HomeMy WebLinkAboutPolicy Discussion regarding Board of Adjustment Purview
Commission Memorandum
REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Commission
FROM: Brian Krueger, Associate Planner
Chris Saunders, Assistant Planning Director
Tim McHarg, Planning Director
SUBJECT: Policy Discussion regarding Board of Adjustment Purview and
Development Review Processes
MEETING DATE: August 29, 2011
AGENDA ITEM TYPE: Action Item
RECOMMENDATION: Review the background information in this memorandum and
provide direction for possible future Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) amendments.
RECOMMENDED MOTION: No motion is necessary. This is a policy discussion that
requires no formal action by the City Commission.
BACKGROUND: Several variance, deviation and conditional use applications have been
reclaimed by the City Commission over the past few months. The reasons for reclaiming these
applications have varied. Some have been at the applicant’s request; some have been at Staff’s
request; some have been because previous components of the development proposal were
considered by the Commission.
Because of this recent increase in the number of reclaimed applications that would routinely be
heard by the Board of Adjustment (BOA), the Mayor and Commission expressed interest in a
policy discussion regarding the purview of the BOA. However, Staff would request the Mayor
and Commission to consider expanding the scope of this policy discussion to address the
development review process more generally.
The Commission Work Plan includes several items that are related to a discussion of variance,
deviation and conditional use review processes. These Work Plan items are as follows:
2. Implement the adopted economic development plan
b) Commitment to a business-friendly process with a focus on retention and expansion
of local businesses
· Expand Planning Director administrative approvals
· Reduce Conditional Uses
· Implement administrative deviation and alternative compliance processes
122
Planning Staff believes that a policy discussion regarding the purview of the Board of
Adjustment within a broader context of these Work Plan items would be beneficial. If the policy
discussion is limited to the Commission considering permanently reclaiming to itself the purview
of the BOA, Staff is concerned that there may be unintended consequences on the workload of
the Commission and the efficiency of the development review process. These concerns are
summarized as follows:
· Reviewing all variance, deviation and conditional use applications would detract from the
time available to the Commission for broader policy discussions.
· The Commission calendar can be congested, particularly during those times of the year
when budget, capital improvement program, and work plan discussions dominate the
agendas. This may result in delays for applicants as they await openings on the
Commission agenda.
· Preparation of staff reports, providing public notice, and holding public hearings
consume a significant amount of staffing resources. For relatively minor applications
that do not generate any public comment, there may be more efficient review processes
that provide equivalent outcomes.
Planning Staff has identified seven specific areas of change that are recommended for
consideration and direction by the Commission. These potential areas of changes to the UDO
were developed from a pragmatic and functional approach to improving the current review
processes for variance, deviation and conditional use applications.
1. Converting Conditional Uses to Permitted Uses: Staff has identified some uses that
are currently listed as Conditional Uses that could be converted to Principal Uses without
any additional changes. This would simply move some uses from a Conditional Use to a
Permitted Use in specific zone districts. These uses could then be reviewed
administratively as site plan, sketch plan or reuse applications, depending on the nature of
the application. The administrative decision would be subject to the Commission reclaim
and appeal procedures.
An example of one use where this might be considered would be Printing Office and
Publishing Establishments in the B-3 district (Central Business District) where they are a
Conditional Use. With changes in technology the impacts associated with printing and
publishing have decreased and might not merit review as a Conditional Use.
This process could work in concert with a process to redefine some uses, as discussed
below under Recommendation No. 4.
2. Converting Conditional Uses to Permitted Uses with the addition of Standards for
Specific Uses: The UDO contains Chapter 18.40, Standards for Specific Uses. This
chapter lists uses with the potential for negative impacts to the community and provides
specific standards for each of these uses in order to mitigate the potential impacts. These
specific standards must be met in addition to the baseline standards of setbacks, lot
coverage, landscaping, parking and other site development standards.
Staff has identified some uses that are currently listed as Conditional Uses that could be
converted to Principal Uses with the inclusion of standards for those specific uses. These
uses could then be reviewed administratively as site plan, sketch plan or reuse
applications, depending on the nature of the application. The administrative decision
would be subject to the Commission reclaim and appeal procedures.
123
An example of this approach would be to move Automobile Repair from a Conditional
Use to a Permitted Use in the B-2 zone district (Community Business District).
Additional standards could be written into the Special Standards Chapter to mitigate for
or not allow outdoor storage, outdoor vehicle storage, inoperable vehicles, and salvage
vehicles.
