HomeMy WebLinkAboutPolicy Discussion regarding Board of Adjustment PurviewCommission Memorandum
REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Commission
FROM: Brian Krueger, Associate Planner
Chris Saunders, Assistant Planning Director
Tim McHarg, Planning Director
SUBJECT: Policy Discussion regarding Board of Adjustment Purview and
Development Review Processes
MEETING DATE: October 3, 2011
AGENDA ITEM TYPE: Action Item
RECOMMENDATION: Review the background information in this memorandum and
provide direction for possible future Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) amendments.
RECOMMENDED MOTION: No motion is necessary. This is a policy discussion that
requires no formal action by the City Commission.
BACKGROUND: Several variance, deviation and conditional use applications have been
reclaimed by the City Commission over the past few months. The reasons for reclaiming these
applications have varied. Some have been at the applicant's request; some have been at Staff s
request; some have been because previous components of the development proposal were
considered by the Commission.
Because of this recent increase in the number of reclaimed applications that would routinely be
heard by the Board of Adjustment (BOA), the Mayor and Commission expressed interest in a
policy discussion regarding the purview of the BOA. However, Staff would request the Mayor
and Commission to consider expanding the scope of this policy discussion to address the
development review process more generally.
The Commission Work Plan includes several items that are related to a discussion of variance,
deviation and conditional use review processes. These Work Plan items are as follows:
2. Implement the adopted economic development plan
b) Commitment to a business - friendly process with a focus on retention and expansion
of local businesses
• Expand Planning Director administrative approvals
• Reduce Conditional Uses
• Implement administrative deviation and alternative compliance processes
182
Planning Staff believes that a policy discussion regarding the purview of the Board of
Adjustment within a broader context of these Work Plan items would be beneficial. If the policy
discussion is limited to the Commission considering permanently reclaiming to itself the purview
of the BOA, Staff is concerned that there may be unintended consequences on the workload of
the Commission and the efficiency of the development review process. These concerns are
summarized as follows:
• Reviewing all variance, deviation and conditional use applications would detract from the
time available to the Commission for broader policy discussions.
• The Commission calendar can be congested, particularly during those times of the year
when budget, capital improvement program, and work plan discussions dominate the
agendas. This may result in delays for applicants as they await openings on the
Commission agenda.
• Preparation of staff reports, providing public notice, and holding public hearings
consume a significant amount of staffing resources. For relatively minor applications
that do not generate any public comment, there may be more efficient review processes
that provide equivalent outcomes.
Planning Staff has identified seven specific areas of change that are recommended for
consideration and direction by the Commission. These potential areas of changes to the UDO
were developed from a pragmatic and functional approach to improving the current review
processes for variance, deviation and conditional use applications.
1. Converting Conditional Uses to Permitted Uses: Staff has identified some uses that
are currently listed as Conditional Uses that could be converted to Principal Uses without
any additional changes. This would simply move some uses from a Conditional Use to a
Permitted Use in specific zone districts. These uses could then be reviewed
administratively as site plan, sketch plan or reuse applications, depending on the nature of
the application. The administrative decision would be subject to the Commission reclaim
and appeal procedures.
An example of one use where this might be considered would be Printing Office and
Publishing Establishments in the B -3 district (Central Business District) where they are a
Conditional Use. With changes in technology the impacts associated with printing and
publishing have decreased and might not merit review as a Conditional Use.
This process could work in concert with a process to redefine some uses, as discussed
below under Recommendation No. 4.
2. Converting Conditional Uses to Permitted Uses with the addition of Standards for
Specific Uses: The UDO contains Chapter 18.40, Standards for Specific Uses. This
chapter lists uses with the potential for negative impacts to the community and provides
specific standards for each of these uses in order to mitigate the potential impacts. These
specific standards must be met in addition to the baseline standards of setbacks, lot
coverage, landscaping, parking and other site development standards.
