HomeMy WebLinkAboutTandem Zone Map Amendment_Part16Page 1 of 14
Z13294, Staff Report for the Tandem Zone Map Amendment
NOTE: UPDATES TO THIS STAFF REPORT THAT HAVE BEEN MADE SINCE ITS PRESENTATION TO THE ZONING COMMISSION AND WHICH WAS PROVIDED TO THE PUBLIC PRIOR TO THE ZONING COMMISSION
PUBLIC HEARING ARE SHOWN IN RED.
Public Hearing Dates: Zoning Commission, February 4, 2014
City Commission, February 24, 2014
Subject: Tandem Zone Map Amendment (ZMA) to change the zoning of approximately
0.27-acres from R-3, Residential Medium Density District to B-2, Community
Business District on property located on the northwest corner of the intersection of
North 6th Avenue and West Villard Street, addressed as 601 West Villard Street, Application Z13294.
Location: 601 West Villard Street and legally described as Lots 8 and 9, Block 3, Violette
Addition to the City of Bozeman, Section Twelve, Township Two South Range Five
East PMM, Gallatin County, Montana.
Recommendation: Approval of the zone map amendment with contingencies.
Recommended Motion: Having reviewed and considered the application materials, public comment, and all of the information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented
in the staff report for application Z13294 and move to recommend approval of the
Zone Map Amendment with the identified contingencies.
Report Date: Thursday, January 30, 2014 (Updated February 13, 2014 for presentation to the City Commission)
Staff Contact: Chris Saunders, Policy and Planning Manager
Agenda Item Type: Action- Legislative
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Unresolved Issues
There are no unresolved issues with this ZMA application that prohibit its review.
Project Summary
The property owner and applicant has made application for a Zone Map Amendment (ZMA)
to amend the City of Bozeman Zone Map from R-3, Residential Medium Density District to B-2, Community Business District for approximately 0.27 acres located northwest of the
intersection of North 6th Avenue and West Villard Street. The site is within the North 7th
Avenue Entryway Corridor Overlay District. The site includes an existing building that has
been in use for commercial/office uses since its construction in 1957. In 2008, the City Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit to allow a significant remodel of the
168
Z13294, Staff Report for the Tandem Zone Map Amendment Page 2 of 14
building and reconfiguration of the parking area for medical office uses as the Bozeman
Birth Center.
In 2009, as part of the overall Bozeman Community Plan growth policy update, the
designated land use for this property was changed from “Residential” to “Community Commercial Mixed Use.”
The Commission must consider all the data, information and public comment to determine if this
is a suitable location for B-2 zoning. No public comment has been received on the application.
This ZMA application must be reviewed solely on whether it meets the criteria for a zone map
amendment in Section 76-2-304 MCA as reviewed in this staff report. These criteria are:
A. Be in accordance with a growth policy.
B. Secure safety from fire and other dangers.
C. Promote public health, public safety, and general welfare.
D. Facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks, and
other public requirements.
E. Reasonable provision of adequate light and air.
F. The effect on motorized and non-motorized transportation systems.
G. Promotion of compatible Urban Growth.
H. Character of the district.
I. Peculiar suitability for particular uses.
J. Conserving the value of buildings.
K. Encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout the jurisdictional area.
Following evaluation of the ZMA criteria, the Development Review Committee (DRC)
recommends approval of the application with contingencies.
2-4-14 Zoning Commission Meeting Supplement
The Zoning Commission held a public hearing and considered the application on February 4,
2014. The Zoning Commission recommended approval of the application. The audio/visual
recording/minutes from this meeting can be accessed at the following link:
http://www.avcaptureall.com/Sessions.aspx#session.8d387120-b383-454a-81dc-
8c6a4338146c
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... 1
Unresolved Issues ............................................................................................................... 1
169
Z13294, Staff Report for the Tandem Zone Map Amendment Page 3 of 14
Project Summary ................................................................................................................. 1
2-4-14 Zoning Commission Meeting Supplement .............................................................. 2
ALTERNATIVES..................................................................................................................... 3
SECTION 1 - MAP SERIES .................................................................................................... 4
SECTION 2 - RECOMMENDED CONTINGENCIES OF APPROVAL ............................... 5
SECTION 3 - RECOMMENDATION AND FUTURE ACTIONS ........................................ 6
SECTION 4 - STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS ............................................................. 6
Section 76-2-304, MCA (Zoning) Criteria: ........................................................................ 6
APPENDIX A –AFFECTED ZONING AND GROWTH POLICY PROVISIONS ............. 10
APPENDIX B – DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND.............. 14
APPENDIX C – NOTICING AND PUBLIC COMMENT ................................................... 14
APPENDIX D - OWNER INFORMATION AND REVIEWING STAFF............................ 14
FISCAL EFFECTS ................................................................................................................. 14
ALTERNATIVES
1) Recommend approval of the zone map amendment as recommended by the Development
Review Committee and the Zoning Commission.
2) Recommend denial of the zone map amendment request.
3) Recommend denial of the zone map amendment request and consider recommending a
zoning designation different than what has been requested by the applicant.
170
Z13294, Staff Report for the Tandem Zone Map Amendment Page 4 of 14
SECTION 1 - MAP SERIES
Current Zoning – 2012 Aerial Photo – Figure 1.1
North: Zoned: R-3 (Residential Medium Density District) - Use: Residential, Single Household
South: Zoned: B-2 (Community Business District) - Use: Commercial/Motel
East: Zoned: R-3 (Residential Medium Density District) - Use: Residential Single
Household
West: Zoned: B-2 (Community Business District) - Use: Commercial/Restaurant
Note: Whittier Elementary School, while not directly adjacent to the subject property, is in proximity north to the subject property as depicted on the above map.
171
Z13294, Staff Report for the Tandem Zone Map Amendment Page 5 of 14
Growth Policy – Future Land Use Map – Figure 3.1
SECTION 2 - RECOMMENDED CONTINGENCIES OF APPROVAL
Please note that these contingencies are necessary for the City to complete the process of the
proposed amendment if the City Commission approves the application.
Recommended Contingencies of Approval:
1. That all documents and exhibits necessary to amend the City of Bozeman Zoning Map
shall be identified as the “Tandem Zone Map Amendment”.
