HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-14-14 Design Review Board MinutesMINUTES
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
UPSTAIRS CONFERENCE ROOM,
ALFRED STIFF PROFESSIONAL BUILDING,
20 EAST OLIVE STREET
WEDNESDAY, MAY 14, 2014
5:30 P.M.
ITEM 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ATTENDANCE
At
:14 sec – Chair Pro-Tem Lessa Racow called the meeting to order and attendance. This was an Informal Meeting, as there was no quorum.
Lessa Racow
Mel Howe
Doug Riley, City Planner
Chris
Mehl, Commission Liaison
Jim Ullmen, Morrison-Maierle
ITEM 2. MINUTES OF MARCH 05, 2014
At :37 sec – Planner Riley stated there would be no vote on the minutes since there is no quorum
for the meeting. Review and vote on the minutes will occur at the next Design Review Board meeting.
ITEM 3. PROJECT REVIEW
1. Bozeman Gateway Building G Preliminary SP/COA (Riley/Johnson)
870
Harmon Stream Boulevard
Preliminary Site Plan with a Certificate of Appropriateness Application to allow
the construction of a 5,410 Square foot multi-tenant retail building with
associated
parking and site improvements on the southeast corner of W. Main Street and
Harmon Stream Boulevard within the Bozeman Gateway Planned Unit Development.
At 1:12 min – Planner
Riley gave his staff report on Bozeman Gateway Building G. The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed this project earlier today (May 14) and approved it with conditions
and requirements.
At 12:35 min – Planner Riley concluded his presentation.
At 12:51 min – Chair Pro-Tem Racow opened for questions for staff. No questions forthcoming.
At 13:25
min – Chair Pro–Tem Racow opened for Applicant presentation. Jim Ullmen,
Morrison-Maierle, representing the applicant, noted the retaining walls are less than four
feet. The DRC placed a condition that if the retaining walls are higher than five feet, they
would need to tier them. Also, the railing will match the railing that is
being constructed
on Building S and the Gateway theme. The retaining wall at Building S goes from six feet
to four feet of a form liner that shows a grass pattern
that will potentially be used on the
Building G retaining retaining wall to keep the same characteristics and theme of Bozeman
Gateway. A mezzanine is potentially planned for the northeast corner of
Building G.
At 16:05 min – Chair Pro–Tem Racow opened for questions of the Applicant.
At 16:10 min – Ms. Racow asked if there will be any exterior windows? Mr. Ullmen answered
no.
At 16:40 min – Commissioner Mehl asked Ms. Racow to read the email comment from Bill Rea,
who was unable to attend tonight’s meeting. He supports staff recommendations
but wished:
- it was extended further, believing the design lacks in context and regionalism;
- does not meet standards set in the Gateway Manual or the UDO;
- high percentage of stucco is of particular concern;
- combination of gold and polished black granite seem to be in opposition to the more
natural
materials in the rest of the Gateway development.
Since this building is an anchor of the development, Mr. Rea believes the architectural style
should more carefully
follow the development manual and the UDO.
At 18:31 min – Mr. Ullmen responded to comment stating Mr. Mitchell wants the buildings to be
different and interesting and doesn’t
want all the buildings to be the same, not all
craftsman. He wants them to be unique. Natural stone is an approved surface. The
enhancement of the
gold should not detract from the building.
At 20:42 min – Chair Pro–Tem Racow opened for discussion.
At 21:02 min – Mr. Howe stated he likes the building. The various elements are
diverse and
create an interesting building – no recommended improvements to the building.
At 22:08 min – Ms. Racow stated she would pass on recommendations to attributes
since
architecture is not her area of expertise. She supports staff’s recommendation to
incorporate additional landscaping at the bottom of the retaining walls.
At 23:21 min – Chair Pro –Tem Racow asked Commissioner Mehl if he had any comments or
questions. He stated he did not.
At 23:30 min – Planner Riley asked for an informal
recommendation from attending DRB
members to the Community Development Director on the project, using the staff
recommended conditions of approval.
At 24:52
min – Mr. Ullmen stated that Mr. Mitchell typically meets the Code and then goes
above and beyond it and increases the plantings.
At 25:25 min – a verbal informal vote
was taken for approval with recommended conditions. Mr.
Howe and Ms. Racow both agreed.
ITEM 4. PUBLIC COMMENT (15 – 20 minutes)
{Limited to any public matter, within the jurisdiction of the Design Review Board, not on this
agenda. Three-minute time limit per speaker.}
At 25:49 min – Chair Pro–Tem Racow opened for public comment. No comment forthcoming.
ITEM 5. ADJOURNMENT
At 26:00 min – Chair Pro–Tem
Racow adjourned meeting.
This meeting is open to all members of the public. If you have a disability that requires assistance, please contact ADA Coordinator, James Goehrung, at 582-3200
(voice) or 582-3203 (TDD).
Michael Pentecost, ChairpersonCity of Bozeman Design Review Board_______________________________________________