Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutA1. England COA DEVPage 1 of 19 Staff Report for the England Residence Remodel Certificate of Appropriateness with Deviations, Application No. 15-224 Date: City Commission meeting is on July 13, 2015 Project Description: A Certificate of Appropriateness application with deviations to remodel the residential structure located at 401 North Grand Avenue in the following manner: 1) demolition of the existing structure’s roof framing and exterior siding, 2) addition of a new second story and front porch within the existing structure’s building footprint, 3) addition of new exterior siding and windows and 4) related site improvements. Project Location: 401 North Grand Avenue; legally described as Lots 19 and 20, Block 7, Beall’s Third Addition, City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana. Recommendation: Approval with conditions. Recommended Motion: “Having reviewed and considered the application materials, public comment, and all the information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for zoning application no. 15-224 and move to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness with Deviations application with conditions and subject to all applicable code provisions.” Report Date: Friday, July 3, 2015 Staff Contact: Allyson B. Brekke, Associate Planner Agenda Item Type: Action (Quasi-judicial) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Unresolved Issues There are no unresolved issues. Project Summary This is a Certificate of Appropriateness application requesting deviations from the Bozeman Municipal Code for the remodel of the existing residential structure located at 401 North Grand Avenue. The property is located at the northwest corner of the North Grand Avenue and West Villard Street intersection. The proposed alterations to the structure are: 1) demolition of the existing structure’s roof framing and exterior siding, 2) addition of a new second story and front porch within the existing structure’s building footprint, 3) addition of new exterior siding and windows and 4) related site improvements. 322 England Residence Remodel Certificate of Appropriateness with Deviations, Application No. 15-224 Page 2 of 19 The remodel requires two deviations, the first from Section 38.08.050.A.1.c of the Bozeman Municipal Code, “Residential Zoning Districts - Yards” to allow the new second-story addition, front and rear porches to encroach into the required 15 foot front yard setback, and the second from Section 38.08.050.A.3 of the Bozeman Municipal Code, “Residential Zoning Districts - Yards” to allow the new second-story addition to encroach into the required 5 foot side yard setback. The second-story addition is occurring above the existing residential structure’s footprint which is already encroaching within the required front and side yard setbacks. The existing encroachments that exist and maintained with the second-story is 8.5 feet into the 15- foot front yard setback along Villard Street, 7 feet into the 15-foot front yard setback along Grand Avenue and 2.7 feet into the 5-foot side yard setback to the north. The requested deviations will enable rehabilitation of a residence within the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District. The City Commission is the review authority for the project because the requested deviations exceed the 20 percent limitation on the deviations permitted to be approved by the Director of Community Development. The application would be limited to a three foot encroachment into the required front yards and two feet encroachment into the required side yard if the Director of Community Development were to remain the review authority of the application. For more project information, please see Appendix B. Alternatives 1. Approval of the application with conditions as recommended; 2. Denial of the requested deviations, which would require the applicant to redesign the proposed addition; or 3. Table the matter and request additional information. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... 1 Unresolved Issues ............................................................................................................... 1 Project Summary ................................................................................................................. 1 Alternatives ......................................................................................................................... 2 SECTION 1 - MAP AND EXHIBIT SERIES .......................................................................... 4 SECTION 2 –REQUESTED RELAXATIONS/DEVIATIONS/VARIANCES ...................... 9 SECTION 3 - RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ...................................... 9 SECTION 4 - CODE REQUIREMENTS REQUIRING PLAN CORRECTIONS ................. 9 SECTION 5 - STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS ............................................................. 9 323 England Residence Remodel Certificate of Appropriateness with Deviations, Application No. 15-224 Page 3 of 19 Standards for Certificates of Appropriateness, Section 38.16.050, BMC ........................ 10 Deviation Review Criteria Within the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District – Section 38.16.070.............................................................................................................. 14 APPENDIX A – PROJECT SITE ZONING AND GROWTH POLICY............................... 17 APPENDIX B – DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND.............. 17 APPENDIX C – NOTICING AND PUBLIC COMMENT ................................................... 18 APPENDIX D - OWNER INFORMATION AND REVIEWING STAFF............................ 18 FISCAL EFFECTS ................................................................................................................. 18 ATTACHMENTS ................................................................................................................... 