HomeMy WebLinkAboutPacket 03-19-2007_198-230_Baxter Meadows Planned Unit Development_Zone Map Amendment #Z-07011
Commission Memorandum
REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Commission
FROM: Chris Saunders, AICP, Assistant Director
SUBJECT: Z-07011, Baxter Meadows PUD ZMA
MEETING DATE: Monday, March 19, 2007
RECOMMENDATION: The City Commission approve zone map amendment Z-07011.
BACKGROUND: The Zoning Commission has considered this amendment and recommends its
approval. See the draft Planning Board resolution. The applicant has requested this ZMA to match
zoning boundaries to property boundaries. No change in use of the affected land is expected. The
majority of the change results in a difference in zoning for a public road.
UNRESOLVED ISSUES: None
FISCAL EFFECTS: None
ALTERNATIVES: As suggested by the City Commission.
CONTACT: Please email Chris Saunders at csaunders@bozeman.net if you have any questions
prior to the public meeting.
APPROVED BY: Andrew Epple, Planning Director
Chris Kukulski, City Manager
Attachments: Zoning Commission Resolution Z-07011
Zoning Commission minutes
Application materials
Staff Report
199
STAFF REPORT
BAXTER MEADOWS PUD ZMA FILE NO. #Z-07011
#Z-07011 Baxter Meadows PUD ZMA Staff Report 1
Item: Zone Map Amendment Application #Z-07011. A request for revised
zoning of PLI and R-3 on approximately 6.06 acres of property located
at southwest of the intersection of Davis Lane and Baxter Lane.
Owner: Baxter Meadows Development, 1500 Poly Drive, Billings MT 59102
Gallatin County, 311 W Main Street, Bozeman MT 59715
Applicant: PC Development, 3985 Valley Commons Drive, Bozeman, MT 59718
Date: Bozeman Zoning Commission, on Wednesday, February 21, 2007, and
Bozeman City Commission on Monday, March 19, 2007, 6 pm., in the
Community Room, Gallatin County Courthouse, 311 West Main Street.
Report By: Chris Saunders, Assistant Director
Recommendation: Conditional Approval
____________________________________________________________________________________
PROJECT LOCATION
The subject property is legally described as of Tract 3A and 4A, Certificate of Survey 2202A,
Gallatin County, Montana, and is located southwest of the intersection of Baxter Lane and Davis Lane. The
property is within the City and is presently zoned. Please refer to the following vicinity map.
200
#Z-07011 Baxter Meadows PUD ZMA Staff Report 2
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Based upon the Development Review Committee’s consideration, and after evaluation of the
proposed zoning, staff finds that the designation of “PLI” and “R-3” is appropriate for the subject
property and meet the state law requirements for zone map amendments as set forth in Section 76-
2-304 Montana Codes Annotated with the following contingencies:
CONTINGENCIES FOR ZONE MAP AMENDMENT
1. That the applicant submit a zone amendment map, titled “Baxter Meadows PUD Zone Map
Amendment”, on a 24” by 36” mylar, 8 ½” by 11”, or 8 ½” by 14” paper exhibit, and a digital copy
of the area to be zoned, acceptable to the Director of Public Service, which will be utilized in the
preparation of the Ordinance to officially amend the City of Bozeman Zoning Map. Said map shall
contain a metes and bounds legal description of the perimeter of the subject property and zoning
districts, total acreage of the property.
2. That the Ordinance for the Zone Map Amendment shall not be drafted until the applicant provides
a metes and bounds legal description prepared by a licensed Montana surveyor and map of the area
to be rezoned, which will be utilized in the preparation of the Ordinance to officially amend the
zone map.
IN THE CASE OF PROTEST AGAINST SUCH CHANGES SIGNED BY THE OWNERS OF
25% OR MORE OF EITHER OF THE AREA OF THE LOTS INCLUDED IN THE
PROPOSED CHANGE; OR THOSE LOTS 150 FEET FROM A LOT INCLUDED IN A
PROPOSED CHANGE, SUCH AMENDMENT MAY NOT BECOME EFFECTIVE EXCEPT
UPON A FAVORABLE VOTE OF TWO-THIRDS OF THE PRESENT AND VOTING
MEMBERS OF THE CITY COMMISSION.
