HomeMy WebLinkAbout11 17 08_Authorize the City Manager to sign the 2008 Water Treatment Plant Professional Services Agreement with HDR Engineering
Commission Memorandum
REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Commission
FROM: Bob Murray, Project Engineer
Chris Kukulski, City Manager
SUBJECT: 2008 Water Treatment Plant Upgrade Project
MEETING DATE: 11/17/08
BACKGROUND: Attached is a copy of the partially executed Agreement with HDR Engineering,
Inc. for Professional Engineering Services for the 2008 Water Treatment Plant Upgrade Project. This
project is for the design services for construction of the first phase of a new membrane Water Treatment
Plant, as described in the adopted Water Facility Plan. This will provide for added capacity to
accommodate future growth, and replace the aging outdated existing facility.
The document is in the City’s standard format. The contract covers the pilot plant testing through the
preliminary design phases of the project. An amendment will be processed at that time to add the other
contract phases. The proposed fee of $1,025,118 appears to be commensurate with the project complexity
and anticipated total project cost. Of the total, the membrane pilot program will be paid on a time and
materials basis, with the rest as a lump sum.
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize City Manager to sign.
FISCAL EFFECTS: This project is currently budgeted in the Water Fund.
ALTERNATIVES: As suggested by the City Commission.
Respectfully submitted,
_________________________________ ____________________________
Robert J. Murray Jr., Project Engineer Chris A. Kukulski, City Manager
Attachments: Professional Services Agreement
Report compiled on 11/12/2008
12
1
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
THIS IS AN AGREEMENT made as of , between THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, a
Municipal Corporation, Bozeman, Montana, 59715 (OWNER) and HDR Engineering, Inc. with principal
office at 1715 South Reserve Street, Suite C, Missoula, Montana, 59801, (ENGINEER).
Whereas the accomplishment of the work and services described in this Agreement is essential to the
OWNER'S public works improvement program.
Whereas the OWNER intends to and has selected the ENGINEER to provide necessary and professional
engineering services for the project.
Whereas the ENGINEER represents that it is willing and qualified to perform the professional engineering
services for this project described in this Agreement.
Therefore, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and the mutual covenants and conditions contained
herein, the parties agree as follows:
The conditions and provisions set forth in the attached EXHIBIT A: Engineer’s Status During Construction;
EXHIBIT B: A Listing of the Duties, Responsibilities and Limitations of Authority of Resident Project
representative; EXHIBIT C: Hyalite/Sourdough Water Treatment Plant Replacement Project - Scope of
Services, and EXHIBIT D: Engineering Fee Estimate are hereby incorporated in and made part of this
Agreement.
ARTICLE 1 - ENGINEERING SERVICES
1.1. The detailed description of the specific project components is described as follows:
This project will provide engineering and professional services for completion of the Bozeman
Water Treatment Plant Replacement project to replace the existing facility with a new water
treatment plant, including: planning and design services for new administration, laboratory
and maintenance facilities at the Water Treatment Plant site; providing assistance to the City
for development of residuals management strategies; and evaluating and improving their
Sourdough raw water intake. Phase 1 tasks include: project management and administration,
conceptual design, membrane pilot testing, membrane equipment pre-purchase assistance, and
preliminary design. Tasks under future phases include: project management, final design, bid
services, construction administration, project startup assistance and commissioning,
application software programming services, project closeout, and additional services as
requested.
1.2. The scope of services under this contract are set forth in this agreement and the attached EXHIBITS.
ARTICLE 2 - ENGINEER'S RESPONSIBILITIES
2.1. ENGINEER shall perform for OWNER professional engineering services in all phases of the Project
13
2
to which this Agreement applies as hereinafter provided. These services will include, but not be limited to,
serving as OWNER's professional engineering representative for the Project, providing professional
engineering consultation and advice and furnishing customary civil and structural engineering services
incidental thereto.
2.2. The ENGINEER shall furnish all labor, materials, equipment, supplies, and incidentals necessary to
conduct and complete the ENGINEER'S portions of the Project and to prepare and deliver to the OWNER all
data, reports, plans, specifications, and recommendations as designated herein.
2.3. The ENGINEER shall ascertain such information as may have a bearing on the work from local units
of government, public, and private organizations and shall be authorized to procure information from other
authorities as to the extent of these contacts and the results thereof.
2.4. The ENGINEER'S work shall be in accordance with the standards of sound engineering practices.
2.5. The ENGINEER shall name a Principal-In-Charge for the duration of the project. The Principal-In-
Charge shall be Amanda McInnis, P.E., Vice President or Craig Caprara, P.E., Interim Department
Manager.
2.6. The ENGINEER shall name a Project Manager who shall be the liaison between the ENGINEER and
the OWNER. The Project Manager shall be Dan Harmon, P.E., Vice President. The OWNER may name a
Task Director who would be the liaison between the ENGINEER and the OWNER during the design segment
of the Project.
2.7. The ENGINEER shall submit an estimated progress schedule at the beginning of the work, and
monthly progress reports thereafter until the project is completed.
ARTICLE 3 - OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES
3.1 The OWNER shall name a Task Director who shall be the liaison between the ENGINEER and the
OWNER during DESIGN segment of the Project. The Task Director designated shall be
Bob Murray, Jr., P.E.
3.2 The OWNER shall have the right of review and examination of the ENGINEER'S work at all times.
3.3 The OWNER shall make available all records (as-built drawings, construction records, etc.)
indicating the existing configuration of the City utilities.
3.4 The OWNER will be responsible for Advertising Bid Openings.
3.5 The OWNER shall attend the pre-bid conferences, bid openings, pre-construction conferences,
construction progress and other job related meetings, substantial completion inspections and final
payment inspections.
3.6 The OWNER shall complete additional responsibilities as described in Exhibit C.
ARTICLE 4 - BASIC ENGINEERING SERVICES
14
3
The ENGINEER shall render professional Engineering Services as follows:
4.1 PRE-DESIGN INVESTIGATION PHASE – NOT APPLICABLE
4.2 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN/PILOT TESTING/MEMBRANE PREPURCHASE/PRELIMINARY
DESIGN PHASE
After written authorization to proceed with the Preliminary Design Phase, ENGINEER shall:
4.2.1. ENGINEER shall prepare Preliminary Design Reports, schematic plans as needed for the
design report and a written description for the Project.
4.2.2. Preliminary Design Reports: Specific items to be addressed in the design reports will
include, but not be limited to work elements as described in Task 500 of Exhibit C.
4.2.3. Based on the information contained in the preliminary design documents, ENGINEER will
submit a revised opinion of probable Total Project Costs to the OWNER.
The Preliminary Design Phase will be completed and submitted as shown on the Schedule included in
Exhibit C following written authorization from OWNER to ENGINEER to proceed with that phase of
services.
4.3 FINAL DESIGN PHASE – NOT PART OF INITIAL SCOPE OF SERVICES
After written authorization to proceed with the Final Design Phase, ENGINEER shall:
4.3.1. On the basis of the accepted Preliminary Design documents and the revised opinion of
probable Total Project Costs, prepare for incorporation in the Contract Documents final drawings and
Technical Specifications of sufficient detail to show the general scope, extent and detailed character
of the work to be furnished and performed by the Contractor(s) suitable for use in the project bidding
and construction.
4.3.2. Advise OWNER of any adjustments to the latest opinion of probable Total Project Costs
caused by changes in general scope, extent or character or design requirements of the Project or
Construction Costs. Furnish to OWNER a revised opinion of probable Total Project Costs based on
the Drawings and Specifications.
4.3.3. Prepare for review and approval by OWNER, its legal counsel and other advisors, contract
agreement forms, general conditions and supplementary conditions, and (where appropriate) bid
forms, invitations to bid and instructions to bidders, special provisions, technical specifications, and
standard drawings, and other related contract documents as defined in Task 600 of Exhibit C.
4.3.4. Furnish OWNER six (6) copies of the Contract Documents (including design drawings,
specifications and contracts), plus the additional prospective bidder document sets. Drawings
shall be half sized (11” x 17”).
The Final Phase will be complete and submitted as shown on the Schedule included in Exhibit C following
15
4
written authorization from OWNER to ENGINEER to proceed with that phase of services.
4.4 BIDDING OR NEGOTIATING PHASE – NOT PART OF INITIAL SCOPE OF SERVICES
After written authorization to proceed with the Bidding or Negotiating Phase, ENGINEER shall:
4.4.1. Assist OWNER in advertising for and obtaining bids or negotiating proposals for
construction contract(s) and record prospective bidders to whom Bidding Documents have been
issued, receive and process deposits for Bidding Documents and conduct pre-bid conferences.
4.4.2. Provide interpretation or clarification to prospective bidders regarding the Bidding
Documents, and issue addenda as appropriate.
4.4.3. Consult with and advise OWNER as to the acceptability of the prime contractor,
subcontractors, suppliers and other persons and organizations proposed by the prime contractor(s)
(herein call "Contractor(s)") for those portions of the work as to which such acceptability is required
by the Bidding Documents.
4.4.4. Consult with OWNER concerning and determine the acceptability of substitute materials and
equipment proposed by Contractor(s) when substitution prior to the award of contracts is allowed by
the Bidding Documents.
4.4.5. Attend the Bid opening, prepare bid tabulation, evaluate bids, assess bidders' responsiveness
and responsibility and make award recommendation to OWNER.
4.4.6 Facilitate contract award, and the execution and distribution of the contract documents for
construction, materials, equipment and services. Furnish Owner two original signature sets of
executed contract documents (including design drawings, specifications and contracts). Furnish
contractor with one set of original signature executed contract documents and up to three sets of
construction documents.
4.5 CONSTRUCTION PHASE – NOT PART OF INITIAL SCOPE OF SERVICES
The responsibilities of the ENGINEER during the Construction Phase are summarized as follows:
4.5.1. General Administration of Construction Contract. ENGINEER shall consult with and advise
OWNER and act as OWNER'S representative as provided in EXHIBIT A: ENGINEER'S STATUS
DURING CONSTRUCTION, attached to and made part of this Agreement and may be further
provided under the General Conditions of the contract documents. The extent and limitations of the
authority, duties, and responsibilities of the ENGINEER on the construction job site as assigned here-
in shall not be modified except as the ENGINEER may otherwise agree in writing. All of OWNER's
instruction to Contractor(s) will be issued through ENGINEER who will have authority to act on
behalf of OWNER to the extent provided in the General Conditions except as otherwise provided in
writing.
In addition to the services provided under Article 10 (Exhibit A) the ENGINEER shall provide the
following services during construction:
16
5
4.5.1.1 Schedule and conduct a pre-construction conference.
4.5.1.2 Provide personnel, equipment and supplies for construction layout and control,
including establishment of line, grade, and blue top control staking.
4.5.1.3 Review Contractors' construction schedules and operations, and the Contractors'
traffic control plans and its implementation prior to the start of construction.
4.5.1.4 Ascertain that the Contractor has secured required permits needed to accomplish his
work.
4.5.1.5 ENGINEER shall provide OWNER copies of all correspondence between the
ENGINEER and Contractor.
4.5.1.6 Issue stop and resume work orders, in whole or in part, when work is not or cannot
be performed in accordance with the Contract Documents.
4.5.1.7 Review and approve, for conformance with the project technical specifications all
shop drawings, and other Contractor submittals required by the Contract Documents.
4.5.1.8 During construction review Contractors' construction schedules and evaluate
conformance and progress under the Contract time provisions.
4.5.1.9 Prepare for OWNER'S approval any plan and specification changes which due to
any initial design or engineering deficiencies are required to complete the project original
design concept.
4.5.1.10 Inspect the project and when appropriate, and after conferring with OWNER, issue a
Certificate of Substantial Completion to the Contractor.
4.5.1.11 Prior to recommending final payment, schedule and conduct with the OWNER a
final project inspection and submit a report to the OWNER documenting any outstanding
items or deficiencies requiring correction prior to final payment. Upon satisfactory project
completion ENGINEER shall certify in writing to the OWNER, and any required regulatory
agencies, that the construction was completed in accordance with the approved plans and
specifications and is performing in accordance with the design concept.
4.5.1.13 Eleven months after project substantial completion schedule and conduct with the
Owner a One Year Warranty Inspection of the project and advise the owner in writing
whether project deficiencies exist and if the project is performing in accordance with the
design concept.
4.5.2. Resident Project Representative. ENGINEER shall provide a qualified Resident Project
Representative at the job site to provide observation of the work as provided in EXHIBIT B: A
LISTING OF THE DUTIES, RESPONSIBILITIES AND LIMITATIONS OF AUTHORITY OF
THE RESIDENT PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE, attached to and made part of this Agreement.
The ENGINEER shall submit to the OWNER, for review and acceptance, the resume of each
17
6
Resident Project Representative who may be assigned to the job site during the course of the Project
not less than 10 calendar days prior to the pre-construction meeting. Any subsequent change in the
resident representative shall also be subject to the OWNER'S approval.
4.5.3 Limitations of Responsibilities. ENGINEER will not be responsible for CONTRACTOR's
means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of construction, or the safety precautions and
programs incident thereto, and ENGINEER will not be responsible for CONTRACTOR's failure to
perform or furnish the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents; however, nothing
contained in this agreement shall be construed to release ENGINEER from liability for failure to
properly perform duties and responsibilities assumed by ENGINEER in the Contract Documents.
4.6. PROJECT DOCUMENTATION– NOT PART OF INITIAL SCOPE OF SERVICES
ENGINEER shall furnish OWNER with (a) one digital AutoCAD drawing file on CD and two paper copies of
the Project Record Drawings ("As-Builts"), (b) written monthly progress reports, and (c) a project notebook
containing such correspondence and documentation as requested by OWNER.
4.7. CONSTRUCTION TESTING – NOT PART OF INITIAL SCOPE OF SERVICES
The inspection services shall include material testing and verification of contract compliance with job site
requirements, plans and specifications.
The ENGINEER shall provide and maintain detailed documentation of the following material testing:
1) Concrete strength, air content and slump
2) Embankment, trench backfill, and gravel and pavement densities
3) Aggregate gradations
4) Plant mix strength, flow and asphalt content
ARTICLE 5 - ADDITIONAL SERVICES
5.1. If OWNER wishes ENGINEER to perform any of the following Additional Services, OWNER shall
so instruct ENGINEER in writing, and ENGINEER shall perform or obtain from others such services and will
be paid therefor as provided in the Agreement:
5.1.1. Legal land surveys performed to obtain data for preparing easements and rights-of-way
descriptions.
5.1.2. Preparation of applications and supporting documents for governmental agencies in addition
to those required under Basic Services; preparation or review of environmental studies and related
services; and assistance in obtaining environmental approvals.
5.1.3. Services resulting from significant changes in the general scope, extent or character of the
Project or major changes in documentation previously accepted by OWNER where changes are due
to causes beyond ENGINEER's control.
18
7
5.1.4. Providing renderings or models.
5.1.5. Preparing documents for alternate bids requested by OWNER for work not executed or for
out-of-sequence work.
5.1.6. Providing other services not otherwise provided for in the Agreement, including services
normally furnished by the OWNER as elsewhere herein described.
5.1.7. Furnishing the services of independent professional associates or consultants for other than
Basic Services.
5.2. When required by the Contract Documents in circumstances beyond ENGINEER's control,
ENGINEER shall perform or obtain from others any of the following Additional Services as circumstances
require during construction and without waiting for specific instructions from OWNER, and ENGINEER will
be paid therefor as provided in this Agreement:
5.2.1. Services in connection with work directive changes and change orders to reflect the changes
requested by OWNER if the resulting change in compensation for Basic Services is not
commensurate with the additional services rendered.
5.2.2. Services in making revisions to Drawings and Specifications occasioned by the OWNER'S
acceptance of substitutions proposed by Contractor(s); services after the award of each contract in
evaluating and determining the acceptability of an unreasonable or excessive number of substitutions
proposed by Contractor; and evaluating an unreasonable or extensive number of claims submitted by
Contractor(s) or others in connection with the work.
5.2.3. Services resulting from significant delays, changes or price increases occurring as a direct
result of materials, equipment or energy shortages.
5.2.4. Additional or extended services during construction made necessary by (1) work damage by
fire or other causes during construction, (2) a significant amount of defective or neglected work of
any Contractor, (3) acceleration of the progress schedule involving services beyond normal working
hours, (4) default by any Contractor.
ARTICLE 6 - COMPENSATION FOR ENGINEERING SERVICE
6.1 DIRECT LABOR COST PAYMENT FOR BASIC SERVICES AND EXPENSES OF ENGINEER.
Membrane pilot program services performed as Basic Engineering Services under section 4.2 (Task 300 of
Exhibit C) shall be compensated in accordance with the following:
6.1.1 The OWNER shall pay for Membrane pilot construction and pilot operating services an
amount not to exceed $384,844 except as provided under 6.1.1.2 and 6.1.4.
6.1.1.1 Costs Compensation. Compensation for these services shall be based on the
ENGINEER's Direct Labor Cost times a factor of 3.15 for services rendered which shall
cover Direct Labor, Direct Labor Overhead, General & Administrative Overhead and Profit.
19
8
6.1.1.2 Notification. At any time during the construction that it becomes apparent that the
Construction Phase and Project Documentation Services rendered under this Agreement will
exceed the negotiated compensation for these services, and prior to performing services in
excess of the contract ceiling, the ENGINEER shall give OWNER written notice thereof.
Promptly thereafter OWNER and ENGINEER shall review the scope and progress of the
project work. ENGINEER shall obtain written authorization from OWNER, prior to any
additional costs being incurred under paragraph 6.1.1.3. If it is determined that due to a
change in project scope under paragraph 5.2.1, the ENGINEER is entitled to additional
compensation, OWNER and ENGINEER may negotiate terms as provided under 6.1.1.1.
The amount and terms of any additional compensation under 6.1.1.1 or 6.1.1.3 shall be
negotiated and agreed in writing pursuant to 9.16.
6.1.1.3 Costs Exceeding Estimated Compensation. Except as allowed under 5.2.1, when the
total cost of the original scope Construction Phase and Project Documentation Services
exceeds the negotiated compensation for these services, the OWNER shall pay only for the
direct costs incurred in excess of the estimated compensation. These costs consist of an
amount equal to the ENGINEER'S Direct Labor Cost times a factor of 2.80 for services
rendered which shall include Direct Labor, the federally audited payroll Direct Labor
Overhead, and General & Administrative Overhead costs, but shall not include any
allowance for profit.
6.2 LUMP SUM AGREEMENT FOR BASIC SERVICES AND EXPENSES OF ENGINEER
6.2.1 Payment. The OWNER shall for conceptual design, membrane equipment procurement
assistance and contract administration, preliminary design and associated management and
administration services performed as Basic Engineering Services under sections 4.2 and 4.3 (Tasks
100, 200, 400 and 500 of Exhibit C) of this agreement pay a total sum in the amount of $640,275 for
such services.
6.2.2 Payment Schedule. Total cumulative payments for the conceptual design, membrane
equipment procurement and preliminary design engineering services (sections 4.2 and 4.3 Tasks
100,200,400 and 500 of Exhibit C) shall not exceed the following ceilings:
$608,261 (95% of design fee) until the Final preliminary design has been submitted to the
OWNER and review authorities.
6.2.3 General. Engineer shall submit monthly statements for services rendered. The statements
shall be based upon Engineer's estimate of the proportion of the total services actually completed at
the time of billing, subject to any limitations on Payments based on completion of tasks or specific
retainage requirements pursuant to the payment provisions of the Agreement.
6.2.4 Reimbursable Expenses. Only those expenses specifically identified for payment under
section 6.1 and 6.3 of this Agreement are reimbursable. All other design related expenses are
included in the Lump Sum Payment for the Basic services (sections 4.2 and 4.3 Tasks 100, 200, 400
and 500 of Exhibit C) and are not separately reimbursable. Additional Services specifically
identified under the scope of services for payment under 6.2 are not separately reimbursable.
6.3 DIRECT LABOR COST PAYMENT FOR BASIC SERVICES AND EXPENSES OF ENGINEER –
20
9
NOT PART OF INITIAL SCOPE OF SERVICES.
Construction and project documentation services performed as Basic Engineering Services under sections 4.4
through 4.7 (Tasks 700 through 1200) including General Administration of Construction Contract, Resident
Project Representation, Project Documentation, and Construction Testing, shall be compensated in
accordance with the following:
6.3.1 The OWNER shall pay for Construction Phase and Project Documentation Services an
amount not to exceed $0.00 except as provided under 6.3.1.2 and 6.3.4.
6.3.1.1 Costs Compensation. Compensation for these services shall be based on the
ENGINEER's Direct Labor Cost times a factor of 3.15 for services rendered which shall
cover Direct Labor, Direct Labor Overhead, General & Administrative Overhead and Profit.
6.2.1.2 Notification. At any time during the construction that it becomes apparent that the
Construction Phase and Project Documentation Services rendered under this Agreement will
exceed the negotiated compensation for these services, and prior to performing services in
excess of the contract ceiling, the ENGINEER shall give OWNER written notice thereof.
Promptly thereafter OWNER and ENGINEER shall review the scope and progress of the
project work. ENGINEER shall obtain written authorization from OWNER, prior to any
additional costs being incurred under paragraph 6.2.1.3. If it is determined that due to a
change in project scope under paragraph 5.2.1, the ENGINEER is entitled to additional
compensation, OWNER and ENGINEER may negotiate terms as provided under 6.2.1.1.
The amount and terms of any additional compensation under 6.2.1.1 or 6.2.1.3 shall be
negotiated and agreed in writing pursuant to 9.16.
6.3.1.3 Costs Exceeding Estimated Compensation. Except as allowed under 5.2.1, when the
total cost of the original scope Construction Phase and Project Documentation Services
exceeds the negotiated compensation for these services, the OWNER shall pay only for the
direct costs incurred in excess of the estimated compensation. These costs consist of an
amount equal to the ENGINEER'S Direct Labor Cost times a factor of 2.80 for services
rendered which shall include Direct Labor, the federally audited payroll Direct Labor
Overhead, and General & Administrative Overhead costs, but shall not include any
allowance for profit.
