Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOne Year Extension on Final Site Plan Application, Woodhaven Village Planned Unit Development.pdf Commission Memorandum REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Commission FROM: Doug Riley, Associate Planner Tim McHarg, Director of Planning and Community Development SUBJECT: Woodhaven Village PUD – Final Site Plan- One Year Approval Extension - #Z-07005 MEETING DATE: July 25, 2011 AGENDA ITEM TYPE: Consent RECOMMENDATION: That the City Commission approve the request from D & D Palmer LLC for a one year extension to the Woodhaven Village PUD – Final Site Plan approval as allowed under Section 18.36.060.B.2 of the Bozeman Municipal Code (BMC). BACKGROUND: The Final Site Plan to allow the construction of 12 condominium units, and related site improvements, at 5349 Baxter Lane, located within the Baxter Square Subdivision PUD, was initially approved on June 14, 2007. As allowed by Code, the Planning Director had previously administratively approved a one year extension to the approval (which set the expiration date for June 14, 2009). At the request of the applicant, and as allowed by Code, the City Commission has previously granted 2 one year extensions to the approval extending the approval to June 14, 2011. While the applicant has not initiated any infrastructure construction or other development on the property, they have paid their cash-in-lieu of parkland to the City in the amount of $29,800.00 as part of the Final Site Plan approval. As noted in the attached request from D & D Palmer LLC, a request is now being made for an additional one year extension. As part of our evaluation, staff reviewed the requested extension with the Development Review Committee (DRC) to determine that the circumstances or conditions had not changed since the initial approval that would not warrant granting the extension. The DRC was fully supportive of the requested extension. Staff’s site visit also did not reveal any public safety or aesthetic issues with the site. UNRESOLVED ISSUES: None determined at this time. ALTERNATIVES: 1) Approved the extension as requested. 2) Approve a different extension time. 3) Denial of the extension request. 4 As suggested by the Commission. 81 Commission Memorandum FISCAL EFFECTS: The standard application fee for review of site plan extension requests was received and added to the Department of Planning and Community Development’s application fee revenue. As previously noted, the applicant had already paid their cash-in-lieu of parkland to the City in the amount of $29,800.00 as part of the Final Site Plan approval. Attachments: Applicants Extension Request Location Map Site Plan Report compiled on July 6, 2011 82 83 84 85 86 87