Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10 06 08_19th and Main Redevelopment_CVS Pharmacy Master Commission Memorandum TO: Honorable Mayor and City Commission FROM: Brian Krueger, Associate Planner SUBJECT: 19th and Main-CVS Pharmacy Maser Site Plan, Site Plan, Certificate of Appropriateness, with Deviations Application #Z-08206 MEETING DATE: Monday, October 6, 2008 at 6:00 PM. RECOMMENDATION: 19th and Main-CVS Pharmacy Maser Site Plan, Site Plan, Certificate of Appropriateness, with Deviations Application #Z-08206 with the conditions and code provisions outlined in the staff report. BACKGROUND: The Master Site Plan will determine the overall development plan and parking arrangement for four commercial buildings with common parking, circulation, and site improvements. The first phase Site Plan application will allow the demolition of all existing buildings and new construction of an approximately 14,698 square foot retail pharmacy and associated site improvements as CVS Pharmacy to be located at 1919 West Main Street The site is zoned B-2 (Community Commercial District), and falls within the N. 19th Avenue Entryway and West Main Overlay District. One Deviation is being requested with this application, from Section 18.52.060 “Signs, Commercial, Manufacturing and Public Land Zones” of the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance “Wall Signs” to allow 17% increase in wall signage for the CVS building. The Development Review Committee, Design Review Board, and staff recommend overall conditional approval of this application with the conditions and code provisions outlined in the staff report. The code provisions are on pages 7-11 and the conditions are on pages 3-5 of the staff report. UNRESOLVED ISSUES: The Department of Planning is not aware of any unresolved issues for the proposed development at this time. FISCAL EFFECTS: The Department of Planning is not aware of any fiscal effects for the proposed development at this time. ALTERNATIVES: As suggested by the City Commission. CONTACT: Please email Brian Krueger at bkrueger@bozeman.net if you have any questions prior to the public hearing. APPROVED BY: Andrew Epple, Planning Director Chris Kukulski, City Manager 135 CITY COMMISSION STAFF REPORT 19th AND MAIN- CVS MASP/SP/COA/DEV FILE NO. #Z-08206 #Z-08206 19th and Main- CVS MASP/SP/COA/DEV Staff Report 1 Item: Master Site Plan including a first phase Site plan and Certificate of Appropriateness with Deviation #Z-08206. The Master Site Plan will determine the overall development plan and parking arrangement for four commercial buildings including common parking, circulation, and site improvements. The first phase Site Plan application will allow the demolition of all existing buildings and new construction of an approximately 14,698 square foot retail pharmacy and associated site improvements as CVS Pharmacy to be located at 1919 West Main Street and is legally described as Lots 1 and 2A, Block 8, West Park Manor 1st Addition, City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana and located within the N. 19th Avenue and West Main Entryway Overlay District. One Deviation is being requested with this application, from Section 18.52.060 “Signs, Commercial, Manufacturing and Public Land Zones” of the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance “Wall Signs” to allow 17% increase in wall signage for the CVS building. Owner: SKP, LLC 102 Village Downtown Blvd. Bozeman, MT 59715 Applicant: Velmeir Companies 7760 France Avenue South, Suite 215 Bloomington, MN 55435 Representative: Intrinsik Architecture 111 North Tracy Street Bozeman, MT 59715 Morrison Maierle, Inc. PO Box 1113 Bozeman, MT 59771 URS Corporation 3950 Sparks Drive SE Grand Rapids, MI 49546 Date: City Commission meeting on October 6, 2008, 5:30 pm in the Community Room, County Courthouse, 311 W. Main Street, Bozeman, Montana. Report By: Brian Krueger, Associate Planner Recommendation: Conditional Approval 136 #Z-08206 19th and Main- CVS MASP/SP/COA/DEV Staff Report 2 ____________________________________________________________________________________ PROJECT LOCATION The subject site is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of W. Main Street and N. 19th Avenue. The site is zoned B-2 (Community Commercial District), and falls within the N. 19th Avenue Entryway and West Main Overlay District. Please refer to the following vicinity map. PROPOSAL The Master Site Plan will determine the overall development plan and parking arrangement for four commercial buildings with common parking, circulation, and site improvements. The first phase Site Plan application will allow the demolition of all existing buildings and new construction of an approximately 14,698 square foot retail pharmacy and associated site improvements as CVS Pharmacy to be located at 1919 West Main Street The site is zoned B-2 (Community Commercial District), and falls within the N. 19th Avenue Entryway and West Main Overlay District. One Deviation is being requested with this application, from Section 18.52.060 “Signs, Commercial, Manufacturing and Public Land Zones” of the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance “Wall Signs” to allow 17% increase in wall signage for the CVS building. On September 24, 2008 the Development Review Committee (DRC) and the Design Review Board (DRB) recommended conditional approval of this application Their recommended conditions and comments are included in this report. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Based on the previous analysis, the DRC, DRB, and ADR staff find that the application, with conditions, is in general compliance with the adopted Growth Policy and the City of Bozeman Unified Development 137 #Z-08206 19th and Main- CVS MASP/SP/COA/DEV Staff Report 3 Ordinance. The following conditions of approval are recommended. Please note that these conditions are in addition to the required code provisions beginning on Pages 7-11 of this report. 1. The phasing plan shall be revised to include all perimeter street frontage landscaping and improvements (sidewalks) within the first phase. The first phase shall also include the parking lot landscape islands east of the Building 3 and south of Building 4 that shall be fully constructed with curb and gutter, crosswalks, irrigation, and landscaping. A city standard dead end barricade detail shall be used at all drive aisle openings to future parking areas. 2. The master site plan and the design guidelines for the master site plan shall note that parking has been provided for retail and limited office uses and that other uses allowed in B-2 may be approved following a parking and traffic analysis of the site that demonstrates adequate parking exists either on site or through a shared parking agreements for all uses on site. 3. The design guidelines shall include a reference to code section 18.42.150.D.7 that requires that all site lighting other than pathway intersection lighting and security lighting all lighting shall be turned off between 11:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. Exceptions shall be granted to those businesses which operate during these hours; such lighting may remain illuminated only while the establishment is actually open for business. 4. A site circulation signage and pavement marking plan shall be submitted with the final site plan that coordinates the one way circulation and access to the drive through uses on site. 5. A reciprocal parking agreement must be recorded on the two lots 6. All master plan exhibits shall consistently and accurately label all buildings as Building 1, 2, 3, and 4. The CVS building may be designated by the building number then tenant in parentheses e.g. Building 2 (CVS Pharmacy). 7. That the applicant upon submitting the Final Site Plan for approval by the Planning Director and prior to issuance of a building permit, will also submit a written narrative outlining how each of the above conditions of approval and code provisions have been satisfied. 8. Final details for all site furniture and public art shall be submitted with the final site plan application. 9. The applicant shall provide an exhibit and inventory of all existing landscaping to be protected, replaced, removed, or moved on site with the final site plan. At the time of final inspection of the newly installed landscaping approved on the final landscape plan all landscaping that was either protected, moved or removed shall be accounted for and noted as on site or noted as removed with the prior approval of the Planning Department. Standard tree protection measure including orange, 4’ high barrier fencing installed at each tree’s drip line shall be instituted for all trees to be protected prior to any grading on site. 10. Site construction details shall be provided for the scored colored concrete crosswalks and speed table with the final site plan. 138 #Z-08206 19th and Main- CVS MASP/SP/COA/DEV Staff Report 4 11. The main north/south driveway shall be constructed to the north property line and a standard detail scored concrete crosswalk be provided across the drive aisle in this location to connect the east west walkway along the north property line. The City standard dead end barrier shall be installed until such time that this driveway is connected to the adjacent site. 12. The parking areas proposed along N. 19th Avenue shall incorporate landscaped berms, low decorative walls, architectural screens, evergreen hedges or a combination thereof a minimum of 4’ in height to screen the parking areas from the public ways. 13. All exterior windows on all the buildings shall utilize transparent clear glass. No frosted, dark tinted, or spandrel glass allowed. 14. All site lighting within the master planned area shall utilize a consistent luminaire, pole, and base detail and noted in the design guidelines. All photometric modeling shall be cumulative with each site plan submittal. 15. No truck parking or outdoor storage of any kind is permitted on site without prior approval of the Planning Department. Loading and unloading only is permitted. 16. The comprehensive signage plan shall state that all signage lighting shall be turned off at the close of businesses for individual businesses. 17. A color palette for the building that includes actual material samples and color chips shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Office prior to Final Site Plan approval. The materials/color palette shall be presented on a board no larger than 24” x36” and contain all the primary materials to be utilized on the building including window/storefront frames and doors (garage and service) and in any proposed fencing or screening. All final building elevations and details shall be keyed to the color palette to delineate where each individual building material and color is specified. The palette shall be returned to the applicant following approval. 18. A preliminary site plan application and subsequent final site plan submittal and approval is required for all future buildings. The Design Review Board shall be advisory to the Planning Director for all site plan applications within this master site plan. 19. Additional brick detailing shall be incorporated into the CVS building along the walls (soldier course), lintels, and cornice line in order to help reduce the perceived mass of the building. 20. A perspective study including modeling shall be provided with the CVS building final site plan for approval to confirm that all mechanical equipment on the rooftop will be screened. This study shall include a study of the viewshed from the intersection of N. 19th Avenue and W. Main Street and from west bound traffic on W. Main Street. 21. The drive access shown on the site plan onto West Main Street does not meet the minimum separation for a partial access onto an arterial from an intersection with another arterial street. If the applicant wishes to keep this proposed drive access they must formally request it from the City Engineer. The guidelines for this request are outlined in UDO section 18.44.090.H.3. 22. A public access easement, equal to the drive width, must be provided for the access drives within 139 #Z-08206 19th and Main- CVS MASP/SP/COA/DEV Staff Report 5 the development. The public easement must be submitted to and approved by the City before FSP approval. 23. Project phasing shall be clearly defined on the Final Site Plan and infrastructure plans and specifications including installation of infrastructure. Any proposed phasing of public infrastructure must be reviewed and approved by the City engineering office. 24. All comments stating “NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION” shall be removed from all drawings in the Final Site Plan submittal. 25. The applicant shall provide and file with the County Clerk and Recorder's office executed Waivers of Right to Protest Creation of Special Improvement Districts (SID’s) for the following: a) Street improvements to N. 19th Avenue, W. Main Street, and W. Beall Street including but not limited to paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage improvements. b) Improvements to the intersection of W. Main Street and N. 19th Avenue. c) Improvements to the intersection of W. Beall and N. 19th Avenue. 26. The document filed shall specify that in the event an SID is not utilized for the completion of these improvements, the developer agrees to participate in an alternate financing method for the completion of said improvements on a fair share, proportionate basis as determined by square footage of property, taxable valuation of the property, traffic contribution from the development, or a combination thereof. CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION The DRC and Staff have reviewed the Site Plan Application. Staff recommends to the City Commission approval of said application with the conditions and code provisions outlined in this Staff Report. Staff has identified various code provisions that are currently not met by this application. Some or all of these items are listed in the findings of this Staff Report. The applicant must comply with all provisions of the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance, which are applicable to this project, prior to receiving Final Site Plan approval. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. ZONING DESIGNATION & LAND USES The property is zoned B-2 (Community Business District). The intent of the B-2 community business district is to provide for a broad range of mutually supportive retail and service functions located in clustered areas bordered on one or more sides by limited access arterials. North: Town and Country Grocery, zoned “B-2” (Community Business District). South: Loaf and Jug Convenience and Fuel Sales uses zoned “B-2” (Community Business District). East: Vacant and Casino uses, zoned “B-2” (Community Business District). West: Kirk Park, zoned “R-2” (Residential Two Household Medium Density District); Pierce Flooring retail uses, zoned “B-2” (Community Business District). 140 #Z-08206 19th and Main- CVS MASP/SP/COA/DEV Staff Report 6 ADOPTED GROWTH POLICY DESIGNATION The Future Land Use Map of the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan designates the subject property to develop as “Community Commercial”. The “Community Commercial” classification provides areas for basic employment and services necessary for a vibrant community. Establishments located within this category draw from a community as a whole for their employee and customer base and are sized accordingly. A broad range of functions include retail, education, professional and personal services, offices, residences and general service activities typify this designation. REVIEW CRITERIA & STAFF FINDINGS SECTION 18.38.080 “DEVIATION FROM OVERLAY OR UNDERLYING ZONING REQUREMENTS” Section 18.30.080 specifies the required criteria for granting deviations from the underlying zoning requirements. In the discussion below, Staff evaluated the project proposal in light of these criteria. Deviation request from Section 18.52.060 “Signs, Commercial, Manufacturing and Public Land Zones” of the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance “Wall Signs” to allow 17% increase in wall signage for the CVS building. A. Deviations will produce an environment, landscape quality and character superior to that produced by the existing standards. The Master Site Plan includes design guidelines to guide future buildings and development on site. The guidelines include signage guidance for the overall development in allocated square footages and examples of anticipated signage styles. Within the guidelines CVS has proffered to prohibit free standing signs within the project with the grant of the requested deviation for signage on their building. Staff finds that the design guidelines and propose CVS building will produce a superior environment. The elimination of freestanding signage will produce a project that is more urban in character and free of signage that is not incorporated into the site architecture. Staff also finds that the requirements for the buildings to match existing setback patterns within the corridor require multi sided architecture and signage on multiple sides of the building to address the public street and the interior areas of the site. B. Deviations will be consistent with the intent and purpose of Chapter 18.30 Bozeman Entryway Corridor Overlay District. The intent and purpose of the Entryway Corridor Overlay is to provide a superior environment within the primary entryways to and within the City. The Design Objectives Plan (DOP) works to ensure that the quality of the development along these corridors will enhance the impression and enjoyment of the community. This project is an enhancement to the site with high quality architecture and landscaping. The aforementioned proposal to eliminate freestanding signage on site will increase the urban character and aesthetic appeal of the site. The development as proposed and conditioned is consistent with the intent and purpose of Chapter 18.30 BMC. C. Deviations will be consistent with the adopted Design Objectives Plan. The DOP strictly discourages franchise architecture. The proposed CVS building is distinctly non- 141 #Z-08206 19th and Main- CVS MASP/SP/COA/DEV Staff Report 7 franchise and includes high quality detailing and materials. The signage proposed including the requested additional signage in the deviation is consistent with the building architecture and is presented in a scale that is consistent with each building façade. The signage does not overwhelm the building and as conditioned will be required to be unlit during hours when the business is not open. The increased signage for the CVS building as proposed is consistent with the adopted DOP. SECTION 18.34 “SITE PLAN AND MASTER SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA” In considering applications for site plan approval under this title, the Planning Director, City Commission, DRC, and when appropriate, the ADR Staff, the DRB or WRB shall consider the following: 1. Conformance to and consistency with the City’s adopted growth policy The development proposal is in conformance with the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan including the “Neighborhood Commercial” classification. This category is typified by smaller scale shops and services and a high level of pedestrian, bicycle, and transit opportunities. Neighborhood Commercial centers are intended to support and help give identity to individual neighborhoods by providing a visible and distinctive focal point. The proposal is in conformance and consistent with this designation. 2. Conformance to this title, including the cessation of any current violations The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. The following code provisions must be addressed prior to Final Site Plan approval: a) Section 18.34.090.E requires that following the approval of a final master site plan, the applicant shall submit to the Planning Department sequential individual site plan for specific areas within the master site plan. b) Section 18.34.130.D states that following approval of a final master site plan, the final master site plan shall be in effect for not more than five years. c) Section 18.34.130 requires the applicant to submit seven (7) copies a Final Site Plan within 6 months of preliminary approval containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office. • If occupancy of any structure is to occur prior to the installation of all required on-site improvements, the Improvements Agreement must be secured by a method of security equal to one and one-half times the amount of the estimated cost of the scheduled improvements not yet installed. Said method of security shall be valid for a period of not less than twelve (12) months; however, the applicant shall complete all on-site improvements within nine (9) months of occupancy to avoid default on the method of security. 142 #Z-08206 19th and Main- CVS MASP/SP/COA/DEV Staff Report 8 d) Section 18.34.130 requires that the final site plan shall contain the materials required in 18.78.080 and 18.78.090. Specifically the final site plan shall show all utilities and utility rights-of-way or easements: (1) Electric; (2) Natural Gas; (3) Telephone, cable TV, and similar services; (4)Water; and (5) Sewer (sanitary, treated effluent and storm). e) Section 18.34.140 states that a Building Permit must be obtained prior to the work, and must be obtained within one year of Final Site Plan approval. Building Permits will not be issued until the Final Site Plan is approved. f) Section 18.38.050.F requires all mechanical equipment to be screened. Rooftop equipment should be incorporated into the roof form or screened in an enclosure and ground mounted equipment shall be screened with walls, fencing or plant materials. The final master site plan and CVS building site plan shall contain a notation that “No ground mounted mechanical equipment, including, but not limited to utilities, air exchange conditioning units, transformers, and meters shall not encroach into the required yard setbacks and will be properly screened with an opaque solid wall and adequate landscape features. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be incorporated into the roof form or screened in an approved enclosure.” g) Sections 18.42.150 requires a lighting plan for all on-site lighting including wall-mounted lights on the building must be included in the final site plan submittal. Clarify that all proposed parking lot and site lighting do not exceed the maximum allowed 25 foot pole height. h) Section 18.42.150.D.7 requires that all site lighting other than pathway intersection lighting and security lighting all lighting shall be turned off between 11:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. Exceptions shall be granted to those businesses which operate during these hours; such lighting may remain illuminated only while the establishment is actually open for business. i) Section 18.42.170 states the size of the trash receptacle shall be appropriately sized for the use and approved by the City Sanitation Department. Accommodations for recyclables must also be considered. All receptacles shall be located inside of an approved trash enclosure. A copy of the site plan, indicating the location of the trash enclosure, dimensions of the receptacle and enclosure and details of the materials used, shall be sent to and approved by the City Sanitation Division (phone: 582-3238) prior to final site plan approval. j) Section 18.46.020.A requires a minimum disabled stall length of 20 feet, 18 feet if measured from a curb where at least 2 ft. of overhand onto landscaping area or a minimum 5 ft. sidewalk is provided or 18 feet measured from a wheel stop where an additional 2 ft. of overhang exists. k) Section 18.46.020.A states that the minimum drive aisle width where there are 90 degree perpendicular parking stalls is 26 feet. The drive aisle on the north side of Building 1 is shown at 24 ft. l) Section 18.46.020.L states that concrete sidewalks a minimum of 3 feet in width shall be provided between any existing or proposed building and adjacent parking lot. Where sidewalks curbs serve as wheel stops, an addition 2 feet of sidewalk width is required. The final site plan shall reflect a minimum 5’ sidewalk on the entire length of the south elevation of the CVS building if the parking is to remain in this location. 143 #Z-08206 19th and Main- CVS MASP/SP/COA/DEV Staff Report 9 m) Section 18.46.040.D states that disabled accessible spaces shall be located as near as practical to a primary entrance. Parking spaces and access aisles shall be level with slopes not exceeding 1:50 in all directions. Raised signs shall be located at a distance no greater than five feet from the front of each accessible space and shall state “Permit Required $100 Fine”. One of the disabled accessible spaces shall also be signed “Van Accessible”. The “Van Accessible” space shall be 8 feet wide with an 8 foot wide striped unloading aisle/ramp. n) Section 18.46.040.E, requires bicycle parking be provide. A bicycle parking location and bike rack detail shall be specified on the final site plan. The Bozeman Bicycle Advisory Board strongly recommends the use of a “Cora” bike rack. o) Section 18.48.050.C.2.e.3 requires that the minimum dimension of any landscape islands to be 8’. p) Section 18.48.050.C.2.A requires that parking lots must be screened from the public street. The screening required shall not be less than 4 feet in width and shall be maintained at a height of 4 to 6 feet except as otherwise restricted by fence and hedge height limits within required front yards and street vision triangles. q) Section 18.48.050.L requires that the finish grade of all landscape areas including stormwater facilities shall not exceed a slope of 25% grade (4 run: 1 rise). r) Section 18.48.050.L requires that all stormwater retention/detention facilities to be designed as landscape amenities. See specific code section for specific language and requirements. A cross section and landscape detail of each facility that meets the requirements of this section shall be submitted with the final landscape plan. s) Section 18.52.060 outlines the amount of permitted signage for the property. A Sign Permit shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office prior to the construction and installation of any on-site signage. All signs shall be in conformance with the approved Comprehensive Signage plan. t) Section 18.52.060.B requires a comprehensive signage plan for two or more tenant spaces on a lot. A comprehensive signage plan shall be submitted with the final site plan that complies with this section. u) Section 18.64.100 states that a building permit shall be obtained within one year of final approval, or said approval shall become null and void. Prior to the lapse of one year, the applicant may seek an extension of one additional year from the Planning Director. v) The Final Site Plan shall be adequately dimensioned. A complete legend of all line types used shall also be provided. w) A Storm Water Drainage/Treatment Grading Plan and Maintenance Plan for a system designed to remove solids, silt, oils, grease, and other pollutants must be provided to and approved by the City Engineer. The plan must demonstrate adequate site drainage (including sufficient spot elevations), storm water detention/retention basin details (including basin sizing and discharge calculations, and discharge structure details), underground storm-tech chamber sizing 144 #Z-08206 19th and Main- CVS MASP/SP/COA/DEV Staff Report 10 calculations, storm water discharge destination, and a storm water maintenance plan. x) Plans and Specifications for any fire service line must be prepared in accordance with the City's Fire Service Line Policy by a Professional Engineer (PE), and be provided to and approved by the City Engineer prior to initiation of construction of the fire service or fire protection system. The applicant shall also provide Professional Engineering services for construction inspection, post-construction certification, and preparation of mylar record drawings. y) Sewer and water services shall be shown on the FSP and approved by the Water/Sewer Superintendent. City of Bozeman applications for service shall be completed by the applicant. z) City standard sidewalk shall be installed and properly depicted at the standard location (i.e., 1 foot off property line) along the street(s) frontage. Any deviation to the standard alignment or location must be approved by the City Engineer and MDT if the sidewalk will be located within their Right of Way. aa) The location of existing water and sewer mains shall be properly depicted, as well as nearby fire hydrants. bb) Typical curb details (i.e., raised and/or drop curbs) and typical asphalt paving section detail shall be provided to and approved by the City Engineer. Concrete curbing shall be provided around the entire new parking lot perimeter and adequately identified on the FSP. cc) All existing utility and other easements must be shown on the FSP. dd) Adequate snow storage area must be designated outside the sight triangles, but on the subject property (unless a snow storage easement is obtained for a location off the property and filed with the County Clerk and Recorder's office). ee) Drive approach and public street intersection sight triangles shall be free of plantings which at mature growth will obscure vision within the sight triangle. ff) The drive approaches shall be constructed in accordance with the City's standard approach (i.e., concrete apron, sidewalk section and drop-curb) and shown as such on the FSP. gg) All trees must be at least 10 feet from any public utilities or service lines. All public utilities and services lines must be shown on the Final Landscaping plan. hh) The Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife & Parks, SCS, Montana Department of Environmental Quality and Army Corps of Engineer's shall be contacted regarding the proposed project and any required permits (i.e., 310, 404, Turbidity exemption, etc.) shall be obtained prior to FSP approval. ii) The applicant shall submit a construction route map dictating how materials and heavy equipment will travel to and from the site in accordance with section 18.74.020.A.1 of the Unified Development Ordinance. This shall be submitted as part of the final site plan for site developments, or with the infrastructure plans for subdivisions. It shall be the responsibility of 145 #Z-08206 19th and Main- CVS MASP/SP/COA/DEV Staff Report 11 the applicant to ensure that the construction traffic follows the approved routes. jj) All construction activities shall comply with section 18.74.020.A.2. of the Unified Development Ordinance. This shall include routine cleaning/sweeping of material that is dragged to adjacent streets. The City may require a guarantee as allowed for under this section at any time during the construction to ensure any damages or cleaning that are required are complete. The developer shall be responsible to reimburse the City for all costs associated with the work if it becomes necessary for the City to correct any problems that are identified. 3. Conformance with all other applicable laws, ordinances, and regulations The Final Site Plan will be reviewed to ensure compliance with this section. The proposal conforms to all other applicable laws, ordinances, and regulations. The plans will be further evaluated against the requirements of the International Building Code at the time application is made for a Building Permit. 4. Relationship of site plan elements to conditions both on and off the property Existing- The subject property was developed and has been operated as an automobile sales dealership for some time. The existing buildings on site include a primary building that consists of a showroom, office, parts storage, and automobile service bays and a secondary used car building that is more temporary in construction. The primary building is constructed primarily of wood, steel, and glass with a unique circular bowl shaped wall and roof features. The primary entrance to the property is currently from West Main Street a secondary entrance is from N. 19th Avenue. All buildings are proposed for demolition and all asphalt is proposed to be removed. Proposed- The proposal for the redevelopment of the property is for more contemporary building designs constructed with multiple types of traditional materials. Four buildings are proposed with only one know use on site. The proposed CVS pharmacy is proposed a approximately 15,000 square feet in size. The CVS buildings have been designed on all four sides and presents an urban front facade orientation to both the side walk and interior parking lot. Most buildings include entrances on both sides of the buildings. There are a total of 4 buildings proposed. Four buildings are proposed at 14,500, 4,500, 12,000, and 6,000 square feet in size. There is substantial pedestrian circulation proposed in the shared drive aisle access and parking area. The proposal includes additional landscaping adjacent to the street and within the parking and circulation areas. A revised boulevard sidewalk layout is proposed along the N. 19th Avenue frontage to bring the sidewalk closer to the buildings proposed at the setback lines. Plaza entrances are adjacent to all building entrances and access to public ways. The access points to the site would remain unchanged except for the addition of a share access from N. 20th Avenue via the Pierce Flooring property. West- Kirk Park and residential neighborhood areas are adjacent to the project west of 20th Avenue. The project proposes to extend plaza connections an existing crosswalk that connects the property to Kirk Park and the community skate park. Pierce Flooring a retail carpet business is also located to the west of the project. A shared access with this site is proposed. 146 #Z-08206 19th and Main- CVS MASP/SP/COA/DEV Staff Report 12 Businesses to the North and South- The Town and Country Grocery store is located directly north of the project site. Across W. Main Street south is located a Loaf and Jug automobile fueling facility and convenience use and a Burger King convenience restaurant. Commercial Development to the East- The former site of the Ressler automobile sales dealership (currently vacant) and a small casino use at the northeast corner of W. Main Street and N. 19th Avenue. 5. The impact of the proposal on the existing and anticipated traffic and parking conditions The traffic study was completed in August 2008 for the adjacent signalized intersections of N. 19th Avenue and West Main Street, the site accesses, and North 20th Avenue and West Beall Street. The study suggests that the total uses on site will generate as many as 2,908 average daily trips. The estimated traffic counts are derived the Institute of Traffic Engineers manuals and are generally based on gross square footage and specific uses. Only one turning movement at the intersections studied currently operates at a LOS D. The N. 19th Avenue access will have full turning movements: right in, right out, left in and left out. The West Main Street access will continue to function as a right in and right out access. The shared access with Pierce Flooring onto N 20th Avenue will be full access onto the local street. The applicant proposes an automobile connection to the abutting Town and Country site at the northwest corner of the project. It would be the decision of the Town and Country property to determine if and when they might connect to this site. The access will be developed and access easements will be provided to the north property line in this location. Staff recommends a condition that the circulation drive be constructed to the north property line and that a standard detail scored concrete crosswalk be provided across the drive aisle in this location to connect the east west sidewalk along the north property line. A total of 115 parking stalls including 8 accessible spaces are provided on site. Based upon the general uses proposed on site this appears to be acceptable. The final required parking will be based upon the actual uses and floor plans proposed for each of the individual buildings. The parking areas are divided into separate lot areas that help to minimize the negative visual aspects of parking on site. The parking is provided to the side and behind the buildings located on the public ways. 6. Pedestrian and vehicular ingress and egress The primary entrance to the development is from N. 19th Avenue, the second access is on West Main Street, and a third shared access to N. 20th Avenue is located adjacent to Kirk Park. The applicant has requested a deviation from the access separation distance for the West Main Street access which is only 180 feet from the curb line at the intersection of N. 19th Avenue. This is an existing permitted access with MDT. Both West Main Street and N. 19th Avenue are MDT Urban Routes and within their jurisdiction. However, a request was forwarded to the City Engineer regarding access placement on West Mai Street. Per Section 18.44.090.H of the 147 #Z-08206 19th and Main- CVS MASP/SP/COA/DEV Staff Report 13 U.D.O. access deviations may be approved at the discretion of the City Engineer. This allowance was originally adopted into the text to provide flexibility for lots platted prior to adopting wider access separation standards. The City Engineer has subsequently reviewed the traffic impact study prior to approving the proposed access separation distance. Engineering is supportive of the deviation and the existing access location. The sidewalk on N. 19th Avenue is currently constructed as a partial boulevard walk and curb walk so there is no boulevard in certain locations. The applicant proposes a new wider boulevard that would be further separated from the street eliminating most sections of the curbwalk. The walk would bring pedestrians closer to the buildings and their entrances and provide for larger planting area in the boulevard along N. 19th Avenue. Final approval of MDT is required prior to final site plan approval. The existing sidewalk on West Main Street is already constructed with a grass boulevard. Preservation of the existing street trees and new trees where spacing requirements have not been met would be required with the redevelopment of the site. A boulevard sidewalk also exists along W. 20th Avenue. A midblock crosswalks exists that currently connects the site to Kirk Park. The proposal includes pedestrian plazas near the entrances to all buildings and adjacent to the boulevard sidewalks along all public ways. 7. Landscaping, including the enhancement of buildings, the appearance of vehicular use, open space, and pedestrian areas, and the preservation or replacement of natural vegetation The landscape design is required to meet the standard of 15 points. The landscape plan currently designates that those points are met on site. The landscape plan received positive comments at the Design Review Board meeting. Staff notes in the code provisions that the required parking lot landscape screening is deficient and will have to be address on the final site plan. The interior landscape islands that are not turf grass must include additional ground cover so at least 75% of the landscape island is live vegetation. Staff is recommending a condition to the Commission that requires an accounting and management plan for protection, removal or replanting of any of the existing landscaping on or adjacent to the site. The final landscape plan will be reviewed during final site plan review for conformance with the requirements of Chapter 18.48 BMC. 8. Open space The existing open space on site is located in the N. 19th Avenue and West Main Street setback areas. The balance of the site is currently paved. In addition to the landscaped yard space and hardscaping on site, large plaza areas with seating and public art are proposed where the building entrances intersect with the public sidewalks in the setback areas. 9. Building location and height The buildings are located mostly along the street frontage at the building setback lines providing enclosure to the street. Although a smaller building is proposed at the intersection of N. 19th Avenue and W. Main Street the design guidelines for the development require strong architecture on the building and encourage architectural massing (tower or second story feature) in this location. 148 #Z-08206 19th and Main- CVS MASP/SP/COA/DEV Staff Report 14 The only building that has been fully designed for the site is the CVS building, which is proposed at approximately 31 feet in height. The maximum height allowed in the zone with the proposed roof configuration is 38 feet. 10. Setbacks The yard setbacks in the B-2 district adjacent to arterial streets (N. 19th Avenue and W. Main Street) in the Entryway Corridor are 25 feet minimum for both buildings, parking, and driveway circulation areas. Since the property also fronts on a local street (N. 20th Avenue) there is a 7 ft. setback along that street for buildings and a required 25 foot setback for parking areas. The north property line represents a side yard setback area and in the B-2 district 5 feet for a building and 8 feet for a parking area respectively is required. The project meets all required setbacks. 11. Lighting The light fixture details appear to meet the lighting standards. All lighting fixtures must be noted on the final site plan including wall-mounted lighting and any proposed security lighting. All light fixtures shall conform to the requirements outlined in the City of Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. Additionally, the pole style light must identify the maximum pole height and a final photometric lighting plan must be submitted for the entire site. Staff has noted a code provision that all site lighting other than security lighting must be turned off between the hours of 11:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. 12. Provisions for utilities, including efficient public services and facilities The private utilities and water services are located within adjacent streets. A large sewer main and easement bisects the site north to south. Sewer is provided throughout the development with individual building stubs in the shared driveways. Water is provided from service in all the adjacent streets. The applicant will need to coordinate with Northwest Energy, Qwest, or other private providers for other services. The utilities and easements need to be coordinated with the landscape plan to ensure no overlap. No trees are permitted within ten feet of mains and services as noted in the conditions. 13. Site surface drainage Stormwater retention and detention is proposed to be satisfied with an underground chamber system installed beneath the parking areas within the site. Stormwater runoff calculations will be required as part of the Final Site Plan and any needed grading for stormwater must be provided. 14. Loading and unloading areas This project does not meet the threshold to provide an off street loading berth. The applicant has proposed a loading area for the CVS building. The area reserved for unloading is sized to accommodate large trucks. Trucks will access the site from N. 19th Avenue exiting onto West Main Street, both streets are designated truck routes in the Bozeman Area Transportation Plan. 15. Grading 149 #Z-08206 19th and Main- CVS MASP/SP/COA/DEV Staff Report 15 A grading and drainage plan is required for review and approval by the City Engineering Department prior to final site plan approval. 16. Signage All new signage shall require a sign permit and shall be included with the Final Site Plan submittal. A comprehensive signage plan is required for all commercial multi-tenant complexes. One Deviation is being requested with this application, from Section 18.52.060 “Signs, Commercial, Manufacturing and Public Land Zones” of the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance “Wall Signs” to allow 17% increase in wall signage for the CVS building. Staff is generally supportive of the deviation as the applicant has proffered to not allow free standing signs on the site in the development guidelines. Staff also recommends a condition that would require that the comprehensive signage plan shall state that all signage lighting shall be turned off at the close of businesses for individual businesses in order to mitigate the increase in signage on site. See additional discussion regarding the deviation under the deviation criteria on pages 3 and 4 of this report. 17. Screening Staff has noted a code provision that requires all mechanical equipment to be screened. Rooftop equipment should be incorporated into the roof form or screened in an enclosure and ground mounted equipment shall be screened with walls, fencing or plant materials. The final master site plan and CVS building site plan shall contain a notation that “No ground mounted mechanical equipment, including, but not limited to utilities, air exchange conditioning units, transformers, and meters shall not encroach into the required yard setbacks and will be properly screened with an opaque solid wall and adequate landscape features. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be incorporated into the roof form or screened in an approved enclosure.” Due the location of the proposed CVS building that is substantially lower than the intersection of West Main and 19th Avenue and the proposed use of roof top HVAC units on the CVS building staff recommends a condition that the applicant provide a perspective study of the building demonstrating that the rooftop mechanical equipment will be adequately screened. 18. Overlay district provisions The site lies within the N. 19th Avenue and West Main Street Class II Entryway Corridors. Staff has reviewed the provisions of the Design Objectives Plan for Entryway Corridors with the Applicant and the Design Review Board. See the attached Design Review Board staff report for specific analysis. Staff finds that as conditioned the application is in general compliance the with the requirements of the Entryway Corridor and the Design Objectives Plan. The Design Review Board recommends approval of the application with the conditions and code provisions outlined in the staff report. 19. Other related matters, including relevant comment from affected parties 150 #Z-08206 19th and Main- CVS MASP/SP/COA/DEV Staff Report 16 Public and Agency comment is attached to the staff report. Two public comments were submitted by an adjacent property owner requesting additional access in the MDT right of way. This request is outside the purview of the City. 20. If the development includes multiple lots that are interdependent for circulation or other means of addressing requirement of this title, whether the lots are either: a. Configured so that the sale of individual lots will not alter the approved configuration or use of the property or cause the development to become nonconforming; b. The subject of reciprocal and perpetual easements or other agreements to which the City is a party so that the sale of individual lots will not cause one or more elements of the development to become nonconforming. A reciprocal public access easement is required on site. A reciprocal parking agreement is required on site. The parcel is on two lots. Attachments: Applicant’s Submittal Materials Design Review Board Staff Report September 24, 2008 Draft Design Review Board Minutes from the September 24, 2008 meeting. Public Comment Agency Comment Aerial exhibit Report Sent to:: SKP, LLC, 102 Village Downtown Boulevard, Bozeman, MT 59715 Morrison- Maierle, Attn. Tom Eastwood, PO Box 1113, Bozeman, MT 5977 Intrinsik Architecture, Attn. Susan Kozub, 111 North Tracy Avenue, Bozeman, MT 59715 URS Corporation, Attn. John Verplank, 3950 Sparks Drive SE, Grand Rapids, MI 49546 The Velmeir Companies, John Lennander, 7760 France Avenue South, Suite 215 Bloomington, MN 55435 151 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT 19th AND MAIN- CVS MASP/SP/COA/DEV FILE NO. #Z-08206 #Z-08206 19th and Main- CVS MASP/SP/COA/DEV Staff Report 1 `Item: Master Site Plan including a first phase Site plan and Certificate of Appropriateness with Deviation #Z-08206. The Master Site Plan will determine the overall development plan and parking arrangement for four commercial buildings including common parking, circulation, and site improvements. The first phase Site Plan application will allow the demolition of all existing buildings and new construction of an approximately 14,698 square foot retail pharmacy and associated site improvements as CVS Pharmacy to be located at 1919 West Main Street and is legally described as Lots 1 and 2A, Block 8, West Park Manor 1st Addition, City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana and located within the N. 19th Avenue and West Main Entryway Overlay District. One Deviation is being requested with this application, from Section 18.52.060 “Signs, Commercial, Manufacturing and Public Land Zones” of the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance “Wall Signs” to allow 17% increase in wall signage for the CVS building. Owner: SKP, LLC 102 Village Downtown Blvd. Bozeman, MT 59715 Applicant: Velmeir Companies 7760 France Avenue South, Suite 215 Bloomington, MN 55435 Representative: Intrinsik Architecture 111 North Tracy Street Bozeman, MT 59715 Morrison Maierle, Inc. PO Box 1113 Bozeman, MT 59771 URS Corporation 3950 Sparks Drive SE Grand Rapids, MI 49546 Date: Design Review Board meeting on September 24, 2008, 5:30 pm in the Professional Office Building, 20 East Olive Street, Bozeman, Montana. Report By: Brian Krueger, Associate Planner Recommendation: Conditional Approval ____________________________________________________________________________________ 152 #Z-08206 19th and Main- CVS MASP/SP/COA/DEV Staff Report 2 PROJECT LOCATION The subject site is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of W. Main Street and N. 19th Avenue. The site is zoned B-2 (Community Commercial District), and falls within the N. 19th Avenue Entryway and West Main Overlay District. Please refer to the following vicinity map. PROPOSAL The Master Site Plan will to determine the overall development plan and parking arrangement for four commercial buildings with common parking, circulation, and site improvements. The first phase Site Plan application will allow the demolition of all existing buildings and new construction of an approximately 14,698 square foot retail pharmacy and associated site improvements as CVS Pharmacy to be located at 1919 West Main Street The site is zoned B-2 (Community Commercial District), and falls within the N. 19th Avenue Entryway and West Main Overlay District. The recommendations of both the DRC and DRB will be forwarded to the City Commission for a final decision. ZONING DESIGNATION & LAND USES The property is zoned B-2 (Community Business District). The intent of the B-2 community business district is to provide for a broad range of mutually supportive retail and service functions located in clustered areas bordered on one or more sides by limited access arterials. North: Town and Country Grocery, zoned “B-2” (Community Business District). South: Loaf and Jug Convenience and Fuel Sales uses zoned “B-2” (Community Business District). East: Vacant and Casino uses, zoned “B-2” (Community Business District). 153 #Z-08206 19th and Main- CVS MASP/SP/COA/DEV Staff Report 3 West: Kirk Park, zoned “R-2” (Residential Two Household Medium Density District); Pierce Flooring retail uses, zoned “B-2” (Community Business District). ADOPTED GROWTH POLICY DESIGNATION The Future Land Use Map of the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan designates the subject property to develop as “Community Commercial”. The “Community Commercial” classification provides areas for basic employment and services necessary for a vibrant community. Establishments located within this category draw from a community as a whole for their employee and customer base and are sized accordingly. A broad range of functions include retail, education, professional and personal services, offices, residences and general service activities typify this designation. REVIEW CRITERIA Design Objectives Plan 1. Neighborhood Design (pages 9-14 of the Design Objectives Plans) A. Green Space: The only existing green space on the current site is existing landscaping located in the setbacks along West Main Street and N. 19th Avenue. The property includes some mature plantings that are located in the setbacks along N. 19th Avenue and along West Main Street. The current balance of the site is comprised of building footprints and asphalt parking and circulation area. The proposal is to enhance the existing setback areas with additional landscaping and the addition of parking lot landscaping within the interior of the site. There are no existing green spaces proposed to be developed or removed. B. Auto Connections: Vehicular circulation is addressed with an egress/ingress points along a shared drive aisles located off 20th Avenue and an access on both West Main Street and N. 19th Avenue. The applicant proposes an automobile connection to the abutting Town and Country site at the northwest corner of the project. It would be the decision of the Town and Country property to determine if and when they might connect to this site. The access will be developed and access easements will be provided to the north property line in this location. Staff recommends a condition that the circulation drive be constructed to the north property line and that a standard detail scored concrete crosswalk be provided across the drive aisle in this location to connect the east west sidewalk along the north property line. C. Pedestrian & Bicycle Connections: The proposed master plan provides good north south pedestrian connections along the exterior of the site. The application proposes to move the current sidewalk along N. 19th Avenue from its current location adjacent to 19th Avenue to a more internal location closer to the building setback lines. This location is supported by staff, but will require the approval of the Montana Department of Transportation. An east/west pedestrian connection is proposed along the north property boundary. Staff recommends a condition that would require a crosswalk across the drive aisle that extends to the north property line. A second east/west pedestrian connection is proved through the center of the site that connects the sidewalk along N. 19th Avenue thorough the site to the crosswalk through N. 20th Avenue connecting to Kirk Park. This walkway provides adequate crosswalks across drive aisles and a speed table crossing through the central drive aisle to increase pedestrian safety. This 154 #Z-08206 19th and Main- CVS MASP/SP/COA/DEV Staff Report 4 east/west walkway does include a section that does not meet current code standards. The walkway is cutoff in front (south elevation) of the CVS building by the stores entrance vestibule. Code section 18.46.020.L requires a minimum 3 foot wide concrete sidewalk between any proposed building and adjacent parking lot. Where the curb serves as a wheel stop and additional two feet is required. A minimum five foot wide concrete sidewalk is required along the entire frontage of the CVS building on the south elevation. Staff has noted this code provision in the DRC comments and recommendation. Staff will require final details of all crosswalks and the speed table with the final site plan. Staff recommends a condition to clarify that all crosswalks and the speed table shall be colored and scored concrete in order to provide more definition and additional pedestrian safety. Bicycle parking is proposed in the plaza entrance areas to all buildings. Final cutsheets for the bicycle parking shall be provided with the final site plan. D. Street Character: Street trees, lighting, sidewalks/paths, and outdoor furniture can all provide continuity and sense of place at a pedestrian scale. A good size outdoor plaza is proposed for the east elevations of the buildings that front onto N. 19th Avenue and a plaza on the streetscape of the building proposed along N. 20th Avenue. Urban street furniture is proposed in these areas and generally described in the design guidelines. Final cutsheets for all proposed site benches, tables, furniture and bicycle racks shall be submitted with the final site plan. The street frontage landscaping also provides a coordinated design along the streetscapes. The proposed landscape buffer areas to shield the parking areas from the public ways are inadequate. Staff recommends a condition that additional landscaping be provided to screened the parked cars on site. In general the streetscape character of the buildings in this proposal are good. 2. Site Design (pages 15-36) A. Natural Features: The site does not contain any existing natural features other than existing landscaping that was installed around the perimeter of the site in the setback areas. Staff is recommending a condition that requires an accounting and management plan for removal or replanting of any of the existing landscaping on or adjacent to the site. Staff has noted a code provision regarding the maximum slope (1:4 or 25%) allowed in landscape areas. The landscaped area at the southeast corner of the site appears to exceed this threshold. B. Views: This project meets the height and other site requirements required in the B-2 District. This is a developed urban area and little impact is anticipated to potential viewsheds. C. Cultural Resources: The site is already developed (Asphalt, sewer and water services). No cultural resources are anticipated on site. D. Topography: A site grading plan is required with the final site plan with review and approval by both the Engineering Office and Planning Staff. A existing retaining wall is proposed to remain at the corner of N. 19th and Oak. There is a substantial grade change at this intersection to the site. A maximum 1:4 slope is allowed on site for all landscape areas. The proposed walkway transition up this slope is required to meet ADA standards and be approved by MDT. 155 #Z-08206 19th and Main- CVS MASP/SP/COA/DEV Staff Report 5 E. Site Drainage: The storm water plan will be required for review and approval of the Engineering Office prior to final site plan approval. Any onsite detention or retention ponds will have to meet code and landscape requirements. F. Building Placement: The buildings are placed appropriately at the yard setback line along West Main Street (25’ setback) and N. 19th Avenue (25’ setback). A building is proposed to anchor the corner at the West Main Street and N. 19th Avenue intersection. The trash enclosure and service entrance area for the CVS building includes design details and architectural enhancement that provides visual interest along N. 19th Avenue. All buildings provide an entrance plaza along the sidewalk edge. G. Outdoor Public Spaces: Outdoor plaza areas are provided at the main entrances to all of the proposed buildings that will provide visual interest to pedestrians and drivers along N. 19th Avenue and N. 20th Avenue. Urban street furniture is proposed in those areas and a requirement for a public art feature. Overall, the entrance plaza is of acceptable quality. H. Pedestrian & Bicycle Circulation Systems: See discussion regarding pedestrian and bicycle circulation systems in C. on page 3. I. Internal Automobile Circulation Systems: The site plan provides a coordinated and continuous system of driveways to provide traffic follow. Adequate drive aisles have been provided except for the drive aisle proposed on the north side of building 1. A minimum of a 26 foot wide drive aisle is required in this area. Staff has noted this code provision during the DRC review. The drive aisles are configured to provide continuous circulation and provide a hierarchy of internal driveways within the constraints of the sewer easement. J. Parking Lots: A total of 115 parking stalls including 8 accessible spaces are provided on site. Based upon the general uses proposed on site this appears to be acceptable. The final required parking will be based upon the actual uses and floor plans proposed for each of the individual buildings. The parking areas are divided into separate lot areas that helps to minimize the negative visual aspects of parking on site. The parking is provide to the side and behind the buildings located on the public ways. The proposed parking lot screening is insufficient and staff recommends a condition to require landscaped berms, low decorative wall, architectural screen, evergreen hedge or a combination of the previous a minimum of 4’ in height to screen the parking areas. A shared use drive is proposed from N. 20th Avenue which will minimize curb cuts along N. 20th Avenue. K. Site Lighting: The site lighting for the entire site existing and proposed will be required to meet the standards in Section 18.42.150. A lighting plan and cutsheets will be required with the final site plan application. The photometric plans submitted to date conform to the regulations. All future lighting shall utilize a common site luminare, pole, and base detail in order to provide continuity. L. Utilities & Service Areas: In general, the site appears to be deficient in sanitation services and trash enclosures. Final approval of the City Sanitation Division for trash enclosures is required prior to final master site plan approval. The CVS building does propose a trash enclosure. It appears to be designed to adequately screen the refuse container. The location of the trash 156 #Z-08206 19th and Main- CVS MASP/SP/COA/DEV Staff Report 6 enclosure will require the written approval of the City Sanitation Division. All mechanical equipment, gas and electric meters, venting and rooftop mechanical equipment must be screened with screening and integrated into the building. Staff notes that there is a roof top unit (RTU) on the CVS building that is at the same height as the proposed parapet wall. This unit is required to be fully screened from all directions including from the intersection of N. 19th Avenue and W. Main Street. Due to the difference in topography staff recommends a condition that the applicant provide a visual study from that intersection confirming that the proposed parapet height is adequate to screen all the proposed RTU’s. M. Landscape Design: The landscape design is generally acceptable. Interior landscape islands that are not turf grass must include additional ground cover so at least 75% of the landscape island is live vegetation. Staff is recommending a condition to the Commission that requires an accounting and management plan for protection, removal or replanting of any of the existing landscaping on or adjacent to the site. N. Buffers: A code provision requires all mechanical equipment locations and screening methods to be shown on the final plans and buildings elevations, and that they be properly screened with physical/opaque screening and/or be integrated into the building and may include landscape features for screening. This includes all air exchange systems, telephone, electric panels/meters, gas meters, irrigation controllers, and storm water facilities. Ground mounted mechanical equipment, including air exchange equipment and irrigation wells, are not permitted in the required yard setbacks must be noted on the site plan and landscape plan if proposed. 