2. That the applicant submit a zone amendment map, titled “Tandem Zone Map
Amendment”, on a 24” by 36” mylar, 8 ½” by 11”, or 8 ½” by 14” paper exhibit, and a
digital copy of the area to be zoned, acceptable to the Director of Public Works, which
will be utilized in the preparation of the Ordinance to officially amend the City of
Bozeman Zoning Map. Said map shall contain a metes and bounds legal description of the perimeter of the subject property and zoning districts, and total acreage of the
property.
172
Z13294, Staff Report for the Tandem Zone Map Amendment Page 6 of 14
3. That the Ordinance for the Zone Map Amendment shall not be drafted until the applicant
provides a metes and bounds legal description prepared by a licensed Montana surveyor
and map of the area to be rezoned, which will be utilized in the preparation of the
Ordinance to officially amend the zone map.
SECTION 3 - RECOMMENDATION AND FUTURE ACTIONS
Having considered the criteria established for a zone map amendment, Staff recommends
approval with contingencies to enable completion of the required implementing ordinance.
The Development Review Committee (DRC) held meetings on January 15 and 22, 2014 to
consider the ZMA. The DRC found that the application was sufficient for review, did not
identify any infrastructure or regulatory constraints which would impede the approval of the
application, and recommended approval with contingencies.
The Zoning Commission held a public hearing on February 4, 2014 to make a
recommendation to the City Commission on the application. After conducting the public
hearing the Zoning Commission voted 4-0 to recommend approval of the application.
The City Commission is scheduled to consider the application on February 24, 2014.
SECTION 4 - STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS
In considering applications for approval under this title, the advisory boards and City
Commission shall consider the following:
Section 76-2-304, MCA (Zoning) Criteria:
Staff has evaluated the proposed amendment with respect to the criteria as summarized
below. The applicant’s written responses to the criteria are included in their application
materials.
Be in accordance with a growth policy.
Yes. The subject property is designated as “Community Commercial Mixed Use” on Figure
3-1 (Future Land Use Map) of the Bozeman Community Plan as shown on page 5 in Section
1. The B-2, Community Business zone is one of the implementing districts for the
Community Commercial Mixed Use land use designation as shown in Table C-16 of the
Bozeman Community Plan which is in Appendix A. The Table of authorized zoning uses
within the B-2 District is also provided in Appendix A and is highlighted in yellow.
Figure 3-1 (Future Land Use Map) is not the only element of the Growth Policy which must
be considered. There are many goals, objectives, and other text which must also be evaluated.
While not every element will apply to every proposal, a broad evaluation of compliance is
needed. A proposal may comply with Figure 3-1 but not with the other elements of the plan.
To be in accordance with the Growth Policy compliance must be to both Figure 3-1 and the
other plan elements.
173
Z13294, Staff Report for the Tandem Zone Map Amendment Page 7 of 14
The Community Commercial Mixed Use designation of the Bozeman Community Plan states
that, “Activities within this land use category are the basic employment and services
necessary for a vibrant community. Establishments located within these categories draw
from the community as a whole for the employee and customer base and are sized
accordingly. A broad range of functions including retail, education, professional and
personal services, offices, residences, and general service activities typify this designation.”
Supportive examples of applicable goals and objectives of the Bozeman Community Plan for
this application include:
Chapter 2 – Addressing Growth and Change
Objective G-2.2 Strive to maintain a balanced supply of land for the variety of uses
necessary to support a vigorous city.
Chapter 3 - Land Use
Objective LU-2.3 Encourage redevelopment and intensification, especially with mixed
uses, of brownfields and underutilized property within the City consistent with the City’s
adopted standards. Using this approach rehabilitate corridor based commercial uses into
a pattern more supportive of the principles supported by commercial centers.
Goal LU-1: Create a sense of place that varies throughout the City, efficiently provides public and private basic services and facilities in close proximity to where people live and
work, and minimizes sprawl.
Chapter 4 – Community Quality
Objective C-1.3 Support compatible infill within the existing area of the City rather than
developing land requiring expansion of the City’s area.
Objective C-4-4 Provide for the protection of character and the enhancement of services
in existing residential neighborhoods.
Chapter 8 Economic Development
Objective ED-2.4 Foster a diverse economy that will protect the economic climate for
existing businesses and maintain opportunities for business expansion.
The amendment will support the continuation of basic services in close proximity to
neighborhoods, supporting businesses, public amenities, and municipal services. The
development of the Birth Center was an intensification from the previous use to better utilize
the site. The Birth Center is compatible infill that protects the character of the existing
residential neighborhood and enhances services available to City residents. The site supports the North 7th Avenue business corridor and Tax Increment Finance District.
In considering the appropriateness of a particular zoning district for a site, it is appropriate to
consider what district will most fully advance the community plan goals. As a zone map
amendment is a legislative, not quasi-judicial, matter the City has broad discretion to decide
the course considered most suitable.
174
Z13294, Staff Report for the Tandem Zone Map Amendment Page 8 of 14
The B-2 Community Business zoning designation requested is consistent with the
Community Commercial Mixed Use land use designation and the Growth Policy.
B. Secure safety from fire and other dangers.
Yes. There are no changes proposed to the site or to the building as it exists. The building is
in conformance to the building code and zoning requirements for setbacks, lot coverage,
height limitations and lot sizes to ensure the health, safety and general welfare of the
community. Emergency services are in close proximity to the subject property.
C. Promote public health, public safety, and general welfare.
Yes. The building is in conformance to the building code and zoning requirements for
setbacks, lot coverage, height limitations and lot sizes to ensure the health, safety and general
welfare of the community. Further development of the subject property and any future
modifications to the existing building will be subject to review and compliance pursuant to
applicable building codes which will ensure they are constructed in a manner which reduces
risk for fire, loss during earthquake, are structurally sound, and well fit for their purpose.
The City’s Development Review Committee, (which includes review by the City’s various
Departments), did not identify any concerns in regards to being able to adequately address
the public health, public safety and general welfare as it relates to the proposed zoning
change.
D. Facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools,
parks, and other public requirements.
Yes. The infrastructure and services to the site are existing and will continue to serve the
existing building and use. Any expansion of the use or redevelopment of the site in the
future will require development review. Development review procedures will evaluate
specific needs for additional services. The City’s development standards require
demonstration that adequate services are available. Section 38.07.010.C, BMC states:
“Placement of any given zoning district on an area depicted on the zoning map indicates
a judgment on the part of the city that the range of uses allowed within that district are
generally acceptable in that location. It is not a guarantee of approval for any given use
prior to the completion of the appropriate review procedure and compliance with all of
the applicable requirements and development standards of this chapter and other
applicable policies, laws and ordinances. It is also not a guarantee of immediate
infrastructure availability or a commitment on the part of the city to bear the cost of
extending service.”
