HomeMy WebLinkAboutWestbrook Zone Map Amendment Z13296Page 1 of 13
Z-13296, Staff Report for the Westbrook Zone Map Amendment
NOTE: UPDATES TO THIS STAFF REPORT THAT HAVE BEEN MADE SINCE
ITS PRESENTATION TO THE ZONING COMMISSION ARE SHOWN IN
RED.
Public Hearing Dates: Zoning Commission, March 18, 2014, 121 N. Rouse Avenue, 6 pm
City Commission, April 14, 2014, 121 N. Rouse Avenue, 6 pm.
Project Description: A request to rezone 5.4 acres from R-3, Residential Medium Density
to R-4, Residential High Density
Project Location: The property is described as a portion of the Amended Plat of Lot 2A,
Minor Subdivision 201A, located in the S½ of Section 4, Township 2S, Range 5E, of
P.M.M, City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana. The project is generally
located north of Durston Road, east of Laurel Parkway and south of Annie Street.
Recommendation: Approval with contingencies
Recommended Motion: Having reviewed and considered the application materials, public
comment, and all the information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in
the staff report for application Z-13296 and move to approve the zone map
amendment with contingencies.
Report Date: March 12, 2014 (Updated April 3, 2014 for presentation to the City
Commission)
Staff Contact: Chris Saunders, Policy and Planning Manager
Agenda Item Type: Action - Legislative
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Unresolved Issues
No unresolved issues have been identified at this time.
Project Summary
The proposal is to rezone approximately 5.4 acres from R-3, Residential Medium Density
Residential District to R-4, Residential High-Density District as allowed by Article 38.37 of
the Bozeman Municipal Code. This project is proposed in conjunction with the Westbrook
Subdivision preliminary plat. However, either project may be acted upon independent of the
other. Public comment was received at the Zoning Commission public hearing an in an email
on April 7th.
284
Z-13296, Staff Report for the Westbrook Zone Map Amendment Page 2 of 13
Alternatives
1) Adopt the amendment as requested.
2) Deny the amendment.
March 18, 2014 Zoning Commission Meeting Supplement
The Zoning Commission held a public hearing and considered the application on March 18,
2014. The Zoning Commission did not recommend approval of the application. The
audio/visual recording/minutes from this meeting can be accessed at the following link:
http://www.avcaptureall.com/Sessions.aspx#session.2aa9a844-78f1-4e6d-bfd4-
96377a1554da. The presentation of this item begins at approximately the 11:45 minute mark
in the recording. Public comments begin at the 26:40 minute mark. Five public comments
were given, all in opposition. Comments focused on prior representations from other parties,
character of the area, impacts on wildlife, storm water and traffic generated from additional
development. The Zoning Commission inquired as to the amount of R-4 property available.
A copy of the 2013 Land Use Inventory report is attached to this report. The inventory report
describes the amount of land designated by zoning district and land use type within the City.
One public comment was received on April 7th via email and was provided to the City
Commission.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... 1
Unresolved Issues ............................................................................................................... 1
Project Summary ................................................................................................................. 1
Alternatives ......................................................................................................................... 2
March 18, 2014 Zoning Commission Meeting Supplement ............................................... 2
SECTION 1 - MAP SERIES .................................................................................................... 3
SECTION 2- RECOMMENDED CONTINGENCIES OF APPROVAL ................................ 6
SECTION 3 - RECOMMENDATION AND FUTURE ACTIONS ........................................ 7
SECTION 4 - STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS ............................................................. 7
Section 76-2-304, MCA (Zoning) Criteria ......................................................................... 7
PROTEST NOTICE FOR ZONING AMENDMENTS ......................................................... 10
APPENDIX A –AFFECTED ZONING AND GROWTH POLICY PROVISIONS ............. 10
APPENDIX B – DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND.............. 11
APPENDIX C – NOTICING AND PUBLIC COMMENT ................................................... 12
285
Z-13296, Staff Report for the Westbrook Zone Map Amendment Page 3 of 13
APPENDIX D - OWNER INFORMATION AND REVIEWING STAFF............................ 12
FISCAL EFFECTS ................................................................................................................. 13
ATTACHMENTS ................................................................................................................... 13
SECTION 1 - MAP SERIES
Vicinity Map showing adjacent zoning
Surrounding Zoning and Land Uses
North: R-2, Residential two-household medium density, vacant
South: PLI, Public Lands and Institutions, Bronken Park
East: R-3, multi-household and vacant
West: R-2, Residential two-household medium density, vacant, watercourse
286
Z-13296, Staff Report for the Westbrook Zone Map Amendment Page 4 of 13
Vicinity Map from Growth Policy Figure 3-1
287
Z-13296, Staff Report for the Westbrook Zone Map Amendment Page 5 of 13
Existing Parks and Open Space Map
288
Z-13296, Staff Report for the Westbrook Zone Map Amendment Page 6 of 13
R-4 and R-1 Distribution Map
SECTION 2- RECOMMENDED CONTINGENCIES OF APPROVAL
Please note that these contingencies are necessary for the City to complete the process of the
proposed amendment.
Recommended Contingencies of Approval:
1. That all documents and exhibits necessary shall be identified as the “Westbrook Zone Map
Amendment”.
2. That the applicant submit a zone amendment map, titled “Westbrook Zone Map
Amendment”, on a 24” by 36” mylar, an 8 ½” by 11” or 8 ½” by 14” paper exhibit, and a
digital copy of the area to be zoned, acceptable to the Director of Public Works, which will
be utilized in the preparation of the Ordinance to officially amend the City of Bozeman
Zoning Map. Said map shall contain a metes and bounds legal description of the perimeter
of the subject property and zoning districts, and total acreage of the property.
3. That the Ordinance for the Zone Map Amendment shall not be drafted until the applicant
provides a metes and bounds legal description prepared by a licensed Montana surveyor and
map of the area to be rezoned, which will be utilized in the preparation of the Ordinance to
officially amend the zone map.
289
Z-13296, Staff Report for the Westbrook Zone Map Amendment Page 7 of 13
SECTION 3 - RECOMMENDATION AND FUTURE ACTIONS
Project Name: Westbrook Zone Map Amendment
File: Z-13296
Having considered the criteria established for a zone map amendment, the Staff recommends
approval as submitted.
The Development Review Committee (DRC) considered the amendment on February 26 and
March 5, 2014. The DRC did not identify any infrastructure or regulatory constraints which
would impede the approval of the application.
The Zoning Commission held a public hearing on this ZMA on March 18, 2014, at 121 N.
Rouse Avenue, Bozeman. The meeting will begin at 6 p.m. and forward a recommendation to
the Commission on the Zone Map amendment. After conducting the public hearing the
Zoning Commission voted 0-4 on the motion to recommend approval of the application. The
motion was not passed. No alternative motion was offered.
The City Commission will hold a public hearing on the zone map amendment on April 7,
2014. The meeting will be held at 121 N. Rouse Avenue, Bozeman. The meeting will begin
at 6 p.m. The City Commission will make the final decision on this application.
