Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014 Bids & RFQ General Contractor for Manager- Dick Anderson, Submittal 1 'fir► � GA • 'A: ' .,ii:fir 1 • � ' �,I imL r • . . _..� -- I STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS PREPARED FOR THE CITY OF BOZEMAN POLICE & MUNICIPAL COURTS FACILITY - MARCH 20, 2014 d aco n stru cti o n.com TABLE OF CONTENTS i S + 4 1. GC/CM FIRM INFORMATION BONDING2. 11 CERTIFICATION - REQUIREMENTS _ �.a �S 1 I FIRM HISTORY 1 Founded in 1975,Dick Anderson Construction has grown from a small,private client company 1 to a strong, debt free corporation experienced in handling multi-million dollar projects. Dick 1 Anderson Construction was incorporated on October 19, 1978. We are a Montana based company with our main office in Helena and offices in Great Falls, Bozeman and Billings. DAC 1 has grown rapidly because we understand our business and we have a reputable list of satisfied OFFICE LOCATIONS 1 clients throughout the state. Currently, Dick Anderson Construction has 268 employees. Great Falls,MT 406.761-8707 Bozeman,MT 406.586.0889 1 EXPERIENCE Helena,MT 406.443,3225 Billings, MT 406.248.3700 1 Dick Anderson Construction has real world, in-depth experience in a wide variety of Sheridan,WY 307.672,0418 construction types, DAC's experience includes medical office buildings, surgical and medical centers, commercial buildings, higher education facilities, complex institutional renovations, 1 religious facilities, water and wastewater treatment facilities, energy projects, composting COMPANY OFFICERS I facilities, banking facilities, bridges, dams and parking structures, historical renovations, large Dick Anderson Chairman ranch infrastructure projects, large luxury residential projects, restaurants, and retail projects. Marty Schuma President We have received numerous awards and recognition for many of our projects. Ed Venetz Vice President Allan Frankl Vice President Derek Didriksen Vice President 1 SAFETY Kevin Hintt Vice President Workplace safety is of utmost concern at Dick Anderson Construction.We have an in-house Brian Bolton Vice President Regan Meredith Secretary/Treas.r2r Safety Director whose sole function is to oversee our Corporate Safety policy. In the past five years our workers compensation modification factor has been below the national average. Due to our low modification factor we are able to pass the savings on to our clients. Our CONTACT INFORMATION: belief is that a safe company is not only a moral responsibility but also dramatically increases Mary Schuma, President productivity and workplace security, not to mention the cost savings to the owner. Our 3424 Highway 12 East employees know their safety is Dick Anderson Construction's first priority and it shows in Helena,MT 59601 their work and attitude. 406.443.3225 Ext. 120 Fax:4 06.4 4 3.1537 CUSTOMER SATISFACTION ma*(@daconstrucfion.com We want to emphasize that we pride ourselves in always providing both consistent quality and SCOPE OF SERVICES service from our DAC project team. The trust we receive from our clients is cherished and can be illustrated by the number of repeat clients we have had the honor of working for. Our • General Contractor reputation upholds the values of sincere business integrity and excellent performance. Our • Construction Manager approach on all construction projects ensures that all client expectations are met. • Pre-Construction Services • Design-Build • Development LICENSES & TRADE CATEGORIES • Civil Construction State of Montana State of Idaho Trade: General Construction Trade: General Construction BONDING COMPANY License:4391 License: RCE 24577 John Leaf State of California State of North Dakota HUB International/Flynn Insurance Trade:General Construction Trade: General Construction P.O. Box 711 License: 82731 b License: 37855 Class A Great Falls,MT 59403 1.800.823.3596 ext.9970 State of Washington Trade:General Construction Individual:$75 Million License: DickAAC916KN Work Program:$200 Million MT CONTRACTOR LICENSE • 4391A STABILITY IN MARKET WORK VOLUME Measuring the stability and strength of a construction company is more than just their YEAR REVENUE financial statement.The other factors that enter into this measurement are as follows. 2007 $97 Million ► EMPLOYEE RETENTION AND LONGEVITY 2008 $80 Million 2009 $82 Million The positive work environment at DAC is a major factor in our success. We 2010 $56 Million have a very committed, hardworking, loyal work force.The sharing of the 2011 $71 Million rewards in our company has helped us to create and retain a highly motivated and creative staff, Our retention and longevity are second to none in our industry. 