Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
A4. Durston Cottonwood Design
Commission Memorandum REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Commission FROM: Bob Murray, Project Engineer Rick Hixson, City Engineer SUBJECT: Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvements Project MEETING DATE: February 1st, 2016 AGENDA ITEM TYPE: Action RECOMMENDED MOTION: Having considered the information provided in written and presented materials, I move to approve the corridor improvement recommendations as follows: completion of Cottonwood to a 4 lane a with turn lane principal arterial section from Babcock to Baxter including installation of a signal at Babcock and installation of roundabouts at Oak and Baxter; and completion of Durston to a 3 lane minor arterial section from Cottonwood to Fowler including installation of signals at Laurel Parkway and Fowler, and installation of roundabouts at Flanders Mill and Ferguson. BACKGROUND: Robert Peccia and Associates was hired to complete the design of Cottonwood Road from Babcock to Baxter, Durston Road from Cottonwood to Fowler, and Baxter Lane from Cottonwood to Ferguson including the selected method of traffic control at the major intersections along the corridors. The first step in the process is the predesign effort which included the completion of a traffic engineering report. In this report, all of the major subdivisions, vacant land, and traffic growth projections were combined to complete a traffic study for the area. This was used to compare and contrast the installation of a signal versus a roundabout at the major intersections along each of the corridors. The analysis included preliminary layout and estimates for the options at each intersection. The full report is included for your review. The study concluded that at all of the intersections either a roundabout or signal will provide an adequate level of service for the projected future traffic loads. The advantages/disadvantages of each alternative can generally be described as follows: Signal Advantages: Can better adapt to changing traffic conditions, additional capacity for future demand, minimal impact to adjoining properties, and lower capital costs. 156 Signal Disadvantages: Induced delay during off peak hours, potential for increase in severe crashes, and potential for higher vehicle emissions. Roundabout Advantages: Less overall delay and no induced delay during off-peak hours, available capacity for future demand, and improved safety. Roundabout Disadvantages: Greater right of way requirement, higher capital cost, and require pedestrian signals where there are multilane approach legs. After the study was completed, staff and the consultant met to review each intersection and come up with an overall recommendation for the each corridor. This is presented graphically in Appendix F, Preferred Design Configuration of the report. It includes the installation of a 4 lane with a turn lane principal arterial section on Cottonwood from Babcock to Baxter with a signal at Babcock and roundabouts at Oak and Baxter; installation of a 3 lane minor arterial section on Durston from Cottonwood to Fowler with signals at Laurel Parkway and Fowler, and roundabouts at Flanders Mill and Ferguson; and the installation of a 3 lane minor arterial section on Baxter from Ferguson to Cottonwood. The detailed cost estimate for the recommended corridor improvements are included in Appendix G, Cost Estimates. Overall, the estimate to complete the corridors with the recommended intersection controls is $29.5 million. UNRESOLVED ISSUES: None ALTERNATIVES: As recommended by the Commission. FISCAL EFFECTS: The recommended improvements are estimated at $29.5 million. It is anticipated that this would be broken down into several projects over a number of years and would be financed though the arterial collector improvement district funds, impact fees, and developer contributions. Attachments: Traffic Engineering Report Report compiled on: 1/21/16 157 APPENDIX A Data Collection Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Baxter / Flanders Mill TMC Site Code: 08 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 1 Turning Movement Data Start Time Baxter Ln Flanders Mill Baxter Ln Westbound Northbound Eastbound Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Peds App. Total Int. Total 7:00 AM 16 4 1 20 6 2 1 8 10 17 1 27 55 7:15 AM 20 9 0 29 11 9 0 20 7 20 0 27 76 7:30 AM 30 13 0 43 13 0 0 13 19 34 0 53 109 7:45 AM 32 26 0 58 29 6 0 35 24 37 1 61 154 Hourly Total 98 52 1 150 59 17 1 76 60 108 2 168 394 8:00 AM 27 22 0 49 28 13 0 41 28 39 0 67 157 8:15 AM 21 23 0 44 19 3 0 22 20 30 0 50 116 8:30 AM 31 16 0 47 25 8 0 33 12 31 0 43 123 8:45 AM 22 18 0 40 15 3 0 18 13 21 0 34 92 Hourly Total 101 79 0 180 87 27 0 114 73 121 0 194 488 *** BREAK ***------------- 11:00 AM 11 11 0 22 10 7 2 17 6 22 2 28 67 11:15 AM 25 6 0 31 16 6 0 22 6 17 0 23 76 11:30 AM 13 11 0 24 14 5 0 19 4 24 0 28 71 11:45 AM 23 13 0 36 9 6 0 15 1 30 1 31 82 Hourly Total 72 41 0 113 49 24 2 73 17 93 3 110 296 12:00 PM 21 13 0 34 11 12 0 23 6 26 0 32 89 12:15 PM 19 9 0 28 18 7 0 25 4 27 0 31 84 12:30 PM 27 6 0 33 10 3 0 13 7 24 0 31 77 12:45 PM 39 23 0 62 15 8 0 23 8 33 0 41 126 Hourly Total 106 51 0 157 54 30 0 84 25 110 0 135 376 *** BREAK ***------------- 4:00 PM 35 19 1 54 13 5 0 18 16 19 0 35 107 4:15 PM 42 14 0 56 25 16 0 41 10 36 0 46 143 4:30 PM 49 18 1 67 20 12 1 32 9 35 1 44 143 4:45 PM 30 27 0 57 16 14 0 30 13 42 0 55 142 Hourly Total 156 78 2 234 74 47 1 121 48 132 1 180 535 5:00 PM 41 18 0 59 21 26 0 47 12 41 0 53 159 5:15 PM 46 31 0 77 25 12 0 37 19 36 0 55 169 5:30 PM 44 29 0 73 38 17 0 55 9 42 0 51 179 5:45 PM 34 20 0 54 28 6 0 34 9 38 0 47 135 Hourly Total 165 98 0 263 112 61 0 173 49 157 0 206 642 Grand Total 698 399 3 1097 435 206 4 641 272 721 6 993 2731 Approach %63.6 36.4 --67.9 32.1 --27.4 72.6 --- Total %25.6 14.6 -40.2 15.9 7.5 -23.5 10.0 26.4 -36.4 - Motorcycles 2 0 -2 0 0 -0 2 4 -6 8 % Motorcycles 0.3 0.0 -0.2 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.7 0.6 -0.6 0.3 Cars 515 292 -807 312 156 -468 201 518 -719 1994 % Cars 73.8 73.2 -73.6 71.7 75.7 -73.0 73.9 71.8 -72.4 73.0 Light Goods Vehicles 161 92 -253 95 44 -139 60 180 -240 632 % Light Goods Vehicles 23.1 23.1 -23.1 21.8 21.4 -21.7 22.1 25.0 -24.2 23.1 Buses 3 5 -8 10 0 -10 1 2 -3 21 % Buses 0.4 1.3 -0.7 2.3 0.0 -1.6 0.4 0.3 -0.3 0.8 Single-Unit Trucks 14 4 -18 14 3 -17 3 15 -18 53 % Single-Unit Trucks 2.0 1.0 -1.6 3.2 1.5 -2.7 1.1 2.1 -1.8 1.9 Articulated Trucks 3 3 -6 1 2 -3 3 1 -4 13 % Articulated Trucks 0.4 0.8 -0.5 0.2 1.0 -0.5 1.1 0.1 -0.4 0.5 Bicycles on Road 0 3 -3 3 1 -4 2 1 -3 10 % Bicycles on Road 0.0 0.8 -0.3 0.7 0.5 -0.6 0.7 0.1 -0.3 0.4 Bicycles on Crosswalk --0 ---0 ---0 -- % Bicycles on Crosswalk --0.0 ---0.0 ---0.0 -- Pedestrians --3 ---4 ---6 -- % Pedestrians --100.0 ---100.0 ---100.0 -- Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Baxter / Flanders Mill TMC Site Code: 08 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 2 04/30/2015 7:00 AMEnding At04/30/2015 6:00 PM MotorcyclesCarsLight Goods Vehicles Buses Other Fake Approach [N] Out In Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 115635122758304Out10972782538072In2253622052816376TotalBaxter Ln [E]T6981731615152L399105922920P3300002 0 2 493 468 961 152 139 291 6 10 16 18 24 42 671 641 1312 Out In Total Flanders Mill [S] L R P 0 0 0 156 312 0 44 95 0 0 10 0 6 18 4 206 435 4Baxter Ln [W]Total813904456481897In6719240325993Out26712053239044518180217721T22016018272R000066PTurning Movement Data Plot Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Baxter / Flanders Mill TMC Site Code: 08 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 3 Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (7:45 AM) Start Time Baxter Ln Flanders Mill Baxter Ln Westbound Northbound Eastbound Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Peds App. Total Int. Total 7:45 AM 32 26 0 58 29 6 0 35 24 37 1 61 154 8:00 AM 27 22 0 49 28 13 0 41 28 39 0 67 157 8:15 AM 21 23 0 44 19 3 0 22 20 30 0 50 116 8:30 AM 31 16 0 47 25 8 0 33 12 31 0 43 123 Total 111 87 0 198 101 30 0 131 84 137 1 221 550 Approach %56.1 43.9 --77.1 22.9 --38.0 62.0 --- Total %20.2 15.8 -36.0 18.4 5.5 -23.8 15.3 24.9 -40.2 - PHF 0.867 0.837 -0.853 0.871 0.577 -0.799 0.750 0.878 -0.825 0.876 Motorcycles 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 % Motorcycles 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 Cars 80 68 -148 79 22 -101 65 112 -177 426 % Cars 72.1 78.2 -74.7 78.2 73.3 -77.1 77.4 81.8 -80.1 77.5 Light Goods Vehicles 25 14 -39 14 8 -22 14 21 -35 96 % Light Goods Vehicles 22.5 16.1 -19.7 13.9 26.7 -16.8 16.7 15.3 -15.8 17.5 Buses 1 1 -2 6 0 -6 0 1 -1 9 % Buses 0.9 1.1 -1.0 5.9 0.0 -4.6 0.0 0.7 -0.5 1.6 Single-Unit Trucks 5 1 -6 1 0 -1 2 3 -5 12 % Single-Unit Trucks 4.5 1.1 -3.0 1.0 0.0 -0.8 2.4 2.2 -2.3 2.2 Articulated Trucks 0 2 -2 0 0 -0 2 0 -2 4 % Articulated Trucks 0.0 2.3 -1.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 2.4 0.0 -0.9 0.7 Bicycles on Road 0 1 -1 1 0 -1 1 0 -1 3 % Bicycles on Road 0.0 1.1 -0.5 1.0 0.0 -0.8 1.2 0.0 -0.5 0.5 Bicycles on Crosswalk --0 ---0 ---0 -- % Bicycles on Crosswalk ----------0.0 -- Pedestrians --0 ---0 ---1 -- % Pedestrians ----------100.0 -- Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Baxter / Flanders Mill TMC Site Code: 08 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 4 Peak Hour Data 04/30/2015 7:45 AMEnding At04/30/2015 8:45 AM MotorcyclesCarsLight Goods Vehicles Buses Other Fake Approach [N] Out In Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23857351910Out19892391480In436149743390TotalBaxter Ln [E]T1115125800L874114680P0000000 0 0 133 101 234 28 22 50 1 6 7 9 2 11 171 131 302 Out In Total Flanders Mill [S] L R P 0 0 0 22 79 0 8 14 0 0 6 0 0 2 0 30 101 0Baxter Ln [W]Total027968213362In01773518221Out0102331514101122113137T065140584R000011PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (7:45 AM) Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Baxter / Flanders Mill TMC Site Code: 08 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 5 Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (11:00 AM) Start Time Baxter Ln Flanders Mill Baxter Ln Westbound Northbound Eastbound Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Peds App. Total Int. Total 11:00 AM 11 11 0 22 10 7 2 17 6 22 2 28 67 11:15 AM 25 6 0 31 16 6 0 22 6 17 0 23 76 11:30 AM 13 11 0 24 14 5 0 19 4 24 0 28 71 11:45 AM 23 13 0 36 9 6 0 15 1 30 1 31 82 Total 72 41 0 113 49 24 2 73 17 93 3 110 296 Approach %63.7 36.3 --67.1 32.9 --15.5 84.5 --- Total %24.3 13.9 -38.2 16.6 8.1 -24.7 5.7 31.4 -37.2 - PHF 0.720 0.788 -0.785 0.766 0.857 -0.830 0.708 0.775 -0.887 0.902 Motorcycles 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 % Motorcycles 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 Cars 48 25 -73 33 16 -49 11 64 -75 197 % Cars 66.7 61.0 -64.6 67.3 66.7 -67.1 64.7 68.8 -68.2 66.6 Light Goods Vehicles 23 14 -37 11 5 -16 5 25 -30 83 % Light Goods Vehicles 31.9 34.1 -32.7 22.4 20.8 -21.9 29.4 26.9 -27.3 28.0 Buses 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 % Buses 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 Single-Unit Trucks 0 1 -1 5 1 -6 0 4 -4 11 % Single-Unit Trucks 0.0 2.4 -0.9 10.2 4.2 -8.2 0.0 4.3 -3.6 3.7 Articulated Trucks 1 1 -2 0 2 -2 1 0 -1 5 % Articulated Trucks 1.4 2.4 -1.8 0.0 8.3 -2.7 5.9 0.0 -0.9 1.7 Bicycles on Road 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 % Bicycles on Road 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 Bicycles on Crosswalk --0 ---0 ---0 -- % Bicycles on Crosswalk ------0.0 ---0.0 -- Pedestrians --0 ---2 ---3 -- % Pedestrians ------100.0 ---100.0 -- Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Baxter / Flanders Mill TMC Site Code: 08 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 6 Peak Hour Data 04/30/2015 11:00 AMEnding At04/30/2015 12:00 PM MotorcyclesCarsLight Goods Vehicles Buses Other Fake Approach [N] Out In Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1429036970Out1133037730In255120731700TotalBaxter Ln [E]T721023480L412014250P0000000 0 0 36 49 85 19 16 35 0 0 0 3 8 11 58 73 131 Out In Total Flanders Mill [S] L R P 0 0 0 16 33 0 5 11 0 0 0 0 3 5 2 24 49 2Baxter Ln [W]Total01395809206In0753005110Out064280496064250493T01150117R000033PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (11:00 AM) Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Baxter / Flanders Mill TMC Site Code: 08 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 7 Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (12:00 PM) Start Time Baxter Ln Flanders Mill Baxter Ln Westbound Northbound Eastbound Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Peds App. Total Int. Total 12:00 PM 21 13 0 34 11 12 0 23 6 26 0 32 89 12:15 PM 19 9 0 28 18 7 0 25 4 27 0 31 84 12:30 PM 27 6 0 33 10 3 0 13 7 24 0 31 77 12:45 PM 39 23 0 62 15 8 0 23 8 33 0 41 126 Total 106 51 0 157 54 30 0 84 25 110 0 135 376 Approach %67.5 32.5 --64.3 35.7 --18.5 81.5 --- Total %28.2 13.6 -41.8 14.4 8.0 -22.3 6.6 29.3 -35.9 - PHF 0.679 0.554 -0.633 0.750 0.625 -0.840 0.781 0.833 -0.823 0.746 Motorcycles 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 % Motorcycles 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 Cars 76 35 -111 38 19 -57 17 88 -105 273 % Cars 71.7 68.6 -70.7 70.4 63.3 -67.9 68.0 80.0 -77.8 72.6 Light Goods Vehicles 28 15 -43 12 10 -22 7 19 -26 91 % Light Goods Vehicles 26.4 29.4 -27.4 22.2 33.3 -26.2 28.0 17.3 -19.3 24.2 Buses 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 % Buses 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 Single-Unit Trucks 1 1 -2 4 1 -5 1 2 -3 10 % Single-Unit Trucks 0.9 2.0 -1.3 7.4 3.3 -6.0 4.0 1.8 -2.2 2.7 Articulated Trucks 1 0 -1 0 0 -0 0 1 -1 2 % Articulated Trucks 0.9 0.0 -0.6 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.9 -0.7 0.5 Bicycles on Road 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 % Bicycles on Road 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 Bicycles on Crosswalk --0 ---0 ---0 -- % Bicycles on Crosswalk ------------- Pedestrians --0 ---0 ---0 -- % Pedestrians ------------- Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Baxter / Flanders Mill TMC Site Code: 08 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 8 Peak Hour Data 04/30/2015 12:00 PMEnding At04/30/2015 1:00 PM MotorcyclesCarsLight Goods Vehicles Buses Other Fake Approach [N] Out In Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16470311260Out15730431110In321100742370TotalBaxter Ln [E]T1062028760L511015350P0000000 0 0 52 57 109 22 22 44 0 0 0 2 5 7 76 84 160 Out In Total Flanders Mill [S] L R P 0 0 0 19 38 0 10 12 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 30 54 0Baxter Ln [W]Total02006407271In01052604135Out09538031360881903110T01770125R000000PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (12:00 PM) Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Baxter / Flanders Mill TMC Site Code: 08 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 9 Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (4:45 PM) Start Time Baxter Ln Flanders Mill Baxter Ln Westbound Northbound Eastbound Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Peds App. Total Int. Total 4:45 PM 30 27 0 57 16 14 0 30 13 42 0 55 142 5:00 PM 41 18 0 59 21 26 0 47 12 41 0 53 159 5:15 PM 46 31 0 77 25 12 0 37 19 36 0 55 169 5:30 PM 44 29 0 73 38 17 0 55 9 42 0 51 179 Total 161 105 0 266 100 69 0 169 53 161 0 214 649 Approach %60.5 39.5 --59.2 40.8 --24.8 75.2 --- Total %24.8 16.2 -41.0 15.4 10.6 -26.0 8.2 24.8 -33.0 - PHF 0.875 0.847 -0.864 0.658 0.663 -0.768 0.697 0.958 -0.973 0.906 Motorcycles 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 1 1 -2 2 % Motorcycles 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 1.9 0.6 -0.9 0.3 Cars 129 80 -209 71 57 -128 39 111 -150 487 % Cars 80.1 76.2 -78.6 71.0 82.6 -75.7 73.6 68.9 -70.1 75.0 Light Goods Vehicles 31 23 -54 28 12 -40 13 47 -60 154 % Light Goods Vehicles 19.3 21.9 -20.3 28.0 17.4 -23.7 24.5 29.2 -28.0 23.7 Buses 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 1 -1 1 % Buses 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.6 -0.5 0.2 Single-Unit Trucks 1 0 -1 1 0 -1 0 0 -0 2 % Single-Unit Trucks 0.6 0.0 -0.4 1.0 0.0 -0.6 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.3 Articulated Trucks 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 % Articulated Trucks 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 Bicycles on Road 0 2 -2 0 0 -0 0 1 -1 3 % Bicycles on Road 0.0 1.9 -0.8 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.6 -0.5 0.5 Bicycles on Crosswalk --0 ---0 ---0 -- % Bicycles on Crosswalk ------------- Pedestrians --0 ---0 ---0 -- % Pedestrians ------------- Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Baxter / Flanders Mill TMC Site Code: 08 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 10 Peak Hour Data 04/30/2015 4:45 PMEnding At04/30/2015 5:45 PM MotorcyclesCarsLight Goods Vehicles Buses Other Fake Approach [N] Out In Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26121751821Out26630542090In527511293911TotalBaxter Ln [E]T16110311290L1052023800P0000001 0 1 119 128 247 36 40 76 0 0 0 2 1 3 158 169 327 Out In Total Flanders Mill [S] L R P 0 0 0 57 71 0 12 28 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 69 100 0Baxter Ln [W]Total233610312444In21506011214Out0186430123011114711161T139130053R000000PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (4:45 PM) Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Baxter / Flanders Mill TMC Site Code: 08 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 11 Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Cottonwood / Babcock TMC Site Code: 06 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 1 Turning Movement Data Start Time Cottonwood Rd Babcock St Cottonwood Rd Babcock St Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 12:00 AM 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 0 1 0 7 12:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 5 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 7 12:30 AM 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 9 12:45 AM 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Hourly Total 0 8 0 0 8 0 1 0 0 1 1 15 0 0 16 0 1 0 1 1 26 1:00 AM 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 7 1:15 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 1:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 1:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 Hourly Total 0 2 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 7 1 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 13 2:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 5 2:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 2:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:45 AM 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 Hourly Total 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 3 3 0 0 6 0 0 1 0 1 10 3:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:15 AM 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 3:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 3:45 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 3 Hourly Total 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 1 8 4:00 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 4:15 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 4:30 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 4:45 AM 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 Hourly Total 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 13 5:00 AM 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 5:15 AM 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 1 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 1 12 5:30 AM 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 3 1 0 0 0 1 9 5:45 AM 0 6 0 0 6 0 0 2 0 2 2 5 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 15 Hourly Total 0 17 0 0 17 0 0 6 0 6 2 14 1 0 17 1 0 1 0 2 42 6:00 AM 1 4 0 0 5 0 1 1 0 2 0 5 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 13 6:15 AM 4 7 2 0 13 0 0 3 0 3 0 10 4 0 14 1 1 1 0 3 33 6:30 AM 2 13 1 0 16 1 1 6 0 8 1 12 0 0 13 0 1 1 0 2 39 6:45 AM 2 23 1 1 26 1 2 8 1 11 2 12 2 0 16 0 2 3 0 5 58 Hourly Total 9 47 4 1 60 2 4 18 1 24 3 39 7 0 49 1 4 5 0 10 143 7:00 AM 2 25 1 0 28 3 2 8 0 13 4 17 1 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 63 7:15 AM 4 35 1 0 40 3 1 13 0 17 3 18 0 0 21 1 1 0 2 2 80 7:30 AM 6 66 3 0 75 1 1 16 0 18 6 24 1 0 31 3 4 7 1 14 138 7:45 AM 1 73 7 0 81 0 2 15 1 17 5 48 2 0 55 3 4 7 0 14 167 Hourly Total 13 199 12 0 224 7 6 52 1 65 18 107 4 0 129 7 9 14 3 30 448 8:00 AM 4 93 5 0 102 4 2 8 0 14 9 65 0 0 74 0 4 2 0 6 196 8:15 AM 4 67 8 0 79 5 1 16 0 22 14 56 2 0 72 0 2 6 0 8 181 8:30 AM 3 80 1 0 84 3 0 11 0 14 4 30 2 0 36 2 2 2 0 6 140 8:45 AM 1 43 2 0 46 1 2 8 0 11 10 38 2 0 50 1 1 4 2 6 113 Hourly Total 12 283 16 0 311 13 5 43 0 61 37 189 6 0 232 3 9 14 2 26 630 9:00 AM 2 34 2 0 38 1 0 4 0 5 3 15 1 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 62 9:15 AM 1 33 1 0 35 2 0 5 0 7 0 31 1 0 32 1 2 0 0 3 77 9:30 AM 3 38 0 2 41 3 1 8 0 12 3 34 0 0 37 2 0 0 0 2 92 9:45 AM 2 35 2 0 39 3 2 7 0 12 2 24 2 0 28 1 2 0 0 3 82 Hourly Total 8 140 5 2 153 9 3 24 0 36 8 104 4 0 116 4 4 0 0 8 313 10:00 AM 9 31 1 0 41 1 1 4 0 6 3 28 3 0 34 2 0 2 0 4 85 10:15 AM 2 41 1 0 44 3 1 10 0 14 5 30 2 0 37 3 1 6 0 10 105 10:30 AM 1 31 2 0 34 1 0 3 0 4 3 27 1 0 31 0 2 3 0 5 74 10:45 AM 3 25 1 1 29 1 1 7 0 9 10 28 3 0 41 1 0 6 0 7 86 Hourly Total 15 128 5 1 148 6 3 24 0 33 21 113 9 0 143 6 3 17 0 26 350 11:00 AM 1 36 1 0 38 5 1 1 0 7 4 29 6 0 39 2 2 5 0 9 93 11:15 AM 2 35 3 0 40 5 1 1 0 7 1 34 4 2 39 3 1 4 1 8 94 11:30 AM 4 35 3 0 42 2 1 6 0 9 4 51 4 0 59 2 0 5 0 7 117 11:45 AM 1 50 2 0 53 4 0 9 0 13 9 29 1 0 39 3 3 4 0 10 115 Hourly Total 8 156 9 0 173 16 3 17 0 36 18 143 15 2 176 10 6 18 1 34 419 12:00 PM 9 35 1 0 45 2 3 8 0 13 10 36 0 2 46 2 1 2 0 5 109 12:15 PM 6 29 2 0 37 3 5 8 1 16 9 32 0 0 41 0 1 1 1 2 96 12:30 PM 4 30 3 0 37 2 3 7 0 12 6 48 1 0 55 1 1 14 0 16 120 12:45 PM 4 36 0 0 40 2 4 9 0 15 8 44 2 0 54 3 1 6 0 10 119 Hourly Total 23 130 6 0 159 9 15 32 1 56 33 160 3 2 196 6 4 23 1 33 444 1:00 PM 5 38 1 0 44 4 1 8 0 13 11 35 2 0 48 4 4 2 1 10 115 1:15 PM 6 40 2 0 48 2 2 8 0 12 7 30 3 0 40 1 3 4 0 8 108 1:30 PM 5 40 1 0 46 4 2 9 0 15 6 29 2 0 37 1 2 4 0 7 105 1:45 PM 2 29 1 0 32 3 2 10 0 15 5 39 7 0 51 1 5 1 0 7 105 Hourly Total 18 147 5 0 170 13 7 35 0 55 29 133 14 0 176 7 14 11 1 32 433 2:00 PM 2 37 1 0 40 6 1 8 0 15 3 36 2 0 41 1 3 1 0 5 101 2:15 PM 3 38 2 0 43 2 0 4 0 6 7 47 1 0 55 2 0 2 0 4 108 2:30 PM 5 39 1 1 45 2 1 6 1 9 4 38 1 1 43 1 0 7 1 8 105 2:45 PM 2 32 0 1 34 0 1 7 0 8 5 34 2 0 41 2 1 3 1 6 89 Hourly Total 12 146 4 2 162 10 3 25 1 38 19 155 6 1 180 6 4 13 2 23 403 3:00 PM 3 34 0 0 37 1 2 7 0 10 12 39 0 0 51 4 3 3 0 10 108 3:15 PM 5 35 5 0 45 6 2 2 0 10 20 65 1 0 86 0 1 2 0 3 144 3:30 PM 4 61 8 0 73 5 1 7 0 13 15 51 1 0 67 2 3 4 0 9 162 3:45 PM 6 66 1 0 73 5 2 8 0 15 7 41 2 1 50 0 1 4 0 5 143 Hourly Total 18 196 14 0 228 17 7 24 0 48 54 196 4 1 254 6 8 13 0 27 557 4:00 PM 6 54 3 0 63 10 2 9 0 21 10 56 2 0 68 1 0 1 0 2 154 4:15 PM 5 52 3 1 60 6 1 5 0 12 9 92 1 0 102 2 0 9 1 11 185 4:30 PM 3 61 6 0 70 8 3 7 0 18 12 51 2 0 65 5 2 5 0 12 165 4:45 PM 8 45 3 0 56 3 2 5 0 10 12 81 2 0 95 2 1 8 0 11 172 Hourly Total 22 212 15 1 249 27 8 26 0 61 43 280 7 0 330 10 3 23 1 36 676 5:00 PM 6 43 3 0 52 8 3 9 0 20 18 64 1 0 83 1 2 5 0 8 163 5:15 PM 4 85 8 0 97 9 3 8 0 20 29 111 2 0 142 1 2 4 0 7 266 5:30 PM 2 57 2 0 61 7 4 8 1 19 19 73 6 0 98 2 1 6 0 9 187 5:45 PM 2 63 3 0 68 2 3 4 0 9 12 107 0 0 119 1 5 5 0 11 207 Hourly Total 14 248 16 0 278 26 13 29 1 68 78 355 9 0 442 5 10 20 0 35 823 6:00 PM 3 77 10 0 90 6 1 6 1 13 16 62 0 0 78 3 6 7 0 16 197 6:15 PM 1 40 2 0 43 5 3 10 0 18 8 48 0 1 56 1 3 6 0 10 127 6:30 PM 1 49 3 0 53 1 6 6 0 13 4 43 0 0 47 0 0 2 0 2 115 6:45 PM 3 22 1 0 26 3 3 5 0 11 6 39 1 0 46 1 0 2 0 3 86 Hourly Total 8 188 16 0 212 15 13 27 1 55 34 192 1 1 227 5 9 17 0 31 525 7:00 PM 3 29 2 0 34 6 3 5 0 14 7 40 0 0 47 0 0 1 0 1 96 7:15 PM 1 24 3 0 28 8 3 2 0 13 3 49 0 9 52 1 4 0 1 5 98 7:30 PM 1 60 7 0 68 7 0 1 0 8 6 45 0 0 51 2 1 0 0 3 130 7:45 PM 1 44 2 0 47 4 3 2 0 9 4 21 0 0 25 1 2 0 0 3 84 Hourly Total 6 157 14 0 177 25 9 10 0 44 20 155 0 9 175 4 7 1 1 12 408 8:00 PM 1 24 0 0 25 1 0 2 0 3 4 21 0 0 25 0 2 2 0 4 57 8:15 PM 0 14 0 1 14 5 2 3 0 10 3 22 3 0 28 0 1 1 0 2 54 8:30 PM 5 16 2 0 23 2 5 1 0 8 9 28 1 0 38 1 5 2 0 8 77 8:45 PM 1 15 0 0 16 1 1 2 0 4 6 12 1 0 19 0 2 1 0 3 42 Hourly Total 7 69 2 1 78 9 8 8 0 25 22 83 5 0 110 1 10 6 0 17 230 9:00 PM 1 14 2 0 17 0 3 5 0 8 7 25 0 0 32 0 0 1 0 1 58 9:15 PM 2 20 0 0 22 1 0 5 0 6 2 19 1 0 22 0 1 1 0 2 52 9:30 PM 0 21 2 0 23 4 4 0 0 8 8 16 2 0 26 0 0 4 0 4 61 9:45 PM 1 9 0 0 10 0 1 4 0 5 1 14 0 0 15 2 1 0 0 3 33 Hourly Total 4 64 4 0 72 5 8 14 0 27 18 74 3 0 95 2 2 6 0 10 204 10:00 PM 1 7 1 0 9 1 1 2 0 4 3 6 0 0 9 0 1 1 0 2 24 10:15 PM 0 6 1 0 7 1 0 1 0 2 5 10 0 0 15 0 0 1 0 1 25 10:30 PM 0 8 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 1 1 9 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 19 10:45 PM 0 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 5 7 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 15 Hourly Total 1 23 2 0 26 4 1 3 0 8 14 32 0 0 46 0 1 2 0 3 83 11:00 PM 0 4 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 1 4 6 0 0 10 0 1 2 0 3 18 11:15 PM 0 2 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 2 11 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 17 11:30 PM 0 5 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 10 11:45 PM 0 3 0 0 3 2 1 0 0 3 0 4 1 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 12 Hourly Total 0 14 0 0 14 5 1 1 0 7 6 23 1 0 30 0 3 3 0 6 57 Grand Total 198 2586 150 8 2934 218 118 419 6 755 484 2581 100 16 3165 85 111 208 13 404 7258 Approach %6.7 88.1 5.1 --28.9 15.6 55.5 --15.3 81.5 3.2 --21.0 27.5 51.5 --- Total %2.7 35.6 2.1 -40.4 3.0 1.6 5.8 -10.4 6.7 35.6 1.4 -43.6 1.2 1.5 2.9 -5.6 - Motorcycles 3 8 0 -11 1 2 2 -5 4 8 0 -12 2 2 0 -4 32 % Motorcycles 1.5 0.3 0.0 -0.4 0.5 1.7 0.5 -0.7 0.8 0.3 0.0 -0.4 2.4 1.8 0.0 -1.0 0.4 Cars 121 2055 118 -2294 192 85 336 -613 376 2097 69 -2542 55 83 127 -265 5714 % Cars 61.1 79.5 78.7 -78.2 88.1 72.0 80.2 -81.2 77.7 81.2 69.0 -80.3 64.7 74.8 61.1 -65.6 78.7 Light Goods Vehicles 64 479 31 -574 23 23 71 -117 92 426 25 -543 25 18 69 -112 1346 % Light Goods Vehicles 32.3 18.5 20.7 -19.6 10.6 19.5 16.9 -15.5 19.0 16.5 25.0 -17.2 29.4 16.2 33.2 -27.7 18.5 Buses 3 8 0 -11 0 0 1 -1 2 9 1 -12 0 0 1 -1 25 % Buses 1.5 0.3 0.0 -0.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 -0.1 0.4 0.3 1.0 -0.4 0.0 0.0 0.5 -0.2 0.3 Single-Unit Trucks 3 23 0 -26 0 0 5 -5 3 36 3 -42 3 1 8 -12 85 % Single-Unit Trucks 1.5 0.9 0.0 -0.9 0.0 0.0 1.2 -0.7 0.6 1.4 3.0 -1.3 3.5 0.9 3.8 -3.0 1.2 Articulated Trucks 3 10 0 -13 0 1 0 -1 0 4 2 -6 0 0 2 -2 22 % Articulated Trucks 1.5 0.4 0.0 -0.4 0.0 0.8 0.0 -0.1 0.0 0.2 2.0 -0.2 0.0 0.0 1.0 -0.5 0.3 Bicycles on Road 1 3 1 -5 2 7 4 -13 7 1 0 -8 0 7 1 -8 34 % Bicycles on Road 0.5 0.1 0.7 -0.2 0.9 5.9 1.0 -1.7 1.4 0.0 0.0 -0.3 0.0 6.3 0.5 -2.0 0.5 Bicycles on Crosswalk ---1 ----0 ----0 ----0 -- % Bicycles on Crosswalk ---12.5 ----0.0 ----0.0 ----0.0 -- Pedestrians ---7 ----6 ----16 ----13 -- % Pedestrians ---87.5 ----100.0 ----100.0 ----100.0 -- Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Cottonwood / Babcock TMC Site Code: 06 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 4 04/30/2015 12:00 AMEnding At05/01/2015 12:00 AM MotorcyclesCarsLight Goods Vehicles Buses Other Cottonwood Rd [N] Out In Total 9 11 20 2416 2294 4710 518 574 1092 10 11 21 54 44 98 3007 2934 5941 3 8 0 0 121 2055 118 0 64 479 31 0 3 8 0 0 7 36 1 8 198 2586 150 8 R T L P 7451921415776Out7551911176135In1500383258119011TotalBabcock St [E]R21820231921T1188023852L41991713362P66000012 12 24 2446 2542 4988 575 543 1118 9 12 21 48 56 104 3090 3165 6255 Out In Total Cottonwood Rd [S] L T R P 0 8 4 0 69 2097 376 0 25 426 92 0 1 9 2 0 5 41 10 16 100 2581 484 16Babcock St [W]Total9540224542820In4265112122404Out5275112420416012769111208L2831808111T255250385R00001313PTurning Movement Data Plot Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Cottonwood / Babcock TMC Site Code: 06 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 5 Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (7:45 AM) Start Time Cottonwood Rd Babcock St Cottonwood Rd Babcock St Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 7:45 AM 1 73 7 0 81 0 2 15 1 17 5 48 2 0 55 3 4 7 0 14 167 8:00 AM 4 93 5 0 102 4 2 8 0 14 9 65 0 0 74 0 4 2 0 6 196 8:15 AM 4 67 8 0 79 5 1 16 0 22 14 56 2 0 72 0 2 6 0 8 181 8:30 AM 3 80 1 0 84 3 0 11 0 14 4 30 2 0 36 2 2 2 0 6 140 Total 12 313 21 0 346 12 5 50 1 67 32 199 6 0 237 5 12 17 0 34 684 Approach %3.5 90.5 6.1 --17.9 7.5 74.6 --13.5 84.0 2.5 --14.7 35.3 50.0 --- Total %1.8 45.8 3.1 -50.6 1.8 0.7 7.3 -9.8 4.7 29.1 0.9 -34.6 0.7 1.8 2.5 -5.0 - PHF 0.750 0.841 0.656 -0.848 0.600 0.625 0.781 -0.761 0.571 0.765 0.750 -0.801 0.417 0.750 0.607 -0.607 0.872 Motorcycles 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 % Motorcycles 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 Cars 7 259 18 -284 8 2 40 -50 24 160 2 -186 5 9 10 -24 544 % Cars 58.3 82.7 85.7 -82.1 66.7 40.0 80.0 -74.6 75.0 80.4 33.3 -78.5 100.0 75.0 58.8 -70.6 79.5 Light Goods Vehicles 4 52 3 -59 4 3 10 -17 8 32 3 -43 0 0 4 -4 123 % Light Goods Vehicles 33.3 16.6 14.3 -17.1 33.3 60.0 20.0 -25.4 25.0 16.1 50.0 -18.1 0.0 0.0 23.5 -11.8 18.0 Buses 0 1 0 -1 0 0 0 -0 0 3 1 -4 0 0 1 -1 6 % Buses 0.0 0.3 0.0 -0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 1.5 16.7 -1.7 0.0 0.0 5.9 -2.9 0.9 Single-Unit Trucks 0 1 0 -1 0 0 0 -0 0 3 0 -3 0 0 0 -0 4 % Single-Unit Trucks 0.0 0.3 0.0 -0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 -1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.6 Articulated Trucks 1 0 0 -1 0 0 0 -0 0 1 0 -1 0 0 1 -1 3 % Articulated Trucks 8.3 0.0 0.0 -0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 -0.4 0.0 0.0 5.9 -2.9 0.4 Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 3 1 -4 4 % Bicycles on Road 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 25.0 5.9 -11.8 0.6 Bicycles on Crosswalk ---0 ----0 ----0 ----0 -- % Bicycles on Crosswalk --------0.0 ------------ Pedestrians ---0 ----1 ----0 ----0 -- % Pedestrians --------100.0 ------------ Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Cottonwood / Babcock TMC Site Code: 06 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 6 Peak Hour Data 04/30/2015 7:45 AMEnding At04/30/2015 8:45 AM MotorcyclesCarsLight Goods Vehicles Buses Other Cottonwood Rd [N] Out In Total 0 0 0 178 284 462 40 59 99 4 1 5 6 2 8 228 346 574 0 0 0 0 7 259 18 0 4 52 3 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 12 313 21 0 R T L P 653011510Out670017500In13230281010TotalBabcock St [E]R1200480T500320L500010400P1100000 0 0 304 186 490 62 43 105 1 4 5 1 4 5 368 237 605 Out In Total Cottonwood Rd [S] L T R P 0 0 0 0 2 160 24 0 3 32 8 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 6 199 32 0Babcock St [W]Total035142657In02441534Out01110112301041217L0900312T050005R000000PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (7:45 AM) Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Cottonwood / Babcock TMC Site Code: 06 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 7 Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (5:15 PM) Start Time Cottonwood Rd Babcock St Cottonwood Rd Babcock St Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 5:15 PM 4 85 8 0 97 9 3 8 0 20 29 111 2 0 142 1 2 4 0 7 266 5:30 PM 2 57 2 0 61 7 4 8 1 19 19 73 6 0 98 2 1 6 0 9 187 5:45 PM 2 63 3 0 68 2 3 4 0 9 12 107 0 0 119 1 5 5 0 11 207 6:00 PM 3 77 10 0 90 6 1 6 1 13 16 62 0 0 78 3 6 7 0 16 197 Total 11 282 23 0 316 24 11 26 2 61 76 353 8 0 437 7 14 22 0 43 857 Approach %3.5 89.2 7.3 --39.3 18.0 42.6 --17.4 80.8 1.8 --16.3 32.6 51.2 --- Total %1.3 32.9 2.7 -36.9 2.8 1.3 3.0 -7.1 8.9 41.2 0.9 -51.0 0.8 1.6 2.6 -5.0 - PHF 0.688 0.829 0.575 -0.814 0.667 0.688 0.813 -0.763 0.655 0.795 0.333 -0.769 0.583 0.583 0.786 -0.672 0.805 Motorcycles 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 1 0 0 -1 1 0 0 -1 2 % Motorcycles 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 -0.2 14.3 0.0 0.0 -2.3 0.2 Cars 9 237 18 -264 21 6 23 -50 51 285 7 -343 3 9 16 -28 685 % Cars 81.8 84.0 78.3 -83.5 87.5 54.5 88.5 -82.0 67.1 80.7 87.5 -78.5 42.9 64.3 72.7 -65.1 79.9 Light Goods Vehicles 2 41 5 -48 3 2 3 -8 23 66 1 -90 3 3 6 -12 158 % Light Goods Vehicles 18.2 14.5 21.7 -15.2 12.5 18.2 11.5 -13.1 30.3 18.7 12.5 -20.6 42.9 21.4 27.3 -27.9 18.4 Buses 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 % Buses 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 Single-Unit Trucks 0 1 0 -1 0 0 0 -0 0 2 0 -2 0 0 0 -0 3 % Single-Unit Trucks 0.0 0.4 0.0 -0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 -0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.4 Articulated Trucks 0 1 0 -1 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 1 % Articulated Trucks 0.0 0.4 0.0 -0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.1 Bicycles on Road 0 2 0 -2 0 3 0 -3 1 0 0 -1 0 2 0 -2 8 % Bicycles on Road 0.0 0.7 0.0 -0.6 0.0 27.3 0.0 -4.9 1.3 0.0 0.0 -0.2 0.0 14.3 0.0 -4.7 0.9 Bicycles on Crosswalk ---0 ----0 ----0 ----0 -- % Bicycles on Crosswalk --------0.0 ------------ Pedestrians ---0 ----2 ----0 ----0 -- % Pedestrians --------100.0 ------------ Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Cottonwood / Babcock TMC Site Code: 06 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 8 Peak Hour Data 04/30/2015 5:15 PMEnding At04/30/2015 6:15 PM MotorcyclesCarsLight Goods Vehicles Buses Other Cottonwood Rd [N] Out In Total 0 0 0 322 264 586 75 48 123 0 0 0 2 4 6 399 316 715 0 0 0 0 9 237 18 0 2 41 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 11 282 23 0 R T L P 1133031781Out61308500In17460391281TotalBabcock St [E]R24003210T1130260L26003230P2200001 1 2 263 343 606 47 90 137 0 0 0 4 3 7 315 437 752 Out In Total Cottonwood Rd [S] L T R P 0 0 1 0 7 285 51 0 1 66 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 8 353 76 0Babcock St [W]Total150170573In128120243Out0225033001660022L0930214T133007R000000PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (5:15 PM) Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Cottonwood / Babcock TMC Site Code: 06 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 9 Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Cottonwood / Baxter TMC Site Code: 07 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 1 Turning Movement Data Start Time Cottonwood Rd Baxter Ln Baxter Ln Southbound Westbound Eastbound Right Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Peds App. Total Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 7:00 AM 0 6 0 6 3 12 0 15 13 0 0 13 34 7:15 AM 1 9 0 10 4 26 0 30 15 1 0 16 56 7:30 AM 2 19 0 21 2 26 0 28 27 1 0 28 77 7:45 AM 5 15 0 20 4 32 0 36 31 3 0 34 90 Hourly Total 8 49 0 57 13 96 0 109 86 5 0 91 257 8:00 AM 7 16 0 23 5 30 0 35 35 6 0 41 99 8:15 AM 4 7 0 11 3 20 0 23 28 3 0 31 65 8:30 AM 0 15 0 15 6 29 0 35 25 1 0 26 76 8:45 AM 2 8 0 10 3 23 0 26 19 1 0 20 56 Hourly Total 13 46 0 59 17 102 0 119 107 11 0 118 296 *** BREAK ***------------- 11:00 AM 3 5 0 8 5 10 1 15 21 1 0 22 45 11:15 AM 2 5 0 7 6 19 0 25 17 1 0 18 50 11:30 AM 1 3 0 4 4 12 0 16 25 0 0 25 45 11:45 AM 2 2 0 4 8 20 0 28 28 0 0 28 60 Hourly Total 8 15 0 23 23 61 1 84 91 2 0 93 200 12:00 PM 2 4 0 6 12 20 0 32 25 0 0 25 63 12:15 PM 2 4 0 6 4 16 0 20 24 0 0 24 50 12:30 PM 2 5 0 7 2 25 0 27 23 0 0 23 57 12:45 PM 1 13 0 14 5 36 0 41 23 1 0 24 79 Hourly Total 7 26 0 33 23 97 0 120 95 1 0 96 249 *** BREAK ***------------- 4:00 PM 2 12 2 14 8 30 0 38 20 0 0 20 72 4:15 PM 2 10 0 12 17 30 2 47 31 2 0 33 92 4:30 PM 5 7 0 12 13 42 0 55 33 1 0 34 101 4:45 PM 0 12 0 12 10 28 0 38 35 4 0 39 89 Hourly Total 9 41 2 50 48 130 2 178 119 7 0 126 354 5:00 PM 3 5 0 8 21 36 0 57 45 1 0 46 111 5:15 PM 5 12 0 17 16 37 0 53 31 7 0 38 108 5:30 PM 0 10 0 10 12 39 0 51 42 1 0 43 104 5:45 PM 1 5 0 6 7 29 0 36 35 3 0 38 80 Hourly Total 9 32 0 41 56 141 0 197 153 12 0 165 403 Grand Total 54 209 2 263 180 627 3 807 651 38 0 689 1759 Approach %20.5 79.5 --22.3 77.7 --94.5 5.5 --- Total %3.1 11.9 -15.0 10.2 35.6 -45.9 37.0 2.2 -39.2 - Motorcycles 1 2 -3 0 2 -2 4 0 -4 9 % Motorcycles 1.9 1.0 -1.1 0.0 0.3 -0.2 0.6 0.0 -0.6 0.5 Cars 31 146 -177 115 421 -536 479 23 -502 1215 % Cars 57.4 69.9 -67.3 63.9 67.1 -66.4 73.6 60.5 -72.9 69.1 Light Goods Vehicles 20 52 -72 54 189 -243 149 15 -164 479 % Light Goods Vehicles 37.0 24.9 -27.4 30.0 30.1 -30.1 22.9 39.5 -23.8 27.2 Buses 0 1 -1 2 2 -4 2 0 -2 7 % Buses 0.0 0.5 -0.4 1.1 0.3 -0.5 0.3 0.0 -0.3 0.4 Single-Unit Trucks 1 5 -6 6 12 -18 16 0 -16 40 % Single-Unit Trucks 1.9 2.4 -2.3 3.3 1.9 -2.2 2.5 0.0 -2.3 2.3 Articulated Trucks 1 2 -3 2 1 -3 0 0 -0 6 % Articulated Trucks 1.9 1.0 -1.1 1.1 0.2 -0.4 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.3 Bicycles on Road 0 1 -1 1 0 -1 1 0 -1 3 % Bicycles on Road 0.0 0.5 -0.4 0.6 0.0 -0.1 0.2 0.0 -0.1 0.2 Bicycles on Crosswalk --0 ---0 ---0 -- % Bicycles on Crosswalk --0.0 ---0.0 ------ Pedestrians --2 ---3 ---0 -- % Pedestrians --100.0 ---100.0 ------ Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Cottonwood / Baxter TMC Site Code: 07 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 2 04/30/2015 7:00 AMEnding At04/30/2015 6:00 PM MotorcyclesCarsLight Goods Vehicles Buses Other Cottonwood Rd [N] Out In Total 0 3 3 138 177 315 69 72 141 2 1 3 9 10 19 218 263 481 1 2 0 31 146 0 20 52 0 0 1 0 2 8 2 54 209 2 R L P 8602532016256Out8072242435362In166747744411618TotalBaxter Ln [E]R18092541150T6271321894212P3300000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Out In Total Fake Approach [S]Baxter Ln [W]Total79543734321370In4502164217689Out3452209215681023150038L4479149217651T000000PTurning Movement Data Plot Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Cottonwood / Baxter TMC Site Code: 07 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 3 Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (7:30 AM) Start Time Cottonwood Rd Baxter Ln Baxter Ln Southbound Westbound Eastbound Right Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Peds App. Total Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 7:30 AM 2 19 0 21 2 26 0 28 27 1 0 28 77 7:45 AM 5 15 0 20 4 32 0 36 31 3 0 34 90 8:00 AM 7 16 0 23 5 30 0 35 35 6 0 41 99 8:15 AM 4 7 0 11 3 20 0 23 28 3 0 31 65 Total 18 57 0 75 14 108 0 122 121 13 0 134 331 Approach %24.0 76.0 --11.5 88.5 --90.3 9.7 --- Total %5.4 17.2 -22.7 4.2 32.6 -36.9 36.6 3.9 -40.5 - PHF 0.643 0.750 -0.815 0.700 0.844 -0.847 0.864 0.542 -0.817 0.836 Motorcycles 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 % Motorcycles 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 Cars 12 43 -55 9 70 -79 104 8 -112 246 % Cars 66.7 75.4 -73.3 64.3 64.8 -64.8 86.0 61.5 -83.6 74.3 Light Goods Vehicles 6 10 -16 3 32 -35 15 5 -20 71 % Light Goods Vehicles 33.3 17.5 -21.3 21.4 29.6 -28.7 12.4 38.5 -14.9 21.5 Buses 0 1 -1 1 2 -3 0 0 -0 4 % Buses 0.0 1.8 -1.3 7.1 1.9 -2.5 0.0 0.0 -0.0 1.2 Single-Unit Trucks 0 1 -1 1 4 -5 2 0 -2 8 % Single-Unit Trucks 0.0 1.8 -1.3 7.1 3.7 -4.1 1.7 0.0 -1.5 2.4 Articulated Trucks 0 2 -2 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 2 % Articulated Trucks 0.0 3.5 -2.7 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.6 Bicycles on Road 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 % Bicycles on Road 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 Bicycles on Crosswalk --0 ---0 ---0 -- % Bicycles on Crosswalk ------------- Pedestrians --0 ---0 ---0 -- % Pedestrians ------------- Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Cottonwood / Baxter TMC Site Code: 07 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 4 Peak Hour Data 04/30/2015 7:30 AMEnding At04/30/2015 8:30 AM MotorcyclesCarsLight Goods Vehicles Buses Other Cottonwood Rd [N] Out In Total 0 0 0 17 55 72 8 16 24 1 1 2 1 3 4 27 75 102 0 0 0 12 43 0 6 10 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 18 57 0 R L P 17851251470Out1225335790In300104602260TotalBaxter Ln [E]R1411390T1084232700P0000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Out In Total Fake Approach [S]Baxter Ln [W]Total01945826260In01122002134Out08238241260850013L01041502121T000000PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (7:30 AM) Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Cottonwood / Baxter TMC Site Code: 07 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 5 Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (11:00 AM) Start Time Cottonwood Rd Baxter Ln Baxter Ln Southbound Westbound Eastbound Right Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Peds App. Total Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 11:00 AM 3 5 0 8 5 10 1 15 21 1 0 22 45 11:15 AM 2 5 0 7 6 19 0 25 17 1 0 18 50 11:30 AM 1 3 0 4 4 12 0 16 25 0 0 25 45 11:45 AM 2 2 0 4 8 20 0 28 28 0 0 28 60 Total 8 15 0 23 23 61 1 84 91 2 0 93 200 Approach %34.8 65.2 --27.4 72.6 --97.8 2.2 --- Total %4.0 7.5 -11.5 11.5 30.5 -42.0 45.5 1.0 -46.5 - PHF 0.667 0.750 -0.719 0.719 0.763 -0.750 0.813 0.500 -0.830 0.833 Motorcycles 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 % Motorcycles 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 Cars 3 9 -12 11 45 -56 58 1 -59 127 % Cars 37.5 60.0 -52.2 47.8 73.8 -66.7 63.7 50.0 -63.4 63.5 Light Goods Vehicles 4 5 -9 8 16 -24 29 1 -30 63 % Light Goods Vehicles 50.0 33.3 -39.1 34.8 26.2 -28.6 31.9 50.0 -32.3 31.5 Buses 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 % Buses 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 Single-Unit Trucks 0 1 -1 2 0 -2 4 0 -4 7 % Single-Unit Trucks 0.0 6.7 -4.3 8.7 0.0 -2.4 4.4 0.0 -4.3 3.5 Articulated Trucks 1 0 -1 2 0 -2 0 0 -0 3 % Articulated Trucks 12.5 0.0 -4.3 8.7 0.0 -2.4 0.0 0.0 -0.0 1.5 Bicycles on Road 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 % Bicycles on Road 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 Bicycles on Crosswalk --0 ---0 ---0 -- % Bicycles on Crosswalk ------0.0 ------ Pedestrians --0 ---1 ---0 -- % Pedestrians ------100.0 ------ Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Cottonwood / Baxter TMC Site Code: 07 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 6 Peak Hour Data 04/30/2015 11:00 AMEnding At04/30/2015 12:00 PM MotorcyclesCarsLight Goods Vehicles Buses Other Cottonwood Rd [N] Out In Total 0 0 0 12 12 24 9 9 18 0 0 0 4 2 6 25 23 48 0 0 0 3 9 0 4 5 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 8 15 0 R L P 1065034670Out844024560In19090581230TotalBaxter Ln [E]R23408110T610016450P1100000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Out In Total Fake Approach [S]Baxter Ln [W]Total01075005162In059300493Out048200169011002L058290491T000000PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (11:00 AM) Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Cottonwood / Baxter TMC Site Code: 07 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 7 Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (12:00 PM) Start Time Cottonwood Rd Baxter Ln Baxter Ln Southbound Westbound Eastbound Right Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Peds App. Total Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 12:00 PM 2 4 0 6 12 20 0 32 25 0 0 25 63 12:15 PM 2 4 0 6 4 16 0 20 24 0 0 24 50 12:30 PM 2 5 0 7 2 25 0 27 23 0 0 23 57 12:45 PM 1 13 0 14 5 36 0 41 23 1 0 24 79 Total 7 26 0 33 23 97 0 120 95 1 0 96 249 Approach %21.2 78.8 --19.2 80.8 --99.0 1.0 --- Total %2.8 10.4 -13.3 9.2 39.0 -48.2 38.2 0.4 -38.6 - PHF 0.875 0.500 -0.589 0.479 0.674 -0.732 0.950 0.250 -0.960 0.788 Motorcycles 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 % Motorcycles 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 Cars 3 15 -18 10 57 -67 65 0 -65 150 % Cars 42.9 57.7 -54.5 43.5 58.8 -55.8 68.4 0.0 -67.7 60.2 Light Goods Vehicles 4 9 -13 12 39 -51 28 1 -29 93 % Light Goods Vehicles 57.1 34.6 -39.4 52.2 40.2 -42.5 29.5 100.0 -30.2 37.3 Buses 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 % Buses 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 Single-Unit Trucks 0 2 -2 1 1 -2 2 0 -2 6 % Single-Unit Trucks 0.0 7.7 -6.1 4.3 1.0 -1.7 2.1 0.0 -2.1 2.4 Articulated Trucks 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 % Articulated Trucks 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 Bicycles on Road 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 % Bicycles on Road 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 Bicycles on Crosswalk --0 ---0 ---0 -- % Bicycles on Crosswalk ------------- Pedestrians --0 ---0 ---0 -- % Pedestrians ------------- Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Cottonwood / Baxter TMC Site Code: 07 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 8 Peak Hour Data 04/30/2015 12:00 PMEnding At04/30/2015 1:00 PM MotorcyclesCarsLight Goods Vehicles Buses Other Cottonwood Rd [N] Out In Total 0 0 0 10 18 28 13 13 26 0 0 0 1 2 3 24 33 57 0 0 0 3 15 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 7 26 0 R L P 1214037800Out1202051670In24160881470TotalBaxter Ln [E]R231012100T971039570P0000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Out In Total Fake Approach [S]Baxter Ln [W]Total01257203200In065290296Out0604301104001001L065280295T000000PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (12:00 PM) Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Cottonwood / Baxter TMC Site Code: 07 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 9 Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (4:45 PM) Start Time Cottonwood Rd Baxter Ln Baxter Ln Southbound Westbound Eastbound Right Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Peds App. Total Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 4:45 PM 0 12 0 12 10 28 0 38 35 4 0 39 89 5:00 PM 3 5 0 8 21 36 0 57 45 1 0 46 111 5:15 PM 5 12 0 17 16 37 0 53 31 7 0 38 108 5:30 PM 0 10 0 10 12 39 0 51 42 1 0 43 104 Total 8 39 0 47 59 140 0 199 153 13 0 166 412 Approach %17.0 83.0 --29.6 70.4 --92.2 7.8 --- Total %1.9 9.5 -11.4 14.3 34.0 -48.3 37.1 3.2 -40.3 - PHF 0.400 0.813 -0.691 0.702 0.897 -0.873 0.850 0.464 -0.902 0.928 Motorcycles 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 2 0 -2 2 % Motorcycles 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 1.3 0.0 -1.2 0.5 Cars 5 31 -36 43 101 -144 106 7 -113 293 % Cars 62.5 79.5 -76.6 72.9 72.1 -72.4 69.3 53.8 -68.1 71.1 Light Goods Vehicles 3 7 -10 16 38 -54 43 6 -49 113 % Light Goods Vehicles 37.5 17.9 -21.3 27.1 27.1 -27.1 28.1 46.2 -29.5 27.4 Buses 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 1 0 -1 1 % Buses 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.7 0.0 -0.6 0.2 Single-Unit Trucks 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 0 -0 2 % Single-Unit Trucks 0.0 2.6 -2.1 0.0 0.7 -0.5 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.5 Articulated Trucks 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 % Articulated Trucks 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 Bicycles on Road 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 1 0 -1 1 % Bicycles on Road 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.7 0.0 -0.6 0.2 Bicycles on Crosswalk --0 ---0 ---0 -- % Bicycles on Crosswalk ------------- Pedestrians --0 ---0 ---0 -- % Pedestrians ------------- Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Cottonwood / Baxter TMC Site Code: 07 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 10 Peak Hour Data 04/30/2015 4:45 PMEnding At04/30/2015 5:45 PM MotorcyclesCarsLight Goods Vehicles Buses Other Cottonwood Rd [N] Out In Total 0 0 0 50 36 86 22 10 32 0 0 0 0 1 1 72 47 119 0 0 0 5 31 0 3 7 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 8 39 0 R L P 19221501372Out19910541440In391311042812TotalBaxter Ln [E]R590016430T14010381010P0000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Out In Total Fake Approach [S]Baxter Ln [W]Total22199012314In21134911166Out010641011480760013L21064311153T000000PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (4:45 PM) Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Cottonwood / Baxter TMC Site Code: 07 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 11 Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Durston / Cottonwood TMC Site Code: 04 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 1 Turning Movement Data Start Time Cottonwood Rd Durston Rd Cottonwood Rd Durston Rd Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 12:00 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 5 1 0 6 1 1 2 2 4 0 4 0 0 4 15 12:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 1 0 6 2 1 4 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 13 12:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 2 0 7 0 0 5 0 5 3 1 0 0 4 16 12:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 7 Hourly Total 0 1 0 0 1 1 18 5 0 24 3 2 11 2 16 4 6 0 0 10 51 1:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 2 2 0 0 4 10 1:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 2 6 1:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 7 1:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 4 Hourly Total 0 0 0 0 0 2 10 0 0 12 0 1 5 0 6 4 5 0 0 9 27 2:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 2 0 1 0 3 0 3 0 0 3 8 2:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 2:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 4 1 0 1 0 2 1 2 0 0 3 9 Hourly Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 1 0 8 3 0 2 0 5 1 6 0 0 7 20 3:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 3 6 3:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 2 5 3:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 3:45 AM 0 1 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 5 Hourly Total 0 1 1 0 2 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 2 0 2 2 3 1 0 6 17 4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 5 0 0 5 9 4:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 3 4:30 AM 0 0 2 0 2 1 1 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 8 4:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 5 0 0 6 8 Hourly Total 0 0 2 0 2 1 5 1 0 7 3 1 1 0 5 2 12 0 0 14 28 5:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 2 4 0 0 6 9 5:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 4 4 0 1 0 5 3 3 0 0 6 15 5:30 AM 0 0 2 0 2 0 7 1 0 8 2 0 0 0 2 2 5 0 0 7 19 5:45 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 7 4 0 11 2 1 2 0 5 0 9 0 0 9 26 Hourly Total 0 1 2 0 3 0 16 8 0 24 9 1 4 0 14 7 21 0 0 28 69 6:00 AM 0 1 2 0 3 0 4 2 0 6 3 1 1 0 5 3 4 0 0 7 21 6:15 AM 0 1 3 2 4 0 9 8 0 17 7 1 2 0 10 5 10 0 0 15 46 6:30 AM 1 1 6 0 8 5 16 6 0 27 8 0 3 0 11 8 20 0 0 28 74 6:45 AM 0 6 3 1 9 2 24 15 0 41 10 3 6 0 19 6 24 0 0 30 99 Hourly Total 1 9 14 3 24 7 53 31 0 91 28 5 12 0 45 22 58 0 0 80 240 7:00 AM 1 1 2 0 4 1 27 15 0 43 11 2 4 2 17 14 22 2 0 38 102 7:15 AM 1 1 0 0 2 0 29 22 0 51 14 1 3 1 18 23 47 0 0 70 141 7:30 AM 0 6 9 1 15 1 27 30 1 58 28 3 12 3 43 38 71 1 0 110 226 7:45 AM 1 4 3 3 8 2 52 45 0 99 42 1 7 2 50 47 78 0 0 125 282 Hourly Total 3 12 14 4 29 4 135 112 1 251 95 7 26 8 128 122 218 3 0 343 751 8:00 AM 0 0 4 0 4 2 40 48 0 90 52 1 4 0 57 45 79 0 0 124 275 8:15 AM 0 3 0 11 3 3 43 45 0 91 54 1 9 1 64 33 79 1 0 113 271 8:30 AM 1 6 2 0 9 0 50 45 0 95 32 3 7 0 42 18 49 0 0 67 213 8:45 AM 0 3 1 0 4 0 37 23 0 60 32 4 5 1 41 19 35 0 0 54 159 Hourly Total 1 12 7 11 20 5 170 161 0 336 170 9 25 2 204 115 242 1 0 358 918 9:00 AM 1 2 0 0 3 2 23 11 0 36 17 3 5 0 25 20 37 0 0 57 121 9:15 AM 0 3 5 3 8 2 31 12 0 45 26 0 1 0 27 23 23 0 0 46 126 9:30 AM 0 1 2 0 3 2 21 16 0 39 25 4 0 0 29 19 28 0 0 47 118 9:45 AM 0 2 0 0 2 1 18 16 0 35 22 1 0 0 23 19 25 0 0 44 104 Hourly Total 1 8 7 3 16 7 93 55 0 155 90 8 6 0 104 81 113 0 0 194 469 10:00 AM 1 1 0 0 2 2 38 27 0 67 24 1 7 0 32 13 18 0 0 31 132 10:15 AM 0 1 1 2 2 2 37 25 0 64 30 3 15 0 48 22 34 0 0 56 170 10:30 AM 1 1 1 0 3 0 27 15 0 42 21 1 10 0 32 18 18 0 0 36 113 10:45 AM 1 1 4 0 6 3 19 16 0 38 20 2 11 0 33 12 16 0 0 28 105 Hourly Total 3 4 6 2 13 7 121 83 0 211 95 7 43 0 145 65 86 0 0 151 520 11:00 AM 0 1 0 0 1 2 24 30 0 56 21 1 12 3 34 9 25 0 0 34 125 11:15 AM 0 2 4 0 6 3 29 25 0 57 22 0 15 1 37 16 24 0 0 40 140 11:30 AM 1 3 2 0 6 2 43 22 2 67 35 7 20 0 62 16 24 0 0 40 175 11:45 AM 0 2 2 0 4 3 30 21 0 54 27 0 13 0 40 26 34 0 0 60 158 Hourly Total 1 8 8 0 17 10 126 98 2 234 105 8 60 4 173 67 107 0 0 174 598 12:00 PM 0 3 4 1 7 7 34 21 4 62 33 0 11 1 44 19 37 0 1 56 169 12:15 PM 0 1 2 4 3 3 37 24 2 64 21 2 14 0 37 18 39 0 0 57 161 12:30 PM 0 4 4 0 8 6 35 19 0 60 41 4 12 0 57 6 43 1 0 50 175 12:45 PM 1 3 6 2 10 4 39 30 0 73 36 1 14 0 51 13 29 1 0 43 177 Hourly Total 1 11 16 7 28 20 145 94 6 259 131 7 51 1 189 56 148 2 1 206 682 1:00 PM 0 2 4 1 6 3 47 30 0 80 30 1 11 0 42 9 31 0 0 40 168 1:15 PM 0 4 2 0 6 4 43 26 0 73 21 1 14 0 36 11 39 0 0 50 165 1:30 PM 0 2 0 1 2 3 44 27 0 74 19 0 19 0 38 12 24 1 0 37 151 1:45 PM 0 4 1 1 5 5 47 15 0 67 29 0 17 0 46 8 21 0 0 29 147 Hourly Total 0 12 7 3 19 15 181 98 0 294 99 2 61 0 162 40 115 1 0 156 631 2:00 PM 0 2 2 0 4 4 45 28 0 77 24 6 14 0 44 10 33 1 0 44 169 2:15 PM 1 2 2 0 5 4 35 27 1 66 28 2 16 0 46 16 27 2 0 45 162 2:30 PM 1 4 1 0 6 2 52 20 0 74 28 0 16 0 44 22 28 0 0 50 174 2:45 PM 1 3 2 1 6 2 52 22 0 76 24 5 10 0 39 9 29 0 1 38 159 Hourly Total 3 11 7 1 21 12 184 97 1 293 104 13 56 0 173 57 117 3 1 177 664 3:00 PM 0 1 3 2 4 1 49 31 0 81 22 3 18 0 43 11 32 0 0 43 171 3:15 PM 0 5 3 3 8 3 47 26 1 76 35 2 16 0 53 18 71 0 1 89 226 3:30 PM 0 3 3 10 6 2 82 31 1 115 44 2 23 0 69 19 34 0 0 53 243 3:45 PM 0 3 0 5 3 3 42 33 1 78 27 4 24 1 55 20 41 0 0 61 197 Hourly Total 0 12 9 20 21 9 220 121 3 350 128 11 81 1 220 68 178 0 1 246 837 4:00 PM 0 1 3 0 4 5 52 39 0 96 23 4 23 0 50 16 36 0 0 52 202 4:15 PM 2 1 4 1 7 3 52 45 0 100 48 2 29 2 79 30 53 0 0 83 269 4:30 PM 0 0 5 1 5 12 61 28 0 101 38 0 24 0 62 22 56 0 0 78 246 4:45 PM 0 3 2 1 5 2 71 35 0 108 51 2 21 0 74 17 45 0 0 62 249 Hourly Total 2 5 14 3 21 22 236 147 0 405 160 8 97 2 265 85 190 0 0 275 966 5:00 PM 0 3 4 1 7 12 77 31 0 120 44 0 28 0 72 20 51 0 0 71 270 5:15 PM 3 2 4 0 9 5 89 55 0 149 26 5 23 0 54 22 77 2 0 101 313 5:30 PM 1 4 3 0 8 5 76 36 0 117 55 4 25 0 84 20 69 1 0 90 299 5:45 PM 0 3 1 0 4 3 70 52 0 125 40 7 18 0 65 24 54 2 0 80 274 Hourly Total 4 12 12 1 28 25 312 174 0 511 165 16 94 0 275 86 251 5 0 342 1156 6:00 PM 0 0 5 0 5 7 54 31 0 92 62 4 28 0 94 22 47 0 0 69 260 6:15 PM 1 1 3 1 5 2 57 19 1 78 33 4 23 0 60 12 40 0 0 52 195 6:30 PM 0 3 1 0 4 3 41 20 0 64 24 3 25 1 52 17 34 2 0 53 173 6:45 PM 1 0 1 1 2 4 42 16 0 62 20 4 21 0 45 13 30 0 0 43 152 Hourly Total 2 4 10 2 16 16 194 86 1 296 139 15 97 1 251 64 151 2 0 217 780 7:00 PM 0 0 4 0 4 8 45 24 0 77 18 7 19 0 44 16 42 0 0 58 183 7:15 PM 0 3 1 0 4 2 42 31 2 75 19 4 15 0 38 8 25 2 0 35 152 7:30 PM 0 0 4 0 4 7 46 24 0 77 30 3 27 0 60 7 31 0 0 38 179 7:45 PM 0 0 2 0 2 3 25 10 4 38 15 3 14 0 32 10 23 0 0 33 105 Hourly Total 0 3 11 0 14 20 158 89 6 267 82 17 75 0 174 41 121 2 0 164 619 8:00 PM 0 2 2 0 4 1 49 10 0 60 9 3 12 0 24 9 23 0 0 32 120 8:15 PM 0 2 1 0 3 4 35 8 0 47 11 3 14 0 28 5 29 0 0 34 112 8:30 PM 0 2 2 1 4 6 34 11 0 51 11 3 14 0 28 9 20 0 0 29 112 8:45 PM 0 0 0 1 0 3 38 9 0 50 4 0 16 0 20 4 21 0 0 25 95 Hourly Total 0 6 5 2 11 14 156 38 0 208 35 9 56 0 100 27 93 0 0 120 439 9:00 PM 1 0 2 1 3 3 30 10 0 43 7 4 13 0 24 7 21 0 0 28 98 9:15 PM 0 0 3 0 3 3 30 17 0 50 8 0 13 0 21 7 23 0 0 30 104 9:30 PM 0 0 3 0 3 2 28 11 0 41 12 3 4 0 19 10 21 0 0 31 94 9:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 3 23 4 0 30 5 0 9 0 14 5 12 0 0 17 61 Hourly Total 1 0 8 1 9 11 111 42 0 164 32 7 39 0 78 29 77 0 0 106 357 10:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 1 0 27 2 0 8 0 10 5 10 0 0 15 52 10:15 PM 2 2 1 0 5 1 15 3 0 19 3 0 10 0 13 3 7 0 0 10 47 10:30 PM 0 0 1 0 1 0 12 2 0 14 1 0 5 0 6 5 13 1 0 19 40 10:45 PM 0 0 1 0 1 2 12 2 0 16 3 0 4 0 7 1 4 0 0 5 29 Hourly Total 2 2 3 0 7 5 63 8 0 76 9 0 27 0 36 14 34 1 0 49 168 11:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 2 0 15 1 0 7 0 8 2 2 0 0 4 27 11:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 1 0 12 1 4 8 0 13 1 6 0 0 7 32 11:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 2 0 10 0 1 3 0 4 1 3 0 0 4 18 11:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 1 0 9 0 0 5 0 5 1 4 0 0 5 19 Hourly Total 0 0 0 0 0 2 38 6 0 46 2 5 23 0 30 5 15 0 0 20 96 Grand Total 25 134 163 63 322 215 2759 1555 20 4529 1687 159 954 21 2800 1064 2367 21 3 3452 11103 Approach %7.8 41.6 50.6 --4.7 60.9 34.3 --60.3 5.7 34.1 --30.8 68.6 0.6 --- Total %0.2 1.2 1.5 -2.9 1.9 24.8 14.0 -40.8 15.2 1.4 8.6 -25.2 9.6 21.3 0.2 -31.1 - Motorcycles 0 1 1 -2 1 11 4 -16 3 2 7 -12 6 6 1 -13 43 % Motorcycles 0.0 0.7 0.6 -0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 -0.4 0.2 1.3 0.7 -0.4 0.6 0.3 4.8 -0.4 0.4 Cars 13 100 131 -244 160 2009 1178 -3347 1292 122 715 -2129 852 1929 11 -2792 8512 % Cars 52.0 74.6 80.4 -75.8 74.4 72.8 75.8 -73.9 76.6 76.7 74.9 -76.0 80.1 81.5 52.4 -80.9 76.7 Light Goods Vehicles 12 27 20 -59 47 666 310 -1023 330 25 213 -568 195 370 7 -572 2222 % Light Goods Vehicles 48.0 20.1 12.3 -18.3 21.9 24.1 19.9 -22.6 19.6 15.7 22.3 -20.3 18.3 15.6 33.3 -16.6 20.0 Buses 0 1 0 -1 0 10 6 -16 10 0 6 -16 2 13 0 -15 48 % Buses 0.0 0.7 0.0 -0.3 0.0 0.4 0.4 -0.4 0.6 0.0 0.6 -0.6 0.2 0.5 0.0 -0.4 0.4 Single-Unit Trucks 0 2 6 -8 4 46 50 -100 47 5 10 -62 6 30 0 -36 206 % Single-Unit Trucks 0.0 1.5 3.7 -2.5 1.9 1.7 3.2 -2.2 2.8 3.1 1.0 -2.2 0.6 1.3 0.0 -1.0 1.9 Articulated Trucks 0 0 3 -3 2 2 6 -10 5 0 0 -5 0 6 0 -6 24 % Articulated Trucks 0.0 0.0 1.8 -0.9 0.9 0.1 0.4 -0.2 0.3 0.0 0.0 -0.2 0.0 0.3 0.0 -0.2 0.2 Bicycles on Road 0 3 2 -5 1 15 1 -17 0 5 3 -8 3 13 2 -18 48 % Bicycles on Road 0.0 2.2 1.2 -1.6 0.5 0.5 0.1 -0.4 0.0 3.1 0.3 -0.3 0.3 0.5 9.5 -0.5 0.4 Bicycles on Crosswalk ---15 ----4 ----2 ----2 -- % Bicycles on Crosswalk ---23.8 ----20.0 ----9.5 ----66.7 -- Pedestrians ---48 ----16 ----19 ----1 -- % Pedestrians ---76.2 ----80.0 ----90.5 ----33.3 -- Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Durston / Cottonwood TMC Site Code: 04 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 4 04/30/2015 12:00 AMEnding At05/01/2015 12:00 AM MotorcyclesCarsLight Goods Vehicles Buses Other Cottonwood Rd [N] Out In Total 4 2 6 293 244 537 79 59 138 0 1 1 19 16 35 395 322 717 0 1 1 0 13 100 131 0 12 27 20 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 11 63 25 134 163 63 R T L P 421711223720335210Out4529127161023334716In8746239391743669926TotalDurston Rd [E]R21570471601T27596310666200911L155557631011784P2020000011 12 23 2130 2129 4259 532 568 1100 9 16 25 71 75 146 2753 2800 5553 Out In Total Cottonwood Rd [S] L T R P 7 2 3 0 715 122 1292 0 213 25 330 0 6 0 10 0 13 10 52 21 954 159 1687 21Durston Rd [W]Total3155291463311367190In13279257215603452Out1827378911676373811170221L6192937013492367T6852195291064R000033PTurning Movement Data Plot Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Durston / Cottonwood TMC Site Code: 04 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 5 Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (7:30 AM) Start Time Cottonwood Rd Durston Rd Cottonwood Rd Durston Rd Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 7:30 AM 0 6 9 1 15 1 27 30 1 58 28 3 12 3 43 38 71 1 0 110 226 7:45 AM 1 4 3 3 8 2 52 45 0 99 42 1 7 2 50 47 78 0 0 125 282 8:00 AM 0 0 4 0 4 2 40 48 0 90 52 1 4 0 57 45 79 0 0 124 275 8:15 AM 0 3 0 11 3 3 43 45 0 91 54 1 9 1 64 33 79 1 0 113 271 Total 1 13 16 15 30 8 162 168 1 338 176 6 32 6 214 163 307 2 0 472 1054 Approach %3.3 43.3 53.3 --2.4 47.9 49.7 --82.2 2.8 15.0 --34.5 65.0 0.4 --- Total %0.1 1.2 1.5 -2.8 0.8 15.4 15.9 -32.1 16.7 0.6 3.0 -20.3 15.5 29.1 0.2 -44.8 - PHF 0.250 0.542 0.444 -0.500 0.667 0.779 0.875 -0.854 0.815 0.500 0.667 -0.836 0.867 0.972 0.500 -0.944 0.934 Motorcycles 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 1 0 0 -1 0 0 0 -0 1 % Motorcycles 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 -0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.1 Cars 0 12 14 -26 7 109 141 -257 121 5 19 -145 138 234 1 -373 801 % Cars 0.0 92.3 87.5 -86.7 87.5 67.3 83.9 -76.0 68.8 83.3 59.4 -67.8 84.7 76.2 50.0 -79.0 76.0 Light Goods Vehicles 1 1 2 -4 1 47 24 -72 44 1 10 -55 25 64 1 -90 221 % Light Goods Vehicles 100.0 7.7 12.5 -13.3 12.5 29.0 14.3 -21.3 25.0 16.7 31.3 -25.7 15.3 20.8 50.0 -19.1 21.0 Buses 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 3 0 2 -5 0 4 0 -4 9 % Buses 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 1.7 0.0 6.3 -2.3 0.0 1.3 0.0 -0.8 0.9 Single-Unit Trucks 0 0 0 -0 0 6 3 -9 5 0 1 -6 0 1 0 -1 16 % Single-Unit Trucks 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 3.7 1.8 -2.7 2.8 0.0 3.1 -2.8 0.0 0.3 0.0 -0.2 1.5 Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 2 0 0 -2 0 0 0 -0 2 % Articulated Trucks 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.2 Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 4 0 -4 4 % Bicycles on Road 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 -0.8 0.4 Bicycles on Crosswalk ---1 ----0 ----0 ----0 -- % Bicycles on Crosswalk ---6.7 ----0.0 ----0.0 ------- Pedestrians ---14 ----1 ----6 ----0 -- % Pedestrians ---93.3 ----100.0 ----100.0 ------- Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Durston / Cottonwood TMC Site Code: 04 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 6 Peak Hour Data 04/30/2015 7:30 AMEnding At04/30/2015 8:30 AM MotorcyclesCarsLight Goods Vehicles Buses Other Cottonwood Rd [N] Out In Total 0 0 0 13 26 39 3 4 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 30 46 0 0 0 0 0 12 14 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 1 13 16 15 R T L P 4991271103691Out33890722570In8372171826261TotalDurston Rd [E]R800170T16260471090L16830241410P1100000 1 1 291 145 436 50 55 105 0 5 5 3 8 11 344 214 558 Out In Total Cottonwood Rd [S] L T R P 0 0 1 0 19 5 121 0 10 1 44 0 2 0 3 0 1 0 7 6 32 6 176 6Durston Rd [W]Total0501148612667In03739045472Out01285827195011002L02346445307T01382500163R000000PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (7:30 AM) Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Durston / Cottonwood TMC Site Code: 04 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 7 Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (5:00 PM) Start Time Cottonwood Rd Durston Rd Cottonwood Rd Durston Rd Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 5:00 PM 0 3 4 1 7 12 77 31 0 120 44 0 28 0 72 20 51 0 0 71 270 5:15 PM 3 2 4 0 9 5 89 55 0 149 26 5 23 0 54 22 77 2 0 101 313 5:30 PM 1 4 3 0 8 5 76 36 0 117 55 4 25 0 84 20 69 1 0 90 299 5:45 PM 0 3 1 0 4 3 70 52 0 125 40 7 18 0 65 24 54 2 0 80 274 Total 4 12 12 1 28 25 312 174 0 511 165 16 94 0 275 86 251 5 0 342 1156 Approach %14.3 42.9 42.9 --4.9 61.1 34.1 --60.0 5.8 34.2 --25.1 73.4 1.5 --- Total %0.3 1.0 1.0 -2.4 2.2 27.0 15.1 -44.2 14.3 1.4 8.1 -23.8 7.4 21.7 0.4 -29.6 - PHF 0.333 0.750 0.750 -0.778 0.521 0.876 0.791 -0.857 0.750 0.571 0.839 -0.818 0.896 0.815 0.625 -0.847 0.923 Motorcycles 0 0 0 -0 0 0 1 -1 0 0 0 -0 0 1 0 -1 2 % Motorcycles 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 -0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 -0.3 0.2 Cars 0 7 12 -19 18 216 153 -387 133 12 71 -216 69 217 2 -288 910 % Cars 0.0 58.3 100.0 -67.9 72.0 69.2 87.9 -75.7 80.6 75.0 75.5 -78.5 80.2 86.5 40.0 -84.2 78.7 Light Goods Vehicles 4 5 0 -9 7 93 18 -118 32 2 21 -55 16 33 3 -52 234 % Light Goods Vehicles 100.0 41.7 0.0 -32.1 28.0 29.8 10.3 -23.1 19.4 12.5 22.3 -20.0 18.6 13.1 60.0 -15.2 20.2 Buses 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 % Buses 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 Single-Unit Trucks 0 0 0 -0 0 2 1 -3 0 0 2 -2 0 0 0 -0 5 % Single-Unit Trucks 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.6 0.6 -0.6 0.0 0.0 2.1 -0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.4 Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 % Articulated Trucks 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 -0 0 1 1 -2 0 2 0 -2 1 0 0 -1 5 % Bicycles on Road 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.3 0.6 -0.4 0.0 12.5 0.0 -0.7 1.2 0.0 0.0 -0.3 0.4 Bicycles on Crosswalk ---0 ----0 ----0 ----0 -- % Bicycles on Crosswalk ---0.0 ----------------- Pedestrians ---1 ----0 ----0 ----0 -- % Pedestrians ---100.0 ----------------- Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Durston / Cottonwood TMC Site Code: 04 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 8 Peak Hour Data 04/30/2015 5:00 PMEnding At04/30/2015 6:00 PM MotorcyclesCarsLight Goods Vehicles Buses Other Cottonwood Rd [N] Out In Total 0 0 0 32 19 51 12 9 21 0 0 0 2 0 2 46 28 74 0 0 0 0 0 7 12 0 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 12 12 1 R T L P 42800653621Out511501183871In939501837492TotalDurston Rd [E]R25007180T31230932160L17420181531P0000001 0 1 229 216 445 39 55 94 0 0 0 3 4 7 272 275 547 Out In Total Cottonwood Rd [S] L T R P 0 0 0 0 71 12 133 0 21 2 32 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 94 16 165 0Durston Rd [W]Total157517006752In12885201342Out028711805410023005L12173300251T069160186R000000PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (5:00 PM) Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Durston / Cottonwood TMC Site Code: 04 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 9 Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Durston / Ferguson TMC Site Code: 02 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 1 Turning Movement Data Start Time Ferguson Ave Durston Rd Ferguson Ave Durston Rd Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 12:00 AM 1 2 0 0 3 0 3 1 0 4 0 0 1 0 1 1 2 0 0 3 11 12:15 AM 2 2 0 1 4 0 4 2 0 6 0 4 0 0 4 0 2 1 0 3 17 12:30 AM 3 0 1 0 4 0 4 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 3 12 12:45 AM 3 0 0 0 3 0 3 1 0 4 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 