Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-09-16 Minutes, City Commission .- MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE CITY COMMISSION BOZEMAN, MONTANA September 16, 1996 ***************************** . The Commission of the City of Bozeman met in regular session in the Commission Room, Municipal Building, September 16, 1996, at 3:00 p.m. Present were Mayor Stueck, Commissioner Rudberg, Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Youngman, City Manager Wysocki, City Attorney Luwe and Clerk of the Commission Sullivan. The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance and a moment of silence. Mayor Stueck asked if any of the Commissioners wished to remove any of the Consent Items for discussion. City Manager Wysocki requested that authorization for the Mayor to sign the agreement with the Montana Department of Transportation regarding the CTEP project for a pathway along South Third Avenue be removed for discussion. Minutes - August 12. Auaust 19. Auaust 26 and SeDtember 3. 1996 . It was moved by Commissioner Rudberg, seconded by Commissioner Stiff, that the minutes of the meetings of August 12 and September 3, 1996, be approved as submitted and the minutes of the meeting of August 19, 1996, be approved as amended. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Rudberg, Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Youngman and Mayor Stueck; those voting No, none. Mayor Stueck deferred action on the minutes of the meetings held on November 20 and December 4, 1995, and August 26 and September 9, 1996, to a later date. Continued ioint Dublic hearings - aDDlications for HOME grant monies and CDBG arant monies for multi-familv housina affordable to low and very low income households - Bozeman Interfaith Housina II. Inc. . This was the time and place set for the continued joint public hearings on an application by Bozeman Interfaith Housing II, Inc., for HOME grant monies and CDBG grant monies for multi-family housing affordable to low and very low income households. Mayor Stueck reopened the continued public hearing. 09-1 6-96 ----------.-.-- ..---. -----. - 2 - City Manager Wysocki reminded the Commission that this public hearing had been continued to allow for consideration of written comment, since the period for written comment ended at 5:00 p.m. on September 12. He indicated that no written comment was received. No one was present to speak in support of or in opposition to the applications. . Mayor Stueck closed the continued public hearing. City Manager Wysocki noted that, included in the Commissioners' packets, was a copy of Commission Resolution No. 3146, as approved by the City Attorney, entitled: COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3146 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF AN APPLICATION TO THE STATE OF MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT MONIES. The City Manager recommended that the Commission adopt this resolution, which will authorize submittal of the application for Community Development Block Grant monies. It was moved by Commissioner Stiff, seconded by Commissioner Frost, that the Commission adopt Commission Resolution No. 3146, authorizing submittal of the application . for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) monies on behalf of Bozeman Interfaith Housing II, Inc., for a multi~family housing rental project for low and very low income households. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Youngman, Commissioner Rudberg and Mayor Stueck; those voting No, none. Continued Dublic hearina - Commission Resolution No. 3128 - intent to annex Tracts A and B. COS No. 1872. and Tract 2. COS No. 1846. located in the SW%. Section 10. T2S. R5E. MPM ( 135 acres at northwest corner of Huffine Lane and Ferguson Road) (A-9603) This was the time and place set for the continued public hearing on Commission Resolution No. 3128, as approved by the City Attorney, entitled: COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3128 . A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, DECLARING IT TO BE THE INTENTION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, THE INHABITANTS THEREOF AND THE INHABITANTS OF TRACTS OF LAND CONTIGUOUS TO SAID CITY OF BOZEMAN, AND HEREIN MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED, TO EXTEND THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID CITY OF BOZEMAN SO AS TO INCLUDE SAID CONTIGUOUS TRACTS WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS THEREOF. 09-16-96 - ,...- .._.._~--- - 3 - City Manager Wysocki noted that, included in the Commissioners' packets, was a memo from City Engineer Craig Brawner, dated September 11, indicating that the information from the consulting engineer regarding sewer service areas was anticipated on Friday, September 13. He stated that timeline did not allow staff adequate time to review the information and . forward a recommendation to the Commission for today's meeting, and requested that the public hearing be continued to the October 7 meeting. It was moved by Commissioner Frost, seconded by Commissioner Youngman, that the Commission continue the public hearing to October 7 to allow staff an opportunity to review the information regarding sewer service areas. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Youngman, Commissioner Rudberg, Commissioner Stiff and Mayor Stueck; those voting No, none. Continued Dublic hearina - Zone Code Amendments - comcrehensive amendments to several sections. including ChaDter 18.65. Bozeman MuniciDal Code. re grandfatherina Dreviouslv permitted sians: Droviding for accessory dwelling units as conditional uses in certain districts: revising the membership of the Design Review Board: and revising the reauirements of the ADR staff (Z-9663) . This was the time and place set for the continued public hearing on comprehensive amendments to several sections of Title 18 of the Bozeman Municipal Code, as initiated by the City Commission under Application No. Z-9663, including a complete rewrite of Chapter 18.65, the City's sign code; providing for accessory dwelling units as conditional uses in certain districts; revising the membership of the Design Review Board; and revising the requirements of the Administrative Development Review staff. Mayor Stueck reopened the continued public hearing. Assistant Planner Christopher Williams reviewed the draft zone code amendments, dated September 16, into which he had incorporated the revisions which the Planning Board forwarded as a result of its public hearing on August 6 and the changes discussed by the Commission during its August 26 public hearing. He reviewed the changes for all but the sign . code individually, characterizing the majority of them as clarifications. He noted that a new section has been added to the revisions, since Planning Board member Bill Mitchell requested that it be amended to provide a procedure for appealing the decisions of Planning staff to the Commission. 09-1 6-96 - 4 - Responding to Mayor Stueck, Commissioner Youngman stated that she and Assistant Planner Christopher Williams have discussed the proposed 6,000-square-foot minimum lot size for accessory dwelling units on several occasions. She stated that, while she would prefer to see the lot size lowered to 5,000 square feet, she understands the number of lots impacted . would be minimal, and options are still available for constructing an accessory dwelling unit on a smaller lot while ensuring that overbuilding does not occur. She concluded by indicating that she can support the revisions with either provision. Responding to Mayor Stueck, City Attorney Luwe stated that the Commission may make a decision to act on all of the zone code amendments except for the sign code, and leave the hearing on the sign code open for a specified period of time if it so chooses. He encouraged the Commissioners to accept input on all of the zone code amendments at this time. Assistant Planner Christopher Williams turned his attention to the revisions proposed to the sign code portion of the amendments. He noted that many of these changes are also for the purpose of clarification. He noted that Section 18.65.1 OO.B. contains a proposed revision recommended by Assistant Planning Director Arkell, noting that this change is designed to . simplify the manner in which the square footage of wall signs for businesses in multi-tenant complexes are calculated. Also, Section 18.65.110.B. contains a simplified calculation for signage for anchor tenants in indoor shopping malls, as proposed by Assistant Planning Director Arkell. The Assistant Planner stated that many of the comments forwarded by Mr. Ron Bachman in his written document presented during the August 26 public hearing are similar to the comments forwarded by Mr. Krause during his presentation to the Commission several months ago. He noted that Mr. Bachman has taken exception to the dimensional standards in the sign code. He reminded the Commission that this restructured sign code is based on the provisions of the existing sign code, and he felt it was important to maintain consistency in the code . rather than changing the regulations as well as the format. He noted, however, that two of Mr. Bachman's comments should be considered, and they pertain to Section 18.65.190. He stated that alternative language for Section 18.65.190, continuing the amortization provision, has also been forwarded for Commission consideration. Responding to Mayor Stueck, the Assistant Planner stated that he discussed the possibility of allowing signs which exceed the code provisions by a specific percentage to 09-1 6-96 --. - --------- - 5 - remain, while any signs larger than that must be brought into compliance with the code requirements with other members of the Planning staff. He cautioned that it would be difficult to draft language for that type of provision and would make it more difficult to justify the size provisions of the sign code if such increases in dimension were specifically allowed. . Responding to Mayor Stueck, the Assistant Planner stated that under the proposed sign code revisions, some minor alterations could be accomplished without triggering the requirement to bring the signage into compliance. He recognized that those alterations could require a building permit, noting it is the planning review processes that would trigger compliance. Commissioner Rudberg requested that a minimum of thirty days for acceptance of written comment on the sign code be provided prior to taking action on these amendments. It was moved by Commissioner Youngman, seconded by Commissioner Rudberg, that the public hearings on accessory dwelling units, Design Review Board and Administrative Design Review staff be closed and that the verbal portion of the hearing on the sign code be closed with the period for accepting written comments to close at 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday, . October 16. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Youngman, Commissioner Rudberg, Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Frost and Mayor Stueck; those voting No, none. City Attorney Luwe reminded the Commissioners that once they take action on the proposed amendments, they must be brought back in ordinance form for final action. Commissioner Youngman forwarded her support for the proposed provisions for accessory dwelling units, noting that she first researched the issue in 1985 when looking for ways to provide affordable housing in the community. She also noted support for the additional citizen member on the Design Review Board. It was moved by Commissioner Rudberg, seconded by Commissioner Stiff, that the Commission authorize and direct staff to bring back an ordinance enacting the proposed . revisions to the zone code to provide for accessory dwelling units in certain zones and revise the membership on the Design Review Board and Administrative Design Review staff. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Rudberg, Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Youngman and Mayor Stueck; those voting No, none. 09-16-96 ....-------- - 6 - Preliminarv Dlat review - Diamond Estates Subdivision - subdivide 19.957 acres into 9 single- family residential lots and 1 remainder lot - E%. W%. E%. SE%. Section 3. T2S. R5E. MPM (4521 Durston Road) (Doug Smith) This was the time and place set to conduct a review of the preliminary plat for Diamond Estates Subdivision, as requested by Doug Smith under Application No. P-9635 under which . 