PROPOSAL
This application will go before the City Commission for a public hearing on Monday, March 19, 2007. The
applicant’s submittal is attached as Exhibit A.
The zone map amendment seeks to rearrange an existing boundary between two zoning districts. The
amendment would revise the Zoning Map designation of “R-3” (Residential Medium Density District) and
on “PLI” (Public Lands and Institutions District) on approximately 6.06 acres resulting in a net increase of
3.01 acres of R-3. The intent of the districts is to provide for a variety of residential dwellings and
supportive uses and public institutions. Based on the findings and conclusions presented herein, Staff
recommends approval of the requested zoning districts.
ADJACENT LAND USES & ZONING
The subject property is currently zoned as PLI and R-3 in the City of Bozeman.
North: City of Bozeman R-3 and B-2.
South: City of Bozeman PLI.
East: City of Bozeman, R-3, currently vacant but platting for development is underway
West: City of Bozeman, PLI, Gallatin County Regional Park.
201
#Z-07011 Baxter Meadows PUD ZMA Staff Report 3
REVIEW CRITERIA
Planning staff has evaluated the proposed amendment with respect to the required criteria set forth in
Section 76-2-304, MCA. A summary of staff’s evaluation follows in the discussion below. The application’s
response to the twelve criteria is provided in attached Exhibit A.
1. Is the new zoning designed in accordance with the growth policy?
Yes. The property being considered for rezoning is planned for residential uses. The requested zoning
districts implement the Residential land use designation which is on this property. The proposed
changes result in increased quantity of residential land.
“Residential. This category designates places where the primary activity is urban density
living quarters. Other uses which complement residences are also acceptable such as parks,
low intensity home based occupations, fire stations, churches, and schools. The residential
designation also indicates that it is expected that development will occur within municipal
boundaries which may require annexation prior to development. The dwelling unit density
expected within this classification varies. It is expected that areas of higher density housing
would be likely to be located in proximity to commercial centers to facilitate the broadest
range of feasible transportation options for the greatest number of individuals and support
businesses within commercial centers. Low density areas should have an average minimum
density of six units per net acre. Medium density areas should have an average minimum
density of twelve units per net acre. High density areas should have an average minimum
density of eighteen units per net acre. A variety of housing types should be blended to
achieve the desired density with large areas of single type housing being discouraged. In
limited instances the strong presence of constraints and natural features such as floodplains
may cause an area to be designated for development at a lower density than normally
expected within this classification.
All residential housing should be arranged with consideration given to the existing character
of adjacent development, any natural constraints such as steep slopes, and in a fashion which
advances the overall goals of the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan. The residential
designation is intended to provide the principal locations for additional housing within the
Planning Area.”
Goal 6.6.1, Objective 1. The landuse map and attendant policies shall be the official guide for
the development of the City and shall be implemented through zoning regulations, capital
improvements, subdivision regulations, coordination with other governmental entities, and other
implementation strategies.
2. Is the new zoning designed to lessen congestion in the streets?
Neutral. The property has been planned for development for many years. The long range transportation
plans for the City and surrounding area anticipate this area developing and describe needed expansions
of the street system to accommodate the additional traffic. The development will participate in
202
#Z-07011 Baxter Meadows PUD ZMA Staff Report 4
mitigation of its transportation impacts. The change in zoning is therefore expected to be neutral in
effect.
3. Will the new zoning promote health and general welfare?
Yes. The standards of development, and accompanying development review processes established
through the City’s Title 18, Unified Development Ordinance, BMC, will adequately address the issues of
health and general welfare.
4. Will the new zoning secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers?
Neutral. City utilities and emergency service protection are available. Under either zoning the property
is subject to the development standards established in Title 18, BMC.
5. Will the new zoning provide adequate light and air?
Yes. Building setbacks have been established to allow for adequate light and air. The City’s zoning
standards protect open space through the area. These standards have been found to provide for
adequate light and air, especially in conjunction with the construction standards of the International
Building Code.
6. Will the new zoning prevent overcrowding of land?
Yes. The City Commission has determined that the standards of the PLI and R-3 districts are sufficient
to prevent overcrowding.
7. Will the new zoning avoid the undue concentration of population?
Yes. The R-3 and PLI districts are subject to the development standards of Title 18, Unified
Development Ordinance, Bozeman Municipal Code, such as minimum parking, landscaping, and height
of building limitations. The PLI area is owned by Gallatin County and is being developed as a park,
therefore population will be transitory in this area. Density is controlled through minimum area per
dwelling requirements, lot coverage, building height, parking requirements, and other standards that act
as a check on density of development.
