HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution No. 4370, Declaring the Powder Horn Sports Signs as historically significant
Commission Memorandum
REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Commission
FROM: Courtney Kramer, Historic Preservation Officer
Tim McHarg, Planning Director
SUBJECT: Z-12014: Designation of “Powderhorn Sporting Goods” signs as
Historically Significant to the Story Block, a commercial property located
within the Main Street Historic District
MEETING DATE: March 26, 2012
AGENDA ITEM TYPE: Action (Quasi-Judicial Hearing)
RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to adopt Resolution 4370, declaring the two
Powderhorn Sporting Goods signs as historically significant and exempt from the sign area
requirements of the Sign Code and authorizing issuance of a sign permit.
BACKGROUND: Property owners Steven Walker of Grove Property Fund, LLC, in
partnership with Jon Edwards of Schnee’s and Charley Franklin of Prugh and Lenon Architects,
PC, have submitted a request to designate two signs associated with Powderhorn Sporting Goods
as historically significant.
The Powderhorn store formerly occupied the retail spaces on the main floor of the Story Block, a
historic commercial structure at 35 and 37 East Main Street. The subject property is located
within the Main Street Historic District and is listed on the National Register of Historic Places.
The property received a Certificate of Appropriateness to reconstruct the original street-level
commercial façade of the structure in conjunction with transitioning the space into the home of
Schnee’s Boots and Shoes. Schnee’s Boots and Shoes will occupy the entire building. In altering
the property, Sections 38.28.020 and 38.28.200.D of the Unified Development Code require all
signage not associated with the retail tenant (Schnees) to be removed from the building. This
would include removal of the two Powderhorn signs.
Sec. 38.28.170 of the UDC provides for a process for designation of historic or culturally
significant signs, as follows:
“Signs which have historical or cultural significance to the city but do not conform to the
provisions of this article, may be permitted provided that the city commission adopts
findings supporting the historical or cultural significance of the sign and issues a sign
permit. Such findings shall be adopted by resolution of the city commission.”
Given the unique design and long-standing presence of the signs on Main Street, the property
owners and tenant wish to retain the Powderhorn Signs by designating them as historically
38
significant. The historic designation would permit the two historic signs to be exempt from the
sign area and non-conformity requirements otherwise applicable to the subject property based
upon the provisions of the Sign Code.
Removal of the signs in order to facilitate rehabilitation was enabled through a Certificate of
Appropriateness on February 27, 2012. The COA included the following condition of approval,
intended to ensure that rehabilitation of the signs satisfies the requirements of Bozeman
Municipal Code inasmuch as possible:
Condition of Approval #1: Bozeman’s Unified Development Code Section 38.28.120 A
caps the illumination of neon and other gas type transformers at 60 milliamperes to soften
light output. UDC 38.28.120 B further requires neon type signs with exposed tubing to be
equipped with dimmers. The rehabilitation of the existing signs shall satisfy these criteria
of Bozeman Municipal Code.
Staff’s recommended findings in support of the historic designations of the two Powderhorn
signs are as follows:
· The Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District was enacted to “stimulate the
restoration and rehabilitation of structures, and all other elements contributing to the
character and fabric of established residential neighborhoods and commercial or
industrial areas.” Designation of the two “Powderhorn Sporting Goods” signs would
allow for their restoration and preservation as a historic and character defining element of
the Downtown streetscape and built environment.
· The Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District “recognizes that diversity is a major
contributing element of the historic character of these neighborhoods or areas” and “the
provisions of this chapter shall be applied in a manner that will encourage the protection
and enhancement of the many diverse features for future generations.” Designation of
the two “Powderhorn Sporting Goods” signs would allow for their restoration and
preservation as a historic and character defining element of the Story Block building
without reducing the sign area available to current businesses on the property.
· The adopted Downtown Plan calls for the City to “encourage the preservation of historic
signs.” Designation of the two “Powderhorn Sporting Goods” signs would allow for their
restoration and preservation as a historic and character defining element of the
Downtown streetscape and built environment.
· The two “Powderhorn Sporting Goods” signs on the Story Block are locally significant
examples of historic signage, important both for their association with a long-standing,
locally owned downtown business and as quality examples of an aesthetically important,
well-regarded example of period commercial design.
Dating from the 1930s and 1940s, the signs are among the oldest surviving wall-
mounted, three-dimensional signs in Bozeman’s Main Street Historic District. As such,
they have a strong association with the district’s commercial streetscape, and are a
reflection of the patterns of historic signage that once characterized
that streetscape. They also serve as a visual reminder of a prominent, local business that
was an anchor of Bozeman’s Main Street for decades.
39
The older sign is green with white lettering illuminated by neon in the Streamline
Moderne style. The sign was flush-mounted on the Main Street façade of the building
when Powderhorn Sporting Goods opened in the retail space sometime in the late 1930’s.
This sign is unique in Bozeman as an example of Depression-era advertisement. The sign
was moved to the alley-frontage in 1948, when a new sign depicting a rifle and target was
installed on the Main Street Façade. The neon on the 1948 sign includes a motion loop, in
which the rifle flashes and the bulls-eye narrows in to the target. The sign is mounted
perpendicular to the building façade in order to catch the attention of the passing
motorist, which reflects the growth of automobile-centered retail during the post World
War II period.
