Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 08- 1730 Amending Chapter 3.24, Impact Fees ORDINANCE NO. 1730 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, AMENDING CHAPTER 3.24, IMPACT FEES, BMC TO CONFORM TO REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAW, ADOPT UPDATED TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES, INCORPORATE AND ADOPT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED BY STATE LAW. Preamble WHEREAS, the City of Bozeman is committed to addressing the community's expressed needs and desires for services; and WHEREAS, the City of Bozeman is committed to meeting those desires and demands for services in a fiscally responsible manner; and WHEREAS, the City of Bozeman is committed to meeting those desires and demands for services in a manner which recognizes the fiscal and legal interest of all of the system users now and in the future and not a limited subset of users; and WHEREAS, the City of Bozeman has developed and adopted an impact fee capital improvements program, which distinguishes current and future transportation needs and provides a lawful, logical, balanced, operationally sound, and cost effective basis upon which to maintain and develop the City's transportation system; and WHEREAS, Sections 7-6-1601 through 7-6-1604, MCA provide specific authority and guidance about the necessary documentation to establish an impact fee and procedures to adopt and administer an impact fee; and WHEREAS, The City of Bozeman adopted an impact fee program in 1996 through ordinance 1414; and, WHEREAS, Bozeman has commissioned updates to the impact fee studies which calculate the cost of individual impact fees; and, WHEREAS, the State of Montana adopted Sections 7-16-1601 through 7-16-1604 providing guidance to local governments regarding impact fees and establishing certain standards for impact fee adoption; and, WHEREAS, Bozeman wishes to update its ordinance relating to impact fees to incorporate newly adopted studies for transportation facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City of Bozeman retained Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. to analyze and assess growth and development projections and capital improvement needs in order to determine the additional demand per unit of land use created by new development for transportation facilities anticipated to be placed on the City as a result of new development; and, WHEREAS, Tindale-Oliver & Associates reviewed the existing demand and needs for transportation facilities, the existing facilities available to meet that demand, and the method of financing the existing systems and needed new facilities; and, WHEREAS, Tindale-Oliver & Associates additionally reviewed the contribution made or to p.1 be made in the future in cash or by taxes, fees, or assessments by property owners towards the capital costs of transportation facilities; and, WHEREAS, Tindale-Oliver & Associates reviewed and relied upon the City of Bozeman's current level of service (LOS) standards and facility cost assumptions in recommending transportation impact fees; and, WHEREAS, Tindale-Oliver & Associates has prepared a transportation impact fee study dated October 31, 2007 (the Fee Study), including the assumptions, population and residential and non-residential development projections, capital infrastructure and impact fee calculations, which study has been submitted to and reviewed by City staff and officials; and, WHEREAS, the Fee Study and the City's capital improvement and facilities plans are based on a level of service standard as established in Section 18.44.060.D ofthe Bozeman Municipal Code and the roadway capacities indicated in the 2001 Greater Bozeman Transportation Plan Update which are hereby incorporated by reference; and WHEREAS, in addition to the Fee Study, Tindale-Oliver & Associates and the City have prepared, updated, and relied upon other documentation, as required by section 7-6-1602 of the Montana Code Annotated, in developing the transportation facilities impact fees adopted pursuant to this Ordinance (collectively, the "Impact Fee Data and Analysis"), including but not limited to the following: (1) 2001 Greater Bozeman Transportation Plan Update; (2) Title 18, Unified Development Ordinance; BMC; (3) Design and Specifications Manual; (4) Street Impact Fee Capital Improvement Program; (5) Capital Improvements Program for General Fund, Street Maintenance Fund, and Street Impact Fee Fund; (6) the City of Bozeman Trip Characteristics Study, Final Report, dated August, 31 2007; (7) the City Budget; and (8) Specified bid tabulations. WHEREAS, the Fee Study and Impact Fee Data and Analysis are hereby incorporated and approved for purposes of developing and implementing transportation impact fees in accordance with Montana law; and WHEREAS, the Fee Study has been presented to and reviewed by the City's Impact Fee Advisory Committee and the City Commission and the City Commission has, determined that: (1) impact fees are necessary to offset the costs to the City associated with meeting the transportation facility demands created by projected new residential and non-residential development in order to maintain the existing levels of service (LOS) currently provided to City residents and relied upon in the Fee Study and supported by other Impact Fee Data & Analysis; (2) the amount of the impact fees recommended in the Fee Study are reasonably related and p.2 attributable to new development's share of the cost of infrastructure improvements made necessary by such development; (3) the expenditure of impact fees, pursuant