HomeMy WebLinkAbout23. Fellowship Baptist Church Page 1 of 18
Z14201, Staff Report for the Fellowship Baptist Church Zone Map
Amendment
UPDATES TO THIS STAFF REPORT THAT HAVE BEEN MADE SINCE ITS
PRESENTATION TO THE ZONING COMMISSION ARE SHOWN IN RED.
Public Hearing Dates: Zoning Commission, September 16, 2014
City Commission, October 6, 2014
Project Description: Ordinance 1898, a Zone Map Amendment Application to allow the
proposed change in zoning designation from R-3 (Residential Medium Density
District) to R-4 (Residential High Density District) on 1.54 acres. The property is
generally located on North 27th between Tschache Lane and Oak Street. Application
No. Z14201
Project Location: Property located at 1480 North 27th Avenue. The legal description is that
part of Lot 5, ANNIE SUBDIVISION, PHASE 2, and adjacent portions of North
27th Avenue and North 25th Avenue, located in the Northeast Quarter of Section 2,
Township 2 South, Range 5 East of P.M.M., City of Bozeman, Gallatin County,
Montana.
Recommendation: Approval of the zone map amendment application Fellowship Baptist
Church ZMA 14201 and provisional adoption of Ordinance 1898.
Recommended Motion: Having reviewed and considered the text of the ordinance,
application materials, public comment, the deliberations and recommendation of the
Zoning Commission at the September 16, 2014 Zoning Commission meeting, and all
the information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report
for application Z14201 and move to adopt Ordinance 1898 the Fellowship Baptist
Church Zone Map Amendment.
Report Date: September 11, 2014 (Updated September 29, 2014 for presentation to the City
Commission)
Staff Contact: Heather Davis, Associate Planner
Agenda Item Type: Action - Legislative
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Unresolved Issues
No unresolved issues have been identified at this time.
277
Z14201, Staff Report for the Fellowship Church Zone Map Amendment Page 2 of 18
Project Summary
The applicant proposes this Zone Map Amendment (ZMA) to rezone approximately 1.5376
acres east of the Breeze Lane and North 27th Avenue intersection from R-3 (Residential
Medium Density District) to R-4 (Residential High Density District). The area subject to the
rezoning is part of a larger parcel currently going through the final plat approval process
(approved as preliminary plat P14017), which will result in the proposed rezoned R-4 area
becoming a separate 1.5376 acre parcel. The Annie Subdivision Phase 2 Lot 5 Preliminary
Plat P14017 was approved by the City Commission May 5, 2014. The preliminary plat was
approved to further subdivide the existing lot of 10.92 acres to into two multi-household
residential lots and one lot for a community center (see map 5). There is no development
currently on the site.
No public comment has been received as of the writing of this report.
This project is on an accelerated schedule as the applicant was willing to provide all the
required materials for processing of the ZMA prior to the action of the City Commission on
the project. Therefore, there are no listed contingencies as all necessary items have already
been addressed.
The Zoning Commission held a public hearing and considered the application on September
16, 2014. There was no public comment at the public hearing. As noted in their attached
minutes, the Zoning Commission passed a motion 3-1 recommending this ZMA for approval
to the City Commission with the finding presented in the staff report.
The video of the Zoning Commission meeting may be reviewed at:
http://www.avcaptureall.com/Sessions.aspx#session.76fab5e3-284a-47bd-ab31-ef9f7c42f3d1
The application began at approximately 8 minutes after the beginning of the recording. The
Zoning Commission inquired as to the amount of R-4 property available. A copy of the 2013
Land Use Inventory report is attached to this report. The inventory report describes the
amount of land designated by zoning district and land use type within the City.
In 2013, R-4 comprised 12.6% of the residential type zoning districts. Below is a summary
from the 2013 Land Use Inventory Report. Please see attached report for more inventory
information. Please note the report is strictly an inventory and does not recommend a specific
percentage goal per zoning district.
2013 Residential Zoning Districts (Acres of each use by Zoning District)
R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 R-S R-O R-MH REMU
Developed 1415.3 701.2 1430.2 589.8 509.3 302.6 93.2
Undeveloped 327.9 89.8 304.5 189 406.5 128.3 31.3 127.3
Vacant 78.9 30.8 389.3 160.3 42.8 68.2
Grand Total 1822.1 821.8 2124 939.1 958.6 499.1 124.5 127.3
% by Zoning District (residential) 24.50% 11% 28.60% 12.60% 12.90% 6.70% 1.60% 1.70%
278
Z14201, Staff Report for the Fellowship Church Zone Map Amendment Page 3 of 18
In considering the appropriateness of a particular zoning district for a site, it is appropriate to
consider what district will most fully advance the community plan goals. As a zone map
amendment is a legislative, not quasi-judicial, matter the City has broad discretion to decide
the course considered most suitable. For an explanation detailing how the project complies
with the City’s growth policies, please refer to Section 76-2-304, MCA (Zoning) Criteria A.
There are currently no target percentage goals for zoning districts within the City of
Bozeman.
Alternatives
1) Adopt the amendment as requested,
2) Deny the amendment; or
3) Continue the application and request additional information.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... 1
Unresolved Issues ............................................................................................................... 1
Project Summary ................................................................................................................. 2
Alternatives ......................................................................................................................... 3
SECTION 1 - MAP SERIES .................................................................................................... 4
SECTION 2- RECOMMENDED CONTINGENCIES OF APPROVAL ................................ 7
SECTION 3 - RECOMMENDATION AND FUTURE ACTIONS ........................................ 9
SECTION 4 - STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS ............................................................. 9
Section 76-2-304, MCA (Zoning) Criteria ......................................................................... 9
PROTEST NOTICE FOR ZONING AMENDMENTS ......................................................... 13
APPENDIX A –AFFECTED ZONING AND GROWTH POLICY PROVISIONS ............. 14
APPENDIX B – DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND.............. 15
APPENDIX C – NOTICING AND PUBLIC COMMENT ................................................... 17
APPENDIX D - OWNER INFORMATION AND REVIEWING STAFF............................ 18
FISCAL EFFECTS ................................................................................................................. 18
ATTACHMENTS ................................................................................................................... 18
279
Page 4 of 18
SECTION 1 - MAP SERIES
Surrounding Zoning and Land Uses:
North: Pending R-4, Vacant South: R-3, Vacant
East: Rose Park
West: (Across 27th Ave.): R-3
RR--33
RR--33
RR--33
RR--44
RR--44
RR--33
Project Location
PPeennddiinngg
RR--44
Map 1
280
Z14201, Staff Report for the Fellowship Church Zone Map Amendment Page 5 of 18
Project Location
Map 2
281
Z14201, Staff Report for the Fellowship Church Zone Map Amendment Page 6 of 18
Project
Location
Map 3
282
Page 7 of 18
Map 4: Fellowship Church ZMA
283
Z14201, Staff Report for the Fellowship Church Zone Map Amendment Page 8 of 18
Once the Annie Subdivision Phase 2 Final Plat is approved the map will be updated to look
as follows:
Map 5: Annie Subdivision Phase 2
284
Z14201, Staff Report for the Fellowship Church Zone Map Amendment Page 9 of 18
SECTION 2- RECOMMENDED CONTINGENCIES OF APPROVAL
Please note that these contingencies are necessary for the City to complete the process of the
proposed amendment.
Recommended Contingencies of Approval: None.
SECTION 3 - RECOMMENDATION AND FUTURE ACTIONS
Project Name: Fellowship Baptist Church Zone Map Amendment
File: Z14201
Having considered the criteria established for a zone map amendment, the Staff recommends
approval as submitted.
The Development Review Committee (DRC) considered the amendment on August 20 and
August 27, 2014. The DRC did not identify any infrastructure or regulatory constraints which
would impede the approval of the application.
The Zoning Commission held a public hearing on this ZMA on September 16, 2014, at 121 N.
Rouse Avenue, Bozeman. The meeting will begin at 6 pm and the Zoning Commission will
forward a recommendation to the City Commission on the application. After conducting the
public hearing the Zoning Commission voted 3-1 on the motion to recommend approval of the
application.
The City Commission will hold a public hearing on the ZMA on October 6, 2014. The meeting
will be held at 121 N. Rouse Avenue, Bozeman. The meeting will begin at 6 pm. The City
Commission will make the final decision on the application.
SECTION 4 - STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS
In considering applications for approval under this title, the advisory boards and City
Commission shall consider the following:
Section 76-2-304, MCA (Zoning) Criteria
A. Be in accordance with a growth policy.
Yes. The site is designated as Residential on Figure 3-1 in the Bozeman Community Plan.
Table C-16 of the growth policy shows R-4, Residential High Density District as an
implementing district for the Residential designation. A review of the applicable goals and
objectives of the growth policy has not identified any specific conflicts with the Community
Plan. The table of authorized zoning uses within the R-4 District is also provided in
Appendix A.
