HomeMy WebLinkAboutProposed Curb Replacement Commission Memorandum
REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Commission
FROM: Rick Hixson, City Engineer
Debbie Arkell, Director of Public Service
Anna Rosenberry, Director of Finance
Chuck Winn, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: Curb Replacement
MEETING DATE: August 31, 2009
AGENDA ITEM TYPE: Action
RECOMMENDATION: Provide direction to staff with respect to updating the City’s curb
replacement program. As part of this effort we have prepared and included two possible versions
of financing scenarios for the commission to consider. These scenarios would allow the city to
re-build 5 miles, approximately $2,750,000.00 worth of the poorest curb in town (today’s costs)
over the next 11 or 12 years. The first version finances these projects without support from
individual property owners, the second is based on a 50 – 50 split between private property
owners and other, community-wide sources such as gas tax money or urban funds.
BACKGROUND: Up until January 1990, curb and gutter was treated in the same fashion as
sidewalk, that is, it was the responsibility of the adjacent property owner to maintain it.
Ordinance 1300 removed curb and gutter maintenance from the property owner’s purview. Later
that year, Ordinance 1310 was adopted, creating the Street Maintenance Assessment, the purpose
of which was to provide “the method for the maintenance of streets, alleys and public places and
providing for the method of paying said costs thereof…” At present every dollar collected under
the Street Maintenance Assessment is used to fund the Street Department who sweep, plow,
repair and otherwise maintain the city’s 200 plus miles of streets and alleys. Unfortunately, while
the Street Department has been able to use some of those funds to replace deficient curbs (see
attached summary of “Curb/Ramp Work 2005-2009), we have a significant backlog of curb in
poor and fair condition and at our current rate of investment, we will find ourselves falling
further behind on its replacement.
The other source of funding the city currently uses for curb replacement is Gas Tax money.
These dollars are distributed by the state to the cities in proportion to their size. Bozeman
currently receives approximately $600,000.00 per year in Gas Tax money. The Department of
Transportation notifies the City Clerk each year in June what the actual allocation is going to be.
While this money is primarily used to pay for the annual street improvements projects the city
bids out every spring, ADA compliant curb ramps and curbing adjacent to those ramps as well as
some sidewalks which are in the project area are also replaced.
126
As was discussed at the July 20th budget discussion, replacement of the curb on both sides of a
street width (600 lineal feet) and the associated pedestrian ramps costs approximately
$40,000/block. The current budget includes the following for curb/ramp replacement:
Source Amount
Street Maintenance Fund $20,000
Gas Tax Fund $50,000
TOTAL FY10 Recommended Budget $70,000
Or 1.75 blocks curbs/ramps (1,050 lineal feet)
Whichever funding mechanism is used, implementation of a curb replacement program should
be done in a way that minimizes disruption to the public. For example, let’s assume for
discussion that a decision was made to increase the Street Maintenance Assessment by 2%,
generating an additional $42,000.00 and to replace the curb on South Willson Avenue. The total
estimated cost of that project as shown on the attached Proposed Curb Replacement Areas list is
$240,000.00. It would be disruptive to do the project $42,000.00 at a time, returning to the same
neighborhood 6 years in a row. We could either save the money for 6 years or use the idea of
selling a General Obligation Bond financed by the increase in the Street Maintenance
Assessment, to generate the $240,000.00 and complete the entire project in one year.
Potential Funding Sources for Curb Replacement
Near Term
Gas Tax
This is the fund which the city currently uses to pay for the annual Street
Improvements project and the annual curbing and sidewalk improvement projects.
The lion’s share of the money goes to street improvements with enough reserved
to make sure we upgrade all of the intersection corners with ADA compliant
pedestrian ramps. It should be noted that this source cannot be used for personnel
or equipment. We also try to fill in gaps in the sidewalk network which are in the
area of the project since typically it is a good time to make those improvements
when the concrete company is already in the area. There are currently 26.6 miles
of city streets which are in need of overlay treatments and 25 miles of streets
which are in need of chip sealing. At our current rate of investment it would take
us approximately 18 years to overlay the streets which need treatments if no
further deterioration of the remaining streets took place. However, unlike curb
and gutter, which has a useful life in excess of 50 years, the service life of asphalt
pavement is no more than 20 years. So 18 years from now when we have taken
care of the streets currently on the list, there will certainly be 27 more miles of
streets in need of overlays and 25 more miles of streets in need of chip seals. We
feel it is in the City’s best interest not to divert any of the current investment in
street improvements to curb improvements because of this backlog and because
streets in poor condition constitute more of an immediate hazard to the driving
public than deteriorated curbs do.