8. Will the new zoning facilitate the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewer, schools,
parks, fire, police, and other public requirements?
Neutral. Services currently exist or can be provided as needed to the area being annexed and rezoned.
Taxes and fees will be paid according to the standards established by ordinance for all users within the
City. Currently water and sewer mains are being developed adjacent to or in close proximity to the
property and will be available for connection. The change is district boundary is to enable realignment
which will better accommodate the users already intended for the site. No additional demands on public
services are anticipated at this time from the change in zoning boundary.
203
#Z-07011 Baxter Meadows PUD ZMA Staff Report 5
9. Does the new zoning give reasonable consideration to the character of the district?
Yes. The Bozeman 2020 Community Plan identified the area for residential uses and anticipates
residential zoning districts. The area being rezoned is adjacent to urban residential development or land
planned for urban level development. The uses permitted within the PLI and R-3 districts are consistent
with those currently in place on the property. The proposed zoning appears to give reasonable
consideration to the character of the district.
10. Does the new zoning give reasonable consideration to the peculiar suitability of the district for
particular uses?
Yes. The City’s adopted growth policy has identified the property as being appropriate for residential
development. The property is adjacent to the east and west of developing residential uses. The property
has been planned for residential uses by the City for many years. The parcel is comparatively large and
unconstrained and will work well for the future residential and institutional development which is
included in those uses allowed by the R-3 and PLI zoning.
11. Was the new zoning adopted with a view of conserving the value of buildings?
Yes. The immediate area is largely undeveloped, but rapidly moving through the development process.
The proposed districts are compatible with other adjacent zoning designations and uses expected within
those zoning designations.
12. Does the new zoning encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout the municipality?
Yes. The growth policy is the means by which land use patterns are evaluated and locations for
appropriate uses assigned in a broad fashion. As discussed in several other criteria in this report, the
proposed zoning is in compliance with the adopted growth policy and the adopted land use
development pattern contained within it. There are few physical constraints to the development of this
parcel. The growth policy guidance respecting physical limitations on development is therefore not
applicable. Such restrictions as do exist will be adequately addressed through the development standards
of the UDO. Therefore, this proposed zoning does encourage the most appropriate use of land in the
municipality.
PUBLIC COMMENT
No public comment has been received as of this writing. Any written comment will be forwarded at the
hearing.
Conclusion
Pursuant to Section 76-2-304 Montana Codes Annotated, the Zoning Commission shall review the Zone
Map amendment application to determine if the proposed zoning change meets the requirements of the
Adopted Growth Policy, state statute, and other adopted state and local ordinances. The Zoning
Commission shall act to recommend approval or denial of the Zone Map Amendment application. The
recommendation of the Bozeman Zoning Commission will be forwarded to the Bozeman City Commission
for consideration at its public hearing on March 19, 2007. The City Commission will make the final
decision on the application.
204
#Z-07011 Baxter Meadows PUD ZMA Staff Report 6
Attachments: Applicant’s Submittal ZMA Application
Report Sent To: Baxter Meadows Development, 1500 Poly Drive, Billings, MT 59102
PC Development 3985 Valley Commons Drive, Bozeman MT 59718
File
205
** MINUTES **
CITY OF BOZEMAN ZONING COMMISSION,
COMMISSION MEETING ROOM, CITY HALL
411 EAST MAIN STREET
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 21st, 2007
7:00 P.M.
ITEM 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ATTENDANCE
Acting Chair Nathan Minnick called the meeting to order at 7:10PM and directed the secretary to record
the attendance.
Members Present: Members Absent:
Nathan Minnick, Acting Chair JP Pomnichowski (excused)
Peter Harned Warren Vaughan (excused)
Nicholas Lieb
Staff Present:
Chris Saunders, Assistant Director of Planning
Martin Knight, Planner
Kimberly Kenney-Lyden, Recording Secretary
Sean Becker, Commission Liaison
Guests Present:
Ray Heagney Steve Domreis
Katryn Mitchell Charles Day
Christine Yearley Ted Newman
Harley Huestis Jeanne Wesley-Weise
Jon Carpenter Arnie Duncan
Nicole Buckley Caitlin Magbee
Tom Noble Pat Estes
Molly Budinsky Bridget Cavanaugh
Toni Oberry Chaucer Silverson
Pete Oliver Ron Gompertz
Chandler Dayton Jami Morris
Stewart Mitchell Joshua Brandner
0:10:33 [11:38:27] ITEM 2. PUBLIC COMMENT (0-15 MINUTES)
Seeing there was none, Nathan Minnick closed this portion of the meeting.