This zone map amendment would result in the addition of 1.5376 acres of R-4 zoned
property to the City, which is supported by the Urban Density principle in Chapter 3 of the
Community Plan, which states: Fundamental to the efficient and cost-effective provision of
285
Z14201, Staff Report for the Fellowship Church Zone Map Amendment Page 10 of 18
urban services, multi-modal transportation oriented development, and a compact
development pattern is a concentration of persons and activities. Density of development
must also be balanced against community character, parks and open spaces, and the housing
choices of citizens. Quality site and architectural design will materially affect the success and
acceptability of urban density and scale of development.
The Residential designation of the Bozeman Community Plan states:
This category designates places where the primary activity is urban
density dwellings… The dwelling unit density expected within this
classification varies between 6 and 32 dwellings per net acre. A higher
density may be considered in some locations and circumstances. A variety
of housing types can be blended to achieve the desired density.
The R-4 zoning designation would implement the goals of the Residential land use
designation. The intent and purpose of the R-4 zoning is to provide for high-density
residential development through a variety of housing types within the City with associated
service functions. This will provide for a variety of compatible housing types to serve the
varying needs of the community’s residents. Although some office use is permitted, it shall
remain as a secondary use to residential development.
Supportive goals and objectives of the Bozeman Community Plan for this application
include:
Chapter 3 - Land Use
Goal LU-1: Create a sense of place that varies throughout the City, efficiently provides public and private basic services and facilities in close proximity to where people live and
work, and minimizes sprawl.
Objective LU-1.4: Provide for and support infill development and redevelopment which provides additional density of use while respecting the context of the existing development which surrounds it. Respect for context does not automatically prohibit difference in scale or design.
Objective LU-3.4: Give particular emphasis to encourage living opportunities within walking
distance of the downtown employment, retail, and neighborhood services.
Chapter 4 – Community Quality
Objective C-1.3 Support compatible infill within the existing area of the City rather than developing land requiring expansion of the City’s area.
Chapter 6 – Housing
Objective H1.1 - Encourage and support the creation of a broad range of housing types in proximity to services and transportation options.
Objective H1.3 - Promote the provision of a wide variety of housing types in a range of costs to meet the diverse residential needs of Bozeman residents.
286
Z14201, Staff Report for the Fellowship Church Zone Map Amendment Page 11 of 18
The project is located within a 10-15 minute walk to the commercial area of 19th Avenue,
which provides employment and retail opportunities. It is also adjacent to Rose Park,
providing recreational and outdoor opportunities for residents. The amendment will create
additional residential density adjacent to developed residential areas near public amenities and schools with adequate municipal services to accommodate the additional residential
development.
In considering the appropriateness of a particular zoning district for a site, it is appropriate to
consider what district will most fully advance the community plan goals. As a zone map
amendment is a legislative, not quasi-judicial, matter the City has broad discretion to decide
the course considered most suitable.
The R-4, Residential High Density District zoning designation requested is consistent with the Residential land use designation and the Growth Policy.
B. Secure safety from fire and other dangers.
Neutral. The same standards for emergency access, fire protection, and related issues apply to
any of the zoning districts. The area is within the City’s emergency service locations and is
provided with 911 and other necessary services. Building permits will apply within this
district to ensure correct construction techniques, building exiting, and other safety concerns
have been addressed.
C. Promote public health, public safety, and general welfare.
Neutral. As discussed in Criterion B, there are many standards which apply equally to the
zoning district. The generally adopted standards of the municipal code will ensure adequate
supply for sanitation, clean water, stormwater control and other items which would possibly
affect this criterion. Development issues related to municipal infrastructure (i.e., water and
sanitary sewer) and public services (i.e. policy and fire protection) will be addressed with
proper site plan review and/or subdivision review. Municipal infrastructure is available in the
adjacent streets to service the site.
D. Facilitate the provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other
public requirements.
Yes. No dedication of rights-of-way or construction of facilities is required because of the
change in zoning. The subsequent subdivision or site plan development review process will
require demonstration of adequate transportation and other facilities. The City’s development
standards require mitigation of site impacts to infrastructure and therefore this criterion is
met. Any expansion of the uses or further development of the site in the future will require
development review. Development review procedures will evaluate specific needs for
additional services. The City’s development standards require demonstration that adequate
services are available. Section 38.07.010.C, BMC states:
Placement of any given zoning district on an area depicted on the zoning
map indicates a judgment on the part of the city that the range of uses
287
Z14201, Staff Report for the Fellowship Church Zone Map Amendment Page 12 of 18
allowed within that district are generally acceptable in that location. It is
not a guarantee of approval for any given use prior to the completion of
the appropriate review procedure and compliance with all of the applicable
requirements and development standards of this chapter and other
applicable policies, laws and ordinances. It is also not a guarantee of
immediate infrastructure availability or a commitment on the part of the
city to bear the cost of extending service.
E. Reasonable provision of adequate light and air.
Yes. The regulatory standards set forth in the Bozeman Municipal Code for the requested R-
4 zoning district provides the necessary provisions (i.e., yard setbacks, lot coverage, open
space and building heights), which are intended to provide for adequate light and air for any
development on the subject property.
F. The effect on motorized and non-motorized transportation systems.
Neutral. This change in zoning designation should not have a substantial effect on existing or
future motorized or non-motorized transportation systems. There would likely be an increase
in future traffic levels due to the further development of additional R-4 zoned property, but
this impact will be required to be mitigated or addressed as part of the future subdivision or
site plan review process for the property. Non-motorized transportation (i.e. bike, sidewalks,
trails, etc.) will also be addressed as part of any future subdivision or site plan review
application.
G. Promotion of compatible urban growth.
Yes. The proposed amendment applies a district determined to be acceptable for urban
characteristics. The site is located within the urban service area for all municipal services.
The location is within the existing municipal boundaries and development area. The change
in zoning will not expand the City boundaries. The development of the area as residential
will be subject to municipal standards for urban development.
H. Character of the district.
Yes. The property in question is located adjacent to urban residential development to the
north, south and west, and public parkland and commercial development to the east. The
City’s adopted growth policy has identified the property as being appropriate for residential
development. The proposed zoning is residential in nature and the area of the zone map
amendment is situated in an area that acts as a transition from commercial development and
parkland from the west to a comparatively medium density development pattern to the west,
with multi-household development to the north and south. West Oak Street, a principal
arterial street acts as a logical demarcation boundary with residential development to the
south.
288
Z14201, Staff Report for the Fellowship Church Zone Map Amendment Page 13 of 18
As stated in Section 38.08.010.A “There is a rebuttable presumption that the uses set forth for
each district will be compatible with each other when the standards of this chapter are met
and any applicable conditions of approval have been satisfied.” The future subdivision or
site plan review process will enable the evaluation of any peculiar impacts of proposed
development and mitigation as needed.
I. Peculiar suitability for particular uses.
Yes. The site has been determined appropriate for R-4 uses with near proximity to arterial
streets, and the City’s trail systems. As noted in the Applicant Submittal the Growth Policy
designation is Residential and the dominant land use in the vicinity is residential. The
proposed zoning classification furthers the goals and policies of the Growth Policy as noted
above. There are several other residential districts which could also be appropriate. There are
no physical features or other attributes which make the site of peculiar suitability for a
particular use.
J. Conserving the value of buildings.
Yes. The property is currently undeveloped so there will be no effect on the value of
buildings by the zone change.
K. Encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout the jurisdictional area.
Yes. The sum of the findings regarding the other criteria indicates that the proposed change
in zoning encourages the most appropriate uses of the subject property and the property in
the vicinity.
PROTEST NOTICE FOR ZONING AMENDMENTS
IN THE CASE OF WRITTEN PROTEST AGAINST SUCH CHANGES SIGNED BY THE
OWNERS OF 25% OR MORE OF THE AREA OF THE LOTS WITHIN THE AMENDMENT
AREA OR THOSE LOTS OR UNITS WITHIN 150 FEET FROM A LOT INCLUDED IN A PROPOSED CHANGE, THE AMENDMENT SHALL NOT BECOME EFFECTIVE EXCEPT BY THE FAVORABLE VOTE OF TWO-THIRDS OF THE PRESENT AND VOTING
MEMBERS OF THE CITY COMMISSION.
289
Z14201, Staff Report for the Fellowship Church Zone Map Amendment Page 14 of 18
APPENDIX A –AFFECTED ZONING AND GROWTH POLICY
PROVISIONS
Zoning Designation and Land Uses:
Current Zoning
R-3, Residential Medium Density District: “The intent of the R-3 residential medium density
district is to provide for the development of one- to five-household residential structures near
service facilities within the city. It should provide for a variety of housing types to serve the
varied needs of households of different size, age and character, while reducing the adverse effect
of nonresidential uses.”
