Davis-Fowler Interceptor between Durston and Oak.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: The interceptor between Durston Rd and W Oak will
eventually exceed capacity as the Baxter Creek drainage basin develops.
How is capacity affected by this project: In order to convey the ultimate build-out flow, the interceptor will need to be increased
from an 18-inch diameter to a 24-inch diameter pipe.
How is connectivity affected by this project: This interceptor provides sewer for Baxter Creek and Cattail Creek Basins.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Limit future development in the area.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
If constructed to the line sizes master planned in the City’s Wastewater Facilities plan, capacity will be provided for anticipating the long-term
future growth in this area
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Impact fees can not fund operating and maintenance costs. The city’s wastewater utility will pay for
these costs, which are estimated to be a small increment of the city’s system as a whole.
FUNDING SOURCES
Wastewater Impact Fees, with local share recovered via payback district
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
379
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Wastewater
PROJECT NUMBER
WWIF24
DEPARTMENT
WW IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
Davis Lane (Lift Station)
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$1,200,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Complete the buildout of Davis Ln Lift Station
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Limit future development in the area.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
If constructed to the line sizes master planned in the City’s Wastewater Facilities plan, capacity will be provided for anticipating the long-term
future growth in this area
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Impact fees can not fund operating and maintenance costs. The city’s wastewater utility will pay for
these costs, which are estimated to be a small increment of the city’s system as a whole.
FUNDING SOURCES
Wastewater Impact Fees, with local share recovered via payback district
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
380
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Wastewater
PROJECT NUMBER
WWIF27
DEPARTMENT
WW IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
South University District/Cattail Creek Basin - S 15th Ave to Willow Way to W Lincoln St
FY18
$795,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project consists of extending the sewer main to service the South University District area with a 10-inch sewer pipe.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: As described in the 2015 Wastewater Facility Plan, there
is little potential to accommodate additional flow from this area through existing pipe network, therefore, if capacity is not added
no further development in this area can be supported. Since this area is especially suited to housing for University students and
since the University continues to grow in population the community needs are best accommodated if collection capacity is
increased.
How is capacity affected by this project: This interceptor will support an average day flow value of 1,456 gallons per acre.
How is connectivity affected by this project: This sewer pipe will serve the area generally between Lincoln and University Way,
and South 19th and the vacant land to the west of Spectators.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Conformance with the City's Wastewater Master Plan.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: It is estimated that 50% of this project costs will be due to
capacity expansion and will be eligible for Wastewater Impact Fees. The remaining 50% of the project costs will need to be
provided by a "local share" contribution or other source.
Are there other affected projects: There are potentially a great number of private development projects which will not be able to
proceed due to the lack of wastewater collection capacity.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Limit future development in the area.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
If constructed to the line sizes master planned in the City’s Wastewater Facilities plan, capacity will be provided for anticipating the long-term
future growth in this area
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Impact fees can not fund operating and maintenance costs. The city’s wastewater utility will pay for
these costs, which are estimated to be a small increment of the city’s system as a whole.
FUNDING SOURCES
Wastewater Impact Fees, with local share recovered via payback district
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
*
381
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Wastewater
PROJECT NUMBER
WWIF31
DEPARTMENT
WW IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
Davis Ln Lift Station, Interceptor, and Force Main
FY18
$645,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project will provide initial funding for oversizing the Davis Ln Lift Station not included in the funding package for the Billings
Clinic. This will include oversizing the wet well capacity and sanitary sewer freeway crossing to accommodate peak hour flows up
to 6.2 MGD.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: This will be the City's portion of the initial Davis Ln Lift
Station upsizing construction that is not included in the Billings Clinic funding.
How is capacity affected by this project: Sanitary sewer capacity will be increased for development in the western portion of the
community.
How is connectivity affected by this project: This lift station serves development north of the Cattail Lake Lift Station.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Conformance with the City's Wastewater Master Plan.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: The Billings Clinic will finance the lift station, and the City
will reimburse the Billings Clinic for the City's portion over 5 years. The Billings Clinic will not be reimbursed for their portion of
the lift station capacity, which is estimates as 8% of the capacity of the initial lift station construction.
Are there other affected projects: Yes, we may want to consider building the Norton East Ranch Outfall Diversion with this
project. Construction of the Diversion will take pressure off the existing Baxter Meadows Lift Station and limit the need to
upgrade that lift station farther into the future. Additionally, the Norton East Ranch Diversion would reduce early operational
challenges in the Davis Lane Lift Station due to odors associated with minimal flows.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
This will pay off the City's portion of the Davis Ln Lift Station
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Impact fees can not fund operating and maintenance costs. The city’s wastewater utility will pay for
these costs, which are estimated to be a small increment of the city’s system as a whole.
FUNDING SOURCES
Billings Clinic is constructing the Lift Station and will provide a payback district for the City's portion of the financing.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
382
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Wastewater
PROJECT NUMBER
WWIF32
DEPARTMENT
WW IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
Hidden Valley (Lift Station)
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$3,240,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Design and Construct Hidden Valley Lift Station and Force Main
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Service area expansion of the City's sanitary sewer
collection system.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Conformance with the City's Wastewater Collection Facilities Plan
Are there other affected projects: The Davis Lane Lift Station must be upgraded to accommodate flows from the Hidden Valley
Lift Station when the Hidden Valley Lift Station is constructed.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Limit development on the northwestern edge of of the City due to no sanitary sewer availability.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased service area of the City's sanitary sewer system.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Operating costs will be paid from the City's sewer enterprise fund.
FUNDING SOURCES
Payback district or other local share contribution from development at the time of construction.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
383
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Wastewater
PROJECT NUMBER
WWIF33
DEPARTMENT
WW IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
Davis Ln Lift Station Debt Service
FY18 FY19
$800,000
Unscheduled
$800,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project will provide a debt service payment for the City's portion of the Davis Ln Lift Station.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: If we do not fund this debit service, the City will be in
default of our loan.
How is capacity affected by this project: Sanitary sewer capacity will be increased for development in the western portion of the
community.
How is connectivity affected by this project: This lift station serves development north of the Cattail Lake Lift Station.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Conformance with the City's Wastewater Master Plan.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: The Billings Clinic will finance the lift station, and the City
will reimburse the Billings Clinic for the City's portion over 5 years. The Billings Clinic will not be reimbursed for their portion of
the lift station capacity, which is estimates as 8% of the capacity of the initial lift station construction.
Are there other affected projects: Yes, we may want to consider building the Norton East Ranch Outfall Diversion with this
project. Construction of the Diversion will take pressure off the existing Baxter Meadows Lift Station and limit the need to
upgrade that lift station farther into the future. Additionally, the Norton East Ranch Diversion would reduce early operational
challenges in the Davis Lane Lift Station due to odors associated with minimal flows.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
This will pay off the City's portion of the Davis Ln Lift Station
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Impact fees can not fund operating and maintenance costs. The city’s wastewater utility will pay for
these costs, which are estimated to be a small increment of the city’s system as a whole.
FUNDING SOURCES
Billings Clinic is constructing the Lift Station and will provide a payback agreement for the City's portion of the financing, to be paid back with
interest over a 5-year period. Repayments are expected to being in the year following construction.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$800,000
FY21
$800,000
FY22
$800,000
384
Wa
t
e
r
Fu
n
d
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
Pl
a
n
Fi
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
Su
m
m
a
r
y
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Ye
a
r
FY
1
7
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
F
Y
2
0
F
Y
2
1
F
Y
2
2
Unscheduled
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
Re
s
e
r
v
e
Ba
l
a
n
c
e
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
55
3
,
7
9
1
$
15
5
,
4
0
4
$
60
0
,
8
2
3
$
(1
,
2
7
1
,
0
6
9
)
$
(4
8
0
,
4
2
0
)
$
1,769,678 $ ‐$
Pl
u
s
:
Wa
t
e
r
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
1,
7
0
2
,
0
1
4
$
2,
2
1
2
,
6
1
9
$
2,
7
7
0
,
0
2
8
$
2,
8
5
3
,
1
2
9
$
3,
8
8
6
,
6
9
8
$
4,003,299 $ ‐$
Pl
u
s
:
Lo
a
n
fo
r
Hy
a
l
i
t
e
Da
m
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
W7
9
4,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
Pl
u
s
:
Lo
a
n
fo
r
Au
t
o
m
a
t
i
o
n
Up
g
r
a
d
e
s
W7
1
6,710,000 $
Pl
u
s
:
Lo
a
n
fo
r
Me
c
h
a
n
i
c
a
l
Up
g
r
a
d
e
s
W7
2
1,
7
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
Pl
u
s
:
Lo
a
n
fo
r
Ly
m
a
n
Ta
n
k
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
WI
F
3
5
3,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
Le
s
s
:
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
d
CI
P
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Co
s
t
s
(2
,
1
0
0
,
4
0
1
)
$
(3
,
5
1
7
,
2
0
0
)
$
(4
,
6
4
1
,
9
2
0
)
$
(2
,
0
6
2
,
4
8
0
)
$
(8
,
8
3
6
,
6
0
0
)
$
(10,363,400)$ (3,464,439)$
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Ye
a
r
‐En
d
Ca
s
h
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
15
5
,
4
0
4
$
60
0
,
8
2
3
$
(1
,
2
7
1
,
0
6
9
)
$
(4
8
0
,
4
2
0
)
$
1,
7
6
9
,
6
7
8
$
2,119,578 $ (3,464,439)$
As
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
s
Ma
d
e
fo
r
Re
v
e
n
u
e
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
s
:
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Ye
a
r
FY
1
7
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
F
Y
2
0
F
Y
2
1
F
Y
2
2
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
An
n
u
a
l
Wa
t
e
r
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
8,
1
0
4
,
8
3
0
$
8,
1
0
4
,
8
3
0
$
8,
5
1
0
,
0
7
2
$
8,
9
3
5
,
5
7
5
$
9,
2
0
3
,
6
4
2
$
9,479,752 $
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
An
n
u
a
l
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
0.
0
%
5.
0
%
5.
0
%
3.
0
%
3
.
0
%
3.0%
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
8,
1
0
4
,
8
3
0
$
8,
5
1
0
,
0
7
2
$
8,
9
3
5
,
5
7
5
$
9,
2
0
3
,
6
4
2
$
9,
4
7
9
,
7
5
2
$
9,764,144 $
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
%
21
.
0
%
21
.
0
%
2
6
.
0
%
3
1
.
0
%
3
1
.
0
%
4
1
.
0
%
Pl
u
s
:
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
0.
0
%
5.
0
%
5.
0
%
0.
0
%
1
0
.
0
%
0.0%
To
t
a
l
% De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
21
.
0
%
26
.
0
%
3
1
.
0
%
3
1
.
0
%
4
1
.
0
%
4
1
.
0
%
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
1,
7
0
2
,
0
1
4
$
2,
2
1
2
,
6
1
9
$
2,
7
7
0
,
0
2
8
$
2,
8
5
3
,
1
2
9
$
3,
8
8
6
,
6
9
8
$
4,003,299 $
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
CU
R
R
E
N
T
12
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
10
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
8,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
6,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
4,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
2,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
0
Wa
t
e
r
Fu
n
d
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
& Eq
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
385
CI
P
PR
O
J
E
C
T
FU
PR
O
J
.
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
PR
O
J
E
C
T
NA
M
E
Unscheduled
FY
2
1
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
FY22
Wa
t
e
r
Fu
n
d
PW
0
4
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
ON
CO
R
N
E
R
OF
AS
P
E
N
&
RO
U
S
E
$0
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
W0
3
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
AN
N
U
A
L
WA
T
E
R
PI
P
E
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
PR
O
G
R
A
M
‐
DE
S
I
G
N
$2
2
,
5
0
0
$2
2
,
5
0
0
$2
2
,
5
0
0
$2
2
,
5
0
0
$22,500
W0
4
‐18
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
WA
T
E
R
PI
P
E
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
20
1
8
$1
,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
W0
4
‐19
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
WA
T
E
R
PI
P
E
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
20
1
9
$1
,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
W0
4
‐20
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
WA
T
E
R
PI
P
E
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
20
2
0
$1
,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
W0
4
‐21
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
WA
T
E
R
PI
P
E
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
20
2
1
$1
,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
W0
4
‐22
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
WA
T
E
R
PI
P
E
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
20
2
2
$1,200,000
GF
2
2
7
Fi
n
a
n
c
e
ER
P
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
"S
U
N
G
A
R
D
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
/
U
P
G
R
A
D
E
"
$333,333
GI
S
0
3
GI
S
AS
S
E
T
MA
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
SO
F
T
W
A
R
E
$5
0
,
0
0
0
GI
S
0
4
GI
S
AE
R
I
A
L
PH
O
T
O
G
R
A
P
H
Y
$8
5
,
0
0
0
$8
5
,
0
0
0
GI
S
0
5
GI
S
LI
D
A
R
$7
5
,
0
0
0
GI
S
0
6
GI
S
GP
S
SY
S
T
E
M
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
$1
7
,
5
0
0
$1
7
,
5
0
0
GI
S
0
8
GI
S
LA
R
G
E
FO
R
M
A
T
PL
O
T
T
E
R
‐
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
$2
0
,
0
0
0
GI
S
1
2
GI
S
FM
E
SE
R
V
E
R
$1
5
,
0
0
0
GI
S
1
1
PU
B
W
O
R
K
S
AD
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
S
$1
6
,
1
0
0
$1
5
,
2
0
0
$1
4
,
8
0
0
$2
2
,
1
0
0
$17,900
GI
S
1
3
PU
B
W
O
R
K
S
AD
LO
N
G
TE
R
M
SH
O
P
S
MA
S
T
E
R
PL
A
N
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
PW
0
3
PU
B
W
O
R
K
S
AD
M
I
N
VE
H
I
C
L
E
MA
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
DE
S
I
G
N
&
ST
O
R
A
G
E
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$5
0
,
0
0
0
GI
S
1
4
SC
A
D
A
SC
A
D
A
UP
G
R
A
D
E
S
& IM
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
$2,100,000
GI
S
1
5
SC
A
D
A
SC
A
D
A
MA
S
T
E
R
PL
A
N
$1
5
0
,
0
0
0
W6
6
SC
A
D
A
ME
T
E
R
S
,
TR
A
N
S
D
U
C
E
R
S
&
CO
M
M
U
N
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
(R
E
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
SC
A
D
A
RA
D
I
O
& ST
R
A
P
ON
FL
O
W
ME
T
E
R
)
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$10,000
WC
0
1
Wa
t
e
r
Co
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
LA
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
AR
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
ME
D
I
A
N
S
AN
D
BO
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
S
$4
5
,
0
0
0
WC
0
2
Wa
t
e
r
Co
n
s
e
r
v
ME
T
E
R
SO
F
T
W
A
R
E
SU
B
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
$3
6
,
0
0
0
$6
0
,
0
0
0
$3
6
,
0
0
0
$3
6
,
0
0
0
$36,000
386
CI
P
PR
O
J
E
C
T
FU
PR
O
J
.
