Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance No. 1750, Amendments to Chapter 13.12, Control of Backflow Protection and Cross-Connections1 Commission Memorandum REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Commission FROM: Debbie Arkell, Director of Public Services Chuck Winn, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: Amendments to Chapter 13.12, Control of Backflow Protection and Cross-Connections via Ordinance No. 1750. This project was continued from the March 2, 2009 meeting to this date, with the direction for Staff to bring additional information/answers to questions and concerns raised to this meeting. MEETING DATE: May 11, 2009 RECOMMENDATION: In light of the expenses full implementation of the proposed installation and testing program could cause business owners/residents in this time of economic downturn, Staff’s recommendation is to re-open the item and then table the item indefinitely. The project will be brought back to the Commission at a future date. Backflow protection devices have been required by Municipal Code in new and remodel construction since at least 1999. Staff will continue to: require the installation of backflow protection devices via site plan and/or building permit approval; inventory which structures have or do not have proper devices; continue to work with existing building owners who have a desire to install these devices; and provide education on the importance of backflow protection devices and the inspection/testing thereof. BACKGROUND: On March 2, 2009, Staff presented Ordinance No. 1750 to amend Section 13.12.322, Protective Devices, and add Chapter 13.14, Control of Backflow and Cross- Connections, of the Bozeman Municipal Code. The Municipal Code and the Uniform Plumbing Code (which is adopted by the City) require the installation of backflow protection devices as well as the testing of installed devices. The proposed Ordinance changes were an effort to formalize both the types of devices allowed and the maintenance and testing of the devices. 203 2 During the March 2 discussion, the Commission asked staff to: Ø Separate the installation and testing components and provide information regarding: · the costs of the city contracting to have these services done § can we get a price break by negotiating the cost of installations and/or testing – i.e. buy a set number of installations and/or tests a head of time to get a break on volume purchasing; · the costs of in-house installation and/or testing § how much current staff time could be devoted to an installation and/or testing program § how many units could be installed and/or tested annually § what are the impacts if an assembly fails a city test inspection and what steps would be taken for the repair · the costs of leaving the securing of these services to the customer; · determine a more accurate cost for the different types of units, including all costs – the unit, the thermal expansion air tank, installation, testing: § commercial/industrial § single family residence § multi-family residence § landscape irrigation Ø Determine the feasibility of saving money by buying the devices in bulk; Ø Better explain how we will identify the structures that don’t have protective devices, identify what triggers the need to install the device, and how we will prioritize the factors to determine which structures need the devices first; Ø Focus on commercial/industrial rather than single family residential; Ø Determine if installing protection devices in the mains, rather than on services, is feasible; Ø Report whether a once per year test is necessary or whether once every two or three years would be adequate; Ø Research how a no- or low-interest one-year loan with monthly payments could be developed; Ø Research how a cost-share program might work; Ø Explain the type of education we are proposing and at what cost, with a focus on older residential neighborhoods to give residents a chance to do the work themselves; and Ø Consider allowing more than a 100 day time period for the installation and testing (3-6 months suggested) This information has been obtained, but formatting the information into a final presentation is still in the works. While the information can be provided to the Commission at this meeting, we will be better prepared at a future date to present the information in a concise and consolidated manner. ALTERNATIVES: As suggested by the City Commission. 204 Commission Memorandum REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Commission FROM: John M. Alston, Water Superintendent Chris Kukulski, City Manager SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 1750 Revising Section 13.12.322 Protective Devices, and Adding Chapter 13.14, Control of Backflow and Cross-Connections of the Bozeman Municipal Code MEETING DATE: March 2, 2009 RECOMMENDATION: Provisionally adopt Ordinance No. 1750 revising Section 13.12.322, Protective Devices, and adding Chapter 13.14, Control of Backflow and Cross-Connections of the Bozeman Municipal Code. BACKGROUND: In FY08 the Commission approved a position in the water operations division to hire a backflow protection specialist. Part of that person’s duties was to research and propose a backflow protection ordinance for the city that expands on Section 13.12.322 of the BMC that requires backflow protection to be installed as a condition of continued water service. Section 13.12.322 was adopted in 1999. The need of the testing program and ordinance was identified in the 2005 Water Facility Plan. The Bozeman Water Department has been requiring Backflow protection on new water services since 1992. Some of these assemblies require yearly testing and were not required to be tested by the Department until the hiring of the Backflow Specialist. On February 20, 2008, the City’s Design Standards and Specifications Policy was amended to require backflow protection to be installed on each fire and domestic service line as required by the Water Superintendant. The intent of Ordinance No. 1750 is to protect the City’s water supply system from the possibility of contamination or pollution by isolating within the customer’s internal distribution systems or the customer’s private water systems contaminants or pollutants which could backflow into the city water system. It will also promote the elimination or control of existing cross-connections between potable water systems and non-potable water systems, plumbing fixtures and industrial pipe systems and provide for the maintenance of a continuing Program of Cross-Connection Control which will systematically and effectively prevent the contamination or pollution of all potable water systems. 57205 ALTERNATIVES: As recommended by the Commission. FISCAL EFFECTS: There will be minimal office expenses associated with mailing letters notifying property owners of the need to test existing backflow prevention assemblies/devices. Attachments: Ordinance No. 1750 Report compiled on February 25, 2009 Cc: Debbie Arkell, Director of Public Services Richard Hixson, City Engineer Dewey Sorensen, Backflow Protection Specialist 58206 59207 60208 61209 62210 63211 64212 65213 66214 67215 68216 69217 70218 71219 72220 73221 74222 75223 76224 77225 78226 79227 81228