Proposed Zoning
R-4, Residential High Density District: “The intent of the R-4 residential high density district is
to provide for high-density residential development through a variety of housing types within the
city with associated service functions. This will provide for a variety of compatible housing
types to serve the varying needs of the community's residents. Although some office use is
permitted, it shall remain as a secondary use to residential development. Secondary status shall
be as measured by percentage of total building area.”
Click here for link to the entire Residential Zoning District Information within the Bozeman
UDC.
Adopted Growth Policy Designation:
The growth policy designation for the amendment area and the surrounding area is Residential
which is defined as:
The property is designated as “Residential” in the Bozeman Community Plan. The Plan
indicates that “This category designates places where the primary activity is urban density
dwellings. Other uses which complement residences are also acceptable such as parks, low
intensity home based occupations, fire stations, churches, and schools. High density
residential areas should be established in close proximity to commercial centers to facilitate
the provision of services and employment opportunities to persons without requiring the use
of an automobile. Implementation of this category by residential zoning should provide for
and coordinate intensive residential uses in proximity to commercial centers. The residential
designation indicates that it is expected that development will occur within municipal
boundaries, which may require annexation prior to development.
The dwelling unit density expected within this classification varies between 6 and 32
dwellings per net acre. A higher density may be considered in some locations and
circumstances. A variety of housing types can be blended to achieve the desired density.
Large areas of single type housing are discouraged. In limited instances the strong presence
of constraints and natural features such as floodplains may cause an area to be designated for
290
Z14201, Staff Report for the Fellowship Church Zone Map Amendment Page 15 of 18
development at a lower density than normally expected within this category. All residential
housing should be arranged with consideration of compatibility with adjacent development,
natural constraints such as watercourses or steep slopes, and in a fashion which advances the
overall goals of the Bozeman growth policy. The residential designation is intended to
provide the primary locations for additional housing within the planning area.
Table C-16 Zoning Correlation with Land Use Categories – Indicates that R-4 zoning is one
of the zoning districts envisioned for the “Residential” Growth Policy Designation.
Following is the Table of R-4 Uses from the Bozeman Municipal Code which indicates the
permitted land uses within the R-4 zoning district.
Sec. 38.08.020. Authorized uses.
A. Uses in the various residential districts are depicted in Table 38.08.020 in
subsection C of this section. Principal uses are indicated with a "P,"
conditional uses are indicated with a "C," accessory uses are indicated with an "A" and uses which are not permitted with the district are indicated
by a "-."
B. Additional uses for telecommunication uses are contained in article 29 of
this chapter.
C. The uses listed are deliberately broad and some are given special definitions in article 42 of this chapter. The intent of this method is to
provide general guidance for uses while allowing the unique needs and
circumstances of each proposal to be specifically addressed through the
review process. Some uses are the subject of special regulations
contained in article 22 of this chapter.
Table 38.08.020
Table of Residential Uses Authorized Uses
R-3 R-4
Accessory dwelling units8, 9 P P
Agricultural uses on 2.5 acres or more2 — —
Agricultural uses on less than 2.5 acres2 — —
291
Z14201, Staff Report for the Fellowship Church Zone Map Amendment Page 16 of 18
Apartments/apartment building, as defined in article 42 of this chapter — P
Bed and breakfast C P
Commercial stable — —
Community centers C C
Community residential facilities with eight or fewer residents P P
Community residential facilities serving nine or more residents C P
Cooperative housing P P
Day care centers P P
Essential services (Type I) P P
Essential services (Type II) — —
Extended stay lodgings P P
Family day care home P P
Fences A A
Fraternity and sorority houses C P
Golf courses — —
Greenhouses A A
Group day care home P P
Group living P P
Guesthouses A A
Home-based businesses5 A/C A/C
Lodginghouses C P
Offices — C3
Other buildings and structures typically accessory to authorized uses A A
Private garages A A
Private or jointly owned recreational facilities A A
Private stormwater control facilities A A
Private vehicle and boat storage A A
Public and private parks P P
Manufactured homes on permanent foundations1 P P
Manufactured home communities — —
Medical offices, clinics, and centers — C
Recreational vehicle parks — —
Signs, subject to article 28 of this chapter A A
Single-household dwelling P P
Temporary buildings and yards incidental to construction work A A
Temporary sales and office buildings A A
Three- or four-household dwelling P P
Two-household dwelling P P
Townhouses (two attached units) P P
Townhouses (five attached units or less) P6 P
Townhouses (more than five attached units) — P
292
Z14201, Staff Report for the Fellowship Church Zone Map Amendment Page 17 of 18
Tool sheds for storage of domestic supplies A A
Uses approved as part of a PUD per article 20 of this chapter C C
Veterinary uses — —
Notes: 1Manufactured homes are subject to the standards of section 38.22.130. 2Agricultural uses include barns and animal shelters, and the keeping of animals and fowl, together with their
dependent young, as hereinafter set forth per 2.5 acres: one horse or one cow; two sheep or two goats; ten rabbits; 36 fowl (chickens, pheasants, pigeons, etc.) or six larger fowl (ducks, geese, turkeys, etc.). For larger parcels the review
authority may determine that a larger number of livestock is consistent with the requirements of this section. 3Only when in conjunction with dwellings. 4Storage for more than three recreational vehicles or boats. 5Home-based businesses are subject to the terms and thresholds of section 38.22.110. 6In the R-3 district, townhouse groups shall not exceed 120 feet in total width 7In the R-S, R-1, and RMH district townhomes are only allowed when utilized to satisfy the requirements of chapter
10, article 8, Affordable Housing. May only be utilized in developments subject to chapter 10, article 8. 8Not permitted on reduced size lots for work force housing as described in chapter 10, article 8. 9Accessory dwelling units in the RS and R1 districts shall be permitted to be placed above garages only in subdivisions receiving preliminary plat approval after January 1, 1997.
(Ord. No. 1645, § 18.16.020, 8-15-2005; Ord. No. 1693, § 4(18.16.020), 2-20-2007; Ord. No. 1709, § 2(18.16.020), 7-16-2007; Ord. No. 1761, exh. A (18.16.020), 7-6-2009; Ord. No. 1769, exh. E(18.16.020), 12-28-2009; Ord. No.
1828, § 9, 9-10-2012; Ord. No. 1838, §§ 1, 2, 9-10-2012; Ord. No. 1830, § 6, 9-24-2012)
APPENDIX B – DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND
BACKGROUND
Project Description: Ordinance 1898, a Zone Map Amendment Application to allow the
proposed change in zoning designation from R-3 (Residential Medium Density District) to R-4
(Residential High Density District) on 1.54 acres. The property is generally located on North 27th
between Tschache Lane and Oak Street. Application No. Z14201
Project Background: The applicant proposes this Zone Map Amendment (ZMA) to adjust
existing zoning districts for a portion of vacant property from R-3 to R-4. The entire property is
currently going through final plat review and once approved will create three separate parcels
(5a, 5b, and 5c). Lot 5a will be R-3, Lot 5c will be R-4 (Z-08075) and with this ZMA, 5B with
this application could change from R-3 to R-4. The application for Annie Subdivision Phase 2
Lot 5 Preliminary Plat P14017 was approved by the City Commission May 5, 20014.
In 2008, the applicants received preliminary approval for both a minor subdivision preliminary
plat and amendment to the Bozeman Zoning Map from R-3 to R-4 for the same property. Due to
the circumstances at the time, the applicant did not move forward to complete either project. The
applicants are now moving forward to complete those previous projects.
APPENDIX C – NOTICING AND PUBLIC COMMENT
No public comments have been received to date. Noticing was posted on site, published in the
Bozeman Daily Chronicle, and mailed to all owners within 200 feet of the outer perimeter of the
property. Notice was provided at least 15 and not more than 45 days prior to the Zoning
293
Z14201, Staff Report for the Fellowship Church Zone Map Amendment Page 18 of 18
Commission public hearing on September 16, 2014 and the City Commission public hearing
tentatively scheduled for October 6, 2014.
APPENDIX D - OWNER INFORMATION AND REVIEWING STAFF
Owner/Applicants: Fellowship Baptist Church of Bozeman, c/o Jeremy Shea, PO Box 11889,
Bozeman, MT 59719
Representative: C&H Engineering and Surveying, 1091 Stoneridge Drive, Bozeman, MT,
59718
Report By: Heather Davis, Associate Planner
FISCAL EFFECTS
No unusual fiscal effects have been identified. No presently budgeted funds will be changed by
this zone map amendment.
ATTACHMENTS
The full application and file of record can be viewed at the Community Development
Department at 20 E. Olive Street, Bozeman, MT 59715.