127
Street Maintenance Assessment
Currently this assessment funds the City Street Departments activities. Some of
this assessment is already used to fund curb replacement as illustrated above. In
order to increase this amount without increasing the annual assessment, services
that the Department provides would have to be cut in some other area, such as
street sweeping or snow plowing.
Increasing this assessment on the other hand would generate revenues which
could be used for curb replacement without a reduction in the existing level of
service. Attached to this memorandum is a Worksheet from the City Finance
Director which illustrates the effect of increasing the assessment by 2% in FY 11
and 2% I FY 12 for the purpose of curb replacement.
Urban Funds
Informal discussions with the Montana Department of Transportation (MDT)
have indicated that the City’s annual urban fund allocation can be used to
rehabilitate curb and gutter on Urban routes. On the attached list of proposed curb
replacement areas South Church Avenue and South and North Willson Avenue
are Urban routes. For the fiscal years 2007 to 2012 our allocation is
$1,240,700.00 per year (see attached Urban Highway Construction Program
Summary). We are currently using our entire allocation through FY 2009 to pay
for the South 19th Avenue improvements which are under construction at this
time. MDT has estimated that upon completion of the South 19th Avenue project
we will have a balance of slightly more than $3,000,000.00 for use on urban
routes. The City has historically used this allocation to accomplish large projects
on major routes in the City. Prior to the South 19th project for example, we used
these funds for the South 3rd Avenue improvements done in 1997. Using these
funds for curb replacement on South Church (est. $200,000.00) South Willson
(est. $240,000.00) and North Willson (est. $80,000.00), the 3 urban routes on our
proposed list, would set our timetable back for whatever the next large project
will be (West College, Kagy, S. 8th …) by half a year.
ARRA Funds - H.B. 645
As the Finance Director discussed at the July 20th Commission Meeting, The City
needs to determine where the final $344,000.00 of the HB645 allocation should
be spent. It needs to be spent by September 30, 2010 or it will revert to the State
General Fund. A good use of these funds would be curb replacement and/or
pedestrian ramps. We would do the work in-house and could certainly have a
project ready for construction next season which would meet the September 30
deadline.
Mid-Term
Special Improvement District (SID)
It is possible and permissible under MCA chapter 7-12-4102 to create an SID for
curb replacement. The issue will no doubt turn on the potential for protest to
block the district’s creation. Since all of the curb replacement areas are in older
parts of town, the City holds no waivers of right to protest creation of such
districts. Therefore, if 51% of the residents in a proposed district funded solely by
SID were to protest, the district could not be created. If a combination of funding
sources were to be used such that the amount funded by SID was 50% or less, the
protest would not be sufficient per MCA 7-12-4113.
128
So in order to use an SID to pay for curb replacement it would probably be
necessary to keep the amount financed by the district under 50%. It is possible
that residents of a street or streets may be willing to fund curb replacement
entirely by SID, but this does not seem likely.
General Obligation (G.O.) Bond
This may be an effective way to aggregate smaller segments into larger, less
disruptive projects. It is important to note that a G.O. Bond must be approved by a
vote of the public. It could be used in conjunction with one or all of the short term
options. Here’s an example of how it could work. We decide that the way to raise
funds is to increase the street maintenance assessment by 2%. This generates
$41,000.00 per year. As discussed above, it is too disruptive to do these projects
forty or eighty-thousand dollars at a time. So, we identify a street to rehabilitate,
South Church for example, and sell G.O. bonds for the entire replacement project,
estimated to be $200,000.00. We then use the revenue generated by the 2% street
maintenance assessment increase to pay off the Bond. This method could be used
in conjunction with any or all of the other options. It could also be used by itself,
but it would probably be difficult to get the community at large to support this
option as a stand-alone method.
Community Transportation Enhancement Program (CTEP)
While we cannot use CTEP funds for curb repair, ADA compliant Pedestrian
ramps are eligible for CTEP funding at either new or existing sidewalks. There is
an application process, a "public input" process as well as a local match
requirement of 13.42% to obtain CTEP funding. The City Commission needs to
solicit public input on how the CTEP funds should be used, and decisions should
be recorded in meeting minutes. The Commission ultimately decides how the
funds will be used, but the public must be given the opportunity to comment.
