Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ14090 Talbot demolition 430 South Tracy Avenue SkCOA_ Application materials430 South Tracy Avenue Demolition & Site Treatment Sketch Plan/COA Application for Demolition 13 May 2014 “Applications for the demolition or movement of structures within the conservation district will not be accepted without a complete submittal for the subsequent development or treatment of the site after the demolition or movement has occurred. The subsequent development or treatment must be approved before a demolition or moving permit may be issued.” - UDC Section 38.16.080A.1 Contents Section 1## Project Narrative Section 2## Application & Checklists Section 3## Existing Conditions (Maps, Site Photographs and Civil Survey) Section 4## Structural Analysis Section 5## Updated Historic Property Record Section 6## Cost Comparison Section 7## Site Treatment Plan & Guidelines for Redevelopment Section 8## Neighborhood Examples Section 1: Project Narrative The existing non-conforming triplex located at 430 South Tracy Avenue has remained vacant for almost eight years. The current property owner, George Talbot, lives in the residence directly north and purchased the triplex to facilitate the upgrade of this problematic property in an otherwise model neighborhood. After a structural analysis and renovation considerations, it has been determined that removal is the logical option. The building is also not only an eyesore but also a safety concern. Police reports (copies available) indicate suspicious activity and criminal trespass with transients entering and attempting to occupy the building. The owner has had to board up the windows (at the recommendation of the City) to secure the premises. The site is located in the South Tracy/South Black Historic District and is zoned R-2, Residential Two-Household District. The property is 53.46 feet wide and 8,764 square feet in area. The structure was listed as “contributing” according to the 1986 Historic Inventory; however, many significant alterations have occurred over the years as described further in the attached updated Historic Record Form (Section 5) as well as the attached structural analysis (Section 4). The home had several significant alterations to the original design since it was constructed in the early 1900s including an intrusive major rear addition to create several illegal apartments. Also note that the building has significant foundation and structural concerns and the underlying unreinforced brick does not lend well to lifting for foundation replacement and retrofitting. For the subsequent treatment of the site, the property owner will completely remove the existing structure and internal walkways, backfill and grade to a level condition and landscape the property. The result will be a safe, maintained and pleasant yard-like condition which will blend with the traditional neighborhood pattern of varied distances between houses. The property will be listed for sale for future residential construction. Significant analysis, research and feedback has indicated that this treatment of the site will be the best way to expedite the sale and redevelopment of the property. Restrictions will be put in place to ensure that redevelopment is compatible with the site and neighborhood and will be consistent with the relevant chapters of the Design Guidelines for the Conservation Overlay District. Removing the structure will eliminate uncertainty and allow a new owner to proceed with clear direction. Having the demolition completed in advance of listing will provide a unique opportunity for an interested party to build a new home in a desirable neighborhood. Quality and thoughtful new construction will add to the overall character of the neighborhood, not to mention the taxable value of the property. We understand that the Community Development Department typically prefers to see specific redevelopment plans in advance, but the proposed subsequent treatment of the site as described in Section 7 will result in a safer interim condition and a construction-ready site. The current property owner agrees to maintain the proposed lawn until such time the property is sold or redeveloped. Note that there is precedent for allowing demolition with landscaping as the subsequent treatment plan. Project Narrative (continued) While we find the Unified Development Code section related to demolition somewhat confusing and contradictory, we have done our best to address the relevant criteria. The language states that the City Commission shall base its decision on the following: a. The standards in 38.16.050 and the architectural, social, cultural and historical importance of the structure or site and their relationship to the district as determined by the state historic preservation office and the planning department. The residence has already been significantly altered since its construction in 1900. Most notably, the significant rear addition, stucco over brick and