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
PR
O
J
E
C
T
NA
M
E
Unscheduled
FY
2
1
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
FY22
WC
0
4
Wa
t
e
r
Co
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
DR
O
U
G
H
T
TO
L
E
R
A
N
T
DE
M
O
N
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
GA
R
D
E
N
$4
5
,
0
0
0
WI
F
3
5
WA
T
E
R
IM
P
A
C
T
FE
E
S
LY
M
A
N
TA
N
K
AN
D
TR
A
N
S
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
MA
I
N
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$3
,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
WI
F
3
9
WA
T
E
R
IM
P
A
C
T
FE
E
S
SO
U
R
D
O
U
G
H
TR
A
N
S
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
MA
I
N
–
PH
A
S
E
1
$3
1
0
,
0
0
0
WI
F
4
0
WA
T
E
R
IM
P
A
C
T
FE
E
S
SO
U
R
D
O
U
G
H
TR
A
N
S
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
MA
I
N
–
PH
A
S
E
2
$4
8
0
,
0
0
0
WI
F
4
5
WA
T
E
R
IM
P
A
C
T
FE
E
S
DE
B
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
FO
R
BO
R
R
O
W
I
N
G
‐
TR
A
N
S
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
MA
I
N
$3
0
,
0
0
0
$420,000 $30,000
ST
R
6
7
WA
T
E
R
OP
S
CO
V
E
R
E
D
ST
O
R
A
G
E
AT
SH
O
P
S
CO
M
P
L
E
X
$50,000
W4
7
WA
T
E
R
OP
S
RE
P
L
A
C
E
#2
6
4
7
‐
19
9
8
1/
2
TO
N
CH
E
V
Y
PI
C
K
U
P
$2
7
,
0
0
0
W4
9
WA
T
E
R
OP
S
RE
P
L
A
C
E
#3
0
7
8
‐
20
0
2
1/
2
TO
N
CH
E
V
Y
PI
C
K
U
P
$27,000
W5
1
WA
T
E
R
OP
S
RE
P
L
A
C
E
#2
5
2
9
‐
19
9
7
1 TO
N
CH
E
V
Y
TR
U
C
K
/
V
A
L
V
E
TR
U
C
K
$4
5
,
0
0
0
W6
8
WA
T
E
R
OP
S
WH
E
E
L
E
D
EX
C
A
V
A
T
O
R
$151,000
W6
9
WA
T
E
R
OP
S
WA
T
E
R
SY
S
T
E
M
CO
N
D
I
T
I
O
N
AS
S
E
S
S
M
E
N
T
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$100,000
W7
0
WA
T
E
R
OP
S
RE
D
U
N
D
A
N
T
NO
R
T
H
50
3
8
ZO
N
E
FE
E
D
$6
6
,
8
8
0
W7
1
WA
T
E
R
OP
S
PR
V
PH
A
S
E
2 ‐
AU
T
O
M
A
T
I
O
N
AN
D
IN
S
T
R
U
M
E
N
T
A
T
I
O
N
UP
G
R
A
D
E
S
$6,710,000
W7
2
WA
T
E
R
OP
S
PR
V
PH
A
S
E
1 ‐
ME
C
H
A
N
I
C
A
L
AN
D
ST
R
U
C
T
U
R
A
L
UP
G
R
A
D
E
S
$1
,
7
5
0
,
0
0
0
W7
3
WA
T
E
R
OP
S
PR
V
AB
A
N
D
O
N
M
E
N
T
S
(A
P
P
R
O
X
I
M
A
T
E
L
Y
6
SI
T
E
S
)
$510,106
W7
4
WA
T
E
R
OP
S
PE
A
R
ST
.
BO
O
S
T
E
R
ST
A
T
I
O
N
UP
G
R
A
D
E
$5
4
7
,
0
0
0
W7
5
WA
T
E
R
OP
S
LE
A
D
SE
R
V
I
C
E
LI
N
E
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
W5
6
WT
P
WT
P
FA
C
I
L
I
T
Y
R&
R
$4
0
,
0
0
0
$4
0
,
0
0
0
$4
0
,
0
0
0
$4
0
,
0
0
0
$40,000
W5
7
WT
P
WT
P
FA
C
I
L
I
T
Y
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
&
OP
T
I
M
I
Z
A
T
I
O
N
$2
0
,
0
0
0
$2
0
,
0
0
0
$2
0
,
0
0
0
$2
0
,
0
0
0
$20,000
W5
8
WT
P
MO
D
U
L
E
RE
P
L
A
C
E
FU
N
D
$5
0
,
0
0
0
$5
0
,
0
0
0
$5
0
,
0
0
0
$5
0
,
0
0
0
$50,000
W5
9
WT
P
RE
P
L
A
C
E
#1
4
2
2
‐
19
9
2
TO
Y
O
T
A
PI
C
K
U
P
$3
0
,
0
0
0
387
CI
P
PR
O
J
E
C
T
FU
PR
O
J
.
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
PR
O
J
E
C
T
NA
M
E
Unscheduled
FY
2
1
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
FY22
W6
3
WT
P
SO
U
R
D
O
U
G
H
WA
T
E
R
S
H
E
D
FU
E
L
RE
D
U
C
T
I
O
N
$4
0
0
,
0
0
0
W7
7
WT
P
CO
N
T
R
O
L
SE
R
V
E
R
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
$2
5
,
0
0
0
W7
8
WT
P
HI
L
L
T
O
P
TA
N
K
IN
S
P
E
C
T
I
O
N
AN
D
MI
X
I
N
G
SY
S
T
E
M
$2
6
1
,
1
2
0
W7
9
WT
P
HY
A
L
I
T
E
DA
M
AN
D
RE
S
E
R
V
O
I
R
OP
T
I
M
I
Z
A
T
I
O
N
IM
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
$4
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
W8
0
WT
P
WA
T
E
R
S
H
E
D
& RE
S
E
R
V
O
I
R
OP
T
I
M
I
Z
A
T
I
O
N
ST
U
D
Y
$1
5
0
,
0
0
0
W8
1
WT
P
CO
M
M
U
N
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
TO
W
E
R
AT
TH
E
SO
U
R
D
O
U
G
H
RE
S
E
R
V
O
I
R
.
$2
5
,
0
0
0
W8
2
WT
P
LY
M
A
N
TR
A
N
S
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
MA
I
N
CO
N
D
I
T
I
O
N
AS
S
E
S
S
M
E
N
T
$1
5
0
,
0
0
0
W8
3
WT
P
SO
U
R
D
O
U
G
H
IN
T
A
K
E
IM
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
$2,000,000
W8
4
WT
P
SO
U
R
D
O
U
G
H
TA
N
K
IN
S
P
E
C
T
I
O
N
AN
D
IM
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
$5
0
0
,
0
0
0
Su
m
m
a
r
y f or
Wa
t
e
r
Fu
n
d
(52
it
e
m
s
)
To
t
a
l
s
by
ye
a
r
:
$8
,
8
3
6
,
6
0
0
$10,363,400
$3
,
5
1
7
,
2
0
0
$3,464,439
FY
2
1
FY22
FY
1
8
Unscheduled
FY
2
0
$2
,
0
6
2
,
4
8
0
$4
,
6
4
1
,
9
2
0
FY
1
9
388
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF227
DEPARTMENT
Finance
PROJECT NAME
ERP Replacement "SunGard Replacement/Upgrade"
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$333,333
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
ERP Replacement "SunGard Replacement/Upgrade"
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue running current SunGard package. Use SunGard.net (Naviline EDGE) as an improvement to the current system, but not a full
replacement.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Simplified package. Easier to integrate the various applications/programs. Easier to pull out information for end users. Easier compilation of
Commission reports and packets for Community Development.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Unknown. Dependent on the option chosen.
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund 33%; Water Fund 33%; Wastewater Fund 33%
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
389
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GIS03
DEPARTMENT
GIS
PROJECT NAME
Asset Management Software
FY18 FY19
$50,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Purchase Asset Management Software.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Managing infrastructure efficiently continues to be one
of the top priorities and goals of the Bozeman City Commission.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: Assets maintained by this equipment include the water distribution
system, wastewater collection system, and the stormwater system.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: Asset management software (Innovyze InfoMASTER) will build upon existing
datasets and systems to assist in delivering the desired level of service for the lowest life cycle cost. Advanced applications are
necessary to analyze condition information and criticality to identify and coordinate overlaps and gaps among various assets.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: Asset management software will be used to better understand
opportunities for system repair and improvement across all asset categories.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: Asset management software will leverage the strengths of
coordinating and scheduling overlapping needs across all infrastructures.
Are there other affected projects: Current and future facility planning efforts will benefit from a comprehensive application of
asset management as it relates to coordinated infrastructure improvements throughout the city.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue managing data and workflow using manual processes with limited potential for effective analysis.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Deferring the purchase of asset management software will not provide
the foundation necessary to proactively manage a wide range of infrastructure needs including deferred maintenance, routine operations, and
modeling for new development.
Using technology to support long term capital planning will aid in rehabilitation/repair/replacement decisions and ultimately result in a prolonged
asset lifespan. A fully developed asset management program will assist the organization in continuing to deliver a high level of service in the most
sustainable way possible.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Maintenance (first year included) = $8,000
FUNDING SOURCES
None
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
390
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GIS04
DEPARTMENT
GIS
PROJECT NAME
Aerial Photography
FY18
$85,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Acquire aerial photography for the Bozeman planning area.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: This information is used on a daily basis in all levels of
our operations to support a wide variety of decisions.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: Aerial photography benefits both the organization and the
community by supplying a clear and accurate representation of current conditions in addition to serving as an important historical
record during times of high growth.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: Current aerial photography supports timely decisions based on accurate
information.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: This information is used on a daily basis in all levels of our operations
to support a wide variety of decisions.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: We continue to experience unprecedented demand for
digital imagery (i.e., staff reports, Commission presentations, water/sewer/stormwater utilities, public requests, etc.).
Are there other affected projects: This project is proposed in conjunction with LiDAR data collection for FY18 (GIS05) to take
advantage of cost savings related to mobilization of using the same flight.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Use of lower resolution satellite imagery. Partnerships with other agencies.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Postponing the cycle for recurring aerial photography would negatively
impact our ability to visualize and manage growth, including awareness of important historical context during times of rapid development.
Contributes to on-going acquisition of photos at regular intervals for historical archives. Since 1987 we have not gone more than five years
without an update. Measurements and land use determinations are made on a local or regional basis without requiring extensive field time.
Aerial photographs are used extensively in several on-line and in-house mapping applications. Background information for existing and future
GIS & CAD datasets and Facility Plans. Meets public demand for current and accurate aerial photography.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
There are no annual operating or maintenance costs associated with this project.
FUNDING SOURCES
None
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21
$85,000
FY22
391
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GIS05
DEPARTMENT
GIS
PROJECT NAME
LIDAR
FY18
$75,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
LiDAR Data Collection
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: This information is used on a daily basis in all levels of
our operations to support a wide variety of decisions.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: LiDAR benefits both the organization and the community by
supplying a clear and accurate representation of current conditions in addition to serving as an important historical record during
times of high growth.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: LiDAR supports timely decisions based on accurate information.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: Accurate and current topographical representation of the landscape
(including building footprints) can provide an efficient means of better understanding the scale of proposed developments, in
addition to stormwater and water conservation needs.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: This information will be leveraged in a number of programs
including (but not limited to) stormwater, water conservation, community development, etc.
Are there other affected projects: This project is proposed in conjunction with the acquisition of aerial photography for FY18
(GIS04) to take advantage of cost savings related to mobilization of using the same flight.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Manual extraction of three dimensional information from national/coarse datasets resulting in marginalized outcomes.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Postponing LiDAR data collection would limit our ability to proactively
visualize and manage the scale of proposed developments, including impacts related to stormwater management and water conservation.
Meets increasing demand for three dimensional analysis within several departments. Community Development has a strong desire to work with
3-D data to effectively communicate future growth scenarios. Both the water conservation & storm water divisions would like to incorporate
accurate elevational information into their projects resulting in increased modeling & analysis capabilities. Additional datasets derived from this
project include updated building footprints, contours, and water features.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
There are no annual operating or maintenance costs associated with this project.