19 324 England Residence Remodel Certificate of Appropriateness with Deviations, Application No. 15-224 Page 4 of 19 SECTION 1 - MAP AND EXHIBIT SERIES 325 England Residence Remodel Certificate of Appropriateness with Deviations, Application No. 15-224 Page 5 of 19 326 England Residence Remodel Certificate of Appropriateness with Deviations, Application No. 15-224 Page 6 of 19 Colored Schematics of Proposed Remodel 327 England Residence Remodel Certificate of Appropriateness with Deviations, Application No. 15-224 Page 7 of 19 Existing and Proposed Encroachments (Red Outline is Existing Encroachment, Highlighted Yellow is Proposed Second Story Encroachments, and Striped Highlighted Yellow is Proposed Covered Porch Encroachments) 328 England Residence Remodel Certificate of Appropriateness with Deviations, Application No. 15-224 Page 8 of 19 Demolition Plan (Areas to be Demolished Outlined in Red) Existing Condition- Northeast Elevation 329 England Residence Remodel Certificate of Appropriateness with Deviations, Application No. 15-224 Page 9 of 19 SECTION 2 –REQUESTED RELAXATIONS/DEVIATIONS/VARIANCES Two deviations from Chapter 38 of the Bozeman Municipal Code are requested with this Certificate of Appropriateness application from the following sections: 1) Section 38.08.050.A.1.c of the Bozeman Municipal Code, “Residential Zoning Districts - Yards” to allow the new second-story addition, front and rear porches to encroach into the required 15 foot front yard setback, and 2) Section 38.08.050.A.3 of the Bozeman Municipal Code, “Residential Zoning Districts - Yards” to allow the new second-story addition to encroach into the required 5 foot side yard setback. SECTION 3 - RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Please note that these conditions are in addition to any required code provisions identified in this report. Recommended Conditions of Approval: 1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the site plan drawings shall be revised to reflect the accurate property line locations along North Grand Avenue and West Villard Street at one foot on the inside edge of the public sidewalk. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall consolidate the underlying lots that comprise the subject property through either a subdivision exemption process or by filing a Lot Merger Agreement with the Department of Community Development. This agreement will be supplied to you by Planning Staff. 3. If any public sidewalk or curb are damaged during the construction, the applicant shall repair and replace them to the design standards of the City of Bozeman. This repair and/or replacement shall be noted on the site plan drawing in the building permit drawings. The applicant is required to obtain a “Sidewalk and/or Driveway and Curb Cut Permit” from the Engineering Department for that work if necessary. All new or replaced sidewalks must be inspected by the City Engineering Department prior to final occupancy of the residence. SECTION 4 - CODE REQUIREMENTS REQUIRING PLAN CORRECTIONS None have been identified at this time. SECTION 5 - STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS Analysis and resulting recommendations are based on the entirety of the application materials, municipal codes, standards, and plans, public comment, and all other materials available during the review period. Collectively this information is the record of the review. The analysis in this report is a summary of the completed review. 330 England Residence Remodel Certificate of Appropriateness with Deviations, Application No. 15-224 Page 10 of 19 Standards for Certificates of Appropriateness, Section 38.16.050, BMC Section 38.16.050 specifies the required standards for granting Certificate of Appropriateness approval for proposed alterations. A. All work performed in completion of an approved Certificate of Appropriateness shall be in conformance with the most recent edition of the Secretary of Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring and Reconstructing Historic Buildings (Published 1995), published by U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Cultural Resource Stewardship and Partnerships, Heritage Preservation Services, Washington, D.C. (available for review at the Department of Community Development and online at http://www.nps.gov/history/hps/tps/standguide/ ). This application proposes modifications to a residential structure within the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District that was originally built pre-1904. Between 1904 and 1912, the original structure increased in size to occupy the building footprint that it occupies today. The structure is considered non-contributing in historical significance, because of modifications to the original architectural features that have occurred throughout the years that have negatively affected the structure’s historic integrity. Therefore, the SOI Standards and Guidelines do not apply to this application. B. Architectural appearance design guidelines used to consider the appropriateness and compatibility of proposed alterations with original design features of subject structures or properties, and with neighboring structures and properties, shall focus upon the following: 1. Height; The existing one-story residence is a little over 18 feet tall at the gable roof ridgeline. The application proposes to increase the height of the residence to 22’-3” to accommodate the proposed second story. This is approximately a 4 foot height increase to the residence’s total building height. The proposed building height of 22’-3” falls within the range of height seen throughout the North Grand Avenue streetscape, which is composed of one-, one-and-one-half, and two-story residential homes. The taller houses along this street are seen at the corner properties, which supports the proposal to increase in height at the West Villard and North Grand property. Please see additional comments under “Relationship of Building Masses” and “Roof Shape.” The increase in height for the second story addition is minimized by consciously choosing to rafter frame the second story and using a smaller second story plate height. This helps the new second story building mass to keep a lower building profile. Staff finds the modified height of the residence appropriate for the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District. 