SECTION 4 - STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS
In considering applications for approval under this title, the advisory boards and City
Commission shall consider the following:
Section 76-2-304, MCA (Zoning) Criteria
A. Be in accordance with a growth policy.
Yes. The site is designated as Residential on Figure 3-1 in the Bozeman Community Plan.
Table C-16 of the growth policy shows both R-3 and R-4 as implementing districts for the
Residential designation. A review of the applicable goals and objectives of the growth policy
has not identified any specific conflicts with the non-mapped elements of the document.
Placing increased density of residential uses in small increments in close proximity to
services and amenities appears to advance the land use principles of Neighborhoods, Urban
Density, and Sustainability as described in Chapter 3 of the Growth Policy. It also appears to
comply with the goals and objectives of Chapter 6, Housing regarding a diversity of housing
types and income availability.
B. Secure safety from fire and other dangers.
290
Z-13296, Staff Report for the Westbrook Zone Map Amendment Page 8 of 13
Yes. Neutral. The same standards for emergency access, fire protection, and related issues
apply to either zoning district. The area is within the City’s emergency service locations and
is provided with 911 and other necessary services. Building permits will apply within either
district to ensure correct construction techniques, building exiting, and other safety concerns
have been addressed. Apartments are allowed within the R-4 but not the R-3 but enhanced
building code requirements will apply so that does not provide a less safe situation. Either
district will be located outside of the adjacent Baxter Creek floodplain.
C. Promote public health, public safety, and general welfare.
Yes. Neutral. As discussed in Criterion B, there are many standards which apply equally to
either the R-3 or R-4 district. Development of the site will include provision of pedestrian
facilities which will improve safety for persons traveling down Durston Road, whether to
Meadowlark Elementary or other destinations. The generally adopted standards of the
municipal code will ensure adequate supply for sanitation, clean water, stormwater control
and other items which would possibly affect this criterion.
D. Facilitate the provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other
public requirements.
Yes. No dedication of rights-of-way or construction of facilities is required because of the
change in zoning. The subsequent subdivision or site plan development review process will
require demonstration of adequate transportation and other facilities. The City’s development
standards require mitigation of site impacts to infrastructure and therefore this criterion is
met.
The City does not provide schools. However, development of the site can support provision
of pedestrian connections to Meadowlark Elementary school by construction of sidewalks
along street frontages.
E. Reasonable provision of adequate light and air.
Yes. The R-4 district has been evaluated against this criterion during the legislative
adoption of the district. The Commission determined that the R-4 district complied with the
criteria of evaluation. Parkland dedication, on-site open space, and building setback
requirements applied in the R-4 district which are the same as the R-3 district will ensure this
is met.
F. The effect on motorized and non-motorized transportation systems.
Neutral. The site has vehicle access to Annie Street and Glenwood Drive. Access for
pedestrian is provided along both streets and along Durston Road. A proposed trail passing
north to south along the watercourse is proposed with the Westbrook subdivision which will
also connect this site to adjacent areas.
Additional traffic will be created with the development. An estimated range of 35 homes to
70 homes is expected with the lesser number being possible under the current R-3 zoning.
291
Z-13296, Staff Report for the Westbrook Zone Map Amendment Page 9 of 13
The Annie Street and Glenwood Drive are local streets. Per the transportation plan they are
capable of carrying the difference of traffic.
There are some identified deficiencies in the local street network. However, there are also
plans in place to begin correcting those deficiencies. The City has listed improvements to
Durston and Cottonwood Roads on its Capital Improvement Program. A more detailed
examination will be made with the Westbrook Subdivision and required mitigation will be
installed through that process. This will be necessary before the area which is the subject of
the amendment can become a developable lot. The additional traffic which may result from
the change is zoning is not a significant change in the overall traffic pattern or generation of
the area.
G. Promotion of compatible urban growth.
Yes. The R-4 district has been determined to be an appropriate urban zoning district. The
zoning map shows five other R-4 areas within a third of a mile of the site. These areas are
divided into smaller areas so that no one area overwhelms the neighborhood with intense
development. The other criteria and related findings show that the R-4 district is compatible
with character, provision of services, and other subjects. Therefore, this criterion is met.
H. Character of the district.
Yes. The R-4 district has been determined to be an appropriate urban zoning district. The
zoning map shows five other R-4 areas within a third of a mile of the site. These areas are
divided into smaller areas so that no one area overwhelms the neighborhood with intense
development. The surrounding area has a mix of residential zoning districts and public parks.
There character is residential in nature. The scale of buildings, setbacks, and parking are of
very similar nature which will enable the proposed R-4 area to fit reasonably with the
adjacent development.
As stated in Section 38.08.010.A “There is a rebuttable presumption that the uses set forth for
each district will be compatible with each other when the standards of this chapter are met
and any applicable conditions of approval have been satisfied.” The site plan review process
will enable the evaluation of any peculiar impacts of proposed development and mitigation as
needed.
I. Peculiar suitability for particular uses.
Neutral. The site is well situated for residential uses with near proximity to education
facilities, parks, and open spaces. The differences between the R-3 and R-4 districts are not
such that one is more particularly more suited for the site than the other.
J. Conserving the value of buildings.
Neutral. There are no buildings on the site. To the west is the Baxter Creek corridor which
provides a substantial separation from adjacent development. South of the site is Bronken
Park which is developed as soccer fields. To the north, the site is vacant. The adjacent
292
Z-13296, Staff Report for the Westbrook Zone Map Amendment Page 10 of 13
property to the east is zoned as R-3 and is partially developed with multi-story residential
condominiums. The R-4 district allows uses very similar in type and scale with the R-3
district and is the next adjacent district in the zoning description. The site plan review process
will enable the evaluation of any peculiar impacts of proposed development and mitigation as
needed.
K. Encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout the jurisdictional area.
Yes. The sum of the findings regarding the other criteria indicates that the R-4 district is an
appropriate use of the subject property. The property is well situated for residential uses.
PROTEST NOTICE FOR ZONING AMENDMENTS
IN THE CASE OF WRITTEN PROTEST AGAINST SUCH CHANGES SIGNED BY THE OWNERS OF 25% OR MORE OF THE AREA OF THE LOTS WITHIN THE AMENDMENT
AREA OR THOSE LOTS OR UNITS WITHIN 150 FEET FROM A LOT INCLUDED IN A
PROPOSED CHANGE, THE AMENDMENT SHALL NOT BECOME EFFECTIVE EXCEPT
BY THE FAVORABLE VOTE OF TWO-THIRDS OF THE PRESENT AND VOTING MEMBERS OF THE CITY COMMISSION.
APPENDIX A –AFFECTED ZONING AND GROWTH POLICY
PROVISIONS
Zoning Designation and Land Uses:
The existing and proposed zoning districts are both residential districts. The purposes for
the districts area described in the following excerpts from Section. 38.08.010.A.