6.3.3. Failed Test Expenses. The ENGINEER shall maintain and provide to the OWNER, a record
of the costs associated with failing quality control tests performed for the OWNER during the course
of the construction of the project and recommend an amount the OWNER deduct from the
contractor(s) payments.
6.3.4 The OWNER shall pay an amount for Additional Services rendered by the ENGINEER and
approved in writing by the OWNER on the basis of the ENGINEER'S Direct Labor Costs times a
factor of 3.15, or an amount otherwise negotiated at the time such services are requested and
approved by the OWNER. Additional Services shall also include those services defined in Task
1200 of EXHIBIT C.
ARTICLE 7 - MEANING OF TERMS
7.1 AGREEMENT
21
10
As used herein the term "this Agreement" refers to the contents of this document and its Exhibits attached
hereto and referred to as if they were part of one and the same document.
7.2 CONSTRUCTION COSTS
The construction cost of the entire Project (herein referred to as "Construction Cost") means the total cost to
OWNER of those portions of the entire Project designed and specified by ENGINEER, but it will not include
ENGINEER's compensation and expenses, the cost of land, rights-of-way, or compensation for or damages to,
properties unless this Agreement so specifies, nor will it include OWNER's legal, accounting, insurance
counseling or auditing services, or interest and financing charges incurred in connection with the Project or
the cost of other services to be provided by others to OWNER.
7.3 DIRECT LABOR COSTS
Direct Labor Costs used as a basis for payment mean the actual salaries and wages paid to all ENGINEER's
personnel engaged directly on the Project, including, but not limited to, engineers, architects, surveyors,
designers, drafters, specification writers, estimators, other technical and business personnel; but does not
include indirect payroll related costs or fringe benefits. For the purposes of this Agreement the principals and
employees of the ENGINEER maximum billable Direct Labor Costs are:
22
11
HDR Engineering, Inc. Morrison – Maierle, Inc.
Principals $71 Principals $60
Project Design/Manager $61 Supervising Engineer III $51
Supervising Engineer III $59 Supervising Engineer II $49
Supervising Engineer II $57 Supervising Engineer I $46
Supervising Engineer I $53 Senior Engineer II $41
Engineer III $48 Senior Engineer I $38
Engineer II $42 Design Engineer II $34
Engineer I $35 Design Engineer I $32
Design Engineer II $30 Staff Engineer $28
Design Engineer I $28 Senior Environmental Professional $39
Staff Engineer $25 Environmental Professional $31
Senior Environmental Professional $59 Engineer Intern $26
Environmental Professional II $48 Senior Survey Manager $48
Environmental Professional I $30 Survey Party Chief $32
Project Architect $51 Land Surveyor I $32
Senior Environmental Technician $31 Survey Technician $26
Engineering Technician $35 Senior Engineering Technician $33
Engineering Technician II $28 Engineering Technician II $31
Engineering Technician I $25 Engineering Technician I $26
CADD Drafter $22 CADD Drafter $25
Accounting/Admin $24 Technicians $22
Clerical $21 Clerical $20
National Technical Director $90
7.4 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
Reimbursable Expenses mean the actual expenses incurred by ENGINEER or ENGINEER's independent
professional associates or consultants directly in connection with the Project, such as expenses for:
transportation and subsistence incidental thereto; obtaining bids or proposals from Contractor(s); subsistence
and transportation of Resident Project Representatives and their assistants; toll telephone calls and telegrams;
reproduction of reports, Drawings, Specifications, Bidding Documents and similar Project-related items; and
if authorized in advance by OWNER, overtime work requiring higher than regular rates. In addition, when
compensation for Basic Services is on the basis of Direct Labor Costs method of payment, Reimbursable
Expenses will also include the amount billed to ENGINEER by special consultants employed by ENGINEER
and authorized by OWNER (other than as an authorized Additional Services) and will also include expenses
incurred for computer time and other specialized equipment, including an appropriate charge for previously
established programs and expenses of photographic production techniques.
ARTICLE 8 - PAYMENT PROVISIONS
8.1 TIMES OF PAYMENTS. ENGINEER may submit monthly statements for Basic Services and
approved Additional Services rendered and for Reimbursable Expenses incurred; however, payments shall not
exceed the ceilings provided in 6.1 and 6.2. Final payment shall be made only after acceptance of the project
23
12
by the OWNER. If OWNER disputes the amount of the billing, OWNER will notify the ENGINEER in
writing within ten (10) calendar days of the receipt of bill of the dispute.
8.2 REQUESTS FOR PAYMENT. Each request for payment shall include a documentation summary of
the period incremental man hours incurred, direct labor rates and billed rates, detail of reimbursable costs,
total period billing, and total cumulative billing. When requested by OWNER services for distinct project
segments shall be accounted and billed separately.
8.3 PAYMENT UNDER TERMINATION. In the event of termination by the OWNER upon the completion
of any phase of the Basic Services, progress payments due ENGINEER for services rendered through such
phase shall constitute total payment for such services. In the event of such termination by OWNER during
any phase of the Basic Services, ENGINEER also will be reimbursed for the charges of pre-approved
independent professional associates and consultants employed by ENGINEER to render Basic Services, and
paid for services rendered during that phase on the basis of the payment provisions of the Agreement. In the
event of any such termination, ENGINEER will be paid for unpaid pre-approved Additional Services and
unpaid Reimbursable Expenses which are authorized under this agreement.
ARTICLE 9 - GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
9.1 TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
9.1.1 The sole right is hereby reserved to the OWNER to terminate this Engineering Agreement for
any and all causes or for its convenience at any time upon fifteen (15) days written notice to the
ENGINEER.
9.1.2 If termination for default is effected by the OWNER, an equitable adjustment in the price
provided for in this Agreement shall be made, but (1) no amount shall be allowed for anticipated
profit on unperformed services or other work, and (2) any payment due to the ENGINEER at the time
of termination may be adjusted to cover any additional costs to the OWNER because of the
ENGINEER's default. If termination for convenience is effected by the OWNER, the equitable
adjustment shall include a reasonable profit, as determined by owner, for services or other work
performed. The equitable adjustment for any termination shall provide for payment to the
ENGINEER for services rendered and expenses incurred prior to the termination, in addition to
termination settlement costs reasonably incurred by the ENGINEER relating to commitments which
had become firm prior to the termination.
9.1.3 Upon receipt of a termination action under paragraph 9.1.2, the ENGINEER shall (1)
promptly discontinue all affected work (unless the notice directs otherwise), and (2) deliver or
otherwise make available to the OWNER within ten (10) days copies of all data, design drawings,
specifications, reports, estimates, summaries and such other information and materials as may have
been accumulated by the ENGINEER in performing this Agreement, whether completed or in
process.
9.1.4 In the event this Contract is terminated prior to completion, the original copies of the
ENGINEER'S data, recommendations, plans, specifications, analysis and other related documents
prepared by the ENGINEER prior to said termination shall be delivered to and become the property
24
13
of the OWNER.
9.1.5 Upon termination, the OWNER may take over the work and may award another party an
Agreement to complete the work under this Agreement.
9.1.6 OWNER'S right to terminate is in addition to any other remedies OWNER may have under
the law.
9.2 INSPECTION AND AUDIT
All books, papers, records, payrolls, vouchers and invoices relating to costs and expenditures incurred as to
the performance of the services by the ENGINEER hereunder shall be made available to the OWNER, or their
authorized representatives for audit and review, at the ENGINEER'S respective offices at all reasonable times
during the contract period and for three years from the date of final payment.
9.3 EMPLOYMENT
The ENGINEER warrants that he has not employed or retained any company or persons, other than a bona
fide employee, working solely for the ENGINEER, to solicit to secure this contract, and that he has not paid
or agreed to pay any company or person, other than bona fide employees working solely for the ENGINEER,
any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts or any other considerations contingent upon or resulting
from the award or making of this Contract. For breach or violation of this warranty, the OWNER shall have
the right to annul the Contract without liability or in its discretion to deduct from the price or consideration or
otherwise recover the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or contingent fee.
All employees of the ENGINEER or other persons while engaged in the performance of work or services
required by the ENGINEER shall be considered employees of the ENGINEER only and not of the OWNER.
9.4 NONDISCRIMINATION
The ENGINEER will not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, creed, political ideas, sex, age,
marital status, national origin or disability in employment or provision of services. The ENGINEER shall be
subject to and comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; Section 140, Title 2, United States Code,
and all regulations promulgated thereunder.
9.5 SUBLETTING OR ASSIGNING OF WORK
The ENGINEER shall not sublet or assign any of the work covered herein without prior written approval of
the OWNER.
9.6 STANDARD OF CARE
In providing services under this agreement, the ENGINEER will perform in a manner consistent with the
25
14
degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the same profession currently practicing under
similar circumstances. If any service should be found to be not in conformance with this standard, the
ENGINEER shall, at the OWNER’s request, re-perform the service at its own expense. Engineer shall also, at
its own expense, make such changes, modifications or additions to the project which are made necessary as a
result of the initial non-performance or the re-performance of services. The OWNER’s rights herein are in
addition to any other remedies the OWNER may have under the law.
9.7 LEGAL RELATIONS
9.7.1 The ENGINEER shall, consistent with the standard care, comply with those Federal, State,
and Local laws and ordinances applicable to the work to be done.
9.7.2 The ENGINEER agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless, the OWNER, its officers,
directors, agents, and employees from and against any suits, cause of action, claim, cost,
expenses, obligations, and liability of any character, including attorney’s fees, which is
brought or asserted for any bodily injury, death, or physical damage to property received or
sustained by any person, persons, property, business or any other entity, arising out of or
resulting from or in connection with the ENGINEER’s negligent performance of the services
specified in this agreement.
9.7.3. The ENGINEER agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the OWNER, its officers,
directors, agents, and employees should OWNER, its officers, directors, agents or employees
be named as a defendant in any action where the OWNER’S alleged liability arises from the
negligent performance of the ENGINEER’S work herein described. The obligation of the
ENGINEER to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the OWNER will apply to any suit,
cause of action, claim, cost or obligation including, without limitation, those alleged under
the common law or pursuant to a federal or state statute or regulation including those arising
in tort, trespass, nuisance, and strict liability.
9.7.4 In the event the OWNER is found proportionately responsible for any damages ultimately
awarded to a plaintiff or plaintiffs in any lawsuit, the ENGINEER will be responsible for
only those damages, costs, or liabilities as are attributable to the ENGINEER’S percent of
fault as compared with 100% of the fault giving rise to the damages. Should the OWNER be
found responsible for negligence by its own officers, directors, agents or employees, then in
that event the OWNER agrees to reimburse the ENGINEER for the reasonable attorney’s
fees and costs incurred in any defense of the OWNER in an amount proportional to the fault
attributed to the OWNER. The indemnity required herein shall not be limited by reason of
the specification of any particular insurance coverage in this Agreement.
9.7.5 Should either OWNER or ENGINEER be held responsible, for any damages, costs or
liabilities resulting from intentional misconduct by any officer, director, agent or employee
in connection with the work specified in this Agreement, then in that event, that party shall
defend, indemnify and hold harmless the other as to any damages, costs or liabilities that
result from or arise out of that intentional misconduct, including reasonable attorney’s fees
and costs which shall include costs and salary of the City attorney or other in-house counsel.
Further, notwithstanding the obligations set forth in paragraphs 9.7.2 and 9.7.3 above, the
ENGINEER agrees to defend OWNER where the OWNER’S alleged liability arises from
intentional misconduct by the ENGINEER. Should the OWNER be found responsible for
26
15
intentional misconduct by its own officers, director, agent or employees, then OWNER
agrees to reimburse ENGINEER for the reasonable attorney’s fees and costs incurred in any
defense of the OWNER.
9.7.6 The ENGINEER shall perform this agreement as an independent contractor, and as such, is
responsible to the OWNER only as to the results to be obtained in the work herein specified,
and to the extent that the work shall be done in accordance with the terms, plans and
specifications. The ENGINEER shall have and maintain complete control over all of its
employees, subcontractors, agents and operations, being responsible for any required payroll
deductions and providing required benefits, such as, but not limited to, worker’s
compensation with statutory limits, and unemployment insurance.
9.8 INSURANCE
The ENGINEER shall secure and furnish to the OWNER certificate of insurance, therein, naming the
OWNER as an additional insured, to include thirty (30) days notice of cancellation or non-renewal.
Without limiting any of ENGINEER's obligations hereunder, ENGINEER shall secure and maintain, until the
work is completed and accepted by the OWNER, insurance coverage naming the OWNER as additional
insured with minimum insurance coverage as follows:
Type of Coverage Limits
Employers' Liability: $ 100,000 per accident
General Liability:
Bodily Injury & Property
Damage Single and combined $ 1,000,000 per accident
Automobile:
Bodily Injury covering all $ 500,000 each person
automobiles, trucks,
tractors, trailers, or $1,000,000 each occurrence
other automotive equip-
ment whether owned or
rented by Engineer or
owned by employees of Engineer.
Property Damage covering $ 500,000 each occurrence
all automobiles, trucks,
tractors, trailers or other
automotive equipment whether
owned or rented by Engineer
or owned by employees of Engineer
OR
27
16
Bodily Injury & Property $ 500,000 each occurrence
Damage Single and combined
Professional Errors & Omissions: $ 1,000,000 per claim and
aggregate each occurrence
9.9 ENDORSEMENT
The ENGINEER shall place his endorsement on all drawings and other data furnished by him.
9.10 OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
The parties admit and agree the documents produced under this agreement are not intended or represented to
be suitable for reuse by OWNER or any other individual on any other project. Any reuse without written
verification or adaptation by ENGINEER will be at OWNER’s sole risk and without liability or legal
exposure to ENGINEER, or to ENGINEER’s independent professional associates or consultants. Files in
electronic media format of text, data, graphics, or of other types that are furnished by ENGINEER to
OWNER are only for convenience of owner. Any conclusion or information obtained or derived from such
electronic files will be at the user's sole risk.
9.11 PUBLIC INFORMATION
The ENGINEER shall not issue any statements, releases or information for public dissemination without prior
approval of the OWNER.
9.12 PROPRIETARY RIGHTS
If patentable discoveries or inventions should result from work required herein, all rights accruing from such
discoveries or inventions shall be joint property of the ENGINEER and the OWNER. Provided that the
OWNER, state agencies or political subdivisions and the United States Government shall have the
irrevocable, nonexclusive, nontransferable and royalty-free license to use each invention in the manufacture,
use and disposition, according to law, of any article or material, and in the use of any method that may be
developed as part of the work described and contemplated herein.
9.13 RECORDS
The ENGINEER shall maintain accounting records and other evidence pertaining to the cost incurred and to
make the records available at all reasonable times during the Contract term and for one (1) year from the date
of final payment. Such accounting records and other evidence pertaining to the cost incurred will be made
available for inspections by OWNER.
9.14 SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST
28
17
The covenants, agreements and all statements in this Contract apply to and shall be binding on the heirs,
personal representatives, successors and assigns of the respective parties.
9.15 ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS
That in the event it becomes necessary for either Party of this Contract to retain an attorney to enforce any of
the terms or conditions of this Contract or to give any notice required herein, then the prevailing Party or the
Party giving notice shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees and costs, including fees, salary, and costs of
in-house counsel to include City Attorney.
9.16 MODIFICATIONS AND AMENDMENTS
That any amendment or modification of this Contract or any provisions herein shall be made in writing or
executed in the same manner as this original document and shall after execution become a part of this
Contract.
29
30
Page 19
EXHIBIT A
TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN OWNER AND ENGINEER FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ENGINEER'S STATUS DURING CONSTRUCTION
This Exhibit is attached to, made a part of and incorporated by reference with the Agreement made on
_________________ , 2008 between CITY OF BOZEMAN (OWNER) and HDR ENGINEERING, INC.
(ENGINEER) providing for professional engineering services.
ARTICLE 10 - ENGINEER'S STATUS DURING CONSTRUCTION
10.1. OWNER’S REPRESENTATIVE
ENGINEER will be OWNER's representative during the construction period. The duties and responsibilities
and the limitations of authority of ENGINEER as OWNER's representative during construction are set forth
in the Contract Documents and shall not be extended without written consent of OWNER and ENGINEER.
10.2. VISITS TO THE SITE
ENGINEER will make visits to the site at intervals appropriate to the various stages of construction to
observe the progress and quality of the executed Work and to determine, in general, if the Work is proceeding
in accordance with the Contract Documents. ENGINEER will not be required to make exhaustive or
continuous on-site inspections to check the quality or quantity of the Work. ENGINEER's efforts will be
directed toward providing for OWNER's greater degree of confidence that the completed Work will conform
to the Contract Documents. On the basis of such visits and on-site observations as an experienced and
qualified design professional, ENGINEER will keep OWNER informed of the progress of the Work and will
endeavor to guard OWNER against defects and deficiencies in the Work.
10.3. PROJECT REPRESENTATION
If OWNER and ENGINEER agree, ENGINEER will furnish a Resident Project Representative to assist
ENGINEER in observing the performance of the Work. The duties, responsibilities and limitations of
authority of any such Resident Project Representative and assistants will be as provided in EXHIBIT B: A
LISTING OF THE DUTIES, RESPONSIBILITIES AND LIMITATIONS OF AUTHORITY OF THE
RESIDENT PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE.
10.4. CLARIFICATIONS AND INTERPRETATIONS
ENGINEER will issue with reasonable promptness such written clarifications or interpretations of the
requirements of the Contract Documents (in the form of Drawings or otherwise) as ENGINEER may
determine necessary, which shall be consistent with or reasonably inferable from the overall intent of the
Contract Documents. If CONTRACTOR believes that a written clarification or interpretation justifies an
increase in the Contract Price or an extension of the Contract Time and the parties are unable to agree to the
amount or extent thereof, CONTRACTOR may make a claim therefor as provided in the General Provisions
of the construction Contract Document.
31
Page 20
10.5. AUTHORIZED VARIATIONS IN WORK
ENGINEER may authorize minor variations in the Work from the requirements of the Contract Documents
which do not involve an adjustment in the Contract Price or the Contract Time and are consistent with the
overall intent of the Contract Documents. These may be accomplished by a Field Order and will be binding
on OWNER, and also on CONTRACTOR who shall perform the Work involved promptly. If
CONTRACTOR believes that a Field Order justifies an increase in the Contract Price or an extension of the
Contract Time and the parties are unable to agree as to the amount or extent thereof, CONTRACTOR may
make a claim therefor as provided in the General Conditions of the Construction Contract.
10.6. REJECTING DEFECTIVE WORK
ENGINEER will have authority to disapprove or reject Work which ENGINEER believes to be defective, and
will also have authority to require special inspection or testing of the Work as provided in the General
Provisions of the construction Contract Document whether or not the work is fabricated, installed, or
completed.
10.7. SHOP DRAWINGS, CHANGE ORDERS AND PAYMENT
10.7.1. The ENGINEER's responsibility for Shop Drawings and samples shall comply with the shop
drawing provisions of the General Provisions of the construction Contract Document
10.7.2. The ENGINEER's responsibilities for Change Orders shall comply with the change order
provisions of the General Provisions of the construction Contract Document.
10.7.3. The ENGINEER's responsibilities for contractor's Application for Payment shall comply with
the payment provisions of the General Provisions of the construction Contract Document.
10.8. DETERMINATIONS FOR UNIT PRICES
ENGINEER will determine the actual quantities and classifications of Unit Price Work performed by
CONTRACTOR. ENGINEER will review with CONTRACTOR the ENGINEER's preliminary
determinations on such matters before rendering a written recommendation thereon (by recommendation of an
Application for Payment or otherwise) to OWNER.
10.9. DECISION ON DISPUTES
10.9.1. ENGINEER will be the initial interpreter of the requirements of the Contract Documents and
judge of the acceptability of the Work thereunder. Claims, disputes and other matters relating to the
acceptability of the Work or the interpretation of the requirements of the Contract Documents pertaining
to the performance and furnishing of the Work and claims under The General Conditions of the
Construction Contract in respect of changes in the Contract Price or Contract Time will be referred
initially to ENGINEER in writing with a request for a formal decision in accordance with this paragraph,
which ENGINEER will render in writing within a reasonable time. Written notice of each such claim,
dispute and other matter shall be promptly reported and copied to the OWNER.
10.9.2. When functioning as interpreter under paragraphs 10.8 and 10.9.1, ENGINEER will not show
partiality to OWNER or CONTRACTOR and will not be liable in connection with any interpretation or
decision rendered in good faith in such capacity. The rendering of a decision by ENGINEER pursuant to
paragraphs 10.8 and 10.9.1 with respect to any such claim, dispute or other matter will be a condition
precedent to any exercise by OWNER or CONTRACTOR of such rights or remedies as either may
32
Page 21
otherwise have under the Contract Documents or by Laws or Regulations in respect of any such claim,
dispute or other matter.
10.10. LIMITATIONS ON ENGINEER'S RESPONSIBILITIES
10.10.1. Neither ENGINEER's authority to act under this Article or elsewhere in the Contract Documents
nor any decision made by ENGINEER in good faith either to exercise or not exercise such authority shall
give rise to any duty or responsibility of ENGINEER to CONTRACTOR, any Subcontractor, any
Supplier, or any other person or organization performing any of the Work, or to any surety for any of
them.
10.10.2. Whenever in the Contract Documents the terms "as ordered", "as directed", "as required", "as
allowed", "as approved" or terms of like effect or import are used, or the adjectives "reasonable",
"suitable", "acceptable", "proper" or "satisfactory" or adjectives of like effect or import are used to
describe a requirement, direction, review or judgment of ENGINEER as to the Work, it is intended that
such requirement, direction, review or judgment will be solely to evaluate the Work for compliance with
the Contract Documents (unless there is a specific statement indicating otherwise). The use of any such
term or adjective shall not be effective to assign to ENGINEER any duty or authority to supervise or
direct the furnishing or performance of the Work or any duty or authority to undertake responsibility
contrary to the provisions of paragraph 4.5.3.
33
Page 22
EXHIBIT B
TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN OWNER AND
ENGINEER FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
A LISTING OF THE DUTIES, RESPONSIBILITIES AND
LIMITATIONS OF AUTHORITY OF THE RESIDENT PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE.
