Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-11-16 ccm . , MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE CITY COMMISSION BOZEMAN, MONTANA November 16, 1992 ***************************** . The Commission of the City of Bozeman met in regular session in the Commission Room, Municipal Building, November 16, 1992, at 3:30 p.m. Present were Mayor Swanson, Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Vincent, Commissioner Knapp, City Manager Wysocki, City Attorney Luwe and Clerk of the Commission Sullivan. The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance and a moment of silence. None of the Commissioners requested that any of the Consent Items be removed for discussion. Minutes - November 9. 1992 It was moved by Commissioner Frost, seconded by Commissioner Stiff, that the minutes of the regular meeting of November 9, 1992, be approved as amended. The motion carried by the .following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Vincent, Commissioner Knapp and Mayor Swanson; those voting No, none. Final reDort from Marvin and Associates - Traffic Safety Improvements (20 intersections) City Manager Wysocki noted that, included in the Commissioners' packets, was a memo from Director of Public Service Forbes along with a list of the twenty intersections which were addressed in this report, as follows: Story and Fifth Tamarack and Fifth Hayes and Third Olive and Tracy Curtiss and Tracy Olive and Black Olive and Seventh Villard and Tracy Babcock and Yellowstone Mendenhall and Tenth Lamme and Fifth Beall and Fifth Peach and Bozeman Olive and Bozeman . Arthur and Third Hayes and Fifth Koch and Third Beall and Tracy Villard and Fifth Garfield and Willson Director of Public Service Phill Forbes introduced Mr. Bob Marvin, principal of Marvin and Associates, the firm from Billings which completed the Traffic Safety Improvement Study for the City of Bozeman. 11-16-92 --------- --- ..," , - 2 - Mr. Bob Marvin provided a brief overview of the study, including a slide presentation. He reminded the Commission that the study was funded through a grant from the State Department of Justice, Highway Safety Division. He stated that since this type of grant was expanded to include urban streets as well as county roads, five studies in major urban areas have been .undertaken. He stated that the process of identifying the intersections to be included in the Bozeman study was started by taking statistical data from the period 1988 through 1991 and sorting through approximately 5,000 accident reports to determine which intersections were the most accident prone. He noted that intersections along Main Street and North 7th Avenue were eliminated, since those are major arterials in joint jurisdiction; and all intersections with less than five accidents were eliminated. He noted that this left a list of 66 intersections; and City staff reviewed that list, eliminating those intersections which were addressed in the transportation plan update's list of transportation system maintenance projects as well as those intersections which had already been improved or are included in this year's budget to be addressed. He noted that left a list of 20 intersections, which are addressed in this report. Mr. Marvin then reviewed the indicators which were evaluated on each of these .intersections. Those indicators include (1) number of accidents, (2) the accident rate or exposure, (3) volume capacity of the intersection, (4) accident severity, (5) sight distance, (6) driver judgment or perception, and (7) weighted tabulation. He stated that the results of evaluating those indicators, which is known as the hazard index, is then factored with the cost/benefit ratio to establish the final priority index. Mr. Marvin stated that the projected costs of implementing each of the twenty projects were calculated, with the appropriate percentages calculated for the State's project eligible funds and the local governing body. He noted that for the total $46,408 project, $28,848 is eligible for Montana Department of Transportation safety funds while the City would be responsible for $17,560. He stated, however, that recent unofficial information reflects that it may be possible for the State to fund all of the improvements. . Mr. Marvin then used the intersection of West Olive Street and South Seventh Avenue as an example to show the Commissioners how the study was conducted and how the determination was made on the type of improvements needed. He noted that still photos and videos were taken during the initial review; and the videos are now on file in Director of Public Service Forbes' office. He stated that the accident information is then reviewed and diagrammed; and a sketch drawing 11-16-92 n___..u____...____ ..v ~,.. ...-.--------.--...". -..-...-....-.