“The intent and purpose of the residential zoning districts is to establish areas within
the city that are primarily residential in character and to set forth certain minimum
standards for development within those areas. The purpose in having more than one
residential district is to provide opportunities for a variety of housing types and
arrangements within the community while providing a basic level of predictability. There
is a rebuttable presumption that the uses set forth for each district will be compatible with
each other when the standards of this chapter are met and any applicable conditions of
approval have been satisfied. Additional requirements for development apply within
overlay districts. All development is subject to Section 38.01.050. Residential density is
correlated with many community goals and objectives that are contained in the city's
adopted growth policy, as well as many standards and purposes of this chapter. Section
38.08.090 sets standards for minimum densities in residential districts which will advance
these goals, objectives, and purposes.”
“4. The intent of the R-3 residential medium density district is to provide for the
development of one- to five-household residential structures near service facilities within
the city. It should provide for a variety of housing types to serve the varied needs of
293
Z-13296, Staff Report for the Westbrook Zone Map Amendment Page 11 of 13
households of different size, age and character, while reducing the adverse effect of
nonresidential uses.
5. The intent of the R-4 residential high density district is to provide for high-density
residential development through a variety of housing types within the city with associated
service functions. This will provide for a variety of compatible housing types to serve the
varying needs of the community's residents. Although some office use is permitted, it
shall remain as a secondary use to residential development. Secondary status shall be as
measured by percentage of total building area.”
Adopted Growth Policy Designation:
The growth policy designation for the amendment area and the surrounding area is
Residential which is defined as:
Residential. This category designates places where the primary activity is urban density
dwellings. Other uses which complement residences are also acceptable such as parks, low
intensity home based occupations, fire stations, churches, and schools. High density
residential areas should be established in close proximity to commercial centers to facilitate
the provision of services and employment opportunities to persons without requiring the use
of an automobile. Implementation of this category by residential zoning should provide for
and coordinate intensive residential uses in proximity to commercial centers. The residential
designation indicates that it is expected that development will occur within municipal
boundaries, which may require annexation prior to development.
The dwelling unit density expected within this classification varies between 6 and 32
dwellings per net acre. A higher density may be considered in some locations and
circumstances. A variety of housing types can be blended to achieve the desired density.
Large areas of single type housing are discouraged. In limited instances the strong presence
of constraints and natural features such as floodplains may cause an area to be designated for
development at a lower density than normally expected within this category. All residential
housing should be arranged with consideration of compatibility with adjacent development,
natural constraints such as watercourses or steep slopes, and in a fashion which advances the
overall goals of the Bozeman growth policy. The residential designation is intended to
provide the primary locations for additional housing within the planning area.
APPENDIX B – DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND
BACKGROUND
Project Description The property is described as a portion of the Amended Plat of
Lot 2A, Minor Subdivision 201A, located in the S½ of Section 4, Township 2S, Range 5E, of
P.M.M, City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana. The project is generally located north
294
Z-13296, Staff Report for the Westbrook Zone Map Amendment Page 12 of 13
of Durston Road, east of Laurel Parkway and south of Annie Street. Maps of the location are
in Section 1 of this report.
The proposal is to rezone approximately 5.4 acres from R-3, Residential Medium Density
Residential District to R-4, Residential High-Density District as allowed by Article 38.37 of
the Bozeman Municipal Code. This project is proposed in conjunction with the Westbrook
Subdivision preliminary plat. However, either project may be acted upon independent of the
other.
Project Background The project area is part of the area annexed and zoned in the early
2000’s as part of the Laurel Glen development. A new owner has obtained the property and
is now pursuing development. A subdivision preliminary plat has been submitted. The area
proposed to be rezoned is depicted as a single lot within that subdivision. The property could
be developed under either the R-3 or R-4 zone. The proposed change is primarily to respond
to the desire of the owner to have additional range of use options on the property.
The area proposed to be rezoned is separated from the single home area to the west by a
watercourse and associated setbacks. The area to the east is partially developed with multi-
household buildings in condominium ownership.
APPENDIX C – NOTICING AND PUBLIC COMMENT
One written public comment has been received to date. Noticing was posted on site,
published in the Bozeman Daily Chronicle, and mailed to all owners within 200 feet of the
outer perimeter of the property. Notice was provided at least 15 and not more than 45 days
prior to the Zoning Commission public hearing on March 18, 2014 and the City Commission
public hearing tentatively scheduled for April 7, 2014.
Five verbal comments were provided at the public hearing held by the Zoning Commission.
A description is provided in the Executive Summary above. Minutes of the public hearing are
attached.
APPENDIX D - OWNER INFORMATION AND REVIEWING STAFF
Owner/Applicant: Four Corners Construction, LLC, 125 Central Ave., Bozeman, MT 59718
Representative: C&H Engineering & Surveying, Inc., 1091 Stoneridge Dr., Bozeman, MT
59718
Report By: Chris Saunders, Policy and Program Manager
295
Z-13296, Staff Report for the Westbrook Zone Map Amendment Page 13 of 13
FISCAL EFFECTS
No unusual fiscal effects have been identified. No presently budgeted funds will be changed by
this zone map amendment.
ATTACHMENTS
The full application and file of record can be viewed at the Community Development
Department at 20 E. Olive Street, Bozeman, MT 59715.
Application materials
Minutes of the March 18, 2014 Zoning Commission public hearing
2013 Land Use Inventory Report
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
1
ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES TUESDAY, MARCH 18, 2014
ITEM 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ATTENDANCE
Chairperson Garberg called the meeting to order at 6:01 p.m. and took attendance.
Members Present:
Erik Garberg, Chairperson Julien Morice
George Thompson
Dan Stevenson
City Commission Liaison: Jeff Krauss
Members Absent:
Guests Present:
Mike Balch – C&H Engineering Chuck Hinesley – applicant Chris & Megan Spaulding
Ben Guttormson
Maggie Beardslie
Matthew McKee Staff Present: Doug Riley, Senior Planner
Chris Saunders, Policy and Planning Manager
ITEM 2. PUBLIC COMMENT (Limited to any public matter within the jurisdiction of the Zoning Commission and not scheduled on this agenda. There is a three-minute time limit per speaker.)
None forthcoming
ITEM 3. MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 04, 2013 Erik Garberg opened the the meeting and asked for motion to approve minutes. George
Thompson moved to approve. Julien Morice seconded. Minutes approved unanimously.
ITEM 4. PROJECT REVIEW
1. Boulder Creek ZMA Z14030
A Zone Map Amendment application requested by owner Four Corners Construction,
LLC, 125 Central Ave., Bozeman, MT 59718, represented by C&H Engineering &
Surveying, Inc., 1091 Stoneridge Dr., Bozeman, MT 59718.To rezone approximately
0.67 acres from R-2, Residential Two Household Medium Density District to R-4,
311
2
Residential High-Density District; 0.21 acres from R-4, Residential High-Density
District to R-2, Residential Two Household Medium Density District; 0.15 acres from
PLI, Public Lands and Institutions District to R-2, Residential Two Household Medium
Density District and 1.35 acres from R-2, Residential Two Household Medium Density
District to PLI, Public Lands and Institutions District as allowed by Article 38.37 of the
Bozeman Municipal Code. The property is described as various portions of Lot 3A of
Minor Subdivision No. 201A, located in the S½ of Section 4, Township 2S, Range 5E,
of P.M.M, City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana. The project is generally located
between Durston Road and W. Oak Street (as extended), east of Laurel Parkway and
north of Annie Street (as extended). (Riley)
At 1:20 min - Doug Riley gave the staff report presentation.