E. Reasonable provision of adequate light and air.
Yes. Any expansion of the use or redevelopment of the site in the future would require
development review. The regulatory standards set forth in the Bozeman Municipal Code for
the requested B-2 zoning district provides the necessary provisions (i.e., yard setbacks, lot
175
Z13294, Staff Report for the Tandem Zone Map Amendment Page 9 of 14
coverage, open space and building heights), which are intended to provide for adequate light
and air for any development on the subject property.
F. The effect on motorized and non-motorized transportation systems.
Yes. The building and site are developed and occupied. There is little opportunity for
additional intensity of development on the site as a result of the map amendment. No
additional impacts to transportation systems are expected.
G. Promotion of Compatible Urban Growth.
Yes. The proposed amendment establishes the use consistent with the Community Plan
including the future land use map.
H. Character of the district.
Yes. This particular property serves as a transitional use area between the more transportation
oriented commercial uses along 7th Avenue and the R-3 residential area to the east. The use is
consistent with the requirements of the B-2 district. The existing building on the site is of a
similar scale as adjacent residential properties and commercial properties.
I. Peculiar suitability for particular uses.
Yes. The existing building was designed and constructed for commercial use. The current
use is consistent with the B-2 list of allowed uses.
J. Conserving the value of buildings.
Yes. The B-2 designation is consistent with the building type and current use. The proposed
zone map amendment conserves the current value and is not detrimental to the value of the
adjacent commercial or residential uses. Designation as a non-conforming zoning standard
can be detrimental to building values. Matching the actual use and the zoning map removes
this issue.
K. Encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout the jurisdictional
area.
Yes. The requested B-2 zoning designation is supportive of the overall intent of the Growth
Policy in regards to appropriate commercial development and the establishment of
commercial centers. The amendment matches the actual development and use of the property
to the designated zoning district.
176
Z13294, Staff Report for the Tandem Zone Map Amendment Page 10 of 14
APPENDIX A –AFFECTED ZONING AND GROWTH POLICY
PROVISIONS
Zoning Designation and Adopted Growth Policy Designation:
The intent of the B-2 Community Business District is “to provide for a broad range of
mutually supportive retail and service functions located in clustered areas bordered on one or
more sides by limited access arterial streets.”
Adopted Growth Policy Designation: Community Commercial Mixed Use: Activities within
this land use category are the basic employment and services necessary for a vibrant
community. Establishments located within these categories draw from the community as a
whole for their employee and customer base and are sized accordingly. A broad range of
functions including retail, education, professional and personal services, offices, residences,
and general service activities typify this designation.
In the “center-based” land use pattern, Community Commercial Mixed Use areas are
integrated with significant transportation corridors, including transit and non-automotive
routes, to facilitate efficient travel opportunities. The density of development is expected to
be higher than currently seen in most commercial areas in Bozeman and should include
multi-story buildings. A Floor Area Ratio in excess of .5 is desired. It is desirable to allow
residences on upper floors, in appropriate circumstances. Urban streetscapes, plazas, outdoor
seating, public art, and hardscaped open space and park amenities are anticipated,
appropriately designed for an urban character. Placed in proximity to significant streets and
intersections, an equal emphasis on vehicle, pedestrian, bicycle, and transit circulation shall
be provided. High density residential areas are expected in close proximity. Including
residential units on sites within this category, typically on upper floors, will facilitate the
provision of services and opportunities to persons without requiring the use of an automobile.
The Community Commercial Mixed Use category is distributed at two different scales to
serve different purposes. Large Community Commercial Mixed Use areas are significant in
size and are activity centers for an area of several square miles surrounding them. These are
intended to service the larger community as well as adjacent neighborhoods and are typically
distributed on a one mile radius. Smaller Community Commercial areas are usually in the 10-
15 acre size range and are intended to provide primarily local service to an area of
approximately one-half mile radius. These commercial centers support and help give identity
to individual neighborhoods by providing a visible and distinctive focal point.
They should typically be located on one or two quadrants of intersections of arterials and/or
collectors. Although a broad range of uses may be appropriate in both types of locations the
size and scale is to be smaller within the local service placements.
Mixed use areas should be developed in an integrated, pedestrian friendly manner and should
not be overly dominated by any single land use. Higher intensity employment and residential
177
Z13294, Staff Report for the Tandem Zone Map Amendment Page 11 of 14
uses are encouraged in the core of the area or adjacent to significant streets and intersections.
As needed, building height transitions should be provided to be compatible with adjacent
development.
Table C-16 Zoning Correlation with Land Use Categories – Indicates that B-2 zoning is one
of the zoning districts envisioned for the “Community Commercial Mixed Use” Growth
Policy Designation.
Following is the Table of B-2 Uses from the Bozeman Municipal Code which indicates the
permitted land uses within the B-2 zoning district.
Sec. 38.08.020. Authorized uses.
A. Uses in the various residential districts are depicted in Table 38.08.020 in subsection C of this section. Principal uses are indicated with a "P," conditional uses are indicated with a "C," accessory uses are indicated with an "A" and uses which are not permitted with the district are indicated by a "-." B. Additional uses for telecommunication uses are contained in article 29 of this chapter.
C. The uses listed are deliberately broad and some are given special definitions in article 42 of this chapter. The intent of this method is to provide general guidance for uses while allowing the unique needs and circumstances of each proposal to be specifically addressed through the review process. Some uses are the subject of special regulations contained in article 22 of this chapter.