19.957 acres known as the East one-half of the West one-half of the East one-half of the Southeast one-quarter of Section 3, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, Montana Principal Meridian, is to be subdivided into 9 single-family residential lots and 1 remainder lot. The subject property is more commonly known as 4521 Durston Road. Assistant Planner Chris Saunders presented the staff report. He noted that this application is accompanied by a conceptual master plan for development of the entire parcel, including the proposed parkland dedication and a conceptual view of lots and streets, and a drawing showing the actual lots to be created under Phase I. He stated that staff has reviewed this application under the criteria established for review of subdivisions, and the comprehensive findings are contained in the written staff report, which has previously been distributed to the Commission. . The Assistant Planner stated that the City-County Planning Board conducted the public hearing on this subdivision at its September 4 meeting. He noted that following that public hearing and review of the criteria, the Board concurred in the staff's recommendation for approval, subject to several conditions. He noted that the Board also granted the applicant's request for waiver of the Environmental Assessment and Community Impact Statement, since the information is available in existing documents. Assistant Planner Saunders stated that the applicant is also requesting three variances from the Bozeman Subdivision Regulations to allow an existing house to encroach into the front yard setback, to allow a dead end water line more than 250 feet in length, and to not require a secondary or emergency access for a subdivision with more than six lots. He stated that, . following their review of this application, the Planning Board forwarded a recommendation for approval of all three of these variances. Mr. Dennis Foreman, Gaston Engineering, indicated that the applicant has reviewed the recommended conditions and is willing to comply with them. He then indicated that he would respond to questions. He also requested that the variances be approved. 09-1 6-96 .--. --- .--. -..... --.--.- -- .--------.-. .-- .- - 7 - Responding to Mayor Stueck, Mr. Foreman stated that the applicant is willing to locate the parkland dedication on either side of Meagher Avenue. Further responding to Mayor Stueck, Mr. Foreman indicated that the nine lots being created at this time will be served by gravity flow sewer lines to the main in Durston Road. He . stated that the remainder of the parcel, which lies between Durston Road and West Oak Street, will not be developed until the sewer main in West Oak Street has been extended, since the topography of the land will allow for gravity flow to that sewer main. Mr. Foreman stated that the parkland dedication is to be made with Phase I of this subdivision. He noted that the land is to be dedicated to the public, recognizing that if the City wishes, it could swap this dedication for other land at some time in the future if it so chooses. City Attorney Luwe cautioned that acceptance of this parkland dedication in its proposed location mayor may not preclude any future relocation because of statutory constraints on different types of dedications. He recognized that, through cooperation of all parties involved, such an exchange of parkland would be possible. It was moved by Commissioner Stiff, seconded by Commissioner Frost, that the . Commission approve the preliminary plat for Diamond Estates Subdivision, as requested by Doug Smith under Application No. P-9635 under which 19.957 acres known as the East one- half of the West one-half of the East one-half of the Southeast one-quarter of Section 3, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, Montana Principal Meridian, is to be subdivided into 9 single- family residential lots and 1 remainder lot, subject to the following conditions: 1. Annexation to the City of Bozeman be completed, including all conditions, prior to the commencement of development of the parcel. 2. Plans and specifications for any water, sewer and/or storm sewer main extensions and public streets (including curb, gutter and sidewalks) prepared and signed by a professional engineer (PE) licensed in the State of Montana shall be provided to and approved by the City Engineer. Water and sewer plans shall also be approved by the Montana Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). The applicant shall also provide professional engineering services for construction inspection, post-construction certification, and . preparation of mylar record drawings. Specific comments regarding the existing and proposed infrastructure shall be provided at that time. Construction shall not be initiated on the public infrastructure improvements until the plans, specifications and shop drawings have been approved and a preconstruction conference has been conducted. 3. All infrastructure improvements including 1 ) water and sewer main extensions, and 2) public or private streets including curb/gutter, sidewalks, and storm drainage infrastructure improvements shall be financially guaranteed or constructed prior to filing of the final plat. No building 09-16-96 ---.--- __..u___ - --~ - 8 - permits will be issued prior to completion and acceptance of the public infrastructure improvements. 4. Applicant shall provide and file with the County Clerk and Recorder's office executed waivers of right to protest creation of SIDs/RIDs for the following: a. Street improvements to Durston Road including paving, curb . a nd gutter, sidewalks and storm drainage. b. Street improvements to Oak Street including paving, curb and g utter, sidewalks and storm drainage. T he Waivers shall specify that in the event SIDs/RIDs are not u tilized for the completion of these projects, the property owner s hall agree to participate in an alternate financing method for c ompletion of said improvements on a fair share, proportionate b asis as determined by square footage of the property, linear f ront footage of the property, taxable valuation of the property, o r combination thereof. A copy of the filed document shall be s ubmitted with the Final Site Plan prior to approval. 5. A Stormwater Drainage Plan/Treatment Plan and Maintenance Plan for a system designed to remove solids, silt, oils, grease and other pollutants from the run-off from the private and/or public streets must be provided to and approved by the City Engineer. The plan must demonstrate adequate site drainage (including sufficient flow directional arrows and spot elevations along drainage courses), storm water detention/retention basin details (including basin sizing and discharge calculation and discharge structure details), storm water discharge destination and a storm water maintenance . plan. If the grading design discloses any adverse impact to off-site properties, necessary design alterations and/or drainage conveyance devices and easements must be provided. The storm water drainage/treatment plan shall include a maintenance plan which must be provided to and approved by the City Engineer. The plan shall include the following: description of maintenance operations, frequency of inspections and maintenance, responsible parties and record keeping methodology. If the stormwater facilities are located off the subject property, a storm water easement shall be established on the adjacent property and filed with the County Clerk and Recorder. Stormwater generated by the proposed subdivision which discharges to a privately owned ditch must have written permission of the ditch owner. Note: It will ultimately be the responsibility of the Homeowner's Association to ensure that the maintenance plan is consistently enforced. It is further recommended that implementation of the plan be included in the covenants and therefore a condition of plat approval. . 6. Covenants shall be recorded with the final plat which shall specifically include the following provisions: a. A Homeowners' Association shall be established to maintain all a pplicable open space and stormwater facilities. b. A section addressing agricultural uses of neighboring properties i n the following form: " Lot owners and residents of the subdivision are informed that a djacent uses may be agricultural. Lot owners accept and are 09-16-96 - 9 - aware that standard agricultural and farming practices can result in dust, animal odors, smoke, files and machinery noise. Standard agricultural practices feature the use of heavy equipment, chemical sprays and the use of machinery early in the morning and sometimes late into the evening." c. All fences bordering agricultural lands shall be maintained by . the landowners in accordance with state law. 7. Ditch relocation or abandonment: a. The users/owners of the ditch lying along the western boundary of the property shall be verified. If the applicant is the sole user/owner or if written permission may be obtained from the other users/owners, the ditch shall be abandoned back to the diversion point prior to the recording of final plat. If abandonment of the ditch may not be obtained relocation of the diversion point and crossing of Durston Road shall be pursued to meet the satisfaction of the City of Bozeman Parks Superintendent. b. The Gallatin Conservation District, .shall be contacted by the applicant regarding any proposed ditch/stream relocation and any required permits (i.e. 310, 404, turbidity exemption, etc.) obtained prior to final plat approval. c. The applicant shall obtain written permission from the existing ditch owners for any proposed relocation prior to final plat approval. . d. If the ditch is not abandoned, pursuant to Section 16.12.050 of the City Code, a 20-foot ditch and utility easement shall be provided on one side of, or 10 feet on either side of the watercourse measured from the high water level. However, it is strongly recommended that this area be established as common open space to preclude future encroachment and maintenance problems which typically occur with ditch easements on private property. 8. The location of and distinction between existing and proposed sewer and water mains and easements shall be clearly depicted on the plans and specifications, as well as nearby fire hydrants and proposed fire hydrants, specifically, the existing 18" sewer main in Durston Road. 9. Sewer and water services shall be approved by the Water/Sewer Superintendent. City of Bozeman applications for service shall be completed by the applicant. The existing house on Lot 1 shall be connected to and served by the City's sewer and water systems. Once connected, the existing septic tank shall . be removed or pumped and filled. and certified by a professional engineer. 10. The dead end water main may be increased to 500 feet in length with the following conditions: a. Services are extended perpendicularly from the main a distance o f no more than 150 feet. b. Any future development will require a fully looped water main. 09-16-96 - 10- c. A blow off or fire hydrant shall be installed at the end of the n ew main. 11. City standard sidewalk shall be installed and properly depicted at the standard location (Le. 1 foot off property line) along Meagher Avenue and Durston Road. Any deviation to the standard alignment or location must be approved by the City Engineer. Sidewalks shall be constructed by lot . owners within three (3) years of plat approval regardless of whether other improvements have been made to the lot(s). 12. All drive approaches shall be constructed in accordance with the City's standard approach, Le., concrete apron, sidewalk section and drop-curb. 13. A waiver of secondary access is recommended for Phase I only. 14. Where project phasing results in dead end streets, temporary cul-de-sacs shall be designed and constructed with each phase. A 50-foot radius temporary easement must be obtained and filed with the County Clerk and Recorder's Office. 15. An encroachment permit must be obtained for the access of Meagher Avenue onto Durston Road. 16. Forty-five (45) feet from the center of Durston Road along the entire southern border, must be dedicated to the public for a road. Thirty-two and a half (32 %) feet from the property line along the entire northern border, must be dedicated to the public for a road. 17. Appropriate street name sign and STOP sign must be provided at the . intersection with Durston Road. 18. Easements for the water and sewer main extensions shall be a minimum of 30 feet in width, with the utility located in the center of the easement. In no case shall the utility be less than 10 feet from edge of easement. All required easements shall be provided prior to final plat approval. 19. All existing utility and other easements must be shown on the Final Plat. The easements currently shown shall be retained and a 10-foot wide utility easement provided along the front property lines of the lots. Two 12-foot utility culverts shall be placed in accordance with the request from Montana Power Company. 20. Sufficient water rights or cash-in-lieu must be provided prior to final plat approval for any given phase. The current phase is comprised of 9 lots; Lots 1-4 of Block 1 and Lots 1-5 of Block 2. 21. If construction activities related to the project results in the disturbance of more that 5 acres of natural ground, an erosion/sediment control plan may be required. The Montana Department of Environmental Quality shall be contacted by the applicant, to determine if a Stormwater Discharge Permit . is necessary. If a permit is required by the State, the developer shall demonstrate to the City full permit compliance. 22. The final plat shall conform to all requirements of the Bozeman Area Subdivision Regulations and the Uniform Standards for Final Subdivision Plats, and shall be accompanied by all required appropriately worded certificates and a Platting Certificate. Corrections shall be made to the Certificate of Dedication as outlined in the staff report. If it is the developer's intent to file the plat prior to the completion of all required improvements, an Improvements Agreement shall be entered into with the City of Bozeman guaranteeing the completion of all improvements in 09-16-96 ... -.-. -...------..--- -.---. ....-.--- .