At 9:07 min - Mike Balch, C&H Engineering was available to answer any questions.
At 9:44 min - Public hearing opened. No public comment was forthcoming. Public Hearing was
closed.
At 10:00 min – Opened up for motion, discussion and vote. George Thompson moved “Having
reviewed and considered the application materials, public comment, and all the
information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for
application Z14030 and move to approve the zone map amendment with contingencies.”
Julien Morice seconded. George Thompson stated he liked what was going on with the
application and feels it’s a common sense approach to deal with the parkland issue
closer to Oak Street. He believes the increase to parkland area will make some of the
parcels very desirable. He likes the connections with the trail system to Annie Street and
the development attitude, saying it goes a long way to creating a good city environment.
At 11:10 min – Motion opened for vote. Recommended for approval to the City Commission.
Motion passed unanimously, 4-0.
2. Westbrook ZMA Z13296
A Zone Map Amendment application requested by owner Four Corners Construction, LLC,
125 Central Ave., Bozeman, MT 59718, represented by C&H Engineering & Surveying, Inc.,
1091 Stoneridge Dr., Bozeman, MT 59718. To rezone approximately 5.4 acres from R-3,
Residential Medium Density Residential District to R-4, Residential High- Density District as
allowed by Article 38.37 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. The property is described as a
portion of the Amended Plat of Lot 2A, Minor Subdivision 201A, located in the S½ of
Section 4, Township 2S, Range 5E, of P.M.M, City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana.
The project is generally located north of Durston Road, east of Laurel Parkway and south of
312
3
Annie Street. (Saunders)
At 11:50 min – Chris Saunders gave the staff report presentation. No public comment received to
date.
At 17:37 min – Opened for questions. Questions and discussion followed.
At 26:14 min - Applicant presentation by Mike Balch, C & H Engineering. Available to answer
questions. No questions forthcoming.
At 26:36 min – Opened public hearing.
At 26:53 min – Margaret Beardsley, 739A Rosa Way. Comment regarding R-3 zoning vs R-4 high
density zoning, character of neighborhood and open space/wildlife corridor/wetlands. No
public comment received because certified letters sent to previous owners and sent during
Spring break when people were not in town.
At 31:34 min – Megan Spaulding, 771A Rosa Way. Supports previous comment, change the
character of the neighborhood. She was told by developer that nothing could be built in area
due to wetlands.
At 33:45 min – Chris Spaulding, 771A Rosa Way. Added higher density building will affect sale
prices if they decided to sell.
At 34:30 min – Ben Guttormson, 739B Rosa Way. Concerns include environmental effect with
pavement, runoff.
At 35:33 min – Matthew McKee – 739A Rosa Way. Impact of R-4 zoning, traffic, water
way, crowding. Development of more R-4 areas.
At 36:40 min –Public hearing closed.
At 36:47 min – Applicant given four minutes for comment. Chuck Hinesley, 4721 Glenwood Dr.,
gave comment regarding application.
At 40:51 min – Opened for motion, discussion and vote. Julien Morice offered a motion “Having
reviewed and considered the application materials, public comment, and all the information
presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application Z-13296 and move
to approve the zone map amendment with contingencies.” Seconded by George Thompson.
313
4
At 42:25 min – Julien Morice gave comment on motion stating he sees a gradual progression in
zoning from R-3 to R-4. Wishes he could see plan as well as zoning. R-4 zoning sounds
scary, but guessing not a lot of it will be built on. Substantial setbacks restricting what can be
done with it. Concerned with property values. He is struggling with this ZMA. Comments
and discussion followed regarding noticing to property owners and R-4 zoning vs R-3
zoning.
At 57:15 min – Vote taken – motion fails on a 0-4 unanimous vote. Application will be heard again
on
April 7, 2014.
ITEM 5. NEW BUSINESS
Discussion about possible investigation on zoning amendments to protect neighborhood character. Possible joint meeting or other collaboration with the Planning Board. Possibility of
having a committee to research the issue and bring back information to be considered at public
meetings.
At 1:04:20 min - Send an email to Aimee and Trevor to put an item under New Business for both the Planning Board and Zoning Board to discuss one of these subjects. Create a sub-
committee to work on subjects.
ITEM 6. ADJOURNMENT
Chairperson Garberg: Adjourned meeting at 7:08 p.m.
Erik Garberg, Chairperson
City of Bozeman Zoning Commission
Chris Saunders, Policy and Planning Manager
City of Bozeman DCD
This meeting is open to all members of the public. If you have a disability that requires assistance, please contact ADA Coordinator, James Goehrung, at 582-3200 (voice) or 582-2301/582-2432 (TDD).
314
Development Review Division Policy and Planning Division Building Division
CITY OF BOZEMAN
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building
20 East Olive Street P.O. Box 1230
Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230
phone 406-582-2260
fax 406-582-2263
planning@bozeman.net
www.bozeman.net 2013 Land Use Inventory Report February 28, 2014
315
2013 Annual Land Use Inventory Report February 28, 2014
Page 2 of 15
Since 2002, the City of Bozeman Department of Planning and Community Development (DPCD)
has worked to prepare an annual report of land use within the City. The report provides a cross tabulation of how the area within each parcel and within each zoning district is used. The use is measured by acres and any established use on the site means the area of the entire parcel is shown as
occupied. All use and area values are rounded to the nearest whole acre. Those cells showing no value
mean there is no amount of that land use in that zoning district. Those cells in data from 2008 on
showing a 0 value mean that there is some but less than one-half acre of that land use in that zoning district. The year 2007 and prior showed a zero in any cell with a value less than one acre in any land use in a zoning district. The table for 2004 was not calculated and is therefore not presented.
Shown in the following tables are the updated land use inventory for the City of Bozeman from
December 31, 2005 through December 31, 2013. The map is for the 2013 inventory. Data prior to 2005
is not shown due to complex changes in the number and type of zoning districts which would make comparisons to current data difficult. The data is available through the DPCD if desired.
The land use classifications and zoning definitions are described below. Zoning districts are
established by the City Commission through the adoption of ordinances. The description of land use
classifications is prepared by the Department of Community Development (DCD). A revised set of
classifications was prepared in 2010 and are reflected in the 2010 land use table. The changes were generally minor but refined several classifications and added several to allow the same classifications to be used either inside or outside the city.
The descriptor shown in parentheses in the list of land use classifications is the value contained in
the geographic information system tables used to track the inventory. The descriptors are used in the
table row labels due to space constraints. The detailed description of uses allowed in the zoning districts and related development standards are available through the City’s Unified Development Ordinance. Please contact the DCD if you have questions on these standards. The current land use information for
individual parcels is available through the interactive geographic information system hosted on the
City’s website, www.bozeman.net.