to the terms of this Ordinance, will result in a beneficial use to such new development reasonably related to the impact fees, per dwelling unit, by type and per increment of non-residential development; (4) the recommended impact fees do not include the cost to correct any existing deficiencies in the transportation system or for operation or maintenance costs; (5) the amount of the impact fees recommended in the Fee Study to not exceed a proportionate share of the costs incurred or to be incurred by the City in accommodating the development, based on the identified need for transportation system improvements required to serve new development and the non-impact fee contributions new development is reasonably anticipated to make in the future; (6) the data and analysis relied upon in the Fee Study, including trip characteristics, trip exchange district, travel, and other demographic data, are representative of existing travel conditions in Bozeman, and, WHEREAS, based on the findings and recommendations set forth in the Fee Study and the Impact Fee Data and Analysis, the benefits resulting from impact fee expenditures for transportation facility improvements to be constructed with impact fee revenues is citywide and therefore the City has determined that onc transportation service area, as established by this Ordinance, is appropriate; and WHEREAS, based on the findings and recommendations set forth in the Fee Study and the Impact Fee Data and Analysis, Central Business District land uses have reduced impacts on the transportation system; and WHEREAS, the City has prepared and will update on an annual basis impact fee capital improvement plans and documentation that include transportation improvements to ensure that new development paying impact fees under this Ordinance receive a beneficial use from facilities constructed through the expenditure of impact fees, as required by law; and, WHEREAS, the 2001 Greater Bozeman Area Transportation Plan Update currently is being updated and upon completion of said plan, the City will evaluate the effects, if any, of the update on impact fees imposed by this Ordinance and will take appropriate action, as necessary, to ensure no fee payer subject to this Ordinance has or will pay more than its proportionate share of the costs to mitigate its impacts on the transportation system as provided herein; and WHEREAS, the City has and will continue to designate impact fee revenues solely for the purpose of providing transportation system capital improvements required to accommodate new development and has and will continue to implement its impact fee capital improvement program to ensure impact fee revenues are not used to correct existing deficiencies in facilities or to fund operations and maintenance costs; and WHEREAS, this Ordinance is necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of Bozeman; and WHEREAS, the Impact Fee Advisory Committee has reviewed and made recommendation p. 3 regarding the impact Fee Study and revisions to ordinance and that recommendation has been received by the City Commission; and, WHEREAS, the Consultant assisting the City of Bozeman in the preparation of the transportation impact fee program did receive and respond to public comment and when appropriate made revisions to the draft Fee Study; and WHEREAS, the amendments were the subject ofa public hearing held on November 26, 2007. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY the Bozeman City Commission: Section 1 That Chapter 3.24 ofthe Bozeman Municipal Code be amended so that it reads: Chapter 3.24 IMPACT FEES Sections: 3.24.010 Legislative Findings 3.24.020 Authority and Applicability 3.24.030 Intent 3.24.040 Definitions 3.24.050 Transportation Impact Fees 3.24.060 Fire Protection Impact Fees 3.24.070 Water Impact Fees 3.24.080 Wastewater Impact Fees 3.24.090 Refunds of Development Impact Fees Paid 3.24.100 Credits Against Development Impact Fees 3.24.110 Miscellaneous Provisions 3.24.010 Legislative Findings The City Commission of the City of Bozeman, Montana finds that: A. The protection of the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of the city requires that the street, fire protection, water, and wastewater systems of the city be expanded and improved to accommodate continuing growth within the city and within those areas directly served by its Fire Department and within those areas connected to its water and wastewater systems. B. New residential and nonresidential development imposes increased and excessive demands upon existing city facilities. p.4 C. New development often overburdens existing public facilities, and the tax revenues generated from new development often do not generate sufficient funds to provide public facilities to serve the new development. D. New development is expected to continue and will place ever-increasing demands on the city to provide public facilities to serve new development. E. The creation of an equitable development impact fee system would enable the City to impose a proportionate share of the costs of required improvements to the city's transportation, fire protection, water, and wastewater systems on those developments that create the need for them. F. All types of development that are not explicitly exempted from the provisions ofthis chapter will generate demand for city's transportation, fire protection, water, and wastewater services or facilities that will require improvements to city facilities and equipment. G. The city's transportation impact fee study, dated October 31, 2007, prepared by Tindale-Oliver & Associates and as updated, and the fire impact fee study dated October 1995 and as updated, prepared by James Duncan and Associates, and water and wastewater impact fee studies dated July 2007, prepared by HDR Engineering, set forth reasonable methodologies and analyses for determining the impacts of various types of development on the city's street, fire protection, water and wastewater systems and for determining the cost of acquiring land and the cost of acquiring or constructing facilities and equipment necessary to meet the demands for such services created by new development. H. The City establishes as city standards the assumptions and service standards referenced in the impact fee studies and other duly adopted documents as part of its current plans for the transportation system and for the city's fire protection, water, and wastewater systems. 