2012 $70 Million 2013 $106 Million ► BACKLOG OF WORK We have always been able to maintain a healthy backlog of work because of our EMPLOYEE LONGEVITY& RETENTION repeat clients and large amounts of negotiated and CM work. This backlog helps us maintain a strong influential presence in the market and has enabled us to have steady NUMBER AVERAGE controllable growth. OF YEARS OF EMPLOYEES SERVICE IN FIELD ► INTERNAL RESOURCES Project Managers& 15 10.8 We have consistently been one of the largest employers of crafts people in Engineers Montana. The development for our own people to perform many of the Superintendents 31 12.2 required skilled trades has been key to our production and ability to meet Feld Employees 1 1 1 4.7 schedules. Our financial strength has allowed us to buy competitively, take Adminstrative 10 10.7 volume discounts, and pay suppliers and subcontractors ahead of schedule. INTERNAL RESOURCES 31 Superintendents • I I I Craftspeople LIM • Financed Debt to Equity Ratio.02 to I STATE OF MONTANA DEPARTMENT OE Woo&INDUSTRY * DAC BENEFITS PROVIDED CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR REOISTRATION UNIT ALL EMPLOYEES TO CERTIFICATE OF CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION • Full Health,Dental&Vision Insurance paid RIGISTRATION No. 4391 for by DAC for the entire family. • Paid Vacation for all Employees DICK ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION AC • Retirement plan paid by DAC 3424 HWY 12 E HELENA,MT 59601-9717 • 401 K Plan Effcoivo Date:Aug 14,2013 • Cafeteria Plan Expiration Date:Aug 13,2015 • Profit Sharing Plan Employcr * * MANAGEMENT STAFF COMPENSATION • Bonus Plan • Profit Sharing Plan • DAC stock available for Senior Project Managers [.� • Health Club Memberships n�dllimial,nfanwtra,a,4a:k � ./6' Nl.ry nobly Ax,.;amryeJ.v,y c�„u,gn nvtlu„aArt�y 1 f Erg t PRESENT & PROJECTED WORKLOADS DICK ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION,INC.Annual Production Completed& DICK ANDFRs CONSTRUCTION.INC ON Cs Change From Previous Year CtNJ In Place 120.000,000 — -._ ..-- ' — 300,000,000 ---------- ---- 11.80% 100.000,000 250,000,000 -16.92% 1.89% 80.000,000 26.9% 200,000,000 -.2'h 3Y89 60,000.000 150.000.000 40.000,000 100,000.000 20,000.000 50,000,000 n L] 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 1 • 2013 Actual Sale Volume: $105,772,000.00 • 2013 Actual Contracts in Place:: $247,121,000.00 • 2012 Actual Sales Volume: $69,824,000.00 • 2012 Actual Contracts in Place:: $191,264,000.00 • 2011 Actual Sales Volume: $70,660,000.00 • 2011 Actual Contracts in Place: $186,766,000.00 • 2010 Actual Sales Volume: $55,650,000.00 • 2010 Actual Contracts in Place: $149,172,000.00 • 2009 Actual Sales Volume: $81,599,765.00 • 2009 Actual Contracts in Place: $180,162,678.00 • 2008 Actual Sales Volume: $80,083,475.00 • 2008 Actual Contracts in Place: $268,982,490.00 • 2007 Actual Sales Volume: $96,390,812.00 • 2007 Actual Contracts in Place: $21 1,902,232.00 LITIGATION HISTORY DAC does=currently have any lawsuits in progress, DAC has not had a legitimate claim against our payment or performance bonds. DAC has not been terminated on a project. DAC has not been declared in default on a project. DAC has been assessed liquidated damages on the following projects: DEARBORN REST AREA t We were assessed liquidated damages in excess or $5,000 for delivering this design build project 21 days late. We ran into difficulties in gaining approval from the Montana Department of Environmental Quality for the Non-Degratory septic system. The final approval of this system was received after contract time had expired. We were able to compress the duration of installation of this system down to only 15 days, however, even with this acceleration we turned the project over to the Owner behind schedule. MILK RIVER BRIDGE Harlem, MT—We were assessed liquidated damages in excess of $5,000 for delivering this project approximately 12 days late. We 1 approached the project with the sequencing plan that we would remove the existing bridge after the new bridge was constructed, rather than removing the existing bridge prior to starting construction of the new bridge. Even though the new bridge and roadway were complete within 1 the contract duration, we could not remove the existing bridge until the water level dropped below flood stage, and were therefore delayed 1 in removing the existing bridge. This was not viewed by the MDT as an excusable weather event as we could have removed the bridge the previous fall.Obviously, had we known that we would have record water levels in the Milk River well into the summer months of 2011 rather t than typical water levels, we would have removed the bridge the previous fall and averted these liquidated damages. DAC has not taken legal action or dispute resolution proceedings against on Owner. 1 1 1 _ 1 { BONDING COMPANY 1 Bonding Company: Continental Casualty Company Contact: Scott Garcia 1 206-626-5805 scott.garcia@cnasuretycom 1 Bonding Agent: John Leaf 1 HUB International/Flynn Insurance P.O. Box 711 \\ 1 Great Falls, MT 59403 - ~ 1 1.800.823.3596 ext. 9970 1 john.feafC@hubintemational.com Continental Casualty Company is our exclusive source for bonds. 