Table 38.10.020
Table of Commercial Uses Authorized Uses
B-1 B-2 B-3
Ambulance service — P P
Apartments and apartment buildings6, as defined in this chapter P P1/C P3
Arts and entertainment center, as defined in this chapter P P P
178
Z13294, Staff Report for the Tandem Zone Map Amendment Page 12 of 14
Automobile fuel sales or repair, as defined in this chapter C C C
Automobile parking lot or garage (public or private) P P P
Automobile washing establishment C P C
Banks and other financial institutions P P P
Business, technical or vocational school — C P3
Bus terminals — C C
Community centers P P P3
Community residential facilities with eight or fewer residents P P1/C P3
Community residential facilities serving nine or more residents — C —
Convenience uses C P C
Convenience use restaurant P P P
Day care centers P P P
Essential services (Type I) P P P
Essential services (Type II) — P P
Extended-stay lodgings — P P
Food processing facilities — C —
Frozen food storage and locker rental — P —
Health and exercise establishments P1/C P P
Hospitals — P C
Hotel or motel — P P
Laboratories, research and diagnostic — P P3
Laundry, dry cleaning — C C
Light goods repair, as defined in this chapter — C A
Lodginghouses — C C3
Manufacturing, light and completely indoors — C —
Mortuary — C C
179
Z13294, Staff Report for the Tandem Zone Map Amendment Page 13 of 14
Museum — C C
Medical and dental clinics P1/C P P
Meeting hall — P P
Offices, as defined in this chapter P1/C P P3
Other buildings and structures typically accessory to permitted uses A A A
Parking facilities P P P3
Personal and convenience services, as defined in this chapter P P P
Pet grooming shop P P P
Printing offices and publishing establishments — — C
Private club, fraternity, sorority or lodge — P P
Public buildings P P P
Refuse and recycling containers A A A
Research laboratories — P P
Restaurants P5 P P
Retail uses, as defined in this chapter P2 P2 P2
Retail, large scale — P —
Sales of alcohol for on-premises consumption7 C C C
Sign paint shops (not including neon sign fabrication) — P C
Upholstery shops (excluding on site upholstery service for cars, boats,
trailers, trucks and other motorized vehicles requiring overnight
storage)
— P P3
Veterinary clinic — C —
Wholesale distributors with on-premises retail outlets, providing
warehousing is limited to commodities which are sold on the premises
— C —
Wholesale establishments that use samples, but do not stock on
premises
— P P
Any use, except adult businesses and casinos approved as part of a
planned unit development subject to the provisions of article 20 of this
chapter
C C C
180
Z13294, Staff Report for the Tandem Zone Map Amendment Page 14 of 14
Notes: 1When located on the second or subsequent floor, or basement as defined in article 42 of this chapter. 2Excluding adult businesses, and large scale retail, as they are defined in article 42 of this chapter. 3Except on ground floor in the core area as defined in this article. 4Private arts instruction shall only be on the second or subsequent floor in the core area as defined in this article. 5Exclusive of drive-ins. 6May be subject to the provisions of chapter 10, article 8. 7Also subject to chapter 4, article 2.
(Ord. No. 1645, § 18.18.020, 8-15-2005; Ord. No. 1693, § 5(18.18.020), 2-20-2007; Ord. No. 1709, § 3(18.18.020), 7-16-2007; Ord. No. 1761, exh. B(18.18.020), 7-6-2009; Ord. No. 1838, § 4, 9-10-2012)
APPENDIX B – DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The property owner/applicant has made application to the Department of Community
Development for a Zone Map Amendment to change the zoning of approximately 0.27-acres
from R-3 (Residential Medium Density District) to B-2 (Community Business District) at the
northwest corner of the intersection of North 6th Avenue and West Villard Street, known as 601
West Villard Street. The site is within the North 7th Avenue Entryway Corridor Overlay District.
The Bozeman Community Plan Land Use Map land use designation for the property is
Community Commercial Mixed Use.
APPENDIX C – NOTICING AND PUBLIC COMMENT
Notice of the application was provided pursuant to Section 38.41.030 BMC. Notice was
submitted on Thursday, January 9, 2014 to the Bozeman Daily Chronicle for publication in the
legal section on Sunday, January 12, 2014; posting a notice prominently on site using the City
standard notice format and sign post on January 10, 2014; and mailed first class mail to property
owner within 200 feet of the property, and through the Neighborhood Recognition requirements
on January 10, 2014. Notice was provided at least 15 days prior to the Zoning Commission
public hearing date of February 4, 2014 and the City Commission public hearing date of
February 24, 2014.
No public comment was received prior to completion of this report. No public comment was
received at the Zoning Commission’s public hearing.
APPENDIX D - OWNER INFORMATION AND REVIEWING STAFF
Owner/Applicant: Tandem Enterprises LLC, 36 Convict Grade Road, Livingston MT 59047
Representative: Intrinsik Architecture, Inc., Susan Riggs, 111 North Tracy Avenue, Bozeman,
MT 59715
FISCAL EFFECTS
The proposed amendment will not affect any budgeted items. No material effect on future
revenues or expenditures are expected as a result of this action.
181
Page 1 of 8
MINUTES - DRAFT
CITY OF BOZEMAN ZONING COMMISSION,
CITY COMMISSION ROOM, CITY HALL 121 NORTH ROUSE AVENUE TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 04, 2014
6:00 P.M.
ITEM 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ATTENDANCE
06:04:37 PM Erik Garberg called the meeting to order at 6:05 p.m.
Board Chair - Erik Garberg: Present
Board Member - Julien Morice: Present Board Member - George Thompson: Present Board Member - Trever McSpadden: Present City Commission Liaison Mayor Jeff Krauss: Present
Staff present was Community Development Staff Doug Riley, Chris Saunders, Dustin Johnson and Wendy Thomas, City Attorney Greg Sullivan and Deputy City Clerk Aimee Brunckhorst (Aimee
until 9:15 p.m.)
06:05:34 PM ITEM 2. PUBLIC COMMENT (Limited to any public matter within the jurisdiction of the Zoning Commission and not scheduled on this agenda. There is a three-minute time limit per speaker.)
Chairperson Erik Garberg opened public comment. Seeing none, he closed general public comment.
06:05:52 PM ITEM 3. MINUTES OF JANUARY 07, 2014
It was moved by Julien Morice, seconded by Trever McSpadden to approve the minutes of January 7, 2014 as submitted. The motion passed 4-0.
Chair Erik Garberg provided a review of the process that will be used for this Zoning Commission
public hearing.
06:08:14 PM
ITEM 5. PROJECT REVIEW
1. Tandem ZMA #13294 Zone Map Amendment application requested by owner Tandem
Enterprises LLC, 36 Convict Grade Road, Livingston MT 59047-9337, and representative
Intrinsik Architecture, Inc., Attn: Susan Riggs, 111 North Tracy Avenue, Bozeman MT
59715. To rezone approximately 0.27-acres from R-3 (Residential Medium Density District)
182
Zoning Commission Minutes of February 4, 2014
Page 2 of 8
to B-2 (Community Business District), upon property located at 601 West Villard Street and
legally described as Lots 8 & 9, Block 3, Violett Addition To City Of Bozeman, Section
Twelve, Township Two South, Range Five East, PMM, Gallatin County, Montana. (Jacobs)
06:08:18 PM Chris Saunders, from the Department of Community Development provided the staff
report on this item.