FUNDING SOURCES
None
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
392
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GIS06
DEPARTMENT
GIS
PROJECT NAME
GPS System Replacement
FY18
$17,500
FY19
$17,500
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
GPS System Replacement
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: GPS data provides current and accurate information to
support critical decisions.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: GPS is used to collect a wide variety of location data, including all
water, sewer, stormwater, parks, and transportation related assets.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: This is the first of two planned upgrades to replace equipment originally
purchased in 2012. Advancements in technology allow for greater efficiency along with improved accuracy.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: GPS is used to collect a wide variety of location data, including all
water, sewer, stormwater, parks, and transportation related assets.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: Major departments that share in the use of this equipment
include water/sewer, stormwater, engineering, community development, streets, etc.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Contracted data collection services. Rental equipment.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Postponing the replacement of existing GPS equipment will likely result
in unnecessary downtime due to performance and support issues related to outdated technology.
Meets the demands of recent expansions in the scope of data collection efforts within Public Works. Maintains our most critical equipment in
the GIS Department with current technology.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
There are no annual operating or maintenance costs associated with this project.
FUNDING SOURCES
None
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
393
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GIS08
DEPARTMENT
GIS
PROJECT NAME
Large Format Plotter - Replacement
FY18 FY19
$20,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Replace Large Format Plotter (Include Scanning Capabilities)
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Printing large scale maps is critical for the delivery of
hard-copy exhibits for both the organization as well as the public.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: Large format displays facilitate efficient and effective decision making by
providing visual context for surrounding infrastructure and development.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: Large format prints are produced on a daily basis in support of all city
departments, including public map sales.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: Major departments that share in the use of this equipment
include water/sewer, stormwater, engineering, community development, streets, etc.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Maintain current equipment beyond recommended lifespan (replacement parts become difficult to locate over time). Contracted printing
services.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Postponing the replacement of the existing large format plotter will likely
result in unnecessary downtime due to performance and support issues related to outdated technology. Maintains critical equipment in the GIS
Department with current technology. Supports on-going printing needs for several departments (including the public).
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
On-going expenses include printing supplies and routine maintenance (approx. $2,500.00/yr.).
FUNDING SOURCES
None
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
394
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GIS11
DEPARTMENT
PUBWORKS ADMIN
PROJECT NAME
Computer Replacements
FY18
$15,200
FY19
$14,800
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Anticipated Public Works computer replacements.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
FUNDING SOURCES
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$22,100
FY21
$16,100
FY22
$17,900
395
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GIS12
DEPARTMENT
GIS
PROJECT NAME
FME Server
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Purchase upgrade to an existing database technology which effectively automates the transfer of information between a variety of
systems.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Database information is used on a daily basis in all levels
of our operations to support a wide variety of decisions.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: Updated technology will result in a more efficient process for managing large
volumes of data.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: Database information is used by almost every department to support
many technology systems.
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Deferring the purchase of this upgrade will not allow for
the full realization of potential efficiencies of moving large amounts of data between systems.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: Upgraded FME server technology will leverage the
strengths of a wide variety of database systems throughout the organization.
Are there other affected projects: Several current and future projects will benefit from automated data transformation including
solid waste, stormwater, and water conservation.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue transferring database information using manual processes with limited potential for increased efficiency.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Employees and citizens will have real-time access to a wide variety of information that is typically out of date and hard to attain.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Maintenance (first year included) = $3,470
FUNDING SOURCES
None
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$15,000
FY21 FY22
396
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GIS13
DEPARTMENT
PUBWORKS ADMIN
PROJECT NAME
Long Term Shops Master Plan
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Develop a long term master plan for the shops facility complex.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
FUNDING SOURCES
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21
$100,000
FY22
397
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GIS14
DEPARTMENT
SCADA
PROJECT NAME
SCADA Upgrades & Improvements
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Install Wide Area Network infrastructure, connect PRV vaults, verify/ install Pressure relief per each Pressure Zone, central site
improvements, update historian, and implement pressure management regimes to improve system pressure protection
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Improved surveillance of system operation, increased
control and understanding of real-time system conditions, ability to implement tighter pressure management controls.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Improves connectivity of remote sites to one another, enhancing overall system
operation
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: Improved understanding of cause/effect allows improved overall
system operation including more precise pressure control, real-time statusing during abnormal events
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Compliance with applicable SCADA and security standards.
Are there other affected projects: PRV vault upgrades, Reservoir mixing upgrades, new storage reservoir, Pear St. Booster
Station upgrade, remote water quality surveillance system
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Status Quo
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Improved surveillance of system operation, increased control and understanding of real-time system conditions, ability to implement tighter
pressure management controls.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
SCADA WAN maintenance expenses, server and hardware maintenance, software maintenance and programming libraries
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Water Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
$2,100,000
398
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GIS15
DEPARTMENT
SCADA
PROJECT NAME
SCADA Master Plan
FY18
$150,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Evaluate options and develop recommendations for wide-area network implementation for planned remote water infrastructure.
Develop SCADA design, equipment and SCADA tagging and programming standards. Formulate data accessibility and SCADA
integration with other City applications (e.g., CMMS)
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Should be implemented in current fiscal year to adopt
for planning processes for FY 18.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: Data-driven decision making.
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: This project is precursor to construction projects at
critical facilities.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: Older/projects precursor to construction projects with
critical facilities.
Are there other affected projects: SCADA Phase 1, SCADA Phase 2, PRV Vault upgrades, Well field development, reservoir
mixers, new booster stations, new reservoir sites.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Status quo operation of limited SCADA within distribution system and plant
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: This project is precursor to construction projects at critical facilities.
Leverage technology to improve understanding and real time remote control of infrastructure. Improved pressure management of high-pressure
operation. Inform maintenance decisions with performance data.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Unknown
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Water Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
399
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
PW03
DEPARTMENT
PUBWORKS ADMIN
PROJECT NAME
Vehicle Maintenance Design & Storage Construction
FY18 FY19
$50,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Design and construct vehicle storage
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Having equipment, especially winter equipment, inside
and ready to go extends the life, produces less emissions by not having to warm up and shortens response time.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: All of our rolling stock and equipment.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: The difference in getting in a motor grader that is parked inside vs. one that is
parked outside in -20 degree weather is enormous. Equipment stays in better shape. Much less wear and tear on drivetrain and
hydraulics. Easily adds an hour of productivity to every shift.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: By being located next to existing city property, we could
aggregate the lots giving even more useful space.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Not build and only use for outdoor storage.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Equipment continues to degrade from the sun and exposure. Large inside
storage for several departments. Equipment would be located next to current Vehicle Maintenance Shop. Good access onto Rouse and
Griffin. Early morning shift equipment could be stored here so as not to disturb the neighbors in this mostly zoned Industrial area. With this
building, Streets could switch to producing our own brine solution for pre wet of the sand. We wouldn't have to use mag chloride which is
about 4-5 times more expensive than salt brine. Gallatin County has expressed interest in buying brine from us.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Normal building maintenance. Possibly heat with waste oil from the Shops. Possibly heat with wood chips from Forestry.
FUNDING SOURCES
This project totals $200,000. It will be split evenly 4 ways: Water Fund ($50,000), Wastewater Fund ($50,000), Street Maintenance ($50,000),
and Parks ($50,000).
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
400
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
PW04
DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
PROJECT NAME
Property on Corner of Aspen & Rouse
FY18
$100,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Property Purchase to expand shops area and potentially offices. This is an opportunity to make more land available for project
PW01-SH - Shops Expansion.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Do not purchase the property. Wait to purchase at a later date.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Larger contiguous land area for City Shops. The Shops Expansion project has been a scheduled CIP for a number of years. This item could
bring an important piece of land into that project area, making a better-functioning property at Rouse and Tamarack.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Building Maintenance would be needed to keep the existing structure useful.
FUNDING SOURCES
Split 33/33/33 between Water, Wastewater and Street Maintenance Funds.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21
$0
FY22
$0
401
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
STR67
DEPARTMENT
WATER OPS
PROJECT NAME
Covered Storage At Shops Complex
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$50,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Covered Storage At Shops Complex
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Getting equipment parked inside greatly extends the life
of the equipment.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: All of our rolling stock and equipment.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: The difference in getting in a motor grader that is parked inside vs. one that is
parked outside in -20 degree weather is enormous. Equipment stays in better shape. Much less wear and tear on drivetrain and
hydraulics. Easily adds an hour of productivity to every shift.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: Equipment and vehicle storage.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: At the proper site we could build one big enough to house
other departments equipment. Project is split 50% Street Maintenance Fund, 25% Water Fund, & 25% Wastewater Fund.
Are there other affected projects: Depends where this building is located.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Keep parking millions of dollars’ worth of equipment outside.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Equipment continues to degrade from the sun and exposure.
Better equipment management.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Normal building maintenance.
FUNDING SOURCES
50% Street Maintenance Fund, 25% Water Fund, 25% Wastewater Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
402
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
W03
DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
PROJECT NAME
Annual Water Pipe Replacement Program - Design
FY18
$22,500
FY19
$22,500
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This item provides for design work to be completed every year, in anticipation of the Annual Water System Upgrades.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Provides for the design of necessary water system maintenance work.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Water Utility Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$22,500
FY21
$22,500
FY22
$22,500
403
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
W04-18
DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
PROJECT NAME
Water Pipe Replacement 2018
FY18
$1,200,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The water replacement program sets aside funds to assess and replace failing water pipes. Priority will go to replace the water
pipe associated with the annual street construction (S Grand from Olive to Hayes). The remaining funds will be used to conduct
water pipe condition assessments and repair identified pipes.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Provides for the construction of necessary water system maintenance work.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
This project results in a net decrease in overall maintenance costs over the lifecycle of all pipes.
FUNDING SOURCES
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
404
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
W04-19
DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
PROJECT NAME
Water Pipe Replacement 2019
FY18 FY19
$1,200,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The water replacement program sets aside funds to assess and replace failing water pipes. Priority will go to replace the water
pipe associated with the annual street construction (S Tracy from Babcock to College). The remaining funds will be used to
conduct water pipe condition assessments and repair identified pipes.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Provides for the construction of necessary water system maintenance work.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
This project results in a net decrease in overall maintenance costs over the lifecycle of all pipes.
FUNDING SOURCES
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
405
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
W04-20
DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
PROJECT NAME
Water Pipe Replacement 2020
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The water replacement program sets aside funds to assess and replace failing water pipes. Priority will go to replace the water
pipe associated with the annual street construction (S Black from College to the Cul-De-Sac). The remaining funds will be used to
conduct water pipe condition assessments and repair identified pipes.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Provides for the construction of necessary water system maintenance work.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
This project results in a net decrease in overall maintenance costs over the lifecycle of all pipes.
FUNDING SOURCES
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$1,200,000
FY21 FY22
406
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
W04-21
DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
PROJECT NAME
Water Pipe Replacement 2021
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The water replacement program sets aside funds to assess and replace failing water pipes. Priority will go to replace the water
pipe associated with the annual street construction (N Tracy from Villard to Peach). The remaining funds will be used to conduct
water pipe condition assessments and repair identified pipes.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Provides for the construction of necessary water system maintenance work.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
This project results in a net decrease in overall maintenance costs over the lifecycle of all pipes.
FUNDING SOURCES
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21
$1,200,000
FY22
407
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
W04-22
DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
PROJECT NAME
Water Pipe Replacement 2022
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The water replacement program sets aside funds to assess and replace failing water pipes. Priority will go to replace the water
pipe associated with the annual street construction (N 17th from Durston to the End). The remaining funds will be used to
conduct water pipe condition assessments and repair identified pipes.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Provides for the construction of necessary water system maintenance work.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
This project results in a net decrease in overall maintenance costs over the lifecycle of all pipes.
FUNDING SOURCES
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
$1,200,000
408
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
W47
DEPARTMENT
WATER OPS
PROJECT NAME
Replace #2647 - 1998 1/2 Ton Chevy Pickup
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project is to replace a 1998 Chevy with 70,779 miles.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: As our crew grows this type of vehicle is used daily in
support of the department's mission.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: This truck responds to all types of calls from locating to witnessing
bores to a support vehicle for excavation jobs.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: Crews are able to quickly access a vehicle to use.
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Using an older vehicle which becomes more unreliable.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: If we had to we could hold off a year.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue to use older vehicle which is becoming unreliable and costly to maintain.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased reliability and safety for staff.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
As the truck ages there will be unforeseen costs to maintain this vehicle.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Water Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21
$27,000
FY22
409
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
W49
DEPARTMENT
WATER OPS
PROJECT NAME
Replace #3078 - 2002 1/2 Ton Chevy Pickup
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project replaces a 2002 Chevy pickup with 85,816 miles.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Leak detection, locating and fire hydrant flush are 3
critical programs for our department.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: This truck is used for leak detection, locating and fire hydrant
snow removal and flushing.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: Would have more fuel efficient vehicle.
