HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution No. 4383, Appropriating Funds for various Budget Units for Fiscal Year ending June 30, 2013
Commission Memorandum
REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Commission
FROM: Anna Rosenberry, Finance Director
Chris Kukulski, City Manager
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 4383 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, APPROPRIATING
FUNDS FOR VARIOUS BUDGET UNITS, AND FURTHER ESTIMATING
REVENUE NECESSARY TO OPERATE AND MAINTAIN SERVICES OF
MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2013.
MEETING DATE: June 25, 2012
AGENDA ITEM TYPE: Public Hearing
RECOMMENDATION: Take public comment, make further revisions, and adopt
Resolution No. 4383 – Appropriation Resolution for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2013
(FY13.)
BACKGROUND: During presentations and work sessions held in May and June, the
Commission has been considering making changes to the City Manager’s Recommended
Budget, (available at http://www.bozeman.net/Departments-(1)/Finance/Budgets-and-
Financials.aspx), so that a Final Budget can be adopted for FY13. Based on feedback during
this work session, and the other work sessions held this spring, we have prepared the
Appropriation (Final Budget) Resolution. Tonight has been advertised as the hearing for
adoption of the Final Budget.
The Appropriation Resolution that is attached comes from the City Manager’s Recommended
Budget, with the following changes:
1. The Storm Water Utility and Street Maintenance District budgets have been changed
so that all existing street sweeping and leaf clean-up costs remain in the Street
Maintenance budget and the Storm Water Utility budget only includes the addition, new
costs of mapping personnel, equipment, and operating costs for the utility. (as presented
May 14, 2012.)
2. Business Improvement Districts and Tax Increment District budgets have been
adjusted, based on their work-plan presentations (presented June 4, 2012)
3. General Obligation Debt schedules, budgets and levy amounts have been adjusted for
the refinancing that we completed on June 14th.
4. A list of General Fund budget cuts were presented and discussed on the June 11th work
session. Feedback from that work session indicated that there was strong support for
NOT cutting the 0.25 FTE Planning position ($11,200), and NOT cutting the Shops
Complex sidewalk project ($32,720). As such, we are NOT cutting these items from the
City Manager’s Recommended Budget for purposes of preparing the Appropriation
134
Resolution. Commissioner may still opt to cut these items by making a motion to adopt
the resolution “without ….”
5. It appeared as though there was support for the remaining General Fund cuts that had
been listed, including the loan that is no longer needed for the Parking Garage Condo, so
these items have been incorporated into the Appropriation Resolution. A motion to
approve the Appropriation Resolution as written would reduce the FY13 Recommended
Budget for these amounts:
Possible Budget Cuts: No. Dept. Item FY13
Amount
Note: Est Mill
Value
1 Parks Sale of Story Mansion –
Irrigation System. Our share
of the costs of the sprinkler
system were much lower than
previously estimated (owing
to continued use of the on-site
irrigation well,) and will
come out of the FY12 budget.
$30,000 We will continue to
have $5,000 in the
FY13 Parks’
contracted services
budget to fund our
share of the
lawn/snow removal
costs for
maintenance of the
park
0.36
2 Finance Check Endorsing
Equipment
$ 2,000 Able to purchase in
FY12.
0.02
3 Police Radio Repeater $18,000 Awarded Grant
Funding
0.21
4 Police FY13 Vacant Officer
Positions - Estimated
minimum of 30 months of
Probationary Officer position
$177,500 Would result in less
"vacancy savings"
to rebate to tax
payers next year.
2.12
5 Fire Battalion Chiefs - Hire in
January 2013
$74,000 One-time Tax Levy
savings, positions
will be an ongoing
cost.
0.88
6 Library Library Materials
reduction
$ 8,000 0.10
7 Rec-
reation
Lindley Center Networking $ 4,000 No longer planning
for office in the
Lindley Center
0.05
8 Attorney E-Discovery Software. We
need this, but it can be
delayed. Keep in the Capital
Improvement Program (CIP).
$ 65,000 Delay, Keep on the
CIP
0.78
9 Rec-
reation
Lindley Center Window
Replacements
$ 9,400 0.11
10 CM
Office
Communications/Admin
Assistant - Delay Hire to
January 2013
$29,000 One-time savings.
Position will be an
additional ongoing
cost.
0.35
11 Parking Loan to Parking $50,000 No longer needed, 0.60
135
Commission for Condo based on decision
to sell.