Bozeman currently has a balance of $293,564.73 available, exclusive of the
College pathway project. The required match for that amount is $39,396.39. We
are bringing this issue up in this memo because it makes sense to replace the curb
ramps at the same time that we are replacing the adjacent curbing.
Long Term
Urban and Collector Assessment
The idea of a city-wide Urban and Collector Assessment to provide funding for
street improvements to those two functional classifications of streets has been
briefly discussed before. The City of Billings has just such an assessment. In
Billings it is a per-square-foot assessment based on a property’s zoning
designation. These funds could be used to maintain city arterials and collectors
which are not on the MDT urban route list. These are streets like Koch, Grant,
Lincoln, Tamarack, Fowler and many others. None of the streets on our suggested
list of proposed curb replacement areas would fall into this category at the present
time.
Stormwater Utility
The EPA’s Phase 2 Stormwater regulations will, in the relatively near future,
force the city to find some way of paying for mandated stormwater
improvements. Creation of a stormwater utility and funding it with an assessment
of some sort (impervious surface, zoning designation, a combination of those…)
may become a necessity.
129
We are not suggesting that that day is today, but once such a utility is created, it
will be possible to use that money to pay for curb and gutter since it is integral to
stormwater management.
Local Option Gas Tax (City/County 2¢)
Montana counties have the option of levying up to 2¢ per gallon of gas to use for
such purposes. This would have to be done in conjunction with the county with
whom we would divide the revenues. Such a levy would have to be approved by
both City and County Commissions and must be approved by a vote of the public.
We have attached to this memorandum a Proposed Curb Replacement Area list. This list is in
order of priority from our point of view, although all of the projects on the list merit the
investment. The highest priority from our perspective is South Church Avenue, due to MDT
scheduling a chip seal project on that street for next summer. If we were able to replace the curbs
on this street before the Department chip seals it, the finished project would be seamless. This
would be quite beneficial in terms of the street’s service life.
We believe that some discussion of the issues involved in improvements to South 8th Avenue is
warranted as part of this presentation. South 8th Avenue is in need of re-construction from
Harrison Street to Main Street. Because South 8th has a median, it has more than twice as much
curb and gutter as a typical street. In addition to the pavement, base layers, storm drains and curb
and gutter, we also need to replace the water main. If we were to replace the curb and gutter
before we replace the water main, we would be digging through, then replacing that new curb
when the main is replaced and all of the service lines are re-established. For this reason it is wise
to replace the water main first. That project is scheduled for the summer of 2011. We believe that
once the water main is replaced it does make sense to go ahead and replace the curb and gutter,
leaving the street reconstruction as the last element of the South 8th project. We will be looking
for direction from the commission as to how to fund that project at that time.
As discussed under the Urban Funds section above, at the end of the South 19th Avenue project
the City will have approximately $3,000,000.00 available in Urban Funds. Three of the projects
on the Proposed Curb Replacement Area list are urban routes – South Church, South Willson and
North Willson. Our total estimated cost for those 3 projects is $520,000.00. In general I think
that the best use of these funds is on large, expensive projects which benefit the community at
large and can’t be paid for easily, projects like South 19th Avenue or West College Street.
However, I do think it would be beneficial to replace the curbs on the three urban routes on our
list in one larger project next summer, financed with urban funds. A lot of curb could be replaced
in the near term and we would still have a good start on saving for the next big urban project.
FISCAL EFFECTS: The fiscal effects of any program will depend on the method the
Commission chooses to use to finance it. Using existing methods, we have prepared two
scenarios that could begin funding curb replacement within a relatively short period of time.
Proposed Scenario #1 approaches curb replacement as entirely a “community-wide”
responsibility, using collective street maintenance resources: gas taxes, current and increased
street maintenance assessments, HB645 allocation and urban funds (where eligible). The results
are:
130
Scenario
#1: 1 10 projects completed by FY20 (within 11 years.)
2
Street Maintenance Assessment increases by 2% in FY11 and an additional 2% in FY12 for continued t
Fund.
3 Urban Funds of $1.27M are utilized for curbs on urban routes.
4 No SID's are created or assessed.
Proposed Scenario #2 assigns 50% of the costs of curb replacement to the adjacent property
owner by creation of a Special Improvement District assessment, payable over 20 years. The
remaining 50% is funded by community-wide resources for street maintenance: gas taxes,
existing street maintenance assessments, and urban funds (where eligible.)
Scenario
#2: 1 These 10 projects completed by FY21 (within 12 years.)