-. - 3 - of the intersection, showing roadway widths, roadside conditions and traffic control devices, is prepared. He noted that an uncontrolled intersection requires a minimum of 110 feet of visibility at 25 miles per hour, to allow time for acceleration or deceleration maneuvers. He noted that "yield" signs require the same sight distance. He noted that for "stop" signs, State law requires .certain sight distances as well as a safety zone around the curb radius. He stated that in the older part of town, the streets are often narrow, with buildings encroaching into the sight distance. Mr. Marvin then stated that if it is determined that a stop sign is needed, it must be installed on the minor street rather than the major street. He noted that to place a stop sign on a major street will result in more accidents, and will result in people not obeying it. He further noted that the provisions of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices must be observed when installing signs. Mr. Bob Marvin noted that the one-way couplet system, which is separated by Main Street, loses much of its efficiency because of that separation. He noted, therefore, that Olive Street and Lamme Street serve as defacto one-way couplets with Babcock Street and Mendenhall Street; and the levels of traffic reflect that. He stated that, with the current structure of the .couPlet, it would take less time for someone traveling west on the south side of town to use Olive Street, even if stop signs were installed on Olive at every intersection, than it would be to use Main Street. Mr. Marvin stated that the initial recommendation for the intersection of Olive and Seventh was to install stop signs on South 7th Avenue; and City staff asked his firm to re-evaluate that recommendation, based on concerns for the residential nature of the Olive corridor. He noted that after reviewing all of the indicators and pertinent data, they re-affirmed their original recommendation because of the drivers' perception of that intersection and the traffic volumes on the four legs. Responding to Commissioner Vincent, Mr. Marvin indicated that people tend to drive at a speed that they feel is comfortable. He noted that if they perceive that a traffic control device .is unwarranted, they will not obey it, i.e., a stop sign on the major leg of an intersection. He noted that in the instance of Olive and Seventh, approximately 80 percent of the drivers he observed on West Olive Street did not recognize it as an intersection, which means they did not slow down or look either way. Responding to Commissioner Frost, Mr. Marvin stated that many studies have reflected 11-16-92 -- - 4 - that in municipalities where stop signs have been installed in an effort to control speed, the result has been higher speeds in mid-block. Commissioner Vincent noted that the Commissioners have not yet viewed the report. He then noted that South Third Avenue seems to be carrying more traffic, largely because it parallels ~ South Willson Avenue, which is often difficult to access. He asked about the possibility of ""installing stop signs as a way of making the street inconvenient to use. Mr. Marvin stated that in some instances, that can be an effective tool, if it takes longer for a person to use that route than to find an alternative route with less stop signs. He noted, however, that care must be taken when installing those signs to make sure they are not on the major leg of an intersection. Mr. Marvin stated that the level of use designates whether a street is a local street, a collector or an arterial. He then noted that while Olive Street has an average traffic flow of 1,400 vehicles per day, that is well below the collector street level of 2,000 vehicles per day. He also indicated that many other streets in the community, while carrying larger volumes than in the past, are also well below the 2,000-vehicle-per-day level. ~ Mr. Marvin then responded to several questions from the Commissioners regarding the ...,.,. study and its contents. He noted that, in addition to addressing specific intersections, he reviewed adjacent intersections and corridors. He noted that one of those included the whole University area, which he feels should have been more comprehensively addressed in the transportation plan update. Mayor Swanson noted the cost projections for the intersections of Olive and Tracy and Olive and Black are quite high, asking what improvements were included. Mr. Marvin responded that those intersection improvements included some changes in street widths, striping for pedestrians, stop signs and sidewalk bulbs at the intersection to minimize the distance for pedestrians crossing the street. He then noted that at the intersection of Garfield . and Willson, a left-turn bay for vehicles traveling south on South Willson Avenue is proposed. Mr. Will Owens, 411 West Lamme Street, stated that his neighborhood is concerned about the intersection of North Fifth Avenue and West Lamme Street, and asked what improvements are proposed for that intersection. Mr. Marvin responded that it is a very restrictive intersection, with no sight distance. He then forwarded the recommendation that stop signs be installed on North 5th Avenue, due in large 11-16-92 - 5 - part to the fact that is how the intersection currently functions. He also noted that West Lamme Street essentially serves as the other half of the one-way couplet. He further suggested that enforcement of the speed limit on West Lamme Street could help to address speed problems. Mr. Will Owens noted that Beall Street, which is only one block away, is a much wider, . more open street that could serve as a collector street; however. much of the traffic tends to use Lamme Street instead, which is a residential street with many small children. Responding to Commissioner Vincent, Mr. Marvin stated there are no instances in which this report recommends that stop signs be placed on the street with the greater traffic volume. He noted that in Kalispell, where