3. Building Design (pages 37-48): A. Building & Topography- The buildings do follow the general lay of the land as suggested. B. Building Character- The guidelines for building character for “All Corridors” strongly discourages franchise architecture. The character of the proposed CVS building does not represent franchise architecture and reflects the regional urban character. The master site plan design guidelines are consistent with the City’s anticipation of innovative new building designs that draw upon regional design traditions. C. Primary Building Entrance- The primary entrances for all buildings appear to orient to the streetscape and the major pedestrian ways. All buildings are proposed with a plaza entrance feature that faces the street. The CVS building proposes a large entryway with a double sided entrance that faces both the public way and the interior parking lots. D. Street Level Interest- In order for staff to make final determinations on compliance with this item staff has request additional clarification on window materials. Staff will await that information prior to a final recommendation on whether the applicant has provided adequate street level interest on the public street facing facades of the CVS building. A rhythm of fenestration and materials is present that provides interest to the passerby and that provides human scale. E. Building Mass & Scale- The building is divided into modules that express dimensions of structures seen traditionally. The building’s façade components express themselves in ways that 157 #Z-08206 19th and Main- CVS MASP/SP/COA/DEV Staff Report 7 help establish a human scale. Staff recommends a condition to add additional brick detailing to the building along the walls (soldier course), lintels, and cornice line in order to help reduce the perceived mass. The primary entrance to the CVS building although large, utilizes a flat awning feature at both doors that reduces the scale and mass of the building at the entrance. Providing at least a five foot wide sidewalk between the building and the parking area will also reduce the perceived scale of the building. F. Roof Form- The primary roof form is flat with a parapet. The guidelines require that all roof forms shall incorporate two features from the list on page 45 of the Design Objectives Plan. This building as proposed provides the required two: flat roof with parapet and a cornice or molding to define the top of the parapet wall. Staff recommends a condition that would require additional brick detailing at the cornice line in order to further define the top of the parapet wall. G. Building Materials- Standard unit brick masonry and glass with steel detailing are the primary building materials. A color and materials board will be required for review and approval of the ADR staff prior to final site plan approval. H. Building Complex- The design guidelines submitted with the master site plan application generally support the Design Objectives Plan guidelines that require coordinated design features among sets of buildings in a single development. I. Service Canopies- Not applicable. The policy is specific to gas station canopy design. J. Color- The guidelines recommend muted earth tones with bolder colors used primarily for accent only. The color palette for the CVS building and demonstrated in the design guidelines presented appears appropriate. O. Utilities & Mechanical Equipment- Title 18 BMC and the Design Objectives Plan require all mechanical equipment to be screened from view. This includes all air exchange systems, telephone, electric panels/meters, gas meters, irrigation controllers, and storm water facilities. Ground mounted mechanical equipment, including air exchange equipment and irrigation wells, are not permitted in the required yard setbacks must be noted on the site plan and landscape plan if proposed. 4. Sign Design (pages 49-56) A sign permit is required prior to any installation of signage on site. A comprehensive signage plan required for this project. Any signage shall be in conformance with the approved comprehensive sign plan. Staff is supportive of the sign deviation requested due to the unique location of the building and the commitment to eliminate pole signs on site. Staff recommends a condition of master site plan approval that would require that signage for individual businesses be turned off after business hours. 5. Corridor Specific Guidelines N. 19th Avenue (Pages 63-68): 158 #Z-08206 19th and Main- CVS MASP/SP/COA/DEV Staff Report 8 North 19th Avenue and Oak Street (Pages 69-79): The North 19th Avenue portion of this Entryway Corridor is the most heavily traveled road in town, and for this reason, it is particularly important that development occur in a manner that supports the overall goals for the corridors. For this corridor specifically, the goal is to establish a greensward as the foreground, to provide a sense of connection with the agricultural heritage of the area and to maintain view opportunities to the mountains beyond. This green area will be more “refined” than historical farm lands, but nonetheless will help to provide a reference to that heritage. Sidewalks or trails are to be provided within these green setback areas, which should serve as a part of the regional pedestrian and bicycle circulation systems. a. Existing agricultural site features and/or resources should be integrated into a newer development when feasible. Non-applicable. b. Create a “green edge” along the front of the property. There is an existing 25-foot greenway corridor for North 19th Avenue in this location. The landscape plan will need to confirm that the minimum landscaping requirements have been met. As staff has previously noted additional parking lot screening is required. c. Minimize the impact of parking lots. The parking areas appear to not be adequately screened with landscaping. Additional screening is required. d. A detached pedestrian and bike boulevard trail shall be provided in the setback. A detached pedestrian way must be provided within the 25-foot greenway setback. The path should have an informal, meandering plan, be enhanced with landscaping, and be located away from the road edge. Not applicable to this specific section of N. 19th Avenue. e. Provide safe and convenient pedestrian and bicycle circulation within and between projects. The pedestrian and bicycle circulation system would be enhanced with the conditions recommended by staff. f. The following building materials are encouraged in this corridor: wood and masonry are preferred over other materials for exterior wall finishes. The primary building materials for this project are brick, unit masonry, and glass. g. The following streetscape elements would be appropriate in this corridor: street trees, simple furnishings, bicycle facilities, regional boulevard trail connections, landscaped area with shelter and map display, transit stops. High quality plaza areas are proposed. h. The following sign types are appropriate in this corridor: low monument signs; directory signs; building mounted signs. General sign locations are indicated on the elevations. Sign context, sign position, sign type, sign materials, sign lighting, and sign content will be addressed with review of the comprehensive 159 #Z-08206 19th and Main- CVS MASP/SP/COA/DEV Staff Report 9 signage plan and sign permits. The deviation for CVS signage is generally supportable with approval of the master plan and design guidelines. i. The following sign design attributes should be demonstrated: the sign shall not disrupt views to the mountains; the sign shall have subdued lighting and colors; it is appropriate to aggregate signs in a development with more than one retail or office use. Sign context, sign position, sign type, sign materials, sign lighting, and sign content will be addressed with review of the comprehensive signage plan. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Based on the following analysis, the Planning Staff finds that the application, with conditions, is in general compliance with Design Objectives Plan. The Design Review Board may determine that additional conditions of approval are necessary. Recommended Conditions: Master Site Plan: 1. The applicant shall provide an exhibit and inventory of all existing landscaping to be protected, replaced, removed, or moved on site with the final site plan. At the time of final inspection of the newly installed landscaping approved on the final landscape plan all landscaping that was either protected, moved or removed shall be accounted for and noted as on site or noted as removed with the prior approval of the Planning Department. Standard tree protection measure including orange, 4’ high barrier fencing installed at each tree’s drip line shall be instituted for all trees to be protected prior to any grading on site. 2. Site construction details shall be provided for the scored colored concrete crosswalks and speed table with the final site plan. 3. The main north/south driveway shall be constructed to the north property line and a standard detail scored concrete crosswalk be provided across the drive aisle in this location to connect the east west walkway along the north property line. The City standard dead end barrier shall be installed until such time that this driveway is connected to the adjacent site. 4. The parking areas proposed along N. 19th Avenue shall incorporate landscaped berms, low decorative walls, architectural screens, evergreen hedges or a combination thereof a minimum of 4’ in height to screen the parking areas from the public ways. 5. All exterior windows on all the buildings shall utilize transparent clear glass. No frosted, dark tinted, or spandrel glass allowed. 6. All site lighting within the master planned area shall utilize a consistent luminaire, pole, and base detail and noted in the design guidelines. All photometric modeling shall be cumulative with each site plan submittal. 7. No truck parking or outdoor storage of any kind is permitted on site. Loading and unloading 160 #Z-08206 19th and Main- CVS MASP/SP/COA/DEV Staff Report 10 only is permitted. 8. The comprehensive signage plan shall state that all signage lighting shall be turned off at the close of businesses for individual businesses. 9. A color palette for the building that includes actual material samples and color chips shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Office prior to Final Site Plan approval. The materials/color palette shall be presented on a board no larger than 24” x36” and contain all the primary materials to be utilized on the building including window/storefront frames and doors (garage and service) and in any proposed fencing or screening. All final building elevations and details shall be keyed to the color palette to delineate where each individual building material and color is specified. The palette shall be returned to the applicant following approval. 10. A preliminary site plan application and subsequent final site plan submittal and approval is required for all future buildings. The Design Review Board shall be advisory to the Planning Director for all site plan applications within this master site plan. CVS Building Site Plan: 1. Additional brick detailing shall be incorporated into the CVS building along the walls (soldier course), lintels, and cornice line in order to help reduce the perceived mass of the building. 2. An elevation study including modeling shall be provided with the final site plan for approval to confirm that all mechanical equipment on the rooftop will be screened by the proposed parapet wall. This study shall include a study of the viewshed from the intersection of N. 19th Avenue and W. Main Street and from west bound traffic on W. Main Street. * Please note that code provisions related to parking calculations, bike racks, site lighting, signage, trash enclosure details, and mechanical equipment screening are all required by the Development Review Committee (DRC). CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the requested MASP/SP/COA/DEV application #Z-08206. The applicant must comply will all applicable conditions of approval. The applicant must comply with all other provisions of Title 18 of the Bozeman Municipal Code, which are applicable to this project prior to receiving Final Site Plan or Building Permit approval. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. NOTE: The recommendations of the Design Review Board and Development Review Committee will be forwarded to the City Commission who will make the final decision regarding this project. Attachments: Applicant’s Submittal Materials 161 #Z-08206 19th and Main- CVS MASP/SP/COA/DEV Staff Report 11 Report Sent To: SKP, LLC, 102 Village Downtown Boulevard, Bozeman, MT 59715 Velmeir Companies 7760 France Avenue South, Suite 215, Bloomington, MN 55435 Morrison- Maierle, Attn. Tom Eastwood, PO Box 1113, Bozeman, MT 5977 Intrinsik Architecture, Attn. Susan Kozub, 111 North Tracy Avenue, Bozeman, MT 59715 URS Corporation, Attn. John Verplank, 3950 Sparks Drive SE, Grand Rapids, MI 49546 162 1 Design Review Board Minutes – September 24, 2008 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 2008 MINUTES ITEM 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ATTENDANCE Chairperson Pro Tem Pentecost called the meeting of the Design Review Board to order at 5:35 p.m. in the upstairs conference room of the Alfred Stiff Professional Building, 20 East Olive Street, Bozeman, Montana and directed the secretary to record the attendance. Members Present Staff Present Bill Rea Dave Skelton, Senior Planner Michael Pentecost Brian Krueger, Associate Planner Elissa Zavora Tara Hastie, Recording Secretary Mel Howe Walter Banziger Randy Wall Visitors Present Lowell Springer Steve McGrath Susan Kozub Tom Eastwood Jon Lennander Sue Pederson ITEM 2. MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 10, 2008 Ms. Zavora stated that on page 2, the language should say “Creeping Juniper” instead of “Calgary Crawl”. Chairperson Pro Tem Pentecost stated “STIPS” should be “SIPS” throughout the document and that on page five the 3rd paragraph should include the language “two tones of gunmetal gray”. MOTION: Ms. Zavora moved, Mr. Banziger seconded, to approve the minutes of September 10, 2008 with corrections. The motion carried 4-0. ITEM 3. CONSENT ITEM 1. Hastings/Osco Building B COA/ADR/Further Development #Z-08209 (Skelton) 1601 West Main Street * A Certificate of Appropriateness/Further Development Application to allow modifications to the building design and common signage plan for building B. Evaluation of final proposal against recommended conditions from DRB. Mr. Howe moved, Ms. Zavora seconded, to move the item from the Consent Agenda for discussion. 163 2 Design Review Board Minutes – September 24, 2008 Senior Planner Dave Skelton presented the Staff Memo and noted that the Planning Director had expressed gratitude to the DRB for attempting to streamline the proposal. He stated the applicant had concerns regarding the large investment and the small amount of signage that would be allowable. He stated they would like to have a dialog with the DRB regarding requesting a Deviation for signage. Mr. Rea and Mr. Wall joined the DRB. Planner Skelton stated Staff thought the proposal was 85% supportable at the moment and encouraged the applicant to present information to the DRB. Mr. McGrath stated he was at the meeting to protect his son’s business and had been making attempts to resolve the issues with the proposal for the last two years. He stated the City Commission had not mandated the redesign of the rear of the structure on the site, but had intended to streamline the approval of the signage within the development. He stated Red Mountain had agreed to spend a modest amount of money for renovations to the back of the building despite the actual construction of the structure being approved; he noted Red Mountain would not be willing to spend the money necessary to make the requested façade improvements as requested by the DRB. He stated he was lead to believe he would be given signage when the occupancy request was approved. He noted Planning Staff was charged with working with the tenants of the site to find a way to allow signage and the tenants should not have been allowed to occupy the structure without those issues being resolved. Planner Skelton clarified that the City Commission had requested Planning Staff move forward with a common signage plan and the rear façade of building B. He stated Staff was attempting to streamline the project and move it forward. He stated the key for the DRB would be to discuss whether or not they would support a request for a Deviation with regard to the allowable size of the signage. Mr. Wall asked the allowable signage that was in accordance with the approved signage plan. Planner Skelton explained the calculation (1.5 X linear sq. ft.) and that the common signage was limited due to the small number of tenants; he added that Site Plan review had included a discussion on where the signage would be located and it had been decided that signage would only be allowed on the north façade. Mr. Wall asked if all the signage could be located on the south side of the structure. Planner Skelton responded it could be located on the south façade if the tenants were amenable. Mr. Banziger asked Mr. Springer if he had any comments. Mr. Springer responded he was confused as he thought the allowable signage calculations had been discussed at 16 sq. ft. He noted he had recently found out that the allowable number would be 10 sq. ft and it did not seem worth the hassle to him or the tenant. He stated he thought it might be more sensible to appeal to the City Commission for the signage Deviation; he noted the process and result had become too burdensome for the tenants. Mr. McGrath added that other tenants were requesting larger signage and the 16 sq. ft. had been previously discussed. Mr. Banziger asked if Staff would prefer a Deviation was pursued for the proposal. Planner Skelton responded Staff was close to approving the proposal, but it would ultimately be up to the tenant to decide if a Deviation request would be in order. Mr. McGrath noted if Red Mountain’s 164 3 Design Review Board Minutes – September 24, 2008 budget was exceeded, there would be no signage for the building because no improvements to the south façade would be made. Mr. Banziger asked if the façade and signage were reviewed concurrently would the proposal come back before the DRB for the signage Deviation request. Planner Skelton explained that the conditions of approval for the project would remain intact and the Commission had been very specific with regard to the signage; he stated he could argue that the two could not be separated. Ms. Zavora asked the difference between a Variance and a Deviation. Planner Skelton explained the Variance would be a sliding scale for signage size, within reason, and the Deviation would be a specifically allowable amount of 20%. Ms. Zavora asked if the 16 sq. ft. had been presented at the last meeting. Mr. Springer responded it had. Mr. Wall stated he understood that signage was a difficult issue and asked if the UDO would allow each letter to be calculated individually. Planner Skelton responded the UDO was very specific which did not allow each letter to be calculated separately and called out that an architectural feature could be used in lieu of a backdrop. Chairperson Pro Tem Pentecost asked if Staff was seeking a recommendation from the DRB. Planner Skelton responded that with the requested signage, the applicant was seeking advice and direction on a signage Deviation request for the proposal. Mr. Springer asked the DRB to keep in mind there would be a point where the budget would be exceeded and the owner would balk at doing the work. Mr. McGrath stated he thought there was a new owner that was an offshoot of the Red Mountain group and he was not comfortable asking the new owner for money for façade improvements. He stated there seemed to be two separate issues and he did not understand why the signage could not be reviewed independently of the façade improvements. Mr. Wall stated he was empathetic to the applicant’s position and business and reminded the applicant that the owner of the building should be dealing with the issues instead of the tenant; he suggested applying heat to the owner to resolve any problems. He stated he did not know the history of the proposal, but thought the DRB should do what they could to help the tenants acquire signage. Mr. Howe stated there were a lot of complex things going on and the UDO contents could not be modified; he noted the DRB could only review the proposals within their jurisdiction. He stated the DRB had been charged with evaluating the aesthetics of an architectural object. Mr. Banziger stated he was sympathetic to the business owner, but he agreed with Planner Skelton with regard to the protection of the community before the individual. He stated signage on the rear façade would certainly be an improvement and he agreed with Staff recommendations. Ms. Zavora stated she agreed that signage should be included on the rear of the façade, but she did not understand how the building had been approved without the issues being resolved. Mr. Springer explained the difficulties with the financial guarantee; he added that he thought it was beyond the DRB’s scope to do all that the Commission had asked with regard to the rear façade. 165 4 Design Review Board Minutes – September 24, 2008 He stated the signage itself would be an improvement to the rear facade even if no other improvements were made. Mr. McGrath stated there had been a lot of inequities with regard to the signage. Mr. Springer added he was pleased with the ideas the DRB had proposed for the Main Street exposure, but he thought it would ultimately be in the wrong direction due to the budget constraints. Mr. Rea stated he agreed with Mr. Howe regarding the jurisdiction of the DRB and the proposal’s review. He stated the common signage plan had not been a surprise to the tenant as it had likely been included in the lease agreement. Mr. Springer responded the tenants had thought they would be allowed signage on the south façade. Mr. Rea stated he agreed that there should be signage on the south façade of the building at the size of 16 sq. ft. as referenced in the provided materials. He stated he would be supportive of a Deviation or Variance request for the proposal. He stated the elevation showed the signage above the joint line and he would prefer to see the signage centered. He stated he would prefer to see reference A2.1B instituted on the site. Chairperson Pro Tem Pentecost stated he agreed with previous DRB comments and the applicant would need to make a decision between requesting a Variance/Deviation or following Staff conditions of approval. He stated he would like to see additional measures to support the signage. He stated the applicant would need to show hardship before a Variance request would be approved and suggested the Deviation process be investigated. Mr. Wall stated he agreed the DRB should review only the aesthetic and as an advisory board, if the position was important to the health, safety, or welfare of the community, a recommendation should be forwarded to the City Commission. He stated advising the Commission how the DRB felt regarding getting half of the site improvements resolved would be better than resolving nothing and punishing the tenants. MOTION: Mr. Wall moved, Mr. Howe seconded to forward a recommendation of approval to the Planning Director for Hastings/Osco Building B COA/ADR/Further Development #Z-08209 with Staff conditions and a recommendation to the City Commission that signage improvements be reviewed independently of the façade improvements. Chairperson Pro Tem Pentecost suggested the motion would need to be more clearly stated. AMENDED MOTION: Mr. Wall moved, Mr. Howe seconded, to forward a recommendation of approval to the Planning Director for Hastings/Osco Building B COA/ADR/Further Development #Z-08209, figure A2.1B and to forward a recommendation to the City Commission and Planning Director that if the tenants are willing to work with the owner and Staff the proposal should be supported as submitted and the signage improvements should be reviewed independently of the façade improvements as long as there was an adequate financial guarantee in place. The amended motion carried 6-0. Mr. Rea stated he was supportive of the motion. 166 5 Design Review Board Minutes – September 24, 2008 ITEM 4. PROJECT REVIEW 1. CVS Pharmacy (19th&Main) Master SP/SP/COA/DEV#Z-08206 (Krueger) 1919 West Main Street * A Master Site Plan with a Site Plan Certificate of Appropriateness and Deviations Application to allow the construction of a new pharmacy, three pad sites, and related site improvements. Susan Kozub, Rob Pertzborn, and Jon Lennander joined the DRB. Associate Planner Brian Krueger presented the Staff Report noting the Informal Application had been reviewed by the DRB. He stated the proposal was for a Master Site Plan with a five year site entitlement; he added the CVS Pharmacy would be the first phase of the development. He stated the iteration they were looking at was what had been previously reviewed by the DRB and the Deviation request was for a larger sign than normally allowed. He stated Staff was generally supportive of the proposal and the applicant had incorporated Staff and DRB comments into the design. He stated the conditions of approval had been separated into sections for the Master Site Plan and those conditions specific to the CVS Pharmacy. He stated page 9, condition #3 contained clarification of what was shown on the Master Site Plan to have the project connect to the adjacent property if and when the adjacent property owner decided to connect; he added the north south driveway would be constructed to the property line, but there would be paved curb and gutter required to be constructed to the property line in a future phase of development until such a time as the adjacent property connected to the site. He stated the UDO required a solid screen that could be landscaping, but the DOP proposed alternative screening methods, such as a berm, to provide for more efficient screening. He stated there were public ways on all sides of the proposal and the DOP suggested design of the buildings on all sides to address the public ways. He stated Staff had seen different solutions to the presentation of structures to public ways and recommended clear glass for all windows on all proposed buildings within the development. He stated there was not clear information on the actual materials proposed for the windows for the CVS building; he added he had asked the applicant for clarification in that regard. He noted some of the windows would be display cases, but he wanted to be certain the larger windows would be functioning including transom materials. He stated there would be a common requirement with regard to the lighting requirements and the photometrics of the site. He recommended any storage on the site would need to be incorporated into the building and the loading areas would be required to disallow vehicle parking or storage in that location. He stated there would be an incremental comprehensive signage plan that would include the calculations for each face and the location of the signage on the buildings. He recommended that the signage lighting would be required to be turned off at the closing of individual businesses; he added Staff was supportive of the size and presentation of the signage, but would review each sign individually with regard to the common signage plan. He stated Staff recommends that brick detailing and coursing could help the street level interest for the building by bringing it down to a human scale. He stated the elevation of the building was lower than the street level grade and the rooftop mechanical equipment may be within potential view sheds from the street unless they were installed below the parapet line or integrated into the roof; he added Staff was recommending a study that would depict the true view of the mechanical equipment. He stated Staff was supportive of the requested Deviation and the proposal as conditioned by Staff. Ms. Kozub stated the applicant had proposed a single sidewalk that would transition from the Town & Country site back to the original corner instead of a double sidewalk; she added the details would need to be worked out with MDOT. She stated the design regulations would 167 6 Design Review Board Minutes – September 24, 2008 require the installation of a plaza with each pad site. She stated all franchise architecture had been scratched and the applicant had no problem with using clear glass throughout the development. She stated a smaller scale, two-bay drive through had been designed to complement the materials pallet of the primary structures. She stated all future pad sites would be required to return to the DRB for Site Plan approval. She stated the applicant had no issues with Staff conditions, but wanted to know if the business lighting could be dimmed or the signage could be dimly lit after hours of operation. She stated the applicant knew there was a grading issue and that the parapets might need to be raised and asked if the first part of the condition could be removed to allow more flexibility for the solution of screening the mechanical equipment. Mr. Wall asked Planner Krueger the intent of the connection to the Town & Country site. Planner Krueger responded the intent was to assist in the internal function of the site without pedestrians and vehicles having to use external streets. Mr. Wall stated he thought the site was integral to the City of Bozeman and he thought the review would need to be done correctly. He asked if the curb and gutter were necessary to the approval of the site. Planner Krueger responded the storm water would need to be dealt with regardless of whether the connection to the adjacent site occurred and was a condition from DRC review. Mr. Wall asked if a reciprocal parking agreement would be required. Planner Krueger responded Staff did not anticipate a lot of shared parking, but the applicant could provide shared parking if they so chose. Mr. Wall asked if the intent of the condition regarding clear glass was to see what was going on inside the building and suggested if that was the case; the interior space should be planned. Planner Krueger responded the intent was notification that the simple use of spandrel glass was not a replacement for inferior design or use of the building; he added the individual buildings would be reviewed at Site Plan submittal. Mr. Wall asked how the City would enforce the lighting and signage being turned off. Planner Krueger responded the Code Enforcement Officer would make a general inspection of the premises. Mr. Wall stated that Staff had found the proposed vestibule would interrupt the pedestrian flow through the site. Planner Krueger responded that code provisions would require the alleviation of the interruption. Mr. Wall asked if it would be a Deviation or Variance for the encroachment. Planner Krueger responded the City Engineer had the authority to allow a Deviation from the access spacing standards. Mr. Wall asked if there had been discussion about removing all the proposed wooden materials due to maintenance issues. Planner Krueger responded the applicant was required to maintain the structure to a like new standard and the final materials would be approved by ADR Staff. Ms. Zavora asked if the site was considered residential adjacency. Planner Krueger responded they were not immediately adjacent to residential development. Mr. Rea asked if the signage on the southwest model image view was larger than the elevation and stated he wanted to be certain that the visual representation of the sign on the elevation would take precedent. Mr. Pertzborn responded the signage calculations would take precedent. Planner Kozub confirmed that if there were ever a question, the elevation would be the scaled method of calculating the signage and was part of the scaled elevations being proposed. Chairperson Pro Tem Pentecost asked if the list of conditions of approval for the Master Site Plan would be passed on to any perspective purchaser on the site. Planner Krueger responded there would be notification of those requirements, but the UDO would allow for a future applicant to come in with a Site Plan for review by the DRB as long as they were in keeping with 168 7 Design Review Board Minutes – September 24, 2008 the approval of the Master Site Plan. He added that a modification to the Master Site Plan could be pursued at the City Commission if the design guidelines were not amenable to a future tenant. Ms. Kozub added the conditions could be incorporated into the guidelines for the Master Site Plan so those requirements would be repeated. Chairperson Pro Tem Pentecost stated the model showed the massing broken up by a lighter material and the elevations did not depict those breaks. Mr. Pertzborn responded the lighter material was depicted in black and white on the elevations. Chairperson Pro Tem Pentecost asked if Staff was asking for a perspective proof regarding the mechanical equipment or for elevation proof. Planner Krueger responded the modeling would need to include the elevations and the perspective. Chairperson Pro Tem Pentecost asked if the single sidewalks were pending the approval of the MDOT. Ms. Kozub responded the MDOT had sent an e-mail giving preliminary approval, but the details would need to be worked out. Chairperson Pro Tem Pentecost asked the reason for the requirement to turn off the lighting at the close of the business. Planner Krueger responded the site would have view corridors into Kirk Park and residential neighborhoods and the signage would be larger if the Deviation was granted. Chairperson Pro Tem Pentecost asked if the condition would apply to all the structures within the development. Planner Krueger responded it was a condition of approval for the Master Site Plan as a whole and would apply to all structures. Mr. Wall stated he was supportive of the project as a whole and it would be very important due to its high traffic location. He stated he was concerned with the access to the site; he added he had read the traffic study and disagreed with the findings. He asked if the project was seeking relief of the future improvements to the intersections near the site. Ms. Kozub responded the applicant had signed Waivers of Right to protest those improvements and were willing to make those improvements if necessary. Mr. Wall stated the sidewalk in front of the vestibule would impact the handicap stalls and two other stalls in the location. Mr. Pertzborn responded the vestibule would be opened up. Ms. Kozub stated the building could be shifted or the parking could be adjusted to provide for flow through the site. Mr. Wall asked how tight the parking calculations were. Ms. Kozub stated the calculations would be tight, but would be closely monitored based on the other uses on the site. Mr. Wall suggested the pedestrian thoroughfare would be through the parking. He asked if powder coated metal planks could be used instead of cedar. Ms. Kozub responded the applicant wanted a variety of materials and they had past successes with cedar. Mr. Wall suggested eliminating all the wood proposed for the project and using powder coated metal. Mr. Howe stated he was supportive of the project as proposed. Ms. Zavora stated she thought it was a great landscape plan with a fresh approach. She stated it looked like a good buffer with a diversity of species. Ms. Kozub added that the landscape calculations were over the required amount. Mr. Rea stated he agreed with Mr. Wall regarding the parking area in front of the entrance being in a bad location. He stated he was supportive of the open vestibule resolution. He stated he agreed with Mr. Wall regarding using wood for the trash enclosure as it would be difficult to maintain. He stated he liked the diversity of the proposed materials. He stated he agreed with Staff conditions of approval, especially Staff condition #8 to require the illuminated signage be turned off after hours of operation. He stated he supported the Staff conditions and commended the applicant and Staff for their work on the proposal. 169 8 Design Review Board Minutes – September 24, 2008 Chairperson Pro Tem Pentecost stated the applicant had done an excellent job on the proposal and asked which LEED certification had been attempted in the design of the structure. Ms. Kozub responded that LEED certification had not been sought. Chairperson Pro Tem Pentecost stated the bar had been raised for other developments coming to the City from that direction. He added he would like to see the vestibule open. MOTION: Mr. Rea moved, Mr. Howe seconded, to forward a recommendation of approval to the City Commission for CVS Pharmacy (19th&Main) Master SP/SP/COA/DEV#Z-08206 with Staff conditions and the amendment of CVS Pharmacy Site Plan condition #2 to require a perspective study instead of an elevation study. The motion carried 4-1. AMENDED MOTION: Mr. Rea moved, Mr. Howe seconded, to forward a recommendation of approval to the City Commission for CVS Pharmacy (19th&Main) Master SP/SP/COA/DEV#Z-08206 with Staff conditions and the amendment of CVS Pharmacy Site Plan condition #2 to require a perspective study instead of an elevation study and to state “a perspective study including modeling shall be provided with the Final Site Plan for approval to confirm that all mechanical equipment on the rooftop will be screened. This study shall include a study of the viewshed from the intersection of N. 19th Avenue and West Main Street and from west bound traffic on West Main Street”. The motion carried 4-1 with Mr. Wall voting in opposition. Mr. Wall suggested he would like to see the wood removed from the proposal. Mr. Rea responded the use of wood would not be a deal killer for him. Mr. Wall responded that any other place in town could use wood, but the site was in a location that would be very obvious. Mr. Wall stated he did not agree with requested Deviation for access to the site and, though he liked the project, he was not supportive of the proposal as presented with regard to the access. Chairperson Pro Tem Pentecost stated he would support an alternative screening other than raising the parapets. ITEM 5. PUBLIC COMMENT – (15 – 20 minutes) {Limited to any public matter, within the jurisdiction of the Design Review Board, not on this agenda. Three-minute time limit per speaker.} There was no public comment forthcoming. ITEM 6. ADJOURNMENT There being no further comments from the DRB, the meeting was adjourned at 8:05 p.m. ________________________________ Michael Pentecost, Chairperson Pro Tem City of Bozeman Design Review Board 170 19th & Main Redevelopment Preliminary Master Site Plan Application August 2008 171 19th & Main Redevelopment table of contents section # development review application, checklists & certificates 1 project narrative 2 aerial image & site photographs 3 draft condo association documents 4 design guidelines 5 lighting plan & specs 6 phasing plan 7 weed memo 8 traffic impact study 9 access deviation request 10 stormwater management design report 11 architectural plans & model images 12 landscape plans 13 engineering plans 14 172 19th & Main Redevelopment Project Team Anchor Tenant: Developer/ Project Manager: Architect of Record/ Landscape Architect: Planning & Architectural Consultants: Engineer: 173 Page 1 Appropriate Review Fee Submitted CITY OF BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building 20 East Olive Street P.O. Box 1230 Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 phone 406-582-2260 fax 406-582-2263 planning@bozeman.net www.bozeman.net DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION 1. Name of Project/Development: 2. Property Owner Information: Name: E-mail Address: Mailing Address: Phone: FAX: 3. Applicant Information: Name: E-mail Address: Mailing Address: Phone: FAX: 4. Representative Information: Name: E-mail Address: Mailing Address: Phone: FAX: 5. Legal Description: 6. Street Address: 7. Project Description: 8. Zoning Designation(s): 9. Current Land Use(s): 10. Bozeman 2020 Community Plan Designation: 11. Gross Area: Acres: Square Feet: 12. Net Area: Acres: Square Feet: 19th & Main Redevelopment Preliminary Master Site Plan SKP, LLC 102 Village Downtown Blvd, Bozeman MT 59715-3815 406.624.6875 The Velmeir Companies (Jon Lennander) jlennander@velmeir.com 7760 France Avenue South, Suite 215, Bloomington, Minnesota 55435 952.883.3240 952.854.8247 [see attached list] Lot 1 and Lot 2A, Block 8, West Park Manor 1st Addition 1919 West Main Street Preliminary Master Site Plan for the redevelopment of the northwest corner of 19th and Main including a new pharmacy, three pad sites and related site improvements - see attached narrative B-2 Car Dealership Community Commercial 4.356 189,728 4.356 189,728 174 175 Project Team Intrinsik Architecture (Susan Kozub, AICP & Rob Pertzborn, AIA) skozub@intrinsikarchitecture.com 111 North Tracy Avenue Bozeman Montana 59715 Phone: 582.8988 FAX: 582.8911 Morrison-Maierle (Tom Eastwood, PE) kjacobsen@m-m.net P.O. Box 1113 Bozeman, MT 59771 Phone: 587.0721 FAX: 922.6702 URS Corporation (John VerPlank, PE & Greg Baughman, RLA, LEED AP) John_VerPlank@URSCorp.com 3950 Sparks Drive SE Grand Rapids, MI 49546 Phone: 616.574.8303 FAX: 616.574.8542 * In addition to the property owner and applicant, please also send all correspondence to the representatives listed above. 176 Page 3 (Site Plan Checklist – Prepared 12/05/03; revised 9/22/04) SITE PLAN CHECKLIST These checklists shall be completed and returned as part of the submittal. Any item checked “No” or “N/A” (not applicable) must be explained in a narrative attached to the checklist. Incomplete submittals will be returned to the applicant. A. Design Review Board (DRB) Site Plan Review Thresholds. Does the proposal include one or more of the following: Design Review Board (DRB) Site Plan Review Thresholds Yes No 1.20 or more dwelling units in a multiple household structure or structures 2.30,000 or more square feet of office space, retail commercial space, service commercial space or industrial space 3.More than two buildings on one site for permitted office uses, permitted retail commercial uses, permitted service commercial uses, permitted industrial uses or permitted combinations of uses 4.20,000 or more square feet of exterior storage of materials or goods 5.Parking for more than 60 vehicles B. General Information. The following information shall be provided for site plan review: General Information Yes No N/A 1.Location map, including area within one-half mile of the site 2.List of names and addresses of property owners according to Chapter 18.76, BMC (Noticing) 3.A construction route map shall be provided showing how materials and heavy equipment will travel to and from the site. The route shall avoid, where possible, local or minor collector streets or streets where construction traffic would disrupt neighborhood residential character or pose a threat to public health and safety 4.Boundary line of property with dimensions 5.Date of plan preparation and changes 6.North point indicator 7.Suggested scale of 1 inch to 20 feet, but not less than 1 inch to 100 feet 8.Parcel size(s) in gross acres and square feet 9.Estimated total floor area and estimated ratio of floor area to lot size (floor area ratio, FAR), with a breakdown by land use 10. Location, percentage of parcel(s) and total site, and square footage for the following: a. Existing and proposed buildings and structures b. Driveway and parking c. Open space and/or landscaped area, recreational use areas, public and semipublic land, parks, school sites, etc. d. Public street right-of-way 11. Total number, type and density per type of dwelling units, and total net and gross residential density and density per residential parcel 12. Detailed plan of all parking facilities, including circulation aisles, access drives, bicycle racks, compact spaces, handicapped spaces and motorcycle parking, on-street parking, number of employee and non-employee parking spaces, existing and proposed, and total square footage of each ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 177 Page 4 General Information, continued Yes No N/A 13. The information required by Section 18.78.060.L, BMC (Streets, Roads and Alleys), unless such information was previously provided through a subdivision review process, or the provision of such information was waived in writing by the City during subdivision review of the land to be developed, or the provision of such information is waived in writing by the City prior to submittal of a preliminary site plan application 14. Description and mapping of soils existing on the site, accompanied by analysis as to the suitability of such soils for the intended construction and proposed landscaping 15. Building design information (on-site): a. Building heights and elevations of all exterior walls of the building(s) or structure(s) b. Height above mean sea level of the elevation of the lowest floor and location of lot outfall when the structure is proposed to be located in a floodway or floodplain area c. Floor plans depicting location and dimensions of all proposed uses and activities 16. Temporary facilities plan showing the location of all temporary model homes, sales offices and/or construction facilities, including temporary signs and parking facilities 17. Unless already provided through a previous subdivision review, a noxious weed control plan complying with Section 18.78.050.H, BMC (Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Plan) 18. Drafts of applicable supplementary documents as set forth in Chapter 18.72, BMC (Supplementary Documents) C. Site Plan Information. The location, identification and dimension of the following existing and proposed data, onsite and to a distance of 100 feet (200 feet for PUDs) outside the site plan boundary, exclusive of public rights-of-way, unless otherwise stated: Site Plan Information Yes No N/A 1.Topographic contours at a minimum interval of 2 feet, or as determined by the Planning Director 2.Adjacent streets and street rights-of-way to a distance of 150 feet, except for sites adjacent to major arterial streets where the distances shall be 200 feet 3.On-site streets and rights-of-way 4.Ingress and egress points 5.Traffic flow on-site 6.Traffic flow off-site 7.Utilities and utility rights-of-way or easements: a. Electric b. Natural gas c. Telephone, cable television and similar utilities d. Water e. Sewer (sanitary, treated effluent and storm) 8.Surface water, including: a. Holding ponds, streams and irrigation ditches b. Watercourses, water bodies and wetlands c. Floodplains as designated on the Federal Insurance Rate Map or that may otherwise be identified as lying within a 100-year floodplain through additional floodplain delineation, engineering analysis, topographic survey or other objective and factual basis d. A floodplain analysis report in compliance with Chapter 18.58, BMC (Bozeman Floodplain Regulations) if not previously provided with subdivision review ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 178 Page 5 Site Plan Information, continued Yes No N/A 9.Grading and drainage plan, including provisions for on-site retention/detention and water quality improvement facilities as required by the Engineering Department, or in compliance with any adopted storm drainage ordinance or best management practices manual adopted by the City 10.All drainageways, streets, arroyos, dry gullies, diversion ditches, spillways, reservoirs, etc. which may be incorporated into the storm drainage system for the property shall be designated: a. The name of the drainageway (where appropriate) b. The downstream conditions (developed, available drainageways, etc.) c. Any downstream restrictions 11.Significant rock outcroppings, slopes of greater than 15 percent or other significant topographic features 12.Sidewalks, walkways, driveways, loading areas and docks, bikeways, including typical details and interrelationships with vehicular circulation system, indicating proposed treatment of points of conflict 13.Provision for handicapped accessibility, including but not limited to, wheelchair ramps, parking spaces, handrails and curb cuts, including construction details and the applicant’s certification of ADA compliance 14. Fences and walls, including typical details 15.Exterior signs. Note – The review of signs in conjunction with this application is only review for compliance with Chapter 18.52, BMC (Signs). A sign permit must be obtained from the Department of Planning and Community Development prior to erection of any and all signs. 16. Exterior refuse collection areas, including typical details 17.A site plan, complete with all structures, parking spaces, building entrances, traffic areas (both vehicular and pedestrian), vegetation that might interfere with lighting, and adjacent uses, containing a layout of all proposed fixtures by location and type. The materials required in Section 18.78.060.R, BMC (Lighting Plan), if not previously provided 18. Curb, asphalt section and drive approach construction details 19.Landscaping - detailed plan showing plantings, equipment, and other appropriate information as required in Section 18.78.100, BMC (Submittal Requirements for Landscaping Plans). If required, complete section C below 20.Unique natural features, significant wildlife areas and vegetative cover, including existing trees and shrubs having a diameter greater than 2.5 inches, by species 21. Snow storage areas 22.Location of City limit boundaries, and boundaries of Gallatin County’s Bozeman Area Zoning Jurisdiction, within or near the development 23. Existing zoning within 200 feet of the site 24.Historic, cultural and archeological resources, describe and map any designated historic structures or districts, and archeological or cultural sites 25. Major public facilities, including schools, parks, trails, etc. 26.The information necessary to complete the determination of density change and parkland provision required by Chapter 18.50, BMC, unless such information was previously determined by the City to be inapplicable and written confirmation is provided to the applicant prior to submittal of a preliminary site plan application. If a new park will be created by the development, the park plan materials of Section 18.78.060.P, BMC shall be provided. 27.Describe how the site plan will satisfy any requirements of Section 17.02, BMC (Affordable Housing) which have either been established for that lot(s) through the subdivision process or if no subdivision has previously occurred are applicable to a site plan. The description shall be of adequate detail to clearly identify those lots and dwellings designated as subject to Title 17, Chapter 2, BMC compliance requirements and to make the obligations placed on the affected lots and dwellings readily understandable. ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 179 Page 6 D. Landscape Plans. If a landscape plan is required, the following information shall be provided on the landscape plan: Landscape Plan Information Yes No N/A 1. Date, scale, north arrow, and the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of both the property owner and the person preparing the plan 2. Location of existing boundary lines and dimensions of the lot 3. Approximate centerlines of existing watercourses, required watercourse setbacks, and the location of any 100-year floodplain; the approximate location of significant drainage features; and the location and size of existing and proposed streets and alleys, utility easements, utility lines, driveways and sidewalks on the lot and/or adjacent to the lot 4. Project name, street address, and lot and block description 5. Location, height and material of proposed screening and fencing (with berms to be delineated by one foot contours) 6. Locations and dimensions of proposed landscape buffer strips, including watercourse buffer strips 7. Complete landscape legend providing a description of plant materials shown on the plan, including typical symbols, names (common and botanical name), locations, quantities, container or caliper sizes at installation, heights, spread and spacing. The location and type of all existing trees on the lot over 6 inches in caliper must be specifically indicated 8. Complete illustration of landscaping and screening to be provided in or near off-street parking and loading areas, including information as to the amount (in square feet) of landscape area to be provided internal to parking areas and the number and location of required off-street parking and loading spaces 9. An indication of how existing healthy trees (if any) are to be retained and protected from damage during construction 10. Size, height, location and material of proposed seating, lighting, planters, sculptures, and water features 11. A description of proposed watering methods 12. Location of street vision triangles on the lot (if applicable) 13. Tabulation of points earned by the plan – see Section 18.48.060, BMC (Landscape Performance Standards) 14. Designated snow removal storage areas 15. Location of pavement, curbs, sidewalks and gutters 16. Show location of existing and/or proposed drainage facilities which are to be used for drainage control 17. Existing and proposed grade 18. Size of plantings at the time of installation and at maturity 19. Areas to be irrigated 20. Planting plan for watercourse buffers, per Section 18.42.100, BMC (Watercourse Setbacks), if not previously provided through subdivision review 21. Front and side elevations of buildings, fences and walls with height dimensions if not otherwise provided by the application. Show open stairways and other projections from exterior building walls ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 180 Page 3 (Certificate of Appropriateness Checklist 2 – Prepared 11/25/03; revised on 9/8/04) CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATNESS CHECKLIST 2 If a project is located in the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District or the Entryway Corridor Overlay District, and DOES NOT qualify for review as a Sketch Plan; Reuse, Change of Use or Further Development of a Site Developed Before 9-3-91; or Amendment/Modification of a Plan Approved On or After 9-3-91, this checklist shall be used. See Section 18.34.050 (Sketch Plan Review), Section 18.34.150 (Amendments to Sketch and Site Plans) or Section 18.34.170 (Reuse, Change in Use or Further Development of Sites Developed Prior to the Adoption of the Ordinance Codified in This Title), BMC. These checklists shall be completed and returned as part of the submittal. Any item checked “No” or “N/A” (not applicable) must be explained in a narrative attached to the checklist. Incomplete submittals will be returned to the applicant. A. Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District. If a proposed development is located in the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District, information shall be provided to the appropriate review authority to review prior to granting or denying a certificate of appropriateness. The extent of documentation to be submitted on any project shall be dictated by the scope of the planned alteration and the information reasonably necessary for the appropriate review authority to make its determination. At a minimum, the following items shall be included in the submission: Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District Information Yes No N/A 1.One current picture of each elevation of each structure planned to be altered and such additional pictures of the specific elements of the structure or property to be altered that will clearly express the nature and extent of change planned. Except when otherwise recommended, no more than eight pictures should be submitted and all pictures shall be mounted on letter-size sheets and clearly annotated with the property address, elevation direction (N, S, E, W) and relevant information 2.Historical information, including available data such as pictures, plans, authenticated verbal records and similar research documentation that may be relevant to the planned alteration 3. Materials and color schemes to be used 4.Plans, sketches, pictures, specifications and other data that will clearly express the applicant’s proposed alterations 5. A schedule of planned actions that will lead to the completed alterations 6. Such other information as may be suggested by the Planning Department 7.Description of any applicant-requested deviation(s) and a narrative explanation as to how the requested deviation(s) will encourage restoration and rehabilitation activity that will contribute to the overall historic character of the community B. Entryway Corridor Overlay District. If a proposed development is located in the Entryway Corridor Overlay District, information shall be provided to the appropriate review authority to review prior to granting or denying a certificate of appropriateness. The extent of documentation to be submitted on any project shall be dictated by the scope of the planned alteration and the information reasonably necessary for the appropriate review authority to make its determination. At a minimum, the following items shall be included in the submission: Entryway Corridor Overlay District Information Yes No N/A 1.Plans, sketches, pictures, specifications and other data that will clearly express the applicant’s proposed alterations 2. Such other information as may be suggested by the Planning Department 3.If the proposal includes an application for a deviation as outlined in Section 18.66.050 (Deviations), BMC, the application for deviation shall be accompanied by written and graphic material sufficient to illustrate the conditions that the modified standards will produce, so as to enable the City Commission to make the determination that the deviation will produce an environment, landscape quality and character superior to that produced by the existing standards, and will be consistent with the intent and purpose of Chapter 18.30 (Entryway Corridor Overlay District), BMC. ✔ ✔ ✔ 181 19th & Main Redevelopment Checklist Explanation Application Checklist As specified in the Site Plan Checklist, any items checked “No” or “N/A” must be explained in a narrative. A.1 This application does not include any residential uses at this time. A.4 This application does not include 20,000 or more SF of exterior storage. B.10.d The subject property does not include any public street right-of-way dedications. B.11 This application does not include any residential uses at this time. B.15.a The structures are not proposed in a floodway or floodplain area. B.16 No temporary facilities are proposed at this time. C.8.b Not watercourses, water bodies, or wetlands exist on the subject property. C.8.c No floodplains exist on the subject property. C.8.d No floodplains exist on the subject property. C.10 There is an existing drainage swale in the northwest portion of the site that is pro- posed to be incorporated into the stormwater system as noted in the stormwater master plan and on the grading plan; however, there are no arroyos, gullies, ditches, etc. that will be affected by this development. C.11 There are no significant rock outcroppings or slopes greater than 15 percent. C.20 There are no significant unique natural features or vegetative cover present on this property. Existing trees greater than 2.5 inches are shown on the landscape plan. C.22 The city limits are not within close proximity to the subject property. C.24 There are no known historic, cultural or archeological resources on the property. C.26 Parkland is not required for a commercial project. C.27 Again, no residential units are proposed with this project. D.20 There are no watercourses present on the subject property. 182 NEIGHBORHOOD RECOGNITION ORDINANCE COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE On December 10, 2007 the Bozeman City Commission adopted the Neighborhood Recognition Ordinance as part of the Bozeman Municipal Code. This new ordinance contains the following requirement: Section 2.82.020, Responsibilities of Individuals or Entities Submitting an Application to the Department of Planning and Community Development. A. In order for the City Liaison to effectively perform their duties executing the intent and purpose of this chapter, as defined in 2.82.020, the following shall be performed: 1. As part of any application to the Department of Planning and Community Development, the applicant shall provide written notice via certified mail, e-mail, facsimile transmission, and/or personal delivery to the City Liaison if notification guidelines (BMC 18.76) require that notice be posted “on-site”, published in the local newspaper or mailed first class. 2. Such notice shall contain a complete set of application materials as submitted to the Department of Planning and Community Development. B. Failure to provide proof of such mailing via certified mail, e-mail and/or facsimile transmission report to the most recent City Liaison address, e-mail address and/or fax number of record, or an affidavit attesting hand delivery, shall result in an incomplete application. I, , hereby certify that I have delivered via certified mail, e- mail, facsimile transmission or hand delivery written notice and a complete set of application materials for the project known as in compliance with Section 2.82.02 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. I further understand that failure to comply will result in this application being deemed incomplete and may result in a delay in the review of this project. Signature Date (Neighborhood Recognition Ordinance Compliance Certificate – Prepared 1/7/08) NEIGHBORHOOD RECOGNITION ORDINANCE COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE On December 10, 2007 the Bozeman City Commission adopted the Neighborhood Recognition Ordinance as part of the Bozeman Municipal Code. This new ordinance contains the following requirement: Section 2.82.020, Responsibilities of Individuals or Entities Submitting an Application to the Department of Planning and Community Development. A. In order for the City Liaison to effectively perform their duties executing the intent and purpose of this chapter, as defined in 2.82.020, the following shall be performed: 1. As part of any application to the Department of Planning and Community Development, the applicant shall provide written notice via certified mail, e-mail, facsimile transmission, and/or personal delivery to the City Liaison if notification guidelines (BMC 18.76) require that notice be posted “on-site”, published in the local newspaper or mailed first class. 2. Such notice shall contain a complete set of application materials as submitted to the Department of Planning and Community Development. B. Failure to provide proof of such mailing via certified mail, e-mail and/or facsimile transmission report to the most recent City Liaison address, e-mail address and/or fax number of record, or an affidavit attesting hand delivery, shall result in an incomplete application. I, , hereby certify that I have delivered via certified mail, e- mail, facsimile transmission or hand delivery written notice and a complete set of application materials for the project known as in compliance with Section 2.82.02 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. I further understand that failure to comply will result in this application being deemed incomplete and may result in a delay in the review of this project. Signature Date (Neighborhood Recognition Ordinance Compliance Certificate – Prepared 1/7/08) 183 CERTIFICATE OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS LIST I, , hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the attached name and address list of all adjoining property owners (including all individual condominium owners) within 200 feet of the property located at , is a true and accurate list from the last declared Gallatin County tax records. I further understand that an inaccurate list may delay review of the project. Signature (Certificate of Adjoining Property Owners List – Prepared 11/20/03; Revised 9/22/06) CERTIFICATE OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS LIST I, , hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the attached name and address list of all adjoining property owners (including all individual condominium owners) within 200 feet of the property located at , is a true and accurate list from the last declared Gallatin County tax records. I further understand that an inaccurate list may delay review of the project. Signature (Certificate of Adjoining Property Owners List – Prepared 11/20/03; Revised 9/22/06) 184 Property Owners ❐Adjacent to proposal site and across watercourses, roads*, etc. Within 200 feet of proposed site. Legal Description of Property Property Owner’s Name Mailing Address of Property Owner from County Tax Records 1 West Park Manor Amnd Lot 5 Block 8 Pierce Buildings, LLP PO Box 80707 Billings, MT 59108-0707 2 West Park Manor Amnd Lot 6 Block 8 Meredith C. Tate PO Box 4027 Bozeman, MT 59772 3 West Park Manor Amnd Lot 7 Block 8 Meredith C. Tate PO Box 4027 Bozeman, MT 59772 4 West Park Manor First Addition, All of Block 6 John M. Simkins, Janet Simkins, Thomas Simkins, William Simkins,Kevin Haggerty, Anita Courtney PO Box 938 Bozeman, MT 59771-0938 5 West Park Manor First Addition, Kirk Park City of Bozeman PO Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 59771-1230 6 West Park Manor First Addition Amnd Lot 01A Block 8 Town & Country Associates 219 N. 19th Ave. Bozeman, MT 59718-3981 7 Kirks 2nd Sub. Boz Block 2 Gallatin Manor, Inc. American Legion Post 14 1806 W. Beall St. Bozeman, MT 59715-3165 8 Spanish Peaks Professional Center Condo, Unit 1 Spanish Peaks Plaza, LLC 160 Prairie View Ln Bozeman, MT 59715-9367 9 Spanish Peaks Professional Center Condo, Unit 2 Ronald N. Hecht Jeanne E. Hecht 120 N. 19th Avenue Bozeman, MT 59715-3911 10 Spanish Peaks Professional Center Condo, Unit 3 Bozeman Deaconess Health Services 915 Highland Boulevard Bozeman, MT 59715-6902 Page 1 of 2 185 Property Owners ❐Adjacent to proposal site and across watercourses, roads*, etc. Within 200 feet of proposed site. Legal Description of Property Property Owner’s Name Mailing Address of Property Owner from County Tax Records 11 Kirks 2nd Sub. Lot 1 Block 1 D & G Investments, LLLP 1735 West Main Street Bozeman, MT 59715-4013 12 Kirks 2nd Subdivision Lot 2 Block 1 Jackpot Casino BHD Partners PO Box 6429 Bozeman, MT 59771-6429 13 Kirks 3rd Subdivision Lot 2 19th & Main, LLC PO Box 788 Bozeman, MT 59771-0788 14 Minor Subdivision 19, Tract E Ned D. Miller Lori G. MillerSavage Savage & Brown PO Box 22845 Oklahoma City, OK 73123-1845 15 Minor Subdivision 19, Tract D Decosse Westgate Partnership c/o Burger King Corp#2195 Property Tax Accountant PO Box 20783 Miami, FL 33102-0783 16 Minor Subdivision 19, Tract C Decosse Westgate Partnership c/o Burger King Corp #2195 Property Tax Accountant PO Box 20783 Miami, FL 33102-0783 17 West Main Street (US 191) & North 19th Avenue Montana Department of Transportation 2701 Prospect Avenue PO Box 201001 Helena, MT 59620-1001 * If road is a state highway, also include Montana Department of Transportation in property owner list. Page 2 of 2 N:\4480\001.01\Adjacent Land Owners\Adjacent Landowner List 8_12_08.doc 186 19th & Main Redevelopment Project Overview 1 Background Information: This Preliminary Master Site Plan Application is for the redevelopment of property located north- west of the intersection of North 19th Avenue and Main Street. The subject property is zoned B-2 (Community Business District) and falls within the West Main Street Class II Entryway Overlay Dis- trict and the North 19th Class II Entryway Overlay District. The site is currently used as JC Billion Automotive Sales & Service Center. Note that there are some significant site constraints for this property including a public access easement along a portion of the frontage on North 19th Avenue, a 30-foot sewer easement in the western portion of the lot and overall odd shaped property boundaries. This application includes demolition of all the existing buildings and outbuildings and construction of a new CVS Pharmacy and three additional future building pad sites and related site improve- ments including landscaping, plazas, shared accesses, and interconnected system of drive ac- cesses, parking and sidewalks. Last Spring, an informal proposal was reviewed by the Development Review Committee (DRC), the Design Review Board (DRB) and the City Commission. With this formal application, the project team has attempted to address the concerns noted during the informal process. Site Plan Layout: The proposed site plan includes the buildings constructed at the required setbacks. Since the buildings cannot move much closer to the sidewalks, the project team proposes that the sidewalks move closer to the buildings. A new 6-foot sidewalk located approximately 5 feet within the prop- erty line would replace the undesirable existing sidewalk located close to the curb along heavily traveled North 19th Avenue. This alternative sidewalk layout would form a more urban setting for the overall project, create incentives for businesses to locate primary facades along the street- scapes, create safer and more interesting pedestrian paths that pass by public plazas and include boulevard trees as a buffer to the road, and eliminate the “double sidewalk” issue identified dur- ing the informal application. The Montana Department of Transportation (MDT) has indicated that they would consider this alternative plan since a portion of the sidewalk on North 19th Avenue is currently located right against the pavement with no boulevard. A Public Access Easement would secure access in perpetuity. We ask that setbacks, however, still be measured from the property lines since this additional easement is voluntary and intended to create a more urban design. Whereas the CVS building essentially “faces” all four directions, the principal façade of the build- ing is oriented to the south to address Main Street. The fronting design continues around to the 19th Avenue east elevation. The actual entrance doors face both east and west to address North 19th Avenue plaza and sidewalk and the drive entrance opposite Kirk Park. An integrated pedes- trian circulation system is shown on the site plan including connections both within this project and to surrounding businesses and Kirk Park. The landscaping and public plazas have been fur- ther defined and enhanced with pedestrian furniture, bicycle racks, and landscaping. The Design Regulations require installation of each of the four plazas with adjacent development. 187 19th & Main Redevelopment Building Design: This CVS building is not a prototype and was specifically designed for this unique Bozeman site as a collaboration between the local design team and URS, the architect of record for CVS. The mate- rial palette includes: dark red and buff brick, cast stone, powder-coated fabricated steel canopies, prefinished architectural panels, bronze aluminum storefront windows/doors/curtain wall and western red cedar slat screen wall assembly. A smaller scale two-bay drive-thru is located on the northwestern portion of the building (furthest away from the prominent intersection) and has been designed to compliment and enhance the overall building composition and materials palette. The building is articulated with consistent order around the building by layered forms, varying heights and material changes. An integrated site and landscape design further enhances the overall project as will be experienced and viewed on and off site. Future pad sites will go through Site Plan Review including review by the Design Review Board. In addition to adherence to the Design Objectives Plan, the attached Design Manual further specifies future project requirements. Deviations: A deviation is requested to allow additional signage for the CVS building. In order to create fronting characteristics for multiple streetscapes that maintain consistent order and proportions to the building massing, the applicants would like to request a 17 percent increase in allowable signage (20% maximum deviation request allowed). This would result in 32 additional square feet for a to- tal of 218 SF (extra 2 SF due to rounding). In exchange for this deviation, CVS has committed to a unique building with quality materials, appropriate detailing, public plazas and additional land- scaping beyond code requirements. Also, CVS is willing to prohibit free-standing signs within the project to help avoid clutter along the entryways. Please refer to Section 5 for more details. A deviation is also requested from the Engineering Division for access separation to maintain the existing drive access on Main Street. Please refer to Section 10. Attachments: Please refer the attached exhibits and drawings for additional information. Project Overview 2 188 19th & Main Redevelopment Review Criteria 1 18.34.090.B Preliminary Master Site Plan Review Criteria 1. CConformance to and consistency with the City’s adopted growth policy The proposed preliminary master site plan is consistent with the 2020 Plan and the following land use goals, objectives, and policies: xPage 6-35 “Support infill development which respects the context of the existing development which surrounds it.” xPage 7-9 “Support business creation, retention and expansion.” xPage 10-18 “Ensure that adequate interconnections are made throughout the transportation sys- tem to ensure a variety of alternative for trip routing.” 2. Conformance to this title, including the cessation of any current violations This application conforms to the UDO. One deviation is requested for signage. An access deviation is requested from the Engineering Division to maintain the existing drive access on Main Street. 3. Conformance with all other applicable laws, ordinances and regulations This project will conform to all other applicable laws, ordinances and regulations. 4. A generalized site plan showing the orientation and relationships among key plan elements both on and off the property, including: a. Compatibility with, and sensitivity to, the immediate environment of the site and the adjacent neighborhoods in terms of overall site organization and building mass and height In terms of building mass and height, the CVS building is compatible to the surrounding buildings. Fu- ture pad sites will be built up against the setbacks and must also be built in accordance with the De- sign Objectives Plan and the CVS Retail Center Design Regulations which further ensure neighborhood compatibility. b. Arrangement of the elements of the site plan (e.g., buildings, circulation, open space and landscap- ing, etc.) so that activities are integrated with the structure of the surrounding area and produce an effi- cient, functionally organized and visually cohesive development that contributes to the overall aesthetic quality of the area This application includes both pedestrian and vehicular connections to surrounding site sites. A side- walk and drive aisle are proposed to connect to Town & Country to the north; a shared drive access off of North 20th Avenue connects to Pierce Flooring to the west; a sidewalk connection addresses Kirk Park to the west; and the drive access off of North 19th Avenue lines up with the existing drive access for Urgent Care. c. If the proposed project is located within a locally designated historical district, or includes a locally designated landmark structure, a statement describing how the project is in conformance with the pro- visions of Chapter 18.28, BMC This project is not within a historical district. d. Description of many elements in a Master Site Plan may be described in written and/or graphic for- mats whichever provides the superior form of communication We have included both written and graphic descriptions of the Master Site Plan requirements. Please refer to the CVS Retail Center Design Regulations in Section 5 of the application submittal materials. 189 19th & Main Redevelopment 5. A statement accompanying the site plan describing the generalized architectural character and its relationship to and compatibility with the historical character of the area, generalized land- scape concept including treatment of public space and relationship to the surrounding area, and visual and aesthetic integration of the proposed development into the surrounding area and its effect on the identity of the adjacent neighborhood Please refer to the CVS Retail Center Design Regulations in Section 5 of the application submit- tal materials. 6. The impact of the proposed development on the existing and anticipated traffic and parking conditions, including identification of the traffic generation and parking needs of individual plan elements A traffic impact study is included in Section 9 of the application submittal materials. The pro- posed project meets the parking requirements of the UDO. 7. Pedestrian and vehicular ingress, egress and circulation, including: a. Overall pedestrian and vehicular circulation systems to assure that pedestrians and vehi- cles can move safely and easily both within the site and between properties and activities within the neighborhood area Regarding pedestrian circulation, again, the existing sidewalk along North 19th Avenue is proposed to be replaced by a new 6-foot wide sidewalk approximately 5 feet inside the property line to create a more protected and interesting pedestrian experience and a more urban condition for the buildings which are already located on the setback lines. In total, there are 3 north/south and 3 east/west pedestrian paths. The northernmost east/west connection will allow the Town & Country property to the north to connect wherever is most convenient. In terms of vehicular connectivity, there are three drive accesses to the site (North 19th Avenue, Main Street, and North 20th Avenue) and one future connection to the property to the north. b. Non-automotive transportation and circulation systems design features to enhance conven- ience and safety across parking lots and streets See comments above related to pedestrian circulation. Scored concrete pavers are included across drive accesses. Also, bicycle racks are required for each plaza area. c. Adequate connection and integration of the pedestrian and vehicular transportation sys- tems to the systems in adjacent developments and general community See previous comments. The representatives have emailed a copy of the site plan to Lee Hazelbaker to determine if the Streamline Bus system is interested in coordinating for a bus stop in this vicinity. d. Dedication and/or abandonment of rights-of-way or easements necessary for efficient land use and accompanying streets and related transportation facilities No dedication or abandonment of rights-of-way are necessary for this project. A public ac- cess easement is proposed for the new sidewalk along North 19th Avenue. 8. Open space, if required under the zoning classification of the proposed development, including: a. Enhancement of the natural environment b. Precautions being taken to preserve existing wildlife habitats or natural wildlife feeding ar- eas c. Provisions to avoid interfering with public access to and use of any adjacent parks and other open space  Review Criteria 2 190 19th & Main Redevelopment Review Criteria 3 d. Provision of recreational areas suitably located and configured, and accessible to the residential units it is intended to serve e. Adequacy of open space as required within this title f. Open space shall be provided in accordance with Chapter 18.50, BMC g. Park land shall be provided in accordance with Chapter 18.50, BMC Not applicable. No residential uses are proposed at this time and all setbacks and land- scaping is provided in accordance with the UDO. No additional open space or parkland dedi- cations are required. Note that this project includes additional pedestrian connectivity to Kirk Park as shown on the site plan.  9. Generalized building gross area (square feet), building locations, building envelopes, and build- ing heights These numbers are all included on the site plan. 10. Setbacks This project meets the required setbacks identified in the UDO. 11. Generalized lighting concept as pertains to public safety A lighting plan and light fixture details are included in Section 6. 12. Generalized provisions for utilities, including efficient public services and facilities Both existing and proposed utilities are shown on the site plan. 13. Generalized site surface drainage and stormwater control The Stormwater Management Design Report is included in Section 11. 14. Generalized locations of loading and unloading areas A loading area is included for CVS Pharmacy on the north elevation. A wood slat extension of the building is proposed to screen the majority of this service area. Adequate delivery truck ma- neuverability has been addressed. 15. Generalized grading See Section 11. 16. Statement regarding proposed signage See Section 5, Page 6. 17. Statement regarding screening of trash, outdoor storage and utility areas The trash enclosures and recycling areas will be screened from the adjacent streetscapes with architectural elements that are coordinated with the building. See attached site plan and eleva- tions as well as the Design Regulations which further specify screening requirements. 18. Overlay district provisions where applicable This property is located within the West Main Street and North 19th Entryway Overlay Districts. The project team has incorporated the requirements from the Bozeman Design Objectives Plan. 19. Other related matters, including relevant comment from affected parties The project team has been in conversations with the Streamline Bus Service and the Montana Department of Transportation regarding this project.  191 Aerial Photograph Source: City of Bozeman GIS Dept. NTSSubjectPropertyTNCPierceFlooringJackpotCasinoResslerAutomotiveUrgentCareKirkPark19th & Main Redevelopment192 19th & Main Redevelopment Existing Site Photos 1 193 19th & Main Redevelopment Existing Site Photos 2 194 DECLARATION FOR THE ________________ CONDOMINIUMS 195 INDEX Certificate of Name Certificate of Floor Plan Declaration for _____________ Condominiums Purpose and Use; Possible Expansion................................................................... Definitions............................................................................................................... Real Property.......................................................................................................... Easement, Common Element - Interior and Exterior Maintenance, Repair and Remodeling ................................................................... Ownership and Voting - Exhibits - Use – Architect’s Certificate - Construction of Building and Units ...................................................... Expansion of the Condominium - Annexation of Additional Land....................................................................................................... The Association ...................................................................................................... Amendment ............................................................................................................ Changes, Repairs and Liens .................................................................................. Interpretation .......................................................................................................... Remedies ............................................................................................................... 196 Severability............................................................................................................. Miscellaneous......................................................................................................... Exhibits 197 CERTIFICATE OF NAME The undersigned being the duly authorized agent of the Department of Revenue of the State of Montana within the County of Gallatin, herewith executes the following certificate relating to the _____________ CONDOMINIUMS, situated as follows: 1. That the name __________________ CONDOMINIUMS, is not the same as, similar to or pronounced the same as a word in the name of any other property or subdivision within Gallatin County, except for the word “Condominiums” and 2. All taxes and assessments due and payable for the said ________________ CONDOMINIUMS, have been paid to date. DATED: __________________________ ______________________________________ COUNTY ASSESSOR 198 CERTIFICATE OF FLOOR PLAN The undersigned, being a duly registered professional architect in the State of Montana, herewith certifies the following: That the floor plans for Building __ of __________ CONDOMINIUMS, situated according to the official plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County, Montana, as duly filed with the Declaration and Bylaws thereof, fully and accurately depict the layout, location, unit designation and dimensions of __________________ CONDOMINIUMS and that such floor plans are an accurate copy of the plans filed with and approved by the officials and officers of the City of Bozeman having jurisdiction to issue building permits. The floor plans accurately depicting the layout, location, unit designation and dimensions of each unit as built, shall be recorded by the Declarant thirty (30) days from the date of completion of the building or from the date of occupancy of the building, whichever first occurs. DATED: ________________________ ______________________________________ REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECT Number: ________________________________ 199 DECLARATION FOR ________________ CONDOMINIUMS BY THIS DECLARATION, made this ______ day of ______________, 2008, by ___________ , a ________ corporation, with address of _________, ___________ _______, herereinafter referred to as “Declarant” whereby the real property hereinafter described is submitted to the provisions of the Montana Code Annotated, Title 70 Chapter 23, which Chapter is also known as the "Unit Ownership Act." The property subject to this Declaration is known as "_____________ Condominiums," hereinafter referred to as "Condominium." The Condominium is located on the real property depicted on the site plan attached and more particularly described as ARTICLE I. PURPOSE AND USE; POSSIBLE EXPANSION The Declarant has constructed as part of the Condominium one building, designated herein as Building 2, which may be expanded to no more than four (4) buildings as depicted on the Site Plan that is attached and incorporated as Exhibit A. Further subdivision of every building is permitted as provided within this Declaration, so long as buildings remain in the general location as depicted on the site plan. The Declarant reserves the right, in the Declarant’s sole discretion, and without any obligation on Declarant to do so, to expand the condominium by adding Buildings 1, 3 and 4 as is more fully described in this Declaration. 200 7 ARTICLE II. DEFINITIONS Unless the context expressly provides otherwise, the following definitions shall pertain throughout this Declaration and in the interpretation thereof: 1. Aggregate Voting - The term "aggregate voting" shall mean the entire number of votes present or available to vote in person or by proxy in a particular circumstance. 2. Allocated Interest - The term "allocated interest" means the percentage interests allocated to each unit, that is, the undivided percentage interest in the common elements, the common expense liability and votes in the Association. 3. Association of Unit Owners - The terms "Association," "Association of Unit Owners" or “ _________ Unit Owners’ Association” shall mean all of the Unit Owners acting as a group or as members of a nonprofit mutual benefit corporation and in accordance with duly adopted Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws and this Declaration. 4. Board or Board of Directors - The terms "Board" or "Board of Directors" shall mean the Board of Directors of the Association as more particularly defined in the Bylaws. 5. Building - The term "building" means the building or buildings comprising a part of the property containing the units shown and located on the site plan and floor plans attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. 6. Bylaws - The term "Bylaws" means the Bylaws promulgated by the Association under this Declaration and the Unit Ownership Act. The initial Bylaws are attached hereto. 7. Common Elements - The term common elements means the general common elements and the limited common elements which are described as follows: a. General Common Elements: “General common elements” means all those elements which are for the use of all of the unit owners and their guests and invitees. The Declarant or the Association may add or delete common elements by amendments to this Declaration and/or by the method set forth in the Unit Ownership Act. The general common elements include, but are not limited to the following: i) all portions of the Property not included within the boundaries of the 201 8 Units, including but not limited to stairs, halls, entryways, fire escapes, elevators, all utilities (water, sewer, gas, electric, cable television lines, and all similar utility, pipes and lines even though not located or installed with in the Unit boundaries, beneficial easements; general parking lot, landscaping, plants, and other materials and improvements separate form and outside of the Units; and other elements necessary for the safety, maintenance, and existence of the Condominium in which each Unit Owner shall have his or her designated percentage interest. b. Limited Common Elements: Limited common elements shall mean those common elements designated in this declaration, site plan, or floor plans or by agreement of the unit owners which are reserved for the use of a certain unit or building or number of units or buildings to the exclusion of the other units or buildings. The percentage interest of the units in the limited common elements shall be computed by determining the number of units that have use of the limited common elements and dividing by the total of the unit(s) making use of the particular limited common element. The general common elements include, but are not limited to the following: i) all Utilities (water, sewer, electrical, gas, cable television lines, and all similar utility pipes and lines) located or installed within a Unit commencing at the point where any one of them enters a Unit. 8. Common Expenses and General Common Expenses - The terms "common expenses" and “general common expenses” mean expenses of administration, maintenance, repair, replacement of common elements and services provided to the Association, and expenses agreed upon as common by the unit Owners, and other expenses declared common by the Unit Ownership Act or this Declaration or the By-Laws. 9. Condominium - The term “Condominium” means the concept of ownership of single units with appurtenant common elements located on the property submitted to the provisions of the Unit Ownership Act and the rights and obligations associated with the ownership of the units, including the right to sell the individual units as a real estate unit. The term “Condominium” is also used herein to refer to the ___________ Condominiums project. 10. Declaration - The term "Declaration" means this document and all parts attached hereto and incorporated by reference and all amendments thereto and it is the instrument by which the property is submitted to the provisions of the Unit Ownership Act. The acquisition of an Ownership interest or lien holder's interest in a unit signifies that the Owner or lien holder accepts, ratifies and agrees to comply with the terms and conditions of this 202 9 Declaration and the Unit Ownership Act. 11. Declarant - The term "Declarant" means the initial owner of the property and the person or entity that subjected the property to the Unit Ownership Act and Declarant’s successor and assigns. 12. Limited Expenses - The term "limited expenses" means the expenses attributable to the maintenance, repair and replacement of and services furnished for limited common elements and which are expenses only for Owners of units within the units or building for which such expenses are incurred. 13. Majority or Majority of the Unit Owners - The terms "majority" or "majority of the unit owners," unless otherwise provided in the Declaration, means the Owners of more than fifty percent (50%) in the aggregate of the undivided ownership interests in the general common elements designated herein as the percentage of interest in such common elements appertaining to each unit as is expressed in this Declaration. Whenever a percentage of the unit Owners is specified, percentage means such percentage in the aggregate of such undivided ownership. 14. Manager - The term "Manager" means the Manager, the Board of Directors, management company or any other person or group of persons retained or appointed by the Board of the Association of Unit Owners for the purpose of the administration of or managing the property. 15. Mortgagee - The term "mortgagee" shall mean lien holder or any beneficiary under a mortgage, deed of trust or Montana Trust Indenture or a Seller under a Contract for Deed. 16. Project - The term "project" means a real estate condominium project, a plan whereby a condominium of one or more units located on property is submitted to the provisions of the unit ownership to be owned, transferred, mortgaged and held as a separate unit. 17. Property - The term "property" means all of the land, buildings, improvements, facilities and structures on the land and all easements, rights and appurtenances belonging thereto, which are submitted to the Unit Ownership Act. 18. Recording Officer - The term "recording officer" means the county officer charged with the duty of filing and recording the deeds, mortgages and all other instruments and documents affecting the title to real property. In this case, the recording officer is the Clerk and Recorder for Gallatin County, Montana. 203 10 19. Rules and Decisions of the Association - The term “Rules and Decision of the Association” means a rule adopted and promulgated by the Association, or a decision made by the Association determining that such a rule has been violated and stating the consequences, as provided in Article VII of this Declaration. 20. Unit - The term “unit” shall be the separate units of the Condominium and the appurtenant undivided interest in the common elements of the condominium and is a part of the property including one or more buildings, rooms occupying one or more floors, intended for any type of independent use, and with a direct exit to a hallway, pathway, sidewalk, street or roadway, or to a common area or areas leading to a public street or highway. 21. Unit Designation - The term "unit designation" means the number, letter, or combination thereof designating a unit in the Declaration. 22. Unit Owner, Owner or Owners - The terms "unit owner," “owner” or "owners" mean the person, persons or entity owning a unit in fee simple absolute or an ownership interest represented by a buyer's interest in a contract for deed as shown by an abstract or notice of purchaser's interest recorded with the Clerk and Recorder of the county in which the condominium is located, individually or as a co-owner in any real estate tenancy relationship that is recognized under the laws of the State of Montana in one or more units of the Condominium. A mortgagee shall not be considered a unit owner. A unit owner may delegate his, her or its rights as a unit owner including the right to vote, to a lessee of the owner’s unit by filing a copy of the lease and such delegation in writing to the presiding officer of the association. 23. Utilities - The term “utilities” means utility lines or service for power, sewer, water, natural gas, telephone, television, computer service and other similar service lines or services, whether or not presently in or available to the Condominium. ARTICLE III. REAL PROPERTY 1. Description. The real property, initially submitted to the Unit Ownership Act and initially included in the condominium, is the land shown on the Site Plan and which is more particularly shown and described: 204 TOGETHER WITH the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anyway appertaining, and easements for ingress and egress, roads, paths, trails, sewer and water systems, telephone, power, propane and other utilities and cable services to each building and unit as shown or delineated on the subdivision plat or certificate of survey, site plan and other documents filed or recorded with the Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County, Montana, and reserving the use thereof to the unit owners and a general easement therefore to the Association in the manner set forth in this Declaration. Reserving unto Declarant and its successor and assigns non-exclusive easements and rights of way for ingress, egress and utilities and right to construct, use, convey, and attach to present and future condominiums, buildings, and units located on the property as tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances any ingress and egress, access roads and path systems, water and sewer systems, including utility easements and the right to access into said systems, paths, trails, utility easements and lines and cable services and the right to access into and use the same. Declarant shall provide a method for the owners of additional buildings and units to be assessed for their prorated share of the maintenance, improvement and replacement of the common areas and systems on an allocated interest basis, per unit, or per building basis. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the Unit Owners within a limited common area shall have the exclusive use of such limited common area, including the right to add additional units or improvements subject to any general common easements over, under and across such limited common area. The real property submitted to the Unit Ownership Act is subject to existing easements, covenants, articles of incorporation, bylaws, terms, conditions, obligations, disclosures, reservations, restrictions, dedications, conditions shown and delineated in the documents, plats and site plan filed or recorded with the Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County, Montana, or State of Montana, applicable to said real property and subject to zoning ordinances and land use restrictions, if any, laws and regulations of the State of Montana and United States of America, and also subject to taxes, assessments and charges levied by the City of Bozeman, special improvement districts, if any. Declarant reserves the right to improve and/or expand the said common systems 11 205 12 and areas thereto or to construct and/or replace the common systems as may be necessary for expansion or the utility of such common systems and Declarant may dedicate roads and utility easements to the public. The Condominium shall initially consist of one unit contained in one (1) building and said building shall be designated Building 2. Building sites 1, 3 and 4, as shown on the Site Plan as the “proposed buildings” may be added by the Owner following compliance with this Declaration, applicable laws and regulations of the State of Montana and regulatory authority in regard to condominium units. The Declarant may expand the condominium project by constructing and declaring up to four buildings total on the property and utilize the common elements as the same are designed for Building 2 and may be modified for the expansion of up to four (4) total buildings, with an undetermined number of total units within said buildings, in the manner set forth in this Declaration to add buildings, units and for future Phases of the Condominium on said lands, not to exceed four (4) buildings total. The Declarant will pay the costs of adding units or other improvements to their appurtenant limited common areas. The Association or all the Unit Owners, in accordance with their respective percentage interest, shall pay for the construction, management, administration, maintenance and repair of the general common facilities. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the Declarant and the Owners of the units shall be unconditionally bound to execute an expansion amendment to this Declaration for the Site Plan and Floor Plans of the building and unit proposed for Buildings 1, 3 and 4. The Declarant shall bear all the costs of construction of the buildings contemplated by the expansion provisions herein, including improvements on the limited common area and the costs of the amendment to the Declaration. The provisions of this Declaration and the Bylaws shall be construed to be covenants running with the land, including the buildings, improvements, easements, appurtenances and units, and shall be binding upon each unit Owner, mortgagees, lien holders and their heirs, successors, personal representatives and assigns, as long as this Condominium Declaration and Bylaws are in effect. 2. Condominium Unit as a Separate and Individual Fee Simple Interest in Real Estate. Each unit, together with the appurtenant undivided interest in the limited and general common elements of the Condominium, shall together comprise a Condominium unit, shall be inseparable, and may be conveyed, leased, rented, devised or encumbered as a Condominium unit as a fee simple interest in a parcel of real property. 206 13 3. Encroachments. If any portion of the general or limited common elements encroaches upon a unit or units, a valid easement for the encroachment and for the maintenance of the same, so long as it stands, shall and does exist. If any portion of a unit encroaches upon the general common elements or limited common elements, or upon adjoining unit or units, a valid easement for the encroachment and for the maintenance of the same, so long as it stands, shall and does exist. Such encroachments and easements shall not be considered or determined to be encumbrances either on the general common elements, the limited common elements, or on the units for purposes for marketability of title. In the event any unit common area or other structure is partially or totally destroyed and then rebuilt, the Owners of the unit or units agree that minor encroachment of parts of the building, units and general or limited common areas necessary or reasonable for the reconstruction shall be permitted and that valid easement for said encroachment and the maintenance thereof shall exist. 4. Buildings. Building 2, comprised of one (1) unit of the Condominium will be contained as shown on the Site Plan. Additional buildings (Buildings 1, 3 and 4) will have one or two floors. The buildings are numbered 1, 2, 3, etc., and the units are labeled A, B, C etc. as shown on the Site Plan. 5. Unit Boundaries. Unit Boundaries Each unit shall include the part of the building containing the Unit that lies within the boundaries of the Unit, which boundaries are as follows: a. Upper and Lower Boundaries: the upper and lower boundaries of the Unit shall be the following boundaries extended to an intersection with the permetrical boundaries: 1. Upper Boundary: the plane of the lowest surfaces of the upper floor or ceiling joists for all units. 2. Lower Boundary: the plane of the highest surface of the floor joists. b. Perimetrical Boundaries: the parametrical boundaries of the Unit shall be the following boundaries extended to an intersection with the upper and lower boundaries; 1. Exterior Building Walls: the plane formed by the center line of the exterior 207 14 walls of the buildings except that such boundary shall be extended so as to include within it all windows in the Unit. 2. Interior Building Walls: the vertical planes of the centerline of the walls bounding a Unit extended to an intersection with other perimetrical boundaries. Where walls between units are of varying thicknesses, the plane of the centerline of a boundary wall shall be the median line drawn between the two outermost boundaries of such wall. 6. Construction Materials. The principal materials of construction of the units are concrete for the basement, foundation, footings and slabs; structural wood beams and steel for the framing, wood for structural and finish work; sheet rock for the interior walls and ceilings; carpet, wood or vinyl for the floors; stone detail work, masonite, stone, brick, metal, wood and standard siding for exterior wall surfaces; and metal, wood or asphalt architectural grade shingles for the roofs of the buildings. ARTICLE IV. EASEMENT, COMMON ELEMENT - INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR MAINTENANCE, REPAIR & REMODELING - RESTRICTIONS ON USES 1. Common Element Easements. A non-exclusive right and easement for ingress and egress over the roads, parking lot and common areas, and utility easements for power, telephone, propane and other utilities, service cables and support through the common elements and for maintenance and repairs is reserved and appurtenant to each unit including future units added pursuant to the expansion rights of the Declarant its successors and assigns. All common elements are subject to such rights. 2. Interior and Exterior Construction, Maintenance and Repair. Each unit Owner shall have the exclusive right to improve, construct, remodel, repair, maintain and paint, repaint, tile, wax, paper, panel, carpet, brick or otherwise maintain, refinish and decorate the exterior and interior surfaces of the walls, roofs, ceilings, floors, basements, fixtures, windows and doors within the boundaries of his or her own unit and its appurtenant and within the appurtenant limited common area, such as garages, accessory buildings, signs and other improvements, decks, paving, walkways and the like. 208 15 3. Development of Buildings 1, 3 and 4. It is recognized that Building 2, shall be developed consistent with the approvals of the City of Bozeman, the floor plan, construction materials and site plan attached hereto. The additional potential buildings 1, 3 and 4 shall be developed consistent with the rules and regulations of the City of Bozeman and the CVS Retail Center / Design Regulations dated August of 2008, attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. Uses within Buildings 1, 3 and 4 shall be restricted so as not to directly compete with Building 2, which is owned and occupied by CVS. Some of the uses restricted and prohibited are pharmacy, sales of beer and wine, sale of household and domestic goods. 4. Parking. The common elements include parking areas for automobiles of Unit Owners and their guests, invitees and designees. These areas will be laid out by the Declarant and may be assigned to each unit or limited common elements for certain units, and may be changed from time to time by Declarant or by the Association. Those spaces not designated as limited common elements will be common elements for the use and benefit of unit owners, which shall be allotted parking spaces on a square foot basis. Thereafter, subsequent use and assignment of parking space shall be pursuant to regulation of the Association. ARTICLE V. OWNERSHIP AND VOTING - EXHIBITS - USE - ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE - CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS AND UNITS 1. Allocated Interest. Owner shall be entitled to the exclusive ownership, use and possession of his or her own unit. Owner shall own an undivided interest in the common elements in the percentages expressed herein, based upon the approximate relation that the value of the unit, on the date of this Declaration, bears to the then combined value of all units having an interest in the particular common elements. The Declarant has based the value of each unit upon the approximate standard commercial rates for the square foot construction costs of a unit. Such allocated interest represents the Owner’s undivided ownership interest in the common elements and each Unit Owner's responsibility and liability for common expenses and voting interest in the Association and in all matters whereby a Unit Owner is entitled to vote. The approximate value of the units shall be set by the Declarant or its successors and assigns. The values need not conform to market value. 209 16 The allocated interest and rounded percentage of interest of Building 2 of the Condominium are set forth below. ALLOCATED FRACTIONAL INTEREST OR PERCENT IN INTEREST IN BUILDING NO. SQUARE FEET GENERAL COMMON ELEMENTS 2 ** 100.00 TOTAL 100.00%* *subject to the expansion provision If and when additional units are added to the condominium by expansion and amendment to this Declaration, the above allocated interests and percentage interest of each unit shall be reallocated by taking the value of each unit on the date of filing the amendment and dividing it by the then combined value of all the units having an undivided interest in the general common elements of the condominiums. The approximate value of the units shall be set by the Declarant or its successors and assigns based upon the approximate standard commercial rates per square foot construction costs for a particular unit. The values need not conform to market value. Each Unit Owner, by accepting title to a unit, unconditionally agrees and consents to the foregoing method of altering the fractional or percentage interest in the general common elements of the unit for units added to the Condominium. The undivided interest in the common elements, as the same may be allocated or reallocated, will not be separated from the unit to which it appertains and shall be appurtenant to and conveyed or encumbered with the unit even though such interest is not expressed, mentioned, or properly described in the conveyance or other instrument. If the fractional interest and percentage in a unit is reallocated and amended by the addition of units to the condominium, if a unit Owner transfers, conveys, or encumbers such unit Owner’s unit, the Owner shall describe such Owner’s percentage interest in the common elements as the same as amended. If an owner mistakenly describes the owner’s percentage interest in the common elements, the same shall be deemed amended to conform with this Declaration and any amendments thereto. 2. Site Plans, Floor Plans, Elevations and Exhibits. For identification and descriptive purposes, the following exhibits are attached hereto and by this reference incorporated into and made a part of this Declaration showing the site plan, floor plans of the buildings and each of the units: Exhibit A - Site Plan: Consists of the description of the real property in the condominium, a site plan of the Condominium on the real property, the location of the buildings containing the units on the property, the location and designation of 210 17 each unit, and the location of the access and utility easements and other exterior general and limited common areas. The proposed building site for Buildings 1, 3 and 4 are generalized and may be modified based upon approval of the Declarant and the City of Bozeman. Exhibit B - Floor Plans: Showing the layout and unit designation for Building 2 as shown on the site plan, the floor level of the building, the location of the building and the approximate area of the Building and for Buildings 1, 3 and 4 each of the units as shown on the site plan, the floor levels of each building, the location of the units in the buildings and the approximate area of each unit and building and the dimensions and elevations of each building and level and unit and the common areas. A verified statement by a registered architect, registered professional engineer or professional land surveyor who has reviewed the floor plans, certifying that the plans are an accurate copy of the plans filed with and approved by the city and county officers having jurisdiction to issue building permits, if any; that the floor plans fully and accurately depict the layout of units and floors of the buildings, unit designation, square feet, dimensions, elevation and floor plans of each of the units as built, and the date construction of each of the buildings and units were completed. The verified statement is found after the index in this document. A verified statement by a registered architect, registered professional engineer or registered professional land surveyor, who has reviewed the site plan and verified that the site plans fully and accurately depict the location of the buildings and units shown on the site plans of the building(s) units as built. The verified statement is found after the index in this document. If any of the buildings or units are not completed on the date this Declaration is recorded, within thirty (30) days from the date of completion of a building or unit (or as soon as possible thereafter), an amendment to the Declaration shall be recorded, executed by the Unit Owner constructing the unit and Declarant, to which shall be attached the verified statement of a registered architect, registered professional engineer or registered professional land surveyor, certifying that the floor plans and site plan previously filed or being filed simultaneously with the amendment, fully and accurately depict the layout, location, unit designation, square feet and dimensions of the building, units and floors of each building as shown on the site plan and floor plans as built and the date construction of the building was completed. 3. Use. The units and common elements shall be occupied and used as follows: a. The units shall be used for commercial or permitted use purposes only. 211 18 Rentals and leases are allowed subject to the conditions, provisions covenants and restrictions contained in this Declaration, and are further subject to the Bylaws. b. Except as provided elsewhere in this Declaration, and except for Declarant's rights, there shall be no obstruction of the general common elements nor shall anything be stored in or on the general common elements without the prior written approval of the Association. Each Unit Owner shall be obligated to maintain and keep in good order and repair his, her or its own unit. If the Unit Owner fails to maintain and keep in good order and repair his, her or its unit, upon thirty (30) days written notice by the Association to the Unit Owner of such failure, the Association may require the Unit Owner to make the repairs or maintenance. c. All valid laws, zoning ordinances and regulations of all governmental bodies having jurisdiction thereof shall be observed. d. Nothing shall be done or kept in any Unit or in the Common Elements that will increase the rate of insurance on the Buildings or contents thereof without prior written consent of the Association. No Owner shall permit anything to be done or kept in the Owner’s Unit or in the Common Elements that will result in the cancellation of insurance on the Property or the contents thereof (without written approval by the Association), or that would be in violation of the law. No waste will be permitted in the Common Elements. e. No nuisance shall be allowed upon the Property nor shall any use or practice be allowed that is a source of unreasonable annoyance to Owners, guests or customers or the Condominium or that interferes with the peaceful possession and proper use of the Property. f. Nothing shall be done in any Unit or in, on or to the Common Elements which will impair the structural integrity of the Building or which shall structurally change the Building, except as is provided herein. 