front porch have been significantly changed from the original design. Please refer to the attached updated Historic Record Form as well as the structural report for specific information. Note again that the standards of 38.16.050 will need to be met with any future construction regardless of the timing. b. If the review authority finds that the criteria of this section are not satisfied, then, before approving an application to demolish or remove, the review authority must find that at least one of the following factors apply based on definitive evidence supplied by the applicant, including structural analysis and cost estimates indicating the costs of repair and/or rehabilitation versus the costs of demolition and redevelopment: (1) The structure or site is a threat to public health or safety, and that no reasonable repairs or alterations will remove such threat; any costs associated with the removal of health or safety threats must exceed the value of the structure. Note that subsection (1) of the UDC differs from (b). The first section calls for a comparison of repair verses demolition + reconstruction while the second section calls for a comparison of repair verses value of the structure. In the attached cost analysis (see Section 6), we have included numbers to support both comparisons. Overall, the structure has become a safety hazard, as evidenced by previously mentioned police reports, for the neighborhood. Despite attempts to secure the building, there has been criminal trespass and suspicious activity. Also, the building has some serious structural issues as described in more detail in the attached structural analysis from TD&H Engineering (see Section 4). (2) The structure or site has no viable economic or useful life remaining. Based on the analysis above and in the attached spreadsheet, the structure does not have viable economic or useful life remaining. In fact, the vast majority of serious potential buyers and realtors have indicated that they view the structure as a liability to the lot. Section 2 Application & Checklists Page 1 Appropriate Review Fee Submitted CITY OF BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building 20 East Olive Street P.O. Box 1230 Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 phone 406-582-2260 fax 406-582-2263 planning@bozeman.net www.bozeman.net DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION 1. Name of Project/Development: 2. Property Owner Information: Name: E-mail Address: Mailing Address: Phone: FAX: 3. Applicant Information: Name: E-mail Address: Mailing Address: Phone: FAX: 4. Representative Information: Name: E-mail Address: Mailing Address: Phone: FAX: 5. Legal Description: 6. Street Address: 7. Project Description: 8. Zoning Designation(s): 9. Current Land Use(s): 10. Bozeman 2020 Community Plan Designation: 11. Gross Area: Acres: Square Feet: 12. Net Area: Acres: Square Feet: x x x x x x x x x No materials or color schemes are proposed. No deviations are proposed. Decrease in impervious surfaces. Section 3 Existing Conditions (Maps, Site Photographs and Civil Survey) Vicinity Map 430 South Tracy Avenue Source: Bozeman GIS Department Subject Property Zoning: R-2 Subject Property Aerial Image 430 South Tracy Avenue Source: Bozeman GIS Department Subject Property Photographs 430 South Tracy Avenue West Elevation East Elevation Photographs 430 South Tracy Avenue West and South Elevations West and North Elevations Photographs 430 South Tracy Avenue Interior (Image A) Interior (Image B) Photographs 430 South Tracy Avenue Interior (Image C) Interior (Image D) Section 4 Structural Analysis Section 5 Updated Historic Property Record 430 South Tracy Avenue, Bozeman, Montana | Historic Property Record Form Update DRAFT Updated 5/13/14 by MONTANA HISTORIC PROPERTY RECORD For the Montana National Register of Historic Places Program and State Antiquities Database Montana State Historic Preservation Office Montana Historical Society PO Box 201202, 1410 8th Ave Helena, MT 59620-1202 Property Address: 430 South Tracy Avenue Historic Address (if applicable): 430 South Tracy Avenue City/Town: Bozeman MT 59715 Site Number: (An historic district number may also apply.) County: Gallatin County Historic Name: unknown Original Owner(s): James N. Kelley Current Ownership Private Public Current Property Name: 430 South Tracy Avenue Owner(s): GHT Investments LLC Owner Address: 424 S Tracy Avenue, Bozeman MT Phone: 1 406 599 8520 Legal Location PM: Montana Township: 2S Range: R6 E of Section: 7 Lot(s): Lots 14, 15, S 6’ Lot 16 Block(s): F Addition: Hoffman’s Addition Year of Addition: 1880 USGS Quad Name: Bozeman, MT Year: 1987 Historic Use: Residence Current Use: Vacant Construction Date: Pre-1904 (1898- 1904) Estimated Actual Original Location Moved Date Moved: UTM Reference www.nris.mt.gov/topofinder2 NAD 27 (preferred) NAD 83 Zone: Easting: Northing: National Register of Historic Places NRHP Listing Date: n/a Historic District: South Tracy/ South Black Historic Neighborhood