the firm is currently conducting a study, there are five intersections where stop signs have been installed on the major leg; and those are probably the most hazardous of the 25 intersections in the community which they are studying, with fifteen to twenty accidents recorded per year. Commissioner Vincent noted that the traffic volume is growing in Bozeman; and he anticipates it will only increase more, resulting in more problems. He then expressed concern that much of that traffic is using residential streets, suggesting that the Commission should discuss a .policy addressing that issue. He noted that Mr. Marvin has done a good job in preparing his report, per his contract; however, he feels that the Commission should carefully consider neighborhoods when considering approval of the recommendations and their implementation. Commissioner Stiff stated appreciation for a report well done. He then noted interest in carefully reviewing that report in the near future. Commissioner Frost stated he feels the engineering issues have been well addressed in this report. He noted, however, his concern about creating through streets in residential neighborhoods. At Mayor Swanson's request, Mr. Marvin addressed the east side of the campus area. He noted that in an area generally bounded by West College Street, South 11th Avenue, West . Grant and South Willson Avenue, there were an estimated 200 accidents during the review period. with 80 injuries and an estimated $1.2 million in property damage. He suggested that 40 percent of those accidents could be eliminated with improved access to the University, particularly its parking areas. He noted that, after reviewing the draft transportation plan update, he feels that the issue could have been better addressed, with additional measures being taken to designate routes to the parking lots. 11-16-92 - 6 - Responding to Mayor Swanson, Mr. Marvin stated he has not reviewed the downtown parking chapter of the transportation plan; therefore, he does not know how his recommendations for elimination of parking spaces would impact the number of lost parking stalls in the area. Mr. Will Owens noted that he recently moved from Albuquerque, New Mexico. He noted ....Ar.. that his neighborhood had encountered traffic problems and heard similar reports to this one; -however, he noted that the problem was resolved with the installation of four-way stop signs and heavy police enforcement. He suggested the same method could be effective in Bozeman as well. Mr. Marvin stated the warrants for installation of a four-way stop at this intersection are simply not met. Ms. Chris Dunn, 5887 Cottonwood Road, noted the extensive amount of time that the City-County Planning Board has devoted to the transportation plan, and an interest in reviewing this report in conjunction with that plan. She then asked Mr. Marvin if traffic diverters or street closures work well. Mr. Marvin responded that traffic diverters work well if they are strategically placed. He noted, however, that the best way to discourage traffic in residential neighborhoods is to establish ~ a good system of collectors and arterials that efficiently carry traffic. He noted that this may ,., involved widening of streets, installation of stop lights and possibly elimination of parking on those streets. Responding to Mayor Swanson, the City Manager indicated that this is the last step in completing the contractual obligations for this project. He then noted that it may be beneficial for the Commission to receive public input on the study before making a decision. He also noted that the transportation plan and the transportation system maintenance projects listed in that report must be considered in conjunction with this study. Director of Public Service Forbes emphasized the importance of ensuring that the two studies mesh together well. He also noted, however, that to implement the safety measures suggested and to reduce the number of traffic accidents at those specific intersections would be .benefiCial. He then stated that the next step in the process is to write a letter for the Mayor's signature, asking the State Department of Transportation for funding for these projects. Responding to questions from the Commission, the Director stated that the State funding can only be used for installing the improvements recommended in this report at the specified intersections, unless the City can successfully argue that a different solution may be better or more 11-16-92 - 7 - appropriate. He then assured the Commission that application for, and approval of, funding for these projects does not commit the City to completing all of the projects. He noted that the State monies will only be expended for those projects which are completed. It was moved by Commissioner Stiff, seconded by Commissioner Vincent, that the . Commission acknowledge receipt of the Traffic Safety Improvements report as prepared by Marvin and Associates. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Vincent, Commissioner Knapp, Commissioner Frost and Mayor Swanson; those voting No, none. Discussion - FYI Items City Manager Wysocki presented to the Commission the following "For Your Information" items. (1 ) Copy of a letter of thanks from Assistant Chief of Police Conner to the Rotary Club for their $2,500 donation to the DARE program, dated November 11, 1992. (2) Minutes from the Beautification Committee meeting held on October 27. ~ (3) Copy of the final resolutions adopted by the League of Cities and Towns which .., will be discussed at tomorrow evening's meeting with legislators. (4) Draft copy of an ordinance accepting dedication of Fieldstone Drive as a public street, which will be on next week's agenda for action. (5) Agenda for the Development Review Committee meeting to be held at 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday, November 17, at the Carnegie Building. (6) Agenda for the Design Review Board meeting to be held at 4:00 p.m. on Tuesday, November 17, at the Carnegie Building. (7) Agenda for the County Commission meeting to be held at 1 :30 p.m. on Tuesday, November 17, along with daily minutes for the weeks of October 26 and November 2, 1992. (8) Memo from Planning Director Epple, dated November 12, along with the agenda . for the City-County Planning Board meeting to be held at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, November 17, in the Commission Room. (9) The City Manager submitted his weekly report, as follows. (1) Reminded the Commission of the dinner meeting with legislators scheduled for 6:00 p.m on Tuesday at the Baxter. (2) Noted that a team from City Hall and one from the Fire Department bowled in the 11-16-92 ......____.u.._ - 8 - "Bowl for Kids' Sake" fund raiser for the Big Brothers/Big Sisters program and raised just over $1,900 through those efforts. (3) Noted that he attended City Attorney Luwe's cheesecake party, which was a part of the Night of 100 Dinners fund raiser for the Library. (4) Announced that he will attend the Gallatin Development Corporation's retreat on Thursday, at which he will make a epresentation on the City's infrastructure system. (1) Attended the DBA Board (10) Commissioner Frost submitted the following. meeting on Wednesday night, which included a 2 %-hour discussion of the transportation plan. (2) Noted he has attended portions of the Planning Board meetings regarding the transportation plan. He noted appreciation for the work that the Board is doing in preparing its recommendations for Commission consideration. (3) Stated that he attended the DRB meeting on Tuesday, where the Wal-Mart plan was reviewed. (11 ) Commissioner Knapp noted the October report for the Bozeman Public Library, which reflects increases in many of the categories. She also noted the Foundation's first newsletter, which was just recently distributed. ( 12) City Attorney Luwe noted that copies of his letter to Dr. Malone, President of eMSU, dated November 12, were distributed to the Commission. He noted that letter places the University on notice that concentrated dye was unlawfully dumped into the City's sanitary sewer system, resulting in turning the East Gallatin River red. He noted that he will be pursuing a meeting with representatives from MSU to further discuss the issue. ( 13) Clerk of the Commission Sullivan noted that a copy of the new zone code, dated "01/23/92" has just been placed on the Commissioners' desks. (14) Mayor Swanson submitted the following. (1) Noted that he met with the Clerk last week to discuss allocation of time for various projects. He noted that the Clerk has identified two or three areas upon which she wishes to focus; and he will have additional information on those issues within the next few weeks. (2) Noted the Building Inspection Division report for . October, which is on the consent agenda. He referenced the third page of that report. which includes a breakdown of the number of building permits issued in the city as well as the jurisdictional area. He noted that in October, permits for 29 new housing units were issued inside city limits, and 4 new housing units in the jurisdictional area. He stated this information reflects a different picture than that portrayed by those who did not support adoption of the new zone code. (3) Noted that he has used the new fact sheet about the City when making presentations 11-16-92 - 9 - to various groups; and that information seems to have been very well received. He then suggested the possibility of enhancing that information somewhat and then using it as a stuffer in the newspaper, to more widely disseminate the information to the general public. (4) Stated he will participate in the GDC retreat later this week. (5) Noted that tomorrow, he will participate in a . walking tour of the Story Mill spur. He stated that a group is working with Montana Rail Link on the possibility of acquiring that two-mile stretch of railroad right-of-way for trail purposes. Consent Items City Manager Wysocki presented to the Commission the following Consent Items. Acknowledae receiDt of aoolication for annexation - Human Resource Develooment Council for Richard and Ann Francis - W% of the NE%. Section 11. T2S. R5E. MPM ( 1 O-acre parcel alona the north side of West Babcock Street. immediately west of the Lessley oroDerty): refer to staff Authorize use of annual leave - City Manager Wysocki - November 30. 1992: confirm aDDointment of Assistant Ron Brev as Actina City Manager Building InsDection Division reDort for October 1992 It was moved by Commissioner Vincent, seconded by Commissioner Knapp, that the Commission approve the Consent Items as listed, and authorize and direct the appropriate persons '.to complete the necessary actions. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Vincent, Commissioner Knapp, Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Stiff and Mayor Swanson; those voting No, none. Recess - 4:55 o.m. Mayor Swanson recessed the meeting at 4:55 p.m., to reconvene at 7:00 p.m. for the purpose of conducting the scheduled public hearing. Reconvene - 7:00 o.m. Mayor Swanson reconvened the meeting at 7:00 p.m., for the purpose of conducting the .scheduled public hearing. Public hearing - Commission Resolution No. 2892 - intent to annex 12.267-acre tract located at northwest corner of intersection of West Main Street and West College Street as reauested bv PV Enterprises This was the time and place set for the public hearing on Commission Resolution No. 11-16-92 ..-------- ----...... . - 10 - 2892, entitled: COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2892 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, DECLARING IT TO BE THE INTENTION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, THE INHABITANTS THEREOF AND THE INHABITANTS OF A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS TO SAID CITY OF BOZEMAN, AND HEREIN MORE . PARTICULARL Y DESCRIBED, TO EXTEND THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID CITY OF BOZEMAN SO AS TO INCLUDE SAID CONTIGUOUS TRACT WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS THEREOF. Mayor Swanson opened the public hearing. Associate Planner Debbie Arkell presented the staff report. She noted that the subject 12.267-acre tract lies in the northwest one-quarter of Section 14, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, Montana Principal Meridian, and is located along the south side of U.S. Highway 191/West Main Street, immediately south ofthe Main Mall property. She noted the parcel is located adjacent to existing city boundaries and lies entirely within the sewer service area boundary. She noted that annexation would result in a natural westward extension of the city's boundaries. She noted that access to the subject parcel will be from U.S. Highway 191, with accesses being coordinated by the Montana Department of Transportation and the City's Engineering Department. She stated that .the annexation and development will result in traffic impacts; and those issues are to be addressed on a project by project basis. Planner Arkell stated that staff supports annexation of the subject parcel. She noted, however, that staff recommends that the following issues be addressed in the annexation agreement, to mitigate the impacts it will have on various City systems: (1) waivers of right to protest the creation of SID's for improvements to and signalization of the intersection of West Main Street and West College Street; (2) waiver of right to protest the creation of an SID for improvements to West College Street; (3) provision of usable water rights or a cash-in-lieu of water rights payment; (4) dedication of the right-of-way for possible future extension of West Garfield Street; and (5) waiver of right to protest participation in improvements to the North 17th Avenue interceptor sewer trunk line. . The Planner then stated that staff has reviewed this annexation request in light of the eight goals and twelve policies set forth in Commission Resolution No. 2716. She briefly highlighted the staff findings, stating that it complies with Goal Nos. 1, 2, 3, 7 and 8 and does not substantially conflict with any goals; and, assuming the issues listed above are satisfactorily addressed in the annexation agreement, the request will essentially comply with most of the 11-16-92 . - 11 - policies and not substantially conflict with any policy. She then forwarded the staff recommendation that the Commission authorize and direct staff to proceed with the annexation process for the subject parcel. Planner Arkell reminded the Commission that the current master plan land use designation .,.for the subject property is business park industrial. She noted that last month, the Commission ...., denied applications to change the land use designation to commercial and to change the zoning from Public Lands and Institutions and Agriculture Suburban to Community Business District. She noted, therefore, that staff would recommend that if this parcel is annexed, the applicant be required to apply immediately for the appropriate zoning designation, which would probably be business park in light of the Commission's previous action, for the entire 30-acre parcel. Associate Planner Arkell stated the applicant projects that the property will reach 100 percent development within three years. She noted that they are currently pursuing the planned unit development process; and the formal application should be filed with the Planning Office in the near future. Ms. Holly Brown, attorney representing the applicant, noted that both Mr. Paul Vander Jagt .and Mr. Sherm Veltkamp, principals of PV Enterprises, are present to respond to any questions. She stated that they have decided to proceed with the annexation request even though the applications for a master plan amendment and zone map change were denied last month, since conversations with some individual Commissioners reflected the general interest in seeing the planned unit development process utilized for development of this site. She then requested that approval of this annexation be contingent upon approval of the planned unit development. Ms. Brown stated the applicants agree with the conditions for annexation as outlined by