1 1 Dick Anderson Construction has used Continental Casualty \ { Company for bonds since 1988. P Y BONDING LIMIT PER PROJECT C/VASURETY $75,000,000.00 S-1dr ONO" rsfe'Metnty,e ( SM9ThWA--Sulic2W*.,d,WA 9&104 -� . BONDING CAPACITY 1'•1pM., 2a,it:J083 { fxkmnk ib�rame uxn 7.rora Total Bonding Capacity:$200,000,000.00 M rch 18•2nt4 Net Bonding Availability:$175,000,000.00 1 ' WORK CURRENTLY IN PROGRESS 1 City Of Bo7.Cman Currently in Progress:$90,000,000.00 Office of the City(Neck 1 poBox 1130 Under Contract:$225,000,000.00 &rcem;m,lift'19771-12i0 Re: RFQ for GC/C\f ticn•iccs for Police and Municipal Courts hacdin INSURANCE COMPANY f ToUllornItMay Concern, PayneWest Insurance We are providing this infinmation at the request of txa principle,Dick Anderson Construction.Inc., Contact: Levi Downey who has advised us of their intentions to submit a proposal for the above referenced RFQ. We hatc PO Box 3089 reviewed the RFQ and understand the protect is estimated to be roughly$20,tXN1,0(X1 in value. Butte, MT 59702 Dick Anderson Constructitm,lac.is currently bonded through Contractual Casualty Company,which 406-533-1007 is treasury listed and rated ASV by die currentA31 Best Guild. We have been providing performance idowneyO)paynewest.eom and payment bonds for Dick Anderson Construction,[tic.since 1985,and we hate the unnost confidence in them We recommend them for your favorable consideration. lliek:Wdersun construction,Inc cutrcntls has surety support on single protects in excess of General Liability-$1,000,000 per occurence/ $75,000,000 in the surge and$2000)(1,000 in the a&mgate,and they have moue than sufficient $2,000,000 aggregate limits capacity to obtain 100'*o performance and payments bonds for this project please be advised that issuance of performance and payments bonds is a matter between Dick Automobile Liability-$1,000,000 per accident limits Anderson Construction,Inc and ourselves and we assume no liabdity to durd parties. .1ny requests for bonds will be subject to out standard undctwricmg criteria,which include but are not limited to, Umbrella Polio -$10,000,000 lima that schedules over review of contract documents and confimhauon of financing. Y 1 IF nu that a an)questions,please do not hesttatr ro contactme at env time both the general liability and auto l timee`�reay, Tvtcr Mclatyre I indem ritung Manager PROJECT SAFETY Safety at Dick Anderson Construction is as much a part of our culture as production. Clients to have reaped the benefits from our excellent safety program. We have an in-house Safety Director, Tom Tubbs, whose sole function is to oversee our Corporate Safety policy. Our employees actively participate in maintaining the established safety culture through site safety audits,job hazard analysis and site-specific safety plans. ►��- y_ Not only have we won a multitude of Safety Commendations from the Associated General ST.PETERS HOSPITAL Contractors of America, but we have a superior Worker's Compensation Modification Rate (MOD Factor)over the last several years. •• 77,0$35,0000 Man Man H Project Hours worked ' The MOD Factor that a contractor carries tells you more about a company's commitment • Work Comp savings to Owner: ' to safety than anything else.You can talk Safety, but your MOD Factor is the true indicator of $102,000.00 whether you practice what you preach. MSU CHEMISTRY BUILDING i WHAT IS A MOD FACTOR? • $20,000,000 Project i • 42,000 Man Hours worked The Worker's Compensation modification rate is a multiplier used to determine what Work Comp savings to Owner: ' percentage of an average an employer will pay. MOD rates are determined by averaging a $61,000.00 i company's past safety performance in comparison to similar companies in the industry. The average multiplier for an employer is 1.0. — 2012 SAFETY REWARDS DAC SAFETY STATISTICS: TO EMPLOYEES • Dick Anderson Construction has never had any construction fatalities. • OSHA Violations or Penalties in the last five years: 0 • Lost time injuries: 0 � 2014 EMIR rate:0.74 ALL DICK ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYEES 1 • Number of OSHA recordable claims: 10 in 333,141 man hours worked ARE REQUIRED TO TAKE MANDATORY DRUG TESTS. AWARDS 1 Dick Anderson Construction,Inc.was awarded atraveling plaque from the Montana Contractors Compensation Fund in Division I for a Loss Ratio below 10%for 2011 and 2012. MCCF came up with the traveling plaque as a way to recognize companies in the MCCF for i a good year of safety performance.The first is given to companies that have worked 275,000 man hours or more,the second is given to companies that have worked between 150,000- ' 275,000 man hours and the third is given to those who worked less than 150,000 man hours. DICK ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION,INC. Tom Tubbs is Dick Anderson Construction's full-time Safety March 19,2014 Director.Tom joined Dick Anderson To whom 1t May Concern: Construction in 1982 as a Project Dick Anderson Construction has received 0 citations or penalties from OSHA in the past 5 years. Superintendent. In 2006 he was appointed to the role of Safety Our EMIR for 201a i5 aa. Director.Tom has had thirty-one years At this time our cost quarter incident rate for 2014 is looking to be 3.5. of experience in the construction Thank you for your /consideration, industry. Tom Tubbs Dick Anderson Construction Safety Manager C ' This document is not intended to replace Site Specific existing company safety program but p cific Health $ Safety Plan Supplement for: enhance it by identifying site-specific information and hazards. Dick Anderson Construction • Job Hazard Analysis Performed by: ' ��� �c ,c:`k Date Performed: ,\-} \3 • Job Name: Job Location: -z��c�<c L • Start Date (est.): 11-11 3 ,Est. Completion Date: 1 • Project Manger: /�Us � �v'�`l `��-s , Superintendent: �ze_L- ■ Description of work performed: IN(iw' ■ Has Urgent Care/Hospital near location been identified? (For remote jobsites notify EMS of our operationtlocation) ❑N/A❑NO"�"Yes Name: \-'�x5p ,Address: L 115 ylzlc.A-� ,Tele. `19 2-24kc� ■ D es job have emergency 911 service available,any First Aid/CPR qualified persons and equipment: Yes[]No, kit location &qualified persons? VNfi c.