- - 11 - accordance with the preliminary plat submittal information and conditions of approval. If the final plat is filed prior to the installation of all improvements, the developer shall supply the City of Bozeman with an acceptable method of security equal to 1 50 percent of the cost of the remaining improvements. 23. Two clothback, two mylar copies, and a digital copy of the final plat, . acceptable to the Engineering Division of the City of Bozeman, must be submitted with the final plat application. and approve the variances requested to (1) allow the existing house to encroach into the required 25-foot front yard setback, (2) allow the dead end water line for Phase I to exceed 250 feet, and (3) allow Phase I, which contains more than six lots, to be developed without a secondary or emergency access. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Youngman, Commissioner Rudberg and Mayor Stueck; those voting No, none. Ordinance No. 1428 - amending Section 10.32.410. Bozeman MuniciDal Code. to revise structure for overtime Darking fines Previously included in the Commissioners' packets was a copy of Ordinance No. . 1428, as approved by the City Attorney, entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 1428 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, PROVIDING THATTHE BOZEMAN MUNICIPAL CODE BE AMENDED BY REVISING SECTION 10.32.410 OF SAID CODE; PROVIDING FOR INCREASED FINES FOR OVERTIME PARKING VIOLATIONS. It was moved by Commissioner Frost, seconded by Commissioner Youngman, that the Commission finally adopt Ordinance No. 1428, revising Section 10.32.410 of the Bozeman Municipal Code to increase fines for overtime parking violations. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting. Aye being Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Youngman, Commissioner Rudberg, Commissioner Stiff and Mayor Stueck; those voting No, none. . Ordinance No. 1429 - amending Section 12.14.020. Bozeman M~niciDal Code. to Drovide a timeframe for adoDtion of the annual assessment resolution for tree maintenance district which is the same as State statutes Previously included in the Commissioners' packets was a copy of Ordinance No. 1429, as approved by the City Attorney, entitled: 09-16-96 - 12 - ORDINANCE NO. 1429 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, PROVIDING THAT THE BOZEMAN MUNICIPAL CODE BE AMENDED BY REVISING SECTION 12.14.020 OF SAID CODE; PROVIDING FOR THE SAME TIME FRAME AS STATE STATUTE FOR TREE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENTS. . It was moved by Commissioner Youngman, seconded by Commissioner Rudberg, that the Commission finally adopt Ordinance No. 1429, amending Section 12.14.020 of the Bozeman Municipal Code to provide a timeframe for adoption of the annual assessment resolution for tree maintenance district which is the same as State statutes. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting- Aye being Commissioner Youngman, Commissioner Rudberg, Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Frost and Mayor Stueck; those voting No, none. Authorize Mavor to sign - General Proiect DeveloDment and Construction Aareement - between City and Montana DeDartment of TransDortation - CTEP Proiect No. STPE 1209 (1) -South 3rd Avenue Dath City Manager Wysocki reminded the Commission that he had removed this item from the . Consent Items because a member of the public wishes to address the Commission. Mr. Robert Spencer, 2303 South Third Avenue, stated he owns a one-acre lot on the west side of South Third Avenue, just south of its intersection with Kagy Boulevard. He expressed concern that the roadway, which is currently 24 feet wide, is to be widened to 40 feet, with additional right-of-way being needed for the project. He stated that if the road is constructed as it is currently marked, a row of green ash will be removed, along with one extremely large swamp willow tree, and it will be dangerously close to another swamp willow tree. He expressed concern that these are very mature, since they were planted 72 years ago. Mr. Spencer stated that the removal of these trees will change the aesthetic and architectural features of the property, which will result in its devaluation. He further noted that the road will be very close to his front porch, and the driveway will be shortened to the point he will have . no room to turn around, but will be required to back into the street. Responding to Mayor Stueck, Mr. Spencer stated his lot is 165 feet by 265 feet. Further responding to the Mayor, he acknowledged that the trees are located in the public right-of-way. The City Manager reminded the Commission that South Third Avenue is actually an old farm-to-market road that was initially developed in a 60-foot-wide right-of-way. He then 09-16-96 -- - ---..--- - 13 - encouraged the Commissioners to postpone action on this agenda item to allow staff an opportunity to review and respond to Mr. Spencer's concerns. It was moved by Commissioner Rudberg, seconded by Commissioner Stiff, that the Commission delay action on this item until the special meeting to be held on September 30. . The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Rudberg, Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Youngman and Mayor Stueck; those voting No, none. Discussion - FYI Items City Manager Wysocki presented to the Commission the following "For Your Information" items. ( 1 ) Two letters from T. Weaver, 824 O'Connell Drive, dated September 7 and September 6, regarding the curb bulbs on South Willson Avenue and traffic planning, along with copies of articles from the August 7, 1996, edition of the Wall Street Journal. (2) Letter from Betsy Taylor-McGee, 4 Mallard Lane, dated September 10, 1996, . expressing her support of the existing sign code. (3) Petition from nine citizens stating support for enforcement of the current sign ordinance. (4) Minutes of the Parking Commission meetings at City Hall held on July 11 and August 15, 1996. (5) Copy of the Library Services Contract between the City and the County for Fiscal Year 1996-1997. (6) Memo from the County Commissioners' office, dated September 11, forwarding 0 a complaint by a resident within the doughnut area because she cannot vote in City elections. The City Manager reminded the Commission that the City-County Planning Board is comprised of one representative of the Soil Conservation Service, four County Commission . appointees and five City Commission appointees. He suggested that, on that basis, this individual is actually represented by five of the Board members. (7) Copy of a petition from residents of the Legion Villa, dated September 13, 1996, requesting flashing lights and signs at the crosswalk for the Legion Villa and Gallatin County Rest Home. 09-16-96 - 14 - The City Manager stated that, when he initially received this petition, he forwarded it to HKM Associates, the engineering consultant who is assessing Durston Road between North 7th Avenue and North 19th Avenue to determine if the entire roadway needs improvements, or just the intersections. He recognized that, while it is best to incorporate this type of request into . the overall improvements, the residents desire immediate action. (8) Copy of the draft Ordinance No. 1430, extending the moratorium on casinos, which the Commission will consider at its September 30 meeting. (9) Agenda for the Historic Preservation Advisory Commission meeting scheduled for 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, September 17, at the Carnegie Building, along with minutes from their August 27 meeting. (10) Notice that the County Commission will hold no public meeting on Tuesday, September 1 7. (11 ) Agenda for the Development Review Committee meeting to be held at 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday, September 17, 1996 in the Commission Room. ( 12) Agenda for the City-County Planning Board meeting to be held at 7:00 p.m. on . Tuesday, September 17,1996 in the Commission Room. ( 13) The City Manager submitted his weekly report, as follows. (1) Announced that JTL Group has completed the chip and seal and street overlay projects. (2) Stated that he, Commissioner Youngman and Commissioner Rudberg attended the Downtown Bozeman Association meeting two weeks ago. He noted that a long list of "to dos" resulted from that meeting. (3) Stated that he swore in the 36th police officer this past week. (4) Stated that the City was prepared to paved some of the unpaved streets in the northeast sector with millings, and one of the residents protested it. He noted that a neighborhood meeting was held last week in an effort to resolve the issues so the street can be paved. (5) Noted that the irrigation water in Valley Unit Park has been running heavier than it should be because of someone changing the headgates. City crews are currently monitoring the head gates to ensure . that they are not changed, and are working with the ditch company in an attempt to resolve the problem. (6) Met with Mayor Stueck and Park/Cemetery/Forestry Superintendent John McNeil regarding access to Burke Park prior to the joint meeting. (7) Reminded the Commissioners that Interagency Breakfast is scheduled for 7:00 a.m. on Wednesday, September 18, at Bridger Bar-B-Q. (8) Announced that Director of Public Service Forbes 09-1 6-96 - 15 - attended the quarterly meeting with the Department of Environmental Quality on Friday. (9) Announced that between July 16 and August 15, 257 million gallons of water was used, for an average of 8.3 million gallons per day. He noted this is the most water used in a single month in the City's history, attributing that usage to the hot weather. . (14) Commissioner Youngman stated that the meeting with the Downtown Bozeman Association resulted in a long list of issues to be addressed. She noted that the DBA members had a good list of questions and forwarded some ideas worth consideration. (15) Commissioner Rudberg submitted the following. (1) Has been attending the focus group meetings and will continue to do so. (2) Attended several other meetings during the past two weeks, including the City-County Planning Board, kick-off for the Parade of Homes, 9-1-1 Board meeting, Board of Adjustment and the kick-off for United Way, as well as working on a request for proposals. (3) Reminded the Commissioners that she had distributed copies of a proposed resolution which County Commissioner Jane Jelinski has requested be adopted by all of the cities in Gallatin County prior to the Thursday, September 26, meeting with legislators. She noted that the City Manager has requested some changes be incorporated into . the resolution prior to adoption and, in fact, the County will not be adopting it prior to the meeting. (4) Stated she has received several telephone calls about dogs. (5) Noted that at last week's Design Review Board meeting, they discussed the survey results and felt that many of the issues and concerns raised have already been addressed. They felt that the document provided some good, constructive information about meetings and procedures. (6) Attended the meeting of Planning Boards held at the Belgrade Fire sub-station last week, noting it was a well-attended meeting. ( 16) Commissioner Rudberg stated she has been concerned about the fact that North 19th Avenue is located very close to Covered Wagon Mobile Home Park, with no landscaping provided and no monies in the City budget to install any. She stated that, with the excavation for West Oak Street starting, she talked to Rob Buckvich from the local office of the Montana . Department of Transportation, and he indicated a willingness to ask the contractor to move some of that dirt to form berms along North 19th Avenue and West Oak Street adjacent to the mobile home park. Also, the owner of the Covered Wagon Mobile Home Park has indicated a willingness to have the dirt bermed up on his property along those street frontages. She noted that this will help to reduce the noise and intrusion on residents of the park; and it will also 09-1 6-96 ----------- - 16 - serve as a base for landscaping as opportunities arise, possibly through the use of ISTEA monies or some similar source. (17) Commissioner Rudberg stated she called the City of Libby about the skateboard park that was constructed there, and learned that the City had nothing to do with that project. . She noted that the park was completed approximately three years ago. The City Manager stated that skateboard parks were discussed at the last MMIA Board meeting, and it will not insure this type of facility. (18) Commissioner Rudberg noted that a number of "For Your Information" items were included in last week's packet but not discussed at the meeting. She referenced the grant summary, stating she would like additional information, particularly about those grants that will be disappearing over the next few years. The City Manager responded that a discussion of the summary will be placed on an upcoming work session agenda. He then indicated that this information was provided as a result of the topics previously identified by the Commission for potential work session agendas. ( 19) Commissioner Stiff stated that laSt week, he was invited to visit the Rolfe place, . a part of which was the Catron farm, where he grew up. He noted that it was interesting to see the changes that have occurred over the intervening years since he moved from there in 1943. (20) Mayor Stueck submitted the following. (1) Noted the Commissioners have received a letter from the Council for Concerned Citizens, dated September 12, forwarding their concerns about substandard housing and enforcement of the building/housing codes in the community. (2) Gave staff the application for recertification as a Tree City USA. (3) Made a presentation at the Kiwanis Club meeting today. (4) Attended the kick-off celebrations for the Parade of Homes and United Way. (5) Performed a wedding on Peets' Hill on Saturday. (6) Noted that at a recent ORB meeting, the cost of the evaluation of the planning and building processes was estimated at $6,000; in reality, the cost was under $800. (7) Asked for a . future work session agenda item to discuss the evaluation report on the planning and building processes. (21 ) Mayor Stueck noted that he and Commissioner Stiff met with representatives from the Cemetery Board, Recreation and Parks Advisory Board and City staff regarding the fence around the cemetery. He stated that the Recreation and Parks Advisory Board has discussed 09-16-96 - -----.