2 10 Hourly Total 9 4 1 1 14 0 14 4 0 18 1 4 2 0 7 2 8 1 0 11 50 1:00 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 3 1 2 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 2 9 1:15 AM 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 1 0 3 1 2 1 0 4 1 1 0 0 2 11 1:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 2 0 4 0 0 1 0 1 6 1:45 AM 1 1 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 7 Hourly Total 2 3 0 0 5 1 7 1 0 9 4 4 5 0 13 1 4 1 0 6 33 2:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 4 2:15 AM 1 2 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 2:30 AM 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Hourly Total 2 2 0 0 4 0 6 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 13 3:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 5 3:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 3 3:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 4 Hourly Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 2 0 7 0 2 1 0 3 0 2 1 0 3 13 4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 2 1 2 3 0 6 10 4:15 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 3 4:30 AM 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 3 0 0 2 0 2 7 4:45 AM 1 4 0 0 5 0 0 2 0 2 1 3 1 0 5 0 0 2 0 2 14 Hourly Total 2 5 0 0 7 0 3 2 0 5 4 5 2 0 11 2 2 7 0 11 34 5:00 AM 1 10 0 0 11 0 1 2 1 3 0 3 0 0 3 4 2 2 0 8 25 5:15 AM 3 8 0 0 11 0 2 15 0 17 1 1 0 0 2 4 4 2 0 10 40 5:30 AM 0 7 0 0 7 1 5 2 0 8 0 3 2 0 5 6 3 2 0 11 31 5:45 AM 0 9 0 0 9 0 10 5 0 15 0 5 0 1 5 3 5 5 1 13 42 Hourly Total 4 34 0 0 38 1 18 24 1 43 1 12 2 1 15 17 14 11 1 42 138 6:00 AM 5 5 0 0 10 0 2 5 1 7 2 6 3 0 11 3 4 6 1 13 41 6:15 AM 4 7 0 1 11 0 9 10 2 19 4 11 3 1 18 3 5 7 2 15 63 6:30 AM 4 16 0 2 20 0 20 3 0 23 7 28 3 1 38 8 12 13 0 33 114 6:45 AM 8 15 0 1 23 1 30 14 1 45 8 26 5 2 39 7 19 12 1 38 145 Hourly Total 21 43 0 4 64 1 61 32 4 94 21 71 14 4 106 21 40 38 4 99 363 7:00 AM 20 18 0 0 38 0 17 14 0 31 3 19 5 0 27 9 17 14 0 40 136 7:15 AM 15 16 0 0 31 0 28 16 0 44 10 31 10 2 51 14 21 21 0 56 182 7:30 AM 20 39 1 0 60 0 27 26 1 53 12 32 6 0 50 30 61 35 0 126 289 7:45 AM 33 45 2 0 80 2 57 23 0 82 10 26 20 2 56 29 42 38 0 109 327 Hourly Total 88 118 3 0 209 2 129 79 1 210 35 108 41 4 184 82 141 108 0 331 934 8:00 AM 25 39 0 0 64 0 50 19 1 69 17 22 18 3 57 31 53 34 0 118 308 8:15 AM 23 47 0 9 70 1 56 13 0 70 12 36 15 1 63 37 48 37 0 122 325 8:30 AM 26 35 0 3 61 1 35 19 3 55 14 30 15 0 59 36 46 45 0 127 302 8:45 AM 17 51 1 0 69 1 39 11 0 51 13 35 8 0 56 28 35 17 0 80 256 Hourly Total 91 172 1 12 264 3 180 62 4 245 56 123 56 4 235 132 182 133 0 447 1191 9:00 AM 13 31 1 2 45 1 14 11 1 26 14 27 9 2 50 18 26 20 0 64 185 9:15 AM 16 28 0 0 44 1 23 13 0 37 3 25 13 0 41 15 24 26 0 65 187 9:30 AM 17 28 0 0 45 1 23 15 0 39 8 30 15 2 53 23 31 20 0 74 211 9:45 AM 14 34 0 0 48 2 19 18 0 39 16 42 7 2 65 25 9 23 0 57 209 Hourly Total 60 121 1 2 182 5 79 57 1 141 41 124 44 6 209 81 90 89 0 260 792 10:00 AM 32 26 2 1 60 0 23 10 0 33 11 31 14 0 56 12 20 21 1 53 202 10:15 AM 19 28 1 0 48 0 22 13 0 35 9 35 12 0 56 23 27 31 0 81 220 10:30 AM 17 39 0 0 56 0 19 8 0 27 10 32 7 0 49 12 27 16 0 55 187 10:45 AM 18 30 0 0 48 0 17 10 0 27 11 22 17 0 50 7 15 21 0 43 168 Hourly Total 86 123 3 1 212 0 81 41 0 122 41 120 50 0 211 54 89 89 1 232 777 11:00 AM 22 30 0 0 52 0 22 22 0 44 15 19 12 0 46 10 30 32 0 72 214 11:15 AM 23 38 1 0 62 1 31 13 0 45 14 34 11 2 59 11 24 20 0 55 221 11:30 AM 31 22 1 0 54 2 19 13 1 34 10 26 11 2 47 15 30 37 0 82 217 11:45 AM 27 39 0 2 66 1 22 16 0 39 15 23 12 0 50 6 35 21 2 62 217 Hourly Total 103 129 2 2 234 4 94 64 1 162 54 102 46 4 202 42 119 110 2 271 869 12:00 PM 29 36 3 1 68 1 24 16 0 41 11 31 12 0 54 13 31 28 0 72 235 12:15 PM 28 27 1 0 56 3 30 16 1 49 15 32 10 0 57 12 36 19 0 67 229 12:30 PM 28 31 0 2 59 5 33 18 2 56 13 32 12 0 57 19 46 23 0 88 260 12:45 PM 29 45 1 0 75 1 40 10 0 51 12 35 17 2 64 17 38 25 0 80 270 Hourly Total 114 139 5 3 258 10 127 60 3 197 51 130 51 2 232 61 151 95 0 307 994 1:00 PM 42 43 1 0 86 2 30 13 0 45 19 38 11 1 68 15 22 29 0 66 265 1:15 PM 26 37 1 0 64 1 40 18 0 59 15 49 9 1 73 11 26 16 0 53 249 1:30 PM 27 44 0 0 71 3 21 23 0 47 10 37 6 0 53 15 31 24 0 70 241 1:45 PM 29 23 3 0 55 1 33 13 0 47 17 33 16 2 66 17 27 16 3 60 228 Hourly Total 124 147 5 0 276 7 124 67 0 198 61 157 42 4 260 58 106 85 3 249 983 2:00 PM 27 24 1 0 52 2 28 15 0 45 18 27 19 0 64 13 28 32 0 73 234 2:15 PM 28 42 1 1 71 3 24 19 0 46 13 36 11 0 60 9 20 26 0 55 232 2:30 PM 22 35 1 2 58 2 27 14 0 43 14 29 13 2 56 16 24 24 1 64 221 2:45 PM 29 29 0 0 58 2 31 9 0 42 11 28 19 0 58 13 23 21 0 57 215 Hourly Total 106 130 3 3 239 9 110 57 0 176 56 120 62 2 238 51 95 103 1 249 902 3:00 PM 38 39 0 1 77 2 43 17 1 62 17 36 21 0 74 16 18 22 0 56 269 3:15 PM 51 40 0 0 91 1 41 12 0 54 9 27 34 0 70 14 32 24 0 70 285 3:30 PM 36 60 0 11 96 0 44 19 0 63 20 33 15 4 68 30 46 38 4 114 341 3:45 PM 20 39 1 1 60 1 35 20 1 56 21 46 17 2 84 17 54 32 2 103 303 Hourly Total 145 178 1 13 324 4 163 68 2 235 67 142 87 6 296 77 150 116 6 343 1198 4:00 PM 27 43 1 0 71 6 51 11 0 68 10 36 21 3 67 22 24 30 0 76 282 4:15 PM 37 30 0 2 67 1 51 14 0 66 16 48 20 1 84 21 40 40 0 101 318 4:30 PM 29 45 1 1 75 0 41 19 0 60 13 36 25 0 74 20 47 44 0 111 320 4:45 PM 42 48 2 1 92 0 48 24 0 72 16 45 30 3 91 24 39 37 0 100 355 Hourly Total 135 166 4 4 305 7 191 68 0 266 55 165 96 7 316 87 150 151 0 388 1275 5:00 PM 40 28 0 0 68 2 61 17 0 80 17 37 47 0 101 20 40 30 0 90 339 5:15 PM 46 35 0 0 81 2 62 13 0 77 18 41 31 0 90 27 23 32 0 82 330 5:30 PM 27 43 1 2 71 5 48 28 0 81 21 49 20 0 90 24 24 51 0 99 341 5:45 PM 27 42 0 0 69 4 49 26 2 79 19 36 18 2 73 40 22 39 0 101 322 Hourly Total 140 148 1 2 289 13 220 84 2 317 75 163 116 2 354 111 109 152 0 372 1332 6:00 PM 44 38 0 2 82 7 45 17 0 69 9 32 23 2 64 16 53 40 3 109 324 6:15 PM 24 32 1 1 57 3 31 13 1 47 18 38 20 1 76 24 39 28 0 91 271 6:30 PM 21 26 1 3 48 0 32 7 2 39 14 21 16 3 51 12 26 23 0 61 199 6:45 PM 31 38 0 0 69 4 33 15 0 52 20 27 11 2 58 8 23 24 0 55 234 Hourly Total 120 134 2 6 256 14 141 52 3 207 61 118 70 8 249 60 141 115 3 316 1028 7:00 PM 29 28 3 0 60 4 42 13 1 59 8 25 14 0 47 17 30 18 0 65 231 7:15 PM 33 25 0 3 58 1 26 13 0 40 13 20 10 0 43 8 21 15 0 44 185 7:30 PM 24 16 1 0 41 1 33 9 1 43 11 12 14 0 37 13 47 18 0 78 199 7:45 PM 14 26 0 0 40 0 22 7 0 29 8 17 14 3 39 7 29 5 0 41 149 Hourly Total 100 95 4 3 199 6 123 42 2 171 40 74 52 3 166 45 127 56 0 228 764 8:00 PM 22 21 2 0 45 0 34 11 2 45 10 20 12 0 42 4 26 7 0 37 169 8:15 PM 12 18 0 1 30 1 30 3 0 34 11 14 10 1 35 7 23 12 0 42 141 8:30 PM 23 21 0 0 44 2 18 16 1 36 10 16 9 0 35 4 15 11 0 30 145 8:45 PM 26 17 2 0 45 0 22 6 0 28 13 20 10 1 43 4 13 8 0 25 141 Hourly Total 83 77 4 1 164 3 104 36 3 143 44 70 41 2 155 19 77 38 0 134 596 9:00 PM 20 18 0 0 38 2 18 7 0 27 9 12 7 0 28 5 14 9 0 28 121 9:15 PM 20 16 1 1 37 2 27 6 0 35 6 14 11 1 31 11 14 9 0 34 137 9:30 PM 16 13 0 0 29 0 15 6 0 21 4 16 9 0 29 11 22 9 0 42 121 9:45 PM 10 11 1 0 22 0 12 3 0 15 7 11 6 0 24 3 7 7 0 17 78 Hourly Total 66 58 2 1 126 4 72 22 0 98 26 53 33 1 112 30 57 34 0 121 457 10:00 PM 5 5 1 0 11 0 12 6 0 18 7 11 8 0 26 3 9 1 0 13 68 10:15 PM 3 10 0 0 13 3 16 3 0 22 5 7 3 0 15 5 6 2 0 13 63 10:30 PM 4 9 0 0 13 1 7 4 0 12 5 7 7 0 19 1 6 5 0 12 56 10:45 PM 4 5 1 0 10 1 12 1 0 14 2 4 5 0 11 4 3 2 0 9 44 Hourly Total 16 29 2 0 47 5 47 14 0 66 19 29 23 0 71 13 24 10 0 47 231 11:00 PM 1 3 0 0 4 0 9 4 0 13 3 0 4 0 7 0 2 1 0 3 27 11:15 PM 4 3 0 0 7 0 6 2 0 8 0 4 2 0 6 0 4 1 0 5 26 11:30 PM 6 3 0 0 9 0 4 0 0 4 3 1 3 0 7 0 1 1 0 2 22 11:45 PM 3 2 0 0 5 1 7 5 0 13 1 4 3 0 8 0 3 0 0 3 29 Hourly Total 14 11 0 0 25 1 26 11 0 38 7 9 12 0 28 0 10 3 0 13 104 Grand Total 1631 2066 44 58 3741 100 2125 949 27 3174 820 1905 948 60 3673 1049 1888 1546 21 4483 15071 Approach %43.6 55.2 1.2 --3.2 67.0 29.9 --22.3 51.9 25.8 --23.4 42.1 34.5 --- Total %10.8 13.7 0.3 -24.8 0.7 14.1 6.3 -21.1 5.4 12.6 6.3 -24.4 7.0 12.5 10.3 -29.7 - Motorcycles 4 8 0 -12 1 5 5 -11 5 9 2 -16 2 3 2 -7 46 % Motorcycles 0.2 0.4 0.0 -0.3 1.0 0.2 0.5 -0.3 0.6 0.5 0.2 -0.4 0.2 0.2 0.1 -0.2 0.3 Cars 1213 1562 41 -2816 78 1674 716 -2468 610 1456 758 -2824 890 1461 1120 -3471 11579 % Cars 74.4 75.6 93.2 -75.3 78.0 78.8 75.4 -77.8 74.4 76.4 80.0 -76.9 84.8 77.4 72.4 -77.4 76.8 Light Goods Vehicles 369 452 2 -823 14 407 208 -629 175 396 177 -748 146 384 384 -914 3114 % Light Goods Vehicles 22.6 21.9 4.5 -22.0 14.0 19.2 21.9 -19.8 21.3 20.8 18.7 -20.4 13.9 20.3 24.8 -20.4 20.7 Buses 3 3 0 -6 2 2 4 -8 19 4 4 -27 2 7 6 -15 56 % Buses 0.2 0.1 0.0 -0.2 2.0 0.1 0.4 -0.3 2.3 0.2 0.4 -0.7 0.2 0.4 0.4 -0.3 0.4 Single-Unit Trucks 32 32 1 -65 2 17 7 -26 6 27 5 -38 7 13 29 -49 178 % Single-Unit Trucks 2.0 1.5 2.3 -1.7 2.0 0.8 0.7 -0.8 0.7 1.4 0.5 -1.0 0.7 0.7 1.9 -1.1 1.2 Articulated Trucks 9 7 0 -16 1 12 7 -20 1 10 1 -12 0 8 3 -11 59 % Articulated Trucks 0.6 0.3 0.0 -0.4 1.0 0.6 0.7 -0.6 0.1 0.5 0.1 -0.3 0.0 0.4 0.2 -0.2 0.4 Bicycles on Road 1 2 0 -3 2 8 2 -12 4 3 1 -8 2 12 2 -16 39 % Bicycles on Road 0.1 0.1 0.0 -0.1 2.0 0.4 0.2 -0.4 0.5 0.2 0.1 -0.2 0.2 0.6 0.1 -0.4 0.3 Bicycles on Crosswalk ---11 ----2 ----12 ----2 -- % Bicycles on Crosswalk ---19.0 ----7.4 ----20.0 ----9.5 -- Pedestrians ---47 ----25 ----48 ----19 -- % Pedestrians ---81.0 ----92.6 ----80.0 ----90.5 -- Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Durston / Ferguson TMC Site Code: 02 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 4 04/30/2015 12:00 AMEnding At05/01/2015 12:00 AM MotorcyclesCarsLight Goods Vehicles Buses Other Ferguson Ave [N] Out In Total 12 12 24 2654 2816 5470 794 823 1617 12 6 18 79 84 163 3551 3741 7292 4 8 0 0 1213 1562 41 0 369 452 2 0 3 3 0 0 42 41 1 58 1631 2066 44 58 R T L P 2752452656121128Out3174588629246811In5926103341190458019TotalDurston Rd [E]R1005214781T212537240716745L9491642087165P2727000015 16 31 3168 2824 5992 806 748 1554 9 27 36 66 58 124 4064 3673 7737 Out In Total Ferguson Ave [S] L T R P 2 9 5 0 758 1456 610 0 177 396 175 0 4 4 19 0 7 40 11 60 948 1905 820 60Durston Rd [W]Total1871161867241629187In7347191415764483Out1136459539864704211203846341546L314613847331888T2890146291049R00002121PTurning Movement Data Plot Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Durston / Ferguson TMC Site Code: 02 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 5 Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (7:45 AM) Start Time Ferguson Ave Durston Rd Ferguson Ave Durston Rd Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 7:45 AM 33 45 2 0 80 2 57 23 0 82 10 26 20 2 56 29 42 38 0 109 327 8:00 AM 25 39 0 0 64 0 50 19 1 69 17 22 18 3 57 31 53 34 0 118 308 8:15 AM 23 47 0 9 70 1 56 13 0 70 12 36 15 1 63 37 48 37 0 122 325 8:30 AM 26 35 0 3 61 1 35 19 3 55 14 30 15 0 59 36 46 45 0 127 302 Total 107 166 2 12 275 4 198 74 4 276 53 114 68 6 235 133 189 154 0 476 1262 Approach %38.9 60.4 0.7 --1.4 71.7 26.8 --22.6 48.5 28.9 --27.9 39.7 32.4 --- Total %8.5 13.2 0.2 -21.8 0.3 15.7 5.9 -21.9 4.2 9.0 5.4 -18.6 10.5 15.0 12.2 -37.7 - PHF 0.811 0.883 0.250 -0.859 0.500 0.868 0.804 -0.841 0.779 0.792 0.850 -0.933 0.899 0.892 0.856 -0.937 0.965 Motorcycles 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 % Motorcycles 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 Cars 87 124 2 -213 2 160 55 -217 43 90 55 -188 125 163 100 -388 1006 % Cars 81.3 74.7 100.0 -77.5 50.0 80.8 74.3 -78.6 81.1 78.9 80.9 -80.0 94.0 86.2 64.9 -81.5 79.7 Light Goods Vehicles 18 36 0 -54 0 35 18 -53 8 21 10 -39 6 21 46 -73 219 % Light Goods Vehicles 16.8 21.7 0.0 -19.6 0.0 17.7 24.3 -19.2 15.1 18.4 14.7 -16.6 4.5 11.1 29.9 -15.3 17.4 Buses 0 0 0 -0 2 1 1 -4 1 1 3 -5 0 3 3 -6 15 % Buses 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 50.0 0.5 1.4 -1.4 1.9 0.9 4.4 -2.1 0.0 1.6 1.9 -1.3 1.2 Single-Unit Trucks 1 4 0 -5 0 2 0 -2 0 1 0 -1 2 0 5 -7 15 % Single-Unit Trucks 0.9 2.4 0.0 -1.8 0.0 1.0 0.0 -0.7 0.0 0.9 0.0 -0.4 1.5 0.0 3.2 -1.5 1.2 Articulated Trucks 1 2 0 -3 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 3 % Articulated Trucks 0.9 1.2 0.0 -1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.2 Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 1 1 0 -2 0 2 0 -2 4 % Bicycles on Road 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 1.9 0.9 0.0 -0.9 0.0 1.1 0.0 -0.4 0.3 Bicycles on Crosswalk ---4 ----0 ----3 ----0 -- % Bicycles on Crosswalk ---33.3 ----0.0 ----50.0 ------- Pedestrians ---8 ----4 ----3 ----0 -- % Pedestrians ---66.7 ----100.0 ----50.0 ------- Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Durston / Ferguson TMC Site Code: 02 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 6 Peak Hour Data 04/30/2015 7:45 AMEnding At04/30/2015 8:45 AM MotorcyclesCarsLight Goods Vehicles Buses Other Ferguson Ave [N] Out In Total 0 0 0 192 213 405 67 54 121 6 0 6 7 8 15 272 275 547 0 0 0 0 87 124 2 0 18 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 6 0 12 107 166 2 12 R T L P 24434292080Out27624532170In52058824250TotalDurston Rd [E]R402020T19821351600L740118550P4400000 0 0 304 188 492 60 39 99 1 5 6 8 3 11 373 235 608 Out In Total Ferguson Ave [S] L T R P 0 0 0 0 55 90 43 0 10 21 8 0 3 1 1 0 0 2 1 6 68 114 53 6Durston Rd [W]Total06901361013849In03887369476Out0302634437301004635154L01632132189T0125602133R000000PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (7:45 AM) Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Durston / Ferguson TMC Site Code: 02 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 7 Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (4:45 PM) Start Time Ferguson Ave Durston Rd Ferguson Ave Durston Rd Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 4:45 PM 42 48 2 1 92 0 48 24 0 72 16 45 30 3 91 24 39 37 0 100 355 5:00 PM 40 28 0 0 68 2 61 17 0 80 17 37 47 0 101 20 40 30 0 90 339 5:15 PM 46 35 0 0 81 2 62 13 0 77 18 41 31 0 90 27 23 32 0 82 330 5:30 PM 27 43 1 2 71 5 48 28 0 81 21 49 20 0 90 24 24 51 0 99 341 Total 155 154 3 3 312 9 219 82 0 310 72 172 128 3 372 95 126 150 0 371 1365 Approach %49.7 49.4 1.0 --2.9 70.6 26.5 --19.4 46.2 34.4 --25.6 34.0 40.4 --- Total %11.4 11.3 0.2 -22.9 0.7 16.0 6.0 -22.7 5.3 12.6 9.4 -27.3 7.0 9.2 11.0 -27.2 - PHF 0.842 0.802 0.375 -0.848 0.450 0.883 0.732 -0.957 0.857 0.878 0.681 -0.921 0.880 0.788 0.735 -0.928 0.961 Motorcycles 0 1 0 -1 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 1 % Motorcycles 0.0 0.6 0.0 -0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.1 Cars 134 132 3 -269 8 185 67 -260 56 140 103 -299 83 101 110 -294 1122 % Cars 86.5 85.7 100.0 -86.2 88.9 84.5 81.7 -83.9 77.8 81.4 80.5 -80.4 87.4 80.2 73.3 -79.2 82.2 Light Goods Vehicles 20 20 0 -40 1 32 15 -48 13 29 24 -66 12 24 38 -74 228 % Light Goods Vehicles 12.9 13.0 0.0 -12.8 11.1 14.6 18.3 -15.5 18.1 16.9 18.8 -17.7 12.6 19.0 25.3 -19.9 16.7 Buses 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 3 0 0 -3 0 1 0 -1 4 % Buses 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 4.2 0.0 0.0 -0.8 0.0 0.8 0.0 -0.3 0.3 Single-Unit Trucks 1 1 0 -2 0 0 0 -0 0 1 1 -2 0 0 2 -2 6 % Single-Unit Trucks 0.6 0.6 0.0 -0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.6 0.8 -0.5 0.0 0.0 1.3 -0.5 0.4 Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 -0 0 1 0 -1 0 2 0 -2 0 0 0 -0 3 % Articulated Trucks 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 -0.3 0.0 1.2 0.0 -0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.2 Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 -0 0 1 0 -1 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -0 1 % Bicycles on Road 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 -0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.1 Bicycles on Crosswalk ---0 ----0 ----0 ----0 -- % Bicycles on Crosswalk ---0.0 ---------0.0 ------- Pedestrians ---3 ----0 ----3 ----0 -- % Pedestrians ---100.0 ---------100.0 ------- Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Durston / Ferguson TMC Site Code: 02 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 8 Peak Hour Data 04/30/2015 4:45 PMEnding At04/30/2015 5:45 PM MotorcyclesCarsLight Goods Vehicles Buses Other Ferguson Ave [N] Out In Total 0 1 1 258 269 527 68 40 108 0 0 0 5 2 7 331 312 643 0 1 0 0 134 132 3 0 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 3 155 154 3 3 R T L P 20104371600Out31020482600In51124854200TotalDurston Rd [E]R900180T21920321850L820015670P0000001 0 1 282 299 581 47 66 113 0 3 3 1 4 5 331 372 703 Out In Total Ferguson Ave [S] L T R P 0 0 0 0 103 140 56 0 24 29 13 0 0 0 3 0 1 3 0 3 128 172 72 3Durston Rd [W]Total071615016873In02947412371Out0422760450201103802150L01012410126T083120095R000000PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (4:45 PM) Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Durston / Ferguson TMC Site Code: 02 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 9 Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Durston / Flanders Mill TMC Site Code: 03 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 1 Turning Movement Data Start Time Flanders Mill Rd Durston Rd Durston Rd Southbound Westbound Eastbound Right Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Peds App. Total Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 7:00 AM 7 5 1 12 4 36 1 40 34 4 0 38 90 7:15 AM 8 9 0 17 7 49 0 56 48 11 0 59 132 7:30 AM 17 14 0 31 2 45 0 47 108 13 0 121 199 7:45 AM 33 16 1 49 15 87 0 102 111 23 1 134 285 Hourly Total 65 44 2 109 28 217 1 245 301 51 1 352 706 8:00 AM 23 17 1 40 13 83 0 96 109 28 17 137 273 8:15 AM 20 19 9 39 4 100 0 104 110 21 29 131 274 8:30 AM 23 13 5 36 9 77 0 86 102 22 5 124 246 8:45 AM 14 14 0 28 5 55 0 60 58 11 0 69 157 Hourly Total 80 63 15 143 31 315 0 346 379 82 51 461 950 *** BREAK ***------------- 11:00 AM 17 3 1 20 4 55 1 59 71 14 1 85 164 11:15 AM 7 3 0 10 8 51 0 59 49 14 4 63 132 11:30 AM 9 2 0 11 4 60 0 64 77 13 3 90 165 11:45 AM 10 5 1 15 5 55 0 60 61 12 1 73 148 Hourly Total 43 13 2 56 21 221 1 242 258 53 9 311 609 12:00 PM 11 5 0 16 6 57 0 63 60 17 1 77 156 12:15 PM 14 3 3 17 5 56 0 61 62 15 0 77 155 12:30 PM 4 7 0 11 3 64 0 67 76 12 1 88 166 12:45 PM 17 15 3 32 6 79 0 85 50 19 0 69 186 Hourly Total 46 30 6 76 20 256 0 276 248 63 2 311 663 *** BREAK ***------------- 4:00 PM 23 11 2 34 13 90 1 103 70 4 1 74 211 4:15 PM 17 6 0 23 12 90 0 102 91 30 0 121 246 4:30 PM 18 11 0 29 14 85 0 99 96 18 0 114 242 4:45 PM 25 13 0 38 13 102 0 115 86 17 2 103 256 Hourly Total 83 41 2 124 52 367 1 419 343 69 3 412 955 5:00 PM 19 9 1 28 26 121 0 147 87 22 0 109 284 5:15 PM 36 17 2 53 13 130 0 143 122 24 0 146 342 5:30 PM 32 5 2 37 13 90 0 103 122 39 2 161 301 5:45 PM 24 9 1 33 10 109 0 119 96 20 0 116 268 Hourly Total 111 40 6 151 62 450 0 512 427 105 2 532 1195 Grand Total 428 231 33 659 214 1826 3 2040 1956 423 68 2379 5078 Approach %64.9 35.1 --10.5 89.5 --82.2 17.8 --- Total %8.4 4.5 -13.0 4.2 36.0 -40.2 38.5 8.3 -46.8 - Motorcycles 1 1 -2 0 4 -4 2 0 -2 8 % Motorcycles 0.2 0.4 -0.3 0.0 0.2 -0.2 0.1 0.0 -0.1 0.2 Cars 300 179 -479 163 1324 -1487 1397 298 -1695 3661 % Cars 70.1 77.5 -72.7 76.2 72.5 -72.9 71.4 70.4 -71.2 72.1 Light Goods Vehicles 105 48 -153 47 453 -500 502 101 -603 1256 % Light Goods Vehicles 24.5 20.8 -23.2 22.0 24.8 -24.5 25.7 23.9 -25.3 24.7 Buses 5 2 -7 1 8 -9 13 6 -19 35 % Buses 1.2 0.9 -1.1 0.5 0.4 -0.4 0.7 1.4 -0.8 0.7 Single-Unit Trucks 13 1 -14 2 29 -31 29 11 -40 85 % Single-Unit Trucks 3.0 0.4 -2.1 0.9 1.6 -1.5 1.5 2.6 -1.7 1.7 Articulated Trucks 2 0 -2 1 6 -7 5 5 -10 19 % Articulated Trucks 0.5 0.0 -0.3 0.5 0.3 -0.3 0.3 1.2 -0.4 0.4 Bicycles on Road 2 0 -2 0 2 -2 8 2 -10 14 % Bicycles on Road 0.5 0.0 -0.3 0.0 0.1 -0.1 0.4 0.5 -0.4 0.3 Bicycles on Crosswalk --4 ---0 ---4 -- % Bicycles on Crosswalk --12.1 ---0.0 ---5.9 -- Pedestrians --29 ---3 ---64 -- % Pedestrians --87.9 ---100.0 ---94.1 -- Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Durston / Flanders Mill TMC Site Code: 03 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 2 04/30/2015 7:00 AMEnding At04/30/2015 6:00 PM MotorcyclesCarsLight Goods Vehicles Buses Other Flanders Mill Rd [N] Out In Total 0 2 2 461 479 940 148 153 301 7 7 14 21 18 39 637 659 1296 1 1 0 300 179 0 105 48 0 5 2 0 17 1 33 428 231 33 R L P 2187431555015763Out204040950014874In42278324105030637TotalDurston Rd [E]R21431471630T182637845313244P3300000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Out In Total Fake Approach [S]Durston Rd [W]Total733191161321144633In2169560319602379Out51624558135422540298101618423L2139750213421956T00006868PTurning Movement Data Plot Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Durston / Flanders Mill TMC Site Code: 03 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 3 Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (7:45 AM) Start Time Flanders Mill Rd Durston Rd Durston Rd Southbound Westbound Eastbound Right Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Peds App. Total Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 7:45 AM 33 16 1 49 15 87 0 102 111 23 1 134 285 8:00 AM 23 17 1 40 13 83 0 96 109 28 17 137 273 8:15 AM 20 19 9 39 4 100 0 104 110 21 29 131 274 8:30 AM 23 13 5 36 9 77 0 86 102 22 5 124 246 Total 99 65 16 164 41 347 0 388 432 94 52 526 1078 Approach %60.4 39.6 --10.6 89.4 --82.1 17.9 --- Total %9.2 6.0 -15.2 3.8 32.2 -36.0 40.1 8.7 -48.8 - PHF 0.750 0.855 -0.837 0.683 0.868 -0.933 0.973 0.839 -0.960 0.946 Motorcycles 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 % Motorcycles 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 Cars 67 57 -124 35 254 -289 320 71 -391 804 % Cars 67.7 87.7 -75.6 85.4 73.2 -74.5 74.1 75.5 -74.3 74.6 Light Goods Vehicles 25 6 -31 5 82 -87 96 19 -115 233 % Light Goods Vehicles 25.3 9.2 -18.9 12.2 23.6 -22.4 22.2 20.2 -21.9 21.6 Buses 1 1 -2 1 3 -4 5 2 -7 13 % Buses 1.0 1.5 -1.2 2.4 0.9 -1.0 1.2 2.1 -1.3 1.2 Single-Unit Trucks 6 1 -7 0 7 -7 8 1 -9 23 % Single-Unit Trucks 6.1 1.5 -4.3 0.0 2.0 -1.8 1.9 1.1 -1.7 2.1 Articulated Trucks 0 0 -0 0 1 -1 0 0 -0 1 % Articulated Trucks 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.3 -0.3 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.1 Bicycles on Road 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 3 1 -4 4 % Bicycles on Road 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.7 1.1 -0.8 0.4 Bicycles on Crosswalk --1 ---0 ---3 -- % Bicycles on Crosswalk --6.3 -------5.8 -- Pedestrians --15 ---0 ---49 -- % Pedestrians --93.8 -------94.2 -- Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Durston / Flanders Mill TMC Site Code: 03 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 4 Peak Hour Data 04/30/2015 7:45 AMEnding At04/30/2015 8:45 AM MotorcyclesCarsLight Goods Vehicles Buses Other Flanders Mill Rd [N] Out In Total 0 0 0 106 124 230 24 31 55 3 2 5 2 7 9 135 164 299 0 0 0 67 57 0 25 6 0 1 1 0 6 1 16 99 65 16 R L P 4971261023770Out38884872890In88520101896660TotalDurston Rd [E]R41015350T34783822540P0000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Out In Total Fake Approach [S]Durston Rd [W]Total07122221127972In0391115713526Out0321107414446071192294L032096511432T00005252PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (7:45 AM) Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Durston / Flanders Mill TMC Site Code: 03 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 5 Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (11:00 AM) Start Time Flanders Mill Rd Durston Rd Durston Rd Southbound Westbound Eastbound Right Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Peds App. Total Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 11:00 AM 17 3 1 20 4 55 1 59 71 14 1 85 164 11:15 AM 7 3 0 10 8 51 0 59 49 14 4 63 132 11:30 AM 9 2 0 11 4 60 0 64 77 13 3 90 165 11:45 AM 10 5 1 15 5 55 0 60 61 12 1 73 148 Total 43 13 2 56 21 221 1 242 258 53 9 311 609 Approach %76.8 23.2 --8.7 91.3 --83.0 17.0 --- Total %7.1 2.1 -9.2 3.4 36.3 -39.7 42.4 8.7 -51.1 - PHF 0.632 0.650 -0.700 0.656 0.921 -0.945 0.838 0.946 -0.864 0.923 Motorcycles 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 % Motorcycles 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 Cars 21 9 -30 15 151 -166 181 35 -216 412 % Cars 48.8 69.2 -53.6 71.4 68.3 -68.6 70.2 66.0 -69.5 67.7 Light Goods Vehicles 17 4 -21 5 65 -70 63 11 -74 165 % Light Goods Vehicles 39.5 30.8 -37.5 23.8 29.4 -28.9 24.4 20.8 -23.8 27.1 Buses 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 % Buses 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 Single-Unit Trucks 3 0 -3 1 3 -4 10 3 -13 20 % Single-Unit Trucks 7.0 0.0 -5.4 4.8 1.4 -1.7 3.9 5.7 -4.2 3.3 Articulated Trucks 2 0 -2 0 2 -2 1 4 -5 9 % Articulated Trucks 4.7 0.0 -3.6 0.0 0.9 -0.8 0.4 7.5 -1.6 1.5 Bicycles on Road 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 3 0 -3 3 % Bicycles on Road 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 1.2 0.0 -1.0 0.5 Bicycles on Crosswalk --1 ---0 ---0 -- % Bicycles on Crosswalk --50.0 ---0.0 ---0.0 -- Pedestrians --1 ---1 ---9 -- % Pedestrians --50.0 ---100.0 ---100.0 -- Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Durston / Flanders Mill TMC Site Code: 03 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 6 Peak Hour Data 04/30/2015 11:00 AMEnding At04/30/2015 12:00 PM MotorcyclesCarsLight Goods Vehicles Buses Other Flanders Mill Rd [N] Out In Total 0 0 0 50 30 80 16 21 37 0 0 0 8 5 13 74 56 130 0 0 0 21 9 0 17 4 0 0 0 0 5 0 2 43 13 2 R L P 271140671900Out24260701660In5132001373560TotalDurston Rd [E]R21105150T22150651510P1100000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Out In Total Fake Approach [S]Durston Rd [W]Total0388156031575In021674021311Out017282010264035110753L018163014258T000099PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (11:00 AM) Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Durston / Flanders Mill TMC Site Code: 03 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 7 Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (12:00 PM) Start Time Flanders Mill Rd Durston Rd Durston Rd Southbound Westbound Eastbound Right Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Peds App. Total Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 12:00 PM 11 5 0 16 6 57 0 63 60 17 1 77 156 12:15 PM 14 3 3 17 5 56 0 61 62 15 0 77 155 12:30 PM 4 7 0 11 3 64 0 67 76 12 1 88 166 12:45 PM 17 15 3 32 6 79 0 85 50 19 0 69 186 Total 46 30 6 76 20 256 0 276 248 63 2 311 663 Approach %60.5 39.5 --7.2 92.8 --79.7 20.3 --- Total %6.9 4.5 -11.5 3.0 38.6 -41.6 37.4 9.5 -46.9 - PHF 0.676 0.500 -0.594 0.833 0.810 -0.812 0.816 0.829 -0.884 0.891 Motorcycles 0 0 -0 0 1 -1 1 0 -1 2 % Motorcycles 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 0.4 0.0 -0.3 0.3 Cars 28 27 -55 15 178 -193 158 41 -199 447 % Cars 60.9 90.0 -72.4 75.0 69.5 -69.9 63.7 65.1 -64.0 67.4 Light Goods Vehicles 16 3 -19 4 69 -73 82 18 -100 192 % Light Goods Vehicles 34.8 10.0 -25.0 20.0 27.0 -26.4 33.1 28.6 -32.2 29.0 Buses 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 1 0 -1 1 % Buses 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.4 0.0 -0.3 0.2 Single-Unit Trucks 2 0 -2 0 7 -7 2 4 -6 15 % Single-Unit Trucks 4.3 0.0 -2.6 0.0 2.7 -2.5 0.8 6.3 -1.9 2.3 Articulated Trucks 0 0 -0 1 1 -2 2 0 -2 4 % Articulated Trucks 0.0 0.0 -0.0 5.0 0.4 -0.7 0.8 0.0 -0.6 0.6 Bicycles on Road 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 2 0 -2 2 % Bicycles on Road 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.8 0.0 -0.6 0.3 Bicycles on Crosswalk --1 ---0 ---0 -- % Bicycles on Crosswalk --16.7 -------0.0 -- Pedestrians --5 ---0 ---2 -- % Pedestrians --83.3 -------100.0 -- Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Durston / Flanders Mill TMC Site Code: 03 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 8 Peak Hour Data 04/30/2015 12:00 PMEnding At04/30/2015 1:00 PM MotorcyclesCarsLight Goods Vehicles Buses Other Flanders Mill Rd [N] Out In Total 0 0 0 56 55 111 22 19 41 0 0 0 5 2 7 83 76 159 0 0 0 28 27 0 16 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 6 46 30 6 R L P 27861851851Out27690731931In5541511583782TotalDurston Rd [E]R20104150T25680691781P0000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Out In Total Fake Approach [S]Durston Rd [W]Total2405185120613In1199100110311Out120685010302041180463L11588216248T000022PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (12:00 PM) Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Durston / Flanders Mill TMC Site Code: 03 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 9 Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (5:00 PM) Start Time Flanders Mill Rd Durston Rd Durston Rd Southbound Westbound Eastbound Right Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Peds App. Total Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 5:00 PM 19 9 1 28 26 121 0 147 87 22 0 109 284 5:15 PM 36 17 2 53 13 130 0 143 122 24 0 146 342 5:30 PM 32 5 2 37 13 90 0 103 122 39 2 161 301 5:45 PM 24 9 1 33 10 109 0 119 96 20 0 116 268 Total 111 40 6 151 62 450 0 512 427 105 2 532 1195 Approach %73.5 26.5 --12.1 87.9 --80.3 19.7 --- Total %9.3 3.3 -12.6 5.2 37.7 -42.8 35.7 8.8 -44.5 - PHF 0.771 0.588 -0.712 0.596 0.865 -0.871 0.875 0.673 -0.826 0.874 Motorcycles 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 1 0 -1 3 % Motorcycles 0.0 2.5 -0.7 0.0 0.2 -0.2 0.2 0.0 -0.2 0.3 Cars 93 27 -120 47 365 -412 306 82 -388 920 % Cars 83.8 67.5 -79.5 75.8 81.1 -80.5 71.7 78.1 -72.9 77.0 Light Goods Vehicles 17 12 -29 14 80 -94 118 23 -141 264 % Light Goods Vehicles 15.3 30.0 -19.2 22.6 17.8 -18.4 27.6 21.9 -26.5 22.1 Buses 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 % Buses 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 Single-Unit Trucks 0 0 -0 1 2 -3 2 0 -2 5 % Single-Unit Trucks 0.0 0.0 -0.0 1.6 0.4 -0.6 0.5 0.0 -0.4 0.4 Articulated Trucks 0 0 -0 0 1 -1 0 0 -0 1 % Articulated Trucks 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.2 -0.2 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.1 Bicycles on Road 1 0 -1 0 1 -1 0 0 -0 2 % Bicycles on Road 0.9 0.0 -0.7 0.0 0.2 -0.2 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.2 Bicycles on Crosswalk --1 ---0 ---1 -- % Bicycles on Crosswalk --16.7 -------50.0 -- Pedestrians --5 ---0 ---1 -- % Pedestrians --83.3 -------50.0 -- Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Durston / Flanders Mill TMC Site Code: 03 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 10 Peak Hour Data 04/30/2015 5:00 PMEnding At04/30/2015 6:00 PM MotorcyclesCarsLight Goods Vehicles Buses Other Flanders Mill Rd [N] Out In Total 0 1 1 129 120 249 37 29 66 0 0 0 1 1 2 167 151 318 0 1 0 93 27 0 17 12 0 0 0 0 1 0 6 111 40 6 R L P 467201303332Out51250944121In979702247453TotalDurston Rd [E]R621014470T45040803651P0000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Out In Total Fake Approach [S]Durston Rd [W]Total2846238071093In138814102532Out145897055610822300105L130611802427T000022PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (5:00 PM) Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Durston / Flanders Mill TMC Site Code: 03 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 11 Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Durston / Fowler TMC Site Code: 01 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 1 Turning Movement Data Start Time Durston Rd Fowler Ave Durston Rd Westbound Northbound Eastbound Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Peds App. Total Int. Total 7:00 AM 29 0 0 29 0 3 1 3 1 39 0 40 72 7:15 AM 35 0 0 35 0 1 1 1 1 71 0 72 108 7:30 AM 54 0 0 54 5 1 1 6 0 113 0 113 173 7:45 AM 79 0 0 79 11 3 2 14 0 104 0 104 197 Hourly Total 197 0 0 197 16 8 5 24 2 327 0 329 550 8:00 AM 74 1 0 75 1 2 3 3 1 110 0 111 189 8:15 AM 68 1 0 69 3 2 2 5 0 95 1 95 169 8:30 AM 62 1 0 63 4 0 5 4 2 85 0 87 154 8:45 AM 52 2 0 54 3 0 0 3 0 88 0 88 145 Hourly Total 256 5 0 261 11 4 10 15 3 378 1 381 657 *** BREAK ***------------- 11:00 AM 48 2 0 50 3 0 0 3 0 71 0 71 124 11:15 AM 43 0 0 43 4 0 2 4 0 43 0 43 90 11:30 AM 51 0 0 51 3 0 1 3 1 53 0 54 108 11:45 AM 52 0 0 52 0 0 0 0 0 49 0 49 101 Hourly Total 194 2 0 196 10 0 3 10 1 216 0 217 423 12:00 PM 55 2 0 57 1 0 4 1 1 57 0 58 116 12:15 PM 78 5 0 83 2 0 3 2 0 62 0 62 147 12:30 PM 76 3 0 79 2 1 0 3 1 73 0 74 156 12:45 PM 64 0 0 64 3 0 0 3 0 75 0 75 142 Hourly Total 273 10 0 283 8 1 7 9 2 267 0 269 561 *** BREAK ***------------- 4:00 PM 90 0 1 90 3 1 3 4 2 60 0 62 156 4:15 PM 79 2 0 81 1 1 3 2 1 81 0 82 165 4:30 PM 92 7 0 99 1 0 5 1 0 75 0 75 175 4:45 PM 96 6 0 102 2 1 6 3 1 72 0 73 178 Hourly Total 357 15 1 372 7 3 17 10 4 288 0 292 674 5:00 PM 122 1 0 123 0 0 2 0 0 89 0 89 212 5:15 PM 121 7 0 128 1 1 3 2 5 96 0 101 231 5:30 PM 100 5 0 105 3 0 2 3 1 88 0 89 197 5:45 PM 113 6 0 119 2 2 5 4 1 108 0 109 232 Hourly Total 456 19 0 475 6 3 12 9 7 381 0 388 872 Grand Total 1733 51 1 1784 58 19 54 77 19 1857 1 1876 3737 Approach %97.1 2.9 --75.3 24.7 --1.0 99.0 --- Total %46.4 1.4 -47.7 1.6 0.5 -2.1 0.5 49.7 -50.2 - Motorcycles 5 1 -6 1 0 -1 0 9 -9 16 % Motorcycles 0.3 2.0 -0.3 1.7 0.0 -1.3 0.0 0.5 -0.5 0.4 Cars 1357 41 -1398 46 19 -65 13 1455 -1468 2931 % Cars 78.3 80.4 -78.4 79.3 100.0 -84.4 68.4 78.4 -78.3 78.4 Light Goods Vehicles 347 7 -354 11 0 -11 5 365 -370 735 % Light Goods Vehicles 20.0 13.7 -19.8 19.0 0.0 -14.3 26.3 19.7 -19.7 19.7 Buses 6 0 -6 0 0 -0 1 10 -11 17 % Buses 0.3 0.0 -0.3 0.0 0.0 -0.0 5.3 0.5 -0.6 0.5 Single-Unit Trucks 7 0 -7 0 0 -0 0 5 -5 12 % Single-Unit Trucks 0.4 0.0 -0.4 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.3 -0.3 0.3 Articulated Trucks 5 0 -5 0 0 -0 0 2 -2 7 % Articulated Trucks 0.3 0.0 -0.3 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.1 -0.1 0.2 Bicycles on Road 6 2 -8 0 0 -0 0 11 -11 19 % Bicycles on Road 0.3 3.9 -0.4 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.6 -0.6 0.5 Bicycles on Crosswalk --0 ---21 ---0 -- % Bicycles on Crosswalk --0.0 ---38.9 ---0.0 -- Pedestrians --1 ---33 ---1 -- % Pedestrians --100.0 ---61.1 ---100.0 -- Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Durston / Fowler TMC Site Code: 01 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 2 04/30/2015 7:00 AMEnding At04/30/2015 6:00 PM MotorcyclesCarsLight Goods Vehicles Buses Other Fake Approach [N] Out In Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19151810376150110Out178420635413986In36993816730289916TotalDurston Rd [E]T173318634713575L51207411P1100001 1 2 54 65 119 12 11 23 1 0 1 2 0 2 70 77 147 Out In Total Fowler Ave [S] L R P 0 1 0 19 46 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 19 58 54Durston Rd [W]Total14284471717363628In9146837011181876Out5137634761817529145536510181857T01351019R000011PTurning Movement Data Plot Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Durston / Fowler TMC Site Code: 01 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 3 Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (7:30 AM) Start Time Durston Rd Fowler Ave Durston Rd Westbound Northbound Eastbound Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Peds App. Total Int. Total 7:30 AM 54 0 0 54 5 1 1 6 0 113 0 113 173 7:45 AM 79 0 0 79 11 3 2 14 0 104 0 104 197 8:00 AM 74 1 0 75 1 2 3 3 1 110 0 111 189 8:15 AM 68 1 0 69 3 2 2 5 0 95 1 95 169 Total 275 2 0 277 20 8 8 28 1 422 1 423 728 Approach %99.3 0.7 --71.4 28.6 --0.2 99.8 --- Total %37.8 0.3 -38.0 2.7 1.1 -3.8 0.1 58.0 -58.1 - PHF 0.870 0.500 -0.877 0.455 0.667 -0.500 0.250 0.934 -0.936 0.924 Motorcycles 1 0 -1 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 1 % Motorcycles 0.4 0.0 -0.4 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.1 Cars 208 2 -210 16 8 -24 1 335 -336 570 % Cars 75.6 100.0 -75.8 80.0 100.0 -85.7 100.0 79.4 -79.4 78.3 Light Goods Vehicles 58 0 -58 4 0 -4 0 76 -76 138 % Light Goods Vehicles 21.1 0.0 -20.9 20.0 0.0 -14.3 0.0 18.0 -18.0 19.0 Buses 5 0 -5 0 0 -0 0 7 -7 12 % Buses 1.8 0.0 -1.8 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 1.7 -1.7 1.6 Single-Unit Trucks 3 0 -3 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 3 % Single-Unit Trucks 1.1 0.0 -1.1 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.4 Articulated Trucks 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 % Articulated Trucks 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 Bicycles on Road 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 4 -4 4 % Bicycles on Road 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.9 -0.9 0.5 Bicycles on Crosswalk --0 ---3 ---0 -- % Bicycles on Crosswalk ------37.5 ---0.0 -- Pedestrians --0 ---5 ---1 -- % Pedestrians ------62.5 ---100.0 -- Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Durston / Fowler TMC Site Code: 01 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 4 Peak Hour Data 04/30/2015 7:30 AMEnding At04/30/2015 8:30 AM MotorcyclesCarsLight Goods Vehicles Buses Other Fake Approach [N] Out In Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44247803510Out27735582101In7197121385611TotalDurston Rd [E]T27535582081L200020P0000000 0 0 3 24 27 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 28 31 Out In Total Fowler Ave [S] L R P 0 0 0 8 16 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 20 8Durston Rd [W]Total1552134127706In03367674423Out1216585328303357674422T010001R000011PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (7:30 AM) Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Durston / Fowler TMC Site Code: 01 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 5 Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (11:00 AM) Start Time Durston Rd Fowler Ave Durston Rd Westbound Northbound Eastbound Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Peds App. Total Int. Total 11:00 AM 48 2 0 50 3 0 0 3 0 71 0 71 124 11:15 AM 43 0 0 43 4 0 2 4 0 43 0 43 90 11:30 AM 51 0 0 51 3 0 1 3 1 53 0 54 108 11:45 AM 52 0 0 52 0 0 0 0 0 49 0 49 101 Total 194 2 0 196 10 0 3 10 1 216 0 217 423 Approach %99.0 1.0 --100.0 0.0 --0.5 99.5 --- Total %45.9 0.5 -46.3 2.4 0.0 -2.4 0.2 51.1 -51.3 - PHF 0.933 0.250 -0.942 0.625 0.000 -0.625 0.250 0.761 -0.764 0.853 Motorcycles 1 0 -1 0 0 -0 0 1 -1 2 % Motorcycles 0.5 0.0 -0.5 0.0 --0.0 0.0 0.5 -0.5 0.5 Cars 148 1 -149 6 0 -6 0 164 -164 319 % Cars 76.3 50.0 -76.0 60.0 --60.0 0.0 75.9 -75.6 75.4 Light Goods Vehicles 41 1 -42 4 0 -4 1 46 -47 93 % Light Goods Vehicles 21.1 50.0 -21.4 40.0 --40.0 100.0 21.3 -21.7 22.0 Buses 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 1 -1 1 % Buses 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 --0.0 0.0 0.5 -0.5 0.2 Single-Unit Trucks 1 0 -1 0 0 -0 0 2 -2 3 % Single-Unit Trucks 0.5 0.0 -0.5 0.0 --0.0 0.0 0.9 -0.9 0.7 Articulated Trucks 2 0 -2 0 0 -0 0 1 -1 3 % Articulated Trucks 1.0 0.0 -1.0 0.0 --0.0 0.0 0.5 -0.5 0.7 Bicycles on Road 1 0 -1 0 0 -0 0 1 -1 2 % Bicycles on Road 0.5 0.0 -0.5 0.0 --0.0 0.0 0.5 -0.5 0.5 Bicycles on Crosswalk --0 ---0 ---0 -- % Bicycles on Crosswalk ------0.0 ------ Pedestrians --0 ---3 ---0 -- % Pedestrians ------100.0 ------ Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Durston / Fowler TMC Site Code: 01 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 6 Peak Hour Data 04/30/2015 11:00 AMEnding At04/30/2015 12:00 PM MotorcyclesCarsLight Goods Vehicles Buses Other Fake Approach [N] Out In Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22641501701Out19640421491In42281923192TotalDurston Rd [E]T19440411481L200110P0000000 0 0 1 6 7 2 4 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 10 13 Out In Total Fowler Ave [S] L R P 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 10 3Durston Rd [W]Total23128818411In11644714217Out1148410419411644614216T001001R000000PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (11:00 AM) Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Durston / Fowler TMC Site Code: 01 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 7 Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (12:00 PM) Start Time Durston Rd Fowler Ave Durston Rd Westbound Northbound Eastbound Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Peds App. Total Int. Total 12:00 PM 55 2 0 57 1 0 4 1 1 57 0 58 116 12:15 PM 78 5 0 83 2 0 3 2 0 62 0 62 147 12:30 PM 76 3 0 79 2 1 0 3 1 73 0 74 156 12:45 PM 64 0 0 64 3 0 0 3 0 75 0 75 142 Total 273 10 0 283 8 1 7 9 2 267 0 269 561 Approach %96.5 3.5 --88.9 11.1 --0.7 99.3 --- Total %48.7 1.8 -50.4 1.4 0.2 -1.6 0.4 47.6 -48.0 - PHF 0.875 0.500 -0.852 0.667 0.250 -0.750 0.500 0.890 -0.897 0.899 Motorcycles 0 1 -1 1 0 -1 0 1 -1 3 % Motorcycles 0.0 10.0 -0.4 12.5 0.0 -11.1 0.0 0.4 -0.4 0.5 Cars 198 9 -207 6 1 -7 1 195 -196 410 % Cars 72.5 90.0 -73.1 75.0 100.0 -77.8 50.0 73.0 -72.9 73.1 Light Goods Vehicles 70 0 -70 1 0 -1 1 63 -64 135 % Light Goods Vehicles 25.6 0.0 -24.7 12.5 0.0 -11.1 50.0 23.6 -23.8 24.1 Buses 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 % Buses 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 Single-Unit Trucks 1 0 -1 0 0 -0 0 3 -3 4 % Single-Unit Trucks 0.4 0.0 -0.4 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 1.1 -1.1 0.7 Articulated Trucks 2 0 -2 0 0 -0 0 1 -1 3 % Articulated Trucks 0.7 0.0 -0.7 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 0.5 Bicycles on Road 2 0 -2 0 0 -0 0 4 -4 6 % Bicycles on Road 0.7 0.0 -0.7 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 1.5 -1.5 1.1 Bicycles on Crosswalk --0 ---1 ---0 -- % Bicycles on Crosswalk ------14.3 ------ Pedestrians --0 ---6 ---0 -- % Pedestrians ------85.7 ------ Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Durston / Fowler TMC Site Code: 01 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 8 Peak Hour Data 04/30/2015 12:00 PMEnding At04/30/2015 1:00 PM MotorcyclesCarsLight Goods Vehicles Buses Other Fake Approach [N] Out In Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27580642012Out28350702071In5581301344083TotalDurston Rd [E]T27350701980L1000091P0000001 1 2 10 7 17 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 9 21 Out In Total Fowler Ave [S] L R P 0 1 0 1 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 1 8 7Durston Rd [W]Total1395134013543In11966408269Out0199700527411956308267T011002R000000PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (12:00 PM) Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Durston / Fowler TMC Site Code: 01 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 9 Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (5:00 PM) Start Time Durston Rd Fowler Ave Durston Rd Westbound Northbound Eastbound Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Peds App. Total Int. Total 5:00 PM 122 1 0 123 0 0 2 0 0 89 0 89 212 5:15 PM 121 7 0 128 1 1 3 2 5 96 0 101 231 5:30 PM 100 5 0 105 3 0 2 3 1 88 0 89 197 5:45 PM 113 6 0 119 2 2 5 4 1 108 0 109 232 Total 456 19 0 475 6 3 12 9 7 381 0 388 872 Approach %96.0 4.0 --66.7 33.3 --1.8 98.2 --- Total %52.3 2.2 -54.5 0.7 0.3 -1.0 0.8 43.7 -44.5 - PHF 0.934 0.679 -0.928 0.500 0.375 -0.563 0.350 0.882 -0.890 0.940 Motorcycles 2 0 -2 0 0 -0 0 4 -4 6 % Motorcycles 0.4 0.0 -0.4 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 1.0 -1.0 0.7 Cars 385 16 -401 6 3 -9 6 291 -297 707 % Cars 84.4 84.2 -84.4 100.0 100.0 -100.0 85.7 76.4 -76.5 81.1 Light Goods Vehicles 66 2 -68 0 0 -0 1 85 -86 154 % Light Goods Vehicles 14.5 10.5 -14.3 0.0 0.0 -0.0 14.3 22.3 -22.2 17.7 Buses 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 % Buses 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 Single-Unit Trucks 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 % Single-Unit Trucks 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 Articulated Trucks 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 % Articulated Trucks 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 Bicycles on Road 3 1 -4 0 0 -0 0 1 -1 5 % Bicycles on Road 0.7 5.3 -0.8 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.3 -0.3 0.6 Bicycles on Crosswalk --0 ---11 ---0 -- % Bicycles on Crosswalk ------91.7 ------ Pedestrians --0 ---1 ---0 -- % Pedestrians ------8.3 ------ Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Durston / Fowler TMC Site Code: 01 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 10 Peak Hour Data 04/30/2015 5:00 PMEnding At04/30/2015 6:00 PM MotorcyclesCarsLight Goods Vehicles Buses Other Fake Approach [N] Out In Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38710852974Out47540684012In862501536986TotalDurston Rd [E]T45630663852L19102160P0000000 0 0 22 9 31 3 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 1 26 9 35 Out In Total Fowler Ave [S] L R P 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 3 6 12Durston Rd [W]Total668515204847In42978601388Out2388660345942918501381T061007R000000PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (5:00 PM) Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Durston / Fowler TMC Site Code: 01 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 11 Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Durston / Laurel Parkway TMC Site Code: 05 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 1 Turning Movement Data Start Time Laurel Parkway Durston Rd Durston Rd Southbound Westbound Eastbound Right Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Peds App. Total Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 7:00 AM 5 20 1 25 11 22 1 33 19 0 1 19 77 7:15 AM 5 33 0 38 7 28 0 35 33 0 0 33 106 7:30 AM 3 64 1 67 6 38 0 44 41 1 0 42 153 7:45 AM 7 39 1 46 9 55 0 64 62 2 0 64 174 Hourly Total 20 156 3 176 33 143 1 176 155 3 1 158 510 8:00 AM 2 47 0 49 9 31 0 40 72 1 0 73 162 8:15 AM 1 37 0 38 10 46 0 56 66 1 0 67 161 8:30 AM 1 26 0 27 9 46 0 55 33 3 0 36 118 8:45 AM 6 20 0 26 11 28 0 39 30 3 0 33 98 Hourly Total 10 130 0 140 39 151 0 190 201 8 0 209 539 *** BREAK ***------------- 11:00 AM 0 13 1 13 16 21 0 37 21 2 2 23 73 11:15 AM 3 24 1 27 17 24 6 41 12 1 1 13 81 11:30 AM 4 19 0 23 22 39 1 61 20 0 1 20 104 11:45 AM 4 27 0 31 20 22 0 42 33 0 0 33 106 Hourly Total 11 83 2 94 75 106 7 181 86 3 4 89 364 12:00 PM 5 20 2 25 22 22 0 44 31 2 0 33 102 12:15 PM 0 22 0 22 21 29 0 50 37 0 2 37 109 12:30 PM 0 18 0 18 10 33 0 43 27 3 0 30 91 12:45 PM 3 19 0 22 22 28 0 50 17 1 0 18 90 Hourly Total 8 79 2 87 75 112 0 187 112 6 2 118 392 *** BREAK ***------------- 4:00 PM 1 17 2 18 40 39 0 79 29 2 1 31 128 4:15 PM 2 31 1 33 28 45 0 73 50 1 0 51 157 4:30 PM 3 21 3 24 25 54 0 79 55 3 2 58 161 4:45 PM 0 18 0 18 38 48 0 86 43 4 0 47 151 Hourly Total 6 87 6 93 131 186 0 317 177 10 3 187 597 5:00 PM 7 16 0 23 25 79 0 104 59 4 0 63 190 5:15 PM 1 35 1 36 44 59 0 103 65 2 0 67 206 5:30 PM 4 30 0 34 37 58 0 95 58 5 0 63 192 5:45 PM 2 30 0 32 38 55 0 93 47 1 0 48 173 Hourly Total 14 111 1 125 144 251 0 395 229 12 0 241 761 Grand Total 69 646 14 715 497 949 8 1446 960 42 10 1002 3163 Approach %9.7 90.3 --34.4 65.6 --95.8 4.2 --- Total %2.2 20.4 -22.6 15.7 30.0 -45.7 30.4 1.3 -31.7 - Motorcycles 0 1 -1 2 2 -4 2 0 -2 7 % Motorcycles 0.0 0.2 -0.1 0.4 0.2 -0.3 0.2 0.0 -0.2 0.2 Cars 42 505 -547 370 684 -1054 719 27 -746 2347 % Cars 60.9 78.2 -76.5 74.4 72.1 -72.9 74.9 64.3 -74.5 74.2 Light Goods Vehicles 26 114 -140 109 237 -346 224 15 -239 725 % Light Goods Vehicles 37.7 17.6 -19.6 21.9 25.0 -23.9 23.3 35.7 -23.9 22.9 Buses 0 9 -9 7 2 -9 2 0 -2 20 % Buses 0.0 1.4 -1.3 1.4 0.2 -0.6 0.2 0.0 -0.2 0.6 Single-Unit Trucks 0 10 -10 8 19 -27 8 0 -8 45 % Single-Unit Trucks 0.0 1.5 -1.4 1.6 2.0 -1.9 0.8 0.0 -0.8 1.4 Articulated Trucks 1 0 -1 0 2 -2 1 0 -1 4 % Articulated Trucks 1.4 0.0 -0.1 0.0 0.2 -0.1 0.1 0.0 -0.1 0.1 Bicycles on Road 0 7 -7 1 3 -4 4 0 -4 15 % Bicycles on Road 0.0 1.1 -1.0 0.2 0.3 -0.3 0.4 0.0 -0.4 0.5 Bicycles on Crosswalk --1 ---0 ---0 -- % Bicycles on Crosswalk --7.1 ---0.0 ---0.0 -- Pedestrians --13 ---8 ---10 -- % Pedestrians --92.9 ---100.0 ---100.0 -- Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Durston / Laurel Parkway TMC Site Code: 05 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 2 04/30/2015 7:00 AMEnding At04/30/2015 6:00 PM MotorcyclesCarsLight Goods Vehicles Buses Other Laurel Parkway [N] Out In Total 2 1 3 397 547 944 124 140 264 7 9 16 9 18 27 539 715 1254 0 1 0 42 505 0 26 114 0 0 9 0 1 17 14 69 646 14 R L P 1606301133812243Out144633934610544In3052632068422787TotalDurston Rd [E]R497971093702T9492422376842P8800000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Out In Total Fake Approach [S]Durston Rd [W]Total414725024382020In27462392131002Out27262632251018027150042L2719224213960T00001010PTurning Movement Data Plot Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Durston / Laurel Parkway TMC Site Code: 05 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 3 Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (7:30 AM) Start Time Laurel Parkway Durston Rd Durston Rd Southbound Westbound Eastbound Right Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Peds App. Total Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 7:30 AM 3 64 1 67 6 38 0 44 41 1 0 42 153 7:45 AM 7 39 1 46 9 55 0 64 62 2 0 64 174 8:00 AM 2 47 0 49 9 31 0 40 72 1 0 73 162 8:15 AM 1 37 0 38 10 46 0 56 66 1 0 67 161 Total 13 187 2 200 34 170 0 204 241 5 0 246 650 Approach %6.5 93.5 --16.7 83.3 --98.0 2.0 --- Total %2.0 28.8 -30.8 5.2 26.2 -31.4 37.1 0.8 -37.8 - PHF 0.464 0.730 -0.746 0.850 0.773 -0.797 0.837 0.625 -0.842 0.934 Motorcycles 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 % Motorcycles 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 Cars 8 146 -154 25 113 -138 198 3 -201 493 % Cars 61.5 78.1 -77.0 73.5 66.5 -67.6 82.2 60.0 -81.7 75.8 Light Goods Vehicles 5 36 -41 7 50 -57 41 2 -43 141 % Light Goods Vehicles 38.5 19.3 -20.5 20.6 29.4 -27.9 17.0 40.0 -17.5 21.7 Buses 0 3 -3 2 1 -3 0 0 -0 6 % Buses 0.0 1.6 -1.5 5.9 0.6 -1.5 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.9 Single-Unit Trucks 0 0 -0 0 5 -5 1 0 -1 6 % Single-Unit Trucks 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 2.9 -2.5 0.4 0.0 -0.4 0.9 Articulated Trucks 0 0 -0 0 1 -1 0 0 -0 1 % Articulated Trucks 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.6 -0.5 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.2 Bicycles on Road 0 2 -2 0 0 -0 1 0 -1 3 % Bicycles on Road 0.0 1.1 -1.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.4 0.0 -0.4 0.5 Bicycles on Crosswalk --0 ---0 ---0 -- % Bicycles on Crosswalk --0.0 ---------- Pedestrians --2 ---0 ---0 -- % Pedestrians --100.0 ---------- Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Durston / Laurel Parkway TMC Site Code: 05 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 4 Peak Hour Data 04/30/2015 7:30 AMEnding At04/30/2015 8:30 AM MotorcyclesCarsLight Goods Vehicles Buses Other Laurel Parkway [N] Out In Total 0 0 0 28 154 182 9 41 50 2 3 5 0 2 2 39 200 239 0 0 0 8 146 0 5 36 0 0 3 0 0 2 2 13 187 2 R L P 42843773440Out20463571380In6321061344820TotalDurston Rd [E]R34027250T17061501130P0000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Out In Total Fake Approach [S]Durston Rd [W]Total03229818429In02014302246Out01215516183032005L01984102241T000000PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (7:30 AM) Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Durston / Laurel Parkway TMC Site Code: 05 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 5 Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (11:00 AM) Start Time Laurel Parkway Durston Rd Durston Rd Southbound Westbound Eastbound Right Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Peds App. Total Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 11:00 AM 0 13 1 13 16 21 0 37 21 2 2 23 73 11:15 AM 3 24 1 27 17 24 6 41 12 1 1 13 81 11:30 AM 4 19 0 23 22 39 1 61 20 0 1 20 104 11:45 AM 4 27 0 31 20 22 0 42 33 0 0 33 106 Total 11 83 2 94 75 106 7 181 86 3 4 89 364 Approach %11.7 88.3 --41.4 58.6 --96.6 3.4 --- Total %3.0 22.8 -25.8 20.6 29.1 -49.7 23.6 0.8 -24.5 - PHF 0.688 0.769 -0.758 0.852 0.679 -0.742 0.652 0.375 -0.674 0.858 Motorcycles 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 1 0 -1 3 % Motorcycles 0.0 1.2 -1.1 0.0 0.9 -0.6 1.2 0.0 -1.1 0.8 Cars 8 60 -68 53 76 -129 58 3 -61 258 % Cars 72.7 72.3 -72.3 70.7 71.7 -71.3 67.4 100.0 -68.5 70.9 Light Goods Vehicles 3 16 -19 18 25 -43 24 0 -24 86 % Light Goods Vehicles 27.3 19.3 -20.2 24.0 23.6 -23.8 27.9 0.0 -27.0 23.6 Buses 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 % Buses 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 Single-Unit Trucks 0 5 -5 4 4 -8 2 0 -2 15 % Single-Unit Trucks 0.0 6.0 -5.3 5.3 3.8 -4.4 2.3 0.0 -2.2 4.1 Articulated Trucks 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 1 0 -1 1 % Articulated Trucks 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 1.2 0.0 -1.1 0.3 Bicycles on Road 0 1 -1 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 1 % Bicycles on Road 0.0 1.2 -1.1 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.3 Bicycles on Crosswalk --0 ---0 ---0 -- % Bicycles on Crosswalk --0.0 ---0.0 ---0.0 -- Pedestrians --2 ---7 ---4 -- % Pedestrians --100.0 ---100.0 ---100.0 -- Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Durston / Laurel Parkway TMC Site Code: 05 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 6 Peak Hour Data 04/30/2015 11:00 AMEnding At04/30/2015 12:00 PM MotorcyclesCarsLight Goods Vehicles Buses Other Laurel Parkway [N] Out In Total 0 1 1 56 68 124 18 19 37 0 0 0 4 6 10 78 94 172 0 1 0 8 60 0 3 16 0 0 0 0 0 6 2 11 83 2 R L P 16990401182Out18180431291In350170832473TotalDurston Rd [E]R754018530T1064025761P7700000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Out In Total Fake Approach [S]Durston Rd [W]Total21455207206In161240389Out1842804117030003L158240386T000044PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (11:00 AM) Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Durston / Laurel Parkway TMC Site Code: 05 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 7 Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (12:00 PM) Start Time Laurel Parkway Durston Rd Durston Rd Southbound Westbound Eastbound Right Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Peds App. Total Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 12:00 PM 5 20 2 25 22 22 0 44 31 2 0 33 102 12:15 PM 0 22 0 22 21 29 0 50 37 0 2 37 109 12:30 PM 0 18 0 18 10 33 0 43 27 3 0 30 91 12:45 PM 3 19 0 22 22 28 0 50 17 1 0 18 90 Total 8 79 2 87 75 112 0 187 112 6 2 118 392 Approach %9.2 90.8 --40.1 59.9 --94.9 5.1 --- Total %2.0 20.2 -22.2 19.1 28.6 -47.7 28.6 1.5 -30.1 - PHF 0.400 0.898 -0.870 0.852 0.848 -0.935 0.757 0.500 -0.797 0.899 Motorcycles 0 0 -0 1 0 -1 0 0 -0 1 % Motorcycles 0.0 0.0 -0.0 1.3 0.0 -0.5 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.3 Cars 1 63 -64 58 82 -140 75 3 -78 282 % Cars 12.5 79.7 -73.6 77.3 73.2 -74.9 67.0 50.0 -66.1 71.9 Light Goods Vehicles 6 13 -19 16 27 -43 34 3 -37 99 % Light Goods Vehicles 75.0 16.5 -21.8 21.3 24.1 -23.0 30.4 50.0 -31.4 25.3 Buses 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 % Buses 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 Single-Unit Trucks 0 2 -2 0 3 -3 2 0 -2 7 % Single-Unit Trucks 0.0 2.5 -2.3 0.0 2.7 -1.6 1.8 0.0 -1.7 1.8 Articulated Trucks 1 0 -1 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 1 % Articulated Trucks 12.5 0.0 -1.1 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.3 Bicycles on Road 0 1 -1 0 0 -0 1 0 -1 2 % Bicycles on Road 0.0 1.3 -1.1 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.9 0.0 -0.8 0.5 Bicycles on Crosswalk --0 ---0 ---0 -- % Bicycles on Crosswalk --0.0 -------0.0 -- Pedestrians --2 ---0 ---2 -- % Pedestrians --100.0 -------100.0 -- Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Durston / Laurel Parkway TMC Site Code: 05 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 8 Peak Hour Data 04/30/2015 12:00 PMEnding At04/30/2015 1:00 PM MotorcyclesCarsLight Goods Vehicles Buses Other Laurel Parkway [N] Out In Total 1 0 1 61 64 125 19 19 38 0 0 0 0 4 4 81 87 168 0 0 0 1 63 0 6 13 0 0 0 0 1 3 2 8 79 2 R L P 19160471380Out18730431401In37890902781TotalDurston Rd [E]R750016581T1123027820P0000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Out In Total Fake Approach [S]Durston Rd [W]Total01617007238In0783703118Out0833304120033006L0753403112T000022PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (12:00 PM) Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Durston / Laurel Parkway TMC Site Code: 05 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 9 Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (5:00 PM) Start Time Laurel Parkway Durston Rd Durston Rd Southbound Westbound Eastbound Right Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Peds App. Total Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 5:00 PM 7 16 0 23 25 79 0 104 59 4 0 63 190 5:15 PM 1 35 1 36 44 59 0 103 65 2 0 67 206 5:30 PM 4 30 0 34 37 58 0 95 58 5 0 63 192 5:45 PM 2 30 0 32 38 55 0 93 47 1 0 48 173 Total 14 111 1 125 144 251 0 395 229 12 0 241 761 Approach %11.2 88.8 --36.5 63.5 --95.0 5.0 --- Total %1.8 14.6 -16.4 18.9 33.0 -51.9 30.1 1.6 -31.7 - PHF 0.500 0.793 -0.868 0.818 0.794 -0.950 0.881 0.600 -0.899 0.924 Motorcycles 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 1 0 -1 1 % Motorcycles 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.4 0.0 -0.4 0.1 Cars 8 90 -98 115 201 -316 163 10 -173 587 % Cars 57.1 81.1 -78.4 79.9 80.1 -80.0 71.2 83.3 -71.8 77.1 Light Goods Vehicles 6 19 -25 27 50 -77 63 2 -65 167 % Light Goods Vehicles 42.9 17.1 -20.0 18.8 19.9 -19.5 27.5 16.7 -27.0 21.9 Buses 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 % Buses 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 Single-Unit Trucks 0 1 -1 2 0 -2 2 0 -2 5 % Single-Unit Trucks 0.0 0.9 -0.8 1.4 0.0 -0.5 0.9 0.0 -0.8 0.7 Articulated Trucks 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 % Articulated Trucks 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 Bicycles on Road 0 1 -1 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 1 % Bicycles on Road 0.0 0.9 -0.8 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.1 Bicycles on Crosswalk --0 ---0 ---0 -- % Bicycles on Crosswalk --0.0 ---------- Pedestrians --1 ---0 ---0 -- % Pedestrians --100.0 ---------- Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Durston / Laurel Parkway TMC Site Code: 05 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 10 Peak Hour Data 04/30/2015 5:00 PMEnding At04/30/2015 6:00 PM MotorcyclesCarsLight Goods Vehicles Buses Other Laurel Parkway [N] Out In Total 0 0 0 125 98 223 29 25 54 0 0 0 2 2 4 156 125 281 0 0 0 8 90 0 6 19 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 14 111 1 R L P 34040822531Out39520773160In735601595691TotalDurston Rd [E]R14420271150T25100502010P0000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Out In Total Fake Approach [S]Durston Rd [W]Total138212102506In11736502241Out0209560026501020012L11636302229T000000PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (5:00 PM) Robert Peccia & Associates 825 Custer Ave Helena, Montana, United States 59604 406-447-5000 scottr@rpa-hln.com Count Name: Durston / Laurel Parkway TMC Site Code: 05 Start Date: 04/30/2015 Page No: 11 APPENDIX B Existing Year Operational Analysis Scenario 2: 2: AM Peak 2015 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0.099Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 11.0Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: #1: Baxter Ln and Harper Puckett Rd Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 16124139142268Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 431354517Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.83600.83600.83600.83600.83600.8360Peak Hour Factor 13104116121857Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.000.700.700.000.002.60Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 13104116121857Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 2 10/29/2015 Scenario 2: 2: AM Peak 2015 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with BIntersection LOS 2.77d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AABApproach LOS 0.000.6910.62d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.008.798.7910.4910.4995th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.000.000.350.350.420.4295th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] AAAAABMovement LOS 0.000.000.007.509.5910.96d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.010.020.10V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median noTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] noFlared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings 3 10/29/2015 Scenario 2: 2: AM Peak 2015 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0.070Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 13.7Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: #2: Baxter Ln and Flanders Mill Rd Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] ThruLeftRightThruRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 122969215111534Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 31242338299Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.87600.87600.87600.87600.87600.8760Peak Hour Factor 107848113210130Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.600.000.000.601.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 107848113210130Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 4 10/29/2015 Scenario 2: 2: AM Peak 2015 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with BIntersection LOS 3.99d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AABApproach LOS 3.480.0011.26d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 14.5714.570.000.0019.2419.2495th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.580.580.000.000.770.7795th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] AAAABBMovement LOS 0.007.910.000.0010.5413.70d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.070.000.000.140.07V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median noTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] noFlared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings 5 10/29/2015 Scenario 2: 2: AM Peak 2015 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with BLevel Of Service: 13.5Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: All-way stopControl Type: #10: Durston Rd and Ferguson Ave Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0Pocket Length [ft] 000100000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 4197741331915310716525311367Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 149183353827411132817Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor 0.9650.9650.9650.9650.9650.9650.9650.9650.9650.9650.9650.965Peak Hour Factor 4190711281814810315925110965Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.001.000.001.500.003.201.803.600.004.201.800.80Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 4190711281814810315925110965Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 6 10/29/2015 Scenario 2: 2: AM Peak 2015 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with BIntersection LOS 13.49Intersection Delay [s/veh] BBBBApproach LOS 14.8812.0513.8613.28Approach Delay [s/veh] 64.3920.7137.2859.1348.0995th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 2.580.831.492.371.9295th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results Lanes Intersection Settings 7 10/29/2015 Scenario 2: 2: AM Peak 2015 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0.284Volume to Capacity (v/c): DLevel Of Service: 26.8Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: #11: Durston Rd and Flanders Mill Rd Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 413524399510569Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 1088110242617Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.94600.94600.94600.94600.94600.9460Peak Hour Factor 39333415909965Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.002.301.901.101.506.10Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 39333415909965Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 8 10/29/2015 Scenario 2: 2: AM Peak 2015 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with DIntersection LOS 4.05d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AACApproach LOS 0.001.4821.05d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.000.006.6154.5854.5895th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.000.000.000.262.182.1895th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] AAAACDMovement LOS 0.000.000.008.3517.2926.78d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.080.160.28V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median noTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] noFlared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings 9 10/29/2015 Scenario 2: 2: AM Peak 2015 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with CLevel Of Service: 15.4Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: All-way stopControl Type: #32: Durston Rd and Cottonwood Rd Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 9167172167316211417188634Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 24243427910344729Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor 0.9340.9340.9340.9340.9340.9340.9340.9340.9340.9340.9340.934Peak Hour Factor 8156161156295211316176632Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.003.701.800.000.300.000.000.000.003.900.003.10Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 8156161156295211316176632Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 10 10/29/2015 Scenario 2: 2: AM Peak 2015 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with CIntersection LOS 15.39Intersection Delay [s/veh] BCBBApproach LOS 14.6417.9510.1211.84Approach Delay [s/veh] 79.10133.224.7340.8695th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 3.165.330.191.6395th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results Lanes Intersection Settings 11 10/29/2015 Scenario 2: 2: AM Peak 2015 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0.154Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 16.9Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: #33: Cottonwood and Babcock Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0Pocket Length [ft] 001000101001No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 14655614181435924372287Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 311413539069572Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor 0.8720.8720.8720.8720.8720.8720.8720.8720.8720.8720.8720.872Peak Hour Factor 12548512161231321321996Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.000.000.000.000.005.908.300.300.000.002.