Staff has identified some uses that are currently listed as Conditional Uses that could be
converted to Principal Uses with the inclusion of standards for those specific uses. These
uses could then be reviewed administratively as site plan, sketch plan or reuse
applications, depending on the nature of the application. The administrative decision
would be subject to the Commission reclaim and appeal procedures.
im
An example of this approach would be to move Automobile Repair from a Conditional
Use to a Permitted Use in the B -2 zone district (Community Business District).
Additional standards could be written into the Special Standards Chapter to mitigate for
or not allow outdoor storage, outdoor vehicle storage, inoperable vehicles, and salvage
vehicles.
Creating a New Category of Special Uses: The new category of Special Use would
require a Special Use Permit. The criteria for a Special Use Permit would be similar in
criteria and public notice requirements to a Conditional Use Permit, but would not require
a public hearing and would be an administrative decision by the Planning Director. This
process could be a stand -alone approval for certain uses or could be used in concert with
standards for specific uses similar to that outlined above for the Conditional Use Permit
process.
An example of a use that may be appropriate for a Special Use Permit would be On
Premise Consumption of Alcohol. This use is currently a Conditional Use in all
commercial zones and as such is the subject of a majority of the conditional uses
permitted over the past five years by the department. Most conditions imposed on these
permit types are very similar and could be codified into Specific Use Standards. The
Special Use Permit would still require noticing and the consideration of public comment
prior to any decision, as well as being subject to the Commission reclaim and appeal
procedures.
4. Redefining Uses and Differentiating in Operation Scale: Over time, the character of
land uses change based upon the demands of the market and changes in technology. New
land uses can arise for these same reasons. The use tables within the code could be
updated to better reflect the range of uses that occur today and might occur in the future
in the City.
At the same time, certain uses could be better defined by intensity and size in order to
permit those smaller scale uses with little opportunity for negative impacts to be
permitted outright and those larger uses in both physical size and intensity to be classified
as either a Special or Conditional Use.
For example, manufacturing could be redefined as a use group with three subheadings:
Artisan, Light, and General. A detailed definition to describe a range of intensity and
size could be developed for each subcategory. Under this approach, an artisan that
manufactures jewelry or pottery may be able to be allowed outright in the B -1
(Neighborhood Business District), B -2, or B -3 zoning districts while a light manufacturer
such as a welding fabrication shop, seat cover manufacturer or truck accessory
manufacturer would remain permitted only in the more industrial M zones.
Expanding Allowances for Accessory Uses: Accessory uses are listed in the use tables
inconsistently. Many permitted and legal businesses include accessory uses that are not
specifically listed as accessory uses or as allowed uses within the zoning district in which
they are located. Many accessory uses are permitted through the use of a Special
Temporary Use Permit (STUP) for a limited period of time with provisions for renewal.
This results in uncertainty for business owners, consumption of staff resources to track
and renew STUPs, and inconsistencies over time.
1s@
Because of these inconsistencies and confusion over what is listed and what is not listed,
Staff recommends removal of all accessory uses from the use table. In lieu of listing
specific uses, the code could include a revised and expanded section on the interpretation
of uses that would list specific criteria to provide a context for the acceptable
classification of a use as accessory to the principal use. Such criteria could include
customer types, hours of operation, percentage of gross square feet allocated to a use,
vehicle trips generated, how a business advertises itself, and relative percentages of sales
activity.
6. Creation of Processes for Administrative Deviations: The UDO currently allows
deviations from the numerical standards within the zoning ordinance. In the
Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District, the code allows an "unlimited" deviation
that could include up to full relief from (i.e. waiver of) an applicable standard. In the
Entryway Corridor Overlay District the code allows up to a 20% deviation above or
below a listed numerical standard. Areas within the City that are not within one of the
Overlay Districts do not have the ability to ask for relief from code standards other than
through a variance process.