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Using an older vehicle which becomes more unreliable.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue to use older piece of equipment which is becoming unreliable and costly to maintain.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased reliability and safety for staff.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
As the truck ages there will be unforeseen costs to maintain this vehicle.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Water Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
$27,000
410
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
W51
DEPARTMENT
WATER OPS
PROJECT NAME
Replace #2529 - 1997 1 Ton Chevy Truck/Valve Truck
FY18
$45,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project will replace a 1997 Chevy with 73,716 miles.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: This truck is one of 2 trucks that "exercises" the 5,392 water
valves. This exercising is important to ensure the valves work.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: This is a faster and safer way to exercise valves.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue to use older vehicle which is becoming unreliable and costly to maintain.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: We could defer this piece of equipment 1 year. Increased reliability and
safety for staff.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
As the truck ages there will be unforeseen costs to maintain this vehicle.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Water Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
411
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
W56
DEPARTMENT
WTP
PROJECT NAME
WTP Facility R&R
FY18
$40,000
FY19
$40,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Repair and replacement fund for the WTP
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Having this item in the budget will allow for unexpected
and rapid repair of equipment, in the event of failure. This will result in shorter down time and not defer other planned projects.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: This fund will be used to repair unexpected failures in the
treatment processes.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: The city will be able to rapidly repair equipment and have less down time for
maintenance.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: Without this fund, maintenance could be deferred for up to a year.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Not having this fund would defer other needed maintenance.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Significate down time for the Water Treatment Plants and possible
backlog of deferred maintenance as projects are set back to deal with "spot fires". If systems fail, they need to be repaired immediately. If the
failure is unexpected, other items that have been budgeted for will need to be postponed. Not all repairs or equipment failures can be predicted
and budgeted as capital improvement projects
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
None
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Water Funds
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$40,000
FY21
$40,000
FY22
$40,000
412
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
W57
DEPARTMENT
WTP
PROJECT NAME
WTP Facility Engineering & Optimization
FY18
$20,000
FY19
$20,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
WTP Facility Engineering & Optimization
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: The longer the water treatment plant is in operation,
operators become familiar with the processes and come up with ideas to optimize the process. This line item will allow for
engineering studies on the operators ideas before the expense of changing the process.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: The plan for this budget items is to improve the process from the
raw water intakes to the treated water reservoirs.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: This will allow engineering to be completed on needed projects and to study
optimization options before spending money on equipment that might not be needed or the proper type. It will allow studies to
be conducted to make sure that proposed optimizations will actually improve the process at a reasonable expense.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: Through the optimization of the plant with engineering studies the
process will be streamlined and will save money in the future.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Proceed with optimization projects without knowing if the project will actually improve plant performance.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Time and material may be wasted in failed optimization experiments. The
advantage of having funds available to do engineering studies before any project is started will make sure that the right equipment is purchased
and that it will perform properly. Optimization studies will predict actual cost/benefit over time to make sure the city is spending its money
efficiently.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
None
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Water Funds
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$20,000
FY21
$20,000
FY22
$20,000
413
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
W58
DEPARTMENT
WTP
PROJECT NAME
Module Replace Fund
FY18
$50,000
FY19
$50,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Annual Repair Fund
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Without the timely replacement of the membranes at
the end of their useful lifespan, the whole treatment process will need to be shut down. Because this treatment process is
relatively new, we do not have a firm estimate on the lifespan of the membranes. I expect them to last at least ten years but they
could last twenty.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: The whole water treatment process and Sourdough water plant.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: This "savings account" will provide for rapid acquisition and replacement of the
membrane modules when the time comes, instead of waiting for the next budget cycle.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: This would serve as a sort of "savings account" in the event that any of
the Plant's membrane modules needs to be replaced in the future. The costs for these replacements would be significant and
typically need to be planned for after 10 years. This will be an on-going item for the next 20 years.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Determine funding source at the time these replacements are needed.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Having the treatment process shut down until the financing can be
arranged. If a membrane module at the plant needs to be replaced, the cost will be significant. This will allow the city to save money over time.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
None
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Water Funds
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$50,000
FY21
$50,000
FY22
$50,000
414
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
W59
DEPARTMENT
WTP
PROJECT NAME
Replace #1422 - 1992 Toyota Pickup
FY18
$30,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Replace #1422 - 1992 Toyota Pickup with 86,000 miles
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: This piece of equipment will be for transporting
operators to training.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: Water Treatment Superintendents managementHow is
efficiency improved with this equipment: A new vehicle will have less repair costs better fuel efficiency.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: The newer vehicle can have more seating for training trips
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue using pickup and paying increased repair and maintenance costs.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: As this vehicle gets older the cost of repair and maintenance will
continue to be more expensive. New vehicle would provide more reliability and have fewer repair and maintenance costs.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Minimal maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Water Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
415
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
W63
DEPARTMENT
WTP
PROJECT NAME
Sourdough Watershed Fuel Reduction
FY18 FY19
$400,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Sourdough Fuel Reduction
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Protects investment in WTP pre-membrane
sedimentation process and membrane filters by reducing wildfire impacts on raw water quality in sourdough. Should lessen wear
and tear on processes and components in event of wildfire impacted source water
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: Reduces wildfire risk in sourdough drainage and increases resiliency
against catastrophic wildfire. Provides a safer environment for fire suppression to occur in the event of.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: Project works in dovetail with USFS BMW project. Does
not happen unless BMW project goes.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Do nothing
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Provides landscape level fuel reduction that dovetails with the USFS BMW project. reduces susceptibility of catastrophic wildfire in Sourdough
municipal watershed. Reduces impacts to public and watershed closures during work activities
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Unknown
FUNDING SOURCES
State RRGL grants
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
416
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
W66
DEPARTMENT
SCADA
PROJECT NAME
Meters, Transducers & Communications (Replacement Scada Radio & Strap On Flow Meter)
FY18
$10,000
FY19
$10,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Meters, Transducers & Communications (Replacement Scada Radio & Strap On Flow Meter) for the SCADA Technician.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: The City's SCADA Technician needs funds to perform
their necessary job functions. Failure of electronic devices needed to perform the job cannot be foreseen or scheduled. This fund
would allow funds for that equipment.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: Water Distribution, WRF, WTP
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: It improves accuracy of measurement and improvement of efficiency
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: Cost savings through conservation.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Diminished leak detection and higher costs through water loss. This fund
will allow the Technician to repair or replace important equipment in a more timely manner.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
None
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Water Funds
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$10,000
FY21
$10,000
FY22
$10,000
417
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
W68
DEPARTMENT
WATER OPS
PROJECT NAME
Wheeled Excavator
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$151,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This would be a trac hoe excavator with wheels instead of tracks.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: It is a critical piece of machinery in our department.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: Can be split with wastewater.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue to use smaller equipment .
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Continue using smaller equipment that takes longer to do the work due
to it's size. Increased productivity with larger excavator.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
N/A
FUNDING SOURCES
50% Water Fund, 50% Wastewater Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
418
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
W69
DEPARTMENT
WATER OPS
PROJECT NAME
Water System Condition Assessment
FY18
$100,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Prepare and evaluate condition assessment plan and execute water main condition assessments in high risk portions of the city.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Major assets whose failure could affect a large
population of end-users. Work-around may be possible with heavy burden on Utility resources.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: Has subsystem application or affects major asset(s) and produces
substantial & quantifiable benefits that improves product quality, processes, or adoption of best industry practices.
Are there other affected projects: Follow-on R&R.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
No inspection
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Doing planned condition assessment can provide a cost effective mechanism of identifying likely asset failures and thereby offering the
opportunity of repairing the deficiency or the whole asset if needed prior to failure. Additionally, CA often can identify assets in good working
condition, so only required repairs are completed thereby saving significant money in replacing assets in good working order.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
No
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Water Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$100,000
FY21 FY22
$100,000
419
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
W70
DEPARTMENT
WATER OPS
PROJECT NAME
Redundant North 5038 Zone Feed
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Evaluate, and upgrade as required, 2nd location of redundant feed of 5130 Zone water into North (5038) Zone. This will ensure
alternative source of water exists and is sufficient to feed North Zone in time when Lyman Creek source is unavailable.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: This provides a second path for water to move from
South Zone to North Zone in event that Lyman source is unavailable.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: Second source from outside the Pressure Zone. Adds amount of
redundancy to system needed in event Lyman source is unavailable.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Meets City Hydraulic criteria.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: Could be performed in conjunction with Pear St. Booster
Upgrade to facilitate testing and commissioning.
Are there other affected projects: Pear St. Booster Station Upgrade.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue with single connection between pressure zones
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Use existing facilities and connectivity to provide redundant back up source of water
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
None
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Water Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$66,880
FY21 FY22
420
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
W71
DEPARTMENT
WATER OPS
PROJECT NAME
PRV Phase 2 - Automation and Instrumentation Upgrades
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Upgrade pressure instrumentation, automate valve actuation, provide a LAN connection and SCADA programming for real-time
monitoring and remote control of PRV settings.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Without project, system operators are without vital
data on system operating conditions. Limited real time data allows operators to anticipate, diagnose, or correct abnormal
operating conditions.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Maintains existing connectivity
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: Standardized pressure controls offers improved protections from
surge conditions which are likely cause of pipe failure. Improves service levels to existing customers where pressure transients
cause leaks in sprinkler systems or within customer premises.
Are there other affected projects: Pressure Management, PRV Abandonments
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Status quo operation
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Improve water distribution operations through increased understanding of system operating characteristics. Improve responsiveness to dynamic
operating conditions. Facilitate improved access to existing sites now requiring confined space entry procedures. Standardize and improve surge
control features throughout system.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Debt service (if any) to construct, power costs, SCADA maintenance, vault maintenance, instrument maintenance, programming libraries
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Water Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
$6,710,000
421
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
W72
DEPARTMENT
WATER OPS
PROJECT NAME
PRV Phase 1 - Mechanical and Structural Upgrades
FY18 FY19
$1,750,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Upgrade hatch/entry, valving, piping, pressure settings, sump pumps and provide power
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Provides operators with a safe working environment
and sets PRVs at operating pressures at pressure zone interfaces consistent with the WFPU recommendations. Provides
necessary upgrades to equipment, piping and valving in PRV vaults to reduce likelihood of failure.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Maintains existing connectivity
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: Standardized pressure controls offers improved protections from
surge conditions which are likely cause of pipe failure. Improves service levels to existing customers where pressure transients
cause leaks in sprinkler systems or within customer premises
Are there other affected projects: Pressure Management, PRV Abandonments.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Status quo operation
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Improve water distribution operations through increased understanding of system operating characteristics. Improve responsiveness to dynamic
operating conditions. Facilitate improved access to existing sites now requiring confined space entry procedures. Standardize and improve surge
control features throughout system.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Debt service (if any) to construct, power costs, SCADA maintenance, vault maintenance, instrument maintenance, programming libraries
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Water Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
422
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
W73
DEPARTMENT
WATER OPS
PROJECT NAME
PRV Abandonments (approximately 6 sites)
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$510,106
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Abandon (in place) existing PRV's serving Northwest 4940 Pressure Zone, at sites to be determined through detailed hydraulic
modeling. Install looped mains to maintain connectivity. Project done in conjunction with other transmission main improvements
serving Northwest zones
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Reduces system complexity, and simplifies control
strategy, which is critical with additional improvements planned within service area.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Reduces system complexity, yet maintains sufficient connectivity between zones per
Hydraulic criteria
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: Reduces system complexity, and opportunity for PRV's feeding zone
to create undesired chattering of PRV's fighting each other via control strategy. Chattering of valves can lead to undesired
hydraulic transients in system.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Maintenance of City Hydraulic criteria
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: Connected to West Water Transmission Main, Phase 2 and
PRV upgrades projects
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Status quo
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Avoid costs of equipping sites with SCADA and related infrastructure. Reduce future operating expenses associated with PRV vault operation
and control. Simplify zone operation by reducing number of required PRV's to feed zone.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Avoid costs of equipping sites with SCADA and related infrastructure. Reduce future operating expenses associated with PRV vault operation
and control
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Water Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
423
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
W74
DEPARTMENT
WATER OPS
PROJECT NAME
Pear St. Booster Station Upgrade
FY18
$547,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Rehabilitate station by adding 2 - 1000 gpm high service pumps, 1 - 400 gpm normal service pump, electrical and control (either
VFD and discharge check valve or Soft Starts with discharge control valves); verify condition or install new 5038 Zone PRVs (1
low range, 1 high range) to backfeed Zone. Allows interim operation as booster station into South 5130 Zone for South Zone
reservoirs, as well as backfeed when Lyman Reservoir to be taken out of service. Provide SCADA control logic modifications as
required.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: In absence of pumping capacity, Lyman source can not
be fully exploited to fill reservoirs in South Zone. With limited storage, can affect capability to maintain storage for equalization,
fire protection and emergency storage.
How is capacity affected by this project: Enables Lyman supply at approximately 2-3MGD to be fully utilized.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Abandonment of Site as booster station. Status quo for backfeed from 5130 South Zone to 5038 North Zone
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Maintain capability during high demand period to fill/maintain reservoir levels in Sourdough and Hilltop Reservoirs. Augment Sourdough supply
during peak demand period. Provide capability to backfeed North Zone in event Lyman Creek supply is insufficient or Lyman Reservoir is out of
service.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
No
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Water Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
424
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
W75
DEPARTMENT
WATER OPS
PROJECT NAME
Lead Service Line Replacement
FY18
$200,000
FY19
$200,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This two year project will be used to hire a contractor to assist water crews in replacing lead service lines.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Removing lead service lines is critical to maintaining a
high level of health and safety for our customers.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: Removing all lead service lines is the safest standard that we can
meet.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: This line removal meets recommendations of the National Drinking
Water Advisory Council for total removal of all lead service lines.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: City of Bozeman water crews are assisting with the lead
service line replacements.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue using just COB water crews to replace the lead service lines, extending the program by several years. We have a commitment to the
community that they will all be replaced by FY19.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
The City of Bozeman will no longer have any lead service lines
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
N/A
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Water Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
425
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
W77
DEPARTMENT
WTP
PROJECT NAME
Control Server Replacement
FY18
$25,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Servers are on five year replacement warranty administered by IT.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Server failure will result in plant shutdown.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: The Water Treatment SCADA system and security system.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: Improved communication speed and redundancy.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: Control of all aspects of the Water Treatment Plant.