3. Creating a New Category of Special Uses: The new category of Special Use would
require a Special Use Permit. The criteria for a Special Use Permit would be similar in
criteria and public notice requirements to a Conditional Use Permit, but would not require
a public hearing and would be an administrative decision by the Planning Director. This
process could be a stand-alone approval for certain uses or could be used in concert with
standards for specific uses similar to that outlined above for the Conditional Use Permit
process.
An example of a use that may be appropriate for a Special Use Permit would be On
Premise Consumption of Alcohol. This use is currently a Conditional Use in all
commercial zones and as such is the subject of a majority of the conditional uses
permitted over the past five years by the department. Most conditions imposed on these
permit types are very similar and could be codified into Specific Use Standards. The
Special Use Permit would still require noticing and the consideration of public comment
prior to any decision, as well as being subject to the Commission reclaim and appeal
procedures.
4. Redefining Uses and Differentiating in Operation Scale: Over time, the character of
land uses change based upon the demands of the market and changes in technology. New
land uses can arise for these same reasons. The use tables within the code could be
updated to better reflect the range of uses that occur today and might occur in the future
in the City.
At the same time, certain uses could be better defined by intensity and size in order to
permit those smaller scale uses with little opportunity for negative impacts to be
permitted outright and those larger uses in both physical size and intensity to be classified
as either a Special or Conditional Use.
For example, manufacturing could be redefined as a use group with three subheadings:
Artisan, Light, and General. A detailed definition to describe a range of intensity and
size could be developed for each subcategory. Under this approach, an artisan that
manufactures jewelry or pottery may be able to be allowed outright in the B-1
(Neighborhood Business District), B-2, or B-3 zoning districts while a light manufacturer
such as a welding fabrication shop, seat cover manufacturer or truck accessory
manufacturer would remain permitted only in the more industrial M zones.
5. Expanding Allowances for Accessory Uses: Accessory uses are listed in the use tables
inconsistently. Many permitted and legal businesses include accessory uses that are not
specifically listed as accessory uses or as allowed uses within the zoning district in which
they are located. Many accessory uses are permitted through the use of a Special
Temporary Use Permit (STUP) for a limited period of time with provisions for renewal.
This results in uncertainty for business owners, consumption of staff resources to track
and renew STUPs, and inconsistencies over time.
124
Because of these inconsistencies and confusion over what is listed and what is not listed,
Staff recommends removal of all accessory uses from the use table. In lieu of listing
specific uses, the code could include a revised and expanded section on the interpretation
of uses that would list specific criteria to provide a context for the acceptable
classification of a use as accessory to the principal use. Such criteria could include
customer types, hours of operation, percentage of gross square feet allocated to a use,
vehicle trips generated, how a business advertises itself, and relative percentages of sales
activity.
6. Creation of Processes for Administrative Deviations: The UDO currently allows
deviations from the numerical standards within the zoning ordinance. In the
Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District, the code allows an “unlimited” deviation
that could include up to full relief from (i.e. waiver of) an applicable standard. In the
Entryway Corridor Overlay District the code allows up to a 20% deviation above or
below a listed numerical standard. Areas within the City that are not within one of the
Overlay Districts do not have the ability to ask for relief from code standards other than
through a variance process.
Today, deviations are only available through a public hearing process and approval by the
Board of Adjustment or City Commission. The deviation process could be revised to
include an administrative Planning Director approval for some deviations, the addition of
a deviation process for areas outside of Overlay Districts, and revised criteria and
standards for what constitutes a deviation and how much one could deviate from a
standard.
One example of this concept would be to offer deviations outside of Overlay Districts up
to 10% above or below a listed standard subject to criteria. The standards to which the
administrative deviation could apply could include setbacks, height, lot, and/or parking.
An example of a criterion would be that an administrative deviation is available only for
expansions to existing structures and lots and would not be available for new lots and
new structures.
7. Transfer of approval authority. The Staff and Planning Board worked in early 2011 to
identify who approves what kind of things in the UDO. A list of these approvals is
attached. Over the years, there are numerous types of approvals that have been assumed
specifically by the City Commission. The list identifies 57 City Commission specific
approvals while only 15 of those are required by statute.
In connection with the other possible changes identified in options 1-6 a review of those
approval actions assigned to the City Commission should be reviewed. Any changes to
transfer approval authority to administrative staff could be integrated with the other code
amendments. The administrative decision would be subject to the Commission reclaim
and appeal procedures.