2 Street Maintenance Assessments do not increase over their current rate as a result of this plan.
3 Approximately $1.7M in SID's are issued over 12 years (not including finance costs).
4 Estimated annual SID assessment for 100' of curb = $270 ($22.50/month)
5 $635,000 of Urban Funds are spent on curbs on urban routes.
ALTERNATIVES: As suggested by the City Commission.
Attachments:
Curb Replacement Areas Map
Proposed Curb Replacement Areas List
Curb/Ramp Work Summary 2005-2009
Curb Condition Map
Curb Plan Version 1
Curb Plan Version 2
Report compiled on: August 21, 2009
131
S 6TH AVE S 4TH AVE S 5TH AVE S 3RD AVE S 8TH AVE S GRAND AVE S TRACY AVE S CHURCH AVE S WILLSON AVE S BLACK AVE W MAIN ST S 9TH AVE W KOCH ST
W OLIVE ST
W BEALL ST
W STORY ST
W LAMME ST S 7TH AVE W CURTISS ST
W COLLEGE ST
W BABCOCK ST
E MAIN ST
W HARRISON ST
E OLIVE ST
W DICKERSON ST
E LAMME ST
W ALDERSON ST
W MENDENHALL ST
W CLEVELAND ST S BOZEMAN AVE E BABCOCK ST
E STORY ST
E GARFIELD ST W GARFIELD ST
E MENDENHALL ST N 9TH AVE N 5TH AVE N 7TH AVE E BEALL ST N TRACY AVE N BLACK AVE N ROUSE AVE N GRAND AVE N 8TH AVE N CHURCH AVE N WILLSON AVE S ROUSE AVE LINDLEY PL ICE POND R D DELL PL PERKINS PL E ALDER S O N ST E COLLEGE ST
E HARRISON ST BONNER LN S 5TH AVE N 7TH AVE S 3RD AVE S 8TH AVE S ROUSE AVE P r o p o s e d C u r b R e p l a c e m e n t A r e a sProposed C u r b R e p l a c e m e n t A r e a s
825 0 825412.5 Feet
¯L e g e n dLegend
Proposed Curb Replacement
TEXTTEXT
DATE 8/13/09 * THIS MAP IS FOR ENGINEERING DEPARMENT PURPOSEST ONLY, FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
132
Proposed curb replacement areas
Estimated costs are for curb replacement only.
1. South Church, Story to Babcock (urban route, collector)
MDT has proposed a chip seal, possibly next year. It would be good to get curb replaced
prior to that. Minimum to do would be west side, Story to south approach to Bogert Park,
this is about 625 lf. Install valley gutters at Story and Bogert Place and ADA ramps for
better access to Peets Hill. Est. cost: $41,000. Could replace all curbing on this street
segment, est. cost: $200,000.
2. S. Willson, Koch to Harrison (urban route, arterial)
Pavement is in relatively good shape, but due to the many overlays the gutters are steeply
sloped and impossible to clean good with street sweepers. Curb fair to totally gone. Est.
cost: $240,000.
3. S. Tracy, Story to ½ block south of Harrison
Snow route with a school. Curb fair to poor, pavement poor. Replace curb to facilitate
future mill/overlay. Install valley gutters or storm drains to get rid of shallow drain pipe
crossings at College. Est. cost: $220,000.
4. Olive, Grand to 8th
Snow route, higher than normal traffic load for a local street. Curbs poor, pavement poor,
replace curbs to facilitate mill/overlay. Watermain replacement may still be needed in
600 block. Est. cost: $270,000.
5. Olive, Black to Church
Snow route, higher than normal traffic load for a local street. Curbs poor, pavement poor,
replace curbs to facilitate mill/overlay. Watermain replacement needed at Bozeman and
Lindley Place. Est. cost: $175,000.
6. S. Bozeman, Olive to Koch
Water main replacement needed. Curbs poor, pavement poor. Could possibly combine
into one project (main replacement, new curbs, re-paving). Est. cost: $110,000.
7. N. Willson, Mendenhall to Beall (urban route)
Curbs fair to poor, pavement fair. Replace curbs to facilitate mill/overlay. Install valley
gutters at Lamme to get rid of shallow drain pipes. Est. cost: $80,000.
133
8. S. Grand, Olive to Garfield
Bike route. Curbs fair to poor. Pavement poor. Replace curbs to facilitate mill/overlay.
Full reconstruction may be necessary on some blocks. Est. cost: $475,000.
9. Story Street, Church to Tracy
Snow route. Curbs poor to totally gone. Full street reconstruction may be necessary. Est.
cost: $230,000. Water main work needed at Bozeman and Dell Place.