This Exhibit is attached to, made a part of and incorporated by reference with the Agreement made on
___________, 2008 between CITY OF BOZEMAN (OWNER) and HDR ENGINEERING, INC.
(ENGINEER) providing for professional engineering services.
ARTICLE 11 - DUTIES, RESPONSIBILITIES AND LIMITATIONS OF AUTHORITY OF THE
RESIDENT PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE
ENGINEER shall furnish a Resident Project Representative (RPR), assistants and other field staff to assist
ENGINEER in observing performance of the work of Contractor.
Through more extensive on-site observations of the work in progress and field checks of materials and
equipment by the RPR and assistants, ENGINEER shall endeavor to provide further protection for OWNER
against defects and deficiencies in the work of CONTRACTOR; but, the furnishing of such services will not
make ENGINEER responsible for or give ENGINEER control over construction means, methods, techniques,
sequences or procedures or for safety precautions or programs, or responsibility for CONTRACTOR's failure
to perform the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents and in particular the specific limitations set
forth in section 8.5 of the Agreement are applicable.
The duties and responsibilities of the RPR are limited to those of ENGINEER in this agreement and in the
construction Contract Documents, and are further limited and described as follows:
11.1. GENERAL
RPR is ENGINEER's agent at the site, will act as directed by and under the supervision of ENGINEER, and
will confer with ENGINEER regarding RPR's actions. RPR's dealings in matters pertaining to the on-site
work shall in general be with ENGINEER and CONTRACTOR keeping OWNER advised as necessary.
RPR's dealings with subcontractors shall only be through or with the full knowledge and approval of
CONTRACTOR. RPR shall generally communicate with OWNER with the knowledge of and under the
direction of ENGINEER.
11.2. DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF RPR
11.2.1. Schedules: Review the progress schedule, schedule of Shop Drawing submittals and schedule of
values prepared by CONTRACTOR and consult with ENGINEER concerning acceptability.
11.2.2. Conferences and Meetings: Attend meetings with CONTRACTOR, such as preconstruction
conferences, progress meetings, job conferences and the project-related meetings, and prepare and
circulate copies of minutes thereof.
34
Page 23
11.2.3. Liaison:
11.2.3.1. Serve as ENGINEER's liaison with CONTRACTOR, working principally through
CONTRACTOR's superintendent and assist in understanding the intent of the Contract Documents;
and assist ENGINEER in serving as OWNER's liaison with CONTRACTOR.
11.2.3.2. Assist in obtaining from OWNER additional details or information, when required for
proper execution of the Work.
11.2.4. Shop Drawings and Samples:
11.2.4.1. Record date of receipt of Shop Drawings and samples.
11.2.4.2. Receive samples which are furnished at the site by CONTRACTOR, and notify
ENGINEER of availability of samples for examination.
11.2.4.3. Advise ENGINEER and CONTRACTOR of the commencement of any Work
requiring Shop Drawing or sample if the submittal has not been approved by
ENGINEER.
11.2.5. Review of Work, Rejection of Defective Work, Inspections and Tests:
11.2.5.1. Conduct on-site observations of the Work in progress to assist ENGINEER in
determining if the Work is in general proceeding in accordance with the Contract
Documents.
11.2.5.2. Report to ENGINEER whenever RPR believes that any Work is unsatisfactory,
faulty or defective or does not conform to the Contract Documents, or has been damaged, or
does not meet the requirements of any inspection, test or approval required to be made; and
advise ENGINEER of Work that RPR believes should be corrected or rejected or should be
uncovered for observation, or requires special testing, inspection or approval.
11.2.5.3. Verify that tests, equipment and systems startup and operating and maintenance
training are conducted in the presence of appropriate personnel, and the CONTRACTOR
maintains adequate records thereof; and observe, record and report to ENGINEER
appropriate details relative to the test procedures and startup.
11.2.5.4. Accompany visiting inspectors representing public or other agencies having
jurisdiction over the Project, record the results of these inspections and report to
ENGINEER.
11.2.6. Interpretation of Contract Documents: Report to ENGINEER when clarifications and
interpretations of the Contract Documents are needed and transmit to CONTRACTOR clarifications
and interpretations as issued by ENGINEER.
11.2.7. Modifications: Consider and evaluate CONTRACTOR's suggestions for modifications in
Drawings or Specifications and report with RPR's recommendations to ENGINEER. Transmit to
CONTRACTOR decisions as issued by ENGINEER.
35
Page 24
11.2.8. Records:
11.2.8.1. Maintain at the job site orderly files for correspondence, reports of job
conferences, Shop Drawings and samples, reproductions of original Contract Documents
including all Work Directive Changes, Addenda, Change Orders, Field Orders, additional
Drawings issued subsequent to the execution of the Contract, ENGINEER's clarifications
and interpretations of the Contract Documents, progress reports, and other Project related
documents.
11.2.8.2. Keep a detailed and accurate diary or log book, recording CONTRACTOR hours
on the job site, weather conditions, prime and subcontractor daily work force, daily log of
equipment onsite or on standby, data relative to questions of Work Directive Changes,
Change Orders or changed conditions, list of job site visitors, daily activities, decisions,
observations in general, and specific observations in more detail as in the case of observing
test procedures; and send copies to ENGINEER.
11.2.8.3. Record names, addresses and telephone numbers of all CONTRACTORS,
subcontractors and major suppliers of materials and equipment.
11.2.9. Reports:
11.2.9.1. Furnish ENGINEER periodic reports as required of progress of the Work and of
CONTRACTOR's compliance with the progress schedule and schedule of Shop Drawing and
sample submittals.
11.2.9.2. Consult with ENGINEER in advance of scheduled major tests, inspections or
start of important phases of the Work.
11.2.9.3. Draft proposed Change Orders and Work Directive Changes, obtaining backup
material from CONTRACTOR and recommend to ENGINEER Change Orders, Work
Directive Changes, and Field Orders.
11.2.9.4. Report immediately to ENGINEER and OWNER upon the occurrence of any
accident.
11.2.10. Payment Requests: Review applications for payment with CONTRACTOR for compliance
with the established procedure for their submission and forward with recommendations to
ENGINEER, noting particularly the relationship of the payment requested to the schedule of values,
Work completed and materials and equipment delivered at the site but not incorporated in the Work.
11.2.11. Certificates, Maintenance and Operation Manuals: During the course of the Work, verify
that certificates, maintenance and operation manuals and other data required to be assembled and
furnished by CONTRACTOR are applicable to the items actually installed and in accordance with
the Contract Documents, and have this material delivered to ENGINEER for review and forwarding
to OWNER prior to final payment for the Work.
11.2.12. Completion:
36
Page 25
11.2.12.1. Submit to CONTRACTOR, and ENGINEER a list of observed items requiring
completion or correction before ENGINEER may issue a Certificate of Substantial
Completion.
11.2.12.2 Assess completion or correction of items noted under 11.2.12.1, advise
ENGINEER on their status, and make recommendation to Engineer regarding issuance of a
Certificate of Substantial Completion.
11.2.12.3. Conduct final inspection in the company of ENGINEER, OWNER, and
CONTRACTOR and prepare a final list of items to be completed or corrected.
11.2.12.4. Observe that all items on final list have been completed or corrected and make
recommendations to ENGINEER concerning final acceptance.
11.3. LIMITATIONS OF AUTHORITY
Resident Project Representative:
11.3.1. Shall not authorize any deviation from the Contract Documents or substitution of materials or
equipments, unless authorized by ENGINEER.
11.3.2. Shall not exceed limitations of ENGINEER's authority as set forth in the Agreement or the
Contract Documents.
11.3.3. Shall not undertake any of the responsibilities of CONTRACTOR, subcontractors or
CONTRACTOR's superintendent.
11.3.4. Shall not advise on, issue directions relative to or assume control over any aspect of the
means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of construction unless such advice or directions
are specifically required by the Contract Documents.
11.3.5. Shall not advise on, issue directions regarding or assume control over safety precautions and
programs in connection with the Work.
11.3.6. Shall not accept Shop Drawing or sample submittals from anyone other than
CONTRACTOR.
11.3.7. Shall not authorize OWNER to occupy the Project in whole or in part.
11.3.8. Shall not participate in specialized field or laboratory tests or inspections conducted by others
except as specifically authorized by ENGINEER.
37
Scope of Services 1 of 36 10/28/2008
EXHIBIT C - CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA
HYALITE/SOURDOUGH WATER TREATMENT PLANT REPLACEMENT PROJECT
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Tasks
100 Project Management & Administration
200 Conceptual Design
300 Membrane Pilot Program
400 Membrane Equipment Procurement Assistance and Contract
Administration
500 WTP Process Preliminary Design
600 WTP Process Final Design *Future Task*
700 Bid Services *Future Task*
800 Construction Administration *Future Task*
900 Project Startup Assistance & Commissioning *Future Task*
1000 Application Software Programming Services *Future Task*
1100 Project Closeout *Future Task*
1200 Additional Services Only upon Authorization of City
Project Goals and Understanding
The following assumptions are included as part of this scope of services plan:
• A single construction contract will be completed and executed.
• The pilot testing program that is to be conducted will utilize up to three (3) membrane
units (both submerged and pressure membrane technologies).
• A membrane system will be selected prior to final design.
• Parameters for membrane selection and equipment purchase will be established by the
membrane pilot testing.
• The membrane system will be designed to treat coagulated and flocculated or settled
water. A “no coagulant” option will be included for times when water quality does not
require coagulation.
38
Scope of Services 2 of 36 10/28/2008
• The membrane system will be designed for a rated capacity of 22 MGD. The system will
also be designed to be expandable to 36 MGD.
• Residuals and backwash handling options will be explored in the preliminary design
phase to determine if a new MPDES permit is required.
• Bidding and construction services have been included in this scope as preliminary tasks
for information purposes. These services will be added through contract amendment after
completion of the pilot program, preliminary and final designs and prior to project
bidding.
• The existing WTP will remain in operation throughout design and construction, with
provisions to allow eventual demolition of the existing WTP facilities.
In 2004, the City of Bozeman (City) undertook the task of planning for the future of their water
infrastructure. The goal of the planning effort was to define the existing infrastructure, estimate
future populations and water quantities, determine improvements needed to accommodate
growth, and develop an improvements plan for the water system.
In 2007, the City approved the 2007 Bozeman Water Facility Plan (Plan), which identified
system deficiencies and needs. The Plan recommended the City enhance their water rights/water
supply, improve the Lyman Creek system, plan for increased storage and improve the
Hyalite/Sourdough WTP system. The selected alternative for improving the Hyalite/Sourdough
treatment system was to replace the existing facilities with a new membrane filter treatment
plant. The plant improvements that have been assumed for the pilot program, preliminary design
and final design are based upon the following Project components:
• New screening tower and preliminary treatment facilities;
• New chemical coagulation and flocculation facilities;
• New sedimentation facilities;
• Membrane filtration system with 22 MGD capacity, expandable to 36 MGD, including
the following systems:
o Feed or permeate pumping;
o Strainers or screens;
o Compressed air;
o Backwash pumping;
o Backwash water recovery;
o Chemical cleaning;
o Cleaning waste neutralization; and
o Instrumentation and control;
• A new clearwell, with potential of locating the clearwell above grade at a hydraulic
gradient above the membrane modules;
39
Scope of Services 3 of 36 10/28/2008
• Reconstruction of the Sourdough intake
• Evaluation of the feasibility of adding hydropower to the project ;
• A new backwash waste sump with possible provisions of a backwash recovery membrane
treatment train;
• Hypochlorination, fluoridation, and sodium hydroxide chemical feed systems;
• Backwash waste handling facilities, including possible use of gravity thickeners,
microstrainers, vacuum-assisted drying beds and/or discharge to the City’s wastewater
collection system;
• New office/laboratory facility;
• New workshop and maintenance facilities; and
• Standby power generation, instrumentation and control, fire suppression, and security
systems.
The work tasks that will be required during the Project are as follows.
Task 100 – Project Management and Administration
Objective
HDR/MMI will manage and control its professional services contract to provide efficient
completion of the project. Under this task, we will prepare and implement a project management
plan; provide scope, schedule, and cost control services; negotiate and administer the contract;
and initiate and attend project working meetings. The project management plan will be
completed jointly for all project phases and components identified in the scope of services for
project delivery.
HDR/MMI Subtasks:
Subtask 101 – Project Coordination Meetings and Reports
The HDR/MMI project manager will conduct meetings with City staff as necessary to review
project progress, schedule and budget; identify information needs, and make decisions regarding
any changes in the scope of the preliminary design and design. These meetings are planned to be
coordinated with the work meetings identified in specific tasks, and will also be conducted in
conjunction with the meetings required for detailed preliminary and final design. It is assumed
for this Project, that where practical, the meetings will be conducted at the MMI office in
Bozeman, MT that is a central location for the project team. This scope of services also assumes
that some meetings will be conducted at the WTP site, when on-site review of existing facilities
is necessary for implementation of the preliminary and final designs.
An initial project kick-off working meeting will be held immediately after the Notice to Proceed
to identify City goals, performance data, engineering data needs and schedule. Members of the
project team will be introduced. Data will be exchanged and work tasks outlined in detail.
40
Scope of Services 4 of 36 10/28/2008
During this initial work session, all project communications and project team responsibilities will
be clearly defined. Initial project alternatives will be identified and all key alternatives for each
project element and/or unit process will be selected for further evaluation and analysis by
HDR/MMI.
We anticipate conducting two (2) preliminary planning and pilot design working meetings
involving the City/HDR/MMI project team. These working meetings will be comprised of pilot
setup and development and pilot performance review and membrane selection.
We anticipate conducting three (3) preliminary design working meetings involving the
City/HDR/MMI project team. These working meetings will be conducted throughout the
preliminary design phase. Each working meeting will be comprised of project-specific time
segments (schematic design and process control descriptions, preliminary design summary) to
allow for easy transition and participation of the applicable project stakeholders. The four
working meetings will address the progress on the design as a whole, but will focus on the
following areas: 1) Final Membrane and Ancillary Process Unit Selection, 2) Instrumentation
and Controls, 3) Design Summary.
The HDR/MMI project manager will submit project invoices monthly. A brief progress
memorandum, in bullet item format, will be prepared with each monthly invoice. The progress
memo will summarize the work progress being invoiced, the budget expenditures to date, and
identify any information requirements or decisions that need to be made by the City. These
reports will help maintain frequent communications with the City and design team, and will be
presented in a simple informative format, which can be used for distribution to the City
Commission and citizens.
A project decision log will be maintained throughout the project to monitor project decisions and
maintain a record of key actions to be addressed by the City and design team. The decision log
will be developed in a simple spreadsheet format by project area, and will be distributed
frequently to project staff to ensure key decisions are effectively implemented.
Subtask 102 – Project Team Coordination Work Sessions
The HDR/MMI project team will meet (usually weekly) with our staff to review project
progress, schedule and budget; and coordinate technical aspects of the design. These meetings
will be conducted in conjunction with the working meetings required for the pilot program,
detailed preliminary and final design, and will be conducted using network meeting tools and
conference calls to the greatest extent possible to reduce personnel travel.
Deliverables
Progress memoranda and invoices (3 copies and digital .pdf file).
Work Meeting agendas and notes in bullet item format (3 copies and digital .pdf copy of
each agenda and meeting notes).
City Responsibilities:
Timely review of submittals and coordination of all City review comments.
41
Scope of Services 5 of 36 10/28/2008
Participation in Project work sessions.
Prompt processing and payment of invoices.
Task 200 – Conceptual Design
Objective
Make preliminary general decisions that will guide the pilot testing program, membrane
procurement, and preliminary design.
HDR/MMI Subtasks:
Subtask 201 – Analyze Data from Existing Water Treatment Plant
HDR / MMI will analyze and evaluate raw and finished water quality provided by the City. This
information will be used to evaluate pre-treatment alternatives and define water quality
expectations for use during membrane pilot testing and procurement. Chemical feed rates and
consumptive use data provided by the City will be evaluated for use in designing new chemical
feed facilities.
Subtask 202 – Establish Finished Water Quality Goals
HDR/ MMI will propose finished water quality goals for the new water treatment plant.
Subtask 203 – Evaluate Pre-Treatment Alternatives
The new water treatment plant will include coagulation and flocculation facilities to control both
color and sand / grit. The potential to operate without coagulant addition will also be evaluated.
The existing WTP uses a ferric chloride coagulant and polymer for flocculation. Polymers
would likely not be compatible with membrane filtration and changing coagulant chemicals
would likely improve membrane filtration performance. This task would discuss coagulation
and flocculation chemicals and design criteria, and make recommendations on chemicals for
pilot testing.
Spring runoff turbidities can exceed 200 ntu for brief periods and there is risk of wildfire that
would degrade water quality. This task will develop two pre-treatment alternatives with the goal
of determining if a sedimentation process should be carried forward to the pilot testing phase: 1)
coagulation / flocculation and 2) coagulation / flocculation / sedimentation. A “no coagulant”
operating scenario will also be evaluated and tested. Design criteria will be established for each
alternative. The costs and risks of each alternative will be estimated and described.
Recommendations for pre-treatment will be provided for use in developing the treatment process
to be tested during the pilot testing phase.
Subtask 204 – Evaluate Waste Handling Alternatives
The existing WTP does not have a sanitary sewer connection and disposes of sanitary wastes
using a septic system. Filter backwash waste is settled and discharged back to the source. The
42
Scope of Services 6 of 36 10/28/2008
NPDES permit is currently under review and modification by MDEQ. The backwash waste
from the new membrane plant can be recovered to reduce waste volume. A sanitary sewer could
be extended to the WWTP to reduce or eliminate the need for the creek discharge. This task will
develop three alternatives for waste handling: 1) backwash water recovery with sewer discharge;
2) backwash water recovery with conventional waste handling and discharge to creek; and 3)
conventional waste handling and discharge to creek.
The existing NPDES discharge permit will be reviewed and summarized. MDEQ will be
contacted regarding the permit status and potential changes. Potential changes and impacts to
discharge capability with the new water treatment plant will be considered. Expected waste
flows and quality with and without backwash water recovery will be established. Three
alternatives for waste handling will be developed. HDR/ MMI will evaluate the alternatives and
make a recommendation for incorporation into the new WTP and the pilot testing program.
Subtask 205 – Hold a Workshop to Select Membrane Systems for Pilot
Testing
There are many different membrane systems that could be selected for pilot testing. This one-
day workshop will discuss different membrane systems and result in the selection of up to three
membrane systems for pilot testing.
Subtask 206 – Tour Existing Membrane Facilities
This task would identify existing membrane filtration water treatment plants for tours by City
and HDR / MMI team staff. The purpose is to review the performance of the different
membrane systems and to identify design features and preferences to incorporate into the design
of Bozeman’s new WTP. HDR/MMI would develop an itinerary to visit existing membrane
filtration facilities with membrane types selected for pilot testing. Preferences related to
membrane system characteristics would be documented for use in addition to life-cycle cost in
selecting the preferred membrane system. Design preferences would also be documented. It is
assumed that up to three locations would be visited including up to six facility tours, not to
exceed one week of travel. The trip will involve overnight travel (three nights maximum) to
operating facilities anticipated to be most similar to Bozeman’s future facilities. A minimum of
two HDR/MMI staff members will accompany City staff on the visit. It is anticipated that the
City will pay for their own time and travel costs for the site visits, and HDR/MMI will include
time and travel costs for the site visits in the engineering services budget.
Subtask 207 – Prepare a Conceptual Design Memorandum
A draft conceptual design memorandum will be prepared describing the results of this task and
outlining the recommendations for the pilot test and the new water treatment plant. A meeting
will be held to discuss City review questions and comments. A final memorandum will be
prepared incorporating City review comments.
43
Scope of Services 7 of 36 10/28/2008
Task 300 - Membrane Pilot Program
Objective
HDR/MMI will assist the City in conducting pilot plant testing at the existing WTP, to verify the
feasibility of utilizing alternative treatment technologies selected in the Plan. Pilot testing will be
used to confirm the technological feasibility of submerged or pressure membrane systems,
identify key differences between the various membrane systems that may impact the facility
design and/or acceptance, obtain operational and water quality data required for state regulatory
approval, and establish membrane system design criteria. Testing will be done at the WTP site.
The pilot testing will be conducted from January through July, testing submerged low-pressure
and pressure membranes from up to three (3) potential suppliers. These proprietary membrane
systems will be pilot tested in parallel under various water quality conditions, using either
coagulated, flocculated or settled water. The pilot systems will be provided by the respective
vendors under terms to be determined during development of the pilot-testing program. The test
systems will consist of mostly automated, skid-mounted test units, complete with all pumps,
valves, and pressure and flow indicators, and water quality instrumentation required to allow
automatic operation of the test units. Operator intervention will be required only to set initial
operating conditions, monitor system performance (e.g. flows, pressures and filtrate water
quality), collect and send water quality samples, and conduct chemical cleaning of the
membranes. Each membrane test unit will contain “full-size” membrane modules and will be
operated in a manner consistent with full-scale installations.
HDR/MMI Subtasks:
Subtask 301 – Coordinate, Negotiate, and Execute Rental Agreements
with Membrane Suppliers
HDR/MMI will contact selected membrane system manufacturers to determine interest in the
project and willingness to participate in pilot testing. HDR/MMI will meet with representatives
of each manufacturer to review pilot testing capabilities and contractual requirements and will
meet with each membrane supplier to negotiate the contract for HDR/MMI leasing of the
membrane pilot units for up to eight (8) months. HDR/MMI will also identify changes to the
lease agreement needed to meet HDR/MMI and City needs and finalize contract language.
HDR/MMI will make final approval of the contract language for leases and will pay supplier
directly for the membrane equipment leases.
Subtask 302 - Identify Installation Requirements for Pilot Testing
Equipment
HDR/MMI will determine the installation requirements for the membrane pilot units, and will
prepare a summary of the key needs. HDR/MMI will obtain drawings from suppliers of the pilot
units, including schematics and plans and will coordinate with the City on pilot unit layouts for
installation at the existing WTP. HDR/MMI will also determine piping and electrical
requirements for installation and operation of the pilot facilities.