Staff believes that implementing some or all of these seven potential areas for change would
significantly improve the efficiency and flexibility of the development review process without
reducing the quality of the built environment or quality of life outcomes in the community.
UNRESOLVED ISSUES: None at this time.
ALTERNATIVES: The policy discussion will be sufficiently broad to consider a full range of
alternatives relative to these issues.
125
FISCAL EFFECTS: The work necessary to implement the City Commission’s policy direction
on these issues has been budgeted as part of the Planning Department’s ongoing effort to address
the individual components of the Commission’s Work Plan.
Attachments: None.
Report compiled on: August 12, 2011
126
community planning zoning subdivision review annexation historic preservation neighborhood planning urban design GIS
CITY OF BOZEMAN
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building
20 East Olive Street
P.O. Box 1230
Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230
phone 406-582-2260
fax 406-582-2263
planning@bozeman.net
www.bozeman.net
TO: CITY COMMISSION
FROM: PLANNING STAFF
RE: APPROVAL STRUCTURE IN TITLE 18, UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT
DATE: AUGUST 22, 2011
Title 18, Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) , Bozeman Municipal Code contains procedures and
standards for subdivision and site development. It pulls together many different subjects and can apply
in many different circumstances. Some of the procedures are given specific steps and approval
requirements by state law. Only Commission actions are mandated to give final approvals. All of the
UDO is affected by a myriad of state and federal laws and judicial rulings.
To help understand the dynamics of the UDO, a chart of sections of the document is provided below. It
lists: what sections the approval body is/are mentioned in; which approval body is/are affected; and
whether that approval is required by statute. This list was prepared in support of the City Commission’s
2011-2012 work plan. The chart is not exhaustive of all possible approvals. Some actions require
consultation and approval by agencies outside of the City as well as within the City’s organization. The
external agencies are not listed.
Generally, the assignment of responsibilities for approval are laid out in Section 18.64.010. As noted in
that section, the City Commission has reserved to itself the ability to take back review of an application
which normally is delegated to others. The City Commission has also reserved to themselves, as the
original review body, some specific items they consider of community importance such as the review of
large scale retail.
In the last quarter of 2010, the Planning Board and Staff discussed various options to consider to
revise the City’s land use and development processes. Staff committed to providing several options for
consideration. This memo presents for consideration and discussion 20 possible changes. A
prioritization is offered for consideration as well. This list of potential changes is limited to the approval
authority. Other options will be presented for discussion under other procedural or standards discussions
later. The recent set of text amendments approved by the Commission in June began implementing the
Planning Board and Staff discussions.
Shading is provided to help indicate subject matter. Items in white are generally applicable. Items in
blue are specific to subdivisions. Items in green are specific to zoning. Yellow text shows item, person,
and priority to possibly alter the designated approval authority and the priority for consideration.
REVIEW TYPE City
Commission
State Law
Required
Board of
Adjustment
Planning
Director
City
Engineer
1 City owned land 18.02.080 - Any approval
1
Medium
When
compliant
127
Page 2
REVIEW TYPE City
Commission
State Law
Required
Board of
Adjustment
Planning
Director
City
Engineer
2 Correction of Errors, Amendments, or
Vacation of Final Plat 18.04.030 1 1
3 Concurrent Review 18.06.030 - Allows
simultaneous state and local review of
infrastructure plans
1 1
4 Preliminary Plat 18.06.040.D - Approve
preliminary plat 1 1