TOTAL $466,900 Total Mills 5.57
The Appropriation Resolution DOES NOT CONTAIN any of the following cuts, which had been
mentioned during the June 11, 2012 work session. If these adjustments are to be made for the
Final Budget, please include them specifically in your motion to adopt the Resolution.
Issue Notes: FY13 Amount Estimated
Mill Value
FY13
A Battalion Chiefs Delay until April 2013, or… $ 74,000 0.88
B Battalion Chiefs ...Do not Hire in FY13 would add
savings of…
$ 74,000 0.88
C Admin/Communications
Assistant
Do not Hire in FY13 $ 29,000 0.35
D Jarrett Park Playground
Equipment
$50,000 is included. $ 50,000 0.60
E Professional Building
Parking Lot Lights
$32,000 is included $ 28,000 0.33
F Cemetery 4-Wheeler
with Plow
$11,000 is included $ 11,000 0.13
G Police Cars Cut two of the four funded
vehicles
$ 81,000 0.97
TOTAL $ 422,000 5.04
Attached are the Capital Improvement Plan description sheets for the following items:
D: Jarrett Park Playground Equipment.
E: Professional Building Parking Lot Lights.
F: Cemetery 4-Wheeler with Plow.
G: Police Cars. The City Manager’s Budget includes the replacement of 3 Patrol Vehicles (CIP
item GF053) and the addition of an unmarked vehicle for support services (CIP item GF052) to
the existing fleet.
• Unmarked Vehicle: $35,500. Although not ideal, this vehicle could be cut from the
budget. We would rely on the existing fleet to provide a vehicle for support services.
The purchase of this vehicle would be requested again in the CIP process this fall.
• Marked Vehicles: Marked vehicle replacements were cut from budgets in 2009 and
2010. The disruption in the rotation cycle combined with the significant increase in miles
driven / staffing levels has resulted in vehicles that are very costly to maintain and pose
an ever increasing safety risk.
Currently, eight vehicles in the patrol fleet have over 100,000 miles. The three scheduled
for the next fiscal year are between 122,000 and 143,000. Vehicles that are scheduled for
FY13 replacement will not be ordered, delivered and outfitted until June 2013. Our
marked patrol vehicles average approximately 20,000 per year so those being replaced
will likely have between 140,000 and 165,000 miles at the time of their replacement.
136
Additionally, the laptop computers in the those vehicles will require upgrade to be
compatible with new dispatch requirements and were factored into the replacement costs.
The replacement of the three marked patrol vehicles identified in the FY13 Capital Plan
are a necessary expenditure for both safety of the officers and continuity of service to the
community.
Mandeville Farm Judgment: After much discussion, a financial plan to address the amount the
City will owe under the judgment is being developed. During our General Fund work session, a
model with payments spread over three fiscal years was requested. This is attached as
Mandeville Option #1.
Option #1 Strategy to cover the Judgment Payments:
1. Anticipate a $1,000,000 payments in FY13, FY14, FY15.
2. Cut the FY13 General Fund Budget for Capital Items, listed on the sheet.
3. Utilize FY12 budget savings to add to the General Fund cash reserve to help with
judgment payments now and in the future.
4. Utilize money from the SID Revolving Fund in later year of the plan.
5. Utilize budget savings in FY13 to help with judgment payments.
At that same meeting, the issue of Bogert Pool was discussed. Because of the need to have
money available to address the Pool in FY13, Mandeville Option #2 was put together.
Option #2 Strategy to cover the Judgment Payments: Changes in Blue.
1. Anticipate a $1,000,000 payments in FY13, FY14, FY15.
2. Do NOT cut the Bogert Pool items (total $482,000) from the budget. Cut the FY13
General Fund Budget for Capital Items related to the PD Design Costs and the Lindley
Park Restrooms.
3. Utilize FY12 budget savings to add to the General Fund cash reserve to help with
judgment payments now and in the future.
4. Utilize money from the SID Revolving Fund in FY13 of the plan. (Hold hearing this
summer to transfer money.)
5. Utilize budget savings in FY13 and FY14 to help with judgment payments.
Bogert Pool: It is preferred that the Bogert Pool Repair money not be cut from the FY13
Budget. Discussions by both Commissioners and staff have recently identified either the repair
of Bogert or the replacement of Bogert as being imminent. The current condition of Bogert Pool
is not good; this spring start-up showed a significant pool leak and boiler failure that needed
repairs. If the decision is made not to repair Bogert’s gutter, shell and boiler, we should
consider using the repair money in the FY13 budget ($482,000) to begin designing its
replacement.