Land Use Classifications
Use Type Description
(MIXED) Mixed Use More than one principal use occurring on one lot.
(RB) Restaurant/Bar A restaurant, coffee shop, cafeteria, grill, short order café, luncheonette,
sandwich stand, drugstore, soda fountain, serving food; or an establishment where alcoholic beverages are served on premises.
(CR) Commercial
Retail sales, services,
Banks
Uses involving the sale of goods or services carried out for profit.
(HM) Hotel/Motel A building or group of buildings, in which lodging is provided and
offered to transient guests for compensation (not to include a boarding
house, lodging house or rooming house)>
316
2013 Annual Land Use Inventory Report February 28, 2014
Page 3 of 15
Use Type Description
(CA) Commercial
Auto sales, rental,
parts, storage, gas, service
Establishments primarily engaged in automotive related sale/services,
fuels, repair, sales, washing, rental and leasing.
(AP) Administrative
Professional
An establishment in which overall management functions occur and/or in
which a recognized profession is maintained for the conduct of that profession.
(LM) Light
Manufacturing
Fabrication of and/or assembly of goods from previously prepared
materials, to include storage, and mini-warehousing.
(HI) Heavy Industrial Those industries whose processing of products results in the emission of any atmospheric pollution, light flashes, glare, odor, noise or vibration
which may be heard and/or felt off the premises and those industries
which constitute a fire or explosion hazard.
(GOLF) Golf Course A tract of land laid out for playing golf with at least nine holes; and
improved with tees, greens, fairways and hazards; and which may
include a clubhouse and/or shelter.
(POS) Park or Open
Space
Parks, trails, recreational areas and other places that are capable of being
used by the public for recreation, relaxation and social purposes. May
include private land serving a property owners association for similar purposes
(AG) Agricultural Land, usually 20 acres or greater, without dwellings
(AGR) Agricultural Land, usually 20 acres or greater, with one or more
dwellings
(CE) Conservation
Easement
A property legally restricted from development for the purpose of
preserving open space or habitat. May or may not have a dwelling or
other uses on the property.
(CHURCH) Church A building where persons regularly assemble for religious worship and
which, together with its accessory buildings and uses, is maintained and
controlled by a religious body organized to sustain public worship.
(PFP) Public Facility A building, structure, facility or complex, used by or providing services
to the general public and constructed by either the federal, state, county
or municipal government agency. Also includes utilities serving the
general public such as electrical service.
317
2013 Annual Land Use Inventory Report February 28, 2014
Page 4 of 15
Use Type Description
(SEF)
School/Educational
Facility
Any building or part thereof which is constructed or used for public or
private education or instruction; when not conducted as a commercial
enterprise for the profit of individual owners or stockholders.
(SFR) Single-Household Residential
A building used for residential occupancy by one household, including
multiple residences that share a common wall, as long as only one
dwelling unit lies upon a single lot; townhomes. Also may include an
accessory dwelling unit.
(DTR) Duplex/Triplex
Residential
A building, or a portion thereof, used for occupancy by two or three
households living independently of each other, with the units completely
separated by a common wall, floor and/or ceiling and reside on one lot; including apartments and condos.
(MFR) Multi-
Household Residential
A building, or portion thereof, used for occupancy by four or more
households living independently of each other, with the units completely separated by a common wall, floor and/or ceiling; apartments, condos.
(MHMP) Mobile
Home, Mobile Park,
Manufactured Housing
A factory assembled structure(s), exceeding eight feet in width,
originally equipped with the necessary service connections and originally
made so as to be readily movable as a unit(s) on its own running gear and designed to be used as a dwelling unit(s) without a permanent foundation, whether or not the running gear has been removed.
(RP) Residential with Pasture Residential property, usually single-household, with 1 or more acres but not more than 20 acres, that has open pasture used for grazing animals.
(RR) Rural Residential Detached single-household residential property located outside of the
City limits that does not have pasture.
(ROW) Rights-of-Way A public way established or dedicated for public purposes by duly
recorded plat, deed, grant, easement, governmental authority or by operation of law; roads; railroads.
(UDV) Undeveloped Land that is not ready to be occupied by buildings (needs to be
subdivided; needs infrastructure)
(VACANT) Vacant Land that is currently developed and ready to be occupied by buildings but is unoccupied; no buildings or buildings requiring significant
improvement in order to be used.
318
2013 Annual Land Use Inventory Report February 28, 2014