��(7. kA ■ Has One-Call been notified (800-424-5555):�Yes❑ No❑N/A if yes list date &Time , Locate Number . *Note:You may be required to call local utilitiesfor locates not provided by One Call. • Sub-Contractors: ■ Does this job require any Competent/Special Trained Persons?N Yes❑No,if yes what:❑Scaffold, Q Trench/Excavation, ❑Confined Sp ace, 'Forklift. Name(s): 13r o.a. r1 Me, / X,•r,, N.-A-/ c k?_ . T ■ Any special permits or licenses needed? N Yes ❑No,What type:❑Confined Space,q Hazwoper, Welding/fire or other: z— ■ Check major hazards(all that apply) unique/special to this site that require employee briefing or',, training,then list control measures i.e.: Fall protection harness and lanyard, and guardrail system:�v•. �(Fall Protection ❑ Trenching/Excavation ❑ Non-Permit Confined Space ❑ Permit Required Confined Space ❑Respiratory ❑Hearing AHeavy Equipment O'Crane Operation ❑Motor Vehicle ❑Traffic ❑Scaffold ❑Electrical General ❑Electrical Overhead ❑Welding ❑Silica(wet method,ventilate,PPE) Q Asbestos (has survey been obtained,list abatement contractor) List controls for hazardschecked above: rY, Q_(,V" "_V t at-11c� lC - rv\r� c� SA-c. Refer to main safety plan for more specifics on all topics! • Special Personal Protection Equipment(PPE) needed: ■ All MSDS's that apply to job are available?,M Yes ❑No❑N/A,Location: Job Trail ,Office Superintendent pickup, other: ■ Safety meetings will be conducted Weekly on this day:�\c unless told otherwise at(time)'T-� (All site personnel are expected to attend and participate in weekly safer meetings.) Note:This is a living document with information subject to change as job requirements change. Changes are communicated through weekly safety meetings. This SSHSP will be communicated to site personnel at the start of the projccl. 1 4 C01" F ­911111111' - t Site Specific Health&Safety Plan Supplement for: Dick Anderson Construction, Inc. (This document is not intended to replace existing company safety program but enhance it by identifying site-specific information and hazards.) Job Hazard Analysis Performed by: ,JOL tto�{7;-,A-i Date Performed'_ 5 ^ � r Job Name�.C�r vt�' _f1ca4— (_ Job Location 3 67,r, �� it (z f Start Date jest.): / .'_-i Est.Complete Date: h Project Manager f.��r f 1 . �!&I t- a Superintendent �h r� (�bl��i✓i� Descriplion of work performed, '`X Cd4„_y_.ti�•'\ -'C�t f,t�C�, �+,,,,�- (!C- ,� �.� r i'r� 4 ( (f ) t r T' iJ Has Urgent Care/Hospital near location been identified?TES For remotejobsites notify EMS of our operation/location � F �i L(J(�f:.. YeA U of t� 144 1 1�f 2�J Name 7 t• � . �Q% ddress Phone Does Job have emergency 911 service available? First Aid/CPR qualified persons and equipment:Kit location 06 C f7 #JrL,(Q Q � '��;f- r Qualified person(si ��, Has One-call been notified(800-424-SSSS) Yes 0 No 0 N/A Ifyes,date /�_)cr / l &time %•_i�:��Cat, Lorate Number� . J " J 4' ?' ; Note:You maybe required to call local utilities for locates not provided by One Call. Subcantraciors: f1 Does this Job require any Competent/Special Trained Persons? [3 Yes No It Yes,what:0 Scaffold, Trench/Excavation, Confined Space, ?r�._' Forklift. Names:�� ��1� Any special permits or licenses needed?Yes j No Q What Type:O Confined—Space Hazwoper Welding/Fire .t1 Other, J Check major hazards fall that apply)unique/special to this sire that require employee briefing or training,then list control measures,i.e.:Fall Protection harness and lanyard,and guardrail system. Fall Protection ©Trenching/Excavation 0 Non-Permit Confined Space 0 Permit Required Confined Space Respiratory [�Hearing=Heavy Equipment©Crane Operation ©Motor Vehicle 0 Traffic Control 0 Scaffold Electrical General=Electrical Overhead�Welding 0 Silica(wet method,ventilate,PPE) r— Asbestos(has survey been obtained,list abatement contractor):_ List Controls for hazards ch `lhecked above: Z H j i ,'�k 5 lr4 ( Refer to main Safety Plan for more sped es on of topics( Special Personal Protection Equipment(PPE)needed: Pr 3T fG�e L f-c•-n G C !