Both of these options would allow us to adopt an FY13 budget without going below our
Minimum Reserve level, given the current Appropriation Resolution. However, we have not
incorporated either of these Options into the Appropriation Resolution at this time. Please
indicate whether you would like to see them added to the resolution now, or at the time the issue
is resolved through a budget amendment. Under either circumstance, we can describe the chosen
plan in the Final Budget document.
137
Property Taxes: The property tax levy proposed by the City Manager’s Recommended budget
was estimated to be an increase of 12.38 mills; costing the median residence an additional $47.00
per year. The Appropriation Resolution returns, after the $466,900 in cuts described above,
with an estimated property tax increase of 6.81 mills or $25.26/year for the median residence.
Typical Resident: Assessment/Charge
CM Rec
Budget
Appropriation
Resolution
*Street Assessments $9.11 $9.11
Forestry Assessments - -
Property Taxes $47.00 $25.26
Water Services $20.64 $20.64
Sewer Services $29.88 $29.88
*Storm Water Services - 11 Months $18.37 $18.37
Annual Increase $125.00 $103.26
Monthly Increase $10.42 $8.60
FISCAL EFFECTS: The Final Budget adoption has far-reaching fiscal effects, which are
describe in the CM Recommended Budget, in the numerous materials prepared for budget work
sessions, and in the information above. The specific effect on a typical resident is described in
the table immediately above. The budget estimates revenues and approves spending as outlined
in the Appropriation resolution.
Attachments:
Appropriation Resolution No. 4383
Estimated FY13 Mill Levies Sheet
Mandeville Option #1
Mandeville Option #2
CIP Jarrett Park Playground Equipment.
CIP Professional Building Parking Lot Lights.
CIP Cemetery 4-Wheeler with Plow.
CIP Police Cars.
Report compiled on: June 17, 2012
138
- 1 -
COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4383
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
BOZEMAN, MONTANA, APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR VARIOUS
BUDGET UNITS, AND FURTHER ESTIMATING REVENUE NECESSARY
TO OPERATE AND MAINTAIN SERVICES OF MUNICIPAL
GOVERNMENT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2013.
WHEREAS, the City Commission did, on the 7th day of May, 2012, receive and hear the City
Manager’s Budget Recommendations for Fiscal Year 2012-2013 (Fiscal Year 2013); and
WHEREAS, the City Commission did, on May 14, May 21st, June 4th, and June 11th hold
Budget Work Sessions that were open to the public to discuss the details of the Recommended Budget
and make changes to the same; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission did, on the 25th day of June, 2012, after due and proper
legal notice, conduct a public hearing on the proposed municipal budget.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Commission of the City of Bozeman,
Montana, to wit:
Section 1
The City Commission of the City of Bozeman, Montana, does hereby authorize and
appropriate expenditures of governmental fund types (general fund, special revenues funds, debt service
funds and capital project funds) and operating expenses for proprietary fund types (enterprise funds and
internal service funds) and fiduciary fund types (permanent funds) for budget units and purposes set
forth below, in the amounts designated herein, as follows. The City Commission further authorizes and
re-appropriates the unexpended balance of Capital Improvement Program & repair and equipment items
previously budgeted which have not been completed.
Budget Unit Total/Fund
General Fund $24,759,945
139
- 2 -
Special Revenue Funds 17,838,533
Debt Service Funds 2,633,326
Capital Projects 31,000
Enterprise Funds 36,088,513
Internal Service Funds 4,372,221
Permanent Funds 0 GRAND TOTAL – Operating Budget $ 85,723,538
Section 2
The City Commission of the City of Bozeman, Montana does hereby estimate revenues for the
various funds, as follows:
General Fund $23,743,467
Special Revenue Funds 12,721,672
Debt Service Funds 2,664,566
Capital Projects 0
Enterprise Funds 37,974,268
Internal Service Funds 4,359,191
Permanent Funds 33,000
GRAND TOTAL – Estimated Revenues $ 81,496,164
Section 3
That budget information contained in the "City Manager's Recommended Budget for Fiscal
Year 2012-2013" document pertaining to Policy Direction, Fiscal Policy, and the specific information
concerning budgeting for each department, as may be subsequently amended prior to final adoption of
the budget, are hereby incorporated into the document entitled "Approved Budget for Fiscal Year 2012-
2013" and are hereby adopted by reference.