1. The documentation required by 7-6-1602, MCA is collectively contained in the City's facility plans, impact fee studies, development regulations, financial records, capital improvements program, design and specification manual, and other city documents. 1. The development impact fees described in this chapter are reasonably related to the service demands and needs of new development and are based on the above-cited impact fee studies and documentation and do not exceed the costs of acquiring additional land and the costs of acquiring or constructing additional facilities or equipment required to serve the new developments that will pay the fees. K. All transportation improvements upon which the transportation impact fees are based and upon which transportation impact fee revenues will be spent, based on the limitations set forth in this chapter will benefit all new development in the city; and it is, therefore, appropriate to treat the entire city as a single service area for purposes of calculating, collecting, and spending the transportation impact fees, while recognizing differences in the demand for service based upon the identified factors set forth in the transportation impact fee study. L. All of the fire protection improvements listed in the fire impact fee study will benefit all new development that receives fire protection service directly from the City Fire Department; and it is, therefore, appropriate to treat the entire city and all properties p. 5 served directly by the City Fire Department as a single service area for purposes of calculating, collecting, and spending the fire protection impact fees. M. All ofthe water system improvements listed in the water impact fee study will benefit all new development that connects to the city water system; and it is, therefore, appropriate to treat the entire city and all properties connected to the city water system as a single service area for purposes of calculating, collecting, and spending the water impact fees. N. All of the wastewater system improvements listed in the wastewater impact fee study will benefit all new development that connects to the city wastewater system; and it is, therefore, appropriate to treat the entire city and all properties connected to the city wastewater system as a single service area for purposes of calculating, collecting, and spending the wastewater impact fees. O. There is both a rational nexus and a rough proportionality between the development impacts created by each type of development covered by this chapter and the development impact fees that such development will be required to pay. P. The City's facility planning, capital improvement program, development review, and bidding processes crcate a public process by which, on a specific and detailed basis, the capacity expanding components of construction can be identified and funded distinctly from those components which are not capacity expanding by providing for evaluation by the City and the Impact Fee Advisory Committee of future needs relatcd to growth, identification of applicable funding sources, and monitoring of construction and payments. Q. This chapter creates a system by which development impact fees paid by new developments will be used to expand or improve the city transportation, fire protection, water, and wastewater systems in ways that benefit the dcvelopment that paid each fee within a reasonable period of time after thc fee is paid. R. This chapter creates a system under which development impact fees shall not be used to cure existing dcficiencies in public facilities or to pay maintenance or operations costs associated with providing public facilities. 3.24.020 Authority and Applicability A. This chapter is enacted pursuant to the city's selfMgovemment powers, the authority granted to the City by the Montana State Constitution, Sections 7-6-1601 through 7-6- 1604, and Sections 7-1- 4123, 7-1-4124, 7M3A313, 7-7-4404, 7M7-4424, 7-13M4304, and 69-7-101 of the Montana Code Annotated. B. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all of the territory within the limits of the city. C. The provisions of this chapter related to the fire protection impact fees shall also apply to all properties located outside the city that are served directly by the City Fire Department. D. The provisions of this chapter relatcd to water impact fees shall also apply to all properties located outside the city that are connected to the city watcr system. E. The provisions of this chapter relatcd to wastewater impact fecs shall also apply to all properties located outside the city that are connected to the city wastcwater system. 