Today, deviations are only available through a public hearing process and approval by the
Board of Adjustment or City Commission. The deviation process could be revised to
include an administrative Planning Director approval for some deviations, the addition of
a deviation process for areas outside of Overlay Districts, and revised criteria and
standards for what constitutes a deviation and how much one could deviate from a
standard.
One example of this concept would be to offer deviations outside of Overlay Districts up
to 10% above or below a listed standard subject to criteria. The standards to which the
administrative deviation could apply could include setbacks, height, lot, and /or parking.
An example of a criterion would be that an administrative deviation is available only for
expansions to existing structures and lots and would not be available for new lots and
new structures.
7. Transfer of approval authority. The Staff and Planning Board worked in early 2011 to
identify who approves what kind of things in the UDO. A list of these approvals is
attached. Over the years, there are numerous types of approvals that have been assumed
specifically by the City Commission. The list identifies 57 City Commission specific
approvals while only 15 of those are required by statute.
In connection with the other possible changes identified in options 1 -6 a review of those
approval actions assigned to the City Commission should be reviewed. Any changes to
transfer approval authority to administrative staff could be integrated with the other code
amendments. The administrative decision would be subject to the Commission reclaim
and appeal procedures.
Staff believes that implementing some or all of these seven potential areas for change would
significantly improve the efficiency and flexibility of the development review process without
reducing the quality of the built environment or quality of life outcomes in the community.
UNRESOLVED ISSUES: None at this time.
ALTERNATIVES: The policy discussion will be sufficiently broad to consider a full range of
alternatives relative to these issues.
.;
FISCAL EFFECTS: The work necessary to implement the City Commission's policy direction
on these issues has been budgeted as part of the Planning Department's ongoing effort to address
the individual components of the Commission's Work Plan.
Attachments: None.
Report compiled on: August 12, 2011
196
CITY OF BOZEMAN
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406 - 582 -2260
20 East Olive Street fax 406 - 582 -2263
P.O. Box 1230 planningPbozeman.net
Bozeman, Montana 59771 -1230 www.bozeman.net
TO: CITY COMMISSION
FROM: PLANNING STAFF
RE: APPROVAL STRUCTURE IN TITLE 18, UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT
DATE: AUGUST 22, 2011
Title 18, Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) , Bozeman Municipal Code contains procedures and
standards for subdivision and site development. It pulls together many different subjects and can apply
in many different circumstances. Some of the procedures are given specific steps and approval
requirements by state law. Only Commission actions are mandated to give final approvals. All of the
UDO is affected by a myriad of state and federal laws and judicial rulings.
To help understand the dynamics of the UDO, a chart of sections of the document is provided below. It
lists: what sections the approval body is /are mentioned in; which approval body is /are affected; and
whether that approval is required by statute. This list was prepared in support of the City Commission's
2011 -2012 work plan. The chart is not exhaustive of all possible approvals. Some actions require
consultation and approval by agencies outside of the City as well as within the City's organization. The
external agencies are not listed.
Generally, the assignment of responsibilities for approval are laid out in Section 18.64.010. As noted in
that section, the City Commission has reserved to itself the ability to take back review of an application
which normally is delegated to others. The City Commission has also reserved to themselves, as the
original review body, some specific items they consider of community importance such as the review of
large scale retail.
In the last quarter of 2010, the Planning Board and Staff discussed various options to consider to
revise the City's land use and development processes. Staff committed to providing several options for
consideration. This memo presents for consideration and discussion 20 possible changes. A
prioritization is offered for consideration as well. This list of potential changes is limited to the approval
authority. Other options will be presented for discussion under other procedural or standards discussions
later. The recent set of text amendments approved by the Commission in June began implementing the
Planning Board and Staff discussions.