0:11:28 [18:39:07] ITEM 3. MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 6TH, 2006.
Seeing there were no changes or additions to the minutes, Mr. Minnick noted the minutes will stand as
206
written.
0:20:50 [19:11:35] 2. Zone Map Amendment Application, #Z-07011 – (Baxter Meadows
PUD). A Zone Map Amendment requested by the owners, Baxter Meadows Development, and
applicant, PC Development requesting to amend the City of Bozeman Zone Map to ensure the
correct zoning designation of PLI (Public Lands & Institutions) and R-3 (Residential Medium
Density) Districts will apply to revised property line boundaries on 6.60 acres located southwest of
Davis Lane and Baxter Lane. This property is located in the Baxter Meadows PUD, Bozeman,
Gallatin County, Montana. (Saunders)
0:20:59 [19:11:37] Staff Presentation
Assistant Director Chris Saunders gave the staff report. He noted the property is located northwest of
Davis Lane and Oak Street. The owners of this property are Baxter Development and Gallatin County.
He stated the purpose of this application is to realign the boundaries because there has been a desire to
cooperate with the YMCA for this property and another application will follow this. There has been no
public comment received to date.
Mr. Saunders noted there are no conflicts with the zoning criteria, but there are two procedural
contingencies listed in the staff report in order to carry out an appropriate formal application to the City
Commission. He added that both PLI and R3 designations are allowed for a residential . Mr. Saunders
noted this application does not change any facility issues and closed by stating the County is planning on
using this for park purposes.
0:24:10 [19:11:41] Questions for Staff
Nicholas Lieb noted that the PLI portion will actually be increasing and asked Assistant Director
Saunders if that was correct. He responded that the PLI will decrease to by about 3 acres.
0:24:45 [19:11:53] Applicant Presentation
Harley Huestis with PC Development noted there is an increase in R3 and decrease in PLI in the total
zoned area when it is completed because the R3 will go to the edge of the Right of Way. He added the
net change increases the PLI and decreases in R3. Mr. Huestis closed by clarifying the usable acreage of
the park increases and buildable acreage decreases.
0:27:08 [19:14:31] Questions for Applicant
Zoning Commissioner Peter Harned stated he was curious as to why apply for this change in zoning.
Harley Huestis replied that the history of this is the YMCA was originally going to be part of the park,
but there were some problems with the original spot because there would have been an increase in
pedestrians crossing the street and now, this will allow users of the YMCA to just enter and exit through
the park.
0:28:38 [19:15:12] Public Comment
207
Ted Newman, lives on 535 Valley Drive and stated he's been following along with this application with
the Parks Board. Mr. Newman noted that since the original developers are no longer Baxter
Development and is now PC Development, and requested that staff ensure that the YMCA is what gets
put into the R3 zoned area and not a large condominium complex like what is in the other R3
surrounding areas. He further suggested that the portion of the parcel the applicant is trying to change be
denied by the board and kept as PLI so nothing else but a park goes in there, in case things do not work
out in the future. He closed by requesting to the board members to deny this and make it PLI zoned
property.
0:30:50 [19:16:37] Questions for Staff
Peter Harned asked why R3 zoning is being requested when B1 or B2 is the more logical choice for the
YMCA. Mr. Saunders responded that 'community centers' are allowed in most residential districts,
however, having the YMCA in an R3 zone would put higher standards to ensure set backs and height
requirements are met. He closed by stating R3 is more stringent than PLI in the design standards.
Nick Lieb asked Mr. Saunders is putting a YMCA on PLI zoned property, why chose R3. Chris
Saunders responded the applicant chose to proceed this way.
0:32:00 [19:17:45] Discussion
Peter Harned stated he would hate to see this piece of property to end up as residential property instead
of the YMCA which can be utilized by park attendees. He added that the current system in place will
keep this from happening because the City Commission would make it extremely difficult to have
residential units on park land. He closed by stating this zoning designation is the best use of this portion
of property, this is in compliance with all the criteria, and will be in support of this.