Application materials
Ordinance 1898
Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes September 16, 2014
2013 Land Use Inventory Report
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
LOT 5, ANNIE SUBDIVISION, PHASE 2 ZONE MAP AMENDMENT LEGAL
DESCRIPTION
That part of Lot 5, ANNIE SUBDIVISION, PHASE 2, and adjacent portions of North 27th
Avenue and North 25th Avenue, located in the Northeast Quarter of Section 2, Township 2
South, Range 5 East of P.M.M., City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana, described as follows:
Commencing at the northwest corner of said Lot 5, at a point which is also the C-N 1/16 corner
of said Section 2; thence southerly 181°28'43", assumed azimuth from north, 466.42 feet along
the west line of said Lot 5 and also being the centerline of North 27th Avenue to the Point of Beginning; thence easterly 091°28'57" azimuth, 322.35 feet; thence southerly 181°28'43"
azimuth, 222.35 feet along the center line of North 25th Avenue; thence southerly 48.42 feet on a
tangential curve concave to the east, radius 340.00 feet and central angle 8°9'33" along said
centerline; thence westerly 271°29'48" azimuth, 325.79 feet to the centerline of North 27th
Avenue and the western boundary of Lot 5; thence northerly 001°28'43" azimuth, 270.53 feet along the center line of North 27th Avenue and the western boundary of Lot 5 to the point of
beginning.
Area = 87,286 square feet, 2.0038 acres or 8,109.1 square meters. Subject to existing easements.
305
ORDINANCE NO. 1898
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, AMENDING THE CITY OF BOZEMAN ZONE MAP FOR THAT PART
OF LOT 5, ANNIE SUBDIVISION, PHASE 2, AND ADJACENT PORTIONS OF N.
27TH AVE AND N. 25TH AVE.; LOCATED IN THE NE1/4 OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 5 EAST, P.M.M., CITY OF BOZEMAN, GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA.
WHEREAS, the proposed zone map amendment to amend the City of Bozeman Zone
Map to rezone approximately 1.54-acres from R-3 (Residential Medium Density District) to R-4
(Residential High Density District) has been properly submitted, reviewed and advertised; and
WHEREAS, the Bozeman Zoning Commission held a public hearing on September 16,
2014, to receive and review all written and oral testimony on the request for a zone map
amendment; and
WHEREAS, the Bozeman Zoning Commission recommended to the Bozeman City
Commission that the zone map amendment be approved as recommended by the Community
Development Department and as provided for in the staff report for approval of 1.54-acres from
R-3 (Residential Medium Density District) to R-4 (Residential High Density District); and
WHEREAS, after proper notice, the City Commission held its public hearing on October
7, 2014, to receive and review all written and oral testimony on the request for a zone map
amendment; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission has reviewed and considered the thirteen zone map
amendment criteria established in Section 76-2-304, M.C.A., and found that the proposed zone
map amendment would be in compliance with the thirteen criteria; and
WHEREAS, at its meeting held on October 6, 2014, the City Commission found that
the proposed zone map amendment would be in compliance with Bozeman’s adopted growth
policy and would be in the public interest.
ORDINANCE NO. 1898 Page 1 of 4
306
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Commission of the City of
Bozeman, Montana:
Section 1
That the zoning district designation of the following-described property is hereby
designated as "R-4" (Residential High Density District):
That part of Lot 5, ANNIE SUBDIVISION, PHASE 2, and adjacent portions of North 27th Avenue and North 25th Avenue, located in the Northeast Quarter of Section 2, Township 2
South, Range 5 East of P.M.M., City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana, described as
follows:
Commencing at the northwest corner of said Lot 5, at a point which is also the C-N 1/16 corner of said Section 2; thence southerly 181°28'43", assumed azimuth from north, 466.42 feet along
the west line of said Lot 5 and also being the centerline of North 27th Avenue to the Point of
Beginning; thence easterly 091°28'57" azimuth, 322.35 feet; thence southerly 181°28'43"
azimuth, 222.35 feet along the center line of North 25th Avenue; thence southerly 48.42 feet on a
tangential curve concave to the east, radius 340.00 feet and central angle 8°9'33" along said centerline; thence westerly 271°29'48" azimuth, 325.79 feet to the centerline of North 27th
Avenue and the western boundary of Lot 5; thence northerly 001°28'43" azimuth, 270.53 feet
along the center line of North 27th Avenue and the western boundary of Lot 5 to the point of
beginning.
Area = 87,286 square feet, 2.0038 acres or 8,109.1 square meters. Subject to existing easements.
Section 2
Repealer.
All provisions of the ordinances of the City of Bozeman in conflict with the provisions of
this ordinance are, and the same are hereby, repealed and all other provisions of the ordinances
of the City of Bozeman not in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance shall remain in full
force and effect.
Section 3
Savings Provision.
This ordinance does not affect the rights and duties that matured, penalties that were
incurred or proceedings that were begun before the effective date of this ordinance. All other
provisions of the Bozeman Municipal Code not amended by this Ordinance shall remain in full
force and effect.
ORDINANCE NO. 1898 Page 2 of 4
307
Section 4
Severability.
That should any sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or section of this
ordinance be adjudged or held to be unconstitutional, illegal, or invalid, the same shall not affect
the validity of this ordinance as a whole, or any part or provision thereof, other than the part so
decided to be invalid, illegal or unconstitutional, and shall not affect the validity of the Bozeman
Municipal Code as a whole.
Section 5
Codification.
This Ordinance shall not be codified but shall be kept by the City Clerk and entered into a
disposition list in numerical order with all other ordinances of the City and shall be organized in
a category entitled “Zoning Map Amendments.”
Section 6
Effective Date.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after final adoption.
PROVISIONALLY ADOPTED by the City Commission of the City of Bozeman, Montana, at a
regular session thereof held on the 7th day of October, 2014.
___________________________________ JEFFREY K. KRAUSS Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________________
STACY ULMEN, CMC City Clerk
ORDINANCE NO. 1898 Page 3 of 4
308
FINALLY ADOPTED by the City Commission of the City of Bozeman, Montana, on
second reading, at a regular session thereof held on the ________ day of ________, 2014.
___________________________________
JEFFREY K. KRAUSS Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________________
STACY ULMEN, CMC
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________________
GREG SULLIVAN
City Attorney
ORDINANCE NO. 1898 Page 4 of 4
309
MINUTES
CITY OF BOZEMAN ZONING COMMISSION,
CITY COMMISSION ROOM, CITY HALL
121 NORTH ROUSE AVENUE TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 16, 2014 6:00 P.M.
To view the video linked to these minutes, please go to: http://www.avcaptureall.com/Sessions.aspx#session.76fab5e3-284a-47bd-ab31-ef9f7c42f3d1
06:02:08 PM
ITEM 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ATTENDANCE
Council Member - Erik Garberg: Present
Board Member - Julien Morice: Present Board Member - George Thompson: Present
Board Member - Laura Dornberger: Present Staff:
Heather Davis, Staff Jeff Krauss, Commission Liaison, absent
Members of Public:
Mike Balch, C&H Engineering
06:02:33 PM ITEM 2. PUBLIC COMMENT (Limited to any public matter within the jurisdiction of the Zoning Commission and not scheduled on this agenda. There is a three-minute time limit per speaker.)
06:02:50 PM ITEM 3. MINUTES OF AUGUST 05, 2014
Board Member - Laura Dornberger: Motion Board Member - George Thompson: 2nd Ms. Dornberger noted that Mayor Krauss’ comment was inserted into the minutes and that is the
beginning of putting more information into the minutes.
Commissioner Morice noted that he was not at the August 5th meeting and asked if he did not vote to
approve/disapprove the minutes, is there a quorum? Chair Garberg answered at this time, he wasn’t going to worry about that, but was only concerned about the public hearing and if Commission
Morice felt he needed to abstain from the vote, it is within his purview. Council Member - Erik Garberg: Approve Board Member - Julien Morice: Approve
Board Member - George Thompson: Approve Board Member - Laura Dornberger: Approve Minutes approved unanimously.
06:04:46 PM
1 310
ITEM 4. PROJECT REVIEW 1. Fellowship Baptist Zone Map Amendment Application Z14201 (Davis)
A Zone Map Amendment Application requested by the property owner Fellowship Baptist
Church of Bozeman, PO Box 11889, Bozeman, MT 59719, and representative C&H
Engineering and Surveying, Bozeman MT 59718 to amend the zoning map to rezone
approximately 1.54-acres from R-3 (Residential Medium Density District) to R-4
(Residential High Density District) upon a portion of the property located east of the
intersection of Breeze Lane and North 27th Avenue. The property is legally described as that
part of Lot 5, ANNIE SUBDIVISION, PHASE 2, and adjacent portions of North 27th
Avenue and North 25th Avenue, located in the Northeast Quarter of Section 2, Township 2
South, Range 5 East of P.M.M., City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana. The project is
generally located at 1480 N. 27th Avenue.
06:04:57 PM
Planner Davis presented her staff report to the Commission. The DRC found no issues with the
application and staff recommends approval. No public comment has been received on the
application. The application will be presented to the Commission on October 6th.