Section 4
Pursuant to Sections 7-6-4006 and 7-6-4012, M.C.A., the City Commission hereby delegates
140
- 3 -
appropriation and budget amendment authority to the City Manager for the expenditures from the
following funds: debt service funds; fee-based budgets; trust funds; federal, state and private grants
accepted and approved by the City Commission; special assessments; monies borrowed during the year;
proceeds from sale of land; and funds for gifts or donations.
Section 5
Pursuant to Section 7-6-4030, M.C.A., this resolution, upon its passage, shall be in full force
and effect on July 1, 2011.
Section 6
That upon this resolution becoming effective, as provided in Section 5 above, all resolutions
and parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed.
Section 7
That should it be found by any court of competent jurisdiction that any section, clause, portion,
sentence, word, or phrase of this resolution is deemed to be contrary to any existing law or regulations,
that in this instance, it is the intent of the City Commission of the City of Bozeman, Montana, that all
other portions, sections, words, clauses, phrases, or paragraphs of this document shall remain in full
force and effect.
PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Commission of the City of Bozeman, Montana, at a
regular session thereof held on the 25th day of June, 2012.
________________________________________
SEAN BECKER
Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________________
STACY ULMEN, CMC
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________________________
GREG SULLIVAN
City Attorney
141
FISCAL YEARFY08FY09FY10FY11FY12FY13 EST
MILL VALUE68,981$ 74,178$ 78,290$ 80,399$ 82,062$ 83,769$
*Corrected 9/2011Issued 9/2011
PERCENTAGE CHANGE9.1%7.5%5.5%2.7%2.1%2.1%
GENERAL FUND:
All-Purpose101.26111.91111.96110.16127.16134.67
SPECIAL REVENUE:
City Planning2.002.002.002.002.002.00
Police Retirement*4.274.144.344.450.000.00
Firefighters' Retirement*2.812.722.852.970.000.00
Public Employees' Retirement*4.614.524.754.860.000.00
Comprehensive Insurance*4.674.534.614.730.000.00
Health/Med Insurance22.3624.3123.6724.2922.5323.07
Fire Capital & Equipment4.004.004.004.004.00
Fire Truck/Equipment
Senior Transportation1.001.001.001.001.001.00
Workforce Housing 1.461.000.500.500.50
TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUE41.7248.6848.2248.8030.0330.57
DEBT SERVICE:*Refunded
Library G.O. Bonds4.534.27 4.03 3.94 3.84 3.28
Transportation G.O. Bonds6.676.305.985.855.725.04
TOTAL DEBT SERVICE11.2010.5710.019.799.568.32
TOTAL ALL LEVIES154.18171.16170.19168.75166.75173.56
Percentage Change in Mills-5.7%11.0%-0.6%-0.8%-1.2%4.0%
Property Taxes Levied$10,635,491$12,696,306$13,324,175$13,567,611$13,683,839$14,538,906
Percentage Change in Dollars2.9%19.4%4.9%1.8%0.9%6.2%
* These funds are being combined into the All Purpose Levy. They are all subject to MCA 15-10-420.