06:13:28 PM Applicant Presentation, Susan Riggs with Intrinsik Architecture
Ms. Riggs provided the staff presentation on this item.
06:14:55 PM
Public Comment
Chairperson Erik Garberg opened public comment on this item.
Seeing none, he closed public comment on this item.
Trever McSpadden moved, Julien Morice seconded that having reviewed and considered the
application materials, public comment and information presented by staff, I hereby adopt the
findings presented in the staff report for application and move to recommend the approval of
the Zone Map Amendment to the City Commission with the identified contingencies.
Board Member - Trever McSpadden: Motion
Board Member - Julien Morice: 2nd
Board Chair - Erik Garberg: Approve
Board Member - Julien Morice: Approve
Board Member - George Thompson: Approve
Board Member - Trever McSpadden: Approve
The motion passed 4-0.
2. 06:23:35 PM
Campus Crest ZMA # Z13268 A Zone Map Amendment application requested by owner
Bon Ton Inc; Gene Graf, PO Box 906, Bozeman, MT 59771-0906, Campus Crest
Development, LLC; Chris Russ, 2100 Rexford Road #414, Charlotte, NC 28211 and the
representative is Madison Engineering LLC; Chris Budeski, 895 Technology Blvd., Suite
203, Bozeman, MT 59718 to change the zoning of approximately 5.0 acres of R-3
(Residential Medium Density District); approximately 10.6 acres of R-1 (Residential Single
Household Low Density District) and approximately 0.39 acres of R-2 (Residential Two
Household Medium Density District) to R-4 (Residential Two Household Medium
Density District), Application Z13268. The property is legally described as a portion of
remainder Tract A in Phase II of the Allison Subdivision. The property is currently vacant
but is generally described as south of Opportunity Way and east of what would be South 11th
183
Zoning Commission Minutes of February 4, 2014
Page 3 of 8
Avenue extended. (Riley)
06:23:54 PM Doug Riley from the Department of Community Development provided the staff
presentation on this item.
06:33:54 PM Doug Riley summarized the staff findings for this applicant as seen in the staff report. 06:57:53 PM
The Zoning Commission asked questions of staff.
06:59:52 PM George Thompson 07:00:43 PM Doug Riley 07:01:12 PM George Thompson
07:03:13 PM Doug Riley
07:03:35 PM George Thompson
07:04:07 PM Doug Riley 07:04:52 PM George Thompson 07:05:34 PM Doug Riley
07:06:38 PM George Thompson
07:07:09 PM Erik Garberg
07:07:34 PM Doug Riley 07:07:49 PM Julien Morice 07:09:00 PM Doug Riley
07:10:00 PM Chris Saunders
07:13:00 PM Julien Morice
07:15:11 PM Trever McSpadden 07:15:58 PM Doug Riley 07:16:31 PM Trever McSpadden
07:16:51 PM Mayor Jeff Krauss
07:17:20 PM Dustin Johnson, Engineering
07:17:40 PM Mayor Krauss 07:18:04 PM Dustin Johnson
07:19:15 PM Mike Hartnett, representing Campus Crest Communities based in Charlotte,
North Carolina, Applicant
Mr. Hartnett provided the application presentation on this item.
Mayor Krauss called a point of order.
07:21:36 PM Greg Sullivan, City Attorney
Mr. Hartnett continued the presentation on this item.
07:29:38 PM Questions for the Applicant
07:29:48 PM George Thompson 07:30:38 PM George Thompson
184
Zoning Commission Minutes of February 4, 2014
Page 4 of 8
07:31:29 PM Mr. Hartnett, Applicant
07:32:27 PM George Thompson
07:33:26 PM Erik Garberg
07:33:51 PM Julien Morice 07:34:12 PM Mr. Hartnett, Applicant
07:34:39 PM Erik Garberg gave guidance for how public testimony can be provided.
07:36:07 PM Public Comment
Chairperson Erik Garberg opened public comment.
07:36:21 PM Brett Sneyder, , Public Comment
Mr. Sneyder provided public comment.
07:39:38 PM Rick Meis, Public Comment Mr. Meis of 704 West Arnold provided public comment.
07:42:53 PM John King, Public Comment
Mr. King of 2604 Westridge Drive provided public comment. 07:45:07 PM Travis Horton, Public Comment
Mr. Horton of 507 Staudaher Street provided public comment.
07:47:29 PM Allison Harmon, Public Comment Ms. Harmon of 2805 Secor Avenue provided public comment.
07:49:21 PM Jennifer King, Public Comment
Ms. King of 515 West Arnold provided public comment.
07:51:42 PM Klett King, Public Comment Mr. King of 515 West Arnold provided public comment.
07:53:46 PM Jen Grace, Public Comment
Ms. Grace of 2512 Landoe Ave provided public comment. 07:56:53 PM Susan Bolgiano, Public Comment
Ms. Bolgiano of 704 W. Arnold provided public comment.
07:59:34 PM Dexter Wester, Public Comment Mr. Wester of 2601 Westridge Drive provided public comment.
08:02:25 PM Stacey Lunden, Public Comment
Ms. Lunden of 517 West Arnold provided public comment.
08:05:29 PM Dan Stevenson, Public Comment Mr. Stevenson of 3009 Westridge Drive provided public comment.
185
Zoning Commission Minutes of February 4, 2014
Page 5 of 8
08:08:45 PM Greg Adams, Public Comment
Mr. Adams of 1014 Brookdale Drive provided public comment.
08:12:07 PM Christine Phillips, Public Comment Ms. Phillips of 2807 Westridge Drive provided public comment.
08:14:59 PM Katie Delong, Public Comment
Ms. Delong of Brookdale Drive provided public comment.
08:18:46 PM Scott Humphrey, Public Comment
Mr. Humphrey of 3298 Gardenbrook Lane provided public comment.
08:21:55 PM Tom Schmidt, Public Comment
Mr. Schmidt of 815 West Arnold provided public comment. 08:24:34 PM Jim McKenna, Public Comment
Mr. McKenna of 505 West Arnold provided public comment.
08:27:08 PM Craig Brawner, Public Comment Mr. Brawner of 703 West Arnold Street provided public comment.
08:31:05 PM Julie Chananzea Public Comment
Ms. Chananzea of 735 West Arnold provided public comment.
08:34:12 PM Jason Lunden, Public Comment
Mr. Lunden of 517 West Arnold provided public comment.