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 12548512161231321321996Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 12 10/29/2015 Scenario 2: 2: AM Peak 2015 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with CIntersection LOS 2.52d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] CCAAApproach LOS 15.4015.020.470.21d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 2.572.5713.493.743.744.170.000.001.400.000.000.4495th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.100.100.540.150.150.170.000.000.060.000.000.0295th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] ABCBCCAAAAAAMovement LOS 9.6114.8116.9410.6915.4216.160.000.007.800.000.008.03d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.020.020.150.010.040.050.000.000.020.000.000.01V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 0000Number of Storage Spaces in Median nonoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 0000Storage Area [veh] nonoFlared Lane StopStopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings 13 10/29/2015 Scenario 2: 2: AM Peak 2015 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0.339Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 14.6Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: #34: Durston and Laurel Parkway Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 35175247513193Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 944621348Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.93400.93400.93400.93400.93400.9340Peak Hour Factor 33163231512180Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.003.500.400.000.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 33163231512180Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 14 10/29/2015 Scenario 2: 2: AM Peak 2015 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with BIntersection LOS 4.44d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AABApproach LOS 0.000.1514.22d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.0016.7816.781.1637.3595th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.000.000.670.670.051.4995th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] AAAAABMovement LOS 0.000.000.007.639.2814.55d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.000.020.34V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median noTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings 15 10/29/2015 Scenario 7: 7: AM 2015 TWSC Cottonwood/Durston RoadsRobert Peccia and Associates Version 4.00-00 Generated with 0.005Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 13.8Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 1: Fowler Avenue and Durston Road Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 02862143800002109Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 071101100000502Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.92400.92400.92400.92400.92400.92400.92400.92400.92400.92400.92400.9240Peak Hour Factor 02642140500001908Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 02642140500001908Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name volumes 1 12/15/2015Shane Forsythe Scenario 7: 7: AM 2015 TWSC Cottonwood/Durston RoadsRobert Peccia and Associates Version 4.00-00 Generated with 0000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoNoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 0000Storage Area [veh] NoNoFlared Lane StopStopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings 2 12/15/2015Shane Forsythe Scenario 7: 7: AM 2015 TWSC Cottonwood/Durston RoadsRobert Peccia and Associates Version 4.00-00 Generated with BIntersection LOS 12.25d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BBAAApproach LOS 11.2413.612.412.16d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 36.4036.400.3775.1975.190.000.000.000.000.000.000.4195th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 1.461.460.013.013.010.000.000.000.000.000.000.0295th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] BBBBBBAAAAAAMovement LOS 10.4011.2213.8412.6913.6111.120.000.007.240.000.007.21d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.330.000.000.510.000.000.000.000.000.000.01V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 3 12/15/2015Shane Forsythe Scenario 3: 3: PM Peak 2015 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0.066Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 11.1Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: #1: Baxter Ln and Harper Puckett Rd Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 6114415813942Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 1536403211Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.92800.92800.92800.92800.92800.9280Peak Hour Factor 5713414712839Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.000.700.700.000.002.60Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 5713414712839Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 2 10/29/2015 Scenario 3: 3: PM Peak 2015 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with BIntersection LOS 1.53d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AABApproach LOS 0.000.5810.87d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.0010.5910.596.216.2195th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.000.000.420.420.250.2595th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] AAAAABMovement LOS 0.000.000.007.649.5711.14d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.010.010.07V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median noTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] noFlared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings 3 10/29/2015 Scenario 3: 3: PM Peak 2015 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0.177Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 16.0Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: #2: Baxter Ln and Flanders Mill Rd Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] ThruLeftRightThruRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 1711115617111076Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 432814432819Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.90600.90600.90600.90600.90600.9060Peak Hour Factor 1551015115510069Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.600.000.000.601.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1551015115510069Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 4 10/29/2015 Scenario 3: 3: PM Peak 2015 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with CIntersection LOS 4.89d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AABApproach LOS 3.110.0013.57d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 19.6319.630.000.0032.4732.4795th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.790.790.000.001.301.3095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] AAAABCMovement LOS 0.007.900.000.0011.8816.01d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.080.000.000.130.18V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median noTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] noFlared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings 5 10/29/2015 Scenario 3: 3: PM Peak 2015 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with CLevel Of Service: 24.6Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: All-way stopControl Type: #10: Durston Rd and Ferguson Ave Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0Pocket Length [ft] 000100000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 92198295126150155154372172128Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 2552124313739391184332Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor 0.9610.9610.9610.9610.9610.9610.9610.9610.9610.9610.9610.961Peak Hour Factor 92107991121144149148369165123Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.000.500.000.000.001.300.600.600.000.001.800.80Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 92107991121144149148369165123Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 6 10/29/2015 Scenario 3: 3: PM Peak 2015 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with CIntersection LOS 24.56Intersection Delay [s/veh] CCCDApproach LOS 24.9320.9322.1229.91Approach Delay [s/veh] 120.3317.46106.56108.79163.5395th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 4.810.704.264.356.5495th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results Lanes Intersection Settings 7 10/29/2015 Scenario 3: 3: PM Peak 2015 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0.036Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 14.3Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: #11: Durston Rd and Flanders Mill Rd Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 23243284584915Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 6617115124Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.87400.87400.87400.87400.87400.8740Peak Hour Factor 20212248514313Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 1.600.600.500.000.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 20212248514313Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 8 10/29/2015 Scenario 3: 3: PM Peak 2015 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with BIntersection LOS 1.74d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AABApproach LOS 0.001.3411.13d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.000.003.478.138.1395th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.000.000.000.140.330.3395th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] AAAABBMovement LOS 0.000.000.007.8810.1614.27d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.040.060.04V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median noTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] noFlared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings 9 10/29/2015 Scenario 3: 3: PM Peak 2015 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with CLevel Of Service: 22.1Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: All-way stopControl Type: #32: Durston Rd and Cottonwood Rd Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 263251819026154131317917102Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 781452265113345425Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor 0.9230.9230.9230.9230.9230.9230.9230.9230.9230.9230.9230.923Peak Hour Factor 24300167832415412121651694Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.000.600.600.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.002.10Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 24300167832415412121651694Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 10 10/29/2015 Scenario 3: 3: PM Peak 2015 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with CIntersection LOS 22.13Intersection Delay [s/veh] DCBCApproach LOS 30.7116.0310.7415.26Approach Delay [s/veh] 225.2389.264.8271.5095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 9.013.570.192.8695th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results Lanes Intersection Settings 11 10/29/2015 Scenario 3: 3: PM Peak 2015 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0.119Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 23.7Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: #33: Cottonwood and Babcock Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0Pocket Length [ft] 001000101001No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 2914319162614350299443910Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 7382473887241102Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor 0.8050.8050.8050.8050.8050.8050.8050.8050.8050.8050.8050.805Peak Hour Factor 231125713211128223763538Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.800.000.000.600.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 231125713211128223763538Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 12 10/29/2015 Scenario 3: 3: PM Peak 2015 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with CIntersection LOS 2.50d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] CCAAApproach LOS 17.2620.500.630.15d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 8.018.0110.676.296.299.970.000.002.140.000.000.6395th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.320.320.430.250.250.400.000.000.090.000.000.0395th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] BCCBCCAAAAAAMovement LOS 11.6618.8621.7711.1520.5423.710.000.008.540.000.008.01d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.050.050.130.010.060.120.000.000.030.000.000.01V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 0000Number of Storage Spaces in Median nonoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 0000Storage Area [veh] nonoFlared Lane StopStopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings 13 10/29/2015 Scenario 3: 3: PM Peak 2015 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0.291Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 16.8Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: #34: Durston and Laurel Parkway Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 1612812561415125Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 4070643431Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.85800.85800.85800.85800.85800.8580Peak Hour Factor 1382412201213107Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1382412201213107Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 14 10/29/2015 Scenario 3: 3: PM Peak 2015 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with CIntersection LOS 2.78d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AACApproach LOS 0.000.4316.09d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.0023.6723.671.6829.8195th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.000.000.950.950.071.1995th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] AAAABCMovement LOS 0.000.000.008.2610.3916.77d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.010.020.29V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median noTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings 15 10/29/2015 Scenario 8: 8: PM 2015 TWSC Cottonwood/Durston RoadRobert Peccia and Associates Version 4.00-00 Generated with 0.000Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 13.8Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 1: Fowler Avenue and Durston Road Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 04662073890000603Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 011652970000201Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.94000.94000.94000.94000.94000.94000.94000.94000.94000.94000.94000.9400Peak Hour Factor 04381973660000603Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 04381973660000603Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name volumes 2 12/15/2015Shane Forsythe Scenario 8: 8: PM 2015 TWSC Cottonwood/Durston RoadRobert Peccia and Associates Version 4.00-00 Generated with 0000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoNoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 0000Storage Area [veh] NoNoFlared Lane StopStopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings 3 12/15/2015Shane Forsythe Scenario 8: 8: PM 2015 TWSC Cottonwood/Durston RoadRobert Peccia and Associates Version 4.00-00 Generated with BIntersection LOS 12.79d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BBAAApproach LOS 13.4112.282.402.40d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 78.1478.143.2358.1758.170.000.000.000.000.000.000.1495th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 3.133.130.132.332.330.000.000.000.000.000.000.0195th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] BBBBBBAAAAAAMovement LOS 12.7013.4412.7811.5212.2913.780.000.007.210.000.007.20d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.520.040.010.440.000.000.000.000.000.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 4 12/15/2015Shane Forsythe Scenario 9: 9: AM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0.134Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 10.8Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: #1: Baxter Ln and Harper Puckett Rd Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] nonononononoPresence of On-Street Parking 16124139142268Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 431354517Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.83600.83600.83600.83600.83600.8360Peak Hour Factor 13104116121857Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.000.700.700.000.002.60Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 13104116121857Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 2 10/23/2015 Scenario 9: 9: AM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 3 10/23/2015 Scenario 9: 9: AM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] nononoPedestrian Recall nononoMaximum Recall nononoMinimum Recall 0.02.02.00.00.02.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.02.00.00.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 010100010Pedestrian Clearance [s] 055005Walk [s] 0.03.03.00.00.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 030300030Split [s] 0.01.01.00.00.01.0All red [s] 0.03.03.00.00.03.0Amber [s] 030300030Maximum Green [s] 055005Minimum Green [s] -----LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 048001Signal Group PermissivePermissivePermissivePermissivePermissiveProtectedControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fixed timeActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 60Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group noLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 4 10/23/2015 Scenario 9: 9: AM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 49.4753.9731.0295th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 1.982.161.2495th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 27.4829.9817.2350th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 1.101.200.6950th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] noyesyesCritical Lane Group BBBLane Group LOS 10.9010.9310.47d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.170.180.12X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.470.440.32d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.50k, delay calibration 10.4210.4810.15d1, Uniform Delay [s] 801867762c, Capacity [veh/h] 184918491758s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.080.080.05(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.430.430.43g / C, Green / Cycle 262626g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.002.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] CCCLane Group Lane Group Calculations 5 10/23/2015 Scenario 9: 9: AM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 10.93 10.90 10.9010.47d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]10.9310.47 BB BBMovement LOS BB 10.9010.93d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]10.47 BBApproach LOS B 10.81d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BIntersection LOS 0.134Intersection V/C ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------8-Ring 2 --------------41Ring 1 Sequence 6 10/23/2015 Scenario 9: 9: AM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0.256Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 10.4Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: #2: Baxter Ln and Flanders Mill Rd Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] ThruLeftRightThruRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] nonononononoPresence of On-Street Parking 122969215111534Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 31242338299Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.87600.87600.87600.87600.87600.8760Peak Hour Factor 107848113210130Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.600.000.000.601.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 107848113210130Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 7 10/23/2015 Scenario 9: 9: AM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 8 10/23/2015 Scenario 9: 9: AM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] nononoPedestrian Recall nononoMaximum Recall nononoMinimum Recall 2.00.00.02.00.02.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00.00.02.00.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 100010010Pedestrian Clearance [s] 500505Walk [s] 3.00.00.03.00.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 360036024Split [s] 1.00.00.01.00.01.0All red [s] 3.00.00.03.00.03.0Amber [s] 300030030Maximum Green [s] 500505Minimum Green [s] -----LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 400805Signal Group PermissivePermissivePermissivePermissivePermissiveProtectedControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fixed timeActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 60Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group noLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 9 10/23/2015 Scenario 9: 9: AM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 62.7869.8169.0895th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 2.512.792.7695th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 34.8838.7838.3850th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 1.401.551.5450th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] yesnoyesCritical Lane Group AABLane Group LOS 9.078.2315.90d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.280.260.27X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.860.661.23d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.50k, delay calibration 8.217.5714.67d1, Uniform Delay [s] 793944546c, Capacity [veh/h] 132417701639s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.160.140.09(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.530.530.33g / C, Green / Cycle 323220g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.000.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] CCCLane Group Lane Group Calculations 10 10/23/2015 Scenario 9: 9: AM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 8.23 9.07 9.0715.90d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]8.2315.90 AA ABMovement LOS AB 9.078.23d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]15.90 AAApproach LOS B 10.41d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BIntersection LOS 0.256Intersection V/C ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------85Ring 2 --------------4-Ring 1 Sequence 11 10/23/2015 Scenario 9: 9: AM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0.290Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 15.2Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: #10: Durston Rd and Ferguson Ave Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0Pocket Length [ft] 000100000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] nonononononononoPresence of On-Street Parking 4197741331915310716525311367Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 149183353827411132817Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor 0.9650.9650.9650.9650.9650.9650.9650.9650.9650.9650.9650.965Peak Hour Factor 4190711281814810315925110965Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.001.000.001.500.003.201.803.600.004.201.800.80Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 4190711281814810315925110965Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 12 10/23/2015 Scenario 9: 9: AM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 13 10/23/2015 Scenario 9: 9: AM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] nonononoPedestrian Recall nonononoMaximum Recall nonononoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0100010001000100Pedestrian Clearance [s] 050050050050Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.0Vehicle Extension [s] 0380038003700370Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.01.00.00.01.00.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.0Amber [s] 0300030003000300Maximum Green [s] 050050050050Minimum Green [s] ------------Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080060020Signal Group PermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fixed timeActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 75Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group noLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 14 10/23/2015 Scenario 9: 9: AM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 93.1239.5769.8492.12140.381.0478.5141.0595th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 3.721.582.793.685.620.043.141.6495th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 51.7321.9838.8051.1877.990.5843.6122.8050th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 2.070.881.552.053.120.021.740.9150th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] nononoyesyesnononoCritical Lane Group BBBBBBBBLane Group LOS 13.2116.2512.9619.1015.3215.6313.6119.85d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.240.130.200.300.360.000.210.15X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.650.490.621.461.340.010.630.74d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.50k, delay calibration 12.5515.7612.3517.6313.9815.6112.9819.12d1, Uniform Delay [s] 850562746516755536777439c, Capacity [veh/h] 18751255164611631715123917671116s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.110.060.090.130.160.000.090.06(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.450.450.450.450.440.440.440.44g / C, Green / Cycle 3434343433333333g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.002.000.002.000.002.000.002.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] CLCLCLCLLane Group Lane Group Calculations 15 10/23/2015 Scenario 9: 9: AM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 12.96 12.9619.10 16.25 13.2113.2115.3219.85 13.61d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]15.3213.61 15.63 B BB BBBBBMovement LOS B BBB 16.04 14.03d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]15.3215.40 B BApproach LOS B B 15.21d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BIntersection LOS 0.290Intersection V/C ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------86Ring 2 --------------42Ring 1 Sequence 16 10/23/2015 Scenario 9: 9: AM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0.340Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 13.4Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: #11: Durston Rd and Flanders Mill Rd Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] nonononononoPresence of On-Street Parking 413524399510569Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 1088110242617Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.94600.94600.94600.94600.94600.9460Peak Hour Factor 39333415909965Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.002.301.901.101.506.10Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 39333415909965Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 17 10/23/2015 Scenario 9: 9: AM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 18 10/23/2015 Scenario 9: 9: AM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] nononoPedestrian Recall nononoMaximum Recall nononoMinimum Recall 0.02.02.00.00.02.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.02.00.00.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 010100010Pedestrian Clearance [s] 055005Walk [s] 0.03.03.00.00.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 044440031Split [s] 0.01.01.00.00.01.0All red [s] 0.03.03.00.00.03.0Amber [s] 030300030Maximum Green [s] 055005Minimum Green [s] -----LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 048001Signal Group PermissivePermissivePermissivePermissivePermissiveProtectedControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fixed timeActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 75Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group noLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 19 10/23/2015 Scenario 9: 9: AM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 169.33193.1953.20100.5895th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 6.777.732.134.0295th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 94.07107.9829.5655.8850th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 3.764.321.182.2450th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] noyesnoyesCritical Lane Group BBBBLane Group LOS 11.6612.1016.9718.39d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.400.440.200.29X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 1.251.420.951.23d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.500.50k, delay calibration 10.4110.6816.0117.16d1, Uniform Delay [s] 973994473598c, Capacity [veh/h] 182418659961662s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.220.240.100.10(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.530.530.530.36g / C, Green / Cycle 40404027g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.002.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] CCLCLane Group Lane Group Calculations 20 10/23/2015 Scenario 9: 9: AM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 12.10 11.66 11.6618.39d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]16.9718.39 BB BBMovement LOS BB 11.6612.97d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]18.39 BBApproach LOS B 13.36d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BIntersection LOS 0.340Intersection V/C ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------8-Ring 2 --------------41Ring 1 Sequence 21 10/23/2015 Scenario 9: 9: AM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0.288Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 13.5Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: #32: Durston Rd and Cottonwood Rd Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] nonononononononoPresence of On-Street Parking 9167172167316211417188634Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 24243427910344729Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor 0.9340.9340.9340.9340.9340.9340.9340.9340.9340.9340.9340.934Peak Hour Factor 8156161156295211316176632Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.003.701.800.000.300.000.000.000.003.900.003.10Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 8156161156295211316176632Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 22 10/23/2015 Scenario 9: 9: AM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 23 10/23/2015 Scenario 9: 9: AM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] nonononoPedestrian Recall nonononoMaximum Recall nonononoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0100010001000100Pedestrian Clearance [s] 050050050050Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.0Vehicle Extension [s] 0430043003200320Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.01.00.00.01.00.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.0Amber [s] 0300030003000300Maximum Green [s] 050050050050Minimum Green [s] ------------Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080060020Signal Group PermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fixed timeActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 75Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group noLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 24 10/23/2015 Scenario 9: 9: AM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 67.55100.4965.22132.00.863.693.698.99108.61.4318.3495th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 2.704.022.615.280.030.150.150.364.340.060.7395th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 37.5355.8336.2373.360.482.052.054.9960.340.7910.1950th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 1.502.231.452.930.020.080.080.202.410.030.4150th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] nononoyesnonononoyesnonoCritical Lane Group BBBBBBBBBBBLane Group LOS 10.0017.9810.1711.2311.7114.8114.8116.3418.2314.7616.74d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.190.330.200.320.000.010.010.030.320.000.06X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.441.720.530.860.010.030.030.091.480.010.20d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.50k, delay calibration 9.5716.269.6410.3711.7014.7914.7916.2516.7514.7516.54d1, Uniform Delay [s] 9445188409856386937095915801351570c, Capacity [veh/h] 18161061161518941228185619001432155436181378s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.100.160.100.170.000.000.000.010.120.000.02(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.520.520.520.520.520.370.370.370.370.370.37g / C, Green / Cycle 3939393939282828282828g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.002.000.000.002.000.000.002.000.000.002.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] CLRCLCCLRCLLane Group Lane Group Calculations 25 10/23/2015 Scenario 9: 9: AM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 11.23 10.1711.71 17.98 10.0010.0014.8116.74 14.76d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]14.8118.23 16.34 B BB BBBBBMovement LOS B BBB 10.87 13.95d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]15.6217.92 B BApproach LOS B B 13.46d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BIntersection LOS 0.288Intersection V/C ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------86Ring 2 --------------42Ring 1 Sequence 26 10/23/2015 Scenario 9: 9: AM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0.138Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 10.2Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: #33: Cottonwood and Babcock Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0Pocket Length [ft] 001000101001No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] nonononononononoPresence of On-Street Parking 14655614181435924372287Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 311413539069572Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor 0.8720.8720.8720.8720.8720.8720.8720.8720.8720.8720.8720.872Peak Hour Factor 12548512161231321321996Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.000.000.000.000.005.908.300.300.000.002.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 12548512161231321321996Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 27 10/23/2015 Scenario 9: 9: AM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 28 10/23/2015 Scenario 9: 9: AM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] nonononoPedestrian Recall nonononoMaximum Recall nonononoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0100010001000100Pedestrian Clearance [s] 050050050050Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.0Vehicle Extension [s] 0300030004500450Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.01.00.00.01.00.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.0Amber [s] 0300030003000300Maximum Green [s] 050050050050Minimum Green [s] ------------Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080060020Signal Group PermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fixed timeActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 75Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group noLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 29 10/23/2015 Scenario 9: 9: AM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 10.5632.0110.5110.2265.8666.329.5545.2446.062.8695th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.421.280.420.412.632.650.381.811.840.1195th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 5.8717.785.845.6836.5936.855.3125.1325.591.5950th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.230.710.230.231.461.470.211.011.020.0650th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] noyesnonoyesnononononoCritical Lane Group BBBBAABAABLane Group LOS 16.3118.8116.2818.118.958.9410.318.618.5710.64d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.030.100.030.040.180.180.040.130.130.01X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.110.380.100.130.390.380.110.290.270.04d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.50k, delay calibration 16.2018.4316.1917.988.568.5510.218.328.3010.61d1, Uniform Delay [s] 586538626513102210366449701018578c, Capacity [veh/h] 1691141418041335186918941132177418631025s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.010.040.010.010.100.100.020.070.070.01(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.350.350.350.350.550.550.550.550.550.55g / C, Green / Cycle 26262626414141414141g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.002.000.002.000.000.002.000.000.002.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] CLCLCCLCCLLane Group Lane Group Calculations 30 10/23/2015 Scenario 9: 9: AM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 16.28 16.2818.11 18.81 16.3116.318.9510.64 8.59d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]8.948.61 10.31 B BB BBBAAMovement LOS B AAB 17.15 18.14d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]9.028.64 B BApproach LOS A A 10.16d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BIntersection LOS 0.138Intersection V/C ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------86Ring 2 --------------42Ring 1 Sequence 31 10/23/2015 Scenario 9: 9: AM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0.237Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 13.4Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: #34: Durston and Laurel Parkway Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] nonononononoPresence of On-Street Parking 35175247513193Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 944621348Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.93400.93400.93400.93400.93400.9340Peak Hour Factor 33163231512180Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.003.500.400.000.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 33163231512180Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 32 10/23/2015 Scenario 9: 9: AM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 33 10/23/2015 Scenario 9: 9: AM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] nononoPedestrian Recall nononoMaximum Recall nononoMinimum Recall 0.02.02.00.00.02.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.02.00.00.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 010100010Pedestrian Clearance [s] 055005Walk [s] 0.03.03.00.00.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 039390036Split [s] 0.01.01.00.00.01.0All red [s] 0.03.03.00.00.03.0Amber [s] 030300030Maximum Green [s] 055005Minimum Green [s] -----LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 048001Signal Group PermissivePermissivePermissivePermissivePermissiveProtectedControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fixed timeActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 75Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group noLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 34 10/23/2015 Scenario 9: 9: AM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 95.70113.882.535.7895.5795th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 3.834.560.100.233.8295th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 53.1763.271.413.2153.0950th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 2.132.530.060.132.1250th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] noyesnonoyesCritical Lane Group BBBBBLane Group LOS 12.8213.0615.0312.4814.57d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.250.280.010.020.25X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.730.790.030.050.78d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.500.500.50k, delay calibration 12.0912.2715.0012.4313.80d1, Uniform Delay [s] 832883535689772c, Capacity [veh/h] 17831892119016151810s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.120.130.000.010.11(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.470.470.470.430.43g / C, Green / Cycle 3535353232g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.002.000.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] CCLRLLane Group Lane Group Calculations 35 10/23/2015 Scenario 9: 9: AM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 13.06 12.82 12.8214.57d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]15.0312.48 BB BBMovement LOS BB 12.8213.10d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]14.44 BBApproach LOS B 13.42d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BIntersection LOS 0.237Intersection V/C ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------8-Ring 2 --------------41Ring 1 Sequence 36 10/23/2015 Scenario 5: 5: AM 2015 Signal Cottonwood/Durston RoadsRobert Peccia and Associates Version 4.00-00 Generated with 0.244Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 14.2Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 2010Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 1: Fowler Avenue and Durston Road Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 02862143800002109Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 071101100000502Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.92400.92400.92400.92400.92400.92400.92400.92400.92400.92400.92400.9240Peak Hour Factor 02642140500001908Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 02642140500001908Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name volumes 2 12/15/2015Shane Forsythe Scenario 5: 5: AM 2015 Signal Cottonwood/Durston RoadsRobert Peccia and Associates Version 4.00-00 Generated with 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group Exclusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0100010001000100Pedestrian Clearance [s] 050050050050Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.0Vehicle Extension [s] 0520052003800380Split [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.0Amber [s] 0300030003000300Maximum Green [s] 050050050050Minimum Green [s] ------------Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080061025Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fixed timeActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 90Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 3 12/15/2015Shane Forsythe Scenario 5: 5: AM 2015 Signal Cottonwood/Durston RoadsRobert Peccia and Associates Version 4.00-00 Generated with 146.361.30235.950.000.000.000.0013.230.005.8695th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 5.850.059.440.000.000.000.000.530.000.2395th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 81.310.72139.200.000.000.000.007.350.003.2650th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 3.250.035.570.000.000.000.000.290.000.1350th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] NoNoYesNoNoNoNoYesNoNoCritical Lane Group BBBAAAABABLane Group LOS 12.8318.7014.790.000.000.000.0018.400.0019.51d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.290.000.440.000.000.000.000.040.000.02X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.730.021.430.000.000.000.000.110.000.05d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.50k, delay calibration 12.0918.6813.360.000.000.000.0018.290.0019.46d1, Uniform Delay [s] 992424992541697697555592697576c, Capacity [veh/h] 190096518991110190019001413161519001440s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.150.000.230.000.000.000.000.010.000.01(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.520.520.520.520.370.370.370.370.370.37g / C, Green / Cycle 47474747333333333333g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 3.003.003.003.003.003.003.003.003.003.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.002.000.002.000.000.002.000.000.002.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 5.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] CLCLCCLCCLLane Group Lane Group Calculations 4 12/15/2015Shane Forsythe Scenario 5: 5: AM 2015 Signal Cottonwood/Durston RoadsRobert Peccia and Associates Version 4.00-00 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 14.79 14.790.00 18.70 12.8312.830.0019.51 9.20d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]0.0018.40 0.00 B BA BBBAAMovement LOS B ABA 14.79 12.87d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]0.0018.73 B BApproach LOS B A 14.22d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BIntersection LOS 0.244Intersection V/C ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 -------------86-Ring 2 -------------42-Ring 1 Sequence 5 12/15/2015Shane Forsythe Scenario 10: 10: PM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0.143Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 12.5Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: #1: Baxter Ln and Harper Puckett Rd Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] nonononononoPresence of On-Street Parking 6114415813942Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 1536403211Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.92800.92800.92800.92800.92800.9280Peak Hour Factor 5713414712839Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.000.700.700.000.002.60Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 5713414712839Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 2 10/23/2015 Scenario 10: 10: PM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 3 10/23/2015 Scenario 10: 10: PM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] nononoPedestrian Recall nononoMaximum Recall nononoMinimum Recall 0.02.02.00.00.02.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.02.00.00.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 010100010Pedestrian Clearance [s] 055005Walk [s] 0.03.03.00.00.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 039390036Split [s] 0.01.01.00.00.01.0All red [s] 0.03.03.00.00.03.0Amber [s] 030300030Maximum Green [s] 055005Minimum Green [s] -----LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 048001Signal Group PermissivePermissivePermissivePermissivePermissiveProtectedControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fixed timeActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 75Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group noLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 4 10/23/2015 Scenario 10: 10: PM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 92.9874.7923.0495th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 3.722.990.9295th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 51.6641.5512.8050th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 2.071.660.5150th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] yesnoyesCritical Lane Group BBBLane Group LOS 12.7412.1812.86d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.250.190.07X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.700.450.17d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.50k, delay calibration 12.0411.7312.69d1, Uniform Delay [s] 837914756c, Capacity [veh/h] 179318481772s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.110.090.03(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.470.470.43g / C, Green / Cycle 353532g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.002.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] CCCLane Group Lane Group Calculations 5 10/23/2015 Scenario 10: 10: PM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 12.18 12.74 12.7412.86d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]12.1812.86 BB BBMovement LOS BB 12.7412.18d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]12.86 BBApproach LOS B 12.53d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BIntersection LOS 0.143Intersection V/C ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------8-Ring 2 --------------41Ring 1 Sequence 6 10/23/2015 Scenario 10: 10: PM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0.319Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 14.4Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: #2: Baxter Ln and Flanders Mill Rd Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] ThruLeftRightThruRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] nonononononoPresence of On-Street Parking 1711115617111076Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 432814432819Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.90600.90600.90600.90600.90600.9060Peak Hour Factor 1551015115510069Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.600.000.000.601.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1551015115510069Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 7 10/23/2015 Scenario 10: 10: PM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 8 10/23/2015 Scenario 10: 10: PM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] nononoPedestrian Recall nononoMaximum Recall nononoMinimum Recall 2.00.00.02.00.02.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00.00.02.00.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 100010010Pedestrian Clearance [s] 500505Walk [s] 3.00.00.03.00.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 400040035Split [s] 1.00.00.01.00.01.0All red [s] 3.00.00.03.00.03.0Amber [s] 300030030Maximum Green [s] 500505Minimum Green [s] -----LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 400805Signal Group PermissivePermissivePermissivePermissivePermissiveProtectedControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fixed timeActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 75Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group noLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 9 10/23/2015 Scenario 10: 10: PM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 154.60100.7996.2095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 6.184.033.8595th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 85.8955.9953.4450th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 3.442.242.1450th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] yesnoyesCritical Lane Group BBBLane Group LOS 15.4412.3315.48d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.390.260.27X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 1.600.730.96d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.50k, delay calibration 13.8311.5914.52d1, Uniform Delay [s] 719869691c, Capacity [veh/h] 135918101672s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.210.130.11(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.480.480.41g / C, Green / Cycle 363631g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.000.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] CCCLane Group Lane Group Calculations 10 10/23/2015 Scenario 10: 10: PM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 12.33 15.44 15.4415.48d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]12.3315.48 BB BBMovement LOS BB 15.4412.33d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]15.48 BBApproach LOS B 14.43d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BIntersection LOS 0.319Intersection V/C ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------85Ring 2 --------------4-Ring 1 Sequence 11 10/23/2015 Scenario 10: 10: PM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0.308Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 16.1Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: #10: Durston Rd and Ferguson Ave Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0Pocket Length [ft] 000100000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] nonononononononoPresence of On-Street Parking 92198295126150155154372172128Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 2552124313739391184332Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor 0.9610.9610.9610.9610.9610.9610.9610.9610.9610.9610.9610.961Peak Hour Factor 92107991121144149148369165123Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.000.500.000.000.001.300.600.600.000.001.800.80Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 92107991121144149148369165123Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 12 10/23/2015 Scenario 10: 10: PM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 13 10/23/2015 Scenario 10: 10: PM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] nonononoPedestrian Recall nonononoMaximum Recall nonononoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0100010001000100Pedestrian Clearance [s] 050050050050Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.0Vehicle Extension [s] 0360036003900390Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.01.00.00.01.00.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.0Amber [s] 0300030003000300Maximum Green [s] 050050050050Minimum Green [s] ------------Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080060020Signal Group PermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fixed timeActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 75Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group noLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 14 10/23/2015 Scenario 10: 10: PM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 114.7349.65112.3097.98153.001.56114.1182.1495th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 4.591.994.493.926.120.064.563.2995th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 63.7427.5862.3954.4485.000.8763.4045.6450th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 2.551.102.502.183.400.032.541.8350th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] nononoyesyesnononoCritical Lane Group BBBCBBBCLane Group LOS 14.9219.5515.0821.7014.3415.6713.2721.03d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.280.170.290.320.380.010.290.29X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.890.800.991.821.370.020.911.62d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.50k, delay calibration 14.0318.7514.0919.8812.9815.6412.3719.42d1, Uniform Delay [s] 801471754467810506828446c, Capacity [veh/h] 18771178176611561735115417741079s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.120.070.130.130.180.000.140.12(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.430.430.430.430.470.470.470.47g / C, Green / Cycle 3232323235353535g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.002.000.002.000.002.000.002.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] CLCLCLCLLane Group Lane Group Calculations 15 10/23/2015 Scenario 10: 10: PM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 15.08 15.0821.70 19.55 14.9214.9214.3421.03 13.27d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]14.3413.27 15.67 B BC BBBBBMovement LOS C BBB 17.75 16.15d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]14.3615.94 B BApproach LOS B B 16.12d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BIntersection LOS 0.308Intersection V/C ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------86Ring 2 --------------42Ring 1 Sequence 16 10/23/2015 Scenario 10: 10: PM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0.189Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 12.1Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: #11: Durston Rd and Flanders Mill Rd Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] nonononononoPresence of On-Street Parking 23243284584915Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 6617115124Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.87400.87400.87400.87400.87400.8740Peak Hour Factor 20212248514313Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 1.600.600.500.000.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 20212248514313Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 17 10/23/2015 Scenario 10: 10: PM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 18 10/23/2015 Scenario 10: 10: PM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] nononoPedestrian Recall nononoMaximum Recall nononoMinimum Recall 0.02.02.00.00.02.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.02.00.00.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 010100010Pedestrian Clearance [s] 055005Walk [s] 0.03.03.00.00.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 042420033Split [s] 0.01.01.00.00.01.0All red [s] 0.03.03.00.00.03.0Amber [s] 030300030Maximum Green [s] 055005Minimum Green [s] -----LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 048001Signal Group PermissivePermissivePermissivePermissivePermissiveProtectedControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fixed timeActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 75Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group noLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 19 10/23/2015 Scenario 10: 10: PM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 112.09120.6529.2632.1395th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 4.484.831.171.2995th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 62.2767.0316.2617.8550th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 2.492.680.650.7150th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] noyesnoyesCritical Lane Group BBBBLane Group LOS 11.4011.5314.7314.99d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.280.300.110.10X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.750.790.390.31d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.500.50k, delay calibration 10.6510.7414.3414.67d1, Uniform Delay [s] 943958546641c, Capacity [veh/h] 1860189111311657s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.140.150.050.04(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.510.510.510.39g / C, Green / Cycle 38383829g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.002.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] CCLCLane Group Lane Group Calculations 20 10/23/2015 Scenario 10: 10: PM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 11.53 11.40 11.4014.99d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]14.7314.99 BB BBMovement LOS BB 11.4012.07d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]14.99 BBApproach LOS B 12.08d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BIntersection LOS 0.189Intersection V/C ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------8-Ring 2 --------------41Ring 1 Sequence 21 10/23/2015 Scenario 10: 10: PM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0.283Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 13.5Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: #32: Durston Rd and Cottonwood Rd Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] nonononononononoPresence of On-Street Parking 263251819026154131317917102Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 781452265113345425Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor 0.9230.9230.9230.9230.9230.9230.9230.9230.9230.9230.9230.923Peak Hour Factor 24300167832415412121651694Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.000.600.600.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.002.10Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 24300167832415412121651694Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 22 10/23/2015 Scenario 10: 10: PM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 23 10/23/2015 Scenario 10: 10: PM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] nonononoPedestrian Recall nonononoMaximum Recall nonononoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0100010001000100Pedestrian Clearance [s] 050050050050Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.0Vehicle Extension [s] 0430043003200320Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.01.00.00.01.00.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.0Amber [s] 0300030003000300Maximum Green [s] 050050050050Minimum Green [s] ------------Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080060020Signal Group PermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fixed timeActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 75Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group noLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 24 10/23/2015 Scenario 10: 10: PM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 9.18136.7100.333.22104.92.424.194.196.88101.64.0558.3195th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.375.474.011.334.200.100.170.170.284.060.162.3395th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 5.1076.0055.7518.4558.301.352.332.333.8256.452.2532.4050th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.203.042.230.742.330.050.090.090.152.260.091.3050th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] noyesnononononononoyesnonoCritical Lane Group ABBABBBBBBBBLane Group LOS 8.8511.3416.679.4110.6713.8914.8314.8216.3717.8214.8118.12d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.030.330.320.110.260.010.010.010.020.300.010.18X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.070.901.480.260.650.030.040.030.071.260.020.68d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.50k, delay calibration 8.7810.4415.189.1510.0213.8614.8014.7916.3016.5614.8017.44d1, Uniform Delay [s] 8409825678409885186557095836031351573c, Capacity [veh/h] 161518891129161519001072175419001418161536181389s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.020.170.160.060.140.000.000.000.010.110.000.07(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.520.520.520.520.520.520.370.370.370.370.370.37g / C, Green / Cycle 393939393939282828282828g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.002.000.000.002.000.000.002.000.000.002.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] RCLRCLCCLRCLLane Group Lane Group Calculations 25 10/23/2015 Scenario 10: 10: PM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 10.67 9.4113.89 16.67 8.8511.3414.8318.12 14.81d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]14.8317.82 16.37 B AB ABBBBMovement LOS B BBB 10.39 13.03d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]15.5017.75 B BApproach LOS B B 13.48d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BIntersection LOS 0.283Intersection V/C ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------86Ring 2 --------------42Ring 1 Sequence 26 10/23/2015 Scenario 10: 10: PM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0.172Volume to Capacity (v/c): ALevel Of Service: 7.2Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: #33: Cottonwood and Babcock Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0Pocket Length [ft] 001000101001No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] nonononononononoPresence of On-Street Parking 2914319162614350299443910Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 7382473887241102Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor 0.8050.8050.8050.8050.8050.8050.8050.8050.8050.8050.8050.805Peak Hour Factor 231125713211128223763538Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.800.000.000.600.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 231125713211128223763538Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 27 10/23/2015 Scenario 10: 10: PM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 28 10/23/2015 Scenario 10: 10: PM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] nonononoPedestrian Recall nonononoMaximum Recall nonononoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0100010001000100Pedestrian Clearance [s] 050050050050Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.0Vehicle Extension [s] 0200020005500550Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.01.00.00.01.00.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.0Amber [s] 0300030003000300Maximum Green [s] 050050050050Minimum Green [s] ------------Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080060020Signal Group PermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fixed timeActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 75Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group noLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 29 10/23/2015 Scenario 10: 10: PM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 29.8422.6216.9919.2237.9338.208.4957.9760.432.6195th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 1.190.900.680.771.521.530.342.322.420.1095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 16.5812.579.4410.6821.0721.224.7232.2133.571.4550th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.660.500.380.430.840.850.191.291.340.0650th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] yesnonononononoyesnonoCritical Lane Group CCCCAAAAAALane Group LOS 24.4826.5923.8727.054.494.496.394.914.875.54d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.120.090.070.080.140.140.050.220.210.01X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.670.520.330.480.240.230.140.410.380.03d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.50k, delay calibration 23.8126.0723.5426.574.254.256.254.504.495.50d1, Uniform Delay [s] 3623433813261265128262612071284736c, Capacity [veh/h] 169814081787138518601885885177518891034s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.030.020.010.020.100.100.030.150.140.01(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.210.210.210.210.680.680.680.680.680.68g / C, Green / Cycle 16161616515151515151g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.002.000.002.000.000.002.000.000.002.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] CLCLCCLCCLLane Group Lane Group Calculations 30 10/23/2015 Scenario 10: 10: PM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 23.87 23.8727.05 26.59 24.4824.484.495.54 4.88d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]4.494.91 6.39 C CC CCCAAMovement LOS A AAA 25.49 25.36d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]4.634.90 C CApproach LOS A A 7.22d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AIntersection LOS 0.172Intersection V/C ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------86Ring 2 --------------42Ring 1 Sequence 31 10/23/2015 Scenario 10: 10: PM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0.323Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 13.1Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: #34: Durston and Laurel Parkway Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] nonononononoPresence of On-Street Parking 1612812561415125Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 4070643431Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.85800.85800.85800.85800.85800.8580Peak Hour Factor 1382412201213107Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1382412201213107Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 32 10/23/2015 Scenario 10: 10: PM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 33 10/23/2015 Scenario 10: 10: PM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] nononoPedestrian Recall nononoMaximum Recall nononoMinimum Recall 0.02.02.00.00.02.