44
Scope of Services 8 of 36 10/28/2008
Subtasks 303 - Develop Pilot Testing Protocols and Obtain Montana DEQ
Approval
A pilot testing protocol will be developed to establish the operational approach for the membrane
pilot units. The protocol will identify requirements for sampling, water quality testing, pilot unit
operating parameters and equipment monitoring needs and data management. The protocols will
be structured to obtain the following information and to support preparation of the membrane
equipment prepurchase documents:
• The variability of membrane feed water and levels of constituents of interest in feed
water.
• The variables related to backwash, including volumes, frequency and duration.
• The rate at which the various membranes foul and require chemical cleaning. Fouling
rate is related to the feed water quality, filter loading rate (flux), hydraulic recovery
and backwash efficiency. The frequency and cost of chemical cleaning.
• The sensitivity of fouling rate to small or moderate increases in membrane flux. The
fouling rate for membrane filters will typically increase at “critical” flux and/or
recovery conditions.
• The propensity for the various membranes to become irreversibly fouled.
• The compatibility of the various membrane materials with the feed water quality and
chemicals to which the membranes may be exposed.
• The compatibility of the various membrane systems with the overall treatment
strategy including, for example, disinfection and requirements for taste and odor
control.
• The ability to meet design flows under worst-case conditions such as during cold
water, spring run-off and simulated post wildfire run-off events.
• The ability of the various membrane systems to consistently meet the treatment
objectives.
The pilot testing protocol will be submitted to Montana DEQ for approval prior to beginning
piloting to ensure that all data needs are met with respect to approval of the membrane system.
Subtask 304 – Pilot Plant Facility Construction and Startup
HDR/MMI will develop plans, specifications and work summaries for implementing the
installation requirements outlined in Subtask 302. HDR/MMI will coordinate and pay for power
feed improvements at the WTP necessary for providing electrical service to each pilot unit
(including drawings, schematics, and plans necessary); coordinate installation of phone service
to each pilot unit (including locating telephone facilities and development of a contract for
service throughout the duration of the pilot project); provide appurtenances not provided by the
membrane suppliers (piping, valves, sample ports, raw water plumbing, coagulated/flocculated
water delivery and waste tank or waste receiving facilities if necessary); arrange for off-load of
the pilot equipment upon arrival to the site; provide pre-treated flocculated water pumping
45
Scope of Services 9 of 36 10/28/2008
system, including suction and discharge pilot delivery piping; install electrical services through
an electrical subcontractor and the membrane vendors; coordinate telephone service installation
through the telephone company and the membrane vendors; and obtain chemicals and chemical
feed pumps recommended by each vendor for each pilot unit.
HDR/MMI will provide for installation of the pilot units, including verification of compliance
with the requirements of each pilot unit vendor/supplier. HDR/MMI, and their subcontractors,
will set the units in place, provide for plumbing and electrical connections, and will coordinate
auxiliary systems needed for each pilot unit. The pilot equipment will only be turned over to
City operations staff once the equipment is fully operational. HDR/MMI will require treatment
equipment vendors to provide training to the City’s operations staff. HDR/MMI will attend the
trainings and provide additional training and guidance for the overall pilot system and pilot
testing protocol.
Subtask 305 - Provide Operational Assistance to City on Pilot Units
During pilot testing, the membranes will be operated by City staff in accordance with the Pilot
Test Protocol, with regular input from HDR/MMI’s quality control and treatment specialists. The
protocol will include provisions for the optimization of operating conditions (i.e. flux, backwash
frequency, etc.) during the first month of operation. Following the optimization period, operation
for the remainder of the test period will provide data for determination of overall performance.
The City will collect and send water quality samples to an outside laboratory identified by
HDR/MMI for analysis. The protocol will include a sampling and analysis plan for water quality
data. The expected analyses to be performed include total coliform, hardness, alkalinity, silica,
HPC, color, turbidity, TOC, UV-254, and particle counts. Lab costs will be paid directly by
HDR/MMI.
Subtask 306 - Review Operations Data Collected by City
HDR/MMI will review pilot unit operational data provided by the City and membrane vendors
on a weekly basis. HDR/MMI will also advise City staff and pilot unit vendors on changes
recommended in the data collection program and on operation of the pilot plant systems.
Subtask 307 - Coordinate with Pilot Unit Suppliers During Operation
HDR/MMI will coordinate with pilot unit suppliers during operation of the systems, to assure
proper care and control of the equipment is being maintained. Obtain supplier input on operating
parameter adjustments needed to the pilot units, including supplementary treatment (i.e.with and
without sedimentation) to enhance membrane performance.
HDR/MMI will also coordinate with the City or an outside septic service provider to provide for
removal of the clean-in-place waste materials if it is determined that the waste cannot be
neutralized, dechlorinated, and disposed with WTP filter backwash waste. HDR/MMI will also
work with the City and the Montana DEQ to develop the most economical means for disposal of
filter backwash materials, including surface water discharge via the City’s current backwash
disposal system.
46
Scope of Services 10 of 36 10/28/2008
Subtask 308 – Pilot Plant Shutdown, Evaluation, and Reporting
At the completion of the pilot testing and evaluation of the pilot results, HDR/MMI will provide
for the shut-down of the pilot units, including disassembly, removal of electrical and telephone
service, removal of ancillary systems and preparation of the units for shipment. HDR/MMI will
plan for the potential for City purchase of the selected membrane equipment supplier’s pilot unit
to be used throughout the preliminary design and design as a “proof-test” unit. Should the City
elect to purchase the pilot unit selected, HDR/MMI will provide operations support to the City
and will not provide for equipment removal. Provisions will be made in the pilot unit lease
agreement/contracts for the potential purchase by the City. A report of the pilot test will be
prepared. The report will document pilot test activities and results and include recommended
design criteria to be used for membrane procurement.
Deliverables
• Membrane pilot rental agreements/contracts with HDR/MMI.
• Membrane pilot testing protocol.
• Operator training for pilot test equipment and pilot test protocol.
• Operations data review summaries and Performance Optimization Summary.
• Membrane pilot test report summary.
City Responsibilities:
• Provide review of pilot unit rental/leases.
• Assist as necessary for HDR/MMI coordination of utilities and support services. Provide
assistance to HDR/MMI for installation of pilot test units (with HDR/MMI assistance).
• Support pilot unit operation and execute the sampling and analysis plan.
• Coordinate chemical addition for pilot testing.
Task 400 – Membrane Equipment Procurement Assistance
and Contract Administration
Objective
The purpose of this phase of the project will be to provide assistance to the City in bidding and
award of an equipment pre-purchase contract for the selected membrane equipment. It also
includes tasks related to shop drawing approvals and membrane equipment contract
administration.
47
Scope of Services 11 of 36 10/28/2008
HDR/MMI Subtasks:
Subtask 401 - Prepare Equipment Pre-purchase Documents
Based upon the results of the pilot testing, HDR/MMI will develop membrane procurement
documents that will include the following:
• Scope of supply.
• Method of supplier selection/elevation.
• Bonds and insurance requirements.
• Performance incentives/non-performance penalties.
• Conditions of default or termination.
• General process layout.
• Technical specifications.
The procurement documents will be submitted to the City for review and City comments will be
incorporated. HDR/MMI will prepare drawings for each membrane system to be considered for
pre-purchase, including:
• Process flow diagram.
• Process and Instrumentation Diagrams; feed, typical unit, filtrate, backwash, clean in
place, compressors/blowers.
• PLC/SCADA architecture.
• Equipment and construction contract interfaces.
Subtask 402 - Assist City in Bidding Equipment Pre-purchase
HDR/MMI will reproduce the membrane equipment pre-purchase bid documents and distribute
them to membrane vendors that successfully completed the pilot test. Bidder questions will be
answered and HDR/MMI will prepare addenda as needed.
Subtask 403 - Review Prepurchase Proposals
HDR/MMI will review membrane equipment pre-purchase bids and make recommendation of
contract award. HDR/MMI will assist in preparation of contract documents for contract award by
the City.
Subtask 404 – Prepare Membrane Pre-Purchase Contracts
HDR/MMI will prepare contract documents for the City to pre-purchase the membrane system.
HDR/MMI will coordinate with the selected membrane system supplier to finalize the contract
language and content. Draft contract documents will be submitted to the City and the supplier for
review and final coordination. HDR/MMI will also assist the City in obtaining all necessary
signatures and document approvals.
48
Scope of Services 12 of 36 10/28/2008
Deliverables
• Equipment pre-purchase documents.
• Membrane procurement drawings for systems considered for pre-purchase.
• Pre-purchase proposals evaluation summary and recommendation for selection.
• Pre-purchase contract documents.
City Responsibilities:
• Provide review of membrane procurement documents.
• Provide input on procurement drawings.
• Execute equipment pre-purchase contract.
Task 500 – WTP Process Preliminary Design
Objective
HDR/MMI will complete project preliminary design evaluation and provide an update to the
previously completed 2007 City of Bozeman Water Facilities Plan. This includes completing a
Schematic Design effort, including completion of preliminary site layouts, process and
instrumentation diagrams and process control descriptions for all unit processes identified for
installation at the treatment plant. HDR/MMI will conduct review working sessions on facility
alternatives with City staff and select a preferred alternative for each project element.
Preliminary construction cost estimates will be completed and a summary memorandum on the
preferred approach will be prepared for approval by MDEQ.
HDR/MMI Subtasks:
Subtask 501 – Preliminary Design Memoranda
Preliminary Design Memoranda will be brief and are assumed to not take more than 60 hours on
average to complete. The preliminary engineering design effort will include engineering
calculations, preliminary hydraulic analyses, preliminary process control, and preliminary cost
estimates. Preliminary design is intended to occur around the selected proprietary membrane
system and will be completed after selection of the membrane supplier. Each project element or
unit process that is initially discussed in the kickoff working session, (and determined to be
worth evaluating further), will be summarized by a short technical memorandum to be included
in the final preliminary design report. The technical memoranda will include the comments,
ideas and decisions made by the team and recommended alternatives to be considered by the
City. Where appropriate, HDR/MMI will review alternatives for each treatment process area so
that equipment costs, operational procedures and maintenance are considered. Project elements
to be addressed by separate memoranda (that will form the Table of Contents of the Preliminary
Design Report):
Chapter 1: Design Objectives and Criteria
49
Scope of Services 13 of 36 10/28/2008
Chapter 2: Applicable Codes, Regulations, and Project Permitting
Chapter 3: Hydraulic Profile and Plant Hydraulic Constraints
Chapter 4: Treatment Plant Process and Layout
Chapter 5: Intakes and Raw Water Transmission
Chapter 6: Hydropower
Chapter 7: Coagulation/Flocculation/Sedimentation
Chapter 8: Chemical Feed Systems, Disinfection and Corrosion Control
Chapter 9: Backwash, Residuals and Waste Streams
Chapter 10: Architectural/Structural Approach (up to three architectural approaches)
Chapter 11: Electrical Supply, Standby Power Generation and Hydropower Application
Chapter 12: Instrumentation and Controls
Chapter 13: Site Civil/Yard Piping/Residuals Discharge/Landscaping
Chapter 14: Administration/Laboratory/ Workshop / Maintenance / Parking Facilities
Chapter 16: Provisions for Future Phases / Demolition of Existing Treatment Building
Chapter 18: Summary Cost Estimate
Appendices: Equipment Data Sheets, Detailed Cost Estimates
Following completion of each technical memoranda and cost estimates, they will be forwarded to
the City for review.
Subtask 502 – Site Surveys
HDR/MMI will provide site surveying services for the WTP property. Mapping will be based on
field control and GPS/Total Station data collection. Final product will be a topographic map with
a contour interval of one foot and a scale of 1” = 50’. In addition to the site mapping, 24 hours
of survey crew time is budgeted for detailed mapping of building and critical hydraulic
elevations. Control points for use during construction will be established as part of this work.
Existing survey information will be used to the greatest extent possible. Property boundary
surveys are not included in the scope of work. Project design will be based upon the detailed site
survey.
During the course of design additional survey work may be required including subsurface utility
exploration. If these services are required they will be performed as additional services. It is
assumed that, if on-site potholing will be required for utility locates, the City will assist in
completing on-site excavations with their own crews or an outside excavator will be used at an
additional cost to the contract.
Subtask 503 – Geotechnical Services
HDR/MMI and their geotechnical subconsultant, will conduct a geotechnical investigation for
the new structure foundations to be constructed for the WTP improvements. The geotechnical
50
Scope of Services 14 of 36 10/28/2008
investigation is planned to provide key subsurface/geotechnical information necessary for
completion of the preliminary design. The geotechnical investigation will involve a review of all
available geotechnical investigations from previous projects at the treatment plant and
completion of an on-site investigation. The geotechnical services will include:
• Drilling exploratory borehole(s) at defined foundation locations using a truck-mounted
drill rig. The actual depths of the boreholes may vary depending on field conditions and
depth of planned infrastructure. It is estimated that four (4) exploratory test holes will be
required to a maximum of 30 feet, or to equipment refusal in the dense gravels that are
expected.
• Laboratory testing will include optimum moisture content on selected samples to help
classify the foundation soils and determine their overall engineering properties.
• Summarize finding in a geotechnical report. The report will include a description of the
work performed, a discussion of site conditions and recommendations for shoring (if
required), corrosion protection of metallic and concrete surfaces, and structural design.
The report will also include the logs for the exploratory boreholes and a summary of
laboratory test results.
• Up to two (2) groundwater monitoring piezometers will be incorporated into two (2)
selected exploratory boreholes as part of this scope of work. The data from the
monitoring records from the piezometer well levels, will be recorded and included in the
project specifications for contractor use in development of their construction dewatering
plan.
• Data to be used for development of a performance-based, contractor-installed
construction dewatering system that will be provided in the construction contract in raw
form for contractor’s use. A detailed construction dewatering plan will not be included as
part of this scope of services.
• Long-term monthly monitoring of the piezometers installed will be completed throughout
the preliminary design and design phases of the project by HDR/MMI field personnel.
Subtask 504 - Wetland/Stream/Ditch Permitting Review
HDR/MMI will review the treatment plant site and the Sourdough Intake site for permitting
issues relative to wetlands, streams and irrigation ditches to determine project impacts and
permitting requirements. A wetland delineation survey and report will be completed and
submitted to the USACE for verification and jurisdictional determinations. An inventory of
irrigation ditches and the ditch owners will be completed.
Subtask 505- Preliminary Design Report Submittal
The design memoranda developed in Subtask 501 will be combined with an executive summary
into a preliminary design report to be submitted to MDEQ for final project approval. Based upon
the information contained in the Preliminary Design Report, HDR/MMI will advise the City of
any substantial changes in project scope that are anticipated to affect Construction Costs.
Additional information on project costs will be presented at this time and the Probable
51
Scope of Services 15 of 36 10/28/2008
Construction Costs will be updated as necessary to address any identified changes in project
scope.
Subtask 506 - Quality Control
HDR/MMI will utilize the services of senior design personnel to conduct a detailed review of the
WTP preliminary design technical memoranda. This review will focus on opportunities for cost
savings, added value, improved operation and constructability and will serve as a verification of
the recommendations made by the project team. No value engineering review is included.
Deliverables:
Geotechnical reports (2 copies).
Site survey(s) (3 copies of site survey and digital site plans in AutoCAD format).
Preliminary Design Memoranda (6 DRAFT and 6 Final copies of each memorandum
including digital files in .pdf format).
Preliminary Design Report (6 copies).
Field Survey (3 Copies of Site Plans for Use in Preliminary Evaluations, digital File of
Surveys).
Groundwater Information memorandum for treatment plant site with the results with
respect to groundwater levels (6 copies, digital file of memo in .pdf format).
City Responsibilities:
Deliver available previous geotechnical investigation reports.
Deliver available previous site surveys.
Deliver as-built drawings, as available.
Deliver requested existing equipment data.
Assist with establishing design criteria.
Timely review of submittals and coordination of all City review comments.
Participation in Project work sessions.
Task 600 – WTP Process Final Design *Future Task*
Objective:
HDR/MMI will complete a Schematic Design Summary (20% Design Report) with three
dimensional renderings of the recommended project, which briefly summarizes improvements by
project element or unit process, defines project phasing and schedule, and describes the process
element or unit process control strategy including process and instrumentation diagrams where
applicable. The task also includes the completion of project design documents in conformance
52
Scope of Services 16 of 36 10/28/2008
with Montana DEQ Circular DEQ 1-Design Standards for Water Facilities, and preparation of
construction documents for bidding and construction of project improvements.
HDR/MMI Subtasks:
Subtask 601 – Schematic Design Summary (20% Design)
The summary will build on the preliminary design report generated in Task 501 above. At this
point in the design schedule, a summary will be developed for submittal to the City for review
and approval prior to completion of the detailed final design. The summary will also include the
process instrumentation and control diagrams for each project element or unit process and an
associated control description that defines the proposed process control strategies. Three
dimensional presentations of proposed facilities will be prepared and delivered to the City for
review. The Schematic Design Summary will be used for coordination between the project
design team and the City and for final buy-in by the project team prior to completion of the
detailed final design.
The 2007 Water Facility Plan recommended the construction of a new replacement membrane
filter treatment plant using skid-mounted pressure membrane modules complete with integral
controls on each skid. The new membrane facility would be initially configured for 22 MGD and
be easily expandable to 36 MGD capacity. The new plant would also include a screening tower
and preliminary treatment facility, membrane chemical cleaning equipment, a new clearwell, a
backwash waste system, hypochlorination and fluoridation systems, a new lab/office/control
room, gravity thickeners and backwash strainers for backwash handling, and vacuum-assisted
drying beds for solids dewatering.
HDR/MMI has proposed that during the preliminary design and facilities design, additional
process options or alternatives be considered for the final project, including:
• Installation of coagulation and flocculation as part of the initial pre-treatment facilities.
• Consideration of alternative coagulants, including polyaluminum chloride.
• Pilot testing both pressure and submerged low pressure membranes, with possible
inclusion of sedimentation or enhanced high solids membranes to address wildfire risks.
• Installation of a backwash recycle membrane skid to reduce backwash quantities and
increase filtration efficiencies.
• Installation of a residuals sanitary sewer to the City’s wastewater collection system in
lieu of the originally planned residuals handling systems.
• Construction of a new Administration/Laboratory Building with lockers.
• Construction of a new maintenance workshop with hoist and welding bay, light duty
workshop, vehicle service bay, flammables storage, lubricant storage, parts rooms,
storage rooms, housekeeping storage, garage space and equipment and tools storage.
• Possible inclusion of hydroelectric generation from the Hyalite raw water source.
• Improvements to the Sourdough Creek intake head gate and flow metering system.
53
Scope of Services 17 of 36 10/28/2008
Subtask 602 – Administration/Laboratory and Maintenance Shop Space
Programming and Design Development
The HDR/MMI project design team and architect will evaluate the options for including new
WTP Administration/Laboratory and Maintenance Shop Facilities into the treatment building to
accommodate the administrative offices, support facilities, laboratory, workshops, instrument
repair, vehicle service, garage and other equipment needs of the new WTP facility. To initiate the
programming effort, the HDR/MMI project team will conduct a preliminary survey of space
needs for the water treatment department through interviews with key staff members and from
current facilities planning. Key questions to be answered will be staff response to space needs,
clear understanding of all required staff functions, and understanding of specific equipment
needs by staff for completion of identified department functions.
Following the staff interviews, a preliminary programming and space planning summary will be
developed, utilizing similar planning efforts completed at other similar facilities. The preliminary
programming summary will include a brief summary of the programming data collected, a
summary of recommended space needs, listing of required equipment and support facilities
necessary for identified functions, and up to three preliminary layout options for combining the
administrative offices, laboratory, and maintenance/garage facilities into one administrative
building on the WTP plant grounds or two smaller facilities. The programming summary
memorandum will also identify costs associated with the options identified and an evaluation of
the feasibility of the options identified.
The programming will be summarized in a Schematic Design Memorandum to be used for
coordination between the project design team and the City and for final buy-in by the City prior
to completion of the detailed final design of facilities. The schematic design will enable the City
staff to confirm findings of the space programming effort and will enable selection of a preferred
facilities layout. Following completion of the Schematic Design review workshop, a final
Schematic Design Memorandum will be developed to record findings of the programming effort
and selection of the proposed facility(ies). Each project element will be summarized by a short
technical memorandum to be included in the final Design Development Memorandum. The
technical memorandum will include the comments, ideas and decisions made by the team and
recommended alternatives to be considered by the City. Where appropriate, HDR/MMI will
review alternatives for each component so that costs, operational procedures and maintenance
functions are considered. The Table of Contents of the Administration/Laboratory/Maintenance
Building(s) Schematic Design Memorandum is as follows:
Chapter 1: Architecture Design and Executive Summary
Chapter 2: Laboratory, Administration, Maintenance and Vehicle Storage Layout
Chapter 3: Mechanical Design Concept
Chapter 4: Structural Design Concept
Chapter 5: Electrical Design Concept
Chapter 6: Safety Considerations / Review
Chapter 7: LEED Certification Considerations and Recommendation
54
Scope of Services 18 of 36 10/28/2008
Chapter 8: Site Considerations, Utilities
Chapter 9: Zoning and Covenants Considerations
Chapter 10: Construction Cost Estimate
Appendix A: Facility Floor Plan
Appendix B: Elevation Views
Appendix C: Site Plan
Subtask 603 – Plans and Specifications
HDR/MMI will prepare detailed plans and specifications for the recommended facilities and
facilities added as part of the Phase 1 preliminary design. All drawings will be prepared per
industry standards and specifications will be prepared using the sixteen-division format of the
Construction Specifications Institute. The design will incorporate HDR/MMI’s and the City’s
engineering and equipment standards to maintain consistency and compatibility with the City’s
facilities.
The project specifications will be prepared using HDR’s standard master specifications,
Engineer’s Joint Council General Conditions and other Contract Documents. The Engineer’s
Joint Council General Conditions are consistent with the Montana State Standards for Public
Works Facilities and will ensure more rapid review from the State Department of Environmental
Quality. Final plans and specifications will be prepared in accordance with Montana Department
of Environmental Quality guidelines and will meet the requirements for Circular DEQ 1. A
complete listing of the proposed project drawings and specifications **will be provided** in
Exhibits E&F.
