Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-15-2014 Planning Board MinutesPLANNING BOARD MINUTES TUESDAY, APRIL 15, 2014 ITEM 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ATTENDANCE President McSpadden called the regular meeting of the Planning Board to order at 6:02 p.m. in the Commission Meeting Room, City Hall, 121 North Rouse Avenue, Bozeman, Montana and took attendance. Members Present: Trever McSpadden, President George Thompson Julien Morice Paul Neubauer Erik Garberg Laura Dornberger Brett Potter – joined meeting at 7:00pm City Commission Liaison: Members Absent: Jerry Pape Guests Present: Dave Crawford, TD&H Engineering Ken Smith, Process Architecture Scott Hacker, Applicant ITEM 2. PUBLIC COMMENT (Limited to any public matter within the jurisdiction of the Planning Board and not scheduled on this agenda. Three-minute time limit per speaker.) At :17 min - Chair McSpadden, opened for public comment. No public comment forthcoming. Public Comment period was closed. ITEM 3. MINUTES OF MARCH 18, 2014 At :59 min – Mr. Thompson noted a correction to be made to the March 18th minutes regarding Westbrook Subdivision. Strike “He finds very large homes that are being built three or four feet apart in some neighborhoods.” Replace with “very large homes that are being built out-of-character with the adjacent homes.” Mr. McSpadden also noted a correction to be made saying it was Mr. Pape, not Mr. Thompson, who had the “milk” comment. At 2:29 min Mr. Morice moved to approve the corrected minutes. Mr. Thompson seconded. The motion was approved unanimously. ITEM 4. PROJECT REVIEW 1. Trout Meadows Ph. 3 Prel. Plat Application P14011 A Subdivision Preliminary Plat Application requested by the property owner and Applicant by the property owner Remainder at Trout Meadows, LLC, 7403 Highline Ct., Missoula, MT 59808 and applicant: Montana Crestview, 4200 Expressway, Missoula, MT 59808, and represented by: TD & H Engineering, 234 East Babcock Street, Bozeman, MT 59715. A Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat application to aggregate ten (10) lots into two (2) lots in Block 5 and to aggregate eleven (11) lots and relocate open space in Block 6 and to remove the existing Restricted Size Lot (RSL) designations from certain lots within these blocks in the Cattail Lake Subdivision, Phases 1 and 2. The properties involved are described as Lots 1-10 in Block 5 and Lots 1-11 & OSPA 1 in Block 6 of the Plat of Cattail Lake Subdivision, Phases 1 & 2, located in the SW ¼ of Sec. 26, T1S, R5E, P.M.M, City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana. Block 5 is generally located north of Catamount Street, between Fen Way and Blackbird Drive. Block 6 is generally located south of Trout Meadows Road, between Fen Way and Davis Lane. (Riley) At 2:48 min – Chair McSpadden opened Item #4 Project Review. At 2:57 min – Planner Riley provided an overview of the application, staff report and recommendation. He stated that no public comment has been received regarding this application and there are no unresolved issues. Planner Riley requested feedback from the Planning Board on the continued policy regarding having to complete a new preliminary plat and public hearing to remove previous RSL designations. He concluded his presentation and stated he was available for questions. At 13:44 min – Mr. Crawford of TD&H Engineering, representing the applicant, thanked the Planning Board for the opportunity to speak about this application and stated he is available to answer any questions. At 14:55 min – In response to a question from Planning Board member Neubauer, Scott Hacker, Applicant, explained the future plans for the development of the restricted lot area and their previous parkland dedication areas. At 17:37 min – Mr. Crawford stated that regarding the RSL policy, that he believes using the subdivision exemption process would be a better use of everyone’s time. At 18:08 min – Mr. Hacker stated that removing the RSL’s (new prel. plat) delayed the process two months at a cost of few thousand dollars. At 19:00 min – Ms. Dornberger asked about the frequency of requests to remove RSL designations. Planner Riley indicated that it is quite common, but many people never pursue due to the time and expense of a new preliminary plat. At 20:05 min – Mr. Morice asked whether these blocks/apartments will be part of the existing Property Owners’ Association? Mr. Hacker replied that, yes, they will be. At 20:30 min – Chair McSpadden opened for Public Comment. No public was forthcoming. Public Comment was closed. At 20: 52 min – Chair McSpadden opened for motion, discussion and vote. Mr. Thompson made the motion to approve. “Having reviewed and considered the application materials, public comment, and all the information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application P14011 and move to recommend approval of the subdivision with conditions and subject to all applicable code provisions.” Mr. Garberg seconded the motion. At 21:45 min – Planning Board members discussed the RSL Policy. Mr. Thompson stated he was initially concerned with losing RSLs, but with the existing apartments the RSLs don’t fit and apartments work better here. At 23:25 min – Mr. Morice stated the underlying zoning permits apartments as well so he doesn’t have a problem with removing RSLs and still create affordable housing. At 24:17 min – Mr. Garberg stated he still likes the idea of some type of public noticing before RSL designations are removed. Perhaps it can be incorporated into an administrative exemption process and if there is a certain public comment trigger, it would then require a full preliminary plat and public hearing. At 25:04 min – Mr. Morice stated if the zoning allows the land use he is ok, but what should govern the plat or zoning? He believes it should be the zoning. At 27:13 min – Mr. Garberg stated that often compatibility issues between housing types creates a problem. For example, large homes next to small homes. At 28:52 min – Mr. Neubauer stated the location of the RSLs are generally on the west side of town. Perhaps if they were in the core/downtown area of the city, he would not want to lose them in order to accommodate more affordable housing in the heart of the city. At 30:48 min – Chair McSpadden stated this project is a good example of where an administrative exemption review process would be ok, but he also likes the idea of some public noticing. Perhaps there needs to be some staff discretion to determine when an exemption is ok. At 34:03 min – Mr. Garberg stated the review process does have merit including the DRC review of traffic, parkland, subdivision issues, etc. At 35:26 min – Chair McSpadden opened for a vote on the motion. Motion passed unanimously. ITEM 5. NEW BUSINESS At 35:45 min – Chair McSpadden opened for new business. Discussion regarding RSLs continued. The Planning Board also discussed addressing the following items: Affordable Housing; Parkland/open space; and Housing/subdivision design flexibility, including PUD’s At 55:51 min – Chair McSpadden indicated that he would encourage the Planning Board to become more involved and work on key policy issues. However, due to staff workloads, this may mean that the Planning Board members would be doing much of the work. At 1:28:09 min – Chair McSpadden stated that as Planning Board members have ideas for future policy discussions, to send him an email and he will review them with Planning & Policy Manager Saunders to see if it is an appropriate item to place on a future agenda and how best for the Planning Board to provide policy feedback to the Commission, etc. ITEM 5. ADJOURNMENT At 1:39:16 min – Seeing there is no further business before Planning Board Mr. Garberg moved to adjourn the meeting. Mr. Morice seconded. The meeting was adjourned at 7:50 p.m. Trever McSpadden, President Doug Riley, Senior Planner Planning Board Department of Community Development City of Bozeman City of Bozeman