Shading is provided to help indicate subject matter. Items in white are generally applicable. Items in
blue are specific to subdivisions. Items in green are specific to zoning. Yellow text shows item, person,
and priority to possibly alter the designated approval authority and the priority for consideration.
community planning zoning subdivision review annexation his ric preservation neighborhood planning urban design GIS
REVIEW TYPE
City
' bdwx III a°
Board of
Planning
City
Commission
IZcqw,dre° :d
Adjustment
Director
Engineer
1
City owned land 18.02.080 - Any approval
Medium
1
When
compliant
community planning zoning subdivision review annexation his ric preservation neighborhood planning urban design GIS
Page 2
198
REVIEW TYPE
City
' bdx III °
Board of
Planning
City
Commission
I4.m;lw,dre° :d
Adjustment
Director
Engineer
2
Correction of Errors, Amendments, or
1
Vacation of Final Plat 18.04.030
3
Concurrent Review 18.06.030 - Allows
simultaneous state and local review of
1
�.
infrastructure plans
4
Preliminary Plat 18.06.040.1) - Approve
1
preliminary plat
5
Final Plat 18.06.060.E - Allows recording
1
of plat and sale of lots
6
Final Plan 18.08.040 - Subdivisions by rent
1
or lease
7
Exemptions from Surveying and Filing
Requirements but Subject to Review
1.
18.10.030 - Subdivisions by rent or lease
8
Procedures and General Requirements
18.10.060 - Approval of subdivision
1
exemptions
9
Official Map Replacement Conditions
1
18.14.030 - Replace the zoning map
10
Boundary Interpretation Guidelines
18.14.040.13 - Interpret the zoning map
1
when it isn't clear
11
Boundary Interpretation Guidelines
18.14.040.0 - Interpret the zoning map
1
when it isn't clear
12
Classification of Particular Uses - Planning
Director and City Commission Authority
1
1
18.14.050.A - When there is a new use
13
Zoning of Annexed Territory 18.14.060 -
1
Initial zoning at the time of annexation
14
Additional RMH Performance Standards
Low
18.16.080.A.2 - minimum size of RMH
1
Delete
zoning district
Standard
15
Special Standards 18.19.070.A - Minimum
1
size of UMU zoning district
16
Conservation District Designation or
Recision 18.28.030 - Designation as a
1
historic land mark or added to historic
preservation review
17
Certificate of Appropriateness 18.28.040 -
1 _
Approve projects
1
1
Majority
18
Deviations from Underlying Zoning
Requirements 18.28.070 - grant special
1
1
Medium
exceptions
19
Demolition or Movement of Structures or
Site Within the Conservation District
1
1 High
18.28.080.13 - Approve removal of structure
20
Demolition or Movement of Structures or
Site Within the Conservation District
1
Medium
18.28.080.0 - Approve removal for
historically significant structures
Page 2
198
Page 3
190
REVIEW TYPE
City
' bdx III °'�v
Board of
Planning
City
Commission
I4.m;lw,dre° :d
Adjustment
Director
Engineer
21
Deviations from Overlay or Underlying
Zoning Requirements 18.30.080.A -
1
1
Medium
Approve special exceptions
22
Introduction 18.34.010.1) - Approval for
1
conditional uses
23
Sketch Plan Review 18.34.050.A.3 -
1
Determination of submittal requirements
24
Site Plan Review 18.34.070.13. La -
1
Approval of site plans
25
Site Plan Review 18.34.070.13.2 - Approval
of site plans with special exceptions and
1
Medium
conditional uses
26
Site Plan Review 18.34.070.B.3.a -
1 (when
Approval of master site plans
1
compliant)
27
Board of Adjustment Consideration and
Records for Conditional Use Permits
1
1 (F.2 only)
18.34.100 - Approval of conditional uses