Are there other affected projects: Water Distribution.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Server failure will result in plant shutdown. Reliability and robustness of
equipment.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
None
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Water Funds
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
426
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
W78
DEPARTMENT
WTP
PROJECT NAME
Hilltop Tank Inspection and Mixing System
FY18 FY19
$261,120
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Inspect reservoir. Furnish and Install Mixer(s), Power and Control and update Reservoir SCADA to include remote monitoring
capability of mixer(s).
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Without mixing of tank contents, Water Quality can be
impacted, cold weather operation can create damage to reservoir contents
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: Freeze protection reduces risk of ice damage to cathodic protection
system, tank interior.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Installation of separate inlet and outlet configurations per each Reservoir
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Least expensive way to effect reservoir mixing and added freeze protection
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Energy costs for mixing; SCADA maintenance, scheduled mixer maintenance,
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Water Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
427
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
W79
DEPARTMENT
WTP
PROJECT NAME
Hyalite Dam and Reservoir Optimization Improvements
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Armoring of the control tower (to enable some year-over-year storage capacity) and control upgrades to improve winter
operation
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Current vulnerability of Bozeman to drought is very
high, due to the lack of sources that are robust in drought (large raw water reservoirs with year-over-year storage capacity, large
rivers, or groundwater). Hyalite Reservoir is capable of providing year-over-year storage, but is not operated in that manner due
to concerns of ice damage to the control tower.
How is capacity affected by this project: Capacity could be improved in a major drought condition.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: The risk of an extremely dry year resulting in the inability to fill the
Hyalite reservoir with enough water for the City and irrigation uses.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Drought resiliency.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: Project could potentially remove the 20% surcharge the
City pays for Hyalite releases.
Are there other affected projects: The ability to utilize some year-over-year storage in Hyalite to mitigate against a dry year
reduces the criticality of obtaining groundwater, or adding major storage to Lyman.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue to deal with current Hyalite dam operation
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Drought mitigation, improved water use and cost efficiencies
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Unknown
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Water Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21
$4,000,000
FY22
428
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
W80
DEPARTMENT
WTP
PROJECT NAME
Watershed & Reservoir Optimization Study
FY18
$150,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Hydrologic and operations study of Sourdough, Hyalite and Lyman Creek municipal watersheds to determine water yields of each
respective watershed supply source, demonstrate the physical availability of needed water supplies for the City of Bozeman
pursuant to the Montana Water Use Act, Optimize operations of hyalite reservoir source and identify improvements needed for
year round withdrawals of stored water. Study will also provide for additional data collection needs.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Understanding municipal watersheds' long-term supply
yields affects the sizing of the West Transmission Main and eventual WTP expansion, as well as the criticality of securing
Sourdough rights and groundwater supply. In addition, this project will assess the feasibility of armoring the control tower,
decreasing the City's drought vulnerability by enabling retention of water from wet years until the following year's water supply is
assured.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: Has system wide application or affects major asset(s) and produces
substantial & quantifiable benefits that improves product quality, processes, or adoption of best industry practices
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: Recommended by IWRP, DMP
Are there other affected projects: Long-term design of the West Transmission Main, Sourdough WTP expansion, quantification
of groundwater needs
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue to utilize outdated hydrologic evaluations completed in mid 1980's and earlier by HKM and others.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Uncertainty in planning and designing Sourdough WTP supply, West
Transmission Main and Groundwater systems. Continued high vulnerability to drought. Updates critical data supporting long-range water supply
management, future water supply planning , and drought contingency decision making.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
May lead to annual costs for additional data collection for stream gaging and/or SNOTEL snowpack data
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Water Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
429
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
W81
DEPARTMENT
WTP
PROJECT NAME
Communications tower at the Sourdough Reservoir.
FY18
$25,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Installing a communications tower at Sourdough reservoir to enhance network reliability for city network control system.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Communication Signal failure would result in Loss of
Water production from the WTP.
Which infrastructure assets are maintained by this equipment: Sourdough Reservoir and Water Treatment Plant.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: Better Communications with the Water Treatment Plant and the City. Enhanced
Sourdough Bypass redundancy in valve control.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: Security of water production.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: The IT Departments Network would be enhanced.
Are there other affected projects: IT network
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Phone line through a third party carrier.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Communication Signal failure would result in Loss of Water production
from the WTP. Better Communications with the Water Treatment Plant and the City. Enhanced Sourdough Bypass redundancy in valve control.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
None
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Water Funds
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
430
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
W82
DEPARTMENT
WTP
PROJECT NAME
Lyman Transmission Main Condition Assessment
FY18
$150,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Prepare and evaluate condition assessment plan and execute condition assessment for the high consequence transmission main
through the northeast Bozeman corridor to confirm likelihood of failure.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Major asset whose failure would possibly affect a large
population of end-users. Work-around possible with heavy burden on Utility resources. Asset is at or exceeds service capacity
and does not allow for growth
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: Has subsystem application or affects major asset(s) and produces
substantial & quantifiable benefits that improves product quality, processes, or adoption of best industry practices
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
No inspection
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Doing planned condition assessment can provide a cost effective mechanism of identifying likely asset failures and thereby offering the
opportunity of repairing the deficiency or the whole asset if needed prior to failure. Additionally, CA often can identify assets in good working
condition, so only required repairs are completed thereby saving significant money in replacing assets in good working order.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Assuming project is capitalized, operating costs to be less than $35,000 for in-house labor
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Water Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
431
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
W83
DEPARTMENT
WTP
PROJECT NAME
Sourdough Intake Improvements
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$2,000,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Sourdough intake improvements to increase efficiency of existing diversion infrastructure. Project calls for replacement of
existing surface diversion, installation of sub-surface collection system within stream bed gravels to capture water during surface
freeze-off events, new instrumentation and controls.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: increases resiliency of Sourdough water supply by
reducing, or potentially eliminating, periods and frequency of surface water freeze-off.
How is capacity affected by this project: Increases efficiency of diversion operations.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Keep existing diversion configuration and continue to deal with intermittent freeze-off problems of the source
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increases efficiency of diversion operations
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Unknown
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Water Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
432
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
W84
DEPARTMENT
WTP
PROJECT NAME
Sourdough Tank Inspection and Improvements
FY18 FY19
$500,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project would entail taking the Sourdough Tank offline (once the West Transmission Main is online), inspecting it and
repairing it as necessary. This project may or may not include reconfiguration of the inlet/outlet configuration to provide flow-
through hydraulics.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: The condition of the Sourdough Tank is unknown. The
hydraulics to and from the tank are suspected to be suboptimal. This project is critical to ensure that the Sourdough tank is
reliable and operating well.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: Risk of critical failure of Sourdough Tank due to corrosion. Risk of long
water age and reduced water quality due to poor hydraulics.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Wait for critical failure
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Rehabilitation of critical storage infrastructure for several decades to come.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
None
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Water Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
433
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
WC01
DEPARTMENT
Water Conservation
PROJECT NAME
Landscape Architect Medians and Boulevards
FY18
$45,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Quantify water consumption in City of Bozeman medians and boulevards to spur change in how we think about these landscapes
and to have an LSA take the inventory and create a few landscape and irrigation designs that developers and/or the City could
utilize to install low water use vegetation and drip systems, with the objective to move the City away from sod and overhead
sprays in those areas.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: This will allow the City to contract with a Landscape
Architect with knowledge and expertise as to low water use and native plants, irrigation, soil and sun requirements of such
plants, the development of designs and maintenance plans to ensure proper care throughout the irrigation season and the
contacts and sub-contractors to make sure the work is of high quality and competence.
How is connectivity affected by this project: This connects Streets Department and Water Conservation Division.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: It also provides a means in which to demonstrate water wise
plantings to developers, builders, and residents.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
(1) No action. Most of the City’s medians and boulevards remain un-landscaped and unsightly. (2) Traditional turf grass is used and unlike
native or low water use shrubs and perennials, requires weekly mowing, fertilizer, chemical weed mitigation and requires, on average, three to
four times the amount of water when compared to low water use shrubs and perennials.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
The landscape architect provides expertise with regard to the water, soil and sun requirements for native and low water use plants, can draft
designs, oversee projects and sub-contractors, draft and manage maintenance plans to ensure the success of attractive, low water use and native
landscapes on City medians and boulevards.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
NA
FUNDING SOURCES
Enterprise Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
434
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
WC02
DEPARTMENT
Water Conservation
PROJECT NAME
Meter Software Subscription
FY18
$60,000
FY19
$36,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Software upgrades to provide for flow management alerts to customers and individualized water use assessments.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: This project is vital to both water conservation and
water and sewer operations. A mechanism must be established to alert customers of leaks and inefficient water usage in real
time. Delays in relaying this information are costly for customers and harm relations between utility and customers.
How is connectivity affected by this project: There is a potential to shift bill pay to FATHOM, and the additional cost in FY18
represents this one-time implementation fee for doing so (in addition to other services).
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Best practice standards for empowering customers with real time
information about their water usage.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Catches leaks very early and educates customers about individual water usage to reduce water consumption.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
NA
FUNDING SOURCES
Water Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$36,000
FY21
$36,000
FY22
$36,000
435
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
WC04
DEPARTMENT
Water Conservation
PROJECT NAME
Drought Tolerant Demonstration Garden
FY18
$45,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Demonstration garden to show best practices for drought tolerant and water smart native landscapes and irrigation systems to
encourage turf replacement with these types of plantings and associated hydrozones and drip systems to reduce outdoor water
use.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: The drought tolerant demonstration garden will provide
a living exhibit to the community and beyond as to how to reduce outdoor water consumption. As 50% of total water supplies go
to outdoor watering, it is essential to Bozeman's water resiliency to reduce outdoor water usage. Additionally, due to the
drought prone nature of our climate, these plants are best suited to withstand drought events and not result in significant socio-
economic impacts resulting from the loss of outdoor landscapes.
How is connectivity affected by this project: This project has the potential to bring together the City, MSU and MOR in
partnership for Bozeman and Gallatin County residents and beyond.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Best management practice standards for landscape and irrigation
design, installation and maintenance.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: Partnerships with MSU and MOR
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Outdoor irrigation accounts for 50% of total water use in Bozeman. If customers can see and learn about beautiful water wise gardens as an
alternative to sod, they will be more likely to participate in turf replacement programs.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
$5,000.00 annually for maintenance
FUNDING SOURCES
Water Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
436
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
WIF35
DEPARTMENT
WATER IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
Lyman Tank and Transmission Main Construction
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Construct a new 5MG storage tank at Lyman, decommission existing Lyman storage tank, Condition Assessment-based repairs of
the existing Lyman transmission main, new supply main tie in to new storage tank, new transmission main tie in from new storage
tank to existing transmission main, new chlorination/fluoridation feed facility. Decommission Pear Street Booster Station if
Hydraulic Grade Line of tank raised to meet Sourdough Tank.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: The Lyman water supply is a critical element of the
city's overall water supply portfolio accounting for roughly 20% of annual supply volume to the city currently. The source
provides supply redundancy and resiliency as it is geographically removed from the Sourdough/Hyalite source and provides an
independent connection to the distribution system.
How is capacity affected by this project: The effective available water supply is increased since the new storage system will not
leak and will expand the number of customers able to be supplied by Lyman water.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Maintains existing connectivity.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: Likelihood of failure of Lyman supply system dramatically reduced
by replaced storage, new transmission and Condition Assessment -based rehab to existing transmission.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: Constructs project design.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Status quo operation of existing Lyman system
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Replaces Lyman storage tank which is at the end of its useful life. Increases effective available supply as existing tank leaks at a rate exceeding
100 gpm. If new storage sited at an elevation to match HGL of Sourdough Tank then Pear Street Booster Station can be decommissioned
which reduces annual operating costs for power. CA-based rehab reduces likelihood of failure of critical transmission infrastructure.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Anticipated operating cost reduction related to pear street booster decommissioning. Operating costs for new tank and transmission
comparable to
FUNDING SOURCES
60% Water Impact Fees ($4,800,000); 40% Water Utility ($3,200,000)
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21
$3,200,000
FY22
437
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
WIF39
DEPARTMENT
WATER IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
Sourdough Transmission Main – Phase 1
FY18
$310,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The project consists of constructing approximately 3,000 feet of 48-inch DIP transmission main, starting at the WTP, cutting the
corner at Nash and Sourdough, to tie into the existing transmission main.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: This project is critical to overcome vulnerabilities
presented by the aging and unknown condition of the existing transmission main between the City's WTP and Sourdough Tank.
How is capacity affected by this project: This transmission main will provide additional capacity from the WTP to the Sourdough
reservoir.
How is connectivity affected by this project: This project improves connectivity between the WTP and the City.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: The risk of not having adequate potable water and fire flow supplies
to the City in the event of a failure to the existing bar-wrapped 30" main. Provides redundant transmission from WTP to tie in
point with existing 30" bar-wrapped concrete transmission main.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Water supply security.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: This project's provides full hydraulic capacity of new
Sourdough WTP storage tank.