331 England Residence Remodel Certificate of Appropriateness with Deviations, Application No. 15-224 Page 11 of 19 2. Proportions of doors and windows; Seven windows in the existing residential structure will not be changed and will remain. The 12 new windows proposed with the second story will coordinate with the existing windows both in size and placement and materials. The existing and new windows will be trimmed in a similar detail. Staff finds the proportion of windows and doors proposed with this project to be appropriate for the historic residence in the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District. 3. Relationship of building masses and spaces; The proposed second story does significantly change the residential structure’s building mass and form. The existing structure is composed of two gable fronting roof forms that front North Grand Avenue with a cross gable ridge in between. With the proposal, the building changes to one gable roof form fronting North Grand, while a new gable roofline is created with the second story that runs the entire length of the existing building footprint and presents a gable front along West Villard. The new roof plan creates an L-shaped plan rather than the existing H-shaped plan. The increase in height for the second story addition is minimized by consciously choosing to rafter frame the second story and using a smaller second story plate height. This helps the new second story building mass to keep a lower building profile. The second story height is also minimized by running a secondary shed roof line across the entire front façade that face North Grand. The secondary shed roof line is repeated in the rear of the structure as well and fronts the rear yard. This secondary roof line helps break up the second story wall plane and helps minimize the building massing. The proposed porches in both the front and rear help bring the massing of the second story down to the pedestrian level. The vertical direction of the second story height is minimized with the incorporation of shed roof lines into the primary gable ridges. Staff finds the proposed relationship of building masses and spaces appropriate for a residential structure outside of a historic district but within the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District boundaries. 4. Roof shape; The proposed second story does significantly change the residential structure’s roof plan. The existing structure is composed of two gable fronting roof forms that front North Grand Avenue with a cross gable ridge in between. With the proposal, the building changes to one gable roof form fronting North Grand, while a new gable roofline is created with the second story that runs the entire length of the existing building footprint and presents a gable front along West Villard. The new roof plan creates an L-shaped plan rather than the existing H-shaped plan. 332 England Residence Remodel Certificate of Appropriateness with Deviations, Application No. 15-224 Page 12 of 19 The proposed L-shaped roof plan is found as appropriate for the surrounding neighborhood as several historic examples exist. Additionally, the gable roof form is seen traditionally along North Grand. Staff finds the proposed modifications to the roof shape appropriate for a residence outside a historic district but within the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District boundaries. 5. Scale; While the proposal is to add a second story, the scale of the addition is very modest by bringing the total height of the remodel to just a little over 22 feet. See staff comments under “Relationship of building masses.” Staff finds the proposed modifications to the building’s scale as appropriate for a residence outside a historic district but within the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District boundaries. 6. Directional expression; The proposed L-shaped roof plan helps the residential structure better address both street frontages. The house will now have a gable fronting roof form that faces West Villard Street. Staff also finds the L-shaped directional expression to traditionally exist within the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed porches in both the front and rear help bring the massing of the second story down to the pedestrian level. The vertical direction of the second story height is minimized with the incorporation of shed roof lines into the primary gable ridges. The front porch also helps to signify the front entrance of the house. Staff finds the proposed modifications to the building’s directional expression as appropriate for a residence outside a historic district but within the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District boundaries. 7. Architectural details; The proposed architecture is intended to reflect Craftsman architectural details. All new exterior siding is proposed with the addition. Horizontal lap siding with a 6” reveal is proposed for the first story and cedar shingles is proposed in the second story. Window trim, corner boards and belly band between the first and second floors help reflect similar architectural details as seen traditionally in the neighborhood. The shed roof lines have exposed rafter tails, while the gable roof ends have cedar knee braces, both which are typical of Craftsman architecture. The application also proposes an accessory structure with similar architectural detailing. Staff finds the proposed modifications to the building’s architectural detailing as appropriate for a residence outside a historic district but within the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District boundaries. 