Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNorth Rouse Avenue Impound Yard.pdf Commission Memorandum REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Commission FROM: Chris Saunders, Assistant Director Tim McHarg, Director Dept. of Planning and Community Development. Chris Kukulski, City Manager SUBJECT: R-10019, C.O.B. Impound Lot Reuse/Further Development MEETING DATE: April 25, 2011 AGENDA ITEM TYPE: Action RECOMMENDATION: Continue the public hearing and vote on the motion that was tabled on February 28, 2011. Staff recommends that you deny the application by voting no on the motion. Tabled motion from February 28th: It was moved by Cr. Andrus, seconded by Cr. Mehl to approve R-10019, including agency exemptions from Section 18.42.130 to allow use of barbed wire on security fencing in the PLI district and to allow fence height to exceed a maximum 8 feet; and allowing the watercourse setback to comply with Section 18.42.100.A. Cr. Andrus amended the motion to table the motion until April 11th. On April 11th the Commission opened and continued this item to April 25th to allow more time for staff to solidify alternative plans. BACKGROUND: The City has recently reconfigured the Lower Yards along N. Rouse Avenue to provide for a new vehicle maintenance facility and sand storage. A consequence of this is the need to modify the City’s impound yard for vehicles. The Police Department has decided to pursue impounding for many circumstances through contracting with private firms and will no longer require as large of an impound area. The existing space at the Lower Yards can meet the lessened need for secure storage of vehicles involved in criminal events. The application for a Reuse/Further Development of an existing developed site at the North Rouse Avenue site is therefore being withdrawn. The Police Department can answer any questions on the change in approach for impounding service. UNRESOLVED ISSUES: None ALTERNATIVES: 1) Accept withdrawal of the application – voting Nay on the motion on the table. 2) Approve the application anyway by voting yes on the motion. FISCAL EFFECTS: None Attachments: None Report compiled on: April 14, 2011 143