Are there other affected projects: Sourdough WTP Storage Tank and Phase 2 of Sourdough Transmission Main.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Conduct a condition assessment of the existing 30-inch concrete pipe and repair/rehabilitate as necessary. Lose hydraulic capacity of new
sourdough WTP storage tank due to HGL of existing sourdough transmission main.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
The condition of the existing transmission main from the WTP to the Sourdough reservoir is currently unknown. Approval of this project will
provide redundancy for this main, and mitigate the risk and consequence of its failure. 48" DIP provides hydraulics necessary to overcome
friction losses and realize full capacity of new Sourdough WTP storage tank.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating & Maintenance Costs: Impact Fees can not be spent on annual operations and maintenance costs. The Water Utility will see
incremental increases in general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
90% Impact Fees ($2,790,000); 10% ($310,000) Water Utility
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
438
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
WIF40
DEPARTMENT
WATER IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
Sourdough Transmission Main – Phase 2
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The project consists of constructing approximately 8,000 feet of 30-inch DIP transmission main, which will start at the end of the
Phase 1 connection point and go to the Sourdough Plant.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: This project is critical to overcome vulnerabilities
presented by the aging and unknown condition of the existing transmission main between the City's WTP and Sourdough Tank.
How is capacity affected by this project: This transmission main will provide additional capacity from the WTP to the Sourdough
reservoir.
How is connectivity affected by this project: This project improves connectivity between the WTP and the City.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: The risk of not having adequate potable water and fire flow supplies
to the City in the event of a failure to the existing bar-wrapped 30" main.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Water supply security.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: This project's cost and administration could be improved if
combined with the new 3,000 feet of 48" bypass pipe.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Conduct a condition assessment of the existing 30-inch concrete pipe and repair/rehabilitate as necessary.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
The condition of the existing transmission main from the WTP to the Sourdough reservoir is currently unknown. Approval of this project will
provide redundancy for this main, and mitigate the risk and consequence of its failure.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating & Maintenance Costs: Impact Fees can not be spent on annual operations and maintenance costs. The Water Utility will see
incremental increases in general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
90% Impact Fees ($4,320,000); 10% ($480,000)
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$480,000
FY21 FY22
439
CIP Project Fund
Water Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
WIF45
DEPARTMENT
WATER IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
DEBT SERVICE FOR BORROWING - TRANSMISSION MAIN
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$420,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
These are the estimated annual amounts owned for borrowing for WIF40 - Sourdough Transmission Main project. Payments will
begin in the fiscal year following borrowing.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
The project can be constructed before cash is on hand.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating & Maintenance Costs: Impact Fees can not be spent on annual operations and maintenance costs. The Water Utility will see
incremental increases in general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
Water Utility Revenue Bonds will be issued, with repayments made by the Utilty (10%) and Impact Fee Fund (90%).
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21
$30,000
FY22
$30,000
440
Wa
t
e
r
Im
p
a
c
t
Fe
e
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
Pl
a
n
Fi
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
Su
m
m
a
r
y
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Ye
a
r
FY
1
7
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
FY
2
1
F
Y
2
2
Unscheduled
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
Re
s
e
r
v
e
Ba
l
a
n
c
e
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
1,
5
7
7
,
0
0
0
$
1,
8
5
6
,
2
5
0
$
(1
4
0
,
3
5
0
)
$
(2
4
3
,
2
9
0
)
$
(9
1
,
7
9
6
)
$
79,289 $ ‐$
Pl
u
s
:
Im
p
a
c
t
Fe
e
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
1,
4
7
5
,
0
0
0
$
1,
7
9
3
,
4
0
0
$
1,
8
8
3
,
0
7
0
$
1,
9
7
7
,
2
2
4
$
2,
0
7
6
,
0
8
5
$
2,179,889 $ ‐$
Pl
u
s
:
Lo
a
n
fo
r
We
l
l
Fi
e
l
d
WI
F
3
2
8,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
Pl
u
s
:
Lo
a
n
fo
r
Ly
m
a
n
Ta
n
k
WI
F
3
5
4,
8
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
Pl
u
s
:
Lo
a
n
fo
r
So
u
r
d
o
u
g
h
Tr
a
n
s
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
Ma
i
n
,
PH
2
WI
F
4
0
4,
3
2
0
,
0
0
0
$
Le
s
s
:
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
d
CI
P
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Co
s
t
s
(1
,
1
9
5
,
7
5
0
)
$
(3
,
7
9
0
,
0
0
0
)
$
(1
,
9
8
6
,
0
1
0
)
$
(1
4
,
1
4
5
,
7
2
9
)
$
(6
,
7
0
5
,
0
0
0
)
$
(2,245,000)$ (164,590,604)$
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Ye
a
r
‐En
d
Ca
s
h
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
1,
8
5
6
,
2
5
0
$
(1
4
0
,
3
5
0
)
$
(2
4
3
,
2
9
0
)
$
(9
1
,
7
9
6
)
$
79
,
2
8
9
$
14,178 $
As
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
s
Ma
d
e
fo
r
Re
v
e
n
u
e
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
s
:
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Ye
a
r
FY
1
7
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
FY
2
1
FY22
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
An
n
u
a
l
Wa
t
e
r
Im
p
a
c
t
Fe
e
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
1,
4
7
5
,
0
0
0
$
1,
7
0
8
,
0
0
0
$
1,
7
9
3
,
4
0
0
$
1,
8
8
3
,
0
7
0
$
1,
9
7
7
,
2
2
4
$
2,076,085 $
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
An
n
u
a
l
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
0.
0
%
5%
5%
5%
5%5%
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
1,
4
7
5
,
0
0
0
$
1,
7
9
3
,
4
0
0
$
1,
8
8
3
,
0
7
0
$
1,
9
7
7
,
2
2
4
$
2,
0
7
6
,
0
8
5
$
2,179,889 $
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
%
10
0
.
0
%
10
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
10
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
Pl
u
s
:
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
Wa
t
e
r
Ca
p
a
c
i
t
y
Ex
p
a
n
s
i
o
n
CI
P
0.
0
%
0.
0
%
0.
0
%
0.
0
%
0.0%0.0%
To
t
a
l
% De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
10
0
.
0
%
10
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
10
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to
CI
P
1,
4
7
5
,
0
0
0
$
1,
7
9
3
,
4
0
0
$
1,
8
8
3
,
0
7
0
$
1,
9
7
7
,
2
2
4
$
2,
0
7
6
,
0
8
5
$
2,179,889 $
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
CU
R
R
E
N
T
16
5
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
14
5
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
12
5
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
10
5
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
85
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
65
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
45
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
25
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
5,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
15
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
Wa
t
e
r
Im
p
a
c
t
Fe
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
441
CI
P
PR
O
J
E
C
T
FU
PR
O
J
.
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
PR
O
J
E
C
T
NA
M
E
Unscheduled
FY
2
1
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
FY22
Im
p
a
c
t
Fe
e
s
Wa
t
e
r
WI
F
0
5
WA
T
E
R
IM
P
A
C
T
FE
E
S
WE
S
T
TR
A
N
S
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
MA
I
N
‐
PH
A
S
E
1
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$28,006,293
WI
F
1
4
WA
T
E
R
IM
P
A
C
T
FE
E
S
LO
A
N
DE
B
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
‐
WT
P
5.
3
M
G
CO
N
C
R
E
T
E
WA
T
E
R
ST
O
R
A
G
E
RE
S
E
R
V
O
I
R
$6
0
0
,
0
0
0
$6,800,000
$6
0
0
,
0
0
0
$6
0
0
,
0
0
0
$6
0
0
,
0
0
0
$600,000
WI
F
2
1
WA
T
E
R
IM
P
A
C
T
S 11
T
H
12
"
WA
T
E
R
MA
I
N
EX
T
E
N
S
I
O
N
$1
3
6
,
0
1
0
WI
F
2
5
WA
T
E
R
IM
P
A
C
T
FE
E
S
DA
V
I
S
12
"
WA
T
E
R
MA
I
N
& VA
L
L
E
Y
CE
N
T
E
R
16
"
WA
T
E
R
MA
I
N
EX
T
E
N
S
I
O
N
$7
2
5
,
7
2
9
WI
F
2
6
WA
T
E
R
IM
P
A
C
T
FE
E
S
LY
M
A
N
TA
N
K
AN
D
TR
A
N
S
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
MA
I
N
DE
S
I
G
N
$7
5
0
,
0
0
0
WI
F
2
7
WA
T
E
R
IM
P
A
C
T
51
2
6
WE
S
T
SO
U
R
D
O
U
G
H
RE
S
E
R
V
O
I
R
1
$9,757,500
WI
F
2
8
WA
T
E
R
IM
P
A
C
T
FE
E
S
51
2
6
WE
S
T
SO
U
R
D
O
U
G
H
RE
S
E
R
V
O
I
R
1 ‐
SI
T
I
N
G
$350,000
WI
F
2
9
WA
T
E
R
IM
P
A
C
T
FE
E
S
55
6
0
SO
U
T
H
E
A
S
T
RE
S
E
R
V
O
I
R
AN
D
PU
M
P
ST
A
T
I
O
N
$21,232,807
WI
F
3
0
WA
T
E
R
IM
P
A
C
T
EA
S
T
TR
A
N
S
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
MA
I
N
$7,167,372
WI
F
3
1
WA
T
E
R
IM
P
A
C
T
GR
O
U
N
D
W
A
T
E
R
TE
S
T
WE
L
L
$4
0
0
,
0
0
0
WI
F
3
2
WA
T
E
R
IM
P
A
C
T
FE
E
S
GR
O
U
N
D
W
A
T
E
R
WE
L
L
FI
E
L
D
AN
D
TR
A
N
S
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$8
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
WI
F
3
3
WA
T
E
R
IM
P
A
C
T
FE
E
S
GR
O
U
N
D
W
A
T
E
R
WE
L
L
FI
E
L
D
AN
D
TR
A
N
S
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
MA
I
N
DE
S
I
G
N
$5
0
0
,
0
0
0
WI
F
3
5
WA
T
E
R
IM
P
A
C
T
FE
E
S
LY
M
A
N
TA
N
K
AN
D
TR
A
N
S
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
MA
I
N
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$4
,
8
0
0
,
0
0
0
WI
F
3
6
WA
T
E
R
IM
P
A
C
T
FE
E
S
WE
S
T
TR
A
N
S
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
MA
I
N
PL
A
N
N
I
N
G
ST
U
D
Y
$400,000
WI
F
3
7
WA
T
E
R
IM
P
A
C
T
FE
E
S
SO
U
R
D
O
U
G
H
CA
N
Y
O
N
NA
T
U
R
A
L
ST
O
R
A
G
E
‐
PL
A
N
N
I
N
G
AN
D
DE
S
I
G
N
$5
0
0
,
0
0
0
WI
F
3
8
WA
T
E
R
IM
P
A
C
T
FE
E
S
SO
U
R
D
O
U
G
H
CA
N
Y
O
N
NA
T
U
R
A
L
ST
O
R
A
G
E
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$8,000,000
WI
F
3
9
WA
T
E
R
IM
P
A
C
T
FE
E
S
SO
U
R
D
O
U
G
H
TR
A
N
S
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
MA
I
N
–
PH
A
S
E
1
$2
,
7
9
0
,
0
0
0
WI
F
4
0
WA
T
E
R
IM
P
A
C
T
FE
E
S
SO
U
R
D
O
U
G
H
TR
A
N
S
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
MA
I
N
–
PH
A
S
E
2
$4
,
3
2
0
,
0
0
0
WI
F
4
1
WA
T
E
R
IM
P
A
C
T
FE
E
S
WE
S
T
TR
A
N
S
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
MA
I
N
‐
PH
A
S
E
1
DE
S
I
G
N
$2,907,235
442
CI
P
PR
O
J
E
C
T
FU
PR
O
J
.
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
PR
O
J
E
C
T
NA
M
E
Unscheduled
FY
2
1
FY
1
8
FY
1
9
FY
2
0
FY22
WI
F
4
2
WA
T
E
R
IM
P
A
C
T
FE
E
S
WE
S
T
TR
A
N
S
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
MA
I
N
‐
PH
A
S
E
S
2 ‐5
DE
S
I
G
N
& CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
$61,669,396
WI
F
4
3
WA
T
E
R
IM
P
A
C
T
FE
E
S
DE
B
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
FO
R
BO
R
R
O
W
I
N
G
‐
WE
L
L
FI
E
L
D
$1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$10,800,000 $1,000,000
WI
F
4
4
WA
T
E
R
IM
P
A
C
T
FE
E
S
DE
B
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
FO
R
BO
R
R
O
W
I
N
G
‐
LY
M
A
N
TA
N
K
PR
O
J
E
C
T
$446,000 $340,000
WI
F
4
5
WA
T
E
R
IM
P
A
C
T
FE
E
S
DE
B
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
FO
R
BO
R
R
O
W
I
N
G
‐
TR
A
N
S
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
MA
I
N
$3
0
5
,
0
0
0
$3,750,000 $305,000
Su
m
m
a
r
y f or
Im
p ac
t
Fe
e
s
Wa
t
e
r
(23
it
e
m
s
)
To
t
a
l
s
by
ye
a
r
:
$6
,
7
0
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
2
4
5
,
0
0
0
$3
,
7
9
0
,
0
0
0
$161,286,604
FY
2
1
FY22
FY
1
8
Unscheduled
FY
2
0
$14
,
1
4
5
,
7
2
9
$1
,
9
8
6
,
0
1
0
FY
1
9
443
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Water
PROJECT NUMBER
WIF05
DEPARTMENT
WATER IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
West Transmission Main - Phase 1 Construction
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$28,006,293
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The project consists of a constructing a new transmission main from the Sourdough water treatment plant to the southwestern
edge of the existing distribution network (S. 19th and Graf St.) to serve future anticipated growth and provide water delivery
redundancy.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: This second transmission line from the WTP to the
City's distribution system is critical to provide a second path to get potable water from the WTP into the City, as well as to
adequately serve the rapidly growing western portions of the City with potable water and fire flows.