The signs are important local examples of period advertising design, displaying a high-
quality period aesthetic that is now recognized by commercial historians for its artistic
and technical merit. The three-dimensional construction and artistic use of colored neon
tubing are representative of the era in which the signs were created, and of commercial
advertising technology and design that was once common in downtown
Bozeman. Relatively few examples of this important sign technology remain on
Bozeman’s Main Street today. The Powderhorn signs are quality examples of this
increasingly rare type, custom-designed for the Powderhorn business and the products it
once sold.
· Rehabilitation of the Story Block for continued business use for new businesses should
not require removal of these historic signs. Designation of the two “Powderhorn Sporting
Goods” signs as historically significant would allow for their restoration and preservation
without reducing the sign area available to current businesses on the property.
· The two “Powderhorn Sporting Goods” signs do represent a commercial message for any
business or identify any entity on the subject property. With the new businesses, the two
“Powderhorn Sporting Goods” signs become architectural elements of the building and
should not be included in the calculation of sign area for the subject property.
These findings have been incorporated into the attached Resolution 4370 to form the basis for
designation of the two “Powderhorn Sporting Goods” signs as historically significant.
Staff and the Bozeman Historic Preservation Advisory Board are in support of this application.
UNRESOLVED ISSUES: There are no unresolved issues at this time.
ALTERNATIVES: The City Commission has the following alternative actions available:
1. Approve the application as recommended by Staff and approve Resolution 4370 adopting
findings supporting the historical or cultural significance of the signs.
2. Approve the application with conditions to address concerns identified by the City
Commission and approve Resolution 4370 adopting findings supporting the historical or
cultural significance of the signs.
3. Deny the application as submitted based on a finding that the signs are not historically or
culturally significant.
40
4. Continue the public hearing on the application, with specific direction to Staff or the
applicant for additional information.
FISCAL EFFECTS: None at this time.
Report compiled on: March 1, 2012
Attachments: draft Resolution 4370 declaring the Powderhorn Sporting Goods signs as
historically significant
Minutes from February 24, 2012 Historic Preservation Advisory Board Meeting
Application materials
41
1 of 2
COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4370
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN,
MONTANA, DECLARING THE POWDERHORN SPORTING GOOD SIGNS AS
HISTORIC AND CULTURALLY SIGNIFICANT.
WHEREAS, Section 38.28.170 of the Bozeman Unified Development Code
establishes a process for designation of historic or culturally significant signs based upon
adopted findings by the City Commission; and
WHEREAS, the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District was enacted to
“stimulate the restoration and rehabilitation of structures, and all other elements contributing to
the character and fabric of established residential neighborhoods and commercial or industrial
areas;” and
WHEREAS, the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District “recognizes that
diversity is a major contributing element of the historic character of these neighborhoods or
areas” and “the provisions of this chapter shall be applied in a manner that will encourage the
protection and enhancement of the many diverse features for future generations;” and
WHEREAS, the adopted Downtown Plan calls for the City to “encourage the
preservation of historic signs;” and
WHEREAS, the two “Powderhorn Sporting Goods” signs reflect the continued
commercial development of the Main Street Historic District during the middle of the 20th
42
2 of 2
century through their unique design elements, and rehabilitation of the property for a new
business should not require removal of these historic signs;
WHEREAS, the Powderhorn signs do represent a commercial message for any
business or identify any entity on the subject property;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Commission of the City of
Bozeman, Montana, that the two “Powderhorn Sporting Goods Signs,” including one sign which
states the name of the business and another depicting a rifle and target, satisfy the Criteria set
forth in Bozeman’s Unified Development Code Section 38.28.170 “Historic or Culturally
Significant Signs” and shall be declared as such.
PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Commission of the City of Bozeman,
Montana, at a regular session thereof held on the 19th day of March, 2012.
Section 1
___________________________________
SEAN A. BECKER
Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________________
STACY ULMEN, CMC
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________________
GREG SULLIVAN
City Attorney
43
Bozeman Historic Preservation Advisory Board
Regular meeting minutes, February 23, 2012
Present: Mark Hufstetler (Chair), Jecyn Bremer, Jennifer Britton, Bruce Brown, Lora
Dalton, Angela Keesee, Steven Keuch, Courtney Kramer (City Liaison), Ryan Olson,
Paul Reichert, Anne Sherwood, Carson Taylor (City Commission), Lisa Verwys.
Quorum was established.
Absent: Jillian Bowers, Lesley Gilmore, Jared Infanger, Angela Keesee
Guests: Mary Keck, Jessie Nunn, MSU student group
I. The meeting was called to order shortly after 6:30 pm.
II. Minutes from prior meeting:
Motion to approve by RO, seconded by LD.
Unanimously approved.
III. Public Comment: none
IV. Ex Parte Communication: MH talked with Rob Pertzborn re: the Montgomery
Ward Building renovation. CK reminded Board that if a project comes up in
conversation, and it's already been submitted, try not to comment because it
may come before the Board.