4. Service of Process. The name and address of the person designated to receive service of process for the Condominium until another designation is filed of record shall be: Susan B. Swimley 1807 West Dickerson, Suite B Bozeman, Montana 59715 212 19 5. Exclusive Ownership. Each Owner or Owners shall be entitled to exclusive ownership and possession of their unit, improvements and limited common area. Such Owner or Owners may use the general and limited common elements in accordance with the purposes for which they are intended or as they may otherwise agree between themselves, so long as they do not hinder or encroach upon the lawful rights of other unit Owners. ARTICLE VI. EXPANSION OF THE CONDOMINIUM Declarant and its successors and assigns reserve the right from time to time to add, expand or revise the Condominium by constructing, revising or adding up to four (4) total buildings containing new units, revised common elements and common facilities or amenities, amendment to this Declaration, or by any other means or methods allowed under the laws and regulations of the State of Montana and Gallatin County. The buildings, units, common elements, common facilities or amenities may be located on the real property described herein and may then be submitted to the Unit Ownership Act. The extent of any expansion or revision of the number of additional buildings, units or the common elements created by this initial Declaration is in the sole discretion of Declarant and its successors and assigns and Declarant is not bound as to use, design, units or common elements, common facilities or amenities which may be constructed or added under the provisions of this paragraph, except as shall be required by governmental authority or applicable covenants. This right to expand the condominium shall be considered Declarant’s development rights which may be assignable by transfer of the development rights by the execution, acknowledgment and recording of an assignment to any third person or entity by the Declarant. The manner of expansion and subjecting this Condominium to the additional buildings, units, common elements or common facilities shall be accomplished by the Declarant or 100% of the Unit Owners filing of record in the office of the Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County, Montana, an amended Declaration for each such expansion containing: a. An amended Exhibit A Site Plan showing the description of the buildings or units added, the location of the buildings and units, the common elements, units to be added to this Condominium, showing the designation by number of the buildings and units to be added to the Condominium by the amended Declaration and showing the general common elements. b. Amended Exhibit B Floor Plans showing the layout, unit designation and dimensions of the units and the location and approximate area of the units and the buildings and the common elements to which each unit has access. 213 20 c. An amendment to Paragraph IV of the Declaration showing the new percentages of interest of all the units in the common elements by the inclusion of the new units to be added to the Condominium by such expansion, to be adjusted and allocated as provided in Paragraph IV above. d. Such additional information and exhibits as shall be necessary to show the changes and meet the requirements of the Unit Ownership Act and/or the then applicable provisions of Montana law, including, without limitation, a description of the building materials and structures, use, unit boundaries, descriptions of limited common elements and general common elements, etc., and any and all other changes to be incorporated into the initial Declaration as a consequence of such expansion, which do not conform with the information set forth in the initial Declaration and are required to adequately describe the units to be added to the Condominium by such expansion. e. Additional or amended verified statement(s) certifying that the floor plans and site plan fully and accurately depict the layout, dimensions, and location of the new buildings and units as built. The Declarant or 100% of the Unit Owners and their successors or assigns reserve the right and the privilege to make the amendments, revisions, changes, additions and expansion as is provided for herein and subsequent transferees, grantees, buyers, lien holders, successors or assigns in title and interest, including mortgagees or other lien holders herewith and by these presents, agree to and give their consent to the filing or recording of the amended Declaration and exhibits providing for the expansion of the condominium to include the additional buildings and units, and common elements or common facilities and the changes in the percentages of interest in the common elements which occur as a consequence of such expansion. Such amendments or changes in percentages, additions and expansions may be done and executed solely by the Declarant or 100% of the owners without being required to obtain the consent or permission of the Association or any unit lien holders to the expansion amendment. The changes in percentages of ownership of the Owners of the condominium units in the common elements of the Condominium shall be adjusted as stated in Paragraph IV above. The resulting reallocated percentages of interest shall be set forth in an amendment and/or restatement to this Declaration and shall thereafter be the percentage of ownership interest allocated to all of the units in the common elements thereafter or until the next expansion amendment for the purposes of operation of the Condominium, ownership and assessments as herein set forth. Any expansion amendment to this Declaration shall be effective and binding upon Declarant, the Unit Owners and any lien holder upon the execution and notary public acknowledgment by and of Declarant (or its successors or assigns) of an amendment and/or restatement to this Declaration duly recorded in the Clerk and Recorder’s office in Gallatin County, Montana. 214 21 A copy of any amendment, after the same is recorded, shall be provided by the Declarant or owners by mail or personal delivery to the Association and to each of the unit owners at their last known address. After the recording of such amended Declaration all of the owners of such condominium units and lien holders or of an interest in the units including the owners of new units shall be subject to the provisions of this Declaration in its then amended form. Such expansion may be by a single amendment and/or restatement or there may be a series of amendments adding any portion of all of the additional buildings, units, common elements and facilities. Except as otherwise specifically provided for in this Declaration or any amendment or restatement thereto, all of the terms, conditions, provisions and definitions herein contained shall, on the recording of such amendments, be deemed expanded to and include the additional buildings and units then subject to the Declaration and the amendments thereto. The Declarant shall not be required to construct all of the buildings and units shown on the initial site plan and floor plans during a specified period of time. Declarant or Unit Owners reserve the right to make design changes to the interior floor plans and dimensions of the unbuilt units, provided that the Site Plan of the unbuilt buildings shall remain the same as shown on the original site plan. Lines for an unbuilt and future planned buildings are not the approximate location of the buildings. Until an additional unit is designated as a unit on the Site Plans and Floor Plans and completed and ready for occupancy (built unit), the assessments allocable and chargeable to the owner for such units shall be adjusted to reflect Declarant's prorated share of the assessments for the budgeted items and assessments for the general common elements relating only to the unbuilt units and the owner shall not be charged with or pay for assessments relating only to the built units. However Declarant will be charged for assessments for general common expenses which are attributable to the general benefit all the built and unbuilt and designated units, such as liability insurance, maintenance of roads, other general common elements, and general common element easement areas, snow plowing, administrative and assessments on the general common elements. An owner shall be entitled to vote on the budget for the expenses solely attributable to designated and unbuilt units. The rights and obligations herein set forth shall accrue to and be binding upon the Declarant, the owners, the Association and their successors and assigns. In matters relating to an owner or the Declarant’s designated but unbuilt units or to general common elements for which an owner or Declarant may be assessed or affected by any vote of the unit owners, the Declarant and the Unit Owners’ votes on such matters shall be adjusted to allow an owner a vote equal to the allocated percentage each designated but unbuilt unit would have if built for such voting purposes and for such assessment purposes. The allocated percentage of the unbuilt units shall be based upon 215 22 the proportionate expected value of the unbuilt units (based upon the floor plans) and shown in Article IV bears to the total value of all the units. ARTICLE VII. THE ASSOCIATION 1. Membership. An Owner of a unit in the Condominium shall automatically, upon becoming the Owner of said unit, become a member of the Association of Unit Owners, hereinafter referred to as the "Association," and shall remain a member of said Association until such time as his or her ownership ceases for any reason, at which time his or her membership in said Association shall automatically cease. The membership shall be limited to Unit Owners as defined in this Declaration. However, a member may by proxy or power of attorney appoint another person or entity to vote for the member. 2. Function. It shall be the function of the Association to: a. Adopt Bylaws for the governance of the Association. b. Make provisions for the general management of the Condominium. c. Maintain and repair the common open space, public park lands, open space corridors, storm water facilities, public trails, and parking lot including making provision for snow removal and storage. d. Levy assessments as provided for in this Declaration, the Bylaws and the Unit Ownership Act. e. Adopt and implement a policy for the affairs of the Condominium. f. Enter into contracts to hire or engage personnel or entities for the management of the affairs of the Association and the maintenance and repair of the common areas and for services to the Association, or other entity for administration and management of the sewer and water systems. g. The Association through its Board of Directors shall also have the power to adopt, implement such reasonable rules and regulations as to the use by the Unit Owners of the common areas. h. The Association may be incorporated and operate as a Montana corporation. 216 23 Either the Declarant or the Board of Directors of the Association shall be authorized to sign and file the Articles of Incorporation. 3. Vote. On all matters to be decided by the members of the Association, unless otherwise provided in this Declaration, each unit Owner shall have a vote equal to his or her unit percentage of interest in the general common elements. An Owner of a unit, upon becoming an Owner, shall be a member of the Association and shall remain a member for the period of his or her unit ownership. Except as otherwise provided in Montana law, this Declaration or the Bylaws, a majority of the aggregate percentage interest voting at any meeting, in person, by proxy, by authorized agent, or voting on a matter by written ballot shall be sufficient to act on, approve or disapprove matters brought before the owners or the Association. The Unit Owners within each building may appoint by a majority written vote of the aggregate percentage interest of all the unit Owners in the building a Unit Owner or agent to represent and vote as the authorized agent for all of the Unit Owners in such building at any and all Association meetings and matters. However, if a Unit Owner is present at an Association meeting, such Unit Owner may vote his own interest if he notifies the Secretary of the meeting of his or her intent to so vote prior to the vote on a matter. 4. Failure To Comply. Each Owner shall comply with the provisions of this Declaration, the Bylaws of the Association and the rules, regulations, decisions and resolutions of the Association adopted pursuant thereto as the same may be lawfully amended from time to time. Failure to comply with any of the same shall be grounds for an action to recover sums due for damages or injunctive relief or both, and for reimbursement of all costs, including reasonable attorney's fees incurred in connection therewith, which action shall be maintainable by the Manager or by the Board of Directors in the name of the Association, on behalf of the Owners or by an aggrieved Owner where there has been a failure of the Association to bring such action within a reasonable time, or by Declarant, its successors or assigns. The Association, after giving an Owner proper notice and a right to a hearing pursuant to the standards for due process, may revoke an Owner’s right to use all or a portion of the common facilities in the event an Owner fails to comply or pay assessments, until the Owner is in compliance and pays all assessments. 5. Payment Of Assessments - When Due. All assessments shall be due within thirty (30) days from the due date set forth in the mailing of such assessments following the meeting at which time assessments are levied by the Association. Assessments may be made payable in monthly, quarterly or annual installments at the option of the Board. The amount of the common expenses assessed 217 24 against each Condominium unit and the amount of limited common expenses assessed against each Condominium unit shall be the personal and individual debt of the Owner thereof. No Owner may exempt himself or herself from liability for this contribution toward the common expenses and the limited common expenses by waiver of the use or enjoyment of any of the general common elements or limited common elements or by abandonment of his or her unit. All assessments which are not paid within thirty (30) days from the date they are due and payable become delinquent and are subject to interest and penalty charges. The Association, through its Board of Directors, shall have the authority and responsibility of taking prompt action to collect any unpaid assessment that becomes delinquent. In the event of delinquency in the payment of the assessment, the Unit Owner shall be obligated to pay, in addition to the assessment, interest at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum on the amount of the assessment from the date delinquent; and if an attorney is engaged to collect the delinquent assessment and interest or if an attorney is engaged to foreclose the lien for the unpaid assessment, the unit Owner who is delinquent shall reimburse the Association for its costs and attorney's fees. The Board of Directors may also set and assess a penalty for late payment of assessments in an amount sufficient to cover the Association’s time and costs of sending additional notices and collection letters. a. Common expenses and common profits, if any, and limited common expenses of the Condominium shall be distributed among, and charged to, the Unit Owners according to the percentage of interest of each in the common elements. b. Except as otherwise limited in this Declaration, each Unit Owner shall have the right to use the common elements for all purposes incidental to the use of and occupancy of the respective unit as a residence, and such other incidental uses permitted by the Association, which rights shall be appurtenant to and run with the unit. 6. Unpaid Assessments. All delinquent assessments for the common expenses and limited common expenses chargeable to any unit shall constitute a lien on such unit and the owners of a unit shall be personally liable, jointly and severally, for payment of the assessments on a unit. 7. Unpaid Assessments - Mortgagee. Where the mortgagee of a first mortgage of record or other purchaser of a unit obtains title to the unit as a result of foreclosure of the first mortgage, which is prior in recording time to the recording of the association lien for assessments, such acquirer of title and his or her successors and assigns shall not be liable for the share of common expenses and assessments by the Association, chargeable to such unit, which become due 218 25 prior to the acquisition of title to such unit by such acquirer. Such unpaid share of common expenses or assessments shall be deemed to be common expenses collectible from all of the units, including such acquirer and his or her successors and assigns. However, the Owner of the unit when the assessment is made shall remain personally liable for the assessment. 8. Levying Assessments - When Made - Purposes. The Association of Unit Owners shall levy assessments upon the Unit Owners in the following manner and for the following reasons: a. Annually, general assessments shall be made for the expenses of the Association and the common expenses of the Condominium and common elements. Assessments may be made for special purposes at any regular, annual or special meeting of the Association thereof or approved by written ballot delivered to the unit owners. The Board of Directors shall cause an annual budget for income and expenses to be prepared as a proposed budget and delivered or mailed to each Unit Owner prior to or at the annual meeting or other meeting at which assessments are to be levied. The proposed annual budget shall be reviewed, amended if necessary and discussed and voted upon by the members at such meeting of the Association. A final budget must be approved by a majority of the Unit Owners present at the meeting, voting by mail ballot, voting by proxy or by authorized agent at the meeting. The budget shall be amended until so approved. The meeting may be continued if necessary to revise and resubmit the budget. The annual assessments shall be fixed by a majority vote of the Board of Directors based upon the annual budget approved by the Unit Owners. b. General assessments may be made for the repair, replacement, general maintenance of the Condominium and common elements, snow removal, purchase of personal property and fixtures for the use of the Condominium, maintenance and repair of trails, walkways, roads, park areas, easements, and common elements, management and administration of the Condominium, public liability, fire and other standard perils and casualties insurance, Directors and officers insurance, and other types of protective insurance deemed reasonable and desirable by the Board of Directors; fees, costs and expenses of a Manager, repairs, maintenance and taxes or assessments for common elements or units owned by the Association, if any, and fees and costs of any services or provisions for water, sewer, power, propane, telephone, cable, television, special or rural improvement districts or sewer and water systems, and for any other services provided to the Association and Condominium, including professional fees and costs of collection of assessments and attorney’s fees and costs of enforcement of 219 26 this Declaration, the By-Laws or the rules and regulations, the legal fees and costs of defense of the Association, its agents, officers and Board of Directors in a law suit filed against the Association. Assessments may be made for fees for management and administration of the Condominium including the water and sewer systems and the billing for the use and maintenance of the water, heating and sewer systems may be made either to the Association or to the unit owners. The base for billing for the water, heating and sewer will be related to the expected use of the water and sewer system in each unit. Therefore, assessments for water and sewer for each unit may not be the same amount. Assessments shall be based upon, computed and billed by using the allocated percentage of interest that each Unit Owner has in relation to the common elements. Except in unusual circumstances where the Association owns a unit or common element, the Unit Owners will be separately assessed by the taxing authorities for real estate taxes and assessments including special or rural improvement districts for their respective units and percentage interest in the common elements and billed individually. The individual unit Owners, and not the Association, shall pay the taxes and assessments on each Owner's units. c. General assessments may also be made for the payment of limited common element expenses; provided that the Unit Owners are chargeable only for the limited common element expenses relating to their respective units. Unit Owners shall share in the payment for such limited common expenses for the repair, maintenance and replacement of limited common elements of their respective units in accordance with each unit's proportionate share, use or ownership in the limited common element for which the assessment is being made. If only one unit is involved for which the assessment is associated with the limited common elements, then the entire cost of such repair, maintenance or replacement shall be borne by that unit, including insurance. d. General assessments may be made for improvement, repair and replacement of utility and service lines, garbage and snow removal, improvement, maintenance, care of any landscaping and easement areas, parking areas, roads, walkways, services rendered by or to the Association and other common elements and/or facilities. General assessments may also be made for any purpose contemplated by this Declaration and for any purpose set out in the Montana Unit Ownership Act. e. Special assessments for improvements, amenities, or other special projects allowed by this Declaration may be made if approved by seventy-five percent (75%) of the aggregate percentage interests of the unit owners affected by such special assessments. A special assessment may also be approved with 220 27 or without a meeting by seventy-five percent (75%) of the percentage interests of the unit owners voting in favor of the special assessment by written ballot either mailed or personally delivered to the unit owners and returned to the Association. Special assessments are defined as assessments which are for a special project expense and not part of the annual budget and general assessments. However, the repair, maintenance, management and continuing costs of a special project may be included in the annual budget for limited common or general common expenses after a special project is approved by the unit Owners. Written notice of any special assessments, the amount thereof, and the purpose for which it is made, shall be delivered to all unit Owners affected by the special assessment by mailing or delivering a copy of the notice to the unit Owners at their address of record at least thirty (30) days prior to the date of such meeting. f. Common expenses and profits, if any, of the Condominium shall be distributed among and charged to the unit Owners according to the percentage of undivided interest of each in the common elements. All of the Owners of the units shall be chargeable for items of expenses common to all of the units, such as attributable to the common areas and elements. g. In a voluntary conveyance of a unit, the grantee of the unit shall be jointly and severally liable with the grantor for all unpaid assessments by the Association against the latter for his or her share of the common expenses up to the time of the grant or conveyance, without prejudice to the grantee's rights to recover from the grantor the amounts paid by the grantee therefore. However, any such grantor or grantee shall be entitled to a statement from the Manager or Board of Directors of the Association, as the case may be, setting forth the amount of any unpaid assessments made by the Association against the grantor in excess of the amount therein set forth. h. An Association bank account may be set up in a financial institution in which all assessments shall be deposited and withdrawn to pay association expenses. The annual assessments should include an assessment for a reserve fund for contingencies and future expected or known expenses of the Association. The assessments may be billed to the owners on a monthly, quarterly, annual or other convenient basis as determined by the Board of Directors. I. The Unit Owners of each building by a seventy-five percent (75%) vote based on one vote per unit may form a separate sub-association to manage, improve and repair the building and administer rules for such building and/or to vote as a unit in the main association matters and meetings such sub- association and may elect directors, incorporate and adopt by-laws, assess the Unit owners and enforce such actions and assessments in the same manner and to the same effect and extent as the main association may do 221 28 under these covenants. ARTICLE VIII. AMENDMENT Subject to Declarant’s rights set forth herein to expand the Condominium and amend this Declaration without the consent or approval of the Association, unit Owners or lien holders, an amendment of this Declaration may be made in the following manner: a. At any regular, annual or special meeting of the Association of unit Owners or the Board of Directors, an amendment may be proposed as a resolution by the Declarant or by at least twenty percent (20%) of the Unit Owners based upon the Unit Owners' allocated percentages or by a majority of the Board of Directors. Upon adoption of the resolution by a majority vote of those Owners present, in person or by proxy, or by a majority of the Board of Directors, the proposed amendment shall be made a subject for consideration and vote by mail ballot and/or at a special meeting or the next succeeding regular or annual meeting of the Owners of the Association, with notice thereof, a copy of the proposed amendment to be mailed or personally delivered to each Unit Owner at the Owner’s last known address at least ten (10) days in advance of such meeting or in the event of a mail ballot at least fifteen (15) days before the mail ballot is required to be returned in order to be counted. At such meeting or ballot, the proposed amendment will be deemed approved and adopted upon receiving the favorable vote of at least seventy-five percent (75%) of the Unit Owners' percentage interests voting on the issue. b. The Association may, by resolution, provide that the amendment shall be deemed adopted by a combination of mail ballots and Owners, present at a meeting or voting by proxy, favorably vote in favor of the amendment by seventy-five percent (75%) or more of the total aggregate interests of the Unit Owners voting on the issue. In lieu of a meeting of the Unit Owners, the proposed amendment shall be deemed adopted if approved by a written ballot by the vote of at least seventy-five percent (75%) of the total aggregate percentage interests of the Unit Owners voting on the issue. A written ballot for the amendment may be mailed to each Unit Owner or delivered personally and shall set forth the amendment, the time when the written ballot must be returned to be counted as a vote, and allow the Unit Owner to vote for or against the amendment by checking or otherwise indicating his or her choice and return the ballot to the Association. Each Unit Owner’s vote shall be based upon such owner’s allocated percentage. If the amendment is approved and adopted, it shall be the responsibility of the Association through its President, Chairman or its Secretary to execute and record the amendment with the Clerk and Recorder's Office of the county in which the 222 29 Condominium is located. The amendment shall state that the amendment was adopted by the Association in accordance with this Section and shall state the amendment upon recording of such amendment, this Declaration shall be so amended. The Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors shall have the authority to certify that the amendment was property adopted and shall have the authority to execute, have acknowledged and record the amendment. c. Declarant and its successors and assigns shall have the right and duty from time to time to amend this Declaration for the purpose of expanding the Condominium, amending the site plan and floor plans for the buildings, units and common elements as the same are amended in accordance with the terms of this declaration and for the purpose of recording the verified statement of a registered architect, professional engineer or professional land surveyor certifying the completed buildings and units are built as shown on the original or amended floor plans and site plan in accordance with the provisions of this Declaration. d. Either the Board of Directors by a seventy-five percent (75%) vote, or the Declarant has the power and authority to amend this Declaration to make corrections in spelling, correct typographical errors or to amend sentences which are inconsistent with the language of other sentences or the general concept contained herein or to otherwise make an amendment to clarify or restate sentences or paragraphs in this Declaration which are ambiguous or unclear. The Declarant shall not be required to give prior notice to or to obtain the approval or vote of the Unit Owners, lien holders or Association for amendments which the Declarant has the right to make under this Declaration and each Owner, by the acceptance of a deed or other conveyance of a unit, consents and agrees to such rights and amendments. Declarant shall execute and have acknowledged any such amendment setting forth the items amended and stating compliance with the terms of this Declaration which shall be recorded with the Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County. e. Within thirty (30) days after the recording of any amendment to this Declaration, the signer shall deliver a recorded copy thereof to the Association. The Association shall then mail a copy to the last known address of each unit Owner. 223 30 ARTICLE IX. CHANGES, REPAIRS AND LIENS 1. Alterations by Unit Owners. The interior plan of a unit may be modified by its Owner unless such modification affects the structural integrity of the building or a portion thereof and with the exception of the bearing walls which may not be moved. In addition to compliance with the provisions contained herein, an amendment must be filed by the owner and the Association setting forth and contain an amended floor plan to the unit(s) concerned showing layout of the unit after the change and attached to the amendment as exhibits. Such amendments must be in conformance with this Declaration and the Unit Ownership Act as amended. 2. Maintenance by Unit Owner. An Owner shall maintain and keep in repair the unit, appurtenances and limited common areas. All fixtures, utility lines, lighting and equipment installed in the unit or appurtenant limited common areas shall be maintained and kept in repair by the Owner thereof. An Owner shall do no act nor any work that will impair the structural soundness, or functional integrity of the building, common elements, improvements, and fixtures, or impair any easement. The right of each Owner to repair, alter and remodel is coupled with the obligation to replace any finishing or other materials removed with similar types or kinds of material. No acts of alteration, repairing or remodeling by any Unit Owner shall impair in any way the structural or functional integrity of the units adjoining or the structural integrity of limited common elements or general common elements. 3. Exterior Alterations. An Owner may not change, alter or remodel the exterior of his or her unit, the building, or the common elements. Repair and maintenance of the exterior of the unit, building and common elements shall be the responsibility of the Owner, provided the provision of this Declaration shall be complied with. 4. Liens for Alterations. Labor performed and materials furnished and incorporated into a unit with the consent of or at the request of the unit Owner, his or her agent, or his or her contractor or subcontractor, may be the basis for the filing of a lien against only the unit or the Unit Owner consenting to or requesting the same. Each Unit Owner shall indemnify and hold harmless each of the other Owners from and against all liability arising from the claim of any lien against the unit or against the general common elements or limited common elements for construction performed or for labor, materials, services or other products incorporated in the Owner's unit at such Owner's request. 224 31 5. Claim for Assessments and Expenses - Priority of Lien - Contents - Recording - Foreclosure of Lien - Collection of Assessments. Whenever the Association furnishes or causes to be furnished to a Unit Owner and/or a unit any services, labor, or material lawfully chargeable as common expenses, chargeable as individual expenses against a unit owner or unit or chargeable as general or special assessments against a unit owner, or a unit owner is delinquent in payment of annual or special assessments billed to the unit owner, the Association shall have a lien upon the individual unit, and the undivided interest in the common elements appertaining to such unit for such expenses or assessments, and the lien shall be prior to all other liens or encumbrances upon the unit except: a. tax and assessment liens; and b. a first mortgage or trust indenture of record. The Association claiming the benefits of the lien shall record in the county in which the unit or some part thereof is located a claim containing: a. a true statement of the account due for such common expenses and assessments or individual expenses after deducting all just credits and offsets and a general description of what the expenses or assessments were charged for; b. the name of the Owner of the unit or reputed Owner, if known; c. a description of the property where the common expenses, if any, were furnished and the designation of the unit, sufficient for identification; and d. a statement that the Association claims or has a lien on the unit for such expenses or assessments. The claim shall be verified by the oath of some person having knowledge of the facts and shall be filed with and recorded by the recording officer in the book kept for the purpose of recording liens filed under Title 7, Montana Code Annotated, Chapter 3, Part 5. The lien may be enforced by the Manager acting on behalf of the Association of Unit Owners or by the Board of Directors. The proceedings to foreclose the liens created pursuant hereto and pursuant to the Unit Ownership Act shall conform as nearly as possible to the proceedings to foreclose liens created by Title 71, Chapter 3, Part 5, Montana Code Annotated. An action to recover a money judgment for unpaid expenses and assessments may 225 32 be maintained by the Manager or Board of Directors without foreclosing or waiving the lien securing the claim for expenses or assessments. It shall not be necessary to file a claim of lien to bring a suit against a Unit Owner to collect assessments, interest, penalties or attorney’ fees and costs. 6. Foreclosure on Unit - Payment of Rent - Purchase of Unit by Manager or Board of Directors. In any foreclosure suit against a unit, upon entry of the decree or order of foreclosure, the Unit Owner shall be required to pay a reasonable rental for the unit if the Unit Owner fails to give up possession unto the Association or purchaser, and the plaintiff in such foreclosure shall be entitled to the appointment of a receiver to collect the rent and an order for the removal of the Unit Owner and his or her personal possessions The Manager or Board of Directors acting on behalf of the Association shall have power, to bid on the unit at the foreclosure sale and to acquire and hold, lease, mortgage, sell and convey the same. 7. Purchaser at Foreclosure Sale Not Totally Liable for Prior Common Expenses. Where the purchaser of a unit obtains title to the unit as a result of foreclosure of the first mortgage or trust indenture, such purchaser, his successors and assigns shall not be liable for any of the expenses or assessments chargeable to such unit which became due prior to the acquisition of title to such unit by such purchaser. Such unpaid share of expenses or assessments shall be a expense of all the Unit Owners, including such purchaser, his successors, and assigns. 8. Joint Liability of Grantor and Grantee for Unpaid Common Expenses. In a voluntary conveyance of a unit, the grantee is jointly and severally liable with the grantor for all unpaid charges against the latter for his proportionate share of the common expenses, charges and assessments up to the time of the grant or conveyance, without prejudice to the grantee's right to recover from the grantor the amounts paid by the grantee therefore. However, upon request of a prospective purchaser or a closing agent, the Board of Directors or Manager shall make and deliver a statement of the unpaid charges against the prospective grantor and unit, and the grantee in that case is not liable for nor is the unit when conveyed subject to a lien filed thereafter for any unpaid charges against the grantor in excess of the amount therein set forth. 9. Insurance. The individual Unit Owners shall insure their buildings, appurtenant limited common area, improvements and units owned by them against loss or damage by fire and such other perils and hazards in such amounts as shall be determined reasonable. The 226 33 Association shall not insure the contents of a unit. The unit owner may insure the contents of their units. a. The Association is authorized to purchase and maintain such other insurance coverage for the common elements and for the Association as the Board of Directors shall determine shall be reasonable, including but not limited to, public liability insurance, casualty insurance, theft insurance, earthquake insurance and Directors' and officers' liability insurance. All insurance policies purchased by the Association shall be issued by an insurance company authorized to do business in the State of Montana. If the insurance is purchased by the Association, the following shall apply: i) Named Insured on Building Improvements and Units - Personal Property: The named insured for the Association insurance shall be the Association. The Board of Directors or Manager shall be designated as the insurance trustee and the agent for the unit Owners without naming them. Payments for losses thereunder by the insurer shall be paid to the insurance trustee herein designated and all policies and endorsements thereon shall be deposited with the insurance trustee. Unit Owners shall obtain insurance coverage at their own expense upon their own units, buildings, limited common areas and personal property and for their personal liability. b. Insurance Trustee. The Insurance Trustee is irrevocably appointed agent for the Association, each Unit Owner and for each Owner of a mortgagee or other lien holder upon a unit and for each Owner of any other interest in the Condominium property to adjust all claims arising under insurance policies purchased by the Association and to execute and deliver releases upon the payment of claims. c. Benefit To Mortgagees. Certain provisions in this paragraph entitled "Insurance" are also for the benefit of mortgagees of Condominium Units and common elements, and all such provisions are covenants for the benefit of any mortgagee of a unit and may be enforced by such mortgagee. 10. Reconstruction. a. Repair After Casualty. If any part of a unit, building, or the Condominium property shall be damaged by casualty, whether or not it shall be reconstructed or repaired, shall be determined in the following manner: i) Lesser Damage. If a unit or units, building, or other improvements are 227 34 found by the Board of Directors of the Association to be tenantable after the casualty, the damaged property shall be repaired by the Owner. ii) Not Tenantable And Election Not To Rebuild. If a unit or units, building or other improvements are found by the Board of Directors not to be tenantable after the casualty, the damaged property may be reconstructed or rebuilt by the Owner; or if the Owners elect not to reconstruct or rebuild, then the property shall be subject to the applicable provisions of the Unit Ownership Act and this Declaration. iii) Election Not To Rebuild. In the event the Owner elects not to rebuild as herein provided and set forth in 70-23-803, Montana Code Annotated, the insurance proceeds shall be used to satisfy any outstanding liens or encumbrances on the property and the balance paid to the Owners in accordance with the unit Ownership act. iv) Certificate. The insurance trustee may rely upon a certificate of the Association made by its Chairman, or three members of the Board of Directors to determine whether or not the damaged property is to be reconstructed. b. Plans And Specifications. Any reconstruction or repair must be substantially in accordance with the floor plans and site plans for the original improvements, or if not, then according to plans approved in writing by not less than seventy-five percent (75%) of votes of the percentage interests of the units voting on the matter, including one hundred percent (100%) of the votes of the Owners of all units which are to be altered. Any such reconstruction not in accordance with the floor plans must be set forth in an amendment to the Declaration, which amendment shall be prepared and filed of record in accordance with the provisions of this Declaration. c. Responsibility. The responsibility for maintenance and repair after casualty shall be the same as for maintenance and repair of the Condominium property. d. Assessments. If the proceeds of insurance are not sufficient to defray the estimated costs of reconstruction or repair of the common areas or elements for which the Association is responsible, or if at any time during such reconstruction or repair, the funds for the payment of the costs thereof are insufficient, assessment shall be made against all unit Owners in sufficient amounts to provide funds for the payment of such costs. Such assessment shall be in proportion to the Owner's percentage of interest in the general common elements. e. Construction Funds. The funds for payment of costs of reconstruction or 228 35 repair after casualty, which shall consist of proceeds of insurance held by the insurance trustee and funds collected by the Association from assessments against unit Owners, shall be disbursed in the sound discretion of the trustee and according to the contract of reconstruction or repair, which contract must have the approval of the Board of Directors. f. Surplus. It shall be presumed that the first monies disbursed in payment of costs of reconstruction and repair shall be from the insurance proceeds. If there is a balance in a construction fund after payment of all costs of the reconstruction and repair for which the fund is established, such balance shall be paid to the Association for the use and benefit of the unit owners and/or to defray expenses of the Association. ARTICLE X. INTERPRETATION The provisions of this Declaration and of the Bylaws to be promulgated and recorded herewith shall be liberally construed to effectuate the purposes of this Declaration and Bylaws and to create a building or buildings and units and common areas subject to and under the provisions of the Montana Unit Ownership Act. In the event of any conflict between the Declaration and the Bylaws, the Declaration shall prevail. ARTICLE XI. REMEDIES All remedies provided for in this Declaration and Bylaws shall not be exclusive of any other remedies which may not be, or are hereafter, available to the parties hereto as provided for by law. ARTICLE XII. SEVERABILITY The provisions hereof shall be deemed independent and severable and the invalidity or partial invalidity or unenforceability of any other provisions shall not affect the validity or enforceability of any other provision hereof. ARTICLE XIII. MISCELLANEOUS 1. Utility and Structural Easements. Easements are reserved unto the Declarant and the Association through the Condominium property and common elements as may be required for access roads, and utility easements and other common services, including water, sewer, power, telephone, 229 36 natural gas and such other easements as shall be necessary to serve the Condominium and units adequately. Every portion of a unit which contributes to the structural support of the building shall be burdened with an easement of structural support for the benefit of the common elements. 2. Right of Access. The Association shall have the irrevocable right, to be exercised by the Manager or Board of Directors, to have access to each unit from time to time during reasonable hours as may be necessary for the maintenance, repair or replacement of any of the general or limited common elements therein or accessible therefrom or for making emergency repairs therein necessary for the maintenance, repair or replacement of any of the limited common elements therein necessary to prevent damage to the general or limited common elements or to any unit. Damage to the interior or any part of the unit resulting from maintenance, repair, emergency repair or replacement of any of the general or limited common elements or as a result of any emergency repair within another unit at the instance of the Association shall be designated either limited or general common expenses by the Association and assessed in accordance with such designation. 3. Expenditures. No single expenditure or debt in excess of SEVEN THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($7,500.00) for general common expenses, except for annual premiums for required insurance, and other pre-approved general or special assessment items, may be made or incurred by the Association or its manager for any project or service without the prior approval of seventy-five percent (75%) of the Board of Directors of the Association. 4. Benefit. Except as otherwise provided herein, this Declaration shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the Declarant, the Association and each unit Owner, and the heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns of each. 5. Warranties. The Declarant expressly makes no warranties or representations concerning the property, the units, the Declaration, Bylaws or deeds of conveyance except as specifically set forth therein; and no one may rely upon such warranty or representation not so specifically expressed therein. The Declarant makes no warranty or representation as to sight protection, the view shed, or the type of development of adjacent or nearby properties. 230 37 6. Notification of First Mortgagee. A first mortgagee, upon written request to the Association, will be entitled to written notification from the Owners' Association of any default in the performance by an individual unit Owner of any obligation under the Condominium documents which is not cured within thirty (30) days. 7. First Mortgagees' Right. First mortgagees of record shall have the right to examine the books and records of the Association upon written request and at a reasonable time and place. 8. Unit Ownership Act. The Unit Ownership Act - Condominium, Chapter 23, Title 70, of Montana Code Annotated, and any amendments thereto are incorporated herein and by this reference made a part hereof as though fully set forth. The provisions of this Declaration shall supersede the provisions of the Act when permitted by the Act or law. However, in the event of any irreconcilable conflict between said Act and any provisions contained herein, the Act shall control. 9. Fees And Costs In Action To Enforce. In the event of any action to enforce the obligations and covenants contained herein, the prevailing party shall be entitled to its, his or her costs, including reasonable attorney's fees. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Declarant has caused this Declaration to be made and executed according to the provisions of the Montana Unit Ownership Act, MCA '70-23-101, et seq., Montana Code Annotated). DECLARANT: _____________________ By: ______________ Its: ___________________ 231 38 STATE OF MONTANA ) :ss County of Gallatin ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on the ____ day of _________________, 2007, by _____________, the ____________ of ______________________________, Declarant. ___________________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC for the State of Montana Printed Name: _______________________________ Residing at __________________________________ My Commission expires ________________________ 232 BYLAWS OF THE ASSOCIATION OF UNIT OWNERS OF _____________________ CONDOMINIUMS 233 TABLE OF CONTENTS Purpose and Application ................................................................................................... Membership ...................................................................................................................... Obligations ........................................................................................................................ Meeting and Voting ........................................................................................................... Voting Interest................................................................................................................... Board of Directors ............................................................................................................. Officers of the Board of Directors...................................................................................... Powers and Duties of Board of Directors .......................................................................... Vacancies and Removal.................................................................................................... Compensation................................................................................................................... Managers.......................................................................................................................... Amendment of Bylaws....................................................................................................... Assessments..................................................................................................................... The Declaration................................................................................................................. 234 BYLAWS OF THE ASSOCIATION OF UNIT OWNERS OF _________________ CONDOMINIUMS I. PURPOSE AND APPLICATION These Articles are and shall be the Bylaws of the Association of Unit Owners of _________________ Condominiums. These Bylaws shall, upon being recorded with the Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County, State of Montana, govern and control the administration of ________________ Condominiums. All Unit Owners, their employees, business invitees, guests and any renters or sublessees, present and future shall have the rights and responsibilities described in these Bylaws and shall be subject to the provisions thereof. The acquisition of an ownership interest in a unit in ________________ Condominiums signifies that the Owner accepts, ratifies and agrees to comply with these Bylaws. II. MEMBERSHIP Persons owning a Unit in ________________ Condominiums or an interest in a unit, or owning a unit in any real estate tenancy relationship recognized by the State of Montana, shall be a member of the Association of Unit Owners (“Association”). An owner may not decline membership in the Association. Membership begins concurrently with the acquisition of an ownership interest and terminates at the time such ownership interest is terminated. Such termination shall not relieve any owner of liability for obligations incurred while a member of the Association; further, membership in the Association does not in any way negate or impair any owner’s legal remedies, right to bring legal action, or defenses to any and all actions involving the Association, other Unit Owners, or the Management, which may arise from or be incidents of unit ownership. III. OBLIGATIONS Each Unit Owner shall be obligated to comply with these Bylaws, the Declaration, and the laws of the City of Bozeman, the County of Gallatin, and the State of Montana. Such obligations shall include, but not be limited to, the paying of assessments levied by the Association, and the adherence to the protective covenants which are a part of the Declaration. Failure of any owner to abide by these Bylaws, and all rules made pursuant thereto, the declaration and the laws of the City of Bozeman, the County of Gallatin, and the State of Montana, shall be grounds for appropriate legal action by the Association of Unit Owners or by an aggrieved Unit Owner against such noncomplying owner. 235 4 IV. MEETING AND VOTING There shall be a regular meeting of the Association annually on the second Monday in September of each year, commencing in the year the condominium regime is established, or on such other date properly announced by the Association. Pursuant to these Bylaws, the Association may at any time hold special meetings. Such special meetings may be called on the initiative of the Chairman of the Association, by the Board of Directors, a signed request of the Manager, or a petition signed by fifty-one percent (51%) of the Unit Owners. Notice of any special meeting must specify the reason for such meeting and the matters to be raised. Only matters set forth in the petition or request may be brought before such meeting unless more than fifty-one percent (51%) of the aggregate interest present agree otherwise. A. Notice. Notice of all meetings, regular or special, shall be mailed by the Association’s Secretary to every Unit Owner of record at his address of record at least ten (10) business days prior to the time for holding such meeting. Such notice shall specify the date, time and place of the meeting and shall make provisions to allow for the voting of each Unit Owner’s interest by proxy at the discretion of the owner. The mailing of a notice in the manner provided in this paragraph or the personal delivery of such notice by the Secretary of the Association shall be considered as notice served. B. Quorum. No meeting, regular or special, shall be convened to conduct business unless a quorum is present in person or by proxy. A quorum shall consist of fifty-one percent (51%) of the total aggregate interest of _______________ Condominiums. At any time, during any meeting, that quorum is not present, such meeting shall be adjourned forthwith. V. VOTING INTEREST Each Unit at Association meetings shall have an equal voting interest as set forth in the Declaration, a copy of which is being filed concurrently with the filing of these Bylaws with the Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County, State of Montana. Each Unit shall thus have an equal voting interest on all matters affecting the general business of _______________ Condominiums, on all matters affecting the common elements, assessments for the common elements, and on all matters upon which the Association has agreed to have voting on the general common elements’ interests. Voting upon matters affecting limited common elements and assessments for limited expenses shall be only by owners having a unit or interest in units located in the building affected. Whenever a quorum is present at a meeting of the Association or the Board of Directors, those present may do any and all acts they are empowered to do unless specific provisions of these Bylaws, the Declaration, or the laws of the State of Montana direct 236 5 otherwise. VI. BOARD OF DIRECTORS The governance of ______________ Condominiums shall be by a Board of five (5) Directors, elected among the Unit Owners. Such Board shall have all powers and responsibilities attendant to the general administration and control of the condominium. Additionally, the Board shall have the authority necessary to carry into effect the powers and duties specified by these Bylaws. VII. OFFICERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS The Association shall elect from its membership a Board of Directors of five persons, who shall serve for a term of one (1) year. The manner of election of the Board of Directors shall be as follows: At the first and all subsequent annual meetings of the Association, nominations for positions on the Board shall be accepted from any of the Unit Owners present. Voting will be noncumulative, with each Association member having a vote equal to his/her percentage of interest in the general common elements, for as many persons as there are Directors to be elected. Board members shall be elected by majority vote of the interests present or voting by proxy at any annual or special meeting. The first Board consisting of two (2) persons, as listed below, shall serve until the first annual meeting of the Association, at which time a new Board shall be elected. VIII. POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS The Board of Directors shall have the following powers and duties: A. To call annual meetings of the Association and give due notice thereof. B. To conduct elections of the Board of Directors. C. To enforce the provisions of the Declaration, Bylaws and protective covenants of _______________ Condominiums by appropriate action. D. To promulgate and adopt rules and regulations for the use of the common elements and for the occupancy of the units so as not to interfere with the peace and quiet of all the residents. Such rules must be approved by seventy-five percent (75%) of the unit owners at any regular or special meeting of the Association. E. To maintain and repair the common open space, public park lands, open space corridors, storm water facilities, public trails and parking lot including 237 6 making provisions for snow removal and storage. F. To provide for the management of ____________ Condominiums by hiring or contracting with suitable and capable management and personnel for the day-to-day operation, maintenance, upkeep and repair of the general common and limited common elements. G. To levy assessments as allowed by the Declaration, these Bylaws and the State of Montana, and to provide for the collection, expenditure and accounting of said assessments. H. To pay for the expenses of the maintenance, repair and upkeep of the general common elements and the limited common elements, and to approve payment vouchers either at regular or special meetings. I. To delegate authority to the Manager for the routine conduct of condominium business, however, such authority shall be precisely defined with ultimate authority at all time residing in the Board of Directors. J. To provide a means of hearing grievances of Unit Owners and to respond appropriately thereto. K. To meet at regularly scheduled times and to hold such meetings open to all Unit Owners or their agents. L. To prepare an annual budget for the condominium in order to determine the amount of the assessments payable by the Unit Owners to meet the general common and limited common expenses, and allocate and assess such charges among the Unit Owners according to their respective interests in the general common and limited common elements. M. To levy and collect special assessments whenever, in the opinion of the Board, it is necessary to do so in order to meet increased operating or maintenance expenses, costs, or additional capital expenses, or because of emergencies. N. To take appropriate legal action to collect any delinquent assessments, payments or amounts due from Unit Owners, or from any person or persons owing money to the condominium, and to levy a penalty and to charge interest on unpaid amounts due and owing. However, other than for the collection of delinquent assessments or accounts, the Board shall not initiate any litigation or lawsuit without prior approval of at least seventy five percent (75%) of the aggregate interest of the Unit Owners in the condominium. O. To defend in the name of the Association any and all lawsuits wherein _______________ Condominiums is a party defendant. 