28
Final Site Plan 18.34.130.A - Approve final
1
site plan
29
Final Site Plan 18.34.130.1) - Approve final
1
site plan eltensions
30
Final Site Plan 18.34.130.E - Approve final
1
site plan eltensions
31
Amendments to Sketch and Site Plans
1
18.34.150.13 - Approve amendments
32
Re -use, Change in Use or Further
Development of Sites Developed Prior to
1
the Adoption of this Ordinance
Codified in this Title 18.34.170.A
33
Improvements to Existing Developed Sites
Independent of Site Plan Review
1
18.34.180.A - Allow incremental
improvements without full site plan review
34
Special Temporary Use Permit 18.34.190.0
1
- Allow short term activities
35
Application and Uses of a Planned Unit
Development 18.36.020.1) - Approve
1
planned unit development
36
Planned Unit Development Review
Procedures and Criteria 18.36.040.C.3 -
1
Approval of final PUD plan
37
Planned Unit Development Review
Procedures and Criteria 18.36.040.C.4.a -
1
Approve minor changes to a PUD
38
Planned Unit Development Review
Procedures and Criteria 18.36.040.C.4.b -
1
Approve major changes to a PUD
39
Duration of Planned Unit Development
Approval 18.36.060.A.2 -Extend
1
preliminary approval
Page 3
190
Page 4
196
REVIEW TYPE
City
' bdx III °'�v
Board of
Planning
City
Commission
I4.m;iw,dre° :d
Adjustment
Director
Engineer
40
Duration of Planned Unit Development
Approval 18.36.060.A.3 -Extend
1
High
preliminary approval beyond 1 year
41
Duration of Planned Unit Development
Approval 18.36.060.13.1 - Extend final PUD
1
plan approval
42
Duration of Planned Unit Development
Approval 18.36.060.13.2 - Extend final PUD
1
High
plan approval beyond 1 year
43
Planned Unit Development Design
Objectives and Criteria
1
18.36.090.E.a.(7).(b).(v) - Locate open
space outside of PUD boundaries
44
Use of Lands - Buildings and Structures
18.38.030.D.2 - Alternate muncipal
1
infrastructure requirements
45
Home Based Businesses 18.40.110. C.4 -
Determine when a conditional use permit is
1
required
46
Manufactured Homes on Individual Lots
18.40.130.1) - Approve siting of
1
manufactured home on individual lots
47
Portable Carry -Out Food and Beverage
Buildings 18.40.160.E - Approve special
1
1
temporary use permit
48
Large Scale retail, size limiations and
design and site develompent guidelines and
1
Medium
requirements 18.40.180.C.4 - Approve site
development
49
Stable, Commercial 18.40.190.G - Require
1
dust control
50
Stable, Commercial 18.40.190.H - Provide
1
for adequate parking
51
Tennis and Raquet Club 18.40.200.0 -
1
High
Approval for holding tournaments
52
Tennis and Raquet Club 18.40.200.E -
1
High
Restrict hours of operation
53
Neighborhood Centers 18.42.020.1' - Allow
1
location of stormwater facilities
54
Municipal Water, Sanitary Sewer and
Storm Sewer Systems 18.42.070.A.3 -
1
Exception to not extend infrastucture to
adjacent property
55
Municipal Water, Sanitary Sewer and
Storm Sewer Systems 18.42.070.13.1 -
1
Maximum length of dead end water mains
56
Municipal Water, Sanitary Sewer and
Storm Sewer Systems 18.42.070.13.2 -
1
Maximum length of service lines
57
Grading and Drainage 18.42.080.13 -
1
Exceptions to stormwater controls
58
Lighting 18.42.150.13.3 - Allow alternate
1
lighting standard
Page 4
196
Page 5
196
REVIEW TYPE
City
' bdx III °'�v
Board of
Planning
City
Commission
I4.m;iw,dre° :d
Adjustment
Director
Engineer
59
Lighting 18.42.150.D.7.j - Allow high
1
intensity lights for special events
60
Streets, General 18.44.O 10.A -Exception
1
Low