5 Final Plat 18.06.060.E - Allows recording
of plat and sale of lots 1 1
6 Final Plan 18.08.040 - Subdivisions by rent
or lease 1 1
7 Exemptions from Surveying and Filing
Requirements but Subject to Review
18.10.030 - Subdivisions by rent or lease 1 1
8 Procedures and General Requirements
18.10.060 - Approval of subdivision
exemptions 1
9 Official Map Replacement Conditions
18.14.030 - Replace the zoning map 1 1
10 Boundary Interpretation Guidelines
18.14.040.B - Interpret the zoning map
when it isn't clear 1
11 Boundary Interpretation Guidelines
18.14.040.C - Interpret the zoning map
when it isn't clear 1
12 Classification of Particular Uses - Planning
Director and City Commission Authority
18.14.050.A - When there is a new use
1 1
13 Zoning of Annexed Territory 18.14.060 -
Initial zoning at the time of annexation 1 1
14 Additional RMH Performance Standards
18.16.080.A.2 - minimum size of RMH
zoning district 1
Low
Delete
Standard
15 Special Standards 18.19.070.A - Minimum
size of UMU zoning district 1
16 Conservation District Designation or
Recision 18.28.030 - Designation as a
historic land mark or added to historic
preservation review
1
17 Certificate of Appropriateness 18.28.040 -
Approve projects 1 1 1 -
Majority
18 Deviations from Underlying Zoning
Requirements 18.28.070 - grant special
exceptions
1 1 Medium
19 Demolition or Movement of Structures or
Site Within the Conservation District
18.28.080.B - Approve removal of structure 1 1 High
20 Demolition or Movement of Structures or
Site Within the Conservation District
18.28.080.C - Approve removal for
historically significant structures
1 Medium
128
Page 3
REVIEW TYPE City
Commission
State Law
Required
Board of
Adjustment
Planning
Director
City
Engineer
21 Deviations from Overlay or Underlying
Zoning Requirements 18.30.080.A -
Approve special exceptions 1 1 Medium
22 Introduction 18.34.010.D - Approval for
conditional uses 1
23 Sketch Plan Review 18.34.050.A.3 -
Determination of submittal requirements 1
24 Site Plan Review 18.34.070.B.1.a -
Approval of site plans 1
25 Site Plan Review 18.34.070.B.2 - Approval
of site plans with special exceptions and
conditional uses 1 Medium
26 Site Plan Review 18.34.070.B.3.a -
Approval of master site plans 1
1 (when
compliant)
27 Board of Adjustment Consideration and
Records for Conditional Use Permits
18.34.100 - Approval of conditional uses 1 1 (F.2 only)
28 Final Site Plan 18.34.130.A - Approve final
site plan 1
29 Final Site Plan 18.34.130.D - Approve final
site plan e1tensions 1
30 Final Site Plan 18.34.130.E - Approve final
site plan e1tensions 1
31 Amendments to Sketch and Site Plans
18.34.150.B - Approve amendments 1
32 Re-use, Change in Use or Further
Development of Sites Developed Prior to
the Adoption of this Ordinance
Codified in this Title 18.34.170.A 1
33 Improvements to Existing Developed Sites
Independent of Site Plan Review
18.34.180.A - Allow incremental
improvements without full site plan review 1
34 Special Temporary Use Permit 18.34.190.C
- Allow short term activities 1
35 Application and Uses of a Planned Unit
Development 18.36.020.D - Approve
planned unit development
1
36 Planned Unit Development Review
Procedures and Criteria 18.36.040.C.3 -
Approval of final PUD plan 1
37 Planned Unit Development Review
Procedures and Criteria 18.36.040.C.4.a -
Approve minor changes to a PUD 1
38 Planned Unit Development Review
Procedures and Criteria 18.36.040.C.4.b -
Approve major changes to a PUD 1
39 Duration of Planned Unit Development
Approval 18.36.060.A.2 - Extend
preliminary approval 1
129
Page 4
REVIEW TYPE City
Commission
State Law
Required
Board of
Adjustment
Planning
Director
City
Engineer
40 Duration of Planned Unit Development
Approval 18.36.060.A.3 - Extend
preliminary approval beyond 1 year 1 High
41 Duration of Planned Unit Development
Approval 18.36.060.B.1 - Extend final PUD
plan approval 1
42 Duration of Planned Unit Development
Approval 18.36.060.B.2 - Extend final PUD
plan approval beyond 1 year
1 High
43 Planned Unit Development Design
Objectives and Criteria
18.36.090.E.a.(7).(b).(v) - Locate open
space outside of PUD boundaries
1
44 Use of Lands - Buildings and Structures
18.38.030.D.2 - Alternate muncipal
infrastructure requirements 1