3.24.030 Intent p.6 A. This chapter is adopted to help implement the comprehensive plan of the city, the city's 2001 transportation plan update prepared by Robert Peccia & Associates, and as updated, the September 2006 draft of the water facility plan prepared for the City by Allied Engineering and Robert Peccia and Associates, and as updated, and the May 2006 draft of the wastewater facility plan prepared for the City by HDR Engineering and Morrison-Maierlie, Inc., and as updated. B. The intent of this chapter is to ensure that new development bears a proportionate share of the cost of improvements to the city transportation, fire protection, water, and wastewater systems; to ensure that such proportionate share does not exceed the cost of the transportation, fire protection, water, and wastewater facilities and equipment required to serve such new developments; and to ensure that funds collected from new developments are actually used to construct improvements to the city transportation, fire protection, water, and wastewater systems that reasonably relate to the benefits accruing to such new developments. C. It is the further intent of this chapter that new development pay for its proportionate share of public facilities through the imposition of development impact fees that will be used to finance, defray, or reimburse all or a portion of the costs incurred by the City to construct improvements to the city transportation, fire protection, water, and wastewater systems that serve or benefit such new development. D. It is not the intent ofthis chapter to collect any money from any new development in excess of the actual amount necessary to offset new demands for transportation, fire protection, water, or wastewater improvements generated by that new development. E. It is not the intent of this chapter that any monies collected from any development impact fee and deposited in an impact fee fund ever be co-mingled with monies from a different impact fee fund or ever be used for a type of facility or equipment different from that for which the fee was paid. 3.24.040 Definitions A. "Central Business District" (CBD) means land uses established within the B-3, "Central Business District," zoning district. B. "Development" means any construction or expansion of a building, structure, or use, any change in use of a building or structure, or any change in the use of land, which creates additional demand for public services. C. "Development impact fees" means the transportation impact fee, fire protection impact fee, water impact fee, and wastewater impact fee established by this chapter. D. "Development Impact Fees Review Committee" means the committee composed of the Impact Fee Coordinator, the Building Official, the Director of Public Service, the Fire Chief, and the Director of Planning and Community Development, or their designees appointed to serve in the member's place at a meeting. E. "Encumber" means to legally obligate by contract, or otherwise commit to use by appropriation or other official act ofthe City. F. "Impact Fee Capital Improvement Program" means the capital improvements program for the transportation system, the city fire protection system, and the city water and wastewater systems, which shall assign monies from each impact fee fund to specific projects and related expenses for improvements to the type of facilities or services for which the fees in that fund were paid, and shall not include improvements needed to correct existing deficiencies or operations or maintenance costs. p. 7 G. "Impact Fee Coordinator" means the Director ofthe City's Department of Planning and Community Development or the Director's designee. H. "Impact fee funds" means the transportation impact fee fund, fire protection impact fee fund, water impact fee fund, and wastewater impact fee fund established by this chapter. 1. "Impact fee studies" means the transportation impact fee study, dated October 31, 2007, prepared by Tindale-Oliver & Associates and as updated, and the fire impact fee study, dated October 1995 and as updated, prepared by James Duncan and Associates, and the water and wastewater impact fee studies dated May 2007, prepared by I-lOR Engineering. J. "Improvement" means planning, land acquisition, engineering design, construction inspection, on-site construction, off-site construction, equipment purchases, and financing costs associated with new or expanded facilities, buildings, and equipment that expand the capacity of a facility or service system and that have an average useful life of at least ten years. "Improvement" does not include maintenance, operations, or improvements that do not expand capacity. K. "Independent fee calculation study" means a study prepared by an applicant for a building permit or water or wastewater connection permit calculating the cost of expansions or improvements to the city's transportation, fire protection, water, or wastewater systems required to serve the applicant's proposed development; that is performed on an average cost (not marginal cost) methodology; uses the service units and unit construction costs stated in the impact fee studies; and is performed in compliance with any criteria for such studies established by this chapter or by the City. L. "Initiation of construction" means the date ofthe preconstruction meeting with the City Engineer or his/her designee, or the date of the first visible change in the physical condition of the improved site caused by the first person furnishing services or materials to effect construction of the improvement, whichever occurs first. M. "Project-related improvements" means site-related improvements including, without limitation, all access streets adjacent to the proposed