06:10:42 PM
Chair Garberg asked about apartments being constructed in the R-3 zone and didn’t understand how
that could work. Planner Davis responded that since it was a PUD development (West Winds), they
had relaxations to allow to build apartments.
06:13:32 PM
Planner Davis closed her presentation and was open for questions.
Commissioner Thompson stated he did not understand the church’s role in this application, stating
that they are the beneficial owner of the property rather than simply developing it for church
activities. Planner Davis answered that they do own the property, but are subdividing the property to
sell the parcels to make money to build the church.
Commissioner Thompson then wanted to know why it is so important to come up to an R-4 standard
when the adjacent properties are R-3. Chair Garberg stated the pending is a done deal as soon as the
final plat goes through. Planner Davis responded that City Commission already approved it and that
ZMAs do not have an expiration date. The existing ZMA will processed when the final plat is
approved. She stated that staff is recommending the higher density since the property is so close to N
19th shopping and Rose Park and it’s within the mix and is not an anomaly to have R-4 there.
Chair Garberg stated he was surprised they were reviewing an R-4 application and there was no one
from the public in the audience.
311
06:16:06 PM
Chair Garberg closed questions for staff and opened for the Applicant.
Mike Balch, C&H Engineering, 1091 Stoneridge, did not have anything to add to the report but was
available for questions.
Commissioner Dornberger asked if they would be required to extend N. 25th. Mr. Balch responded
that it’s a yes and no answer, depending on timing and what is build there. Each lot will have its own
site plan, which will determine when N. 25th is extended. It will eventually be extended.
Commissioner Thompson asked about frontage along N. 27th but no road construction required for
the area between the parcel and the park. Mr. Balch responded there is dedicated right-of-way in
place and there will be road construction, it’s just a matter of when that will happen. Commissioner
Dornberger stated it depends on if development requires it. Chair Garberg stated the project will
probably be built in phases. It’s dependant on density and when they have hit the threshold of traffic
volume. The City will mandate when it goes in.
Commissioner Thompson asked if the developer built the road, would there be an additional cost to
the City. Chair Garberg stated unless, hypothetically, a bond were to pass for a new pool at Rose
Park, an argument could be made that the City would be required to pay for a portion. If the Zoning
Commission does not make a condition tonight and it goes through, the City Commission would
mandate the developer to construct the street as part of their site plan review.
Mr. Morice stated that they didn’t need to consider site plan, or ownership, or anything, just whether
or not the zoning fit the area. Looking at the market as a whole to ensure that R-2, R-3, R-4 are in
the right areas. He feels there is a lot of vacant R-4s in the area, and to rezone something like this
without the real need in that area for a rezone.
06:20:44 PM
Chair Garberg close questions for the applicant and opened the public hearing. No public comment
forthcoming.
06:21:01 PM
Chair Garberg closed the public hearing and opened for motion, discussion and vote.
06:21:11 PM
Board Member - Julien Morice: Motion
Board Member - Laura Dornberger: 2nd
Commissioner Morice made the motion:
3 312
“Having reviewed and considered the text of the ordinance, application materials, public comment,
and all the information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for
Application Z14201 and move to recommend adopting Ordinance 1898, the Fellowship Baptist
Church Zone Map Amendment.”
Chair Garberg asked Mr. Morice if he would like to speak to his motion. He deferred.
Commissioner Thompson stated he was having a hard time understanding why this is needed, stating
there already is quite a bit of undeveloped R-4 in the city. If there was not enough multi-family
housing, he could understand it. He feels there is a whole bunch of horse trading going on, but
nobody is working the horses they have, swapping out R-3 for R-4. The incremental value of going
from R-3 to R-4 for this project is not warranted. He doesn’t understand the prevailing need for R-4
zoning at this location.
Commissioner Dornberger stated she didn’t see a problem with changing the zoning because 1) there
is already R-4 on the west and north sides and 2) the property owners of this piece of property are
only trying to find means to afford to develop their property. There is higher density in the area, but
because of Rose Park , there is also a lot of open space to the east.
Chair Garberg agreed that the R-4 with the proximity to Rose Park maximizes the value to the
residents, it may affect the type of end product that we get and it’s surrounded by R-4 on the north
and west. It makes sense with the surrounding zoning. He stated, for the record, that he is very
sensitive and has voted against R-3s to R-4s, but given the lack of public comment and because of
neighborhood integrity, there is no strong argument against it because they people who live there do
not have a problem with it. He will vote in support.
Commissioner Morice stated he agrees. He can’t find a problem with it. He’s looking for a long-term
plan for zoning. Does this fit? He thinks probably so, although we can’t foresee the needs five years
down the road. He will probably vote for it because because of the R-3 owner to the south and to the
west, there’s no public comment and it is already an R-4 like density and there is R-4 to the north.
The way little chunks of land are being rezoned here and there without necessity seems like short-
term thinking.
Chair Garberg stated the R-4 zoning doesn’t mean they have to build out to R-4 zoning.
Commissioner Thompson stated he spoke his piece, he’s just puzzled by the need.
06:28:19 PM
Chair Garberg called for a vote on the motion.
4 313
Council Member - Erik Garberg: Approve
Board Member - Julien Morice: Approve
Board Member - George Thompson: Disapprove
Board Member - Laura Dornberger: Approve Motion carries 3-1. Chair Garberg stated it will go to the City Commission with a favorable
recommendation on October 7, 2014.
06:29:05 PM
ITEM 5. NEW BUSINESS
No new business
06:29:14 PM
ITEM 6. ADJOURNMENT This meeting is open to all members of the public. If you have a disability that requires assistance, please
contact ADA Coordinator, James Goehrung, at 582-3200 (voice) or 582-2301/582-2432 (TDD).
5 314
Development Review Division Policy and Planning Division Building Division
CITY OF BOZEMAN
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building
20 East Olive Street P.O. Box 1230
Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230
phone 406-582-2260
fax 406-582-2263
planning@bozeman.net
www.bozeman.net 2013 Land Use Inventory Report February 28, 2014
315
2013 Annual Land Use Inventory Report February 28, 2014
Page 2 of 15
Since 2002, the City of Bozeman Department of Planning and Community Development (DPCD)
has worked to prepare an annual report of land use within the City. The report provides a cross tabulation of how the area within each parcel and within each zoning district is used. The use is measured by acres and any established use on the site means the area of the entire parcel is shown as
occupied. All use and area values are rounded to the nearest whole acre. Those cells showing no value
mean there is no amount of that land use in that zoning district. Those cells in data from 2008 on
showing a 0 value mean that there is some but less than one-half acre of that land use in that zoning district. The year 2007 and prior showed a zero in any cell with a value less than one acre in any land use in a zoning district. The table for 2004 was not calculated and is therefore not presented.
Shown in the following tables are the updated land use inventory for the City of Bozeman from
December 31, 2005 through December 31, 2013. The map is for the 2013 inventory. Data prior to 2005
is not shown due to complex changes in the number and type of zoning districts which would make comparisons to current data difficult. The data is available through the DPCD if desired.
The land use classifications and zoning definitions are described below. Zoning districts are
established by the City Commission through the adoption of ordinances. The description of land use
classifications is prepared by the Department of Community Development (DCD). A revised set of
classifications was prepared in 2010 and are reflected in the 2010 land use table. The changes were generally minor but refined several classifications and added several to allow the same classifications to be used either inside or outside the city.
The descriptor shown in parentheses in the list of land use classifications is the value contained in
the geographic information system tables used to track the inventory. The descriptors are used in the
table row labels due to space constraints. The detailed description of uses allowed in the zoning districts and related development standards are available through the City’s Unified Development Ordinance. Please contact the DCD if you have questions on these standards. The current land use information for
individual parcels is available through the interactive geographic information system hosted on the
City’s website, www.bozeman.net.
Land Use Classifications
Use Type Description
(MIXED) Mixed Use More than one principal use occurring on one lot.
(RB) Restaurant/Bar A restaurant, coffee shop, cafeteria, grill, short order café, luncheonette,
sandwich stand, drugstore, soda fountain, serving food; or an establishment where alcoholic beverages are served on premises.
(CR) Commercial
Retail sales, services,
Banks
Uses involving the sale of goods or services carried out for profit.
(HM) Hotel/Motel A building or group of buildings, in which lodging is provided and
offered to transient guests for compensation (not to include a boarding
house, lodging house or rooming house)>
316
2013 Annual Land Use Inventory Report February 28, 2014
Page 3 of 15
Use Type Description
(CA) Commercial
Auto sales, rental,
parts, storage, gas, service
Establishments primarily engaged in automotive related sale/services,
fuels, repair, sales, washing, rental and leasing.
(AP) Administrative
Professional
An establishment in which overall management functions occur and/or in
which a recognized profession is maintained for the conduct of that profession.
(LM) Light
Manufacturing
Fabrication of and/or assembly of goods from previously prepared
materials, to include storage, and mini-warehousing.