from extending streets to adjacent property
61
Streets, General 18.44.0 10.E.I - Turn-
1
arounds on dead end streets
62
Streets, General 18.44.010.G - Partial street
1
construction
63
Streets, General 18.44.010.I - Allowance
1
for cul -de -sac
64
Street Names 18.44.040.A.2 - Allowing
1
names of streets
65
Street Improvement Standards 18.44.060 -
1
Plans and specifications for streets
66
Street Improvement Standards 18.44.060.A
1
- Approval of proposed street surfacing
67
Street Improvement Standards
1
18.44.060.13.2 - Alley specifications
68
Street Improvement Standards 18.44.060. C
1
- Traffic signal spacing
69
Access 18.44.090.A. 1.a - Approval of curb
1
cuts and sidewalks
70
Access 18.44.090.G -Location and width
1
of drive accesses
71
Access 18.44.090.H - Modifications to
1
property accesses
72
Stall, Aisle and Driveway Design
18.46.020.F - Alternatives to surfacing for
1
parking areas
73
Stall, Aisle and Driveway Design
1
18.46.020.J.3 - Alternatives to curbing
74
Number of Parking Spaces Required
18.46.040.13.1 - Classification of parking
1
requirement for non - specified uses
75
Joint Use of Parking Facilities 18.46.050.13
1
- Allow joint use of parking area
76
Mandatory Landscaping Provisions
18.48.050.E. I -Minimum landscaping
1
requirements for street frontage
77
Mandatory Landscaping Provisions
18.48.050.H.2 - Protection of landscaped
1
areas
78
Mandatory Landscaping Provisions
18.48.050.L.3 - Maximum allowed slope
1
for landscaped areas
79
Cash Donation in -Lieu of Land Dedication
Medium If
18.50.030 - Determine if land or money
CC not
best meets requirements
1.
otherwise
required
80
Park Use 18.50.040 - Determination of park
1
usage
Page 5
196
Page 6
192
REVIEW TYPE
City
' bdx III °'�v
Board of
Planning
City
Commission
I4.m;lw,dre° :d
Adjustment
Director
Engineer
81
Location 18.50.050.A - Suitable location
for parks
82
Waiver of Required Park Dedication
1
18.50. 100 - Waive park dedication
83
Sign Permitted Upon Issuance of a Sign
1
Permit 18.52.060 - Approve sign permits
84
Sign Permitted Upon Issuance of a Sign
1
Permit 18.52.060.1) - Deviations for signs
85
Comprehensive Sign Plan 18.52.070 -
Approve integrating elements in a
1
comprehensive sign plan
86
Historic or Culturally Significant Signs
1
18.52.160 - Approve exceptions
87
Application 18.52.170 - Review of sign
1
1
applications
88
Application Requirements and Procedures
for Regulated Activities in Regulated
1
Wetland Areas 18.56.070.13.1 - Approval of
sketch plans for wetland changes
89
Floodplain Administrator 18.58.060 -
1
Designates the floodplain administrator
90
Flood Hazard Evaluation
18.58.090.B.4.d.(2) - Contents of flood
1
hazard report
91
Flood Hazard Evaluation 18.58.090.0 -
1
Allow waiver of flood hazard report
92
Changes to or Expansions of
Nonconforming Uses 18.60.020. A.1 -
1
High
Change or expand non - residential
93
Changes to or Expansions of
Nonconforming Uses 18.60.020.13.1 -
1
High
Residential
94
Nonconforming Area and Bulk
Requirements for Existing Lots
1
High
18.60.030.A - Allow use of substandard lot
95
Purpose of DRC, DRB, ADR, WRB, and
BOA 18.62.010.A - Establishes general
1
responsibilities
96
Purpose of DRC, DRB, ADR, WRB, and
BOA 18.62.010.A.5 - Assigns specific
1
duties
97
Purpose of DRC, DRB, ADR, WRB, and
BOA 18.62.010.0 - Appointment of DRB
1
members
98
Purpose of DRC, DRB, ADR, WRB, and
BOA 18.62.010.1 - Appointment of WRB
1
members
99
Purpose of DRC, DRB, ADR, WRB, and
BOA 18.62.010.G - Appointment of BOA
1
1
members
100