development or leading only to the proposed development and not included on the transportation system; all streets and driveways within the development; all acceleration, deceleration, right, or left turn lanes leading to any streets and driveways within the development; all traffic control devices for streets and driveways within the development; all water lines or facilities adjacent to, leading to, or located within the development and serving only the development; all wastewater lines or facilities adjacent to, leading to, or located within and serving only the development; and all off-site improvements necessary for thc safety and code compliance of a development. Credit for incidental improvements shall not be allowed. The presumption shall be made that the minimum improvement needed to serve a project shall be deemed to be a project improvement even if additional capacity is thereby created that may be potentially used by other developments presently or in the future. N. "Transportation system" means capacity-adding improvements to collectors or arterial roads of three lanes or more, which are included on the 2001 Greater Bozeman Transportation Plan Update or the City's impact fee capital improvement program, and which will benefit new development as required by law and this chapter. Themtransportation system includes only those bicycle and pedestrian facilities built in conjunction with and included in a capacity-adding transportation facility improvement p.8 otherwise eligible for impact fee funding pursuant to the terms of this chapter. The "transportation system" does not include project-related improvements. O. "Trip Exchange District" means a defined geographic area that meets the following criteria, pursuant to the transportation fee study and an independent fee calculation study as provided in section 3.24.050(B)(3), BMC: 1. The use of shared and consolidated parking; 2. A high degree of pedestrian and bicycle access to and throughout the proposed development; 3. The availability of public transit; 4. Extensive trip capture within the proposed development where trips to the proposed development result in visits to multiple businesses in the area via a mode other than automobile; The following additional physical development characteristics are associated with trip exchange district land uses: 1. The majority of buildings associated with the proposed development are multi-story buildings, often more than two stories; 2. Diverse business proprietorships within the development; 3. Primary use at the ground floor is commercial; 4. The majority of individual businesses within the development are less than 20,000 square feet; 5. Structures within the development are in near to each other and the public street (with small or no setbacks); 6. Having a high percentage building coverage on the lot and typically in excess of 0.5; and 7. The physical characteristics are shared among the entire business area, not just one or a few of the businesses. 8. The area should be at least 50% developed as measured by lot area utilized. 9. The area is the subject of a city enforceable common plan of development, such as an urban renewal plan. 3.24.050 Transportation Impact Fees A. Imposition of Transportation Impact Fees 1. On or after March 23, 1996, any person who seeks to obtain any of the following forms of development approval is required to pay a transportation impact fee in the amount specified in Table 3.24.050: a. A building permit; b. Any other permit that will result in the construction of improvements that will generate additional traffic; or c. Any extension of any such permit that was issued before the effective date of this chapter;; or d. Any delayed payment of impact fees as specified and approved by the City Commission in accordance with the BMC Title 17, Chapter p. 9 2 for Workforce Housing Lots. 2. Notwithstanding the above subsection, no impact fee shall be imposed earlier than the issuance of a building permit for developments requiring a building permit. 3. No permits of the types described in Subsection A(l) of this section shall be issued until the transportation impact fee described in this chapter has been paid, unless the development for which the permit is sought is exempted by Subsection F of this section. B. Computation of Amount of Transportation Impact Fee 1. An applicant required by this chapter to pay a transportation impact fee may choose to have the amount of such fee determined pursuant to either Subsection (B)(2) or (B)(3) of this section. The amount ofthe fee calculated pursuant to either Subsection (B)(2) or (B)(3) shall be subject to the following adjustment: a. F or the first expansion of an existing nonresidential building, the amount calculated shall not include the amount calculated for the expansion of up to thirty percent as compared with its size on February 22, 1996, or two thousand square feet, whichever is less. b. The transportation impact fees adopted are those shown in Table 3.24.050, BMC and as updated as provided for in this Chapter. 1. Beginning on February 16,2008 the amount of the fee collected shall be sixty percent (60%) ofthe amount calculated. 