238 7 P. To enter into contracts necessary to carry out the duties herein set forth. Q. To establish a bank account for ______________ Condominiums, and to keep therein all funds of the Association. Withdrawal of monies from such accounts shall only be by checks signed by such persons as are authorized by the Board of Directors. R. In general, to act for and carry on the administration and affairs of the Association as authorized and prescribed by the Declaration, and to do all those things which are necessary and reasonable in order to carry out the governance and operation of __________________ Condominiums. S. To make repairs, alterations, additions and improvements to the general common and limited common elements consistent with managing the condominium in a first-class manner and in the best interest of the Unit Owners. T. To provide for the perpetual maintenance of the general common open area and landscaping, the parking areas and driving lanes, and any stream, and to make any assessments necessary for such maintenance as provided herein. Such maintenance shall specifically include the control of County declared noxious weeds. U. To arrange, keep, maintain and renew the insurance for the Association as set forth in the Declaration. V. To receive and make payment for common utility expenses, including the power bill, for all of the condominium units. The pro rata portion of the utility expenses shall be paid by the unit owners as part of, or in addition to, their condominium assessment, with the method of payment to be determined by the Board. W. To carry out the duties and responsibilities of the Board in all other matters as may be authorized, needed or required by the Declaration. IX. VACANCIES AND REMOVAL Should a vacancy occur on the Board of Directors, the Board, subject to the exception described below, shall appoint a member of the Association to serve for the unexpired term. Such vacancy shall be filled no later than the next regular Board meeting after which it occurs. Should such vacancy not be filled by the Board at the next regular meeting of the Association, the Association may fill such vacancy. At any regular or special meeting of the Association, any member of the Board may 239 8 be removed by a majority of the aggregate interest in ________________ Condominiums. Such vacancy shall be filled by the Association. Such removal matter must be announced in the notice of such regular or special meeting. The personal delivery of such notice by the Secretary of the Association shall be considered notice served. X. COMPENSATION No member of the Board of Directors shall receive any compensation for acting as such. Nothing herein, however, shall be construed to preclude compensation being paid to Managers who are hired by the Board of Directors. XI. MANAGERS The Manager shall be appointed and/or removed by the Board of Directors. The Manager (or any member of the Board or Association handling Association funds or having power to withdraw or spend such funds) shall be bonded if required by the Board of Directors, and shall maintain the records of the financial affairs of the condominium. Such records shall detail all assessments made by the Association and the status of payments of said assessments by all Unit Owners. All records shall be available for examination during normal business hours to any Unit Owner or his assigned representative. All functions and duties herein provided for the Manager may be performed by the Board, or the Chairman, if the Board should decide not to have a Manager. A. Accounts: The receipts and expenditures of the Association shall be under the direction of the Manager and be classified as appropriate into general common expenses and limited common expenses, and shall include a provision for current expenses which shall include all receipts and expenditures to be made within the year for which the budget is made, including a reasonable allowance for contingencies and working funds, except expenditures chargeable to reserves or betterments. The balance in this fund at the end of each year shall be applied to reduce the assessments for current expenses for the succeeding year. Other budget items may be provided for in the discretion of the Manager. B. Budget: The Manager shall prepare and submit to the Board each calendar year, a budget, which must be approved and adopted by the Board. The budget shall include the estimated funds required to defray the general common and limited common expenses and to provide and maintain funds for the foregoing accounts according to good accounting practices. Copies of the budget and proposed assessments shall be transmitted to each member on or before December 15 of the year preceding the year for which the budget is made. If the budget is subsequently amended, a copy of the amended budget shall be furnished to each member. 240 9 C. Financial Report: An audit and financial report of the accounts of the Association may be made annually by a Certified Public Accountant, if required by the Board of Directors, and a copy of the report shall be furnished to each member no later than March 1st of each year for which the audit is made. The Manager shall generally operate and manage the condominium for and on behalf of the Unit Owners and shall have such other powers and authority as the Board may designate. If there is no Manager or the Manager resigns, is terminated or his contract expires, the Board shall perform all the duties of the Manager. XII. AMENDMENT OF BYLAWS These Bylaws may be amended at any regular or special meeting of the Association providing that a copy of the proposed revision is included in the notice of such meeting. Upon a vote of over fifty percent (50%) of the aggregate interest in the condominium, the amendment shall be declared adopted. The Secretary shall as soon as practicable after adoption, prepare a copy of these Bylaws as amended for certification by the Chairman and Secretary of the Association. Such amended and certified Bylaws shall then be filed and recorded in the office of the Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County, State of Montana. Bylaws as amended shall become effective at the time of such recording. XIII. ASSESSMENTS In accordance with the percentage of interest in the general common elements as set forth in the Declaration, each Unit Owner shall be assessed for general common expenses. Such assessments, and assessments for limited common expenses, shall be collected and paid according to the terms and under the procedures more particularly set forth in the Declaration. The amount of assessments described above and any other assessments allowed by these Bylaws, the Declaration, and by the State of Montana, shall be fixed by the Board of Directors. Notice of each owner’s assessments shall be mailed to said owner at his address of record. XIV. THE DECLARATION The undersigned has filed, along with these Bylaws, a Declaration whereby the properties known as _________________ Condominiums are submitted subject to Title 70, Chapter 23, M.C.A. The Declaration shall govern the acts, powers, duties and responsibilities of the Association of Unit Owners, and in the event these Bylaws and the Declaration are in conflict, the Declaration shall prevail. The definition of terms set forth in the Declaration shall be applicable throughout these Bylaws and the interpretation thereof. By virtue of these Bylaws and the Declaration, each Unit Owner has the right to 241 10 membership in the Association of Unit Owners and any Unit Owner may be on the Board of Directors of _____________________ Condominiums. _____________ Condominium Association of Unit Owners and its Board of Directors shall have the primary and final authority on all matters solely affecting the condominium area, subject to the laws, rules and regulations of the City of Bozeman, the County of Gallatin, and the State of Montana. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, as the owners of record of all of the condominium units and 100% of the voting interests of _____________ Condominiums as of the date hereof, hereby appoints the following persons to serve on the Board of Directors and as officers until the first annual meeting of the Association, to-wit: ________________ President ________________ Vice-President ________________ Secretary/Treasurer And, the Declarants and the said Board hereby declare and affirm the adoption of the foregoing Bylaws on the ___ day of _____________________, 2008. DECLARANT: ________________________ By: __________________________ Its: _________________ _______________ CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION OF UNIT OWNERS: - Director - Director - Director 242 11 STATE OF MONTANA ) : ss. County of Gallatin ) On this ___ day of _______________________, 2008, before me, a Notary Public in and for the State of Montana, personally appeared ________, the __________ of ___________________, whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same on behalf of the corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year first above written. Notary Public for the State of Montana Printed Name: Residing at _________________ My Commission expires: ____ STATE OF MONTANA ) : ss. County of Gallatin ) On this ___ day of _______________________, 2008, before me, a Notary Public in and for the State of Montana, personally appeared __________, __________ and ____________, the Board of Directors of ____________ Condominium Owners Association, whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed the same on behalf of the Association. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year first above written. Notary Public for the State of Montana Printed Name: Residing at My Commission expires: 243 CONDOMINIUM\CHECK.LST CHECK LIST FOR DECLARATION AND BYLAWS FOR CONDOMINIUMS 1. Name of condominium. 2. Name and street address of agent who can receive process in county where condominium is located. 3. Surveyed or platted description of the real property upon which the condominium is to be initially located. Surveyed or platted description of the real property for other phases, if any. 4. Names and addresses of record owners of the real property upon which condominium units are to be located. A current title insurance policy or commitment would be most desirable. 5. If you have or are going to create a new entity to do the project, provide the name of the entity and copies of the deeds transferring the real property to the new entity. 6. Description of the building(s), including the number of floors and basements, and the number of units in each building, a statement of the use allowed for each building and unit, i.e. residential, office, etc. Whether rental of units is allowed. 7. Describe the principal materials of which the building is constructed, i.e. concrete for the foundation, wood for the framing, structural and finish work, rock trim for portions of the floors, wood for the exterior and asphalt shingles for the roof. 8. A site plan showing the location of the building(s) and the units on the land, the distance and azimuth of at least two corners of each building from the outside boundary lines of the land, showing the general common elements (used by every unit owner) and limited common elements (for the use of a limited number of unit owners). The unit numbers shall also be shown for each unit in each building. The site plan should show upper and lower floors of units and tie in with the floor plan. 9. Floor plans for each unit showing the layout of each unit, the elevations, upper and lower floors and dimensions of each unit, the unit number and designations, and the total square footage of each unit. Floor plans should show limited common areas for each unit. Name, address, phone and fax numbers of the architect who prepared floor plans. 10. The percentage of interest of each unit owner in the common elements. The percentage shall be in the approximate relation that the value of the unit bears to the combined value of all the units having an interest in the common elements. Value need not conform to market value. Usually we use the total square footage of each unit multiplied by a price per square foot to determine the values of the units and then compute the percentage. 244 CONDOMINIUM\CHECK.LST 11. Description of the general common elements and areas and the limited common elements and areas, including the units allowed to use the limited common elements and areas. 12. Any other details regarding the property or condominiums that should be noted in the documentation. Include any plans providing for expansion of the condominium, include annexation of additional lands and/or units. Provisions for alteration of floor plans for unbuilt units by developer should be included. Provisions for who maintains and pays for the limited common areas, i.e. the unit owners= association or the individual unit owners. Provisions for payment of utilities and costs of hookup. 13. Names and addresses of first Board of Directors for the Bylaws of _________________ Unit Owners= Association. 245 CVS RETAIL CENTER Design Regulations August 2008 246 CVS Retail Center DESIGN REGULATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS table of contents Section # Purpose 1 Process 2 Site Design 3 Building Design 4 Landscape Design 5 Signage Design 6 Appendix A 7 247 CVS Retail Center DESIGN REGULATIONS PURPOSE Purpose The purpose of these Design Regulations is to create a well-designed retail and service cen- ter with coordinated buildings, signage, landscaping, public plazas, pedestrian circulation, parking and access. No construction, development, demolition, excavation, installation, landscaping, or like ac- tivities shall occur on any pad lot within CVS Retail Center without prior written approval from CVS Pharmacy. The following pages describe the design review process and require- ments for site, building, landscape and signage design. The attached Master Site Plan (see Appendix A) is designed to provide basic building, access, plaza and parking layouts. This layout is conceptual and not intended to be binding. Variations from this layout will be con- sidered if CVS Pharmacy and the City of Bozeman agree that the proposed layout is better for the overall project. Note that all of the lots in this project are also subject to the City of Bozeman Unified Devel- opment Ordinance and Design Objectives Plan (whichever version is in place at the time of site plan submittal).. Development of pad sites must go through the appropriate city review processes. CVS Pharmacy shall review and approve all projects prior to a submittal of a for- mal application to the City of Bozeman. Approval by CVS Pharmacy does not guarantee ap- proval by the City of Bozeman. Page 1 of 7 248 CVS Retail Center DESIGN REGULATIONS PROCESS Process Mail two copies of the development review proposal to: CVS Realty Co. 777 S. Harbor Blvd. Suite E163 La Habra, CA 90631 The following documents and drawings are required as part of a development review proposal: Upon review, the Owner will be notified within thirty (30) business days that the design has been approved, approved with stipulations or disapproved. Incomplete applications may be returned. The reasons for approval with stipulation and disapproval will be clarified for the Owner in writing and/or with drawings. An application for withdrawal may be made without prejudice, provided the request for withdrawal is made in writing. If an application has been denied, or the approval is subject to conditions that the Owner feels are unacceptable, the Owner may request a meeting or conference call before CVS Pharmacy to justify his/her position. CVS Pharmacy will consider the arguments and facts presented by the Owner and notify the him/her of their decision to schedule a meeting within thirty (30) business days. It is anticipated that Owners may wish to make improvements or modifications to their buildings or during initial construction or at a future date. A change may be executed after written approval from CVS Pharmacy. All modification requests must be made in advance. CVS Pharmacy reserves the right to inspect in the field for compliance during any stage of construction and is empowered to enforce its policy as set forth in the condominium asso- ciation documents. Required Drawings (2 copies) Drawing Checklist Site Plan (1/16” or 1/8” scale) All dimensions must be noted. north arrow; property lines; setbacks; easements; sidewalks; streets; building footprints; awnings; stairs; screening; overhangs (as dashed lines); plazas; limits of construction activity Landscape Plan (1/16” or 1/8” scale) foundations plantings; equipment screening; plaza details including pedes- trian furniture, picnic tables, sculptures, etc. Floor Plans (1/8” scale or larger) All dimensions must be noted. gross and net square footages per use must be labeled on the floor plans; windows & doors, overhangs & awnings Elevations (1/4” scale or larger) All dimensions must be noted. doors, windows, awnings, canopies; all materials must be specified; overall height (from average grade); roof pitches, lights and light fixture details; me- chanical & dumpster screening details Color Rendering Color rendering and color chips Material Samples As requested by CVS Page 2 of 7 249 CVS Retail Center DESIGN REGULATIONS SITE DESIGN Site Design xBuildings, parking and sidewalks and landscaping shall be located as shown on the Preliminary Master Site Plan. Minor adjustments within the designated pad site areas is expected. xThe internal sidewalk and pedestrian circulation system shall be coordinated to connect buildings to other buildings, plazas, park- ing areas and sidewalks. xDevelopment of each pad site must include installation of the ad- jacent plaza as further specified on Page 5. xAll ground-mounted mechanical equipment and trash/recycling receptacles shall be screened from all adjacent streetscape(s) with a layered combination of walls, fencing, and landscaping that compliments the building design. xBuildings should take into account appropriate solar orientation at a minimum. Active solar elements are encouraged. xCVS Pharmacy will install parking lot lighting as specified. xBuilding and plaza lighting is the responsibility of the pad site owner. xAll setbacks, lot coverage, accesses, accessory structures, parking requirements, etc. are governed by the Bozeman Unified Develop- ment Ordinance. xFurther design requirements are outlined in the Design Objectives Plan. Page 3 of 7 Plazas Building 1 Building 3 Building 2 Building 4 250 CVS Retail Center DESIGN REGULATIONS BUILDING DESIGN Building Design xBuildings shall have meaningful design and exhibit clear order and comprehensive composition. xBuildings shall be designed to be presentable on all sides facing a public street and parking area including but not limited to the fol- lowing characteristics – signage, doors, awnings, canopies, ar- cades, windows, layered planes, other fenestration to address the streetscapes and interior parking areas. Specifically: - Building 1 must have a strong corner presence for North 19th Avenue and Main Street with height massing detailing. - Building 4 must include design elements to specifically address Kirk Park. xMain entrances shall be emphasized and be clearly identifiable. Buildings with multiple entrances are required. xA broad range of materials including masonry, metal, wood, and stucco are acceptable with quality appropriate detailing. xPrimary materials on a façade may change only at a horizontal band or an inside corner. xExterior wall-mounted light fixtures must be full cutoff as required by Section 18.42.150 of the Bozeman Unified Development Ordi- nance. xAll wall-mounted and rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened with a combination of layers of walls, fencing, and land- scaping. xAll building heights, encroachments, etc. are governed by the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. Page 4 of 7 251 CVS Retail Center DESIGN REGULATIONS LANDSCAPE DESIGN Landscape Design xLandscaping shall add to a sense of permanence and consistency for the project while also connecting the built and natural environ- ments. xCVS Pharmacy will be responsible for landscaping the boulevards, yards and parking lots as indicated on the Master Landscape Plan. xLandscaping around and within individual pad sites and plazas is the responsibility of the Owner after building construction. xThe 4 plazas identified on the Master Site Plan shall be designed with a level of human scale and detail to encourage pedestrian activity. Each pad site is responsible for developing the adjacent plaza with a minimum of: - 4 trees - 1 bicycle rack - Seating for at least 10 people (benches, picnic tables, chairs, landscape etc.) Note that some seating should face each other to encourage human interaction. - 6 seasonal pots with flowers or plants - 1 original, freestanding, permanent sculpture (9 cubic feet minimum) integrated with other landscape features. xAll existing mature vegetation should be preserved during con- struction as specified below. Page 5 of 7 252 CVS Retail Center DESIGN REGULATIONS SIGNAGE DESIGN Signage Design Building 1 (Future Pad Site) xEstimated Building Frontage: 130 LF (Main Street) x130 x 1.5 = 195 SF max + 35% corner bonus = 2263 SF estimated xPermitted Signage Types: wall-mounted signage; canopy signage; awning signage; projecting signage and window signage xNotes: signage must help to anchor the corner of Main Street and North 19th Avenue while also addressing the parking area Building 2 (CVS Pharmacy) xActual Building Frontage: 124 LF (North 19th Avenue) x124 x 1.5 = 186 SF + requested 17% deviation = 2218 SF max xPermitted Signage Types: wall-mounted and window signage. xAs shown, the proposed CVS signage includes: South Elevation: 102 SF “CVS/pharmacy” sign East Elevation: 52 SF “CVS/pharmacy” sign North Elevation: 52 SF “CVS/pharmacy” sign Canopy: 10 SF “Drive Thru Pharmacy Full Service” sign TOTAL: 2216 SF xDeviation Request: A deviation is requested to allow additional signage for the CVS building. In order to create fronting characteristics for multiple streetscapes that maintain appropriate proportionate to the building mass- ing, the applicants would like to request a 17 percent increase in allowable signage. This would result in 32 additional square feet for a total of 218 SF (extra 2 SF due to rounding). In exchange for this deviation, CVS has commit- ted to a unique building with quality materials, public plazas and additional landscaping beyond code requirements. Also, CVS is willing to prohibit free- standing signs within the project to help avoid clutter along the entryways. Building 3 (Future Pad Site) xEstimated Building Frontage: 70 LF (North 19th Avenue) x70 x 1.5 = 1105 SF estimated xPermitted Signage Types: wall-mounted signage; canopy signage; awning signage; projecting signage and window signage xNotes: signage must address both North 19th Avenue and the parking area Building 4 (Future Pad Site) xEstimated Building Frontage: 50 LF (North 20th Avenue) x50 x 1.5 = 775 SF estimated xPermitted Signage Types: wall-mounted signage; canopy signage; awning signage; projecting signage and window signage xNotes: signage must address both North 20th Avenue and the parking area Total Signage Permitted: xZoning: B-2 (Community Business District) therefore, the maximum total project signage: 400 SF per lot x 2 lots = 8800 SF. The anticipated total project signage is 6654 SF. Requirements For All Signage: xSignage must compliment the building composition and massing xSigns with individual letters are encouraged xAll signage lighting must be internal or directed downward xWindow signage is permitted up to 25% of the windows xSandwich boards signs are permitted near entrances in plaza areas only xFree-standing signs (pole and monument) are not permitted xAll signage must be in compliance with Chapter 18.52 of the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance Page 6 of 7 253 CVS Retail Center DESIGN REGULATIONS APPENDIX A: MASTER SITE PLAN Page 7 of 7 254 255 © 2007 LSI INDUSTRIES INC.Project Name Fixture Type Catalog # 1- Requires the use of Medium Base Reduced Envelope lamp. 2- For indoor applications only. 3- For wattage and size restrictions, see RLM GLOBES option. FINISH - Available in either Architectural Textured, High Gloss, or Galvanized finish. LAMP OPTIONS - Designed to accommodate Incandescent, Compact Fluorescent, and HID lamps. CFL and HID lamps available – order separately; Incandescent lamps by others. MOUNTING - Fixed hub tapped for 3/4" NPT conduit. Compact Fluorescent fixtures are pre-wired with 96" leads. (NOTE: Fixtures not available with cord sets.) REFLECTOR - Heavy-duty, spun Galvanized steel construction. SOCKETS - Incandescent (rated 660 Watt/600 Volt) and HID fixtures (4KV pulse rated) are medium base porcelain. Compact Fluorescent sockets feature smart push-pull thermoplastic design for ease of lamping. CA B Fixture Rated Light Line Reflector Mounting Factory Installed Field Installed Prefix Wattage Source Voltage Color Options Accessories AD 100 (100 Watt Max.) INC - Incandescent 120 BLK - Black LDS96 WL - G6 - Globe3 Ball Aligners AD 150 (150 Watt Max.) Factory prewired PG3 - Globe3 AD 200 (200 Watt Max.) leads for use with Decorative Aligner stem or bracket AD 200 26/32/42 CFL - Compact UE mounting in Wet Locations Gooseneck Fluorescent & Wall Brackets (Globe option required) RUS - Rust Poles & Pole Brackets AL - Galvanized AD 200 50 MH - Metal Halide 120 Remote Ballasts 70 (PG3 Globe option 100 required) Stems 1751 AD 100 50 MP - Metal Halide2 Wire Guards AD 150 70 (for use in open optics) AD 200 100 wet location Not available with Cord Sets MSV - Metallic Silver GWT - Gloss White GBK - Gloss Black GRD - Gloss Red GGN - Gloss Green GPT - Textured Graphite RUS - Textured Rust SVG - Satin Verde Green GAL - Galvanized COLOR SELECT CTS – Low Luster Citrus IND – Low Luster Indigo LAG – Low Luster Lagoon SAL – Low Luster Salsa SGP – Low Luster Sage Peal TCA – Low Luster Terra Cotta ABOLITE ANGLED REFLECTOR Fixture Prefix Height (A) Diameter (B) Neck (C) Weight (lbs./kg) AD 100 10" (254mm) 7" (178mm) 5" (127mm) 2.0 (.9kg) AD 150 11-1/2" (292mm) 9" (229mm) 5-1/4" (133mm) 2.0 (.9kg) AD 200 13-1/2" (343mm) 11" (279mm) 5-1/2" (140mm) 2.5 (1.1kg) AD 200 INC 120 MSV LDS96 WL PG3 Shown with Gooseneck Bracket Accessory 256 © 2007 LSI INDUSTRIES INC.Project Name Fixture Type Catalog # ABOLITE GOOSENECK AND WALL BRACKETS RLM ACCESSORIES6-11/32" (161mm)4-1/2" (114mm) 4-1/2" (114mm) 7-1/2" (191mm) 7-1/2" (191mm) 7-1/2" (191mm) 7-1/2" (191mm) 7-1/2" (191mm) 7-1/2" (191mm) 4-1/2" (114mm) 4-1/2" (114mm) 4-1/2" (114mm) 4-5/8" (117mm) 46o 4-1/2" (114mm) 3" (76mm) 3" (76mm) 3/4" NPT 3/4" NPT 3/4" NPT 3/4" NPT 3/4" NPT 3/4" NPT 3/4" NPT 3/4" NPT ++ 22-1/4" (565mm) 32-5/8" (829mm)+ 48-1/4" (1226mm) 4-1/2"+46o 29-3/4" (756mm) 10-13/16" (275mm) + + 5-3/16" (132mm) 24-3/4" (629mm) 2-1/2" (64mm) + +1-3/4" (45mm) 2-1/2" (64mm)40-1/4" (1022mm) 14-1/2" (368mm) 14-1/2" (368mm) + 54-1/4" (1378mm) 17" (432mm) 23" (584mm) + 6-3/4" (171mm) 32-1/4" (819mm) 43 11-1/2" (292mm) 6" (152mm) 12-3/4" (324mm) ++ 31-3/4" (819mm) 28 2" (51mm) + 46 22-1/4" 6-11/16" (170mm)+ 3" (76mm) + 9" (229mm) Brackets are finished in gloss white powder, other optional colors are available. All brackets suitable for use in wet locations, and mounts to recessed 4” octagon box (by others). Fixtures used in wet locations must be specified “WL” separately. To order, specify catalog number indicated. NOTE: Brackets feature 3/4" stems which slip fit into wall plate (wall end is unthreaded). Conduit may be cut down (in the field by other) to shorten bracket length. CA5 wall plate included with all goosenecks. GB A 3 GWT - 3/4" Single Reflector Gooseneck Wall Bracket. Features rigid conduit and cast wall plate which fits 4" octagonal box (by other). The bracket features a gloss white powder finish. GB B 3 GWT - 3/4" Single Reflector Gooseneck Wall Bracket. Features rigid conduit and cast wall plate which fits 4" octagonal box (by other). The bracket features a gloss white powder finish. GB C 3 GWT - 3/4" Single Reflector Gooseneck Wall Bracket. Features rigid conduit and cast wall plate which fits 4" octagonal box (by other). The bracket features a gloss white powder finish. GB D 3 GWT - 3/4" Single Reflector Gooseneck Wall Bracket. Features rigid conduit and cast wall plate which fits 4" octagonal box (by other). The bracket features a gloss white powder finish. GB E 3 GWT - 3/4" Single Reflector Gooseneck Wall Bracket. Features rigid conduit and cast wall plate which fits 4" octagonal box (by other). The bracket is designed to be mounted to a horizontal surface, but could also be mounted to a wall. The bracket features a gloss white powder finish. GB F 3 GWT - 3/4" Single Reflector Gooseneck Wall Bracket. Features rigid conduit and cast wall plate which fits 4" octagonal box (by other). The bracket features a gloss white powder finish. GB G 3 GWT - 3/4" Single Reflector Gooseneck Wall Bracket. Features rigid conduit and cast wall plate which fits 4" octagonal box (by other). The bracket features a gloss white powder finish. GB H 3 GWT - 3/4" Single Reflector Gooseneck Wall Bracket. Features rigid conduit and cast wall plate which fits 4" octagonal box (by other). The bracket features a gloss white powder finish. 257 © 2007 LSI INDUSTRIES INC.Project Name Fixture Type Catalog # ABOLITE GOOSENECK AND WALL BRACKETS GB K 3 GWT - 3/4" Single Reflector Gooseneck Wall Bracket. Features rigid conduit and cast wall plate which fits 4" octagonal box (by other). The bracket features a gloss white powder finish. GB J 3 GWT - 3/4" Single Reflector Gooseneck Wall Bracket. Features rigid conduit and cast wall plate which fits 4" octagonal box (by other). The bracket features a gloss white powder finish. GB P 3 GWT - 3/4" Single Reflector Gooseneck Wall Bracket. Features rigid conduit and cast wall plate which fits 4" octagonal box (by other). The bracket features a gloss white powder finish. CWBM 1 GWT and CWBL 1 GWT - Contemporary Wall Bracket with gloss white powder finish. Replacement CA 5 - Gloss white powder finish (other colors available). • Mounts to recessed 4” octagon box (by others). DWB 1 GWT - Single Reflector Wall Bracket. Four 5/16” diameter holes are provided for wall mounting The bracket features a gloss white powder finish. 37-1/2" 3/4" NPT 1-3/8" GB U 3 GWT - 3/4" Single Reflector Gooseneck Wall Bracket. Features rigid conduit and cast wall plate which fits 4" octagonal box (by other). The bracket features a gloss white powder finish. 12-5/8" (321mm) 12-5/8" (321mm) + 39" (991mm) 2-1/2" (64mm) + 25-1/4" (641mm) 9" (229mm) 9" (229mm) +3" (76mm) 41-3/16" (1046mm) R 4-1/2" (114mm) 3" (76mm) 15 A B OLITE LIGHTING3-1/2" (89mm) 1-3/4"(44mm) 3/16" (5mm) Holes Accepts 3/4" Conduit 3/8" Set Screws 4-3/4" (121mm) 18-1/4" (464mm) 6" (152mm) 9" (229mm) 5" (127mm) Mounting Hole Centers 4" (102mm) 23-7/8" (606mm) 19-3/4" (502mm) 8" (203mm) 23" (584mm) 20" (508mm) R 9" 9229mm) 20" (508mm) 5-1/2" (140mm) 5-1/2" (140mm) 4-7/8" (124mm) 4-7/8" (124mm) 4" (102mm) 10-1/4" (260mm) 10-1/4" (260mm) 14" (356mm) CWBM 1 GWT CWBL 1 GWT R 6" (152mm) 11" (279mm)11" (279mm) 37-1/2" (953mm) 1-3/8" (35mm) 3/4" NPT 3/4" NPT 3/4" NPT 3/4" NPT 3/4" NPT 4-1/2"(114mm) 258 Type Catalog number ................................... ............................................................................................................................................. ................................... ............................................................................................................................................. Aperture:10-1/8 (27.0) Ceiling opening:12-1/4 (31.1) Overlap trim: 12-5/8 (32.1) 7-3/4 (19.7)) H.I.D. Downlights Square Lens Drop Holophane* Control Lens Wet Location Horizontal Lamp Metal Halide or HPS Lamps Choose the boldface catalog nomenclature that best suits your needs and write it on the appropriate line. Order accessories as separate catalog numbers (shipped separately). Provides compatibility with Lithonia Reloc System 820. Tamperproof (includes two tamperproof screws). Quartz Restrike System (uses D.C. base quartz lamp by others; see other side for wattage restrictions). Emergency circuit (D.C. base socket with leads for connection to external emergency power source; see other side). Single fuse. Double fuse (208V and 240V). Consult factory. Electronic ballast. Encased and potted ballast. Super CWA pulse start ballast (250W only). Example: Metal Halide M100/C/U/MED M150/C/U M175/C/U M250/C/U1 Color-Corrected Metal Halide2 MPC50/C/MED MPC70/C/MED MPC100/C/MED High Pressure Sodium LU70/D/MOG LU100/D/MOG LU150/55/D/MOG Drop Holophane lens Order as separate catalog numbers 24" steel bar hangers (2) for T-bar mounting. Set of 4 T-bar mounting clips for use with bar hangers supplied with unit. (Not for use with BH24). Flush white door Stepped black baffle 13-1/4 (33.7) 24 (61.0) All dimensions are inches (centime- ters). Notes: 1 250M available with encased-and-potted ballast; 120, 277 or 347 volts only. 2 Ceramic arc tube consistent-color lamp. Philips MasterColor or GE ConstantColor. OPTICAL SYSTEM • Diffused anodized aluminum reflector. • Drop Holophane Controlens. DOOR • Die-cast aluminum, gasketed door frame available in flush white or regressed stepped baffle. • Self-aligning butterfly door support springs. MECHANICAL SYSTEM • Die-formed steel upper housing with white polyes- ter powder paint and formed steel lower housing with matte black finish. • Expandable mounting bars provide horizontal and vertical adjustment. • Galvanized steel junction box with bottom-hinged access covers and spring latches. Two combi- nation 1/2"-3/4" knockouts and three 1/2" knock- outs for straight-through conduit runs. Capacity: 8 (4 in, 4 out) No. 12 AWG conductors rated for 90oC. ELECTRICAL SYSTEM • Horizontally-mounted, mogul-base porcelain socket with nickel-plated screw shell. • Prewired HPF core-and-coil ballast. • Thermally-activated insulation detector. LISTING • Fixtures are UL listed for thru-branch wiring, re- cessed mounting and wet locations. Listed and labeled to comply with Canadian Standards. 250M 12FW 120 SCWA OB LAH 250M 12FW FHL 120 SCWA 259 ©2003 Gotham, Rev. 01/03 DHID-450.P65 Square Lens, Gotham Series From 0° cp. Lumens 0° 32365° 3210 30515° 2917 82025° 2291 106235° 1617 101445° 911 72555° 523 47965° 341 34275° 233 24785° 141 15490° 98 Zone Lumens %lamp 0°-30°2186 18.20°-40°3200 26.70°-60°4405 36.70°-90°5148 42.990°-180° 0 0.00°-180°5319 44.3* * Fixture efficiency , 175W M175/C/U lamp, 1.0 s/mh, 12000 rated lumens, test no. 2189020903 f 20% c 80% 50% 30% w 50% 30% 50% 30% 50% 30% 14745444342412434040383837339363634353343532343132305332931283028630272926282572724262426238252224222421924202320222010 22 19 21 18 21 18 , 250W M250/C/U lamp, 1.0 s/mh, 20500 rated lumens, test no. 2189020904 f 20% c 80% 50% 30% w 50% 30% 50% 30% 50% 30% 15856545251502524747474745347444542434144440413840375403638353734637333532343173430322931288312730272926929252824272410 27 23 26 23 25 22 Zone Lumens %lamp 0–30°4600 22.4 0–40°6708 32.70–60°9233 45.00–90°10805 52.790–180° 0 0.00–180°11182 54.6* * Fixture efficiency 50% 10% beam angle 51.2° beam angle 89.9° Initial fc fc at fc at Mount at beam Beam beam Beam beam height center diameter edge diameter edge 8' 228.7 5.3' 114.4 10.9' 22.910' 123.0 7.2' 61.5 14.9' 12.312' 76.7 9.1' 38.3 18.9' 7.714' 52.3 11.0' 26.2 22.8' 5.216' 38.0 12.9' 19.0 26.8' 3.8 50% 10% beam angle 52.0° beam angle 89.9° Initial fc fc at fc at Mount at beam Beam beam Beam beam height center diameter edge diameter edge 8' 107.0 5.4'53.5 5.4'10.710' 57.5 7.3' 28.8 15.0' 5.812' 35.9 9.3' 17.9 19.0' 3.614' 24.5 11.2' 12.2 23.0' 2.416' 17.8 13.2' 8.9 27.0' 1.8 0° 0° 45° 90° 45° 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 90° From 0° cp. Lumens 0° 53305° 5306 50415° 4836 135625° 3681 170635° 2478 156245° 1366 108955° 776 71365° 499 50275° 336 35785° 206 22490° 140 , 150W LU150/55/D/MOG lamp, 1.0 s/mh, 15000 rated lumens, test no. 2189020801 f 20% c 80% 50% 30% w 50% 30% 50% 30% 50% 30% 15857545352512535050484846348454643444244541423941385413739363835638343633353273531333033308322831283027930262926282510 28 24 27 24 26 23 Zone Lumens %lamp 0–30°3567 23.90–40°5128 34.20–60°6929 46.20–90°8012 53.490–180° 0 0.00–180°8252 55.0* * Fixture efficiency 50% 10% beam angle 51.0° beam angle 88.4° Initial fc fc at fc at Mount at beam Beam beam Beam beam height center diameter edge diameter edge 8' 176.2 5.2' 88.1 10.7' 17.610' 94.8 7.2' 47.4 14.6' 9.512' 59.1 9.1' 29.5 18.5' 5.914' 40.3 11.0' 20.2 22.4' 4.016' 29.3 12.9' 14.6 26.3' 2.9 0° 90° 45° 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 From 0° cp. Lumens 0° 69185° 6840 64915° 6161 173225° 4793 222035° 3361 210845° 1905 151655° 1102 100965° 716 72175° 492 52285° 303 13190° 208 Use multiplier to determinecandlepower, lumens andfootcandles of other lamps. 100M = 175M X .57 70S = 150S x .40 100S = 150S x .59 HID Maximum Lamp wattage wattage type <100W 100 150W 150 Double contact 175W 150 bayonet base 250W 250 Wattage/Maximum Line Current Input Ballast 120V 208V 240V 277V 347V watts Metal Halide (Power Factor 90%) 100M HX-HPF 2.60 1.50 1.30 1.15 1.00 130 175M CWA 1.80 1.10 .90 .80 .65 210 250M CWA 3.05 1.65 1.55 1.25 1.05 294 High Pressure Sodium (Power Factor 90%) 70S HX-HPF 1.45 .85 .75 .65 .52 94 100S HX-HPF 2.20 1.40 1.10 .95 .70 130 150S HX-HPF 3.00 1.65 1.45 1.25 1.00 188 Tested to current IES and NEMA standards under stabilized laboratory conditions. Various operating factors can cause differences between laboratory data and actual field measure- ments. Dimensions and specifications are based on the most current available data and are subject to change. 260 Type Catalog number ..................................... ...................................................................................................................................................... ..................................... ...................................................................................................................................................... Example: OPTICAL • Reflector – Self-flanged, specular clear or semi-diffuse reflector. Optically designed for 45 degree cutoff to lamp and lamp image. Minimum flange matches reflector finish. White painted flange optional. • Baffle/cone – Specular clear upper reflector. Microgroove baffle with white painted flange or specular black cone with flange that matches cone finish. MECHANICAL • 16-gauge galvanized steel mounting/plaster frame with friction support springs to retain optical system. Accommodates up to 7/8” thick ceiling standard. See Accessories for increased ceiling thickness capability. • Mounting bars are 16-gauge galvanized steel with continuous 4” vertical adjustment, held in place with tool- less, cam-action locking system. Post installation adjustment possible without the use of tools from above or below the ceiling. Shipped pre-installed. • Galvanized steel junction box with bottom-hinged access covers and spring latches. Two combination ½”-3/4” and four ½” knockouts for straight-through conduit runs. Capacity: 8 (4 in, 4 out) No. 12 AWG conductors rated for 90°C. ELECTRICAL SYSTEM • Die-cast aluminum lampholder housing. Designed for effective heat dissipation and positive light center positioning. • Mogul-base porcelain socket with nickel-plated screw shell. • Prewired, encased-and-potted, 120/277V or 120/347V ballast tray module. Module can be attached before or after mounting of mounting/plaster frame. • Thermally-activated insulation detector. Listing • Fixtures are UL Listed for thru-branch wiring, recessed mounting and damp locations. Listed and labeled to comply with Canadian Standards (see Options). *Alzak is a registered trademark of ALCOA. Order as separate catalog numbers. Sloped ceiling adaptor. Degree of slope must be specified (10D, 15D, 20D, 25D, 30D). Ex: SC10 . Ceiling thickness adaptor (extends mounting frame to accommodate ceiling thickness up to 2"). Clear Champagne gold Gold Wheat Umber Pewter Aperture:9-3/4 (24.8) Ceiling opening:10-3/8 (26.4) Overlap trim: 10-3/4 (27.3) HID Downlights Open Reflector MH or HPS Lamp 17-15/16 (45.5) 21-11/16 (55.1) 15-1-4 (38.7) All dimensions are inches (centimeters). Metal Halide (includes required safety glass) M175/C/BU/BD M250/C/U High Pressure Sodium LU70/MED LU100/MED LU150/55/MED Choose the boldface catalog nomenclature that best suits your needs and write it on the appropriate line. Order accessories as separate catalog numbers (shipped separately). With lamp (shipped separately). White painted flange. Provides compatibility with Lithonia Reloc System 820. Quartz restrike system (uses maximum 150W DC base quartz lamp by others). Emergency circuit (DC socket with leads for con- nection to external emergency power source; maximum150W lamp). Single fuse. Quartz restrike system with time delay. Listed and labeled to comply with Canadian Stan- dards. Super CWA pulse start ballast Safety glasses (with socket for enclosed metal halide, 150W andbelow). (blank)Specular low irides- cent Semi- diffuse low irides- cent OB LAH 250M 12FW FHL 120 SCWA 250M 12FW 120 120 CGL-SCWA 261 From 0° cp. Lumens 0° 67675° 6809 66115° 7116 199325° 4994 234935° 2597 167945° 1051 85155° 99 16565° 12 1275° 4 485° 1 190° 1 0 Zone Lumens %lamp 0°-30°5003 33.30°-40°6682 44.50°-60°7698 51.30°-90°7715 51.490°-180° 0 0.00°-180°7715 51.4* * Efficiency 175W M175/C/U lamp, 1.0 s/mh, 15000 rated lumens, test no. 2189062303 50% 10% beam angle 52.3° beam angle 82.5° Initial fc fc at fc at Mount at beam Beam beam Beam beam height center diameter edge diameter edge 8' 120.3 7.4' 60.2 13.2' 12.0 10' 75.0 9.3' 37.5 16.7' 7.512' 51.2 11.3' 25.6 20.2' 5.114' 37.1 13.3' 18.6 23.7' 3.716' 28.2 15.2' 14.1 27.2' 2.8 f 20% c 80% 50% 30% w 50% 30% 50% 30% 50% 30% 1 6766 6362 61602 6361 6058 58573 5957 5755 56544 5653 5452 53515 5349 5148 50486 5046 4846 48457 4743 4643 45428 4441 4340 42409 4138 4037 403710 39 36 38 35 38 35 50% 10% beam angle 64.0° beam angle 90.0° Initial fc fc at fc at Mount at beam Beam beam Beam beam height center diameter edge diameter edge 8' 217.2 6.9' 108.6 11.0' 21.710' 116.8 9.4' 58.4 15.0' 11.712' 72.8 11.9' 36.4 19.0' 7.314' 49.7 14.4' 24.8 23.0' 5.016' 36.0 16.9' 18.0 27.0' 3.6 Open Reflector, Gotham Series ©2003 Gotham, Rev. 01/03 DHID-270.p65 Tested to current IES and NEMA standards under stabilized laboratory conditions. Various operating factors can cause differences between laboratory data and actual field measurements. Dimensions and specifications on this catalog sheet are based on the most current available data and are subject to change without notice. From 0° cp. Lumens 0° 83795° 8528 81115° 8500 239525° 7906 357135° 5222 330845° 2460 195555° 651 65765° 80 10275° 0 285° 0 090° 0 Zone Lumens %lamp 0°-30°6777 33.060°-40°10084 49.190°-60°12696 61.930°-90°12799 62.4490°-180° 0 0.00°-180°12799 62.44* * Efficiency f 20% c 80% 50% 30% w 50% 30% 50% 30% 50% 30% 1 6968 6866 65642 6462 6361 61593 6057 5956 57554 5652 5552 54515 5248 5148 50476 4844 4844 47447 4541 4441 43408 4138 4137 40379 3835 3834 373410 36 32 35 32 35 31 From 0° cp. Lumens 0° 65695° 6695 64515° 7398 206025° 6970 315135° 4356 280245° 1862 149055° 258 32965° 1 275° 0 085° 0 090° 0 , 150W LU150/55/MED lamp, 1.2 s/mh, 15000 rated lumens, test no. 2191070802 f 20% c 80% 50% 30% w 50% 30% 50% 30% 50% 30% 1 7776 7674 73722 7370 7169 69673 6864 6764 65624 6360 6359 61585 5955 5855 57546 5551 5551 54507 5147 5147 50468 4844 4743 47439 4440 4440 433910 41 37 41 37 40 36 Zone Lumens %lamp 0°-30°5855 39.040°-40°8657 57.720°-60°10475 69.840°-90°10477 69.8590°-180° 0 0.00°-180°10477 69.85* * Efficiency 50% 10% beam angle 61.4° beam angle 90.6° Initial fc fc at fc at Mount at beam Beam beam Beam beam height center diameter edge diameter edge 8' 277.0 6.5' 138.5 11.1' 27.710' 149.0 8.9' 74.5 15.1' 14.912' 92.9 11.3' 46.4 19.2' 9.314' 63.4 13.7' 31.7 23.2' 6.316' 46.0 16.0' 23.0 27.3' 4.6 Maximum Maximum line current line current Input Ballast 120/277 120/347 watts Metal Halide (Power Factor 90%) 175W CWA 2.00/0.87 1.90/0.65 205/208 250W CWA 2.60/1.12 2.50/0.85 290/285 High Pressure Sodium (Power Factor 90%) 70W HX 1.45/.65 1.35/.45 90/94 100W HX 1.67/.80 1.90/.90 125 150W HX 2.55/1.17 2.55/0.90 185 IMPORTANT: Plug-in insulated receptacles provided are polarized and marked 120 or 277. Fixture is shipped with ballast plugged into 277. For 120V operation, plug into 120 receptacle. 90° 45° 0° 90° 45° 0° 1500 3000 4500 6000 7500 90° 45° 0° , 250W M250/C/U lamp, 1.2 s/mh, 20500 rated lumens, test no. 2191070302 1450 2900 4350 5800 7500 1800 3600 5400 7200 9000 Use multiplier to determine candlepower, lumens and footcandles of other finishes. CR = .95; GR = .90 262 Ordering Information SpecificationsDimensions ®Architectural Cutoff Hubbell Lighting, Inc., 2000 Electric Way, Christiansburg, Virginia 24073, (540) 382-6111 • Fax (540) 382-1526 Submitted by: Comments See back for Photometrics Job Type OTD 1 - 8/98 NRTL/C Catalog Number Catalog Number Vertical Lamp 1 MSVMAGNUSQUARE® II SERIES HP06805 MSV ABC 14.7" 12.2" 21.0" sq. 374 mm 309 mm 533 mm series mounting wattage source distribution voltage finish options MSV A Housing Rugged, one piece aluminum, formed and welded for long term weatherability. Ballast Mounted to a pre-galvanized steel end support which ties into arm or yoke for secure, cool operation. Lens / Door Frame Door assembly is hinged and held in place by twin securing screws. A one piece lens gasket seals to reflector giving protection from dirt and insects. Lektrocote® Finish Electrostatically applied powder coating, high temperature bonded to surface for maximum adherence and finish hardness. Additional Features All fixtures supplied with lamp for installation convenience. Various optical distributions available. A selection of mounting arms and adapters allow use on new or existing poles. Hubbell SSP steel of SAP aluminum poles are recommended. Units are NRTL/C certified and UL listed for use in North America. SERIES MSV Magnusquare® II Series - Vertical Lamp MOUNTING A Arm mount WATTAGE 400 400W 1000 1000W (metal halide only) SOURCE S High Pressure Sodium H Metal Halide DISTRIBUTION 1 VI Type I VP Type III VT Type IV VW Type V sq. VOLTAGE 5 480V 6 Tri-Tap (120, 277, 347V) 8 QuadTap® (120, 208, 240, 277V) LEKTROCOTE FINISH 1 Bronze 2 Black 3 Gray 4 White OPTIONS A1 10" arm shipped in fixture carton A4 4" arm shipped in fixture carton PCR(X)2 Twist-Lock photocontrol receptacle (specify voltage) (photocontrol ordered separately) F(X)2 Fusing (specify voltage) 1. Change letter V to B for high performance reflector. 2. Substitute voltage for "X" (1-120V;2-208V;3-240V;4-277V;5-480V;6-347V) Accessories must be ordered separately. See Accessories. B C A 263 Ordering Information ® Lighting, Inc. MSVMAGNUSQUARE® II SERIES Vertical Lamp Hubbell Lighting, Inc., 2000 Electric Way, Christiansburg, Virginia 24073, (540) 382-6111 • Fax (540) 382-1526 • http://www.hubbell-ltg.com/ Hubbell Canada, Inc., 870 Brock Road South, Pickering, Ontario L1W1Z8, (905) 839-1138 • Fax (905) 839-9108 • http://www.hubbell-canada.com/ ACCESSORY - Must be ordered separately Catalog Number Description Weight EPA lbs kg ft2 m2 MSV-GS Glare shield — field drilled to desired orientation - mounting hardware included. Flat black finish. 1.7 .8 1.1 .11 264 ® Lighting, Inc. Hubbell Lighting, Inc., 2000 Electric Way, Christiansburg, Virginia 24073, (540) 382-6111 • Fax (540) 382-1526 • http://www.hubbell-ltg.com/ Hubbell Canada, Inc., 870 Brock Road South, Pickering, Ontario L1W1Z8, (905) 839-1138 • Fax (905) 839-9108 • http://www.hubbell-canada.com/ Vertical Lamp Photometrics MSVMAGNUSQUARE® II SERIES 265 266 To: Brian Krueger, Associate City Planner, City of Bozeman From: Steve Laufenberg, Senior Environmental Scientist Joel Moore, Environmental Scientist Date: August 7, 2008 Re: Bozeman CVS/Pharmacy –Weed Management Plan MMI # 4480.001.01 cc: Jon Lennander, Velmeir Companies Thomas Eastwood, P.E., MMI The proposed site of a CVS/pharmacy retail center featuring a new CVS pharmacy and retail store, and three additional retail facilities (see attached Site Layout Plan), was investigated for the presence of noxious weeds on July 25, 2008 by Morrison-Maierle, Inc., Environmental Services Group (MMI). The proposed project area is located at the current location of Billion Auto Group at the intersection of North 19th Avenue and West Main Street in Bozeman, Montana. The legal description of the approximately 4.3-acre project area is a portion of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 11, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, P.M.M., Gallatin County, Montana. The proposed project is likely to be completed through phased development. The initial project phase (Phase 1), identified in the attached modified Overall Site Layout Plan, will include the construction of the CVS pharmacy structure, sidewalks, associated parking areas, and access driveways. Remaining project phases are anticipated to be completed within 2 years of the commencement of Phase 1 and will include the construction of the remaining three retail structures, associated parking areas, and sidewalks. All undeveloped areas will be landscaped following the completion of the project phase, as depicted in the attached Landscape Plan. The majority of the proposed project area is currently paved as the Billion Auto Group lot. Unpaved areas within the subject property are limited to narrow grass/landscaped strips adjacent to West Main Street to the south, North 19th Avenue to the east, North 20th Avenue to the northwest, and along the boundary with Pierce Flooring in the southwestern portion of the project area. Additionally, a narrow (approximately 8 feet wide) area of gravel and shrubs separates the current Billion Auto Group lot with the parking area of Town and Country Foods along the northern boundary of the project area. Approximately 50 square feet of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense), a state-listed noxious weed, was identified within the narrow vegetated strip Technical Memo 267 CVS Pharmacy –Weed Management Plan (MMI# 4480.001.01) Page 2 Morrison-Maierle, Inc., Environmental Services Group August 2008 located immediately north of Pierce Flooring within the proposed project area (see attached Site Layout Plan). This small area of weed infestation appears to extend into a portion of the Pierce Flooring property. CVS/pharmacy will assume responsibility for the control of noxious weeds on the subject property from the commencement of site construction activities through the completion of landscaping associated with full build-out of the project. The identified area of Canada thistle infestation will be spot-sprayed with Milestone® at the recommended rate of 6 ounces per acre each spring until elimination of noxious weed species or completion of the project/landscaping activities. CVS/pharmacy will assume responsibility for controlling new weed infestations within the proposed project area associated with phased construction activities from the commencement of construction activities through the completion of landscaping associated with full build-out of the project. Jon Lennander, Velmeir Companies Date 268 269 270 271 Traffic Impact Study for CVS/pharmacy Bozeman, Montana August 2008 Prepared For: CVS/pharmacy c/o The Velmeir Companies 5757 West Maple Road, Suite 800 West Bloomfield, MI 48322-2277 Prepared By: Morrison-Maierle, Inc. 2880 Technology Boulevard West Bozeman, MT 59718 Phone: (406) 587-0721 Fax: (406) 922-6702 MMI Project No. 4571.001.06.010.0310 272 i TABLE OF CONTENTS Purpose of Report and Study Objectives.............................. 1 Proposed Development........................................................................1 Location...................................................................................................................... 1 Land Use and Intensity .............................................................................................. 1 Site Access...................................................................................................................2 Zoning.........................................................................................................................4 Parking........................................................................................................................5 Development Horizon ................................................................................................5 Existing Area Conditions.....................................................................6 Study Area...................................................................................................................6 Study Area Land Use ..................................................................................................6 Site Accessibility.........................................................................................................6 Area Roadway System......................................................................................................................6 Traffic Volumes.................................................................................................................................8 Transit Service...................................................................................................................................8 Pedestrians and Bicyclists ..............................................................................................................10 Projected Traffic.............................................................................. 10 Site Traffic................................................................................................................. 10 Trip Generation...............................................................................................................................10 Trip Distribution.............................................................................................................................11 Modal Split.......................................................................................................................................12 Trip Assignment..............................................................................................................................13 Existing Land Use Traffic........................................................................................ 13 Through Traffic ........................................................................................................ 15 Method of Projection.....................................................................................................................15 Estimated Volumes.........................................................................................................................15 Total Traffic.............................................................................................................. 15 Transportation Analysis.................................................................. 18 Capacity and Level of Service................................................................................... 18 Existing Conditions........................................................................................................................18 Background Conditions.................................................................................................................18 Total Traffic.....................................................................................................................................18 Site Access................................................................................................................. 19 Drive-Through Service..............................................................................................22 Improvement Analysis ....................................................................... 22 Improvements to Accommodate Existing Traffic....................................................22 Improvements to Accommodate Background Traffic .............................................23 Additional Improvements to Accommodate Site Traffic.........................................24 273 ii Findings ................................................................................................ 24 Conclusions and Recommendations .............................................. 25 Site Access.................................................................................................................25 Off-Site Improvements .............................................................................................25 Existing Conditions........................................................................................................................25 Non-Site and Total Traffic Conditions.......................................................................................26 References .......................................................................................... 27 Appendix A – Traffic Volume Data Appendix B – Trip Generation Data Appendix C – Capacity and Level of Service Analyses: Existing Conditions Appendix D – Capacity and Level of Service Analyses: Estimated 2012 Non-Site Traffic Appendix E – Capacity and Level of Service Analyses: Estimated 2012 Total Traffic Appendix F – Improvement Analyses: Existing Conditions Appendix G – Improvement Analyses: Estimated 2012 Background Conditions Appendix H – Improvement Analyses: Estimated 2012 Total Traffic Conditions Appendix I – Queuing Analysis 274 iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 – Site Location.................................................................................................................................2 Figure 2 – Site Layout....................................................................................................................................3 Figure 3 – Current Daily Traffic Volumes ...............................................................................................9 Figure 4 – Directional Distribution of Site Traffic ..............................................................................11 Figure 5 – Site Traffic ..................................................................................................................................14 Figure 6 – Estimated 2012 Non-Site Traffic..........................................................................................16 Figure 7 – Estimated 2012 Total Traffic.................................................................................................17 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 – Off-Street Parking Requirements ............................................................................................5 Table 2 – Estimated Site Traffic Generation ........................................................................................10 Table 3 – Estimated Vehicle Trip Reduction .......................................................................................12 Table 4 – Estimated Pass-By, Internal, and New External Site Traffic Generation.................13 Table 5 – Existing Intersection Operations Summary.......................................................................19 Table 6 – Estimated 2012 Non-Site Traffic Intersection Operations Summary.........................20 Table 7 – Estimated 2012 Total Traffic Intersection Operations Summary................................21 Table 8 – Existing Intersection Mitigation Measures Summary....................................................23 Table 9 – Estimated 2012 Non-Site Traffic Intersection Mitigation Measures Summary .............................................................................................23 Table 10 – Estimated 2012 Total Traffic Intersection Mitigation Measures Summary .............................................................................................24 275 Traffic Impact Study For CVS/pharmacy 276 1 Traffic Impact Study –CVS/pharmacy Purpose of Report and Study Objectives This traffic impact study summarizes the potential impacts from the proposed CVS/pharmacy in Bozeman, Montana. The information presented in this report is intended to evaluate the safety and operational aspects of the transportation system in the area of the proposed development under existing conditions as well as with estimated impacts. Study recommendations and conclusions are intended to provide guidance with respect to the function of the proposed site accesses and the area transportation system. Proposed Development Location The proposed development is located in Bozeman, Montana on Lots 1 and 2A, Block 8 of West Park Manor, First Addition in the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 11, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, Principal Meridian of Montana. Generally, the property is bordered by North 19th Avenue to the east, West Main Street to the south, North 20th Avenue and Pierce Flooring to the west, and the Town & Country grocery store to the north. The site location is depicted in Figure 1 on the following page. Land Use and Intensity The proposed site would include four buildings on a total site area of approximately 4.36 acres (189,728 ft2). The proposed CVS/pharmacy building would be approximately 14,480 square feet (ft2) in size. The additional buildings proposed for the site include two potential retail uses (6,000 and 4,460 ft2) as well as a potential office/bank/retail building approximately 12,000 ft2 in size. The proposed site layout is shown in Figure 2. 