(HI) Heavy Industrial Those industries whose processing of products results in the emission of any atmospheric pollution, light flashes, glare, odor, noise or vibration
which may be heard and/or felt off the premises and those industries
which constitute a fire or explosion hazard.
(GOLF) Golf Course A tract of land laid out for playing golf with at least nine holes; and
improved with tees, greens, fairways and hazards; and which may
include a clubhouse and/or shelter.
(POS) Park or Open
Space
Parks, trails, recreational areas and other places that are capable of being
used by the public for recreation, relaxation and social purposes. May
include private land serving a property owners association for similar purposes
(AG) Agricultural Land, usually 20 acres or greater, without dwellings
(AGR) Agricultural Land, usually 20 acres or greater, with one or more
dwellings
(CE) Conservation
Easement
A property legally restricted from development for the purpose of
preserving open space or habitat. May or may not have a dwelling or
other uses on the property.
(CHURCH) Church A building where persons regularly assemble for religious worship and
which, together with its accessory buildings and uses, is maintained and
controlled by a religious body organized to sustain public worship.
(PFP) Public Facility A building, structure, facility or complex, used by or providing services
to the general public and constructed by either the federal, state, county
or municipal government agency. Also includes utilities serving the
general public such as electrical service.
317
2013 Annual Land Use Inventory Report February 28, 2014
Page 4 of 15
Use Type Description
(SEF)
School/Educational
Facility
Any building or part thereof which is constructed or used for public or
private education or instruction; when not conducted as a commercial
enterprise for the profit of individual owners or stockholders.
(SFR) Single-Household Residential
A building used for residential occupancy by one household, including
multiple residences that share a common wall, as long as only one
dwelling unit lies upon a single lot; townhomes. Also may include an
accessory dwelling unit.
(DTR) Duplex/Triplex
Residential
A building, or a portion thereof, used for occupancy by two or three
households living independently of each other, with the units completely
separated by a common wall, floor and/or ceiling and reside on one lot; including apartments and condos.
(MFR) Multi-
Household Residential
A building, or portion thereof, used for occupancy by four or more
households living independently of each other, with the units completely separated by a common wall, floor and/or ceiling; apartments, condos.
(MHMP) Mobile
Home, Mobile Park,
Manufactured Housing
A factory assembled structure(s), exceeding eight feet in width,
originally equipped with the necessary service connections and originally
made so as to be readily movable as a unit(s) on its own running gear and designed to be used as a dwelling unit(s) without a permanent foundation, whether or not the running gear has been removed.
(RP) Residential with Pasture Residential property, usually single-household, with 1 or more acres but not more than 20 acres, that has open pasture used for grazing animals.
(RR) Rural Residential Detached single-household residential property located outside of the
City limits that does not have pasture.
(ROW) Rights-of-Way A public way established or dedicated for public purposes by duly
recorded plat, deed, grant, easement, governmental authority or by operation of law; roads; railroads.
(UDV) Undeveloped Land that is not ready to be occupied by buildings (needs to be
subdivided; needs infrastructure)
(VACANT) Vacant Land that is currently developed and ready to be occupied by buildings but is unoccupied; no buildings or buildings requiring significant
improvement in order to be used.
318
2013 Annual Land Use Inventory Report February 28, 2014
Page 5 of 15
Zoning Districts by Title
R-S - Residential suburban district
R-1 - Residential single household, low density district
R-2 - Residential two household, medium density district
R-3 - Residential medium density district
R-4 - Residential high density district
R-O - Residential office district
RMH -Residential manufactured home community district
REMU- Residential emphasis mixed use district (first appears on the zoning map in 2010)
HMU - Historic mixed use district
PLI - Public lands and institutions
B-1 - Neighborhood business district
B-2 - Community business district
B-3 - Central business district
M-1 - Light manufacturing district
M-2 - Manufacturing and industrial district
B-P - Business park district
UMU - Urban Mixed Use (first appears on the zoning map in 2008)
319
2013 Annual Land Use Inventory Report February 28, 2014
Page 6 of 15
2013 Land Use Inventory Report as of December 31, 2013, Acres of Each Use by Zoning District Land Use Classifications Zoning Districts
B-1 B-2 B-3 BP HMU M-1 M-2 PLI R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 REMU R-MH R-O R-S UMU
Grand
Total
% By
Land Use
AP 3.7 41.2 14.2 83.5 16.2 2.6 0.0 0.2 0.0 1.2 4.1 47.9 214.9 1.7%
CA 3.5 54.3 2.8 12.9 0.2 40.7 1.5 0.3 1.8 0.7 118.8 0.9%
CHURCH 5.2 4.0 0.0 6.6 11.3 28.5 10.6 21.2 0.5 1.5 89.5 0.7%
CR 9.5 267.1 20.4 29.1 3.3 72.0 7.8 1.6 0.5 6.1 16.4 13.9 1.1 448.8 3.5%
DTR 0.0 2.7 2.0 0.1 0.8 38.4 93.1 94.9 21.5 13.8 0.6 268.0 2.1%
GOLF 5.0 0.4 171.5 176.8 1.4%
HM 2.4 94.9 1.0 0.8 0.0 0.3 0.2 99.5 0.8%
LM 6.2 1.2 5.2 8.5 291.4 34.4 0.8 0.7 7.7 4.1 7.7 367.9 2.9%
MFR 17.6 4.8 1.6 0.0 36.8 31.5 243.1 148.4 80.2 2.9 566.9 4.4%
MHMP 2.4 9.8 0.0 12.2 0.0 34.4 22.6 5.0 86.5 0.7%
MIXED 19.2 91.0 14.3 1.2 4.5 62.0 9.4 2.0 0.2 1.4 6.8 16.4 0.0 16.1 24.5 269.0 2.1%
PFP 2.2 10.5 9.7 0.2 20.8 0.7 396.3 0.0 6.9 0.0 4.1 0.0 451.4 3.5%
POS 0.1 38.2 0.2 17.8 26.1 0.1 502.0 242.8 47.5 237.0 72.2 5.0 18.5 108.5 1,316.1 10.3%
RB 1.6 37.3 1.5 0.2 0.2 0.4 41.2 0.3%
ROW 16.1 233.5 46.2 45.1 11.4 212.7 371.5 140.2 355.9 203.1 400.7 143.7 6.8 65.6 87.2 6.7 2,346.6 18.3%
SEF 0.0 0.2 7.4 41.1 4.5 714.7 29.3 4.6 32.3 2.9 25.7 1.2 0.5 864.5 6.8%
SFR 1.5 30.8 7.5 0.0 8.7 12.3 4.7 7.4 698.1 307.5 366.5 137.1 0.0 13.3 98.3 1,693.9 13.2%
UDV 0.4 171.6 92.3 62.9 150.1 153.2 327.9 89.8 304.5 189.0 127.3 31.3 128.3 406.5 2,235.0 17.5%
VACANT 33.4 223.4 0.5 11.6 1.7 62.1 2.2 5.2 78.9 30.8 389.3 160.3 68.2 42.8 31.3 1,141.9 8.9%
Grand Total 91.6 1,319.9 138.5 351.4 39.6 894.7 585.1 1,921.8 1,822.1 821.8 2,124.0 939.1 127.3 124.5 499.1 958.6 38.0 12,797.2 100.0%