2. Unless an applicant requests that the City determine the amount of such fee pursuant to Subsection (B)(3) of this section, the City shall determine the amount of the required transportation impact fee by reference to Table 3.24.050. The fee amounts set forth in such table include credits for expected future receipts of state and federal highway funds and expected future receipts of gas tax revenues, and all other non-impact fee sources of funding anticipated to be made by or as a result of new development to be applied to the transportation improvements required to serve new development. a. If the applicant's development is of a type not listed in Table 3.24.050, then the City shall use the fee applicable to the most nearly comparable type or land use in the table. In making a decision about which use is most nearly comparable, the City shall be guided by the most recent edition of "Trip Generation: An Information Report" prepared by the Institute of Transportation Engineers; or if such publication is no longer available, then by a similar publication. If the City determines that there is no p. 10 comparable type of land use listed in the table, then a new fee shall be determined by: 1. Finding the most nearly comparable trip generation rate from the above publication; and 2. Applying the formula set forth in Subsection (B)(3)(d) of this section. b. Ifthe applicant's development includes a mix ofthose uses listed in Table 3.24.050, then the fee shall be determined by adding up the fees that would be payable for each use if it were a freestanding use pursuant to Table 3.24.050. c. If the applicant is applying for an extension of a permit issued previously, then the fee shall be the net increase between the fee applicable at the time of the current permit application and any transportation impact fee previously paid pursuant to this chapter for the same structure. In the event that the fee applicable at the time of the current permit application is lower than the transportation impact fee previously paid pursuant to this chapter for the same structure, there shall be no refund of transportation impact fees previously paid. d. If the applicant is applying for a permit to allow a change of use or the expansion, redevelopment, or modification of an existing development, the fee shall be based on the net positive increase in the fee for the new use as compared to the previous use. However, no new fee shall be imposed unless an additional unit of service demand is created, in accordance with Table 3.24.50. Ifnecessary to determine such net increase, the City shall be guided by the most recent edition of "Trip Generation: An Information Report" prepared by the Institute of Transportation Engineers; or if such publication is no longer available, then by a similar publication. In the event that the proposed change of use, expansion, redevelopment, or modification results in a net decrease in the fee for the new use or development as compared to the previous use or development, there shall be no refund oftransportation impact fees previously paid. 3. An applicant may request that the City determine the amount of the required transportation impact fee by reference to an independent fee calculation study for the applicant's development prepared by qualified professional traffic engineers and/or economists at the applicant's cost and submitted to the City Engineer. Any such study must show the traffic engineering and economic methodologies and assumptions used, including, but not limited to, those forms of documentation listed in Subsections (B)(3)(a) and (B)(3)(b) of this section and must be acceptable to the City pursuant to Subsection (B)(3)( c) of this section. p. 11 a. Traffic engineering studies must include documentation of trip generation rates, trip lengths, any percentage of trips from the site that represent net additions to current trips from the site, the percentage of trips that are new trips as opposed to pass-by or divert-link trips, and any other trip data for the proposed land use. b. Economic studies must include documentation of any special factors that the applicant believes will reduce the traffic volumes otherwise attributable to the proposed land use. c. The City shall consider all such documentation and any independent fee calculation study submitted by the applicant, but shall not be required to accept any such study or documentation that the City deems to be inaccurate or unreliable and may request that the applicant submit additional or different documentation for consideration. Any independent fee calculation study submitted by an applicant may be accepted, rejected, or accepted with modifications by the City as the basis for calculating transportation impact fees. d. Upon acceptance, or acceptance with modifications, of an independent fee calculation study and documentation, the City shall use the following formulas to determine the transportation impact fee: Net Impact Fee = Total Impact Cost - Gas Tax Credit - Ad Valorem Credit Where: Total Impact Cost = ((Trip Rate x Assessable Trip Length x % New Trips) / 2) x (1 -Interstate Adj. Factor) x (Cost per Lane Mile / A vg. Capacity Added per Lane Mile) Total Gas Tax Credit = Present Value (Annual Gas Tax Credit), given 4.6% interest rate & 25-year facility life Annual Gas Tax Credit = (((Trip Rate x Total Trip Length x % New Trips) / 2) x Effective Days per Year x $lGallon to Capital) / Fuel Efficiency And where: Trip Rate = the average daily trip generation rate, in vehicle-trips/day Assessable Trip Length = the actual average trip length for the category, in vehicle miles Total Trip Length = the assessable trip length plus an adjustment factor of half a mile is added to the trip length to account for the fact that gas taxes are collected for travel on all roads including local roads % New Trips = adjustment factor to account for trips that are already on the roadway Divide by 2 = The total daily miles of travel generated by a particular category (i.e., rate X length X % new trips) is