HomeMy WebLinkAboutMeadow Creek Subdivision Payback Agreement
Commission Memorandum
REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Commission
FROM: Bob Murray, Project Engineer
Chris Kukulski, City Manager
SUBJECT: Meadow Creek Subdivision
MEETING DATE: 11/28/08
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize City Manager to sign the water & signal payback
agreements as proposed and sewer payback revised to include the entire
drainage zone in the district.
BACKGROUND: Attached is a copy of the partially executed water, sewer, and signal
payback agreements for the above referenced project. The proposed
districts are to cover offsite improvements that were installed as part of the
subdivision. In all cases the sizes of the improvements were dictated by
the City’s facility plans and will serve a much lager area than just the
Meadow Creek Subdivision. The signal payback is for signals that were
installed at 19th and Stucky, and 19th and Graf. Engineering staff has
reviewed the proposed boundary and costs for the signal payback and
found it to be acceptable.
Water improvements for the project included the master planned 24”
diameter main on 19th between Kagy and Graf and a 16” main in the
future extensions of 11th and Blackwood were installed to provide a
looped system. Engineering staff has reviewed the proposed boundary
and costs for the water payback and found it to be acceptable.
82
The trunk sewer main improvements were the most extensive of the three.
They included a 24” main in Davis/Fowler from Cattail to Baxter, a 21”
main in Davis/Fowler from Baxter to Oak, a 24” main on Fowler from
Durston to Baxter, a 21” main in Fowler from Baxter to Huffine, a 21”
main in Fowler from Garfield to Stucky, a 27” main in Stucky from
Fowler to 27th, and a 15” main from there into the subdivision.
Engineering staff is recommending a change to this district boundary. As
proposed they have only included the undeveloped properties within the
drainage zone that is defined by the wastewater master plan. Staff’s
recommendation is that the district should include all of the property
within the drainage zone so that the undeveloped property do not have to
carry all of the costs. This would mean that those developed properties
would be sunk costs to the developer.
FISCAL EFFECTS: N/A
ALTERNATIVES: Disapprove.
Respectfully submitted,
_________________________________ ____________________________
Robert J. Murray Jr., Project Engineer Chris A. Kukulski, City Manager
Attachments: Payback Agreements
Report compiled on 1/22/08
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119