District NRHP Eligible: Yes No Date of this document: September 2013 Form Prepared by: Intrinsik Architecture, Inc. Address: 111 North Tracy Avenue Daytime Phone: 406-582-8988 MT SHPO USE ONLY Eligible for NRHP: □ yes □ no Criteria: □ A □ B □ C □ D Date: Evaluator: Comments: MONTANA HISTORIC PROPERTY RECORD PAGE 2 Property Name: 430 South Tracy Avenue Site Number: ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION See Additional Information Page Architectural Style: Queen-Anne (folk interpretation) If Other, specify: Property Type: Residential Specific Property Type: Single Household Residential Architect: unknown Architectural Firm/City/State: unknown Builder/Contractor Company/City/State: unknown Source of Information Concisely, accurately, and completely describe the property and alterations with dates. Number the buildings and features to correlate with the Site Map. This single-family residence has a simple L-shaped plan consisting of a prominent gable front and wing/ side gable with a front porch that spans the entire west elevation of the house. The setbacks from South Tracy Street are relatively consistent with the surrounding residences dating back to 1904, as visible in the 1904 Sanborn Map. The brick and balloon frame construction is finished in stucco, wood lap siding, and shingles. It rests on a partial brick and stone basement with a crawl space foundation that supports a wood framed floor. The front gable roof and side gable roof is covered with asphalt shingles and has two brick chimneys rising from the middle of the house. There are several features of the house floor plan that are not consistent with any of the Sanborn Maps dating up to 1943. The east facing façade shows evidence of clearly being altered since its original construction. There is a large addition to the east side of the building that rises up three stories and features a shed roof. The location of the existing windows, lack of architectural ornament (shingles, trim boards) and architectural massing of this addition are uncharacteristic with the historic architecture of the original structure. There exists another addition to east side of the house that is only a single level in height and features several large doors that open to the adjacent back yard. Both the north and south elevations show signs of continued alterations made to the original historic structure. Unlike the western front facing gable of the house where the brick and shingles have been entirely covered in stucco, the north and south elevation of the house still maintain their shingle cladding between the third level trim board and the side gable eaves of the roof. Also evident on both the north and south exterior elevations is the addition of a 1/1 double hung window at the third level amidst the shingle cladding. It should be noted that these windows are not evident in the photo used by James R. McDonald Architects in their Montana Historical and Architectural Inventory survey. There is a large metal conduit on the exterior of the north elevation that enters the building at the third level that is suggests that the third level of the building was converted into a separate living unit with its own separate power supply. The western elevation facing South Tracy Avenue appears to have maintained much of its historic appearance. The two-bay façade is asymmetrical in elevation, has an off-center entrance, one fixed window and a 1/1 double-hung window at the first level of the house. There exist two pairs of 1/1 double-hung windows at the second level of the western elevation. One pair of 1/1 double-hung windows exists in a front facing shed roof dormer that protrudes from the side wing of the house at the second level. The front facing shed dormer is clad in shingles. It is noticeable from the Montana Historical and Architectural Inventory survey completed by James R. McDonald Architects that in their provided photo the house maintained a small porch roof gable over the entry of the existing porch. Also evident in this photo is that the porch structure and roof did not extend across the entire western elevation of the house. This is contradictory with the 1904, 1912, and 1927 Sanborn maps which show a front porch extending across the entire west elevation of the house. The 1904-1927 Sanborn maps also show structures along the alley that no longer remain. MONTANA HISTORIC PROPERTY RECORD PAGE 3 Property Name: 430 South Tracy Avenue Site Number: HISTORY OF PROPERTY See Additional Information Page This residence is associated with the general residential aspect of the Civic Phase of Bozeman’s historic/architectural development in the early 1900s. This early 1900s home is found in a grouping of homes built in the middle of Bozeman's "Civic Phase" which experienced steady growth due to the growth of the Agricultural College fueled by the regional economic prosperity. The builders of these local homes are likely to have drawn their variations of styles from pattern