Tax Authority Authorized but Not Levied
General Fund Reduction 462,720$ 684,976$ 604,068$
Street & Tree Maintenance Offset 116,270$ -$ -$
Police & Fire Reductions583,000$ 849,000$ 914,000$ 578,525$
SAFER Grant350,120$ 303,570$ 189,720$ 113,985$ -$
911 Mills (Resolution No. 3954)620,829 667,602$ 704,610$ 723,303$ 738,558$ 753,921$
FY11 Certification Error:59,753$
Total Authorized But Not Levied620,829$ 1,017,722$ 1,591,180$ 2,400,766$ 2,451,519$ 1,936,514$
Number of Mills- 9.00 13.72 20.32 29.87 23.12
MILL LEVIES & MILL VALUES
B-4
142
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF052
DEPARTMENT
POLICE
PROJECT NAME
UNMARKED VEHICLE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM
FY13
$35,500
FY14FY15
$35,500
FY16Unscheduled
$33,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
FOR POLICE INVESTIGATION AND ADMINISTRATION VEHICLES. FY13 - New vehicle for support service administrative
position. FY15 - Replace vehicle Asset #3138 03 Chevrolet Impala. ~113,000 miles at replacement. FY17 - Replace vehicle Asset
#3479 08 Chevrolet Trailblazer. ~108,000 miles at replacement. Purchase mid-size passenger vehicles, plus equipment, to replace
high mileage cars currently driven by detectives and to provide safe and reliable emergency response vehicles. An additional
Support Service Supervisory Position requires a vehicle with similar emergency response needs. Old detective cars are rotated
into the police department parking program generally after at least 110,000 miles of use and are used as travel cars for officers
attending training, traded in, sold at auction or transferred to other divisions within the city. This amount includes all the
necessary vehicle equipment.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
No safe and reliable alternatives have been identified.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Would drastically reduce maintenance costs, mechanical concerns and provide many years of reliable service. Increased public
safety and officer safety in providing mechanically sound emergency response vehicles, reduced risk and liability related to us e of
unreliable cars.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Reduction in maintenance costs and possible reduction in fuel costs.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% General Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:63
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):20
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):10
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):10
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):10
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):5
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):3
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY17
City of Bozeman, MT34 Approved CIP FY13-17
143
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF053
DEPARTMENT
POLICE
PROJECT NAME
POLICE CARS & VEHICLE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
FY13
$156,000
FY14
$208,000
FY15
$156,000
FY16
$208,000
Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This plan allows for a number of patrol cars to be replaced each year, including all of the necessary vehicle equipment (top lights,
sirens, mobile data terminals, video cameras, electronic reporting / ticketing systems, etc.) Patrol vehicles are an essential item in
the operation of the Bozeman Police Department. Police vehicles must be available for police patrol use 24 hours a day, 365 days
a year. These vehicles are used to respond to both emergency and non-emergency calls for service, investigate accidents, conduct
traffic enforcement and for general patrol duties. These patrol vehicles average approximately 20,000 miles annually. The table on
the following pageis an outline of the replacement schedule.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
This helps us plan for safe and reliable emergency response vehicles for patrol use, as well as projected lower annual maintenance
costs due to lower annual miles driven per vehicle per year. This program would allow for the replacement of older, higher
mileage patrol cars that become less reliable and more costly to repair. Equipment components mounted inside the car can
sometimes be transferred from the old car to the new car, depending on the condition.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: These are replacements; recurring costs frequently decline as newer cars replace older
ones. Maintenance costs have stabilized due to regularly scheduled service even though calls for service have increased and
additional officers have been hired. Also, fewer miles are accumulating on the vehicles because the number of patrol vehicles has
increased. Our projection is the useful life of each patrol car is being extended.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% General Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:63
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):20
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):10
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):10