Page 5 of 15
Zoning Districts by Title
R-S - Residential suburban district
R-1 - Residential single household, low density district
R-2 - Residential two household, medium density district
R-3 - Residential medium density district
R-4 - Residential high density district
R-O - Residential office district
RMH -Residential manufactured home community district
REMU- Residential emphasis mixed use district (first appears on the zoning map in 2010)
HMU - Historic mixed use district
PLI - Public lands and institutions
B-1 - Neighborhood business district
B-2 - Community business district
B-3 - Central business district
M-1 - Light manufacturing district
M-2 - Manufacturing and industrial district
B-P - Business park district
UMU - Urban Mixed Use (first appears on the zoning map in 2008)
319
2013 Annual Land Use Inventory Report February 28, 2014
Page 6 of 15
2013 Land Use Inventory Report as of December 31, 2013, Acres of Each Use by Zoning District Land Use Classifications Zoning Districts
B-1 B-2 B-3 BP HMU M-1 M-2 PLI R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 REMU R-MH R-O R-S UMU
Grand
Total
% By
Land Use
AP 3.7 41.2 14.2 83.5 16.2 2.6 0.0 0.2 0.0 1.2 4.1 47.9 214.9 1.7%
CA 3.5 54.3 2.8 12.9 0.2 40.7 1.5 0.3 1.8 0.7 118.8 0.9%
CHURCH 5.2 4.0 0.0 6.6 11.3 28.5 10.6 21.2 0.5 1.5 89.5 0.7%
CR 9.5 267.1 20.4 29.1 3.3 72.0 7.8 1.6 0.5 6.1 16.4 13.9 1.1 448.8 3.5%
DTR 0.0 2.7 2.0 0.1 0.8 38.4 93.1 94.9 21.5 13.8 0.6 268.0 2.1%
GOLF 5.0 0.4 171.5 176.8 1.4%
HM 2.4 94.9 1.0 0.8 0.0 0.3 0.2 99.5 0.8%
LM 6.2 1.2 5.2 8.5 291.4 34.4 0.8 0.7 7.7 4.1 7.7 367.9 2.9%
MFR 17.6 4.8 1.6 0.0 36.8 31.5 243.1 148.4 80.2 2.9 566.9 4.4%
MHMP 2.4 9.8 0.0 12.2 0.0 34.4 22.6 5.0 86.5 0.7%
MIXED 19.2 91.0 14.3 1.2 4.5 62.0 9.4 2.0 0.2 1.4 6.8 16.4 0.0 16.1 24.5 269.0 2.1%
PFP 2.2 10.5 9.7 0.2 20.8 0.7 396.3 0.0 6.9 0.0 4.1 0.0 451.4 3.5%
POS 0.1 38.2 0.2 17.8 26.1 0.1 502.0 242.8 47.5 237.0 72.2 5.0 18.5 108.5 1,316.1 10.3%
RB 1.6 37.3 1.5 0.2 0.2 0.4 41.2 0.3%
ROW 16.1 233.5 46.2 45.1 11.4 212.7 371.5 140.2 355.9 203.1 400.7 143.7 6.8 65.6 87.2 6.7 2,346.6 18.3%
SEF 0.0 0.2 7.4 41.1 4.5 714.7 29.3 4.6 32.3 2.9 25.7 1.2 0.5 864.5 6.8%
SFR 1.5 30.8 7.5 0.0 8.7 12.3 4.7 7.4 698.1 307.5 366.5 137.1 0.0 13.3 98.3 1,693.9 13.2%
UDV 0.4 171.6 92.3 62.9 150.1 153.2 327.9 89.8 304.5 189.0 127.3 31.3 128.3 406.5 2,235.0 17.5%
VACANT 33.4 223.4 0.5 11.6 1.7 62.1 2.2 5.2 78.9 30.8 389.3 160.3 68.2 42.8 31.3 1,141.9 8.9%
Grand Total 91.6 1,319.9 138.5 351.4 39.6 894.7 585.1 1,921.8 1,822.1 821.8 2,124.0 939.1 127.3 124.5 499.1 958.6 38.0 12,797.2 100.0%
% By Zoning
District 0.7% 10.3% 1.1% 2.7% 0.3% 7.0% 4.6% 15.0% 14.2% 6.4% 16.6% 7.3% 1.0% 1.0% 3.9% 7.5% 0.3% 100.0%
320
2013 Annual Land Use Inventory Report February 28, 2014
Page 7 of 15
2012 Land Use Inventory Report as of December 31, 2012, Acres of Each Use by Zoning District
Land Use Classification Zoning Districts
B-1 B-2 B-3 BP HMU M-1 M-2 PLI R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 REMU R-MH R-O R-S UMU Grand Total
% By Land
Use
AG 22.7 38.0 19.0 79.7 0.63%
AP 3.7 41.2 13.2 83.5 16.2 2.6 0.2 1.2 4.8 47.9 214.6 1.69%
CA 3.5 54.3 2.8 12.9 0.2 40.7 1.5 0.8 1.8 0.7 119.3 0.94%
CHURCH 0.0 5.2 4.0 0.0 6.6 11.3 28.5 10.6 0.5 1.5 68.3 0.54%
CR 12.3 265.9 20.6 29.1 3.3 72.0 7.8 1.6 0.5 6.1 6.4 16.3 1.1 443.1 3.50%
DTR 2.7 2.3 0.1 0.8 38.4 93.0 94.6 24.0 9.8 0.6 266.3 2.10%
GOLF 5.0 0.4 171.5 176.8 1.40%
HM 2.4 92.3 0.6 0.8 0.3 0.2 96.5 0.76%
LM 6.2 0.4 5.2 8.6 291.4 34.4 0.8 0.7 8.5 4.1 7.7 368.0 2.91%
MFR 10.9 4.8 1.6 36.8 31.5 203.1 144.2 80.2 2.9 516.0 4.07%
MHMP 2.4 9.8 0.0 12.2 34.4 22.6 5.0 86.5 0.68%
MIXED 16.4 89.9 14.1 1.2 4.5 62.0 9.4 2.0 0.2 1.4 6.8 16.6 16.1 24.5 265.1 2.09%
PFP 2.2 10.5 9.7 0.2 20.8 0.7 398.2 0.0 0.0 5.7 4.1 452.2 3.57%
POS 0.1 38.2 0.2 17.8 26.1 0.1 501.6 230.5 40.8 221.8 70.4 5.0 18.3 108.0 1,278.9 10.10%
RB 1.6 37.0 1.5 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.0 40.9 0.32%
ROW 16.1 229.6 45.3 45.0 11.4 212.7 371.5 138.7 344.8 203.7 396.4 135.5 6.8 65.9 87.8 6.7 2,317.9 18.30%
RR 3.5 3.5 0.03%
SEF 7.4 41.1 4.5 671.4 29.3 4.6 32.3 2.9 25.7 1.2 0.5 820.9 6.48%
SFR 1.5 30.6 6.8 8.7 12.3 1.2 7.4 686.4 303.0 334.9 132.2 14.2 95.5 1,634.7 12.90%
UDV 0.4 118.9 92.3 62.9 150.1 196.5 363.3 89.8 286.3 198.4 127.3 52.6 106.6 406.5 2,251.7 17.77%
VACANT 33.4 256.9 1.0 11.6 1.7 62.1 2.2 0.3 76.5 35.4 401.8 136.6 90.5 25.8 31.3 1,167.2 9.21%
Grand
Total 91.6 1,307.3 135.4 351.4 39.6 894.7 585.1 1,916.9 1,819.9 815.8 2,065.2 917.8 127.3 124.5 499.1 938.7 38.0 12,668.2 100.00%
% By
Zoning
District 0 0.1032 0.01 0.03 0 0.07 0.05 0.1513 0.1437 0.06 0.163 0.07 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.07 0.003 1
321
2013 Annual Land Use Inventory Report February 28, 2014
Page 8 of 15
2011 Land Use Inventory Report as of December 31, 2011, Acres of Each Use by Zoning District
Land use Classifications Zoning Districts
B-1 B-2 B-3 BP HMU M-1 M-2 PLI R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 R-MH R-O R-S UMU Total % By Land Use
AP 4 41 13 84 18 3 0 0 0 1 5 45 212.5 1.70%
CA 4 59 3 13 0 41 1 1 2 1 123.7 0.99%
CHURCH 5 4 0 7 11 28 12 1 2 69.0 0.55%
CR 12 254 21 29 3 65 8 2 0 6 17 16 1 434.8 3.48%
DTR 0 3 2 0 1 38 93 93 24 10 1 264.6 2.12%