Subtask 604 – Design QA/QC Reviews
A formal design QA/QC review will be conducted at the 50 percent and 90 percent design points
by the identified Quality Assurance Team/Technical Advisors. A safety specialist will participate
in these reviews. At these times, HDR/MMI will submit the design and seek input and
comments from City staff. A checklist, in the form of a quality assurance log, will be prepared
which summarizes all comments and provides a running archive of the design team’s response to
the comments.
Subtask 605 – Permit/Regulatory Approval Assistance
HDR/MMI will involve the regulators early in the process and maintain focus on the minimum
requirements needed to meet project objectives. HDR/MMI will sustain involvement, which will
build consensus and avoid surprises during critical review steps.
HDR/MMI will provide technical criteria, written descriptions and design data for use in filing
applications for permits with, or obtaining approvals of, government authorities that have
jurisdiction to approve the design of the project. HDR/MMI will meet with MDEQ at the 20%
and 90% steps in the process to review the design with them.
55
Scope of Services 19 of 36 10/28/2008
Subtask 606 – Estimate of Probable Construction Cost
HDR/MMI will update the estimated project cost at the 20 percent Schematic Design, 70 percent,
and 90 percent design points and will submit a final estimate of the anticipated construction cost
prior to the bid opening.
Subtask 607 – Summary Project Presentation
HDR/MMI will prepare and provide a summary project presentation to the City Commission
and City Staff near the conclusion of this task, at a time as directed by City staff.
Subtask 608 – Coordinate Design with Selected Membrane Supplier
HDR/MMI will coordinate the City WTP design with the installation and equipment
requirements of the selected membrane system. The membrane SCADA system will be
integrated with the City’s SCADA/telemetry system and a new overall plant SCADA system, as
appropriate. HDR/MMI will meet with the City and representatives of the membrane supplier to
coordinate the design and obtain necessary information to complete the design of the plant
improvements.
Subtask 609 – Review Membrane Equipment Shop Drawings
HDR/MMI will conduct review(s) of the membrane equipment and will coordinate with the
City’s General Contractor for the WTP replacement project. Approved shop drawings will be
transmitted to the City’s General Contractor for their use. Equipment delivery schedules will be
coordinated with the membrane equipment procurement and general construction contracts.
Subtask 610 – Membrane Contract Administration
HDR/MMI will administer and provide oversight of the membrane equipment supply contract.
This will include coordination and monitoring of equipment manufacturing and delivery
schedules, completing reviews, issuing notices as required by the contract, issuing change orders
as required, and reviewing and recommending requests for payment. Equipment delivery
schedules will be coordinated with the membrane equipment procurement and general
construction contracts.
Deliverables:
Schematic Design Summary (6 copies, digital file of summary in .pdf format)
Drawings (camera-ready copies, 6 half-size copies of all preliminary submittals).
Specifications (camera-ready copies, 6 copies of all preliminary submittals).
Cost estimate submittals at 20 percent schematic design, 70, 90, and 100 percent design
stages.
Memoranda, decision log, and quality assurance log summarizing comments and
responses from design reviews.
56
Scope of Services 20 of 36 10/28/2008
Membrane equipment shop drawing review(s) summary.
City Responsibilities:
Assist with establishing final design criteria.
Participate in schematic design development and plant site visits.
Provide comments on 50 percent and 90 percent review submittals.
Timely review of submittals and coordination of all City review comments.
Participation in Project work sessions including review meetings with MDEQ.
Participate in summary project presentation to the City Commission.
Provide review assistance with membrane equipment shop drawings.
Task 700 – Bid Services *Future Task*
Objective:
Provide assistance to the City in project bidding, bid evaluation and assistance to the City in
award of a construction contract. The scope of services for project bidding assumes that a single
construction contract will be bid and executed. The bidding services provided by HDR/MMI
shall meet the requirements presented in Section 4.4. of the Professional Services Agreement
(PSA).
HDR/MMI Subtasks:
Subtask 701– Printing/Plotting Plans and Specifications
HDR/MMI will provide for printing of contract documents for use in bidding the construction
contract(s). Half-sized documents will be used exclusively during project review and bidding to
save costs. Full size will be made available after the project bid. Actual number of document sets
may vary dependent upon project requirements. HDR/MMI will invoice the City for actual
charges incurred for printing.
It is assumed that 40 sets of plans and specifications (printed in installments of 20, 10 and 10
sets) will be produced for the final bid and permit acquisition point. HDR/MMI will provide the
City with the camera-ready originals of the project specifications and drawings following the
project bid, and will supply the Contractor with four (4) sets of executed contract documents as
required by Section 4.4.6. of the PSA. HDR/MMI will develop a separate document fee account
during the bidding phase for fees collected from the sale of document sets (non-refundable).
HDR/MMI will utilize the document fee collected to address direct costs associated with
document distribution and administration of the project. Any difference in the cost for document
printing and disposition, from what is collected in document fees assessed to the perspective
bidders, will be treated as an additional scope item and billed as additional services. If the
revenue received from the sale of documents exceeds costs for document printing and
distribution, the additional funds will be returned to the City.
57
Scope of Services 21 of 36 10/28/2008
Subtask 702 – Bid Advertisement
HDR/MMI will assist the City in advertising for and obtaining bids for materials, equipment and
services to be performed by a contractor for the construction contract. It is envisioned that the
Project will be bid as a single construction contract, in accordance with Section 4.4.1. of the
PSA.
Subtask 703 – Prospective Bidder Notification
HDR/MMI will contact up to five (5) general contractors who have bid similar projects in both
Montana and surrounding states approximately four (4) weeks prior to the first bid advertisement
to alert them to the project, general bidding requirements, etc.
Subtask 704 – Pre-Bid Conference
HDR/MMI will prepare an agenda and conduct a pre-bid conference, in accordance with Section
4.4.1.of the PSA, to be attended by the City, interested Contractors, and HDR/MMI. The meeting
will include a presentation given by the HDR/MMI Project Manager, and a tour of the work site.
Subtask 705 – Addenda and Bid Assistance
HDR/MMI shall receive and respond to prospective contractor questions in accordance with
Section 4.4.2. of the PSA. HDR/MMI shall assist the City in determining acceptability of
substitutes in accordance with Section 4.4.4. of the PSA.
Subtask 706 – Bid Opening, Tabulation and Contract Award
HDR/MMI will attend the bid opening, prepare bid tabulation sheets, assist the City in evaluating
bids, and help the City determine contractor responsiveness and responsibility. This subtask will
also include assistance to the City for awarding the construction contract in accordance with
Sections 4.4.5. and 4.4.6. of the PSA.
Deliverables:
Recommended bid advertisement.
Camera-ready specifications and reproducible drawings.
Addenda.
Bid tabulation.
Recommendation of award.
Pre-bid conference meeting minutes.
Drawings (camera-ready copies, forty (40) half-size copies of bid and permit acquisition
documents, ten (10) copies of full-size after bidding).
Specifications (camera-ready copies, forty (40) copies of bid documents).
Final Contract Documents in digital .pdf and AutoCAD format.
58
Scope of Services 22 of 36 10/28/2008
Task 800 – Construction Administration *Future Task*
Objective:
Assist the City of Bozeman in administering the construction of the Water Treatment Plant
Replacement Project in accordance with Section 4.5 - Construction Phase of the PSA. The scope
of services for project construction services assumes that a single construction contract will be
completed and executed. HDR/MMI will manage and control its professional services contract to
provide efficient completion of the project. The design phase Project Management Plan will be
updated and used for the construction phase. Similarly, HDR/MMI will prepare and implement
the project management plan update; provide scope, schedule, and cost control services;
negotiate and administer the contract; and initiate and attend project coordination meetings.
HDR/MMI Subtasks:
Subtask 801 – Project Administration
The HDR/MMI project manager will conduct periodic meetings with City staff, in conjunction
with construction review meetings, to review project progress, schedule and budget; identify
information needs, and make decisions regarding any changes in the scope of the construction
management efforts.
A progress memorandum will be prepared with each monthly invoice. The progress
memorandum will summarize the work progress to date, the budget expenditures to date, and
identify any information requirements or decisions that need to be made by the City. These
memos will help maintain frequent communications with the City and will be presented in a
simple informative newsletter format, which can be used for distribution to the City Commission
and citizens.
Subtask 802 – Pre-construction Conference
HDR/MMI will schedule, prepare an agenda and administer a pre-construction conference to be
attended by the City, Contractors, appropriate subcontractors, and HDR/MMI’s Project and
Construction Services Managers in accordance with Section 4.5.1.1. of the PSA.
Subtask 803 – Construction Engineering
HDR/MMI will consult with and advise the City of Bozeman as set forth in the engineering
services contract. The City of Bozeman’s instructions to the contractor will be issued through
HDR/MMI, who will have limited authority to act on behalf of the City of Bozeman to the extent
provided in the PSA. HDR/MMI will consult with and advise the City of Bozeman as set forth in
Section 4.5 and Article 10, Exhibit A of the PSA.
Subtask 804 – On-site Construction Observation
The City of Bozeman and HDR/MMI agree that HDR/MMI will provide resident representation
at the site. HDR/MMI will provide the City of Bozeman Resident Project Representative(s) to
assist in carrying out such responsibilities at the site, in accordance with Section 4.5.2. and
Article 11, Exhibit B of the PSA.
59
Scope of Services 23 of 36 10/28/2008
Subtask 805– Record Drawings
HDR/MMI will prepare final record drawings, which conform to construction records and will
furnish the City with an electronic copy of the final product in accordance with Section 4.6. of
the PSA. HDR/MMI will provide the City one set of record drawings on 22 IN x 34 IN
reproducible sheets as well as one set of record drawings in electronic format for use with
AutoCAD Version 2008. One complete set of .pdf format drawings will also be developed for
use at the treatment plant site and City Engineering office. These drawings will be based on
construction records provided by the Contractor, City and on-site resident project
representatives. HDR/MMI will complete the record drawings within three months of the date of
receipt of all of the marked-up prints and other necessary data from the Contractor.
Subtask 806– Field Surveying/Staking
HDR/MMI will provide required field surveying and staking for facility construction. Field
survey information will be developed and stakes provided for project components to provide the
Contractor with reasonable information to complete the work.
HDR/MMI will establish a horizontal and vertical survey control network around the project site.
Existing facilities will be located with respect to this control. HDR/MMI will establish one set of
stakes for the Contractor to use in performance of the work. Generally, staking will include
pipelines, utility corridors, buildings, structures, access roads, parking areas, site grading, and
fencing. Further, elevation control will be established at multiple points on the job site.
HDR/MMI will provide the following stakes:
WTP Process Yard Piping Improvements (Fittings, manholes, vaults, 100’ stations)
New Building Improvements (Building corners)
New Structure Improvements (Structure corners and midpoints for circular structures)
Access Road Improvements (100’ stations, grade changes, fillets)
Parking Areas (100’ stations, grade changes, fillets)
Curb and Gutter, Paving Improvements (Top back of curb)
Storm Drains (Alignment or pipe at 100’ stations, manholes/vaults)
Fencing Improvements (100’ stations, bends, gates)
Elevation Control (20 points across job site)
HDR/MMI will provide the above-described staking one time only. Any re-staking or additional
staking needed by the Contractor to complete the work shall be done solely at the Contractor’s
Expense.
Subtask 807– Geotechnical and Material Testing Services
HDR/MMI will coordinate testing of the construction materials to be incorporated into the
project as part of the construction contract. The Contractor will be required to provide testing
from an independent testing agency for all materials imported for incorporation into the project.
HDR/MMI will provide testing of in-situ materials to be used during construction or materials
control verification using the services of the MMI Bozeman testing lab and local engineering
staff, including provision of the following services:
60
Scope of Services 24 of 36 10/28/2008
Concrete strength, air content and slump
Embankment (backfill), trench backfill, and gravel and pavement densities
Aggregate gradations
Asphalt concrete plant mix strength, flow and asphalt content and core samples
HDR/MMI will conduct the required on-site testing using the Contractor provided initial
materials control tests for all imported materials, or coordinate the Contractor provided
compaction testing throughout the project, utilizing the materials testing data provided as noted
above. The type and frequency of tests will be specific to the construction and will be conducted
in a manner to develop a good verification that the compaction requirements are being met.
HDR/MMI will coordinate the provision of testing reports and will make recommendation to the
City as to the acceptability of the work in accordance with Section 4.7 of the PSA.
Subtask 808– Special Inspection Services
HDR/MMI will provide on-site special inspection of the buildings in accordance with Sections
1704-1709 of the 2006 International Building Code as required by the State of Montana Building
Inspector. HDR/MMI will coordinate the provision of testing reports and will make
recommendation to the City as to the acceptability of the work in accordance with Section 4.7 of
the PSA.
Deliverables:
Construction Administration Plan coordinated with City’s Financial Plan and Project
Management Plan (3 copies and one digital .pdf file).
Progress reports and invoices (3 copies and digital .pdf file).
Workshop/Meeting agendas and notes in bullet item format (3 copies and digital .pdf
copy of each agenda and meeting notes).
Submittal review comment letters responding to contractor submittals.
Pre-construction conference meeting summary notes.
Construction meeting summary notes and action items list.
Field logs including daily reports for all days when HDR/MMI are on-site.
Geotechnical and compaction testing reports.
Responses to requests for information.
Response to contract change proposals.
Contract change orders.
Deficiency punch lists.
Record drawings (one set of full-size copies, camera-ready reproducible documents,
digital files).
Project observation reports.
Shop drawing submittal log.
Contractor pay estimate reviews.
Compiled monthly reports.
Field copy of Shop Drawings.
61
Scope of Services 25 of 36 10/28/2008
Task 900 – Project Startup Assistance and Commissioning
*Future Task*
Objectives:
In addition to the startup requirements of the construction contractor, HDR/MMI will provide
startup assistance to the City in final project commissioning of the newly constructed facilities.
The services will include:
HDR/MMI Subtasks:
Subtask 901 – Operations and Maintenance Manual
HDR/MMI will prepare an Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Manual addressing the
improvements incorporated in this project. The manual content and format will be developed in
consultation with City staff and in accordance with Montana Department of Environmental
Quality requirements. It is anticipated that the manual will be provided in both hard copy and
electronic form to allow easy updating for future modifications. Provide the City of Bozeman
with 10 copies of inserts to the City’s existing Operations and Maintenance Manual that includes
the following:
1. Prepare electronic text and graphics files to reflect the changes in the plant.
2. Text files will be produced in the latest version of Microsoft Word. Graphic files will be
produced in latest version of AutoCAD.
3. The preparation of standard operating procedures (SOPs) is not included in this task, and
will be included as part of the facility startup and operator training. General standard
operating procedures will be provided for key process systems. Detailed SOPs will not be
developed, unless specifically directed by the City’s operations staff. If detailed SOPs are
developed, they will be completed in collaboration with City staff.
4. Prepare and deliver five draft paper copies of the revised text and graphics for review by
the City approximately one month prior to startup.
5. The City will forward a compilation of all comments marked up on one draft copy to
HDR within two weeks of receipt.
6. Revise the text and graphic files and issue five (5) final paper copies within two weeks of
receipt of comments. HDR will also provide the City a CD-ROM containing the
electronic text and graphics files.
Subtask 902– Electronic O&M Manual (Optional Task)
HDR/MMI will also offer the City, as an optional task, completion of the Operations and
Maintenance Manual in a full electronic format. The Operations Manual electronic preparation
would include the following steps:
1. After City review, comments and approval of the Operations Manual text and graphic
files developed in the previous subtask,
2. HDR/MMI will incorporate the revised files into a Web based electronic format for use at
the plant. The Web based manual will only be available to treatment plant staff and the
Engineer. Other City departments will not be enabled to access the manual initially.
62
Scope of Services 26 of 36 10/28/2008
3. The Operations Manual will be accessible as an local WRF based internal City web site
using Microsoft Internet Explorer. The Operations Manual will be developed in
Microsoft Front Page. Microsoft Word text files developed in the previous subtask will
be converted to .html files and imported into Microsoft Front Page. An AutoCAD viewer
will run within Microsoft Internet Explorer to enable the user to view and print the
Operations Manual figures developed in AutoCAD.
4. The electronic Operations Manual will be created to function on a City provided
Windows based server.
Before any production on the electronic Operations Manual, a half-day meeting between
HDR/MMI's webmaster and the City’s information services staff will be held. At this meeting,
the City will supply HDR/MMI with all standards pertinent to converting, configuring, and
hosting the electronic manual on the City’s system. After the meeting, HDR/MMI will send the
City a mock-up version of the electronic Operations Manual for approval by the City’s
information services staff and the plant supervisor. There will be two progress meetings
scheduled by HDR/MMI with the plant staff. HDR/MMI will prepare the electronic Operations
Manual for viewing and comments at the 75% completion mark and at 90% completion mark.
HDR/MMI will facilitate the meeting and make provisions for the necessary personnel to attend.
After the meetings, HDR/MMI will document the review comments and provide meeting
minutes and the plant staff will provide any additional comments and recommendations on the
electronic Operations Manual to HDR/MMI in writing within two weeks. At the 75% completion
meeting, HDR/MMI’s webmaster will ensure that the electronic Operations Manual operates
properly on the City’s server and that the search engine features are operating properly. After
completion of post-startup assistance as described above, HDR/MMI will revise the electronic
Operations Manual as necessary.
After the final completion of the electronic Operations Manual, HDR/MMI will schedule a
meeting with the plant staff. At this meeting, HDR/MMI will facilitate three (3) one-hour
training sessions for the plant staff on how to use the electronic Operations Manual. The
computers and servers necessary to view the electronic Operations Manual are not included with
the production of the electronic Operations Manual.
Subtask 903 – Plant Facility Start-up and Operator Training
HDR/MMI will work with the City to make appropriate adjustments to the program to best
match your needs.
HDR/MMI will review operating data for submission to the funding agencies and will assess
overall performance of the new equipment and facilities. HDR/MMI will provide operational
assistance to the City of Bozeman after the system is started, and train the City of Bozeman’s
personnel.
Pre-startup Training will be provided to communicate to the plant operators the following:
1. The ability to operate the equipment in each unit process.
2. An understanding of both the field and SCADA equipment controls and the ability to
operate both.
63
Scope of Services 27 of 36 10/28/2008
The pre-startup training will be presented in a classroom setting using a lecture format
supplemented with figures and graphics delivered via an overhead projector or using Microsoft
PowerPoint on an LCD projector. The training material for each specific session will consist of
draft copies of the Operations Manual sections. Pre-startup training will be presented in the
following modules:
1. Intakes and raw water transmission
2. Headworks/preliminary treatment/coagulation and flocculation
3. Membrane filtration system and clean-in-place
4. Chemical feed systems
5. Disinfection and corrosion control
6. Solids handling system
7. Instrumentation and controls
8. Utilities and support facilities including standby engine generator
Coordination with PLC/SCADA programmers (systems integrators) will be provided. The
portion of each module pertaining to SCADA controls will be presented by the HDR/MMI
SCADA programmer for that system. The SCADA instructor will use a LCD projector to show
the actual SCADA screens for each equipment item discussed in the module. The SCADA
presentation will cover manual starting, stopping and speed control of equipment, set-point
adjustment, operating mode changes and alarms.
Startup Coordination will also be provided to the City of Bozeman to provide coordination
between the contractor, the construction administration team and the plant staff during startup of
the new equipment. The startup coordinator will allow the startup of new equipment to occur if,
and only if, the equipment and ancillary subsystems are ready to be placed into service and the
manufacturer’s O&M manuals are on-site and available for use by plant staff. The secondary
purpose of this effort is to provide informal training to the plant operators during the actual
process startup.
HDR/MMI will coordinate clean water testing with the contractor. The clean water test occurs
prior to startup and uses potable water to demonstrate the functionality of new equipment and
controls.
HDR/MMI will conduct startup service for each project element or unit process in conjunction
with the training services provided by the City’s construction contractor and equipment supplier.
Startup means placing the equipment into operation for its intended purpose and using the
intended process material, i.e. raw water screening, coagulation and flocculation, membrane
filtration, clean-in-place, etc. Startup assistance will be provided as follows for the project
components listed above.
Startup services will include the following work products:
1. Review and approve equipment supplier training agendas and training material outlines
as provided by the Contractor. Use discretion, based on experience with vendor training,
to enforce contract provisions for vendor training duration.
64
Scope of Services 28 of 36 10/28/2008
2. Coordinate vendor training schedule with Contractor and plant staff to ensure that vendor
training occurs on Wednesdays as a first choice, Tuesdays and Thursdays as second
choice and avoids Mondays and Fridays.
3. Prepare a startup plan that lists specific responsibilities for the contractor, construction
administration staff, PLC/SCADA programmer(s) and plant staff.
4. Provide the written startup plan to the contractor, the construction administration staff,
PLC/SCADA programmer(s) and the plant staff approximately one month before startup.
5. Schedule and conduct a startup review meeting between the contractor, the construction
management staff, PLC/SCADA programmer(s) and the plant staff approximately two
weeks before startup.
6. Revise the startup plan and schedule as needed based on the review meeting and reissue.
7. Verify the equipment is ready for the clean water test:
8. Verify the manufacturer's field service forms have been completed for each piece of
equipment.
9. Verify pipe pressure tests and concrete water tightness tests have been conducted.
10. Verify rotating equipment has been bumped to check for proper rotation.
The following activities will be performed during startup:
1. Coordinate with the contractor, the construction administration staff, the PLC/SCADA
programmer and the plant staff to ensure that process material is introduced to the process
in such a way as to not adversely impact the rest of the plant.
2. Verify and document that the controls and alarms are working in conformance with the
software pre-design report.
3. Verify and document the results of any testing that was deferred from the clean water
test.
4. Identify and document any equipment or control deficiencies.
Operator training during the clean water test and startup will be conducted by HDR/MMI on an
informal basis in the field. The purpose of this training is to provide an opportunity to answer
operator questions, to demonstrate (when requested) the transition from manual control to
automatic control, and to demonstrate alternate modes of operation (when requested).
Deliverables:
Operation and maintenance manual (6 preliminary copies and 6 final copies, digital files).
Startup checklists and training materials.
One training session (may be consecutive or combined with other systems) for each of the
separate unit project elements or processes.
Written operation procedures for each project element or unit process.