divided by two to prevent the double-counting of travel generated among land use codes since every trip has an origin and a destination. p.12 Interstate Adjustment Factor = adjustment factor to account for the travel demand occurring on interstate highways (15.0%) Cost per Lane Mile = unit cost to construct one lane mile of roadway, in $/lane mile($3,678,522 per study and will be subject to inflationary adjustments) A verage Capacity Added per Lane Mile = represents the average daily traffic on one travel lane at capacity for one lane mile of roadway, in vehicles/lane-mile/day (8,658 per study) Cost per Vehicle Mile of Capacity = unit cost to construct to provide a vehicle mile of capacity ($472.92 per study) Present Value = calculation of the present value of a uniform series of cash flows, gas tax payments in this case, given an interest rate, "i," and a number of periods, "n;" for 4.6% interest and a 25-year facility life, the uniform series present worth factor is 14.6768 Effective Days per Year = 365 days $/Gallon to Capital = the amount of gas tax revenue per gallon of fuel that is used for capital improvements, in $/gallon ($0.102) Fuel Efficiency = average fuel efficiency of vehicles, in vehicle- miles/gallon (17.70) C. Payment of Transportation Impact Fee 1. An applicant for any ofthe permits or extensions listed in Subsection (A)(1) of this section shall pay the transportation impact fee required by this chapter to the City prior to the issuance of any such permit. 2. All funds paid by an applicant pursuant to this chapter shall be identified as transportation impact fees and shall be promptly deposited in the transportation impact fee fund described in Subsection D of this section. D. Transportation Impact Fee Funds 1. A single transportation impact fee fund is created and such fund shall be maintained in an interest bearing account. 2. Such fund shall contain only those transportation impact fees collected pursuant to this chapter and any interest which may accrue from time to time on such amounts. E. Use of Transportation Impact Fee Funds. The monies in the transportation impact fee fund shall be used only as follows: 1 To acquire land for and/or acquire or construct capacity-adding capital improvements to the transportation system reasonably related to the benefits accruing to new development subject to the terms of this chapter, in accordance with the requirements of Montana law; or 2 To pay debt service on such capital improvements to the transportation system; or 3 For purposes of refunds or credits, as described in Sections 3.24.090 or 3.24.100(G)); and 4. May not be used for a. operations or maintenance purposes; b to correct existing deficiencies; or p.13 c. for bicycle or pedestrian facilities not built in conjunction with and included in a capacity-adding transportation system facility, otherwise eligible for impact fee funding. F. Exemptions from Transportation Impact Fee 1. The following types of development shall be exempted from payment of the transportation impact fee: a. Alterations, remodeling, rehabilitations, expansions of existing buildings, or other improvements to an existing structure where no additional vehicle trips will be produced over and above those produced by the existing use; b. Construction of accessory buildings or structures that will not produce additional vehicle trips over and above those produced by the primary building or land use; c. The replacement of a destroyed or partially destroyed building or structure with a new building or structure of the same size and use where no additional vehicle trips will be produced over and above those produced by the original building or structure; d. The installation or replacement of a mobile home on a lot or a mobile home site when a transportation impact fee for such lot or site has previously been paid pursuant to this chapter or where a mobile home legally existed on such site on or prior to the effective date of this chapter; e. Any other type of development for which the applicant can demonstrate that the proposed land use and development will produce no more vehicle trips from such site over and above the trips from such site prior to the proposed development, or for which the applicant can show that a transportation impact fee for such site has previously been paid in an amount that equals or exceeds the transportation impact fee that would be required by this chapter for such development. 2. Any such claim for exemption must be made no later than the time when the applicant applies for the first permit or a type listed in Subsection (A)(1) of this section for the proposed development, and any claim for exemption not made at or before that time shall have been waived. 3. The City Manager or his designee shall determine the validity of any claim for exemption pursuant to the criteria set forth in Subsection (F)(l) of this section. TABLE 3.24.050 The following transportation impact fees apply to developments not located in the Central Business District or a designated Trip Exchange District. ITE LUC Land Use Unit Fee* RESIDENTIAL: p.14 ITE LUC Land Use Unit Fee* 210 Single Family (Detached) Less than 1,500 sf and very low income(2) du $2,171 Less than 1,500 sf and low income (3) du $3,147 Less than 1,500 sf du $3,968 1,500 to 2,499 sf du $5,396 2,500 sf or larger du $6,082 220 Apartments du $3,339 230 Residential Condominium! Townhouse du $2,946 240 Mobile Home Park du $1,593 LODGING: 310 Hotel room $3,063 320 Motel room $1,678 RECREATION: 430 Golf Course hole $12,295 411 City Park acre $546 444 Movie Theaters 1,000 sf $6,463 INSTITUTIONS: 