277 2 Traffic Impact Study –CVS/pharmacy HUFFINE LN PROPOSEDPROPOSEDPROPOSEDPROPOSED SITESITESITESITE 11THAVES19THAVES19THAVENDURSTON RD OAK ST 7THAVENBABCOCK STW WILLSONAVESMAIN ST ROUSEAVENFOWLERLNBAXTER LN GARFIELD STW COLLEGE STW Figure 1 Site Location Site Access It is proposed that the development would utilize three of the four existing accesses to the site. On North 19th Avenue, the southernmost existing access to the site would be removed. The northern full access would be utilized with minor modifications. It would be reconstructed to a City of Bozeman standard non-residential boulevard style approach. It is proposed to remain as a full access approach with a reduction in width from approximately 39 feet to 30 feet. 278 3 Traffic Impact Study –CVS/pharmacy Figure 2 Site Layout 279 4 Traffic Impact Study –CVS/pharmacy The existing access to West Main Street (US 191) is in conflict with the access spacing standards of the City of Bozeman. For developments approved prior to July 10, 2002, access to an arterial in commercial/industrial district must be a minimum of 200 feet from the nearest intersection. Presently, the south access to the site is approximately 150 feet west of the intersection of West Main Street and North 19th Avenue. For developments approved after July 10, 2002, access to an arterial must be a minimum of 315 feet from the nearest intersection or other public and/or private accesses. There is a private access to West Main Street located approximately 150 feet to the west of the south access to the proposed CVS/pharmacy site. Additional discussion on access spacing, safety, and operation is included later in this study. Utilizing the south access to West Main Street (US 191), minor modifications would be incorporated including a reduction in width from approximately 40 feet to 26 feet with its reconstruction to a City of Bozeman standard non-residential style approach. The access would retain right-in, right-out movement restrictions. Because the access to North 20th Avenue is presently in poor condition, it would also be reconstructed to City of Bozeman standards. The existing sidewalk sections on either side of the approach would be connected at grade and the existing accessibility ramp removed. A boulevard style approach would provide the transition from the street surface to the sidewalk. Zoning The proposed development property is currently zoned B-2 under the City of Bozeman’s zoning designation. The Unified Development Ordinance (City of Bozeman, August 15, 2007) states: “The intent of the B-2 community business district is to provide for a broad range of mutually supportive retail and service functions located in clustered areas bordered on one or more sides by limited access arterial streets.” The portions of the property adjacent to North 19th Avenue and West Main Street are also within the City’s Class II Entryway Corridor Overlay District. For this district the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) provides assurance that the quality of development along these corridors will enhance the impression and enjoyment of the community both by guiding development and stimulating and assisting improvements in signage, landscaping, access, and other contributing elements of entry corridor appearance and function. 280 5 Traffic Impact Study –CVS/pharmacy Parking Off-street parking requirements are defined in the UDO based on the type of land use for a commercial development. As shown in Table 1, there are some land uses that have excess parking and others that are deficient on parking; however, the combined parking spaces provided (121 total) for the development falls within the minimum and maximum number of spaces required. Table 1 Off-Street Parking Requirements Land Use Type Gross Floor Area (ft2) Net Floor Area - 85% of Gross - (ft2) Parking Spaces Required By Ordinance Total Parking Spaces Required1 Total Parking Spaces Provided Building Pad 1 (South – Retail) 6,000 5,100 1 space per 300 ft2 of floor area 15 – 21 22 Building Pad 2 CVS/pharmacy (Retail) 14,480 12,308 1 space per 300 ft2 of floor area 38 – 52 55 Building Pad 3 (North – Bank/Office/Retail) 12,000 10,200 1 space per 250 ft2 of floor area, minimum of 4 37 – 51 23 Building Pad 4 (West – Retail) 4,460 3,791 1 space per 300 ft2 of floor area 12 – 16 21 Total Site 36,940 31,399 102 – 140 121 Development Horizon It is currently proposed to install the improvements necessary to serve the proposed CVS/pharmacy site with the initial development. Additional site improvements would be completed with the development of each remaining building pad site. It is estimated that full build-out of the site would occur by 2012. Because this is a small development (having less than 500 estimated peak hour trips), it is not anticipated that this development would have significant impacts beyond its opening year assuming full build-out and occupancy. Therefore, this study will assess any impacts this development may have on the area transportation system in the year 2012. 1The range of parking spaces provided in Table 1 above shows the minimum (including the allowable 10% maximum reduction in parking for site located within a commercial node, BMC Section 18.46.040.B.3.b) and maximum (defined as 125% of the minimum spaces required for the net floor area, BMC Section 18.46.040.B.2) range of parking spaces required with the associated development. 281 6 Traffic Impact Study –CVS/pharmacy Existing Area Conditions Study Area The transportation impacts from a development are largely dependant on its location and size as well as the characteristics of the surrounding transportation system. The CVS/pharmacy site is not significantly large in size; therefore, it has a limited impact area on the transportation system. It is estimated that the most significant impacts would generally be located at the adjacent signalized intersections on North 19th Avenue, the site accesses, and the intersection of North 20th Avenue and West Beall Street. Study Area Land Use The intersection of West Main Street (US 191) and North 19th Avenue is one of the commercial nodes within Bozeman. To the north of the proposed CVS/pharmacy development is the Town & Country grocery store. Pierce Flooring & Design is located in the existing building to the immediate west of the site. A city park is located across North 20th Avenue to the northwest. To the east, a small group of professional offices, a former automotive dealership, and a restaurant/casino are located across North 19th Avenue. The automotive dealership, which is currently vacant, has recently relocated west of Bozeman. An additional automotive dealership is located on the southeast corner of the West Main Street and North 19th Avenue intersection. On the south side of West Main Street, there is an existing gas station and fast food restaurant. Site Accessibility Area Roadway System The development could have potential impacts to the roadways of West Main Street (US 191), North 19th Avenue, and North 20th Avenue. Potentially impacted intersections include West Main Street and its intersections with North 19th Avenue and the existing access, North 19th Avenue and its intersections with the northerly existing access and West Beall Street, and to the intersection of North 20th Avenue and West Beall Street. 282 7 Traffic Impact Study –CVS/pharmacy West Main Street (US 191) is a State of Montana primary route (P-50) and is under the jurisdiction of the Montana Department of Transportation (MDT). It is classified as a principal arterial roadway by the Greater Bozeman Area Transportation Plan Year 2001 Update (Robert Peccia & Associates, June 2001). It serves as a major route within Bozeman, linking its central business district to Interstate 90 to the east and commercial centers to the west. This route is used by recreational and tourism related traffic for access to Yellowstone National Park. It also provides access to Bozeman High School and links the north-south arterial roadways throughout Bozeman. Adjacent to the site, West Main Street is currently a four-lane paved roadway separated by a raised median. The posted speed limit adjacent to the site is 35 miles per hour (mph). North 19th Avenue is also classified as a principal arterial by the Greater Bozeman Area Transportation Plan Year 2001 Update (GBATP). Additionally, it is an urban system route (U-1201) under MDT’s functional classification. This route serves as a commuter route between Bozeman and communities to the west as well as a major commercial corridor from its junction with Interstate 90 to the north to West Main Street. It is also a primary link to the Montana State University campus. Adjacent to the site, North 19th Avenue is currently a four-lane paved roadway separated by a raised median. The posted speed limit adjacent to the site is 25 mph. Both North 20th Avenue and West Beall Street are classified as local streets. They are paved roadways, having two-way traffic with single travel lanes in each direction. By ordinance, the roadways have a speed limit of 25 mph. The intersection of West Main Street and North 19th Avenue is a signalized intersection. On the northbound approach, there is currently a left turn, two through, and a dedicated right turn lane. The southbound approach includes a left turn, through, and a right turn lane. The eastbound approach includes two left turn, a through, and a shared through-right turn lane. Lastly, the westbound approach includes a left turn, two through, and a right turn lane. Pin-down curb is in place on both the southbound and westbound approaches for the future addition of lanes with the anticipated widening of South 19th Avenue from West Babcock Street to Kagy Boulevard. The signal control includes semi-actuated operation with actuations for the left turn bays. Due to the dual-left turn on the eastbound approach, the signal operates with a variety of phases. However, during peak periods split-phase operation is typical. 283 8 Traffic Impact Study –CVS/pharmacy The northerly existing access to the site from North 19th Avenue currently functions as a two-way stop controlled intersection. The north and southbound approaches on North 19th Avenue include a left turn, through, and shared through-right turn lane. The east and westbound approaches provide access to private developments and each includes a single lane to accommodate all available vehicular movements. The intersection of North 19th Avenue and West Beall Street is also a signalized intersection. Its geometry is similar to that of the northerly existing access to the JC Billion site. Presently, the traffic signal is under two phase operation, having one phase for north and southbound movements and another for east and westbound movements. The intersection of West Beall Street and North 20th Avenue has all-way stop control. Single lanes are available on each approach to accommodate all available vehicular movements. The eastbound approach also includes a raised median, which is approximately 20 feet in length and separates the east and westbound movements. As stated previously, the existing access to the site from West Main Street is restricted to right-in, right-out movements only. The access restriction is created by the raised median on West Main Street. Operationally, the access functions under stop control, although it is not posted as such. Traffic Volumes Intersection turning movement counts were conducted at the study area intersections by Morrison- Maierle, Inc. during July 2008. It should be noted that turning movement count data was collected when regular classes at Montana State University – Bozeman (MSU) were not in session. Therefore, the identified traffic volumes may not be representative of condition experienced during most of the year. Particularly, West Main Street and North 19th Avenue serve as primary commuter routes for travel to the MSU campus. The peak hour volumes found at each of the study area intersections are shown in Figure 3 on the following page. The count data is also provided in Appendix A. No daily or monthly adjustments were made to the count data for any of the study area intersections. Transit Service In 2006, Streamline was initiated in Gallatin County. This bus system currently provides service to Belgrade, Bozeman, Four Corners, and MSU. Additionally, Streamline is currently free for all passengers, which creates an incentive for bus ridership. Streamline’s Redline Downtown route, 284 9 Traffic Impact Study –CVS/pharmacy which provides service from Robert’s Hall on the MSU campus, to the downtown area, west to the Gallatin Valley Mall and Bozeman Ponds, east to Bozeman High School, and back to Robert’s Hall, currently travels immediately adjacent to the proposed site on West Main Street with directed stops at West Babcock Street and the Hastings Shopping Center. Additional routes may be added to Streamline as the system expands in the future. PROPOSEDPROPOSEDPROPOSEDPROPOSED SITESITESITESITE 19THAVENLEGEND XX (XX) AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS 1 1 71 288 74 87 312 79 (109) (520) (125) (147) (681) (179)246 427 116 (385) (445)(151) 19 389 423 (60) (633) (205) BEALL STW MAIN STW20THAVEN 19THAVES2 34 5 2 3 4 5 618 11 (1170) (5)9 (8) 613 (1116) 17 574 19 9 1 7 (8) (1190)(10) (8) (0) (32)10 775 34 (8) (889) (21) 6 2 0 (11) (0) (5) 14 493 11 18 13 10 (37) (1005) (49) (31) (37) (19)33 839 9 (21) (888) (21) 31 24 24 (40) (46) (65) 8815 25 24 6 (52) (27) (75) (31) (69) (13)128 (2) (7) (2) 30 55 0 (52) (71) (4) Figure 3 Current Daily Traffic Volumes 285 10 Traffic Impact Study –CVS/pharmacy Pedestrians and Bicyclists Provisions for the safety and accommodation of bicyclists and pedestrians are an important consideration with any development. These alternative modes of travel are becoming increasingly popular as a means of saving money, helping the environment, and improving personal health. Consideration of alternative modes of travel for the proposed site development is provided with sidewalk connections from the adjacent streets onto and throughout the site. In addition, bicycle racks and benches are proposed at key locations within the proposed development. Projected Traffic Site Traffic Trip Generation One of the most important elements in assessing the traffic impacts associated with a new development is an accurate estimate of the traffic to be generated. There are a number of options available for estimating trip generation. This study utilized Trip Generation, 7th Edition published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Average vehicle trip ends (Trip ends are defined as a single or one-directional travel movement with either the origin or the destination of the trip inside the study site.) were estimated using Land Use Codes (LUC) 814 – Specialty Retail Center, 881 – Pharmacy/Drugstore with Drive-Through Window, and 912 – Drive-in Bank. The independent variables used were 1,000 square feet of gross leasable (LUC 814) and floor area (LUC 881) and employees (LUC 912) in estimating the total site trip generation, which is provided in Table 2 below. Table 2 Estimated Site Traffic Generation Average Weekday AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use Units Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Specialty Retail Center 10.5 233 232 465 35 37 72 21 26 47 Pharmacy/Drugstore w/ Drive-Through Window 14.5 639 639 1,278 22 17 39 61 64 125 Drive-in Bank 16 582 583 1,165 26 20 46 66 72 138 Totals 1,454 1,454 2,908 83 74 157 148 162 310 286 11 Traffic Impact Study –CVS/pharmacy Trip Distribution The estimated traffic generated by the development must be distributed and assigned in order to analyze the impacts on the roadway system and intersections within the study area. Various methods are available for estimating trip distribution, including the analogy, trip distribution model, area of influence, origin-destination (O-D), and surrogate data methods. For a commercial development, the proximity of residential areas, accessibility, and market area for the site are all key factors in determining the distribution of site generated trips. This study utilizes a combination of the analogy method, which bases the trip distribution on existing travel patterns in the area, and the area of influence method that assumes trips will originate or terminate within a given area (market area in this case). The trip distribution for the proposed CVS/pharmacy development is shown in Figure 4. PROPOSEDPROPOSEDPROPOSEDPROPOSED SITESITESITESITE 19THAVENBEALL STW MAIN STW20THAVEN 19THAVESLEGEND XX% TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGE 28% 2% 1% 3% 21% 16% 29% Figure 4 Directional Distribution of Site Traffic 287 12 Traffic Impact Study –CVS/pharmacy Modal Split Modal split refers to how the total number of person trips are divided amongst the various means of travel such as automobile (both single occupant and carpool), walking, biking, or transit. In most instances, the automobile is the primary means of travel. However, the other means of travel may account for a portion of the trips generated by a site. The Trip Generation Handbook, 2nd Edition published by ITE provides vehicle trip reduction percentages attributable to alternate modes of travel such as bicycling or transit. These trip reduction percentages only apply to commuter trips; however, it is assumed that a majority of the AM and PM peak hour trips for the proposed site would be comprised of commuter trips. Transit oriented trips are not assumed to make up a significant portion of site related trips, but bicycling and walking may be a potential means of travel. Vehicle trip reductions may range from two-and-a-half percent (2.5%) to seven percent (7%) depending on the site characteristics and its location. For the proposed development, a four percent (4%) vehicle trip reduction was assumed for analysis purposes. Table 3 provides the estimated vehicle trip reduction and the net new vehicular trips based on bicycle travel. Table 3 Estimated Vehicle Trip Reduction Transportation Average Weekday AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Impact Factor Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total 4% Vehicle Trip Reduction 46 46 92 3 4 7 4 7 11 Totals 46 46 92 3 4 7 4 7 11 Pass-by trips will makeup a portion of site generated trips associated with the proposed development. The Trip Generation Handbook, Second Edition (ITE, June 2004) provides land uses and time periods for which pass-by trip data is available. Transportation and Land Development, 2nd Edition also provides some limited pass-by trip data. Although the specialty retail center land use is not specifically identified in either source, a shopping center is similar and has an approximate pass-by trip percentage of 34% during the weekday and PM peak hour. Data is available for the pharmacy and drive-in bank land uses. Employee related trips are estimated to comprise a majority of AM peak hour trips; therefore, no pass-by trips are assumed to occur during this period. 288 13 Traffic Impact Study –CVS/pharmacy Internal trips between each of the proposed developments within the site may also occur. A detailed analysis of the internal capture trips is provided in the appendix. Diverted and internal trips are not estimated to be a significant portion of site generated trips and have been excluded from the analyses. The estimated pass-by, internal, and net new trips are summarized in Table 4. Table 4 Estimated Pass-By, Internal, and New External Site Traffic Generation Average Weekday AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Trip Classification Intensity Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Total Site Trips 1,454 1,454 2,908 83 74 157 148 162 310 Alt. Mode Trips 46 46 92 3 4 7 4 7 11 Internal Trips Varies 306 306 612 0 0 0 15 15 30 Pass-By Trips Varies 515 515 1,030 0 0 0 60 65 125 New External Trips 587 587 1,174 80 70 150 69 75 144 Trip Assignment The assignment of development related traffic provides the information necessary to determine the level of site related impacts to the area roadway system and intersections. It involves determining the volume of traffic and its movements along the roadway system and at area intersections. At a minimum, trip assignment must also consider route choice, how the existing transportation system functions, and travel times to and from the site. The resulting CVS/pharmacy site traffic assignment for both net new external and pass-by trips is shown in Figure 5 on the following page. Existing Land Use Traffic In order to adequate evaluate the impacts from the proposed development, it is also necessary to account for traffic volume reductions due to the change in land use. The traffic from the existing site would cease to exist at the access points as shown in Figure 3. Therefore, the analyses included within this study do not include the existing traffic volumes shown in Figure 3 at the site access points on North 19th Avenue and West Main Street (US 191). 289 14 Traffic Impact Study –CVS/pharmacy PROPOSEDPROPOSEDPROPOSEDPROPOSED SITESITESITESITE 19THAVENLEGEND XX (XX) AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS 1 1 580 0 7 10 (4) (7)(0) (0) (0) (14)01115 (6) (14) (16) 0 0 15 (0) (0) (17) BEALL STW MAIN STW20THAVEN 19THAVES2 34 5 2 3 4 5 0 12 (-26) (30)13 (34) 17 (15) 35 00 0 0 0 (44) (-14) (0) (0) (0) (0)25 0 0 (35) (-14) (0) 26 0 16 (50) (0) (37) 0151 2 0 0 (6) (16) (1) (1) (0) (0)0220 (0) (19) (0) 1 0 5 (1) (1) (7) 215 0 0 0 (2) (1) (8) (0) (0) (0)0 1 0 (0) (1) (0) 1 1 0 (1) (1) (0) Figure 5 Site Traffic 290 15 Traffic Impact Study –CVS/pharmacy Through Traffic Method of Projection In order to more accurately reflect the potential impacts from site generated traffic it is necessary to develop an estimate of non-site related traffic growth during the analysis period. Three primary means are typically used to estimate growth of non-site generated traffic, including the build-up method, the use of transportation plans or models, as well as the trends or growth rate method. The build-up method takes into account traffic growth due to approved or anticipated to be approved developments in the study area. Transportation plans or models typically provide estimates for traffic volumes for approximately 20 years into the future. The model volumes are usually provided for average weekday traffic, but can be converted to peak hour volumes including turning movements. However, the conversions can produce results that do not accurately reflect real-world conditions. The trends or growth rate method is commonly used and involves evaluating the historic traffic growth rates within a study area. The underlying assumption with this method is that historic growth trends will remain approximately the same and continue in the future. This study utilizes the trends or growth rate method, considering the immediate area is substantially developed and is not anticipated to experience significant growth in the future. Estimated Volumes Background traffic was estimated for the year 2012, which is the anticipated year for full build-out of the proposed development. Given recent economic trends and a future recovery period, traffic growth within the study area was estimated at an annual rate of approximately 1.70%. The estimated growth at study area intersections is shown in Figure 6 on the following page. Total Traffic Site-generated traffic is combined with existing and non-site generated traffic to establish the total traffic volumes that will be used in the impact analyses. Again, the total traffic volumes used in the analyses are based on year 2012 projections, and are shown in Figure 7. 291 16 Traffic Impact Study –CVS/pharmacy PROPOSEDPROPOSEDPROPOSEDPROPOSED SITESITESITESITE 19THAVENLEGEND XX (XX) AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS 1 1 76 308 79 93 334 85 (117) (556) (134) (99) (729) (192)263 457 124 (412)(476)(161) 20 416 219 (64) (445) (453) BEALL STW MAIN STW20THAVEN 19THAVES2 34 5 2 3 4 5 661 0 (1252) (0)0 (0) 655 (962) 0 614 19 9 0 7 (0) (1273)(10) (8) (0) (32)0 829 34 (0) (951) (21) 0 0 0 (0) (0) (0) 14 527 11 18 13 10 (37) (1075)(49) (31) (37) (19)33 898 9 (21)(950) (21) 31 24 24 (40) (46) (65) 8815 25 24 6 (52) (27) (75) (31) (69) (13)128 (2) (7) (2) 30 55 2 (52) (71) (4) Figure 6 Estimated 2012 Non-Site Traffic 292 17 Traffic Impact Study –CVS/pharmacy PROPOSEDPROPOSEDPROPOSEDPROPOSED SITESITESITESITE 19THAVENLEGEND XX (XX) AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS 1 1 81 316 79 93 341 95 (121) (563)(134) (99) (729) (206)263 468 139 (418) (490)(177) 20 416 234 (64) (445) (470) BEALL STW MAIN STW20THAVEN 19THAVES2 34 5 2 3 4 5 661 12 (1226) (30)13 (34) 672 (977) 35 614 19 9 0 7 (44)(1259)(10) (8) (0) (32)25 829 34 (35) (937)(21) 26 0 16 (50) (0) (37) 14 542 12 20 13 10 (43) (1091) (50) (32) (37) (19)33 920 9 (21) (969) (21) 32 24 29 (41) (47) (72) 10 9 20 25 24 6 (54) (28) (83) (31) (69) (13)1 38 (2) (8) (2) 31 56 2 (53) (72) (4) Figure 7 Estimated 2012 Total Traffic 293 18 Traffic Impact Study –CVS/pharmacy Transportation Analysis Capacity and Level of Service Existing Conditions Two-way and all-way stop control capacity and level of service analyses were performed for existing conditions on West Main Street (US 191) and North 19th Avenue at their intersections with the existing site accesses as well as at the intersection of West Beall Street and North 20th Avenue using Highway Capacity Software Plus, Version 5.21 (HCS+) developed and maintained by the McTrans Center at the University of Florida. The stop controlled intersection analyses are based on Chapter 17 of HCM 2000 and are summarized in Table 5. Signalized intersection capacity and level of service analyses were performed using SIGNAL2000 for North 19th Avenue and its intersections with West Main Street and West Beall Street using observed signal phasing for each intersection. Signalized analyses are based on the procedures found in Chapter 16 of HCM 2000 and are also summarized in Table 5. Non-Site Traffic Conditions It is also necessary to evaluate roadway and intersection operations based on background traffic conditions for the design year. This information can assist in differentiating whether transportation related impacts are related to background traffic growth or the addition of site-generated traffic. It is not estimated that there will be significant traffic growth at the intersection of West Beall Street and North 20th Avenue. Therefore, it has not been included in the 2012 non-site traffic analyses. The resulting capacity analyses are summarized in Table 6. Total Traffic The total traffic analyses include existing land use traffic reductions and estimated 2012 non-site traffic combined with site generated traffic for the total estimated traffic volumes. The resulting levels of service are summarized in Table 7. 294 19 Traffic Impact Study –CVS/pharmacy Table 5 Existing Intersection Operations Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection Approach Approach LOS Delay (s/veh) Volume to Capacity Ration, v/c Approach LOS Delay (s/veh) Volume to Capacity Ratio, v/c EB L C 29.5 0.62 F 143.9 1.21 EB TR C 27.4 0.59 E 78.8 1.07 WB L C 29.0 0.49 D 52.8 0.83 WB T C 25.3 0.49 E 78.9 1.07 WB R B 12.3 0.10 B 14.0 0.28 NB L C 25.8 0.32 C 27.3 0.49 NB T B 18.0 0.31 C 20.2 0.57 NB R A 9.9 0.09 B 10.5 0.17 SB L C 28.0 0.53 C 34.2 0.69 West Main Street (US 191) & 19th Avenue SB TR C 22.9 0.71 C 34.9 0.91 EB B 11.9 0.02 B 13.9 0.04 WB B 13.9 0.04 C 16.9 0.12 NB L A 9.3 0.02 A 9.6 0.01 NB TR A - - A - - SB L A 8.8 0.04 B 11.8 0.04 North 19th Avenue & Northerly JC Billion Site Access SB TR A - - A - - EB C 21.8 0.29 C 26.3 0.60 WB C 20.8 0.14 C 21.9 0.31 NB L A 4.2 0.05 A 5.0 0.13 NB TR A 4.7 0.24 A 6.4 0.50 SB L A 3.9 0.02 A 4.7 0.09 North 19th Avenue & West Beall Street SB TR A 5.9 0.44 A 6.1 0.46 EB A 7.3 0.27 A 8.3 0.38 WB A 7.5 0.19 A 8.6 0.35 NB A 7.2 0.11 A 8.8 0.43 West Beall Street & North 20th Avenue SB A 7.6 0.04 A 8.0 0.05 EB T A - - A - - WB TR A - - A - - West Main Street & Site Access SB R B 10.7 0.02 B 13.5 0.02 Site Access Site accesses were evaluated for sight distance, approach geometry, and queue storage requirements. Sight distance would be acceptable at each of the proposed accesses under existing and proposed conditions. The terrain in the area does not present any sight obstructions due to changes in grade, and there are no sight obstructions resulting from vegetation or other fixed objects. Queuing was also evaluated at the proposed site accesses. Based on a desired queue storage length of 25 feet and a minimum of 20 feet, a minimum protected throat depth of 50 feet should be provided for each access. 295 20 Traffic Impact Study –CVS/pharmacy Table 6 Estimated 2012 Non-Site Traffic Intersection Operations Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection Approach Approach LOS Delay (s/veh) Volume to Capacity Ration, v/c Approach LOS Delay (s/veh) Volume to Capacity Ratio, v/c EB L C 30.5 0.63 F 178.6 1.29 EB TR C 28.4 0.67 C 32.8 0.79 WB L C 29.9 0.53 C 31.0 0.56 WB T C 25.8 0.52 F 105.8 1.14 WB R B 12.4 0.11 B 14.2 0.30 NB L C 26.0 0.34 C 28.0 0.53 NB T B 18.2 0.34 C 20.7 0.61 NB R A 9.9 0.09 B 10.6 0.18 SB L C 29.0 0.56 D 37.2 0.73 West Main Street (US 191) & 19th Avenue SB TR C 24.6 0.77 D 47.5 0.98 EB - - - - - - WB B 13.5 0.04 C 19.0 0.14 NB L - - - - - - NB TR A - - A - - SB L A 8.9 0.04 B 12.6 0.05 North 19th Avenue & Northerly JC Billion Site Access SB TR A - - A - - EB C 21.8 0.29 C 26.3 0.60 WB C 20.8 0.14 C 21.9 0.31 NB L A 4.2 0.05 A 5.2 0.14 NB TR A 4.8 0.26 A 6.7 0.54 SB L A 3.9 0.02 A 5.0 0.10 North 19th Avenue & West Beall Street SB TR A 6.2 0.47 A 6.3 0.49 As stated previously, the existing access to West Main Street (US 191) is in conflict with the access spacing standards of the City of Bozeman. Presently, the south access to the site is approximately 150 feet west of the intersection of West Main Street and North 19th Avenue. For developments approved after July 10, 2002, access to an arterial must be a minimum of 315 feet from the nearest intersection or other public and/or private accesses. As shown in Table 5 on the previous page, the site access functions acceptably in terms of level of service. Data was requested on crashes for West Main Street (US 191) from milepost 87.75 to 88.25 from MDT. This roadway segment includes the existing site access located at approximately milepost 88.1. During the three year period beginning January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2007 there were 101 reported crashes within this roadway segment. However, a review of the data did not find any reported crashes involving traffic between vehicles exiting or entering the site access and westbound vehicles on West Main Street. 296 21 Traffic Impact Study –CVS/pharmacy Table 7 Estimated 2012 Total Traffic Intersection Operations Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection Approach Approach LOS Delay (s/veh) Volume to Capacity Ration, v/c Approach LOS Delay (s/veh) Volume to Capacity Ratio, v/c EB L C 32.0 0.67 F 187.0 1.31 EB TR C 28.4 0.67 C 33.0 0.79 WB L C 29.9 0.53 C 31.0 0.56 WB T C 26.0 0.54 F 105.8 1.14 WB R B 12.5 0.13 B 14.5 0.32 NB L C 26.2 0.37 C 28.5 0.55 NB T B 18.2 0.35 C 20.9 0.61 NB R A 9.9 0.09 B 10.6 0.18 SB L C 31.4 0.63 D 44.2 0.80 West Main Street (US 191) & 19th Avenue SB TR C 25.0 0.78 D 53.3 1.01 EB B 13.8 0.10 C 22.4 0.31 WB B 14.6 0.04 C 19.2 0.14 NB L A 9.6 0.05 B 10.3 0.06 NB TR A - - A - - SB L A 8.9 0.04 B 12.3 0.04 North 19th Avenue & Northerly JC Billion Site Access SB TR A - - A - - EB C 22.0 0.32 C 28.1 0.64 WB C 20.8 0.15 C 22.0 0.31 NB L A 4.3 0.06 A 5.6 0.17 NB TR A 4.8 0.26 A 6.8 0.55 SB L A 3.9 0.02 A 5.0 0.11 North 19th Avenue & West Beall Street SB TR A 6.3 0.48 A 6.4 0.50 EB A 7.4 0.28 A 8.4 0.38 WB A 7.6 0.19 A 8.7 0.35 NB A 7.3 0.15 A 8.9 0.44 West Beall Street & North 20th Avenue SB A 7.6 0.05 A 8.0 0.05 EB T A - - A - - WB TR A - - A - - West Main Street & Site Access SB R B 10.9 0.02 B 14.3 0.05 Based on field observations, the existing traffic signal operations at the intersection of West Main Street and 19th Avenue create substantial gaps in the traffic stream west of the intersection. These available gaps allow traffic entering or exiting the site to do so with minimal conflicts that typically result within the functional area of an intersection. The existing raised median on West Main Street also limits potential conflicts by restricting movements at the access to right-in, right-out only. The combination of all these features would allow the continued use of the existing access to operate favorably. 297 22 Traffic Impact Study –CVS/pharmacy Drive-Through Service The proposed drive-through window was analyzed to verify that adequate queue storage space is available for the estimated vehicular demand. Assuming a maximum arrival rate of 20 vehicles per hour and an average service time of two minutes per vehicle, it was determined that on average each vehicle would experience approximately 5.27 minutes of total service time in the drive-through. Additionally, an ideal design should provide for minimum queue storage of 50 feet. The currently proposed design would be adequate to meet these demands. Improvement Analysis Improvements to Accommodate Existing Traffic Presently, the intersection of West Main Street (US 191) and 19th Avenue is operating below the desired LOS C for design. This could be mitigated with modifications to the existing signal timing and phasing. Allowing protected-permitted left turns for the eastbound dual-left turn lanes, the intersection could operate at LOS C on all approaches. This would require modifications to the existing signal heads to include a green “ball” indication for the left turn lanes in addition to “LEFT TURN MUST YEILD ON [GREEN BALL]” signing. This would be similar to movements allowed at the intersection of West Main Street and North 7th Avenue in Bozeman; however, the speeds would differ by approximately 10 mph. With these improvements, the phasing and timing would be as follows: Signal Phase Green (sec) Yellow (sec) All-Red (sec) 1 – NB+SB w/ Permitted Left Turns 31.25 3.0 1.0 2 – EB+WB Left Turns + NB RT 6.00 4.0 0.0 3 – EB 0.55 0.0 0.0 4 – EB+WB w/ Permitted Left Turns 20.20 3.0 1.0 Cycle Length = 70.0 sec The resulting levels of service at the intersection with these changes are summarized in Table 8 on the following page. Future widening on South 19th Avenue may also mitigate existing operational issues by increasing capacity for the southbound through movement at the intersection. 298 Page 1/1Intersection:Location:Date Count Performed:Count Time Period:Seasonal Adjustment Factor:Street/Approach Total Peak HourRoad Movement 7:00 7:15 7:30 7:45 8:00 8:15 8:30 8:45 Total % % Volume PHFT 00000000 00.00% 0.00% 0 0.00Ped0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0.00T 00000000 00.00% 0.00% 0 0.00R 00004322 11100.00% 50.00% 11 0.69Ped0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0.00R 00012323 11100.00% 50.00% 10 0.83Ped0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0.0000016645 22100.00% 21 0.881 7 13 17 21Hourly VolumeJC Billion AccessFrom the NorthStart TimeWest Main StreetFrom the WestWest Main StreetFrom the EastIntersection TotalsNO DATANO DATANO DATAAM Peak Period1.00Intersection Turning Movement Count SummaryJC Billion Access & West Main Street (JC Billion Traffic)Bozeman, Montana7/23/2008 to 7/25/2008 (Average)N:\4571\001.06\Design Docs\Traffic Data\JC-Billion-Access_West-Main-Street_AM_072408.xlsPrinted On: 7/25/2008299 23 Traffic Impact Study –CVS/pharmacy Table 8 Existing Intersection Mitigation Measures Summary PM Peak Hour Intersection Approach Approach LOS Delay (s/veh) Volume to Capacity Ratio, v/c EB L C 34.8 0.91 EB TR C 27.0 0.75 WB L C 20.9 0.63 WB T C 27.6 0.75 WB R C 22.4 0.39 NB L C 22.9 0.65 NB T B 13.0 0.37 NB R A 6.7 0.13 SB L B 16.5 0.56 West Main Street (US 191) & 19th Avenue SB TR B 15.3 0.60 Improvements to Accommodate Background Traffic The intersection of West Main Street and 19th Avenue may continue to experience level of service issues with continued traffic growth. With the previously discussed improvements to mitigate existing concerns, future traffic growth could be accommodated with slight modifications to signal timing and phasing. In order to mitigate the levels of service for estimated 2012 non-site traffic volumes, the phasing and timing would be as follows: Signal Phase Green (sec) Yellow (sec) All-Red (sec) 1 – NB+SB w/ Permitted Left Turns 35.83 3.0 1.0 2 –WB Lead + NB RT 8.42 0.0 0.0 3 – EB w/ Permitted Left Turns+WB TR 12.75 4.0 0.0 4 – EB+WB w/ Permitted Left Turns 6.00 3.0 1.0 Cycle Length = 75.0 sec Table 9 Estimated 2012 Non-Site Traffic Intersection Mitigation Measures Summary PM Peak Hour Intersection Approach Approach LOS Delay (s/veh) Volume to Capacity Ratio, v/c EB L C 34.9 0.79 EB TR C 28.8 0.65 WB L C 34.9 0.56 WB T C 32.5 0.82 WB R C 24.2 0.39 NB L C 25.5 0.69 NB T B 12.6 0.37 NB R A 5.4 0.12 SB L B 16.8 0.58 West Main Street (US 191) & 19th Avenue SB TR B 14.9 0.60 300 24 Traffic Impact Study –CVS/pharmacy Additional Improvements to Accommodate Site Traffic At the intersection of West Main Street and 19th Avenue, it is estimated that the eastbound and westbound approaches would operate at LOS F. Additional phasing modifications and the previously discussed improvements would allow the intersection to operate effectively under the estimated conditions. The resulting signal timing and phasing would be as follows: Signal Phase Green (sec) Yellow (sec) All-Red (sec) 1 –SB Lead 12.72 0.0 0.0 2 –NB w/ Permitted Left Turns+SB TR 12.52 4.0 0.0 3 – NB Lag 6.00 3.0 1.0 4 – WB Lead + NB R Overlap 8.42 0.0 0.0 5 – EB w/ Permitted Left Turns+WB TR 13.02 4.0 0.0 4 – EB Lag 6.32 3.0 1.0 Cycle Length = 75.0 sec Table 10 Estimated 2012 Total Traffic Intersection Mitigation Measures Summary PM Peak Hour Intersection Approach Approach LOS Delay (s/veh) Volume to Capacity Ratio, v/c EB L C 34.9 0.80 EB TR C 27.9 0.63 WB L C 34.9 0.56 WB T C 31.8 0.81 WB R C 24.5 0.42 NB L C 26.0 0.41 NB T C 29.1 0.73 NB R B 14.7 0.19 SB L C 35.0 0.67 West Main Street (US 191) & 19th Avenue SB TR C 30.9 0.87 Findings At the intersection of West Main Street and 19th Avenue, improvements are necessary based on existing conditions and are not related to impacts resulting from site generated traffic. Based on available funding and other projects in the area, modifications are recommended for existing signal indications and the signal timing and phasing. Additional improvements are warranted in the future, but should include analysis following completion of widening improvements on South 19th Avenue from West Babcock Street to Kagy Boulevard, which will alter the lane utilization on 19th Avenue. 301 25 Traffic Impact Study –CVS/pharmacy Conclusions and Recommendations Site Access Analysis of trip generation estimates, site circulation, and traffic operations reveal that the proposed CVS/pharmacy development will have minimal impact on the area transportation system. For the proposed access to West Main Street, the following is recommended: A deviation request be granted to allow continued use of the existing access to West Main Street. This recommendation is based on the following: o Intersection capacity analyses indicate that the proposed access would operate at acceptable levels of service throughout the design period. o Evaluation of reported crashes at the access location did not find any reported crashes involving traffic between vehicles exiting or entering the site access and westbound vehicles on West Main Street. o Field observations indicate that the existing traffic signal operations at the intersection of West Main Street and 19th Avenue create substantial gaps in the traffic stream west of the intersection. These available gaps allow traffic entering or exiting the site to do so with minimal conflicts that typically result within the functional area of an intersection. o The existing raised median on West Main Street also limits potential conflicts by restricting movements at the access to right-in, right-out only. o The combination of all these features would allow the continued use of the existing access to operate favorably. Off-Site Improvements Existing Conditions Analyses of existing traffic volumes and operations determined a need for improvements to the intersection of West Main Street and 19th Avenue. Existing level of service issues during the PM peak hour can be mitigated with the following: Four-head traffic signals that include a green ball and a left turn arrow should be installed for the two eastbound left turn lanes. Signage should be installed on the mast arms adjacent to the four-indication signal heads that reads “LEFT TURN MUST YIELD ON [GREEN BALL]”. Modifications to the signal timing and phasing should be made in the traffic controller. The necessary improvements are a result of existing traffic conditions and are not required as a result of site generated traffic. 302 26 Traffic Impact Study –CVS/pharmacy Non-Site and Total Traffic Conditions With continued traffic growth on the arterial roadways, it would be necessary to provide additional modifications to signal timing and phasing at the intersection of West Main Street and 19th Avenue. These modifications should be evaluated with anticipated roadway improvements to South 19th Avenue from West Babcock Street to Kagy Boulevard. If the above improvements are implemented as recommended, any impacts resulting from the proposed development should operate safely and efficiently. All traffic control improvements should be installed in accordance with MDT, City of Bozeman, and the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices standards. 303 27 Traffic Impact Study –CVS/pharmacy References 1. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2004). A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. Washington, DC: Author. 2. Engineering, Inc. (March 2007). DRAFT Traffic Impact Study for Cameron Springs Subdivision. Bozeman, MT: Author. 3. Institute of Transportation Engineers. (1999). Traffic Engineering Handbook. Washington, DC: Author. 4. Institute of Transportation Engineers. (2005). Transportation Impact Analyses for Site Development: An ITE Proposed Recommended Practice. Washington, DC: Author. 5. Institute of Transportation Engineers. (2003). Trip Generation, 7 th Edition. Washington, DC: Author. 6. Institute of Transportation Engineers. (June 2004). Trip Generation Handbook: An ITE Recommended Practice. Washington, DC: Author. 7. Robert Peccia & Associates. (June 2001). Greater Bozeman Area Transportation Plan Year 2001 Update. Bozeman, MT: City of Bozeman. 8. Stover, Vergil G. and Frank K. Koepke. (2002). Transportation and Land Development, 2 nd Edition. Washington, DC: Institute of Transportation Engineers. 9. Transportation Research Board. (2000). Highway Capacity Manual 2000. Washington, DC: Author. 304 Appendix A Traffic Volume Data 305 Page 1/1Calibration Factor:Hour% ofBegin NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB TOTAL Total0:000000 00 00.00%1:000000 00 00.00%2:000000 00 00.00%3:000001 01 10.36%4:000000 00 00.00%5:001210 11 21.45%6:001211 12 31.82%7:000011 11 10.73%8:0010 8 11 10 11 9 20 14.18%9:001557 36 96.55%10:002 11 2 9 2 10 12 8.73%11:003437 36 96.18%12:004 8 11 6 8 7 15 10.55%13:00787 8 15 10.91%14:00474 7 11 8.00%15:00484 8 12 8.73%16:00585 8 13 9.45%17:0035182 7 9 6.18%18:0014031 4 4 2.91%19:0001020 2 2 1.09%20:0003000 2 2 1.09%21:0001000 1 1 0.36%22:0000111 1 1 0.73%23:0000000 0 0 0.00%TOTAL0000414448535420000528600138100.00%138TRAFFIC VOLUME COUNT SUMMARYRoadway:Count Location:Road Classification:Dates Performed:JC Billion Access+/- 100' North of West Main Street (US 191)7/23/2008 to 7/25/2008Private Access1.0007/23/2008Wednesday7/22/2008TuesdayMonday7/21/2008Saturday7/27/2008Sunday7/24/2008Wednesday7/25/2008Thursday0 0 18 1290AverageWeekend77 0 0 138WeekdayAverage7/26/2008Percentage of Daily Traffic Volume Per Hour0.0%2.0%4.0%6.0%8.0%10.0%12.0%14.0%16.0%0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00Time of DayPercentage of TotalN:\4571\001.06\Design Docs\Traffic Data\JC-Billion-Access_N_West-Main-Street_072308_072508.xlsPrinted On: 7/25/2008306 Page 1/1Intersection:Location:Date Count Performed:Count Time Period:Seasonal Adjustment Factor:Street/Approach Total Peak HourRoad Movement 7:00 7:15 7:30 7:45 8:00 8:15 8:30 8:45 Total % % Volume PHFL 10 23 21 19 23 25 31 37 189 13.41% 4.48% 116 0.78T 57 77 84 109 114 102 94 117 754 53.51% 17.86% 427 0.91R 46 46 46 64 68 48 66 64 448 31.80% 10.61% 246 0.90Ped 11032344 181.28% 0.43% 13 0.81L 11 5 10 18 19 19 17 16 115 14.97% 2.72% 71 0.93T 44 49 79 72 54 65 80 89 532 69.27% 12.60% 288 0.81R 15 6 6 18 18 14 24 18 119 15.49% 2.82% 74 0.77Ped 00110000 20.26% 0.05% 0 0.00L 6 12 19 28 21 27 20 19 152 17.88% 3.60% 87 0.81T 59 47 57 82 63 72 87 90 557 65.53% 13.19% 312 0.87R 15 8 11 13 22 17 14 26 126 14.82% 2.98% 79 0.76Ped 21343002 151.76% 0.36% 5 0.42L 23 36 51 59 42 39 52 72 374 31.30% 8.86% 205 0.71T 42 85 116 147 101 88 97 103 779 65.19% 18.45% 389 0.94R 66143286 363.01% 0.85% 19 0.59Ped 21001101 60.50% 0.14% 3 0.75339 403 505 641 554 522 594 664 4222 100.00% 2334 0.881888 2103 2222 2311 2334Hourly VolumeWest Main StreetFrom the EastWest Main StreetFrom the WestStart TimeNorth 19th AvenueFrom the NorthSouth 19th AvenueFrom the SouthIntersection TotalsAM Peak Period1.00Intersection Turning Movement Count SummaryWest Main Street & North 19th AvenueBozeman, Montana7/16/2008N:\4571\001.06\Design Docs\Traffic Data\West-Main-Street_19th-Avenue_AM_071608.xlsPrinted On: 7/25/2008307 Page 1/1Intersection:Location:Date Count Performed:Count Time Period:Seasonal Adjustment Factor:Street/Approach Total Peak HourRoad Movement 4:00 4:15 4:30 4:45 5:00 5:15 5:30 5:45 Total % % Volume PHFL 42 49 14 27 57 31 36 256 15.76% 3.97% 151 0.66T 83 91 80 112 124 96 113 699 43.04% 10.85% 445 0.90R 77 90 87 104 108 88 85 639 39.35% 9.92% 385 0.89Ped 3083556 301.85% 0.47% 19 0.79L 20 22 24 16 32 27 34 175 14.39% 2.72% 109 0.80T 112 98 97 111 137 137 135 827 68.01% 12.83% 520 0.95R 28 25 24 30 34 30 31 202 16.61% 3.13% 125 0.92Ped 0113322 120.99% 0.19% 10 0.83L 38 35 29 32 35 45 35 249 14.57% 3.86% 147 0.82T 144 155 152 134 171 203 173 1132 66.24% 17.57% 681 0.84R 43 42 50 39 49 48 43 314 18.37% 4.87% 179 0.91Ped 0231341 140.82% 0.22% 9 0.56L 110 119 93 103 109 93 118 745 39.31% 11.56% 423 0.90T 130 135 120 146 127 173 187 1018 53.72% 15.80% 633 0.85R 1 8 37 37 8 5 10 106 5.59% 1.64% 60 0.41Ped 11142521 261.37% 0.40% 10 0.50832 883 823 900 1007 989 1010 6444 100.00% 3906 0.973438 3613 3719 3906 3006Hourly VolumeWest Main StreetFrom the EastWest Main StreetFrom the WestStart TimeNorth 19th AvenueFrom the NorthSouth 19th AvenueFrom the SouthIntersection TotalsPM Peak Period1.00Intersection Turning Movement Count SummaryWest Main Street & North 19th AvenueBozeman, Montana7/16/2008N:\4571\001.06\Design Docs\Traffic Data\West-Main-Street_19th-Avenue_PM_071608.xlsPrinted On: 7/25/2008308 Page 1/1Intersection:Location:Date Count Performed:Count Time Period:Seasonal Adjustment Factor:Street/Approach Total Peak HourRoad Movement 7:00 7:15 7:30 7:45 8:00 8:15 8:30 8:45 Total % % Volume PHFR 01200001 466.67% 0.16% 1 0.25Ped 11000000 233.33% 0.08% 0 0.00T 89 100 108 163 135 151 144 180 1070 97.81% 42.60% 610 0.85Ped 42325233 242.19% 0.96% 13 0.65T 105 139 147 214 187 173 199 227 1391 98.51% 55.37% 786 0.87R 30011012 80.57% 0.32% 4 0.50Ped 13014211 130.92% 0.52% 8 0.50203 246 260 381 332 328 348 414 2512 100.00% 1422 0.861090 1219 1301 1389 1422AM Peak Period1.00Intersection Turning Movement Count SummaryNorth 19th Avenue & South Access to J.C. BillionBozeman, Montana7/24/2008Hourly VolumeNorth 19th AvenueFrom the SouthNorth 19th AvenueFrom the NorthStart TimeSouth Access toJ.C. BillionFrom the WestIntersection TotalsN:\4571\001.06\Design Docs\Traffic Data\North-19th-Avenue_JC-Billion-South-Access_AM_072408.xlsPrinted On: 7/25/2008309 Page 1/1Intersection:Location:Date Count Performed:Count Time Period:Seasonal Adjustment Factor:Street/Approach Total Peak HourRoad Movement 4:00 4:15 4:30 4:45 5:00 5:15 5:30 5:45 Total % % Volume PHFR 01022100 6100.00% 0.15% 5 0.63Ped 00000000 00.00% 0.00% 0 0.00T 282 251 273 294 329 312 279 263 2283 98.87% 55.21% 1208 0.92Ped 23265053 261.13% 0.63% 13 0.54T 223 255 216 209 235 247 195 216 1796 98.68% 43.43% 907 0.92R 00100010 20.11% 0.05% 1 0.25Ped 52431322 221.21% 0.53% 11 0.69512 512 496 514 572 563 482 484 4135 100.00% 2145 0.942034 2094 2145 2131 2101Hourly VolumeNorth 19th AvenueFrom the SouthNorth 19th AvenueFrom the NorthStart TimeSouth Access toJ.C. BillionFrom the WestIntersection TotalsPM Peak Period1.00Intersection Turning Movement Count SummaryNorth 19th Avenue & South Access to J.C. BillionBozeman, Montana7/24/2008N:\4571\001.06\Design Docs\Traffic Data\North-19th-Avenue_JC-Billion-South-Access_PM_072408.xlsPrinted On: 7/25/2008310 Page 1/1Intersection:Location:Date Count Performed:Count Time Period:Seasonal Adjustment Factor:Street/Approach Total Peak HourRoad Movement 7:00 7:15 7:30 7:45 8:00 8:15 8:30 8:45 Total % % Volume PHFL 7 13 14 18 14 4 8 8 86 5.71% 3.27% 34 0.61T 108 138 147 213 185 172 194 224 1381 91.70% 52.51% 775 0.86R 14373412 251.66% 0.95% 10 0.63Ped 23214020 140.93% 0.53% 6 0.38L 12003437 201.84% 0.76% 17 0.61T 82 90 104 156 129 142 137 166 1006 92.38% 38.25% 574 0.86R 68473547 444.04% 1.67% 19 0.68Ped 13124233 191.74% 0.72% 12 0.75L 01022142 1252.17% 0.46% 9 0.56T 00000010 14.35% 0.04% 1 0.25R 02013310 1043.48% 0.38% 7 0.58Ped 00000000 00.00% 0.00% 0 0.00L 01110000 325.00% 0.11% 0 0.00T 10000110 325.00% 0.11% 2 0.50R 00001023 650.00% 0.23% 6 0.50Ped 00000000 00.00% 0.00% 0 0.00209 265 276 408 351 338 361 422 2630 100.00% 1472 0.871158 1300 1373 1458 1472AM Peak Period1.00Intersection Turning Movement Count SummaryNorth 19th Avenue & JC Billion North AccessBozeman, Montana7/24/2008Hourly VolumeBusiness/Ressler AccessFrom the EastJC Billion AccessFrom the WestStart TimeNorth 19th AvenueFrom the NorthNorth 19th AvenueFrom the SouthIntersection TotalsN:\4571\001.06\Design Docs\Traffic Data\North-19th-Avenue_JC-Billion-North-Access_AM_072408.xlsPrinted On: 7/25/2008311 Page 1/1Intersection:Location:Date Count Performed:Count Time Period:Seasonal Adjustment Factor:Street/Approach Total Peak HourRoad Movement 4:00 4:15 4:30 4:45 5:00 5:15 5:30 5:45 Total % % Volume PHFL 96527721 392.13% 0.92% 21 0.75T 217 255 208 206 230 245 192 210 1763 96.23% 41.37% 889 0.91R 01502110 100.55% 0.23% 8 0.40Ped 52331321 201.09% 0.47% 10 0.83L 34022432 200.87% 0.47% 8 0.50T 279 241 272 289 323 306 273 261 2244 97.06% 52.65% 1190 0.92R 06134230 190.82% 0.45% 10 0.63Ped 33275072 291.25% 0.68% 14 0.50L 30520135 1920.65% 0.45% 8 0.40T 00000000 00.00% 0.00% 0 0.00R 9596710206 7278.26% 1.69% 32 0.80Ped 00100000 11.09% 0.02% 1 0.25L 00101303 830.77% 0.19% 5 0.42T 00000010 13.85% 0.02% 0 0.00R 30415111 1661.54% 0.38% 11 0.55Ped 00000001 13.85% 0.02% 0 0.00531 523 516 521 587 583 508 493 4262 100.00% 2207 0.942091 2147 2207 2199 2171Hourly VolumeBusiness/Ressler AccessFrom the EastJC Billion AccessFrom the WestStart TimeNorth 19th AvenueFrom the NorthNorth 19th AvenueFrom the SouthIntersection TotalsPM Peak Period1.00Intersection Turning Movement Count SummaryNorth 19th Avenue & JC Billion North AccessBozeman, Montana7/24/2008N:\4571\001.06\Design Docs\Traffic Data\North-19th-Avenue_JC-Billion-North-Access_PM_072408.xlsPrinted On: 7/25/2008312 Page 1/1Intersection:Location:Date Count Performed:Count Time Period:Seasonal Adjustment Factor:Street/Approach Total Peak HourRoad Movement 7:00 7:15 7:30 7:45 8:00 8:15 8:30 8:45 Total % % Volume PHFL 5215031 171.21% 0.68% 9 0.45T 151 134 220 225 209 185 204 1328 94.72% 53.21% 839 0.93R 347971010 503.57% 2.00% 33 0.83Ped 1312000 70.50% 0.28% 3 0.38L 2214722 202.28% 0.80% 14 0.50T 76 96 146 139 109 99 146 811 92.58% 32.49% 493 0.84R 5343314 232.63% 0.92% 11 0.69Ped 1275331 222.51% 0.88% 18 0.64L 4444465 3141.89% 1.24% 18 0.75T 0325332 1824.32% 0.72% 13 0.65R 2125300 1317.57% 0.52% 10 0.50Ped 3251100 1216.22% 0.48% 7 0.35L 2676293 3524.31% 1.40% 24 0.67T 44134255 3725.69% 1.48% 24 0.46R 858514410 5437.50% 2.16% 31 0.55Ped 3132333 1812.50% 0.72% 11 0.92270 272 431 424 370 333 396 2496 100.00% 1558 0.901397 1497 1558 1523 1099Hourly VolumeWest Beall StreetFrom the EastWest Beall StreetFrom the WestStart TimeNorth 19th AvenueFrom the NorthNorth 19th AvenueFrom the SouthIntersection TotalsAM Peak Period1.00Intersection Turning Movement Count SummaryNorth 19th Avenue & West Beall StreetBozeman, Montana7/15/2008N:\4571\001.06\Design Docs\Traffic Data\North-19th-Avenue_West-Beall-Street_AM_071508.xlsPrinted On: 7/25/2008313 Page 1/1Intersection:Location:Date Count Performed:Count Time Period:Seasonal Adjustment Factor:Street/Approach Total Peak HourRoad Movement 4:00 4:15 4:30 4:45 5:00 5:15 5:30 5:45 Total % % Volume PHFL 3454844 321.96% 0.81% 21 0.66T 219 218 242 196 226 224 208 1533 93.70% 38.87% 888 0.92R 5963579 442.69% 1.12% 21 0.75Ped 12401118 271.65% 0.68% 16 0.36L 7 10 3 6 12 16 9 63 3.29% 1.60% 37 0.58T 230 256 248 210 275 272 241 1732 90.44% 43.91% 1005 0.91R 7 5 10 13 16 10 12 73 3.81% 1.85% 49 0.77Ped103758410 472.45% 1.19% 24 0.75L 24651371 3828.36% 0.96% 31 0.60T 1 10 9 7 13 8 11 59 44.03% 1.50% 37 0.71R 20225102 2317.16% 0.58% 19 0.48Ped 3132320 1410.45% 0.35% 10 0.83L 12 8 20 5 20 20 11 96 37.07% 2.43% 65 0.81T 13 15 10 9 10 17 8 82 31.66% 2.08% 46 0.68R 4 4 14 6 7 13 9 57 22.01% 1.45% 40 0.71Ped10320540 249.27% 0.61% 11 0.55529 552 591 473 637 619 543 3944 100.00% 2320 0.912145 2253 2320 2272 1799Hourly VolumeWest Beall StreetFrom the EastWest Beall StreetFrom the WestStart TimeNorth 19th AvenueFrom the NorthNorth 19th AvenueFrom the SouthIntersection TotalsPM Peak Period1.00Intersection Turning Movement Count SummaryNorth 19th Avenue & West Beall StreetBozeman, Montana7/15/2008N:\4571\001.06\Design Docs\Traffic Data\North-19th-Avenue_West-Beall-Street_PM_071508.xlsPrinted On: 7/25/2008314 Page 1/1Intersection:Location:Date Count Performed:Count Time Period:Seasonal Adjustment Factor:Street/Approach Total Peak HourRoad Movement 7:00 7:15 7:30 7:45 8:00 8:15 8:30 8:45 Total % % Volume PHFL 0012402 934.62% 2.86% 8 0.50T 0220011 623.08% 1.90% 2 0.50R 0000100 13.85% 0.32% 1 0.25Ped 0330112 1038.46% 3.17% 4 0.50L 3344112 1829.51% 5.71% 8 0.50T 0102132 914.75% 2.86% 8 0.67R 1424056 2236.07% 6.98% 15 0.63Ped 1402032 1219.67% 3.81% 7 0.58L 3388575 3942.86% 12.38% 25 0.78T 3199267 3740.66% 11.75% 24 0.67R 0011221 77.69% 2.22% 6 0.75Ped 0011411 88.79% 2.54% 7 0.44L 0000000 00.00% 0.00% 0 0.00T 6 14 15 18 13 10 14 90 65.69% 28.57% 55 0.76R 3555997 4331.39% 13.65% 30 0.83Ped 0101101 42.92% 1.27% 3 0.7520 41 51 57 44 49 53 315 100.00% 203 0.89169 193 201 203 146Hourly VolumeWest Beall StreetFrom the EastWest Beall StreetFrom the WestStart TimeNorth 20th AvenueFrom the NorthNorth 20th AvenueFrom the SouthIntersection TotalsAM Peak Period1.00Intersection Turning Movement Count SummaryNorth 20th Avenue & West Beall StreetBozeman, Montana7/17/2008N:\4571\001.06\Design Docs\Traffic Data\North-20th-Avenue_West-Beall-Street_AM_071708.xlsPrinted On: 7/25/2008315 Page 1/1Intersection:Location:Date Count Performed:Count Time Period:Seasonal Adjustment Factor:Street/Approach Total Peak HourRoad Movement 4:00 4:15 4:30 4:45 5:00 5:15 5:30 5:45 Total % % Volume PHFL 0001101 38.11% 0.43% 2 0.50T 1232112 1232.43% 1.70% 7 0.58R 0110101 410.81% 0.57% 2 0.50Ped 0222507 1848.65% 2.56% 9 0.45L 5 8 16 11 12 13 8 73 27.24% 10.37% 52 0.81T 86271265 4617.16% 6.53% 27 0.56R 8 14 23 11 24 17 17 114 42.54% 16.19% 75 0.78Ped 3265973 3513.06% 4.97% 27 0.75L 56876106 4824.62% 6.82% 31 0.78T 17 10 13 10 27 19 20 116 59.49% 16.48% 69 0.64R 6324611 2311.79% 3.27% 13 0.54Ped 1015100 84.10% 1.14% 7 0.35L 0111021 62.94% 0.85% 4 0.50T 16 15 22 11 15 23 11 113 55.39% 16.05% 71 0.77R 3 8 9 14 16 13 11 74 36.27% 10.51% 52 0.81Ped 0151310 115.39% 1.56% 10 0.5073 79 114 92 139 113 94 704 100.00% 458 0.82358 424 458 438 346Hourly VolumeWest Beall StreetFrom the EastWest Beall StreetFrom the WestStart TimeNorth 20th AvenueFrom the NorthNorth 20th AvenueFrom the SouthIntersection TotalsPM Peak Period1.00Intersection Turning Movement Count SummaryNorth 20th Avenue & West Beall StreetBozeman, Montana7/17/2008N:\4571\001.06\Design Docs\Traffic Data\North-20th-Avenue_West-Beall-Street_PM_071708.xlsPrinted On: 7/25/2008316 Page 1/1Intersection:Location:Date Count Performed:Count Time Period:Seasonal Adjustment Factor:Street/Approach Total Peak HourRoad Movement 7:00 7:15 7:30 7:45 8:00 8:15 8:30 8:45 Total % % Volume PHFL 12514332 2116.03% 9.95% 12 0.75T 9 11 8 14 10 12 20 22 106 80.92% 50.24% 64 0.73Ped 01100110 43.05% 1.90% 2 0.50T 16553858 4164.06% 19.43% 24 0.75R 00414003 1218.75% 5.69% 7 0.44Ped 00010055 1117.19% 5.21% 10 0.50L 00000101 212.50% 0.95% 2 0.50R 00123215 1487.50% 6.64% 11 0.55Ped 00000000 00.00% 0.00% 0 0.00Ped 00000000 00.00% 0.00% 0 0.0011 20 24 24 24 27 35 46 211 100.00% 132 0.7279 92 99 110 132Hourly VolumePrivate AccessFrom the EastFrom the WestStart TimeNorth 20th AvenueFrom the NorthNorth 20th AvenueFrom the SouthIntersection TotalsAM Peak Period1.00Intersection Turning Movement Count SummaryNorth 20th Avenue & JC Billion Access (Total Vehicles)Bozeman, Montana7/24/2008N:\4571\001.06\Design Docs\Traffic Data\North-20th-Avenue_JC-Billion-Access_Total_AM_072408.xlsPrinted On: 7/25/2008317 Page 1/1Intersection:Location:Date Count Performed:Count Time Period:Seasonal Adjustment Factor:Street/Approach Total Peak HourRoad Movement 4:00 4:15 4:30 4:45 5:00 5:15 5:30 5:45 Total % % Volume PHFL 15113113 169.14% 4.66% 6 0.50T 23 24 21 18 24 19 16 12 157 89.71% 45.77% 82 0.85Ped 00001100 21.14% 0.58% 2 0.50T 13 11 10 11 14 19 4 8 90 77.59% 26.24% 54 0.71R 02241000 97.76% 2.62% 7 0.44Ped 53210231 1714.66% 4.96% 5 0.63L 10241220 1223.53% 3.50% 9 0.56R 424055109 3976.47% 11.37% 14 0.70Ped 00000000 00.00% 0.00% 0 0.00Ped 00000001 10.00% 0.29% 0 0.0047 47 42 39 49 49 36 34 343 100.00% 179 0.91175 177 179 173 168PM Peak Period1.00Intersection Turning Movement Count SummaryNorth 20th Avenue & JC Billion Access (Total Vehicles)Bozeman, Montana7/24/2008Hourly VolumePrivate AccessFrom the EastFrom the WestStart TimeNorth 20th AvenueFrom the NorthNorth 20th AvenueFrom the SouthIntersection TotalsN:\4571\001.06\Design Docs\Traffic Data\North-20th-Avenue_JC-Billion-Access_Total_PM_072408.xlsPrinted On: 7/25/2008318 Page 1/1Intersection:Location:Date Count Performed:Count Time Period:Seasonal Adjustment Factor:Street/Approach Total Peak HourRoad Movement 7:00 7:15 7:30 7:45 8:00 8:15 8:30 8:45 Total % % Volume PHFL 02512022 14100.00% 36.84% 10 0.50T 00000000 00.00% 0.00% 0 0.00Ped 00000000 00.00% 0.00% 0 0.00T 00000000 00.00% 0.00% 0 0.00R 00414003 12100.00% 31.58% 9 0.56Ped 00000000 00.00% 0.00% 0 0.00L 00000101 216.67% 5.26% 0 0.00R 00023104 1083.33% 26.32% 5 0.42Ped 00000000 00.00% 0.00% 0 0.00Ped 00000000 00.00% 0.00% 0 0.0002949221038100.00% 