City Responsibilities:
• Provide necessary software on City WTP computers to enable the electronic Operations
Manual to function (optional task):
• Provide the needed Microsoft Internet Explorer capability.
65
Scope of Services 29 of 36 10/28/2008
• Provide a copy of AutoCAD viewer.
• Provide the path to and the necessary space on a City provided server at the WTP
facilities for the electronic Operations Manual.
Subtask 904 – Evaluate and Assist the City with Implementation of a
Spare Parts Inventory Program
HDR/MMI will work with to evaluate and assist the City with implementation of a spare parts
inventory program. The specific scope of work for this task will be developed in the future when
the City is ready to authorize Task 900.
Task 1000 – Application Software Programming Services
*Future Task*
Objectives:
Implement the programming for the plant SCADA system including PLC (Programmable Logic
Controller) ladder logic and their associated HMI (Human-Machine Interface) configurations.
The new PLC ladder logic will be installed on the plant PLC’s (new and existing as required).
The new HMI interface will be configured using the system selected during the design phase of
the project. The PLC ladder logic and HMI process displays will be developed in collaboration
with WTP plant personnel to provide the controls as described in the City of Bozeman Water
Treatment Plant Replacement Project Contract Documents (Project Manual).
HDR/MMI Subtasks:
Subtask 1001– System Integration
HDR/MMI will provide systems integration support for the project for the following work
activities:
Prepare and maintain a work plan and project instructions to include organization, roles,
responsibilities, schedule, budget, and staff plan for execution of the PLC and HMI
application software (Software) design effort. The work plan and project instructions will
include a QA/QC plan.
Hold monthly onsite meetings with City of Bozeman Staff, Contractor and design staff to
discuss the mechanics of implementing the Software changes and to define standards to
be followed. The project schedule will be discussed and coordinated with the
construction schedule to define milestones and resource allocations.
Document meeting decisions and action items; assign the activities to team members, and
follow-up to ensure timely resolution.
Review Contractor provided equipment and electrical submittals, and provide
coordination input for electrical and instrumentation systems.
Monitor project progress including work completed, work remaining, budget expended,
schedule, estimated cost of work remaining, and estimated cost at completion.
66
Scope of Services 30 of 36 10/28/2008
The project schedule will be developed to show the required programming to be
completed one month before the associated construction start-up date.
Manage the work provided by any hired subcontractors to verify for compliance with the
current WTP Software standards, quality of documentation, and scheduling. All of the
plant software is anticipated to be new.
Monitor project activities for potential changes, anticipate changes whenever possible,
and with City of Bozeman approval, modify project subtasks, subtask budgets, and
approach.
Deliverables:
Agendas for meetings.
Preliminary project schedule with milestones.
Regularly Updated Detailed Project Schedules.
Meeting notes for meetings.
Monthly invoice with Software project progress summary report.
Subtask 1002 – Software Pre-Design Report
HDR/MMI will provide software development preliminary design and develop a software design
summary for the project. The following work activities are planned:
Prepare a Software Pre-Design Report for the project which will include the following
information:
1. Understanding of the City of Bozeman HMI and PLC Software standards.
2. Updated Control Loop Descriptions (using Contract Document Specification Section
13442).
3. Existing SCADA System Process Display Printouts marked up to show planned
modifications.
4. Interface Definition Specifications (IDS), i.e. PLC/HMI tag database, based on
information in the Contract Document).
5. Process Field Database Interface and Report Generation.
a. Provide system programming and necessary interface to provide output of
monthly equipment operating information (accumulated run time and number
of starts) to the City’s new equipment maintenance management software.
b. Each report saved with report date-based file naming convention (or as
requested by the City).
6. Alarm generation and alarm management will be as shown in the Contract
Documents. As a minimum, alarms will be stored in a alarm database to enable data
access and/or report generation and printing from the SCADA report printer.
7. Real time and historical data management will be consistent with current Software
standards. Reports will be printed from the historical database files, in spreadsheet
format as desired by the City. This will include the capability for automated state
review forms.
8. Define eO&M interface requirements and coordinate with eO&M development team.
67
Scope of Services 31 of 36 10/28/2008
Conduct Software Pre-Design Report review meetings with City of Bozeman staff and
HDR/MMI to discuss the following:
1. The new process displays and their functionality for the major process areas.
2. Identify which process screens (and tags) are to be removed or updated.
a. Report content, format and printing.
b. Alarm management.
c. Data management.
Document meeting decisions and action items; assign the activities to team members, and
follow-up to ensure timely resolution.
Issue the Final Software Pre-design Report, including comments and revisions discussed
in the meeting.
Deliverables:
Agendas for review meetings.
Meeting notes of review meetings.
Final Software Pre-design Report – Five (5) copies.
Subtask 1003 – Software Programming & Testing
The PLC logic program and HMI process screen configuration will be designed from the
information provided by the Final Software Pre-Design Report. This subtask includes the
following work activities:
Obtain the most current existing PLC programs, HMI process screens, configuration files,
tag database(s), data files, and other required files from City of Bozeman’s SCADA
system just prior to beginning the programming effort.
Develop the programming for the new equipment to meet the requirements identified in
the updated Final Software Pre-Design Report.
Obtain the latest process screen and configuration files and databases (i.e., process
database, alarm area database, picture files) for the WTP from the City and IAC.
Process screens will be designed to meet the requirements identified in the Final Software
Pre-design Report. The types of process graphics or pictures to be generated include
process screens, overview screens, controller pop-ups, real time and historical trending
screens, and report screens.
The new process tag database, tag-groups, process screens and picture files for the new
equipment being added will be merged or replaced with existing screens and files on the
SCADA Server.
The Software will be tested and debugged. HDR/MMI reserves the right to use a software
simulation package (where possible and practical) to thoroughly test the Software and
process interface. The I/O simulator software program will be used to simulate the real
I/O to be connected for this project. Only the pertinent process databases and the new
process screens will be active in the simulator for testing.
68
Scope of Services 32 of 36 10/28/2008
Deliverables:
Latest PLC ladder logic disk and hardcopy (print-outs).
Latest process electronic files for screens, pictures, pop-ups, alarms, and data handling.
90% complete process displays for City of Bozeman Operations staff review (color print-
out hardcopy, and where applicable marked up color print-outs of existing graphic
displays).
As-built documentation of non-modified PLCs or HMI components is not included.
City Responsibilities:
Review and comment on draft SCADA screens, and alarm dialer functionality
Subtask 1004 –Functional Demonstrations
This subtask includes the following work activities:
During the testing period, HDR/MMI will perform up to two (2) periodic QA/QC
reviews. This will involve verification that the program strategy is correct, adequately
documented, and in accordance with City of Bozeman software standards developed
under Task 1402.
Software Demonstration meetings will be held at the 90% design completion. It is
anticipated that up to four of these meetings will be required as indicated below. These
meetings will be held in the Water Treatment Plant. It is intended to demonstrate the
functionality of the new selected SCADA system software process displays in
conjunction with the new PLC ladder logic. City of Bozeman Operations will perform
hands-on activities necessary to run the simulated processes as identified in the Final
Software Pre-design Report.
Software Demonstration 90%
meeting
Duration
(days +
travel)
Preliminary Treatment,
Chemical Feed Systems
1 2
Membrane Filtration System 2 3
Electrical Systems, Residuals
Handling, Mechanical
Systems, Other
1 1
Totals 4 6
Deliverables:
Agendas for Software Demonstration Meetings.
Meeting minutes from the Software Demonstration Meetings.
Hardcopy printout of the PLC ladder logic programs.
Hardcopy printout of the HMI process displays and reports.
69
Scope of Services 33 of 36 10/28/2008
Subtask 1005 – Field Commissioning and Software Startup
This subtask includes the following work activities:
HDR/MMI will verify that the interconnections for the new PLC I/O are terminated
correctly by witnessing the Contractor perform loop testing (specified in Section 13440).
These tests are referred to as the Operational Readiness Tests (or Loop Checkouts).
After the Operational Readiness Tests are complete, HDR/MMI will upload the new PLC
ladder logic. Also, at this time we will transfer to the plant HMI workstations the new
SCADA process screens and the associated database files. The new Remote I/O Bases
will then be attached to the associated PLCs, and the Functional Testing period will
begin.
Functional Testing is the process of putting the new equipment into full automatic
operation. Loop tuning of the controls will be performed. Minor corrections will be made
to the new PLC logic and SCADA process interface if found necessary.
Subtask 1006 – Post Startup Support
Upon substantial completion of the new programming, the automated system will be turned over
to the City of Bozeman. HDR/MMI and City of Bozeman staff will periodically monitor the
SCADA system to verify that Operations can satisfactorily control the processes as designed.
HDR/MMI has allocated 80 hours of project engineer time in the budget for this subtask. These
hours shall be available to be utilized within 6 months after the project is turned over to the City
of Bozeman.
Deliverables:
Startup plan identifying pre-startup and startup activities and responsibilities. This plan
will be issued prior to startup.
Deliver new PLC program files to be installed prior to the Functional Testing period.
Deliver new SCADA process displays and revised databases to be installed prior the
Functional Testing period.
Deliver database with all new SCADA process tags, alarms, memory addresses, and
description at start-up, with updates as required through start-up and substantial
completion.
Task 1100 – Project Close-Out/Certification
Objectives:
Conduct final project reviews and assist the City in completion of project closeout reporting and
coordination with MDEQ. Conduct final one-year certification evaluation and reporting to meet
MDEQ project closeout requirements.
70
Scope of Services 34 of 36 10/28/2008
HDR/MMI Subtasks:
Subtask 1101 – Contract Close-Out
HDR/MMI will provide the City with a list of construction deficiencies, inspection of the
correction of these deficiencies, review final payment application(s), make recommendation to
the City for final payment, and give written notice to the City and Contractor(s) that work is
acceptable and complete. HDR/MMI will provide consultation on warranty items, assist in the
11-month warranty inspection and provide warranty follow-up.
HDR/MMI will provide their consultation on contract close-out in accordance with the PSA
Subarticle 4.5.1.12 and 4.5.1.13.
Subtask 1102 – Certification
HDR/MMI will provide the City with the necessary certification documentation as required by
the Montana Department of Environmental Quality.
Deliverables:
Final recommendation for payment.
Final deficiency list check-off.
Notice of project acceptance and final project completion.
Task 1200 – Additional Services Only Upon Authorization of
City
Objectives:
The HDR/MMI team is available to provide additional services, if identified as necessary
throughout the completion of the identified work elements for the Phase 1 improvements at the
WTP. These services would be completed on a time and materials basis, as negotiated at the time
identified for project completion. Although not all-inclusive, the following work tasks have been
identified as work items that may be identified as needed additional services for the project:
71
Scope of Services 35 of 36 10/28/2008
Schedule
Starting from the Notice to Proceed (NTP), the project schedule projected is as shown below and
depicted on the following page.
Task Description Schedule
100 Project Management and Administration Project Duration
Management Plan – 30 days after NTP 200 Conceptual Design
300 Membrane Pilot Program 7-month operation duration
January 2009 to July 2009
400 Membrane Equipment Procurement
Assistance and Contract Administration
11 months following membrane
selection
500 WTP Process Preliminary Design Pre Design review session– 100 days
after conclusion of piloting 600 WTP Process Final Design Schematic Design review session – 1
month after Design NTP
Schematic Design report – 2 months
after Design NTP
50% design review – 4 months after
Design NTP
90% design review – 6 months after
Design NTP
Summary project presentation – 7
months after Design NTP 700 Bid Services Duration – 60 calendar days
800 Construction Administration As determined after Preliminary Design
900 Project Startup Assistance &
Commissioning
As determined after Preliminary Design
1000 Application Software Programming
Services
As determined after Preliminary Design
1100 Project Closeout As determined after Preliminary Design
1200 Additional Services Only Upon
Authorization of City
As authorized by City, Schedule as
appropriate
72
36 of 36 10/28/2008 City of Bozeman WTP Replacement Project – Design Engineering Services Schedule 2008 2009 2010 2011-2013 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1-Q4 NTP Task 100 – Project Management & Admin. Task 200/300 – Conceptual Design/Membrane Pilot Program Task 400 – Membrane Equipment Task 500 – WTP Process Preliminary Design Task 600 – WTP Process Final Design Task 700 – Bid Services Task 800 – Construction Administration Task 900 – Project Startup Assistance & Commissioning Task 1000 – Application Software Programming Service Task 1100 – Project Closeout Task 1200 - Additional Service (upon request) Pre-design review session Schematic Design Review 20%, 50%, 90% Submittals 20%, 50%, 90% Submittals 20%, 50%, 90% Submittals Summary Project Presentation 73
Exhibit D
City of Bozeman Water Treatment Plant Replacement Project
Engineering Fee Estimate
Task Task Description Direct Labor
Expenses By
Task Task Total
100 Project Management and Administration 102,888$ 14,700$ 117,588$
200 Conceptual Design 130,924$ 12,400$ 143,324$
300 Membrane Pilot Program 128,344$ 256,500$ 384,844$
400 Membrane Equipment Procurement Assistance and Contract Administration 97,875$ 8,300$ 106,175$
500 WTP Process Preliminary Design 240,088$ 33,100$ 273,188$
600 WTP Process Final Design *Future Task* -$ -$ -$
700 Bid Services *Future Task* -$ -$ -$
800 Construction Administration *Future Task* -$ -$ -$
900 Project Startup Assistance and Commissioning *Future Task* -$ -$ -$
1000 Application Software Programming Services *Future Task* -$ -$ -$
1100 Project Close-Out/Certification *Future Task* -$ -$ -$
1200 Additional Services Only Upon Authorization of City *Future Task* -$ -$ -$
Total Labor and Expenses Cost by Task 700,118$ 325,000$ 1,025,118$
Expense Summary Expenses
Miscellaneous (Incl. Pilot and Geotech) 262,700$
Travel Expenses 18,400$
Mapping/Photos/Surveys 5,700$
Printing and Photocopying 19,400$
Technology 18,800$
Total Expenses 325,000$
TOTAL ESTIMATED ENGINEERING SERVICES FEE 1,025,118$
Task Cost Summary
20081028 DRAFTBozeman_Ph1_WTP-Budget.xls Page 1 of 15 10/28/2008
74
PM DM QA1 QA3 PDT1 DT1 DT2 DT3 DT5 DT6 OPS TS1 TS5 TS6 TS8 CAD1 ADM2SubtotalQA2 QA4 DT CMS1 PDT2 DT4 DT7 DT8 CMS3 CMS4 TS9 TS10 TS11 TS12 CAD ADM1 ADM2 SubTotalTask 100 Project Management and Administration101 Project Coordination Meetings and Reports 80 10080 260 8 40 5098102 Project Team Coordination Work Sessions 32 32 12 8 20 12 12 20 8 8 10 32 206 14 30 28 2820 20 140 Hours sub-total11213212 8 2012012200880001011246602207028007800000020200238Task 200 Conceptual Design201 Analyze Data from Existing Water Treatment Plant 4 2050478 2020 40202 Establish Finished Water Quality Goals 2 1620 324740203 Evaluate Pre-Treatment Alternatives 6 28 12 3224 4 10688204 Evaluate Waste Handling Alternatives 4 84 16 4 36 4 80 40 8024 228205 Hold a Workshop to Select Membrane Systems for Pilo81614 6 16464 44206 Tour Existing Membrane Facilities 4 60128841616207 Prepare a Conceptual Design Memorandum 4 40 8 8 20 20 6 4 8 118 4 4 8 2440Hours sub-total3218822 14 012040166060002024365600880688001280000004400336Task 300 Membrane Pilot Program301 Coordinate, Negotiate, and Execute Rental Agreement23048440302 Identify Installation Requirements for Pilot Testing Equ 4 42860 1140303 Develop Pilot Testing Protocols and Obtain Montana D430432700304 Pilot Plant Facility Construction and Startup 4 26838 24 24 100148305 Provide Operational Assistance to City on Pilot Units 4 80 41610432 100132306 Review Operations Data Collected by City 2 24 8344040307 Coordinate with Pilot Unit Suppliers During Operation 26 4303232308 Pilot Plant Shutdown, Evaluation, and Reporting 4 32 844 4 8 1628 Hours sub-total2429032 0 0000560160000600478000280006428800000000380Task 400 Membrane Equipment Procurement Assistance and Contract Administration401 Prepare Equipment Pre-purchase Documents8 100 24 16 5080 100 1639488402 Assist City in Bidding Equipment Pre-purchase8268 412 6 67088403 Review Prepurchase Proposals4322 2400404 Prepare Membrane Pre-Purchase Contracts232 4380Hours sub-total2219034 22 05400000009201062254200016000000000000016Task 500 WTP Process Preliminary Design501 Preliminary Design Memoranda16 180 100 20 32 70 90 50 50 706786 120 60 120 20 40 32 32430502 Site Surveys8816880 16104503 Geotechnical Services881616 40 48104504 Wetland/Stream/Ditch Permitting Review4430 32 3092505 Preliminary Design Report Submittal440 323210820 20848506 Quality Control224262424Hours sub-total42 220 0 24 140 20 0 0 0 32 70 90 50 50 0 78 32 848 0 24 6 194 92 0 0 140 70 0 0 20 80 88 56 32 0 802Task 600 WTP Process Final Design *Future Task*601 Schematic Design Summary (20% Design) 00602 Administration/Laboratory and Maintenance Shop Space Programming and Design Development00603 Plans and Specifications00604 Design QA/QC Reviews00605 Permit/Regulatory Approval Assistance00606 Estimate of Probable Construction Cost00607 Summary Project Presentation00608 Tasks 608, 609, 610 per scope of work00Hours sub-total000 0 00000000000000000000000000000000Task 700 Bid Services *Future Task*701 Printing/Plotting Plans and Specifications00702 Bid Advertisement00703 Prospective Bidder Notification00704 Pre-Bid Conference 00705 Addenda and Bid Assistance00706 Bid Opening, Tabulation and Contract Award00Hours sub-total000 0 00000000000000000000000000000000Task 800 Construction Administration *Future Task*801 Project Administration00802 Pre-construction Conference00803 Construction Engineering00804 On-site Construction Observation00805 Record Drawings00806 Field Surveying/Staking00807 Geotechnical and Material Testing Services00808 Special Inspection Services00Hours sub-total000 0 00000000000000000000000000000000Task 900 Project Startup Assistance and Commissioning *Future Task*901 Operations and Maintenance Manual00902 Electronic O&M Manual (Optional Task)00903 Plant Facility Start-up and Operator Training00Hours sub-total000 0 00000000000000000000000000000000Task 1000 Application Software Programming Services *Future Task*1001 System Integration001002 Software Pre-Design Report001003 Software Programming & Testing001004 Functional Demonstrations001005 Field Commissioning and Software Startup001006 Post Startup Support 00Hours sub-total000 0 00000000000000000000000000000000Task 1100 Project Close-Out/Certification *Future Task*1101 Contract Close-Out001102 Certification00 Hours sub-total000 0 00000000000000000000000000000000Task 1200 Additional Services Only Upon Authorization of City *Future Task*1201 TBD001202 TBD001203 TBD001204 TBD001205 TBD001206 TBD00 Hours sub-total000 0 00000000000000000000000000000000Total Personnel Hours232 1,020 100 68 160 98 0 52 242 32 100 98 50 142 20 278 2022,8940 54 86 376 128 0 0 410 358 0 0 20 80 88 120 52 01,772Key PersonnelHDRLabor CategoryNameActual RateActual RatePM - Project Manager Project Manager Dan Harmon58.80 58.80 61.74DM - Design Manager Design Manager Bryan Black60.17 60.17QA1 - Quality Assurance Principal Yu-Jung Chang93.53 93.53QA3 - Quality Assurance Principal John Koch70.77 70.77PDT1 - Preliminary Design Team Engineer II Mario Benisch44.10 44.10DT1 - Design Team Supervising Engineer II Grover Jones58.80 58.80DT2 - Design Team Engineer II Jeremy Grove25.46 25.46DT3 - Design Team Engineer I Anna Zaklikowski31.97 31.97DT5 - Design Team Engineering Technician Tina Whitfield34.13 34.13DT6 - Design Team Supervising Engineer II Ernie Swanson56.12 56.12OPS - Operations Specialist Supervising Engineer II Chris Sheridan53.55 53.55TS1 - Technical Support Project Architect Donn Hogan50.81 50.81TS5 - Technical Support Senior Environmental ProfessionalAmy Dammarell63.67 63.67TS6 - Technical Support Supervising Engineer II Don Best56.23 56.23TS8 - Technical Support Principal Amanda McInnis58.85 58.85CAD - CAD Technician CADD Drafter Shawn Kuhns37.40 37.40ADM2 - Project Assistant Clerical Chris Kelly22.58 22.58MMIQA2 - Quality Assurance Supervising Engineer III Scott Murphy51 48.57QA4 - Quality Assurance Principal Bob Morrison60 57.14DT - Design Team Supervising Engineer I Nancy Cormier44 41.88CMS1 - CM Specialists Supervising Engineer III James Nickelson50 47.23PDT2 - Preliminary Design Team Senior Engineer I Mike Hickman35 32.74DT4 - Design Team Senior Engineer II Alan Erickson41 39.05DT7 - Design Team Senior Engineer I Jeff Ashley35 33.33DT8 - Design Team Senior Engineer II Travis Meyer42 40.06CMS3 - CM Specialists Engineering Technician I Roger Somerville34 32.37CMS4 - CM Specialists Senior Engineering Technician Jay Fischer34 32.70TS9 - Technical Support Senior Engineer II Tom Heneke41 39.04TS10 - Technical Support Supervising Engineer III Kurt Keith47 44.80TS11 - Technical Support Survey Manager Steve Rude32 30.16TS12 - Technical Support Design Engineer II Mike Brandt34 31.87CAD - CAD Technician Senior Engineering Technician Jerry Halford32 30.79ADM1 - Project Controller Clerical Sue Dugan17 16.51ADM2 - Clerical Clerical Paula Madden17 16.26Exhibit D: City of Bozeman Water Treatment Plant Replacement ProjectStaff Hour EstimateHDR Engineering, Inc.Morrison Maierle, Inc.20081028 DRAFTBozeman_Ph1_WTP-Budget.xlsPage 2 of 1510/28/200875