45 Home Based Businesses 18.40.110.C.4 -
Determine when a conditional use permit is
required 1
46 Manufactured Homes on Individual Lots
18.40.130.D - Approve siting of
manufactured home on individual lots 1
47 Portable Carry-Out Food and Beverage
Buildings 18.40.160.E - Approve special
temporary use permit 1 1
48 Large Scale retail, size limiations and
design and site develompent guidelines and
requirements 18.40.180.C.4 - Approve site
development
1 Medium
49 Stable, Commercial 18.40.190.G - Require
dust control 1
50 Stable, Commercial 18.40.190.H - Provide
for adequate parking 1
51 Tennis and Raquet Club 18.40.200.C -
Approval for holding tournaments 1 High
52 Tennis and Raquet Club 18.40.200.E -
Restrict hours of operation 1 High
53 Neighborhood Centers 18.42.020.F - Allow
location of stormwater facilities 1
54 Municipal Water, Sanitary Sewer and
Storm Sewer Systems 18.42.070.A.3 -
Exception to not extend infrastucture to
adjacent property
1
55 Municipal Water, Sanitary Sewer and
Storm Sewer Systems 18.42.070.B.1 -
Maximum length of dead end water mains 1
56 Municipal Water, Sanitary Sewer and
Storm Sewer Systems 18.42.070.B.2 -
Maximum length of service lines 1
57 Grading and Drainage 18.42.080.B -
Exceptions to stormwater controls 1
58 Lighting 18.42.150.B.3 - Allow alternate
lighting standard 1
130
Page 5
REVIEW TYPE City
Commission
State Law
Required
Board of
Adjustment
Planning
Director
City
Engineer
59 Lighting 18.42.150.D.7.j - Allow high
intensity lights for special events 1
60 Streets, General 18.44.010.A - Exception
from extending streets to adjacent property 1 Low
61 Streets, General 18.44.010.E.1 - Turn-
arounds on dead end streets 1
62 Streets, General 18.44.010.G - Partial street
construction 1
63 Streets, General 18.44.010.I - Allowance
for cul-de-sac 1
64 Street Names 18.44.040.A.2 - Allowing
names of streets 1
65 Street Improvement Standards 18.44.060 -
Plans and specifications for streets 1
66 Street Improvement Standards 18.44.060.A
- Approval of proposed street surfacing 1
67 Street Improvement Standards
18.44.060.B.2 - Alley specifications 1
68 Street Improvement Standards 18.44.060.C
- Traffic signal spacing 1
69 Access 18.44.090.A.1.a - Approval of curb
cuts and sidewalks 1
70 Access 18.44.090.G - Location and width
of drive accesses 1
71 Access 18.44.090.H - Modifications to
property accesses 1
72 Stall, Aisle and Driveway Design
18.46.020.F - Alternatives to surfacing for
parking areas 1
73 Stall, Aisle and Driveway Design
18.46.020.J.3 - Alternatives to curbing 1
74 Number of Parking Spaces Required
18.46.040.B.1 - Classification of parking
requirement for non-specified uses 1
75 Joint Use of Parking Facilities 18.46.050.B
- Allow joint use of parking area 1
76 Mandatory Landscaping Provisions
18.48.050.E.1 - Minimum landscaping
requirements for street frontage 1
77 Mandatory Landscaping Provisions
18.48.050.H.2 - Protection of landscaped
areas 1
78 Mandatory Landscaping Provisions
18.48.050.L.3 - Maximum allowed slope
for landscaped areas 1
79 Cash Donation in-Lieu of Land Dedication
18.50.030 - Determine if land or money
best meets requirements 1 1
Medium If
CC not
otherwise
required
80 Park Use 18.50.040 - Determination of park
usage 1
131
Page 6
REVIEW TYPE City
Commission
State Law
Required
Board of
Adjustment
Planning
Director
City
Engineer
81 Location 18.50.050.A - Suitable location
for parks 1 1 1
82 Waiver of Required Park Dedication
18.50.100 - Waive park dedication 1 1
83 Sign Permitted Upon Issuance of a Sign
Permit 18.52.060 - Approve sign permits 1
84 Sign Permitted Upon Issuance of a Sign
Permit 18.52.060.D - Deviations for signs 1
85 Comprehensive Sign Plan 18.52.070 -
Approve integrating elements in a
comprehensive sign plan 1
86 Historic or Culturally Significant Signs
18.52.160 - Approve exceptions 1
87 Application 18.52.170 - Review of sign
applications 1 1
88 Application Requirements and Procedures
for Regulated Activities in Regulated
Wetland Areas 18.56.070.B.1 - Approval of
sketch plans for wetland changes 1
89 Floodplain Administrator 18.58.060 -
Designates the floodplain administrator 1
90 Flood Hazard Evaluation
18.58.090.B.4.d.(2) - Contents of flood
hazard report 1
91 Flood Hazard Evaluation 18.58.090.C -