333 England Residence Remodel Certificate of Appropriateness with Deviations, Application No. 15-224 Page 13 of 19 8. Concealment of non-period appurtenances, such as mechanical equipment; and No mechanical equipment was proposed with the application. Mechanical equipment must be screened as required in the Bozeman Municipal Code. 9. Materials and color scheme. The colored schematics as shown in “Section 1: Map and Exhibit Series” of this staff report show the proposed color scheme of green, red and natural cedar. White vinyl windows are proposed for all new windows to match the existing windows that are preserved with the remodel. New colored window trim is proposed for the entire structure to help coordinate with the new color scheme. Staff finds the proposed modifications to the building’s materials and color scheme as appropriate for a residence outside a historic district but within the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District boundaries. C. Contemporary, nonperiod and innovative design of new structures and additions to existing structures shall be encouraged when such new construction or additions do not destroy significant historical, cultural or architectural structures, or their components, and when such design is compatible with the foregoing elements of the structure and the surrounding structures. The application proposes demolition of the existing roof, rafters, and related walls to accommodate the new second story. As a part of this application, Staff requested the applicant to examine the cost of proposed demolition in comparison to the value of the historic structure. The applicant did determine the proposed demolition is less than 50% of the replacement cost of the historic structure. This allowed the applicant to request a historic zoning deviation for the second story addition as Staff found the proposed work rehabilitated the existing structure by retaining more than 50% of its value. The demolition and cost analysis the applicant supplied is included below: Replacement value of the part of existing structure being demolished (roof, rafters, and related walls) = $30,000. Replacement value of existing structure in total: ~1600 sq ft of existing living space x $190/sq ft = $304,000. This yields a demolition percent of 30/304 or 9.8%. These estimates have been provided by Vidmar Construction, our contractor for the project. For clarity and in summation, here are the percentages of demolition: a. % of existing replacement value: 9.8% b. % of existing living square footage: 0% c. % of walls being demolished as % of all walls (sq ft): 10.1% d. % of existing total volume of house demolished (cu ft): 1645/(11433+1645) = 12.6% D. When applying the standards of subsections A-C, the review authority shall be guided by the Design Guidelines for the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District which are hereby incorporated by this reference. When reviewing a contemporary, non- 334 England Residence Remodel Certificate of Appropriateness with Deviations, Application No. 15-224 Page 14 of 19 period, or innovative design of new structures, or addition to existing structure, the review authority shall be guided by the Design Guidelines for the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District to determine whether the proposal is compatible with any existing or surrounding structures. The Design Guidelines were reviewed with the COA standards. Any comments pertaining to the guidelines were incorporated into staff’s comments addressing the architectural appearance design guidelines. E. Conformance with other applicable development standards of this title. The application requests two deviations from Section 38.08.050 “Yards” Bozeman Municipal Code. Please see further review under the deviation review criteria. The application proposes significant new construction on a residential parcel with more than one underlying lot line. The International Building Code prohibits new construction across lot lines. Staff has included recommended condition of approval no. one to address this issue. With exception of the requested deviations, the application meets all other applicable development standards. F. Tax abatement certificate of appropriateness applications are also reviewed with the procedures and standards established in chapter 2, article 6, division 2. The application does not meet the standards for awarding Tax Abatement for Historic Preservation, as found in Sec. 2.06.390 Bozeman Municipal Code. Deviation Review Criteria Within the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District – Section 38.16.070 The application requests two deviations from Chapter 38 of the Bozeman Municipal Code (BMC) from the following sections: 1) Section 38.08.050.A.1.c of the Bozeman Municipal Code, “Residential Zoning Districts - Yards” to allow the new second-story addition, front and rear porches to encroach into the required 15 foot front yard setback, and 2) Section 38.08.050.A.3 of the Bozeman Municipal Code, “Residential Zoning Districts - Yards” to allow the new second-story addition to encroach into the required 5 foot side yard setback. As the residence at 401 North Grand Avenue is located on the corner of North Grand Avenue and West Villard Street, the property presents a “second or subsequent front yard or corner side yard,” as defined by Sec. 38.42.2780 BMC as “A yard on a corner lot the area of which is bounded by a line extending from the front of the principal building (the front building line) to a point intersecting the side street right-of-way line (side lot line), then along the side lot line to a 335 England Residence Remodel Certificate of Appropriateness with Deviations, Application No. 15-224 Page 15 of 19 point intersecting the rear lot line, then along the rear lot line to a point intersecting the line formed by extending the wall of the nearest principal building paralleling the side lot line.” Sec. 38.08.050 A BMC “Yards” requires a minimum 15 foot front yard setback for properties adjacent to local streets, which in this case would apply to both the North Grand and West Villard fronts of the property. This situation is illustrated as follows in Figure 38.42.2650 “Required Yard:” 1. Modifications shall be more historically appropriate for the building and site in question and the adjacent properties, as determined by the standards in section 38.16.050, than would be achieved under a literal enforcement of this chapter; The existing structure was built over one hundred years ago and therefore, does not comply with the current required yard setbacks as prescribed in the current Bozeman Municipal Code. The second addition is occurring in a location where the existing house is already located within the required front and yard setbacks. The current encroachments have existed on the property since 1912 (some existing since 1904) and reflect the historical pattern of development on the property. With the proposal, the house building footprint remains the same with the only increase in encroachments occurring with the proposed front and rear covered porches. 