(a 7c�-c Pay �'�tG��+=.,1-!E���-r•���, � _� r t- � r i �`.f���:1�c:,.j All MSDS's that apply to job are available? c.,+s_,l Yes 0 No NJA Location: �Zl Job Trailer 0 Office =Superintendent Truck=Other Safety Meetings will be conducted Weekly on this dayfQQey+J"wunless told otherwise at(time) t 30-jfl to personnel are expected to attend and participate in weekly safety meetings. This SSHSP will be communicated to site personnel at the start of the project. I LEGEND � � II y, L I IC PROPOSED CONCRETE —x—x— STRAW WATTLE �- Tye- - ` PROPOSED ASPHALT EXISTING CONTOUR t (- ------ --_ —82— PROPOSED CONTOUR - PROPOSED ROCK MULCH PROPOSED STORM DRAIN 'I 9 VEHICLE TRACK PAD AND ACCESS TO SITE EXISTING STORM DRAIN i _ > I — DRAINAGE FLOW PATH DISTURBANCE BOUNDARY WIRE-MESH WRAPPED ROCK 1♦ SHEET FLOW DIRECTION 1.. - - -' - ---- s- '� 3 -B • J WATTLE (SEE NOTE 8) m 1 'EL DRAI T ST.. - 3 r POT NT1AL ON OW 70 1 1 m,, 011 FALL 002 TO-IST G CITY SITE FROM 00STI 1 u9 s A SIDQWALiC AR FBOZEMANST011 SEWER NOTES' e sp WIR SH PED CK Be ENT BASIN VE CAL P T,� 1 EXISTING AREA IS A MIXTURE OF CONCRETE SIDEWALKS.AND VEGETATIVE AREAS -� I WA E INL PRDTE TION(TYP.) OUTFLOW ISER ) `+ 2 COMPLY WITH THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN(SWPPP)TEXT AND THE GENERAL PERMIT FOR STORM WATER DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AS STATED IN THE NOTICE OF INTENT(NOI)FORM. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT DISTURB AREAS BEYOND PROJECT LIMITS WITHOUT PRIOR RAVEL AROUN t �' AUTHORIZATION- '; 4, LOCATIONS OF EXISTING OVERHEAD AND BURIED UTILITIES SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING Il I UTFLOW RISE ARE APPROXIMATE.AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AND MARKED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF POTENT I y- t p c�i; THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY STOCK ILE I "' RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING UTILITIES AND SHALL REPAIR ANY '-_ L FACILITIES DAMAGED DURING PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. • ' \E_- 5 MONITOR CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES TO ENSURE THAT SIGNIFICANT SEDIMENT OR VEGETATIVE �T DIMENT BASIN 1 SOIL DOES NOT LEAVE THE SITE. A\. BUFFER 6. PROPOSED CONTOUR REFERENCE ELEVATION IS 48DO FT t ✓ 7 VEHICLE TRACK PAD INSTALLATION WILL BE DONE AS ACCESS POINTS ARE USED OR AS I 1 22 JOBSITE T ER I - G• ( — NEEDED TO MINIMIZE SEDIMENT TRACKING TO STREETS NOT ALL LOCATIONS WILL BE P t �Y•" USED AT THE SAMETIME, J. 8 WATTLE PROTECTION FOR MANHOLE INLETS WILL BE PLACED AS NEEDED BASED ON THE EXTENT OF CONSTRUCTION AND IF THE STORM DRAIN INLET IS BEING UTILIZED TO CONCR p / , 1 PROPOSED BUILDING - \ 1 I - INTERCEPT RUNOFF RUNOFF .F r 1 (CUT AND FILL -+ - - 9 INTERCEPT RUNOFF FROM WILSON HALL STORM DRAIN AND DIVERT AROUND WORK \,'� i I LOCATION) 7 AREA,TO UNAFFECTED EXIXTNG STORM DRAIN. \ FILTER FABRIC 1' INLET PROTECTION J'� TENTIAL • I l FOUNDATION S •,� r 11 EXISTING PARKING LOT / I- WILSbN HALL ROOF' DRAIA(SEE NOTE 91 .T "--' I--I - �� J • GRAPHIC SCALE ETATIJE ` I ER I I (IN"E7 1 T—1,- 80 IL y. DSTURBAN BOUNDARY —3 — • 3-_ \I FILTER FA9RlC INL'f7 P[OTECTION � . T � � t'� is-� - LEx� 1V"CULI.EGF,,STRTF.T 1 I: PIPE CONVEYANLEOF \% \ �F_� _ Y OUTFALL 003 SHEET FLOW TO EXISTING LSON HALL R O TO 4,, �.,r ,y,-���� 1 I _ — — --Y — _ _ - _ _ OUT OF BOZEMAN STORM SEWER ``((��BB Ulm .s \ W OUTFALL 001 TO EXISTING CITY OF BOZEMAN =Y-F 1_^c _ �871_ _ YtEEP THERUNOPA CIFJ,N, \ 1 !.l STORM SEWER I � \ >j= \t- — r` -- — —_ -s- _•.i I srx^:—x�x--x--x--x�x—x_x—x_x max_ x w C SS CK Z PAD * t" MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE SITE BOUNDARY CONCRETE '�T3 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE TO BE CONDUCTED WITHIN THIS OF BUSINESS BUILDING SITE :t L WASHOUT AREA �$ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DISTURBANCE BOUNDARY GRAPHIC SCALE J0 �874 STOCKPILEAND STORAGE POTENTIAL ON FLOW TO SITE FROM EXISTING GRASS AND (BI FM I "ARE GROUND THE AREA TO THE SOUTH TO BE LEFT I Inch 30 It UNDISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES- MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF BUSINESS COLLEGE STREET STAGING AREA VERIFY SCALE! REVISIONS DRAWN BY: JAB PROJECT NUMBER THESE PRINTS MAYBE NO DESCRIPTION DATE BY MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF BUSINESS 3766.014 REDUCED.LINE BELOW 2980 Tech-logy BNO.W. CHK'D.BY: MEASURES ONE INCH ON MORRISON Enymeers Bozeman.MT 59718 BUILDING SHEET NUMBER APPR.BY:oacwna DRAWING_ - I�II sorveyws BOZEMAN MONTANA t �I-J MAIERLE INC. plann—SaenasJs DATE:6I2013 DRAWING NUMBER MODIFY SCALE ACCORDINGLY: J ""n"' Phone: (406)922-6702 i o A.REVIEW STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN N:V3766V014MSUCOBIDESIGNDOCSTemu1sZWPPPLSWPPP.drrg Plotted by Jodie bonescn lunr=013 An fmplayra�U..md[Lmpnny B SWPPP-1 (,qry .n 4 MDRIn90KMU ERIE PIC..1p1J DATE: LEGEND NOTE. $ o i _r. EXISTING SANITARY SEWER WHOLE 1.STRAW ROLL INSTALLATION REWIRES THE <L0 • 4,�E.or PLACEMENT AND SECURE STAKING OF THE ROLL IN U w I U 0 - - -- - EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE A TRENCH,3•-5•(75-125mm)DEEP.DUG ON I - I z CONTOUR. RUNOFF MUST NOT BE ALLOWED TO RUN MARK A. EXISTING WATER MAIN UNDER OR AROUND ROLL d I __ _ Z CHANDLER _ EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE I _- p Ne-951SES '0 RIM ELEV-4917.64 EXISTING GAS LINE s-4•_J T7 c - N s A I \ (77mJ -, M o F.L N ELEV=491Z.33 I �' U �,�tFi1l4 `MITI• 4r- f.L S ELEY=4912.43 EXISTING HYDRA~ EXISTING WATER VALVE STRAW ROLLS MUST BE PLACED LIB ALONG SLOPE CONTOURS 4j 1pP 0f 1rv0•"n�J°Ulmn Sheet 1 of t 4 EXISTING POWER POLE • ADJACENT ROLLS SHALL ELLMllbr ) EXISTING ELEC BOX �� TIGHTLY ABUT • • - - -- - - ---- - - - - ~ - - - - - �- m r EXISTING TELEPHONE BOX o-75'(3-amJ I .i„ L� m n - 5 EXISTING CONTOUR LINE ---- PROPOSED CABLE,ELEC,TELEPHONE / , `"'� '�;�� �Z= ; WEST KAGY BO ULEKAR z C ` AND GAS TO EACH BUILDING :`:u✓1 . . \ 1 TO w' ! - 1 �'U _ - --- -- - ' _ _ - I 0 5 ► S PROPERTY LINE SPACING DEPENDS ^✓.: i -_ _______�- - ___-_-_-_- � _�= y_&__--_____-__-__ ADJOINING PROPERTY LINE ON SOIL TYPE AND .