08:36:06 PM Carol Wester, Public Comment
Ms. Wester of 2601 Westridge Drive provided public comment. 08:39:08 PM Missey Dore, Public Comment
Ms. Dore of 64 Hitching Post Road provided public comment.
08:40:29 PM Andy Sherman, Public Comment Mr. Sherman of 3006 Westridge Drive provided public comment.
08:43:35 PM Brian Hollowell, Public Comment
Mr. Hollowell of 2911 Westridge Drive provided public comment.
08:45:28 PM Ginger Dynneson, Public Comment
Ms. Dynneson of 3005 Westridge Drive provided public comment.
08:46:35 PM James Irving, Public Comment
Mr. Irving of 2900 Secor Avenue provided public comment.
186
Zoning Commission Minutes of February 4, 2014
Page 6 of 8
08:49:51 PM Sara Rushing, Public Comment
Ms. Rushing of 208 Westridge Drive provided public comment.
08:50:48 PM Rosie Wallander, Public Comment Ms. Wallander of 2407 Westridge Drive provided public comment.
08:52:02 PM Rance Harmon, Public Comment
Mr. Harmon of 2805 Secor Avenue provided public comment.
08:54:31 PM Patrick Schmidt, Public Comment
Mr. Schmidt of 815 West Arnold provided public comment.
08:57:42 PM Brad Ebel, Public Comment
Mr. Ebel of 2605 Westridge Drive provided public comment. 09:00:47 PM Janet Yeomans, Public Comment
Ms. Yeomans of 3155 Madrona Lane provided public comment.
09:02:00 PM Crystal Boxwell, Public Comment Ms. Boxwell of 8 West Arnold Street provided public comment.
09:02:51 PM Deborah Kimball Robinson, Public Comment
Ms. Kimball Robinson of 2308 South 3rd provided public comment.
09:04:38 PM Mike Hartnett, Applicant Rebuttal
Mr. Hartnett provided applicant rebuttal to the public comment.
09:07:29 PM Greg Sullivan, City Attorney
09:08:30 PM Break
09:18:42 PM Back from Break
09:19:31 PM It was moved by Julien Morice, seconded by George Thompson that having reviewed and
considered the application materials, public comment and the information presented by staff, I
hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application Z13268 and move to
recommend approval of the Zone Map Amendment to the City Commission with the identified
contingencies.
09:19:57 PM Discussion on the motion.
09:20:20 PM Mayor Krauss
09:22:06 PM George Thompson
09:26:41 PM Trever McSpadden 09:32:42 PM Julien Morice
09:32:45 PM George Thompson
187
Zoning Commission Minutes of February 4, 2014
Page 7 of 8
09:36:32 PM Trever McSpadden
09:38:10 PM Julien Morice
09:38:47 PM Erik Garberg
09:40:30 PM Julien Morice 09:41:47 PM Trever McSpadden
09:43:08 PM Mayor Krauss
09:44:55 PM Trever McSpadden
09:45:55 PM Mayor Krauss
09:46:38 PM Erik Garberg 09:47:41 PM Trever McSpadden
09:49:42 PM George Thompson
09:52:43 PM Julien Morice
09:55:47 PM Trever McSpadden
09:56:28 PM Julien Morice 09:57:00 PM Erik Garberg
09:57:15 PM Julien Morice
10:00:08 PM Erik Garberg
10:00:25 PM Trever McSpadden
10:01:58 PM Erik Garberg 10:03:02 PM Julien Morice
10:05:22 PM Trever McSpadden
10:08:05 PM George Thompson
10:10:09 PM Trevor McSpadden
10:10:20 PM George Thompson 10:11:06 PM Erik Garberg
10:12:24 PM
Vote on the motion that having reviewed and considered the application materials, public
comment and the information presented by staff, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application Z13268 and move to recommend approval of the Zone Map Amendment to the City Commission with the identified contingencies.
Julien Morice - Nay
George Thompson - Nay Trever McSpadden - Aye Erik Garberg - Aye The motion failed 2-2 with Julien Morice and George Thompson opposed.
ITEM 5. NEW BUSINESS ITEM 4. 10:15:11 PM ELECTION OF OFFICERS This item was moved from item 4 to item 6.
It was moved by Erik Garberg, seconded by Trever McSpadden to appoint Erik Garberg as
the chairperson of the Zoning Commission.
188
Zoning Commission Minutes of February 4, 2014
Page 8 of 8
It was moved by Julien Morice, seconded by Erik Garberg to appoint Trever McSpadden as the vice-chair of the Zoning Commission.
Erik McSpadden informed the Commission that his term is expired and he is holding office just until his replacement is appointment.
The motion passed 4-0.
10:17:41 PM Erik Garberg Bylaws need updated
10:18:02 PM Greg Sullivan
Mr. Sullivan reminded the Zoning Commission that Model Rules of Procedure have been created for
the Commission. 10:18:53 PM Questions were raised regarding whether the Zoning Commission and Planning Board
could ever be combined.
10:20:26 PM Greg Sullivan said he could come back to a future meeting in the next couple months to answer related questions on this subject.
10:21:40 PM ADJOURNMENT
This meeting is open to all members of the public. If you have a disability that requires assistance,
please contact ADA Coordinator, James Goehrung, at 582-3200 (voice) or 582-2301/582-2432
(TDD).
189
601 West Villard
Zone Map
Amendment
December 2013
190
Narrative
This Zone Map Amendment (ZMA) Application seeks to rezone the Bozeman Birth
Center property located at 601 West Villard Street from R-3 (Residential Medium
Density District) to B-2 (Community Business District).
The building was constructed in 1957 and served a variety of uses over the years
including offices and storage. In 2008, the City Commission approved Conditional Use
Permit (CUP) Application #Z-08012 which allowed the Bozeman Birth Center to reuse
the building as a medical office. Significant investment was made in the property with
major building renovations and site improvements including a new parking lot and
extensive landscaping.
In 2011, as part of the overall Community Plan update, the City Commission changed
the land use designation for this property from “Residential” to “Community
Commercial Mixed Use.”
This application is extremely straightforward to simply make the zoning match
the growth policy.
It is essential to note that in accordance with Table C-16 of the Unified Development
Code (UDC) which correlates zoning designations and land use categories, the
existing R-3 zoning is not in compliance with the existing land use designation whereas
the proposed zoning designation of B-2 would be in compliance with the existing land
use designation.
Please refer to the attached exhibits for more information.
191
192
Response to Criteria
1) Is the new zoning designed in accordance with the comprehensive plan?