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.02.00.00.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 010100010Pedestrian Clearance [s] 055005Walk [s] 0.03.03.00.00.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 043430032Split [s] 0.01.01.00.00.01.0All red [s] 0.03.03.00.00.03.0Amber [s] 030300030Maximum Green [s] 055005Minimum Green [s] -----LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 048001Signal Group PermissivePermissivePermissivePermissivePermissiveProtectedControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fixed timeActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 75Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group noLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 34 10/23/2015 Scenario 10: 10: PM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 205.56103.107.867.5266.7895th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 8.224.120.310.302.6795th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 116.9057.284.374.1837.1050th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 4.682.290.170.171.4850th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] yesnononoyesCritical Lane Group BBBBBLane Group LOS 13.4110.6817.1814.9516.47d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.490.260.030.030.19X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 1.850.670.160.080.63d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.500.500.50k, delay calibration 11.5610.0217.0314.8715.84d1, Uniform Delay [s] 910969408591662c, Capacity [veh/h] 1750186394415831774s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.250.140.010.010.07(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.520.520.520.370.37g / C, Green / Cycle 3939392828g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.002.000.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] CCLRLLane Group Lane Group Calculations 35 10/23/2015 Scenario 10: 10: PM Peak 2015 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 10.68 13.41 13.4116.47d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]17.1814.95 BB BBMovement LOS BB 13.4111.02d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]16.31 BBApproach LOS B 13.13d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BIntersection LOS 0.323Intersection V/C ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------8-Ring 2 --------------41Ring 1 Sequence 36 10/23/2015 Scenario 6: 6: PM 2015 Signal Cottonwood/Durston RoadsRobert Peccia and Associates Version 4.00-00 Generated with 0.249Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 15.6Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 2010Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 1: Fowler Avenue and Durston Road Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 04662073890000603Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 011652970000201Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.94000.94000.94000.94000.94000.94000.94000.94000.94000.94000.94000.9400Peak Hour Factor 04381973660000603Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 04381973660000603Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name volumes 2 12/15/2015Shane Forsythe Scenario 6: 6: PM 2015 Signal Cottonwood/Durston RoadsRobert Peccia and Associates Version 4.00-00 Generated with 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group Exclusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0100010001000100Pedestrian Clearance [s] 050050050050Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.0Vehicle Extension [s] 0510051003900390Split [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.0Amber [s] 0300030003000300Maximum Green [s] 050050050050Minimum Green [s] ------------Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080061025Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fixed timeActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 90Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 3 12/15/2015Shane Forsythe Scenario 6: 6: PM 2015 Signal Cottonwood/Durston RoadsRobert Peccia and Associates Version 4.00-00 Generated with 257.8713.12217.350.000.000.000.003.660.001.9095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 10.310.528.690.000.000.000.000.150.000.0895th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 155.597.29125.490.000.000.000.002.030.001.0650th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 6.220.295.020.000.000.000.000.080.000.0450th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] YesNoNoNoNoNoNoYesNoNoCritical Lane Group BBBAAAABABLane Group LOS 15.9519.0214.880.000.000.000.0017.520.0018.74d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.480.050.410.000.000.000.000.010.000.01X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 1.700.191.280.000.000.000.000.030.000.02d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.50k, delay calibration 14.2518.8313.600.000.000.000.0017.490.0018.73d1, Uniform Delay [s] 971441968391718718586610718592c, Capacity [veh/h] 190010041894941190019001432161519001440s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.250.020.210.000.000.000.000.000.000.00(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.510.510.510.510.380.380.380.380.380.38g / C, Green / Cycle 46464646343434343434g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 3.003.003.003.003.003.003.003.003.003.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.002.000.002.000.000.002.000.000.002.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 5.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] CLCLCCLCCLLane Group Lane Group Calculations 4 12/15/2015Shane Forsythe Scenario 6: 6: PM 2015 Signal Cottonwood/Durston RoadsRobert Peccia and Associates Version 4.00-00 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 14.88 14.880.00 19.02 15.9515.950.0018.74 8.76d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]0.0017.52 0.00 B BA BBBAAMovement LOS B ABA 14.88 16.07d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]0.0017.93 B BApproach LOS B A 15.56d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BIntersection LOS 0.249Intersection V/C ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 -------------86-Ring 2 -------------42-Ring 1 Sequence 5 12/15/2015Shane Forsythe LEVEL OF SERVICE Site: Baxter / Cottonwood - AM 2015 Existing Traffic Roundabout All Movement Classes East North West Intersection LOS A A A A Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane. LOS F will result if v/c > irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:03:55 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2015.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Baxter / Cottonwood - AM 2015 Existing Traffic Roundabout Movement Performance - Vehicles Demand Flows 95% Back of QueueMov ID OD Mov Deg. Satn Average Delay Level of Service Prop. Queued Effective Stop Rate Average Speed Total HV Vehicles Distance veh/h % v/c sec veh ft per veh mph East: Baxter Lane 6 T1 124 0.7 0.111 3.8 LOS A 0.4 9.3 0.06 0.01 34.8 16 R2 16 0.0 0.111 3.8 LOS A 0.4 9.3 0.06 0.01 34.0 Approach 140 0.6 0.111 3.8 LOS A 0.4 9.3 0.06 0.01 34.7 North: Harper Puckett Road 7 L2 68 2.6 0.078 3.8 LOS A 0.2 6.3 0.20 0.10 33.0 14 R2 22 0.0 0.078 3.8 LOS A 0.2 6.3 0.20 0.10 32.5 Approach 90 2.0 0.078 3.8 LOS A 0.2 6.3 0.20 0.10 32.9 West: Baxter Lane 5 L2 14 0.0 0.127 4.0 LOS A 0.4 10.7 0.15 0.07 34.3 2 T1 139 0.7 0.127 4.0 LOS A 0.4 10.7 0.15 0.07 34.4 Approach 153 0.6 0.127 4.0 LOS A 0.4 10.7 0.15 0.07 34.4 All Vehicles 383 0.9 0.127 3.9 LOS A 0.4 10.7 0.13 0.06 34.2 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:03:55 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2015.sip6 LEVEL OF SERVICE Site: Baxter / Cottonwood - PM 2015 Existing Traffic Roundabout All Movement Classes East North West Intersection LOS A A A A Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane. LOS F will result if v/c > irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:03:56 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2015.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Baxter / Cottonwood - PM 2015 Existing Traffic Roundabout Movement Performance - Vehicles Demand Flows 95% Back of QueueMov ID OD Mov Deg. Satn Average Delay Level of Service Prop. Queued Effective Stop Rate Average Speed Total HV Vehicles Distance veh/h % v/c sec veh ft per veh mph East: Baxter Lane 6 T1 161 4.4 0.186 4.5 LOS A 0.7 16.8 0.06 0.02 34.3 16 R2 68 0.0 0.186 4.5 LOS A 0.7 16.8 0.06 0.02 33.7 Approach 229 3.1 0.186 4.5 LOS A 0.7 16.8 0.06 0.02 34.1 North: Harper Puckett Road 7 L2 47 6.7 0.054 3.9 LOS A 0.2 4.1 0.23 0.13 32.6 14 R2 10 12.5 0.054 3.9 LOS A 0.2 4.1 0.23 0.13 31.9 Approach 56 7.7 0.054 3.9 LOS A 0.2 4.1 0.23 0.13 32.5 West: Baxter Lane 5 L2 14 0.0 0.154 4.2 LOS A 0.5 13.5 0.13 0.05 34.3 2 T1 176 0.0 0.154 4.2 LOS A 0.5 13.5 0.13 0.05 34.4 Approach 191 0.0 0.154 4.2 LOS A 0.5 13.5 0.13 0.05 34.4 All Vehicles 477 2.4 0.186 4.3 LOS A 0.7 16.8 0.11 0.04 34.0 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:03:56 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2015.sip6 LEVEL OF SERVICE Site: Cottonwood / Babcock - AM 2015 Existing Traffic Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS A A A A A Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane. LOS F will result if v/c > irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:03:57 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2015.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Cottonwood / Babcock - AM 2015 Existing Traffic Roundabout Movement Performance - Vehicles Demand Flows 95% Back of QueueMov ID OD Mov Deg. Satn Average Delay Level of Service Prop. Queued Effective Stop Rate Average Speed Total HV Vehicles Distance veh/h % v/c sec veh ft per veh mph South: Cottonwood Road 3 L2 7 0.0 0.112 3.9 LOS A 0.4 9.3 0.13 0.05 34.5 8 T1 228 2.0 0.112 3.9 LOS A 0.4 9.3 0.13 0.05 34.6 18 R2 37 0.0 0.112 3.9 LOS A 0.4 9.3 0.13 0.05 33.8 Approach 272 1.7 0.112 3.9 LOS A 0.4 9.3 0.13 0.05 34.5 East: Babcock Street 1 L2 55 0.0 0.071 4.0 LOS A 0.2 5.6 0.30 0.20 33.0 6 T1 6 0.0 0.071 4.0 LOS A 0.2 5.6 0.30 0.20 33.1 16 R2 14 0.0 0.071 4.0 LOS A 0.2 5.6 0.30 0.20 32.4 Approach 75 0.0 0.071 4.0 LOS A 0.2 5.6 0.30 0.20 32.9 North: Cottonwood Road 7 L2 24 0.0 0.164 4.4 LOS A 0.6 14.4 0.16 0.07 34.1 4 T1 359 0.3 0.164 4.4 LOS A 0.6 14.4 0.16 0.07 34.4 14 R2 14 8.3 0.164 4.4 LOS A 0.6 14.4 0.16 0.07 33.4 Approach 397 0.6 0.164 4.4 LOS A 0.6 14.4 0.16 0.07 34.3 West: Babcock Street 5 L2 18 5.9 0.043 4.4 LOS A 0.1 3.2 0.38 0.29 33.1 2 T1 14 0.0 0.043 4.4 LOS A 0.1 3.2 0.38 0.29 33.5 12 R2 6 0.0 0.043 4.4 LOS A 0.1 3.2 0.38 0.29 32.7 Approach 38 2.9 0.043 4.4 LOS A 0.1 3.2 0.38 0.29 33.2 All Vehicles 781 1.0 0.164 4.2 LOS A 0.6 14.4 0.17 0.09 34.2 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:03:57 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2015.sip6 LEVEL OF SERVICE Site: Cottonwood / Babcock - PM 2015 Existing Traffic Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS A A A A A Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane. LOS F will result if v/c > irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:03:58 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2015.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Cottonwood / Babcock - PM 2015 Existing Traffic Roundabout Movement Performance - Vehicles Demand Flows 95% Back of QueueMov ID OD Mov Deg. Satn Average Delay Level of Service Prop. Queued Effective Stop Rate Average Speed Total HV Vehicles Distance veh/h % v/c sec veh ft per veh mph South: Cottonwood Road 3 L2 10 0.0 0.224 5.0 LOS A 0.8 21.2 0.17 0.08 34.0 8 T1 439 0.6 0.224 4.9 LOS A 0.8 21.2 0.17 0.08 34.1 18 R2 94 0.0 0.224 4.9 LOS A 0.8 21.2 0.17 0.08 33.3 Approach 543 0.5 0.224 4.9 LOS A 0.8 21.2 0.17 0.08 34.0 East: Babcock Street 1 L2 31 0.0 0.083 4.8 LOS A 0.3 6.5 0.41 0.34 33.3 6 T1 14 0.0 0.083 4.8 LOS A 0.3 6.5 0.41 0.34 33.4 16 R2 29 0.0 0.083 4.8 LOS A 0.3 6.5 0.41 0.34 32.6 Approach 73 0.0 0.083 4.8 LOS A 0.3 6.5 0.41 0.34 33.0 North: Cottonwood Road 7 L2 29 0.0 0.160 4.3 LOS A 0.6 14.1 0.14 0.05 34.1 4 T1 350 0.8 0.160 4.3 LOS A 0.6 14.1 0.14 0.05 34.4 14 R2 14 0.0 0.160 4.3 LOS A 0.6 14.1 0.14 0.05 33.7 Approach 393 0.7 0.160 4.3 LOS A 0.6 14.1 0.14 0.05 34.3 West: Babcock Street 5 L2 26 0.0 0.055 4.4 LOS A 0.2 4.2 0.37 0.29 33.3 2 T1 16 0.0 0.055 4.4 LOS A 0.2 4.2 0.37 0.29 33.4 12 R2 9 0.0 0.055 4.4 LOS A 0.2 4.2 0.37 0.29 32.7 Approach 51 0.0 0.055 4.4 LOS A 0.2 4.2 0.37 0.29 33.2 All Vehicles 1060 0.5 0.224 4.7 LOS A 0.8 21.2 0.18 0.10 34.0 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:03:58 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2015.sip6 LEVEL OF SERVICE Site: Durston / Cottonwood - AM 2015 Existing Traffic Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS A A A A A Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane. LOS F will result if v/c > irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 8:30:17 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2015.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Durston / Cottonwood - AM 2015 Existing Traffic Roundabout Movement Performance - Vehicles Demand Flows 95% Back of QueueMov ID OD Mov Deg. Satn Average Delay Level of Service Prop. Queued Effective Stop Rate Average Speed Total HV Vehicles Distance veh/h % v/c sec veh ft per veh mph South: Cottonwood Road 3 L2 34 3.1 0.042 4.1 LOS A 0.1 3.2 0.33 0.23 32.6 8 T1 6 0.0 0.042 4.1 LOS A 0.1 3.2 0.33 0.23 32.9 18 R2 188 3.9 0.198 5.7 LOS A 0.7 17.1 0.38 0.31 32.8 Approach 229 3.7 0.198 5.4 LOS A 0.7 17.1 0.37 0.29 32.8 East: Durston Road 1 L2 172 1.8 0.200 4.7 LOS A 0.7 18.3 0.13 0.05 32.7 6 T1 167 3.7 0.200 4.1 LOS A 0.7 18.3 0.12 0.04 33.9 16 R2 9 0.0 0.087 3.7 LOS A 0.3 7.0 0.11 0.04 34.0 Approach 348 2.7 0.200 4.4 LOS A 0.7 18.3 0.12 0.04 33.3 North: Cottonwood Road 7 L2 17 0.0 0.018 3.9 LOS A 0.1 1.3 0.35 0.23 32.5 4 T1 14 0.0 0.016 3.9 LOS A 0.0 1.2 0.35 0.23 34.7 14 R2 1 0.0 0.016 3.9 LOS A 0.0 1.2 0.35 0.23 33.9 Approach 32 0.0 0.018 3.9 LOS A 0.1 1.3 0.35 0.23 33.5 West: Durston Road 5 L2 2 0.0 0.291 6.1 LOS A 1.1 28.8 0.33 0.23 33.5 2 T1 316 0.3 0.291 6.1 LOS A 1.1 28.8 0.33 0.23 33.6 12 R2 167 0.0 0.153 4.6 LOS A 0.5 13.0 0.29 0.19 33.4 Approach 485 0.2 0.291 5.6 LOS A 1.1 28.8 0.31 0.22 33.5 All Vehicles 1094 1.7 0.291 5.1 LOS A 1.1 28.8 0.27 0.18 33.3 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 8:30:17 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2015.sip6 LEVEL OF SERVICE Site: Durston / Cottonwood - PM 2015 Existing Traffic Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS A A A A A Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane. LOS F will result if v/c > irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 8:30:29 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2015.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Durston / Cottonwood - PM 2015 Existing Traffic Roundabout Movement Performance - Vehicles Demand Flows 95% Back of QueueMov ID OD Mov Deg. Satn Average Delay Level of Service Prop. Queued Effective Stop Rate Average Speed Total HV Vehicles Distance veh/h % v/c sec veh ft per veh mph South: Cottonwood Road 3 L2 102 2.1 0.117 4.6 LOS A 0.4 9.6 0.32 0.23 32.4 8 T1 17 0.0 0.117 4.6 LOS A 0.4 9.6 0.32 0.23 32.6 18 R2 179 0.0 0.173 5.1 LOS A 0.6 14.9 0.34 0.26 33.2 Approach 298 0.7 0.173 4.9 LOS A 0.6 14.9 0.33 0.25 32.9 East: Durston Road 1 L2 181 0.6 0.320 6.2 LOS A 1.3 33.4 0.26 0.16 32.5 6 T1 325 0.6 0.320 5.4 LOS A 1.3 33.4 0.24 0.14 33.3 16 R2 26 0.0 0.139 4.3 LOS A 0.5 11.9 0.22 0.12 33.6 Approach 532 0.6 0.320 5.6 LOS A 1.3 33.4 0.25 0.15 33.1 North: Cottonwood Road 7 L2 13 0.0 0.019 4.7 LOS A 0.1 1.4 0.44 0.35 32.4 4 T1 13 0.0 0.019 4.7 LOS A 0.1 1.4 0.44 0.35 34.0 14 R2 4 0.0 0.019 4.7 LOS A 0.1 1.4 0.44 0.35 33.4 Approach 30 0.0 0.019 4.7 LOS A 0.1 1.4 0.44 0.35 33.2 West: Durston Road 5 L2 5 0.0 0.244 5.6 LOS A 0.9 22.9 0.31 0.22 33.7 2 T1 261 0.0 0.244 5.6 LOS A 0.9 22.9 0.31 0.22 33.8 12 R2 90 0.0 0.082 4.0 LOS A 0.3 6.6 0.27 0.17 33.7 Approach 356 0.0 0.244 5.2 LOS A 0.9 22.9 0.30 0.21 33.8 All Vehicles 1217 0.4 0.320 5.3 LOS A 1.3 33.4 0.29 0.19 33.2 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 8:30:29 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2015.sip6 LEVEL OF SERVICE Site: Durston / Ferguson - AM 2015 Existing Traffic Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS A A A A A Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane. LOS F will result if v/c > irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:03:59 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2015.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Durston / Ferguson - AM 2015 Existing Traffic Roundabout Movement Performance - Vehicles Demand Flows 95% Back of QueueMov ID OD Mov Deg. Satn Average Delay Level of Service Prop. Queued Effective Stop Rate Average Speed Total HV Vehicles Distance veh/h % v/c sec veh ft per veh mph South: Ferguson Avenue 3 L2 67 0.8 0.212 5.2 LOS A 0.8 19.2 0.28 0.18 33.3 8 T1 113 1.8 0.212 5.2 LOS A 0.8 19.2 0.28 0.18 33.4 18 R2 53 4.2 0.212 5.2 LOS A 0.8 19.2 0.28 0.18 32.6 Approach 233 2.1 0.212 5.2 LOS A 0.8 19.2 0.28 0.18 33.2 East: Durston Road 1 L2 74 0.0 0.279 6.5 LOS A 1.0 26.3 0.41 0.35 32.8 6 T1 197 0.5 0.279 6.5 LOS A 1.0 26.3 0.41 0.35 32.9 16 R2 4 0.0 0.279 6.5 LOS A 1.0 26.3 0.41 0.35 32.2 Approach 275 0.4 0.279 6.5 LOS A 1.0 26.3 0.41 0.35 32.8 North: Ferguson Avenue 7 L2 2 0.0 0.279 6.5 LOS A 1.0 26.2 0.41 0.35 33.3 4 T1 165 0.6 0.279 6.5 LOS A 1.0 26.2 0.41 0.35 33.4 14 R2 107 0.6 0.279 6.5 LOS A 1.0 26.2 0.41 0.35 32.7 Approach 274 0.6 0.279 6.5 LOS A 1.0 26.2 0.41 0.35 33.1 West: Durston Road 5 L2 153 1.3 0.288 6.2 LOS A 1.1 28.0 0.35 0.27 32.4 2 T1 19 0.8 0.288 6.2 LOS A 1.1 28.0 0.35 0.27 32.5 12 R2 133 0.0 0.288 6.2 LOS A 1.1 28.0 0.35 0.27 31.9 Approach 305 0.7 0.288 6.2 LOS A 1.1 28.0 0.35 0.27 32.2 All Vehicles 1086 0.9 0.288 6.1 LOS A 1.1 28.0 0.37 0.29 32.8 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:03:59 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2015.sip6 LEVEL OF SERVICE Site: Durston / Ferguson - PM 2015 Existing Traffic Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS A A A A A Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane. LOS F will result if v/c > irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:03:59 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2015.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Durston / Ferguson - PM 2015 Existing Traffic Roundabout Movement Performance - Vehicles Demand Flows 95% Back of QueueMov ID OD Mov Deg. Satn Average Delay Level of Service Prop. Queued Effective Stop Rate Average Speed Total HV Vehicles Distance veh/h % v/c sec veh ft per veh mph South: Ferguson Avenue 3 L2 128 0.8 0.363 7.3 LOS A 1.5 37.9 0.41 0.33 32.2 8 T1 172 1.8 0.363 7.3 LOS A 1.5 37.9 0.41 0.33 32.3 18 R2 72 0.0 0.363 7.3 LOS A 1.5 37.9 0.41 0.33 31.6 Approach 371 1.1 0.363 7.3 LOS A 1.5 37.9 0.41 0.33 32.1 East: Durston Road 1 L2 82 0.0 0.345 7.8 LOS A 1.3 33.6 0.50 0.47 32.1 6 T1 219 0.5 0.345 7.8 LOS A 1.3 33.6 0.50 0.47 32.2 16 R2 9 0.0 0.345 7.8 LOS A 1.3 33.6 0.50 0.47 31.6 Approach 310 0.4 0.345 7.8 LOS A 1.3 33.6 0.50 0.47 32.2 North: Ferguson Avenue 7 L2 3 0.0 0.341 7.7 LOS A 1.3 33.3 0.48 0.45 32.7 4 T1 154 0.6 0.341 7.7 LOS A 1.3 33.3 0.48 0.45 32.8 14 R2 155 0.6 0.341 7.7 LOS A 1.3 33.3 0.48 0.45 32.1 Approach 312 0.6 0.341 7.7 LOS A 1.3 33.3 0.48 0.45 32.5 West: Durston Road 5 L2 150 1.3 0.349 6.9 LOS A 1.5 36.4 0.38 0.29 32.2 2 T1 126 0.0 0.349 6.9 LOS A 1.5 36.4 0.38 0.29 32.4 12 R2 95 0.0 0.349 6.9 LOS A 1.5 36.4 0.38 0.29 31.7 Approach 370 0.5 0.349 6.9 LOS A 1.5 36.4 0.38 0.29 32.2 All Vehicles 1364 0.7 0.363 7.4 LOS A 1.5 37.9 0.44 0.38 32.2 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:03:59 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2015.sip6 LEVEL OF SERVICE Site: Durston / Flanders Mill - AM 2015 Existing Traffic Roundabout All Movement Classes East North West Intersection LOS A A A A Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane. LOS F will result if v/c > irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:03:58 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2015.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Durston / Flanders Mill - AM 2015 Existing Traffic Roundabout Movement Performance - Vehicles Demand Flows 95% Back of QueueMov ID OD Mov Deg. Satn Average Delay Level of Service Prop. Queued Effective Stop Rate Average Speed Total HV Vehicles Distance veh/h % v/c sec veh ft per veh mph East: Durston Road 6 T1 352 0.6 0.332 6.2 LOS A 1.4 35.6 0.23 0.12 33.6 16 R2 41 1.6 0.332 6.2 LOS A 1.4 35.6 0.23 0.12 32.8 Approach 393 0.7 0.332 6.2 LOS A 1.4 35.6 0.23 0.12 33.5 North: Flanders Mill Road 7 L2 69 0.0 0.178 5.4 LOS A 0.6 15.2 0.38 0.31 33.1 14 R2 105 0.0 0.178 5.4 LOS A 0.6 15.2 0.38 0.31 32.5 Approach 173 0.0 0.178 5.4 LOS A 0.6 15.2 0.38 0.31 32.7 West: Durston Road 5 L2 95 0.0 0.440 7.5 LOS A 2.2 56.0 0.23 0.11 32.5 2 T1 439 0.5 0.440 7.5 LOS A 2.2 56.0 0.23 0.11 32.6 Approach 534 0.4 0.440 7.5 LOS A 2.2 56.0 0.23 0.11 32.6 All Vehicles 1100 0.5 0.440 6.7 LOS A 2.2 56.0 0.25 0.15 32.9 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:03:58 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2015.sip6 LEVEL OF SERVICE Site: Durston / Flanders Mill - PM 2015 Existing Traffic Roundabout All Movement Classes East North West Intersection LOS A A A A Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane. LOS F will result if v/c > irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:03:58 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2015.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Durston / Flanders Mill - PM 2015 Existing Traffic Roundabout Movement Performance - Vehicles Demand Flows 95% Back of QueueMov ID OD Mov Deg. Satn Average Delay Level of Service Prop. Queued Effective Stop Rate Average Speed Total HV Vehicles Distance veh/h % v/c sec veh ft per veh mph East: Durston Road 6 T1 224 0.6 0.200 4.7 LOS A 0.7 18.4 0.14 0.06 34.3 16 R2 21 1.6 0.200 4.7 LOS A 0.7 18.4 0.14 0.06 33.5 Approach 245 0.7 0.200 4.7 LOS A 0.7 18.4 0.14 0.06 34.3 North: Flanders Mill Road 7 L2 14 0.0 0.055 3.8 LOS A 0.2 4.3 0.27 0.17 34.2 14 R2 45 0.0 0.055 3.8 LOS A 0.2 4.3 0.27 0.17 33.6 Approach 59 0.0 0.055 3.8 LOS A 0.2 4.3 0.27 0.17 33.7 West: Durston Road 5 L2 54 0.0 0.249 5.0 LOS A 1.0 24.7 0.07 0.02 33.7 2 T1 262 0.5 0.249 5.0 LOS A 1.0 24.7 0.07 0.02 33.8 Approach 316 0.4 0.249 5.0 LOS A 1.0 24.7 0.07 0.02 33.8 All Vehicles 621 0.5 0.249 4.8 LOS A 1.0 24.7 0.12 0.05 34.0 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:03:58 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2015.sip6 LEVEL OF SERVICE Site: Laurel Parkway / Durston - AM 2015 Existing Traffic Roundabout All Movement Classes East North West Intersection LOS A A A A Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane. LOS F will result if v/c > irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:03:56 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2015.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Laurel Parkway / Durston - AM 2015 Existing Traffic Roundabout Movement Performance - Vehicles Demand Flows 95% Back of QueueMov ID OD Mov Deg. Satn Average Delay Level of Service Prop. Queued Effective Stop Rate Average Speed Total HV Vehicles Distance veh/h % v/c sec veh ft per veh mph East: Durston Road 6 T1 175 3.5 0.169 4.3 LOS A 0.6 14.9 0.03 0.01 34.5 16 R2 35 0.0 0.169 4.3 LOS A 0.6 14.9 0.03 0.01 33.8 Approach 210 2.9 0.169 4.3 LOS A 0.6 14.9 0.03 0.01 34.3 North: Laurel Parkway 7 L2 193 0.0 0.184 4.9 LOS A 0.7 16.3 0.27 0.18 32.2 14 R2 13 0.0 0.184 4.9 LOS A 0.7 16.3 0.27 0.18 31.6 Approach 206 0.0 0.184 4.9 LOS A 0.7 16.3 0.27 0.18 32.2 West: Durston Road 5 L2 5 0.0 0.229 5.4 LOS A 0.8 21.2 0.30 0.20 33.8 2 T1 247 0.4 0.229 5.4 LOS A 0.8 21.2 0.30 0.20 33.9 Approach 253 0.4 0.229 5.4 LOS A 0.8 21.2 0.30 0.20 33.9 All Vehicles 668 1.1 0.229 4.9 LOS A 0.8 21.2 0.21 0.13 33.5 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:03:56 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2015.sip6 LEVEL OF SERVICE Site: Laurel Parkway / Durston - PM 2015 Existing Traffic Roundabout All Movement Classes East North West Intersection LOS A A A A Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane. LOS F will result if v/c > irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:03:57 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2015.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Laurel Parkway / Durston - PM 2015 Existing Traffic Roundabout Movement Performance - Vehicles Demand Flows 95% Back of QueueMov ID OD Mov Deg. Satn Average Delay Level of Service Prop. Queued Effective Stop Rate Average Speed Total HV Vehicles Distance veh/h % v/c sec veh ft per veh mph East: Durston Road 6 T1 281 0.0 0.349 6.1 LOS A 1.6 39.6 0.08 0.02 33.6 16 R2 161 1.4 0.349 6.1 LOS A 1.6 39.6 0.08 0.02 32.9 Approach 442 0.5 0.349 6.1 LOS A 1.6 39.6 0.08 0.02 33.3 North: Laurel Parkway 7 L2 125 0.0 0.135 4.7 LOS A 0.5 11.3 0.33 0.24 32.4 14 R2 15 0.0 0.135 4.7 LOS A 0.5 11.3 0.33 0.24 31.8 Approach 140 0.0 0.135 4.7 LOS A 0.5 11.3 0.33 0.24 32.3 West: Durston Road 5 L2 14 0.0 0.234 5.2 LOS A 0.9 22.0 0.24 0.14 33.8 2 T1 256 0.9 0.234 5.2 LOS A 0.9 22.0 0.24 0.14 33.9 Approach 270 0.9 0.234 5.2 LOS A 0.9 22.0 0.24 0.14 33.9 All Vehicles 852 0.5 0.349 5.6 LOS A 1.6 39.6 0.17 0.09 33.3 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:03:57 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2015.sip6 LEVEL OF SERVICE Site: Fowler/Durston - AM 2015 New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS A A A A A Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane. LOS F will result if v/c > irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 1:07:33 PM Project: F:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Fowler roundabout.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Fowler/Durston - AM 2015 New Site Roundabout Movement Performance - Vehicles Demand Flows 95% Back of QueueMov ID OD Mov Deg. Satn Average Delay Level of Service Prop. Queued Effective Stop Rate Average Speed Total HV Vehicles Distance veh/h % v/c sec veh ft per veh mph South: Fowler Avenue 3 L2 9 0.0 0.011 4.0 LOS A 0.0 0.8 0.37 0.25 33.5 8 T1 1 0.0 0.011 4.0 LOS A 0.0 0.8 0.37 0.25 33.3 18 R2 21 0.0 0.023 4.1 LOS A 0.1 1.7 0.38 0.27 34.5 Approach 30 0.0 0.023 4.1 LOS A 0.1 1.7 0.38 0.26 34.2 East: Durston Road 1 L2 2 0.0 0.226 4.8 LOS A 0.8 20.2 0.05 0.01 35.6 6 T1 286 0.0 0.226 4.8 LOS A 0.8 20.2 0.05 0.01 35.4 16 R2 1 0.0 0.226 4.8 LOS A 0.8 20.2 0.05 0.01 34.4 Approach 289 0.0 0.226 4.8 LOS A 0.8 20.2 0.05 0.01 35.4 North: Fowler Avenue 7 L2 1 0.0 0.002 3.5 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.30 0.15 34.3 4 T1 1 0.0 0.002 3.5 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.30 0.15 35.1 14 R2 1 0.0 0.002 3.5 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.30 0.15 34.9 Approach 3 0.0 0.002 3.5 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.30 0.15 34.8 West: Durston Road 5 L2 1 0.0 0.344 6.0 LOS A 1.4 36.2 0.04 0.01 35.0 2 T1 438 0.0 0.344 6.0 LOS A 1.4 36.2 0.04 0.01 34.8 12 R2 1 0.0 0.344 6.0 LOS A 1.4 36.2 0.04 0.01 33.8 Approach 440 0.0 0.344 6.0 LOS A 1.4 36.2 0.04 0.01 34.8 All Vehicles 763 0.0 0.344 5.4 LOS A 1.4 36.2 0.06 0.02 35.0 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 1:07:33 PM Project: F:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Fowler roundabout.sip6 LEVEL OF SERVICE Site: Fowler/Durston - PM 2015 New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS A A A A A Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane. LOS F will result if v/c > irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Monday, December 14, 2015 10:25:55 AM Project: F:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Fowler roundabout.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Fowler/Durston - PM 2015 New Site Roundabout Movement Performance - Vehicles Demand Flows 95% Back of QueueMov ID OD Mov Deg. Satn Average Delay Level of Service Prop. Queued Effective Stop Rate Average Speed Total HV Vehicles Distance veh/h % v/c sec veh ft per veh mph South: Fowler Avenue 3 L2 3 0.0 0.004 3.8 LOS A 0.0 0.3 0.35 0.21 33.9 8 T1 1 0.0 0.004 3.8 LOS A 0.0 0.3 0.35 0.21 33.8 18 R2 6 0.0 0.007 3.9 LOS A 0.0 0.5 0.35 0.21 34.7 Approach 11 0.0 0.007 3.8 LOS A 0.0 0.5 0.35 0.21 34.4 East: Durston Road 1 L2 20 0.0 0.380 6.4 LOS A 1.7 42.4 0.04 0.01 34.6 6 T1 466 0.0 0.380 6.4 LOS A 1.7 42.4 0.04 0.01 34.5 16 R2 1 0.0 0.380 6.4 LOS A 1.7 42.4 0.04 0.01 33.5 Approach 487 0.0 0.380 6.4 LOS A 1.7 42.4 0.04 0.01 34.5 North: Fowler Avenue 7 L2 1 0.0 0.002 4.1 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.39 0.23 34.0 4 T1 1 0.0 0.002 4.1 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.39 0.23 34.8 14 R2 1 0.0 0.002 4.1 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.39 0.23 34.6 Approach 3 0.0 0.002 4.1 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.39 0.23 34.5 West: Durston Road 5 L2 1 0.0 0.314 5.7 LOS A 1.3 31.5 0.09 0.03 35.1 2 T1 389 0.0 0.314 5.7 LOS A 1.3 31.5 0.09 0.03 34.9 12 R2 7 0.0 0.314 5.7 LOS A 1.3 31.5 0.09 0.03 33.9 Approach 398 0.0 0.314 5.7 LOS A 1.3 31.5 0.09 0.03 34.9 All Vehicles 899 0.0 0.380 6.1 LOS A 1.7 42.4 0.07 0.02 34.7 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Monday, December 14, 2015 10:25:55 AM Project: F:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Fowler roundabout.sip6 APPENDIX C Projected Year Operational Analysis Scenario 5: 5: AM Peak 2035 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0.265Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 16.1Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: #1: Baxter Ln and Harper Puckett Rd Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 481534719165142341116371117Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 123812541461029934Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor 0.8360.8360.8360.8360.8360.8360.8360.8360.8360.8360.8360.836Peak Hour Factor 4012839161381219349731914Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 272439162201344031914Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.000.700.000.000.700.000.000.002.600.000.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 13104001161218057000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 2 10/29/2015 Scenario 5: 5: AM Peak 2035 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with CIntersection LOS 5.54d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AABBApproach LOS 1.450.5414.6611.14d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.002.600.000.000.772.037.2126.313.311.853.1495th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.000.000.100.000.000.030.080.291.050.130.070.1395th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] AAAAAAABCABBMovement LOS 0.000.007.650.000.007.639.2413.4916.159.3013.0813.89d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.000.030.000.000.010.030.090.260.040.020.04V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 0000Number of Storage Spaces in Median nonoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 0000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane FreeFreeStopStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings 3 10/29/2015 Scenario 5: 5: AM Peak 2035 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0.119Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 19.5Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: #2: Baxter Ln and Flanders Mill Rd Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] ThruLeftRightThruRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 2281309626614637Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 57332466379Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.87600.87600.87600.87600.87600.8760Peak Hour Factor 2001148423312832Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 93303101272Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.600.000.000.601.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 107848113210130Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 4 10/29/2015 Scenario 5: 5: AM Peak 2035 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with CIntersection LOS 4.08d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AABApproach LOS 3.030.0014.19d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 31.2331.230.000.0034.1834.1895th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 1.251.250.000.001.371.3795th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] AAAABCMovement LOS 0.008.340.000.0012.8519.46d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.110.000.000.200.12V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median noTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] noFlared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings 5 10/29/2015 Scenario 5: 5: AM Peak 2035 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with FLevel Of Service: 70.6Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: All-way stopControl Type: #10: Durston Rd and Ferguson Ave Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0Pocket Length [ft] 000100000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 8498791792731781312251156160120Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 21252045684533563144030Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor 0.9650.9650.9650.9650.9650.9650.9650.9650.9650.9650.9650.965Peak Hour Factor 8481761732631721262171154154116Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 4291545245242358934551Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.000.500.000.000.801.300.600.600.004.201.800.80Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 4190711281814810315925110965Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 6 10/29/2015 Scenario 5: 5: AM Peak 2035 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with FIntersection LOS 70.60Intersection Delay [s/veh] FFECApproach LOS 122.7464.8443.5320.15Approach Delay [s/veh] 504.2218.29353.8656.27208.132.2078.1634.2295th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 20.170.7314.152.258.330.093.131.3795th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results Lanes Intersection Settings 7 10/29/2015 Scenario 5: 5: AM Peak 2035 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 1.026Volume to Capacity (v/c): FLevel Of Service: 281.4Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: #11: Durston Rd and Flanders Mill Rd Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 4573476212914177Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 11183191323519Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.94600.94600.94600.94600.94600.9460Peak Hour Factor 4369472112213373Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 436130632348Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.002.301.901.101.506.10Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 39333415909965Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 8 10/29/2015 Scenario 5: 5: AM Peak 2035 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with FIntersection LOS 30.25d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AAFApproach LOS 0.001.45256.02d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.000.0013.49336.40336.4095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.000.000.000.5413.4613.4695th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] AAABFFMovement LOS 0.000.000.0010.05242.18281.35d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.010.010.150.351.03V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median noTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] noFlared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings 9 10/29/2015 Scenario 5: 5: AM Peak 2035 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with DLevel Of Service: 30.8Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: All-way stopControl Type: #32: Durston Rd and Cottonwood Rd Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 1952553203365091066116411625914985Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 4964808412726154129653721Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor 0.9340.9340.9340.9340.9340.9340.9340.9340.9340.9340.9340.934Peak Hour Factor 182238299314475995715310824213979Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 174821381581809756140926613347Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.003.701.800.000.300.000.000.000.003.900.003.10Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 8156161156295211316176632Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 10 10/29/2015 Scenario 5: 5: AM Peak 2035 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with DIntersection LOS 30.76Intersection Delay [s/veh] DECCApproach LOS 30.8241.9815.1119.84Approach Delay [s/veh] 221.05117.4199.39338.520.5526.5927.9831.14102.17.417.421.995th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 8.844.703.9813.540.821.061.121.254.090.700.700.8895th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results Lanes Intersection Settings 11 10/29/2015 Scenario 5: 5: AM Peak 2035 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0.696Volume to Capacity (v/c): FLevel Of Service: 136.0Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: #33: Cottonwood and Babcock Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0Pocket Length [ft] 001000101001No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 533257262447916931183845447Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 1381476122317330911412Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor 0.8720.8720.8720.8720.8720.8720.8720.8720.8720.8720.8720.872Peak Hour Factor 462850232141796041033339641Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 34232189256729182119735Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.000.000.000.000.005.908.300.300.000.002.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 12548512161231321321996Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 12 10/29/2015 Scenario 5: 5: AM Peak 2035 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with FIntersection LOS 10.04d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] FFAAApproach LOS 51.1583.831.140.83d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 47.7947.7963.5229.0529.0577.630.000.009.150.000.004.4295th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 1.911.912.541.161.163.110.000.000.370.000.000.1895th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] CFFCFFAAAAAAMovement LOS 21.9256.4375.3619.4951.43135.90.000.008.730.000.009.52d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.070.350.550.040.250.700.000.010.110.000.000.06V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 0000Number of Storage Spaces in Median nonoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 0000Storage Area [veh] nonoFlared Lane StopStopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings 13 10/29/2015 Scenario 5: 5: AM Peak 2035 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with CLevel Of Service: 18.5Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: All-way stopControl Type: #34: Durston and Laurel Parkway Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 3625766193697210204200032Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 96417592250515008Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor 0.9340.9340.9340.9340.9340.9340.9340.9340.9340.9340.9340.934Peak Hour Factor 3424062183457200191187030Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 177621811428011187030Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.003.500.000.000.400.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 33163002315120180000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 14 10/29/2015 Scenario 5: 5: AM Peak 2035 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with CIntersection LOS 0.42d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AACApproach LOS 0.030.0016.70d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.160.000.007.267.2695th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.000.010.000.000.290.2995th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] AAAABCMovement LOS 0.008.860.000.0013.7923.48d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.010.000.000.010.050.04V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median noTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] noFlared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings 17 10/29/2015 Scenario 5: 5: AM Peak 2035 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with ALevel Of Service: 8.8Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: All-way stopControl Type: #24: Oak St and Cottonwood Rd Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 793226601151667976557524Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 2087152942201914196Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Peak Hour Factor 793226601151667976557524Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.000.000.000.002.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 793226601151667976557524Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 2 10/23/2015 Scenario 5: 5: AM Peak 2035 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with AIntersection LOS 8.83Intersection Delay [s/veh] AAAAApproach LOS 8.548.879.158.69Approach Delay [s/veh] 9.153.973.4810.5911.742.075.215.3111.027.518.463.1995th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.370.160.140.420.470.080.210.210.440.300.340.1395th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results Lanes Intersection Settings 3 10/23/2015 Scenario 3: 3: AM 2035 AWSC Cottonwood/Durston RoadsRobert Peccia and Associates Version 4.00-00 Generated with FLevel Of Service: 160.6Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 2010Analysis Method: All-way stopControl Type: Intersection 1: Fowler Avenue and Durston Road Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 2857746072132293049232673Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 7144115180878126718Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.9200Peak Hour Factor 2653145566329272845212467Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 2653145566329272845212467Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name volumes 2 12/15/2015Shane Forsythe Scenario 3: 3: AM 2035 AWSC Cottonwood/Durston RoadsRobert Peccia and Associates Version 4.00-00 Generated with FIntersection LOS 160.60Intersection Delay [s/veh] FFBBApproach LOS 112.29238.7112.1312.69Approach Delay [s/veh] 522.570.62985.375.265.025.7010.373.904.8616.3595th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 20.900.0239.410.210.200.230.410.160.190.6595th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 4 12/15/2015Shane Forsythe Scenario 6: 6: PM Peak 2035 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0.205Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 16.5Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: #1: Baxter Ln and Harper Puckett Rd Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 12018533451991113381302422Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 30468115003820765Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor 0.8360.8360.8360.8360.8360.8360.8360.8360.8360.8360.8360.836Peak Hour Factor 1001552838166192868252018Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 4321282619112829252018Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.000.000.700.700.000.000.000.002.600.000.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 5713401214708039000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 2 10/29/2015 Scenario 6: 6: PM Peak 2035 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with CIntersection LOS 3.97d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AACBApproach LOS 0.760.0315.2312.46d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.001.910.000.000.061.056.2019.012.834.654.3095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.000.000.080.000.000.000.040.250.760.110.190.1795th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] AAAAAAABCABBMovement LOS 0.000.007.780.000.007.849.5714.0616.479.5414.3314.41d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.000.020.000.000.000.010.080.210.040.060.05V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 0000Number of Storage Spaces in Median nonoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 0000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane FreeFreeStopStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings 3 10/29/2015 Scenario 6: 6: PM Peak 2035 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0.343Volume to Capacity (v/c): DLevel Of Service: 29.9Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: #2: Baxter Ln and Flanders Mill Rd Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] ThruLeftRightThruRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 3791395830113581Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 953515753420Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.90600.90600.90600.90600.90600.9060Peak Hour Factor 3431265327312273Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 188252118224Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.600.000.000.601.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1551015115510069Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 4 10/29/2015 Scenario 6: 6: PM Peak 2035 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with DIntersection LOS 5.72d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AACApproach LOS 2.240.0023.55d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 54.6954.690.000.0075.7775.7795th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 2.192.190.000.003.033.0395th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] AAAACDMovement LOS 0.008.360.000.0019.7129.93d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.110.000.000.190.34V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median noTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] noFlared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings 5 10/29/2015 Scenario 6: 6: PM Peak 2035 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with FLevel Of Service: 137.4Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: All-way stopControl Type: #10: Durston Rd and Ferguson Ave Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0Pocket Length [ft] 000100000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 32537871364261791862071476228202Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 813422341064547523195750Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor 0.9610.9610.9610.9610.9610.9610.9610.9610.9610.9610.9610.961Peak Hour Factor 31516841314091721791991373219194Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 223065402882830511045471Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.000.500.000.000.001.300.600.600.000.001.800.80Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 92107991121144149148369165123Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 6 10/29/2015 Scenario 6: 6: PM Peak 2035 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with FIntersection LOS 137.37Intersection Delay [s/veh] FFFDApproach LOS 215.89177.0868.5832.76Approach Delay [s/veh] 742.7022.63704.4063.85291.882.96166.0181.0895th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 29.710.9128.182.5511.680.126.643.2495th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results Lanes Intersection Settings 7 10/29/2015 Scenario 6: 6: PM Peak 2035 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0.440Volume to Capacity (v/c): FLevel Of Service: 62.6Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: #11: Durston Rd and Flanders Mill Rd Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 1006326541029650Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 25158164252413Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.87400.87400.87400.87400.87400.8740Peak Hour Factor 87552572898444Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 67340324384131Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 1.600.600.500.000.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 20212248514313Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 8 10/29/2015 Scenario 6: 6: PM Peak 2035 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with FIntersection LOS 4.80d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AAEApproach LOS 0.001.3046.96d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.000.009.7799.7499.7495th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.000.000.000.393.993.9995th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] AAAAEFMovement LOS 0.000.000.009.6238.8262.58d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.010.010.120.210.44V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median noTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] noFlared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings 9 10/29/2015 Scenario 6: 6: PM Peak 2035 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with FLevel Of Service: 70.6Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: All-way stopControl Type: #32: Durston Rd and Cottonwood Rd Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 82530332217403636613366376179299Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 21132835410116173317944575Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor 0.9230.9230.9230.9230.9230.9230.9230.9230.9230.9230.9230.923Peak Hour Factor 76489306200372586112361347165276Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 52189139117131535711149182149182Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.000.600.600.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.002.10Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 24300167832415412121651694Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 10 10/29/2015 Scenario 6: 6: PM Peak 2035 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with FIntersection LOS 70.57Intersection Delay [s/veh] FEBEApproach LOS 134.6844.9314.6437.57Approach Delay [s/veh] 690.87164.6664.59283.513.8323.7624.9715.77225.21.121.1167.95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 27.636.592.5811.340.550.951.000.639.010.850.856.6895th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results Lanes Intersection Settings 11 10/29/2015 Scenario 6: 6: PM Peak 2035 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0.000Volume to Capacity (v/c): FLevel Of Service: 10,000.0Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: #33: Cottonwood and Babcock Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0Pocket Length [ft] 001000101001No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 20030327551116655881989881529Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 50781913291614749252047Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor 0.8050.8050.8050.8050.8050.8050.8050.8050.8050.8050.8050.805Peak Hour Factor 1612426604193524731597965623Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 13813153287241191136330315Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.800.000.000.600.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 231125713211128223763538Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 12 10/29/2015 Scenario 6: 6: PM Peak 2035 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with FIntersection LOS 288.75d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] FFAAApproach LOS 1320.131301.102.670.28d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 240.7240.7150.0218.4218.4370.90.000.0026.270.000.002.3895th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 9.639.636.008.748.7414.840.000.001.050.000.000.1095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] FFFFFFAABAAAMovement LOS 102.9176.210000226.5302.82434.0.000.0011.460.000.008.94d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.360.660.000.111.165.590.000.010.260.000.010.03V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 0000Number of Storage Spaces in Median nonoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 0000Storage Area [veh] nonoFlared Lane StopStopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings 13 10/29/2015 Scenario 6: 6: PM Peak 2035 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with DLevel Of Service: 32.4Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: All-way stopControl Type: #34: Durston and Laurel Parkway Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 1723812253635723200131149035Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 439556989650333709Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor 0.8580.8580.8580.8580.8580.8580.8580.8580.8580.8580.8580.858Peak Hour Factor 1483271933130620170112128030Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 108619331868405128030Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 1.400.000.000.000.900.000.000.000.900.000.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1382410022012130107000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 14 10/29/2015 Scenario 6: 6: PM Peak 2035 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with DIntersection LOS 0.24d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AACApproach LOS 0.220.0018.62d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.001.530.000.002.552.5595th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.000.060.000.000.100.1095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] AAAABDMovement LOS 0.008.860.000.0012.9629.95d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.010.020.000.010.010.02V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median noTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] noFlared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings 17 10/29/2015 Scenario 6: 6: PM Peak 2035 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with ALevel Of Service: 9.2Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: All-way stopControl Type: #24: Oak St and Cottonwood Rd Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 8491891578151338573912272Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 212322420431014103118Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Peak Hour Factor 8491891578151338573912272Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 8491891578151338573912272Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 2 10/23/2015 Scenario 6: 6: PM Peak 2035 Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with AIntersection LOS 9.19Intersection Delay [s/veh] AAAAApproach LOS 9.208.969.249.26Approach Delay [s/veh] 10.3111.8713.335.886.132.043.053.258.3610.1910.9110.5595th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.410.470.530.240.250.080.120.130.330.410.440.4295th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results Lanes Intersection Settings 3 10/23/2015 Scenario 4: 4: PM 2035 AWSC Cottonwood/Durston RoadsRobert Peccia and Associates Version 4.00-00 Generated with FLevel Of Service: 234.8Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 2010Analysis Method: All-way stopControl Type: Intersection 1: Fowler Avenue and Durston Road Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 4281723756914042284092677Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 1120461917310117102719Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.9200Peak Hour Factor 3975221696363739263782471Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 3975221696363739263782471Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name volumes 2 12/15/2015Shane Forsythe Scenario 4: 4: PM 2035 AWSC Cottonwood/Durston RoadsRobert Peccia and Associates Version 4.00-00 Generated with FIntersection LOS 234.84Intersection Delay [s/veh] FFBBApproach LOS 303.95220.4611.9113.01Approach Delay [s/veh] 1208.753.70933.666.657.465.288.251.484.8517.4295th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 48.350.1537.350.270.300.210.330.060.190.7095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 4 12/15/2015Shane Forsythe Scenario 7: 7: AM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0.194Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 13.3Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: #1: Baxter Ln and Harper Puckett Rd Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] nonononononononoPresence of On-Street Parking 481534719165142341116371117Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 123812541461029934Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor 0.8360.8360.8360.8360.8360.8360.8360.8360.8360.8360.8360.836Peak Hour Factor 4012839161381219349731914Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 272439162201344031914Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.000.700.000.000.700.000.000.002.600.000.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 13104001161218057000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 2 10/23/2015 Scenario 7: 7: AM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 3 10/23/2015 Scenario 7: 7: AM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] nonononoPedestrian Recall nonononoMaximum Recall nonononoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0100010001000100Pedestrian Clearance [s] 050050050050Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.0Vehicle Extension [s] 0390039003600360Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.01.00.00.01.00.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.0Amber [s] 0300030003000300Maximum Green [s] 050050050050Minimum Green [s] ------------Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080060020Signal Group PermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fixed timeActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 75Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group noLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 4 10/23/2015 Scenario 7: 7: AM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 90.7224.0781.707.0814.0414.5060.0716.724.828.2595th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 3.630.963.270.280.560.582.400.670.190.3395th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 50.4013.3745.393.937.808.0633.379.292.684.5950th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 2.020.531.820.160.310.321.330.370.110.1850th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] yesnononononoyesnononoCritical Lane Group BBBBBBBBBBLane Group LOS 12.6615.2312.4014.9812.6712.6415.5012.7612.4314.25d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.240.080.210.030.040.040.180.050.010.03X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.660.290.560.090.110.090.610.150.030.08d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.50k, delay calibration 12.0014.9411.8414.9012.5612.5414.8912.6212.4014.17d1, Uniform Delay [s] 845561865544718811647689811625c, Capacity [veh/h] 1810121918531200168219001390161519001359s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.110.040.100.010.020.020.080.020.010.01(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.470.470.470.470.430.430.430.430.430.43g / C, Green / Cycle 35353535323232323232g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.002.000.002.000.000.002.000.000.002.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] CLCLCCLRCLLane Group Lane Group Calculations 5 10/23/2015 Scenario 7: 7: AM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 12.40 12.4014.98 15.23 12.6612.6612.6714.25 12.43d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]12.6412.76 15.50 B BB BBBBBMovement LOS B BBB 12.59 13.15d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]14.4913.10 B BApproach LOS B B 13.33d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BIntersection LOS 0.194Intersection V/C ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------86Ring 2 --------------42Ring 1 Sequence 6 10/23/2015 Scenario 7: 7: AM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0.119Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 19.5Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: #2: Baxter Ln and Flanders Mill Rd Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] ThruLeftRightThruRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 2281309626614637Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 57332466379Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.87600.87600.87600.87600.87600.8760Peak Hour Factor 2001148423312832Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 93303101272Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.600.000.000.601.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 107848113210130Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 7 10/23/2015 Scenario 7: 7: AM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with CIntersection LOS 4.08d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AABApproach LOS 3.030.0014.19d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 31.2331.230.000.0034.1834.1895th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 1.251.250.000.001.371.3795th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] AAAABCMovement LOS 0.008.340.000.0012.8519.46d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.110.000.000.200.12V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median noTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] noFlared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings 8 10/23/2015 Scenario 7: 7: AM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0.469Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 18.7Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: #10: Durston Rd and Ferguson Ave Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0Pocket Length [ft] 000100000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] nonononononononoPresence of On-Street Parking 8498791792731781312251156160120Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 21252045684533563144030Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor 0.9650.9650.9650.9650.9650.9650.9650.9650.9650.9650.9650.965Peak Hour Factor 8481761732631721262171154154116Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 4291545245242358934551Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.000.500.000.000.801.300.600.600.004.201.800.80Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 4190711281814810315925110965Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 9 10/23/2015 Scenario 7: 7: AM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 10 10/23/2015 Scenario 7: 7: AM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] nonononoPedestrian Recall nonononoMaximum Recall nonononoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0100010001000100Pedestrian Clearance [s] 050050050050Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.0Vehicle Extension [s] 0410041003400340Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.01.00.00.01.00.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.0Amber [s] 0300030003000300Maximum Green [s] 050050050050Minimum Green [s] ------------Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080060020Signal Group PermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fixed timeActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 75Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group noLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 11 10/23/2015 Scenario 7: 7: AM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 246.9552.01223.50144.03209.176.52116.0694.2895th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 9.882.088.945.768.370.264.643.7795th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 147.3928.89130.0180.01119.533.6264.4852.3850th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 5.901.165.203.204.780.142.582.1050th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] yesnononoyesnononoCritical Lane Group BCBCBBBCLane Group LOS 15.4421.7915.1729.5219.4219.1516.4528.82d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.540.210.520.510.500.020.300.37X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 2.281.282.225.312.530.101.093.18d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.50k, delay calibration 13.1620.5112.9524.2116.8919.0415.3625.64d1, Uniform Delay [s] 930374869347709440714326c, Capacity [veh/h] 188595417628961774118417851033s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.270.080.260.200.200.010.120.12(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.490.490.490.490.400.400.400.40g / C, Green / Cycle 3737373730303030g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.002.000.002.000.002.000.002.