336 England Residence Remodel Certificate of Appropriateness with Deviations, Application No. 15-224 Page 16 of 19 If a deviation were not requested, the required yard setbacks along North Grand and West Villard would be 15 feet. The required side yard setback to the north would be 5 feet. This would cause the second story addition to occur in a very small section of the existing structure’s footprint, not allowing the sidewalls of the two floors to be the same and create a non-traditional design. The requested deviations allow the existing structure to increase in size while preserving the existing building footprint and small front and side yard setbacks. Therefore, Staff finds the modifications enabled through approval of the requested deviations are more historically appropriate for the residential structure building in question than would be achieved under a literal enforcement of this chapter. 2. Modifications will have minimal adverse effect on abutting properties or the permitted uses thereof; and The proposed encroachments for the second story already are present with the existing residential structure. The required deviations allow the second story addition to maintain the same side, front and rear wall locations as the existing structure. They also allow the second story to better address the West Villard Street frontage by providing a gable front, while still providing a front yard setback distance that is within the range of setbacks seen traditionally along West Villard. A more than two foot side yard setback is provided to the north, which allows adequate space to perform maintenance to the structure, while also providing a buffer to the adjacent neighbor. Public notice of the requested deviation was completed as described in Appendix C. This included a notice mailed to all adjoining property owners of record. One public comment in support of the project was received and is attached to this staff report following the applicant’s materials. Staff finds that the requested yard deviations will have minimal adverse effects on abutting properties or the permitted uses thereof. 3. Modifications shall assure the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare. Approvals may be conditioned to assure such protection, and such conditions may include a time period within which alterations will be completed; landscaping and maintenance thereof; architectural, site plan and landscape design modifications; or any other conditions in conformity with the intent and purpose set forth in this article. The modifications enabled through approval of the requested deviations will assure the public health, safety and general welfare. Analysis has been completed and no new hazards will be created through approval of the requested deviation. Staff finds that the proposed modification will not adversely affect the public health, safety and general welfare. 337 England Residence Remodel Certificate of Appropriateness with Deviations, Application No. 15-224 Page 17 of 19 APPENDIX A – PROJECT SITE ZONING AND GROWTH POLICY Zoning Designation and Land Uses: The subject property is zoned R-3. The intent of the R-3 residential medium density district is to provide for the development of one- to five-household residential structures near service facilities within the city. It should provide for a variety of housing types to serve the varied needs of households of different size, age and character, while reducing the adverse effect of nonresidential uses. Adopted Growth Policy Designation: The property is designated as Residential. The Residential land use category is described as: “This category designates places where the primary activity is urban density dwellings. Other uses which complement residences are also acceptable such as parks, low intensity home based occupations, fire stations, churches, and schools. High density residential areas should be established in close proximity to commercial centers to facilitate the provision of services and employment opportunities to persons without requiring the use of an automobile. Implementation of this category by residential zoning should provide for and coordinate intensive residential uses in proximity to commercial centers. The residential designation indicates that it is expected that development will occur within municipal boundaries, which may require annexation prior to development.” APPENDIX B – DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND Project Background The applicant went through an informal review by the Development Review Committee prior to submitting a formal Certificate of Appropriateness application. Staff’s recommendations during the informal application process were well received by the applicant and reflected in the formal application proposal. Project Summary This is a Certificate of Appropriateness application requesting deviations from the Bozeman Municipal Code for the remodel of the existing residential structure located at 401 North Grand Avenue. The property is located at the northwest corner of the North Grand Avenue and West Villard Street intersection. The proposed alterations to the structure are: 1) demolition of the existing structure’s roof framing and exterior siding, 2) addition of a new second story and front porch within the existing structure’s building footprint, 3) addition of new exterior siding and windows and 4) related site improvements. The remodel requires two deviations, the first from Section 38.08.050.A.1.c of the Bozeman Municipal Code, “Residential Zoning Districts - Yards” to allow the new second-story addition, front and rear porches to encroach into the required 15 foot front yard setback, and the second from Section 38.08.050.A.3 of the Bozeman Municipal