Allow waiver of flood hazard report 1
92 Changes to or Expansions of
Nonconforming Uses 18.60.020.A.1 -
Change or expand non-residential 1 High
93 Changes to or Expansions of
Nonconforming Uses 18.60.020.B.1 -
Residential 1 High
94 Nonconforming Area and Bulk
Requirements for Existing Lots
18.60.030.A - Allow use of substandard lot 1 High
95 Purpose of DRC, DRB, ADR, WRB, and
BOA 18.62.010.A - Establishes general
responsibilities 1
96 Purpose of DRC, DRB, ADR, WRB, and
BOA 18.62.010.A.5 - Assigns specific
duties 1
97 Purpose of DRC, DRB, ADR, WRB, and
BOA 18.62.010.C - Appointment of DRB
members
1
98 Purpose of DRC, DRB, ADR, WRB, and
BOA 18.62.010.F - Appointment of WRB
members
1
99 Purpose of DRC, DRB, ADR, WRB, and
BOA 18.62.010.G - Appointment of BOA
members
1 1
100 General Procedures, Noticing and Timing
18.62.020.A - Establishment of review fee 1
132
Page 7
REVIEW TYPE City
Commission
State Law
Required
Board of
Adjustment
Planning
Director
City
Engineer
101 Review Authority 18.64.010.A - Overall
review authority 1
102 Review Authority 18.64.010.B - General
Planning Director authority for review of
applications 1
103 Review Authority 18.64.010.C - General
BOA authority for review of applications 1
104 Administration and Enforcement - Planning
Director Authority 18.64.020.A - Authorize
Planning Director to administer Title 18 1
105 Administration and Enforcement - Planning
Director Authority 18.64.020.C - Authority
to stop work 1
106 Enforcement Planning Director 18.64.030 -
Assignment of enforcement authority 1
107 Stop Work Order - Planning Director,
Building Official, City Engineer Authority
18.64.040 - Can issue order to cease all
work 1 1
108 Building Permit Requirements 18.64.100.F
- Extension of approval duration 1
109 Fee Schedule 18.64.140.A - Authority to set
fee schedule 1
110 Violation - Penalty - Assisting or Abetting -
Additional Remedies 18.64.160.E -
Authorization to record a notice of violation 1 Low
111 Purposes 18.66.010.B - Authorization for
zoning variances 1
112 Purposes 18.66.010.C - Authorization for
subdivision variances 1
113 Administrative Project Decision Appeals
18.66.030 - Who hears appeals 1
114 Administrative Interpretation Appeals
18.66.040 - Decide appeals of
administrative decisions 1
115 Deviations 18.66.050 - General authority to
hear deviations 1 Medium w/
parameters
116 Zoning Variances 18.66.060.D.1 -
Authorization to approve variances 1
117 Initiation of Amendments and Changes
18.68.010 – Approve amendments to the
text of the UDO
1 1
118 Protest Text Amendments 18.68.040 -
Standard to override a protest of a zoning
text change 1 1
119 Public Hearing Procedures and
Requirements 18.70.030 - Approve zone
map amendments 1 1
120 Covenants 18.72.010 - Approval of
covenants 1 1
121 Covenants 18.72.030.H.2 - City assumption
of responsibility of private improvements 1
133
Page 8
REVIEW TYPE City
Commission
State Law
Required
Board of
Adjustment
Planning
Director
City
Engineer
122 Standards for Improvements 18.74.020.B -
Approval of improvements to be dedicated
to the public 1
123 Completion of Improvements
18.74.030.B.1.b - Street installation
improvements and guarantees 1
124 Completion of Improvements 18.74.030.C -
Site improvements 1
125 Completion of Improvements
18.74.030.D.13 - Concurrent construction
plan 1
126 Improvements Agreements 18.74.060.A.3 -
Determine applicability of requirement for
improvement agreement for COAs 1
127 Improvements Agreements 18.74.060.B -
Determine exception for requirement for
street paving 1
128 Improvements Agreements 18.74.060 C.2.c
- Reduction of security for improvement
agreement 1
129 Improvements Agreements 18.74.060 C.2.d
- Reduction of security for off-site
improvements
1 Medium 1
130 Improvements Agreements 18.74.060 C.3.d
- Extension of security for site
improvements 1
131 Improvements Agreements 18.74.060.E -
Assign responsibility for signing on behalf
of City 1
132 Notice Requirements for Application
Processing 18.76.030.C - Determine
additional noticing requirements 1
133 Final Plat 18.78.070.D - Approval final
plan for park development with final plat 1
134 Artificial Lot 18.80.220 - Determine the
area of an artificial lot 1
Existing 57 15 12 50 30
134