Yes. The new zoning designation of B-2 (Community Business District) directly
corresponds with the Bozeman Community Plan land use designation of
“Community Commercial Mixed Use.” Note that the existing zoning designation of
R-3 (Residential Medium Density District) does not comply with the comprehensive
plan.
2) Is the zoning designed to lessen congestion in the streets?
Neutral. The existing building and site are already developed and occupied.
3) Will the new zoning promote health and general welfare?
Yes. The proposed zoning will also allow the existing building and existing use to
continue to provide an important community service.
4) Will the new zoning secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers?
Neutral. The 2008 remodel of the building and corresponding site upgrades already
meet and will continue to meet zoning and building codes.
5) Will the new zoning provide adequate light and air?
Neutral. All zoning districts within the City of Bozeman are designed with standards
that will ensure adequate light and air. Again, the building and site were upgraded
in 2008 to meet all current code standards.
6) Will the new zoning prevent the overcrowding of land?
Neutral. There are no existing or proposed residential uses on the property. If any
residential uses are proposed at any time in the future, corresponding parkland and
open space (or parkland/open space equivalent) will be required.
7) Will the new zoning avoid the undue concentration of population?
Neutral. The B-2 District is designed primarily for commercial uses rather than
residential uses and occupancy restrictions are in place. All of Bozeman’s zoning
districts are designed to avoid the undue concentration of population.
8) Will the new zoning facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water,
sewer, schools, parks, fire, police, and other public requirements?
Neutral. The existing infrastructure has and will continue to serve the existing
building and use regardless of the zoning designation.
193
Response to Criteria (continued)
9) Does the new zoning give consideration to the peculiar suitability of the
property for particular uses?
Yes. Again, the new zoning designation is more far more appropriate to the existing
and historical uses of the building and site. As previously noted, the building was
constructed as a commercial building and has been used by a variety of
commercial businesses over the years.
10) Does the new zoning give reasonable consideration to the character of the
district?
Yes. The dimensional standards of the B-2 zoning designation are more
appropriate to the character of this portion of West Villard Street. The Birth Center
provides a perfect transition from the pizza restaurant directly west and the hotel
directly the south to the residential neighborhood to the east.
11) Was the new zoning adopted with a view to conserving the value of
buildings?
Yes. The proposed zoning designation of B-2 will allow the existing commercial
building to remain.
12) Will the new zoning encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout
such county or municipal area?
Yes. The Bozeman Community Plan, which included an extensive public process,
has determined that this property is best suited for the “Community Commercial
Mixed Use” land use designation. The only zoning districts allowed in this
designation are: B-1 (Neighborhood Business District), B-2 (Community Business
District), UMU (Urban Mixed Use District) and PLI (Public Lands and Institutions
District). Based on the existing building and uses as well as the adjacent zoning
district to both the west and south, the B-2 zone is the best fit for this property.
194
Page 1 Appropriate Review Fee Submitted
CITY OF BOZEMAN FEE APPLIES- $
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building
20 East Olive Street
P.O. Box 1230
Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230
phone 406-582-2260
fax 406-582-2263
planning@bozeman.net
www.bozeman.net
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION
1. Name of Project/Development:
2. Property Owner Information:
Name: E-mail Address:
Mailing Address:
Phone: FAX:
3. Applicant Information:
Name: E-mail Address:
Mailing Address:
Phone: FAX:
4. Representative Information:
Name: E-mail Address:
Mailing Address:
Phone: FAX:
5. Legal Description:
6. Street Address:
7. Project Description:
8. Zoning Designation(s): 9. Current Land Use(s):
10. Bozeman Community Plan Designation:
11. Gross Area: Acres: Square Feet: 12. Net Area:Acres: Square Feet:
601 West Villard ZMA
Tandem Enterprises LLC
[same as above]
605 West Villard Street
Zone Map Amendment to update zoning to correspond to current Bozeman
Community Plan Designation (from R-3 to B-2)
Existing: R-3;
Proposed B-2
Bozeman Birth Center
(similar to medical offices)
Community Commercial Mixed Use
0.268
VIOLETT ADD, S12, T02 S, R05 E, BLOCK 3, Lot 8 - 9, PLAT E-1
sriggs@intrinsikarchitecture.comIntrinsik Architecture, Inc.
contact: Susan Riggs, AICP
111 North Tracy Avenue, Bozeman MT 59715
406-582-8988
36 Convict Grade Road, Livingston MT 59047-9337
rbaergmt@gmail.com
406-223-3007
11,660 0.268 11,660
195
196
ZONING MAP OR UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TEXT AMENDMENT CHECKLIST
This checklist shall be completed and returned as part of the submittal. Any item checked “No” or “N/A” (not applicable)
must be explained in a narrative attached to the checklist. Incomplete submittals will be returned to the applicant.
A. Amendment Type. What type of amendment is being requested? (check all that apply)
Zoning Map Amendment
Unified Development Code Amendment – Zoning Provisions
Unified Development Code Amendment – Subdivision Provisions
B. Zoning Map or UDC Zoning Provision Amendment Criteria. For Zoning Map Amendments and Unified
Development Code Text Amendments involving zoning provisions, written responses for each of the following
criteria shall be provided.
Are written responses for the following criteria provided?
Zoning Provision Criteria Yes No N/A
1. Is the new zoning designed in accordance with the comprehensive plan?
2. Is the zoning designed to lessen congestion in the streets?
3. Will the new zoning promote health and general welfare?
4. Will the new zoning secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers?
5. Will the new zoning provide adequate light and air?
6. Will the new zoning prevent the overcrowding of land?
7. Will the new zoning avoid the undue concentration of population?
8. Will the new zoning facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewer,
schools, parks, fire, police, and other public requirements?
9. Does the new zoning give consideration to the peculiar suitability of the property for
particular uses?
10. Does the new zoning give reasonable consideration to the character of the district?
11. Was the new zoning adopted with a view to conserving the value of buildings?
12. Will the new zoning encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout such
county or municipal area?
C. UDC Subdivision Provision Criteria. For Unified Development Code Text Amendments involving subdivision
provisions, written responses for each of the following criteria shall be provided.
Are written responses for the following criteria provided?
Subdivision Provision Criteria Yes No N/A
1. Will the amendment provide for the orderly development of the jurisdictional area?
2. Will the amendment provide for the coordination of roads within subdivided land
with other roads, both existing and planned?
3. Will the amendment provide for the dedication of land for roadways and for public
utility easements?