Exhibit D
City of Bozeman Water Treatment Plant Replacement Project
Task 100 Project Management and
Administration Total
HDR Staff 101 102 Hours Rate Total
Dan Harmon Project Manager 80 32 112 $58.80 6,585.60
Bryan Black Design Manager 100 32 132 $60.17 7,941.78
Yu-Jung Chang Principal 0 12 12 $93.53 1,122.41
John Koch Principal 0 8 8 $70.77 566.16
Mario Benisch Engineer II 0 20 20 $44.10 882.00
Grover Jones Supervising Engineer II 0 12 12 $58.80 705.60
Jeremy Grove Engineer II 0 0 0 $25.46 0.00
Anna Zaklikowski Engineer I 0 12 12 $31.97 383.67
Tina Whitfield Engineering Technician 0 20 20 $34.13 682.50
Ernie Swanson Supervising Engineer II 0 0 0 $56.12 0.00
Chris Sheridan Supervising Engineer II 0 8 8 $53.55 428.40
Donn Hogan Project Architect 0 8 8 $50.81 406.48
Amy Dammarell Senior Environmental Professional 0 0 0 $63.67 0.00
Don Best Supervising Engineer II 0 0 0 $56.23 0.00
Amanda McInnis Principal 0 0 0 $58.85 0.00
Shawn Kuhns CADD Drafter 0 10 10 $37.40 374.01
Chris Kelly Clerical 80 32 112 $22.58 2,528.40
HDR Totals 260 206 466 22,607.00
Morrison Maierle Staff
Scott Murphy Supervising Engineer III 0 0 0 $51.00 0.00
Bob Morrison Principal 8 14 22 $60.00 1,320.00
Nancy Cormier Supervising Engineer I 0 0 0 $44.00 0.00
James Nickelson Supervising Engineer III 40 30 70 $50.00 3,500.00
Mike Hickman Senior Engineer I 0 28 28 $35.00 980.00
Alan Erickson Senior Engineer II 0 0 0 $41.00 0.00
Jeff Ashley Senior Engineer I 0 0 0 $35.00 0.00
Travis Meyer Senior Engineer II 50 28 78 $42.00 3,276.00
Roger Somerville Engineering Technician I 0 0 0 $34.00 0.00
Jay Fischer Senior Engineering Technician 0 0 0 $34.00 0.00
Tom Heneke Senior Engineer II 0 0 0 $41.00 0.00
Kurt Keith Supervising Engineer III 0 0 0 $47.00 0.00
Steve Rude Survey Manager 0 0 0 $32.00 0.00
Mike Brandt Design Engineer II 0 0 0 $34.00 0.00
Jerry Halford Senior Engineering Technician 0 20 20 $32.00 640.00
Sue Dugan Clerical 0 20 20 $17.00 340.00
Paula Madden Clerical 0 0 0 $17.00 0.00
Morrison Maierle Totals 98 140 238 10,056.00
TOTAL HOURS 358 346 704
101 Project Coordination Meetings and Reports Total Labor $32,663.00
102 Project Team Coordination Work Sessions OH/Profit Multiplier x3.15
Total Direct Labor $102,888.46
Direct Expenses:
Miscellaneous $2,200.00
Travel Expenses $9,100
Mapping/Photos/Surveys $500.00
Printing and Photocopying $100.00
Technology $2,800.00
Total Direct Expenses $14,700.00
TASK TOTAL $117,588.46
Subtasks
20081028 DRAFTBozeman_Ph1_WTP-Budget.xls Page 3 of 15 10/28/2008
76
Exhibit D
City of Bozeman Water Treatment Plant Replacement Project
Task 200 Conceptual Design Total
HDR Staff 201 202 203 204 207 208 209 Hours Rate Total
Dan Harmon Project Manager 426484432$58.80 1,881.60
Bryan Black Design Manager 20 16 28 8 16 60 40 188 $60.17 11,311.02
Yu-Jung Chang Principal 0000140822$93.53 2,057.75
John Koch Principal 000060814$70.77 990.78
Mario Benisch Engineer II 00000000$44.10 0.00
Grover Jones Supervising Engineer II 0 0 12 000012$58.80 705.60
Jeremy Grove Engineer II 00000000$25.46 0.00
Anna Zaklikowski Engineer I 0 20 00002040$31.97 1,278.90
Tina Whitfield Engineering Technician 50 32 32 4 16 12 20 166 $34.13 5,664.75
Ernie Swanson Supervising Engineer II 00000000$56.12 0.00
Chris Sheridan Supervising Engineer II 00000066$53.55 321.30
Donn Hogan Project Architect 00000000$50.81 0.00
Amy Dammarell Senior Environmental Professional 00000000$63.67 0.00
Don Best Supervising Engineer II 00000000$56.23 0.00
Amanda McInnis Principal 0 0 0 16 0 0 4 20 $58.85 1,177.05
Shawn Kuhns CADD Drafter 0 0 24 000024$37.40 897.62
Chris Kelly Clerical 444448836$22.58 812.70
HDR Totals 78 74 106 36 64 84 118 560 27,099.07
Morrison Maierle Staff
Scott Murphy Supervising Engineer III 00000000$51.00 0.00
Bob Morrison Principal 00040048$60.00 480.00
Nancy Cormier Supervising Engineer I 0 0 0 80 0 0 0 80 $44.00 3,520.00
James Nickelson Supervising Engineer III 20 0 0 40 4 0 4 68 $50.00 3,400.00
Mike Hickman Senior Engineer I 00000088$35.00 280.00
Alan Erickson Senior Engineer II 00000000$41.00 0.00
Jeff Ashley Senior Engineer I 00000000$35.00 0.00
Travis Meyer Senior Engineer II 0 0 8 80 0 16 24 128 $42.00 5,376.00
Roger Somerville Engineering Technician I 00000000$34.00 0.00
Jay Fischer Senior Engineering Technician 00000000$34.00 0.00
Tom Heneke Senior Engineer II 00000000$41.00 0.00
Kurt Keith Supervising Engineer III 00000000$47.00 0.00
Steve Rude Survey Manager 00000000$32.00 0.00
Mike Brandt Design Engineer II 00000000$34.00 0.00
Jerry Halford Senior Engineering Technician 20 0 0 24 0 0 0 44 $32.00 1,408.00
Sue Dugan Clerical 00000000$17.00 0.00
Paula Madden Clerical 00000000$17.00 0.00
Morrison Maierle Totals 40 0 8 228 4 16 40 336 14,464.00
TOTAL HOURS 118 74 114 264 68 100 158 896
201 Analyze Data from Existing Water Treatment Plant Total Labor $41,563.07
202 Establish Finished Water Quality Goals OH/Profit Multiplier x3.15
203 Evaluate Pre-Treatment Alternatives Total Direct Labor $130,923.68
204 Evaluate Waste Handling Alternatives
205 Evaluate Methods of Chlorination Direct Expenses:
206 Evaluate the Need and Methods for Corrosion Control Miscellaneous $1,400.00
205 Hold a Workshop to Select Membrane Systems for Pilot Testing Travel Expenses $2,000.00
206 Tour Existing Membrane Facilities Mapping/Photos/Surveys $1,400.00
207 Prepare a Conceptual Design Memorandum Printing and Photocopying $4,000.00
Technology $3,600.00
Total Direct Expenses $12,400.00
TASK TOTAL $143,323.68
Subtasks
20081028 DRAFTBozeman_Ph1_WTP-Budget.xls Page 4 of 15 10/28/2008
77
Exhibit D
City of Bozeman Water Treatment Plant Replacement Project
Task 300 Membrane Pilot Program TotalHDR Staff 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 Hours Rate Total
Dan Harmon Project Manager 2444420424$58.80 1,411.20
Bryan Black Design Manager 30 42 30 26 80 24 26 32 290 $60.17 17,447.85Yu-Jung Chang Principal 4040484832$93.53 2,993.09
John Koch Principal 000000000$70.77 0.00Mario Benisch Engineer II 000000000$44.10 0.00
Grover Jones Supervising Engineer II 000000000$58.80 0.00
Jeremy Grove Engineer II 000000000$25.46 0.00Anna Zaklikowski Engineer I 000000000$31.97 0.00
Tina Whitfield Engineering Technician 8 8 32 8000056$34.13 1,911.00Ernie Swanson Supervising Engineer II 000000000$56.12 0.00
Chris Sheridan Supervising Engineer II 00001600016$53.55 856.80
Donn Hogan Project Architect 000000000$50.81 0.00Amy Dammarell Senior Environmental Professional 000000000$63.67 0.00
Don Best Supervising Engineer II 000000000$56.23 0.00Amanda McInnis Principal 000000000$58.85 0.00
Shawn Kuhns CADD Drafter 0 60 00000060$37.40 2,244.06
Chris Kelly Clerical 000000000$22.58 0.00HDR Totals 44 114 70 38 104 34 30 44 478 26,864.00
Morrison Maierle StaffScott Murphy Supervising Engineer III 000000000$51.00 0.00
Bob Morrison Principal 000000000$60.00 0.00
Nancy Cormier Supervising Engineer I 000000000$44.00 0.00James Nickelson Supervising Engineer III 0 0 0 24 000428$50.00 1,400.00
Mike Hickman Senior Engineer I 000000000$35.00 0.00Alan Erickson Senior Engineer II 000000000$41.00 0.00
Jeff Ashley Senior Engineer I 000000000$35.00 0.00
Travis Meyer Senior Engineer II 0 0 0 24 32 0 0 8 64 $42.00 2,688.00Roger Somerville Engineering Technician I 0 0 0 100 100 40 32 16 288 $34.00 9,792.00
Jay Fischer Senior Engineering Technician 000000000$34.00 0.00Tom Heneke Senior Engineer II 000000000$41.00 0.00
Kurt Keith Supervising Engineer III 000000000$47.00 0.00
Steve Rude Survey Manager 000000000$32.00 0.00Mike Brandt Design Engineer II 000000000$34.00 0.00
Jerry Halford Senior Engineering Technician 000000000$32.00 0.00Sue Dugan Clerical 000000000$17.00 0.00
Paula Madden Clerical 000000000$17.00 0.00
Morrison Maierle Totals 0 0 0 148 132 40 32 28 380 13,880.00
TOTAL HOURS 44 114 70 186 236 74 62 72 858
301 Coordinate, Negotiate, and Execute Rental Agreements with MeTotal Labor $40,744.00
302 Identify Installation Requirements for Pilot Testing Equipment OH/Profit Multiplier x3.15303 Develop Pilot Testing Protocols and Obtain Montana DEQ ApproTotal Direct Labor $128,343.59
304 Pilot Plant Facility Construction and Startup305 Provide Operational Assistance to City on Pilot Units Direct Expenses:
306 Review Operations Data Collected by City Miscellaneous $245,600.00307 Coordinate with Pilot Unit Suppliers During Operation Travel Expenses $3,500.00
308 Pilot Plant Shutdown, Evaluation, and Reporting Mapping/Photos/Surveys $1,300.00
Printing and Photocopying $2,600.00
Technology $3,500.00
Total Direct Expenses $256,500.00
TASK TOTAL $384,843.59
Subtasks
20081028 DRAFTBozeman_Ph1_WTP-Budget.xls Page 5 of 15 10/28/2008
78
Exhibit D
City of Bozeman Water Treatment Plant Replacement Project
Task 400 Membrane Equipment
Procurement Assistance and
Contract Administration Total
HDR Staff 401 402 403 404 Hours Rate Total
Dan Harmon Project Manager 884222$58.80 1,293.60
Bryan Black Design Manager 100 26 32 32 190 $60.17 11,431.35
Yu-Jung Chang Principal 24 8 2 0 34 $93.53 3,180.16
John Koch Principal 16 0 2 4 22 $70.77 1,556.94
Mario Benisch Engineer II 00000$44.10 0.00
Grover Jones Supervising Engineer II 50 4 0 0 54 $58.80 3,175.20
Jeremy Grove Engineer II 00000$25.46 0.00
Anna Zaklikowski Engineer I 00000$31.97 0.00
Tina Whitfield Engineering Technician 00000$34.13 0.00
Ernie Swanson Supervising Engineer II 00000$56.12 0.00
Chris Sheridan Supervising Engineer II 00000$53.55 0.00
Donn Hogan Project Architect 00000$50.81 0.00
Amy Dammarell Senior Environmental Professional 00000$63.67 0.00
Don Best Supervising Engineer II 80 12 0 0 92 $56.23 5,172.93
Amanda McInnis Principal 00000$58.85 0.00
Shawn Kuhns CADD Drafter 100 6 0 0 106 $37.40 3,964.51
Chris Kelly Clerical 16 6 0 0 22 $22.58 496.65
HDR Totals 394 70 40 38 542 30,271.33
Morrison Maierle Staff
Scott Murphy Supervising Engineer III 00000$51.00 0.00
Bob Morrison Principal 00000$60.00 0.00
Nancy Cormier Supervising Engineer I 00000$44.00 0.00
James Nickelson Supervising Engineer III 880016$50.00 800.00
Mike Hickman Senior Engineer I 00000$35.00 0.00
Alan Erickson Senior Engineer II 00000$41.00 0.00
Jeff Ashley Senior Engineer I 00000$35.00 0.00
Travis Meyer Senior Engineer II 00000$42.00 0.00
Roger Somerville Engineering Technician I 00000$34.00 0.00
Jay Fischer Senior Engineering Technician 00000$34.00 0.00
Tom Heneke Senior Engineer II 00000$41.00 0.00
Kurt Keith Supervising Engineer III 00000$47.00 0.00
Steve Rude Survey Manager 00000$32.00 0.00
Mike Brandt Design Engineer II 00000$34.00 0.00
Jerry Halford Senior Engineering Technician 00000$32.00 0.00
Sue Dugan Clerical 00000$17.00 0.00
Paula Madden Clerical 00000$17.00 0.00
Morrison Maierle Totals 880016 800.00
TOTAL HOURS 402 78 40 38 558
401 Prepare Equipment Pre-purchase Documents Total Labor $31,071.33
402 Assist City in Bidding Equipment Pre-purchase OH/Profit Multiplier x3.15
403 Review Prepurchase Proposals Total Direct Labor $97,874.70
404 Prepare Membrane Pre-Purchase Contracts
Direct Expenses:
Miscellaneous $1,000.00
Travel Expenses $1,700.00
Mapping/Photos/Surveys $500.00
Printing and Photocopying $3,000.00
Technology $2,100.00
Total Direct Expenses $8,300.00
TASK TOTAL $106,174.70
Subtasks
20081028 DRAFTBozeman_Ph1_WTP-Budget.xls Page 6 of 15 10/28/2008
79
Exhibit D
City of Bozeman Water Treatment Plant Replacement Project
Task 500 WTP Process Preliminary Design Total
HDR Staff 501 502 503 504 505 506 Hours Rate Total
Dan Harmon Project Manager 16 8844242$58.80 2,469.60
Bryan Black Design Manager 180 0 0 0 40 0 220 $60.17 13,236.30
Yu-Jung Chang Principal 0000000$93.53 0.00
John Koch Principal 000002424$70.77 1,698.48
Mario Benisch Engineer II 100 0 8 0 32 0 140 $44.10 6,174.00
Grover Jones Supervising Engineer II 20 0000020$58.80 1,176.00
Jeremy Grove Engineer II 0000000$25.46 0.00
Anna Zaklikowski Engineer I 0000000$31.97 0.00
Tina Whitfield Engineering Technician 0000000$34.13 0.00
Ernie Swanson Supervising Engineer II 32 0000032$56.12 1,795.92
Chris Sheridan Supervising Engineer II 70 0000070$53.55 3,748.50
Donn Hogan Project Architect 90 0000090$50.81 4,572.86
Amy Dammarell Senior Environmental Professional 50 0000050$63.67 3,183.60
Don Best Supervising Engineer II 50 0000050$56.23 2,811.38
Amanda McInnis Principal 0000000$58.85 0.00
Shawn Kuhns CADD Drafter 70 8000078$37.40 2,917.28
Chris Kelly Clerical 000032032$22.58 722.40
HDR Totals 678 16 16 4 108 26 848 44,506.31
Morrison Maierle Staff
Scott Murphy Supervising Engineer III 0000000$51.00 0.00
Bob Morrison Principal 000002424$60.00 1,440.00
Nancy Cormier Supervising Engineer I 6000006$44.00 264.00
James Nickelson Supervising Engineer III 120 8 16 30 20 0 194 $50.00 9,700.00
Mike Hickman Senior Engineer I 60 0 0 32 0 0 92 $35.00 3,220.00
Alan Erickson Senior Engineer II 0000000$41.00 0.00
Jeff Ashley Senior Engineer I 0000000$35.00 0.00
Travis Meyer Senior Engineer II 120 0 0 0 20 0 140 $42.00 5,880.00
Roger Somerville Engineering Technician I 0 0 40 30 0 0 70 $34.00 2,380.00
Jay Fischer Senior Engineering Technician 0000000$34.00 0.00
Tom Heneke Senior Engineer II 0000000$41.00 0.00
Kurt Keith Supervising Engineer III 20 0000020$47.00 940.00
Steve Rude Survey Manager 0 80 000080$32.00 2,560.00
Mike Brandt Design Engineer II 40 0 48 0 0 0 88 $34.00 2,992.00
Jerry Halford Senior Engineering Technician 32 16 008056$32.00 1,792.00
Sue Dugan Clerical 32 0000032$17.00 544.00
Paula Madden Clerical 0000000$17.00 0.00
Morrison Maierle Totals 430 104 104 92 48 24 802 31,712.00
TOTAL HOURS 1108 120 120 96 156 50 1650
501 Preliminary Design Memoranda Total Labor $76,218.31
502 Site Surveys OH/Profit Multiplier x3.15
503 Geotechnical Services Total Direct Labor $240,087.67
504 Wetland/Stream/Ditch Permitting Review
505 Preliminary Design Report Submittal Direct Expenses:
506 Quality Control Miscellaneous (Incl. Geotech) $12,500.00
Travel Expenses $2,100.00
Mapping/Photos/Surveys $2,000.00
Printing and Photocopying $9,700.00
Technology $6,800.00
Total Direct Expenses $33,100.00
TASK TOTAL $273,187.67
Subtasks
20081028 DRAFTBozeman_Ph1_WTP-Budget.xls Page 7 of 15 10/28/2008
80
Exhibit D
City of Bozeman Water Treatment Plant Replacement Project
Task 600 WTP Process Final Design *Future
Task*Total
HDR Staff 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 Hours Rate Total
Dan Harmon Project Manager 000000000$58.80 0.00Bryan Black Design Manager 000000000$60.17 0.00
Amy Dammarell Principal 000000000$63.67 0.00Yu-Jung Chang Principal 000000000$93.53 0.00
John Koch Principal 000000000$70.77 0.00
Dave Clark Principal 000000000$93.53 0.00David Besinger Princiipal 000000000$68.46 0.00
Mario Benisch Engineer II 000000000$44.10 0.00Grover Jones Supervising Engineer II 000000000$58.80 0.00
Jeremy Grove Engineer II 000000000$25.46 0.00
Anna Zaklikowski Engineer I 000000000$31.97 0.00Tina Whitfield Engineering Technician 000000000$34.13 0.00
Ernie Swanson Supervising Engineer II 000000000$56.12 0.00Chris Sheridan Supervising Engineer II 000000000$53.55 0.00
Donn Hogan Project Architect 000000000$50.81 0.00
Brenda Sherwood Supervising Engineer III 000000000$44.10 0.00Dave Besinger Engineer III 000000000$68.46 0.00
Corrinne Humphrey Environmental Professional II 000000000$51.19 0.00Amy Dammarell Senior Environmental Professional 000000000$63.67 0.00
Don Best Supervising Engineer II 000000000$56.23 0.00
Randy Goff Engineer III 000000000$73.50 0.00Amanda McInnis Principal 000000000$58.85 0.00
Shawn Kuhns CADD Drafter 000000000$37.40 0.00Deborah Rose Accounting/Admin.000000000$32.55 0.00
Chris Kelly Clerical 000000000$22.58 0.00
HDR Totals 000000000 0.00Morrison Maierle Staff
Scott Murphy Supervising Engineer III 000000000$51.00 0.00Bob Morrison Principal 000000000$60.00 0.00
Nancy Cormier Supervising Engineer I 000000000$44.00 0.00
James Nickelson Supervising Engineer III 000000000$50.00 0.00Mike Hickman Senior Engineer I 000000000$35.00 0.00
Alan Erickson Senior Engineer II 000000000$41.00 0.00Jeff Ashley Senior Engineer I 000000000$35.00 0.00
Travis Meyer Senior Engineer II 000000000$42.00 0.00
Roger Somerville Engineering Technician I 000000000$34.00 0.00Jay Fischer Senior Engineering Technician 000000000$34.00 0.00
Tom Heneke Senior Engineer II 000000000$41.00 0.00Kurt Keith Supervising Engineer III 000000000$47.00 0.00
Steve Rude Survey Manager 000000000$32.00 0.00
Mike Brandt Design Engineer II 000000000$34.00 0.00Jerry Halford Senior Engineering Technician 000000000$32.00 0.00
Sue Dugan Clerical 000000000$17.00 0.00Paula Madden Clerical 000000000$17.00 0.00
Morrison Maierle Totals 000000000 0.00
TOTAL HOURS 000000000
601 Schematic Design Summary (20% Design) Total Labor $0.00
602 Administration/Laboratory and Maintenance Shop Space Progra OH/Profit Multiplier x3.15
603 Plans and Specifications Total Direct Labor $0.00
604 Design QA/QC Reviews
605 Permit/Regulatory Approval Assistance Direct Expenses:606 Estimate of Probable Construction Cost Miscellaneous
607 Summary Project Presentation Travel Expenses608 Tasks 608, 609, 610 per scope of work Mapping/Photos/Surveys
Printing and Photocopying
Technology $0.00
Total Direct Expenses $0.00
TASK TOTAL $0.00
Subtasks
20081028 DRAFTBozeman_Ph1_WTP-Budget.xls Page 8 of 15 10/28/2008
81
Exhibit D
City of Bozeman Water Treatment Plant Replacement Project
Task 700 Bid Services *Future Task*Total
HDR Staff 701 702 703 704 705 706 Hours Rate Total
Dan Harmon Project Manager 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $58.80 0.00
Bryan Black Design Manager 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $60.17 0.00
Amy Dammarell Principal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $63.67 0.00
Yu-Jung Chang Principal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $93.53 0.00
John Koch Principal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $70.77 0.00
Dave Clark Principal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $93.53 0.00
David Besinger Princiipal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $68.46 0.00
Mario Benisch Engineer II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $44.10 0.00
Grover Jones Supervising Engineer II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $58.80 0.00
Jeremy Grove Engineer II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $25.46 0.00
Anna Zaklikowski Engineer I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $31.97 0.00
Tina Whitfield Engineering Technician 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $34.13 0.00
Ernie Swanson Supervising Engineer II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $56.12 0.00
Chris Sheridan Supervising Engineer II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $53.55 0.00
Donn Hogan Project Architect 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $50.81 0.00
Brenda Sherwood Supervising Engineer III 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $44.10 0.00
Dave Besinger Engineer III 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $68.46 0.00
Corrinne Humphrey Environmental Professional II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $51.19 0.00
Amy Dammarell Senior Environmental Professional 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $63.67 0.00
Don Best Supervising Engineer II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $56.23 0.00
Randy Goff Engineer III 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $73.50 0.00