% By Zoning
District 0.7% 10.3% 1.1% 2.7% 0.3% 7.0% 4.6% 15.0% 14.2% 6.4% 16.6% 7.3% 1.0% 1.0% 3.9% 7.5% 0.3% 100.0%
320
2013 Annual Land Use Inventory Report February 28, 2014
Page 7 of 15
2012 Land Use Inventory Report as of December 31, 2012, Acres of Each Use by Zoning District
Land Use Classification Zoning Districts
B-1 B-2 B-3 BP HMU M-1 M-2 PLI R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 REMU R-MH R-O R-S UMU Grand Total
% By Land
Use
AG 22.7 38.0 19.0 79.7 0.63%
AP 3.7 41.2 13.2 83.5 16.2 2.6 0.2 1.2 4.8 47.9 214.6 1.69%
CA 3.5 54.3 2.8 12.9 0.2 40.7 1.5 0.8 1.8 0.7 119.3 0.94%
CHURCH 0.0 5.2 4.0 0.0 6.6 11.3 28.5 10.6 0.5 1.5 68.3 0.54%
CR 12.3 265.9 20.6 29.1 3.3 72.0 7.8 1.6 0.5 6.1 6.4 16.3 1.1 443.1 3.50%
DTR 2.7 2.3 0.1 0.8 38.4 93.0 94.6 24.0 9.8 0.6 266.3 2.10%
GOLF 5.0 0.4 171.5 176.8 1.40%
HM 2.4 92.3 0.6 0.8 0.3 0.2 96.5 0.76%
LM 6.2 0.4 5.2 8.6 291.4 34.4 0.8 0.7 8.5 4.1 7.7 368.0 2.91%
MFR 10.9 4.8 1.6 36.8 31.5 203.1 144.2 80.2 2.9 516.0 4.07%
MHMP 2.4 9.8 0.0 12.2 34.4 22.6 5.0 86.5 0.68%
MIXED 16.4 89.9 14.1 1.2 4.5 62.0 9.4 2.0 0.2 1.4 6.8 16.6 16.1 24.5 265.1 2.09%
PFP 2.2 10.5 9.7 0.2 20.8 0.7 398.2 0.0 0.0 5.7 4.1 452.2 3.57%
POS 0.1 38.2 0.2 17.8 26.1 0.1 501.6 230.5 40.8 221.8 70.4 5.0 18.3 108.0 1,278.9 10.10%
RB 1.6 37.0 1.5 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.0 40.9 0.32%
ROW 16.1 229.6 45.3 45.0 11.4 212.7 371.5 138.7 344.8 203.7 396.4 135.5 6.8 65.9 87.8 6.7 2,317.9 18.30%
RR 3.5 3.5 0.03%
SEF 7.4 41.1 4.5 671.4 29.3 4.6 32.3 2.9 25.7 1.2 0.5 820.9 6.48%
SFR 1.5 30.6 6.8 8.7 12.3 1.2 7.4 686.4 303.0 334.9 132.2 14.2 95.5 1,634.7 12.90%
UDV 0.4 118.9 92.3 62.9 150.1 196.5 363.3 89.8 286.3 198.4 127.3 52.6 106.6 406.5 2,251.7 17.77%
VACANT 33.4 256.9 1.0 11.6 1.7 62.1 2.2 0.3 76.5 35.4 401.8 136.6 90.5 25.8 31.3 1,167.2 9.21%
Grand
Total 91.6 1,307.3 135.4 351.4 39.6 894.7 585.1 1,916.9 1,819.9 815.8 2,065.2 917.8 127.3 124.5 499.1 938.7 38.0 12,668.2 100.00%
% By
Zoning
District 0 0.1032 0.01 0.03 0 0.07 0.05 0.1513 0.1437 0.06 0.163 0.07 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.07 0.003 1
321
2013 Annual Land Use Inventory Report February 28, 2014
Page 8 of 15
2011 Land Use Inventory Report as of December 31, 2011, Acres of Each Use by Zoning District
Land use Classifications Zoning Districts
B-1 B-2 B-3 BP HMU M-1 M-2 PLI R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 R-MH R-O R-S UMU Total % By Land Use
AP 4 41 13 84 18 3 0 0 0 1 5 45 212.5 1.70%
CA 4 59 3 13 0 41 1 1 2 1 123.7 0.99%
CHURCH 5 4 0 7 11 28 12 1 2 69.0 0.55%
CR 12 254 21 29 3 65 8 2 0 6 17 16 1 434.8 3.48%
DTR 0 3 2 0 1 38 93 93 24 10 1 264.6 2.12%
GOLF 5 0 171 176.8 1.42%
HM 2 64 1 1 0 0 0 68.2 0.55%
LM 6 0 5 9 294 34 1 0 8 4 8 370.9 2.97%
MFR 11 5 2 0 35 32 241 140 80 3 548.5 4.40%
MHMP 2 10 0 12 0 34 23 5 86.5 0.69%
MIXED 16 89 14 1 4 62 9 2 0 1 7 17 0 16 24 264.0 2.12%
PFP 2 10 10 0 21 1 398 0 0 6 0 1 0 449.1 3.60%
POS 0 43 0 16 25 506 242 52 226 66 5 18 108 1,306.9 10.47%
RB 2 37 1 0 0 0 40.9 0.33%
ROW 16 224 45 50 11 201 372 139 345 203 416 135 7 66 88 7 2,324.5 18.63%
SEF 0 0 7 41 4 671 29 5 32 1 26 1 0 819.5 6.57%
SFR 2 31 7 0 8 12 5 7 682 292 310 131 0 14 91 1,591.4 12.75%
VACANT 34 408 1 126 2 140 152 149 433 125 689 348 53 204 430 31 3,326.0 26.65%
Total 92 1,279 135 378 40 895 585 1,874 1,818 814 2,063 912 125 499 932 38 12,477.9 100.00%
% By Zoning District 0.73% 10.25% 1.08% 3.03% 0.32% 7.17% 4.69% 15.02% 14.57% 6.53% 16.54% 7.31% 1.00% 4.00% 7.47% 0.30% 100.00%
322
2013 Annual Land Use Inventory Report February 28, 2014
Page 9 of 15
2010 Land Use Inventory Report as of December 31, 2010, Acres of Each Use by Zoning District Land Use Classification Zoning Districts
B-1 B-2 B-3 BP HMU M-1 M-2 PLI R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 R-MH R-O R-S UMU Total*
% By
Land Use
AP 4 43 13 80 17 3 0 0 0 1 5 45 210 1.69%
CA 3 47 3 13 0 41 1 1 2 1 112 0.90%
CHURCH 5 4 0 7 11 28 12 2 2 70 0.56%
CR 12 253 21 29 3 64 8 2 0 6 17 16 1 432 3.46%
DTR 0 3 2 0 1 38 93 93 24 10 1 264 2.11%
GOLF 5 2 171 179 1.43%
HM 2 64 1 1 0 0 0 68 0.55%
LM 6 0 5 9 294 34 1 0 8 4 16 378 3.03%
MFR 11 5 2 0 35 31 241 140 80 3 548 4.39%
MHMP 0 2 10 0 12 0 34 23 5 87 0.70%
MIXED 17 87 13 1 4 59 9 2 0 1 7 16 0 18 17 253 2.03%
PFP 2 10 10 0 21 1 398 0 0 6 0 0 448 3.59%
POS 0 41 0 16 25 506 237 52 210 55 5 16 106 1,269 10.17%
RB 2 36 1 0 0 2 41 0.33%
ROW 16 220 45 50 11 201 372 139 345 203 416 134 7 67 88 7 2,320 18.59%
SEF 0 0 7 41 4 671 29 5 32 1 26 1 0 820 6.57%
SFR 1 29 7 0 8 12 5 7 677 286 301 129 0 16 90 1,570 12.58%
VACANT 34 425 1 130 2 144 152 149 443 131 712 361 53 206 433 31 3,409 27.32%
Total* 92 1,273 135 378 40 895 585 1,874 1,818 814 2,063 912 125 505 932 38 12,478 100.00%
% By Zoning
District* 0.74% 10.20% 1.08% 3.03% 0.32% 7.17% 4.69% 15.02% 14.57% 6.53% 16.54% 7.31% 1.00% 4.05% 7.47% 0.30%
100.00
%
*The total land area for this year includes the land use of Right of Way (ROW) which was absent in the prior two years. This changes the total areas.
323
2013 Annual Land Use Inventory Report February 28, 2014
Page 10 of 15
2009 Land Use Inventory Report as of December 31, 2009, Acres of Each Use by Zoning District Land Use Classification Zoning Districts
B-1 B-2 B-3 BP HMU M-1 M-2 PLI R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 R-MH R-O R-S UMU TOTAL*
% By
Land Use
AP 4 43 13 75 17 3 0 0 0 1 6 35 197 1.94%
CA 3 47 3 13 0 41 1 1 2 1 112 1.10%
CHURCH 5 4 0 7 11 11 12 2 2 52 0.51%
CR 12 253 21 29 3 64 8 9 2 0 6 17 16 1 442 4.35%
DTR 0 3 2 0 1 12 93 93 24 10 1 238 2.34%
GOLF 5 2 171 179 1.76%
HM 2 64 1 1 0 0 0 68 0.67%
LM 11 0 10 9 287 34 1 2 0 13 4 19 391 3.85%
MFR 11 5 2 0 35 31 241 139 80 3 547 5.38%
MHMP 5 2 10 0 3 12 10 34 23 5 105 1.03%
MIXED 16 87 13 1 4 59 9 2 0 1 7 16 0 18 17 252 2.48%
PFP 2 10 10 0 13 1 393 0 0 6 0 8 443 4.36%
POS 0 41 0 16 25 506 263 52 210 55 5 26 106 1,305 12.84%
RB 2 36 1 0 0 2 41 0.40%
SEF 0 0 7 41 4 671 29 5 32 1 1 0 794 7.81%
SFR 1 29 7 0 8 12 5 7 673 282 287 128 0 16 88 1,544 15.19%
VACANT 30 464 1 130 2 150 152 149 447 131 744 303 78 206 432 31 3,452 33.98%
TOTAL* 76 1,097 90 327 28 686 214 1,739 1,473 611 1,648 733 118 438 852 31 10,162
100.00
%
% By Zoning District 0.75% 10.80% 0.89% 3.22% 0.28% 6.75% 2.10% 17.11% 14.50% 6.02% 16.21% 7.22% 1.16% 4.31% 8.38% 0.31% 100.00%
* Excludes any land used for ROW. The ROW values were not included in this year’s tabulation due to technical difficulties with the data.