-- ______n____ --.----.- ----.- -- - .--- .-.. --.......-..-. - - 17 - and approved the proposed compromise developed at that meeting, but the Cemetery Board has not yet met on it. Commissioner Stiff stated that Cemetery Board Chair Carroll Henderson has verbally indicated that the Cemetery Board endorses the compromise. e Mayor Stueck noted that, during Development Review Committee review of the Hospital's request for expansion, representatives from the Hospital discussed the possibility of some roadway and parking lot improvements along the north side of their property, which could possibly lead to a cooperative effort between the City and the Hospital for access to Burke Park. The Mayor then highlighted some of the components of the compromise, which includes a 4-foot-high chain link fence along the steep part of the terrain, with hedges to be planted along the fences, and the installation of a road along the south side of the Cemetery to provide access to Burke Park. He stated that the hedge is to be planted when the new well has been drilled and water lines extended to provide irrigation to that portion of the cemetery, since watering of the new plants will be essential. He noted that an immediate expansion of the e Veteran's section of the cemetery is planned, with a new area to be opened along the side edge of the cemetery within the next few years. The City Manager noted that the Harrison Street right-of-way is located 22 feet north of the southern boundary of the cemetery land. He suggested that it may be beneficial to vacate that right-of-way and create a new road alignment that straddles the property line between the City and the Hospital. He then cautioned that the access to Burke Park should be a narrow, gravel access, rather than a "paved super-highway". He also reminded the Commission that the well and irrigation system will cost an estimated $50,000. Responding to Commissioner Frost, the Mayor stated that the City has hedge materials that can be transplanted when the fence is installed. He also noted that trees will be transplanted to further landscape the Burke Park side of the fence. e Commissioner Stiff recognized the important part which the City staff played in the meeting, thanking Park Superintendent John McNeil for his efforts. He also noted that Mayor Stueck chaired the meeting well, encouraging everyone to participate in the compromise process. 09-1 6-96 .. - --.-.-.-- - 18 - Mayor Stueck recognized Park/Cemetery/Forestry Superintendent John McNeil and Cemetery Foreman Tim Murphy for their contributions, noting that they helped to generate the atmosphere necessary for a successful meeting. . Consent Items City Manager Wysocki presented to the Commission the following Consent Items. Proclamation - "United Way Davs" - SeDtember 16 to November 30. 1996 Acknowledge receiDt of aDDlication for annexation - Hinsley DeveloDment for Terrence Corcoran - 23.45-acre Darcel located along south side of Durston Road. immediately west of Greenway Subdivision; refer to staff Authorize City Manager to sign - Amendment No.2 to Aareement with Montana DeDartment of Environmental Quality re transDortation study Authorize Mayor to sign - General Proiect DevelODment and Construction Agreement - between City and Montana DeDartment of TransDortation - CTEP Proiect No. STPE 1299 (5) - landscaDina of entrywavs Authorize Mayor to sign - General Proiect DeveloDment and Construction Agreement - between City and Montana DeDartment of Transportation - CTEP Proiect No. STPE 1299 (6) - Bozeman Ponds trails . Reiect bid for installation of traffic sianal at intersection of North 7th Avenue and West Tamarack Street Reiect bid for installation of traffic signals at intersection of North Willson Avenue and West Mendenhall Street and intersection of Highland Boulevard and East Main Street Commission Resolution No. 3147 - intent to amend 1990 Bozeman Area Master Plan Uodate by add in a a sub-area Dlan for develoDment of the North 19th Avenue/West Oak Street corridor COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3147 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, STATING THE CITY'S INTENT TO AMEND THE 1990 BOZEMAN AREA MASTER PLAN UPDA TE BY ESTABLISHING A SUB-PLAN FOR DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE NORTH 19TH A VENUE/WEST OAK STREET CORRIDOR. Authorize City Manaaer to sian - Chanae Order No. 5 to Hiahland Boulevard Reconstruction - subtract $29.576.40 and 0 calendar davs . ADDrove reDayment schedule for CDBG grantlloan for owner-occuDied rehabilitation . Dar Community Affordable Housina Advisory Board recommendation of SeDtember 4. 1996 ADDlication for TemDOrary Beer and Wine license - Montana Community Shares - SeDtember 20. 1996 - The Mill. 2150 Story Mill Road Reauest for Dermission to conduct 10K CROP Walk for the Hunary - Sundav. October 13. 1 :00 D.m. - limited to sidewalks and walkways 09-1 6-96 - 19 - Reauest from Fire Department for permission to advertise for bids for sale of 1980 Dodge mini-pumper Building Inspection Division report for August 1996 Claims It was moved by Commissioner Stiff, seconded by Commissioner Frost, that the . Commission approve the Consent Items as listed, and authorize and direct the appropriate persons to complete the necessary actions. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Youngman, Commissioner Rudberg and Mayor Stueck; those voting No, none. Recess - 4:13 p.m. Mayor Stueck declared a recess at 4: 13 p.m., to reconvene at 7:00 p.m., for the purpose of conducting the scheduled public hearings. Reconvene - 7:00 p.m. Mayor Stueck reconvened the meeting at 7:00 p.m., for the purpose of conducting the . scheduled public hearings. Proclamation - "Harmonv Month" - September 17 throuah October 8. 1996 Mayor Stueck read the proclamation designating the period September 17 through October 8, 1996, as "Harmony Month" in Bozeman. It was moved by Commissioner Frost, seconded by Commissioner Youngman, that the Commission concur in the Mayor's proclamation of September 17 through October 8, 1996, as "Harmony Month". The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Youngman, Commissioner Rudberg, Commissioner Stiff and Mayor Stueck; those voting No, none. . Mayor Stueck presented the proclamation to Mr. Nick Schrauger, who accepted it on behalf of the Bozeman Chord rustlers. He noted that their group sings in four-part harmony, noting that concept can also be spread to the community. Nearly twenty members of the Chord rustlers serenaded the Commissioners with a medley 09-1 6-96 -----.---- - ----- - 20 - of tunes from "Paint Your Wagon", "Oh, City Commission" and "Teach the Commission to Sing". Public Hearing - Commission Resolution No. 3140 -Ievvina and assessing aarbaae assessments for Fiscal Year 1997 . This was the time and place set for the public hearing on Commission Resolution No. 3140, as approved by the City Attorney, entitled: COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3140 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, ESTABLISHING SOLID WASTE COLLECTION FEES, AND LEVYING AND ASSESSING A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT UPON ALL REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, COUNTY OF GALLATIN, STATE OF MONTANA, UNLESS PROVISIONALLY EXEMPTED, TO DEFRAY THE COST AND EXPENSE OF COLLECTING, REMOVING AND DISPOSING OF SOLID WASTE UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF ORDINANCE NO. 1323, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE NO. 1367, OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN MUNICIPAL CODE. Mayor Stueck opened the public hearing. City Manager Wysocki stated that under this resolution, the base rates for collection of solid waste are established and assessed for this fiscal year. . Ms. Shirley Powell, 8 Teton Avenue, asked what the proposed increase in base rate is to be. Mayor Stueck responded that this resolution reflects an approximate 4-percent increase in the base rate, which is to be $51.82 per dwelling unit for Fiscal Year 1996-1997. Mayor Stueck closed the public hearing. It was moved by Commissioner Youngman, seconded by Commissioner Rudberg, that the Commission finally adopt Commission Resolution No. 3140, levying and assessing assessments for collection of solid waste for Fiscal Year 1996-1997. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Youngman, Commissioner Rudberg, Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Frost and Mayor Stueck; those voting No, none. . Public Hearing - Commission Resolution No. 3141 - levvina and assessing liahtina district assessments for Fiscal Year 1997 This was the time and place set for the public hearing on Commission Resolution No. 3141, as approved by the City Attorney, entitled: 0 9-1 6-96 .-..-.--- .-.--- -......---. - 21 - COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3141 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, LEVYING AND ASSESSING MAINTENANCE AND ELECTRICAL CURRENT COSTS FOR SPECIAL IMPROVEMENT LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN. . Mayor Stueck opened the public hearing. City Manager Wysocki reminded the Commissioners that special improvement lighting districts have been created in some portions of the community, where additional lighting has been requested. He noted that the City pays the electrical costs for those districts throughout the fiscal year, then assesses those actual costs the following October. Responding to Mayor Stueck, the City Manager confirmed that the lighting districts are created at the request of the residents. No one was present to speak in support or in opposition to the levying and assessing of lighting district assessments. Mayor Stueck closed the public hearing. It was moved by Commissioner Rudberg, seconded by Commissioner Stiff, that the . Commission finally adopt Commission Resolution No. 3141, levying and assessing lighting district assessments for Fiscal Year 1996-1997. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Rudberg, Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Youngman and Mayor Stueck; those voting No, none. Public Hearing - Commission Resolution No. 3142 - levvina and assessina delinauent solid waste charges for Fiscal Year 1996 This was the time and place set for the public hearing on Commission Resolution No. 3142, as approved by the City Attorney, entitled: COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3142 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, LEVYING AND ASSESSING A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT UPON CERTAIN SPECIFIED REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, COUNTY OF . GALLATIN, STATE OF MONTANA, TO DEFRAY THE COST AND EXPENSE OF COLLECTING, REMOVING AND DISPOSING OF SOLID WASTE. Mayor Stueck opened the public hearing. City Manager Wysocki stated that there is one delinquent solid waste collection charge from last fiscal year, in the amount of $24.68. 09-1 6-96 .-.. - ---.- ..-.. -.--.----.-.- -----... - 22 - No one was present to speak in support of or in opposition to the assessment of delinquent solid waste charges. Mayor Stueck closed the public hearing. It was moved by Commissioner Stiff, seconded by Commissioner Frost, that the . Commission finally adopt Commission Resolution No. 3142, levying and assessing delinquent solid waste charges for Fiscal Year 1995-1996. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Youngman, Commissioner Rudberg and Mayor Stueck; those voting No, none. Public hearing - Commission Resolution No. 3143 - levving and assessing delinauent sewer charges for Fiscal Year 1996 This was the time and place set for the public hearing on Commission Resolution No. 3143, as approved by the City Attorney, entitled: C OMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3143 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, LEVYING AND ASSESSING A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT UPON . CERTAIN SPECIFIED REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, COUNTY OF GALLATIN, STATE OF MONTANA, UNLESS PROVISIONALLY EXEMPTED, TO COLLECT DElINOUENT SEWER CHARGES PLUS COSTS AND EXPENSES INCURRED BY THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, AS PROVIDED FOR IN SECTION 7-13-4309, MONTANA CODE ANNOTATED. Mayor Stueck opened the public hearing. City Manager Wysocki noted that, as of today, there are ten delinquent sewer charges for last fiscal year, totalling $ 265.78. No one was present to speak in support of or in opposition to the assessment of delinquent sewer charges. Mayor Stueck closed the public hearing. It was moved by Commissioner Frost, seconded by Commissioner Youngman, that the Commission finally adopt Commission Resolution No. 3143, levying and assessing delinquent . sewer charges for Fiscal Year 1995-1996. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Youngman, Commissioner Rudberg, Commissioner Stiff and Mayor Stueck; those voting No, none. 09-16-96 ..--.-----.-.--..- ... n. _.__ __ _uo_ - 23 - Public hearing - Commission Resolution No. 3144 - levying and assessina delinauent snow removal charaes for Fiscal Year 1996 This was the time and place set for the public hearing on Commission Resolution No. 3144, as approved by the City Attorney, entitled: . C OMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3144 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, LEVYING AND ASSESSING A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT UPON CERTAIN SPECIFIED REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, COUNTY OF GALLATIN, STATE OF MONTANA, UNLESS PROVISIONALLY EXEMPTED, TO DEFRAY THE COST AND EXPENSE FOR REMOVAL OF SNOW AND ICE FROM SIDEWALKS IN THE CITY OF BOZEMAN UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 12.24 OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN MUNICIPAL CODE. Mayor Stueck opened the public meeting. City Manager Wysocki stated that, as of today, there are fourteen delinquent snow removal charges for last fiscal year, totalling $1,137.57. No one was present to speak in support of or in opposition to the assessment of delinquent snow removal charges. Mayor Stueck closed the public hearing. . It was moved by Commissioner Youngman, seconded by Commissioner Rudberg, that the Commission finally adopt Commission Resolution No. 3144, levying and assessing delinquent snow removal charges for Fiscal Year 1995-1996. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Youngman, Commissioner Rudberg, Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Frost and Mayor Stueck; those voting No, none. Public hearing - Commission Resolution No. 3145 - levvina and assessina delinauent weed mowina charaes for Fiscal Year 1996 This was the time and place set for the public hearing on Commission Resolution No. 3145, as approved by the City Attorney, entitled: C OMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3145 . A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, LEVYING AND ASSESSING A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT UPON CERTAIN SPECIFIED REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, COUNTY OF GALLATIN, STATE OF MONT ANA, TO COLLECT WEED CUTTING OR EXTERMINATING CHARGES PLUS COSTS AND EXPENSES INCURRED BY THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, AS PROVIDED FOR IN SECTION 7-22-4101, MONTANA CODE ANNOTATED AND CHAPTER 8.36 OF THE BOZEMAN MUNICIPAL CODE. Mayor Stueck opened the public meeting. 09-16-96 - ..-...--.----- - 24- City Manager Wysocki noted that, as of today, there are four delinquent weed mowing charges for last fiscal year, totalling $206.00. No one was present to speak in support of or in opposition to the assessment of delinquent weed mowing charges. . Mayor Stueck closed the public hearing. It was moved by Commissioner Rudberg, seconded by Commissioner Stiff, that the Commission finally adopt Commission Resolution No. 3145, levying and assessing delinquent weed mowing charges for Fiscal Year 1995-1996. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Rudberg, Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Youngman and Mayor Stueck; those voting No, none. Public hearing - Master Plan Amendment - Sub-area Plan for North 19th Avenue/West Oak Street (P-9629) This was the time and place set for the public hearing on the Master Plan Amendment sub-area plan for North 19th Avenue/West Oak Street, as requested by the City-County . Planning Board, under Application No. P-9629. Mayor Stueck opened the public hearing. Senior Planner Dave Skelton presented the staff report. He stated that this proposed sub-area plan would apply to 1,022 acres, part of which lies within city limits and part of which lies just outside city limits, within the jurisdictional area. He noted that the article in Sunday's edition of the Bozeman Daily Chronicle has done an excellent job of establishing the background for this application and discussion. He stated that the study area for this sub-area plan extends along North 19th Avenue from the Interchange to Durston Road and along West Oak Street from North 7th Avenue to Western Drive. He noted that this sub-area plan was prompted by the Planning Board's recognition that a new entryway to the community has been created and, through appropriate long-range planning, an attractive type of development can be encouraged. . He further noted that this will allow the City to guide growth and development along these entryways, rather than being reactionary to specific development proposals. The Senior Planner noted that the City-County Planning Board and staff have spent the last three months developing this proposed sub-area plan, and it reflects the issues raised during public forums and meetings with property owners along these corridors. He noted that 09-1 6-96 - 25 - the public forums identified several general topics of concern, including protecting entryway corridors and urban open space, providing parks and greenbelts, ensuring the use of planned unit development procedures, providing new commercial land while protecting against deterioration of existing commercial property, and providing new jobs as well as affordable . housing. He stated that those concerns and the proposed uses within these corridors were taken into consideration and reflected in the sub-area plan as forwarded by staff. Senior Planner Skelton indicated that, through the review process, five principal goals were identified, and are the basis for the sub-area plan. Those goals include: 1. Promote and enhance North 19th Avenue and West Oak Street as major e ntryways into the city that exemplify the importance of urban open space t o the basic quality of life in Bozeman; 2. Promote the establishment, utilization and/or protection of parkland, open s pace, trail corridors and environmentally sensitive lands in order to provide f or needed community amenities in the study area; 3. Provide for the establishment of commercial and business park areas that e nhance the Bozeman economy while remaining sensitive to existing and p roposed neighborhoods, and while respecting environmental and historic c onditions in the area; . 4. Protect existing neighborhoods and areas designated for future residential development from conflicting land uses; and 5. Provide for public facilities which can accommodate projected growth and f uture development in the area. The Senior Planner reviewed the land use map, as contained in the current 1990 Bozeman Area Master Plan Update and the proposed land use map, as forwarded in this amendment. He highlighted the significant changes, as follows: the northwest Quadrant of North 19th Avenue/West Oak Street from residential to commercial; the southeast quadrant of North 19th Avenue/Baxter Lane from residential to business park; and the northwest quadrant of North 19th Avenue/West Oak Street from residential to limited commercial. He stated another change in the land use map would be from residential to limited commercial on the northwest quadrant of North 19th Avenue/Durston Road, which would bring the land use . designation into compliance with the existing "B-1", Neighborhood Service, and "R-O", Residential--Office, zoning designations. He stated that Gallatin County has also requested that the north ten acres of its Rest Home site, which is located along the south side of West Oak Street, be designated as urban residential infill instead of public lands and open space. 0 9-16-96 .. -..- ."'..-..-..--.- ..-.--..-.------- --- - 26 - Senior Planner Skelton recognized that the designation "limited commercial" is a new one, and is designed to allow uses which serve a limited population and professional offices. He noted that buildings within that designation must architecturally blend with the surrounding residential development, and compatible zoning might be "B-1" or "R-O". The Planner noted . that the "business park" land use designation is also new, and is to encourage development of high technology industries, research establishments, light manufacturing and regional offices which are attractive and blend with the surroundings. He indicated that compatible zoning designations might be "BP", Business Park, or "M-1", Light Manufacturing. The Senior Planner identified the four major property owners in the study area, which include Jerry Perkins and Philip Saccoccia on the east side of North 19th Avenue between West Oak Street and Baxter Lane; Cape/France on both the east and west sides of North 19th Avenue between West Oak Street and Baxter Lane; and Gene Graf on the west side of North 19th Avenue, between Baxter Lane and the interchange. Senior Planner Dave Skelton stated that the 1990 Bozeman Area Master Plan Update contains four criteria by which amendments are to be considered. He noted that those criteria . and the staff's comprehensive findings are contained in the written staff report, which was previously distributed to the Commission. He briefly highlighted those findings and the summary, under which staff forwarded its recommendation for approval. The Senior Planner stated that this proposed amendment establishes five elements for the sub-area plan, which include the revised land use map as previously reviewed. The second element is the transportation plan, which identifies new collectors in the area as being the northward extensions of North 11th Avenue and North 15th Avenue, the westward extension of Juniper Street, and a new east/west collector midway between Baxter Lane and West Oak Street, which is currently unnamed. The third element pertains to identification and protection of environmentally sensitive areas, which may be accomplished through an overlay district. The Senior Planner stated that the fourth element is a parks and open space plan, under which . a network of linear open space corridors, pathways and bicycle routes is anticipated. Four watercourses have been identified in the study area: Mandeville Creek, which extends from Durston Road to Baxter Lane; Walton's Ditch/Farmers' Canal, which extends from Durston Road to Baxter Lane; and East Catron Creek and West Catron Creek, which extend from Durston Road to the interchange. He reminded the Commission that a 70-foot-wide corridor 09-1 6-96 - 27 - is required along each of these waterways, and those could be used in the calculations for open space. He also noted that trails could be installed within these corridors, which could provide an attractive atmosphere for walking. The Senior Planner noted that the fifth element, which is probably the key element, is the . greenway corridor plan. He stated that this plan is anticipated to provide the urban open space and greenbelt which have been identified as necessary to ensure the type of entryway to the community that is desired. Senior Planner Skelton stated that under this sub-area plan, development is to be considered through the planned unit development procedure, which currently exists in the zone code. He stated that, through this type of review, steps can be taken to ensure that high- quality development is promoted. He further noted that a plan for the entire corridor can be considered, thus avoiding the results that piecemeal development can bring. He stated that, through creative landscaping and building design, this corridor should be aesthetically pleasing and an asset to the community. He recognized that a significant amount of concern has been raised about the length of time that the planned unit development process takes. He reviewed . a graph of the timeline for the reviews necessary to develop raw land, beginning with the subdivision process and going through the zoning process. He stressed that the subdivision process and the planned unit development process are essentially parallel and can be accomplished in tandem. He noted that once those processes are completed, a specific application for development of a parcel could be reviewed and approved within three weeks. He stated that if the standard subdivision process and zoning process are followed, the length of review time could actually be longer. Senior Planner Skelton stated that under this plan, both North 19th Avenue and West Oak Street are designated as Class I entryway corridors, which means that all development within 660 feet of the roadway must be reviewed under the planned unit development review process, and a minimum 50-foot-wide front yard setback is required. He emphasized that, . under the Planning Board's recommendation, the core of the study area outside the 660-foot corridor along the roadways would not be subject to the provisions of this plan. He stated, rather, they will be subject to the standard review processes under their zoning designations. He cautioned that the minimum regulations for those districts, as contained in the zone code, are typically viewed by developers as the maximums. 