V. Introduction of invited guests: We have a group of MSU students to observe
the meeting. They will be helping to evaluate Bozeman’s historic preservation
process.
Jessie Nunn is present as an interested member of the public.
Mary Keck is here to inform us of the progress of the Heritage Trees project.
VI. Project Review and Recommendations to Staff:
A. Schnee’s sign project (Powderhorn Sports signs):
Board consensus supports that the restored historic signs, which
promote a previous long-time business in that building, should not
count as part of allowed square footage per the sign ordinance.
Discussion of whether restored historic signs should be exempt
even if they advertise the current business; what if a sign is moved
to another location? Board appreciates Schnee’s willingness to
spend money on restoration of historic neon signage.
RO moved that the Board supports Schnee’s application, BB
seconded, passed unanimously.
VII. Chair’s Report:
44
A. Heritage trees in Bozeman: Mary Keck : State Heritage Tree program is
also currently being developed, may dovetail with local program.
They will keep us apprised as they work on this. Looking for
appropriate trees in likely areas: cemetery, S. 8th, Cooper Park.
City forester is working on tree inventory of city at this time, which
will help.
PR: Interest in tree diseases? Mary: Yes – education, workshops,
mainly promote planting. Green ash street trees at risk.
CK: Add tree info to Preservation Days walking tours? Mary: Yes.
CK: N.E. Neighborhood walking tour planned. Will share route with
Mary so they can co-ordinate tree info.
Mark: Methodology to identify Heritage trees? Connected to
historic events? People? Age? Mary: Yes, everything. Mark:
Individual trees or landscapes? Mary: There are landscapes that
may qualify.
Mark: Do you need anything from us? Mary: The prospective tour,
and support in future.
B. Tax Abatement applications
There are two outstanding, the American Indian Institute and the
MacDonald house on S. Tracy. CK sent each of them a copy of
the memo the Board prepared for their respective projects, so they
could address issues raised by the Board regarding qualification.
We wanted to see their projects upon completion. CK suggested
professional subcommittee can review. MH said that is
appropriate, but noted that unless there have been substantial
changes those projects will not qualify.
AS moved to have professional subcommittee review completed
projects and make recommendation to City. RO seconded, passed
unanimously.
C. Followup on speakers, etc.: RO did groundwork for tour of neon sign shop
(Ole Nelson), maybe tour in March. Nelson has part of Starlite
Drive-in signage, Rialto, East Side Diner, and other historic and/or
interesting neon signs.
VIII. Planning and Policy Subcommittee
Tax abatement must go to CK so she can get it reviewed; LD
asked CT if we have liaison yet, CT says almost, and he will follow
up. Committee plans to work on Demo by Neglect (historic
buildings only) and an addition to the municipal sign ordinance to
protect and encourage preservation/restoration of historic signs.
CK and LD met with David Chambers and Chris Naumann of the
North East Neighborhood Association (NENA). They requested
meeting to find out about construction bonds; they want to prevent
things like Brewery Wall from happening again, have resources to
work on that, would like our help, especially information and
language to make the case. P&P committee must discuss
45
whether/how much we can help. LD supportive of their plans,
noted that discussion of Demo by Neglect always seems to bring
up bonding/guarantees. Meeting set for March 6th, 6:30pm, at BB’s
office.
IX. Education and Outreach Subcommittee
RO: Preservation Days; Gearing up for Preservation Awards, collecting
nominations. Not yet ready for AS to look over. Schedule in place
for screening, voting, ceremony. New walking tour planned for
Northeast area where we just surveyed. CK talked to Dale Martin,
who will help. Awards tentatively May 17th at Beall Park.
Possible artwork-esque projects on/near Main St. An architect
downtown is looking for ways to “vitalize” side streets off Main with
art, has idea to create window-frames on bare walls that match
buildings (i.e., upper-floor windows) and use as frames for art.
Notes that side streets North of Main have few commercial
storefronts, many blank walls of bldgs that front Main. Architect
working on Avant-Courier Bldg. Will find ways to attach frames
without damaging walls. CK will keep us informed.
Working on Cemetery tour, also looking for company to produce
digital walking tours. CK says maybe good project for interns, RO
says just need to get ball rolling re: company in Butte that has
done recorded tours.
Next meeting scheduled for Thursday, March 1st, 6:30 pm, SK’s
house.
X. Staff Liaison Report
A. 2012 CLG application: CK went over application and points she made in it,
asked if anything needed to be added. No. Pr moved for approval
of CLG application to SHPO, with corrections. AS seconded,
motion passed unanimously.
B. Save America’s Treasures grant applications: Pioneer Museum application
OK; they will restore windows, replace only in rear up high. Avant-
Courier Building (Delaney) agreed to not put side windows in, so
OK. Looking for another project for balance of grant (about
$25,000). PR suggested restoration of two street lights on N.
Willson (by Burger Bob’s building), CK: and maybe Armory in
some small way.
C. No other updates.
Meeting was adjourned at about 8:30.
Next BHPAB meeting scheduled for March 22. Possible visit to sign shop before
meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
46
Lora Dalton
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58