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] CLCLCLCLLane Group Lane Group Calculations 12 10/23/2015 Scenario 7: 7: AM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 15.17 15.1729.52 21.79 15.4415.4419.4228.82 16.45d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]19.4216.45 19.15 B BC BCBBBMovement LOS C BBB 19.22 16.30d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]19.4120.87 B BApproach LOS C B 18.66d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BIntersection LOS 0.469Intersection V/C ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------86Ring 2 --------------42Ring 1 Sequence 13 10/23/2015 Scenario 7: 7: AM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0.556Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 15.3Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: #11: Durston Rd and Flanders Mill Rd Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] nonononononoPresence of On-Street Parking 4573476212914177Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 11183191323519Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.94600.94600.94600.94600.94600.9460Peak Hour Factor 4369472112213373Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 436130632348Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.002.301.901.101.506.10Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 39333415909965Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 14 10/23/2015 Scenario 7: 7: AM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 15 10/23/2015 Scenario 7: 7: AM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] nononoPedestrian Recall nononoMaximum Recall nononoMinimum Recall 0.02.02.00.00.02.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.02.00.00.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 010100010Pedestrian Clearance [s] 055005Walk [s] 0.03.03.00.00.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 050500025Split [s] 0.01.01.00.00.01.0All red [s] 0.03.03.00.00.03.0Amber [s] 030300030Maximum Green [s] 055005Minimum Green [s] -----LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 048001Signal Group PermissivePermissivePermissivePermissivePermissiveProtectedControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fixed timeActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 75Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group noLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 16 10/23/2015 Scenario 7: 7: AM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 318.55304.4099.08156.6395th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 12.7412.183.966.2795th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 202.01191.0655.0587.0250th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 8.087.642.203.4850th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] yesnonoyesCritical Lane Group BBCCLane Group LOS 13.2112.5626.6025.80d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.690.670.420.47X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 3.483.084.203.41d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.500.50k, delay calibration 9.739.4822.4022.39d1, Uniform Delay [s] 11281144307463c, Capacity [veh/h] 183918656961654s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.420.410.190.13(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.610.610.610.28g / C, Green / Cycle 46464621g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.002.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] CCLCLane Group Lane Group Calculations 17 10/23/2015 Scenario 7: 7: AM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 12.56 13.21 13.2125.80d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]26.6025.80 BB BCMovement LOS CC 13.2114.59d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]25.80 BBApproach LOS C 15.32d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BIntersection LOS 0.556Intersection V/C ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------8-Ring 2 --------------41Ring 1 Sequence 18 10/23/2015 Scenario 7: 7: AM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0.707Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 20.2Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: #32: Durston Rd and Cottonwood Rd Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] nonononononononoPresence of On-Street Parking 1952553203365091066116411625914985Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 4964808412726154129653721Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor 0.9340.9340.9340.9340.9340.9340.9340.9340.9340.9340.9340.934Peak Hour Factor 182238299314475995715310824213979Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 174821381581809756140926613347Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.003.701.800.000.300.000.000.000.003.900.003.10Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 8156161156295211316176632Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 19 10/23/2015 Scenario 7: 7: AM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 20 10/23/2015 Scenario 7: 7: AM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] nonononononononononoPedestrian Recall nonononononononononoMaximum Recall nonononononononononoMinimum Recall 2.02.02.02.02.02.00.02.02.02.02.02.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.02.02.02.02.02.00.02.02.02.02.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 1010010100010010100Pedestrian Clearance [s] 550550050550Walk [s] 3.03.03.03.03.03.00.03.03.03.03.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 3434934349023923239Split [s] 1.01.01.01.01.01.00.01.01.01.01.01.0All red [s] 3.03.03.03.03.03.00.03.03.03.03.03.0Amber [s] 30303030303003030303030Maximum Green [s] 555555055555Minimum Green [s] --Lead--Lead--Lead--LeadLead / Lag 1,45,82,7Auxiliary Signal Groups 447883061225Signal Group PermiPermiProtecOverlaPermiProtecPermiPermiProtecOverlaPermiProtecControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fixed timeActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 75Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group noLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 21 10/23/2015 Scenario 7: 7: AM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 277.78165.03150.7305.741.8774.0477.2861.85160.246.4944.8495th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 11.116.606.0312.231.672.963.092.476.411.861.7995th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 170.6691.6883.77192.123.2641.1342.9334.3689.0025.8324.9150th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 6.833.673.357.680.931.651.721.373.561.031.0050th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] nonoyesyesnoyesnonoyesnonoCritical Lane Group CCBCBCCBCCBLane Group LOS 23.3421.3512.3323.1712.0423.6823.4416.4320.1522.1916.14d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.660.650.400.670.210.250.240.190.450.160.15X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 4.996.511.424.710.901.361.180.652.480.380.56d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.50k, delay calibration 18.3514.8410.9118.4611.1422.3222.2615.7817.6721.8015.58d1, Uniform Delay [s] 681493840758515438481625580916568c, Capacity [veh/h] 17021048161518941109173019001396155436181293s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.260.310.210.270.100.060.060.080.170.040.07(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.400.520.520.400.520.250.250.370.370.250.37g / C, Green / Cycle 3039393039191928281928g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.000.002.002.000.002.002.000.002.002.000.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] CLRCLCCLRCLLane Group Lane Group Calculations 22 10/23/2015 Scenario 7: 7: AM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 23.17 12.3312.04 21.35 23.3423.3423.6816.14 22.19d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]23.5120.15 16.43 C BB CCCCCMovement LOS B CCB 18.10 22.51d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]21.1320.07 B CApproach LOS C C 20.22d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] CIntersection LOS 0.707Intersection V/C ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 ------------8765Ring 2 ------------4321Ring 1 Sequence 23 10/23/2015 Scenario 7: 7: AM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0.261Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 11.0Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: #33: Cottonwood and Babcock Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0Pocket Length [ft] 001000101001No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] nonononononononoPresence of On-Street Parking 533257262447916931183845447Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 1381476122317330911412Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor 0.8720.8720.8720.8720.8720.8720.8720.8720.8720.8720.8720.872Peak Hour Factor 462850232141796041033339641Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 34232189256729182119735Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.000.000.000.000.005.908.300.300.000.002.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 12548512161231321321996Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 24 10/23/2015 Scenario 7: 7: AM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 25 10/23/2015 Scenario 7: 7: AM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] nonononoPedestrian Recall nonononoMaximum Recall nonononoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0100010001000100Pedestrian Clearance [s] 050050050050Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.0Vehicle Extension [s] 0280028004700470Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.01.00.00.01.00.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.0Amber [s] 0300030003000300Maximum Green [s] 050050050050Minimum Green [s] ------------Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080060020Signal Group PermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fixed timeActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 75Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group noLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 26 10/23/2015 Scenario 7: 7: AM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 49.5435.8828.3530.46144.6150.054.6782.8184.3723.2795th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 1.981.441.131.225.786.002.193.313.370.9395th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 27.5219.9415.7516.9280.3583.3830.3746.0046.8712.9350th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 1.100.800.630.683.213.341.211.841.870.5250th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] yesnononoyesnononononoCritical Lane Group BCBCAABAABLane Group LOS 18.8521.1918.1722.009.669.6212.558.418.3913.55d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.160.120.090.110.370.370.220.230.230.12X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.600.520.320.541.000.960.940.530.510.60d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.50k, delay calibration 18.2520.6617.8521.468.658.6511.617.897.8812.95d1, Uniform Delay [s] 5484725574211042108653810391068399c, Capacity [veh/h] 17121376174012591818189491918131863701s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.050.040.030.040.210.210.130.130.130.07(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.320.320.320.320.570.570.570.570.570.57g / C, Green / Cycle 24242424434343434343g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.002.000.002.000.000.002.000.000.002.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] CLCLCCLCCLLane Group Lane Group Calculations 27 10/23/2015 Scenario 7: 7: AM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 18.17 18.1722.00 21.19 18.8518.859.6613.55 8.40d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]9.638.41 12.55 B BC BCBAAMovement LOS B AAB 20.02 19.79d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]10.028.85 C BApproach LOS A B 11.05d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BIntersection LOS 0.261Intersection V/C ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------86Ring 2 --------------42Ring 1 Sequence 28 10/23/2015 Scenario 7: 7: AM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0.377Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 16.6Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: #34: Durston and Laurel Parkway Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] nonononononononoPresence of On-Street Parking 3625766193697210204200032Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 96417592250515008Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor 0.9340.9340.9340.9340.9340.9340.9340.9340.9340.9340.9340.934Peak Hour Factor 3424062183457200191187030Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 177621811428011187030Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.003.500.000.000.400.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 33163002315120180000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 29 10/23/2015 Scenario 7: 7: AM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 30 10/23/2015 Scenario 7: 7: AM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] nonononoPedestrian Recall nonononoMaximum Recall nonononoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0100010001000100Pedestrian Clearance [s] 050050050050Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.0Vehicle Extension [s] 0380038003700370Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.01.00.00.01.00.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.0Amber [s] 0300030003000300Maximum Green [s] 050050050050Minimum Green [s] ------------Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080061020Signal Group PermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fixed timeActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 75Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group noLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 31 10/23/2015 Scenario 7: 7: AM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 146.5742.89202.123.939.09136.9999.0015.1195th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 5.861.728.080.160.365.483.960.6095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 81.4323.83114.412.185.0576.1155.008.4050th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 3.260.954.580.090.203.042.200.3450th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] nonoyesnonoyesnonoCritical Lane Group BCBBBCBBLane Group LOS 14.6321.5315.8917.5111.9922.5214.4113.67d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.360.170.460.020.030.410.280.05X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 1.240.971.760.060.082.490.990.13d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.50k, delay calibration 13.3920.5614.1317.4411.9120.0313.4213.54d1, Uniform Delay [s] 815383851449711497711670c, Capacity [veh/h] 17971011187611031615120116151413s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.160.070.210.010.010.170.120.02(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.450.450.450.450.440.440.440.44g / C, Green / Cycle 3434343433333333g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.002.000.002.000.002.000.002.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] CLCLCLCLLane Group Lane Group Calculations 32 10/23/2015 Scenario 7: 7: AM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 15.89 15.8917.51 21.53 14.6314.6311.9913.67 14.41d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]11.9914.41 22.52 B BB BCBBBMovement LOS B BBC 15.92 15.90d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]21.5414.31 B BApproach LOS B C 16.65d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BIntersection LOS 0.377Intersection V/C ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 -------------86-Ring 2 -------------42-Ring 1 Sequence 33 10/23/2015 Scenario 7: 7: AM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0.125Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 12.9Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: #24: Oak St and Cottonwood Rd Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] nonononononononoPresence of On-Street Parking 793226601151667976557524Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 2087152942201914196Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Peak Hour Factor 793226601151667976557524Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 793226601151667976557524Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 2 10/23/2015 Scenario 7: 7: AM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 3 10/23/2015 Scenario 7: 7: AM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] nonononoPedestrian Recall nonononoMaximum Recall nonononoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0100010001000100Pedestrian Clearance [s] 050050050050Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.0Vehicle Extension [s] 0360036003900390Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.01.00.00.01.00.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.0Amber [s] 0300030003000300Maximum Green [s] 050050050050Minimum Green [s] ------------Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 047083061025Signal Group PermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fixed timeActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 75Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group yesLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 4 10/23/2015 Scenario 7: 7: AM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 37.4614.3513.6540.5341.708.2517.4117.5037.5526.9427.6910.9595th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 1.500.570.551.621.670.330.700.701.501.081.110.4495th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 20.817.977.5922.5223.174.589.679.7220.8614.9715.386.0850th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.830.320.300.900.930.180.390.390.830.600.620.2450th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] nononoyesnonononoyesnononoCritical Lane Group BBBBBBBBBBBBLane Group LOS 13.4912.6815.6913.5213.3815.3811.0911.0814.2211.4311.3212.75d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.130.040.050.130.120.030.060.050.130.090.080.04X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.440.120.200.440.360.110.140.130.490.270.210.13d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.50k, delay calibration 13.0512.5715.4913.0813.0215.2710.9510.9513.7311.1511.1112.62d1, Uniform Delay [s] 608715492637715517763782565679782597c, Capacity [veh/h] 142516761084149216761149163616761130145416761177s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.060.020.020.060.050.010.030.030.070.040.040.02(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.430.430.430.430.430.430.470.470.470.470.470.47g / C, Green / Cycle 323232323232353535353535g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.002.000.000.002.000.000.002.000.000.002.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] CCLCCLCCLCCLLane Group Lane Group Calculations 5 10/23/2015 Scenario 7: 7: AM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 13.41 13.5215.38 15.69 13.4912.6811.0912.75 11.33d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]11.0811.43 14.22 B BB BBBBBMovement LOS B BBB 13.61 13.72d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]12.5711.59 B BApproach LOS B B 12.89d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BIntersection LOS 0.125Intersection V/C ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 ------------8-6-Ring 2 ------------4-2-Ring 1 Sequence 6 10/23/2015 Scenario 1: 1: AM 2035 Signal Cottonwood/Durston RoadsRobert Peccia and Associates Version 4.00-00 Generated with 0.465Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 18.9Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 2010Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 1: Fowler Avenue and Durston Road Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 2857746072132293049232673Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 7144115180878126718Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.9200Peak Hour Factor 2653145566329272845212467Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 2653145566329272845212467Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name volumes 2 12/15/2015Shane Forsythe Scenario 1: 1: AM 2035 Signal Cottonwood/Durston RoadsRobert Peccia and Associates Version 4.00-00 Generated with 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group Exclusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoNoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoNoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoNoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.02.00.03.02.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.02.00.02.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0100010001000100Pedestrian Clearance [s] 050050050050Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.03.00.03.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 0590059002790279Split [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.01.00.02.01.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.03.00.03.03.0Amber [s] 030003000303003030Maximum Green [s] 050050055055Minimum Green [s] --------Lead--LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080061025Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fixed timeActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 95Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 3 12/15/2015Shane Forsythe Scenario 1: 1: AM 2035 Signal Cottonwood/Durston RoadsRobert Peccia and Associates Version 4.00-00 Generated with 323.043.49463.8823.8325.0025.5035.8320.6221.1654.2695th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 12.920.1418.560.951.001.021.430.820.852.1795th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 205.491.94317.7213.2413.8914.1719.9111.4511.7630.1550th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 8.220.0812.710.530.560.570.800.460.471.2150th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] NoNoYesNoYesNoNoNoNoYesCritical Lane Group BCBCCCCCCCLane Group LOS 15.1927.7819.6421.7928.9628.8022.4528.7928.6722.93d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.560.020.730.090.080.070.080.060.060.13X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 2.160.124.470.490.400.300.290.330.250.46d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.50k, delay calibration 13.0327.6515.1721.3128.5628.5022.1628.4728.4222.47d1, Uniform Delay [s] 10712441066360374440579376440573c, Capacity [veh/h] 18857031875828161519001475162519001466s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.320.010.420.040.020.020.030.010.010.05(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.570.570.570.570.230.230.330.230.230.33g / C, Green / Cycle 54545454222231222231g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 3.003.003.003.003.003.000.003.003.000.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.002.000.002.000.000.000.000.000.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 5.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] CLCLCCLCCLLane Group Lane Group Calculations 4 12/15/2015Shane Forsythe Scenario 1: 1: AM 2035 Signal Cottonwood/Durston RoadsRobert Peccia and Associates Version 4.00-00 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 19.64 19.6421.79 27.78 15.1915.1928.9622.93 28.67d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]28.8028.79 22.45 B BC BCBCCMovement LOS C CCC 19.72 15.27d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]25.9625.26 B BApproach LOS C C 18.90d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BIntersection LOS 0.465Intersection V/C ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 -------------865Ring 2 -------------421Ring 1 Sequence 5 12/15/2015Shane Forsythe Scenario 8: 8: PM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0.231Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 13.5Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: #1: Baxter Ln and Harper Puckett Rd Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] nonononononononoPresence of On-Street Parking 12018533451991113381302422Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 30468115003820765Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor 0.8360.8360.8360.8360.8360.8360.8360.8360.8360.8360.8360.836Peak Hour Factor 1001552838166192868252018Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 4321282619112829252018Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.000.000.700.700.000.000.000.002.600.000.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 5713401214708039000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 2 10/23/2015 Scenario 8: 8: PM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 3 10/23/2015 Scenario 8: 8: PM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] nonononoPedestrian Recall nonononoMaximum Recall nonononoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0100010001000100Pedestrian Clearance [s] 050050050050Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.0Vehicle Extension [s] 0400040003500350Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.01.00.00.01.00.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.0Amber [s] 0300030003000300Maximum Green [s] 050050050050Minimum Green [s] ------------Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080061020Signal Group PermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fixed timeActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 75Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group noLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 4 10/23/2015 Scenario 8: 8: PM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 144.1917.05109.190.539.9610.1142.3313.9010.9210.9395th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 5.770.684.370.020.400.401.690.560.440.4495th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 80.119.4760.660.305.535.6223.517.726.076.0750th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 3.200.382.430.010.220.220.940.310.240.2450th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] yesnononononoyesnononoCritical Lane Group BBBBBBBBBBLane Group LOS 13.4115.3712.4716.0813.1513.1315.8013.2813.1414.79d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.360.060.280.000.030.030.130.040.030.04X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 1.170.230.780.010.080.070.440.130.070.11d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.50k, delay calibration 12.2415.1411.6916.0813.0713.0615.3613.1513.0714.68d1, Uniform Delay [s] 853524883473721785617668785621c, Capacity [veh/h] 1777114618401091174419001373161519001384s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.170.030.130.000.010.010.060.020.010.02(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.480.480.480.480.410.410.410.410.410.41g / C, Green / Cycle 36363636313131313131g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.002.000.002.000.000.002.000.000.002.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] CLCLCCLRCLLane Group Lane Group Calculations 5 10/23/2015 Scenario 8: 8: PM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 12.47 12.4716.08 15.37 13.4113.4113.1514.79 13.14d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]13.1313.28 15.80 B BB BBBBBMovement LOS B BBB 12.48 13.60d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]14.8613.67 B BApproach LOS B B 13.46d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BIntersection LOS 0.231Intersection V/C ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 -------------86-Ring 2 -------------42-Ring 1 Sequence 6 10/23/2015 Scenario 8: 8: PM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0.343Volume to Capacity (v/c): DLevel Of Service: 29.9Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: #2: Baxter Ln and Flanders Mill Rd Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] ThruLeftRightThruRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 3791395830113581Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 953515753420Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.90600.90600.90600.90600.90600.9060Peak Hour Factor 3431265327312273Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 188252118224Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.600.000.000.601.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1551015115510069Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 7 10/23/2015 Scenario 8: 8: PM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with DIntersection LOS 5.72d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AACApproach LOS 2.240.0023.55d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 54.6954.690.000.0075.7775.7795th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 2.192.190.000.003.033.0395th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] AAAACDMovement LOS 0.008.360.000.0019.7129.93d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.110.000.000.190.34V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median noTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] noFlared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings 8 10/23/2015 Scenario 8: 8: PM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0.534Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 22.0Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: #10: Durston Rd and Ferguson Ave Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0Pocket Length [ft] 000100000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] nonononononononoPresence of On-Street Parking 32537871364261791862071476228202Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 813422341064547523195750Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor 0.9610.9610.9610.9610.9610.9610.9610.9610.9610.9610.9610.961Peak Hour Factor 31516841314091721791991373219194Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 223065402882830511045471Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.000.500.000.000.001.300.600.600.000.001.800.80Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 92107991121144149148369165123Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 9 10/23/2015 Scenario 8: 8: PM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 10 10/23/2015 Scenario 8: 8: PM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] nonononoPedestrian Recall nonononoMaximum Recall nonononoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0100010001000100Pedestrian Clearance [s] 050050050050Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.0Vehicle Extension [s] 0400040003500350Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.01.00.00.01.00.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.0Amber [s] 0300030003000300Maximum Green [s] 050050050050Minimum Green [s] ------------Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040083060025Signal Group PermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fixed timeActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 75Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group noLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 11 10/23/2015 Scenario 8: 8: PM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 294.7267.79294.54170.46227.898.76169.55191.5695th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 11.792.7111.786.829.120.356.787.6695th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 183.6037.66183.4794.70133.244.8694.19106.8150th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 7.341.517.343.795.330.193.774.2750th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] nonoyesnoyesnononoCritical Lane Group BCBDBCBDLane Group LOS 17.9627.9918.2838.2919.6220.6217.2438.91d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.630.300.640.620.550.040.410.65X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 3.392.713.629.802.960.171.6910.01d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.50k, delay calibration 14.5725.2814.6628.4916.6620.4415.5528.90d1, Uniform Delay [s] 899287875287720387739312c, Capacity [veh/h] 18728621822845174310921788999s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.300.100.310.210.230.010.170.20(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.480.480.480.480.410.410.410.41g / C, Green / Cycle 3636363631313131g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.002.000.002.000.002.000.002.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] CLCLCLCLLane Group Lane Group Calculations 12 10/23/2015 Scenario 8: 8: PM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 18.28 18.2838.29 27.99 17.9617.9619.6238.91 17.24d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]19.6217.24 20.62 B BD BCBBBMovement LOS D BBC 23.11 19.29d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]19.6525.89 C BApproach LOS C B 22.03d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] CIntersection LOS 0.534Intersection V/C ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 ------------8-6-Ring 2 ------------4-2-Ring 1 Sequence 13 10/23/2015 Scenario 8: 8: PM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0.538Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 14.2Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: #11: Durston Rd and Flanders Mill Rd Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] nonononononoPresence of On-Street Parking 1006326541029650Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 25158164252413Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.87400.87400.87400.87400.87400.8740Peak Hour Factor 87552572898444Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 67340324384131Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 1.600.600.500.000.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 20212248514313Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 14 10/23/2015 Scenario 8: 8: PM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 15 10/23/2015 Scenario 8: 8: PM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] nononoPedestrian Recall nononoMaximum Recall nononoMinimum Recall 0.02.02.00.00.02.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.02.00.00.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 010100010Pedestrian Clearance [s] 055005Walk [s] 0.03.03.00.00.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 051510024Split [s] 0.01.01.00.00.01.0All red [s] 0.03.03.00.00.03.0Amber [s] 030300030Maximum Green [s] 055005Minimum Green [s] -----LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 048001Signal Group PermissivePermissivePermissivePermissivePermissiveProtectedControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fixed timeActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 75Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group yesLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 16 10/23/2015 Scenario 8: 8: PM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 301.78249.7674.43102.8595th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 12.079.992.984.1195th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 189.04149.5041.3557.1450th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 7.565.981.652.2950th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] yesnonoyesCritical Lane Group BBCCLane Group LOS 13.3411.1324.4924.85d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.700.610.340.36X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 3.992.643.102.52d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.500.50k, delay calibration 9.358.4921.3822.33d1, Uniform Delay [s] 10401066298402c, Capacity [veh/h] 166017016621509s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.440.380.150.10(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.630.630.630.27g / C, Green / Cycle 47474720g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.002.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] CCLCLane Group Lane Group Calculations 17 10/23/2015 Scenario 8: 8: PM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 11.13 13.34 13.3424.85d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]24.4924.85 BB BCMovement LOS CC 13.3412.93d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]24.85 BBApproach LOS C 14.18d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BIntersection LOS 0.538Intersection V/C ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------8-Ring 2 --------------41Ring 1 Sequence 18 10/23/2015 Scenario 8: 8: PM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0.472Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 21.2Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: #32: Durston Rd and Cottonwood Rd Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] nonononononononoPresence of On-Street Parking 82530332217403636613366376179299Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 21132835410116173317944575Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor 0.9230.9230.9230.9230.9230.9230.9230.9230.9230.9230.9230.923Peak Hour Factor 76489306200372586112361347165276Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 52189139117131535711149182149182Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.000.600.600.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.002.10Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 24300167832415412121651694Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 19 10/23/2015 Scenario 8: 8: PM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 20 10/23/2015 Scenario 8: 8: PM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] nonononononononononoPedestrian Recall nonononononononononoMaximum Recall nonononononononononoMinimum Recall 2.02.02.02.02.02.00.02.02.02.02.02.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.02.02.02.02.02.00.02.02.02.02.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 1010010100010010100Pedestrian Clearance [s] 550550050550Walk [s] 3.03.03.03.03.03.00.03.03.03.03.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 36361134349021921219Split [s] 1.01.01.01.01.01.00.01.01.01.01.01.0All red [s] 3.03.03.03.03.03.00.03.03.03.03.03.0Amber [s] 30303030303003030303030Maximum Green [s] 555555055555Minimum Green [s] --Lead--Lead--Lead--LeadLead / Lag 1,45,82,7Auxiliary Signal Groups 447883061225Signal Group PermiPermiProtecOverlaPermiProtecPermiPermiProtecOverlaPermiProtecControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fixed timeActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 75Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group noLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 21 10/23/2015 Scenario 8: 8: PM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 377.22145.5088.09232.822.9168.6171.2935.99243.459.18197.395th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 15.095.823.529.310.922.742.851.449.742.377.8995th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 248.0780.8348.94136.912.7338.1239.6119.99144.732.88110.950th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 9.923.231.965.480.511.521.580.805.791.324.4450th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] nononoyesnononoyesyesnonoCritical Lane Group CBBBBCCBCCCLane Group LOS 25.8814.1710.7319.7711.9225.3525.0017.0824.0124.2124.25d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.780.530.260.530.140.250.240.110.620.220.54X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 7.433.250.752.640.641.571.300.414.810.613.79d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.50k, delay calibration 18.4410.929.9817.1311.2723.7823.7016.6819.2023.5920.47d1, Uniform Delay [s] 787623840760452384431574603820552c, Capacity [veh/h] 1845116916151900991169619001382161536181338s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.330.280.130.210.060.060.050.050.230.050.22(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.430.550.520.400.550.230.230.350.370.230.35g / C, Green / Cycle 3241393041171726281726g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.000.002.002.000.002.002.000.002.002.000.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] CLRCLCCLRCLLane Group Lane Group Calculations 22 10/23/2015 Scenario 8: 8: PM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 19.77 10.7311.92 14.17 25.8825.8825.3524.25 24.21d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]25.0824.01 17.08 B BB CBCCCMovement LOS C CCB 16.18 21.76d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]23.1624.13 B CApproach LOS C C 21.24d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] CIntersection LOS 0.472Intersection V/C ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 ------------8765Ring 2 ------------4321Ring 1 Sequence 23 10/23/2015 Scenario 8: 8: PM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0.509Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 15.9Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: #33: Cottonwood and Babcock Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0Pocket Length [ft] 001000101001No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] nonononononononoPresence of On-Street Parking 20030327551116655881989881529Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 50781913291614749252047Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor 0.8050.8050.8050.8050.8050.8050.8050.8050.8050.8050.8050.805Peak Hour Factor 1612426604193524731597965623Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 13813153287241191136330315Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.800.000.000.600.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 231125713211128223763538Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 24 10/23/2015 Scenario 8: 8: PM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 25 10/23/2015 Scenario 8: 8: PM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] nonononoPedestrian Recall nonononoMaximum Recall nonononoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0100010001000100Pedestrian Clearance [s] 050050050050Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.0Vehicle Extension [s] 0290029004600460Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.01.00.00.01.00.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.0Amber [s] 0300030003000300Maximum Green [s] 050050050050Minimum Green [s] ------------Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080061025Signal Group PermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fixed timeActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 75Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group yesLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 26 10/23/2015 Scenario 8: 8: PM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 154.1521.0075.1897.58124.8128.8182.2194.1199.314.1095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 6.170.843.013.904.995.157.297.777.980.5695th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 85.6411.6741.7654.2169.3771.56101.2108.6112.47.8350th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 3.430.471.672.172.772.864.054.354.500.3150th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] yesnononononoyesnononoCritical Lane Group CCBCBBCBBBLane Group LOS 22.8622.2619.2732.1310.0810.0433.9111.8611.7913.23d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.470.080.240.400.350.350.660.490.490.07X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 3.130.431.124.081.051.0210.691.861.790.35d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.50k, delay calibration 19.7321.8318.1428.059.039.0323.2310.0010.0012.87d1, Uniform Delay [s] 494382516290917950301916952400c, Capacity [veh/h] 14831156154710521638169655916371700713s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.160.030.080.110.200.200.350.270.270.04(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.330.330.330.330.560.560.560.560.560.56g / C, Green / Cycle 25252525424242424242g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.002.000.002.000.000.002.000.000.002.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] CLCLCCLCCLLane Group Lane Group Calculations 27 10/23/2015 Scenario 8: 8: PM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 19.27 19.2732.13 22.26 22.8622.8610.0813.23 11.82d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]10.0611.86 33.91 B BC CCCBBMovement LOS B BBC 25.43 22.79d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]15.6111.87 C CApproach LOS B B 15.93d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BIntersection LOS 0.509Intersection V/C ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 -------------86-Ring 2 -------------42-Ring 1 Sequence 28 10/23/2015 Scenario 8: 8: PM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0.412Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 16.6Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: #34: Durston and Laurel Parkway Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] nonononononononoPresence of On-Street Parking 1723812253635723200131149035Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 439556989650333709Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor 0.8580.8580.8580.8580.8580.8580.8580.8580.8580.8580.8580.858Peak Hour Factor 1483271933130620170112128030Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 108619331868405128030Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 1.400.000.000.000.900.000.000.000.900.000.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1382410022012130107000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 29 10/23/2015 Scenario 8: 8: PM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 30 10/23/2015 Scenario 8: 8: PM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] nonononoPedestrian Recall nonononoMaximum Recall nonononoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0100010001000100Pedestrian Clearance [s] 050050050050Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.0Vehicle Extension [s] 0430043003200320Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.01.00.00.01.00.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.0Amber [s] 0300030003000300Maximum Green [s] 050050050050Minimum Green [s] ------------Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080061020Signal Group PermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fixed timeActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 75Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group noLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 31 10/23/2015 Scenario 8: 8: PM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 263.35156.10175.1414.5010.0488.6282.4919.0595th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 10.536.247.010.580.403.543.300.7695th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 159.7286.7297.308.055.5849.2445.8310.5850th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 6.393.473.890.320.221.971.830.4250th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] yesnonononoyesnonoCritical Lane Group BCBCBCBBLane Group LOS 15.2023.1512.2520.3215.0123.1917.2017.01d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.590.490.410.070.030.290.250.06X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 2.733.631.280.380.101.640.980.20d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.50k, delay calibration 12.4719.5310.9719.9314.9121.5416.2216.81d1, Uniform Delay [s] 937463964340603449603575c, Capacity [veh/h] 1801100718538691615124716151414s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.310.220.210.030.010.110.090.02(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.520.520.520.520.370.370.370.37g / C, Green / Cycle 3939393928282828g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.002.000.002.000.002.000.002.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] CLCLCLCLLane Group Lane Group Calculations 32 10/23/2015 Scenario 8: 8: PM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 12.25 12.2520.32 23.15 15.2015.2015.0117.01 17.20d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]15.0117.20 23.19 B BC BCBBBMovement LOS B BBC 12.69 17.50d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]22.1017.16 B BApproach LOS B C 16.61d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BIntersection LOS 0.412Intersection V/C ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 -------------86-Ring 2 -------------42-Ring 1 Sequence 33 10/23/2015 Scenario 8: 8: PM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0.136Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 13.1Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: #24: Oak St and Cottonwood Rd Intersection Level Of Service Report yesyesyesyesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] nonononononononoPresence of On-Street Parking 8491891578151338573912272Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 212322420431014103118Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Peak Hour Factor 8491891578151338573912272Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 8491891578151338573912272Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 2 10/23/2015 Scenario 8: 8: PM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 3 10/23/2015 Scenario 8: 8: PM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] nonononoPedestrian Recall nonononoMaximum Recall nonononoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.00.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0100010001000100Pedestrian Clearance [s] 050050050050Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.0Vehicle Extension [s] 0370037003800380Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.01.00.00.01.00.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.00.0Amber [s] 0300030003000300Maximum Green [s] 050050050050Minimum Green [s] ------------Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080060020Signal Group PermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiPermiControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fixed timeActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 75Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group yesLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 4 10/23/2015 Scenario 8: 8: PM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with 38.7741.1846.2520.4120.547.5810.6710.7928.8734.7535.6934.9195th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 1.551.651.850.820.820.300.430.431.151.391.431.4095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 21.5422.8825.7011.3411.414.215.936.0016.0419.3119.8319.4050th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.860.921.030.450.460.170.240.240.640.770.790.7850th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] nonoyesnonononononononoyesCritical Lane Group BBBBBBBBBBBBLane Group LOS 12.9412.7815.3912.3012.2614.8111.4911.4614.7812.1412.0713.93d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.130.120.160.070.060.030.040.030.110.110.110.12X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.440.340.610.180.170.110.100.080.410.330.290.40d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.50k, delay calibration 12.5012.4314.7812.1112.1014.7011.3911.3814.3811.8111.7813.53d1, Uniform Delay [s] 627738559698738506697760532699760603c, Capacity [veh/h] 142516761168158616761084153716761098154216761213s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.060.050.080.030.030.010.020.020.050.050.050.06(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.440.440.440.440.440.440.450.450.450.450.450.45g / C, Green / Cycle 333333333333343434343434g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.002.000.000.002.000.000.002.000.000.002.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] CCLCCLCCLCCLLane Group Lane Group Calculations 5 10/23/2015 Scenario 8: 8: PM Peak 2035 - Alternatives Durston / CottonwoodRobert Peccia and Associated Version 3.00-04 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 12.28 12.3014.81 15.39 12.9412.7811.4913.93 12.09d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]11.4712.14 14.78 B BB BBBBBMovement LOS B BBB 12.63 13.71d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]13.2212.67 B BApproach LOS B B 13.13d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BIntersection LOS 0.136Intersection V/C ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------86Ring 2 --------------42Ring 1 Sequence 6 10/23/2015 Scenario 2: 2: PM 2035 Signal Cottonwood/Durston RoadsRobert Peccia and Associates Version 4.00-00 Generated with 0.515Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 19.2Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 2010Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 1: Fowler Avenue and Durston Road Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 4281723756914042284092677Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 1120461917310117102719Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.9200Peak Hour Factor 3975221696363739263782471Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 3975221696363739263782471Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name volumes 2 12/15/2015Shane Forsythe Scenario 2: 2: PM 2035 Signal Cottonwood/Durston RoadsRobert Peccia and Associates Version 4.00-00 Generated with 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group Exclusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoNoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoNoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoNoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.02.00.03.02.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.02.00.02.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0100010001000100Pedestrian Clearance [s] 050050050050Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.03.00.03.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 0620062002490249Split [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.01.00.02.01.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.03.00.03.03.0Amber [s] 030003000303003030Maximum Green [s] 050050055055Minimum Green [s] --------Lead--LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080061025Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fixed timeActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 95Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 3 12/15/2015Shane Forsythe Scenario 2: 2: PM 2035 Signal Cottonwood/Durston RoadsRobert Peccia and Associates Version 4.00-00 Generated with 492.0918.58411.5037.3438.7225.1030.7315.5315.7360.8595th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 19.680.7416.461.491.551.001.230.620.632.4395th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 340.7310.32275.4220.7421.5113.9417.078.638.7433.8050th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 13.630.4111.020.830.860.560.680.350.351.3550th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] YesNoNoNoYesNoNoNoNoYesCritical Lane Group BCBCCCCCCCLane Group LOS 18.8024.5316.2730.5132.0431.2324.4330.9830.9225.31d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.760.080.680.170.130.070.070.050.050.15X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 4.830.533.391.560.830.380.260.270.230.61d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.50k, delay calibration 13.9723.9912.8828.9531.2130.8524.1630.7130.6924.70d1, Uniform Delay [s] 11302901121235323380544348380517c, Capacity [veh/h] 18847131868653161519001499174019001466s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.460.030.410.060.030.010.030.010.010.05(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.600.600.600.600.200.200.290.200.200.29g / C, Green / Cycle 57575757191928191928g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 3.003.003.003.003.003.000.003.003.000.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.002.000.002.000.000.000.000.000.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 5.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] CLCLCCLCCLLane Group Lane Group Calculations 4 12/15/2015Shane Forsythe Scenario 2: 2: PM 2035 Signal Cottonwood/Durston RoadsRobert Peccia and Associates Version 4.00-00 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 16.27 16.2730.51 24.53 18.8018.8032.0425.31 30.94d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]31.2330.98 24.43 B BC BCBCCMovement LOS C CCC 16.98 18.95d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]29.0727.07 B BApproach LOS C C 19.18d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BIntersection LOS 0.515Intersection V/C ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 -------------865Ring 2 -------------421Ring 1 Sequence 5 12/15/2015Shane Forsythe LEVEL OF SERVICE Site: Cottonwood / Babcock - AM 2035 Projected Traffic Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS A A A A A Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane. LOS F will result if v/c > irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:31:10 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2035.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Cottonwood / Babcock - AM 2035 Projected Traffic Roundabout Movement Performance - Vehicles Demand Flows 95% Back of QueueMov ID OD Mov Deg. Satn Average Delay Level of Service Prop. Queued Effective Stop Rate Average Speed Total HV Vehicles Distance veh/h % v/c sec veh ft per veh mph South: Cottonwood Road 3 L2 47 0.0 0.247 5.6 LOS A 0.9 23.2 0.30 0.20 33.4 8 T1 454 2.0 0.247 5.6 LOS A 0.9 23.2 0.30 0.20 33.6 18 R2 38 0.0 0.247 5.6 LOS A 0.9 23.2 0.30 0.20 33.0 Approach 539 1.7 0.247 5.6 LOS A 0.9 23.2 0.30 0.20 33.5 East: Babcock Street 1 L2 57 0.0 0.171 6.1 LOS A 0.6 14.2 0.47 0.45 32.7 6 T1 32 0.0 0.171 6.1 LOS A 0.6 14.2 0.47 0.45 32.8 16 R2 53 0.0 0.171 6.1 LOS A 0.6 14.2 0.47 0.45 32.1 Approach 142 0.0 0.171 6.1 LOS A 0.6 14.2 0.47 0.45 32.5 North: Cottonwood Road 7 L2 118 0.0 0.394 7.1 LOS A 1.8 45.4 0.30 0.19 32.5 4 T1 693 0.3 0.394 7.1 LOS A 1.8 45.4 0.30 0.19 32.8 14 R2 91 8.3 0.394 7.2 LOS A 1.8 44.8 0.30 0.19 32.0 Approach 901 1.1 0.394 7.1 LOS A 1.8 45.4 0.30 0.19 32.7 West: Babcock Street 5 L2 47 5.9 0.153 7.5 LOS A 0.5 12.0 0.55 0.55 31.7 2 T1 24 0.0 0.153 7.5 LOS A 0.5 12.0 0.55 0.55 32.0 12 R2 26 0.0 0.153 7.5 LOS A 0.5 12.0 0.55 0.55 31.4 Approach 97 2.8 0.153 7.5 LOS A 0.5 12.0 0.55 0.55 31.7 All Vehicles 1680 1.3 0.394 6.6 LOS A 1.8 45.4 0.33 0.24 32.9 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:31:10 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2035.sip6 LEVEL OF SERVICE Site: Cottonwood / Babcock - PM 2035 Projected Traffic Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS A B A A A Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane. LOS F will result if v/c > irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:31:11 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2035.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Cottonwood / Babcock - PM 2035 Projected Traffic Roundabout Movement Performance - Vehicles Demand Flows 95% Back of QueueMov ID OD Mov Deg. Satn Average Delay Level of Service Prop. Queued Effective Stop Rate Average Speed Total HV Vehicles Distance veh/h % v/c sec veh ft per veh mph South: Cottonwood Road 3 L2 29 0.0 0.488 9.7 LOS A 2.4 61.1 0.53 0.50 31.7 8 T1 815 0.6 0.488 9.7 LOS A 2.4 61.1 0.53 0.50 31.8 18 R2 98 0.0 0.488 9.7 LOS A 2.4 61.1 0.53 0.50 31.1 Approach 942 0.5 0.488 9.7 LOS A 2.4 61.1 0.53 0.50 31.7 East: Babcock Street 1 L2 32 0.0 0.431 12.5 LOS B 1.7 43.7 0.66 0.71 30.4 6 T1 30 0.0 0.431 12.5 LOS B 1.7 43.7 0.66 0.71 30.5 16 R2 200 0.0 0.431 12.5 LOS B 1.7 43.7 0.66 0.71 29.9 Approach 262 0.0 0.431 12.5 LOS B 1.7 43.7 0.66 0.71 30.0 North: Cottonwood Road 7 L2 198 0.0 0.356 6.5 LOS A 1.6 39.7 0.23 0.12 32.4 4 T1 588 0.8 0.356 6.5 LOS A 1.6 39.7 0.23 0.12 33.0 14 R2 65 0.0 0.356 6.5 LOS A 1.6 39.6 0.23 0.12 32.6 Approach 850 0.6 0.356 6.5 LOS A 1.6 39.7 0.23 0.12 32.8 West: Babcock Street 5 L2 116 0.0 0.355 10.0 LOS A 1.3 33.7 0.61 0.63 30.8 2 T1 51 0.0 0.355 10.0 LOS A 1.3 33.7 0.61 0.63 30.9 12 R2 75 0.0 0.355 10.0 LOS A 1.3 33.7 0.61 0.63 30.3 Approach 241 0.0 0.355 10.0 LOS A 1.3 33.7 0.61 0.63 30.7 All Vehicles 2294 0.4 0.488 8.8 LOS A 2.4 61.1 0.44 0.40 31.8 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:31:11 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2035.sip6 LEVEL OF SERVICE Site: Baxter / Cottonwood - AM 2035 Projected Traffic Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS A A A A A Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane. LOS F will result if v/c > irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:31:08 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2035.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Baxter / Cottonwood - AM 2035 Projected Traffic Roundabout Movement Performance - Vehicles Demand Flows 95% Back of QueueMov ID OD Mov Deg. Satn Average Delay Level of Service Prop. Queued Effective Stop Rate Average Speed Total HV Vehicles Distance veh/h % v/c sec veh ft per veh mph South: Cottonwood Road 3 L2 17 0.0 0.027 3.8 LOS A 0.1 2.1 0.32 0.21 33.3 8 T1 11 0.0 0.027 3.8 LOS A 0.1 2.1 0.32 0.21 33.5 18 R2 37 0.0 0.037 3.9 LOS A 0.1 2.8 0.32 0.22 33.8 Approach 65 0.0 0.037 3.9 LOS A 0.1 2.8 0.32 0.22 33.6 East: Baxter Lane 1 L2 14 0.0 0.165 4.4 LOS A 0.6 14.5 0.16 0.07 34.2 6 T1 165 0.7 0.165 4.4 LOS A 0.6 14.5 0.16 0.07 34.3 16 R2 19 0.0 0.165 4.4 LOS A 0.6 14.5 0.16 0.07 33.6 Approach 199 0.6 0.165 4.4 LOS A 0.6 14.5 0.16 0.07 34.2 North: Harper Puckett Road 7 L2 116 2.6 0.165 4.8 LOS A 0.6 14.3 0.28 0.19 32.7 4 T1 41 0.0 0.165 4.8 LOS A 0.6 14.3 0.28 0.19 32.9 14 R2 23 0.0 0.165 4.8 LOS A 0.6 14.3 0.28 0.19 32.2 Approach 179 1.7 0.165 4.8 LOS A 0.6 14.3 0.28 0.19 32.7 West: Baxter Lane 5 L2 47 0.0 0.221 5.2 LOS A 0.8 20.4 0.28 0.18 33.5 2 T1 153 0.7 0.221 5.2 LOS A 0.8 20.4 0.28 0.18 33.6 12 R2 48 0.0 0.221 5.2 LOS A 0.8 20.4 0.28 0.18 32.9 Approach 248 0.4 0.221 5.2 LOS A 0.8 20.4 0.28 0.18 33.5 All Vehicles 690 0.8 0.221 4.8 LOS A 0.8 20.4 0.25 0.15 33.5 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:31:08 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2035.sip6 LEVEL OF SERVICE Site: Baxter / Cottonwood - PM 2035 Projected Traffic Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS A A A A A Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane. LOS F will result if v/c > irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:31:09 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2035.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Baxter / Cottonwood - PM 2035 Projected Traffic Roundabout Movement Performance - Vehicles Demand Flows 95% Back of QueueMov ID OD Mov Deg. Satn Average Delay Level of Service Prop. Queued Effective Stop Rate Average Speed Total HV Vehicles Distance veh/h % v/c sec veh ft per veh mph South: Cottonwood Road 3 L2 22 0.0 0.045 3.9 LOS A 0.1 3.5 0.32 0.22 33.6 8 T1 24 0.0 0.045 3.9 LOS A 0.1 3.5 0.32 0.22 33.7 18 R2 30 0.0 0.030 3.8 LOS A 0.1 2.3 0.31 0.21 33.8 Approach 76 0.0 0.045 3.9 LOS A 0.1 3.5 0.32 0.21 33.7 East: Baxter Lane 1 L2 1 0.0 0.211 5.0 LOS A 0.8 19.3 0.18 0.08 34.1 6 T1 199 4.4 0.211 5.0 LOS A 0.8 19.3 0.18 0.08 34.1 16 R2 46 0.0 0.211 5.0 LOS A 0.8 19.3 0.18 0.08 33.4 Approach 246 3.6 0.211 5.0 LOS A 0.8 19.3 0.18 0.08 34.0 North: Harper Puckett Road 7 L2 82 6.7 0.124 4.6 LOS A 0.4 10.1 0.29 0.20 32.7 4 T1 34 0.0 0.124 4.6 LOS A 0.4 10.1 0.29 0.20 33.0 14 R2 11 12.5 0.124 4.6 LOS A 0.4 10.1 0.29 0.20 32.0 Approach 126 5.4 0.124 4.6 LOS A 0.4 10.1 0.29 0.20 32.7 West: Baxter Lane 5 L2 34 0.0 0.308 6.3 LOS A 1.2 30.9 0.25 0.15 33.2 2 T1 186 0.0 0.308 6.3 LOS A 1.2 30.9 0.25 0.15 33.3 12 R2 120 17.4 0.308 6.3 LOS A 1.2 30.9 0.25 0.15 32.1 Approach 340 6.1 0.308 6.3 LOS A 1.2 30.9 0.25 0.15 32.9 All Vehicles 788 4.6 0.308 5.4 LOS A 1.2 30.9 0.24 0.14 33.3 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:31:09 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2035.sip6 LEVEL OF SERVICE Site: Durston / Cottonwood - AM 2035 Projected Traffic Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS A A A C B Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane. LOS F will result if v/c > irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 8:29:41 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2035.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Durston / Cottonwood - AM 2035 Projected Traffic Roundabout Movement Performance - Vehicles Demand Flows 95% Back of QueueMov ID OD Mov Deg. Satn Average Delay Level of Service Prop. Queued Effective Stop Rate Average Speed Total HV Vehicles Distance veh/h % v/c sec veh ft per veh mph South: Cottonwood Road 3 L2 85 3.1 0.324 9.0 LOS A 1.2 29.6 0.57 0.58 31.4 8 T1 149 0.0 0.324 9.0 LOS A 1.2 29.6 0.57 0.58 31.5 18 R2 259 3.9 0.370 10.0 LOS A 1.4 35.6 0.59 0.61 30.8 Approach 493 2.6 0.370 9.5 LOS A 1.4 35.6 0.58 0.59 31.1 East: Durston Road 1 L2 320 1.8 0.555 11.1 LOS B 3.1 78.4 0.56 0.53 30.1 6 T1 255 3.7 0.555 10.2 LOS B 3.1 78.4 0.53 0.50 30.7 16 R2 195 0.0 0.242 6.1 LOS A 0.9 22.0 0.40 0.33 32.7 Approach 770 2.0 0.555 9.5 LOS A 3.1 78.4 0.51 0.47 30.9 North: Cottonwood Road 7 L2 116 0.0 0.224 7.2 LOS A 0.8 18.9 0.52 0.52 31.6 4 T1 164 0.0 0.224 7.2 LOS A 0.8 18.9 0.52 0.52 32.6 14 R2 61 0.0 0.224 7.2 LOS A 0.8 18.9 0.52 0.52 32.2 Approach 340 0.0 0.224 7.2 LOS A 0.8 18.9 0.52 0.52 32.2 West: Durston Road 5 L2 106 0.0 0.767 21.5 LOS C 6.2 155.8 0.83 0.96 27.0 2 T1 509 0.3 0.767 21.5 LOS C 6.2 155.8 0.83 0.96 27.1 12 R2 336 0.0 0.419 9.8 LOS A 1.8 45.1 0.58 0.61 31.0 Approach 951 0.2 0.767 17.3 LOS C 6.2 155.8 0.74 0.84 28.3 All Vehicles 2554 1.2 0.767 12.1 LOS B 6.2 155.8 0.61 0.64 30.1 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 8:29:41 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2035.sip6 LEVEL OF SERVICE Site: Durston / Cottonwood - PM 2035 Projected Traffic Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS B C B B B Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane. LOS F will result if v/c > irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 9:41:07 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2035.