0 9-1 6-96 -.----...--- - __u n_ _ .._ _.._ ----.-.....-- ---...-. .--..--- -... - 28 - The Senior Planner reviewed the reasons that development under this sub-area plan would be preferable to development under the regulations currently in place. He stated that under the existing site plan review processes and the design objectives plans, the mechanisms are in place to ensure that development is appropriate for an entryway corridor. He noted, . however, that those procedures result in piecemeal development since only one project is considered at a time; and there is no mechanism for ensuring that circulation patterns for pedestrians and bicycles are provided. He stated that, through adoption of this sub-area plan, an overall plan for the entryway corridor can be established, with open space corridors and a circulation system that will enhance the area. Senior Planner Skelton stated that, following its public hearing on this sub-area plan at its September 4 meeting and consideration of the four criteria for master plan amendments, the City-County Planning Board voted 10 to 0 to recommend approval, subject to some minor revisions. He encouraged the Commission to recognize the diversity of the Board members and their efforts over the past three months to create a document with which all of them could be comfortable and which addresses the concerns and issues raised by members of the public and . the property owners. Senior Planner Dave Skelton and Associate Planner Dean Patterson gave a slide presentation, along with a narrative about the subject property and how it might be developed. The Senior Planner noted that the property is currently vacant agricultural land, stressing the importance of planning for development of that property to ensure that the Quality of life factors are protected and enhanced. He suggested that, through the installation of boulevard streets, greenbelts and pedestrian ways, the fabric of the area and the entryway can be identified. He encouraged the Commission to carefully consider the Planning Board's recommendation, and to recognize that this is an opportunity to take a proactive role in planning for future development. Mr. Dan Kamp, representing the design team for three of the four major landowners, . distributed to the Commission copies of a proposal for alternative provisions in the sub-area plan. He noted that the issues have been very well identified in Senior Planner Skelton's report. He further noted that the issues critical to Bozeman's future have been enumerated, and assured the Commission that the landowners share in those concerns. He recognized the work that has gone into preparation of this sub-area plan, suggesting that the alternative forwarded 0 9-16-96 -- -- - - ___.n_n__. ______ - 29 - in this proposal could address those concerns while providing an alternative to the planned unit development that is supported by the landowners. Mr. Kamp characterized this proposal as a modification to the Planning Board's recommendation. He stated that it is endorsed by three of the four major landowners, Philip . Saccoccia, Jerry Perkins and Cape/France. He indicated that Mr. Gene Graf will forward his own comments later in this meeting. He noted that under this proposal, wherever reference is made to the planned unit development overlay, the phrase "or alternative development review procedure (ADRP)" would be inserted. He noted that this procedure would be contained in Section 18.43 of the Bozeman Municipal Code, which is the Entryway Corridor section of the zone code. He suggested that the section should include a set of design criteria upon which all parties involved agree, recognizing that this proposal will require revisions to both the master plan and the zone code. Mr. Kamp forwarded proposed procedure and design criteria for the new "alternative development review procedure", noting that all developments within this sub-plan area would be coordinated under site master plans which meet the goals and objectives of this sub-plan. . He indicated that conceptual site master plans and conceptual development guidelines would be sufficient for this process. The conceptual master plans would show general land uses, major streets, pedestrian circulation, trails, stream corridors, open spaces, greenbelts, streetscape and any other significant features. Requests for preliminary approval of a phase would require a more specific site plan and development guidelines. The site master plans shall provide for integrated pedestrian ways adjacent to the corridors and interior public spaces where appropriate. The use of natural corridors would be encouraged for an integrated network of pedestrian ways. He noted that if private open spaces are linked to publicly-owned pedestrian ways, the landowner would retain the right to reasonably control or restrict use of those open spaces. To preserve and enhance the year round views from the roadway, a predominance of evergreen trees would be used, with provisions to ensure the maintenance and . irrigation of all live landscaping. Mr. Kamp stated that under the "alternative development review procedure", the open space requirements for commercial projects would be evaluated on performance and would be a maximum of 20 percent. It could include all maintained private or public open space or other publicly accessible areas or gathering places, parking lot landscaping and pedestrian trails. 09-16-96 - 30- Also, if the entire 50-foot setback from the roadway is landscaped and maintained to meet the viewshed and pedestrian concerns, 50 percent of that area could be applied to the open space requirements. He indicated that if an applicant chooses to incorporate lands beyond the entryway corridor boundary into the master plan, open space in that area could be credited . toward the open space requirements, provided it is a significant portion of the project land base. Open space credits would also be given if parking areas adjacent to the entryways are totally screened from view by depressing them or screening them with berms and evergreens or other landscape treatments. Mr. Dan Kamp suggested that if projects are developed under the planned unit development process which currently exists, applicants should be allowed to add land to Rose Park in lieu of up to 50 percent of the open space requirements or 100 percent of any parkland dedication requirement. He noted that this would provide a mechanism for increasing the size of Rose Park, which has been identified as desirable for designation as a regional park. Mr. Kamp recognized that, to optimize use of the parcels, it will be essential to subdivide. He noted that two of the property owners have always intended to master plan their parcels . prior to subdivision, to maximize the value of the property and to meet the subdivision requirements for parcels in the entryway corridor. He indicated that under the "alternative development review procedure", the master plan would be reviewed as a part of the subdivision review process. As projects are developed, the buildings would be reviewed in light of the entryway corridor guidelines to ensure that they comply. Mr. Kamp noted that Mr. Gene Graf has developed a conceptual plan for development of his entire parcel. He noted that under this proposed alternative process, those portions of the parcels lying within the entryway overlay corridor would go through a similar conceptual plan review, with each building being reviewed and approved individually before being constructed. He suggested that, with this substantial amount of review, steps can be taken . to ensure an attractive and integrated entryway. He stated that the "alternative design review procedure" meets the concerns of the staff, Planning Board and City Commission and is acceptable to the major property owners. Mr. Bill Rolfe, 2501 North 19th Avenue, stated that the roadway has already taken a 140-foot strip of what had been good agricultural land . He expressed concern that, with the setback requirements and the open space requirements proposed, another significant portion 09-1 6-96 - 31 - of agricultural land will be used to retain what has been identified as necessary to maintain the natural beauty of the area. He questioned how much that will cost the property owners, and how much more good agricultural land will be taken up for those purposes. Mr. Rolfe asked the Commissioners to consider whether it can afford this proposed plan, stating he does not . believe the landowners should be required to bear the costs. Mr. Rolfe noted that if a 50-foot-wide landscape buffer is required along each side of North 19th Avenue, the swath for the roadway will essentially be 240 feet wide, and that concerns him. He noted that the land in the community is quickly being eaten up, and houses are being built in the mountains. He concluded by stating that roadways should take no more space than absolutely necessary, cautioning that this plan will result in eliminating even more agricultural land than is required. Mr. Gene Graf, 3025 Langohr Avenue, distributed copies of his testimony, forwarded in a letter dated September 1 6. He stated that he does not believe his property should be included in this sub-area master plan. He reminded the Commission that his 167-acre parcel has already been rezoned, in compliance with the current master plan, and is the subject of a . conceptual master plan. He noted that that conceptual master plan includes open space for wetlands, waterways and trails and provides berming along North 19th Avenue. Also, the street plan is intended to provide a much greener appearance and less blacktop along the road corridor. He expressed concern that imposing this overlay zone on his property would require starting the development process over. He also noted that the property along the east side of North 19th Avenue, north of Baxter Lane, is not included in this proposed sub-area plan. Mr. Graf reminded the Commission that the North 19th Avenue interchange has become a reality several years earlier than it might have been because Senator Max Baucus became involved in obtaining demonstration funds to do so. He stated that, as a part of this project, he donated 13 % acres to be used as part of the City's match. Mr. Gene Graf estimated that development of his parcel will take forty to fifty years. He . stated that, to date, he and his development team have spent a considerable amount of time and effort in envisioning the type of development that is desired and in preparing the conceptual master plan to guide development in that direction. He suggested that the ability to provide an entryway which is different from North 7th Avenue, North Rouse Avenue, West Main Street and East Main Street is one of the biggest marketing tools they have available. He 09-1 6-96 --..-------.--."'... ------..-.. . - 32 - stated that, to ensure the type of development envisioned by the City, he is willing to enter into an agreement with the City to provide open space. He reiterated, however, that he does not believe his parcel should be included in this sub-area plan. Mr. Dick Rolfe, 2525 North 19th Avenue, stated that he grew up in an agricultural . setting along what is now the North 19th Avenue corridor. He expressed concern that this proposed plan infringes on property owners' rights, and it will encourage urban sprawl. He recognized that the community is not the same as it was 42 years ago. He stated, however, that he wishes to continue the agricultural use of the land which his parents currently own; and he does not want to be under any type of land use plan that takes that option away. Mr. Rolfe expressed his frustration that, while he lives outside city limits, the use of his land is impacted by those who govern the City. He then forwarded his support for Mr. Graf's comments, characterizing his conceptual master plan as a beautiful proposal that reflects a lot of thought. Mr. Rolfe recognized that open space may be nice. He encouraged the Commissioners to remember, however, that providing open space within developments along this entryway will . decrease the amount of development that can occur and will simply encourage greater urban sprawl. He also expressed concern that maintaining the green spaces will require a significant amount of water, serving to compound any potential water problems in the future. He recognized that providing natural corridors along water ways makes a lot of sense, indicating that he could support those open spaces. Mr. Rolfe noted that this is still a "melting pot community", with a large percentage of the population living here an average of four or five years. He stated that, because of this high turnover in population, the landowners' concerns should be weighed more heavily than general public comments. He concluded by encouraging the Commission to consider these issues when acting on this proposed sub-area master plan. Mr. Lowell Springer, architect representing Cape/France, recognized the good job which . the Planning staff and Planning Board have done in developing a good sub-area plan in a short period of time. He encouraged the Commissioners to recognize how close everyone is to agreeing on the plan, with only one modification being forwarded by three of the four major property owners. He assured the Commission that the same goals and objectives will be addressed through the "alternative design