HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-10-1996 DRB Minutes DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 10, 1996
CITY COMMISSION ROOM, CITY HALL, 411 EAST MAIN
3:30 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Cliff Chisholm, Rich Noonan, Roger Cruwys, Kim Walker, Walt
Willett, Paul Gleye, Mara-Gai Katz, and Ed McCrone
STAFF PRESENT: Dean Patterson, Derek Strahn, Carol Schott
VISITORS PRESENT: Rob Carter, Joan Rudberg, Bob Eckey, Kris Thomas, A. Carr,
Souther, Todd Braden, Dave Crawford
Vice-Chairperson Kim Walker called the meeting to order. She noted that she had called the
Planning Office to remove the item from the consent agenda.
A. CONSENT AGENDA
L Ranch & Home MiSP Z-9673 - (Patterson)
2275 North 7th Avenue
- A Minor Site Plan Application to allow parking lot expansion to the
south of the existing facility.
Vice-Chairperson Walker noted that she had some questions on the proposed fence. Mr.
Dave Crawford joined the DRB and explained that the fence is a solid opaque wood fence, 6'
high. Mr. Cruwys noted that if it is cedar, it will need a center stringer and the applicant
*ill have to take care in distancing the posts. Chairperson Chisholm asked for an
explanation for the need of a fence. Mr. Crawford noted that the fence is required for
screening. Planner Patterson noted the applicant is thinking of planting a hedge. Mr.
Crawford noted that Shelly Engler and he had worked today on the landscaping plan. Ms.
Walker asked if tree groups are required. Planner Patterson confirmed. Mr. Crawford
noted that they will meet with a landscape architect to be sure to meet the required
landscaping points.
Chairperson Chisholm moved, Mr. Gleye seconded, that the project be approved as per staff
conditions and with the added condition that the hedge be included in the landscaping.
Motion carried unanimously by voice vote.
1
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 10, 1996
CITY COMMISSION ROOM, CITY HALL, 411 EAST MAIN
3:30 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Cliff Chisholm, Rich Noonan, Roger Cruwys, Kim Walker, Walt
Willett, Paul Gleye, Mara-Gai Katz, and Ed McCrone
STAFF PRESENT: Dean Patterson, Derek Strahn, Carol Schott
VISITORS PRESENT: Rob Carter, Joan Rudberg, Bob Eckey, Kris Thomas, A. Carr,
Souther, Todd Braden, Dave Crawford
B. PROJECT REVIEWS
1. Christensen COA Z-9681 - (Patterson)
416 North Montana
- A Certificate of Appropriateness Application to allow the extension of
northern roof rafters through the peak by 3' for overhang of clerestory
windows and a new roof on south wall to extend over front entry, deck and
walk.
Jason Christensen joined the DRB and displayed a colored rendering and distributed
comments from neighbors. Planner Dean Patterson reviewed the project. (Staff Report is on
file at the Planning Office.)
Mr. McCrone inquired if this is a narrow lot. Planning Director Andrew Epple clarified that
Mr. Christensen had received a deviation from the City several years ago to allow an
addition to the rear of the house.
Chairperson Chisholm noted that he had visited with Mr. Christensen on site. He asked Mr.
Christensen to explain his project. Mr. Christensen clarified the changes that had been made
in the application. Chairperson Chisholm noted that he had visited with the applicant and
discussed lighting for the interior. Mr. Christensen noted that he and his friend have built
several models with different series of windows. He explained the lighting on the proposed
model, and the location of the rooms and basement. He presented pictures of homes in the
neighborhood that have clerestory windows, dormers, metal roofing materials, and other
different roof styles.
Mr. Willett inquired if the applicant had considered not running the clerestory windows all
the way to the front of the building. Mr. Christensen noted that he had, however, he and his
friend have planned a cathedral ceiling, leaving the original 1930's roof structure in place for
interior design.
Mr Gleye noted that this is an appropriate design as the neighborhood is in transition.
2
Mr. Willett noted that there is little history left to preserve in the neighborhood. Mr.
Noonan concurred with Staff's recommendations. Mr. McCrone noted that he concurs and,
with the neighbors in support of the project, he feels it should be approved.
Ms. Katz concurred, and supports the project. She noted that condition #2 shouldn't be an
issue. Planner Patterson noted that several changes have been made in the color rendering to
meet Conditions #143.
Mr. Cruwys suggested that a fascia above the clerestory windows would clean up the view.
Discussion ensued on the porch ceiling. Ms. Walker concurred with the discussion thus far
and complimented the thought that had gone into the project.
Chairperson Chisholm noted that the applicant has created a different vocabulary by using
different materials and suggested using a different material for the porch roof supports. Mr.
Christensen noted that he plans to use lodge poles, but the supports won't be so twisted. He
also noted that the stairs into the basement are made of log. Discussion ensued on the roof
supports.
Ms. Walker inquired if Condition #4 is necessary, and if Staff would support the changes
that have been made. Planner Patterson indicated that Staff would support the changes and
Condition #4 is not needed if #1-3 have been met.
Ms. Walker moved, Mr. Gleye seconded, that the submittal be approved with Condition #1 -
that the changed submittal is the accepted submittal and Condition #2 - that all subsequent
changes be approved by Staff, and Staff's condition #5.
Mr. Noonan noted that the rendering is a mixture of the original submittal and the ideas
discussed today. He moved to amend the motion to change condition #1 from "as submitted"
to "as discussed, including the applicant's change of the cut-away ceiling appearance, the
clerestory reduction, the recommendation on the support structure for the entryway, the
ceiling treatment over of the entryway, and approval of the green standing seam roofing.
Mr. Cruwys seconded the motion, which carried unanimously by voice vote.
The amended motion carved unanimously by voice vote.
3