- 1 I V� m j I T____-____ W E SLOPE STEEPNESS M001FY APPROACH m• 8 --- EASEMENT UNE ` 6 !AS ISHOY-N C` C ---- YARD SETBACK LINE - 1, ..V, •,H� i - .- PROPOSED CURB - (1s _ -!! i J I ♦ 1Tnsr r stxR slue f - PROPOSED SWALE TION POND CONTOUR DIMENT•ORGANIC MATTER EXTEND EXISTING SANITARY SEWER - R tlAm AND , -.- ..,- - I'"I W CONSTRUCTION UNITS AND NA71YE SEEDS ARE MAIM Tl] PEOPOSED�AANI4DLE Ki _ 1 -'�:'•.$. A+ �.z•_�, 151.43 STA 12+83.44 CAPTURED BEHIND ME ROLLS. --�'e, `-•.. ==''•°a•.•.-+ti". NEW SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE 1 7 .74' L FT LL nI.•foz SOL STOCKPILE AREA 3`-5`(75-J15mmJ RIM ELEY=4916.42 I •�•`\ i:':.•!.-:•.'.':'.•.•.'.'••.::.'.': •� _ L - m STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION F.L. OUT(N)=4913.04 _ \ __._... ....� _ •.'.'� W AT LN F.L. IN (S)=4913.24 \ as.w vmeo swel en4...-'•':'.':.•.�, nmlla F Z ENTRANCE/WASH PAD LIVE STAKE 6"-10"OU _ - \ _ {t0.t J+wlr ear'^1 M�^1M v 2Ho _______-________ ✓ STA. 12+59.84 I J •- (?00-250mmJ I _ ` `_ .,y- •-•�.�...:. a ogb- '.^ I I a 65.62 LEFT VEGETATIVE BUFFER 1 1 •� �- �gZ4L•.'...;.;. ;.•;--' I p CONSTRUCTION ((+ may. c I _ 60 �hM7�r ffiT FENCE OR STRAW WATTLES BOUNDARY I�I� `�,Nl?.� \� r.•':':) .;.;:.;_..:'. ;';'.{�.` IT°x 10104b) R i III 17 [�] CONSTRUCTION STAGING AREA II I I ``\\ \ `•� 10. p '"•k-ar 1'X 1'STAKE - 1 II �� \ Y AEQIoSA1.MtAhf•SEYlEk Mi"`(0(.�•�2':-:•:-:':• :•.•.'.`. - Q n WATTLE/STRAW ROLL SM RIFLEv=491fi.5s � I Az aoNa N07 70 SCALE i IS FEET * ' :' :'.. saF,Nis 0.os) . . : . IAuo-- wzc rt •� 1F L .(6A913.90'.'.'.'.'.•.•.•.'.'.•.-.•...; II I�BDTTOY DF vna.ulSCL 1\ •, 1' '!.as Cur .•.•.•-•-•:•:-:•:-:-:•:•:•:•:-:•:- :•:'.•.-;.;;:;:._:::: -• J♦i I- 11--�J LLJ Lo 1V SEE ABOVE FOR INDPADUAL POND TOP AND BOTTOM ELEVATIONS CI t 7 r, i = p D Q Q '.. ' TRACrt aA ` _•. :.:;;js I IN it �y U Q h R EXISTING GRADE EXISTING GRADE %- _ ----- �:, s w c1004atn ^.' `� V� a 1S1dNsa� :•• - ' f L,,- t0.10Nloo 3=11 roles - •:-:•:-:y.:- _} 1 a Z TYPICAL RETENTION POND DETAL {-:•:•:•:-:•:•;:•:•:•:•:-:•:•:•:-:-` t ! H I - z L) ti•.•.•.•_•.•.•.•.•.•.•:.•.•.•.•.•.:- �' :�}! � q�mM�l nnuuunuuunuuwuwellr�� I I IIj + '�' p R1NP,ED) j Mar lmo vcztr nNONmw xTim ••.-•'.'.�.`•-.••`.•.•.'.-.•. I I ! SOIL STOCKPILE AREA I I Oe Ou'IL E x 91m FDPEE O m .I;••..•.;..:.•.;.•;.•.•-.•.-.•.•.•. I I I ` EQ j I'� �1 Q FLIER FAWN CUTE)-W WE MLS '�'Z! L� Y Y 2s Gfon,0�1 I I �'{: C Scale In Feet ISE STARES W W b TO ArAW VEGETATIVE BUFFER -J'.'.•..•' ....._....'.fir: = g wPrlY u•E� �•) 30 0 30 'AM 1D'rC TYP .1 {•,•--_•--.••-••• rI �- Ne/IAr-DDnI New w-DOw1 1 I tFL�y rc BY 14 cA 1nr FA.IC 0I CONF. } .L;•__.•.._._.:.•.•.•.•..•.. I �IIi III I' 9 9 to 't:.'.'.-.•.•.•.'.•.-.-..•.-._.•.-.•. 11 Scale Inc, Meters " b •{.'.'.'.-.'.-.'.':.'.-.•.'.'.'.'::: �� 1�! 114 (roxzolvm) b - ;;;•••--•-•-•.'••.-••.•-•.•.'•• •4 j I WV I\ _p i __ __ __ _ _ Alt •'? '.r EP�4rA•3•PLY1rR-•..5 _.__ ___ DmTEAMNLfl/0.Y �1 G _.�___._._ i 1 I ):0.f . :. 1 1OG47 �. 'I I E vpocc TH'-r Ih'■A9{D In •.I •. I It I $ ME. I v n�`iw RIFIYK a T cTMs w •'I00 ._;•.•;•:•;•;:•..•.'.•.•.•.•.•.•.- ;` •'L'.'.'.'.'.•.'.'. rl I d ID I I SILT FENCE OR BIER FNI.t WWAW W aC[.Ou.i .... - I I 1 g2l 96) I STRAW WATTLES •-F-•-•• II I j 1 i (nD EI�� N O FASM 10 W. 6 Aq I I I U t I1 la A ra•W 14 w W FNY o6 Eautl 10 I:::.•:.•.•... __ _ Y Fes('IIE11r••....5 ER MANHOLE 11 ' I L'- C------72 b :•'•'• ELEV-4921. 'N N4a IM 1? .•L'.'.'':'::.'.•. (N)=49�1w5I►jC■_ II Ij _.-_•11• fTDvy tone eY ` °�1NGwF-D) OUT 16. 1 1 I I 5.62' LEFT TRUCTION T -- A3Qt OQA CONS I Z STAGING AREA 1\ CONC. ROS O �f 1' __. CONCRETE WASH ( •___i ]�_ ,qpy I I I fl. OUT PIT iiAA STAMPED I ' O I- W y W6 D MTEa I 8 I ) (2s 13)1 ROSSWALK LEGAL DESCRIPTION �� kNrnr AND ' I LITT In&*, GRAVEL J N ��VV TRACT lA CE7iTIF1CAlE OF SURVEY Na 2005A Yrt'TRODUO1 TARING FO BETTER �_ C I CONSTRUCTIO Olt[tuN� � stm f9iE F�1S I I I _1 PROPOSED 3 TCH EXIShING STAMPM TRANCE N SE 1/a,SEC 1A T.2 S,R.S E OF PJI.Y., ■ CITY 1>i B02EMAN.OALIATN COUNTY,MONTANA (2)SILT FENCE DETALS t 24.710 4- (23'lQ+ ! .0111EY FIEGK BUILDING 1 RE) h GUTTER 1 CROSSWAI)ta y I Fx.acv-N7s.0 I I I MODIFY EJN.( SW Sr c.NIS 1 I I i (Tb11OlE1F sue aN aADO I I i' PROACH EXISTING ASS WN U 1 GENERAL NOTES 1 l i } '•°(2500) 1 N' Q W I. CONSTRUCTION AND EARTH DISTURBING ACTIVITIES SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CONDITIONS OF THE I t l aL4I C41 C F I _ OFISASPHAL�r GENERAL PER10T FOR STORM WATER DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY - - I STA. 8+5.67 2. CONSTRUCTION TO TAKE PLACE INCLUDES WATER,SEWER,ROADS.STORM DRAINAGE AND A r i i.