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Durston / Cottonwood - PM 2035 Projected Traffic Roundabout Movement Performance - Vehicles Demand Flows 95% Back of QueueMov ID OD Mov Deg. Satn Average Delay Level of Service Prop. Queued Effective Stop Rate Average Speed Total HV Vehicles Distance veh/h % v/c sec veh ft per veh mph South: Cottonwood Road 3 L2 299 2.1 0.506 11.1 LOS B 2.5 63.1 0.61 0.64 29.9 8 T1 179 0.0 0.506 11.1 LOS B 2.6 63.8 0.61 0.64 30.4 18 R2 376 0.0 0.506 11.0 LOS B 2.6 63.8 0.61 0.65 30.5 Approach 854 0.7 0.506 11.1 LOS B 2.6 63.8 0.61 0.64 30.3 East: Durston Road 1 L2 335 0.6 0.789 22.3 LOS C 7.0 175.5 0.84 0.99 26.4 6 T1 530 0.6 0.789 16.8 LOS C 7.0 175.5 0.72 0.81 28.5 16 R2 82 0.0 0.344 8.3 LOS A 1.3 32.9 0.53 0.53 31.8 Approach 947 0.5 0.789 18.0 LOS C 7.0 175.5 0.75 0.85 27.9 North: Cottonwood Road 7 L2 66 0.0 0.257 10.7 LOS B 0.8 20.7 0.67 0.67 30.5 4 T1 133 0.0 0.257 10.7 LOS B 0.8 20.7 0.67 0.67 31.0 14 R2 66 0.0 0.257 10.7 LOS B 0.8 20.7 0.67 0.67 30.7 Approach 265 0.0 0.257 10.7 LOS B 0.8 20.7 0.67 0.67 30.8 West: Durston Road 5 L2 63 0.0 0.550 12.1 LOS B 3.0 74.7 0.64 0.68 30.5 2 T1 403 0.0 0.550 12.1 LOS B 3.0 74.7 0.64 0.68 30.6 12 R2 217 0.0 0.256 7.0 LOS A 0.9 22.7 0.49 0.48 32.3 Approach 683 0.0 0.550 10.4 LOS B 3.0 74.7 0.59 0.62 31.1 All Vehicles 2749 0.4 0.789 13.3 LOS B 7.0 175.5 0.66 0.71 29.7 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 9:41:07 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2035.sip6 LEVEL OF SERVICE Site: Cottonwood / Oak - AM New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS A A A A A Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane. LOS F will result if v/c > irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 10:01:01 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2035.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Cottonwood / Oak - AM New Site Roundabout Movement Performance - Vehicles Demand Flows 95% Back of QueueMov ID OD Mov Deg. Satn Average Delay Level of Service Prop. Queued Effective Stop Rate Average Speed Total HV Vehicles Distance veh/h % v/c sec veh ft per veh mph South: Cottonwood Road 3 L2 24 0.0 0.070 3.8 LOS A 0.2 5.1 0.25 0.15 35.2 8 T1 75 0.0 0.070 3.8 LOS A 0.2 5.1 0.25 0.15 35.3 18 R2 55 0.0 0.070 3.8 LOS A 0.2 5.1 0.25 0.15 34.7 Approach 154 0.0 0.070 3.8 LOS A 0.2 5.1 0.25 0.15 35.1 East: Oak Street 1 L2 26 0.0 0.049 3.4 LOS A 0.1 3.6 0.17 0.08 35.0 6 T1 32 0.0 0.049 3.4 LOS A 0.1 3.6 0.17 0.08 34.8 16 R2 79 0.0 0.067 3.6 LOS A 0.2 4.9 0.18 0.09 34.8 Approach 137 0.0 0.067 3.5 LOS A 0.2 4.9 0.18 0.09 34.9 North: Cottonwood Road 7 L2 76 0.0 0.066 3.5 LOS A 0.2 4.9 0.15 0.06 33.6 4 T1 79 0.0 0.066 3.5 LOS A 0.2 4.9 0.15 0.06 36.0 14 R2 6 0.0 0.066 3.5 LOS A 0.2 4.9 0.15 0.06 35.0 Approach 161 0.0 0.066 3.5 LOS A 0.2 4.9 0.15 0.06 34.8 West: Oak Street 5 L2 16 0.0 0.085 3.9 LOS A 0.3 6.4 0.23 0.14 35.6 2 T1 115 0.0 0.085 3.9 LOS A 0.3 6.4 0.23 0.14 35.6 12 R2 60 0.0 0.085 3.9 LOS A 0.3 6.4 0.23 0.14 34.7 Approach 191 0.0 0.085 3.9 LOS A 0.3 6.4 0.23 0.14 35.3 All Vehicles 643 0.0 0.085 3.7 LOS A 0.3 6.4 0.20 0.11 35.0 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 10:01:01 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2035.sip6 LEVEL OF SERVICE Site: Cottonwood / Oak - PM New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS A A A A A Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane. LOS F will result if v/c > irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 10:02:46 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2035.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Cottonwood / Oak - PM New Site Roundabout Movement Performance - Vehicles Demand Flows 95% Back of QueueMov ID OD Mov Deg. Satn Average Delay Level of Service Prop. Queued Effective Stop Rate Average Speed Total HV Vehicles Distance veh/h % v/c sec veh ft per veh mph South: Cottonwood Road 3 L2 72 0.0 0.101 4.0 LOS A 0.3 7.7 0.21 0.12 34.2 8 T1 122 0.0 0.101 4.0 LOS A 0.3 7.7 0.21 0.12 35.2 18 R2 39 0.0 0.101 4.0 LOS A 0.3 7.7 0.21 0.12 34.7 Approach 233 0.0 0.101 4.0 LOS A 0.3 7.7 0.21 0.12 34.8 East: Oak Street 1 L2 89 0.0 0.119 4.3 LOS A 0.4 9.2 0.26 0.17 33.9 6 T1 91 0.0 0.119 4.3 LOS A 0.4 9.2 0.26 0.17 34.7 16 R2 84 0.0 0.119 4.3 LOS A 0.4 9.2 0.26 0.17 34.5 Approach 264 0.0 0.119 4.3 LOS A 0.4 9.2 0.26 0.17 34.4 North: Cottonwood Road 7 L2 57 0.0 0.053 3.8 LOS A 0.2 3.9 0.27 0.17 33.3 4 T1 38 0.0 0.048 3.8 LOS A 0.1 3.4 0.27 0.17 36.0 14 R2 13 0.0 0.048 3.8 LOS A 0.1 3.4 0.27 0.17 34.8 Approach 108 0.0 0.053 3.8 LOS A 0.2 3.9 0.27 0.17 34.4 West: Oak Street 5 L2 15 0.0 0.048 3.6 LOS A 0.1 3.5 0.23 0.13 35.4 2 T1 78 0.0 0.048 3.6 LOS A 0.1 3.5 0.23 0.13 35.7 12 R2 15 0.0 0.048 3.6 LOS A 0.1 3.5 0.23 0.13 34.9 Approach 108 0.0 0.048 3.6 LOS A 0.1 3.5 0.23 0.13 35.5 All Vehicles 713 0.0 0.119 4.0 LOS A 0.4 9.2 0.24 0.15 34.7 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 10:02:46 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2035.sip6 LEVEL OF SERVICE Site: Durston / Ferguson - AM 2035 Projected Traffic Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS A B B B B Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane. LOS F will result if v/c > irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:31:12 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2035.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Durston / Ferguson - AM 2035 Projected Traffic Roundabout Movement Performance - Vehicles Demand Flows 95% Back of QueueMov ID OD Mov Deg. Satn Average Delay Level of Service Prop. Queued Effective Stop Rate Average Speed Total HV Vehicles Distance veh/h % v/c sec veh ft per veh mph South: Ferguson Avenue 3 L2 120 0.8 0.382 8.5 LOS A 1.5 38.7 0.52 0.51 31.6 8 T1 160 1.8 0.382 8.5 LOS A 1.5 38.7 0.52 0.51 31.7 18 R2 56 4.2 0.382 8.5 LOS A 1.5 38.7 0.52 0.51 31.0 Approach 336 1.8 0.382 8.5 LOS A 1.5 38.7 0.52 0.51 31.6 East: Durston Road 1 L2 79 0.0 0.656 14.7 LOS B 4.5 112.3 0.70 0.76 29.5 6 T1 498 0.5 0.656 14.7 LOS B 4.5 112.3 0.70 0.76 29.6 16 R2 8 0.0 0.656 14.7 LOS B 4.5 112.3 0.70 0.76 29.0 Approach 585 0.4 0.656 14.7 LOS B 4.5 112.3 0.70 0.76 29.6 North: Ferguson Avenue 7 L2 11 0.0 0.495 12.0 LOS B 2.3 58.2 0.64 0.69 30.7 4 T1 225 0.6 0.495 12.0 LOS B 2.3 58.2 0.64 0.69 30.8 14 R2 131 0.6 0.495 12.0 LOS B 2.3 58.2 0.64 0.69 30.2 Approach 367 0.6 0.495 12.0 LOS B 2.3 58.2 0.64 0.69 30.6 West: Durston Road 5 L2 178 1.3 0.631 12.7 LOS B 4.3 108.3 0.61 0.58 30.0 2 T1 273 0.8 0.631 12.7 LOS B 4.3 108.3 0.61 0.58 30.1 12 R2 179 0.0 0.631 12.7 LOS B 4.3 108.3 0.61 0.58 29.5 Approach 630 0.7 0.631 12.7 LOS B 4.3 108.3 0.61 0.58 29.9 All Vehicles 1918 0.8 0.656 12.4 LOS B 4.5 112.3 0.63 0.65 30.2 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:31:12 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2035.sip6 LEVEL OF SERVICE Site: Durston / Ferguson - PM 2035 Projected Traffic Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS C D C C C Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane. LOS F will result if v/c > irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:31:13 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2035.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Durston / Ferguson - PM 2035 Projected Traffic Roundabout Movement Performance - Vehicles Demand Flows 95% Back of QueueMov ID OD Mov Deg. Satn Average Delay Level of Service Prop. Queued Effective Stop Rate Average Speed Total HV Vehicles Distance veh/h % v/c sec veh ft per veh mph South: Ferguson Avenue 3 L2 202 0.8 0.644 15.7 LOS C 3.9 99.3 0.72 0.80 28.7 8 T1 228 1.8 0.644 15.7 LOS C 3.9 99.3 0.72 0.80 28.7 18 R2 76 0.0 0.644 15.7 LOS C 3.9 99.3 0.72 0.80 28.2 Approach 506 1.1 0.644 15.7 LOS C 3.9 99.3 0.72 0.80 28.6 East: Durston Road 1 L2 87 0.0 0.828 26.5 LOS D 7.9 197.3 0.89 1.08 25.5 6 T1 537 0.5 0.828 26.5 LOS D 7.9 197.3 0.89 1.08 25.6 16 R2 32 0.0 0.828 26.5 LOS D 7.9 197.3 0.89 1.08 25.2 Approach 657 0.4 0.828 26.5 LOS D 7.9 197.3 0.89 1.08 25.6 North: Ferguson Avenue 7 L2 14 0.0 0.607 16.4 LOS C 3.2 80.6 0.72 0.81 29.0 4 T1 207 0.6 0.607 16.4 LOS C 3.2 80.6 0.72 0.81 29.1 14 R2 186 0.6 0.607 16.4 LOS C 3.2 80.6 0.72 0.81 28.5 Approach 407 0.6 0.607 16.4 LOS C 3.2 80.6 0.72 0.81 28.8 West: Durston Road 5 L2 179 1.3 0.735 16.5 LOS C 6.6 166.4 0.73 0.72 28.6 2 T1 426 0.0 0.735 16.5 LOS C 6.6 166.4 0.73 0.72 28.7 12 R2 136 0.0 0.735 16.5 LOS C 6.6 166.4 0.73 0.72 28.2 Approach 741 0.3 0.735 16.5 LOS C 6.6 166.4 0.73 0.72 28.6 All Vehicles 2310 0.6 0.828 19.1 LOS C 7.9 197.3 0.77 0.86 27.7 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:31:13 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2035.sip6 LEVEL OF SERVICE Site: Durston / Flanders Mill - AM 2035 Projected Traffic Roundabout All Movement Classes East North West Intersection LOS B A B B Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane. LOS F will result if v/c > irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:31:11 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2035.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Durston / Flanders Mill - AM 2035 Projected Traffic Roundabout Movement Performance - Vehicles Demand Flows 95% Back of QueueMov ID OD Mov Deg. Satn Average Delay Level of Service Prop. Queued Effective Stop Rate Average Speed Total HV Vehicles Distance veh/h % v/c sec veh ft per veh mph East: Durston Road 6 T1 734 0.6 0.674 12.7 LOS B 5.1 127.3 0.48 0.31 30.6 16 R2 45 1.6 0.674 12.7 LOS B 5.1 127.3 0.48 0.31 30.0 Approach 779 0.7 0.674 12.7 LOS B 5.1 127.3 0.48 0.31 30.6 North: Flanders Mill Road 7 L2 77 0.0 0.301 8.6 LOS A 1.1 26.6 0.57 0.57 31.6 14 R2 141 0.0 0.301 8.6 LOS A 1.1 26.6 0.57 0.57 31.1 Approach 218 0.0 0.301 8.6 LOS A 1.1 26.6 0.57 0.57 31.3 West: Durston Road 5 L2 129 0.0 0.739 14.6 LOS B 7.1 179.3 0.46 0.25 29.5 2 T1 762 0.5 0.739 14.6 LOS B 7.1 179.3 0.46 0.25 29.6 Approach 891 0.4 0.739 14.6 LOS B 7.1 179.3 0.46 0.25 29.6 All Vehicles 1888 0.5 0.739 13.1 LOS B 7.1 179.3 0.48 0.31 30.2 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:31:11 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2035.sip6 LEVEL OF SERVICE Site: Durston / Flanders Mill - PM 2035 Projected Traffic Roundabout All Movement Classes East North West Intersection LOS A A A A Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane. LOS F will result if v/c > irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:31:12 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2035.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Durston / Flanders Mill - PM 2035 Projected Traffic Roundabout Movement Performance - Vehicles Demand Flows 95% Back of QueueMov ID OD Mov Deg. Satn Average Delay Level of Service Prop. Queued Effective Stop Rate Average Speed Total HV Vehicles Distance veh/h % v/c sec veh ft per veh mph East: Durston Road 6 T1 584 0.6 0.569 9.8 LOS A 3.6 89.3 0.33 0.19 31.8 16 R2 92 1.6 0.569 9.8 LOS A 3.6 89.3 0.33 0.19 31.1 Approach 675 0.7 0.569 9.8 LOS A 3.6 89.3 0.33 0.19 31.7 North: Flanders Mill Road 7 L2 47 0.0 0.166 6.1 LOS A 0.5 13.7 0.47 0.46 32.8 14 R2 89 0.0 0.166 6.1 LOS A 0.5 13.7 0.47 0.46 32.2 Approach 135 0.0 0.166 6.1 LOS A 0.5 13.7 0.47 0.46 32.4 West: Durston Road 5 L2 94 0.0 0.566 9.5 LOS A 3.7 92.3 0.23 0.10 31.6 2 T1 605 0.5 0.566 9.5 LOS A 3.7 92.3 0.23 0.10 31.7 Approach 699 0.4 0.566 9.5 LOS A 3.7 92.3 0.23 0.10 31.7 All Vehicles 1510 0.5 0.569 9.3 LOS A 3.7 92.3 0.30 0.17 31.8 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:31:12 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2035.sip6 LEVEL OF SERVICE Site: Laurel Parkway / Durston - AM 2035 Projected Traffic Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS A A A A A Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane. LOS F will result if v/c > irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:31:09 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2035.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Laurel Parkway / Durston - AM 2035 Projected Traffic Roundabout Movement Performance - Vehicles Demand Flows 95% Back of QueueMov ID OD Mov Deg. Satn Average Delay Level of Service Prop. Queued Effective Stop Rate Average Speed Total HV Vehicles Distance veh/h % v/c sec veh ft per veh mph South: Laurel Parkway 3 L2 32 0.0 0.286 7.6 LOS A 1.0 25.7 0.52 0.52 32.5 8 T1 1 0.0 0.286 7.6 LOS A 1.0 25.7 0.52 0.52 32.6 18 R2 200 0.0 0.286 7.6 LOS A 1.0 25.7 0.52 0.52 31.9 Approach 233 0.0 0.286 7.6 LOS A 1.0 25.7 0.52 0.52 32.0 East: Durston Road 1 L2 66 0.0 0.296 5.7 LOS A 1.2 30.5 0.14 0.05 33.3 6 T1 257 3.5 0.296 5.7 LOS A 1.2 30.5 0.14 0.05 33.3 16 R2 36 0.0 0.296 5.7 LOS A 1.2 30.5 0.14 0.05 32.7 Approach 360 2.5 0.296 5.7 LOS A 1.2 30.5 0.14 0.05 33.3 North: Laurel Parkway 7 L2 204 0.0 0.234 6.0 LOS A 0.8 21.1 0.41 0.35 31.8 4 T1 1 0.0 0.234 6.0 LOS A 0.8 21.1 0.41 0.35 31.9 14 R2 21 0.0 0.234 6.0 LOS A 0.8 21.1 0.41 0.35 31.2 Approach 227 0.0 0.234 6.0 LOS A 0.8 21.1 0.41 0.35 31.7 West: Durston Road 5 L2 7 0.0 0.382 7.5 LOS A 1.6 41.0 0.42 0.34 32.8 2 T1 369 0.4 0.382 7.5 LOS A 1.6 41.0 0.42 0.34 32.9 12 R2 19 0.0 0.382 7.5 LOS A 1.6 41.0 0.42 0.34 32.2 Approach 396 0.4 0.382 7.5 LOS A 1.6 41.0 0.42 0.34 32.8 All Vehicles 1216 0.9 0.382 6.7 LOS A 1.6 41.0 0.35 0.29 32.6 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:31:09 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2035.sip6 LEVEL OF SERVICE Site: Laurel Parkway / Durston - PM 2035 Projected Traffic Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS A B A A A Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane. LOS F will result if v/c > irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:31:10 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2035.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Laurel Parkway / Durston - PM 2035 Projected Traffic Roundabout Movement Performance - Vehicles Demand Flows 95% Back of QueueMov ID OD Mov Deg. Satn Average Delay Level of Service Prop. Queued Effective Stop Rate Average Speed Total HV Vehicles Distance veh/h % v/c sec veh ft per veh mph South: Laurel Parkway 3 L2 35 0.0 0.215 6.4 LOS A 0.7 18.5 0.47 0.44 33.0 8 T1 1 0.0 0.215 6.4 LOS A 0.7 18.5 0.47 0.44 33.1 18 R2 149 0.0 0.215 6.4 LOS A 0.7 18.5 0.47 0.44 32.4 Approach 185 0.0 0.215 6.4 LOS A 0.7 18.5 0.47 0.44 32.5 East: Durston Road 1 L2 225 0.0 0.636 11.1 LOS B 4.8 120.1 0.31 0.15 30.7 6 T1 381 0.0 0.636 11.1 LOS B 4.8 120.1 0.31 0.15 30.8 16 R2 172 1.4 0.636 11.1 LOS B 4.8 120.1 0.31 0.15 30.1 Approach 779 0.3 0.636 11.1 LOS B 4.8 120.1 0.31 0.15 30.6 North: Laurel Parkway 7 L2 131 0.0 0.194 6.7 LOS A 0.6 16.1 0.50 0.50 31.5 4 T1 1 0.0 0.194 6.7 LOS A 0.6 16.1 0.50 0.50 31.6 14 R2 20 0.0 0.194 6.7 LOS A 0.6 16.1 0.50 0.50 31.0 Approach 152 0.0 0.194 6.7 LOS A 0.6 16.1 0.50 0.50 31.5 West: Durston Road 5 L2 23 0.0 0.430 8.7 LOS A 1.9 47.6 0.49 0.44 32.2 2 T1 357 0.9 0.430 8.7 LOS A 1.9 47.6 0.49 0.44 32.3 12 R2 36 0.0 0.430 8.7 LOS A 1.9 47.6 0.49 0.44 31.6 Approach 416 0.8 0.430 8.7 LOS A 1.9 47.6 0.49 0.44 32.2 All Vehicles 1531 0.4 0.636 9.4 LOS A 4.8 120.1 0.40 0.30 31.3 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:31:10 AM Project: G:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Roundabout Analysis - 2035.sip6 LEVEL OF SERVICE Site: Fowler/Durston - AM 2035 New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS A A A B B Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane. LOS F will result if v/c > irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Monday, December 14, 2015 10:23:55 AM Project: F:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Fowler roundabout.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Fowler/Durston - AM 2035 New Site Roundabout Movement Performance - Vehicles Demand Flows 95% Back of QueueMov ID OD Mov Deg. Satn Average Delay Level of Service Prop. Queued Effective Stop Rate Average Speed Total HV Vehicles Distance veh/h % v/c sec veh ft per veh mph South: Fowler Avenue 3 L2 73 0.0 0.106 6.4 LOS A 0.3 8.2 0.52 0.52 32.1 8 T1 26 0.0 0.071 6.0 LOS A 0.2 5.4 0.51 0.50 34.8 18 R2 23 0.0 0.071 6.0 LOS A 0.2 5.4 0.51 0.50 33.7 Approach 122 0.0 0.106 6.2 LOS A 0.3 8.2 0.51 0.51 32.9 East: Durston Road 1 L2 4 0.0 0.521 9.0 LOS A 2.8 68.8 0.34 0.21 33.4 6 T1 577 0.0 0.521 9.0 LOS A 2.8 68.8 0.34 0.21 33.3 16 R2 28 0.0 0.521 9.0 LOS A 2.8 68.8 0.34 0.21 32.3 Approach 610 0.0 0.521 9.0 LOS A 2.8 68.8 0.34 0.21 33.2 North: Fowler Avenue 7 L2 49 0.0 0.070 5.4 LOS A 0.2 5.4 0.47 0.43 32.8 4 T1 30 0.0 0.070 5.4 LOS A 0.2 5.4 0.47 0.43 34.6 14 R2 29 0.0 0.070 5.4 LOS A 0.2 5.4 0.47 0.43 34.0 Approach 109 0.0 0.070 5.4 LOS A 0.2 5.4 0.47 0.43 33.6 West: Durston Road 5 L2 32 0.0 0.671 12.2 LOS B 5.0 126.2 0.37 0.21 31.8 2 T1 721 0.0 0.671 12.2 LOS B 5.0 126.2 0.37 0.21 31.7 12 R2 60 0.0 0.671 12.2 LOS B 5.0 126.2 0.37 0.21 30.9 Approach 812 0.0 0.671 12.2 LOS B 5.0 126.2 0.37 0.21 31.7 All Vehicles 1652 0.0 0.671 10.1 LOS B 5.0 126.2 0.38 0.25 32.4 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Monday, December 14, 2015 10:23:55 AM Project: F:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Fowler roundabout.sip6 LEVEL OF SERVICE Site: Fowler/Durston - PM 2035 New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS A C A B B Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane. LOS F will result if v/c > irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: ROBERT PECCIA AND ASSOCIATES | Processed: Monday, December 14, 2015 10:23:07 AM Project: F:\highways\14510_000_Durston Cottonwood Roads\REPORTS\TRAFFIC\SIDRA\Fowler roundabout.sip6 APPENDIX D Signal Warrant Analysis Worksheets Durston and Cottonwood Roads Improvements Project Cottonwood / Babcock Bozeman, MT WARRANT 1: EIGHT-HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME NOT SATISFIED Condition A: Minimum Vehicular Volume Not Satisfied Required volumes reached for 0 hours, 8 are needed Condition B: Interruption of Continuous Traffic Not Satisfied Required volumes reached for 0 hours, 8 are needed Combination of Conditions A and B Not Satisfied Required volumes reached for 0 hours, 8 are needed WARRANT 2: FOUR-HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME NOT SATISFIED Required volumes reached for 0 hours, 4 are needed WARRANT 3: PEAK HOUR NOT SATISFIED Condition A: Peak Hour Delay N/A Condition A was not evaluated due to the intersection not meeting required criteria Condition B: Peak Hour Vehicular Volumes N/A Condition B was not evaluated due to the intersection not meeting required criteria WARRANT 4: PEDESTRIAN VOLUME NOT SATISFIED Condition A: Pedestrian Four-Hour Volume Not Satisfied Required volumes reached for 0 hours, 4 are needed Condition B: Pedestrian Peak Hour Volume Not Satisfied Required volumes reached for 0 hours, 1 is needed WARRANT 5: SCHOOL CROSSING NOT SATISFIED No school in the area WARRANT 6: COORDINATED SIGNAL SYSTEM NOT SATISFIED Intersection is not part of a coordinated signal system WARRANT 7: CRASH EXPERIENCE NOT SATISFIED Intersection does not have the required crash history to meet warrants WARRANT 8: ROADWAY NETWORK NOT SATISFIED Traffic signal is not warranted based on the roadway network need WARRANT 9: INTERSECTION NEAR A GRADE CROSSING NOT SATISFIED Intersection is not near a grade crossing IS A TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTED?NO TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS SUMMARY Durston and Cottonwood Roads Improvements Project Cottonwood / Babcock Bozeman, MT Starting Hour Major Street Total Higher-Volume Minor Approach Total Volume 17:00 720 65 785 16:00 579 59 638 8:00 543 59 602 15:00 482 46 528 18:00 439 53 492 7:00 353 62 415 12:00 355 54 409 13:00 346 53 399 100% 70% Major Approach 600 420 Minor Approach 200 140 Is Criteria A: Minimum Vehicular Volume Satisfied? NO 100% 70% Major Approach 900 630 Minor Approach 100 70.0 Is Criteria B: Interruption of Continuous Traffic Satisfied? NO 80% 56% 80% 56% Major Approach 280 196 Major Approach 720 504 Minor Approach 160 112 Minor Approach 80 56 Is the Combination of Conditions A and B Satisfied? NO Is the Minimum Criteria for Warrant #1: Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume Satisfied?NO WARRANT 1: EIGHT-HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME Eight Highest Vehicular Volumes Does the isolated community have a population of less than 10,000? Use 70% criteria? NO Warrant Minimum Volumes Total Number of Qualifying Hours 0 Does the posted speed or 85th percentile speed of the major street exceed 40 mph? Condition A: Minimum Vehicular Volume Condition B: Interruption of Continuous Traffic Combination of Conditions A and B Condition B: Interruption of Continuous Traffic 0 Condition A: Minimum Vehicular Volume Total Number of Qualifying Hours 0 Warrant Minimum Volumes Total Number of Qualifying Hours NO NO Durston and Cottonwood Roads Improvements Project Cottonwood / Babcock Bozeman, MT Starting Hour Major Street Total Higher-Volume Minor Approach Total Volume 17:00 720 65 785 16:00 579 59 638 8:00 543 59 602 15:00 482 46 528 Total Number of Qualifying Hours 0 Is the Minimum Criteria for Warrant #2: Four-Hour Vehicular Volume Satisfied?NO Does the posted speed or 85th percentile speed of the major street exceed 40 mph or does the isolated community have a population of less than 10,000? Use 70% criteria? NO WARRANT 2: FOUR-HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME Four Highest Vehicular Volumes NO 0 100 200 300 400 500 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500Minor Street Higher-VolumeApproach (vph)Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicles per Hour (vph) Warrant 2, Four-Hour Vehicular Volume Vehicle Volumes 1 Lane & 1 Lane 1 Lane & 2 or More Lanes 2 or More Lanes & 1 Lane 2 or More Lanes &2 or More Lanes 0 100 200 300 400 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500Minor Street Higher-VolumeApproach (vph)Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicles per Hour (vph) Warrant 2, Four-Hour Vehicular Volume (70% Factor) Vehicle Volumes 1 Lane & 1 Lane 1 Lane & 2 or MoreLanes 2 or More Lanes &1 Lane 2 or More Lanes &2 or More Lanes Durston and Cottonwood Roads Improvements Project Cottonwood / Babcock Bozeman, MT Total stopped time delay on minor-street approach N/A Warrant minimum stopped time delay 5 Total peak hour vehicles on minor-street approach N/A Warrant minimum vehicular volume 150 Total peak hour volume entering the intersection N/A Warrant minimum volume entering during peak hour 800 Is Condition A: Peak Hour Delay Satisfied? N/A N/A Is Condition B: Vehicular Volumes Satisfied? N/A Is the Minimum Criteria for Warrant #3: Peak Hour Satisfied?NO Condition B: Peak Hour Vehicular Volumes NO Use 70% criteria?Total Number of Qualifying Hours WARRANT 3: PEAK HOUR NO Condition A: Peak Hour Delay Is this an unusual case, such as an office complex, manufacturing plant, industrial complex, or high-occupancy vehicle facility that attracts or discharges large numbers of vehicles over a short time? 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800Minor Street Higher-VolumeApproach (vph)Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicles per Hour (vph) Warrant 3, Peak Hour Vehicle Volumes 1 Lane & 1 Lane 1 Lane & 2 orMore Lanes 2 or More Lanes &1 Lane 2 or More Lanes &2 or More Lanes 0 100 200 300 400 500 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500Minor Street Higher-VolumeApproach (vph)Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicles per Hour (vph) Warrant 3, Peak Hour (70% Factor) Vehicle Volumes 1 Lane & 1 Lane 1 Lane & 2 or More Lanes 2 or More Lanes &1 Lane 2 or More Lanes & 2 or More Lanes Durston and Cottonwood Roads Improvements Project Cottonwood / Babcock Bozeman, MT Starting Hour Major Street Total Peds Crossing Major Street 19:00 177 10 14:00 162 6 12:00 159 4 7:00 224 4 Is Criteria A: Pedestrian Four-Hour Volume Satisfied? NO Is Criteria B: Pedestrian Peak Hour Volume Satisfied? NO Is the Minimum Criteria for Warrant #4: Pedestrian Volume Satisfied?NO Is the Minimum Criteria for Warrant #5: School Crossing Satisfied?NO NO WARRANT 5: SCHOOL CROSSING WARRANT 4: PEDESTRIAN VOLUME NO Use 70% Criteria? NO Is the distance to the nearest traffic control signal along the major street less than 300 ft, and if so, would the proposed traffic control signal restrict the progressive movement of traffic? Four Highest Pedestrian Volumes Is the nearest traffic signal along the major road located more than 300 feet away, or would the proposed traffic signal not restrict the progressive movement of traffic? Are there fewer adequate gaps in the major road traffic stream during the period when the children are using the crossing than the number of minutes in the same period? Is there a minimum of 20 students during the highest crossing hour? NO YES 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800Pedestrians Crossing Major Street - Pedestrians per Hour (pph)Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicles per Hour (vph) Warrant 4, Pedestrian Volume Pedestrian Volumes Four-Hour Four-Hour (70%) Peak Hour Peak Hour(70%) Durston and Cottonwood Roads Improvements Project Cottonwood / Babcock Bozeman, MT Is the Minimum Criteria for Warrant #6: Coordinated Signal System Satisfied?NO NO NO NO Is the Minimum Criteria for Warrant #7: Crash Experience?NO YES Is the Minimum Criteria for Warrant #8: Roadway Network Satisfied?NO Is the Minimum Criteria for Warrant #9: Intersection Near a Grade Crossing Satisfied?NO WARRANT 9: INTERSECTION NEAR A GRADE CROSSING Does a grade crossing exist on an approach controlled by a STOP or YIELD sign with the center of the track nearest to the intersection within 140 feet of the stop line or yield line on the approach? During the highest traffic volume hour during which the rail traffic uses the crossing, does the corresponding traffic value fall above the applicable curve (Figure 4C-9 or 4C-10 of the MUTCD)? NO N/A Rural or suburban highway outside of, entering, or traversing a city? Appears as a major route on an official plan? Is the total entering volume at least 1,000 vph during a typical weekday peak hour? Do five-year projected volumes satisfy one or more of Warrants 1, 2, or 3? Is the total entering volume at least 1,000 vph for each of any 5 hours of a non-normal business day (Sat. or Sun.)? Part of the street or highway system that serves as the principal roadway network for through traffic flow? NO NO N/A YES NO Characteristics of Major Route N/A WARRANT 8: ROADWAY NETWORK Is Warrant 1, Condition A satisfied at 80%? Is Warrant 1, Condition B satisfied at 80%? Is Warrant 4 satisfied at 80%? NO Have there been five or more reported crashes, of types susceptible to correction by a traffic signal, within a 12- month period which have involved personal injury or property damage? Has there been an adequate trial of alternatives with satisfactory observance and enforcement which has failed to reduce the crash frequency? Is the intersection on a one-way road that has traffic predominately in one direction and the adjacent signals are so far apart that they do not provide the necessary degree of vehicle platooning? Is the intersection on a two-way road and adjacent signals do not provide the necessary degree of platooning and the proposed and adjacent signals will collectively provide a progressive operation? WARRANT 7: CRASH EXPERIENCE WARRANT 6: COORDINATED SIGNAL SYSTEM NO NO Durston and Cottonwood Roads Improvements Project Durston / Cottonwood Bozeman, MT WARRANT 1: EIGHT-HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME NOT SATISFIED Condition A: Minimum Vehicular Volume Not Satisfied Required volumes reached for 4 hours, 8 are needed Condition B: Interruption of Continuous Traffic Not Satisfied Required volumes reached for 1 hours, 8 are needed Combination of Conditions A and B Not Satisfied Required volumes reached for 3 hours, 8 are needed WARRANT 2: FOUR-HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME NOT SATISFIED Required volumes reached for 3 hours, 4 are needed WARRANT 3: PEAK HOUR NOT SATISFIED Condition A: Peak Hour Delay N/A Condition A was not evaluated due to the intersection not meeting required criteria Condition B: Peak Hour Vehicular Volumes N/A Condition B was not evaluated due to the intersection not meeting required criteria WARRANT 4: PEDESTRIAN VOLUME NOT SATISFIED Condition A: Pedestrian Four-Hour Volume Not Satisfied Required volumes reached for 0 hours, 4 are needed Condition B: Pedestrian Peak Hour Volume Not Satisfied Required volumes reached for 0 hours, 1 is needed WARRANT 5: SCHOOL CROSSING NOT SATISFIED Does not meet the requirements for a school crossing WARRANT 6: COORDINATED SIGNAL SYSTEM NOT SATISFIED Intersection is not part of a coordinated signal system WARRANT 7: CRASH EXPERIENCE NOT SATISFIED Intersection does not have the required crash history to meet warrants WARRANT 8: ROADWAY NETWORK SATISFIED Traffic signal is warranted to encourage concentration and organization of traffic flow on the roadway network WARRANT 9: INTERSECTION NEAR A GRADE CROSSING NOT SATISFIED Intersection is not near a grade crossing IS A TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTED?YES TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS SUMMARY Durston and Cottonwood Roads Improvements Project Durston / Cottonwood Bozeman, MT Starting Hour Major Street Total Higher-Volume Minor Approach Total Volume 17:00 819 275 1094 16:00 653 265 918 8:00 667 204 871 15:00 572 220 792 18:00 492 251 743 7:00 570 128 698 12:00 447 189 636 14:00 451 173 624 100% 70% Major Approach 500 350 Minor Approach 150 105 Is Criteria A: Minimum Vehicular Volume Satisfied? NO 100% 70% Major Approach 750 525 Minor Approach 75 52.5 Is Criteria B: Interruption of Continuous Traffic Satisfied? NO 80% 56% 80% 56% Major Approach 400 280 Major Approach 600 420 Minor Approach 120 84 Minor Approach 60 42 Is the Combination of Conditions A and B Satisfied? NO Is the Minimum Criteria for Warrant #1: Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume Satisfied?NO WARRANT 1: EIGHT-HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME Eight Highest Vehicular Volumes Does the isolated community have a population of less than 10,000? Use 70% criteria? NO Warrant Minimum Volumes Total Number of Qualifying Hours 3 Does the posted speed or 85th percentile speed of the major street exceed 40 mph? Condition A: Minimum Vehicular Volume Condition B: Interruption of Continuous Traffic Combination of Conditions A and B Condition B: Interruption of Continuous Traffic 1 Condition A: Minimum Vehicular Volume Total Number of Qualifying Hours 4 Warrant Minimum Volumes Total Number of Qualifying Hours NO NO Durston and Cottonwood Roads Improvements Project Durston / Cottonwood Bozeman, MT Starting Hour Major Street Total Higher-Volume Minor Approach Total Volume 17:00 819 275 1094 16:00 653 265 918 8:00 667 204 871 15:00 572 220 792 Total Number of Qualifying Hours 3 Is the Minimum Criteria for Warrant #2: Four-Hour Vehicular Volume Satisfied?NO Does the posted speed or 85th percentile speed of the major street exceed 40 mph or does the isolated community have a population of less than 10,000? Use 70% criteria? NO WARRANT 2: FOUR-HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME Four Highest Vehicular Volumes NO 0 100 200 300 400 500 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500Minor Street Higher-VolumeApproach (vph)Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicles per Hour (vph) Warrant 2, Four-Hour Vehicular Volume Vehicle Volumes 1 Lane & 1 Lane 1 Lane & 2 or More Lanes 2 or More Lanes & 1 Lane 2 or More Lanes &2 or More Lanes 0 100 200 300 400 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500Minor Street Higher-VolumeApproach (vph)Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicles per Hour (vph) Warrant 2, Four-Hour Vehicular Volume (70% Factor) Vehicle Volumes 1 Lane & 1 Lane 1 Lane & 2 or MoreLanes 2 or More Lanes &1 Lane 2 or More Lanes &2 or More Lanes Durston and Cottonwood Roads Improvements Project Durston / Cottonwood Bozeman, MT Total stopped time delay on minor-street approach N/A Warrant minimum stopped time delay 4 Total peak hour vehicles on minor-street approach N/A Warrant minimum vehicular volume 100 Total peak hour volume entering the intersection N/A Warrant minimum volume entering during peak hour 800 Is Condition A: Peak Hour Delay Satisfied? N/A N/A Is Condition B: Vehicular Volumes Satisfied? N/A Is the Minimum Criteria for Warrant #3: Peak Hour Satisfied?NO Condition B: Peak Hour Vehicular Volumes NO Use 70% criteria?Total Number of Qualifying Hours WARRANT 3: PEAK HOUR NO Condition A: Peak Hour Delay Is this an unusual case, such as an office complex, manufacturing plant, industrial complex, or high-occupancy vehicle facility that attracts or discharges large numbers of vehicles over a short time? 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800Minor Street Higher-VolumeApproach (vph)Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicles per Hour (vph) Warrant 3, Peak Hour Vehicle Volumes 1 Lane & 1 Lane 1 Lane & 2 orMore Lanes 2 or More Lanes &1 Lane 2 or More Lanes &2 or More Lanes 0 100 200 300 400 500 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500Minor Street Higher-VolumeApproach (vph)Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicles per Hour (vph) Warrant 3, Peak Hour (70% Factor) Vehicle Volumes 1 Lane & 1 Lane 1 Lane & 2 or More Lanes 2 or More Lanes &1 Lane 2 or More Lanes & 2 or More Lanes Durston and Cottonwood Roads Improvements Project Durston / Cottonwood Bozeman, MT Starting Hour Major Street Total Peds Crossing Major Street 15:00 336 25 12:00 249 15 7:00 241 13 8:00 323 13 Is Criteria A: Pedestrian Four-Hour Volume Satisfied? NO Is Criteria B: Pedestrian Peak Hour Volume Satisfied? NO Is the Minimum Criteria for Warrant #4: Pedestrian Volume Satisfied?NO Is the Minimum Criteria for Warrant #5: School Crossing Satisfied?NO NO WARRANT 5: SCHOOL CROSSING WARRANT 4: PEDESTRIAN VOLUME NO Use 70% Criteria? NO Is the distance to the nearest traffic control signal along the major street less than 300 ft, and if so, would the proposed traffic control signal restrict the progressive movement of traffic? Four Highest Pedestrian Volumes Is the nearest traffic signal along the major road located more than 300 feet away, or would the proposed traffic signal not restrict the progressive movement of traffic? Are there fewer adequate gaps in the major road traffic stream during the period when the children are using the crossing than the number of minutes in the same period? Is there a minimum of 20 students during the highest crossing hour? NO YES 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800Pedestrians Crossing Major Street - Pedestrians per Hour (pph)Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicles per Hour (vph) Warrant 4, Pedestrian Volume Pedestrian Volumes Four-Hour Four-Hour (70%) Peak Hour Peak Hour(70%) Durston and Cottonwood Roads Improvements Project Durston / Cottonwood Bozeman, MT Is the Minimum Criteria for Warrant #6: Coordinated Signal System Satisfied?NO NO NO NO Is the Minimum Criteria for Warrant #7: Crash Experience?NO YES Is the Minimum Criteria for Warrant #8: Roadway Network Satisfied?YES Is the Minimum Criteria for Warrant #9: Intersection Near a Grade Crossing Satisfied?NO WARRANT 9: INTERSECTION NEAR A GRADE CROSSING Does a grade crossing exist on an approach controlled by a STOP or YIELD sign with the center of the track nearest to the intersection within 140 feet of the stop line or yield line on the approach? During the highest traffic volume hour during which the rail traffic uses the crossing, does the corresponding traffic value fall above the applicable curve (Figure 4C-9 or 4C-10 of the MUTCD)? NO N/A Rural or suburban highway outside of, entering, or traversing a city? Appears as a major route on an official plan? Is the total entering volume at least 1,000 vph during a typical weekday peak hour? Do five-year projected volumes satisfy one or more of Warrants 1, 2, or 3? Is the total entering volume at least 1,000 vph for each of any 5 hours of a non-normal business day (Sat. or Sun.)? Part of the street or highway system that serves as the principal roadway network for through traffic flow? YES YES N/A YES NO Characteristics of Major Route N/A WARRANT 8: ROADWAY NETWORK Is Warrant 1, Condition A satisfied at 80%? Is Warrant 1, Condition B satisfied at 80%? Is Warrant 4 satisfied at 80%? NO Have there been five or more reported crashes, of types susceptible to correction by a traffic signal, within a 12- month period which have involved personal injury or property damage? Has there been an adequate trial of alternatives with satisfactory observance and enforcement which has failed to reduce the crash frequency? Is the intersection on a one-way road that has traffic predominately in one direction and the adjacent signals are so far apart that they do not provide the necessary degree of vehicle platooning? Is the intersection on a two-way road and adjacent signals do not provide the necessary degree of platooning and the proposed and adjacent signals will collectively provide a progressive operation? WARRANT 7: CRASH EXPERIENCE WARRANT 6: COORDINATED SIGNAL SYSTEM NO NO Durston and Cottonwood Roads Improvements Project Durston / Ferguson Bozeman, MT WARRANT 1: EIGHT-HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME NOT SATISFIED Condition A: Minimum Vehicular Volume Not Satisfied Required volumes reached for 4 hours, 8 are needed Condition B: Interruption of Continuous Traffic Not Satisfied Required volumes reached for 1 hours, 8 are needed Combination of Conditions A and B Not Satisfied Required volumes reached for 3 hours, 8 are needed WARRANT 2: FOUR-HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME NOT SATISFIED Required volumes reached for 3 hours, 4 are needed WARRANT 3: PEAK HOUR NOT SATISFIED Condition A: Peak Hour Delay N/A Condition A was not evaluated due to the intersection not meeting required criteria Condition B: Peak Hour Vehicular Volumes N/A Condition B was not evaluated due to the intersection not meeting required criteria WARRANT 4: PEDESTRIAN VOLUME NOT SATISFIED Condition A: Pedestrian Four-Hour Volume Not Satisfied Required volumes reached for 0 hours, 4 are needed Condition B: Pedestrian Peak Hour Volume Not Satisfied Required volumes reached for 0 hours, 1 is needed WARRANT 5: SCHOOL CROSSING NOT SATISFIED Does not meet the requirements for a school crossing WARRANT 6: COORDINATED SIGNAL SYSTEM NOT SATISFIED Intersection is not part of a coordinated signal system WARRANT 7: CRASH EXPERIENCE NOT SATISFIED Intersection does not have the required crash history to meet warrants WARRANT 8: ROADWAY NETWORK SATISFIED Traffic signal is warranted to encourage concentration and organization of traffic flow on the roadway network WARRANT 9: INTERSECTION NEAR A GRADE CROSSING NOT SATISFIED Intersection is not near a grade crossing IS A TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTED?YES TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS SUMMARY Durston and Cottonwood Roads Improvements Project Durston / Ferguson Bozeman, MT Starting Hour Major Street Total Higher-Volume Minor Approach Total Volume 17:00 819 264 1083 16:00 653 254 907 8:00 667 196 863 15:00 572 211 783 18:00 492 241 733 7:00 570 123 693 12:00 447 181 628 14:00 451 166 617 100% 70% Major Approach 500 350 Minor Approach 150 105 Is Criteria A: Minimum Vehicular Volume Satisfied? NO 100% 70% Major Approach 750 525 Minor Approach 75 52.5 Is Criteria B: Interruption of Continuous Traffic Satisfied? NO 80% 56% 80% 56% Major Approach 400 280 Major Approach 600 420 Minor Approach 120 84 Minor Approach 60 42 Is the Combination of Conditions A and B Satisfied? NO Is the Minimum Criteria for Warrant #1: Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume Satisfied?NO Warrant Minimum Volumes Total Number of Qualifying Hours 3 Does the posted speed or 85th percentile speed of the major street exceed 40 mph? Condition A: Minimum Vehicular Volume Condition B: Interruption of Continuous Traffic Combination of Conditions A and B Condition B: Interruption of Continuous Traffic 1 Condition A: Minimum Vehicular Volume Total Number of Qualifying Hours 4 Warrant Minimum Volumes Total Number of Qualifying Hours NO NO WARRANT 1: EIGHT-HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME Eight Highest Vehicular Volumes Does the isolated community have a population of less than 10,000? Use 70% criteria? NO Durston and Cottonwood Roads Improvements Project Durston / Ferguson Bozeman, MT Starting Hour Major Street Total Higher-Volume Minor Approach Total Volume 17:00 819 264 1083 16:00 653 254 907 8:00 667 196 863 15:00 572 211 783 Total Number of Qualifying Hours 3 Is the Minimum Criteria for Warrant #2: Four-Hour Vehicular Volume Satisfied?NO Does the posted speed or 85th percentile speed of the major street exceed 40 mph or does the isolated community have a population of less than 10,000? Use 70% criteria? NO WARRANT 2: FOUR-HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME Four Highest Vehicular Volumes NO 0 100 200 300 400 500 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500Minor Street Higher-VolumeApproach (vph)Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicles per Hour (vph) Warrant 2, Four-Hour Vehicular Volume Vehicle Volumes 1 Lane & 1 Lane 1 Lane & 2 or More Lanes 2 or More Lanes & 1 Lane 2 or More Lanes &2 or More Lanes 0 100 200 300 400 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500Minor Street Higher-VolumeApproach (vph)Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicles per Hour (vph) Warrant 2, Four-Hour Vehicular Volume (70% Factor) Vehicle Volumes 1 Lane & 1 Lane 1 Lane & 2 or MoreLanes 2 or More Lanes &1 Lane 2 or More Lanes &2 or More Lanes Durston and Cottonwood Roads Improvements Project Durston / Ferguson Bozeman, MT Total stopped time delay on minor-street approach N/A Warrant minimum stopped time delay 4 Total peak hour vehicles on minor-street approach N/A Warrant minimum vehicular volume 100 Total peak hour volume entering the intersection N/A Warrant minimum volume entering during peak hour 800 Is Condition A: Peak Hour Delay Satisfied? N/A N/A Is Condition B: Vehicular Volumes Satisfied? N/A Is the Minimum Criteria for Warrant #3: Peak Hour Satisfied?NO Condition B: Peak Hour Vehicular Volumes NO Use 70% criteria?Total Number of Qualifying Hours WARRANT 3: PEAK HOUR NO Condition A: Peak Hour Delay Is this an unusual case, such as an office complex, manufacturing plant, industrial complex, or high-occupancy vehicle facility that attracts or discharges large numbers of vehicles over a short time? 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800Minor Street Higher-VolumeApproach (vph)Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicles per Hour (vph) Warrant 3, Peak Hour Vehicle Volumes 1 Lane & 1 Lane 1 Lane & 2 orMore Lanes 2 or More Lanes &1 Lane 2 or More Lanes &2 or More Lanes 0 100 200 300 400 500 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500Minor Street Higher-VolumeApproach (vph)Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicles per Hour (vph) Warrant 3, Peak Hour (70% Factor) Vehicle Volumes 1 Lane & 1 Lane 1 Lane & 2 or More Lanes 2 or More Lanes &1 Lane 2 or More Lanes & 2 or More Lanes Durston and Cottonwood Roads Improvements Project Durston / Ferguson Bozeman, MT Starting Hour Major Street Total Peds Crossing Major Street 15:00 336 27 12:00 249 8 7:00 241 5 8:00 323 20 Is Criteria A: Pedestrian Four-Hour Volume Satisfied? NO Is Criteria B: Pedestrian Peak Hour Volume Satisfied? NO Is the Minimum Criteria for Warrant #4: Pedestrian Volume Satisfied?NO Is the Minimum Criteria for Warrant #5: School Crossing Satisfied?NO NO WARRANT 5: SCHOOL CROSSING WARRANT 4: PEDESTRIAN VOLUME NO Use 70% Criteria? NO Is the distance to the nearest traffic control signal along the major street less than 300 ft, and if so, would the proposed traffic control signal restrict the progressive movement of traffic? Four Highest Pedestrian Volumes Is the nearest traffic signal along the major road located more than 300 feet away, or would the proposed traffic signal not restrict the progressive movement of traffic? Are there fewer adequate gaps in the major road traffic stream during the period when the children are using the crossing than the number of minutes in the same period? Is there a minimum of 20 students during the highest crossing hour? NO YES 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800Pedestrians Crossing Major Street - Pedestrians per Hour (pph)Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicles per Hour (vph) Warrant 4, Pedestrian Volume Pedestrian Volumes Four-Hour Four-Hour (70%) Peak Hour Peak Hour(70%) Durston and Cottonwood Roads Improvements Project Durston / Ferguson Bozeman, MT Is the Minimum Criteria for Warrant #6: Coordinated Signal System Satisfied?NO NO NO NO Is the Minimum Criteria for Warrant #7: Crash Experience?NO YES Is the Minimum Criteria for Warrant #8: Roadway Network Satisfied?YES Is the Minimum Criteria for Warrant #9: Intersection Near a Grade Crossing Satisfied?NO Is the intersection on a one-way road that has traffic predominately in one direction and the adjacent signals are so far apart that they do not provide the necessary degree of vehicle platooning? Is the intersection on a two-way road and adjacent signals do not provide the necessary degree of platooning and the proposed and adjacent signals will collectively provide a progressive operation? WARRANT 7: CRASH EXPERIENCE WARRANT 6: COORDINATED SIGNAL SYSTEM NO NO N/A WARRANT 8: ROADWAY NETWORK Is Warrant 1, Condition A satisfied at 80%? Is Warrant 1, Condition B satisfied at 80%? Is Warrant 4 satisfied at 80%? NO Have there been five or more reported crashes, of types susceptible to correction by a traffic signal, within a 12- month period which have involved personal injury or property damage? Has there been an adequate trial of alternatives with satisfactory observance and enforcement which has failed to reduce the crash frequency? Rural or suburban highway outside of, entering, or traversing a city? Appears as a major route on an official plan? Is the total entering volume at least 1,000 vph during a typical weekday peak hour? Do five-year projected volumes satisfy one or more of Warrants 1, 2, or 3? Is the total entering volume at least 1,000 vph for each of any 5 hours of a non-normal business day (Sat. or Sun.)? Part of the street or highway system that serves as the principal roadway network for through traffic flow? YES YES N/A YES NO Characteristics of Major Route WARRANT 9: INTERSECTION NEAR A GRADE CROSSING Does a grade crossing exist on an approach controlled by a STOP or YIELD sign with the center of the track nearest to the intersection within 140 feet of the stop line or yield line on the approach? During the highest traffic volume hour during which the rail traffic uses the crossing, does the corresponding traffic value fall above the applicable curve (Figure 4C-9 or 4C-10 of the MUTCD)? NO N/A APPENDIX E Preliminary Design Configurations APPENDIX F Preferred Design Configuration APPENDIX G Cost Estimates 12/1/2015Quantity Cost Quantity CostQuantity Cost Quantity CostQuantity Cost Quantity CostQuantity Cost Quantity CostMILE MISCELLANEOUS WORK $100,000 0.2 $20,000 0.4 $40,000 0.4 $40,000 0.4$40,000 0.3 $30,000 0.4 $40,000 0.3 $30,000 0.1 $10,000LUMP SUM DEWATERING1 $20,000 1 $20,000 1 $20,000 1 $20,000 1 $10,000 1 $20,000 1 $10,000 1 $5,000LUMP SUM TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL & SWPPP 1 $15,000 1 $16,000 1 $9,000 1 $11,000 1 $8,000 1 $11,000 1 $7,500 1 $5,000CU YD STREET EXCAVATION OR EMBANKMENT $25 2,000 $50,000 7,000 $175,000 4,000 $100,000 4,000 $100,000 6,000 $150,000 8,000 $200,000 6,000 $150,000 4,000 $100,000SQ YD ROAD GEOTEXTILE $1.50 2,851 $4,277 11,472 $17,208 7,305 $10,958 10,297 $15,446 17,619 $26,429 18,255 $27,383 11,817 $17,726 7,050 $10,575TON ASPHALT PAVEMENT $100 425 $42,500 2,250 $225,000 1,319 $131,900 2,017 $201,700 2,881 $288,100 2,916 $291,600 2,121 $212,100 1,158 $115,800CU YD BASE COURSE $32 410 $13,120 2,078 $66,496 1,132 $36,224 1,798 $57,536 2,624 $83,968 2,695 $86,240 1,826 $58,432 1,052 $33,664CU YD SUBBBASE COURSE $20 1,640 $32,800 8,315 $166,300 4,527 $90,540 7,191 $143,820 10,496 $209,920 10,778 $215,560 7,304 $146,080 4,207 $84,140SQ YD SIDEWALK‐CONCRETE 6" $65 1,099 $71,435 1,470 $95,550 1,073 $69,745 1,522 $98,930 1,867 $121,355 2,634 $171,210 1,307 $84,955 472 $30,680SQ YD DETECTABLE WARNING DEVICES $300 9 $2,700 7 $2,100 11 $3,300 8 $2,400 10 $3,000 5 $1,500 16 $4,800LN FT CURB AND GUTTER $22 1,566 $34,452 5,000 $110,000 2,062 $45,364 4,253 $93,566 7,500 $165,000 7,000 $154,000 3,443 $75,746 2,960 65,120SQ YD MEDIAN CONCRETE CAP $60 558 $33,480 2,800 $168,000 610 $36,600 4,702 $282,120 1,507 $90,420 2,927 $175,620 236 $14,160 973 58,380MILE STORM DRAIN & CULVERTS $250,000 0.1 $25,000 0.4 $100,000 0.2 $50,000 0.4 $100,000 0.5 $125,000 0.7 $175,000 0.5 $125,000 0.1 $25,000EACH TRAFFIC SIGNALS & INTERSECTION LIGHTS $275,000 1 275,000 1 275,000 1 275,000 1 275,000LUMP SUM SIGNAL RETROFIT1 50,000MILE DECORATIVE LIGHTING ON 3‐LANE ROAD $250,000 0.1 $25,000 0.2 $50,0000.2 $50,000MILE DECORATIVE LIGHTING ON 5‐LANE ROAD $350,000 0.1 $35,000 0.4 $140,000 0.2 $70,000 0.4$140,000 0.3 $105,000 0.4 $140,000 0.1 $35,000 0.1 $35,000LN FT THERMOPLASTIC STRIPING $8 8,392 $67,136 11,500 $92,000 11,449 $91,590 13,318 $106,544 8,500 $68,000 11,488 $91,904 8,707 $69,656 4,300 $34,400EACH THERMOPLASTIC WORDS & SYMBOLS $350 50 $17,500 40 $14,000 73 $25,550 20 $7,000 78 $27,300 10 $3,500 60 $21,000 4 $1,400MILE SIGNS $45,000 0.2 $9,000 0.4 $18,000 0.4 $18,000 0.4 $18,000 0.3 $13,500 0.4 $18,000 0.3 $13,500 0.1 $4,500LUMP SUM WATER & SEWER ADJUSTMENTS 1 $15,000 1 $20,000 1 $11,000 1 $15,000 1 $6,000 1 $12,000 1 $7,500 1 $10,000CU YD TOPSOIL‐SALVAGE & PLACE $18 600 $10,800 750 $13,500 400 $7,200 750 $13,500 1,000 $18,000 1,750 $31,500 1,700 $30,600 700 $12,600SQ FT PREP, HYDROSEED & MULCH $0.20 33,174 $6,635 38,300 $7,660 22,110 $4,422 45,000 $9,000 48,220 $9,644 86,000 $17,200 92,000 $18,400 25,000 $5,000LUMP SUM LANDSCAPING & IRRIGATION ADJUSTMENTS 1 $10,000 1 $15,000 1 $10,000 1 $10,000 1 $5,000 1 $10,000 1 $5,000 1 $5,000Subtotal$835,835 $1,521,814 $1,256,393 $1,485,562 $1,838,636 $1,893,217 $1,462,155 $651,259Traffic Control10% $83,584 $152,181 $125,639 $148,556 $183,864 $189,322 $146,216 $65,126Mobilization, Bonding & Submittals10% $91,942 $167,400 $138,203 $163,412 $202,250 $208,254 $160,837 $71,638SUBTOTAL: $1,011,360 $1,841,395 $1,520,236 $1,797,530 $2,224,750 $2,290,793 $1,769,208 $788,023Contingency15% $151,704 $276,209 $228,035 $269,630 $333,712 $343,619 $265,381 $118,204Design Fees10% $101,136 $184,139 $152,024 $179,753 $222,475 $229,079 $176,921 $78,802Construction Engineering10% $101,136 $184,139 $152,024 $179,753 $222,475 $229,079 $176,921 $78,802CONSTRUCTION & DESIGN TOTAL: $1,365,336 $2,485,883 $2,052,318 $2,426,666 $3,003,412 $3,092,570 $2,388,430 $1,063,832ACRERight of Way & Construction Permits$100,000.00 0.5 $50,000 0.5 $50,000 1.2 $120,000 0.5 $50,000 2.4 $240,000 4.0 $400,000 2.9 $290,000 1.0 $100,000ACREWetland & Stream Mitigation$200,000.00 0.1 $20,000 0.1 $20,000 0.2 $40,000 0.0 $0 0.0 $0 0.0 $0 0.0 $0 0.0 $0SEGMENT TOTAL: $1,435,336 $2,555,883 $2,212,318 $2,476,666 $3,243,412 $3,492,570 $2,678,430 $1,163,832Note: Costs do not include boulevard landscaping, new irrigation systems, water main extensions, or sewer main extensions.COTTONWOOD IMPROVEMENTS ‐ PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE SIGNAL SCENARIO 0.3 milesCottonwood Road Segment 4North of Baxter Ln. to North of Equestrian Ln.0.1 miles0.4 miles 0.4 milesSouth of Sports Complex driveway to South of Baxter Ln.0.4 milesCottonwood Road Segment 30.2 milesNorth of Billion driveway to South of Cascade St.North of Sherwood Way to South of Sports Complex drivewaySouth of Baxter Ln to North of Baxter Ln. and West of Cottonwood Rd. to Sports Complex drivewayCottonwood & Oak IntersectionCottonwood & Baxter Intersection0.3 milesCottonwood Road Segment 1Cottonwood Road Segment 2South of Cascade St. to Bembrick St. Glenwood Dr. to North of Sherwood WayCottonwood & Babcock IntersectionCottonwood & Durston Intersection0.4 milesBembrick St. to Glenwood Dr. and Twin Lakes Ave. to Eneboe Ave.Unit Description Unit PricesPage 1 of 2 12/1/2015Quantity Cost Quantity Cost Quantity Cost Quantities Cost Quantity Cost Quantity Cost Quantity Cost Quantity CostMILE MISCELLANEOUS WORK $100,000 0.1 $10,000 0.1 $10,000 0.1 $10,000 0.3 $30,000 0.3 $30,000 0.2 $20,000 0.4 $40,000 4.0 $400,000LUMP SUM DEWATERING1 $10,000 1 $15,000 1 $15,000 1 $30,000 1 $15,000 1 $15,000 1 $5,000 15 $230,000LUMP SUM TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL & SWPPP 1 $5,000 1 $10,000 1 $10,000 1 $20,000 1 $10,000 1 $10,000 1 $2,500 15 $150,000CU YD STREET EXCAVATION OR EMBANKMENT $25 1,000 $25,000 1,000 $25,000 1,000 $25,000 6,000$150,000 4,000 $100,000 6,000 $150,000 1,000 $25,000 61,000 $1,525,000SQ YD ROAD GEOTEXTILE $1.50 1,132 $1,698 1,077 $1,616 1,158 $1,737 7,851 $11,777 8,742 $13,113 7,650 $11,475 3,771 $5,657 118,047 $177,075TON ASPHALT PAVEMENT $100 158 $15,800 177 $17,700 170 $17,000 1,397 $139,700 1,561 $156,000 1,438 $143,800 663 $66,300 20,651 $2,065,000CU YD BASE COURSE $32 159 $5,088 161 $5,152 166 $5,312 1,209 $38,688 1,348 $43,136 1,205 $38,560 578 $18,496 18,441 $590,112CU YD SUBBBASE COURSE $20 636 $12,720 643 $12,860 662 $13,240 4,836 $96,7205,391 $107,820 4,820 $96,400 2,311 $46,220 73,757 $1,475,140SQ YD SIDEWALK‐CONCRETE 6" $65 262 $17,030 527 $34,255 402 $26,130 557 $36,205 159 $10,335 1,101 $71,565 721 $46,865 15,173 $986,245SQ YD DETECTABLE WARNING DEVICES $300 9 $2,700 6 $1,800 3 $900 10 $3,000 19 $5,700 14 $4,200 4 $1,200 131 $39,300LN FT CURB AND GUTTER $22 710 $15,620 451 $9,922 659 $14,498 2,385 $52,4702,621 $57,662 1,682 $37,004 1,218 $26,796 43,510 $957,220SQ YD MEDIAN CONCRETE CAP $60 213 $12,7801,089 $65,34015,615 $936,900MILE STORM DRAIN & CULVERTS $250,000 0.1 $25,000 0.1 $25,000 0.1 $25,000 0.3 $75,000 0.3 $75,000 0.2 $50,000 0.1 $25,000 4.1 $1,025,000EACH TRAFFIC SIGNALS & INTERSECTION LIGHTS $275,000 1 $275,000 1 $275,000 1 $275,000 1 $275,000 8 $2,200,000LUMP SUM SIGNAL RETROFIT1 $50,000MILE DECORATIVE LIGHTING ON 3‐LANE ROAD $250,000 0.1 $25,000 0.1 $25,000 0.1 $25,000 0.3 $75,000 0.3 $75,000 0.2 $50,000 0.4 $100,000 2.0 $500,000MILE DECORATIVE LIGHTING ON 5‐LANE ROAD $350,0002.0 $700,000LN FT THERMOPLASTIC STRIPING $8 6,697 $53,572 3,162 $25,296 3,456 $27,648 10,047$80,376 8,854 $70,832 6,689 $53,512 10,620 $84,960 127,179 $1,017,426EACH THERMOPLASTIC WORDS & SYMBOLS $350 40 $14,000 16 $5,600 8 $2,800 40 $14,000 48 $16,800 47 $16,450 38 $13,300 572 $200,200MILE SIGNS $45,000 0.1 $4,500 0.1 $4,500 0.1 $4,500 0.3 $13,500 0.3 $13,500 0.2 $9,000 0.4 $18,000 4.0 $180,000LUMP SUM WATER & SEWER ADJUSTMENTS 1 $1,000 1 $12,500 1 $15,000 1 $25,000 1 $30,000 1 $20,000 1 $5,000 15 $205,000CU YD TOPSOIL‐SALVAGE & PLACE $18 100 $1,800 200 $3,600 300 $5,400 700 $12,600 500 $9,000 500 $9,000 1,000 $18,000 10,950 $197,100SQ FT PREP, HYDROSEED & MULCH $0.20 3,170 $634 14,000 $2,800 14,000 $2,800 38,601$7,720 35,000 $7,000 27,000 $5,400 29,000 $5,800 550,575 $110,115LUMP SUM LANDSCAPING & IRRIGATION ADJUSTMENTS 1 $10,000 1 $10,000 1 $10,000 1 $40,000 1 $10,000 1 $10,000 1 $10,000 15 $170,000Subtotal$543,942 $532,601 $256,965 $1,226,756 $921,238 $1,096,366 $564,094 $16,086,833Traffic Control10% $54,394 $53,260 $25,697 $122,676 $92,124 $109,637 $56,409 $1,608,683Mobilization, Bonding & Submittals10% $59,834 $58,586 $28,266 $134,943 $101,336 $120,600 $62,050 $1,769,552SUBTOTAL: $658,170 $644,447 $310,928 $1,484,375 $1,114,698 $1,326,603 $682,554 $19,465,068Contingency15% $98,725 $96,667 $46,639 $222,656 $167,205 $198,990 $102,383 $2,919,760Design Fees10% $65,817 $64,445 $31,093 $148,437 $111,470 $132,660 $68,255 $1,946,507Construction Engineering10% $65,817 $64,445 $31,093 $148,437 $111,470 $132,660 $68,255 $1,946,507CONSTRUCTION & DESIGN TOTAL: $888,529 $870,004 $419,752 $2,003,906 $1,504,842 $1,790,914 $921,448 $26,277,842ACRERight of Way & Construction Permits$100,000.00 0.3 $30,000 0.3 $30,000 0.2 $20,000 0.7 $70,000 0.1 $10,000 1.7 $170,000 0.4 $40,000 15.2 $1,520,000ACREWetland & Stream Mitigation$200,000.00 0.0 $0 0.0 $0 0.1 $20,000 0 $0 0.0 $0 0.3 $60,000 0.1 $20,000 0.9 $180,000SEGMENT TOTAL: $918,529 $900,004 $459,752 $2,073,906 $1,514,842 $2,020,914 $981,448 $27,977,842Note: Costs do not include boulevard landscaping, new irrigation systems, water main extensions, or sewer main extensions.DURSTON AND BAXTER IMPROVEMENTS ‐ PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE SIGNAL SCENARIO Unit Description Unit PricesDurston & Laurel Parkway IntersectionDurston & Flanders Mill IntersectionDurston & Ferguson IntersectionDurston and Fowler Intersection0.1 miles 0.1 miles 0.3 milesKimball Ave. to Sanders Ave. Hanson St. to New Holland Dr.4.0 milesSIGNAL TOTALSClifden Dr. to Heritage Christian SchoolDurston Road ‐ Segment 1Heritage Christian School to Kimball Ave.0.1 milesDurston Road ‐ Segment 2Sanders Ave. to Hanson St.0.3 miles 0.2 milesBaxter LaneSports Compex driveway to Flanders Mill Rd.0.4 milesPage 2 of 2 12/1/2015Quantity Cost Quantity CostQuantity Cost Quantity CostQuantity Cost Quantity CostQuantity Cost Quantity CostMILE MISCELLANEOUS WORK $100,000 0.2 $20,000 0.4 $40,000 0.4 $40,000 0.4$40,000 0.3 $30,000 0.4 $40,000 0.3 $30,000 0.1 $10,000LUMP SUM DEWATERING1 $20,000 1 $20,000 1 $10,000 1 $20,000 1 $10,000 1 $20,000 1 $10,000 1 $5,000LUMP SUM TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL & SWPPP 1 $15,000 1 $16,000 1 $9,000 1 $11,000 1 $8,000 1 $11,000 1 $7,500 1 $5,000CU YD STREET EXCAVATION OR EMBANKMENT $25 9,000 $225,000 7,000 $175,000 10,000 $250,000 4,000 $100,000 7,000 $175,000 8,000 $200,000 6,000 $150,000 4,000 $100,000SQ YD ROAD GEOTEXTILE $1.50 11,016 $16,524 11,472 $17,208 13,049 $19,574 10,297 $15,446 14,591 $21,886 18,255 $27,383 12,811 $19,217 7,050 $10,575TON ASPHALT PAVEMENT $100 1,920 $192,000 2,250 $225,000 1,900 $190,000 2,017 $201,700 2,463 $246,300 2,916 $291,600 2,271 $227,100 1,158 $115,800CU YD BASE COURSE $32 1,682 $53,824 2,078 $66,496 2,188 $70,016 1,798 $57,536 2,200 $70,400 2,695 $86,240 1,970 $63,040 1,052 $33,664CU YD SUBBBASE COURSE $20 6,729 $134,580 8,315 $166,300 8,751 $175,020 7,191 $143,820 8,801 $176,020 10,778 $215,560 7,879 $157,580 4,207 $84,140SQ YD CONCRETE PAVEMENT TRUCK APRON $230 574 $132,020 574 $132,020 574 $132,020 574 $132,020SQ YD SIDEWALK‐CONCRETE 6" $65 2,138 $138,970 1,470 $95,550 2,351 $152,815 1,522 $98,930 2,576 $167,440 2,634 $171,210 2,497 $162,305 472 $30,680SQ YD DETECTABLE WARNING DEVICES $300 47 $14,100 7 $2,100 50 $15,000 8 $2,400 47 $14,100 5 $1,500 48 $14,400LN FT CURB AND GUTTER $22 3,694 $81,268 5,000 $110,000 4,338 $95,436 4,253 $93,566 5,556 $122,232 7,000 $154,000 3,970 $87,340 2,960 $65,120LN FT MEDIAN CURB $28 805 $22,540 2,020 $56,560 250 $7,000 945 $26,460SQ YD MEDIAN CONCRETE CAP $60 2,026 $121,560 2,800 $168,000 2,183 $130,980 4,702 $282,120 1,463 $87,780 2,927 $175,620 1,302 $78,120 973 $58,380MILE STORM DRAIN & CULVERTS $250,000 0.3 $75,000 0.4 $100,000 0.5 $125,000 0.4 $100,000 0.6 $150,000 0.7 $175,000 0.5 $125,000 0.1 $25,000QUADRANT HAWK PEDESTRIAN SIGNALS $30,000 2 $60,000 4 $120,000 4 $120,000 2 $60,000MILE DECORATIVE LIGHTING ON 3‐LANE ROAD $250,0000.2 $50,0000.2 $50,000MILE DECORATIVE LIGHTING ON 5‐LANE ROAD $350,000 0.1 $35,000 0.4 $140,000 0.2 $70,000 0.4$140,000 0.3 $105,000 0.4 $140,000 0.1 $35,000 0.1 $35,000EACH ROUNDABOUT LIGHTING $100,000 1 $100,000 1 $100,000 1 $100,000 1 $100,000LN FT THERMOPLASTIC STRIPING $8 8,840 $70,720 11,500 $92,000 10,725 $85,800 13,318 $106,544 9,794 $78,352 11,488 $91,904 9,160 $73,280 4,300 $34,400EACH THERMOPLASTIC WORDS & SYMBOLS $350 40 $14,000 40 $14,000 79 $27,650 20 $7,000 50 $17,500 10 $3,500 26 $9,100 4 $1,400MILE SIGNS $45,000 0.2 $9,000 0.4 $18,000 0.4 $18,000 0.4 $18,000 0.3 $13,500 0.4 $18,000 0.3 $13,500 0.1 $4,500LUMP SUM WATER & SEWER ADJUSTMENTS 1 $30,000 1 $20,000 1 $50,000 1 $15,000 1 $8,000 1 $12,000 1 $15,000 1 $10,000CU YD TOPSOIL‐SALVAGE & PLACE $18 900 $16,200 750 $13,500 1,000 $18,000 750 $13,500 1,500 $27,000 1,750 $31,500 1,000 $18,000 700 $12,600SQ FT PREP, HYDROSEED & MULCH $0.20 64,650 $12,930 38,300 $7,660 58,000 $11,600 45,000 $9,000 82,500 $16,500 86,000 $17,200 75,000 $15,000 25,000 $5,000LUMP SUM LANDSCAPING & IRRIGATION ADJUSTMENTS 1 $15,000 1 $15,000 1 $20,000 1 $10,000 1 $5,000 1 $10,000 1 $10,000 1 $5,000Subtotal$1,625,236 $1,521,814 $2,092,471 $1,485,562 $1,909,030 $1,893,217 $1,688,962 $651,259Traffic Control10% $162,524 $152,181 $209,247 $148,556 $190,903 $189,322 $168,896 $65,126Mobilization, Bonding & Submittals10% $178,776 $167,400 $230,172 $163,412 $209,993 $208,254 $185,786 $71,638SUBTOTAL: $1,966,536 $1,841,395 $2,531,890 $1,797,530 $2,309,926 $2,290,793 $2,043,644 $788,023Contingency15% $294,980 $276,209 $379,783 $269,630 $346,489 $343,619 $306,547 $118,204Design Fees10% $196,654 $184,139 $253,189 $179,753 $230,993 $229,079 $204,364 $78,802Construction Engineering10% $196,654 $184,139 $253,189 $179,753 $230,993 $229,079 $204,364 $78,802CONSTRUCTION & DESIGN TOTAL: $2,654,823 $2,485,883 $3,418,051 $2,426,666 $3,118,401 $3,092,570 $2,758,919 $1,063,832ACRERight of Way & Construction Permits$100,000.00 1.5 $150,000 0.5 $50,000 1.9 $190,000 0.5 $50,000 2.7 $270,000 4.0 $400,000 3.9 $390,000 1.0 $100,000ACREWetland & Stream Mitigation$200,000.00 0.1 $20,000 0.1 $20,000 0.2 $40,0000.0 $0 0.2 $40,000 0.0 $0 0.0 $0 0.0 $0SEGMENT TOTAL: $2,824,823 $2,555,883 $3,648,051 $2,476,666 $3,428,401 $3,492,570 $3,148,919 $1,163,832Note: Costs do not include boulevard landscaping, new irrigation systems, water main extensions, or sewer main extensions.COTTONWOOD IMPROVEMENTS ‐ PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE ROUNDABOUT SCENARIO Unit Description Unit PricesCottonwood & Durston IntersectionCottonwood & Babcock IntersectionCottonwood Road Segment 3Bembrick St.to Glenwood Dr. and Twin Lakes Ave. to Eneboe Ave.0.4 miles0.2 milesNorth of Billion driveway to South of Cascade St.North of Sherwood Way to South of Sports Complex drivewaySouth of Baxter Ln to North of Baxter Ln. and West of Cottonwood Rd. to Sports Complex drivewayCottonwood & Oak IntersectionCottonwood & Baxter Intersection0.3 milesSouth of Sports Complex driveway to South of Baxter Ln.0.4 milesCottonwood Road Segment 4North of Baxter Ln. to North of Equestrian Ln.0.1 milesCottonwood Road Segment 1South of Cascade St. to Bembrick St.0.4 milesCottonwood Road Segment 2Glenwood Dr. to North of Sherwood Way0.4 miles 0.3 milesPage 1 of 2 12/1/2015Quantity Cost Quantity Cost Quantity Cost Quantities CostQuantity Cost Quantity CostQuantity Cost Quantity CostMILE MISCELLANEOUS WORK $100,000 0.1 $10,000 0.1 $10,000 0.1 $10,000 0.3$30,000 0.3 $30,000 0.2 $20,000 0.4 $40,000 4.0 $400,000LUMP SUM DEWATERING1 $30,000 1 $15,000 1 $15,000 1 $30,000 1 $15,000 1 $15,000 1 $5,000 15 $240,000LUMP SUM TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL & SWPPP 1 $20,000 1 $10,000 1 $10,000 1 $20,000 1 $10,000 1 $10,000 1 $2,500 15 $165,000CU YD STREET EXCAVATION OR EMBANKMENT $25 6,000 $150,000 4,000 $100,000 1,000 $25,000 6,000 $150,000 4,000 $100,000 6,000 $150,000 1,000 $25,000 83,000 $2,075,000SQ YD ROAD GEOTEXTILE $1.50 6,989 $10,484 3,646 $5,469 1,158 $1,737 8,019 $12,029 8,742 $13,113 9,993 $14,990 3,771 $5,657 140,859 $211,292TON ASPHALT PAVEMENT $100 1,247 $124,700 588 $58,800 170 $17,000 1,407 $140,700 1,561 $156,000 1,874 $187,300 663 $66,300 24,405 $2,440,300CU YD BASE COURSE $32 1,077 $34,464 540 $17,280 166 $5,312 1,228 $39,296 1,348 $43,136 1,572 $50,304 578 $18,496 22,172 $709,504CU YD SUBBBASE COURSE $20 4,309 $86,180 2,160 $43,200 662 $13,240 4,913 $98,260 5,391 $107,820 6,287 $125,740 2,311 $46,220 88,684 $1,773,680SQ YD CONCRETE PAVEMENT TRUCK APRON $230 327 $75,210 302 $69,460 333 $76,590 574 $132,020 3,832 $881,360SQ YD SIDEWALK‐CONCRETE 6" $65 1,753 $113,945 1,410 $91,650 402 $26,130 1,893 $123,045 159 $10,335 1,957 $127,205 721 $46,865 23,955 $1,557,075SQ YD DETECTABLE WARNING DEVICES $300 52 $15,600 35 $10,500 3 $900 57 $17,100 19 $5,700 48 $14,400 4 $1,200 430 $129,000LN FT CURB AND GUTTER $22 2,102 $46,244 1,625 $35,750 659 $14,498 2,601 $57,222 2,621 $57,662 2,248 $49,456 1,218 $26,796 49,845 $1,096,590LN FT MEDIAN CURB $28 1,735 $48,580 1,190 $33,320 1,522 $42,616 1,878 $52,570 10,345 $289,646SQ YD MEDIAN CONCRETE CAP $60 823 $49,380 468 $28,080 485 $29,100 1,089 $65,34021,241 $1,274,460MILE STORM DRAIN & CULVERTS $250,000 0.2 $50,000 0.2 $50,000 0.1 $25,000 0.4$100,000 0.3 $75,000 0.5 $125,000 0.1 $25,000 5.3 $1,325,000QUADRANT HAWK PEDESTRIAN SIGNALS $30,0002 $60,000 14 $420,000LUMP SUM REMOVE & SALVAGE EXISTING SIGNAL1 $50,000MILE DECORATIVE LIGHTING ON 3‐LANE ROAD $250,000 0.2 $50,000 0.1 $25,000 0.1 $25,000 0.2$50,000 0.3 $75,000 0.1 $25,000 0.4 $100,000 1.8 $450,000MILE DECORATIVE LIGHTING ON 5‐LANE ROAD $350,0000.1 $35,000 2.1 $735,000EACH ROUNDABOUT LIGHTING $100,000 1 $100,000 1 $100,000 1 $100,000 1 $100,000 8 $800,000LN FT THERMOPLASTIC STRIPING $8 6,800 $54,400 4,886 $39,088 3,456 $27,648 6,215 $49,720 8,854 $70,832 7,452 $59,616 10,620 $84,960 127,408 $1,019,264EACH THERMOPLASTIC WORDS & SYMBOLS $350 18 $6,300 14 $4,900 8 $2,800 18 $6,300 48 $16,800 28 $9,800 38 $13,300 441 $154,350MILE SIGNS $45,000 0.1 $4,500 0.1 $4,500 0.1 $4,500 0.3 $13,500 0.3 $13,500 0.2 $9,000 0.4 $18,000 4.0 $180,000LUMP SUM WATER & SEWER ADJUSTMENTS 1 $20,000 1 $30,000 1 $15,000 1 $50,000 1 $30,000 1 $20,000 1 $5,000 15 $330,000CU YD TOPSOIL‐SALVAGE & PLACE $18 1,000 $18,000 1,000 $18,000 300 $5,400 1,000 $18,000 500 $9,000 500 $9,000 1,000 $18,000 13,650 $245,700SQ FT PREP, HYDROSEED & MULCH $0.20 41,000 $8,200 34,000 $6,800 14,000 $2,800 52,000 $10,400 35,000 $7,000 32,000 $6,400 29,000 $5,800 711,450 $142,290LUMP SUM LANDSCAPING & IRRIGATION ADJUSTMENTS 1 $25,000 1 $15,000 1 $10,000 1 $50,000 1 $10,000 1 $10,000 1 $10,000 15 $220,000Subtotal$1,151,187 $821,797 $256,965 $1,313,878 $921,238 $1,417,801 $564,094 $19,314,511Traffic Control10% $115,119 $82,180 $25,697 $131,388 $92,124 $141,780 $56,409 $1,931,451Mobilization, Bonding & Submittals10% $126,631 $90,398 $28,266 $144,527 $101,336 $155,958 $62,050 $2,124,596SUBTOTAL: $1,392,936 $994,374 $310,928 $1,589,792 $1,114,698 $1,715,539 $682,554 $23,370,558Contingency15% $208,940 $149,156 $46,639 $238,469 $167,205 $257,331 $102,383 $3,505,584Design Fees10% $139,294 $99,437 $31,093 $158,979 $111,470 $171,554 $68,255 $2,337,056Construction Engineering10% $139,294 $99,437 $31,093 $158,979 $111,470 $171,554 $68,255 $2,337,056CONSTRUCTION & DESIGN TOTAL: $1,880,464 $1,342,405 $419,752 $2,146,220 $1,504,842 $2,315,978 $921,448 $31,550,254ACRERight of Way & Construction Permits$100,000.00 0.5 $50,000 0.5 $50,000 0.2 $20,000 0.9 $90,000 0.1 $10,000 2.4 $240,000 0.4 $40,000 21.2 $2,120,000ACREWetland & Stream Mitigation$200,000.00 0.0 $0 0.1 $20,000 0.1 $20,000 0.1 $20,000 0.0 $0 0.6 $120,000 0.1 $20,000 1.6 $320,000SEGMENT TOTAL: $1,930,464 $1,412,405 $459,752 $2,256,220 $1,514,842 $2,675,978 $981,448 $33,990,254Note: Costs do not include boulevard landscaping, new irrigation systems, water main extensions, or sewer main extensions.DURSTON AND BAXTER IMPROVEMENTS ‐ PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE ROUNDABOUT SCENARIO Unit Description Unit PricesDurston & Laurel Parkway IntersectionDurston & Flanders Mill IntersectionDurston & Ferguson IntersectionDurston and Fowler IntersectionDurston Road ‐ Segment 1Heritage Christian School to Kimball Ave.Clifden Dr. to Heritage Christian School Kimball Ave. to Sanders Ave. Hanson St. to New Holland Dr.0.1 miles 0.1 miles 0.3 miles 0.2 miles0.1 miles4.0 milesDurston Road ‐ Segment 2Sanders Ave. to Hanson St.0.3 milesROUNDABOUT TOTALSBaxter LaneSports Compex driveway to Flanders Mill Rd.0.4 milesPage 2 of 2 12/11/2015 Page 2 of 2 Quantity Cost Quantity Cost Quantity Cost Quantity Cost Quantity Cost Quantity Cost Quantity Cost Quantity Cost Quantity Cost Quantity Cost Quantity Cost Quantities Cost Quantity Cost Quantity Cost Quantity Cost Quantity Cost MILE MISCELLANEOUS WORK $100,000 0.2 $20,000 0.4 $40,000 0.4 $40,000 0.4 $40,000 0.3 $30,000 0.4 $40,000 0.3 $30,000 0.1 $10,000 0.1 $10,000 0.1 $10,000 0.1 $10,000 0.3 $30,000 0.3 $30,000 0.2 $20,000 0.4 $40,000 4 $400,000 LUMP SUM DEWATERING 1 $20,000 1 $20,000 1 $20,000 1 $20,000 1 $10,000 1 $20,000 1 $10,000 1 $5,000 1 $10,000 1 $15,000 1 $15,000 1 $30,000 1 $15,000 1 $15,000 1 $5,000 15 $230,000LUMP SUM TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL & SWPPP 1 $15,000 1 $16,000 1 $9,000 1 $11,000 1 $8,000 1 $11,000 1 $7,500 1 $5,000 1 $5,000 1 $10,000 1 $10,000 1 $20,000 1 $10,000 1 $10,000 1 $2,500 15 $150,000CU YD STREET EXCAVATION OR EMBANKMENT $25 2,000 $50,000 7,000 $175,000 4,000 $100,000 4,000.0 $100,000 7,000 $175,000 8,000 $200,000 6,000 $150,000 4,000 $100,000 1,000 $25,000 4,000 $100,000 1,000 $25,000 6,000 $150,000 4,000 $100,000 6,000 $150,000 1,000 $25,000 65,000 $1,625,000SQ YD ROAD GEOTEXTILE $1.50 2,851 $4,277 11,472 $17,208 7,305 $10,958 10,297.0 $15,446 14,591 $21,886 18,255 $27,383 12,811 $19,217 7,050 $10,575 1,132 $1,698 3,646 $5,469 1,158 $1,737 8,019 $12,029 8,742 $13,113 7,650 $11,475 3,771 $5,657 118,750 $178,128 TON ASPHALT PAVEMENT $100 425 $42,500 2,250 $225,000 1,319 $131,900 2,017.0 $201,700 2,463 $246,300 2,916 $291,600 2,271 $227,100 1,158 $115,800 158 $15,800 588 $58,800 170 $17,000 1,407 $140,700 1,561 $156,000 1,438 $143,800 663 $66,300 20,804 $2,080,300CU YD BASE COURSE $32 410 $13,120 2,078 $66,496 1,132 $36,224 1,798.0 $57,536 2,200 $70,400 2,695 $86,240 1,970 $63,040 1,052 $33,664 159 $5,088 540 $17,280 166 $5,312 1,228 $39,296 1,348 $43,136 1,205 $38,560 578 $18,496 18,559 $593,888CU YD SUBBBASE COURSE $20 1,640 $32,800 8,315 $166,300 4,527 $90,540 7,191.0 $143,820 8,801 $176,020 10,778 $215,560 7,879 $157,580 4,207 $84,140 636 $12,720 2,160 $43,200 662 $13,240 4,913 $98,260 5,391 $107,820 4,820 $96,400 2,311 $46,220 74,231 $1,484,620SQ YD CONCRETE PAVEMENT TRUCK APRON $230 574 $132,020 574 $132,020 302 $69,460 333 $76,590 1,783 $410,090SQ YD SIDEWALK-CONCRETE 6"$65 1,099 $71,435 1,470 $95,550 1,073 $69,745 1,522.0 $98,930 2,576 $167,440 2,634 $171,210 2,497 $162,305 472 $30,680 262 $17,030 1,410 $91,650 402 $26,130 1,893 $123,045 159 $10,335 1,101 $71,565 721 $46,865 19,291 $1,253,915 SQ YD DETECTABLE WARNING DEVICES $300 9 $2,700 7 $2,100 11 $3,300 8.0 $2,400 47 $14,100 5 $1,500 48 $14,400 9 $2,700 35 $10,500 3 $900 57 $17,100 19 $5,700 14 $4,200 4 $1,200 276 $82,800LN FT CURB AND GUTTER $22 1,566 $34,452 5,000 $110,000 2,062 $45,364 4,253.0 $93,566 5,556 $122,232 7,000 $154,000 3,970 $87,340 2,960 $65,120 710 $15,620 1,625 $35,750 659 $14,498 2,601 $57,222 2,621 $57,662 1,682 $37,004 1,218 $26,796 43,483 $956,626LNFTMEDIAN CURB $28 250 $7,000 945 $26,460 1,190 $33,320 1,522 $42,616 3,907 $109,396SQ YD MEDIAN CONCRETE CAP $60 558 $33,480 2,800 $168,000 610 $36,600 4,702.0 $282,120 1,463 $87,780 2,927 $175,620 1,302 $78,120 973 $58,380 213 $12,780 468 $28,080 485 $29,100 1,089 $65,340 17,590 $1,055,400MILESTORM DRAIN & CULVERTS $250,000 0.1 $25,000 0.4 $100,000 0.2 $50,000 0.4 $100,000 0.6 $150,000 0.7 $175,000 0.5 $125,000 0.1 $25,000 0.1 $25,000 0.2 $50,000 0.1 $25,000 0.4 $100,000 0.3 $75,000 0.2 $50,000 0.1 $25,000 4 $1,100,000 QUADRANT HAWK PEDESTRIAN SIGNALS $30,000 4.0 $120,000 2.0 $60,000 6 $180,000EACHTRAFFIC SIGNALS & INTERSECTION LIGHTS $275,000 1 $275,000 1 275,000 1 $275,000 1 $275,000 4 $1,100,000LUMP SUM SIGNAL RETROFIT 1 50,000 1 $50,000MILEDECORATIVE LIGHTING ON 3-LANE ROAD $250,000 0.1 $25,000 0.2 $50,000 0.2 $50,000 0.1 $25,000 0.1 $25,000 0.1 $25,000 0.2 $50,000 0.3 $75,000 0.2 $50,000 0.4 $100,000 2 $475,000MILEDECORATIVE LIGHTING ON 5-LANE ROAD $350,000 0.1 $35,000 0.4 $140,000 0.2 $70,000 0.4 $140,000 0.3 $105,000 0.4 $140,000 0.1 $35,000 0.1 $35,000 2 $700,000 EACH ROUNDABOUT LIGHTING $100,000 1.0 $100,000 1.0 $100,000 1.0 $100,000 1.0 $100,000 4 $400,000LN FT THERMOPLASTIC STRIPING $8 8,392 $67,136 11,500 $92,000 11,449 $91,590 13,318.0 $106,544 9,794 $78,352 11,488 $91,904 9,160 $73,280 4,300 $34,400 6,697 $53,572 4,886 $39,088 3,456 $27,648 6,215 $49,720 8,854 $70,832 6,689 $53,512 10,620 $84,960 126,818 $1,014,538EACHTHERMOPLASTIC WORDS & SYMBOLS $350 50 $17,500 40 $14,000 73 $25,550 20.0 $7,000 50 $17,500 10 $3,500 26 $9,100 4 $1,400 40 $14,000 14 $4,900 8 $2,800 18 $6,300 48 $16,800 47 $16,450 38 $13,300 486 $170,100MILESIGNS$45,000 0.2 $9,000 0.4 $18,000 0.4 $18,000 0.4 $18,000 0.3 $13,500 0.4 $18,000 0.3 $13,500 0.1 $4,500 0.1 $4,500 0.1 $4,500 0.1 $4,500 0.3 $13,500 0.3 $13,500 0.2 $9,000 0.4 $18,000 4 $180,000LUMP SUM WATER & SEWER ADJUSTMENTS 1 $15,000 1 $20,000 1 $11,000 1 $15,000 1 $8,000 1 $12,000 1 $15,000 1 $10,000 1 $1,000 1 $30,000 1 $15,000 1 $50,000 1 $30,000 1 $20,000 1 $5,000 15 $257,000 CU YD TOPSOIL-SALVAGE & PLACE $18 600 $10,800 750 $13,500 400 $7,200 750.0 $13,500 1,500 $27,000 1,750 $31,500 1,000 $18,000 700 $12,600 100 $1,800 1,000 $18,000 300 $5,400 1,000 $18,000 500 $9,000 500 $9,000 1,000 $18,000 11,850 $213,300SQ FT PREP, HYDROSEED & MULCH $0.20 33,174 $6,635 38,300 $7,660 22,110 $4,422 45,000.0 $9,000 82,500.0 $16,500 86,000 $17,200 75,000 $15,000 25,000 $5,000 3,170 $634 34,000 $6,800 14,000 $2,800 52,000 $10,400 35,000 $7,000 27,000 $5,400 29,000 $5,800 601,254 $120,251LUMP SUM LANDSCAPING & IRRIGATION ADJUSTMENTS 1 $10,000 1 $15,000 1 $10,000 1 $10,000 1 $5,000 1 $10,000 1 $10,000 1 $5,000 1 $10,000 1 $15,000 1 $10,000 1 $50,000 1 $10,000 1 $10,000 1 $10,000 15 $190,000 Subtotal $835,835 $1,521,814 $1,256,393 $1,485,562 $1,909,030 $1,893,217 $1,688,962 $651,259 $543,942 $821,797 $256,965 $1,313,878 $921,238 $1,096,366 $564,094 $16,760,352Traffic Control 10%$83,584 $152,181 $125,639 $148,556 $190,903 $189,322 $168,896 $65,126 $54,394 $82,180 $25,697 $131,388 $92,124 $109,637 $56,409 $1,676,035Mobilization, Bonding & Submittals 10%$91,942 $167,400 $138,203 $163,412 $209,993 $208,254 $185,786 $71,638 $59,834 $90,398 $28,266 $144,527 $101,336 $120,600 $62,050 $1,843,639 SUBTOTAL: $1,011,360 $1,841,395 $1,520,236 $1,797,530 $2,309,926 $2,290,793 $2,043,644 $788,023 $658,170 $994,374 $310,928 $1,589,792 $1,114,698 $1,326,603 $682,554 $20,280,026 Contingency 15%$151,704 $276,209 $228,035 $269,630 $346,489 $343,619 $306,547 $118,204 $98,725 $149,156 $46,639 $238,469 $167,205 $198,990 $102,383 $3,042,004 Design Fees 10%$101,136 $184,139 $152,024 $179,753 $230,993 $229,079 $204,364 $78,802 $65,817 $99,437 $31,093 $158,979 $111,470 $132,660 $68,255 $2,028,003Construction Engineering 10%$101,136 $184,139 $152,024 $179,753 $230,993 $229,079 $204,364 $78,802 $65,817 $99,437 $31,093 $158,979 $111,470 $132,660 $68,255 $2,028,003CONSTRUCTION & DESIGN TOTAL: $1,365,336 $2,485,883 $2,052,318 $2,426,666 $3,118,401 $3,092,570 $2,758,919 $1,063,832 $888,529 $1,342,405 $419,752 $2,146,220 $1,504,842 $1,790,914 $921,448 $27,378,035 ACRE Right of Way & Construction Permits $100,000.00 0.5 $50,000 0.5 $50,000 1.2 $120,000 0.5 $50,000 2.7 $270,000 4.0 $400,000 3.9 $390,000 1.0 $100,000 0.3 $30,000 0.5 $50,000 0.2 $20,000 0.9 $90,000 0.1 $10,000 1.7 $170,000 0.4 $40,000 18.4 $1,840,000ACREWetland & Stream Mitigation $200,000.00 0.1 $20,000 0.1 $20,000 0.2 $40,000 0.0 $0 0.2 $40,000 0.0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0.0 $0 0.1 $20,000 0.1 $20,000 0.1 $20,000 0.0 $0 0.3 $60,000 0.1 $20,000 1.3 $260,000SEGMENT TOTAL: $1,435,336 $2,555,883 $2,212,318 $2,476,666 $3,428,401 $3,492,570 $3,148,919 $1,163,832 $918,529 $1,412,405 $459,752 $2,256,220 $1,514,842 $2,020,914 $981,448 $29,478,035Note: Costs do not include boulevard landscaping, new irrigation systems, water main extensions, or sewer main extensions. DURSTON, COTTONWOOD AND BAXTER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT - PREFERRED CORRIDOR ALTERNATIVE - PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE (12/11/2015) Unit Description Unit Prices Durston & Laurel Parkway SIGNAL Intersection Durston & Flanders Mill ROUNDABOUT Durston & Ferguson ROUNDABOUT Durston and Fowler SIGNAL IntersectionCottonwood & Babcock SIGNAL Intersection 0.1 miles 0.1 miles 0.3 miles Kimball Ave. to Sanders Ave.Hanson St. to New Holland Dr. Cottonwood & Durston SIGNAL Intersection Cottonwood Road Segment 2 Bembrick St. to Glenwood Dr. and Twin Lakes Ave. to Eneboe Ave. Glenwood Dr. to North of Sherwood Way 4.0 miles0.2 miles PROJECT TOTALNorth of Billion driveway to South of Cascade St. North of Sherwood Way to South of Sports Complex driveway South of Baxter Ln to North of Baxter Ln. and West of Cottonwood Rd. to Sports Complex driveway Cottonwood & Oak ROUNDABOUT Cottonwood & Baxter ROUNDABOUT Clifden Dr. to Heritage Christian School 0.3 miles0.4 miles 0.4 miles Durston Road - Segment 1 Heritage Christian School to Kimball Ave. 0.1 miles Cottonwood Road Segment 1 South of Cascade St. to Bembrick St. 0.4 miles Durston Road - Segment 2 Sanders Ave. to Hanson St. 0.3 miles 0.2 miles0.4 miles Cottonwood Road Segment 4 Baxter Lane North of Baxter Ln. to North of Equestrian Ln. Sports Compex driveway to Flanders Mill Rd. 0.1 miles 0.4 miles0.3 miles Cottonwood Road Segment 3 South of Sports Complex driveway to South of Baxter Ln. Prepared by: ROBERT PECCIA & ASSOCIATES www.rpa-hln.com TRAFFIC ENGINEERING REPORT DURSTON AND COTTONWOOD ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT December 17, 2015 Prepared for: City of Bozeman, Montana Scott Randall, PE, PTOE Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 i TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ............................................................................................................ i List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................. ii List of Tables .............................................................................................................................................. ii Technical Appendix .................................................................................................................................... ii 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1. Project Location and Background ...................................................................................................... 1 2. Existing Conditions ..................................................................................................... 2 2.1. Road Segments ................................................................................................................................. 2 2.2. Intersections ....................................................................................................................................... 2 2.3. Existing Traffic Volumes ..................................................................................................................... 4 2.4. Multi Modal Traffic .............................................................................................................................. 6 2.5. Intersection Operational Analysis ...................................................................................................... 6 3. Projected Conditions .................................................................................................. 8 3.1. Prior TIS Documents .......................................................................................................................... 8 3.2. Planned Development Summary ..................................................................................................... 13 3.3. Projected Traffic Conditions ............................................................................................................. 15 3.3.1. Future Projections ..................................................................................................................................... 15 3.3.2. Traffic Projection Assumptions .................................................................................................................. 17 3.4. Projected Intersection Operational Analysis .................................................................................... 17 4. Safety ........................................................................................................................ 19 4.1. Study Area Crash Analysis .............................................................................................................. 19 4.1.1. Crash Period .............................................................................................................................................. 19 4.1.2. Environmental Factors ............................................................................................................................... 20 4.1.3. Crash Type ................................................................................................................................................ 21 4.1.4. Safety Data Trend Analysis ....................................................................................................................... 21 5. Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis ................................................................................ 22 5.1. Warrant Results ............................................................................................................................... 22 5.2. Conclusion ........................................................................................................................................ 24 6. Improvement Options ............................................................................................... 25 6.1. Mainline Roadways .......................................................................................................................... 25 6.1.1. Durston Road and Baxter Lane ................................................................................................................. 25 6.1.2. Cottonwood Road ...................................................................................................................................... 25 6.2. Major Intersections ........................................................................................................................... 26 1. Laurel Parkway and Durston Road .................................................................................................................. 27 2. Cottonwood Road and Durston Road .............................................................................................................. 30 3. Flanders Mill Road and Durston Road ............................................................................................................. 33 4. Ferguson Avenue and Durston Road .............................................................................................................. 36 5. Fowler Avenue and Durston Road ................................................................................................................... 39 6. Flanders Mill Road and Baxter Lane ............................................................................................................... 42 7. Cottonwood Road and Baxter Lane ................................................................................................................. 43 8. Cottonwood Road and Babcock Street ............................................................................................................ 46 9. Cottonwood Road and Oak Street ................................................................................................................... 49 6.3. Summary of Scenarios ..................................................................................................................... 52 7. Conclusions and Next Steps .................................................................................... 53 Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 ii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1: Project Vicinity ............................................................................................................................ 1 Figure 2.1: Existing Intersection Configurations ........................................................................................... 3 Figure 2.2: Existing Traffic Volumes ............................................................................................................. 5 Figure 3.1: Development Location and Trip Generation ............................................................................. 14 Figure 3.2: Projected Traffic Volumes ......................................................................................................... 16 Figure 4.1: Time of Day ............................................................................................................................... 20 Figure 4.2: Month of Year ........................................................................................................................... 20 Figure 4.3: Lighting Conditions ................................................................................................................... 21 Figure 4.4: Crash Type ............................................................................................................................... 21 Figure 6.1: Durston Road and Baxter Lane Typical Section ....................................................................... 25 Figure 6.2: Cottonwood Typical Section ..................................................................................................... 26 LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1: Observed Multi-modal Traffic Volumes ........................................................................................ 6 Table 2.2: LOS Criteria ................................................................................................................................. 6 Table 2.3: Existing Intersection Operational Analysis ................................................................................... 7 Table 3.1: Annual Growth Rates to Year 2035 ........................................................................................... 15 Table 3.2: Projected Conditions Operational Analysis ................................................................................ 18 Table 4.1: Crash Frequency Summary ....................................................................................................... 19 Table 6.1: Scenario Summary .................................................................................................................... 52 Table 7.1: Preferred Intersection Configurations ........................................................................................ 53 TECHNICAL APPENDIX Appendix A: Data Collection Appendix B: Existing Year Operational Analysis Appendix C: Projected Year Operational Analysis Appendix D: Signal Warrant Analysis Worksheets Appendix E: Preliminary Design Configurations Appendix F: Preferred Design Configuration Appendix G: Cost Estimates Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 1 1. INTRODUCTION This Traffic Engineering Report is intended to evaluate and identify recommended improvements for the Cottonwood and Durston Road Improvement project. The scope of the project includes the reconstruction of portions of Cottonwood Road, Durston Road, and Baxter Lane as well as improvements to major inter- sections. 1.1. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND The project limits for this project include Durston Road between Laurel Parkway and Fowler Avenue. Cot- tonwood Road between Fallon Street and Baxter Lane, and Baxter Lane between Cottonwood Road and Flanders Mill Road. The project includes approximately 4.0 miles of roadway reconstruction. In addition, eight major intersections are being evaluated for improvement based on existing and future traffic condi- tions. Figure 1.1 shows the location of the project roadways and major intersections. Furthermore, inter- section layout options for the intersection of Cottonwood Road and Oak Street are being evaluated. Figure 1.1: Project Vicinity 90 191 86 BAXTER LN DAVIS LNN 19TH AVEHUFFINE LN MAIN ST DURSTON RD OAK ST 1234 5 67 8 Legend Bozeman City Limits Bozeman Parks Study Roads 0120.5 Miles Study Intersections# Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 2 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS The project roadways and intersections consist of three road segments and 33 intersections. The following subsections provide detailed descriptions of these road segments and intersections. 2.1. ROAD SEGMENTS Cottonwood Road is a north/south principal arterial roadway. The roadway typical-section varies from a five-lane with dedicated left-turn bays, center boulevard, and bike lanes on the southern end to a two lane roadway with intermittent sidewalks on the northern end. The four lane boulevard extends between Huffine Lane to just north of Babcock Street. From there, the roadway typical-section transitions to an undivided two lane section until its current terminus at Oak Street. Cottonwood Road intersects with 12 roads within the study area. Of the 12 intersections, the intersections with Durston Road and Babcock Street are con- sidered major and were evaluated in detail in this report. Additionally, evaluation of future layout options for the intersection of Cottonwood Road and Oak Street was performed. Durston Road is classified as a minor arterial. Beginning at the intersection with Fowler Avenue, Durston Road consists of two travel lanes and narrow shoulders. A bike lane begins on the north side of the roadway, just west of Meagher Avenue and ends after approximately 1,000 feet, just east of Sanders Avenue. A two- way left-turn lane (TWLTL) and a bike lane on the south side of the road begin west of Kimball Avenue. A bike lane on the north side of the road begins west of Flanders Mill Road. The TWLTL and the south side bike lane ends east of Cottonwood Road. The typical-section of Durston Road to the west of Cottonwood Road consists of two travel lanes and a westbound bike lane for the remainder of its length within the study area. Durston Road intersects with 18 roads within the study area. Of the 18 intersections, the major inter- sections with Laurel Parkway, Cottonwood Road, Flanders Mill Road, Ferguson Avenue, and Fowler Ave- nue were evaluated in more detail. Baxter Lane is classified as a minor arterial roadway. The typical-section of the roadway consists of two lanes and narrow shoulders between Harper Puckett and Flanders Mill Roads. There are three intersections within the study area. The major intersections with Flanders Mill Road and Harper Puckett Road were evaluated in detail in this report. Durston Road is currently being reconstructed between Westgate Avenue and Cottonwood Road as part of Lakes at Valley West subdivision. Improvements include expansion of Durston Road to a three-lane roadway with curb and gutter, sidewalks, and bike lanes on both sides of the roadway. Traffic control at the intersection of Cottonwood and Durston Roads is being replaced with a traffic signal. Cottonwood Road will remain a two-lane roadway. 2.2. INTERSECTIONS The major intersections within the study area were evaluated for improvements to traffic control. Figure 2.1 presents the location and configuration of these intersections. Note that at the time of data collection, April 30, 2015, the intersection of Cottonwood Road and Durston Road was configured as a two-way stop con- trolled intersection. However, the traffic control was changed to all-way stop control on May 21, 2015. All information pertaining to the intersection has been updated to reflect the change in traffic control. Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 3 Figure 2.1: Existing Intersection Configurations 7 6 12 3 458 FOWLER AVELAUREL PWYFlanders Mill RoadDURSTON RD DAVIS LNBABCOCK ST BAXTER LN COTTONWOOD RDFERGUSON RDOAK STFERGUSON AVEMEAGHER AVEFALLON STHARPER-PUCKETT RD00.510.25 Miles Legend Bozeman Parks Waterbodies Streams Existing Study Roadways Existing Non-study Roadways Study Intersections Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 4 2.3. EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES Traffic data for study area were collected on April 30, 2015. Turning movement counts were collected for the eight major intersections identified previously. For the intersections of Cottonwood/Babcock, Cotton- wood/Durston, and Ferguson/Durston, 24-hour turning movement counts were conducted. Peak hour turn- ing movement counts were completed at the remaining five intersections. The data were collected using Miovision Traffic Data on Demand video processing service. To ensure that the collected data reflect the average traffic conditions seen throughout the year, seasonal adjustment factors obtained from the Mon- tana Department of Transportation (MDT) were applied1. For collectors and minor arterials, a factor of 0.96 was used, for principal arterials, a factor of 1.00 was used. The adjusted traffic volumes for the AM and PM peak hours are presented in Figure 2.2. The adjusted 24-hour count approach data are also presented in Figure 2.2. Refer to Appendix A for more detailed information. 1 MDT, 2015 Seasonal Day of the Week For Axle Counts, collectors, minor arterials, and principal arterials for April, Accessed 05/07/2015 Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 5 Figure 2.2: Existing Traffic Volumes 333 | 212 39 | 20 415 | 248 90 | 51 99 | 4365 | 13107 | 155 84 | 101 30 | 69101 | 100132 | 155 81 | 51 104 | 134 13 | 57 116 | 147 12 | 12 18 | 857 | 395 | 11 12 | 23 48 | 25 199 | 3536 | 832 | 7612 | 13 16 | 21 5 | 7 313 | 28212 | 1121 | 236,941 7075,6888,819 5,4488,470 5,9246,235BABCOCK ST 7 6 163 | 241 33 | 138 231 | 220 5 | 12 12 | 13180 | 1071 24190 | 210 4 | 9 71 | 79 109 | 16565 | 12351 | 6918 | 121 148 | 144 128 | 91 159 | 148103 | 1492 | 33 8 264 | 438 2 | 18 8 | 319 | 6405 | 366 1 | 7 5156 | 300 8 | 24 161 | 167 6 | 1632 | 94176 | 165295 | 241 2 | 5 156 | 83 13 | 121 | 416 | 12FOWLER AVEDURSTON RD BAXTER LN DAVIS LNCOTTONWOOD RDFERGUSON RDFALLON ST FLANDERS MILL RDOAK ST MEAGHER AVEBozeman Parks Waterbodies Streams Existing Non-study Roadways Existing Study Roadways Study Intersections 00.510.25 Miles Traffic Data Key Note: Existing traffic data were collected in April, 2015 *A seasonal use factor of 0.96 was applied to Baxter Ln and Babcock St and a factor of 1.00 for all other roads based on MDT's Seasonal Day of the Week (2015) factors. Legend 250 | 150 Turning Movement Counts AM Peak Hour | PM Peak Hour 5,500 24-hour Traffic Volume (ADT) Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 6 2.4. MULTI MODAL TRAFFIC Amenities for non-motorized users exist at varying locations within the study area. During the data collection effort, pedestrians and bicyclists were observed using the corridors. Data were collected on a day with reasonably clear weather, therefore it can be assumed that the pedestrian and bicycle traffic is representa- tive for the area. The inclusion of pedestrian and bicycle facilities in any future roadway design would help to promote safe pedestrian and bicycle activity in the area. The intersection of Flanders Mill Road and Durston Road is in a designated school zone. Crossing guards are used to assist children in safely crossing the roadway. Table 2.1 presents the number of bicyclists and pedestrians observed at each major inter- section during the AM and PM peak hours. No adjustments were made to the bicycle or pedestrian data. Table 2.1: Observed Multi-modal Traffic Volumes Intersection Type AM Peak PM Peak 1 Laurel Parkway and Durston Road Pedestrian 2 13 Bicycle 3 1 2 Cottonwood Road and Durston Road Pedestrian 21 1 Bicycle 5 5 3 Flanders Mill Road and Durston Road Pedestrian 64 7 Bicycle 8 3 4 Ferguson Avenue and Durston Road Pedestrian 15 6 Bicycle 11 1 5 Fowler Avenue and Durston Road Pedestrian 6 1 Bicycle 7 16 6 Flanders Mill Road and Baxter Lane Pedestrian 1 0 Bicycle 3 3 7 Harper Puckett Road and Baxter Lane Pedestrian 0 0 Bicycle 0 1 8 Cottonwood Road and Babcock Street Pedestrian 1 2 Bicycle 4 8 2.5. INTERSECTION OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS A traffic operational analysis was performed for the major intersections. The operational performance of the intersections is measured in terms of average vehicle delay. The average vehicle delay results in a Level of Service (LOS) being assigned to the intersection. LOS is used as a means for identifying intersections that experience operational difficulties, as well as a way to simply compare multiple intersections. The LOS scale represents a full range of operating conditions, with a LOS of A representing little, if any, vehicle delay and a LOS of F indicating significant vehicle delay and traffic congestion. Table 2.2 presents the LOS criteria for intersections as given by the Highway Capacity Manual (2010). Table 2.2: LOS Criteria Level of Service (LOS) Delay (sec/veh) Unsignalized Signalized A <10 <10 B 10 to 15 10 to 20 C 15 to 25 20 to 35 D 25 to 35 35 to 50 E 35 to 50 50 to 80 F >50 >80 Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 7 For this report, the operational analysis of the eight major intersections was performed using the turning movement counts collected April 30th, 2015. A seasonal adjust factor of 0.96 was applied to intersection legs on Durston Road, Baxter Lane, Babcock Street, and Ferguson Avenue and a factor of 1.00 was applied to intersection legs on Cottonwood Road. Local roads, such as Flanders Mill Road, were not adjusted. Table 2.3 presents the operational analysis results. Detailed results are provided in Appendix B. Table 2.3: Existing Intersection Operational Analysis Location AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Delay (s/veh) LOS Delay (s/veh) LOS 1 Laurel Parkway/Durston Road (TWSC) 14.6 B 16.8 C Southbound 14.2 B 16.1 C Eastbound 0.2 A 0.4 A Westbound 0.0 A 0.0 A 2 Cottonwood Road/Durston Road (AWSC) 15.4 C 22.1 C Northbound 11.8 B 15.3 C Southbound 10.1 B 10.7 B Eastbound 18.0 C 16.0 C Westbound 14.6 B 30.7 D 3 Flanders Mill Road/Durston Road (TWSC) 26.8 D 14.3 B Southbound 21.1 C 11.1 B Eastbound 1.5 A 1.3 A Westbound 0.0 A 0.0 A 4 Ferguson Avenue/Durston Road (AWSC) 13.5 B 24.6 C Northbound 13.3 B 29.9 D Southbound 13.9 B 22.1 C Eastbound 12.1 B 21.0 C Westbound 14.9 B 25.0 C 5 Fowler Avenue/Durston Road (TWSC) 14.6 B 17.0 C Northbound 12.2 B 12.7 B Eastbound 0.0 A 0.0 A Westbound 0.1 A 0.3 A 6 Flanders Mill Road/Baxter Lane (TWSC) 13.7 B 16.0 C Northbound 11.3 B 13.6 B Eastbound 0.0 A 0.0 A Westbound 3.5 A 3.1 A 7 Cottonwood Road/Baxter Lane (TWSC) 11.0 B 11.1 B Southbound 10.6 B 10.9 B Eastbound 0.7 A 0.6 A Westbound 0.0 A 0.0 A 8 Cottonwood Road/Babcock Street (TWSC) 17.0 C 23.5 C Northbound 0.2 A 0.2 A Southbound 0.5 A 0.6 A Eastbound 14.9 B 20.3 C Westbound 15.4 C 17.3 C TWSC – Two-way Stop Controlled AWSC – All-way Stop Controlled Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 8 3. PROJECTED CONDITIONS Determining appropriate growth for the study area is important for forecasting future traffic volumes and determining mitigation needs. Prior traffic impact studies (TIS’s) were reviewed to determine what growth assumptions have been made for the developments impacting the road segments and intersections within the study area boundary. The following sub-sections present the investigation of the findings of prior TIS’s. Furthermore, a description of the process used to project future traffic within the study area is provided. 3.1. PRIOR TIS DOCUMENTS The following summarizes the information contained in various TIS documents as obtained from the City of Bozeman. Figure 3.1 presents a map depicting the approximate location of each development in the general area around the project limits, and the estimated trips generated by the development. Four Points Subdivision The Four Points Subdivision is located between Davis Lane and Ferguson Avenue, south of the existing Cattail Street right-of-way, and north of Kimberwicke Street. A Preliminary TIS, dated July 15, 2014, states that, “At the present time, platting documents have not advanced to a stage where definitive residential development numbers are available. Therefore, exact trip generation numbers can’t be developed to de- termine relative traffic impacts.” An estimated 3,000 to 5,000 daily trips is given based on total land area and variable density levels that could be developed. It is also stated that the highest impacts can be ex- pected at the intersections along Davis Lane. Based on the Preliminary Plat - Conditions of Approval sheet 3 of 3 dated August 18, 2014, a total of 200 apartment dwelling units are proposed. Calculations performed based on the land use (220) and the number of dwelling units (200) yields an expected number of daily trips of 1,336. Sundance Apartments The Sundance Apartments development is located between Vaquero Parkway and Caspian Avenue, south of Kimberwicke Street, and north of Galloway Street. A TIS was not provided for this development. How- ever, according to a Commission Memorandum dated October 15, 2012, a total of 195 apartment dwelling units are to be built at this location. Using land use code 220 - Apartment, from the ITE Trip Generation Manual 8th Edition, a total of 1,305 total daily trips are projected to be generated to and from this site. Baxter Meadows Phase 2 Baxter Meadows Phase 2 is located between Baxter Lane and Cattail Lane, with Ferguson Avenue to the west and Caspian Avenue to the east. No TIS was provided for Baxter Meadows Phase 2, however, ex- pected traffic volumes were found in Table 2 of the Baxter Meadows Phase 3 TIS dated September, 2005. The TIS projects a total of 13,351 daily trips generated by this development. Land use included 70 single detached houses (210), 20 apartments (220), 274 residential condominium/townhouse (230), 172,000 square feet of general office building (710), and 172,000 square feet of specialty retail (814). Adjustments for pedestrian/bicycle, internal capture, and pass by trips were given in the TIS. It was assumed that 1.0 percent of trips would be pedestrian/bicycles, 20.0 percent would be internal capture trips, and 3.0 percent of externally generated trips would be pass by trips. The resulting total daily traffic was 10,231 trips. Ex- pected trip numbers were further refined based on the building that has taken place since the TIS was published. It was determined that roughly 37 percent of the retail/office space has been built. No residential has been built as of April, 2015. As such a 37 percent reduction in trips resulting from retail/office uses was applied. The final resulting number of total trips was found to be 8,770 trips. Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 9 Baxter Meadows Phase 3 The Baxter Meadows Phase 3 development is located north of Baxter Lane, between Harper Puckett Road and Ferguson Avenue. According to the TIS dated September, 2005, 129 single family detached houses (210) are projected to produce 1,314 daily trips from the development. Approximately 53 percent of the trips generated by the development would be distributed onto Davis Lane and Baxter Lane, according to the TIS. In a TIS update dated august 7, 2012, an updated number of dwelling units was given as 112 for a combination of phases 3A and 3B. This value accounts for the dwelling units that have been built since the original TIS in 2005. Further refinement of the total number of trips being generated by Phase 3 was done by estimating the number of houses that have been built since the TIS was published. As of April, 2015, approximately 80 percent of Phase 3B has been built and only one house in Phase 3A. Applying an 80 percent reduction to Phase 3A resulted in a combined 803 trips for Phases 3A and 3B. Baxter Meadows Phase 4 Baxter Meadows Phase 4 development is located in the southwest quadrant of the Baxter Lane and Davis Lane intersection. According to the TIS dated December 4, 2012, it is projected that 1,099 daily trips will be generated by the 112 single family homes (210) within the development. Baxter Lane and Davis Lane would carry the majority of the expected traffic increases, according to the TIS. Further refinement of the total number of trips being generated by Phase 4 was done by estimating the number of houses that have been built since the TIS was published. As of April, 2015, 28 of the 112 houses have been built. A reduction of 25 percent was applied to the total number of trips being generated by Phase 4, resulting in 824 total daily trips. Baxter Meadows Phase 5 Baxter Meadows Phase 5 is located in the northwest quadrant of the Baxter Lane and Davis Lane intersec- tion. Phase 5 has not been developed and no current TIS gives the expected development. To estimate possible trips that may be generated by Phase 5, information from a November, 2000, TIS was used. The November, 2000, TIS used a different phasing scheme, however, it was possible to estimate Phase 5 trips based on more current TIS’s for Phases 6, 2A, 2B, 2C, 2E, and 2F. The resulting projected total daily trips was found to be approximately 2,751 total trips. Baxter Meadows Phase 6 The Baxter Meadows Phase 6 development is located north of Galloway Street and east of Ferguson Ave- nue. A total of 49 single family homes (210) and 48 condominium units (230) are planned. According to the TIS dated February, 2006, a total of 883 daily trips are projected to be generated by the development. Approximately 53 percent of the trips generated by the development would be distributed onto Davis Lane and Baxter Lane, according to the TIS. Phase 6 has been fully built out and additional traffic impacts were not assessed as they are already realized. Flanders Mill Subdivision The Flanders Mill subdivision is bounded by Flanders Mill Road, on the West; Ferguson Avenue, on the east; Baxter Lane, on the north; and a parcel of property that fronts on Durston Road, on the south. Land use is to consist of 284 single family homes (210) and 112 apartments (220). According to the TIS dated November, 2013, a total of 3,545 daily trips will be generated by this subdivision. Baxter Lane and Ferguson Avenue are expected to carry the majority of the traffic generated by the subdivision, according to the TIS. West Winds Phase 3-8 The West Winds Planned Community is located within the area bounded by Baxter Lane on the north, 27th Street on the east, Oak Street on the south, and Davis Lane on the West. According to the TIS dated September 26, 2013, it is projected that 56 single-family houses (210) will generate 616 daily trips. It is Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 10 anticipated that the majority of the additional traffic will utilize Baxter Lane, Tschache Lane, and Oak Street, according to the TIS. Aquatic Facility Initial planning for a community Aquatics Facility has be outlined in a Commission Memorandum dated June 9, 2014. The facility would be a multiple use recreation facility with a focus on aquatics. In a Bozeman Daily Chronicle article dated June 9, 2014, the Bozeman City Commission decided to partner with the YMCA to build an aquatics center near the intersection of Baxter Lane and Vaquero Parkway. An estimated facility size was given as 40,660 square feet indoors and 32,950 square feet outdoors. The ITE Trip Gen- eration Manual has a land use code for Recreational Community Center (495). Care must be taken when using this trip code. For weekday trips based on square feet of gross floor area, only one study is listed in the ITE Trip Generation Manual. The small sample size can lead to erroneous trip generation values. Keep- ing these limitations in mind, it was approximated that 930 daily trips would be generated by a new aquatics facility. Trips to and from the aquatics facility were routed onto Baxter Lane at Vaquero Parkway. Future Sports Complex An 80 acre sports complex is proposed between Harper Puckett Road and Flanders Mill Road, south of Baxter Lane. The sports facility, as outlined in the Commission Memorandum dated April 7, 2014, would be used primarily for soccer and lacrosse. The land use type of Soccer Complex (488) is listed in the ITE Trip Generation Manual. The independent variable for this land use type is the number of soccer fields. Based on the Bozeman Sports Park Application for the Bozeman Trails, Open Space and Parks Advisory Committee dated January 31, 2014, an anticipate 22 fields will be constructed. Using the ITE trip rate of 71.33 trips per field yields a total expected number of daily trips of 1,569. However, the ITE Trip Generation manual advises against using this value for two reasons: 1) the trip rate is based on three data points, and 2) the number of anticipated fields at the sports complex is greater than the range represented by the three available data points. Despite the limitations presented by the ITE Trip Generation Manual, the calculated 1,569 daily trips were used. Traffic generated by the sports complex was distributed onto Cottonwood Road, Flanders Mill Road, and Baxter Lane. Future High School A new high school is planned to be constructed directly north of Meadowlark Elementary School on Cot- tonwood Road. According to the Bozeman School District, it is anticipated that the school will have 1,500 students. It is anticipated that the new high school would be opened in 2020. No information on new school district boundaries is available at this time. Based on the anticipated number of students, an estimated 2,565 daily trips was determined based on the ITE Trip Generation Manual land use code High School (530). Trips were distributed to both external stations and internal developments using engineering judg- ment. Access will be provided through the intersection of Cottonwood Road and Annie Street. Spring Hill Presbyterian Church The Spring Hill Presbyterian Church is located north of Babcock Street and west of Cottonwood Road. No TIS was available for the church, however, a site plan dated November 13, 2012 provides the completed building area. Using the area and land use type Church (560) it is possible to estimate the number of trips that will be generated by this development. The site plan calls for two phases of construction. Phase 1 has been completed, leaving the 1,000-square-foot Phase 2 construction yet to be completed. Based on the size of the Phase 2 construction, it is expected that approximately 800 daily trips will be generated on a typical weekday. Trips were distributed using engineering judgment. Access will be provided through a private approach at the intersection of Cottonwood Road and Cascade Street. Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 11 Boulder Creek/Westbrook Residential Development The Boulder Creek/Westbrook Residential Development is located north of Durston Road and between Cottonwood Road and Laurel Parkway. According to a TIS dated November, 2013, it is projected that 233 single-family homes will be built in the development. Using trip generation rates for single-family houses (210), a total of 2,230 daily trips are projected to be generated by this development. The TIS states that it is anticipated that 50 percent of traffic is anticipated to use travel east on Durston Road, 40 percent is expected to travel south on Cottonwood Road, and the remaining 10 percent of traffic to be split equally westbound on Durston Road and northbound on Flanders Mill Road. J&D Family Located west of Cottonwood Road and between Babcock Road and Fallon Street, the J&D Family devel- opment is a 40-acre development. According to the November, 2009 TIS, it is projected that a total of 3,814 daily weekday trips will be generated by the mix of land used at the site. Five land uses are being developed at the site: New Car Sales & Service (841) Tire Superstore (849) Shopping Center (820) Business Park (770) Multi-plex residential (230) For trip distribution, the TIS states that the majority, 66 percent, of traffic generated by this development will use Huffine Lane or travel further south on Cottonwood Road. Eastbound on Durston Road is expected to see 17 percent of the traffic, while westbound on Durston Road will account for 5 percent of the traffic. Northbound traffic on Cottonwood Road, north of Durston Road, is expected to account for 2 percent of traffic. Babcock Street and Fallon Street are expected to carry 8 and 3 percent, respectively, of the total traffic generated by the development. Trips originating within the development will be able to access Cot- tonwood Road via either Babcock Street of Fallon Street. The Lakes at Valley West The Lake at Valley West development is located to the south of Durston Road in the vicinity of Laurel Parkway. The development is a 65-acre parcel of land that is to be developed to include 300 single and multifamily homes. A TIS dated January 2015 states that an expected 2,310 daily weekday trips will be generated by the single family homes (210) and residential condos/townhouses (230). Trips are expected to be routed onto Durston Road with 50 percent of traffic traveling eastbound past Cottonwood road. Fifteen percent of traffic is expected to travel westbound on Durston Road. The remaining 35 percent of traffic is predicted to use Cottonwood Road. The development will be accessible only from Durston Road. Laurel Park Condominiums Based off of a site grading and drainage plan dated August 6, 2014, the Laurel Park Condominiums devel- opment is located north of Annie Street and to the west of Laurel Parkway. No TIS was available for the development, however, the location and number of condominiums could be determined from the site plan. A total of 31 residential condo/townhouses (230) are to be built in the development. This is projected to generate 180 total daily weekday trips. Engineering judgment was used to distribute the traffic onto the network. Access will be provided to Durston Road via Laurel Parkway. Norton Ranch Homes 12-Plex The Norton Ranch Homes 12-plex is located west of Cottonwood Road and South of Babcock Street. As the name suggests, the development is a 12 unit apartment (220). No TIS document is available, however, Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 12 the number of units and the trip generation code can be used to project the traffic volume that will be generated. A total of 80 daily weekday trips are projected to be generated by the development. Engineering judgment was used for trip distribution. All traffic generated by the development is assumed to use the intersection of Cottonwood Road and Babcock Street. Norton East Ranch Phase 3 The Norton East Ranch Phase 3 development is located west of Laurel Parkway between Fallon Street and Babcock Street. According to a TIS dated June, 2014, the development consists of 108 residential condo/townhouses (230). It is projected that 1,014 total daily weekday trips will be generated by the devel- opment. For trip distribution, the TIS states that the majority, 53 percent, of traffic generated by this devel- opment will use Huffine Lane or travel further south on Cottonwood Road. Eastbound on Durston Road is expected to see 18 percent of the traffic, while westbound on Durston Road will account for 8 percent of the traffic. Northbound traffic on Cottonwood Road, north of Durston Road, is expected to account for 3 percent of traffic. Babcock Street and Fallon Street are expected to both carry 9 of the total traffic generated by the development. Trips originating within the development will be able to access Cottonwood Road via either Babcock Street of Fallon Street. Partridge Downs The 30 residential condo/townhouse (230) development called Partridge Downs is located north of Durston Road to the east of Meagher Avenue. No TIS document is available for this development. A Preliminary plat dated March 5, 2014 shows that the development will consist of 30 residential condo/townhouses (230). A total of 287 daily weekday trips are projected to be generated by the development. Engineering judgment was used to distribute the traffic to the network. The development is accessed exclusively by Durston Road. Spring Creek Village Spring Creek Village is a 20-acre development planned to be located north of Fallon Street to the east of Cottonwood Road. According to the June, 2013 TIS, the development will consist of four land use types: Hotel (310) Quality Restaurant (931) Drive-in Bank (912) Business Park (770) A total of 6,422 daily weekday trips are projected to be generated by the development. Westbound Huffine Lane is expected to receive 25 percent of the generated traffic, while 30 percent of the generated traffic is expected to travel eastbound on Huffine Lane. Northbound on Cottonwood Road and Ferguson Avenue are expected to receive 20 and 10 percent of traffic, respectively. The remaining 15 percent of traffic is expected to travel eastbound on Babcock Street. Traffic will be able to access the site using Huffine lane and Resort Drive. Traditions Subdivision Phases 2 & 3 The Traditions Subdivision Phases 2 & 3 development is located to the north of Durston Road and to the east of Laurel Parkway. According to the September, 2014 TIS, the development will consist of 98 new residential condo/townhouses (270). It is projected that the new development will generate 938 daily week- day trips. Of the new trips, 50 percent are expected to travel eastbound on Durston Road, while 40 percent use Cottonwood road for southbound trips. The remaining 10 percent of trip is predicted to be split between Flanders Mill Road for northbound trips and Durston Road for westbound trips. All of the generated trips will have to use Durston Road to access the road network. Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 13 Norton Ranch Based on a zoning map for the Norton Ranch development, two regions were determined to contribute to projected traffic along Cottonwood and Durston Roads. Each of the two regions are expected to primarily use Laurel Parkway for north and southbound trips. Huffine Lane is expected to carry the majority of east and westbound trips. The region located in the south-east corner of the Norton Ranch development is zoned as high-density residential housing. The total approximate area of the region is 20 acres. It was assumed that high-density residential housing translates to approximately eight dwelling units per acre. Given the approximate size and assumed dwelling density, 160 single family homes are expected to be generating traffic for this region. The resulting total daily trips generated would be 1,531 trips. Approximately 75 percent of trips are projected to use Laurel Parkway to access Huffine Lane. The remaining 25 percent of trip are projected to travel northbound on Laurel Parkway (5 percent), eastbound on Fallon Street (5 percent), northbound on Cotton- wood Road (10 percent), and southbound on Cottonwood Road (5 percent). The region located in the north-west corner of the Norton Ranch development is zoned as medium-density residential housing. The total approximate area of the region is 35 acres. It was assumed that medium- density residential housing translates to approximately four dwelling units per acre. Given the approximate area and assumed dwelling density, 140 single family homes are projected to be generating traffic for this region. The resulting total daily trips generated would be 1,340 trips. Approximately 70 percent of trips are projected to use Laurel Parkway to access Huffine Lane. The remaining 30 percent of trips are projected to travel northbound on Laurel Parkway (10 percent), eastbound on Babcock Street (10 percent), north- bound on Cottonwood Road (5 percent), and southbound on Cottonwood Road (5 percent). 3.2. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY In total, 26 planned developments were included in this report. The developments ranged from residential single family homes to retail space. Combined, the developments are projected to generate 45,990 new trips during an average weekday. Figure 3.1 presents the location of each development, the trip volumes projected to be generated during the AM and PM peak hours, and the approximate percentage of trips that are projected to use various areas of the transportation network. In addition to the proposed and in process developments, the roadway network was modified to include future planned roadway expansion. These roadways include Oak Street between Ferguson Avenue and Flanders Mill Road, Cottonwood Road between Oak Street and Baxter Lane, Ferguson Avenue between Oak Street and Baxter Lane, and Laurel Parkway between Durston Road and Huffine Lane. Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 14 Figure 3.1: Development Location and Trip Generation Cottonwood Road 25.7% Durston Road 5.4% Baxter Lane 2.0% Harper Pucket Road 1.7% Davis Lane 2.3% Cattail Lane 4.5% Baxter Lane / 19th Avenue 15.3% Tschache Lane / 19th Avenue 4.2% Oak Street / 19th Avenue 13.3% Durston Road 8.6% Hunters Way 4.2% Babcock Street / Ferguson Avenue 8.7% Meagher Avenue 4.1%FLANDERS MILL RDDAVIS LNROCKY ROAD MCINTOSHCTBAXTER LANE OAK ST DURSTON RD W BABCOCK STCOTTONWOOD RDGOOCH HILL RDHARPER-PUCKETT RD1 2 3 4 5 6 7 89 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Legend Projected Development Traffic Destination Total Percent of all Traffic 0½¼ Miles Study Intersections Subdivison boundaries are for illustration only.Locations are approximate. Existing Study Roadways Planned Study Roadways Existing Non-study Roadways Planned Non-studyRoadways Name Trips In Trips Out Trips In Trips Out 1 Four Points 20 81 83 45 2 Sundance Apt 20 79 81 44 3 Baxter Meadows Phase 5 149 117 79 135 4 Baxter Meadows Phase 3B 14 41 45 26 5 Baxter Meadows Phase 3A 2674 6 Sports Complex 15 15 314 141 7 Flanders Mill 64 203 219 129 8 Baxter Meadows Phase 4 16 49 63 32 9 Aquatics Center 40 26 29 49 10 West Winds 12 37 39 23 11 Baxter Meadows Phase 2A 186 152 97 165 12 Baxter Meadows Phase 2E 110 85 61 100 13 Baxter Meadows Phase 2F 155 118 85 139 14 New High School 428 202 92 103 15 Boulder Creek/Westbrook 44 131 148 87 16 J&D Family 206 76 129 211 17 Lakes at Valley West 37 140 141 80 18 Traditions 13 61 66 33 19 Laurel Park 2 12 11 520 Norton Ranch Homes 12 plex 1 5 5 2 21 Partridge Downs 4 19 20 10 22 Spring Creek Village 212 82 422 406 23 Norton East Ranch Phase 3 14 66 72 35 24 Spring Hill Church 42 34 23 2525 Norton Ranch - SE 88 32 32 130 26 Norton Ranch - NW 77 28 28 113 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 15 3.3. PROJECTED TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 3.3.1. Future Projections To project future traffic volumes for the study area, the number of trips expected to be generated by the developments discussed in Section 3.1 were distributed on the road network. Traffic projected to be gen- erated from the developments was estimated based on the available TIS documents and applied to the road network using the software PTV Vistro version 3. Using a combination of data available in the TIS documents and engineering judgment, traffic was distributed through the road network. For the future pro- jections, five assumptions were made about the road network: 1. Oak Street will extend west to Cottonwood Road, 2. Ferguson Avenue will extend north to Baxter Lane, 3. Cottonwood Road will extend north to Baxter Lane, 4. Cattail Street will extend from Davis Lane to Ferguson Avenue, and 5. Fowler Avenue will extend from Oak Street to Babcock Street. Trip distribution was completed for each development individually. If a TIS was available, trip distribution values from the TIS were used. However, if no TIS was available, engineering judgment was used to esti- mate trip distribution. Route choice was assigned based on engineering judgment and knowledge of traffic patterns in the area. It was assumed that path choices that involved backtracking would not be selected and were therefore not assigned any trips. Figure 3.2 presents the resulting future traffic conditions. An annual growth rate (AGR) for each intersection was determined based on future planned developments. For the AM peak hour, AGRs range from 2.0 percent to 4.3 percent out to the year 2035. For the PM peak hour, AGRs range from 2.3 percent to 4.5 percent. In addition to the peak hours, 24-hour AGR for Cotton- wood and Durston Roads was calculated to range from 2.4 percent to 4.4 percent. Table 3.1 gives the AGRs for each study intersection for the AM and PM peak hours along with the 24-hour AGR were data were available. Table 3.1: Annual Growth Rates to Year 2035 Intersection AM Peak Hour AGR (%) PM Peak Hour AGR (%) 24-hour AGR (%) 1 Laurel Parkway and Durston Road 3.0 3.0 * 2 Cottonwood Road and Durston Road 4.3 4.2 4.3 3 Flanders Mill Road and Durston Road 2.7 4.5 * 4 Ferguson Avenue and Durston Road 2.9 2.7 2.4 5 Fowler Avenue and Durston Road 2.5 2.8 * 6 Flanders Mill Road and Baxter Lane 2.0 2.3 * 7 Cottonwood Road and Baxter Lane 3.0 2.5 * 8 Cottonwood Road and Babcock Street 3.9 3.9 4.4 * 24-hour traffic data were unavailable Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 16 Figure 3.2: Projected Traffic Volumes 240 | 327 34 | 148 62 | 193 0 | 030 | 30187 | 128345 | 306 7 | 20 18 | 31 0 | 020 | 17191 | 112128 | 155 40 | 100 39 | 28 9 | 2014 | 1831 | 25138 | 28 12 | 68 16 | 9 34 | 2819 | 997 | 68238 | 489 182 | 76 299 | 306 139 | 16579 | 276242 | 347475 | 372 99 | 58 314 | 200 153 | 12357 | 61108 | 61694 | 552 43 | 87 721 | 572 122 | 89 133 | 8473 | 44200 | 343 114 | 126 32 | 73128 | 122233 | 273 84 | 53 28 | 24 46 | 161 50 | 26 396 | 65641 | 2333 | 7921 | 41 41 | 93 23 | 60 604 | 47379 | 52103 | 15914,224 5,66811,75615,983 13,98016,092 14,53212,009BABCOCK ST 7 6 1 24481 | 516 8 | 31 76 | 84 154 | 219116 | 19454 | 73263 | 409 172 | 172 173 | 131 217 | 199126 | 17911 | 133 8 FOWLER AVE5 531 | 752 26 | 39 4 | 21 24 | 2467 | 7121 | 8663 | 636 29 | 37 55 | 69 28 | 2627 | 3945 | 37DURSTON RD BAXTER LN DAVIS LNCOTTONWOOD RDFERGUSON RDFALLON ST FLANDERS MILL RDOAK ST MEAGHER AVE00.510.25 Miles Bozeman Parks Waterbodies Streams Existing Non-study Roadways Existing Study Roadways Study Intersections Traffic Data Key Note: Projected traffic volumes determined using PTV Vistro 3.0 and available planned development Information. 5,500 24-hour Traffic Volume (ADT) 250 | 150 Turning Movement Counts AM Peak Hour | PM Peak Hour Planned Non-study Roadways Planned Study Roadways Legend Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 17 3.3.2. Traffic Projection Assumptions Land use plays a critical role in the function and design of the transportation system. Land use helps to define travel patterns and traffic volumes. The future growth defined for the study area are based on as- sumptions contained in existing TIS reports and on engineering judgment. The location, type, and design of land use developments ultimately impacts the existing and future transportation system. Additionally, the traffic analysis in this report focused on existing travel patterns during the AM and PM peak hours. Those existing patterns were projected using planned developments to represent future year conditions. Ulti- mately, travel patterns have a major effect on the traffic operations of the corridor. The peak hour analysis represents the traffic conditions during time periods with the highest amounts of traffic during a typical weekday. Consideration should be given to changes in traffic patterns and charac- teristics when identifying recommendations. Future development and land use changes may change the travel patterns of the area, which may result in differing traffic operations from those projected in this report. If growth in the area differs from those assumptions made in this report, the results of the traffic operational analysis may be no longer hold true and may need to be reevaluated. 3.4. PROJECTED INTERSECTION OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Using the turning movement data collected April 30th, 2015 and the predicted growth from the surrounding developments, a projected operational analysis was conducted for the major intersections within the study area. Table 3.2 presents the results of the operational analysis. Detailed information is provided in Appen- dix C. The configuration of each intersection remained the same as existing conditions with the exception of the intersections of Laurel Parkway/Durston Road, Fowler Avenue/Durston Road, and Cottonwood Road/Durston Road. Laurel Parkway/Durston Road is currently being reconstructed as an all-way stop- controlled intersection. A traffic signal is currently being constructed at the intersection of Cottonwood Road/Durston Road. Future plans call to expand Fowler Avenue to a five-lane roadway and to extend the corridor between Durston Road and Oak Street. It is unknown at this time what traffic control would be in place at the intersection of Fowler Avenue/Durston Road once the future expansion is constructed. For the purposes of this analysis, all-way stop control was assumed. Further discussion and analysis of these in- tersections is provided in Section 5. Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 18 Table 3.2: Projected Conditions Operational Analysis Location AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Delay (s/veh) LOS Delay (s/veh) LOS 1 Laurel Parkway/Durston Road (AWSC) 18.5 C 32.4 D Northbound 13.2 B 13.0 B Southbound 16.1 C 14.5 B Eastbound 24.7 C 27.1 D Westbound 16.7 C 43.3 E 2 Cottonwood Road/Durston Road (AWSC) 30.8 D 70.6 F Northbound 19.8 C 37.6 E Southbound 15.1 C 14.6 B Eastbound 42.0 E 44.9 E Westbound 30.8 D 134.7 F 3 Flanders Mill Road/Durston Road (TWSC) 281.4 F 62.6 F Southbound 256.0 F 47.0 E Eastbound 1.5 A 1.3 A Westbound 0.0 A 0.0 A 4 Ferguson Avenue/Durston Road (AWSC) 70.6 F 137.4 F Northbound 20.2 C 32.8 D Southbound 45.5 E 68.6 F Eastbound 64.8 F 177.1 F Westbound 122.7 F 215.9 F 5 Fowler Avenue/Durston Road (AWSC) 160.6 F 234.8 F Northbound 12.7 B 13.0 B Southbound 12.1 B 11.9 B Eastbound 238.7 F 220.5 F Westbound 522.57 F 304.0 F 6 Flanders Mill Road/Baxter Lane (TWSC) 19.5 C 29.9 D Northbound 14.2 B 23.6 C Eastbound 0.0 A 0.0 A Westbound 3.0 A 2.2 A 7 Cottonwood Road/Baxter Lane (AWSC) 16.2 B 16.5 B Northbound 11.4 B 12.5 B Southbound 14.7 B 15.2 C Eastbound 0.5 A 0.0 A Westbound 1.5 A 0.8 A 8 Cottonwood Road/Babcock Street (TWSC) 199.5 F * F Northbound 0.8 A 0.3 A Southbound 1.1 A 2.7 A Eastbound 114.6 F 3,295.8 F Westbound 97.4 F 1,359.1 F * Calculated delay is outside of the computational bounds for Vistro 3.0. TWSC – Two-way Stop Controlled AWSC – All-way Stop Controlled Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 19 4. SAFETY Crash data were provided for five intersections (Laurel Parkway and Durston Road, Cottonwood Road and Durston Road, Ferguson Avenue and Durston Road, Fowler Road and Durston Road, and Babcock Street and Cottonwood Road) within the study area. The provided crash data contained information such as crash time, location, manner of collision, contributing circumstances, driver’s age, etc. This information was ana- lyzed to identify any trends. The following subsections present the results of this analysis. 