review procedure" as will be addressed through the 09-1 6-96 - 33 - planned unit development process. He stated that, as a result of the last Planning Board meeting, the property owners' representatives felt that they had been encouraged to provide this alternative for Commission consideration. He noted that both the Planning Board and the property owners recognize the amount of time and effort that staff has put into developing the . sub-area plan, and they further recognized that the property owners could be responsible for development and submittal of this alternative proposal. He encouraged the Commissioners to carefully consider this alternative proposal as it acts on the master plan amendment. Mrs. Anne Banks, 7 Hill Street, member of the Recreation and Parks Advisory Board, thanked the Planning staff and Planning Board for their efforts to develop a plan to provide for a visionary approach to development of the North 19th Avenue corridor rather than a piecemeal approach. She forwarded her appreciation for the goal to establish parkland, open space and green corridors and to protect environmentally sensitive areas; however, she forwarded some concerns about implementation of that goal. She forwarded her interest in having the open spaces along the stream corridors and ditch corridors designated as public lands, recognizing that may require a revision to the zone code. She expressed concern that if those areas are . not designated as public lands, it may be possible to close them to public access. She expressed concern that all of the stream corridors run north/south, and no east/west corridors have been identified to create a network of trails that can be easily used. Mrs. Banks noted that Rose Park currently contains 21 to 26 acres, and she is not sure there is a mechanism in place for adding to that park as proposed under the alternative forwarded by the property owners. She stated that the Recreation and Parks Advisory Board views Rose Park as a community park rather than a regional park, and they feel that 50 acres would be a good size. Mrs. Banks stated her support for adoption of the master plan amendment, noting that the alternative forwarded by the property owners is worth consideration. She noted that, by its adoption, the Commission will help to ensure that piecemeal development of this entryway . is avoided. Ms. Rebecca Dorobis, 1000 North 17th Avenue, submitted to the Commission a petition containing 130 signatures in support of the sub-area master plan as forwarded by the Planning staff and Planning Board. She stated that the proposed planned unit development process gives current residents a more secure feeling because they recognize that community interests 09-16-96 - --- . .---- - -----.. - - . ----- - 34- will be taken into consideration when development proposals are being considered. She forwarded her concerns about buffering between existing residential development and the proposed commercial development. She noted that when North 19th Avenue was constructed, only a small grassed strip was provided between the roadway and the Covered Wagon Mobile . Home Park, and that has become a used car lot. She concluded by encouraging the elected officials to represent the best interests of the community in their decision. Mrs. Lisa Hardiman, 1000 North 17th Avenue, stated the Montana People's Action is concerned about development along North 19th Avenue, particularly since 203 families with many small children live along that roadway. She noted that there is significant pressure to develop any available land at the present time. She expressed concern that, under the planned unit development criteria, a Wal-Mart could be constructed along this entryway and the parking lot could be considered open space. She stated that it is not in anyone's best interests to allow that type of development in this area. She recognized that the landowners have rights; however, she stated that people in the community also have rights that must be taken into consideration. She encouraged the landowners to be good neighbors and forward their . proposals for development to the residential neighbors for their review and input. Dr. Pat Pardis, 1616 Durston Road, stated he lives at the corner of North 17th Avenue and Durston Road. He noted that Durston Road serves as a main connector between North 19th Avenue and North 7th Avenue, and its character has changed over the past few years. He stated that when he purchased the home six years ago, Durston Road had some semblance of a residential neighborhood street, characteristic of the R-3 zoning along it. He noted projections suggested that when North 19th Avenue was completed and when West Oak Street was completed, congestion on Durston Road would be relieved. He noted that with the completion of North 19th Avenue, however, congestion has actually increased; and he is concerned that the extension of West Oak Street will not relieve the situation. He characterized his property as a buffer for others living along North 17th Avenue. He is . concerned that, because of losing its residential character, his property is losing its value, and he does not feel that he can sell his house to a family with children. He asked the Commission to remember in the future that placing residential development along a busy street is not in anyone's best interests. 09-16-96 - 35 - Mrs. Claudia Foster, 719 North Wallace Avenue, Chair of the Bozeman Area Beautification Advisory Board, read into the record a letter of support for the sub-area plan, dated September 13. She noted that entryway corridors define the community's character and appearance, providing a visitor's first impression. She recognized that residents of the . community will also be impacted by the character and appearance of this entryway. Mrs. Foster stated the Board feels efforts should be made to retain as much of the natural beauty in the area as possible, while providing for quality development. She noted that care must be taken to avoid strip development, particularly with its lack of landscaping and architectural elements. She suggested that this entryway corridor could set a precedent for future developments, thus leading the community into the 21 st century. Mrs. Foster suggested that if there were some way to retain agricultural land within the open space along this corridor, it could be to everyone's benefit. She noted that, not only could it reduce the need for irrigation, it could help to retain the agricultural flavor of the area. Mr. Bert Hopeman, President of the Downtown Bozeman Association and Chair of the Downtown Improvement District Board, stated that both bodies have been very interested in . the development of this sub-area plan. He stated that the downtown businesses are dependent on visitors to the community, and the business owners are concerned that the new entryway be developed in an attractive manner, to encourage people to enter the community. He noted that if it is developed as the other entryways have been, business owners are concerned that tourists will not be attracted, and their businesses could be negatively impacted. Mr. Hopeman noted that since he has been in Bozeman, he has seen the North 7th Avenue entrance improve. He forwarded his appreciation to the Planning Board and the City Commission for their interest in ensuring that this new entryway is developed in an attractive manner, characterizing this as a fifty-year decision. He noted that once development occurs, it takes a long time to change it. Mr. Hopeman stated that both the Downtown Bozeman Association and the Downtown . Improvement District Board support the plan as forwarded by the Planning staff and Planning Board. He noted that neither group is opposed to commercial development; they wish to avoid unattractive development. Mr. Hopeman quickly addressed the alternative proposal, which would reduce the open space to 20 percent, with several options for obtaining credits. He cautioned that if this 09-16-96 .---.---.... - 36 - alternative is considered, steps should be taken to ensure that an attractive configuration of open space is provided so that the integrity of the entryway is not compromised. Mr. Keith Swenson, 603 South Willson Avenue, suggested that if the Commission wishes to consider the "alternative design review procedure" forwarded by Mr. Dan Kamp on behalf . of the major property owners, it should refer the proposal back to the Planning Board for its review and recommendation before taking action. He recognized that the alternative plan may have merit, but he feels the community should be given an opportunity to review it and forward input prior to the decision being made. He stated that the downtown business owners support the proposed change from residential to commercial, but they feel it is important to provide a mechanism to ensure the type of development that occurs is the type that is desired. He stated that the proposed planned unit development process will accomplish that, although he recognized that another type of review might also ensure the same results. Mr. Swenson noted that nine years ago, he and Mr. Kamp served on an ad hoc committee appointed by the Commission to consider what types of changes were needed in the City's master plan and zone code, and the "T", transitional, zones resulted. He noted that . this zoning designation generated a significant amount of concern in the community because each proposal was considered on its own merits rather than having a specific list of uses allowed in each zoning district. He encouraged the Commission to avoid that type of situation in the future, suggesting that the proposal forwarded by the Planning board could help to ensure consistency and desirability of development. Mr. Bill Mowen, 315 Griffin Drive, stated that he has purchased a lot in the Walker Planned Unit Development, which is located just north of the North 19th Avenue interchange. He owns a small business in Bozeman; and he felt that by purchasing a lot in a planned unit development, he would be assured of the type of development occurring around him and that the value of his lot would be retained. He characterized this as a long-term investment with security. He noted that one of the previous speakers spoke about the deteriorating property . values on Durston Road. He stated, however, that six years ago, most of the residents in the community recognized what was going to happen along that roadway. Mr. Mowen stated his support for the sub-area master plan with the planned unit development review process. He noted that this will help to ensure quality development along the entryway, and further ensure that property values are not negatively impacted by 09-16-96 -. ..----. - 37 - undesirable development. He stated that under these stringent guidelines, development similar to North 7th Avenue can be avoided. Mr. Chuck Paden, 507 Ice Pond Road, noted that in 1990 and 1991, when review of the master plan and zone code was underway, he was one of the community members who spent . many hours attending meetings and providing input on proposed changes. He noted that the new plans are based on performance, and the planned unit development process ensures that those performance standards are met. He noted that such review, with provision for public input, is essential to ensure that new development is completed in accordance with zoning regulations and in the manner that is identified and approved during the review process. He stated that this proposed master plan amendment will provide for an overall master plan of the area, under which development will occur, rather than encountering the problems that can arise with the piecemeal approach to development. Mr. Paden questioned whether it is appropriate to change from residential to commercial land use designations along North 19th Avenue; however, he noted that through the planned unit development process, the kind of controls on quality can be implemented. He . characterized this conversion in land use designation as a "giving" rather than a "taking" because it gives the property owners an opportunity to make money. He stressed that, in so doing, the City must take the necessary steps to protect the public welfare through integrated planning and zoning processes. He recognized that, no matter what decision the Commission makes on this master plan amendment, the property will be developed, and the property owners will realize a tidy return on their investments. He noted the result will be a legacy with which the community must live for many years. He encouraged the Commission to carefully consider this proposed amendment, noting that it will help to ensure that the desired type of growth is realized. Mr. Bob Hawks, 703 West Koch Street, reminded the Commission of the period of time . when the "T", Transitional, zoning designation was in place, characterizing it as a nightmare. He noted that under this proposed amendment, the concept for development in the area will be in place and that will result in a uniform policy under which everyone can be treated fairly. He stated that this approach is preferable to a piecemeal approach, and encouraged the Commission to approve the amendment. 