324
2013 Annual Land Use Inventory Report February 28, 2014
Page 11 of 15
2008 Land Use Inventory Report as of December 31, 2008, Acres of Each Use by Zoning District Land Use Classifications Zoning Districts
B-1 B-2 B-3 BP HMU M-1 M-2 PLI R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4
R-
MH R-O R-S UMU Total*
% By
Land
Use*
AP 4 43 13 75 17 3 0 0 0 1 6 35 197 1.95%
C 12 253 21 34 3 64 8 9 2 0 3 17 16 1 443 4.37%
CA 3 47 3 13 0 41 1 1 2 1 112 1.11%
CHURCH 5 4 0 7 11 11 12 2 2 52 0.52%
DTHR 0 3 2 0 1 12 93 93 22 10 1 235 2.32%
GOLF 5 2 171 179 1.76%
HM 2 63 1 1 1 0 0 0 68 0.67%
LM 11 0 5 9 109 34 1 2 0 13 4 19 208 2.05%
MHMP 5 2 10 0 3 12 10 34 23 5 105 1.04%
MHR 11 5 2 0 0 35 31 244 139 80 3 550 5.43%
MIXED 16 86 13 1 4 59 9 2 0 1 7 16 0 18 17 252 2.49%
PF 2 10 10 0 10 1 393 0 0 6 0 8 440 4.34%
PFP 0 41 0 16 25 476 263 52 210 55 5 26 106 1,275 12.58%
RB 2 36 1 0 2 41 0.40%
SEF 0 0 7 41 4 671 29 5 32 1 1 0 794 7.84%
SHR 1 29 7 0 8 12 5 7 669 281 283 128 0 16 87 1,534 15.15%
VACANT 30 464 1 130 2 330 152 149 451 132 750 306 78 206 432 31 3,645 35.98%
Total* 76 1,096 90 327 28 685 214 1,709 1,473 611 1,648 733 118 438 852 31 10,130 100.00%
% By
Zoning
District* 0.75% 10.82% 0.89% 3.23% 0.28% 6.76% 2.11% 16.87% 14.54% 6.03% 16.27% 7.24% 1.16% 4.32% 8.41% 0.31% 100.00%
* Excludes any land used for ROW. The ROW values were not included in this year’s tabulation due to technical difficulties with the data.
325
2013 Annual Land Use Inventory Report February 28, 2014
Page 12 of 15
2007 Land Use Inventory Report as of December 31, 2007, Acres of Each Use by Zoning District
Land Use Classification Zoning Districts
R-S R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4
R-
MH R-O B-1 B-2 B-3 HMU M-1 M-2 BP PLI TOTAL
% BY LAND
USE
SHR 81 650 270 261 94 1 6 0 26 7 8 21 1 0 7 1433 12.0%
DTHR 1 13 92 84 22 0 3 0 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 220 1.8%
MHR 3 35 36 184 135 0 53 0 10 5 0 0 0 1 0 463 3.9%
MHMP 2 0 0 12 0 53 23 0 2 0 0 7 0 0 0 99 0.8%
CHURCH 2 9 2 11 8 0 2 0 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 42 0.3%
GOLF 171 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 174 1.4%
MIXED 8 0 1 7 1 0 6 15 86 13 4 58 9 1 2 213 1.8%
RB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 34 1 0 2 0 0 0 39 0.3%
C 1 2 0 3 17 0 14 11 239 21 4 63 8 31 7 422 3.5%
HM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 59 1 1 1 0 0 0 64 0.5%
CA 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 3 47 3 0 41 1 12 0 111 0.9%
LM 23 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 6 0 9 106 36 19 1 207 1.7%
HI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0%
AP 0 0 0 1 5 0 33 2 36 14 0 17 3 81 16 208 1.7%
PFP 92 261 52 212 60 5 26 0 43 11 0 21 0 20 646 1449 12.1%
SEF 0 27 5 21 1 0 0 1 0 7 0 4 0 41 532 641 5.3%
ROW* 87 345 200 402 129 11 64 16 217 45 11 188 372 57 128 2272 19.0%
VACANT 453 482 138 729 238 78 163 40 461 1 1 393 155 146 455 3932 32.8%
TOTALS 924 1825 796 1930 714 148 399 93 1274 135 40 923 585 409 1794 11988 100.0%
% BY ZONING DISTRICT 7.7% 15.2% 6.6% 16.1% 6.0% 1.2% 3.3% 0.8% 10.6% 1.1% 0.3% 7.7% 4.9% 3.4% 15.0% 100.0%
326
2013 Annual Land Use Inventory Report February 28, 2014
Page 13 of 15
2006 Land Use Inventory Report as of December 31, 2006, Acres of Each Use by Zoning District Land Use Classification Zoning Districts
R-S R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 R-MH R-O B-1 B-2 B-3 HMU M-1 M-2 BP PLI TOTAL
% BY LAND
USE
SHR 77 645 264 242 95 1 6 1 26 7 8 21 1 1 7 1402 13%
DTHR 1 38 90 78 21 0 3 0 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 237 2%
MHR 3 35 31 201 109 0 99 0 9 5 0 0 0 2 0 494 4%
MHMP 2 0 0 12 0 53 23 0 2 0 0 7 0 0 0 99 1%
CHURCH 1 9 2 8 8 0 2 5 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 44 0%
GOLF 171 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 178 2%
MIXED 8 0 1 6 1 0 6 10 76 13 4 56 9 1 2 193 2%
RB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 33 1 0 2 0 0 0 38 0%
C 1 2 1 16 17 0 13 14 256 21 4 66 8 31 7 457 4%
HM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 59 1 1 1 0 0 0 64 1%
CA 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 33 3 0 41 1 15 0 97 1%
LM 23 0 1 0 1 0 4 0 6 0 9 106 36 14 1 201 2%
HI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
AP 0 0 0 1 5 0 32 2 34 14 0 16 3 87 16 210 2%
PFP 102 212 45 178 41 5 21 0 13 11 0 21 0 16 555 1220 11%
SEF 0 9 5 13 1 0 0 1 0 7 0 4 0 41 532 613 6%
ROW 73 310 163 252 91 12 52 15 147 47 11 68 152 44 118 1555 14%
VACANT 459 443 108 843 201 78 96 37 525 1 1 393 155 124 553 4017 36%
TOTALS 921 1708 711 1852 591 149 358 92 1227 137 38 803 365 376 1791 11119 100%
% BY ZONING DISTRICT 8% 15% 6% 17% 5% 1% 3% 1% 11% 1% 0% 7% 3% 3% 16% 100%
327
2013 Annual Land Use Inventory Report February 28, 2014
Page 14 of 15
2005 Land Use Inventory Report as of December 31, 2005, Acres of Each Use by Zoning District Land Use Classification Zoning Districts
R-S R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 R-MH R-O B-1 B-2 B-3 HMU M-1 M-2 BP PLI TOTAL % BY LAND USE
SHR 91 630 253 224 93 1 9 0 26 6 8 20 1 1 13 1376 13%
DTHR 0 38 89 68 20 0 5 0 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 226 2%
MHR 7 38 29 181 98 0 71 0 13 5 0 0 0 3 0 445 4%
MHMP 2 0 0 12 0 53 23 0 2 0 0 7 0 0 0 99 1%
CHURCH 1 9 1 8 5 0 2 7 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 45 0%
GOLF 175 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 182 2%
MIXED 8 0 1 0 0 0 6 6 74 14 4 52 9 1 2 177 2%
RB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 33 1 0 2 0 0 0 38 0%
C 1 2 1 37 17 0 13 11 219 21 4 67 8 39 7 447 4%
HM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 60 1 0 1 0 0 0 64 1%
CA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 33 3 0 41 1 15 0 95 1%
LM 22 0 1 0 1 0 5 0 6 0 3 105 36 15 1 196 2%
HI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
AP 0 0 0 1 3 0 27 2 33 14 0 15 3 73 2 173 2%
PFP 85 150 33 88 35 0 28 0 11 11 0 21 0 16 560 1038 10%
SEF 0 10 5 13 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 5 0 42 539 617 6%
ROW 59 296 163 237 89 10 49 14 145 45 11 62 95 43 116 1434 14%
VACANT 602 346 141 797 190 31 133 35 553 1 1 208 154 153 442 3787 36%
TOTALS 1053 1524 717 1668 552 95 371 82 1219 130 31 607 307 401 1682 10439 100%
% BY ZONING DISTRICT 10% 15% 7% 16% 5% 1% 4% 1% 12% 1% 0% 6% 3% 4% 16% 100%
328
2013 Annual Land Use Inventory Report February 28, 2014
Page 15 of 15
329