4.1. STUDY AREA CRASH ANALYSIS Crash data were obtained from the MDT Safety Management System for the three year period from January 1st, 2011 to December 27th, 2013. The provided crash data included crash type, frequency, location, and severity of each crash. The crash reports are a summation of information from the scene of the crash provided by the responding officers. As such, some of the information contained in the crash reports may be subjective. It should be noted that in this corridor, only crash reports from the Montana Highway Patrol are available for analysis. Those reports from local law enforcement that are not reported to the Montana Highway Patrol are not contained in the database and are not included in this analysis. According to the MDT crash database, a total of 12 crashes were reported at the five intersections during the three year period. The limited available data make identifying crash trends difficult and potentially not statistically significant. Table 4.1 gives a summary of the number of reported crashes during the three year period of record. Table 4.1: Crash Frequency Summary Intersection Number of crashes Crash rate (crashes/year) Laurel Parkway and Durston Road 1 0.33 Cottonwood Road and Durston Road 2 0.67 Ferguson Avenue and Durston Road 8 2.67 Fowler Road and Durston Road 0 0.0 Cottonwood Road and Babcock Street 1 0.33 4.1.1. Crash Period Crash data for the intersection were evaluated based on the time of day the crash occurred. As presented in Figure 4.1, crashes appear to be spread throughout the day with a peak between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM. With respect to the month of the year in which a crash occurred, no clear trends stand-out. Figure 4.2 presents the distribution of crashes based on the month in which the crash occurred. Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 20 Figure 4.1: Time of Day Figure 4.2: Month of Year 4.1.2. Environmental Factors Crash data were reviewed to identify any trends that may exist related to environmental factors such as weather, roadway surfacing, and light conditions. All but two crashes occurred on dry roads, the remaining crash occurred on wet roads. The weather condition for seven crashes was clear, the remaining five crashes occurred during cloudy conditions. Lighting conditions were reported as daylight and dark lighted as presented in Figure 4.3. Number of CrashesNumber of Crashes Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 21 Figure 4.3: Lighting Conditions 4.1.3. Crash Type Of the 12 reported crashes, all but one crash involved two vehicles. Nine of the crashes were right angle crashes. The remaining crashes were left turn, opposite direction or other. Figure 4.4 illustrates the distri- bution of crash types reported for the intersections. Figure 4.4: Crash Type 4.1.4. Safety Data Trend Analysis Three quarters of all crashes were listed as right angle crashes. This crash type is common at four-way stop-controlled intersections. No severe injuries were reported at this intersection. Alcohol was listed as a contributing factor for one crash. Failure to yield right of way, inattentive driving, and disregard for traffic control devices were the most commonly listed contributing factors with all but two of the crashes listing at least one of the aforementioned contributing factors. Daylight 10 Crashes 83% Dark Not Lighted 2 Crashes 17% Right Angle 9 Crashes 75% Left Turn, Opposite Direction 1 Crash 8% Other 2 Crashes 17% Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 22 5. TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS A traffic signal warrant analysis was conducted to evaluate if a traffic signal would be warranted under existing conditions at the intersections of Cottonwood Road / Babcock Street, Cottonwood Road / Durston Road, and Ferguson Avenue / Durston Road under existing conditions. The signal warrant analysis was conducted using guidelines outlined in the 2009 Edition of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). According to the MUTCD, there are nine signal warrants that should be analyzed for the installation of a traffic signal. The warrants are related to vehicle traffic conditions, pedestrian traffic, and physical charac- teristics. The following warrants are contained in the MUTCD: Warrant 1: Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume Warrant 2: Four-Hour Vehicular Volume Warrant 3: Peak Hour Warrant 4: Pedestrian Volume Warrant 5: School Crossing Warrant 6: Coordinated Signal System Warrant 7: Crash Experience Warrant 8: Roadway Network Warrant 9: Intersection Near a Grade Crossing The MUTCD states that a traffic signal should not be installed unless one or more warrants are satisfied, however, meeting one or more warrants does not require the installation of a traffic signal. Note that it may not be appropriate in every case to install a traffic signal at every location that meets warrants. Alternatives to traffic signals, such as roundabouts, reduced access, revised intersection geometrics, etc., may be ana- lyzed as other potential traffic control measures. 5.1. WARRANT RESULTS This section discusses the results of the signal warrant analyses conducted for the intersections of Cotton- wood Road / Babcock Street, Cottonwood Road / Durston Road, and Ferguson Avenue / Durston Road. Appendix D contains the signal warrant analysis worksheets. Warrant 1: Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume This warrant is intended for applications at locations where a large volume of intersection traffic is the principal reason to consider the installation of a traffic signal (Condition A) or where the traffic volume on the major street is so heavy that traffic on the minor street experiences excessive delay or conflict in enter- ing or crossing the major street (Condition B) during any eight hours of an average day. The criteria for Warrant 1 may be met if either Condition A or Condition B is met. A combination of Condition A and B can be used and is intended for applications where Conditions A and B are not satisfied individually and should be applied only after an adequate trial of other alternatives has failed to solve the problem. Cottonwood/Babcock: There were 0 qualifying hours for Condition A, and 0 qualifying hours for Condition B. – Not Met Cottonwood/Durston: There were 4 qualifying hours for Condition A, and 1 qualifying hours for Condition B. – Not Met Ferguson/Durston: There were 4 qualifying hours for Condition A, and 1 qualifying hours for Con- dition B. – Not Met Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 23 Warrant 2: Four-Hour Vehicular Volume This warrant is intended for locations where the volume of intersecting traffic is the principal reason to consider installing a traffic control signal. This warrant requires that the combination of the major-street traffic (total of both approaches) and the higher-volume minor-street traffic (one direction only) reach the designated minimum volume during any four hours of an average day. Cottonwood/Babcock: There were 0 qualifying hours for Warrant 2. – NOT MET Cottonwood/Durston: There were 3 qualifying hours for Warrant 2. – NOT MET Ferguson/Durston: There were 3 qualifying hours for Warrant 2. – NOT MET Warrant 3: Peak Hour This warrant is intended for use at a location where traffic conditions are such that for a minimum of one hour of an average day, the minor-street traffic suffers undue delay when entering or crossing the major street. This warrant requires that the combination of the major-street traffic (total of both approaches) and the higher-volume minor-street traffic (one direction only) reach the designated minimum volume. Warrant 3 is intended for “unusual” cases, such as office complexes, manufacturing plants, industrial com- plexes, or high-occupancy vehicle facilities that attract or discharge large number of vehicles over a short time. If this warrant is the only warrant met and a traffic control signal is justified by an engineering study, the traffic control signal should be traffic-actuated. Cottonwood/Babcock: Intersection does not meet the “unusual” case criteria. – NOT MET Cottonwood/Durston: Intersection does not meet the “unusual” case criteria. – NOT MET Ferguson/Durston: Intersection does not meet the “unusual” case criteria. – NOT MET Warrant 4: Pedestrian Volume This warrant is intended for locations where the traffic volume on a major street is so heavy that pedestrians experience excessive delay in crossing the major street. The criteria must be met for each of any four (4) hours of an average day under Condition A or for one hour of an average day under Condition B. This warrant does not apply to locations where the distance to the nearest traffic control signal or STOP sign controlling the street that pedestrians desire to cross is less than 300 feet. Cottonwood/Babcock: There were 0 qualifying hours for Condition A and 0 qualifying hours for Condition B. – NOT MET Cottonwood/Durston: There were 0 qualifying hours for Condition A and 0 qualifying hours for Condition B. – NOT MET Ferguson/Durston: There were 0 qualifying hours for Condition A and 0 qualifying hours for Con- dition B. – NOT MET Warrant 5: School Crossing This warrant is intended for locations where school children crossing the major street are the principal reason to consider installing a traffic control signal. This warrant addresses the unique characteristics that a nearby school may have on the roadways. It requires that the major roadway be unsafe to cross and that there are no other feasible crossings in the area. Cottonwood/Babcock There is no nearby school to justify Warrant 5. – NOT MET Cottonwood/Durston: Does not meet the school crossing requirements. – NOT MET Ferguson/Durston: Does not meet the school crossing requirements. – NOT MET Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 24 Warrant 6: Coordinated Signal System This warrant is intended for locations within a coordinated signal system where a signal is necessary to provide for the proper platooning of vehicles. This warrant should not be applied where the resultant spacing of traffic control signals would be less than 1,000 feet. Cottonwood/Babcock: Traffic signal is not needed to provide for proper platooning. – NOT MET Cottonwood/Durston: Traffic signal is not needed to provide for proper platooning. – NOT MET Ferguson/Durston: Traffic signal is not needed to provide for proper platooning. – NOT MET Warrant 7: Crash Experience This warrant is intended for locations where the severity and frequency of crashes are the principal reason to consider installing a traffic control signal. Cottonwood/Babcock: The intersection does not have the required crash history to meet Warrant 7. – NOT MET Cottonwood/Durston: The intersection does not have the required crash history to meet Warrant 7. – NOT MET Ferguson/Durston: The intersection does not have the required crash history to meet Warrant 7. – NOT MET Warrant 8: Roadway Network This warrant is intended for locations where the installation of a traffic signal may encourage concentration and organization of traffic flow on a roadway network. Cottonwood/Babcock: Babcock Street is not a major route, therefore the intersection does not meet the criteria for Warrant 8 – NOT MET Cottonwood/Durston: The intersection meets the criteria for Warrant 8 based on Cottonwood and Durston Roads being considered “major routes”. – MET Ferguson/Durston: Ferguson Avenue is not a major route, therefore the intersection does not meet the criteria for Warrant 8. – NOT MET Warrant 9: Intersection near a Grade Crossing This warrant is intended for locations where none of the conditions described in the other eight traffic signal warrants are met, but the proximity to the intersection of a grade crossing on an intersection approach controlled by a STOP or YIELD sign is the principal reason to consider installing a traffic control signal. Cottonwood/Babcock: The intersection is not near a grade crossing. – NOT MET Cottonwood/Durston: The intersection is not near a grade crossing – NOT MET Ferguson/Durston: The intersection is not near a grade crossing – NOT MET 5.2. CONCLUSION The purpose of this evaluation was to determine if a traffic signal is currently warranted for the intersections of Cottonwood Road / Babcock Street, Cottonwood Road / Durston Road, and Ferguson Avenue / Durston Road. This signal warrant analysis was conducted based on existing traffic conditions and does not include impacts from planned and/or already approved developments. For the intersection of Cottonwood Road / Durston Road the criteria for Warrant 8 was met. The other two intersections evaluated do not currently meet signal warrants. Re-evaluation of these intersections may be necessary as development occurs in the area. Detailed signal warrant analysis worksheets can be found in Appendix D. Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 25 6. IMPROVEMENT OPTIONS A list of transportation system improvements strategies was developed to address identified needs within the study area. The goal of the improvement options is to improve safety and operations by providing ap- propriate traffic control and geometrics to address existing and projected traffic conditions. Appendix E provides conceptual exhibits for the options discussed in this section. Cost estimates are provided in Ap- pendix G. 6.1. MAINLINE ROADWAYS Improvements to the mainline roadways are needed to adhere to existing City of Bozeman design standards and to accommodate existing and projected traffic demand. The planned typical sections for the project roadways were identified to match existing configurations of already reconstructed segments, to meet cur- rent standards based on roadway functional classification, and to ensure ample capacity to accommodate future growth. The following sections describe the typical sections used for the project roadways. 6.1.1. Durston Road and Baxter Lane Durston Road and Baxter Lane will both be constructed to a typical section, as presented in Figure 6.1, consisting of two 12-foot travel lanes, a 14-foot TWLTL, five-foot bicycle lanes, curb and gutter, 18-foot grass boulevards, and six-foot sidewalks. This typical section is consistent with the minor arterial standards with 100-foot right-of-way. Figure 6.1: Durston Road and Baxter Lane Typical Section 6.1.2. Cottonwood Road Cottonwood Road will be constructed to two different typical sections. The typical section from Fallon Street to Oak Street will be constructed to match the existing typical section between Huffine Lane and Fallon Street which consists of four 12-foot travel lanes, a 31-foot center median, five-foot bicycle lanes, curb and gutter, five-foot grass boulevards, and 6-foot sidewalks for a total right-of-way of 120 feet consistent with principal arterial standards. From Oak Street to Baxter Lane, the typical section will be constructed to in- clude four 12-foot travel lanes, a 16-foot center median, five-foot bicycle lanes, curb and gutter, 12-foot grass boulevards, and six-foot sidewalks for a total right of way of 120 feet consistent with principal arterial standards. Both typical sections are shown in Figure 6.2. Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 26 Figure 6.2: Cottonwood Typical Section 6.2. MAJOR INTERSECTIONS An evaluation of improvement options for the major intersections was made to address identified needs and accommodate existing and projected traffic demand. The improvement options were developed with the understanding that the roadway corridors would be developed using the typical sections discussed previously. Each major intersection was evaluated under the current configuration for both existing and projected traffic volumes. For those locations where the current configuration was deemed insufficient to accommodate projected traffic volumes, an evaluation for changes in traffic control (i.e. traffic signal or roundabout) was made. For the operational analysis, basic assumptions for geometrics, signal timing, etc. were made to conduct “planning-level” analyses. Detailed data from the intersection operation analysis is contained in the appendix. In addition to the eight major intersections that were previously analyzed, intersection layout scenarios for the intersection of Cottonwood Road / Oak Street were also investigated. Currently, the intersection has no north or east leg. Additionally, the west leg, Oak Street, is a dead-end road with no existing housing. Traffic volumes for this analysis were based on volumes provided by Sanderson Stewart as part of the Oak Street Improvement Project from L Street to Cottonwood Road2. For alternatives with stop control or traffic signals, the Highway Capacity Manual 2010 (HCM) method was used for operational analysis. Roundabout alternatives were evaluated using the HCM method with ad- justed coefficients based on research performed by the Wisconsin Department of Transportation3. In addition to the traffic operations analysis, a list of identified advantages and disadvantages were devel- oped for each improvement option. Planning level cost estimates are also included and are listed in 2015 dollars. The planning level costs include estimates for construction, right-of-way, preliminary engineering, and construction engineering and, in some cases, include segments of roadway reconstruction in addition to intersection reconstruction. 2 Oak Street Improvement Project from L Street to Cottonwood Road, Sanderson Stewart, Unpublished 3 Page 27, Facilities Development Manual, Wisconsin Department of Transportation, December, 20, 2013 North of Oak Street South of Oak Street Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 27 1. Laurel Parkway and Durston Road 1.A – All-way Stop Control Description: The intersection of Laurel Parkway and Durston road is a three-legged intersection with stop control on Laurel Parkway. At the time of this report, the intersection is being re- constructed to an all-way stop controlled inter- section as part of the Lakes at Valley West development. As such, Scenario 1.A assumes the intersection will be an all-way stop con- trolled intersection for projected operational analysis. Traffic Operations: Location Existing (TWSC) Projected (AWSC) AM PM AM PM Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Laurel Parkway and Durston Road 14.6 B 16.8 C 18.5 C 32.4 D Northbound * * * * 13.2 B 13.0 B Southbound 14.2 B 16.1 C 16.1 C 14.5 B Eastbound 0.2 A 0.4 A 24.7 C 27.1 D Westbound 0.0 A 0.0 A 16.7 C 43.3 E * Northbound leg not yet constructed TWSC – Two-way Stop Controlled; AWSC – All-way Stop Controlled Existing configuration does not in- clude a northbound approach leg Minimal delay under existing traffic conditions Projected operational conditions were evaluated as an all-way stop controlled intersection Increased delay along Durston Road under projected traffic condi- tions Advantages: Intersection currently being reconstructed to all-way stop configuration Disadvantages: Limited additional capacity available All-way stop with approaches having multiple lanes is undesirable due to potential driver confusion, opera- tional concerns, and safety issues Potential Barriers/Constraints: None identified Estimated Cost: N/A (currently under construction) Conclusion/Summary: This option is shown to accommodate existing and projected traffic demand. However, the long-term life of this configura- tion is limited as vehicle delay and queuing is shown to reach desirable thresholds under projected conditions. Additionally, having approaches with multiple lanes is generally undesirable. Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 28 1.B - Traffic Signal Description: Scenario 1.B assumes the installation of a traf- fic signal and associated roadway geometric changes. This scenario includes dedicated left-turn bays and shared through/right lanes for all legs of the intersection. Signal timing as- sumed no protected phasing for any leg. Note that signal warrants would need to be met prior to installation of a traffic signal. This location was not evaluated for signal warrants as part of this report. Further evaluation would be needed as development occurs in the area. Traffic Operations: Location Existing Projected AM PM AM PM Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Laurel Parkway and Durston Road 13.4 B 13.1 B 16.7 B 16.6 B Northbound * * * * 14.3 B 17.2 B Southbound 14.4 B 16.3 B 21.5 C 22.1 C Eastbound 13.1 B 11.0 B 15.9 B 12.7 B Westbound 12.8 B 13.4 B 15.9 B 17.5 B * Northbound leg not yet constructed Existing configuration does not in- clude a northbound approach leg LOS C or better for all movements under existing and projected traffic conditions Advantages: Traffic signal can be adapted to changing traffic conditions LOS of C or better for all movements under projected traffic conditions Minimal impact to adjoining properties Disadvantages: Induced delay during off-peak hours Potential for increase in severe crashes Potential for higher vehicle emissions compared to roundabouts Potential Barriers/Constraints: Would need to meet signal warrants prior to installation Estimated Cost: $1.0 Million Conclusion/Summary: This scenario provides capacity to accommodate existing and projected future demands. Signal warrants would need to be met prior to installation. Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 29 1.C – Roundabout Description: Scenario 1.C includes the construction of a roundabout at this intersection. The rounda- bout would be a single lane configuration. The roundabout would accommodate a WB-50 de- sign vehicle. Traffic Operations: Location Existing Projected AM PM AM PM Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Laurel Parkway and Durston Road 4.9 A 5.6 A 6.7 A 9.4 A Northbound * * * * 7.6 A 6.4 A Southbound 4.9 A 4.7 A 6.0 A 6.7 A Eastbound 5.4 A 5.2 A 7.5 A 8.7 A Westbound 4.3 A 6.1 A 5.7 A 11.1 B * Northbound leg not yet constructed Existing configuration does not in- clude a northbound approach leg Low delay for all analysis periods Advantages: Less overall delay than signal option No induced delay during off-peak hours Improved safety LOS of B or better under projected traffic conditions Disadvantages: Greater additional right-of-way requirements than a traf- fic signal Potential Barriers/Constraints: Additional right-of-way needed Residence on northwest quadrant Estimated Cost: $2.0 Million Conclusion/Summary: This scenario provides the greatest benefits to safety and traffic operations. However, a roundabout configuration would require the greatest amount of new right-of-way. Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 30 2. Cottonwood Road and Durston Road 2.A – All-way Stop Control Description: The Cottonwood Road and Durston Road in- tersection is currently all-way stop controlled. Each leg of the intersection currently allows for all movements. At the time of this writing, a traffic signal is be- ing installed at the intersection as part of the Lakes at Valley West development. Under the new construction, however, Cottonwood Road and Durston Road are not being expanded to reflect the desired typical sections discussed previously. The all-way stop control alternative evaluated herein includes expansion of Cottonwood Road in addition to a dedicated right-turn lane on Durston Road. In addition, a two-way stop controlled alternative was evaluated, but re- sulted in operational failure along Durston Road. Therefore, the two-way stop alternative was not included in this report. Traffic Operations: Location Existing Projected AM PM AM PM Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Cottonwood Road and Durston Road 15.4 C 22.1 C 30.8 D 70.6 F Northbound 11..8 B 15.3 C 19.8 C 34.6 E Southbound 10.1 B 10.7 B 15.1 C 14.6 B Eastbound 18.0 C 16.0 C 42.0 E 44.9 E Westbound 14.6 B 30.7 D 30.8 D 134.7 F Westbound approach operating at LOS D under existing traffic condi- tions Intersection operating at LOS F dur- ing PM peak hour under projected traffic conditions Does not provide ample capacity to accommodate projected demand Advantages: None Disadvantages: Projected failing LOS during peak hours. All-way stop with approaches having multiple lanes is undesirable due to potential driver confusion, opera- tional concerns, and safety issues Potential Barriers/Constraints: None identified Estimated Cost: N/A Conclusion/Summary: This option does not provide enough capacity to accommodate projected traffic demands. The all-way stop configuration is also undesirable due to the approach legs having multiple lanes. Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 31 2.B - Traffic Signal Description: Scenario 2.B assumes the installation of a traf- fic signal at this intersection. The intersection currently meets signal warrants as discussed in Section 5. The proposed intersection configuration con- sists of dedicated left- and right-turn bays and two dedicated through lanes for the south leg; a dedicated left-turn bay, one dedicated through lane, and a shared through/right lane for the north leg; dedicated left- and right-turn bays and a dedicated through lane for the west leg; and a dedicated left-turn bay and shared through/right lane for the east leg. Note that a traffic signal is currently being in- stalled at this location. The approach legs are not currently being reconstructed to the typical sections discussed previously. However, some portions of the intersection are likely to remain in place should future expansion oc- cur. Traffic Operations: Location Existing Projected AM PM AM PM Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Cottonwood Road and Durston Road 13.5 B 13.5 B 20.2 C 21.2 C Northbound 17.9 B 17.8 B 20.1 C 24.1 C Southbound 15.6 B 15.5 B 21.1 C 23.2 C Eastbound 10.9 B 10.4 B 18.1 B 16.2 B Westbound 14.0 B 13.0 B 22.5 C 21.8 C The intersection and all approach legs are shown to operate at a LOS C or better under existing and pro- jected conditions. The configuration is shown to have ample capacity to accommodate fu- ture demand. Advantages: Traffic signal can be adapted to changing traffic conditions LOS of C or better for all movements under projected traffic conditions Available capacity for additional demand Minimal impact to adjoining properties Disadvantages: Induced delay during off-peak hours May increase vehicle speed through the intersection Potential for increase in severe crashes Potential for higher vehicle emissions compared to roundabouts Potential Barriers/Constraints: Some additional right-of-way needed Wetlands in southwest quadrant Estimated Cost: $2.2 Million (includes modifications to the existing traffic signal) Conclusion/Summary: This scenario provides capacity to accommodate existing and projected future demands. A traffic signal is currently being constructed at this intersection. Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 32 2.C – Roundabout Description: Scenario 2.C would reconstruct the intersec- tion to include a multi-lane roundabout. All of the legs of the roundabout would have two ap- proaches. The north, east, and south legs would allow for through and right-turn move- ments from the right lane and through and left- turn movements from the left lane. The west leg would allow for only right-turns from the right lane and through and left-turns from the left lane. Traffic Operations: Location Existing Projected AM PM AM PM Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Cottonwood Road and Durston Road 5.1 A 5.3 A 12.1 B 13.3 B Northbound 5.4 A 4.9 A 9.5 A 11.1 B Southbound 3.9 A 4.7 A 7.2 A 10.7 B Eastbound 5.6 A 5.2 A 17.3 C 10.4 B Westbound 4.4 A 5.6 A 9.5 A 18.0 C All approach legs operating at LOS A under existing traffic conditions All approach legs operating at LOS C or better under projected traffic conditions Advantages: Less overall delay than traffic signal Available capacity for additional demand No induced delay during off-peak hours Improved safety Disadvantages: Significant amount of new right-of-way needed Would require pedestrian signal on all approaches Potential Barriers/Constraints: Significant new right-of-way needed Residence in southeast quadrant Wetlands in the southwest quadrant Estimated Cost: $3.7 Million Conclusion/Summary: This scenario provides the greatest benefits to safety and traffic operations. However, a roundabout configuration would require the greatest amount of new right-of-way. Pedestrian signals would also be required along the multi-lane approach legs. Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 33 3. Flanders Mill Road and Durston Road 3.A – Stop Control along Flanders Mill Road Description: Flanders Mill Road and Durston Road inter- sect at a three-legged intersection. At the in- tersection, a single lane on Flanders Mill Road provides for left- and right-turns onto Durston Road. The typical section of Durston Road consists of two travel lanes, a TWTL, and bi- cycle lanes in each direction. A crosswalk on the west leg of the intersection provides pe- destrian access from a shared use path to Meadowlark Elementary School in the north- west quadrant of the intersection. The existing configuration includes stop con- trol along Flanders Mill Road. Scenario 3.A in- cludes reconstruction of the approach legs while the existing stop control would remain in place. In addition, an all-way stop control scenario was evaluated. Under an all-way stop control scenario the intersection is shown to fail under projected conditions and would also result in significant delays and queuing along Durston. Traffic Operations: Location Existing Projected AM PM AM PM Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Flanders Mill Road and Durston Road 26.8 D 14.3 B 281.4 F 62.6 F Southbound 21.1 C 11.1 B 256.0 F 47.0 E Eastbound 1.5 A 1.3 A 1.5 A 1.3 A Westbound 0.0 A 0.0 A 0.0 A 0.0 A Intersection operating at LOS D during the AM peak hour under ex- isting traffic conditions Intersection operating at LOS F for both AM and PM peak hours under projected traffic conditions. Advantages: Minimal impacts to adjoining properties Little delay along Durston Road Disadvantages: High amounts of delay along Flanders Mill Road. Does not have ample capacity to meet projected demand. Does not provide a protected pedestrian crossing along Durston Road Potential Barriers/Constraints: Proximity to Meadowlark Elementary School Estimated Cost: $0.6 Million Conclusion/Summary: This option does not provide enough capacity to accommodate projected traffic demands. Projected conditions show long vehicle delay and queueing along Flanders Mill, particularly during the AM peak hour. Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 34 3.B - Traffic Signal Description: Scenario 3.B assumes that a traffic signal would be installed at this intersection. The pro- posed intersection configuration for this sce- nario would be the same as Scenario 3.A. which includes a shared left/right lane for the north leg; a dedicated left-turn bay and dedi- cated through lane for the west leg; and a shared through/right lane for the east leg. Traf- fic signal timing for this scenario assumed no protected turn phasing. Note that signal warrants would need to be met prior to installation of a traffic signal. This location was not evaluated for signal warrants as part of this report. Further evaluation would be needed as development occurs in the area. Traffic Operations: Location Existing Projected AM PM AM PM Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Flanders Mill Road and Durston Road 13.4 B 12.1 B 15.3 B 14.2 B Southbound 18.4 B 15.0 B 25.8 C 24.9 C Eastbound 13.0 B 12.1 B 14.6 B 12.9 B Westbound 11.7 B 11.4 B 13.2 B 13.3 B LOS C or better for all movements under existing and projected traffic conditions Advantages: Traffic signal can be adapted to changing traffic condi- tions Available capacity for future demand Minimal impacts to adjoining properties Protected pedestrian crossings Disadvantages: Induced delay during off-peak hours Potential for increase in severe crashes Potential of higher vehicle emissions compared to round- abouts Potential Barriers/Constraints: Would need to meet signal warrants prior to installation Proximity to Meadowlark Elementary School Estimated Cost: $0.9 Million Conclusion/Summary: This scenario provides capacity to accommodate existing and projected future demands. Signal warrants would need to be met prior to installation. Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 35 3.C – Roundabout Description: Scenario 3.C would reconstruct the intersec- tion to include a single lane roundabout. The roundabout would accommodate a WB-50 de- sign vehicle. Traffic Operations: Location Existing Projected AM PM AM PM Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Flanders Mill Road and Durston Road 6.7 A 4.8 A 13.1 B 9.3 A Southbound 5.4 A 3.8 A 8.6 A 6.1 A Eastbound 7.5 A 5.0 A 14.6 B 9.5 A Westbound 6.2 A 4.7 A 12.7 B 9.8 A All approach legs operating at LOS A under existing traffic conditions All approach legs operating at LOS B or better under projected traffic conditions Advantages: Minimal intersection delay under existing and projected conditions. No induced delay during off-peak hours Improved safety Disadvantages: Would require additional right-of-way from all quadrants. Potential Barriers/Constraints: Additional right-of-way needed Proximity to Meadowlark Elementary School Estimated Cost: $1.4 Million Conclusion/Summary: This scenario provides the greatest benefits to safety and traffic operations. However, a roundabout configuration would require the greatest amount of new right-of-way. Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 36 4. Ferguson Avenue and Durston Road 4.A – All-way Stop Control Description: The Ferguson Avenue and Durston Road in- tersection is currently configured as all-way stop controlled intersection. The south, east, and north approaches of the intersection are single lanes allowing for all movements. The west approach consists of a shared through- left and a dedicated right-turn bay. The typical section of the north and south legs includes bicycle lanes. Sidewalks are present on all legs. Scenario 4.A would result in reconstruction of the intersection to include dedicated left-turn lanes and shared through/right-turn lanes on all approach legs. This scenario also includes all-way stop control. Traffic Operations: Location Existing Projected AM PM AM PM Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Ferguson Avenue and Durston Road 13.5 B 24.6 C 70.6 F 137.4 F Northbound 13.3 B 29.9 D 20.2 C 32.8 D Southbound 13.9 B 22.1 C 43.5 E 68.6 F Eastbound 12.1 B 20.9 C 64.8 F 177.1 F Westbound 14.9 B 14.9 C 122.7 F 215.9 F Northbound approach leg operating at LOS D under existing traffic con- ditions Intersection operating at LOS F un- der projected traffic conditions Advantages: Fits within existing right-of-way constraints Disadvantages: Does not accommodate projected demand Extensive queuing, particularly along Durston Road under projected peak hour conditions Potential Barriers/Constraints: None identified Estimated Cost: $1.8 Million Conclusion/Summary: This option does not provide enough capacity to accommodate projected traffic demands. The all-way stop configuration is also undesirable due to the approach legs having multiple lanes. Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 37 4.B - Traffic Signal Description: Scenario 4.B includes installation of a traffic signal at this intersection. The intersection configuration would consist of a dedicated left- turn bay and a shared through/right lane for all legs of the intersection. No protected phases were included for any movement. The existing right-turn only lane on the west leg would be removed as part of this scenario. Note that signal warrants would need to be met prior to installation of a traffic signal. The analysis contained in Section 5 shows that signal warrants are not currently met under ex- isting conditions. Reevaluation of signal war- rants will be necessary as development occurs in the area. Traffic Operations: Location Existing Projected AM PM AM PM Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Ferguson Avenue and Durston Road 15.5 B 16.1 B 18.7 B 22.0 C Northbound 15.4 B 15.9 B 20.9 C 25.9 C Southbound 15.3 B 14.4 B 19.4 B 19.7 B Eastbound 16.0 B 17.8 B 19.2 B 23.1 C Westbound 14.0 B 16.2 B 16.3 B 19.3 B All approach legs operating at LOS B under existing traffic conditions All legs operating at LOS C or better under projected traffic conditions Advantages: Traffic signal can be adapted to changing traffic condi- tions Additional capacity for future demand Fits within existing right-of-way constraints Disadvantages: Induced delay during off-peak hours May increase vehicle speed through the intersection Potential for increase in severe crashes Potential for higher vehicle emissions compared to round- abouts Significant reconstruction on the south leg to accommo- date the northbound left-turn lane Potential Barriers/Constraints: Does not currently meet signal warrants Wetlands on both the southwest and southeast quadrants of the intersection Estimated Cost: $2.1 Million Conclusion/Summary: This scenario provides capacity to accommodate existing and projected future demands. Signal warrants would need to be met prior to installation. Analysis shows that signal warrants are not currently met at this intersection. Reevaluation would be needed as development occurs to determine if/when warrants are met. Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 38 4.C – Roundabout Description: Scenario 4.C includes replacing the all-way stop control at this intersection with a single- lane roundabout. The roundabout would ac- commodate a WB-50 design vehicle. Traffic Operations: Location Existing Projected AM PM AM PM Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Ferguson Avenue and Durston Road 6.1 A 7.4 A 12.4 B 19.1 C Northbound 5.2 A 7.3 A 8.5 B 15.7 C Southbound 6.5 A 7.7 A 12.0 B 16.4 C Eastbound 6.2 A 6.9 A 12.7 B 16.5 C Westbound 6.5 A 7.8 A 14.7 B 26.5 D All approach legs operating at LOS A under existing traffic conditions Westbound leg operating at LOS D under projected traffic conditions Advantages: Less overall delay than a traffic signal No induced delay during off-peak hours Improved safety over a traffic signal Disadvantages: Greater right-of-way requirements than a traffic signal LOS of D along the westbound approach leg during pro- jected PM peak hour conditions Potential Barriers/Constraints: Additional right-of-way needed along all quadrants Wetlands on both the southwest and southeast quadrants of the intersection Residence in the northeast quadrant Estimated Cost: $2.3 Million Conclusion/Summary: This scenario provides the greatest benefits to safety and traffic operations. However, a roundabout configuration would require the greatest amount of new right-of-way. Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 39 5. Fowler Avenue and Durston Road 5.A – All-way Stop Control Description: The intersection of Fowler Avenue and Durston Road is currently a three-legged in- tersection with stop control along Fowler Av- enue. Future plans to complete Fowler Avenue from Oak Street to Babcock Street call for the intersection to be four-legged with a five-lane typical section on Fowler Avenue. For the purposes of a baseline analysis, all- way stop control was evaluated as the most basic intersection traffic control scenario. The intersection could also be configured as a two-way stop control along either Durston Road or Fowler Avenue. However, it would be undesirable to provide stop control along Fowler Avenue due to the multiple lanes on each approach. It is also undesirable to pro- vide stop control along Durston Road due to the high traffic volumes. Traffic Operations: Location Existing (TWSC) Projected (AWSC) AM PM AM PM Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Fowler Avenue and Durston Road 14.6 B 17.0 C 160.6 F 234.8 F Northbound 12.2 B 12.7 B 12.7 B 13.0 B Southbound * * * * 12.1 B 11.9 B Eastbound 0.0 A 0.0 A 238.7 F 220.5 F Westbound 0.1 A 0.3 A 112.3 F 304.0 F * Southbound leg not yet constructed TWSC – Two-way Stop Controlled; AWSC – All-way Stop Controlled All approach legs operating at LOS C or better under existing traffic condi- tions. Intersection operating at LOS F dur- ing both peak hours under projected traffic conditions. Advantages: Fits within existing constraints Disadvantages: Undesirable due to potential driver confusion, operational concerns, and safety issues related to multiple lanes on approaches Does not accommodate future traffic volumes along Durston Road Potential Barriers/Constraints: None identified Estimated Cost: $1.7 Million Conclusion/Summary: This scenario does not accommodate projected traffic volumes. Significant delay and queuing is expected on Durston Road under projected traffic conditions. Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 40 5.B – Traffic Signal Description: Scenario 5.B includes construction of a four- legged intersection with signal control. The typical section of Fowler Lane is planned to be five lanes. Durston Road will be con- structed to a three-lane typical section with curb, gutter, bike lanes and sidewalks. The in- tersection would include dedicated left-turn and shared right/through lanes. Note that signal warrants would need to be met prior to installation of a traffic signal. It is unknown when/if warrants would be met. Traffic Operations: Location Existing Projected AM PM AM PM Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Fowler Avenue and Durston Road 14.2 B 15.6 B 18.9 B 19.2 B Northbound 18.7 B 17.9 B 25.3 C 27.1 C Southbound * * * * 26.0 C 29.1 C Eastbound 14.8 B 14.9 B 19.7 B 17.0 B Westbound 12.9 B 16.1 B 15.3 B 19.0 B * Northbound leg not yet constructed All approach legs operating at LOS C or better under existing traffic condi- tions. Intersection operating at LOS B under projected conditions for both the AM and PM peak hours. Advantages: Fits within existing constraints Adequate capacity to accommodate existing and pro- jected demand Disadvantages: Induced delay during off-peak hours May increase vehicle speed through the intersection Potential for increase in severe crashes Potential for higher vehicle emissions compared to round- abouts Potential Barriers/Constraints: Unknown when/if signal warrants would be met Estimated Cost: $2.0 Million Conclusion/Summary: This scenario provides capacity to accommodate existing and projected future demands. Signal warrants would need to be met prior to installation. Further evaluation would be needed as development occurs. Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 41 5.C – Roundabout Description: Scenario 5.C includes constructing a multi- lane roundabout at the planned four-legged intersection. The north and south legs consist of two lanes (a shared through/right and shared through/left). The east and west legs are single lanes allowing for all movements. The roundabout includes two circulating lanes in the north and southbound directions and a single circulating lane in the east and west- bound directions. The roundabout will accom- modate a WB-50 design vehicle. Traffic Operations: Location Existing Projected AM PM AM PM Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Fowler Avenue and Durston Road 5.4 A 6.1 A 10.1 B 13.3 B Northbound 4.1 A 3.8 A 6.2 A 6.1 A Southbound * * * * 5.4 A 6.7 A Eastbound 6.0 A 5.7 A 12.2 B 12.2 B Westbound 4.8 A 6.4 A 9.0 A 16.0 C * Northbound leg not yet constructed All approach legs operating at LOS A under existing traffic conditions. Intersection operating at LOS B dur- ing both AM and PM peak hours un- der projected traffic conditions Advantages: Less overall delay than signal option No induced delay during off-peak hours Improved safety Available capacity for future demand Disadvantages: Greater right-of-way requirements than a traffic signal Requires pedestrian signals on north and south legs Potential Barriers/Constraints: Additional right-of-way needs Estimated Cost: $2.7 Million Conclusion/Summary: This scenario provides the greatest benefits to safety and traffic operations. However, a roundabout configuration would require the greatest amount of new right-of-way. Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 42 6. Flanders Mill Road and Baxter Lane 6.A – Two-way Stop Control Description: The intersection of Flanders Mill Road and Baxter Lane is a three-legged intersection with stop-control on Flanders Mill Road. Baxter lane is a two-lane roadway with curb, gutter, and sidewalk on the north side. Flanders Mill Road is a two-lane road with no curb. Traffic Operations: Location Existing Projected AM PM AM PM Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Flanders Mill Road and Baxter Lane 13.7 B 16.0 C 19.5 C 29.9 D Northbound 11.3 B 13.6 B 14.2 B 23.6 C Southbound 0.0 A 0.0 A 0.0 A 0.0 A Eastbound 3.5 A 3.1 A 3.0 A 2.2 A Intersection operating at LOS C or better under existing traffic condi- tions Intersection operating at LOS D during PM peak hours under pro- jected traffic conditions Advantages: Fits within existing constraints Adequate capacity to accommodate existing and pro- jected demand Disadvantages: Potential traffic queuing along Flanders Mill Road during projected peak hours Potential Barriers/Constraints: None identified Estimated Cost: N/A Conclusion/Summary: This scenario was found to adequately accommodate existing and projected traffic demand. As such, additional scenarios were not evaluated for this location. If traffic demands change over time, a need to reevaluate this intersection for changes in traffic control may be necessary. Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 43 7. Cottonwood Road and Baxter Lane 7.A – Two-way Stop Control Description: The intersection of Harper Puckett Road/Cot- tonwood Road and Baxter Lane is currently configured as a three-legged junction. Stop control is currently provided on Harper Puckett Road. The south leg of the intersection has yet to be constructed. However, for the projected traffic operations, it was assumed that Cotton- wood Road will extend to Baxter Lane as a di- vided four lane roadway. When fully built, the intersection with be a four-legged intersection. For this scenario, stop control was included along Cottonwood Road / Harper Puckett. Al- ternatively, stop control could be provided along Baxter Lane. Further evaluation of travel patterns would be needed to determine where stop control would be most appropriate. Traffic Operations: Location Existing Projected AM PM AM PM Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Cottonwood Road and Baxter Lane 11.0 B 11.1 B 16.2 C 16.5 C Northbound * * * * 11.1 B 12.5 B Southbound 10.6 B 10.9 B 14.7 B 15.2 C Eastbound 0.7 A 0.6 A 0.5 A 0.0 A Westbound 0.0 A 0.0 A 1.5 A 0.8 A * Northbound leg not yet constructed All approach legs operating at LOS B or better under existing traffic opera- tions All approach legs operating at LOS C or better under projected traffic con- ditions Advantages: Adequate capacity to accommodate projected demand LOS of C or better under projected traffic conditions Disadvantages: Stop control on approaches with multiple lanes is undesir- able due to potential driver confusion, operational con- cerns, and safety issues Requires additional right-of-way Potential Barriers/Constraints: Existing residence in northeast quadrant Estimated Cost: $2.4 Million Conclusion/Summary: While this option is shown to accommodate existing and projected traffic demand, caution should be taken as future projections are uncertain at this time. The south leg of the intersection is not currently built. Once the Cottonwood corridor is fully built, traffic patterns in the area may change drastically. Reevaluation of this intersection may be necessary after the corridor is fully built and as development occurs in the area. Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 44 7.B – Traffic Signal Description: Scenario 7.B assumes the installation of a traf- fic signal at this intersection. The intersection configuration would consist of dedicated left- and right-turn bays and a dedicated through lane on the south leg; a dedicated left-turn bay, dedicated through lane, and a shared through/right lane on the north leg; and a ded- icated left-turn bay and a shared through/right lane on the west and east legs. No protected phases were incorporated into the signal tim- ing scheme. Note that signal warrants would need to be met prior to installation of a traffic signal. This location was not evaluated for signal warrants as part of this report. Further evaluation would be needed as development occurs in the area. Traffic Operations: Location Existing Projected AM PM AM PM Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Cottonwood Road and Baxter Lane 10.8 B 12.5 B 13.3 B 13.5 B Northbound * * * * 13.1 B 13.7 B Southbound 10.5 B 12.9 B 14.5 B 14.9 B Eastbound 10.9 B 12.2 B 12.6 B 12.5 B Westbound 10.9 B 12.7 B 13.2 B 13.6 B * Northbound leg not yet constructed All approach legs are shown to op- erate at a LOS B under existing and projected peak hours Advantages: Traffic signal can be adapted to changing traffic condi- tions Available capacity for future demand Disadvantages: Induced delay during off-peak hours Potential for increase in severe crashes Potential for higher vehicle emissions compared to round- abouts Additional right-of-way required Potential Barriers/Constraints: Existing residence in northeast quadrant Would need to meet signal warrants prior to installation Estimated Cost: $2.7 Million Conclusion/Summary: As with the previous option for this intersection, caution should be taken as future projections are uncertain at this time. Reevaluation of the intersection may be necessary after the corridor is fully built and as development occurs in the area. Note that warrants would need to be met prior to installation of a traffic signal. Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 45 7.C – Roundabout Description: This scenario would result in a multi-lane roundabout being constructed at the intersec- tion. The roundabout will accommodate a WB-50 design vehicle. Traffic Operations: Location Existing Projected AM PM AM PM Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Cottonwood Road and Baxter Lane 3.9 A 4.3 A 4.8 A 5.4 A Northbound * * * * 3.9 A 3.9 A Southbound 3.8 A 3.9 A 4.8 A 4.6 A Eastbound 4.0 A 4.2 A 5.2 A 6.3 A Westbound 3.8 A 4.5 A 4.4 A 5.0 A * Northbound leg not yet constructed All approach legs operating at LOS A during all analysis periods under ex- isting and projected traffic conditions Advantages: Available capacity for future demand No induced delay during off-peak hours Improved safety Disadvantages: Greater right-of-way requirements than a traffic signal May require pedestrian signal on south leg Potential Barriers/Constraints: Additional right-of-way needed Existing residence in northeast quadrant Estimated Cost: $3.1 Million Conclusion/Summary: As with the previous options for this intersection, caution should be taken as future projections are uncertain at this time. Reevaluation of the intersection may be necessary after the corridor is fully built and as development occurs in the area. Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 46 8. Cottonwood Road and Babcock Street 8.A – Two-way Stop Control Description: The intersection of Cottonwood Road and Babcock Street is a four-legged intersection with stop control on Babcock Street. The northbound approach currently consists of dedicated left-turn, through, and right-turn lanes. The southbound approach has dedi- cated left-turn and through lanes as well as a shared through/right lane. The east and west- bound approaches both have a dedicated left- turn lane and a shared through/right lane. Under this scenario, the reconstruction of the intersection would modify the south approach to match the existing north approach. The ex- isting stop control along Babcock Street would remain. Traffic Operations: Location Existing Projected AM PM AM PM Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Cottonwood Road and Babcock Street 16.9 C 23.7 C 136.0 F * F Northbound 0.2 A 0.2 A 0.8 A 0.3 A Southbound 0.5 A 0.6 A 1.1 A 2.7 A Eastbound 15.0 C 20.5 C 83.8 F 1301.1 F Westbound 15.4 C 17.3 C 51.2 F 1320.1 F * Delay is outside of the computational bounds for Vistro 3.0 All approach legs operating at LOS C or better under existing traffic conditions Significant delay projected along Babcock Street under projected conditions. Advantages: Only minor intersection reconstruction required Disadvantages: Does not accommodate projected demands Significant delay and vehicle queueing projected Potential Barriers/Constraints: Minimal additional right-of-way needed Estimated Cost: $1.1 Million Conclusion/Summary: This option does not provide enough capacity to accommodate projected traffic demands. Large amounts of vehicle delay and long queue lengths are projected along Babcock Street under this configuration. Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 47 8.B - Traffic Signal Description: Scenario 8.B assumes the construction of a traffic signal at this intersection. The intersec- tion configuration would consist of a dedicated left-turn bay, dedicated through lane, and share through/right lane on the south and north legs; and a dedicated left-turn bay and share through/right lane on the east and west legs. The assumed signal timing did not in- clude any protected phases. Note that signal warrants would need to be met prior to installation of a traffic signal. The analysis contained in Section 5 shows that signal warrants are not currently met under ex- isting conditions. Reevaluation of signal war- rants will be necessary as development occurs in the area. Traffic Operations: Location Existing Projected AM PM AM PM Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Cottonwood Road and Babcock Street 10.2 B 7.2 A 11.1 B 15.9 B Northbound 8.6 A 4.9 A 8.9 A 11.9 B Southbound 9.0 A 4.6 A 10.0 B 15.6 B Eastbound 17.2 B 25.5 C 20.0 C 25.4 C Westbound 18.1 B 25.4 C 19.8 B 22.8 C All approaches operating at LOS C or better for all peak hour analysis periods Advantages: Traffic signal can be adapted to changing traffic condi- tions LOS of C or better for all movements under projected traf- fic conditions Minimal impact to adjoining properties Available capacity for future demand Disadvantages: Induced delay during off-peak hours Potential for increase in severe crashes Potential for higher vehicle emissions compared to round- abouts Potential Barriers/Constraints: Minimal additional right-of-way needed Does not currently meet signal warrants Estimated Cost: $1.4 Million Conclusion/Summary: This scenario provides capacity to accommodate existing and projected future demands. Signal warrants would need to be met prior to installation. Analysis shows that signal warrants are not currently met at this intersection. Reevaluation would be needed as development occurs to determine if/when warrants are met. Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 48 8.C – Roundabout Description: Scenario 8.C includes replacing the existing two-way stop control with a multi-lane round- about. The north and south legs will be two lanes with through and right turns allowed from the right lane, and through and left-turn movements allowed from the left lane. The east and west legs will be single lanes allow- ing for all movements. There will be two circu- lating lanes in the north and southbound directions and a single circulating lane in the east and westbound directions. The rounda- bout will accommodate a WB-50 design vehi- cle. Traffic Operations: Location Existing Projected AM PM AM PM Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Cottonwood Road and Babcock Street 4.2 A 4.7 A 6.6 A 8.8 A Northbound 3.9 A 4.9 A 5.6 A 9.7 A Southbound 4.4 A 4.3 A 7.1 A 6.5 A Eastbound 4.4 A 4.4 A 7.5 A 10.0 A Westbound 4.0 A 4..8 A 6.1 A 12.5 B All approach legs operating at LOS A during all analysis periods under existing and projected traffic condi- tions Advantages: Less overall delay than signal option No induced delay during off-peak hours Improved safety Available capacity for future demand Disadvantages: Greater right-of-way requirements than a traffic signal Requires pedestrian signals on north and south legs Potential Barriers/Constraints: Additional right-of-way needs Estimated Cost: $2.8 Million Conclusion/Summary: This scenario provides the greatest benefits to safety and traffic operations. However, a roundabout configuration would require the greatest amount of new right-of-way. Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 49 9. Cottonwood Road and Oak Street 9.A – All-way Stop Control Description: The intersection of Cottonwood Road and Oak Street currently only consists of a south and west leg. Future plans include the extension of Oak Street to the east and Cottonwood Road to the north to create a four-legged intersec- tion. Both roads are considered future princi- pal arterials and are planned to be reconstructed to a five-lane typical section Scenario 9.A includes all-way stop control for the intersection. Each approach leg will con- sist of a shared through/right lane, a dedicated through lane, and a dedicated left-turn lane. Traffic Operations: Location Existing Projected AM PM AM PM Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Cottonwood Road and Oak Street * * * * 8.8 A 9.2 A Northbound * * * * 8.7 A 9.3 A Southbound * * * * 9.2 A 9.2 A Eastbound * * * * 8.9 A 9.0 A Westbound * * * * 8.5 A 9.24 A * Southbound and westbound legs do not exist Intersection projected to operate at a LOS A under stop control condi- tions Advantages: Accommodates future traffic demand Disadvantages: Undesirable due to potential driver confusion, operational concerns, and safety issues related to multiple lanes on approaches Potential Barriers/Constraints: Additional right-of-way needed Wetlands in southwest quadrant Estimated Cost: $2.9 Million Conclusion/Summary: While this option is shown to accommodate existing and projected traffic demand, caution should be taken as future projections are uncertain at this time. The north and east legs of the intersection are not currently built. Once the Cotton- wood and Oak corridors are fully built, traffic patterns in the area may change drastically. Reevaluation of this intersection may be necessary after the corridors are fully built and as development occurs in the area. Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 50 9.B – Traffic Signal Description: Scenario 9.B includes traffic signal control for the intersection. Each approach leg will con- sist of a shared through/right lane, a dedicated through lane, and a dedicated left-turn lane. Note that signal warrants would need to be met prior to installation of a traffic signal. This location was not evaluated for signal warrants as part of this report. Further evaluation would be needed as development occurs in the area. Traffic Operations: Location Existing Projected AM PM AM PM Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Cottonwood Road and Oak Street * * * * 12.9 B 13.1 B Northbound * * * * 11.6 B 12.7 B Southbound * * * * 12.6 B 13.2 B Eastbound * * * * 13.6 B 12.6 B Westbound * * * * 13.7 B 13.7 B * Southbound and westbound legs do not exist Intersection operating at LOS B un- der projected traffic conditions Advantages: Traffic signal can be adapted to changing traffic condi- tions Accommodates future traffic demand Disadvantages: Induced delay during off-peak hours Potential for increase in severe crashes Potential for higher vehicle emissions compared to round- abouts Potential Barriers/Constraints: Additional right-of-way needed Would need to meet signal warrants prior to installation Wetlands in southwest quadrant Estimated Cost: $3.2 Million Conclusion/Summary: As with the previous option for this intersection, caution should be taken as future projections are uncertain at this time. Reevaluation of the intersection may be necessary after the corridors are fully built and as development occurs in the area. Note that warrants would need to be met prior to installation of a traffic signal. Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 51 9.C – Roundabout Description: The intersection of Cottonwood Road and Oak Street will be a four-legged intersection. Sce- nario 9.C a multi-lane roundabout at the inter- section. The roundabout would have two circulating lanes. Each approach would con- sist of a through/left and a through/right lane. Pedestrian activated signals would be in- cluded on all legs of the intersection. Traffic Operations: Location Existing Projected AM PM AM PM Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Cottonwood Road and Oak Street * * * * 3.7 A 4.0 A Northbound * * * * 3.8 A 4.0 A Southbound * * * * 3.5 A 3.8 A Eastbound * * * * 3.9 A 3.6 A Westbound * * * * 3.5 A 4.3 A * Southbound and westbound legs do not exist Intersection operating at LOS A un- der projected traffic conditions Advantages: Less overall delay than signal option No induced delay during off-peak hours Improved safety Accommodates future traffic demand Disadvantages: Greater right-of-way requirements than a traffic signal Requires pedestrian signal on all approach legs Potential Barriers/Constraints: Additional right-of-way needs Wetlands in southwest quadrant Estimated Cost: $3.4 Million Conclusion/Summary: As with the previous options for this intersection, caution should be taken as future projections are uncertain at this time. Reevaluation of the intersection may be necessary after the corridors are fully built and as development occurs in the area. Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 52 6.3. SUMMARY OF SCENARIOS The major intersections identified previously were evaluated for various forms of traffic control. Each inter- section was evaluated under the current traffic control to determine if changes were needed to accommo- date projected demand. If necessary, alternative scenarios were developed, typically consisting of a traffic signal and roundabout. The results of the scenario analysis is shown in Table 6.1. Table 6.1: Scenario Summary Scenario Level of Service (AM/PM) Estimated Cost Existing Projected 1. Laurel Parkway and Durston Road 1.A – All-way Stop B/C C/D N/A 1.B – Traffic Signal B/B B/B $1.0 Million 1.C – Roundabout A/A A/A $2.0 Million 2. Cottonwood Road and Durston Road 2.A – All-way Stop C/C D/F N/A 2.B – Traffic Signal B/B C/C $2.2 Million 2.C – Roundabout A/A B/B $3.7 Million 3. Flanders Mill Road and Durston Road 3.A – Two-way Stop D/B F/F $0.6 Million 3.B – Traffic Signal B/B B/B $0.9 Million 3.C – Roundabout A/A B/A $1.4 Million 4. Ferguson Avenue and Durston Road 4.A – All-way Stop B/C F/F $1.8 Million 4.B – Traffic Signal B/B B/C $2.1 Million 4.C – Roundabout A/A B/C $2.3 Million 5. Fowler Avenue and Durston Road 5.A – All-way Stop B/C F/F $1.7 Million 5.B – Traffic Signal B/B B/B $2.0 Million 5.C – Roundabout A/A B/B $2.7 Million 6. Flanders Mill Road and Baxter Lane 6.A – Two-way Stop B/C C/D N/A 7. Cottonwood Road and Baxter Lane 7.A – Two-way Stop B/B C/C $2.4 Million 7.B – Traffic Signal B/B B/B $2.7 Million 7.C – Roundabout A/A A/A $3.1 Million 8. Cottonwood Road and Babcock Street 8.A – Two-way Stop C/C F/F $1.1 Million 8.B – Traffic Signal B/A B/B $1.4 Million 8.C – Roundabout A/A A/A $2.8 Million 9. Cottonwood Road and Oak Street 9.A – All-way Stop * A/A $2.9 Million 9.B – Traffic Signal * B/B $3.2 Million 9.C - Roundabout * A/A $3.4 Million * Southbound and westbound legs do not exist Durston and Cottonwood Road Improvement Project Traffic Engineering Report Robert Peccia & Associates December 17, 2015 53 7. CONCLUSIONS AND NEXT STEPS This Traffic Engineering Report provides a thorough study of the Cottonwood Road corridor between Fallon Street and Baxter Lane and the Durston Road corridor between Cottonwood Road and Fowler Avenue. The study area currently experiences traffic operational issues related to peak hour traffic congestion. Fu- ture planned growth is expected to further inhibit traffic flow along these corridors. The existing conditions for the study area were defined through field review and data collection in April, 2015. Future projections were made using anticipated development and growth contained in TIS reports provided by the City of Bozeman. Improvements for the Cottonwood Road and Durston Road corridors are being planned to improve the roadways to meet current typical section standards. In addition, nine major intersections were analyzed in detail for potential changes to traffic control to accommodate projected demand. Each intersection scenario was evaluated in terms of improvements to traffic operations, anticipated impacts, known constraints, and estimated cost. The findings of this analysis was presented to the City of Bozeman on November 9th, 2015. Having consid- ered the information provided in the written and presented material, as well as through follow-up dialogue, the preferred intersection configurations shown in Table 7.1 were identified. These configurations were identified based on a number of factors, including cost, impacts, traffic operations, and safety. The preferred configuration is provided in Appendix F. Cost estimates are included in Appendix G. Table 7.1: Preferred Intersection Configurations Intersection Identified Configuration 1. Laurel Parkway and Durston Road 1.B – Traffic Signal 2. Cottonwood Road and Durston Road 2.B – Traffic Signal 3. Flanders Mill Road and Durston Road 3.C – Roundabout 4. Ferguson Avenue and Durston Road 4.C – Roundabout 5. Fowler Avenue and Durston Road 5.B – Traffic Signal 6. Flanders Mill Road and Baxter Lane 6.A – Two-way Stop 7. Cottonwood Road and Baxter Lane 7.C - Roundabout 8. Cottonwood Road and Babcock Street 8.B – Traffic Signal 9. Cottonwood Road and Oak Street 9.C - Roundabout HELENA, MT – CORPORATE OFFICE 825 Custer Avenue Helena, MT 59604 (P) 406.447.5000 BOZEMAN, MT 3810 Valley Commons Drive, Suite 4 Bozeman, MT 59718 (P) 406.580.4438 KALISPELL, MT 102 Cooperative Way, Suite 300 Kalispell, MT 59903 (P) 406.752.5025 FORT COLLINS, CO 400 Remington Street, Suite B Fort Collins, CO 80524 (P) 970.484.3205 www.rpa-hln.com copyright © 2015 Robert Peccia & Associates