HomeMy WebLinkAboutC15. Wastewater Impact Fee CIP
Commission Memorandum
REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Commission
FROM: Anna Rosenberry, Administrative Services Director
SUBJECT: Adoption of the Wastewater Impact Fee Fund Capital Improvement
Plan (CIP) for FY17-21.
AGENDA ITEM TYPE: Consent
MEETING DATE: December 14, 2015
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Wastewater Impact Fee Fund Capital Improvement
Plan (CIP) for FY17-21.
BACKGROUND: Each year, the City Manager is required to prepare a 5 Year Capital
Improvements Plan and submit it to the Commission by December 15th. The City’s Impact Fee
Advisory Committee (IFAC) met on November 17th and December 3rd to review and make
recommendations for the planned expenditures of Street Impact Fees. The Committee had no
quorum on December 3rd to make a vote; their general recommendations are embodied in this
plan.
Items of Note:
1. Under this plan, the Wastewater Impact Fee Fund would be providing the Local Share in
advance of development for the WWIF11, and WWIF18 - 27 projects (some are
unscheduled.) These projects are noted with an “*”.
a. We anticipate that some of these payback amounts will come back to the
Wastewater Impact Fee Fund as projects develop; but, for purposes of this plan
251
we have not relied on receiving any of that money to fund projects. This is a
conservative approach to a difficult-to-estimate cash flow.
b. We anticipate a payback for “local share” of these projects would be made at the
time a development project is approved.
2. A new Wastewater Impact Fee Study is included in this plan for FY17.
3. Revenues have been updated to reflect the 5-year average for Wastewater Impact Fee
collections. As you can see from the attached chart, annual amounts collected have been
declining since FY2013. We estimate revenue growth at 5% annually, given the 5-year
average changes.
Revenue History – Wastewater Impact Fees Amount Change
2011 $ 669,000.00 -
2012 $ 989,000.00 48%
2013 $ 1,405,000.00 42%
2014 $ 1,140,000.00 -19%
2015 $ 1,052,000.00 -8%
Average 1,051,000.00
UNRESOLVED ISSUES: None.
$-
$200,000.00
$400,000.00
$600,000.00
$800,000.00
$1,000,000.00
$1,200,000.00
$1,400,000.00
$1,600,000.00
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Average
Wastewater Impact Fee Revenues
252
ALTERNATIVES: As suggested by the City Commission. If the Commission is does
not wish to adopt this schedule tonight, it can be scheduled for approval on a later agenda.
FISCAL EFFECTS: This step in the process has no fiscal effect. Once adopted, the
Capital Improvements Plan becomes the basis of the City Manager’s Recommended Budget for
FY16.
Report compiled on: November 21, 2014
Attached: Draft Wastewater Impact Fee Fund CIP
253
Wastewater Impact Fee Capital Improvement PlanFinancial SummaryCurrent YearFY16FY17FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21UnscheduledProjected Beginning Reserve Balance Dedicated to CIP367,000$ (582,000)$ (783,116)$ (653,389)$ 563,275$ 1,470,772$ ‐$ Plus: Impact Fee Revenues Dedicated to CIP1,051,000$ 1,103,550$ 1,158,728$ 1,216,664$ 1,277,497$ 1,341,372$ ‐$ Plus: Loans for WWIF26, WWIF11 1,413,746$ 2,185,520$ Plus: Developer Contribution From WWIF26631,837$ Less: Scheduled CIP Project Costs(2,000,000)$ (3,350,249)$ (1,029,000)$ (2,185,520)$ (370,000)$ ‐$ (5,091,561)$ Projected Year‐End Cash Dedicated to CIP(582,000)$ (783,116)$ (653,389)$ 563,275$ 1,470,772$ 2,812,144$ Assumptions Made for Revenue Estimates:Current YearFY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21Estimated Annual Wastewater Impact Fee Revenues1,051,000$ 1,051,000$ 1,103,550$ 1,158,728$ 1,216,664$ 1,277,497$ Estimated Annual Increase0.0%5%5%5%5%5%Total Estimated Revenues1,051,000$ 1,103,550$ 1,158,728$ 1,216,664$ 1,277,497$ 1,341,372$ Current Revenues Dedicated to CIP %100.0%100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Plus: Increase Dedicated to Wastewater Capacity Expansion CIP0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% Total % Dedicated to CIP100.0%100.0%100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%Total Estimated Revenues Dedicated to CIP1,051,000$ 1,103,550$ 1,158,728$ 1,216,664$ 1,277,497$ 1,341,372$ ProjectedProjectedCURRENT6,000,0005,000,0004,000,0003,000,0002,000,0001,000,0000Wastewater Impact Fee Projects 254