24 0.6715 24 24 17 23Hourly VolumePrivate AccessFrom the EastFrom the WestStart TimeNorth 20th AvenueFrom the NorthNorth 20th AvenueFrom the SouthIntersection TotalsAM Peak Period1.00Intersection Turning Movement Count SummaryNorth 20th Avenue & JC Billion Access (JC Billion Traffic)Bozeman, Montana7/24/2008N:\4571\001.06\Design Docs\Traffic Data\North-20th-Avenue_JC-Billion-Access_Billion-Traffic_AM_072408.xlsPrinted On: 7/25/2008319 Page 1/1Intersection:Location:Date Count Performed:Count Time Period:Seasonal Adjustment Factor:Street/Approach Total Peak HourRoad Movement 4:00 4:15 4:30 4:45 5:00 5:15 5:30 5:45 Total % % Volume PHFL 13111011 9100.00% 24.32% 6 0.50T 00000000 00.00% 0.00% 0 0.00Ped 00000000 00.00% 0.00% 0 0.00T 00000000 00.00% 0.00% 0 0.00R 01121000 5100.00% 13.51% 4 0.50Ped 00000000 00.00% 0.00% 0 0.00L 10121110 730.43% 18.92% 4 0.50R 40302133 1669.57% 43.24% 7 0.44Ped 00000000 00.00% 0.00% 0 0.00Ped 00000000 00.00% 0.00% 0 0.0064655254 37100.00% 21 0.8821 20 18 17 16PM Peak Period1.00Intersection Turning Movement Count SummaryNorth 20th Avenue & JC Billion Access (JC Billion Traffic)Bozeman, Montana7/24/2008Hourly VolumePrivate AccessFrom the EastFrom the WestStart TimeNorth 20th AvenueFrom the NorthNorth 20th AvenueFrom the SouthIntersection TotalsN:\4571\001.06\Design Docs\Traffic Data\North-20th-Avenue_JC-Billion-Access_Billion-Traffic_PM_072408.xlsPrinted On: 7/25/2008320 Page 1/1Intersection:Location:Date Count Performed:Count Time Period:Seasonal Adjustment Factor:Street/Approach Total Peak HourRoad Movement 7:00 7:15 7:30 7:45 8:00 8:15 8:30 8:45 Total % % Volume PHFT 00000000 00.00% 0.00% 0 0.00Ped0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0.00T 00000000 00.00% 0.00% 0 0.00R 00004322 11100.00% 50.00% 11 0.69Ped0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0.00R 00012323 11100.00% 50.00% 10 0.83Ped0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0.0000016645 22100.00% 21 0.881 7 13 17 21Hourly VolumeJC Billion AccessFrom the NorthStart TimeWest Main StreetFrom the WestWest Main StreetFrom the EastIntersection TotalsNO DATANO DATANO DATAAM Peak Period1.00Intersection Turning Movement Count SummaryJC Billion Access & West Main Street (JC Billion Traffic)Bozeman, Montana7/23/2008 to 7/25/2008 (Average)N:\4571\001.06\Design Docs\Traffic Data\JC-Billion-Access_West-Main-Street_AM_072408.xlsPrinted On: 7/25/2008321 Page 1/1Intersection:Location:Date Count Performed:Count Time Period:Seasonal Adjustment Factor:Street/Approach Total Peak HourRoad Movement 4:00 4:15 4:30 4:45 5:00 5:15 5:30 5:45 Total % % Volume PHFT 00000000 00.00% 0.00% 0 0.00Ped0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0.00T 00000000 00.00% 0.00% 0 0.00R 110111001 15100.00% 44.12% 13 0.33Ped0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0.00R 24321313 19100.00% 55.88% 11 0.69Ped0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0.00314432314 34100.00% 24 0.4324 23 12 9 10Hourly VolumeJC Billion AccessFrom the NorthStart TimeWest Main StreetFrom the WestWest Main StreetFrom the EastIntersection TotalsNO DATANO DATANO DATAPM Peak Period1.00Intersection Turning Movement Count SummaryJC Billion Access & West Main Street (JC Billion Traffic)Bozeman, Montana7/23/2008 to 7/25/2008 (Average)N:\4571\001.06\Design Docs\Traffic Data\JC-Billion-Access_West-Main-Street_PM_072408.xlsPrinted On: 7/25/2008322 Appendix B Trip Generation Data 323 Page 1/2ITE Land Independent TotalUse Code Land Use Description Variable Units Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total814Specialty Retail Center11000 Sq. FeetGrossLeasable Area10.5 233 232 465 35 37 72 21 26 47881Pharmacy/Drugstore withDrive-Through Window21000 Sq. FeetGross Floor Area14.5 639 639 1,278 22 17 39 61 64 125912Drive-in Bank3Employees16 582 583 1,165 26 20 46 66 72 1381,454 1,454 2,908 83 74 157 148 162 3101Land Use: 814 - Specialty Retail CenterAverage Vehicle Trip Ends On a:WeekdayAverage Vehicle Trip Ends On a:Weekday, A.M. Peak Hour of GeneratorAverage Vehicle Trip Ends On a:Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent StreetTraffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m.Source: ITE Trip Generation, 7th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2003Average Weekday Trips Average AM Peak Hour Trips Average PM Peak Hour TripsTotalsAverage Trip Generation Rate Equation: Directional Distribution: Coefficient of Determination:T = 44.32(X)50% Entering50% ExitingR2 = ****T = Average Vehicle Trip EndsX = Independent Variable UnitsAverage Trip Generation Rate Equation: Directional Distribution: Coefficient of Determination:T = 6.84(X)Assumed Values:48% Entering52% ExitingR2 = ****T = Average Vehicle Trip EndsX = Independent Variable UnitsFitted Curve Trip Generation Rate Equation: Directional Distribution: Coefficient of Determination:T = 2.40(X) + 21.4844% Entering56% ExitingR2 = 0.98T = Average Vehicle Trip EndsX = Independent Variable UnitsTRIP GENERATION CALCULATIONS - ESTIMATED TOTAL TRIPSN:\4571\001.06\Design Docs\Calcs\Trip Generation\Trip-Generation_CVS-pharmacy_Bozeman.xlsPrinted On: 8/13/2008324 Page 2/22Land Use: 881 - Pharmacy/Drugstore with Drive-Through WindowAverage Vehicle Trip Ends On a:WeekdayAverage Vehicle Trip Ends On a:Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent StreetTraffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m.Average Vehicle Trip Ends On a:Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent StreetTraffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m.3Land Use: 912 - Drive-in BankAverage Vehicle Trip Ends On a:WeekdayAverage Vehicle Trip Ends On a:Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent StreetTraffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m.Average Vehicle Trip Ends On a:Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent StreetTraffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m.Source: ITE Trip Generation, 7th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2003Average Trip Generation Rate Equation: Directional Distribution: Coefficient of Determination:T = 88.16(X)50% Entering50% ExitingR2 = 0.96T = Average Vehicle Trip EndsX = Independent Variable UnitsAverage Trip Generation Rate Equation: Directional Distribution: Coefficient of Determination:T = 2.66(X)57% Entering43% ExitingR2 = ****T = Average Vehicle Trip EndsX = Independent Variable UnitsAverage Trip Generation Rate Equation: Directional Distribution: Coefficient of Determination:T = 8.62(X)49% Entering51% ExitingR2 = ****T = Average Vehicle Trip EndsX = Independent Variable UnitsCoefficient of Determination:T = 72.79(X)50% Entering50% ExitingR2 = ****T = Average Vehicle Trip EndsX = Independent Variable UnitsT = Average Vehicle Trip EndsX = Independent Variable UnitsAverage Trip Generation Rate Equation: Directional Distribution:T = 8.65(X)48% Entering52% ExitingR2 = ****T = Average Vehicle Trip EndsX = Independent Variable UnitsAverage Trip Generation Rate Equation: Directional Distribution: Coefficient of Determination:Average Trip Generation Rate Equation: Directional Distribution: Coefficient of Determination:T = 2.85(X)57% Entering43% ExitingR2 = ****N:\4571\001.06\Design Docs\Calcs\Trip Generation\Trip-Generation_CVS-pharmacy_Bozeman.xlsPrinted On: 8/13/2008325 Page 1/1ITE Land Independent TotalUse Code Land Use Description Variable Units Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total814Specialty Retail Center11000 Sq. FeetGrossLeasable Area10.5 131 131 2620006612881Pharmacy/Drugstore withDrive-Through Window21000 Sq. FeetGross Floor Area14.5 144 144 2880006612912Drive-in Bank3Employees16313162000336306 306 612 0 0 0 15 15 30Source: ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 2nd Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, June 2004TRIP GENERATION CALCULATIONS - ESTIMATED INTERNAL TRIPSAverage Weekday Trips Average AM Peak Hour Trips Average PM Peak Hour TripsTotalsN:\4571\001.06\Design Docs\Calcs\Trip Generation\Trip-Generation_CVS-pharmacy_Bozeman.xlsPrinted On: 8/13/2008326 Page 1/2ITE Land Independent TotalUse Code Land Use Description Variable Units Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total814Specialty Retail Center11000 Sq. FeetGrossLeasable Area10.5448123011881Pharmacy/Drugstore withDrive-Through Window21000 Sq. FeetGross Floor Area14.5 20 20 40112235912Drive-in Bank3Employees1622224411223546469234747111Land Use: 814 - Specialty Retail CenterAverage Vehicle Trip Ends On a:WeekdayAverage Vehicle Trip Ends On a:Weekday, A.M. Peak Hour of GeneratorAverage Vehicle Trip Ends On a:Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent StreetTraffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m.Assumed Trip Generation PercentagesAverage Weekday Trips Average AM Peak Hour Trips Average PM Peak Hour TripsTotalsAverage Bike/Ped Trip Generation Rate Equation: Directional Distribution: Coefficient of Determination:T = 4% {[44.32(X)] - Internal Trips}50% Entering50% ExitingR2 = ****T = Average Vehicle Trip EndsX = Independent Variable UnitsAverage Bike/Ped Trip Generation Rate Equation: Directional Distribution: Coefficient of Determination:T = 4% {[6.84(X)] - Internal Trips}Assumed Values:48% Entering52% ExitingR2 = ****T = Average Vehicle Trip EndsX = Independent Variable Unitsitted Curve Bike/Ped Trip Generation Rate EquationDirectional Distribution: Coefficient of Determination:T = 4% {[2.40(X) + 21.48] - Internal Trips}44% Entering56% ExitingR2 = 0.98T = Average Vehicle Trip EndsX = Independent Variable UnitsTRIP GENERATION CALCULATIONS - ESTIMATED BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN TRIPSN:\4571\001.06\Design Docs\Calcs\Trip Generation\Trip-Generation_CVS-pharmacy_Bozeman.xlsPrinted On: 8/13/2008327 Page 2/22Land Use: 881 - Pharmacy/Drugstore with Drive-Through WindowAverage Vehicle Trip Ends On a:WeekdayAverage Vehicle Trip Ends On a:Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent StreetTraffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m.Average Vehicle Trip Ends On a:Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent StreetTraffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m.3Land Use: 912 - Drive-in BankAverage Vehicle Trip Ends On a:WeekdayAverage Vehicle Trip Ends On a:Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent StreetTraffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m.Average Vehicle Trip Ends On a:Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent StreetTraffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m.Assumed Trip Generation PercentagesAverage Bike/Ped Trip Generation Rate Equation: Directional Distribution: Coefficient of Determination:T = 4% {[88.16(X)] - Internal Trips}50% Entering50% ExitingR2 = 0.96T = Average Vehicle Trip EndsX = Independent Variable UnitsAverage Bike/Ped Trip Generation Rate Equation: Directional Distribution: Coefficient of Determination:T = 4% {[2.66(X)] - Internal Trips}57% Entering43% ExitingR2 = ****T = Average Vehicle Trip EndsX = Independent Variable UnitsAverage Bike/Ped Trip Generation Rate Equation: Directional Distribution: Coefficient of Determination:T = 4% {[8.62(X)] - Internal Trips}49% Entering51% ExitingR2 = ****T = Average Vehicle Trip EndsX = Independent Variable UnitsCoefficient of Determination:T = 4%{[72.79(X)] - Internal Trips}50% Entering50% ExitingR2 = ****T = Average Vehicle Trip EndsX = Independent Variable UnitsT = Average Vehicle Trip EndsX = Independent Variable UnitsAverage Bike/Ped Trip Generation Rate Equation: Directional Distribution:T = 4% {[8.65(X)] - Internal Trips}48% Entering52% ExitingR2 = ****T = Average Vehicle Trip EndsX = Independent Variable UnitsAverage Bike/Ped Trip Generation Rate Equation: Directional Distribution: Coefficient of Determination:Average Bike/Ped Trip Generation Rate Equation: Directional Distribution: Coefficient of Determination:T = 4% {[2.85(X)] - Internal Trips}57% Entering43% ExitingR2 = ****N:\4571\001.06\Design Docs\Calcs\Trip Generation\Trip-Generation_CVS-pharmacy_Bozeman.xlsPrinted On: 8/13/2008328 Page 1/2ITE Land Independent TotalUse Code Land Use Description Variable Units Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total814Specialty Retail Center11000 Sq. FeetGrossLeasable Area10.5 33 33 660005712881Pharmacy/Drugstore withDrive-Through Window21000 Sq. FeetGross Floor Area14.5 233 233 466 0 0 0 26 27 53912Drive-in Bank3Employees16 249 249 498 0 0 0 29 31 60515 515 1,030 0 0 0 60 65 1251Land Use: 814 - Specialty Retail CenterAverage Vehicle Trip Ends On a:WeekdayAverage Vehicle Trip Ends On a:Weekday, A.M. Peak Hour of GeneratorAverage Vehicle Trip Ends On a:Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent StreetTraffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m.Source: ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 2nd Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, June 2004TRIP GENERATION CALCULATIONS - ESTIMATED PASS-BY TRIPSFitted Curve Pass-By Trip Generation Rate EquationDirectional Distribution: Coefficient of Determination:T = 34% {[2.40(X) + 21.48] - Bike/Ped - Internal Trips}44% Entering56% ExitingR2 = 0.98T = Average Vehicle Trip EndsX = Independent Variable UnitsAverage Pass-By Trip Generation Rate Equation: Directional Distribution: Coefficient of Determination:T = 0% {[6.84(X)] - Bike/Ped - Internal Trips}Assumed Values:48% Entering52% ExitingR2 = ****T = Average Vehicle Trip EndsX = Independent Variable UnitsAverage Pass-By Trip Generation Rate Equation: Directional Distribution: Coefficient of Determination:T = 34% {[44.32(X)] - Bike/Ped - Internal Trips}50% Entering50% ExitingR2 = ****T = Average Vehicle Trip EndsX = Independent Variable UnitsAverage Weekday Trips Average AM Peak Hour Trips Average PM Peak Hour TripsTotalsN:\4571\001.06\Design Docs\Calcs\Trip Generation\Trip-Generation_CVS-pharmacy_Bozeman.xlsPrinted On: 8/13/2008329 Page 2/22Land Use: 881 - Pharmacy/Drugstore with Drive-Through WindowAverage Vehicle Trip Ends On a:WeekdayAverage Vehicle Trip Ends On a:Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent StreetTraffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m.Average Vehicle Trip Ends On a:Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent StreetTraffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m.3Land Use: 912 - Drive-in BankAverage Vehicle Trip Ends On a:WeekdayAverage Vehicle Trip Ends On a:Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent StreetTraffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m.Average Vehicle Trip Ends On a:Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent StreetTraffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m.Source: ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 2nd Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, June 2004Average Pass-By Trip Generation Rate Equation: Directional Distribution: Coefficient of Determination:Average Pass-By Trip Generation Rate Equation: Directional Distribution: Coefficient of Determination:T = 0% {[2.85(X)] - Bike/Ped - Internal Trips}57% Entering43% ExitingR2 = ****T = 47% {[8.65(X)] - Bike/Ped - Internal Trips}48% Entering52% ExitingR2 = ****T = Average Vehicle Trip EndsX = Independent Variable UnitsT = Average Vehicle Trip EndsX = Independent Variable UnitsAverage Pass-By Trip Generation Rate Equation: Directional Distribution: Coefficient of Determination:T = 47%{[72.79(X)] - Bike/Ped - Internal Trips}50% Entering50% ExitingR2 = ****T = Average Vehicle Trip EndsX = Independent Variable UnitsAverage Pass-By Trip Generation Rate Equation: Directional Distribution: Coefficient of Determination:T = 49% {[8.62(X)] - Bike/Ped - Internal Trips}49% Entering51% ExitingR2 = ****T = Average Vehicle Trip EndsX = Independent Variable UnitsAverage Pass-By Trip Generation Rate Equation: Directional Distribution: Coefficient of Determination:T = 0% {[2.66(X)] - Bike/Ped - Internal Trips}57% Entering43% ExitingR2 = ****T = Average Vehicle Trip EndsX = Independent Variable UnitsAverage Pass-By Trip Generation Rate Equation: Directional Distribution: Coefficient of Determination:T = 49% {[88.16(X)] - Bike/Ped - Internal Trips}50% Entering50% ExitingR2 = 0.96T = Average Vehicle Trip EndsX = Independent Variable UnitsN:\4571\001.06\Design Docs\Calcs\Trip Generation\Trip-Generation_CVS-pharmacy_Bozeman.xlsPrinted On: 8/13/2008330 Page 1/1ITE Land Independent TotalUse Code Land Use Description Variable Units Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total814Specialty Retail Center11000 Sq. FeetGrossLeasable Area10.5 65 64 129 34 35 69 10 12 22881Pharmacy/Drugstore withDrive-Through Window21000 Sq. FeetGross Floor Area14.5 242 242 484 21 16 37 27 28 55912Drive-in Bank3Employees16 280 281 561 25 19 44 32 35 67587 587 1,174 80 70 150 69 75 144TRIP GENERATION CALCULATIONS - ESTIMATED NET NEW TRIPSAverage Weekday Trips Average AM Peak Hour Trips Average PM Peak Hour TripsTotalsN:\4571\001.06\Design Docs\Calcs\Trip Generation\Trip-Generation_CVS-pharmacy_Bozeman.xlsPrinted On: 8/13/2008331 8/13/2008AnalystName of DevelopmentDateTime Period%30%328%%4%28%1530%%22LAND USE BLAND USE CITE LU CodesITE LU CodeExit to ExternalSizeBalancedSizeExit to External495Total Internal External %44% %22Total Internal External552Enter639 144 495Enter582 31 551Exit639 144 495Exit583 31 552495Total1,278 288 990%33% %15Total1,165 62 1,103 551Enter from External%100% 23% 77%Balanced%100% 5% 95%Enter from External21%INTERNAL CAPTURE1,2785515521,1031,165Single-Use Trip Gen. Est.Net External Trips for Multi-Use DevelopmentLAND USE A LAND USE B LAND USE C102101203465495EnterExitTotal495990DemandMULTI-USE DEVELOPMENT INTERNAL CAPTURE SUMMARYTom EastwoodAugust 200810228%Demand4%44%13113126256%BalancedDemandEnter233ExitTotal%232465100%Demand DemandITE LU Codes814Size10,500 ft2 GLATotal ExternalInternalBalancedOffice/Bank91216 EmployeesDemand DemandDemand88114,500 ft2 GFAPharmacyDemand28%DemandBalancedDemand1013%DemandBalancedLAND USE A Specialty Retail102101203CVS/pharmacyWeekdayExit to ExternalEnter from ExternalN:\4571\001.06\Design Docs\Calcs\Trip Generation\CVS-Pharmacy_Internal-Trip-Capture-Analysis_Weekday.xls332 8/13/2008AnalystName of DevelopmentDateTime Period%20%320%%2%20%3120%%23LAND USE BLAND USE CITE LU CodesITE LU CodeExit to ExternalSizeBalancedSizeExit to External58Total Internal External %22% %23Total Internal External69Enter61 6 55Enter66 3 63Exit64 6 58Exit72 3 6955Total125 12 113%33% %31Total138 6 132 63Enter from External%100% 10% 90%Balanced%100% 4% 96%Enter from External10%INTERNAL CAPTURE1256369132138Single-Use Trip Gen. Est.Net External Trips for Multi-Use DevelopmentLAND USE A LAND USE B LAND USE C1520354755EnterExitTotal58113DemandMULTI-USE DEVELOPMENT INTERNAL CAPTURE SUMMARYTom EastwoodAugust 20081520%Demand2%74%661226%BalancedDemandEnter21ExitTotal%2647100%Demand DemandITE LU Codes814Size10,500 ft2 GLATotal ExternalInternalBalancedOffice/Bank91216 EmployeesDemand DemandDemand88114,500 ft2 GFAPharmacyDemand20%DemandBalancedDemand203%DemandBalancedLAND USE A Specialty Retail152035CVS/pharmacyPM Peak HourExit to ExternalEnter from ExternalN:\4571\001.06\Design Docs\Calcs\Trip Generation\CVS-Pharmacy_Internal-Trip-Capture-Analysis_PM-Peak.xls333 Appendix C Capacity and Level of Service Analyses: Existing Conditions 334 CVS/pharmacy Proposed Site Development 08/20/08 West Main Street (US 191) & 19th Avenue 17:39:30 AM Peak - Existing (2008) SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 2.81.11] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 1 - V/C 0.537 (Critical V/C 0.619) Control Delay 24.0 Level of Service C+ Sq 46 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5 **/** North G/C=0.142 G/C=0.294 G/C=0.112 G/C= -.057 G/C=0.202 G= 9.2"G= 19.1"G= 7.3"G= -3.7"G= 13.1" Y+R= 4.0"Y+R= 4.0"Y+R= 4.0"Y+R= 4.0"Y+R= 4.0" Off= 0.0%Off=20.3%Off=55.9%Off=73.2%Off=73.6% C= 65 sec G= 45.0 sec = 69.2% Y=20.0 sec = 30.8% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% Lane Width/g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L Queue Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume v/c Delay S Model 1 SB Approach 23.7 C+ RT+TH 24/2 0.237 0.294 897 980 695 0.709 22.9 *C+288 ft LT 12/1 0.114 0.142 176 246 132 0.528 28.0 *C 109 ft NB Approach 18.3 B RT 12/1 0.100 0.467 682 739 64 0.087 9.9 A 35 ft TH 24/2 0.122 0.294 959 1042 327 0.314 18.0 B 114 ft LT 12/1 0.079 0.142 176 248 81 0.323 25.8 C+64 ft WB Approach 24.3 C+ RT 12/1 0.101 0.406 584 653 67 0.103 12.3 B+40 ft TH 24/2 0.139 0.202 597 725 355 0.490 25.3 C+151 ft LT 12/1 0.090 0.112 132 193 99 0.493 29.0 *C 84 ft EB Approach 28.1 C RT+TH 24/2 0.167 0.206 609 736 458 0.622 27.4 *C+201 ft LT 24/2 0.096 0.116 295 398 233 0.585 29.5 *C 105 ft 335 CVS/pharmacy Proposed Site Development 08/20/08 West Main Street (US 191) & 19th Avenue 17:40:42 PM Peak - Existing (2008) SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 2.81.11] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 1 - V/C 0.882 (Critical V/C 0.958) Control Delay 60.0 Level of Service E+ Sq 46 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5 **/** North G/C=0.142 G/C=0.294 G/C=0.112 G/C= -.057 G/C=0.202 G= 9.2"G= 19.1"G= 7.3"G= -3.7"G= 13.1" Y+R= 4.0"Y+R= 4.0"Y+R= 4.0"Y+R= 4.0"Y+R= 4.0" Off= 0.0%Off=20.3%Off=55.9%Off=73.2%Off=73.6% C= 65 sec G= 45.0 sec = 69.2% Y=20.0 sec = 30.8% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% Lane Width/g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L Queue Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume v/c Delay S Model 1 SB Approach 34.8 C RT+TH 24/2 0.294 0.294 875 958 874 0.912 34.9 *C 440 ft LT 12/1 0.140 0.142 176 246 172 0.688 34.2 *C 152 ft NB Approach 19.8 B RT 12/1 0.142 0.467 682 739 122 0.165 10.5 B+67 ft TH 24/2 0.196 0.294 959 1042 591 0.567 20.2 C+226 ft LT 12/1 0.109 0.142 176 248 124 0.494 27.3 C+102 ft WB Approach 64.5 E+ RT 12/1 0.177 0.406 584 653 181 0.277 14.0 B+111 ft TH 24/2 0.248 0.202 597 725 774 1.068 78.9 E 544 ft LT 12/1 0.134 0.112 132 193 167 0.831 52.8 *D 167 ft EB Approach 103.6 F RT+TH 24/2 0.252 0.206 605 732 782 1.068 78.8 *E 549 ft LT 24/2 0.171 0.116 295 398 481 1.209 143.9 *F 452 ft 336 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst T. Eastwood Agency/Co.Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Date Performed 8/20/2008 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Intersection N 19th Ave / N Billion Access Jurisdiction MDT/City of Bozeman Analysis Year Existing (2008) Project Description CVS/pharmacy (MMI #4571.001.06.010.0310) East/West Street: JC Billion North Access North/South Street: North 19th Avenue Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)17 574 19 34 775 10 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)19 659 21 39 890 11 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 Configuration L T TR L T TR Upstream Signal 1 1 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)0 2 6 9 1 7 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)0 2 6 10 1 8 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) -3 -2 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LTR LTR v (veh/h)19 39 19 8 C (m) (veh/h)859 980 423 527 v/c 0.02 0.04 0.04 0.02 95% queue length 0.07 0.12 0.14 0.05 Control Delay (s/veh)9.3 8.8 13.9 11.9 LOS A A B B Approach Delay (s/veh)----13.9 11.9 Approach LOS ----B B Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 8/20/2008 1:35 PM 337 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst T. Eastwood Agency/Co.Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Date Performed 8/20/2008 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Intersection N 19th Ave / N Billion Access Jurisdiction MDT/City of Bozeman Analysis Year Existing (2008) Project Description CVS/pharmacy (MMI #4571.001.06.010.0310) East/West Street: JC Billion North Access North/South Street: North 19th Avenue Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)8 1190 10 21 889 8 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)8 1265 10 22 945 8 Percent Heavy Vehicles 10 -- -- 3 -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 Configuration L T TR L T TR Upstream Signal 1 1 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)5 0 11 8 0 32 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)5 0 11 8 0 34 Percent Heavy Vehicles 12 0 0 0 0 2 Percent Grade (%) -3 -2 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LTR LTR v (veh/h)8 22 42 16 C (m) (veh/h)787 553 344 420 v/c 0.01 0.04 0.12 0.04 95% queue length 0.03 0.12 0.41 0.12 Control Delay (s/veh)9.6 11.8 16.9 13.9 LOS A B C B Approach Delay (s/veh)----16.9 13.9 Approach LOS ----C B Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 8/20/2008 1:35 PM 338 CVS/pharmacy Proposed Site Development 08/20/08 North 19th Avenue & West Beall Street 17:51:09 AM Peak - Existing (2008) SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 2.81.11] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 1 - V/C 0.352 (Critical V/C 0.404) Control Delay 6.7 Level of Service A Sq 11 Phase 1 Phase 2 **/** North G/C=0.660 G/C=0.217 G= 42.9"G= 14.1" Y+R= 4.0"Y+R= 4.0" Off= 0.0%Off=72.2% C= 65 sec G= 57.0 sec = 87.7% Y= 8.0 sec = 12.3% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% Lane Width/g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L Queue Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume v/c Delay S Model 1 SB Approach 5.9 A RT+TH 24/2 0.317 0.660 2199 2199 969 0.441 5.9 *A 220 ft LT 12/1 0.000 0.660 509 545 10 0.018 3.9 A 4ft NB Approach 4.7 A RT+TH 24/2 0.195 0.660 2333 2333 560 0.240 4.7 A 113 ft LT 12/1 0.004 0.660 290 331 16 0.048 4.2 A 6ft WB Approach 20.8 C+ RT+TH+LT 12/1 0.060 0.217 240 312 45 0.144 20.8 C+31 ft EB Approach 21.8 C+ RT+TH+LT 12/1 0.104 0.217 230 300 88 0.293 21.8 *C+64 ft 339 CVS/pharmacy Proposed Site Development 08/20/08 North 19th Avenue & West Beall Street 17:49:21 PM Peak - Existing (2008) SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 2.81.11] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 1 - V/C 0.474 (Critical V/C 0.527) Control Delay 8.2 Level of Service A Sq 11 Phase 1 Phase 2 **/** North G/C=0.660 G/C=0.217 G= 42.9"G= 14.1" Y+R= 4.0"Y+R= 4.0" Off= 0.0%Off=72.2% C= 65 sec G= 57.0 sec = 87.7% Y= 8.0 sec = 12.3% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% Lane Width/g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L Queue Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume v/c Delay S Model 1 SB Approach 6.0 A RT+TH 24/2 0.328 0.660 2204 2204 1010 0.458 6.1 *A 232 ft LT 12/1 0.029 0.660 207 248 23 0.093 4.7 A 9ft NB Approach 6.4 A RT+TH 24/2 0.354 0.660 2324 2324 1171 0.504 6.4 A 277 ft LT 12/1 0.131 0.660 272 313 41 0.131 5.0 A 17 ft WB Approach 21.9 C+ RT+TH+LT 12/1 0.108 0.217 241 313 96 0.307 21.9 C+70 ft EB Approach 26.3 C+ RT+TH+LT 12/1 0.181 0.217 212 280 167 0.596 26.3 *C+136 ft 340 ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS General Information Site Information Analyst T. Eastwood Agency/Co.Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Date Performed 8/20/2008 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Intersection W Beall St / N 20th Ave Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Analysis Year Existing (2008) Project ID CVS/pharmacy (MMI #4571.001.060.010.0310) East/West Street: West Beall Street North/South Street: North 20th Avenue Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 55 30 25 24 6 %Thrus Left Lane Approach Northbound Southbound Movement L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 8 8 15 8 2 1 %Thrus Left Lane Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Flow Rate (veh/h)94 60 32 11 % Heavy Vehicles 2 5 5 10 No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 Geometry Group 1 1 1 1 Duration, T 0.25 Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Prop. Left-Turns 0.0 0.5 0.3 0.7 Prop. Right-Turns 0.4 0.1 0.5 0.1 Prop. Heavy Vehicle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 hLT-adj 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 hRT-adj -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 hadj, computed -0.2 0.1 -0.2 0.3 Departure Headway and Service Time hd, initial value (s)3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 x, initial 0.08 0.05 0.03 0.01 hd, final value (s)3.88 4.20 4.07 4.52 x, final value 0.10 0.07 0.04 0.01 Move-up time, m (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Service Time, ts (s)1.9 2.2 2.1 2.5 Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Capacity (veh/h)344 310 282 261 Delay (s/veh)7.32 7.52 7.23 7.58 LOS A A A A Approach: Delay (s/veh) 7.32 7.52 7.23 7.58 LOS A A A A Intersection Delay (s/veh)7.38 Intersection LOS A Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 8/20/2008 1:41 PM 341 ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS General Information Site Information Analyst T. Eastwood Agency/Co.Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Date Performed 8/20/2008 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Intersection W Beall St / N 20th Ave Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Analysis Year Existing (2008) Project ID CVS/pharmacy (MMI #4571.001.060.010.0310) East/West Street: West Beall Street North/South Street: North 20th Avenue Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 4 71 52 31 69 13 %Thrus Left Lane Approach Northbound Southbound Movement L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 52 27 75 2 7 2 %Thrus Left Lane Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR PHF 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 Flow Rate (veh/h)153 136 186 12 % Heavy Vehicles 2 5 5 10 No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 Geometry Group 1 1 1 1 Duration, T 0.25 Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Prop. Left-Turns 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.2 Prop. Right-Turns 0.4 0.1 0.5 0.2 Prop. Heavy Vehicle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 hLT-adj 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 hRT-adj -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 hadj, computed -0.2 0.1 -0.1 0.1 Departure Headway and Service Time hd, initial value (s)3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 x, initial 0.14 0.12 0.17 0.01 hd, final value (s)4.33 4.62 4.45 4.91 x, final value 0.18 0.17 0.23 0.02 Move-up time, m (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Service Time, ts (s)2.3 2.6 2.4 2.9 Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Capacity (veh/h)403 386 436 262 Delay (s/veh)8.30 8.59 8.77 7.99 LOS A A A A Approach: Delay (s/veh) 8.30 8.59 8.77 7.99 LOS A A A A Intersection Delay (s/veh)8.55 Intersection LOS A Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 8/20/2008 1:43 PM 342 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst T. Eastwood Agency/Co.Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Date Performed 8/20/2008 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Intersection W Main St / Billion Access Jurisdiction MDT Analysis Year Existing (2008) Project Description CVS/pharmacy (MMI #4571.001.06.010.0310) East/West Street: West Main Street (US 191) North/South Street: Existing JC Billion Access Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)613 618 11 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)0 696 0 0 702 12 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration T T TR Upstream Signal 1 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)9 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)0 0 0 0 0 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 3 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 1 Configuration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration R v (veh/h)10 C (m) (veh/h)639 v/c 0.02 95% queue length 0.05 Control Delay (s/veh)10.7 LOS B Approach Delay (s/veh)----10.7 Approach LOS ----B Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 8/20/2008 12:59 PM 343 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst T. Eastwood Agency/Co.Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Date Performed 8/20/2008 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Intersection W Main St / Billion Access Jurisdiction MDT Analysis Year Existing (2008) Project Description CVS/pharmacy (MMI #4571.001.06.010.0310) East/West Street: West Main Street (US 191) North/South Street: Existing JC Billion Access Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)1116 1170 5 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)0 1174 0 0 1231 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration T T TR Upstream Signal 1 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)8 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)0 0 0 0 0 8 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 3 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 1 Configuration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration R v (veh/h)8 C (m) (veh/h)432 v/c 0.02 95% queue length 0.06 Control Delay (s/veh)13.5 LOS B Approach Delay (s/veh)----13.5 Approach LOS ----B Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 8/20/2008 12:59 PM 344 Appendix D Capacity and Level of Service Analyses: Estimated 2012 Non-Site Traffic 345 CVS/pharmacy Proposed Site Development 08/20/08 West Main Street (US 191) & 19th Avenue 14:44:46 AM Peak - Estimated 2012 Background SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 2.81.11] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 1 - V/C 0.576 (Critical V/C 0.665) Control Delay 24.9 Level of Service C+ Sq 46 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5 **/** North G/C=0.142 G/C=0.294 G/C=0.112 G/C= -.057 G/C=0.202 G= 9.2"G= 19.1"G= 7.3"G= -3.7"G= 13.1" Y+R= 4.0"Y+R= 4.0"Y+R= 4.0"Y+R= 4.0"Y+R= 4.0" Off= 0.0%Off=20.3%Off=55.9%Off=73.2%Off=73.6% C= 65 sec G= 45.0 sec = 69.2% Y=20.0 sec = 30.8% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% Lane Width/g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L Queue Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume v/c Delay S Model 1 SB Approach 25.3 C+ RT+TH 24/2 0.253 0.294 896 979 749 0.765 24.6 *C+322 ft LT 12/1 0.120 0.142 176 246 141 0.564 29.0 *C 118 ft NB Approach 18.4 B RT 12/1 0.104 0.467 682 739 69 0.093 9.9 A 37 ft TH 24/2 0.129 0.294 959 1042 350 0.336 18.2 B 123 ft LT 12/1 0.082 0.142 176 248 86 0.343 26.0 C+68 ft WB Approach 24.8 C+ RT 12/1 0.106 0.406 584 653 74 0.113 12.4 B+44 ft TH 24/2 0.146 0.202 597 725 380 0.524 25.8 C+163 ft LT 12/1 0.095 0.112 132 193 106 0.527 29.9 *C 91 ft EB Approach 29.1 C RT+TH 24/2 0.176 0.206 609 736 490 0.666 28.4 *C 219 ft LT 24/2 0.102 0.116 295 398 249 0.626 30.5 *C 114 ft 346 CVS/pharmacy Proposed Site Development 08/20/08 West Main Street (US 191) & 19th Avenue 14:48:10 PM Peak - Estimated 2012 Background SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 2.81.11] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 1 - V/C 0.876 (Critical V/C 1.026) Control Delay 64.7 Level of Service E+ Sq 46 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5 **/** North G/C=0.142 G/C=0.294 G/C=0.112 G/C= -.057 G/C=0.202 G= 9.2"G= 19.1"G= 7.3"G= -3.7"G= 13.1" Y+R= 4.0"Y+R= 4.0"Y+R= 4.0"Y+R= 4.0"Y+R= 4.0" Off= 0.0%Off=20.3%Off=55.9%Off=73.2%Off=73.6% C= 65 sec G= 45.0 sec = 69.2% Y=20.0 sec = 30.8% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% Lane Width/g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L Queue Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume v/c Delay S Model 1 SB Approach 45.8 D RT+TH 24/2 0.313 0.294 874 957 940 0.982 47.5 *D 534 ft LT 12/1 0.147 0.142 176 246 183 0.732 37.2 *D+165 ft NB Approach 20.3 C+ RT 12/1 0.149 0.467 682 739 132 0.179 10.6 B+73 ft TH 24/2 0.207 0.294 959 1042 632 0.607 20.7 C+246 ft LT 12/1 0.114 0.142 176 248 133 0.530 28.0 C 110 ft WB Approach 82.7 F RT 12/1 0.186 0.406 584 653 195 0.299 14.2 B+120 ft TH 24/2 0.261 0.202 597 725 828 1.142 105.8 F 663 ft LT 12/1 0.099 0.112 132 193 113 0.562 31.0 *C 98 ft EB Approach 101.8 F RT+TH 24/2 0.199 0.206 601 728 573 0.787 32.8 *C 274 ft LT 24/2 0.181 0.116 295 398 515 1.294 178.6 *F 539 ft 347 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst T. Eastwood Agency/Co.Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Date Performed 8/20/2008 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Intersection N 19th Ave / N Billion Access Jurisdiction MDT/City of Bozeman Analysis Year Estimated 2012 Background Project Description CVS/pharmacy (MMI #4571.001.06.010.0310) East/West Street: JC Billion North Access North/South Street: North 19th Avenue Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)0 614 19 34 829 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)0 682 21 37 921 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 Configuration L T TR L T TR Upstream Signal 1 1 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)0 0 0 9 0 7 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)0 0 0 10 0 7 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) -3 -2 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LTR LTR v (veh/h)0 37 17 0 C (m) (veh/h)842 960 443 v/c 0.00 0.04 0.04 95% queue length 0.00 0.12 0.12 Control Delay (s/veh)9.3 8.9 13.5 LOS A A B Approach Delay (s/veh)----13.5 Approach LOS ----B Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 8/20/2008 2:41 PM 348 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst T. Eastwood Agency/Co.Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Date Performed 8/20/2008 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Intersection N 19th Ave / N Billion Access Jurisdiction MDT/City of Bozeman Analysis Year Estimated 2012 Background Project Description CVS/pharmacy (MMI #4571.001.06.010.0310) East/West Street: JC Billion North Access North/South Street: North 19th Avenue Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)0 1273 10 21 951 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)0 1414 11 23 1056 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 Configuration L T TR L T TR Upstream Signal 1 1 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)0 0 0 8 0 32 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)0 0 0 8 0 35 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) -3 -2 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LTR LTR v (veh/h)0 23 43 0 C (m) (veh/h)733 496 300 v/c 0.00 0.05 0.14 95% queue length 0.00 0.15 0.49 Control Delay (s/veh)9.9 12.6 19.0 LOS A B C Approach Delay (s/veh)----19.0 Approach LOS ----C Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 8/20/2008 2:42 PM 349 CVS/pharmacy Proposed Site Development 08/20/08 North 19th Avenue & West Beall Street 14:49:49 AM Peak - Estimated 2012 Background SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 2.81.11] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 1 - V/C 0.376 (Critical V/C 0.427) Control Delay 6.8 Level of Service A Sq 11 Phase 1 Phase 2 **/** North G/C=0.660 G/C=0.217 G= 42.9"G= 14.1" Y+R= 4.0"Y+R= 4.0" Off= 0.0%Off=72.2% C= 65 sec G= 57.0 sec = 87.7% Y= 8.0 sec = 12.3% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% Lane Width/g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L Queue Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume v/c Delay S Model 1 SB Approach 6.2 A RT+TH 24/2 0.335 0.660 2199 2199 1035 0.471 6.2 *A 240 ft LT 12/1 0.000 0.660 485 521 10 0.019 3.9 A 4ft NB Approach 4.8 A RT+TH 24/2 0.205 0.660 2333 2333 598 0.256 4.8 A 122 ft LT 12/1 0.004 0.660 262 303 16 0.053 4.2 A 6ft WB Approach 20.8 C+ RT+TH+LT 12/1 0.060 0.217 240 312 45 0.144 20.8 C+31 ft EB Approach 21.8 C+ RT+TH+LT 12/1 0.104 0.217 230 300 88 0.293 21.8 *C+64 ft 350 CVS/pharmacy Proposed Site Development 08/20/08 North 19th Avenue & West Beall Street 14:52:01 PM Peak - Estimated 2012 Background SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 2.81.11] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 1 - V/C 0.503 (Critical V/C 0.552) Control Delay 8.3 Level of Service A Sq 11 Phase 1 Phase 2 **/** North G/C=0.660 G/C=0.217 G= 42.9"G= 14.1" Y+R= 4.0"Y+R= 4.0" Off= 0.0%Off=72.2% C= 65 sec G= 57.0 sec = 87.7% Y= 8.0 sec = 12.3% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% Lane Width/g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L Queue Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume v/c Delay S Model 1 SB Approach 6.3 A RT+TH 24/2 0.347 0.660 2205 2205 1079 0.489 6.3 *A 254 ft LT 12/1 0.029 0.660 181 222 23 0.104 5.0 A 9ft NB Approach 6.7 A RT+TH 24/2 0.373 0.660 2325 2325 1248 0.537 6.7 A 303 ft LT 12/1 0.131 0.660 244 285 41 0.144 5.2 A 17 ft WB Approach 21.9 C+ RT+TH+LT 12/1 0.108 0.217 241 313 96 0.307 21.9 C+70 ft EB Approach 26.3 C+ RT+TH+LT 12/1 0.181 0.217 212 280 167 0.596 26.3 *C+136 ft 351 Appendix E Capacity and Level of Service Analyses: Estimated 2012 Total Traffic 352 CVS/pharmacy Proposed Site Development 08/20/08 West Main Street (US 191) & 19th Avenue 16:47:49 AM Peak - Estimated 2012 Total Traffic SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 2.81.11] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 1 - V/C 0.590 (Critical V/C 0.682) Control Delay 25.4 Level of Service C+ Sq 46 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5 **/** North G/C=0.142 G/C=0.294 G/C=0.112 G/C= -.057 G/C=0.202 G= 9.2"G= 19.1"G= 7.3"G= -3.7"G= 13.1" Y+R= 4.0"Y+R= 4.0"Y+R= 4.0"Y+R= 4.0"Y+R= 4.0" Off= 0.0%Off=20.3%Off=55.9%Off=73.2%Off=73.6% C= 65 sec G= 45.0 sec = 69.2% Y=20.0 sec = 30.8% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% Lane Width/g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L Queue Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume v/c Delay S Model 1 SB Approach 26.1 C+ RT+TH 24/2 0.256 0.294 897 980 762 0.778 25.0 *C+331 ft LT 12/1 0.132 0.142 176 246 158 0.632 31.4 *C 136 ft NB Approach 18.5 B RT 12/1 0.104 0.467 682 739 69 0.093 9.9 A 37 ft TH 24/2 0.132 0.294 959 1042 359 0.345 18.2 B 127 ft LT 12/1 0.087 0.142 176 248 92 0.367 26.2 C+73 ft WB Approach 24.7 C+ RT 12/1 0.115 0.406 584 653 85 0.130 12.5 B+51 ft TH 24/2 0.148 0.202 597 725 388 0.535 26.0 C+167 ft LT 12/1 0.095 0.112 132 193 106 0.527 29.9 *C 91 ft EB Approach 29.7 C RT+TH 24/2 0.176 0.206 609 736 490 0.666 28.4 *C 219 ft LT 24/2 0.108 0.116 295 398 268 0.673 32.0 *C 125 ft 353 CVS/pharmacy Proposed Site Development 08/20/08 West Main Street (US 191) & 19th Avenue 16:55:45 PM Peak - Estimated 2012 Total Traffic SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 2.81.11] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 1 - V/C 0.888 (Critical V/C 1.052) Control Delay 67.0 Level of Service E+ Sq 46 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5 **/** North G/C=0.142 G/C=0.294 G/C=0.112 G/C= -.057 G/C=0.202 G= 9.2"G= 19.1"G= 7.3"G= -3.7"G= 13.1" Y+R= 4.0"Y+R= 4.0"Y+R= 4.0"Y+R= 4.0"Y+R= 4.0" Off= 0.0%Off=20.3%Off=55.9%Off=73.2%Off=73.6% C= 65 sec G= 45.0 sec = 69.2% Y=20.0 sec = 30.8% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% Lane Width/g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L Queue Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume v/c Delay S Model 1 SB Approach 51.7 D RT+TH 24/2 0.319 0.294 875 958 963 1.005 53.3 *D 572 ft LT 12/1 0.158 0.142 176 246 201 0.804 44.2 *D+190 ft NB Approach 20.5 C+ RT 12/1 0.149 0.467 682 739 132 0.179 10.6 B+73 ft TH 24/2 0.209 0.294 959 1042 640 0.614 20.9 C+250 ft LT 12/1 0.118 0.142 176 248 138 0.550 28.5 C 115 ft WB Approach 81.8 F RT 12/1 0.196 0.406 584 653 211 0.323 14.5 B+131 ft TH 24/2 0.261 0.202 597 725 828 1.142 105.8 F 663 ft LT 12/1 0.099 0.112 132 193 113 0.562 31.0 *C 98 ft EB Approach 106.3 F RT+TH 24/2 0.200 0.206 601 728 575 0.790 33.0 *C 276 ft LT 24/2 0.183 0.116 295 398 523 1.314 187.0 *F 560 ft 354 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst T. Eastwood Agency/Co.Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Date Performed 8/20/2008 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Intersection N 19th Ave / N Billion Access Jurisdiction MDT/City of Bozeman Analysis Year Estimated 2012 Total Traffic Project Description CVS/pharmacy (MMI #4571.001.06.010.0310) East/West Street: JC Billion North Access North/South Street: North 19th Avenue Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)35 614 19 34 829 25 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)38 682 21 37 921 27 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 Configuration L T TR L T TR Upstream Signal 1 1 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)16 0 26 9 0 7 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)17 0 28 10 0 7 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) -3 -2 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LTR LTR v (veh/h)38 37 17 45 C (m) (veh/h)819 960 392 452 v/c 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.10 95% queue length 0.15 0.12 0.14 0.33 Control Delay (s/veh)9.6 8.9 14.6 13.8 LOS A A B B Approach Delay (s/veh)----14.6 13.8 Approach LOS ----B B Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 8/20/2008 4:37 PM 355 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst T. Eastwood Agency/Co.Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Date Performed 8/20/2008 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Intersection N 19th Ave / N Billion Access Jurisdiction MDT/City of Bozeman Analysis Year Estimated 2012 Total Traffic Project Description CVS/pharmacy (MMI #4571.001.06.010.0310) East/West Street: JC Billion North Access North/South Street: North 19th Avenue Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)44 1259 10 21 937 35 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)46 1339 10 22 996 37 Percent Heavy Vehicles 10 -- -- 3 -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 Configuration L T TR L T TR Upstream Signal 1 1 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)37 0 50 8 0 32 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)39 0 53 8 0 34 Percent Heavy Vehicles 12 0 0 0 0 2 Percent Grade (%) -3 -2 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LTR LTR v (veh/h)46 22 42 92 C (m) (veh/h)723 516 295 298 v/c 0.06 0.04 0.14 0.31 95% queue length 0.20 0.13 0.49 1.28 Control Delay (s/veh)10.3 12.3 19.2 22.4 LOS B B C C Approach Delay (s/veh)----19.2 22.4 Approach LOS ----C C Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 8/20/2008 4:40 PM 356 CVS/pharmacy Proposed Site Development 08/20/08 North 19th Avenue & West Beall Street 16:58:04 AM Peak - Estimated 2012 Total Traffic SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 2.81.11] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 1 - V/C 0.386 (Critical V/C 0.442) Control Delay 6.9 Level of Service A Sq 11 Phase 1 Phase 2 **/** North G/C=0.660 G/C=0.217 G= 42.9"G= 14.1" Y+R= 4.0"Y+R= 4.0" Off= 0.0%Off=72.2% C= 65 sec G= 57.0 sec = 87.7% Y= 8.0 sec = 12.3% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% Lane Width/g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L Queue Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume v/c Delay S Model 1 SB Approach 6.2 A RT+TH 24/2 0.342 0.660 2200 2200 1059 0.481 6.3 *A 248 ft LT 12/1 0.000 0.660 474 511 10 0.020 3.9 A 4ft NB Approach 4.8 A RT+TH 24/2 0.210 0.660 2333 2333 615 0.264 4.8 A 125 ft LT 12/1 0.004 0.660 252 293 16 0.055 4.3 A 6ft WB Approach 20.8 C+ RT+TH+LT 12/1 0.063 0.217 238 309 47 0.152 20.8 C+33 ft EB Approach 22.0 C+ RT+TH+LT 12/1 0.112 0.217 227 297 95 0.320 22.0 *C+70 ft 357 CVS/pharmacy Proposed Site Development 08/20/08 North 19th Avenue & West Beall Street 17:24:56 PM Peak - Estimated 2012 Total Traffic SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 2.81.11] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 1 - V/C 0.514 (Critical V/C 0.569) Control Delay 8.5 Level of Service A Sq 11 Phase 1 Phase 2 **/** North G/C=0.660 G/C=0.217 G= 42.9"G= 14.1" Y+R= 4.0"Y+R= 4.0" Off= 0.0%Off=72.2% C= 65 sec G= 57.0 sec = 87.7% Y= 8.0 sec = 12.3% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% Lane Width/g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L Queue Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume v/c Delay S Model 1 SB Approach 6.4 A RT+TH 24/2 0.352 0.660 2205 2205 1100 0.499 6.4 *A 261 ft LT 12/1 0.029 0.660 175 216 23 0.106 5.0 A 9ft NB Approach 6.8 A RT+TH 24/2 0.379 0.660 2324 2324 1268 0.546 6.8 A 310 ft LT 12/1 0.191 0.660 236 277 48 0.173 5.6 A 20 ft WB Approach 22.0 C+ RT+TH+LT 12/1 0.109 0.217 241 313 98 0.313 22.0 C+71 ft EB Approach 28.1 C RT+TH+LT 12/1 0.191 0.217 210 278 178 0.640 28.1 *C 148 ft 358 ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS General Information Site Information Analyst T. Eastwood Agency/Co.Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Date Performed 8/20/2008 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Intersection W Beall St / N 20th Ave Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Analysis Year Estimated 2012 Total Traffic Project ID CVS/pharmacy (MMI #4571.001.060.010.0310) East/West Street: West Beall Street North/South Street: North 20th Avenue Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 56 31 25 24 6 %Thrus Left Lane Approach Northbound Southbound Movement L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 10 9 20 8 3 1 %Thrus Left Lane Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Flow Rate (veh/h)96 60 43 12 % Heavy Vehicles 2 5 5 10 No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 Geometry Group 1 1 1 1 Duration, T 0.25 Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Prop. Left-Turns 0.0 0.5 0.3 0.7 Prop. Right-Turns 0.4 0.1 0.5 0.1 Prop. Heavy Vehicle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 hLT-adj 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 hRT-adj -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 hadj, computed -0.2 0.1 -0.2 0.3 Departure Headway and Service Time hd, initial value (s)3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 x, initial 0.09 0.05 0.04 0.01 hd, final value (s)3.90 4.23 4.08 4.53 x, final value 0.10 0.07 0.05 0.02 Move-up time, m (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Service Time, ts (s)1.9 2.2 2.1 2.5 Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Capacity (veh/h)346 310 293 262 Delay (s/veh)7.36 7.55 7.28 7.60 LOS A A A A Approach: Delay (s/veh) 7.36 7.55 7.28 7.60 LOS A A A A Intersection Delay (s/veh)7.41 Intersection LOS A Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 8/20/2008 4:42 PM 359 ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS General Information Site Information Analyst T. Eastwood Agency/Co.Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Date Performed 8/20/2008 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Intersection W Beall St / N 20th Ave Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Analysis Year Estimated 2012 Total Traffic Project ID CVS/pharmacy (MMI #4571.001.060.010.0310) East/West Street: West Beall Street North/South Street: North 20th Avenue Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 4 72 53 31 69 13 %Thrus Left Lane Approach Northbound Southbound Movement L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 54 28 83 2 8 2 %Thrus Left Lane Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR PHF 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 Flow Rate (veh/h)155 136 200 13 % Heavy Vehicles 2 5 5 10 No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 Geometry Group 1 1 1 1 Duration, T 0.25 Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Prop. Left-Turns 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.2 Prop. Right-Turns 0.4 0.1 0.5 0.2 Prop. Heavy Vehicle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 hLT-adj 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 hRT-adj -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 hadj, computed -0.2 0.1 -0.2 0.1 Departure Headway and Service Time hd, initial value (s)3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 x, initial 0.14 0.12 0.18 0.01 hd, final value (s)4.37 4.66 4.45 4.94 x, final value 0.19 0.18 0.25 0.02 Move-up time, m (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Service Time, ts (s)2.4 2.7 2.4 2.9 Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Capacity (veh/h)405 386 450 263 Delay (s/veh)8.38 8.66 8.90 8.03 LOS A A A A Approach: Delay (s/veh) 8.38 8.66 8.90 8.03 LOS A A A A Intersection Delay (s/veh)8.65 Intersection LOS A Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 8/20/2008 4:43 PM 360 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst T. Eastwood Agency/Co.Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Date Performed 8/20/2008 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Intersection W Main St / Billion Access Jurisdiction MDT Analysis Year Estimated 2012 Total Traffic Project Description CVS/pharmacy (MMI #4571.001.06.010.0310) East/West Street: West Main Street (US 191) North/South Street: Existing JC Billion Access Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)672 661 12 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)0 746 0 0 734 13 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration T T TR Upstream Signal 1 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)13 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)0 0 0 0 0 14 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 3 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 1 Configuration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration R v (veh/h)14 C (m) (veh/h)623 v/c 0.02 95% queue length 0.07 Control Delay (s/veh)10.9 LOS B Approach Delay (s/veh)----10.9 Approach LOS ----B Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 8/20/2008 4:11 PM 361 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst T. Eastwood Agency/Co.Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Date Performed 8/20/2008 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Intersection W Main St / Billion Access Jurisdiction MDT Analysis Year Estimated 2012 Total Traffic Project Description CVS/pharmacy (MMI #4571.001.06.010.0310) East/West Street: West Main Street (US 191) North/South Street: Existing JC Billion Access Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)979 1226 20 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)0 1030 0 0 1290 21 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration T T TR Upstream Signal 1 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)21 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)0 0 0 0 0 22 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 3 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 1 Configuration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration R v (veh/h)22 C (m) (veh/h)408 v/c 0.05 95% queue length 0.17 Control Delay (s/veh)14.3 LOS B Approach Delay (s/veh)----14.3 Approach LOS ----B Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 8/20/2008 4:13 PM 362 Appendix F Improvement Analyses: Existing Conditions 363 CVS/pharmacy Proposed Site Development 08/20/08 West Main Street (US 191) & 19th Avenue 18:44:05 PM Peak - Existing Mitigation Measures SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 2.81.11] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 1 - V/C 0.636 (Critical V/C 0.735) Control Delay 22.1 Level of Service C+ Sq 16 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 **/** North m G/C=0.446 G/C=0.086 G/C= -.049 G/C=0.289 G= 31.3"G= 6.0"G= -3.5"G= 20.2" Y+R= 4.0"Y+R= 4.0"Y+R= 4.0"Y+R= 4.0" Off= 0.0%Off=50.4%Off=64.6%Off=65.4% C= 70 sec G= 54.0 sec = 77.1% Y=16.0 sec = 22.9% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% Lane Width/g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L Queue Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume v/c Delay S Model 1 SB Approach 15.5 B RT+TH 24/2 0.297 0.446 1409 1458 874 0.599 15.3 B 317 ft LT 12/1 0.327 0.446 259 309 172 0.557 16.5 B 124 ft NB Approach 13.6 B+ RT 12/1 0.151 0.589 897 933 122 0.131 6.7 A 57 ft TH 24/2 0.201 0.446 1536 1583 591 0.373 13.0 B+187 ft LT 12/1 0.391 0.446 149 188 124 0.653 22.9 *C+101 ft WB Approach 25.7 C+ RT 12/1 0.186 0.289 362 464 181 0.390 22.4 C+141 ft TH 24/2 0.253 0.289 918 1034 774 0.749 27.6 *C 355 ft LT 12/1 0.058 0.086 217 264 167 0.633 20.9 *C+136 ft EB Approach 30.0 C RT+TH 24/2 0.258 0.296 937 1050 782 0.745 27.0 C+356 ft LT 24/2 0.094 0.094 482 529 481 0.909 34.8 *C 269 ft 364 Appendix G Improvement Analyses: Estimated 2012 Background Conditions 365 CVS/pharmacy Proposed Site Development 08/20/08 West Main Street (US 191) & 19th Avenue 18:53:08 PM Peak - 2012 Background Mitigation Measures SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 2.81.11] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 1 - V/C 0.616 (Critical V/C 0.780) Control Delay 23.4 Level of Service C+ Sq 18 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 **/** North m G/C=0.478 G/C=0.112 G/C=0.117 G/C=0.080 G= 35.8"G= 8.4"G= 8.8"G= 6.0" Y+R= 4.0"Y+R= 4.0"Y+R= 4.0"Y+R= 4.0" Off= 0.0%Off=53.1%Off=69.7%Off=86.7% C= 75 sec G= 59.0 sec = 78.7% Y=16.0 sec = 21.3% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% Lane Width/g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L Queue Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume v/c Delay S Model 1 SB Approach 15.2 B RT+TH 24/2 0.317 0.478 1513 1561 931 0.596 14.9 B+347 ft LT 12/1 0.361 0.478 266 316 183 0.579 16.8 B 139 ft NB Approach 13.5 B+ RT 12/1 0.161 0.643 990 1018 122 0.120 5.4 A 54 ft TH 24/2 0.217 0.478 1649 1694 632 0.373 12.6 B+204 ft LT 12/1 0.436 0.478 151 190 133 0.693 25.5 *C+117 ft WB Approach 31.4 C RT 12/1 0.191 0.282 337 453 175 0.386 24.2 C+146 ft TH 24/2 0.272 0.282 870 1011 828 0.819 32.5 *C 429 ft LT 12/1 0.112 0.112 114 192 113 0.557 34.9 *C 111 ft EB Approach 31.7 C RT+TH 24/2 0.212 0.250 724 882 570 0.646 28.8 C 272 ft LT 24/2 0.080 0.080 517 651 515 0.791 34.9 *C 269 ft 366 Appendix H Improvement Analyses: Estimated 2012 Total Traffic Conditions 367 CVS/pharmacy Proposed Site Development 08/20/08 West Main Street (US 191) & 19th Avenue 18:56:55 PM Peak - 2012 Total Mitigation Measures SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 2.81.11] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 1 - V/C 0.724 (Critical V/C 0.819) Control Delay 30.3 Level of Service C Sq 88 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5 Phase 6 **/** North m G/C=0.170 G/C=0.114 G/C=0.080 G/C=0.112 G/C=0.120 G/C=0.084 G= 12.7"G= 8.5"G= 6.0"G= 8.4"G= 9.0"G= 6.3" Y+R= 4.0"Y+R= 4.0"Y+R= 4.0"Y+R= 4.0"Y+R= 4.0"Y+R= 4.0" Off= 0.0%Off=22.3%Off=39.0%Off=52.3%Off=68.9%Off=86.2% C= 75 sec G= 51.0 sec = 68.0% Y=24.0 sec = 32.0% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% Lane Width/g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L Queue Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume v/c Delay S Model 1 SB Approach 31.6 C RT+TH 24/2 0.324 0.337 1001 1099 954 0.868 30.9 *C 496 ft LT 12/1 0.170 0.170 202 296 201 0.672 35.0 *C 195 ft NB Approach 26.7 C+ RT 12/1 0.161 0.412 569 653 122 0.187 14.7 B+83 ft TH 24/2 0.220 0.247 746 876 640 0.731 29.1 C 313 ft LT 12/1 0.016 0.080 242 335 138 0.412 26.0 *C+116 ft WB Approach 30.8 C RT 12/1 0.201 0.286 344 459 191 0.416 24.5 C+159 ft TH 24/2 0.272 0.286 885 1024 828 0.809 31.8 *C 424 ft LT 12/1 0.112 0.112 114 192 113 0.557 34.9 *C 111 ft EB Approach 31.3 C RT+TH 24/2 0.212 0.258 757 910 570 0.626 27.9 C 268 ft LT 24/2 0.084 0.084 533 666 532 0.799 34.9 *C 278 ft 368 Appendix I Queuing Analysis 369 M/M/N QUEUING S harmac - Bo eman, Montana rive- hrough nal sis B Morrison-Maierle, Inc. 8 8 8 INPUT DATA FOR PEAK HOUR: verage ehicle rrival ate, 2 ehicles r. verage Service ime, t 2. Minutes umber of e arture hannels, CALCULATED PARAMETERS: rrival ate ambda , λ .33 eh Min Service ate Mu , µ t .ehMin raffic Intensit erm, ρ λ µ ambda Mu .7 tili ation actor, ρ .7 must be . robabilit of having no vehicles in the s stem, .27 PROBABILITY TABLES: nn 27.27 27.27 8. 8 4 .4 22.2 7.8 38.8 . 4.3 7.4 3. 74. 4 2.3 77. 3 7 . 78. 3 8. 7. .7 8 .4 .47 8 .87 .32 8 . 2.2 8.4 3.4 8.4 4. 