GOLF 5 0 171 176.8 1.42%
HM 2 64 1 1 0 0 0 68.2 0.55%
LM 6 0 5 9 294 34 1 0 8 4 8 370.9 2.97%
MFR 11 5 2 0 35 32 241 140 80 3 548.5 4.40%
MHMP 2 10 0 12 0 34 23 5 86.5 0.69%
MIXED 16 89 14 1 4 62 9 2 0 1 7 17 0 16 24 264.0 2.12%
PFP 2 10 10 0 21 1 398 0 0 6 0 1 0 449.1 3.60%
POS 0 43 0 16 25 506 242 52 226 66 5 18 108 1,306.9 10.47%
RB 2 37 1 0 0 0 40.9 0.33%
ROW 16 224 45 50 11 201 372 139 345 203 416 135 7 66 88 7 2,324.5 18.63%
SEF 0 0 7 41 4 671 29 5 32 1 26 1 0 819.5 6.57%
SFR 2 31 7 0 8 12 5 7 682 292 310 131 0 14 91 1,591.4 12.75%
VACANT 34 408 1 126 2 140 152 149 433 125 689 348 53 204 430 31 3,326.0 26.65%
Total 92 1,279 135 378 40 895 585 1,874 1,818 814 2,063 912 125 499 932 38 12,477.9 100.00%
% By Zoning District 0.73% 10.25% 1.08% 3.03% 0.32% 7.17% 4.69% 15.02% 14.57% 6.53% 16.54% 7.31% 1.00% 4.00% 7.47% 0.30% 100.00%
322
2013 Annual Land Use Inventory Report February 28, 2014
Page 9 of 15
2010 Land Use Inventory Report as of December 31, 2010, Acres of Each Use by Zoning District Land Use Classification Zoning Districts
B-1 B-2 B-3 BP HMU M-1 M-2 PLI R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 R-MH R-O R-S UMU Total*
% By
Land Use
AP 4 43 13 80 17 3 0 0 0 1 5 45 210 1.69%
CA 3 47 3 13 0 41 1 1 2 1 112 0.90%
CHURCH 5 4 0 7 11 28 12 2 2 70 0.56%
CR 12 253 21 29 3 64 8 2 0 6 17 16 1 432 3.46%
DTR 0 3 2 0 1 38 93 93 24 10 1 264 2.11%
GOLF 5 2 171 179 1.43%
HM 2 64 1 1 0 0 0 68 0.55%
LM 6 0 5 9 294 34 1 0 8 4 16 378 3.03%
MFR 11 5 2 0 35 31 241 140 80 3 548 4.39%
MHMP 0 2 10 0 12 0 34 23 5 87 0.70%
MIXED 17 87 13 1 4 59 9 2 0 1 7 16 0 18 17 253 2.03%
PFP 2 10 10 0 21 1 398 0 0 6 0 0 448 3.59%
POS 0 41 0 16 25 506 237 52 210 55 5 16 106 1,269 10.17%
RB 2 36 1 0 0 2 41 0.33%
ROW 16 220 45 50 11 201 372 139 345 203 416 134 7 67 88 7 2,320 18.59%
SEF 0 0 7 41 4 671 29 5 32 1 26 1 0 820 6.57%
SFR 1 29 7 0 8 12 5 7 677 286 301 129 0 16 90 1,570 12.58%
VACANT 34 425 1 130 2 144 152 149 443 131 712 361 53 206 433 31 3,409 27.32%
Total* 92 1,273 135 378 40 895 585 1,874 1,818 814 2,063 912 125 505 932 38 12,478 100.00%
% By Zoning
District* 0.74% 10.20% 1.08% 3.03% 0.32% 7.17% 4.69% 15.02% 14.57% 6.53% 16.54% 7.31% 1.00% 4.05% 7.47% 0.30%
100.00
%
*The total land area for this year includes the land use of Right of Way (ROW) which was absent in the prior two years. This changes the total areas.
323
2013 Annual Land Use Inventory Report February 28, 2014
Page 10 of 15
2009 Land Use Inventory Report as of December 31, 2009, Acres of Each Use by Zoning District Land Use Classification Zoning Districts
B-1 B-2 B-3 BP HMU M-1 M-2 PLI R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 R-MH R-O R-S UMU TOTAL*
% By
Land Use
AP 4 43 13 75 17 3 0 0 0 1 6 35 197 1.94%
CA 3 47 3 13 0 41 1 1 2 1 112 1.10%
CHURCH 5 4 0 7 11 11 12 2 2 52 0.51%
CR 12 253 21 29 3 64 8 9 2 0 6 17 16 1 442 4.35%
DTR 0 3 2 0 1 12 93 93 24 10 1 238 2.34%
GOLF 5 2 171 179 1.76%
HM 2 64 1 1 0 0 0 68 0.67%
LM 11 0 10 9 287 34 1 2 0 13 4 19 391 3.85%
MFR 11 5 2 0 35 31 241 139 80 3 547 5.38%
MHMP 5 2 10 0 3 12 10 34 23 5 105 1.03%
MIXED 16 87 13 1 4 59 9 2 0 1 7 16 0 18 17 252 2.48%
PFP 2 10 10 0 13 1 393 0 0 6 0 8 443 4.36%
POS 0 41 0 16 25 506 263 52 210 55 5 26 106 1,305 12.84%
RB 2 36 1 0 0 2 41 0.40%
SEF 0 0 7 41 4 671 29 5 32 1 1 0 794 7.81%
SFR 1 29 7 0 8 12 5 7 673 282 287 128 0 16 88 1,544 15.19%
VACANT 30 464 1 130 2 150 152 149 447 131 744 303 78 206 432 31 3,452 33.98%
TOTAL* 76 1,097 90 327 28 686 214 1,739 1,473 611 1,648 733 118 438 852 31 10,162
100.00
%
% By Zoning District 0.75% 10.80% 0.89% 3.22% 0.28% 6.75% 2.10% 17.11% 14.50% 6.02% 16.21% 7.22% 1.16% 4.31% 8.38% 0.31% 100.00%
* Excludes any land used for ROW. The ROW values were not included in this year’s tabulation due to technical difficulties with the data.
324
2013 Annual Land Use Inventory Report February 28, 2014
Page 11 of 15
2008 Land Use Inventory Report as of December 31, 2008, Acres of Each Use by Zoning District Land Use Classifications Zoning Districts
B-1 B-2 B-3 BP HMU M-1 M-2 PLI R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4
R-
MH R-O R-S UMU Total*
% By
Land
Use*
AP 4 43 13 75 17 3 0 0 0 1 6 35 197 1.95%
C 12 253 21 34 3 64 8 9 2 0 3 17 16 1 443 4.37%
CA 3 47 3 13 0 41 1 1 2 1 112 1.11%
CHURCH 5 4 0 7 11 11 12 2 2 52 0.52%
DTHR 0 3 2 0 1 12 93 93 22 10 1 235 2.32%
GOLF 5 2 171 179 1.76%
HM 2 63 1 1 1 0 0 0 68 0.67%
LM 11 0 5 9 109 34 1 2 0 13 4 19 208 2.05%
MHMP 5 2 10 0 3 12 10 34 23 5 105 1.04%
MHR 11 5 2 0 0 35 31 244 139 80 3 550 5.43%
MIXED 16 86 13 1 4 59 9 2 0 1 7 16 0 18 17 252 2.49%
PF 2 10 10 0 10 1 393 0 0 6 0 8 440 4.34%
PFP 0 41 0 16 25 476 263 52 210 55 5 26 106 1,275 12.58%
RB 2 36 1 0 2 41 0.40%
SEF 0 0 7 41 4 671 29 5 32 1 1 0 794 7.84%
SHR 1 29 7 0 8 12 5 7 669 281 283 128 0 16 87 1,534 15.15%
VACANT 30 464 1 130 2 330 152 149 451 132 750 306 78 206 432 31 3,645 35.98%
Total* 76 1,096 90 327 28 685 214 1,709 1,473 611 1,648 733 118 438 852 31 10,130 100.00%
% By
Zoning
District* 0.75% 10.82% 0.89% 3.23% 0.28% 6.76% 2.11% 16.87% 14.54% 6.03% 16.27% 7.24% 1.16% 4.32% 8.41% 0.31% 100.00%
* Excludes any land used for ROW. The ROW values were not included in this year’s tabulation due to technical difficulties with the data.