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):10
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):5
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):3
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY17
$156,000
City of Bozeman, MT35 Approved CIP FY13-17
144
Po
l
i
c
e
V
e
h
i
c
l
e
D
e
t
a
i
l
s
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Nu
m
b
e
r
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Mi
l
e
a
g
e
As
s
e
t
#
Ma
k
e
FY
1
3
FY
1
4
FY
1
5
FY
1
6
Un
s
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
d
No
t
e
s
FY
1
7
GF
0
5
3
12
2
,
8
8
8
31
4
1
CH
E
V
Y
L
U
M
I
N
A
$5
2
,
0
0
0
Mi
l
e
a
g
e
1
0
/
1
/
2
0
1
1
11
6
,
2
9
7
32
2
1
CH
E
V
Y
L
U
M
I
N
A
$5
2
,
0
0
0
Mi
l
e
a
g
e
1
0
/
1
/
2
0
1
1
11
4
,
9
6
8
32
2
0
CH
E
V
Y
L
U
M
I
N
A
$5
2
,
0
0
0
Mi
l
e
a
g
e
1
0
/
1
/
2
0
1
1
92
,
9
5
4
33
5
2
CH
E
V
Y
L
U
M
I
N
A
$5
2
,
0
0
0
Mi
l
e
a
g
e
1
0
/
1
/
2
0
1
1
11
4
,
0
0
2
31
4
3
CH
E
V
Y
L
U
M
I
N
A
$5
2
,
0
0
0
Mi
l
e
a
g
e
1
0
/
1
/
2
0
1
1
11
1
,
9
8
6
32
7
8
CH
E
V
Y
L
U
M
I
N
A
$5
2
,
0
0
0
Mi
l
e
a
g
e
1
0
/
1
/
2
0
1
1
10
3
,
6
4
9
32
8
0
CH
E
V
Y
L
U
M
I
N
A
$5
2
,
0
0
0
Mi
l
e
a
g
e
1
0
/
1
/
2
0
1
1
91
,
2
6
8
33
1
1
CH
E
V
Y
L
U
M
I
N
A
$5
2
,
0
0
0
Mi
l
e
a
g
e
1
0
/
1
/
2
0
1
1
92
,
2
4
3
33
5
0
CH
E
V
Y
L
U
M
I
N
A
$5
2
,
0
0
0
Mi
l
e
a
g
e
1
0
/
1
/
2
0
1
1
92
,
6
3
7
33
5
1
CH
E
V
Y
L
U
M
I
N
A
$5
2
,
0
0
0
Mi
l
e
a
g
e
1
0
/
1
/
2
0
1
1
52
,
1
2
1
33
7
4
CH
E
V
Y
L
U
M
I
N
A
$5
2
,
0
0
0
Mi
l
e
a
g
e
1
0
/
1
/
2
0
1
1
60
,
4
9
8
34
3
9
CH
E
V
Y
L
U
M
I
N
A
$5
2
,
0
0
0
Mi
l
e
a
g
e
1
0
/
1
/
2
0
1
1
53
,
2
4
7
33
6
9
CH
E
V
Y
L
U
M
I
N
A
$5
2
,
0
0
0
Mi
l
e
a
g
e
1
0
/
1
/
2
0
1
1
63
,
1
5
8
34
4
0
CH
E
V
Y
L
U
M
I
N
A
$5
2
,
0
0
0
Mi
l
e
a
g
e
1
0
/
1
/
2
0
1
1
51
,
4
8
7
33
7
0
CH
E
V
Y
L
U
M
I
N
A
Mi
l
e
a
g
e
1
0
/
1
/
2
0
1
1
$5
2
,
0
0
0
26
,
1
0
5
34
9
8
CH
E
V
Y
L
U
M
I
N
A
Mi
l
e
a
g
e
1
0
/
1
/
2
0
1
1
$5
2
,
0
0
0
19
,
4
6
3
34
9
9
CH
E
V
Y
L
U
M
I
N
A
Mi
l
e
a
g
e
1
0
/
1
/
2
0
1
1
$5
2
,
0
0
0
$1
5
6
,
0
0
0
$2
0
8
,
0
0
0
$1
5
6
,
0
0
0
$2
0
8
,
0
0
0
$1
5
6
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
s
Ci
t
y
o
f
B
o
z
e
m
a
n
,
M
T
3
6
App
r
o
v
e
d
C
I
P
F
Y
1
3
-
1
7
145
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF067
DEPARTMENT
FAC. MTC.
PROJECT NAME
PROFESSIONAL BUILDING PARKING LOT LIGHTS
FY13
$28,000
FY14FY15FY16Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project is to improve the illumination of the parking lot at the Professional Building. Many employees and citizens meet at
this building after dark and the existing parking lot is poorly lit. This item was listed for funding in FY 10. There were some
changes pending with building use that reduced the need for the parking lot lighting: The regular Planning Board evening meeting
is now taking place at the new City Hall. Other Planning meetings do take place, but not as many members of the public are
attending who might not be familiar with the parking area. Facility staff checked with the Planning, E ngineering,
Building, and IT Departments and inquired about their interest in having the lot lit. At least three of the departments said that
their staff would like the lighting installed for staff safety and security.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Continue with existing lighting.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Safety will likely be improved.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: There are two farm style lights mounted on utility poles in the parking lot. These
current fixtures do not meet the dark skies ordinance because the lamps are not shaded. The new lights should be more energy
efficient so no addition operating costs are anticipated. Facility staff will work with Engineering to determine whether LED lamps
can be installed in the lot.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% General Fund.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:30
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):15
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):5
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):2
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):3
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):0
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):0
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY17
City of Bozeman, MT42 Approved CIP FY13-17
146
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF092
DEPARTMENT
PARKS
PROJECT NAME
PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT
FY13
$50,000
FY14
$55,000
FY15
$60,000
FY16Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The following playground equipment needs to be replaced due to its age and condition: FY13– Jarrett Park: This structure is one
of the oldest playgrounds in the City. Replacement will bring fully compliant ADA equipment and reduce liability concerns. FY14–
Christie Park FY15– Beall Park
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Increased safety for community members.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Minimal.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% General Fund.