134
Curb/Ramp Work 2005-2009 Description Total Cost (curbs/ramps only) LF of Curb Replaced Ped. Ramps installed (# of corners) FY 2004 Curb/Ramp Project $68,546 590 20 (E. Olive/S. Black) FY 2006 Curb/Ramp Project $77,962 1332 10 (Westlake Park, S. Tracy, W. Cleveland) (Note: 740 LF was new curb along N. 5th) FY 2007 Curbs and Walks Project $58,920 724 4 (Curtiss St.) FY 2009 Curb/Ramp Project $78,575 1526 9 (S. 9th and Alderson) 2009 Misc. Curbs/Ramps $27,167 240 10 (S. Black, S. Bozeman, E. Lincoln) S. Willson $18,136 286 0 (Downtowner Mall) W. Olive/Tamarack & Wallace $20,126 247 3 Miscellaneous Spot Repairs 2005-2008 $ 6,090 118 2 Totals $355,522 5,063 58 135
136
Assumptions:1 Curb project costs inflation factor of 3.5% each year.2 Curb fund earn and pays interest 1.5% each year.3 Current $50,000 of Gas Tax money transferred into Curb Fund each year.4 Current $20,000 of Street Maintenance money transferred into Curb Fund each year5 Street Maintenance Assessment increases by 2% in FY11 and an additional 2% in FY12 for transfer to Curb Fund.6Urban funds will be utilized for curbs on urban routes.7 HB645 ARRA Funds of $344,000 are utilized for the S. Grand curbs in FY10.Results: 1 These 10 projects completed by FY20 (within 11 years.)2 Street Maintenance Assessment increases by 2% in FY11 and an additional 2% in FY12 for continued transfer to Curb Fund.3Urban Funds of $1.27M are utilized for curbs on urban routes.4No SID's are created or assessed. Curb ProgramScenario 1Assumptions & Results 1137
FY10FY11FY12FY13FY14FY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21Beginning Balance‐$ (61,000.00)$ 50,085.00$ 204,836.28$ 62,554.99$ 91,265.79$ 246,634.77$ 189,214.61$ 346,052.83$ 202,377.55$ 359,413.21$ 208,472.68$ Plus: Revenue Sources 934,000.00$ 112,000.00$ 154,000.00$ 904,000.00$ 154,000.00$ 154,000.00$ 154,000.00$ 154,000.00$ 154,000.00$ 154,000.00$ 154,000.00$ 154,000.00$ Plus: Interest Earnings(915.00)$ 751.28$ 3,072.54$ 938.32$ 1,368.99$ 3,699.52$ 2,838.22$ 5,190.79$ 3,035.66$ 5,391.20$ 3,127.09$ Less: Curb Expenditures 995,000.00$ ‐$ ‐$ 1,049,353.83$ 126,227.53$ ‐$ 215,119.68$ ‐$ 302,866.08$ ‐$ 310,331.73$ ‐$ Ending Balance(61,000.00)$ 50,085.00$ 204,836.28$ 62,554.99$ 91,265.79$ 246,634.77$ 189,214.61$ 346,052.83$ 202,377.55$ 359,413.21$ 208,472.68$ 365,599.77$ Scenario 1Curb Program Summary of Balances, Revenues & Expenditures2138
FY10FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 TOTALSRevenue SourcesAllocation of Gas Tax50,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 600,000.00$ Allocation of Street Mtc Assessments20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 240,000.00$ Increase in Street Mtc Assessments42,000.00$ 84,000.00$ 84,000.00$ 84,000.00$ 84,000.00$ 84,000.00$ 84,000.00$ 84,000.00$ 84,000.00$ 84,000.00$ 84,000.00$ 882,000.00$ ARRA Dollars ‐ HB 645344,000.00$ 344,000.00$ Urban Funds Dedicated to Curb Projects520,000.00$ 750,000.00$ 1,270,000.00$ SID's (50% of Project Costs) ‐$ ‐$ Total Revenue Available934,000.00$ 112,000.00$ 154,000.00$ 904,000.00$ 154,000.00$ 154,000.00$ 154,000.00$ 154,000.00$ 154,000.00$ 154,000.00$ 154,000.00$ 154,000.00$ 3,336,000.00$ Scenario 1Curb Program Revenue Projections3139