Code, “Residential Zoning Districts - 338 England Residence Remodel Certificate of Appropriateness with Deviations, Application No. 15-224 Page 18 of 19 Yards” to allow the new second-story addition to encroach into the required 5 foot side yard setback. The second-story addition is occurring above the existing residential structure’s footprint which is always encroaching within the required front and side yard setbacks. The existing encroachments that exist and maintained with the second-story is 8.5 feet into the 15- foot front yard setback along Villard Street, 7 feet into the 15-foot front yard setback along Grand Avenue and 2.7 feet into the 5-foot side yard setback to the north. The requested deviations will enable rehabilitation of a residence within the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District. The City Commission is the review authority for the project because the requested deviations exceed the 20 percent limitation on the deviations permitted to be approved by the Director of Community Development. The application would be limited to a three foot encroachment into the required front yards and two feet encroachment into the required side yard if the Director of Community Development were to remain the review authority of the application. Demolition Analysis The application proposes demolition of the existing roof, rafters, and related walls to accommodate the new second story. As a part of this application, Staff requested the applicant to examine the cost of proposed demolition in comparison to the value of the historic structure. The applicant did determine the proposed demolition is less than 50% of the replacement cost of the historic structure. This allowed the applicant to request a historic zoning deviation for the second story addition as Staff found the proposed work rehabilitated the existing structure by retaining more than 50% of its value. APPENDIX C – NOTICING AND PUBLIC COMMENT Public notice of the requested deviation was mailed to adjoining property owners on June 25, 2015. The notice was also printed in the Sunday, June 28 and July 5, 2015 legal section of the Bozeman Daily Chronicle. The public notice period will close at the public hearing on July 13, 2015. APPENDIX D - OWNER INFORMATION AND REVIEWING STAFF Owner: Brian England, 401 North Grand Avenue, Bozeman, MT 59715 Applicant: Same Representative: ELS Architects, 129 North 25th Avenue, Bozeman, MT 59718 Report By: Allyson B. Brekke, Associate Planner FISCAL EFFECTS No unusual fiscal effects have been identified. No presently budgeted funds will be changed by this Certificate of Appropriateness application. 339 England Residence Remodel Certificate of Appropriateness with Deviations, Application No. 15-224 Page 19 of 19 ATTACHMENTS 1. Applicant’s materials (revised and original) 2. Public comment The full application and file of record can be viewed at the Community Development Department at 20 E. Olive Street, Bozeman, MT 59715. 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 June 1, 2015 Allyson Brekke City of Bozeman Planning Department Re: Sketch Plan/COA/ One deviation Re: England Remodel I150054 05.28.15 Allyson, Below please find responses to your items listed in your letter of May 13, 2015. We understand you have scheduled us for approval in the July city commission meeting. We thank you for getting us on the schedule but we wonder if that approval is still necessary given that we originally were working with an erroneous percentage of demolition measure. As can be seen below the correct percentage of demolition is less than 10%, and it is our understanding that the trigger for city commission approval was a percentage of demolition in excess of 20%. If our understanding of the trigger is in error, please accept our apologies and we ask that you educate us on the reason for explicit city commission approval. Response to Item #1: Site Plan has been identified with scale at half size and full size. Please see attached drawing set. Response to Item #2: In our initial submission we misunderstood the meaning of percentage of demolition. Our original drawing set A3-1 presented measures of ​new​ construction as a percentage of post-remodel structure. We apologize for this misunderstanding on our part and thank Allyson and Tom for helping us understand the standard per 38.32.040 B. After reading 38.32.040 B (code citation provided by Allyson in May 13th letter), and obtaining direct clarification from Tom in the planning office, we understand that the proper calculation is replacement value of the part of the structure to be demolished divided by the total replacement value of the existing structure. We present below calculations of percentage of demolition based upon replacement value. We have also enhanced the drawing set by adding scale drawings of the existing elevation with red indicating the components of the existing structure that will be removed and replaced (A3-1 in attached drawing set). We also provide alternative measures of demolition percentage below. Replacement value of the part of existing structure being demolished (roof, rafters, and related walls) - $30k. Replacement value of existing structure in total: ~1600 sq ft of existing living space x Page 1 of 4 348 $190/sq ft = $304,000. This yields a demolition percent of 30/304 or 9.8%. These estimates have been provided by Vidmar Construction, our contractor for the project. For clarity and in summation, here are the percentages of demolition: a. % of existing replacement value: 9.8% b. % of existing living square footage: 0% c. % of walls being demolished as % of all walls (sq ft) : 10.1% d. % of existing total volume of house demolished (cu ft) : 1645/(11433+1645) = 12.6% Response to Item #3: “The specific yard setback deviation amounts need to be identified” We are requesting a deviation from UDO section 38.08.050 (yards). While the existing setbacks will not change as a result of this project, it is our understanding that any significant exterior remodeling requires a deviation approval regardless. The existing structure was built over one hundred years ago and therefore does not comply with the setbacks as assigned to