books, “Victorian Revival architecture built during the Civic Phase encompassed Victorian Gothic, Romanesque Revival, Ruskinian Gothic, Queen Anne, and Colonial Revival. Eclecticism and individualism characterized …residential architecture, even when house pattern books were the source of designs” (Bozeman Historic Resource Survey, 2008). “James n. Kelley, a receiver for the U.S. Land Office and later a real estate salesman, was probably the original occupant here, listed at this address about 1904 to about 1916. In 1927, Grace B. Cobler, a “helper” employed by Mrs. Collie Rogers, who ran a cafeteria at 33 S. Black, was living here.” (Montana Historical and Architectural Inventory, 1987) INFORMATION SOURCES/BIBLIOGRAPHY  1904, 1912, 1927, 1927-1943 Sanborn Maps. Sanborn Map & Publishing Co., Limited. New York: 1904, 1912, 1927, 1927-1943.  Gallatin County Clerk & Recorder’s Office, Deed Records.  Sewer Permit: Ida M. Kelley, Bozeman Department of Sanitation, August 23rd 1909.  National Register of Historic Places Evaluation: South Tracy- South Black Historic District. Bozeman MRA. Gallatin County, MT. September 8, 1987.  National Register Bulletin, US Department of the Interior, 2013.  Bozeman Historic Resource Survey, 2008 Revised Edition. Butte, Montana: Renewable Technologies, Inc., February 2008. MONTANA HISTORIC PROPERTY RECORD PAGE 4 Property Name: 430 South Tracy Avenue Site Number: NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES NRHP Listing Date: n/a NRHP Eligibility: Yes No Individually Contributing to Historic District Noncontributing to Historic District NRHP Criteria: A B C D Area of Significance: South Tracy/ South Black District Period of Significance: 1872-1939 STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE See Additional Information Page The house at 430 South Tracy was considered for eligibility for Criterion (C) of the National Register as to whether it embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or that represent the work of a master...or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction" (Criterion for Evaluation 60.4 National Register of Historic Places Program: Federal Program Regulations). The physical appearance of the building’s exterior is such that it maintains only some elements of its original architectural design in appearance, and mainly on its western façade. Based on the absence of certain elements it loses considerable significance and no longer meets the criteria. INTEGRITY (location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, association) See Additional Information Page Location: The house at 430 South Tracy demonstrates Integrity through LOCATION. The structure has not been moved from its historical place of construction. Design: The house at 430 South Tracy does not demonstrate Integrity through DESIGN. The original design features of the property have been substantially altered, diminished, and replaced since its historical construction. The original brick has been covered with stucco, the porch form, length, roof-line, columns and detailing have changed, and an intrusive major rear addition that was added to create apartments have all compromised the design integrity of the structure. Setting: The house at 430 South Tracy demonstrates Integrity through SETTING. The aforementioned property is located in the South Tracy Historic District that contains many unique historical homes that are characteristic of the time period they were constructed in. Materials: The house at 430 South Tracy does not demonstrate Integrity through MATERIALS. The existing materials are a compilation of both historical and contemporary. It is visually apparent that most of the historical materials used to construct the building have since been covered over and/or replaced with modern construction materials and techniques including most significantly the application of stucco over exterior brick walls and trim. Workmanship: The house at 430 South Tracy does not demonstrate Integrity through WORKMANSHIP. There isn’t visual evidence of the relevant technology and craft of the time period in which the building was constructed. The original workmanship of the house’s construction is no longer evident due to the many exterior modifications made to the building since its original construction. Brick work has been obscured, windows and door have been replaced and porch detailing has changed. Feeling: The house at 430 South Tracy does not demonstrate Integrity through FEELING. The architecture of the existing building is devoid of architectural character and does not visually identify itself with the surrounding historic district in a way that contributes to a historic feeling. Specifically, the masonry, carpentry and overall workmanship typical of the period have been compromised over time. e: n A e: n A e: n A X Association: The house at 430 South Tracy does not demonstrate Integrity through ASSOCIATION. The aforementioned property is located in the South Tracy Historic District