-J� aflS17a !1 -1Cd30� r � L4Z i O EROSION BETE ATRIAL CONTROL N 8- 3 nAS S Ia4 d SE I♦SEe I4.T z i.S E. a1 Z 00' LEFT 3, ALL CONCRETE MATERIAL AI BE DISPOSED OF MALL BE HAULED OFF OF SIZE TO LANDFILL NEW■' SANITARY WATER STUB AND(Z � ��" •�,'^-1-, 1 14 4. CONTRACTOR SNEEDSEDIMENT TO MAINTAIN OR THROVE SNARES SEWER STUB 2' BLOWOFF ISO'3' 1'W) 5. IF EROOEO SEDIMENT DEPOSITS CONTROL MEASURES CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE DEPOSITS, I 6. ALL ERASION AT SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE INSPECTED AND MAINTAINED BY THE 1. CONTRACTOR AT LEAST ONCE EVERY FOURTEEN CALENDAR DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER ANY STORM EVENT OF 0.5 INCHES OR GREATER 7. ALL INSPECTIONS AND MONITORING MUST BE DOCUMENTED AND KEPT IN ACCORDANCE'MTN ZI PART IILC.2 AND 3 OF THE MONTANA DEPT.OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY GENERAL PERMIT FOR = STORM WATER DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. LL JJ 8. EXPOSED SURFACES WILL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.EMBANKMENTIU MULCHING SHALL BE STABILIZED BY CRIMPING OR OTHER APPROVED METHOD. p I - Drawng Date: 10/22/13 9. CHEMICALS.FUEL.LUBRICANTS.PAINT,FERMUZERS.ETC.SHALL BE STORED IN AREAS NOT SUBJECT TO RUNOFF AND PROTECTED FROM MOVING EQUIPMENT. 10.NONE OF THE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL STRUCTURES.SHALL BE REMOVED UNTIL PERMANENT VEGETATION AND SITE STABILJZA710H HAS TAKEN PLACE. IT.DISTURBED SOILS SHALL BE STABILIZED WITHIN 14 DAYS OF CLEARING OR INACTIVITY IN CONSTRUCTION. 12-CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF EMPTY/UNUSED CHEMICAL AND HAZARDOUS WASTE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN CONTAINERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH LABEL INSTRUCTIONS. 1 13.CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM DAILY CLEANUP OF CONSTRUCTION SITE TO ENSURE THAT ALL IS W Sw SCALE,t'=30• UTTER IS CONTAINED IN AN APPROPRIATE ENCLOSURE OR CONTAINER. 14.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A SUITABLE WASTE CONTAINER FOR SCUD WASTE DURING CONSTRUCTION 15.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PORTABLE TOILETS LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 15 FEET FROM STORM DRAIN INLETS AND RETENTION BASINS. 13205 VEHICLE TRACKING PAD 1 2 PAVEMENT REMOVAL LEGEND J SILT FENCE STRAW WATTLE --- CHECK DAM DETENTION r POND CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA EXISTING TENTH WATER / =RETENTION POND J VEHICLE TRACKING PAD DETENTION POND / 0 PAVEMENT EXPANSION / EXISTING PAVEMENT _ �" �1� .. 1 EXISTING PAVEMENT SILT FENCE 3 PAVEMENT REMOVAL f / PAVEMENT EXPANSION DRAINAGE PATH SILT FENCE 1` -- AREAS PAVEMENT EXPANSION =97,118 SQ.FT, PAVEMENT REMOVAL =19,140 SQ.FT. \ EXISTING PAVEMENT =119,510 SQ-FT. BUILDING EXPANSION =54,945 SQ.FT. --- _ DETENTION EXISTING BUILDING = 112.025 SQ.FT. PONDS DETENTION \ 1 POND \\ CHECK DAM / EXISTING BUILDING 1\,l t _ 112,025 SQUARE FEET 1 CHECK I ' _�•� L �) i 2 DAMS EXISTING I /I IPAVEMENT � I I I f 1 CONCRETE I T13 CHECK WASHOUT AREA 2 - 1 DAMS PHASE 1 BUILDING EXPANSION 54,945 SQUARE FEET PAVEMENT EXPANSION 1 VEHICLE -N- 1 2 TRACKING PAD ' - - - -----q------ -- 70 35 0 70 140 — SCALE IN FEET STRAW 1 3 WATTLE STRAW � . WATTLE 1 3 REVISIONS DRAWN BY. BJD PROJECT NUMBER VERIFY SCALE! 2490.091 THESE EOLCE PRINTS MAYBE NO. DESCRIPTION DATE BY 1 t Engineering Place DSGN-BY MAP BOEING HELENA EXPANSION-PHASE I REDUCED.LINE BELOW J MORRISON I4EAsuaes orvE IrvcN ON Engineers Helena.MT 59602 SHEET NUMBER ORIGINAL DRAWING SNrvayors APPR.BY'. GRK HELENA MONTANA J MAIERLE INC. $E7eO°r, DATE 17 062013 DRAWING NUMBER Plnnners Phone 14015)44b3050 MODIFY SCALE ACCORDINGLY' Fax(406)442d962 O.C.REVIEW $WPP SITE PLAN 1 An Eblpiny,-a•-Ot�ncd Cbmpuny BY 1 .Q4901091 Boeing SWPPPACADl1-SWPP Site Plan.dwg Plotted by brad drinville on Nov15/2013 ecwR:zen .-Ea E— min DATE f Mman ( i LEED CERTIFIED PROJECTS I At DAC,we realize that Green design not only makes a positive impact on public health and the environment,but it also reduces operating costs,enhances building and organizational marketability,increases occupant productivity and helps create a sustainable community.We have adopted Green building practices as a company philosophy and have committed to becoming a builder on the forefront of Green building construction.To accomplish this,we have committed to training our project managers to become LEED Accredited Professionals, Construction projects that involve or even require some type of green building practice are becoming more and more prevalent in the effort to cut energy costs and practice sustainability in general.Throughout the years, DAC has had many projects that have some sort of"green aspect". I I In addition to the projects on the following page that have earned LEED recognition, Dick Anderson Construction has numerous other projects where sustainable design and construction techniques were incorporated, but LEED certification was not pursued. 