Nathan Minnick noted this application met the criteria and being that this is surrounded by R3 and B2,
this would match and compliment the character of the neighborhood. With the new UDO revisions, this
would ensure that the new YMCA plan would work and closed by stating he will be in support of this
application.
Nick Lieb noted there is more PLI in this change than there was before. He added it makes sense and
will be suppporting this application.
0:34:50 [19:18:09] Motion and Vote
Peter Harned moved to recommend approval of Zone Map Amendment Application #Z-07011 with the
contingencies listed on page two of the staff report, seconded by Nathan Minnick and Nick Lieb. All in
favor. Motion passed 3-0.
Acting Chair Nathan Minnick noted this item will go before the City Commission on March 19th.
208
Baxter Meadows PUD ZMA
RESOLUTION NO. Z-07011
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN ZONING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN APPLICATION TO AMEND THE CITY OF
BOZEMAN ZONING MAP ON APPROXIMATELY 6 ACRES, DESCRIBED AS
PORTIONS OF TRACT 3A AND 4A, CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY 2202A, GALLATIN
COUNTY TO CHANGE THE BOUNDARY OF MUNICIPAL ZONING DESIGNATION
OF “R-3” (RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY DISTRICT) AND “PLI” (PUBLIC
LANDS AND INSTITUTIONS DISTRICT) ON 6.06 ACRES.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WHEREAS, the City of Bozeman has adopted a growth policy pursuant to 76-1-604,
MCA; and
WHEREAS, the Bozeman City Zoning Commission has been created by Ordinance 1604
and Resolution No. 3312 of the City of Bozeman, pursuant to Title 76-2-307, MCA; and
WHEREAS, PC Development on behalf of Baxter Meadows Development and Gallatin
County applied for a Zone Map Amendment, pursuant to Chapter 18.70 of the Bozeman Unified
Development Ordinance to amend the City of Bozeman zoning map on approximately 6.06±
acres to revise the boundary between the “R-3” (Residential Medium Density District) and “PLI”
(Public Lands and Institutions District) on property described as portions of Tracts 3A and 4A,
Certificate of Survey 2202A, Gallatin County ; and
WHEREAS, the proposed Zone Map Amendment has been properly submitted,
reviewed, and advertised in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 18.70 of the
Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bozeman Zoning Commission held a public hearing on
Wednesday, February 21,2007 to receive and review all written and oral testimony on the request
for a Zone Map Amendment; and
WHEREAS, no members of the general public spoke in opposition to the requested zone
map amendment; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bozeman Zoning Commission finds that the request for a zone
map amendment generally complies with the twelve (12) criteria established in
Section 76-2-304, MCA; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bozeman Zoning Commission finds that the request for a zone
map amendment is consistent with the intent and purpose of Chapter 18.70 “Zoning Map
Amendments” of the City of Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Bozeman Zoning
Commission, on a vote of 3-0, recommends to the Bozeman City Commission for a Zone Map
Amendment to amend the boundary between the “R-3” (Residential Medium Density District)
209
and “PLI” (Public Lands and Institutions District) on property described as portions of Tracts 3A
and 4A, Certificate of Survey 2202A, Gallatin County, be approved with the following
contingencies.
1. That the applicant submit a zone amendment map, titled “Baxter Meadows PUD Zone Map
Amendment”, on a 24” by 36” mylar, 8 ½” by 11”, or 8 ½” by 14” paper exhibit, and a
digital copy of the area to be zoned, acceptable to the Director of Public Service, which will
be utilized in the preparation of the Ordinance to officially amend the City of Bozeman
Zoning Map. Said map shall contain a metes and bounds legal description of the perimeter
of the subject property and zoning districts, total acreage of the property.
2. That the Ordinance for the Zone Map Amendment shall not be drafted until the applicant
provides a metes and bounds legal description prepared by a licensed Montana surveyor and
map of the area to be rezoned, which will be utilized in the preparation of the Ordinance to
officially amend the zone map.