09-1 6-96 - 38 - Mrs. Lynn Husby, 403 North 20th Avenue, stated she is neutral on the proposed planned unit development process; however, she is concerned about the proposed changes in land use. She characterized the existing road system as not working, including North 19th Avenue and Durston Road, and the cut through traffic is negatively impacting North 20th Avenue once . again. She stated that, with commercial development being added along North 19th Avenue, the amount of traffic will increase, thus increasing the cut through traffic in the neighborhood. Mrs. Husby questioned why the land use designation on the property on the northwest corner of Durston Road and North 19th Avenue is being changed to commercial, particularly in light of the traffic problems it will create. Mrs. Husby noted that affordable housing has been a priority of the Commission and the community for quite some time, and she feels that the North 19th Avenue corridor could lend itself to that type of development. She suggested that big commercial buildings will not buffer the residential areas as much as may be anticipated. She concluded by encouraging the Commissioners to remember the residential streets, particularly North 20th Avenue, in their deliberations. . Mr. Steve Kirchhoff, 516 South 6th Avenue, stated that he was raised in Bozeman, lived in Chicago for eight years and just recently returned to Bozeman. He noted that, in his trips between Bozeman and Chicago, he learned to use the secondary highways instead of the interstate system because the interstates are basically non-stop commercial development. He stated that Bozeman has changed substantially over the past eight years, and he is concerned that more commercial development will lead to more headaches. He encouraged the Commissioners to take a step back and determine what type of development is needed, rather than reacting to what it views as the inevitable. He also encouraged the Commissioners to not approve a proposal that will result in urban sprawl; however, he recognized that development under an overall plan is preferable to a piecemeal approach. . Mr. Frank Eckes, 2201 Maplewaad Street, stated he has attended all of the meetings on this issue. He commended the Planning staff and the Planning Board for their efforts in developing the proposed master plan amendment under consideration. He stated that, while he does not agree with all parts of the amendment, he feels it is a good proposal overall. He suggested that, through development of limited commercial areas along North 19th Avenue, it may be possible to alleviate some of the traffic. He then stated that, through appropriate use 09-1 6-96 -- - ---.-.-.-...-. ~ 39 - of the limited commercial areas, possibly through the development of professional office buildings, residents in Brentwood Subdivision will actually be buffered from North 19th Avenue by daytime activities. He characterized this as preferable to residential development, which would likely be in the form of rentals, which are often noisy in the evenings and which are . often not well maintained. He further cautioned that the lawns around rental units are often not watered, suggesting that the "green space" could quickly become "brown space". Mr. Eckes recognized that the community will not get a second chance at developing this entryway, so he encouraged the Commission to make sure it is done right. He stated the developers seem to be in a hurry to develop, questioning why. He concluded by encouraging the Commission to approve the master plan amendment, even though he does not fully agree with it. Ms. Donna McKinney, 1000 North 17th Avenue, stated that North 19th Avenue is located just outside her front door. She stated that her main concern is how the area immediately across North 19th Avenue will be developed and how it will be beautified. She noted that when she first moved into her mobile home, there was a ditch with a hedge on top . of it; and those were removed when the road was built. She indicated her interest in seeing that type of buffer provided again, noting that when it was there, residents of the Covered Wagon Mobile Home Park were not impacted by the development of the Brentwood Subdivision. She encouraged the Commissioners to ensure that appropriate development occurs along this corridor, complimenting Mr. Graf on the conceptual master plan for development of his parcel. Mayor Stueck stated that the Commission had briefly talked earlier today, on an informal basis, about keeping the public hearing open for written comment, to allow an opportunity for responses to the alternative proposal submitted by Mr. Kamp. He then suggested that the Commission consider establishing a deadline of 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday, October 2, for written comment. . Commissioner Frost noted that the Commissioners have received a number of letters and petitions pertaining to this master plan amendment, which are to be entered into the record. Senior Planner Skelton responded to some of the questions and issues raised during the public hearing. He stated that both North 19th Avenue and West Oak Street would be Class I entryways, which means there would be a 660-foot strip on each side that would be subject 09-1 6~96 - 40 - to the planned unit development process. He recognized that this impacts a 1 ,300-foot swath through the properties involved. He then stated that a 25-foot front yard setback is required for residential and commercial development as a part of the zone code. Under this proposal, an additional 25-foot front yard setback would be required, providing for additional open space . along the corridor. He recognized that the pedestrian walkways could be provided within this 50-foot buffer, although it could also be located within the project if the developer so chose. He indicated that the entryway overlay corridor does not apply to the 1-90 corridor. Commissioner Rudberg reminded the residents in Covered Wagon Mobile Home Park that they are located in the county, not in the city. She stated, however, that the City is working with the Montana Department of Transportation to get the dirt from excavation of West Oak Street placed to serve as berms along North 19th Avenue and West Oak Street, to provide some buffering for the residents. Responding to Questions from Commissioner Youngman, Senior Planner Skelton stated that the issue of buffering existing residential development from future commercial development will be addressed during the zoning process, rather than under this master plan amendment . process. He encouraged the Commissioners to limit their discussion and consideration to the text amendment, its goals and objectives, recognizing that through the planned unit development process or some similar process, those goals and objectives will be addressed. He reminded the Commission that the master plan amendment is conceptual in nature, providing guidance for the zoning process and any attendant amendments. Senior Planner Skelton encouraged the Commissioners to remember that this is a 30 to 50-year plan. He noted that the traffic impacts have not yet been identified. He further noted, however, that human behavior and attitudes suggest that if one has to stop for five seconds at a stop light, there are traffic problems. He recognized that the alternative plan forwarded by Mr. Kamp has some good merits, asking that the Planning staff be given an opportunity to review it in greater detail. . Responding to Mayor Stueck, the Senior Planner stated that the master plan amendment should provide the strategies for performance and the criteria. He noted that the specific steps to implement those issues will then be addressed through the zoning process. He then assured the Commissioners that the implementation of this amendment will remain in their hands, through creation of an overall plan under whatever review procedure is deemed appropriate. 09-1 6-96 - 41 - Responding to questions from the Mayor, Planning Director Andy Epple stated that he feels the proposal forwarded by the major property owners should be carefully reviewed. He suggested that it may have merit. He noted that a master plan for the entire area, which provides for a unified type of development, will provide the greatest benefit to the community . and ensure an attractive entryway. Mayor Stueck recognized Planning Director Epple, his staff and the Planning Board for the amount of time and effort they have put into preparation of this proposed master plan amendment. He also thanked Mr. Dan Kamp and his clients and design team for the alternative proposal which they have forwarded. He stated that everyone agrees that open space and amenities are essential components for creating the best entryway corridor possible. He recognized that this is a 50-year plan and that the development which occurs under the plan will be something with which the community must live with for an extended period of time. Responding to Commissioner Frost, Senior Planner Skelton recognized that changing the land use designation from residential to commercial will result in the loss of potential parkland in this area. He stated that the parkland dedication on the property located east of North 19th . Avenue and north of West Oak Street designated for residential development would be 13.9 acres; on the west side of North 19th Avenue north of West Oak Street would be 2.65 acres, and south of West Oak Street would be 6.5 acres. He encouraged the Commissioners to remember that parkland is only one element of urban open space. Responding to Commissioner Stiff, Senior Planner Skelton stated that some of the proposals forwarded during this hearing, if implemented, would require cooperation among property owners in the area. He noted that if this can be accomplished, the result could benefit the entire community. The Senior Planner reminded the Commission that since this is a master plan amendment, the County Commission must also approve it. He noted that it is scheduled for public hearing . before them on Monday, September 23. at which time they will probably delay action because of the City Commission's delay of action. He then reminded the Commission that the City- County Planning Board members are appointed by each of the governing bodies. Responding to questions from the Commission, City Attorney Luwe stated that the Commission could address the alternative forwarded by Mr. Kamp as a part of the information submitted during the public hearing. He suggested that if, after careful review it is determined 09-1 6-96 _.., 'u_u_._____ .- . - 42 - the proposal is materially different from what was advertised for public hearing, it may be necessary to go back through the public hearing process to obtain public input. City Manager Wysocki suggested that copies of this proposal could be made available in the Clerk of the Commission's office, and the public could respond during the period for . accepting written testimony. Responding to Commissioner Frost, Senior Planner Skelton stated it would be possible to submit the alternative proposal to the City-County Planning Board at tomorrow night's meeting, for their review. He indicated that the Board members could then individually forward written comments prior to the October 2 deadline, or the Board could take a formal position on it. Responding to Mayor Stueck, the Senior Planner stated that this master plan amendment process is sliding behind schedule because of a two-week delay prior to reaching the Planning Board and the anticipated three-week delay in the Commission's decision. He encouraged the Commission to remember that this is a 50-year plan, and to not hasten the process. Commissioner Rudberg forwarded concern about the possibility of allowing residential . development along North 19th Avenue, noting that a noise expert has cautioned against it. She further noted that the existing residential development along North 19th Avenue is showing signs of deterioration. She then suggested that the proposed limited commercial area along the west side of North 19th Avenue could be extended to the stream corridor, which could provide a natural buffer between commercial and residential uses. Mr. Lowell Springer noted that the Planning Board was preparing to vote when that issue was suggested at their meeting. He further noted that at that time, the Planning Director cautioned that suggestion was not a part of the advertised public hearing. Mayor Stueck thanked everyone for their attendance at this meeting and their input. It was moved by Commissioner Stiff, seconded by Commissioner Frost, that the Commission close the public hearing to verbal comments and extend the period for accepting . written testimony to 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday, October 2, 1996, and direct staff to place the decision on this master plan amendment on the October 7 agenda during the 3:00 p.m. session. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Youngman, Commissioner Rudberg and Mayor Stueck; those voting No, none. 0 9-16-96 - -.....--.---- . _ou., ... _____ - 43 - Adjournment - 10:15 c.m. There being no further business to come before the Commission at this time, it was moved by Commissioner Frost, seconded by Commissioner Youngman, that the meeting be adjourned. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being . Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Youngman, Commissioner Rudberg, Commissioner Stiff and Mayor Stueck; those voting No, none. { r;J0'? L ~~J DON E. STUECK, Mayor ATTEST: GJ~/ ~ ROBIN L. SULLIVAN Clerk of the Commission . . 09-16-96