Associate Planner Arkell. She stated that she feels those can adequately be addressed in the annexation agreement, to the satisfaction of both the applicants and the City. She stated that they fully recognize that utilization of City services will result in some costs. She also noted that the .project must comply with the City's signage regulations and must also comply with the design objective plans, since it lies within an entryway corridor. She then noted her confidence that all of the conditions for all of the processes will be complementary to each other and can be met. Responding to Commissioner Stiff, City Attorney Luwe addressed the contingency issue raised by Ms. Brown. He noted that the next step in the annexation process is the development of an annexation agreement which is satisfactory to both the City and the applicants. He stated 11-16-92 --.--- .-... -...-. - --.-- . - 12 - that while that document is being prepared and finalized, the application for a planned unit development will be moving through its process. He then suggested that the decision on the planned unit development could be timed to coincide with the annexation process as a method of addressing Ms. Brown's concern. He stated that the applicant can control the timing of the . annexation simply by not signing the annexation agreement until the planned unit development process has reached the appropriate stage. Responding to questions from the City Manager, Planner Arkell stated that the applicant could pursue a planned unit development for the subject parcel without annexation; however, the applicant would not be able to obtain a rezoning or city services without annexation. No one was present to speak in opposition to the requested annexation. City Manager Wysocki read into the record letters of support from Vern Voegele, Senior Vice President at First Citizens Bank, dated November 12; from Ronald J. Ahlers, President of First Citizens Bank, dated November 12; and from Daria Joyner, Executive Vice President of the Bozeman Area Chamber of Commerce, dated November 16. It was moved by Commissioner Knapp, seconded by Commissioner Frost, that the public .hearing be closed. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Knapp, Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Vincent and Mayor Swanson; those voting No, none. Mayor Swanson closed the public hearing. It was moved by Commissioner Frost, seconded by Commissioner Stiff, that the customary one-week waiting period of land use decisions be waived. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Vincent, Commissioner Knapp and Mayor Swanson; those voting No, none. Commissioner Stiff expressed concern that the impacts which this annexation may have on the intersection of West College Street and South 19th Avenue are not addressed. He noted . that this impact may result in the need for signalization; however, the staff report does not contain provisions to ensure that the applicant would participate in those costs. Mayor Swanson indicated that he shares those same concerns. The City Manager suggested that, rather than trying to add a condition at this time to address the issue, which really requires some study to determine percentages and the appropriate level of participation, it would be more appropriate to proceed with the annexation as recommended 11-16-92 , . , . - 13 - by staff and address the issue of signalization at the intersection of West College Street and South 19th Avenue in conjunction with the planned unit development process. Commissioner Frost noted that he had previously voted against the requested master plan amendment and zone map change because he was uncomfortable with a commercial zoning. He .then stated his support for the current proposal for development of the site, which includes the planned unit development process; therefore, he will vote for the requested annexation. Commissioner Stiff stated his concurrence with Commissioner Frost, stating he feels this process will create a much better project. It was moved by Commissioner Stiff, seconded by Commissioner Vincent, that the Commission authorize and direct staff to proceed with the annexation process, including preparation of an annexation agreement which includes provisions for: (1) waivers of right to protest the creation of SID's for improvements to and signalization of the intersection of West Main Street and West College Street; (2) waiver of right to protest the creation of an SID for improvements to West College Street; (3) provision of usable water rights or a cash-in-lieu of water rights payment; (4) dedication of the right-of-way for possible future extension of West Garfield ~Street; and (5) waiver of right to protest participation in improvements to the North 17th Avenue _.~ interceptor sewer trunk line. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Vincent, Commissioner Knapp, Commissioner Frost and Mayor Swanson; those voting no, none. Adjournment - 7:27 D.m. There being no further business to come before the Commission at this time, it was moved by Commissioner Vincent, seconded by Commissioner Knapp, that the meeting be adjourned. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Vincent, Commissioner Knapp, Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Stiff and Mayor Swanson; those voting . No, none. ATTEST: (l~ J~ ROBIN L. SULLIVAN Clerk of the Commission 11-16-92 - -----.------