DATED THIS 21st DAY OF FEBRUARY 2007 Resolution No. Z-07011
_________________________________ ________________________________
Chris Saunders, Assistant Director Nathan Minnick, Vice-Chairperson
City of Bozeman Department of City of Bozeman Zoning Commission
Planning and Community Development
210
211
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ZONE MAP AMENDMENT APPLICATION
DESCRIPTION TAB #
Development Review Application................................................ 1
ZMA Checklist ............................................................................. 1
ZMA Checklist Narrative ............................................................. 1
Vicinity Map................................................................................. 2
Zone Change Exhibit - Current and Proposed.............................. 3
Zone Change Exhibit - Actual Areas............................................ 3
Zone Change Calculations……………………………………..... 3
Land Use Concept Plan................................................................. 4
Adjoiners List and Certificate....................................................... 5
212
213
214
215
BAXTER MEADOWS SUBDIVISION, P.U.D.
Zone Map Amendment Application
January 2007
Synapsis:
This Zone Map Amendment application is being submitted in conjunction with a
common boundary realignment. We are not requesting that a particular piece of property
be re-zoned, but rather that the two pieces of property retain their current zoning
throughout, once their boundaries are moved. As a result of the boundary adjustment,
useable, that is, non-right of way, area within the Regional Park will increase by
approximately one acre.
The sole purpose of the boundary adjustment is to create a parcel for the YMCA
on the same side of Vaquero Parkway as the Regional Park. This will create a safer
scenario, as well as allow the two entities to share resources.
Checklist Narrative
B. Zoning Map Amendment Criteria
1. Is the new zoning designed in accordance with the comprehensive plan?
N/A. The new zoning does not change anything in regard to the
comprehensive plan.
2. Is the zoning designed to lessen congestion in the streets?
N/A. The zoning adjustment will not have an affect on traffic congestion.
3. Will the new zoning promote health and general welfare?
Yes. Having the YMCA and Regional Park physically contiguous will create
a safer scenario for children using both facilities.
4. Will the new zoning secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers?
Yes. Having the YMCA and Regional Park physically contiguous will create
a safer scenario for children using both facilities.
5. Will the new zoning provide adequate light and air?
N/A. The new zoning will result in the same concentration of population as
the previous zoning.
6. Will the new zoning prevent the overcrowding of land?
N/A. The new zoning will result in the same concentration of population as
the previous zoning.
7. Will the new zoning avoid the undue concentration of population?
N/A. The new zoning will result in the same concentration of population as
the previous zoning.
216
8. Will the new zoning facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water,
sewer, schools, parks, fire, police, and other public requirements?
N/A. The new zoning will have no noticeable affect on public services versus
the previous zoning.
9. Does the new zoning give consideration to the peculiar suitability of the property
for particular uses?
Yes. The new zoning is the proper scenario for the YMCA and Regional
Park.
10. Does the new zoning give reasonable consideration to the character of the
district?
Yes. The zoning adjustment will restore the proper zoning to the particular
parcels of land, thus maintaining the intended character.
11. Was the new zoning adopted with a view to conserving the value of buildings?
N/A. This zone change will not affect any buildings.
12. Will the new zoning encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout such
county or municipal area?
Yes. The zoning adjustment will restore the proper zoning to the particular
parcels of land, thus maintaining the appropriate and intended uses of said
land.
217
218
219
220
221
ZONING MAP AMENDMENT CALCULATIONS:Park Perimeter Vaquero(non-ROW)ROWROWTotal:non-ROWROWTotal:PLI Current 3,781,325 359,149 222,606 4,363,080 86.81 13.36 100.16PLI Proposed 3,827,334346,36658,1544,231,85487.869.2997.15Difference: 46,009 -12,783 -164,452 -131,226 1.06 -4.07 -3.01acres:1.06-0.29 -3.78-3.01Tract 4-A Perimeter VaqueroSouth of Baxter: (non-ROW)ROWROWTotal:R-3 Current 2,221,840 137,096 0 2,358,936 51.01 3.15 54.15R-3 Proposed 2,212,263149,879128,0202,490,16250.796.3857.17Difference: -9,577 12,783 128,020 131,226 -0.22 3.23 3.01acres:-0.220.292.94 3.01Park + 4-A Perimeter Vaquero(non-ROW)ROWROWTotal:Total Current: 6,003,165 496,245 222,606 6,722,016 137.81 16.50 154.32Total Proposed 6,039,597496,245186,1746,722,016138.6515.67154.32Difference: 36,432 0 -36,432 0 0.84 -0.84 0.00acres: 0.84 -0.84Total increase in useable (non-ROW) PLI: 1.06Total decrease in useable (non-ROW) R-3: -0.22Total net change in zoning acreage - PLI to R-3: 3.01 PLI to R-3 4.80 R-3 to PLI 1.79222
