HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-23-1999 DRB Minutes DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 1999
MINUTES
ITEM 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ATTENDANCE
Chairperson Kim Walker called the meeting to order at 3:30 p.m. and directed the secretary to
record the attendance.
Members Present Members Absent Staff Present Visitors Present
Kim Walker Mara Gai Katz Dave Skelton Bill Roller
Ed McCrone Joni Killebrew Mike Veon
Henry Sorenson Debbie Arkell Kai Tang
Bill Hanson Carol Schott Doug Rand
Bayliss Ward
Jack Sather
ITEM 2. MINUTES OF DECEMBER 22, 1998, AND JANUARY 26, 1999
Chairperson Walker asked for corrections or additions to the minutes. Mr. McCrone requested
an amendment to page 2, 5"`paragraph, following the first sentence - "He noted he doesn't want
to slow the process." Mr. McCrone moved, Mr. Hanson seconded, to approve the minutes as
amended. The motion carried 4-0.
ITEM 3. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Grand Teton Plaza (2nd Submittal) MiSP/COA#Z-9919 - (Arkell)
810 North 7`1 Avenue
- A Minor Site Plan Application with a Certificate of Appropriateness to
allow the partial demolition of the Sunset Motel and building an addition for
conversion to retail space.
Chairperson Walker asked if anyone had requested application#Z-9919 be removed from the
consent agenda. Mr. Sorenson noted he had not requested the item to be removed from the
consent agenda, and asked if they could discuss the project to clarify a few questions he had.
Chairperson Walker advised him that unless he had previously requested to have the item
removed from the Consent Agenda, it could not be discussed. Mr. Hanson moved to approve
application#Z-9919 with Staff conditions. Mr. McCrone seconded the motion, which carried
unanimously.
Design Review Board Minutes-March 23,1999 1
B. Veon MiSP/COA#Z-9922 - (Skelton)
851 Bridger Drive
- A Minor Site Plan Application with a Certificate of Appropriateness to
allow the construction of a new 11,400 square foot building to accommodate 6
commercial tenants.
Chairperson Walker asked if anyone had requested application#Z-9919 be removed from the
consent agenda. Mr. McCrone asked for the item be removed as he had questions for the
applicant. In response to Mr. McCrone, Mr. Roller noted there would not be a second floor in
the structure as there is not enough space for the required parking for an additional floor. Mr.
McCrone asked if there was a considerable amount of fill on that site. Mr. Roller noted there is,
however, it has been tested by Gaston Engineering, who determined it is sound. Mr. McCrone
inquired if Tract C exists. Mr. Roller noted Tract C does exist, and the plans indicate a lightly
drawn building footprint. He noted it is a stand alone project with a different owner, however,
the intent is to have the four lots along Bridger Drive be similar and upscale from what's there
now. In response to Mr. McCrone's question about condition#2, Planner Skelton explained the
landscape requirement for the boulevard trees at a regular spacing of one tree every 50 feet.
In response to Mr. McCrone, Mr. Roller and Mr. Veon indicated they have no problem with the
conditions and have had a good relationship with the Planning Office.
MOTION: Mr. McCrone moved, to approve application#Z-9922 as submitted with conditions
as recommended by staff. The motion was seconded by Henry Sorenson, and carried 4-0.
ITEM 4. DISCUSSION ITEM
Indy Lube Modifications - (Killebrew)
651 West Oak Street
- A discussion to review a request for modifications to a conditionally
approved site plan to change the colors and materials on the exterior of the building,
located in the North 71h Avenue Corridor.
Bayliss Ward and Jack Sather joined the DRB. (Joanne Knoll joined the DRB as a potential
member.) Assistant Planner Joni Killebrew noted the modification is a change in colors.
Mr. Ward noted the original colors on the corners were going to be green with natural gray block.
However, due to the cost of the panels, they are requesting to keep the gray with a gray split face
band and change the green band to a black band along the base. He explained the store front
system they plan to use.
Chairperson Walker asked ADR Staff if there is a problem with the new colors. Senior Planner
Skelton noted there is not, however, the introduction of an accent color would be better and Mr.
Ward has expressed an interest in adding color. Mr. Ward noted the dark bronze roofing and the
black band may not offer enough contrast so they may switch the bronze to black shingles.
Design Review Board Minutes-March 23,1999 2
Mr. Sorenson noted it could be better if more earth tones could be used. Mr. Sauther noted the
color accents will be in the signage and awnings which will both be red.
Mr. Hanson noted the black and gray scheme can be effective. He expressed concern with the
expansive gray block, however, if it is broken up with signs, it could be satisfactory.
A discussion of the signage and it's location followed. Mr. Hanson noted the color of the
building will be satisfactory, however, a little color would emphasis it, He feels the building is
great and stands alone just fine.
Mr. Sorenson commented the structure will look great, has good composition, and the colors
blend into the setting and the theme of the business well,
Mr. McCrone noted the shade of the bronze may be a little off color and he could understand Mr.
Ward's concern with it.
Chairperson Walker noted there is a lot going on along that street. She suggested the landscaping
be quite mature to help warm up the building.
MOTION: Chairperson Walker moved to approve the modifications as submitted March 23,
1999. The motion was seconded by Mr. Hanson. Mr. Sorenson noted the colors fall into the
muted, natural colors and fit the design well. The motion carried unanimously.
ITEM 5. ADJOURNMENT
Chairperson Walker introduced prospective members Joanne Knolle and Dan Glenn to the Board.
There bein no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 3:55 p.m.
Kirn W lker, Chairperson
Desig Review Board
Design Review Board Minutes-March 23, 1999 3