that was developed during a significant historic period within the formation of the town of Bozeman. Through significant changes over time, the house no longer reflects the same character and presence of other neighboring homes of the period. MONTANA HISTORIC PROPERTY RECORD PHOTOGRAPHS Property Name: 430 South Tracy Avenue Site Number: West Elevation Streetscape along South Tracy Avenue (white colored house) West Elevation Streetscape along South Tracy Avenue (white colored house) MONTANA HISTORIC PROPERTY RECORD PHOTOGRAPHS Property Name: 430 South Tracy Avenue Site Number: West Elevation (facing South Tracy Avenue) East Elevation (facing alley) MONTANA HISTORIC PROPERTY RECORD PHOTOGRAPHS Property Name: 430 South Tracy Avenue Site Number: Northwest Corner (facing street) Southwest Corner (facing street) Northeast Corner (facing alley) Southeast Corner (facing alley) MONTANA HISTORIC PROPERTY RECORD SITE MAP Property Name: 430 South Tracy Avenue Site Number: 1891 Sanborn Map 1904 Sanborn Map 1912 Sanborn Map 1927-43 Sanborn Map MONTANA HISTORIC PROPERTY RECORD TOPOGRAPHIC MAP Property Name: 430 South Tracy Avenue Site Number: Field Survey. TD&H Engineering. November 12, 2012 Section 6 Cost Comparison 430 South Tracy Avenue Cost Comparison Value of the Structure 124,000$ (based on Architect's Estimate of current sate) Cost of Repair 323,000$ (see breakdown below) DIFFERENCE 199,000$ *Note cost of repair exceeds value of structure Cost of Demo & Redevelopment 294,470$ (demo $22,000 + rebuild 2,477 SF at $110/SF) Cost of Repair 323,000$ (see breakdown below) DIFFERENCE 28,530$ *Note cost of repair exceeds cost of demo and redevelopment Repair Breakdown (to bring structure to current standards) Exterior Partial Demo 30,000$ Interior Partial Demo 25,000$ Lift and Reset House 20,000$ New Foundation 35,000$ Brick Restoration 30,000$ Structural Repairs to Building 40,000$ Replace Windows/Doors 30,000$ Interior Wall Reconstruction 18,000$ Electric 25,000$ Plumbing 25,000$ Heating 25,000$ Insulation 20,000$ Total 323,000$ Building SF 2477 sq ft Footprint 1240 sq ft Section 7 Site Treatment Plan & Guidelines for Redevelopment 430 South Tracy Avenue Demolition & Site Treatment Plan 1. Demolish existing residence and remove all on-site concrete 2. Grade site 3. Seed 4. Maintain lawn (irrigate and mow) until such time redevelopment occurs GRASS Demolition & Site Treatment Plan430 South Tracy Avenue Guidelines for Redevelopment In order to respect the character and scale of the South Tracy/South Black Historic District, the following outline principles, along with all applicable city codes and guidelines, shall apply to the future design and development of 430 South Tracy Avenue. Site a. Continue the scale, rhythm of regularly spaced houses along the tree lined street. b. Continue existing front yard setback as adjacent properties. c. Provide a walkway from the street to the building. d. A detached garage with vehicular access from the alley is required. Size and massing must be clearly subordinate to home. e. Buildings shall be set back at a similar distance from the street and alley as historical buildings within the neighborhood. f. Lot coverage shall be consistent with the neighborhood. g. Fences in the front yard are prohibited. h. The site shall be fully landscaped and maintained by the owner. The landscape shall be of respectable design in consideration to the historical context of the neighborhood. Building a. Buildings shall generally have traditional building forms, sloping roof planes, be compatible with the neighborhood, and have clear order and comprehensive composition. b. 2 story maximum height. c. Materials shall be consistent with those typically found in the district, including horizontal lap siding, brick, and asphalt or wood shingles. d. Buildings will have front porches oriented toward the street. Front porches will have a minimum depth of 8 feet and shall be a minimum 50 percent of the fronting elevation width. e. Main entries are to be composed with the front porch design. f. All facades of the main building and accessory structures shall be made of similar material and be similarly detailed. g. In terms of color schemes, garish colors are not permitted. h. The design and location of windows should respond to respect the existing condition of neighboring homes. i. Windows shall be made of painted or stained wood and clad in metal. j. Windows must match in material, design and be overall proportional to one another on all elevations of buildings. k. Sliding glass doors may only be used in walls facing the rear yard. l. Skylights, if used, shall be flat in profile (no bubbles or domes). m. Solar panels are to be located away from the view of the historic street corridor. Solar panels are to be applied parallel and flat to the roof. n. Dormers shall be proportionate to the overall composition of the building. o. Soffits shall be constructed of wood. p. All exterior residential lighting must be dark-sky compliant.