the current zoning district in which it sits. The UDO specifically allows for such deviations and recognizes such issues in 38.16.010 D. As requested in your letter, here are the zoning setbacks, the current setbacks, and the after setbacks for both first and second floors: Front Yard Corner Yard Side Yard Zoning 15’0’’ 15’0” 5’0” Current 9’0” 7’4” 2’6” After (1st floor) 9’0” 7’4” 2’6” After (2nd floor) 9’0” - 13’0” 7’4” 2’6” The second floor will have the same front yard setback as the existing first floor for the north ⅓ of the structure (~13.3 feet) and will have a 4 foot larger setback for the south ⅔ of the structure (~26.7 feet). The corner and side yard setbacks for the second floor will have the same setback as the existing first floor. Please see drawing set illustrations for a visualization. “The narrative addressing the deviation criteria is very brief and should be elaborated to better explain why this remodel is more historically appropriate” More historically appropriate ●The existing house has no corner board trim, skirt board trim, or belly band trim. The new remodel will have such trim which is a hallmark of the Craftsman look. ●The existing house has minimal window trim, whereas the new remodel will have substantial and highly decorated window trim in fashion with the Craftsman style (ref.) Page 2 of 4 349 ●The home as shown in the photos is monochromatic in color versus the three tones we are proposing that are picked from the Sherwin Williams line of Historic Colors, American Heritage Line. ●The existing house also has single tab shingles and we are proposing a 3 tab architectural shingle to mimic cedar shakes. ●The existing entry has underscaled 4x4 posts that we will be replacing with properly scaled 6x6 posts with braces. ●We are also adding the typical craftsman style detailing of flying rafters held up by knee braces and exposed rafter tails. ●The existing siding has a large 10 1/2” exposure and we are going to a narrower 6 ¾” exposure which is indicative of the early 1900s. ●The new remodel will also add the class cedar shingle siding found on many craftsman homes of the 1920s. Minimal adverse effect on abutting properties There will be no effect to abutting properties. The house is on a corner with an alley. We have talked to our neighbors and shown them the plans, and they love it. The second floor is not a full story. Building in line with the existing structure will not further encroach into the public right of way. Protection of public health, safety, and welfare Included in the plan is an upgrade of fire safety on the existing walls (suggested during the design review committee meeting). The existing North setback is closer than 10’ and is by today's standard required to have a 1 hour rating. The existing structure will have densdeck added as the exterior sheathing and the second story will be constructed as a 1 hour rated wall with a fire rated eave. There are no other effects on public health, although the residents of 401 Grand will be a little safer after we address our existing structural issues. The rafters in the main house have been structurally compromised due to a fire sometime in the structure’s history and the building envelope needs repair due to age and water damage. Encourage restoration and rehabilitation that contributes to historic nature This deviation would allow the owner to rehabilitate the property in the Craftsman style native to Bozeman. The owner is choosing not to demolish the home and build a new modern interpretation of an historic property. Response to Item #4: Chapter 2 Design Guidelines for All Properties: 1. In general we are keeping our site planning as exists. We are maintaining our detached sidewalk, planting strips, and existing trees that match the neighborhood. (ch.2 D.) 2. Our building form is much the same as the existing, we have a gable facing east and a cross gable running north and south. This is indicative of craftsman houses and in keeping with a rectangular form found in the neighborhood. (Ch.2 F. 1) 3. We are taking off the large lap siding and putting on a narrower lap siding mixed with cedar shingles that was traditionally used in the early 1900s. We are not introducing any shiny Page 3 of 4 350 reflective modern materials. The lower metal roofs will be painted and not raw galvanized material. (ch.2. H.1) Chapter 3 Design Guidelines for Residential Areas 1. We have kept the front porch to signify the front entry. The front entry is single story as most traditional homes on the street are. The pedestrian scale has been retained with a single story shed roof. The posts frame the entry door clearly identifying the front of the home from the corner yard. The existing sidewalk will be retained with landscaping as exists and will not be paved over. (Ch.3 A.1.2.3.4.) 2. We have run a shed roof along 60% of the front facade to keep a single story humanscale and one story porch feel as recommended in Ch. 3. B. 1. The new addition does not exceed a two story full height. The second floor plate height is only 6’ 2 ¾”, not 8’ 0” (a full second story plate) in order to keep the home lower profile. We are opting to rafter frame the home in order to keep a lower profile which is more costly than pre-manufactured trusses. Again, 60% of the front facade is not a full two story height. (ch. 3.B.4.) 3. We are not asking to increase the size of the existing footprint of the home or to deviate from the setbacks the home has already established before the code came into being. (Ch3. b.5.) 