CIP PROJECT FUPROJ.DEPARTMENTPROJECT NAMEFY17UnscheduledFY21FY18FY19FY20Impact Fees WastewaterWWIF11WW IMPACT FEFRONT STREET INTERCEPTOR*$2,185,520WWIF17WW IMPACT FE#4 DIGESTER$2,000,000WWIF18WW IMPACT FEESVALLEY WEST ‐ ANNIE UPSIZE (FLANDERS TO W OF FERGUSON)*$234,000WWIF19WW IMPACT FENORTON RANCH LIFT STATION*$500,000WWIF20WW IMPACT FEN FRONTAGE RD INTERCEPTOR*$370,000WWIF22WW IMPACT FEESDAVIS‐FOWLER INTERCEPTOR (DURSTON RD TO W OAK ST)*$778,035WWIF23WW IMPACT FEESDAVIS LANE EXTENSION (LIFT STATION TO WRF)*$1,313,526WWIF24WW IMPACT FEDAVIS LANE (LIFT STATION)*$500,000WWIF25WW IMPACT FEESCATTAIL CREEK BASIN EXTENSION (19TH FROM GRAF TO STUCKY AND STUCKY FROM 19TH TO 0.5 MILES WEST OF 19TH)+$1,263,674WWIF26WW IMPACT FEESSOUTH UNIVERSITY DISTRICT/CATTAIL CREEK BASIN EXTENSION (LINCOLNTO GARFIELD FROM 19TH TO FOWLER)*$1,413,746WWIF27WW IMPACT FEESSOUTH UNIVERSITY DISTRICT/CATTAIL CREEK BASIN EXTENSION (S 15TH AVE TO WILLOW WAY TO LINCOLN ST)*$795,000WWIF28WW IMPACT FEESBRIDGER CANYON RD IMPROVEMENT (STORY MILL RD TO W ENTRANCE OF BRIDGER VIEW TRAILER COURT)$322,829WWIF29WW IMPACT FEIMPACT FEE STUDY ‐ WASTEWATER$50,000WWIF30WW IMPACT FEESWASTEWATER RIGHT OF WAY ‐ ACROSS MSU FARM$300,000$3,350,249$1,029,000$2,185,520$370,000$5,091,561Summary for Impact Fees Wastewater (14 items)Totals by year:$3,350,249 $1,029,000$5,091,561FY21FY17FY18UnscheduledFY20$370,000$2,185,520FY19255
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Wastewater
PROJECT NUMBER
WWIF11
DEPARTMENT
WW IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
FRONT STREET INTERCEPTOR*
FY17 FY18 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project consists of construction of ~8,500 LF 18" 21" 24" sewer pipe from manhole E0304 to C0524. The lower portion of
the existing sewer is at capacity. Additional capacity is needed to serve the future Bozeman Deaconess Hospital development and
lands to the south. It is estimated that 70% of this project costs will be due to capacity expansion and will be eligible for
Wastewater Impact Fees. The remaining 30% of the project costs will need to be provided by a "local share" contribution or
other source. At this time, the City’s Wastewater Utility does not have a need to replace the existing facility; as such, no utility
dollars are scheduled to be spent.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Limit development to only that capacity of the existing sewer.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
This project will significantly increase the service area and capacity of the trunk sewer.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Impact fees can not fund operating and maintenance costs. The city’s wastewater utility will pay for
these costs, which are estimated to be a small increment of the city’s system as a whole.
FUNDING SOURCES
70% Wastewater Impact Fees = $1,529,864 30% Wastewater Impact Fees for Local Share = $655,656, recovered via payback district.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY19
$2,185,520
FY20 FY21
256
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Wastewater
PROJECT NUMBER
WWIF17
DEPARTMENT
WW IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
#4 DIGESTER
FY17 FY18 Unscheduled
$2,000,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Fund the design and construction of a fourth anaerobic digester.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Do nothing.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Additional Capacity for wastewater treatment.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Not known at this time.