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:37
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):15
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):5
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):2
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):7
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):5
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):0
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):3
FY17
City of Bozeman, MT47 Approved CIP FY13-17
147
CIP Project Fund
General Fund
PROJECT NUMBER
GF133
DEPARTMENT
CEMETERY
PROJECT NAME
FOUR WHEELER WITH PLOW (4X4)
FY13
$11,000
FY14FY15FY16Unscheduled
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
ATV for plowing sidewalks, Spot spraying in cemetery, Transport Wacker within cemetery.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Borrow from other divisions if available, Spot spraying in cemetery, Borrow from other divisions if available.
ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL
Efficient and timely snow removal in and around the cemetery, Safety/eliminate possible back and leg injuries from lifting Wacker
into truck, More fuel efficient vehicle for use in cemetery.
ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE, IF FUNDED
Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs: Reduced maintenance and repair costs, Decreased fuel costs, Routine maintenance and
servicing.
FUNDING SOURCES
100% General Fund
New
Replacement
Equipment
Project
General Fund Project and Equipment Scoring TOTAL RATING:32
LEVEL OF SERVICE (Up to 20):10
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (Up to10):5
SERVICE AREA (Up to 10):2
DEPARTMENT PRIORITY (Up to 10):7
COMMISSION WORKPLAN (Up to 10):0
ADOPTED CLIMATE PLAN (Up to 5):3
FREQUENCY OF USE (Up to 5):5
FY17
City of Bozeman, MT60 Approved CIP FY13-17
148
Ma
n
d
e
v
i
l
l
e
Op
t
i
o
n
#1
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
Fu
n
d
Re
s
e
r
v
e
F
Y
1
2
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
F
Y
1
3
Bu
d
g
e
t
F
Y
1
4
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
F
Y
1
5
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
No
t
e
s
:
Fi
s
c
a
l
Ye
a
r
En
d
i
n
g
Ba
l
a
n
c
e
5
,
3
2
1
,
2
2
2
5,
0
0
4
,
7
4
4
5,
6
1
1
,
7
4
4
5,
2
2
4
,
7
4
4
Fr
o
m
th
e
FY
1
3
Ap
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
i
o
n
Resolution, plus FY12 Budget
Sa
v
i
n
g
s
Ma
n
d
e
v
i
l
l
e
Fa
r
m
Ju
d
g
m
e
n
t
/
S
e
t
t
l
e
m
e
n
t
(
1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
)
(1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
)
(1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
)
Pe
r
ou
r
wr
i
t
t
e
n
ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
,
we can pay over 24 months.
FY
1
3
Bu
d
g
e
t
Cu
t
s
‐
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
‐
PD
De
s
i
g
n
Co
s
t
s
25
0
,
0
0
0
FY
1
3
Bu
d
g
e
t
Cu
t
s
‐
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
‐
Bo
g
e
r
t
Po
o
l
Sh
e
l
l
,
Gu
t
t
e
r
38
2
,
0
0
0
FY
1
3
Bu
d
g
e
t
Cu
t
s
‐
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
‐
Bo
g
e
r
t
Po
o
l
He
a
t
e
r
s
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
FY
1
3
Bu
d
g
e
t
Cu
t
s
‐
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
‐
Li
n
d
l
e
y
Pa
r
k
Re
s
t
r
o
o
m
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
17
5
,
0
0
0
SI
D
Re
v
o
l
v
i
n
g
Fu
n
d
ex
c
e
s
s
61
3
,
0
0
0
Wo
u
l
d
st
i
l
l
le
a
v
e
2x
the statutory minimum in the fund, plus
mo
n
e
y
fo
r
fu
t
u
r
e
ro
a
d
projects.
FY
1
2
/
1
3
/
1
4
Un
s
p
e
n
t
Bu
d
g
e
t
Au
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
~3
%
70
0
,
0
0
0
70
0
,
0
0
0
Kn
o
w
n
ea
c
h
Se
p
t
fo
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
the Fiscal Year end.
Ad
j
u
s
t
e
d
Ba
l
a
n
c
e
6
,
0
2
1
,
2
2
2
5,
6
1
1
,
7
4
4
5,
2
2
4
,
7
4
4
4,
2
2
4
,
7
4
4
Ad
o
p
t
e
d
Mi
n
i
m
u
m
16
.