FY10FY11FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20Projects1 Urban ‐ S. Church200,000.00$ 2 Urban ‐ S. Willson240,000.00$ 3S. Tracy 310,331.73$ 4 Olive (Grand ‐ 8th)299,353.83$ 5 Olive (Black ‐ Church) 215,119.68$ 6S. Bozeman 126,227.53$ 7 Urban ‐ N. Willson80,000.00$ 8S. Grand475,000.00$ 9 Story 302,866.08$ 10 Urban ‐ S. 8th750,000.00$ Total Expenditures995,000.00$ ‐$ ‐$ 1,049,353.83$ 126,227.53$ ‐$ 215,119.68$ ‐$ 302,866.08$ ‐$ 310,331.73$ Curb Program Project ListScenario 14140
Assumptions:1 Curb project costs inflation factor of 3.5% each year.2 Curb fund earn and pays interest 1.5% each year.3 Current $50,000 of Gas Tax money transferred into Curb Fund each year.4 Current $20,000 of Street Maintenance money transferred into Curb Fund each year5 Property owners with lineal curb will be assessed for 50% of the project and financing costs through an SID6 Urban funds will be utilized for curbs on urban routes (along with property owner SID's)Results: 1 These 10 projects completed by FY21 (within 12 years)2 Street Mtc Assessments do not increase over their current rate as a result of this plan.3 Approximately $1.7M in SID's are issued over 12 years (not including finance costs).4 Estimated annual SID assessment for 100' of curb = $270 ($22.50/month)5 $635,000 of Urban Funds are spent on curbs on urban routes.Curb ProgramScenario 2Assumptions & Results 141
FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21Beginning Balance‐$ 70,000.00$ 141,050.00$ 68,550.38$ 78,599.15$ 149,778.13$ (60,050.69)$ 9,048.55$ (32,140.16)$ 197,974.41$ 270,944.02$ 182,789.33$ Plus: Revenue Sources 590,000.00$ 70,000.00$ 214,615.38$ 880,979.48$ 70,000.00$ 352,075.50$ 70,000.00$ 181,324.44$ 230,596.67$ 70,000.00$ 232,218.86$ 230,596.67$ Plus: Interest Earnings 1,050.00$ 2,115.75$ 1,028.26$ 1,178.99$ 2,246.67$ (900.76)$ 135.73$ (482.10)$ 2,969.62$ 4,064.16$ 2,741.84$ Less: Curb Expenditures 520,000.00$ ‐$ 289,230.75$ 871,958.97$ ‐$ 564,151.00$ ‐$ 222,648.87$ ‐$ ‐$ 324,437.71$ 321,193.34$ Ending Balance 70,000.00$ 141,050.00$ 68,550.38$ 78,599.15$ 149,778.13$ (60,050.69)$ 9,048.55$ (32,140.16)$ 197,974.41$ 270,944.02$ 182,789.33$ 94,934.50$ Scenario 2Curb Program Summary of Balances, Revenues & Expenditures142
FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 TOTALSRevenue SourcesAllocation of Gas Tax 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 600,000.00$ Allocation of Street Mtc Assessments20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 240,000.00$ Increase in Street Mtc Assessments‐$ ARRA Dollars ‐ HB 645‐$ Urban Funds Dedicated to Curb Projects 260,000.00$ 375,000.00$ 635,000.00$ SID's (50% of Project Costs) 260,000.00$ 144,615.38$ 435,979.48$ 282,075.50$ 111,324.44$ 160,596.67$ 162,218.86$ 160,596.67$ 1,717,406.99$ ‐$ Total Revenue Available 590,000.00$ 70,000.00$ 214,615.38$ 880,979.48$ 70,000.00$ 352,075.50$ 70,000.00$ 181,324.44$ 230,596.67$ 70,000.00$ 232,218.86$ 230,596.67$ 3,192,406.99$ Scenario 2Curb Program Revenue Projections143
FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20Projects1 Urban ‐ S. Church 200,000.00$ 2 Urban ‐ S. Willson 240,000.00$ 3S. Tracy 4 Olive (Grand ‐ 8th) 289,230.75$5 Olive (Black ‐ Church) 222,648.87$ 6S. Bozeman 121,958.97$ 7 Urban ‐ N. Willson 80,000.00$ 8S. Grand 564,151.00$ 9 Story324,437.71$ 10 Urban ‐ S. 8th 750,000.00$ Total Expenditures 520,000.00$ ‐$ 289,230.75$871,958.97$ ‐$ 564,151.00$ ‐$ 222,648.87$ ‐$ ‐$ 324,437.71$ Curb Program Project List144