8.3 .8. RESULTS: verage ength of ueue . ehicles verage ime Waiting in S stem 3.27 Minutes verage ime S ent in S stem .27 Minutes STORAGE LENGTHS: Minimum cce table 22 eet Minimum esign 4 eet Ideal esign eet 370 1 Access Deviation Request A deviation is being requested from Section 18.44.090.D of the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance for the continued use of the existing site access to West Main Street. The access is in conflict with the access spacing standards of the City of Bozeman. For developments approved prior to July 10, 2002, access to an arterial in commercial/industrial district must be a minimum of 200 feet from the nearest intersection. Presently, the south access to the site is approximately 150 feet west of the intersection of West Main Street and North 19th Avenue. For developments approved after July 10, 2002, access to an arterial must be a minimum of 315 feet from the nearest intersection or other public and/or private accesses. There is a private access to West Main Street located approximately 150 feet to the west of the south access to the proposed CVS/pharmacy site. Utilizing the south access to West Main Street (US 191), minor modifications would be incorporated including a reduction in width from approximately 40 feet to 26 feet with its reconstruction to a City of Bozeman standard non-residential style approach. The access would retain right-in, right-out movement restrictions. The site access functions acceptably in terms of level of service. Data was requested on crashes for West Main Street (US 191) from milepost 87.75 to 88.25 from MDT. This roadway segment includes the existing site access, which located at approximately milepost 88.1. During the three year period beginning January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2007 there were 101 reported crashes within this roadway segment. However, a review of the data did not find any reported crashes involving traffic between vehicles exiting or entering the site access and westbound vehicles on West Main Street. Based on field observations, the existing traffic signal operations at the intersection of West Main Street and 19th Avenue create substantial gaps in the traffic stream west of the intersection. These available gaps allow traffic entering or exiting the site to do so with minimal conflicts that typically result within the functional area of an intersection. The existing raised median on West Main Street also limits potential conflicts by restricting movements at the access to right-in, right-out only. The combination of all these features would allow the continued use of the existing access to operate favorably. 371 2 The deviation request to allow continued use of the existing access to West Main Street is supported by the following: Intersection capacity analyses indicate that the proposed access would operate at acceptable levels of service throughout the design period. Evaluation of reported crashes at the access location did not find any reported crashes involving traffic between vehicles exiting or entering the site access and westbound vehicles on West Main Street. Field observations indicate that the existing traffic signal operations at the intersection of West Main Street and 19th Avenue create substantial gaps in the traffic stream west of the intersection. These available gaps allow traffic entering or exiting the site to do so with minimal conflicts that typically result within the functional area of an intersection. The existing raised median on West Main Street also limits potential conflicts by restricting movements at the access to right-in, right-out only. The combination of all these features would allow the continued use of the existing access to operate favorably. 372 Storm Water Management Design Report for CVS/pharmacy Bozeman, Montana August 2008 Prepared For: CVS/pharmacy c/o The Velmeir Companies 5757 West Maple Road, Suite 800 West Bloomfield, MI 48322-2277 Prepared By: Morrison-Maierle, Inc. 2880 Technology Boulevard West Bozeman, MT 59718 Phone: (406) 587-0721 Fax: (406) 922-6702 MMI Project No. 4480.001.01.020.0310 373 1 Storm Water Management Design Report – CVS/pharmacy Purpose of Report and Design Objectives This design report summarizes the management plan for storm water runoff from the CVS/pharmacy site redevelopment proposed to be located in Bozeman, Montana. The information contained in this report summarizes the basis of design for necessary storm drainage improvements. The methodology and analysis procedures utilized in this report are based on the standards found in the City of Bozeman Design Standards and Specifications Policy, February 2008. Proposed Development Location The proposed development is located in Bozeman, Montana on Lots 1 and 2A, Block 8 of West Park Manor, First Addition in the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 11, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, Principal Meridian of Montana. Generally, the property is bordered by North 19th Avenue to the east, West Main Street to the south, North 20th Avenue and Pierce Flooring to the west, and the Town & Country grocery store to the north. The site location is depicted in Figure 1. Development Description The proposed site would include four buildings on a total site area of approximately 4.36 acres (189,728 ft2). The proposed CVS/pharmacy building would be approximately 14,480 square feet (ft2) in size. The additional buildings proposed for the site include two potential retail uses (6,000 and 4,460 ft2) as well as a potential office/bank/retail building approximately 12,000 ft2 in size. The proposed site layout is shown in Figure 2. Development Horizon It is currently proposed to install the improvements necessary to serve the proposed CVS/pharmacy site with the initial development. Additional site improvements would be completed with the development of each remaining building pad site. It is estimated that full build-out of the site would occur by 2012. 374 2 Storm Water Management Design Report – CVS/pharmacy HUFFINE LN PROPOSEDPROPOSEDPROPOSEDPROPOSED SITESITESITESITE 11THAVES19THAVES19THAVENDURSTON RD OAK ST 7THAVENBABCOCK STW WILLSONAVESMAIN ST ROUSEAVENFOWLERLNBAXTER LN GARFIELD STW COLLEGE STW Figure 1 Site Location 375 3 Storm Water Management Design Report – CVS/pharmacy Figure 2 Site Layout Existing Area Conditions The proposed site redevelopment is located on property currently occupied by the JC Billion automotive dealership. Presently, there is not a functioning storm water management system in place on the site. Additionally, the site is nearly 100 percent impervious surfaces as there is very limited landscaping. Storm water runoff surface flows across the property and either drains onto North 19th Avenue or North 20th Avenue. There is some ponding on-site in depressed areas where the pavement surface has settled. 376 4 Storm Water Management Design Report – CVS/pharmacy Storm Runoff Calculations Storm water runoff calculations were performed using the Modified Rational Method for post- development conditions. Pre-development conditions were not analyzed as the existing site is nearly completely impervious and storm water is surface drained to the adjacent streets. The proposed improvements will incorporate on-site detention with overflows for large storm events. This will be an improvement over the existing situation. Calculations used for sizing of the on-site systems can be found in the appendix. Maintenance Maintenance of detention basins and storm drainage facilities is essential. General objectives of maintenance are to prevent clogging, standing water and the growth of weeds and wetland plants. This requires frequent unclogging of the outlets, inlets, and mowing. Cleaning out sediment with earth-moving equipment may also be necessary in 10 to 20 years. Inlets and storage facilities should be inspected at least once a year. Any necessary repair or maintenance should be prioritized, and scheduled through the spring, summer, and fall. These items may include removing blockages, cleaning and flushing the length of pipes, trimming and removing brush, mowing grass and weeds, and sediment removal. 377 Page 1/2 RATIONAL METHOD FOR RUNOFF CALCULATIONS Basin 1 Post Development, 10 Year Design Storm Frequency Input values for runoff coefficients from appropriate tables. Area Area A A Runoff Coefficient C x A (ft2)(Acres) C (Acres) 11,461.82 0.2631 0.95 0.2500 4,491.68 0.1031 0.95 0.0980 28,012.39 0.6431 0.35 0.2251 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 43,965.90 1.0093 0.5730 Weighted Runoff Coefficient, Cwd CjAj Aj Where Cj is the runoff coefficient for surface type j and Aj is the area of surface type j Basin Time of Concentration Tt = travel time (min) S = slope of basin (%) C = rational method runoff coefficient D = length of basin (ft) Cf = frequency adjustment factor Slope of Length Runoff Frequency Tt Flowpath (%)(ft) Coefficient, C Adjustment, Cf (min) 5.60 65.00 0.40 1.00 5.94 1.20 128.00 0.35 1.00 14.93 1.31 190.00 0.35 1.00 17.67 383.00 0.37 3.00 38.54 (Average Slope) 38.54 minutes Storm Water Runoff Design Storm Frequency = 10 Year Design Time of Concentration = 38.54 minutes = 0.64 hours Calculated Rainfall Intensity, I = 0.853 in/hr Weighted Runoff Coefficient, CW =0.5677 Drainage Basin Area, A = 1.0093 acres Peak Runoff Flow Rate, Q = 0.4890 cfs Q = CW*I*A Totals == Design Time of Concentration= Flow Course Description Overland Flow - Landscaped Slope Total Overland Flow - Landscaped Slope Overland Flow - Landscaped Slope Surface Type 0.5677 Asphalt & Concrete Building Landscaping POWER CURVE RAINFALL X=HR FREQUENCY I=IN/HR 6 MONTH I=0.36X.60(2/3) Assumed *2 YEAR I=0.36X-.60 *5 YEAR I=0.52X-.64 *10 YEAR I=0.64X-.65 *25 YEAR I=0.78X-.64 *50 YEAR I=0.92X-.66 *100 YEAR I=1.01X-.67 *From Figure 2, Pg. 36 City of Belgrade Design Standards and Specifications Policy (2004) 2/1 3/1 )1.1(87.1 S DCC T f t - = N:\4480\001.01\Design Docs\Calcs\Storm Drainage Analyses\Basin-01_Post-Development_10-Year.xls Printed On: 8/20/2008378 Page 2/2 Storm Runoff & Retention Summary for Varying Storm Durations Storm Runoff Discharge Amount Duration Volume Volume Stored (min)(ft3) (ft 3) (ft 3) 1 314.98 314.98 0.00 5 553.26 553.26 0.00 10 705.16 705.16 0.00 15 812.68 812.68 0.00 20 898.77 898.77 0.00 25 971.78 971.78 0.00 30 1,035.81 1,035.81 0.00 35 1,093.23 1,093.23 0.00 40 1,145.54 1,145.54 0.00 45 1,193.75 1,193.75 0.00 50 1,238.59 1,238.59 0.00 55 1,280.61 1,280.61 0.00 60 1,320.21 1,320.21 0.00 75 1,427.45 1,427.45 0.00 90 1,521.51 1,521.51 0.00 105 1,605.85 1,605.85 0.00 120 1,682.68 1,682.68 0.00 150 1,819.37 1,819.37 0.00 180 1,939.25 1,939.25 0.00 360 2,471.70 2,471.70 0.00 1440 4,015.28 4,015.28 0.00 Commentary: Storm water runoff from Basin 1 is discharged to North 19th Avenue. This is similar to storm drainage patterns for the previous site at this location. 0.00 500.00 1000.00 1500.00 2000.00 2500.00 3000.00 3500.00 4000.00 4500.00 0 500 1000 1500 Storm Duration (min)Volume (ft3)Runoff Volume Discharge Volume Volume Retained N:\4480\001.01\Design Docs\Calcs\Storm Drainage Analyses\Basin-01_Post-Development_10-Year.xls Printed On: 8/20/2008379 Page 1/2 RATIONAL METHOD FOR RUNOFF CALCULATIONS Basin 1 Post Development, 25 Year Design Storm Frequency Input values for runoff coefficients from appropriate tables. Area Area A A Runoff Coefficient C x A (ft2)(Acres) C (Acres) 11,461.82 0.2631 0.95 0.2500 4,491.68 0.1031 0.95 0.0980 28,012.39 0.6431 0.35 0.2251 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 43,965.90 1.0093 0.5730 Weighted Runoff Coefficient, Cwd CjAj Aj Where Cj is the runoff coefficient for surface type j and Aj is the area of surface type j Basin Time of Concentration Tt = travel time (min) S = slope of basin (%) C = rational method runoff coefficient D = length of basin (ft) Cf = frequency adjustment factor Slope of Length Runoff Frequency Tt Flowpath (%)(ft) Coefficient, C Adjustment, Cf (min) 5.60 65.00 0.40 1.10 5.60 1.20 128.00 0.35 1.10 14.24 1.31 190.00 0.35 1.10 16.84 383.00 0.37 3.30 36.68 (Average Slope) 36.68 minutes Storm Water Runoff Design Storm Frequency = 25 Year Design Time of Concentration = 36.68 minutes = 0.61 hours Calculated Rainfall Intensity, I = 1.069 in/hr Weighted Runoff Coefficient, CW =0.5677 Drainage Basin Area, A = 1.0093 acres Peak Runoff Flow Rate, Q = 0.6124 cfs Q = CW*I*A Surface Type 0.5677 Asphalt & Concrete Building Landscaping Totals == Design Time of Concentration= Flow Course Description Overland Flow - Landscaped Slope Total Overland Flow - Landscaped Slope Overland Flow - Landscaped Slope POWER CURVE RAINFALL X=HR FREQUENCY I=IN/HR 6 MONTH I=0.36X.60(2/3) Assumed *2 YEAR I=0.36X-.60 *5 YEAR I=0.52X-.64 *10 YEAR I=0.64X-.65 *25 YEAR I=0.78X-.64 *50 YEAR I=0.92X-.66 *100 YEAR I=1.01X-.67 *From Figure 2, Pg. 36 City of Belgrade Design Standards and Specifications Policy (2004) 2/1 3/1 )1.1(87.1 S DCC T f t - = N:\4480\001.01\Design Docs\Calcs\Storm Drainage Analyses\Basin-01_Post-Development_25-Year.xls Printed On: 8/20/2008380 Page 2/2 Storm Runoff & Retention Summary for Varying Storm Durations Storm Runoff Discharge Amount Duration Volume Volume Stored (min)(ft3) (ft 3) (ft 3) 1 368.49 368.49 0.00 5 657.74 657.74 0.00 10 844.16 844.16 0.00 15 976.82 976.82 0.00 20 1,083.41 1,083.41 0.00 25 1,174.03 1,174.03 0.00 30 1,253.68 1,253.68 0.00 35 1,325.22 1,325.22 0.00 40 1,390.48 1,390.48 0.00 45 1,450.70 1,450.70 0.00 50 1,506.79 1,506.79 0.00 55 1,559.38 1,559.38 0.00 60 1,609.00 1,609.00 0.00 75 1,743.59 1,743.59 0.00 90 1,861.87 1,861.87 0.00 105 1,968.11 1,968.11 0.00 120 2,065.04 2,065.04 0.00 150 2,237.77 2,237.77 0.00 180 2,389.57 2,389.57 0.00 360 3,066.84 3,066.84 0.00 1440 5,051.64 5,051.64 0.00 Commentary: Storm water runoff from Basin 1 is discharged to North 19th Avenue. This is similar to storm drainage patterns for the previous site at this location. 0.00 1000.00 2000.00 3000.00 4000.00 5000.00 6000.00 0 500 1000 1500 Storm Duration (min)Volume (ft3)Runoff Volume Discharge Volume Volume Retained N:\4480\001.01\Design Docs\Calcs\Storm Drainage Analyses\Basin-01_Post-Development_25-Year.xls Printed On: 8/20/2008381 Page 1/2 RATIONAL METHOD FOR RUNOFF CALCULATIONS Basin 1 Post Development, 100 Year Design Storm Frequency Input values for runoff coefficients from appropriate tables. Area Area A A Runoff Coefficient C x A (ft2)(Acres) C (Acres) 11,461.82 0.2631 0.95 0.2500 4,491.68 0.1031 0.95 0.0980 28,012.39 0.6431 0.35 0.2251 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 43,965.90 1.0093 0.5730 Weighted Runoff Coefficient, Cwd CjAj Aj Where Cj is the runoff coefficient for surface type j and Aj is the area of surface type j Basin Time of Concentration Tt = travel time (min) S = slope of basin (%) C = rational method runoff coefficient D = length of basin (ft) Cf = frequency adjustment factor Slope of Length Runoff Frequency Tt Flowpath (%)(ft) Coefficient, C Adjustment, Cf (min) 5.60 65.00 0.40 1.25 5.09 1.20 128.00 0.35 1.25 13.19 1.31 190.00 0.35 1.25 15.61 383.00 0.37 3.75 33.89 (Average Slope) 33.89 minutes Storm Water Runoff Design Storm Frequency = 100 Year Design Time of Concentration = 33.89 minutes = 0.56 hours Calculated Rainfall Intensity, I = 1.481 in/hr Weighted Runoff Coefficient, CW =0.5677 Drainage Basin Area, A = 1.0093 acres Peak Runoff Flow Rate, Q = 0.8486 cfs Q = CW*I*A Totals == Design Time of Concentration= Flow Course Description Overland Flow - Landscaped Slope Total Overland Flow - Landscaped Slope Overland Flow - Landscaped Slope Surface Type 0.5677 Asphalt & Concrete Building Landscaping POWER CURVE RAINFALL X=HR FREQUENCY I=IN/HR 6 MONTH I=0.36X.60(2/3) Assumed *2 YEAR I=0.36X-.60 *5 YEAR I=0.52X-.64 *10 YEAR I=0.64X-.65 *25 YEAR I=0.78X-.64 *50 YEAR I=0.92X-.66 *100 YEAR I=1.01X-.67 *From Figure 2, Pg. 36 City of Belgrade Design Standards and Specifications Policy (2004) 2/1 3/1 )1.1(87.1 S DCC T f t - = N:\4480\001.01\Design Docs\Calcs\Storm Drainage Analyses\Basin-01_Post-Development_100-Year.xls Printed On: 8/20/2008382 Page 2/2 Storm Runoff & Retention Summary for Varying Storm Durations Storm Runoff Discharge Amount Duration Volume Volume Stored (min)(ft3) (ft 3) (ft 3) 1 539.50 539.50 0.00 5 917.60 917.60 0.00 10 1,153.44 1,153.44 0.00 15 1,318.57 1,318.57 0.00 20 1,449.88 1,449.88 0.00 25 1,560.68 1,560.68 0.00 30 1,657.46 1,657.46 0.00 35 1,743.96 1,743.96 0.00 40 1,822.52 1,822.52 0.00 45 1,894.76 1,894.76 0.00 50 1,961.80 1,961.80 0.00 55 2,024.48 2,024.48 0.00 60 2,083.45 2,083.45 0.00 75 2,242.66 2,242.66 0.00 90 2,381.74 2,381.74 0.00 105 2,506.03 2,506.03 0.00 120 2,618.93 2,618.93 0.00 150 2,819.06 2,819.06 0.00 180 2,993.87 2,993.87 0.00 360 3,763.34 3,763.34 0.00 1440 5,946.39 5,946.39 0.00 Commentary: Storm water runoff from Basin 1 is discharged to North 19th Avenue. This is similar to storm drainage patterns for the previous site at this location. 0.00 1000.00 2000.00 3000.00 4000.00 5000.00 6000.00 7000.00 0 500 1000 1500 Storm Duration (min)Volume (ft3)Runoff Volume Discharge Volume Volume Retained N:\4480\001.01\Design Docs\Calcs\Storm Drainage Analyses\Basin-01_Post-Development_100-Year.xls Printed On: 8/20/2008383 Page 1/2 RATIONAL METHOD FOR RUNOFF CALCULATIONS Basin 2 Post Development, 10 Year Design Storm Frequency Input values for runoff coefficients from appropriate tables. Area Area A A Runoff Coefficient C x A (ft2)(Acres) C (Acres) 35,853.07 0.8231 0.95 0.7819 9,342.44 0.2145 0.95 0.2037 4,153.76 0.0954 0.35 0.0334 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 49,349.27 1.1329 1.0190 Weighted Runoff Coefficient, Cwd CjAj Aj Where Cj is the runoff coefficient for surface type j and Aj is the area of surface type j Basin Time of Concentration Tt = travel time (min) S = slope of basin (%) C = rational method runoff coefficient D = length of basin (ft) Cf = frequency adjustment factor Slope of Length Runoff Frequency Tt Flowpath (%)(ft) Coefficient, C Adjustment, Cf (min) 3.20 125.00 0.95 1.00 2.13 1.20 82.00 0.95 1.00 2.39 2.00 120.00 0.95 1.00 2.44 327.00 0.95 3.00 6.96 (Average Slope) 6.96 minutes Storm Water Runoff Design Storm Frequency = 10 Year Design Time of Concentration = 6.96 minutes = 0.12 hours Calculated Rainfall Intensity, I = 2.596 in/hr Weighted Runoff Coefficient, CW =0.8995 Drainage Basin Area, A = 1.1329 acres Peak Runoff Flow Rate, Q = 2.6453 cfs Q = CW*I*A Surface Type 0.8995 Asphalt & Concrete Building Landscaping Totals == Design Time of Concentration= Flow Course Description Overland Flow - Shallow Gutter Total Overland Flow - Pavement Overland Flow - Pavement POWER CURVE RAINFALL X=HR FREQUENCY I=IN/HR 6 MONTH I=0.36X.60(2/3) Assumed *2 YEAR I=0.36X-.60 *5 YEAR I=0.52X-.64 *10 YEAR I=0.64X-.65 *25 YEAR I=0.78X-.64 *50 YEAR I=0.92X-.66 *100 YEAR I=1.01X-.67 *From Figure 2, Pg. 36 City of Belgrade Design Standards and Specifications Policy (2004) 2/1 3/1 )1.1(87.1 S DCC T f t - = N:\4480\001.01\Design Docs\Calcs\Storm Drainage Analyses\Basin-02_Post-Development_10-Year.xls Printed On: 8/20/2008384 Page 2/2 Storm Runoff & Retention Summary for Varying Storm Durations Storm Runoff Discharge Amount Duration Volume Volume Stored (min)(ft3) (ft 3) (ft 3) 1 560.17 0.00 560.17 5 983.92 0.00 983.92 10 1,254.07 0.00 1,254.07 15 1,445.29 0.00 1,445.29 20 1,598.39 0.00 1,598.39 25 1,728.23 0.00 1,728.23 30 1,842.11 0.00 1,842.11 35 1,944.22 0.00 1,944.22 40 2,037.25 0.00 2,037.25 45 2,122.98 0.00 2,122.98 50 2,202.73 0.00 2,202.73 55 2,277.45 0.00 2,277.45 60 2,347.88 0.00 2,347.88 75 2,538.60 0.00 2,538.60 90 2,705.87 0.00 2,705.87 105 2,855.87 0.00 2,855.87 120 2,992.51 0.00 2,992.51 150 3,235.60 0.00 3,235.60 180 3,448.80 0.00 3,448.80 360 4,395.70 0.00 4,395.70 1440 7,140.84 0.00 7,140.84 Commentary: Storm water runoff from Basin 2 is retained on-site via underground storage. Overflow from large storm events will discharge to North 19th Avenue. 0.00 1000.00 2000.00 3000.00 4000.00 5000.00 6000.00 7000.00 8000.00 0 500 1000 1500 Storm Duration (min)Volume (ft3)Runoff Volume Discharge Volume Volume Retained N:\4480\001.01\Design Docs\Calcs\Storm Drainage Analyses\Basin-02_Post-Development_10-Year.xls Printed On: 8/20/2008385 Page 1/2 RATIONAL METHOD FOR RUNOFF CALCULATIONS Basin 2 Post Development, 25 Year Design Storm Frequency Input values for runoff coefficients from appropriate tables. Area Area A A Runoff Coefficient C x A (ft2)(Acres) C (Acres) 35,853.07 0.8231 0.95 0.7819 9,342.44 0.2145 0.95 0.2037 4,153.76 0.0954 0.35 0.0334 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 49,349.27 1.1329 1.0190 Weighted Runoff Coefficient, Cwd CjAj Aj Where Cj is the runoff coefficient for surface type j and Aj is the area of surface type j Basin Time of Concentration Tt = travel time (min) S = slope of basin (%) C = rational method runoff coefficient D = length of basin (ft) Cf = frequency adjustment factor Slope of Length Runoff Frequency Tt Flowpath (%)(ft) Coefficient, C Adjustment, Cf (min) 3.20 125.00 0.95 1.10 0.78 1.20 82.00 0.95 1.10 0.88 2.00 120.00 0.95 1.10 0.89 327.00 0.95 3.30 2.55 (Average Slope) 6.30 minutes Storm Water Runoff Design Storm Frequency = 25 Year Design Time of Concentration = 6.30 minutes = 0.11 hours Calculated Rainfall Intensity, I = 3.300 in/hr Weighted Runoff Coefficient, CW =0.8995 Drainage Basin Area, A = 1.1329 acres Peak Runoff Flow Rate, Q = 3.3630 cfs Q = CW*I*A Totals == Design Time of Concentration= Flow Course Description Overland Flow - Shallow Gutter Total Overland Flow - Pavement Overland Flow - Pavement Surface Type 0.8995 Asphalt & Concrete Building Landscaping POWER CURVE RAINFALL X=HR FREQUENCY I=IN/HR 6 MONTH I=0.36X.60(2/3) Assumed *2 YEAR I=0.36X-.60 *5 YEAR I=0.52X-.64 *10 YEAR I=0.64X-.65 *25 YEAR I=0.78X-.64 *50 YEAR I=0.92X-.66 *100 YEAR I=1.01X-.67 *From Figure 2, Pg. 36 City of Belgrade Design Standards and Specifications Policy (2004) 2/1 3/1 )1.1(87.1 S DCC T f t - = N:\4480\001.01\Design Docs\Calcs\Storm Drainage Analyses\Basin-02_Post-Development_25-Year.xls Printed On: 8/20/2008386 Page 2/2 Storm Runoff & Retention Summary for Varying Storm Durations Storm Runoff Discharge Amount Duration Volume Volume Stored (min)(ft3) (ft 3) (ft 3) 1 655.32 0.00 655.32 5 1,169.73 0.00 1,169.73 10 1,501.26 0.00 1,501.26 15 1,737.19 0.00 1,737.19 20 1,926.75 0.00 1,926.75 25 2,087.92 0.00 2,087.92 30 2,229.56 0.00 2,229.56 35 2,356.79 0.00 2,356.79 40 2,472.85 0.00 2,472.85 45 2,579.95 0.00 2,579.95 50 2,679.69 0.00 2,679.69 55 2,773.23 0.00 2,773.23 60 2,861.48 0.00 2,861.48 75 3,100.83 0.00 3,100.83 90 3,311.18 0.00 3,311.18 105 3,500.13 0.00 3,500.13 120 3,672.49 0.00 3,672.49 150 3,979.68 0.00 3,979.68 180 4,249.66 0.00 4,249.66 360 5,454.12 0.00 5,454.12 1440 8,983.92 0.00 8,983.92 Commentary: Storm water runoff from Basin 2 is retained on-site via underground storage. Overflow from large storm events will discharge to North 19th Avenue. 0.00 1000.00 2000.00 3000.00 4000.00 5000.00 6000.00 7000.00 8000.00 9000.00 10000.00 0 500 1000 1500 Storm Duration (min)Volume (ft3)Runoff Volume Discharge Volume Volume Retained N:\4480\001.01\Design Docs\Calcs\Storm Drainage Analyses\Basin-02_Post-Development_25-Year.xls Printed On: 8/20/2008387 Page 1/2 RATIONAL METHOD FOR RUNOFF CALCULATIONS Basin 2 Post Development, 100 Year Design Storm Frequency Input values for runoff coefficients from appropriate tables. Area Area A A Runoff Coefficient C x A (ft2)(Acres) C (Acres) 35,853.07 0.8231 0.95 0.7819 9,342.44 0.2145 0.95 0.2037 4,153.76 0.0954 0.35 0.0334 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 49,349.27 1.1329 1.0190 Weighted Runoff Coefficient, Cwd CjAj Aj Where Cj is the runoff coefficient for surface type j and Aj is the area of surface type j Basin Time of Concentration Tt = travel time (min) S = slope of basin (%) C = rational method runoff coefficient D = length of basin (ft) Cf = frequency adjustment factor Slope of Length Runoff Frequency Tt Flowpath (%)(ft) Coefficient, C Adjustment, Cf (min) 3.20 125.00 0.95 1.25 -1.24 1.20 82.00 0.95 1.25 -1.39 2.00 120.00 0.95 1.25 -1.42 327.00 0.95 3.75 -4.06 (Average Slope) 6.30 minutes Storm Water Runoff Design Storm Frequency = 100 Year Design Time of Concentration = 6.30 minutes = 0.11 hours Calculated Rainfall Intensity, I = 4.572 in/hr Weighted Runoff Coefficient, CW =0.8995 Drainage Basin Area, A = 1.1329 acres Peak Runoff Flow Rate, Q = 4.6593 cfs Q = CW*I*A Surface Type 0.8995 Asphalt & Concrete Building Landscaping Totals == Design Time of Concentration= Flow Course Description Overland Flow - Shallow Gutter Total Overland Flow - Pavement Overland Flow - Pavement POWER CURVE RAINFALL X=HR FREQUENCY I=IN/HR 6 MONTH I=0.36X.60(2/3) Assumed *2 YEAR I=0.36X-.60 *5 YEAR I=0.52X-.64 *10 YEAR I=0.64X-.65 *25 YEAR I=0.78X-.64 *50 YEAR I=0.92X-.66 *100 YEAR I=1.01X-.67 *From Figure 2, Pg. 36 City of Belgrade Design Standards and Specifications Policy (2004) 2/1 3/1 )1.1(87.1 S DCC T f t - = N:\4480\001.01\Design Docs\Calcs\Storm Drainage Analyses\Basin-02_Post-Development_100-Year.xls Printed On: 8/20/2008388 Page 2/2 Storm Runoff & Retention Summary for Varying Storm Durations Storm Runoff Discharge Amount Duration Volume Volume Stored (min)(ft3) (ft 3) (ft 3) 1 959.46 0.00 959.46 5 1,631.88 0.00 1,631.88 10 2,051.29 0.00 2,051.29 15 2,344.97 0.00 2,344.97 20 2,578.50 0.00 2,578.50 25 2,775.54 0.00 2,775.54 30 2,947.66 0.00 2,947.66 35 3,101.48 0.00 3,101.48 40 3,241.21 0.00 3,241.21 45 3,369.67 0.00 3,369.67 50 3,488.89 0.00 3,488.89 55 3,600.37 0.00 3,600.37 60 3,705.24 0.00 3,705.24 75 3,988.39 0.00 3,988.39 90 4,235.72 0.00 4,235.72 105 4,456.76 0.00 4,456.76 120 4,657.54 0.00 4,657.54 150 5,013.45 0.00 5,013.45 180 5,324.35 0.00 5,324.35 360 6,692.78 0.00 6,692.78 1440 10,575.15 0.00 10,575.15 Commentary: Storm water runoff from Basin 2 is retained on-site via underground storage. Overflow from large storm events will discharge to North 19th Avenue. 0.00 2000.00 4000.00 6000.00 8000.00 10000.00 12000.00 0 500 1000 1500 Storm Duration (min)Volume (ft3)Runoff Volume Discharge Volume Volume Retained N:\4480\001.01\Design Docs\Calcs\Storm Drainage Analyses\Basin-02_Post-Development_100-Year.xls Printed On: 8/20/2008389 Page 1/2 RATIONAL METHOD FOR RUNOFF CALCULATIONS Basin 3 Post Development, 10 Year Design Storm Frequency Input values for runoff coefficients from appropriate tables. Area Area A A Runoff Coefficient C x A (ft2)(Acres) C (Acres) 42,196.11 0.9687 0.95 0.9203 10,769.54 0.2472 0.95 0.2349 6,432.58 0.1477 0.35 0.0517 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 59,398.22 1.3636 1.2068 Weighted Runoff Coefficient, Cwd CjAj Aj Where Cj is the runoff coefficient for surface type j and Aj is the area of surface type j Basin Time of Concentration Tt = travel time (min) S = slope of basin (%) C = rational method runoff coefficient D = length of basin (ft) Cf = frequency adjustment factor Slope of Length Runoff Frequency Tt Flowpath (%)(ft) Coefficient, C Adjustment, Cf (min) 3.20 125.00 0.95 1.00 2.13 1.20 82.00 0.95 1.00 2.39 2.00 120.00 0.95 1.00 2.44 327.00 0.95 3.00 6.96 (Average Slope) 6.96 minutes Storm Water Runoff Design Storm Frequency = 10 Year Design Time of Concentration = 6.96 minutes = 0.12 hours Calculated Rainfall Intensity, I = 2.596 in/hr Weighted Runoff Coefficient, CW =0.8850 Drainage Basin Area, A = 1.3636 acres Peak Runoff Flow Rate, Q = 3.1327 cfs Q = CW*I*A Totals == Design Time of Concentration= Flow Course Description Overland Flow - Shallow Gutter Total Overland Flow - Pavement Overland Flow - Pavement Surface Type 0.8850 Asphalt & Concrete Building Landscaping POWER CURVE RAINFALL X=HR FREQUENCY I=IN/HR 6 MONTH I=0.36X.60(2/3) Assumed *2 YEAR I=0.36X-.60 *5 YEAR I=0.52X-.64 *10 YEAR I=0.64X-.65 *25 YEAR I=0.78X-.64 *50 YEAR I=0.92X-.66 *100 YEAR I=1.01X-.67 *From Figure 2, Pg. 36 City of Belgrade Design Standards and Specifications Policy (2004) 2/1 3/1 )1.1(87.1 S DCC T f t - = N:\4480\001.01\Design Docs\Calcs\Storm Drainage Analyses\Basin-03_Post-Development_10-Year.xls Printed On: 8/20/2008390 Page 2/2 Storm Runoff & Retention Summary for Varying Storm Durations Storm Runoff Discharge Amount Duration Volume Volume Stored (min)(ft3) (ft 3) (ft 3) 1 663.39 0.00 663.39 5 1,165.22 0.00 1,165.22 10 1,485.15 0.00 1,485.15 15 1,711.60 0.00 1,711.60 20 1,892.91 0.00 1,892.91 25 2,046.67 0.00 2,046.67 30 2,181.53 0.00 2,181.53 35 2,302.47 0.00 2,302.47 40 2,412.63 0.00 2,412.63 45 2,514.17 0.00 2,514.17 50 2,608.61 0.00 2,608.61 55 2,697.10 0.00 2,697.10 60 2,780.50 0.00 2,780.50 75 3,006.36 0.00 3,006.36 90 3,204.46 0.00 3,204.46 105 3,382.09 0.00 3,382.09 120 3,543.91 0.00 3,543.91 150 3,831.79 0.00 3,831.79 180 4,084.27 0.00 4,084.27 360 5,205.65 0.00 5,205.65 1440 8,456.61 0.00 8,456.61 Commentary: Storm water runoff from Basin 3 is retained on-site via surface storage. Overflow from large storm events will discharge to North 20th Avenue. 0.00 1000.00 2000.00 3000.00 4000.00 5000.00 6000.00 7000.00 8000.00 9000.00 0 500 1000 1500 Storm Duration (min)Volume (ft3)Runoff Volume Discharge Volume Volume Retained N:\4480\001.01\Design Docs\Calcs\Storm Drainage Analyses\Basin-03_Post-Development_10-Year.xls Printed On: 8/20/2008391 Page 1/2 RATIONAL METHOD FOR RUNOFF CALCULATIONS Basin 3 Post Development, 25 Year Design Storm Frequency Input values for runoff coefficients from appropriate tables. Area Area A A Runoff Coefficient C x A (ft2)(Acres) C (Acres) 42,196.11 0.9687 0.95 0.9203 10,769.54 0.2472 0.95 0.2349 6,432.58 0.1477 0.35 0.0517 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 59,398.22 1.3636 1.2068 Weighted Runoff Coefficient, Cwd CjAj Aj Where Cj is the runoff coefficient for surface type j and Aj is the area of surface type j Basin Time of Concentration Tt = travel time (min) S = slope of basin (%) C = rational method runoff coefficient D = length of basin (ft) Cf = frequency adjustment factor Slope of Length Runoff Frequency Tt Flowpath (%)(ft) Coefficient, C Adjustment, Cf (min) 3.20 125.00 0.95 1.10 0.78 1.20 82.00 0.95 1.10 0.88 2.00 120.00 0.95 1.10 0.89 327.00 0.95 3.30 2.55 (Average Slope) 6.30 minutes Storm Water Runoff Design Storm Frequency = 25 Year Design Time of Concentration = 6.30 minutes = 0.11 hours Calculated Rainfall Intensity, I = 3.300 in/hr Weighted Runoff Coefficient, CW =0.8850 Drainage Basin Area, A = 1.3636 acres Peak Runoff Flow Rate, Q = 3.9827 cfs Q = CW*I*A Surface Type 0.8850 Asphalt & Concrete Building Landscaping Totals == Design Time of Concentration= Flow Course Description Overland Flow - Shallow Gutter Total Overland Flow - Pavement Overland Flow - Pavement POWER CURVE RAINFALL X=HR FREQUENCY I=IN/HR 6 MONTH I=0.36X.60(2/3) Assumed *2 YEAR I=0.36X-.60 *5 YEAR I=0.52X-.64 *10 YEAR I=0.64X-.65 *25 YEAR I=0.78X-.64 *50 YEAR I=0.92X-.66 *100 YEAR I=1.01X-.67 *From Figure 2, Pg. 36 City of Belgrade Design Standards and Specifications Policy (2004) 2/1 3/1 )1.1(87.1 S DCC T f t - = N:\4480\001.01\Design Docs\Calcs\Storm Drainage Analyses\Basin-03_Post-Development_25-Year.xls Printed On: 8/20/2008392 Page 2/2 Storm Runoff & Retention Summary for Varying Storm Durations Storm Runoff Discharge Amount Duration Volume Volume Stored (min)(ft3) (ft 3) (ft 3) 1 776.07 0.00 776.07 5 1,385.26 0.00 1,385.26 10 1,777.88 0.00 1,777.88 15 2,057.29 0.00 2,057.29 20 2,281.78 0.00 2,281.78 25 2,472.64 0.00 2,472.64 30 2,640.38 0.00 2,640.38 35 2,791.05 0.00 2,791.05 40 2,928.49 0.00 2,928.49 45 3,055.34 0.00 3,055.34 50 3,173.45 0.00 3,173.45 55 3,284.23 0.00 3,284.23 60 3,388.73 0.00 3,388.73 75 3,672.19 0.00 3,672.19 90 3,921.30 0.00 3,921.30 105 4,145.06 0.00 4,145.06 120 4,349.18 0.00 4,349.18 150 4,712.98 0.00 4,712.98 180 5,032.70 0.00 5,032.70 360 6,459.09 0.00 6,459.09 1440 10,639.30 0.00 10,639.30 Commentary: Storm water runoff from Basin 3 is retained on-site via surface storage. Overflow from large storm events will discharge to North 20th Avenue. 0.00 2000.00 4000.00 6000.00 8000.00 10000.00 12000.00 0 500 1000 1500 Storm Duration (min)Volume (ft3)Runoff Volume Discharge Volume Volume Retained N:\4480\001.01\Design Docs\Calcs\Storm Drainage Analyses\Basin-03_Post-Development_25-Year.xls Printed On: 8/20/2008393 Page 1/2 RATIONAL METHOD FOR RUNOFF CALCULATIONS Basin 3 Post Development, 100 Year Design Storm Frequency Input values for runoff coefficients from appropriate tables. Area Area A A Runoff Coefficient C x A (ft2)(Acres) C (Acres) 42,196.11 0.9687 0.95 0.9203 10,769.54 0.2472 0.95 0.2349 6,432.58 0.1477 0.35 0.0517 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 59,398.22 1.3636 1.2068 Weighted Runoff Coefficient, Cwd CjAj Aj Where Cj is the runoff coefficient for surface type j and Aj is the area of surface type j Basin Time of Concentration Tt = travel time (min) S = slope of basin (%) C = rational method runoff coefficient D = length of basin (ft) Cf = frequency adjustment factor Slope of Length Runoff Frequency Tt Flowpath (%)(ft) Coefficient, C Adjustment, Cf (min) 3.20 125.00 0.95 1.25 -1.24 1.20 82.00 0.95 1.25 -1.39 2.00 120.00 0.95 1.25 -1.42 327.00 0.95 3.75 -4.06 (Average Slope) 6.30 minutes Storm Water Runoff Design Storm Frequency = 100 Year Design Time of Concentration = 6.30 minutes = 0.11 hours Calculated Rainfall Intensity, I = 4.572 in/hr Weighted Runoff Coefficient, CW =0.8850 Drainage Basin Area, A = 1.3636 acres Peak Runoff Flow Rate, Q = 5.5178 cfs Q = CW*I*A Totals == Design Time of Concentration= Flow Course Description Overland Flow - Shallow Gutter Total Overland Flow - Pavement Overland Flow - Pavement Surface Type 0.8850 Asphalt & Concrete Building Landscaping POWER CURVE RAINFALL X=HR FREQUENCY I=IN/HR 6 MONTH I=0.36X.60(2/3) Assumed *2 YEAR I=0.36X-.60 *5 YEAR I=0.52X-.64 *10 YEAR I=0.64X-.65 *25 YEAR I=0.78X-.64 *50 YEAR I=0.92X-.66 *100 YEAR I=1.01X-.67 *From Figure 2, Pg. 36 City of Belgrade Design Standards and Specifications Policy (2004) 2/1 3/1 )1.1(87.1 S DCC T f t - = N:\4480\001.01\Design Docs\Calcs\Storm Drainage Analyses\Basin-03_Post-Development_100-Year.xls Printed On: 8/20/2008394 Page 2/2 Storm Runoff & Retention Summary for Varying Storm Durations Storm Runoff Discharge Amount Duration Volume Volume Stored (min)(ft3) (ft 3) (ft 3) 1 1,136.25 0.00 1,136.25 5 1,932.56 0.00 1,932.56 10 2,429.26 0.00 2,429.26 15 2,777.05 0.00 2,777.05 20 3,053.61 0.00 3,053.61 25 3,286.96 0.00 3,286.96 30 3,490.79 0.00 3,490.79 35 3,672.96 0.00 3,672.96 40 3,838.43 0.00 3,838.43 45 3,990.56 0.00 3,990.56 50 4,131.75 0.00 4,131.75 55 4,263.77 0.00 4,263.77 60 4,387.97 0.00 4,387.97 75 4,723.28 0.00 4,723.28 90 5,016.19 0.00 5,016.19 105 5,277.96 0.00 5,277.96 120 5,515.74 0.00 5,515.74 150 5,937.23 0.00 5,937.23 180 6,305.42 0.00 6,305.42 360 7,925.99 0.00 7,925.99 1440 12,523.72 0.00 12,523.72 Commentary: Storm water runoff from Basin 3 is retained on-site via surface storage. Overflow from large storm events will discharge to North 20th Avenue. 0.00 2000.00 4000.00 6000.00 8000.00 10000.00 12000.00 14000.00 0 500 1000 1500 Storm Duration (min)Volume (ft3)Runoff Volume Discharge Volume Volume Retained N:\4480\001.01\Design Docs\Calcs\Storm Drainage Analyses\Basin-03_Post-Development_100-Year.xls Printed On: 8/20/2008395 Page 1/2 RATIONAL METHOD FOR RUNOFF CALCULATIONS Basin 4 Post Development, 10 Year Design Storm Frequency Input values for runoff coefficients from appropriate tables. Area Area A A Runoff Coefficient C x A (ft2)(Acres) C (Acres) 21,183.31 0.4863 0.95 0.4620 3,137.75 0.0720 0.95 0.0684 12,806.10 0.2940 0.35 0.1029 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 37,127.17 0.8523 0.6333 Weighted Runoff Coefficient, Cwd CjAj Aj Where Cj is the runoff coefficient for surface type j and Aj is the area of surface type j Basin Time of Concentration Tt = travel time (min) S = slope of basin (%) C = rational method runoff coefficient D = length of basin (ft) Cf = frequency adjustment factor Slope of Length Runoff Frequency Tt Flowpath (%)(ft) Coefficient, C Adjustment, Cf (min) 3.20 125.00 0.95 1.00 2.13 1.70 175.00 0.95 1.00 3.11 1.20 207.00 0.95 1.00 3.80 507.00 0.95 3.00 9.03 (Average Slope) 9.03 minutes Storm Water Runoff Design Storm Frequency = 10 Year Design Time of Concentration = 9.03 minutes = 0.15 hours Calculated Rainfall Intensity, I = 2.192 in/hr Weighted Runoff Coefficient, CW =0.7430 Drainage Basin Area, A = 0.8523 acres Peak Runoff Flow Rate, Q = 1.3880 cfs Q = CW*I*A Totals == Design Time of Concentration= Flow Course Description Overland Flow - Shallow Gutter Total Overland Flow - Shallow Gutter Overland Flow - Pavement Surface Type 0.7430 Asphalt & Concrete Building Landscaping POWER CURVE RAINFALL X=HR FREQUENCY I=IN/HR 6 MONTH I=0.36X.60(2/3) Assumed *2 YEAR I=0.36X-.60 *5 YEAR I=0.52X-.64 *10 YEAR I=0.64X-.65 *25 YEAR I=0.78X-.64 *50 YEAR I=0.92X-.66 *100 YEAR I=1.01X-.67 *From Figure 2, Pg. 36 City of Belgrade Design Standards and Specifications Policy (2004) 2/1 3/1 )1.1(87.1 S DCC T f t - = N:\4480\001.01\Design Docs\Calcs\Storm Drainage Analyses\Basin-04_Post-Development_10-Year.xls Printed On: 8/20/2008396 Page 2/2 Storm Runoff & Retention Summary for Varying Storm Durations Storm Runoff Discharge Amount Duration Volume Volume Stored (min)(ft3) (ft 3) (ft 3) 1 348.14 0.00 348.14 5 611.49 0.00 611.49 10 779.38 0.00 779.38 15 898.22 0.00 898.22 20 993.37 0.00 993.37 25 1,074.06 0.00 1,074.06 30 1,144.83 0.00 1,144.83 35 1,208.29 0.00 1,208.29 40 1,266.10 0.00 1,266.10 45 1,319.39 0.00 1,319.39 50 1,368.95 0.00 1,368.95 55 1,415.39 0.00 1,415.39 60 1,459.15 0.00 1,459.15 75 1,577.68 0.00 1,577.68 90 1,681.64 0.00 1,681.64 105 1,774.86 0.00 1,774.86 120 1,859.78 0.00 1,859.78 150 2,010.85 0.00 2,010.85 180 2,143.35 0.00 2,143.35 360 2,731.83 0.00 2,731.83 1440 4,437.88 0.00 4,437.88 Commentary: Storm water runoff from Basin 4 is retained on-site via a surface storage pond. Overflow from large storm events will discharge to North 20th Avenue. 0.00 500.00 1000.00 1500.00 2000.00 2500.00 3000.00 3500.00 4000.00 4500.00 5000.00 0 500 1000 1500 Storm Duration (min)Volume (ft3)Runoff Volume Discharge Volume Volume Retained N:\4480\001.01\Design Docs\Calcs\Storm Drainage Analyses\Basin-04_Post-Development_10-Year.xls Printed On: 8/20/2008397 Page 1/2 RATIONAL METHOD FOR RUNOFF CALCULATIONS Basin 4 Post Development, 25 Year Design Storm Frequency Input values for runoff coefficients from appropriate tables. Area Area A A Runoff Coefficient C x A (ft2)(Acres) C (Acres) 21,183.31 0.4863 0.95 0.4620 3,137.75 0.0720 0.95 0.0684 12,806.10 0.2940 0.35 0.1029 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 37,127.17 0.8523 0.6333 Weighted Runoff Coefficient, Cwd CjAj Aj Where Cj is the runoff coefficient for surface type j and Aj is the area of surface type j Basin Time of Concentration Tt = travel time (min) S = slope of basin (%) C = rational method runoff coefficient D = length of basin (ft) Cf = frequency adjustment factor Slope of Length Runoff Frequency Tt Flowpath (%)(ft) Coefficient, C Adjustment, Cf (min) 3.20 125.00 0.95 1.10 0.78 1.70 175.00 0.95 1.10 1.14 1.20 207.00 0.95 1.10 1.39 507.00 0.95 3.30 3.31 (Average Slope) 6.30 minutes Storm Water Runoff Design Storm Frequency = 25 Year Design Time of Concentration = 6.30 minutes = 0.11 hours Calculated Rainfall Intensity, I = 3.300 in/hr Weighted Runoff Coefficient, CW =0.7430 Drainage Basin Area, A = 0.8523 acres Peak Runoff Flow Rate, Q = 2.0900 cfs Q = CW*I*A Surface Type 0.7430 Asphalt & Concrete Building Landscaping Totals == Design Time of Concentration= Flow Course Description Overland Flow - Shallow Gutter Total Overland Flow - Shallow Gutter Overland Flow - Pavement POWER CURVE RAINFALL X=HR FREQUENCY I=IN/HR 6 MONTH I=0.36X.60(2/3) Assumed *2 YEAR I=0.36X-.60 *5 YEAR I=0.52X-.64 *10 YEAR I=0.64X-.65 *25 YEAR I=0.78X-.64 *50 YEAR I=0.92X-.66 *100 YEAR I=1.01X-.67 *From Figure 2, Pg. 36 City of Belgrade Design Standards and Specifications Policy (2004) 2/1 3/1 )1.1(87.1 S DCC T f t - = N:\4480\001.01\Design Docs\Calcs\Storm Drainage Analyses\Basin-04_Post-Development_25-Year.xls Printed On: 8/20/2008398 Page 2/2 Storm Runoff & Retention Summary for Varying Storm Durations Storm Runoff Discharge Amount Duration Volume Volume Stored (min)(ft3) (ft 3) (ft 3) 1 407.27 0.00 407.27 5 726.96 0.00 726.96 10 933.00 0.00 933.00 15 1,079.63 0.00 1,079.63 20 1,197.44 0.00 1,197.44 25 1,297.60 0.00 1,297.60 30 1,385.62 0.00 1,385.62 35 1,464.69 0.00 1,464.69 40 1,536.82 0.00 1,536.82 45 1,603.39 0.00 1,603.39 50 1,665.37 0.00 1,665.37 55 1,723.50 0.00 1,723.50 60 1,778.35 0.00 1,778.35 75 1,927.10 0.00 1,927.10 90 2,057.83 0.00 2,057.83 105 2,175.25 0.00 2,175.25 120 2,282.37 0.00 2,282.37 150 2,473.29 0.00 2,473.29 180 2,641.07 0.00 2,641.07 360 3,389.62 0.00 3,389.62 1440 5,583.31 0.00 5,583.31 Commentary: Storm water runoff from Basin 4 is retained on-site via a surface storage pond. Overflow from large storm events will discharge to North 20th Avenue. 0.00 1000.00 2000.00 3000.00 4000.00 5000.00 6000.00 0 500 1000 1500 Storm Duration (min)Volume (ft3)Runoff Volume Discharge Volume Volume Retained N:\4480\001.01\Design Docs\Calcs\Storm Drainage Analyses\Basin-04_Post-Development_25-Year.xls Printed On: 8/20/2008399 Page 1/2 RATIONAL METHOD FOR RUNOFF CALCULATIONS Basin 4 Post Development, 100 Year Design Storm Frequency Input values for runoff coefficients from appropriate tables. Area Area A A Runoff Coefficient C x A (ft2)(Acres) C (Acres) 21,183.31 0.4863 0.95 0.4620 3,137.75 0.0720 0.95 0.0684 12,806.10 0.2940 0.35 0.1029 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 37,127.17 0.8523 0.6333 Weighted Runoff Coefficient, Cwd CjAj Aj Where Cj is the runoff coefficient for surface type j and Aj is the area of surface type j Basin Time of Concentration Tt = travel time (min) S = slope of basin (%) C = rational method runoff coefficient D = length of basin (ft) Cf = frequency adjustment factor Slope of Length Runoff Frequency Tt Flowpath (%)(ft) Coefficient, C Adjustment, Cf (min) 3.20 125.00 0.95 1.25 -1.24 1.70 175.00 0.95 1.25 -1.81 1.20 207.00 0.95 1.25 -2.22 507.00 0.95 3.75 -5.27 (Average Slope) 6.30 minutes Storm Water Runoff Design Storm Frequency = 100 Year Design Time of Concentration = 6.30 minutes = 0.11 hours Calculated Rainfall Intensity, I = 4.572 in/hr Weighted Runoff Coefficient, CW =0.7430 Drainage Basin Area, A = 0.8523 acres Peak Runoff Flow Rate, Q = 2.8956 cfs Q = CW*I*A Totals == Design Time of Concentration= Flow Course Description Overland Flow - Shallow Gutter Total Overland Flow - Shallow Gutter Overland Flow - Pavement Surface Type 0.7430 Asphalt & Concrete Building Landscaping POWER CURVE RAINFALL X=HR FREQUENCY I=IN/HR 6 MONTH I=0.36X.60(2/3) Assumed *2 YEAR I=0.36X-.60 *5 YEAR I=0.52X-.64 *10 YEAR I=0.64X-.65 *25 YEAR I=0.78X-.64 *50 YEAR I=0.92X-.66 *100 YEAR I=1.01X-.67 *From Figure 2, Pg. 36 City of Belgrade Design Standards and Specifications Policy (2004) 2/1 3/1 )1.1(87.1 S DCC T f t - = N:\4480\001.01\Design Docs\Calcs\Storm Drainage Analyses\Basin-04_Post-Development_100-Year.xls Printed On: 8/20/2008400 Page 2/2 Storm Runoff & Retention Summary for Varying Storm Durations Storm Runoff Discharge Amount Duration Volume Volume Stored (min)(ft3) (ft 3) (ft 3) 1 596.28 0.00 596.28 5 1,014.18 0.00 1,014.18 10 1,274.83 0.00 1,274.83 15 1,457.35 0.00 1,457.35 20 1,602.48 0.00 1,602.48 25 1,724.94 0.00 1,724.94 30 1,831.90 0.00 1,831.90 35 1,927.50 0.00 1,927.50 40 2,014.34 0.00 2,014.34 45 2,094.18 0.00 2,094.18 50 2,168.27 0.00 2,168.27 55 2,237.55 0.00 2,237.55 60 2,302.73 0.00 2,302.73 75 2,478.70 0.00 2,478.70 90 2,632.41 0.00 2,632.41 105 2,769.78 0.00 2,769.78 120 2,894.56 0.00 2,894.56 150 3,115.75 0.00 3,115.75 180 3,308.97 0.00 3,308.97 360 4,159.42 0.00 4,159.42 1440 6,572.23 0.00 6,572.23 Commentary: Storm water runoff from Basin 4 is retained on-site via a surface storage pond. Overflow from large storm events will discharge to North 20th Avenue. 0.00 1000.00 2000.00 3000.00 4000.00 5000.00 6000.00 7000.00 0 500 1000 1500 Storm Duration (min)Volume (ft3)Runoff Volume Discharge Volume Volume Retained N:\4480\001.01\Design Docs\Calcs\Storm Drainage Analyses\Basin-04_Post-Development_100-Year.xls Printed On: 8/20/2008401 Page 1/2 RATIONAL METHOD FOR RUNOFF CALCULATIONS Basin 5 Post Development, 10 Year Design Storm Frequency Input values for runoff coefficients from appropriate tables. Area Area A A Runoff Coefficient C x A (ft2)(Acres) C (Acres) 2,090.02 0.0480 0.95 0.0456 1,321.25 0.0303 0.95 0.0288 11,314.97 0.2598 0.35 0.0909 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 14,726.24 0.3381 0.1653 Weighted Runoff Coefficient, Cwd CjAj Aj Where Cj is the runoff coefficient for surface type j and Aj is the area of surface type j Basin Time of Concentration Tt = travel time (min) S = slope of basin (%) C = rational method runoff coefficient D = length of basin (ft) Cf = frequency adjustment factor Slope of Length Runoff Frequency Tt Flowpath (%)(ft) Coefficient, C Adjustment, Cf (min) 2.00 30.00 0.95 1.00 1.22 25.00 12.00 0.45 1.00 1.44 1.00 104.00 0.35 1.00 14.30 146.00 0.58 3.00 16.96 (Average Slope) 16.96 minutes Storm Water Runoff Design Storm Frequency = 10 Year Design Time of Concentration = 16.96 minutes = 0.28 hours Calculated Rainfall Intensity, I = 1.455 in/hr Weighted Runoff Coefficient, CW =0.4890 Drainage Basin Area, A = 0.3381 acres Peak Runoff Flow Rate, Q = 0.2405 cfs Q = CW*I*A Surface Type 0.4890 Asphalt & Concrete Building Landscaping Totals == Design Time of Concentration= Flow Course Description Overland Flow - Concrete Total Overland Flow - Landscaped Slope Overland Flow - Pavement POWER CURVE RAINFALL X=HR FREQUENCY I=IN/HR 6 MONTH I=0.36X.60(2/3) Assumed *2 YEAR I=0.36X-.60 *5 YEAR I=0.52X-.64 *10 YEAR I=0.64X-.65 *25 YEAR I=0.78X-.64 *50 YEAR I=0.92X-.66 *100 YEAR I=1.01X-.67 *From Figure 2, Pg. 36 City of Belgrade Design Standards and Specifications Policy (2004) 2/1 3/1 )1.1(87.1 S DCC T f t - = N:\4480\001.01\Design Docs\Calcs\Storm Drainage Analyses\Basin-05_Post-Development_10-Year.xls Printed On: 8/20/2008402 Page 2/2 Storm Runoff & Retention Summary for Varying Storm Durations Storm Runoff Discharge Amount Duration Volume Volume Stored (min)(ft3) (ft 3) (ft 3) 1 90.87 0.00 90.87 5 159.61 0.00 159.61 10 203.44 0.00 203.44 15 234.46 0.00 234.46 20 259.29 0.00 259.29 25 280.36 0.00 280.36 30 298.83 0.00 298.83 35 315.40 0.00 315.40 40 330.49 0.00 330.49 45 344.39 0.00 344.39 50 357.33 0.00 357.33 55 369.45 0.00 369.45 60 380.88 0.00 380.88 75 411.82 0.00 411.82 90 438.95 0.00 438.95 105 463.28 0.00 463.28 120 485.45 0.00 485.45 150 524.88 0.00 524.88 180 559.47 0.00 559.47 360 713.08 0.00 713.08 1440 1,158.40 0.00 1,158.40 Commentary: Storm water runoff from Basin 5 is retained on-site via a surface storage pond and also has some runoff to North 20th Avenue. Overflow from large storm events will discharge to North 20th Avenue. 0.00 200.00 400.00 600.00 800.00 1000.00 1200.00 1400.00 0 500 1000 1500 Storm Duration (min)Volume (ft3)Runoff Volume Discharge Volume Volume Retained N:\4480\001.01\Design Docs\Calcs\Storm Drainage Analyses\Basin-05_Post-Development_10-Year.xls Printed On: 8/20/2008403 Page 1/2 RATIONAL METHOD FOR RUNOFF CALCULATIONS Basin 5 Post Development, 25 Year Design Storm Frequency Input values for runoff coefficients from appropriate tables. Area Area A A Runoff Coefficient C x A (ft2)(Acres) C (Acres) 2,090.02 0.0480 0.95 0.0456 1,321.25 0.0303 0.95 0.0288 11,314.97 0.2598 0.35 0.0909 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 14,726.24 0.3381 0.1653 Weighted Runoff Coefficient, Cwd CjAj Aj Where Cj is the runoff coefficient for surface type j and Aj is the area of surface type j Basin Time of Concentration Tt = travel time (min) S = slope of basin (%) C = rational method runoff coefficient D = length of basin (ft) Cf = frequency adjustment factor Slope of Length Runoff Frequency Tt Flowpath (%)(ft) Coefficient, C Adjustment, Cf (min) 2.00 30.00 0.95 1.10 0.45 25.00 12.00 0.45 1.10 1.34 1.00 104.00 0.35 1.10 13.64 146.00 0.58 3.30 15.42 (Average Slope) 15.42 minutes Storm Water Runoff Design Storm Frequency = 25 Year Design Time of Concentration = 15.42 minutes = 0.26 hours Calculated Rainfall Intensity, I = 1.861 in/hr Weighted Runoff Coefficient, CW =0.4890 Drainage Basin Area, A = 0.3381 acres Peak Runoff Flow Rate, Q = 0.3076 cfs Q = CW*I*A Totals == Design Time of Concentration= Flow Course Description Overland Flow - Concrete Total Overland Flow - Landscaped Slope Overland Flow - Pavement Surface Type 0.4890 Asphalt & Concrete Building Landscaping POWER CURVE RAINFALL X=HR FREQUENCY I=IN/HR 6 MONTH I=0.36X.60(2/3) Assumed *2 YEAR I=0.36X-.60 *5 YEAR I=0.52X-.64 *10 YEAR I=0.64X-.65 *25 YEAR I=0.78X-.64 *50 YEAR I=0.92X-.66 *100 YEAR I=1.01X-.67 *From Figure 2, Pg. 36 City of Belgrade Design Standards and Specifications Policy (2004) 2/1 3/1 )1.1(87.1 S DCC T f t - = N:\4480\001.01\Design Docs\Calcs\Storm Drainage Analyses\Basin-05_Post-Development_25-Year.xls Printed On: 8/20/2008404 Page 2/2 Storm Runoff & Retention Summary for Varying Storm Durations Storm Runoff Discharge Amount Duration Volume Volume Stored (min)(ft3) (ft 3) (ft 3) 1 106.31 0.00 106.31 5 189.76 0.00 189.76 10 243.54 0.00 243.54 15 281.81 0.00 281.81 20 312.56 0.00 312.56 25 338.71 0.00 338.71 30 361.68 0.00 361.68 35 382.32 0.00 382.32 40 401.15 0.00 401.15 45 418.52 0.00 418.52 50 434.70 0.00 434.70 55 449.88 0.00 449.88 60 464.19 0.00 464.19 75 503.02 0.00 503.02 90 537.15 0.00 537.15 105 567.80 0.00 567.80 120 595.76 0.00 595.76 150 645.59 0.00 645.59 180 689.39 0.00 689.39 360 884.78 0.00 884.78 1440 1,457.39 0.00 1,457.39 Commentary: Storm water runoff from Basin 5 is retained on-site via a surface storage pond and also has some runoff to North 20th Avenue. Overflow from large storm events will discharge to North 20th Avenue. 0.00 200.00 400.00 600.00 800.00 1000.00 1200.00 1400.00 1600.00 0 500 1000 1500 Storm Duration (min)Volume (ft3)Runoff Volume Discharge Volume Volume Retained N:\4480\001.01\Design Docs\Calcs\Storm Drainage Analyses\Basin-05_Post-Development_25-Year.xls Printed On: 8/20/2008405 Page 1/2 RATIONAL METHOD FOR RUNOFF CALCULATIONS Basin 5 Post Development, 100 Year Design Storm Frequency Input values for runoff coefficients from appropriate tables. Area Area A A Runoff Coefficient C x A (ft2)(Acres) C (Acres) 2,090.02 0.0480 0.95 0.0456 1,321.25 0.0303 0.95 0.0288 11,314.97 0.2598 0.35 0.0909 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 14,726.24 0.3381 0.1653 Weighted Runoff Coefficient, Cwd CjAj Aj Where Cj is the runoff coefficient for surface type j and Aj is the area of surface type j Basin Time of Concentration Tt = travel time (min) S = slope of basin (%) C = rational method runoff coefficient D = length of basin (ft) Cf = frequency adjustment factor Slope of Length Runoff Frequency Tt Flowpath (%)(ft) Coefficient, C Adjustment, Cf (min) 2.00 30.00 0.95 1.25 -0.71 25.00 12.00 0.45 1.25 1.19 1.00 104.00 0.35 1.25 12.63 146.00 0.58 3.75 13.11 (Average Slope) 13.11 minutes Storm Water Runoff Design Storm Frequency = 100 Year Design Time of Concentration = 13.11 minutes = 0.22 hours Calculated Rainfall Intensity, I = 2.798 in/hr Weighted Runoff Coefficient, CW =0.4890 Drainage Basin Area, A = 0.3381 acres Peak Runoff Flow Rate, Q = 0.4626 cfs Q = CW*I*A Totals == Design Time of Concentration= Flow Course Description Overland Flow - Concrete Total Overland Flow - Landscaped Slope Overland Flow - Pavement Surface Type 0.4890 Asphalt & Concrete Building Landscaping POWER CURVE RAINFALL X=HR FREQUENCY I=IN/HR 6 MONTH I=0.36X.60(2/3) Assumed *2 YEAR I=0.36X-.60 *5 YEAR I=0.52X-.64 *10 YEAR I=0.64X-.65 *25 YEAR I=0.78X-.64 *50 YEAR I=0.92X-.66 *100 YEAR I=1.01X-.67 *From Figure 2, Pg. 36 City of Belgrade Design Standards and Specifications Policy (2004) 2/1 3/1 )1.1(87.1 S DCC T f t - = N:\4480\001.01\Design Docs\Calcs\Storm Drainage Analyses\Basin-05_Post-Development_100-Year.xls Printed On: 8/20/2008406 Page 2/2 Storm Runoff & Retention Summary for Varying Storm Durations Storm Runoff Discharge Amount Duration Volume Volume Stored (min)(ft3) (ft 3) (ft 3) 1 155.65 0.00 155.65 5 264.73 0.00 264.73 10 332.76 0.00 332.76 15 380.40 0.00 380.40 20 418.29 0.00 418.29 25 450.25 0.00 450.25 30 478.17 0.00 478.17 35 503.13 0.00 503.13 40 525.79 0.00 525.79 45 546.63 0.00 546.63 50 565.97 0.00 565.97 55 584.06 0.00 584.06 60 601.07 0.00 601.07 75 647.00 0.00 647.00 90 687.13 0.00 687.13 105 722.98 0.00 722.98 120 755.55 0.00 755.55 150 813.29 0.00 813.29 180 863.73 0.00 863.73 360 1,085.71 0.00 1,085.71 1440 1,715.52 0.00 1,715.52 Commentary: Storm water runoff from Basin 5 is retained on-site via a surface storage pond and also has some runoff to North 20th Avenue. Overflow from large storm events will discharge to North 20th Avenue. 0.00 200.00 400.00 600.00 800.00 1000.00 1200.00 1400.00 1600.00 1800.00 2000.00 0 500 1000 1500 Storm Duration (min)Volume (ft3)Runoff Volume Discharge Volume Volume Retained N:\4480\001.01\Design Docs\Calcs\Storm Drainage Analyses\Basin-05_Post-Development_100-Year.xls Printed On: 8/20/2008407 19th & Main Redevelopment Model Imaging 1 of 2 View From Southeast View From Southwest View From Southwest 408 19th & Main Redevelopment Model Imaging 2 of 2 View From Northeast View From Northwest View From Northeast View From Northwest 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 FW cvs 19th sidewalks From: Susan Kozub [skozub@intrinsikarchitecture.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 3:28 PM To: Brian Krueger Subject: FW: cvs & 19th sidewalks Attachments: CVS MDT copy e.pdf Here is my correspondence with MDT so far… Susan Kozub, AICP intrinsik architecture, inc. 111 north tracy avenue bozeman, montana 59715 t. 406.582.8988 f. 406.582.8911 www.intrinsikarchitecture.com ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________ _____________________________ This email is privileged and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If this email has been received in error, please notify the sender. From: Bukvich, Robert [mailto:rbukvich@mt.gov] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 11:01 AM To: Skinner, Jim Cc: Susan Kozub Subject: FW: cvs & 19th sidewalks Jim, I told Susan that we agree with the concept of moving the sidewalk but there will be details to be worked out with the retaining wall, handrail, ADA, etc. I am forwarding this to you to see if you want to review this since it will be a change in use. thanks From: Susan Kozub [mailto:skozub@intrinsikarchitecture.com] Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2008 11:23 AM To: Bukvich, Robert Subject: cvs & 19th sidewalks Hi Rob – I’ve attached a PDF of a portion of our preliminary master site plan for the Billion site at 19th and Main. (I can give you a disk with the whole submittal if you’d like) We are proposing that the 19th sidewalk be shifted inside the property line and existing trees with a public access easement IF that’s all okay with MDT. Here is a copy of the part of the narrative relative to the 19th sidewalks: “The proposed site plan includes the buildings constructed at the required setbacks. Since the buildings cannot move much closer to the sidewalks, the project team proposes that the sidewalks move closer to the buildings. A new 6-foot sidewalk located approximately 5 feet within the property line would replace the undesirable existing sidewalk located close to the curb along heavily traveled North 19th Avenue. This alternative sidewalk layout would form a more urban setting for the overall project, create incentives for businesses to locate primary facades along the streetscapes, create safer and more interesting pedestrian paths that pass by public plazas and include boulevard trees as a buffer to the road, and eliminate the Page 1 426 FW cvs 19th sidewalks “double sidewalk” issue identified during the informal application. The Montana Department of Transportation (MDT) has indicated that they would consider this alternative plan since a portion of the sidewalk on North 19th Avenue is currently located right against the pavement with no boulevard. A Public Access Easement would secure access in perpetuity. We ask that setbacks, however, still be measured from the property lines since this additional easement is voluntary and intended to create a more urban design.” Would MDT be able to give formal comments on whether you guys can support this request? Give me a call to discuss when you have a chance. Thank you Rob! Susan Kozub, AICP intrinsik architecture, inc. 111 north tracy avenue bozeman, montana 59715 t. 406.582.8988 f. 406.582.8911 www.intrinsikarchitecture.com ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________ _____________________________ This email is privileged and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If this email has been received in error, please notify the sender. ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________ Page 2 427 Public comment on CVS Pharmacy From: Will Osborne [wosborne@pierce.biz] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 3:01 PM To: Brian Krueger Cc: 'Brian Berger'; kbryan@pierce.biz Subject: Public comment on CVS Pharmacy Brain, I work for Pierce Flooring and Design. One of our branches is located at 1921 West Main. Some time ago, the traffic flow on Main street, in the East bound lane was affected by new lane dividers as part of the new intersection layout at 19th and Main. We have experienced a significant reduction in our traffic counts since the traffic flows were changed. The public currently does not have any way to turn directly into our facility from the East bound lane off Main street. We receive input from customers all the time about how difficult it is to get into our parking lot. I reviewed the site plans for the CVS pharmacy located at 1919 West Main and noticed there are plans to remove a portion of the concrete divider, thus allowing traffic to turn left, off of main street, from the east bound lane, directly into the CVS pharmacy. I am asking consideration be made that the removal of the divider be increased to allow East bound main street traffic to turn directly into the Pierce flooring and design entrance, as well as the new pharmacy location. Thank you. Will Osborne Residential Operations Manager Pierce Flooring and Design (O): 406-586-9375 (C): 406-855-0485 Page 1 428 RE Public comment on CVS Pharmacy From: Will Osborne [wosborne@pierce.biz] Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 9:33 AM To: Brian Krueger Cc: kbryan@pierce.biz Subject: RE: Public comment on CVS Pharmacy Brian, One additional comment. In order to improve access to Pierce Flooring and to CVS pharmacy from East bound Main street traffic, we would be very interested in working toward a solution that would provide one common access for both locations if that is feasible. We would be willing to consider donation of land or permanent easement if this would help. Thank you. From: Brian Krueger [mailto:BKrueger@BOZEMAN.NET] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 10:58 AM To: Will Osborne Cc: Brian Berger; kbryan@pierce.biz Subject: RE: Public comment on CVS Pharmacy Thanks for your public comment. It has been added to the project file and will be forwarded on to the City Commission during their review of the project. Brian Krueger Associate Planner Department of Planning & Community Development City of Bozeman PO Box 1230 20 E. Olive Street Bozeman, MT 59771 p 406.582.2260 f 406.582.2263 www.bozeman.net bkrueger@bozeman.net From: Will Osborne [mailto:wosborne@pierce.biz] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 3:01 PM To: Brian Krueger Cc: 'Brian Berger'; kbryan@pierce.biz Subject: Public comment on CVS Pharmacy Brain, I work for Pierce Flooring and Design. One of our branches is located at 1921 West Main. Some time ago, the traffic flow on Main street, in the East bound lane was affected by new lane dividers as part of the new intersection layout at 19th and Main. We have experienced a significant reduction in our traffic counts since the traffic flows were changed. The public currently does not have any way to turn directly into our facility from the East bound lane off Main street. We receive input from customers all the time about how difficult it is to get into our parking lot. I reviewed the site plans for the CVS pharmacy located at 1919 West Main and noticed there are plans to remove a portion of the concrete divider, thus allowing traffic to turn left, Page 1 429 RE Public comment on CVS Pharmacy off of main street, from the east bound lane, directly into the CVS pharmacy. I am asking consideration be made that the removal of the divider be increased to allow East bound main street traffic to turn directly into the Pierce flooring and design entrance, as well as the new pharmacy location. Thank you. Will Osborne Residential Operations Manager Pierce Flooring and Design (O): 406-586-9375 (C): 406-855-0485 Page 2 430 431 432 433