6
7
%
3
,
8
2
3
,
4
1
7
4,
0
3
5
,
1
4
2
4,
0
3
5
,
1
4
2
4,
1
3
7
,
3
1
1
Di
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
fo
r
Ad
o
p
t
e
d
Bu
d
g
e
t
Pu
r
p
o
s
e
s
n
/
a
1
7
6
,
6
0
2
48
9
,
6
0
2
87
,
4
3
3
In
d
i
c
a
t
e
s
wh
e
t
h
e
r
a Special Budget Hearing is likely needed to
be
ne
e
d
e
d
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Di
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
af
t
e
r
Un
s
p
e
n
t
Bu
d
g
e
t
Au
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
is
Kn
o
w
n
2
,
1
9
7
,
8
0
5
1,
5
7
6
,
6
0
2
1,
1
8
9
,
6
0
2
87
,
4
3
3
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
en
d
i
n
g
po
s
i
t
i
o
n
after budget savings.
14
9
Ma
n
d
e
v
i
l
l
e
Op
t
i
o
n
#2
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
Fu
n
d
Re
s
e
r
v
e
F
Y
1
2
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
F
Y
1
3
Bu
d
g
e
t
F
Y
1
4
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
F
Y
1
5
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
No
t
e
s
:
Fi
s
c
a
l
Ye
a
r
En
d
i
n
g
Ba
l
a
n
c
e
5
,
3
2
1
,
2
2
2
5,
0
0
4
,
7
4
4
5,
7
4
2
,
7
4
4
5,
2
4
2
,
7
4
4
Fr
o
m
th
e
FY
1
3
Ap
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
i
o
n
Resolution, plus FY12 Budget
Sa
v
i
n
g
s
Ma
n
d
e
v
i
l
l
e
Fa
r
m
Ju
d
g
m
e
n
t
/
S
e
t
t
l
e
m
e
n
t
(
1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
)
(1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
)
(1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
)
Pe
r
ou
r
wr
i
t
t
e
n
ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
,
we can pay over 24 months.
FY
1
3
Bu
d
g
e
t
Cu
t
s
‐
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
‐
PD
De
s
i
g
n
Co
s
t
s
25
0
,
0
0
0
FY
1
3
Bu
d
g
e
t
Cu
t
s
‐
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
‐
Bo
g
e
r
t
Po
o
l
Sh
e
l
l
,
Gu
t
t
e
r
‐
FY
1
3
Bu
d
g
e
t
Cu
t
s
‐
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
‐
Bo
g
e
r
t
Po
o
l
He
a
t
e
r
s
‐
FY
1
3
Bu
d
g
e
t
Cu
t
s
‐
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
‐
Li
n
d
l
e
y
Pa
r
k
Re
s
t
r
o
o
m
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
17
5
,
0
0
0
SI
D
Re
v
o
l
v
i
n
g
Fu
n
d
ex
c
e
s
s
6
1
3
,
0
0
0
Wo
u
l
d
st
i
l
l
le
a
v
e
2x
the statutory minimum in the fund, plus
mo
n
e
y
fo
r
fu
t
u
r
e
ro
a
d
projects.
FY
1
2
/
1
3
/
1
4
Un
s
p
e
n
t
Bu
d
g
e
t
Au
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
~3
%
70
0
,
0
0
0
70
0
,
0
0
0
50
0
,
0
0
0
Kn
o
w
n
ea
c
h
Se
p
t
fo
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
the Fiscal Year end.
Ad
j
u
s
t
e
d
Ba
l
a
n
c
e
6
,
0
2
1
,
2
2
2
5,
7
4
2
,
7
4
4
5,
2
4
2
,
7
4
4
4,
2
4
2
,
7
4
4
Ad
o
p
t
e
d
Mi
n
i
m
u
m
16
.
6
7
%
3
,
8
2
3
,
4
1
7
4,
0
3
5
,
1
4
2
4,
0
3
5
,
1
4
2
4,
1
3
7
,
3
1
1
Di
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
fo
r
Ad
o
p
t
e
d
Bu
d
g
e
t
Pu
r
p
o
s
e
s
n
/
a
3
0
7
,
6
0
2
7,
6
0
2
(3
9
4
,
5
6
7
)
In
d
i
c
a
t
e
s
wh
e
t
h
e
r
a Special Budget Hearing is likely needed to
be
ne
e
d
e
d
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Di
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
af
t
e
r
Un
s
p
e
n
t
Bu
d
g
e
t
Au
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
is
Kn
o
w
n
2
,
1
9
7
,
8
0
5
1,
7
0
7
,
6
0
2
1,
2
0
7
,
6
0
2
10
5
,
4
3
3
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
en
d
i
n
g
position after budget savings.
15
0