FUNDING SOURCES
Wastewater Impact Fee Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY19 FY20 FY21
257
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Wastewater
PROJECT NUMBER
WWIF18
DEPARTMENT
WW IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
VALLEY WEST - ANNIE UPSIZE (FLANDERS TO W OF FERGUSON)*
FY17 FY18
$234,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project will provide increase capacity for further development in Valley West. It will run along Annie from Flanders to west
of Ferguson.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Limit future development in the area.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
If upsized capacity will be provided for anticipating the long-term future growth in this area
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Impact fees can not fund operating and maintenance costs. The city’s wastewater utility will pay for
these costs, which are estimated to be a small increment of the city’s system as a whole.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Wastewater Impact Fees, with recovery of "local share" via payback district.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY19 FY20 FY21
258
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Wastewater
PROJECT NUMBER
WWIF19
DEPARTMENT
WW IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
NORTON RANCH LIFT STATION*
FY17 FY18 Unscheduled
$500,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project will increase capavity at the Norton Ranch Lift Station to support further development of the Norton Ranch
Subdivision.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Limit future development in the area.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
If constructed to the line sizes master planned in the City’s Wastewater Facilities plan, capacity will be provided for anticipating the long-term
future growth in this area
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Impact fees can not fund operating and maintenance costs. The city’s wastewater utility will pay for
these costs, which are estimated to be a small increment of the city’s system as a whole.
FUNDING SOURCES
Wastewater Impact Fees, with portions recovered via payback district.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY19 FY20 FY21
259
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Wastewater
PROJECT NUMBER
WWIF20
DEPARTMENT
WW IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
N FRONTAGE RD INTERCEPTOR*
FY17 FY18 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project will replace or parallel 11,500' of the North Frontage Rd Interceptor between Springhill Rd and Bridger Dr.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Limit future development in the area.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
If constructed to the line sizes master planned in the City’s Wastewater Facilities plan, capacity will be provided for anticipating the long-term
future growth in this area
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Impact fees can not fund operating and maintenance costs. The city’s wastewater utility will pay for
these costs, which are estimated to be a small increment of the city’s system as a whole.
FUNDING SOURCES
Wastewater Impact Fees, with local share recovered via payback district
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY19 FY20
$370,000
FY21
260
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Wastewater
PROJECT NUMBER
WWIF22
DEPARTMENT
WW IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
DAVIS-FOWLER INTERCEPTOR (DURSTON RD TO W OAK ST)*
FY17 FY18 Unscheduled
$778,035
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project will replace or parallel 2700' of the Davis-Fowler Interceptor between Durston and Oak.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Limit future development in the area.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
If constructed to the line sizes master planned in the City’s Wastewater Facilities plan, capacity will be provided for anticipating the long-term
future growth in this area
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Impact fees can not fund operating and maintenance costs. The city’s wastewater utility will pay for
these costs, which are estimated to be a small increment of the city’s system as a whole.
FUNDING SOURCES
Wastewater Impact Fees, with local share recovered via payback district
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY19 FY20 FY21
261
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Wastewater
PROJECT NUMBER
WWIF23
DEPARTMENT
WW IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
DAVIS LANE EXTENSION (LIFT STATION TO WRF)*
FY17 FY18 Unscheduled
$1,313,526
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project will provide a force main from the Davis Lane Lift Station to the Water Reclimation Facility
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Limit future development in the area.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
If constructed to the line sizes master planned in the City’s Wastewater Facilities plan, capacity will be provided for anticipating the long-term
future growth in this area
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Impact fees can not fund operating and maintenance costs. The city’s wastewater utility will pay for
these costs, which are estimated to be a small increment of the city’s system as a whole.
FUNDING SOURCES
Wastewater Impact Fees, with local share recovered via payback district
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY19 FY20 FY21
262
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Wastewater
PROJECT NUMBER
WWIF24
DEPARTMENT
WW IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
DAVIS LANE (LIFT STATION)*
FY17 FY18 Unscheduled
$500,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project will construct a small initial Davis Lane Lift Station to serve area north of the Cattail Lake Lift Station.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Limit future development in the area.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
If constructed to the line sizes master planned in the City’s Wastewater Facilities plan, capacity will be provided for anticipating the long-term
future growth in this area
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Impact fees can not fund operating and maintenance costs. The city’s wastewater utility will pay for
these costs, which are estimated to be a small increment of the city’s system as a whole.
FUNDING SOURCES
Wastewater Impact Fees, with local share recovered via payback district
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY19 FY20 FY21
263
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Wastewater
PROJECT NUMBER
WWIF25
DEPARTMENT
WW IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
CATTAIL CREEK BASIN EXTENSION (19TH FROM GRAF TO STUCKY AND STUCKY FROM 19T
FY17
$1,263,674
FY18 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project consists of increasing capacity to the existing sewer network by installing a sewer extension along 19th (from Graf to
Stucky) and Stucky (from 19th to 0.5 miles west of 19th)
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Limit future development in the area.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
If constructed to the line sizes master planned in the City’s Wastewater Facilities plan, capacity will be provided for anticipating the long-term
future growth in this area
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Impact fees can not fund operating and maintenance costs. The city’s wastewater utility will pay for
these costs, which are estimated to be a small increment of the city’s system as a whole.