4. Will the amendment provide for the improvement of roads?
Page 3
(Zoning Map or Unified Development Ordinance Text Amendment Checklist – Prepared 12/05/03, revised 9/20/04, revised 11/14/11)
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
197
198
CERTIFICATE OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
I, , hereby certify that, to the best of my
knowledge, the attached name and address list of all adjoining property owners (including all individual
condominium owners) within 200 feet of the property located at
, is a true and accurate list from the last declared Gallatin County tax
records. I further understand that an inaccurate list may delay review of the project.
Signature
(Certificate of Adjoining Property Owners List – Prepared 11/20/03; Revised 9/22/06)
CERTIFICATE OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
I, , hereby certify that, to the best of my
knowledge, the attached name and address list of all adjoining property owners (including all individual
condominium owners) within 200 feet of the property located at
, is a true and accurate list from the last declared Gallatin County tax
records. I further understand that an inaccurate list may delay review of the project.
Signature
(Certificate of Adjoining Property Owners List – Prepared 11/20/03; Revised 9/22/06)
Susan Riggs
601 West Villlard Street
199
Theresa Ruebusch
401 N 5th Avenue
Bozeman MT 59715
Jerry & Joyce Schmidt
423 N 6TH Avenue
Bozeman MT 59715
Gary & Jeanne Delin
407 N 5th Avenue
Bozeman MT 59715
Homes 4 Rent INC
Joy Nedrud & Rand White
25 Rodeo Ct
Bozeman MT 59718
Gregory & Cecelia Notess
415 N 5th Avenue
Bozeman MT 59715
Wilma Norris
415 Comfort
Bozeman MT 59718
Erik Eck
PO BOX 78
Kailua HI 96734
BCE LLC
131 W Main Street
Missoula MT 59802
George & Deborah Thorstad
408 N 6th Avenue
Bozeman MT 59715
Thomas & Judith Deibele
PMB 267272/3590
Round Bottom
Cincinnati OH 45244
Keith & Ellen Koslofsky
414 N 6th Avenue
Bozeman MT 59715
Royal 7 Motel
310 N 7th Avenue
Bozeman MT 59715
Rene Gibbs
420 N 6TH Avenue
Bozeman MT 59715
Lantis Foundation INC
4755 E Colorado Blvd.
Spearfish SD 57783
Charles & Lois Osborne
109 N 9th Avenue
Bozeman MT 59715
Rose-Marie Cain
411 N 6th Avenue
Bozeman MT 59715
James & Nikki Lytle
1301 Woodland Drive
Bozeman MT 59718
200
NEIGHBORHOOD RECOGNITION ORDINANCE COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE
On December 10, 2007 the Bozeman City Commission adopted the Neighborhood Recognition Ordinance as part of the
Bozeman Municipal Code. This new ordinance contains the following requirement:
Section 2.05.1230, Responsibilities of Individuals or Entities Submitting an Application to the Department of Planning and
Community Development.
A. In order for the City Liaison to effectively perform their duties executing the intent and purpose of this chapter, as defined in
2.05.1230, the following shall be performed:
1. As part of any application to the Department of Planning and Community Development, the applicant shall provide written
notice via certified mail, e-mail, facsimile transmission, and/or personal delivery to the City Liaison if notification guidelines
(BMC 38.40) require that notice be posted “on-site”, published in the local newspaper or mailed first class.
2. Such notice shall contain a complete set of application materials as submitted to the Department of Planning and
Community Development.
B. Failure to provide proof of such mailing via certified mail, e-mail and/or facsimile transmission report to the most recent City
Liaison address, e-mail address and/or fax number of record, or an affidavit attesting hand delivery, shall result in an incomplete
application.
I, , hereby certify that I have delivered via certified mail, e-
mail, facsimile transmission or hand delivery written notice and a complete set of application materials for the project known
as in compliance with Section 2.05.1230 of
the Bozeman Municipal Code. I further understand that failure to comply will result in this application being deemed
incomplete and may result in a delay in the review of this project.
Signature Date
(Neighborhood Recognition Ordinance Compliance Certificate – Prepared 1/7/08, revised 11/14/11)
NEIGHBORHOOD RECOGNITION ORDINANCE COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE
On December 10, 2007 the Bozeman City Commission adopted the Neighborhood Recognition Ordinance as part of the
Bozeman Municipal Code. This new ordinance contains the following requirement:
Section 2.05.1230, Responsibilities of Individuals or Entities Submitting an Application to the Department of Planning and
Community Development.
A. In order for the City Liaison to effectively perform their duties executing the intent and purpose of this chapter, as defined in
2.05.1230, the following shall be performed:
1. As part of any application to the Department of Planning and Community Development, the applicant shall provide written
notice via certified mail, e-mail, facsimile transmission, and/or personal delivery to the City Liaison if notification guidelines
(BMC 38.40) require that notice be posted “on-site”, published in the local newspaper or mailed first class.
2. Such notice shall contain a complete set of application materials as submitted to the Department of Planning and
Community Development.
B. Failure to provide proof of such mailing via certified mail, e-mail and/or facsimile transmission report to the most recent City
Liaison address, e-mail address and/or fax number of record, or an affidavit attesting hand delivery, shall result in an incomplete
application.
I, , hereby certify that I have delivered via certified mail, e-
mail, facsimile transmission or hand delivery written notice and a complete set of application materials for the project known
as in compliance with Section 2.05.1230 of
the Bozeman Municipal Code. I further understand that failure to comply will result in this application being deemed
incomplete and may result in a delay in the review of this project.
Signature Date
(Neighborhood Recognition Ordinance Compliance Certificate – Prepared 1/7/08, revised 11/14/11)
Susan Riggs
601 West Villard Street ZMA
12/10/13
201
202
EXHIBIT A: TABLE C-16 Source: Bozeman Community Plan
Existing zoning
not in compliance with
Growth Policy Designation
Proposed zoning
is in compliance with
Growth Policy Designation
203
Subject
Property
EXHIBIT B: Aerial Image Source: Bozeman Geographical Information Systems Department
204
Existing
Land Use
Designation:
Community
Commercial
Mixed Use
EXHIBIT C: Community Plan Source: Bozeman Geographical Information Systems Department
205
Existing
Zoning: R-3
EXHIBIT D: Existing Zoning Source: Bozeman Geographical Information Systems Department
206
Proposed
Zoning: B-2
EXHIBIT E: Proposed Zoning Source: Bozeman Geographical Information Systems Department
207
EXHIBIT F: Photographs
208