Total increase in useable (non-ROW) PLI: 1.06
Total decrease in useable (non-ROW) R-3: -0.22
Total net change in zoning acreage - PLI to R-3: 3.01
223
Total increase in useable (non-ROW) PLI: 1.06
Total decrease in useable (non-ROW) R-3: -0.22
Total net change in zoning acreage - PLI to R-3: 3.01
224
225
Adjoiners List Within 200 feet of Subject Property
Zoning Map Amendment
Warbler Development, LLC
P.O. Box 10968
Bozeman, MT 59719-0968
Cecelia K. Reiner
106 Erik Dr.
Bozeman, MT 59715-6633
Carolyn M. Nistler
48 Cresent Point
Bozeman, MT 59715
Jeremy L. Lee
1129 Gulf Shores Parkway
Gulf Shores, AL 36542-5907
Tawney R. Lee
2124 Gallatin Green Blvd.
Bozeman, MT 59718-7151
Michael D. & Robin E. Gurzi
12810 Larrylyn Dr.
La Mirada, CA 90638-2725
Bonnie J. Schlafman
3524 Gallatin Green Blvd.
Apt. #4
Bozeman, MT 59718-8892
Elwood G. & Gail A. Forsythe
161 E. Chicago Ave.
# E-37A
Chicago, IL 60611-2601
Richard F. & Karen G. Rigard
100 Valley View Dr.
Factoryville, PA 18419-9385
226
Vic N. & Catherine M. Cundy
2146 Gallatin Green Blvd.
Apt. 7
Bozeman, MT 59718-8894
Todd A. Graetz
3562 Gallatin Green Blvd.
Apt. 8
Bozeman, MT 59718-8897
Theresa A. Gallen
P.O. Box 884
Belgrade, MT 59714-0884
Jeffrey M. & Sarah K. Olech
2162 Gallatin Green Blvd.
Unit 10
Bozeman, MT 59718-7154
Kevin C. & Brandi A. Ellerton
3588 Gallatin Green Blvd.
#11
Bozeman, MT 59718-6520
Randell J. & Patsy Y. Duff
3588 Gallatin Green Blvd.
#12
Bozeman, MT 59718-6520
Vickie Lee Perkins
3588 Gallatin Green Blvd.
#13
Bozeman, MT 59718-6520
Colt D. & Jamie L. Frederickson
2188 Gallatin Green Blvd.
#14
Bozeman, MT 59718-7153
Cascade Development, Inc.
c/o Wayne Jennings
125 W. Mendenhall St.
Bozeman, MT 59715-3586
227
William H. & Betty Anne Sippel Trust
12711 W. Allegro Dr.
Sun City West, AZ 85375-4228
Robert J. & Janet M. Swenson
4959 Durston Rd.
Bozeman, MT 59718-9499
Oak Springs Estates LLC
c/o Michael D. Stewart
1777 Sun Peak Dr.
Park City, UT 84098-6725
Karen & Hung Andy Tran
314 Mineral Ave.
Bozeman, MT 59718
Square One Structures, Inc.
P.O. Box 11293
Bozeman, MT 59719-1293
Kelsey Holt
609 Golden West Dr.
Belgrade, MT 59714-8366
Altaya Properties, LLC
P.O. Box 11173
Bozeman, MT 59719-1173
Kittie A. Bowen
695 Sycamore Ln.
Bozeman, MT 59718-9496
Kim C. Colvin
P.O. Box 1749
Big Timber, MT 59011-1749
P. Brandon Calder
P.O. Box 11173
Bozeman, MT 59719-1173
Hung Andy Tran & Sam Nguyen
314 Mineral Ave.
Bozeman, MT 59718
228
230
Douglas L. Smith
4521 Durston Rd.
Bozeman, MT 59718-9497
William R. & Dianne Peterson
5001 Baxter Ln. East
Bozeman, MT 59718-9797
Ben W. & Diane E. Rogers
6724 Davis Ln.
Bozeman, MT 59718-8865
229