How is capacity affected by this project: Potable water delivery and fire flows will be improved in the southwest, west and
northwest portions of the City.
How is connectivity affected by this project: This transmission line connects to the existing distribution system at a location that
enables the existing Sourdough and Hilltop tanks to be filled even if the Sourdough pipeline is out of service.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: This project mitigates the risk of not having enough potable water
to serve the City's residents or provide fire suppression.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Redundant water delivery infrastructure and sufficient fire flow for
the western portion of the City.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: This project will provide the ability for the City to connect
additional storage reservoirs on the City's southwest to satisfy maximum day demand and fire flows on the western side of the
City.
Are there other affected projects: Subsequent phases of the West Transmission Main.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Construct a parallel transmission line between the Sourdough Water Treatment Plant to Kagy Boulevard.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Provides transmission capacity to current and growing peak day and fire flow demands on Bozeman's western flanks, generally west of 19th
Ave. All existing transmission capacity is on the eastern edge of the city's distribution system which presents hydraulic issues as the water
demand centroid moves westward. The transmission also provides redundant transmission in the event of failure of sourdough transmission
mains.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating & Maintenance Costs: Impact Fees can not be spent on annual operations and maintenance costs. The Water Utility will see
incremental increases in general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
Developer contributions
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
444
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Water
PROJECT NUMBER
WIF14
DEPARTMENT
WATER IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
Loan Debt Service - WTP 5.3MG Concrete Water Storage Reservoir
FY18
$600,000
FY19
$600,000
Unscheduled
$6,800,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Repayment of debt used to finance construction of WIF03, a 5.3 million gallon concrete water storage reservoir.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Payoff loan principal
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased water storage to meet the needs of our growth community, and the requirement of MDEQ. Increased system water pressure in the
southern part of the City.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Requires minimal operation and maintenance. Checking of valves, level sensors and vents on an annual basis and diver inspection and vacuuming
every five years. Estimated at $4,000 annually.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Water Impact Fees
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$600,000
FY21
$600,000
FY22
$600,000
445
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Water
PROJECT NUMBER
WIF21
DEPARTMENT
WATER IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
S 11th 12" water main extension
FY18 FY19
$136,010
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Extension of 12" diameter main per AE2S WFPU in S 11th avenue from current terminus to Graf Street.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Provides for future looped water system per AE2S
WFPU.
How is capacity affected by this project: Increases hydraulic capacity of system beyond minimum 8" main.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Provides for a future looped water system
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: Reduces severity and consequences of water system outages due to
future looping and provides for minimum fire flows.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: ISO fire flow requirements and local water main looping standards.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: Impact Fees fund capacity above 8" main which is minimum
local share. Local share could be reimbursed to City through a "payback district" established by City Commission.
Are there other affected projects: S 11th Ave road improvements.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Forego project and don't loop water system in this area
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Provides for water main construction at time of road construction and implements WFPU update for G&D water infrastructure
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
n/a
FUNDING SOURCES
Developer contribution (Graf's) for their "local share" of main would need to be reimbursed through a "payback district" established by the City
Commission
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
446
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Water
PROJECT NUMBER
WIF25
DEPARTMENT
WATER IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
Davis 12" Water Main & Valley Center 16" Water Main Extension
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Extension of 12" water main in Davis Ln from Catamount to Valley Center & Extension of 16" diameter water main in Valley
Center from Davis to 27th. 16" main is per AE2S WFPU. 12" main extends existing 12" main in Davis. These mains needed to
support development south of East Valley Center between Davis and 27th.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Provides for future looped water system per AE2S
WFPU.
How is capacity affected by this project: Increases hydraulic capacity of system beyond minimum 8" main.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Provides for a future looped water system
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: Reduces severity and consequences of water system outages due to
future looping and provides for minimum fire flows.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: ISO fire flow requirements and local water main looping standards.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: Mains completed in connection with development of
Billings Clinic.
Are there other affected projects: 12" main in Davis along the proposed alignment of Phase 5 of West Transmission Main in the
AE2S WFPU. WTM diameter contemplated at 36" in Davis from Catamount to Valley Center.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Billings Clinic may occupy this land. Fire flow demands may require large diameter mains above the minimum 8" diameter typical local share in
order to meet the Clinic's fire flow requirement, thus reducing the overall impact fee contribution
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Implements WFPU update for G&D infrastructure
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
n/a
FUNDING SOURCES
Developer contribution (Billings Clinic) for their "local share" of main
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$725,729
FY21 FY22
447
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Water
PROJECT NUMBER
WIF26
DEPARTMENT
WATER IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
Lyman Tank and Transmission Main Design
FY18 FY19
$750,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Design of new Lyman Storage (5MG), new transmission design, chlorination/fluoridation design and CA based repairs design to
existing transmission main.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Necessary for construction of Lyman tank and
transmission project.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: DEQ construction approval.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: CA-based repairs determined from Lyman Transmission
main CA.
Are there other affected projects: Lyman Tank and Transmission Main Construction.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Status quo operation of existing Lyman system
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Provides bid plans and cost estimates for construction and obtains DEQ approvals needed for construction
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
N/A
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Water Impact Fees
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
448
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Water
PROJECT NUMBER
WIF27
DEPARTMENT
WATER IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
5126 West Sourdough Reservoir 1
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$9,757,500
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The project consists of a constructing a new gravity fed ground storage reservoir to the south/southwest of the City, which
would tie into the West Water Transmission Main – Phase 1 and serve the existing City water distribution system.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: This reservoir provides storage for the areas served by
the West Water Transmission Main, for maximum day demand and potable water supply and fire flows in the City's southwest
area.
How is capacity affected by this project: This reservoir supplies water to the City’s existing distribution network, to provide
necessary storage capacity for the entire system, as well as contributes to adequate water supply capacity for future
development along the City's western half.
How is connectivity affected by this project: In the near term the storage provided by this reservoir will augment storage
provided by the City's existing Sourdough and Hilltop Tanks. In the long-term it provides storage for the west and northwest
areas of the City.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: This project mitigates the risk of not having enough potable water
and fire flow in the southwest area of the City.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Adequate storage for maximum day demand and fire flows, as well
as redundant water storage capacity for existing storage tanks.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: This project is directly tied to construction of the West
Water Transmission Main - Phase 1.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Two of the City's three existing reservoirs are located along the Sourdough Transmission main (Sourdough and Hilltop Tanks). If the Sourdough
transmission main or either of these tanks are off-line for any reason (i.e. maintenance, natural disaster, break, etc.), the City would have
inadequate storage and supply. An additional reservoir located on the West Transmission Main – Phase 1 provides storage redundancy, allowing
for routine inspection and maintenance of both water storage facilities/transmission mains, mitigates the risk of and reduces the consequence of
a failure on the existing Sourdough transmission main or Sourdough or Hilltop tanks. It also contributes to satisfying required storage capacity
for the system, as well as ensuring adequate potable water and fire flows to the City's southwest areas.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating & Maintenance Costs: Impact Fees can not be spent on annual operations and maintenance costs. The Water Utility will see
an incremental increase in general maintenance cost. Current cost estimate of $XX.XX annually.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Water Impact Fees
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
449
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Water
PROJECT NUMBER
WIF28
DEPARTMENT
WATER IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
5126 West Sourdough Reservoir 1 - Siting
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$350,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Siting study and land acquisition for 5MG ground storage reservoir to serve 5126 Pressure Zone from West Transmission Main.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: The West Sourdough Reservoir will be the next
necessary reservoir for the City to continue to provide adequate potable water and fire flow. Proper siting of this reservoir will
provide redundant supply to Sourdough and Hilltop Reservoirs.
How is capacity affected by this project: Increases water storage capacity by 5MG.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: Greater efficiency in providing potable water and fire flows to the City's western
areas. Better ability to take Sourdough or Hilltop reservoirs offline and still provide sufficient storage.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: System wide improvement in water storage capacity.
Are there other affected projects: Groundwater planning, engineering and construction West Transmission Main study, design,
construction; reservoir design, construction projects.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Wait until the need for the reservoir is more imminent
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Potential acquisition of the land by others, less optimal siting of the
reservoir. Procurement of land while it is available, and less expensive
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Water Impact Fees
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
450
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Water
PROJECT NUMBER
WIF29
DEPARTMENT
WATER IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
5560 Southeast Reservoir and Pump Station
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$21,232,807
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The project consists of a constructing a new ground storage tank, pump station, and transmission main that would serve two new
future pressure zones located southeast of the existing City limits.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: This reservoir will become critical for potable water
and fire flows in the southeast pressure zone.
How is capacity affected by this project: This project provides necessary storage to ensure potable water supply and fire flow to
the City's southeast area.
How is connectivity affected by this project: The southeast reservoir and pipe feeds down into the future east transmission line
and provides additional supply if needed. This reservoir will provide this area with water storage inside the zone.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: Inadequate potable water and fire flow for future development in
the City's southeast
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Water Storage for Maximum Day Demand and Fire Flows.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: Correlates with the transmission main from the tank into
the Southeast developments.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
The hydraulic grade line associated in these pressure zones are greater than what can be provided by the City’s existing infrastructure. A new
ground storage reservoir and pump station will ensure that these pressure zones satisfy the City’s hydraulic operating criteria (i.e. operating
pressures, fire flows, and storage requirements). Furthermore, additional storage within the system promotes redundancy, provides flexibility
for maintenance activities, and allows for future growth.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating & Maintenance Costs: Impact Fees can not be spent on annual operations and maintenance costs. The Water Utility will see
incremental increases in costs associated with both general maintenance and energy. Current cost estimate of $XX.XX annually.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Water Impact Fees
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
451
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Water
PROJECT NUMBER
WIF30
DEPARTMENT
WATER IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
East Transmission Main
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$7,167,372
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The project consists of a constructing a new transmission main that would ensure adequate water supply capacity for future
developments located both east and northeast of the existing distribution system (extending approximately from East Kagy Blvd
to Kelly Canyon Rd and Story Hill Rd).
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Without this transmission main, potable water and fire
flows will eventually become insufficient in the east and northeast portions of the City. This main also supplies the future East
Mountain Zone, which has a substantial demand.
How is capacity affected by this project: Potable water and fire flows will be provided in the east and northeast portions of the
City as this area develops.
How is connectivity affected by this project: This project better connects the east and northeast portions of the City with the
supply from the City's WTP. In conjunction with the west transmission mains, it will provide a more looped supply for the
majority of the City.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: This project mitigates the risk of having inadequate potable water
and fire flows to the City's east and northeast areas.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Potable water and fire flow standards.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: This project leverages improvements in delivery of water
due to the Sourdough Main replacement or paralleling. It will also enable siting of storage in the City's east and northeast areas.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
The creation of an East Water Transmission Main is necessary to supply adequate water and fire flows to future developments in the eastern
portion of the City’s distribution system. This transmission line will also provides additional looping and redundancy to the City.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating & Maintenance Costs: Impact Fees can not be spent on annual operations and maintenance costs. The Water Utility will see
incremental increases in general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
Developer contributions
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
452
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Water
PROJECT NUMBER
WIF31
DEPARTMENT
WATER IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
Groundwater Test Well
FY18
$400,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Test well drilling, pumping and monitoring and water quality testing at one or more strategic well field sites identified in the 2016
Groundwater Investigation. Input data into transient hydrogeologic model developed with Groundwater Investigation project.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Necessary for water right permitting and groundwater
well field design.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Provides data to move forward with GW development.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: Utilizes hydrogeologic model developed for the
Groundwater Investigation and constructs design.
Are there other affected projects: Groundwater well field and transmission design; Groundwater construction.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Don't develop a GW supply
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Test well pumping and monitoring provides aquifer property data to determine sustainable aquifer yield and drawdown characteristics at
particular pumping sites. Data informs transient groundwater modeling which is necessary to identify potential adverse effects to existing water
rights and to assemble mitigation strategies for water rights permitting.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
N/A
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Water Impact Fees
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
453
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Water
PROJECT NUMBER
WIF32
DEPARTMENT
WATER IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
Groundwater Well Field and Transmission Construction
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Water right permitting and mitigation plan; purchase of mitigation water rights; construction of aquifer recharge or other
mitigation infrastructure; acquisition of land for well field site; construction of wells, power, power backup, instrumentation and
controls, SCADA, control building and site improvements; and transmission main construction to tie GW supply into the existing
system.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Absolutely critical for meeting long-range water supply
needs and enhancing overall water supply resiliency and redundancy.
How is capacity affected by this project: Increases water supply capacity to meet projected water demands in the future.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Enhances connectivity by providing a redundant water supply source in the event of
Sourdough WTP outage.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: Enhances overall water supply resiliency.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Implements IWRP.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: Implements IWRP. Engages agricultural stakeholders.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Status quo operation
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Improve water distribution operations through increased understanding of system operating characteristics. Improve responsiveness to dynamic
operating conditions. Facilitate improved access to existing sites now requiring confined space entry procedures. Standardize and improve surge
control features throughout system.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Debt service (if any) to construct, power costs, SCADA maintenance, vault maintenance, instrument maintenance, programming libraries
FUNDING SOURCES
Capital funding for water right permitting and water could be augmented with cash in lieu of water rights fund, water fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$8,000,000
FY21 FY22
454
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Water
PROJECT NUMBER
WIF33
DEPARTMENT
WATER IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
Groundwater Well Field and Transmission Main Design
FY18 FY19
$500,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Design of groundwater well field and transmission main including necessary appurtenances, instrumentation and controls, and
DEQ approvals.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Necessary for construction of groundwater supply
source.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: DEQ construction approval for groundwater supply source;
amendments if needed to other DEQ documents such as Source Water Delineation and Assessment Report and Source Water
Protection Plan.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: Utilizes hydrogeologic model developed for the
Groundwater Investigation and test well data.