FUNDING SOURCES
Wastewater Impact Fees, with local share recovered via payback district
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY19 FY20 FY21
264
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Wastewater
PROJECT NUMBER
WWIF26
DEPARTMENT
WW IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
SOUTH UNIVERSITY DISTRICT/CATTAIL CREEK BASIN EXTENSION (LINCOLNTO GARFIELD F
FY17
$1,413,746
FY18 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project consists of extending the sewer main to service South University District and Catail Creek Basin.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Limit future development in the area.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
If constructed to the line sizes master planned in the City’s Wastewater Facilities plan, capacity will be provided for anticipating the long-term
future growth in this area
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Impact fees can not fund operating and maintenance costs. The city’s wastewater utility will pay for
these costs, which are estimated to be a small increment of the city’s system as a whole.
FUNDING SOURCES
Wastewater Impact Fees, with local share recovered via payback district
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY19 FY20 FY21
265
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Wastewater
PROJECT NUMBER
WWIF27
DEPARTMENT
WW IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
SOUTH UNIVERSITY DISTRICT/CATTAIL CREEK BASIN EXTENSION (S 15TH AVE TO WILLOW
FY17 FY18
$795,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project consists of extending the sewer main to service the South University District area with a 10 inch sewer pipe.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Limit future development in the area.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
If constructed to the line sizes master planned in the City’s Wastewater Facilities plan, capacity will be provided for anticipating the long-term
future growth in this area
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Impact fees can not fund operating and maintenance costs. The city’s wastewater utility will pay for
these costs, which are estimated to be a small increment of the city’s system as a whole.
FUNDING SOURCES
Wastewater Impact Fees, with local share recovered via payback district
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY19 FY20 FY21
266
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Wastewater
PROJECT NUMBER
WWIF28
DEPARTMENT
WW IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
BRIDGER CANYON RD IMPROVEMENT (STORY MILL RD TO W ENTRANCE OF BRIDGER VIEW
FY17
$322,829
FY18 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project consists of installing a 15” sewer pipe from Story Mill Rd to the W entrance of Bridger View Trailer Court.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Limit future development in the area.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
If constructed to the line sizes master planned in the City’s Wastewater Facilities plan, capacity will be provided for anticipating the long-term
future growth in this area
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Impact fees can not fund operating and maintenance costs. The city’s wastewater utility will pay for
these costs, which are estimated to be a small increment of the city’s system as a whole.
FUNDING SOURCES
Wastewater Impact Fees, with developer contributions
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY19 FY20 FY21
267
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Wastewater
PROJECT NUMBER
WWIF29
DEPARTMENT
WW IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
IMPACT FEE STUDY - WASTEWATER
FY17
$50,000
FY18 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The city needs to update its calculation and methodology used to establish the price of wastewater impacte fees.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None. Required by State Law.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
A compliant impact fee program.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
None.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% Wastewater Impact Fees.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY19 FY20 FY21
268
CIP Project Fund
Impact Fees Wastewater
PROJECT NUMBER
WWIF30
DEPARTMENT
WW IMPACT FEES
PROJECT NAME
WASTEWATER RIGHT OF WAY - ACROSS MSU FARM
FY17
$300,000
FY18 Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The wastewater main right of way needs to be acquired across the MSU farm, to provide wastewater service connectivity to the
south university district. Customarily, main right of way is provided when development occurs, but the MSU farm is very
unlikely to develop beyond its existing agricultural use. MSU has indicated that it may be willing to trade the right-of-way for in-
kind services/installation of a water service line to their pavilion and connection to the service line. Either way, our righto of way
needs to extend from Garfield Street south to Lincoln St. To be done in conjunction with WWIF26 - South University
District/Cattail Creek Basin Extension.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
MSU Farm remains on a well and septic system. There are no suitable alternatives for the location of the Sewer Main. Without the project,
the south university district will not have adequate sewer service for further development.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Expansion of sewer service to growing parts of the community. Working with the existing land owner to negotiate the sale of right of way.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Minimal - paid for by Wastewater Utility.
FUNDING SOURCES
Wastewater Impact Fees
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
FY19 FY20 FY21
269