1 I0 Pacific Steel&Recycling Corporate Headquarters • Yellowstone Association Renovation • Old Faithful Laundry Remodel • Canyon Village Visitors Center r • Lake Hotel Renovation I • Highland Park Elementary School I0 Madison Valley Hospital 0 DOCUMENTATION OF SOURCE/VENDOR CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS Dick Anderson Construction has completed projects where documentation of the source/vendor of construction materials was required. This includes all projects that are LEED Certified & Pending. In addition to the DAC projects that have earned LEED recognition, these projects required documentation as well. • Highland Park Elementary School Yellowstone Association Renovation • Canyon Village Visitors Center Lake Hotel Renovation • Old Faithful Laundy Remodel 1 1 - 1PW f 1 LEED CERTIFIED PROJECTS I At DAC,we realize that Green design not only makes a positive impact on public health and the environment, but it also reduces operating costs, 1 enhances building and organizational marketability,increases occupant productivity and helps create a sustainable community.We have adopted Green building practices as a company philosophy and have committed to becoming a builder on the forefront of Green building construction,To accomplish 1 this,we have committed to training our project managers to become LEED Accredited Professionals, 1 DAC LEED ACCREDITED PROFESSIONALS 1 Marty Schuma-LEED AP Derek Didriksen-LEED AP - - — I Bob Heberly- LEED AP Y l Allan Frankl -LEED Associate •• !!•' u u !!!. e" N Morrison Maierle Office Building- Bozeman, Montana I • Contract Amount-$6,992,109.00 • Completion Date-March 2008 l • LEED Certification- LEED Gold . . •- • DAC Project Manager-Derek Didriksen, LEED AP -`•' > ; -Y';' • Architect-John With-Think One Architects-406,586.7020 • Owner-Roger Summerville- Morrison Maierle-406.587,072 I y 1; - Bozeman City Hall Addition/Renovation-Bozeman,Montana • Contract Amount-$1,699,579.00 • Completion Date-August 2008 • LEED Certification -LEED Silver - • DAC Project Manager- Derek Didricksen, LEED AP • Architect- Ben Lloyd-Comma-Q-406.585,1 1 12 • Owner-James Goehring-City of Bozeman-406.582.3232 � - Montana State Fund Office Building-Helena, Montana • Contract Amount-$26,702,191.00 • Completion Date-May 2010 • LEED Certification -LEED Gold • DAC Project Manager-Marty Schuma, LEED AP • Architect-Jeff Downhour,Mosaic Architecture-406.449.2013 • Owner Representative-Dan Poling-406.855,6149 _ Pioneer Block Building-Helena, Montana y+_. • Contract Amount-$5,155,000.00 • Completion Date- May 2012 • LEED Certification-LEED Silver(Pending) • DAC Project Manager- Marty Schuma, LEED AP • Architect-Kurt Ratz-406,922.7102 • Owner Representative-Dan Poling-406.855.6149 - MSU Cooley Lab Renovation- Bozeman, Montana • Contract Amount-$12,617,610.00 • Completion Date- June 2012 • LEED Certification- LEED Gold . • DAC Project Manager-Allan Frankl • Architect-Mike Absalonson,ADG -406.257.7125 • Owner Representative-Cecilia Vaniman -406.994.5459 1 ( i ( BOZEMAN HIGH SCHOOL - Bozeman, Montana 1 Owner's Representative: Kevin Barre-406.522.6022 i ■\' Q Comma-Lloyd Architect: Ben Architects-406.585.1 1 12 � 1 Y I A�' Cost: $29,029,867.00 Start: Arpil 2008 Finish: September 2010 MONTANA STATE FUND - Helena, Montana Owner's Representative: Dan Poling-406,855.6149 1p - Architect:Jeff Downhour-Mosaic Architecture-406.449.2013 - j Cost: $26,702,191.00 r ALA. Start: September 2008 1 Finish: May 2010 LEED: LEED Gold 1 ROCKY BOY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL- Box Elder, Montana r Owner's Representative:Voyd St. Pierre-406.395.4291 t Architect: David Cantiey-LPW Architects-406.771,0770 Cost: $3,432,684.00 Start: May 201 1 r M ftwZ Finish: September 2012 t i MSU COOLEY LAB RENOVATION - Bozeman, Montana Owner's Representative: Cecilia Vaniman-406,994.5459 -"f- Architect: Mike Absalonson-ADG-406.257,7125 - Cost: $12,619,610.00 —n'n iiri ii Ti fig la �®a�i G➢ 01 Start: June 201 I R Finish: October 2012 LEED: LEED Gold MSU COLLEGE OF BUSINESS - Bozeman, Montana Owner's Representative: Russ Katherman-406.444.3332 tt Architect:Comma Q Architects-406.585.1 1 12 Cost: $15,000,000.00(in Progress) Start: July2013 Finish: May 2015 LEED: On going(Pursuit of LEED silver/gold) DIFFICULT STAGING ENVIRONMENTS Cooley Lab(MSU)and the College of Business(MSU-Ongoing)had very challenging material handling and staging components.Two things that we have done on each of these projects to reduce impact are; I. Find a suitable remote staging area,close enough to the project where hauling material to the site using trucks and trailers in lieu of semi-truck is not overly burdensome. 2. Incorporate a crane into the project to allow materials to be picked directly from the truck and set at or near its final destination. Another example of difficult staging was during the Canyon Lodge Yellowstone Renovation/Retrofit where construction occurred during operating hours and throughout peak tourism season. The lodge continued full operation during DAC involvement and required DAC to use creative and innovative material storage and delivery strategies to allow unimpeded public services. Additionally, continuous pedestrian safety and public access management proved challenging and,in the end,very successful.