General Procedures, Noticing and Timing
1
18.62.020.A - Establishment of review fee
Page 6
192
Page 7
198
REVIEW TYPE
City
' bdx III °'�v
Board of
Planning
City
Commission
I4.m;lw,dre° :d
Adjustment
Director
Engineer
101
Review Authority 18.64.010.A - Overall
1
review authority
102
Review Authority 18.64.010.13 - General
Planning Director authority for review of
1
applications
103
Review Authority 18.64.010. C - General
1
BOA authority for review of applications
104
Administration and Enforcement - Planning
Director Authority 18.64.020.A - Authorize
1
Planning Director to administer Title 18
105
Administration and Enforcement - Planning
Director Authority 18.64.020.0 - Authority
1
to stop work
106
Enforcement Planning Director 18.64.030 -
1
Assignment of enforcement authority
107
Stop Work Order - Planning Director,
Building Official, City Engineer Authority
1
1
18.64.040 - Can issue order to cease all
work
108
Building Permit Requirements 18.64.100.1
1
- Extension of approval duration
109
Fee Schedule 18.64.140.A - Authority to set
1
fee schedule
110
Violation - Penalty - Assisting or Abetting -
Additional Remedies 18.64.160.E -
1
Low
Authorization to record a notice of violation
111
Purposes 18.66.010.13 - Authorization for
1
zoning variances
112
Purposes 18.66.010.0 - Authorization for
1
subdivision variances
113
Administrative Project Decision Appeals
1
18.66.030 - Who hears appeals
114
Administrative Interpretation Appeals
18.66.040 - Decide appeals of
1
administrative decisions
115
Deviations 18.66.050 - General authority to
Medium w/
hear deviations
1
parameters
116
Zoning Variances 18.66.060.D.I -
1
Authorization to approve variances
117
Initiation of Amendments and Changes
18.68.010 — Approve amendments to the
1.
text of the UDO
118
Protest Text Amendments 18.68.040 -
Standard to override a protest of a zoning
1
�.
text change
119
Public Hearing Procedures and
Requirements 18.70.030 - Approve zone
1
map amendments
120
Covenants 18.72.010 - Approval of
1
1
covenants
121
Covenants 18.72.030.1-1.2 - City assumption
1
of responsibility of private improvements
Page 7
198
Page 8
190
REVIEW TYPE
City
' bdx III
Board of
Planning
City
Commission
I4.m;iw,dre° :d
Adjustment
Director
Engineer
122
Standards for Improvements 18.74.020.13 -
Approval of improvements to be dedicated
1
to the public
123
Completion of Improvements
18.74.030.13. Lb - Street installation
1
improvements and guarantees
124
Completion of Improvements 18.74.030.0 -
1
Site improvements
125
Completion of Improvements
18.74.030.1).13 - Concurrent construction
1
plan
126
Improvements Agreements 18.74.060.A.3 -
Determine applicability of requirement for
1
improvement agreement for COAs
127
Improvements Agreements 18.74.060.13 -
Determine exception for requirement for
1
street paving
128
Improvements Agreements 18.74.060 C.2.c
- Reduction of security for improvement
1
agreement
129
Improvements Agreements 18.74.060 C.2.d
- Reduction of security for off -site
1 Medium
1
improvements
130
Improvements Agreements 18.74.060 C.3.d
- Extension of security for site
1
improvements
131
Improvements Agreements 18.74.060.E -
Assign responsibility for signing on behalf
1
of City
132
Notice Requirements for Application
Processing 18.76.030.0 - Determine
1
additional noticing requirements
133
Final Plat 18.78.070.1) - Approval final
1
plan for park development with final plat
134
Artificial Lot 18.80.220 - Determine the
1
area of an artificial lot
Existing
57
15
12
50
30
Page 8
190