Are there other affected projects: Groundwater Well Field and Transmission Main Construction.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Don't develop a GW supply
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Provides bid plans and cost estimates for construction and obtains DEQ approvals needed for construction.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
N/A
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Water Impact Fees
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
455
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Water
PROJECT NUMBER
WIF35
DEPARTMENT
WATER IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
Lyman Tank and Transmission Main Construction
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Construct a new 5MG storage tank at Lyman, decommission existing Lyman storage tank, Condition Assessment-based repairs of
the existing Lyman transmission main, new supply main tie in to new storage tank, new transmission main tie in from new storage
tank to existing transmission main, new chlorination/fluoridation feed facility. Decommission Pear Street Booster Station if
Hydraulic Grade Line of tank raised to meet Sourdough Tank.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: The Lyman water supply is a critical element of the
city's overall water supply portfolio accounting for roughly 20% of annual supply volume to the city currently. The source
provides supply redundancy and resiliency as it is geographically removed from the Sourdough/Hyalite source and provides an
independent connection to the distribution system.
How is capacity affected by this project: The effective available water supply is increased since the new storage system will not
leak and will expand the number of customers able to be supplied by Lyman water.
How is connectivity affected by this project: Maintains existing connectivity.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: Likelihood of failure of Lyman supply system dramatically reduced
by replaced storage, new transmission and Condition Assessment -based rehab to existing transmission.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: Constructs project design.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Status quo operation of existing Lyman system
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Replaces Lyman storage tank which is at the end of its useful life. Increases effective available supply as existing tank leaks at a rate exceeding
100 gpm. If new storage sited at an elevation to match HGL of Sourdough Tank then Pear Street Booster Station can be decommissioned
which reduces annual operating costs for power. CA-based rehab reduces likelihood of failure of critical transmission infrastructure.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Anticipated operating cost reduction related to pear street booster decommissioning. Operating costs for new tank and transmission
comparable to
FUNDING SOURCES
60% Water Impact Fees ($4,800,000); 40% Water Utility ($3,200,000)
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21
$4,800,000
FY22
456
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Water
PROJECT NUMBER
WIF36
DEPARTMENT
WATER IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
West Transmission Main Planning Study
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$400,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Planning study to identify key design parameters for WTM, right of way, route alignment, and timing for bringing WTM online.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Eventual construction of the West Transmission Main is
necessary to provide redundancy for the Sourdough Transmission Main as well as adequate potable water and fire flow for the
City's west, northwest and north areas.
How is capacity affected by this project: Provides capacity sufficient for UBO and delivery of 34 MGD from future WTP
expansion.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: Conveyance of water to the City's western, northwestern and northern areas
will be more efficient that moving water through downtown and existing PRVs.
Are there other affected projects: All subsequent phases of West Transmission Main design and construction.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Defer the study further out, deferring eventual construction of the West Transmission Main.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Delay of eventual design and construction of the West Transmission
Main, continued reliance on the single-point-of-failure Sourdough Transmission Main to convey water to the City from the WTP. Identify key
design parameters, right-of-way, route and permitting for the West Transmission Main, so that design and construction can proceed once funds
are available.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Water Impact Fees
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
457
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Water
PROJECT NUMBER
WIF37
DEPARTMENT
WATER IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
Sourdough Canyon Natural Storage - Planning and Design
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Alternatives planning and design for sourdough natural storage enhancement project.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Increases resiliency of Sourdough watershed to drought
impacts and provides augmented water supply, protects existing municipal water rights.
How is capacity affected by this project: Augments water supply capacity of sourdough watershed.
What is the impact (i.e., scope-of-use) for this equipment: Impacts the City's long-term water rights and helps close the
approaching water supply gap.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: Potential FEMA involvement for flood control.
Are there other affected projects: Final sizing of West Transmission Main, also informs long-term groundwater needs.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Postpone
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Implements IWRP, augments Sourdough water supply capacity, and increases resiliency of Sourdough water supply by providing 'storage' to
reduce the susceptibility of drought impacts
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Unknown
FUNDING SOURCES
Potential opportunity for federal drought and flood hazard mitigation grants, state RRGL funds. Cash in lieu of water rights fund.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$500,000
FY21 FY22
458
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Water
PROJECT NUMBER
WIF38
DEPARTMENT
WATER IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
Sourdough Canyon Natural Storage Construction
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$8,000,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Construction of natural water storage infrastructure alternatives planned and designed in project WFP_53 that augment water
supply availability, reduce susceptibility to drought impacts, and maximize existing water rights.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Provides enhanced water supply availability to support
future growth and development.
How is capacity affected by this project: Increases water supply availabilityWhat safety or risk measures are mitigated with this
project: Reduces drought susceptibility and peak runoff impacts.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Implements IWRP.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: To be determined. Leveraging potential exists with
federal/state grants, federal/state cooperative agreements (consistent with fed initiatives to increase drought resiliency in western
states and consistent with recommendations in state water plan to increase storage in closed basins). Project implements
recommendations of the IWRP to develop storage in Sourdough.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Project specific alternatives evaluated with project WFP_53. Water supply alternatives evaluated in IWRP.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Augments Sourdough Creek water supply, reduces susceptibility to drought impacts and maximizes existing water rights
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Unknown
FUNDING SOURCES
Federal hazard mitigation grants (drought hazard and flood hazard). State renewable resource grant and loan program.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
459
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Water
PROJECT NUMBER
WIF39
DEPARTMENT
WATER IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
Sourdough Transmission Main – Phase 1
FY18
$2,790,000
FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The project consists of constructing approximately 3,000 feet of 48-inch DIP transmission main, starting at the WTP, cutting the
corner at Nash and Sourdough, to tie into the existing transmission main.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: This project is critical to overcome vulnerabilities
presented by the aging and unknown condition of the existing transmission main between the City's WTP and Sourdough Tank.
How is capacity affected by this project: This transmission main will provide additional capacity from the WTP to the Sourdough
reservoir.
How is connectivity affected by this project: This project improves connectivity between the WTP and the City.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: The risk of not having adequate potable water and fire flow supplies
to the City in the event of a failure to the existing bar-wrapped 30" main. Provides redundant transmission from WTP to tie in
point with existing 30" bar-wrapped concrete transmission main.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Water supply security.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: This project's provides full hydraulic capacity of new
Sourdough WTP storage tank.
Are there other affected projects: Sourdough WTP Storage Tank and Phase 2 of Sourdough Transmission Main.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Conduct a condition assessment of the existing 30-inch concrete pipe and repair/rehabilitate as necessary. Lose hydraulic capacity of new
sourdough WTP storage tank due to HGL of existing sourdough transmission main.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
The condition of the existing transmission main from the WTP to the Sourdough reservoir is currently unknown. Approval of this project will
provide redundancy for this main, and mitigate the risk and consequence of its failure. 48" DIP provides hydraulics necessary to overcome
friction losses and realize full capacity of new Sourdough WTP storage tank.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating & Maintenance Costs: Impact Fees can not be spent on annual operations and maintenance costs. The Water Utility will see
incremental increases in general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
90% Impact Fees ($2,790,000); 10% ($310,000) Water Utility
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
460
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Water
PROJECT NUMBER
WIF40
DEPARTMENT
WATER IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
Sourdough Transmission Main – Phase 2
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The project consists of constructing approximately 8,000 feet of 30-inch DIP transmission main, which will start at the end of the
Phase 1 connection point and go to the Sourdough Plant.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: This project is critical to overcome vulnerabilities
presented by the aging and unknown condition of the existing transmission main between the City's WTP and Sourdough Tank.
How is capacity affected by this project: This transmission main will provide additional capacity from the WTP to the Sourdough
reservoir.
How is connectivity affected by this project: This project improves connectivity between the WTP and the City.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: The risk of not having adequate potable water and fire flow supplies
to the City in the event of a failure to the existing bar-wrapped 30" main.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Water supply security.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: This project's cost and administration could be improved if
combined with the new 3,000 feet of 48" bypass pipe.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Conduct a condition assessment of the existing 30-inch concrete pipe and repair/rehabilitate as necessary.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
The condition of the existing transmission main from the WTP to the Sourdough reservoir is currently unknown. Approval of this project will
provide redundancy for this main, and mitigate the risk and consequence of its failure.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating & Maintenance Costs: Impact Fees can not be spent on annual operations and maintenance costs. The Water Utility will see
incremental increases in general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
90% Impact Fees ($4,320,000); 10% ($480,000)
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20
$4,320,000
FY21 FY22
461
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Water
PROJECT NUMBER
WIF41
DEPARTMENT
WATER IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
West Transmission Main - Phase 1 Design
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$2,907,235
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Design of the first phase of the West Transmission Main, the criteria for which would be developed in the West Transmission
Main Planning Study (WFP_01b).
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Reduces the consequence of a failure on the Sourdough
Transmission Main, by providing a second pipeline to convey water to the City from the WTP.
How is efficiency improved with this equipment: Water delivery to the City's western side will become more efficient.
What are the implications of deferring the purchase of this equipment: Continued reliance on Sourdough Transmission Main, a
single point of failure for conveyance of water from the Sourdough WTP.
Are there other affected projects: Subsequent phases of West Transmission Main design and construction, construction of
storage reservoirs on the City's west side.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Defer design and construction of West Transmission Main
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Potential to install the transmission main before significant growth and development occur along the route, reduced consequence of failure to
Sourdough Transmission Main
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Water Impact Fees
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
462
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Water
PROJECT NUMBER
WIF42
DEPARTMENT
WATER IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
West Transmission Main - Phases 2-5 Design & Construction
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$61,669,396
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The project consists of remaining phases (2 thru 5) of the west Transmission Main, completing the transmission loop around the
city's western flank.
Describe the criticality (i.e., importance) of this project to the operation: Extending the West Transmission Line further north
into the City's future western and northwestern developments to ensure adequate potable water and fire flow for west and
northwest Bozeman residents.
How is capacity affected by this project: This project will substantially improve water delivery and fire flow capacity in the west
and northwest portions of the City.
How is connectivity affected by this project: The northwest portion of the City remains the least well connected area to the
distribution system. Flow to the northwest must come through the existing PRVs from the Sourdough and Hilltop Tanks, or
from the northeast Lyman source. This main will bring water from the WTP well into the northwest portion of the City.
What safety or risk measures are mitigated with this project: This project mitigates the risk of not having enough potable water
or fire flow to serve the City's west residents.
What regulations or standards are attained with this project: Redundant water delivery infrastructure and sufficient fire flow for
the central-western and northwestern portions of the City.
How is this project leveraged with other stakeholders/projects/funds: This project will provide the ability for the City to connect
additional storage reservoirs on the City's southwest and west to satisfy maximum day demand and fire flows.
Are there other affected projects: Subsequent phases of the West Transmission Main.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Do not complete west transmission main loop.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Further extending the West Water Transmission Main would provide the following: distribution redundancy, and adequate water supply and fire
flows for future development on the City's west and northwest sides.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating & Maintenance Costs: Impact Fees can not be spent on annual operations and maintenance costs. The Water Utility will see
incremental increases in general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
Developer contributions
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
463
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Water
PROJECT NUMBER
WIF43
DEPARTMENT
WATER IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
DEBT SERVICE FOR BORROWING - WELL FIELD
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$10,800,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
These are the estimated annual amounts owned for borrowing for WIF32 - Well Field and WIF40 - Sourdough Transmission
Main project. Payments will begin in the fiscal year following borrowing.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
The project can be constructed before cash is on hand.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating & Maintenance Costs: Impact Fees can not be spent on annual operations and maintenance costs. The Water Utility will see
incremental increases in general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
Water Utility Revenue Bonds will be issued, with repayments made by the Impact Fee Fund.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21
$1,000,000
FY22
$1,000,000
464
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Water
PROJECT NUMBER
WIF44
DEPARTMENT
WATER IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
DEBT SERVICE FOR BORROWING - LYMAN TANK PROJECT
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$446,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
These are the estimated annual amounts owned for borrowing for WIF35 - Lyman Tank project.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
The project can be constructed before cash is on hand.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating & Maintenance Costs: Impact Fees can not be spent on annual operations and maintenance costs. The Water Utility will see
incremental increases in general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
Water Utility Revenue Bonds will be issued, with repayments made by the Impact Fee Fund.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21 FY22
$340,000
465
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Water
PROJECT NUMBER
WIF45
DEPARTMENT
WATER IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
DEBT SERVICE FOR BORROWING - TRANSMISSION MAIN
FY18 FY19 Unscheduled
$3,750,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
These are the estimated annual amounts owned for borrowing for WIF40 - Sourdough Transmission Main project. Payments will
begin in the fiscal year following borrowing.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
The project can be constructed before cash is on hand.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating & Maintenance Costs: Impact Fees can not be spent on annual operations and maintenance costs. The Water Utility will see
incremental increases in general maintenance costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
Water Utility Revenue Bonds will be issued, with repayments made by the Utilty (10%) and Impact Fee Fund (90%).
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY20 FY21
$305,000
FY22
$305,000
466