4. Two thirds of the replaced second story is set back from the existing first floor wall line. This reduces the vertical wall on the front yard setback, actually making the setback appearance greater than it is today. Per the design review committee preview, Craftsman style is in keeping with the neighborhood, and a two story structure is appropriate given the surrounding structures. Best regards, Eryn Schwer, Architect Brian England, Owner   Page 4 of 4 351 352 353 354 355 356 CODE REQUIREMENTST.O.FF @ MAIN FLR100' - 0"T.O.2ND FLOOR109' - 4 1/2"ARCHITECTURALA0-1 COVER SHEET, CODE INFO & SITE INFORMATIONA1-1 3-D VIEWSA2-1 SITE PLANA2-2 EXISTING PLANSA2-3 EXISTING ELEVATIONSA3-1 DEMO ELEVATIONSA3-11 FINISHED SECOND FLOOR PLANS, ROOF PLAN, &SECTIONSA4-0 FINISHED ELEVATIONSA4-1 COMPLETE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSA0-12SE CORNER VIEW 3/32" = 1'-0"A0-1501- EAST STREETSCAPE357 MAIN FLOOR100'-0"NEXISTINGGARAGE20' X24'-480 SF6' - 0"9' - 0"5' - 0"6' - 0"5' - 0"5' - 0"18' - 0"9' - 0"24' - 0"2' - 8"2' - 4"7' - 6"7' - 6"5' - 0"6' - 0" 1/8" = 1'-0"A2-11SITE PLAN 1/16"=1'-0" @HALFSIZE SCALE358 3A5-12A5-1N6' - 0"9' - 0"5' - 0"5' - 0"2' - 8"2' - 4"7' - 6"7' - 6"5' - 0"6' - 0" 1/4" = 1'-0"EX-11Second Floor Overlay Plan359 1"13' - 10"13' - 8 1/2"14' - 0 1/2"33' - 2"8' - 5"31' - 11 1/2"4' - 0"M. BDRME101M. BATHE102LIVING RME103BDRM #2E104KITCHENE100534CDEAB128' - 9"1' - 9"12' - 2 1/2"14' - 0"7' - 5"6' - 4"13' - 10"14' - 0"534CDEAB27' - 5"6' - 4"13' - 10"14' - 0"1' - 9"12' - 2 1/2"14' - 0"4" / 12"12" / 12"3" / 12"12" / 12"12" / 12"12" / 12"12" / 12"12" / 12"12" / 12"12" / 12"12" / 12"1" / 12"315 SFOFFICEE200534AB 1/4" = 1'-0"A2-21EXISTING MAIN FLR PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0"A2-22EXISTING ROOF PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0"A2-23EXISTING SECOND FLR PLAN360 T.O.FF @ MAIN FLR100' - 0"B.O. EXIST. FIN. CLG.109' - 4"T.O.2ND FLOOR109' - 4 1/2"6' 8" PL116' - 0 1/2"T.O.FF @ MAIN FLR100' - 0"B.O. EXIST. FIN. CLG.109' - 4"T.O.2ND FLOOR109' - 4 1/2"6' 8" PL116' - 0 1/2"12" / 12"12" / 12"12" / 12"12" / 12"T.O.FF @ MAIN FLR100' - 0"B.O. EXIST. FIN. CLG.109' - 4"6' 8" PL116' - 0 1/2"6' 8" PL116' - 0 1/2"4" / 12"T.O.FF @ MAIN FLR100' - 0"B.O. EXIST. FIN. CLG.109' - 4"12" / 12"12" / 12"12" / 12"12" / 12" 1/4" = 1'-0"A2-310-EXISTING North Elevation 1/4" = 1'-0"A2-320-EXISTING East Elevation 1/4" = 1'-0"A2-330-EXISTING South Elevation 1/4" = 1'-0"A2-340-EXISTING West Elevation361 T.O.FF @ MAIN FLR100' - 0"53T.O.2ND FLOOR109' - 4 1/2"6' 8" PL116' - 0 1/2"42EXTG BLDG HGT17' - 9"T.O.FF @ MAIN FLR100' - 0"T.O.2ND FLOOR109' - 4 1/2"6' 8" PL116' - 0 1/2"CDEABT.O.FF @ MAIN FLR100' - 0"53T.O.2ND FLOOR109' - 4 1/2"6' 8" PL116' - 0 1/2"42T.O.FF @ MAIN FLR100' - 0"6' 8" PL116' - 0 1/2"CDEAB 1/4" = 1'-0"A3-1102-DEMO NORTH ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0"A3-1202- DEMO EAST ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0"A3-1302- DEMO SOUTH ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0"A3-1402- DEMO WEST ELEVATION362 3A3-113A3-1153427' - 8"CDEAB1' - 9"12' - 2 1/2"14' - 0"26' - 2 1/2"14' - 9"27' - 5"6' - 4"13' - 10"14' - 0"WALK IN CLST201LIVING AREA200DEN201FUTURE BATH20241' - 7"2' 0" x 4' 0"2' 0" x 4' 0"2' 6" X 2' 6"2' 6" X 2' 6"2' 6" X 2' 6"2' 0" x 2' 0"2' 0" x 2' 0"2' 0" x 2' 0"2' 6" x 3' 6"2' 6" x 3' 6"2' 6" x 3' 6"2' 6" X 2' 6"2' 6" X 2' 6"2' 6" X 2' 6"T.O.FF @ MAIN FLR100' - 0"LIBRARY102KITCHEN10153T.O.2ND FLOOR109' - 4 1/2"6' 8" PL116' - 0 1/2"48' - 0"114' - 0"12' - 2 1/2"10' - 6"2T.O.PL.6' - 2 3/4"9' - 6 5/8"5' - 10"2' - 4"5' - 6"7' - 1"7' - 6 3/4"12' - 10 1/4"5' - 9 1/2"LIVING AREA200123.00123.00124.50129.00129.00123.001' - 6"3A3-113A3-11534CDEAB1213' - 11 1/2"14' - 0"123.00123.00123.00124.50129.00129.0012 9.00 12 9.00 8' - 9"1' - 9"12' - 2 1/2"14' - 0"7' - 5"6' - 4"13' - 10"14' - 0" 1/4" = 1'-0"A3-11202-SECOND FLOOR PLANN 1/4" = 1'-0"A3-113NEW E/W SECTIONSQUARE FOOTAGE NOTESEXISTING FIRST FLOOR 1225 SFNEW SECOND FLOOR 1063 SFTOTAL 2288 SF% OF NEW CONSTRUCTIONBASED ON FLOOR AREA=46% NEW CONST.MAIN FLOOR VOLUME=11433 CFSECOND FLOOR VOLUME=8398 CFPERCENT OF NEW CONSTRUCTION=42%PROJECT SCOPENEW SIDING=100%NEW ROOF STRUCTURE=100%EXISTING WALL FRAMING TO STAY=1570 SFNEW WALL FRAMING @ SECOND FLR= 854 SF 35%EXISTING WINDOWS TO STAY=7 NEW=12EXISTING CEILING WILL SERVE AS SECOND FLOORSTRUCTURE W/ STRUCTURAL MODIFICATIONSCONSTRUCTION SCHEDULESUBMIT COA APPLICATIONCITY COMMISSION RULING ON DEVIATIONIF YES, THEN,COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS (ARCH & STRUC) ASAPSUBMIT FOR BUILDING PERMITOBTAIN PERMIT-START ASAPGOAL START DATE JULY 1, 2015. 1/4" = 1'-0"A3-111ROOF PLAN363 T.O.FF @ MAIN FLR100' - 0"T.O.2ND FLOOR109' - 4 1/2"6' 8" PL116' - 0 1/2"BLDG HEIGHT22' - 2 3/4"EXTG BLDG HGT17' - 9"4' - 5 3/4"T.O.FF @ MAIN FLR100' - 0"T.O.2ND FLOOR109' - 4 1/2"6' 8" PL116' - 0 1/2"129.00129.00T.O.FF @ MAIN FLR100' - 0"T.O.2ND FLOOR109' - 4 1/2"6' 8" PL116' - 0 1/2"124.50123.00123.00129.00129.00T.O.FF @ MAIN FLR100' - 0"T.O.2ND FLOOR109' - 4 1/2"6' 8" PL116' - 0 1/2"129.00T.O.FRAME5' - 10" 1/4" = 1'-0"A4-0103-FINISHED NORTH ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0"A4-0203- FINISHED EAST ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0"A4-0303- FINISHED SOUTH ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0"A4-0403- FINISHED WEST ELEVATION364 A1-13SW CORNER VIEWA1-11GRAND AVE.A1-14august 5pmA1-12SE STREET CORNER365 T.O.FF @ MAIN FLR100' - 0"53T.O.2ND FLOOR109' - 4 1/2"T.O.PL116' - 0 1/2"4124.50123.00123.00129.00129.0012T.O.FF @ MAIN FLR100' - 0"129.00T.O.2ND FLOOR109' - 4 1/2"T.O.PL116' - 0 1/2"CDEABT.O.FRAME5' - 10"14' - 0"13' - 10"6' - 4"7' - 5"T.O.FF @ MAIN FLR100' - 0"129.00129.00T.O.2ND FLOOR109' - 4 1/2"T.O.PL116' - 0 1/2"CDEABT.O.FF @ MAIN FLR100' - 0"T.O.2ND FLOOR109' - 4 1/2"T.O.PL116' - 0 1/2"BLDG HEIGHT22' - 2 3/4"EXTG BLDG HGT17' - 9"4' - 5 3/4" 1/4" = 1'-0"A4-1201- SOUTH ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0"A4-1301- WEST ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0"A4-1401- EAST ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0"A4-1101-NORTH ELEVATION366 1 Allyson Brekke From:Wendy Thomas Sent:Monday, June 29, 2015 1:39 PM To:Allyson Brekke Cc:Chris Saunders Subject:FW: england residence remodel     ‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐  From: jim schipf [mailto:jrschipf@gmail.com]   Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 1:24 PM  To: Planning  Subject: england residence remodel    Hello  I live at 415 N. Grand Ave.I have no problem with what the Englands want to do with they’re  house. As long as they don’t want to build a separate rental unit (which I see they don’t) it  sounds fine.  So many folks want to build extra rental units on they’re properties these days. But I don’t  think it is appropriate in our neighborhood, and I would say no to that ! FWIW.  Jim Schipf  367