Amanda McInnis Principal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $58.85 0.00
Shawn Kuhns CADD Drafter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $37.40 0.00
Deborah Rose Accounting/Admin. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $32.55 0.00
Chris Kelly Clerical 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $22.58 0.00
HDR Totals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
Morrison Maierle Staff
Scott Murphy Supervising Engineer III 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $51.00 0.00
Bob Morrison Principal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $60.00 0.00
Nancy Cormier Supervising Engineer I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $44.00 0.00
James Nickelson Supervising Engineer III 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $50.00 0.00
Mike Hickman Senior Engineer I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $35.00 0.00
Alan Erickson Senior Engineer II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $41.00 0.00
Jeff Ashley Senior Engineer I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $35.00 0.00
Travis Meyer Senior Engineer II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $42.00 0.00
Roger Somerville Engineering Technician I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $34.00 0.00
Jay Fischer Senior Engineering Technician 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $34.00 0.00
Tom Heneke Senior Engineer II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $41.00 0.00
Kurt Keith Supervising Engineer III 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $47.00 0.00
Steve Rude Survey Manager 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $32.00 0.00
Mike Brandt Design Engineer II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $34.00 0.00
Jerry Halford Senior Engineering Technician 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $32.00 0.00
Sue Dugan Clerical 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $17.00 0.00
Paula Madden Clerical 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $17.00 0.00
Morrison Maierle Totals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
TOTAL HOURS 0000000
701 Printing/Plotting Plans and Specifications Total Labor $0.00
702 Bid Advertisement OH/Profit Multiplier x3.15
703 Prospective Bidder Notification Total Direct Labor $0.00
704 Pre-Bid Conference
705 Addenda and Bid Assistance Direct Expenses:
706 Bid Opening, Tabulation and Contract Award Miscellaneous
Travel Expenses
Mapping/Photos/Surveys
Printing and Photocopying
Technology $0.00
Total Direct Expenses $0.00
TASK TOTAL $0.00
Subtasks
20081028 DRAFTBozeman_Ph1_WTP-Budget.xls Page 9 of 15 10/28/2008
82
Exhibit D
City of Bozeman Water Treatment Plant Replacement Project
Task 800 Construction Administration
*Future Task*Total
HDR Staff 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 Hours Rate Total
Dan Harmon Project Manager 000000000$58.80 0.00Bryan Black Design Manager 000000000$60.17 0.00
Amy Dammarell Principal 000000000$63.67 0.00Yu-Jung Chang Principal 000000000$93.53 0.00
John Koch Principal 000000000$70.77 0.00
Dave Clark Principal 000000000$93.53 0.00David Besinger Princiipal 000000000$68.46 0.00
Mario Benisch Engineer II 000000000$44.10 0.00Grover Jones Supervising Engineer II 000000000$58.80 0.00
Jeremy Grove Engineer II 000000000$25.46 0.00
Anna Zaklikowski Engineer I 000000000$31.97 0.00Tina Whitfield Engineering Technician 000000000$34.13 0.00
Ernie Swanson Supervising Engineer II 000000000$56.12 0.00Chris Sheridan Supervising Engineer II 000000000$53.55 0.00
Donn Hogan Project Architect 000000000$50.81 0.00
Brenda Sherwood Supervising Engineer III 000000000$44.10 0.00Dave Besinger Engineer III 000000000$68.46 0.00
Corrinne Humphrey Environmental Professional II 000000000$51.19 0.00Amy Dammarell Senior Environmental Professional 000000000$63.67 0.00
Don Best Supervising Engineer II 000000000$56.23 0.00
Randy Goff Engineer III 000000000$73.50 0.00Amanda McInnis Principal 000000000$58.85 0.00
Shawn Kuhns CADD Drafter 000000000$37.40 0.00Deborah Rose Accounting/Admin.000000000$32.55 0.00
Chris Kelly Clerical 000000000$22.58 0.00
HDR Totals 000000000 0.00Morrison Maierle Staff
Scott Murphy Supervising Engineer III 000000000$51.00 0.00Bob Morrison Principal 000000000$60.00 0.00
Nancy Cormier Supervising Engineer I 000000000$44.00 0.00
James Nickelson Supervising Engineer III 000000000$50.00 0.00Mike Hickman Senior Engineer I 000000000$35.00 0.00
Alan Erickson Senior Engineer II 000000000$41.00 0.00Jeff Ashley Senior Engineer I 000000000$35.00 0.00
Travis Meyer Senior Engineer II 000000000$42.00 0.00
Roger Somerville Engineering Technician I 000000000$34.00 0.00Jay Fischer Senior Engineering Technician 000000000$34.00 0.00
Tom Heneke Senior Engineer II 000000000$41.00 0.00Kurt Keith Supervising Engineer III 000000000$47.00 0.00
Steve Rude Survey Manager 000000000$32.00 0.00
Mike Brandt Design Engineer II 000000000$34.00 0.00Jerry Halford Senior Engineering Technician 000000000$32.00 0.00
Sue Dugan Clerical 000000000$17.00 0.00Paula Madden Clerical 000000000$17.00 0.00
Morrison Maierle Totals 000000000 0.00
TOTAL HOURS 000000000
801 Project Administration Total Labor $0.00
802 Pre-construction Conference OH/Profit Multiplier x3.15
803 Construction Engineering Total Direct Labor $0.00
804 On-site Construction Observation
805 Record Drawings Direct Expenses:806 Field Surveying/Staking Miscellaneous
807 Geotechnical and Material Testing Services Travel Expenses808 Special Inspection Services Mapping/Photos/Surveys
Printing and Photocopying
Technology $0.00
Total Direct Expenses $0.00
TASK TOTAL $0.00
Subtasks
20081028 DRAFTBozeman_Ph1_WTP-Budget.xls Page 10 of 15 10/28/2008
83
Exhibit D
City of Bozeman Water Treatment Plant Replacement Project
Task 900 Project Startup Assistance and
Commissioning *Future Task*Total
HDR Staff 901 902 903 Hours Rate Total
Dan Harmon Project Manager 0000$58.80 0.00
Bryan Black Design Manager 0000$60.17 0.00
Amy Dammarell Principal 0000$63.67 0.00
Yu-Jung Chang Principal 0000$93.53 0.00
John Koch Principal 0000$70.77 0.00
Dave Clark Principal 0000$93.53 0.00
David Besinger Princiipal 0000$68.46 0.00
Mario Benisch Engineer II 0000$44.10 0.00
Grover Jones Supervising Engineer II 0000$58.80 0.00
Jeremy Grove Engineer II 0000$25.46 0.00
Anna Zaklikowski Engineer I 0000$31.97 0.00
Tina Whitfield Engineering Technician 0000$34.13 0.00
Ernie Swanson Supervising Engineer II 0000$56.12 0.00
Chris Sheridan Supervising Engineer II 0000$53.55 0.00
Donn Hogan Project Architect 0000$50.81 0.00
Brenda Sherwood Supervising Engineer III 0000$44.10 0.00
Dave Besinger Engineer III 0000$68.46 0.00
Corrinne Humphrey Environmental Professional II 0000$51.19 0.00
Amy Dammarell Senior Environmental Professional 0000$63.67 0.00
Don Best Supervising Engineer II 0000$56.23 0.00
Randy Goff Engineer III 0000$73.50 0.00
Amanda McInnis Principal 0000$58.85 0.00
Shawn Kuhns CADD Drafter 0000$37.40 0.00
Deborah Rose Accounting/Admin.0000$32.55 0.00
Chris Kelly Clerical 0000$22.58 0.00
HDR Totals 0000 0.00
Morrison Maierle Staff
Scott Murphy Supervising Engineer III 0000$51.00 0.00
Bob Morrison Principal 0000$60.00 0.00
Nancy Cormier Supervising Engineer I 0000$44.00 0.00
James Nickelson Supervising Engineer III 0000$50.00 0.00
Mike Hickman Senior Engineer I 0000$35.00 0.00
Alan Erickson Senior Engineer II 0000$41.00 0.00
Jeff Ashley Senior Engineer I 0000$35.00 0.00
Travis Meyer Senior Engineer II 0000$42.00 0.00
Roger Somerville Engineering Technician I 0000$34.00 0.00
Jay Fischer Senior Engineering Technician 0000$34.00 0.00
Tom Heneke Senior Engineer II 0000$41.00 0.00
Kurt Keith Supervising Engineer III 0000$47.00 0.00
Steve Rude Survey Manager 0000$32.00 0.00
Mike Brandt Design Engineer II 0000$34.00 0.00
Jerry Halford Senior Engineering Technician 0000$32.00 0.00
Sue Dugan Clerical 0000$17.00 0.00
Paula Madden Clerical 0000$17.00 0.00
Morrison Maierle Totals 0000 0.00
TOTAL HOURS 0000
901 Operations and Maintenance Manual Total Labor $0.00
902 Electronic O&M Manual (Optional Task)OH/Profit Multiplier x3.15
903 Plant Facility Start-up and Operator Training Total Direct Labor $0.00
Direct Expenses:
Miscellaneous
Travel Expenses
Mapping/Photos/Surveys
Printing and Photocopying
Technology $0.00
Total Direct Expenses $0.00
TASK TOTAL $0.00
Subtasks
20081028 DRAFTBozeman_Ph1_WTP-Budget.xls Page 11 of 15 10/28/2008
84
Exhibit D
City of Bozeman Water Treatment Plant Replacement Project
Task 1000
Application Software Programming
Services *Future Task*Total
HDR Staff 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 Hours Rate Total
Dan Harmon Project Manager 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $58.80 0.00
Bryan Black Design Manager 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $60.17 0.00
Amy Dammarell Principal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $63.67 0.00
Yu-Jung Chang Principal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $93.53 0.00
John Koch Principal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $70.77 0.00
Dave Clark Principal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $93.53 0.00
David Besinger Princiipal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $68.46 0.00
Mario Benisch Engineer II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $44.10 0.00
Grover Jones Supervising Engineer II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $58.80 0.00
Jeremy Grove Engineer II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $25.46 0.00
Anna Zaklikowski Engineer I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $31.97 0.00
Tina Whitfield Engineering Technician 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $34.13 0.00
Ernie Swanson Supervising Engineer II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $56.12 0.00
Chris Sheridan Supervising Engineer II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $53.55 0.00
Donn Hogan Project Architect 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $50.81 0.00
Brenda Sherwood Supervising Engineer III 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $44.10 0.00
Dave Besinger Engineer III 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $68.46 0.00
Corrinne Humphrey Environmental Professional II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $51.19 0.00
Amy Dammarell Senior Environmental Professional 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $63.67 0.00
Don Best Supervising Engineer II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $56.23 0.00
Randy Goff Engineer III 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $73.50 0.00
Amanda McInnis Principal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $58.85 0.00
Shawn Kuhns CADD Drafter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $37.40 0.00
Deborah Rose Accounting/Admin. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $32.55 0.00
Chris Kelly Clerical 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $22.58 0.00
HDR Totals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
Morrison Maierle Staff
Scott Murphy Supervising Engineer III 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $51.00 0.00
Bob Morrison Principal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $60.00 0.00
Nancy Cormier Supervising Engineer I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $44.00 0.00
James Nickelson Supervising Engineer III 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $50.00 0.00
Mike Hickman Senior Engineer I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $35.00 0.00
Alan Erickson Senior Engineer II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $41.00 0.00
Jeff Ashley Senior Engineer I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $35.00 0.00
Travis Meyer Senior Engineer II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $42.00 0.00
Roger Somerville Engineering Technician I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $34.00 0.00
Jay Fischer Senior Engineering Technician 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $34.00 0.00
Tom Heneke Senior Engineer II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $41.00 0.00
Kurt Keith Supervising Engineer III 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $47.00 0.00
Steve Rude Survey Manager 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $32.00 0.00
Mike Brandt Design Engineer II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $34.00 0.00
Jerry Halford Senior Engineering Technician 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $32.00 0.00
Sue Dugan Clerical 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $17.00 0.00
Paula Madden Clerical 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $17.00 0.00
Morrison Maierle Totals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
TOTAL HOURS 0000000
1001 System Integration Total Labor $0.00
1002 Software Pre-Design Report OH/Profit Multiplier x3.15
1003 Software Programming & Testing Total Direct Labor $0.00
1004 Functional Demonstrations
1005 Field Commissioning and Software Startup Direct Expenses:
1006 Post Startup Support Miscellaneous
Travel Expenses
Mapping/Photos/Surveys
Printing and Photocopying
Technology $0.00
Total Direct Expenses $0.00
TASK TOTAL $0.00
Subtasks
20081028 DRAFTBozeman_Ph1_WTP-Budget.xls Page 12 of 15 10/28/2008
85
Exhibit D
City of Bozeman Water Treatment Plant Replacement Project
Task 1100 Project Close-Out/Certification
*Future Task* Total
HDR Staff 1001 1002 Hours Rate Total
Dan Harmon Project Manager 0 0 0 $58.80 0.00
Bryan Black Design Manager 0 0 0 $60.17 0.00
Amy Dammarell Principal 0 0 0 $63.67 0.00
Yu-Jung Chang Principal 0 0 0 $93.53 0.00
John Koch Principal 0 0 0 $70.77 0.00
Dave Clark Principal 0 0 0 $93.53 0.00
David Besinger Princiipal 0 0 0 $68.46 0.00
Mario Benisch Engineer II 0 0 0 $44.10 0.00
Grover Jones Supervising Engineer II 0 0 0 $58.80 0.00
Jeremy Grove Engineer II 0 0 0 $25.46 0.00
Anna Zaklikowski Engineer I 0 0 0 $31.97 0.00
Tina Whitfield Engineering Technician 0 0 0 $34.13 0.00
Ernie Swanson Supervising Engineer II 0 0 0 $56.12 0.00
Chris Sheridan Supervising Engineer II 0 0 0 $53.55 0.00
Donn Hogan Project Architect 0 0 0 $50.81 0.00
Brenda Sherwood Supervising Engineer III 0 0 0 $44.10 0.00
Dave Besinger Engineer III 0 0 0 $68.46 0.00
Corrinne Humphrey Environmental Professional II 0 0 0 $51.19 0.00
Amy Dammarell Senior Environmental Professional 0 0 0 $63.67 0.00
Don Best Supervising Engineer II 0 0 0 $56.23 0.00
Randy Goff Engineer III 0 0 0 $73.50 0.00
Amanda McInnis Principal 0 0 0 $58.85 0.00
Shawn Kuhns CADD Drafter 0 0 0 $37.40 0.00
Deborah Rose Accounting/Admin. 0 0 0 $32.55 0.00
Chris Kelly Clerical 0 0 0 $22.58 0.00
HDR Totals 0 0 0 0.00
Morrison Maierle Staff
Scott Murphy Supervising Engineer III 0 0 0 $51.00 0.00
Bob Morrison Principal 0 0 0 $60.00 0.00
Nancy Cormier Supervising Engineer I 0 0 0 $44.00 0.00
James Nickelson Supervising Engineer III 0 0 0 $50.00 0.00
Mike Hickman Senior Engineer I 0 0 0 $35.00 0.00
Alan Erickson Senior Engineer II 0 0 0 $41.00 0.00
Jeff Ashley Senior Engineer I 0 0 0 $35.00 0.00
Travis Meyer Senior Engineer II 0 0 0 $42.00 0.00
Roger Somerville Engineering Technician I 0 0 0 $34.00 0.00
Jay Fischer Senior Engineering Technician 0 0 0 $34.00 0.00
Tom Heneke Senior Engineer II 0 0 0 $41.00 0.00
Kurt Keith Supervising Engineer III 0 0 0 $47.00 0.00
Steve Rude Survey Manager 0 0 0 $32.00 0.00
Mike Brandt Design Engineer II 0 0 0 $34.00 0.00
Jerry Halford Senior Engineering Technician 0 0 0 $32.00 0.00
Sue Dugan Clerical 0 0 0 $17.00 0.00
Paula Madden Clerical 0 0 0 $17.00 0.00
Morrison Maierle Totals 0 0 0 0.00
TOTAL HOURS 000
1101 Contract Close-Out Total Labor $0.00
1102 Certification OH/Profit Multiplier x3.15
Total Direct Labor $0.00
Direct Expenses:
Miscellaneous
Travel Expenses
Mapping/Photos/Surveys
Printing and Photocopying
Technology $0.00
Total Direct Expenses $0.00
TASK TOTAL $0.00
Subtasks
20081028 DRAFTBozeman_Ph1_WTP-Budget.xls Page 13 of 15 10/28/2008
86
Exhibit D
City of Bozeman Water Treatment Plant Replacement Project
Task 1200 Additional Services Only Upon
Authorization of City *Future
Task*Total
HDR Staff 1201 1202 1203 1204 1205 1206 Hours Rate Total
Dan Harmon Project Manager 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $58.80 0.00
Bryan Black Design Manager 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $60.17 0.00
Amy Dammarell Principal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $63.67 0.00
Yu-Jung Chang Principal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $93.53 0.00
John Koch Principal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $70.77 0.00
Dave Clark Principal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $93.53 0.00
David Besinger Princiipal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $68.46 0.00
Mario Benisch Engineer II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $44.10 0.00
Grover Jones Supervising Engineer II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $58.80 0.00
Jeremy Grove Engineer II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $25.46 0.00
Anna Zaklikowski Engineer I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $31.97 0.00
Tina Whitfield Engineering Technician 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $34.13 0.00
Ernie Swanson Supervising Engineer II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $56.12 0.00
Chris Sheridan Supervising Engineer II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $53.55 0.00
Donn Hogan Project Architect 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $50.81 0.00
Brenda Sherwood Supervising Engineer III 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $44.10 0.00
Dave Besinger Engineer III 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $68.46 0.00
Corrinne Humphrey Environmental Professional II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $51.19 0.00
Amy Dammarell Senior Environmental Professional 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $63.67 0.00
Don Best Supervising Engineer II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $56.23 0.00
Randy Goff Engineer III 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $73.50 0.00
Amanda McInnis Principal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $58.85 0.00
Shawn Kuhns CADD Drafter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $37.40 0.00
Deborah Rose Accounting/Admin. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $32.55 0.00
Chris Kelly Clerical 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $22.58 0.00
HDR Totals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
Morrison Maierle Staff
Scott Murphy Supervising Engineer III 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $51.00 0.00
Bob Morrison Principal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $60.00 0.00
Nancy Cormier Supervising Engineer I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $44.00 0.00
James Nickelson Supervising Engineer III 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $50.00 0.00
Mike Hickman Senior Engineer I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $35.00 0.00
Alan Erickson Senior Engineer II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $41.00 0.00
Jeff Ashley Senior Engineer I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $35.00 0.00
Travis Meyer Senior Engineer II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $42.00 0.00
Roger Somerville Engineering Technician I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $34.00 0.00
Jay Fischer Senior Engineering Technician 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $34.00 0.00
Tom Heneke Senior Engineer II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $41.00 0.00
Kurt Keith Supervising Engineer III 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $47.00 0.00
Steve Rude Survey Manager 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $32.00 0.00
Mike Brandt Design Engineer II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $34.00 0.00
Jerry Halford Senior Engineering Technician 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $32.00 0.00
Sue Dugan Clerical 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $17.00 0.00
Paula Madden Clerical 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $17.00 0.00
Morrison Maierle Totals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
TOTAL HOURS 0000000
1201 TBD Total Labor $0.00
1202 TBD OH/Profit Multiplier x3.15
1203 TBD Total Direct Labor $0.00
1204 TBD
1205 TBD Direct Expenses:
1206 TBD Miscellaneous
Travel Expenses
Mapping/Photos/Surveys
Printing and Photocopying
Technology $0.00
Total Direct Expenses $0.00
TASK TOTAL $0.00
Subtasks
20081028 DRAFTBozeman_Ph1_WTP-Budget.xls Page 14 of 15 10/28/2008
87
Exhibit D
City of Bozeman Water Treatment Plant Replacement Project
Estimated Direct Expenses for Membrane Pilot Testing
City of Bozeman MT WTP
Item Qty Unit Rate Total
Pall Pilot 7 Mo 5000 35,000
Zenon 500 Pilot 7 Mo 5000 35,000
Zenon Freight 2 ea 2000 4,000
Zenon 1000 Pilot 7 Mo 5000 35,000
Zenon Freight 2 ea 2000 4,000
Seimens Pilot 7 Mo 5000 35,000
Seimens Freight 2 ea 2000 4,000
MRI Pretreatment Pilot 7 Mo 2000 14,000
MRI Freight 2 ea 2000 4,000
Pilot Install Electrical 17,100
Pilot Install Mechanical 45,000
Chemical 7,000
Waste Hauling 1,500
Power (by City) -
Laboratory sampling 5,000
Telephone (by City) -
Contingency (10%)
Total 245,600
8,771$ $/week
20081028 DRAFTBozeman_Ph1_WTP-Budget.xlsPage 15 of 15 10/28/2008
88