325
2013 Annual Land Use Inventory Report February 28, 2014
Page 12 of 15
2007 Land Use Inventory Report as of December 31, 2007, Acres of Each Use by Zoning District
Land Use Classification Zoning Districts
R-S R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4
R-
MH R-O B-1 B-2 B-3 HMU M-1 M-2 BP PLI TOTAL
% BY LAND
USE
SHR 81 650 270 261 94 1 6 0 26 7 8 21 1 0 7 1433 12.0%
DTHR 1 13 92 84 22 0 3 0 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 220 1.8%
MHR 3 35 36 184 135 0 53 0 10 5 0 0 0 1 0 463 3.9%
MHMP 2 0 0 12 0 53 23 0 2 0 0 7 0 0 0 99 0.8%
CHURCH 2 9 2 11 8 0 2 0 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 42 0.3%
GOLF 171 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 174 1.4%
MIXED 8 0 1 7 1 0 6 15 86 13 4 58 9 1 2 213 1.8%
RB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 34 1 0 2 0 0 0 39 0.3%
C 1 2 0 3 17 0 14 11 239 21 4 63 8 31 7 422 3.5%
HM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 59 1 1 1 0 0 0 64 0.5%
CA 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 3 47 3 0 41 1 12 0 111 0.9%
LM 23 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 6 0 9 106 36 19 1 207 1.7%
HI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0%
AP 0 0 0 1 5 0 33 2 36 14 0 17 3 81 16 208 1.7%
PFP 92 261 52 212 60 5 26 0 43 11 0 21 0 20 646 1449 12.1%
SEF 0 27 5 21 1 0 0 1 0 7 0 4 0 41 532 641 5.3%
ROW* 87 345 200 402 129 11 64 16 217 45 11 188 372 57 128 2272 19.0%
VACANT 453 482 138 729 238 78 163 40 461 1 1 393 155 146 455 3932 32.8%
TOTALS 924 1825 796 1930 714 148 399 93 1274 135 40 923 585 409 1794 11988 100.0%
% BY ZONING DISTRICT 7.7% 15.2% 6.6% 16.1% 6.0% 1.2% 3.3% 0.8% 10.6% 1.1% 0.3% 7.7% 4.9% 3.4% 15.0% 100.0%
326
2013 Annual Land Use Inventory Report February 28, 2014
Page 13 of 15
2006 Land Use Inventory Report as of December 31, 2006, Acres of Each Use by Zoning District Land Use Classification Zoning Districts
R-S R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 R-MH R-O B-1 B-2 B-3 HMU M-1 M-2 BP PLI TOTAL
% BY LAND
USE
SHR 77 645 264 242 95 1 6 1 26 7 8 21 1 1 7 1402 13%
DTHR 1 38 90 78 21 0 3 0 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 237 2%
MHR 3 35 31 201 109 0 99 0 9 5 0 0 0 2 0 494 4%
MHMP 2 0 0 12 0 53 23 0 2 0 0 7 0 0 0 99 1%
CHURCH 1 9 2 8 8 0 2 5 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 44 0%
GOLF 171 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 178 2%
MIXED 8 0 1 6 1 0 6 10 76 13 4 56 9 1 2 193 2%
RB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 33 1 0 2 0 0 0 38 0%
C 1 2 1 16 17 0 13 14 256 21 4 66 8 31 7 457 4%
HM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 59 1 1 1 0 0 0 64 1%
CA 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 33 3 0 41 1 15 0 97 1%
LM 23 0 1 0 1 0 4 0 6 0 9 106 36 14 1 201 2%
HI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
AP 0 0 0 1 5 0 32 2 34 14 0 16 3 87 16 210 2%
PFP 102 212 45 178 41 5 21 0 13 11 0 21 0 16 555 1220 11%
SEF 0 9 5 13 1 0 0 1 0 7 0 4 0 41 532 613 6%
ROW 73 310 163 252 91 12 52 15 147 47 11 68 152 44 118 1555 14%
VACANT 459 443 108 843 201 78 96 37 525 1 1 393 155 124 553 4017 36%
TOTALS 921 1708 711 1852 591 149 358 92 1227 137 38 803 365 376 1791 11119 100%
% BY ZONING DISTRICT 8% 15% 6% 17% 5% 1% 3% 1% 11% 1% 0% 7% 3% 3% 16% 100%
327
2013 Annual Land Use Inventory Report February 28, 2014
Page 14 of 15
2005 Land Use Inventory Report as of December 31, 2005, Acres of Each Use by Zoning District Land Use Classification Zoning Districts
R-S R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 R-MH R-O B-1 B-2 B-3 HMU M-1 M-2 BP PLI TOTAL % BY LAND USE
SHR 91 630 253 224 93 1 9 0 26 6 8 20 1 1 13 1376 13%
DTHR 0 38 89 68 20 0 5 0 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 226 2%
MHR 7 38 29 181 98 0 71 0 13 5 0 0 0 3 0 445 4%
MHMP 2 0 0 12 0 53 23 0 2 0 0 7 0 0 0 99 1%
CHURCH 1 9 1 8 5 0 2 7 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 45 0%
GOLF 175 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 182 2%
MIXED 8 0 1 0 0 0 6 6 74 14 4 52 9 1 2 177 2%
RB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 33 1 0 2 0 0 0 38 0%
C 1 2 1 37 17 0 13 11 219 21 4 67 8 39 7 447 4%
HM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 60 1 0 1 0 0 0 64 1%
CA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 33 3 0 41 1 15 0 95 1%
LM 22 0 1 0 1 0 5 0 6 0 3 105 36 15 1 196 2%
HI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
AP 0 0 0 1 3 0 27 2 33 14 0 15 3 73 2 173 2%
PFP 85 150 33 88 35 0 28 0 11 11 0 21 0 16 560 1038 10%
SEF 0 10 5 13 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 5 0 42 539 617 6%
ROW 59 296 163 237 89 10 49 14 145 45 11 62 95 43 116 1434 14%
VACANT 602 346 141 797 190 31 133 35 553 1 1 208 154 153 442 3787 36%
TOTALS 1053 1524 717 1668 552 95 371 82 1219 130 31 607 307 401 1682 10439 100%
% BY ZONING DISTRICT 10% 15% 7% 16% 5% 1% 4% 1% 12% 1% 0% 6% 3% 4% 16% 100%
328
2013 Annual Land Use Inventory Report February 28, 2014
Page 15 of 15
329