610 Hospital 1,000 sf $6,023 620 Nursing Home bed $381 520 Elementary School student $315 530 High School student $477 540 University (7,500 or fewer students) (4) student $609 550 University (more than 7,500 students) (4) student $529 560 Church! Synagogue 1,000 sf $2,428 565 Day Care 1,000 sf $7,433 OFFICE: 710 50,000 sf or less 1,000 sf $3,977 710 50,001-100,000 sf 1,000 sf $3,623 710 100,001-200,000 sf 1,000 sf $3,084 710 greater than 200,000 1,000 sf $2,460 720 Medical Office 1,000 sf $9,584 RETAIL: 820 under 50,000 sf 1,000 sf $9,378 820 50,000-99,000 sf 1,000 sf $9,587 820 100,000-199,000 sf 1,000 sf $9,331 820 200,000-299,000 sf 1,000 sf $8,567 820 greater than 300,000 sf 1,000 sf $8,144 812 Building Material! Lumber 1,000 sf $21,209 813 Discount Super-Store 1,000 sf $26,996 817 Nursery/Garden Center 1,000 sf $18,903 851 Convenience Store 1,000 sf $44,607 931 Quality Restaurant 1,000 sf $22,036 934 Fast Food Rest wI Drive- Thru 1,000 sf $61,225 841 New/Used Auto Sales 1,000 sf $12,033 890 Furniture Store 1,000 sf $1,684 p.15 ITE LUC Land Use Unit Fee* 912 Bank! Savings Drive-in 1,000 sf $31,706 INDUSTRY: 110 General Light Industrial 1,000 sf $2,290 140 Manufacturing 1,000 sf $1,250 150 Warehouse 1,000 sf $1,627 151 Mini - Warehouse 1,000 sf $810 (1) Source: Transportation Impact Fee Study, Appendix F, Table F.1 (2) Defined as 50% of city median income based on 2007 Gallatin County Average Median Income (AMI) (3) Defined as 80% of city median income based on 2007 Gallatin County Average Median Income (AMI) (4) Impact fee to be assessed on structures with classroom facilities. All auxiliary structures such as administrative buildings and research centers are to be charged at the office land use rate. The following transportation impact fees apply to developments located in the Central Business District or within a designated Trip Exchange District. ITE LUC Land Use Unit Fee* RESIDENTIAL: 210 Single Family (Detached) Less than 1,500 sf and very low income(2) du $2,171 Less than 1,500 sf and low income(3) du $3,147 Less than 1,500 sf du $3,968 1,500 to 2,499 sf du $5,396 2,500 sf or larger du $6,082 220 Apartments du $3,339 230 Residential Condominium! Townhouse du $2,946 240 Mobile Home Park du $1,593 LODGING: 310 Hotel room $2,835 320 Motel room $1,333 RECREATION: 430 Golf Course hole $4,333 411 City Park acre $182 444 Movie Theaters 1,000 sf $2,333 INSTITUTIONS: 610 Hospital 1,000 sf $6,023 620 Nursing Home bed $381 520 Elementary School student $315 530 High School student $477 540 University (7,500 or fewer students) (4) student $609 550 University (more than 7,500 students) (4) student $529 560 Church/Synagogue 1,000 sf $2,428 565 Day Care 1,000 sf $7,433 OFFICE: p.16 ITE LUC Land Use Unit Fee* 710 50,000 sf or less 1,000 sf $3,187 710 50,001-100,000 sf 1,000 sf $2,911 710 100,001-200,000 sf 1,000 sf $2,475 710 greater than 200,000 sf 1,000 sf $1,974 720 Medical Office 1,000 sf $9,584 RETAIL: 820 under 50,000 sf 1,000 sf $5,284 820 50,000-99,000 sf 1,000 sf $5,452 820 100,000-199,000 sf 1,000 sf $5,182 820 200,000-299,000 sf 1,000 sf $5,115 820 greater than 300,000 sf 1,000 sf $4,999 812 Building Material/Lumber 1,000 sf $21 ,209 813 Discount Super-Store 1,000 sf $26,996 817 Nursery/Garden Center 1,000 sf $18,903 851 Convenience Store 1,000 sf $44,607 931 Quality Restaurant 1,000 sf $6,009 934 Fast Food Rest w/ Drive- Thru 1,000 sf $22,164 841 New/ Used Auto Sales 1,000 sf $12,033 890 Furniture Store 1,000 sf $1,684 912 Bank! Savings Drive-in 1,000 sf $24,133 INDUSTRY: 110 General Light Industrial 1,000 sf $2,290 140 Manufacturing 1,000 sf $1,250 150 Warehouse 1,000 sf $1,627 151 Mini - Warehouse 1,000 sf $810 (1) Source: Transportation Impact Fee Study, Appendix F, Table F-2 (2) Defined as 50% of city median income based on 2007 Gallatin County Average Median Income (AMI) (3) Defined as 80% of city median income based on 2007 Gallatin County Average Median Income (AMI) (4) Impact fee to be assessed on structures with classroom facilities. All auxiliary structures such as administrative buildings and research centers are to be charged at the office land use rate. *Compiler's Note: The Transportation Impact Fees listed in this formula shall be adjusted annually as per 3.24.IIO.K. 3.24.060 Fire Protection Impact Fees A. Imposition of Fire Protection Impact Fees 1. On or after March 23, 1996, any person who seeks to obtain: a. A building permit; or b. Any other permit that will result in construction that will generate demand for fire protection services; or p.17 c. Any extension of any such permit that was issued before the effective date of this chapter, is required to pay a fire protection impact fee in the amount specified in this chapter; or d. Any delayed payment of impact fees as specified and approved by the City Commission in accordance with the BMC Title 17, Chapter 2 for Workforce Housing Lots. 2. No permits of the types described in Subsection (A)(l) of this section shall be issued until the fire protection impact fee described in this chapter has been paid, unless the development for which the permit is sought is exempted by Subsection F of this section. B. Computation of Amount of Fire Protection Impact Fee 1. An applicant required by this chapter to pay a fire protection impact fee may choose to have the amount of such fee determined pursuant to either Subsection (B)(2) or (B)(3) of this section. The amount ofthe fee calculated pursuant to either Subsection (B)(2) or (B)(3) ofthis section shall be subject to the following adjustment: p.18 a. F or the first expansion of an existing nonresidential building, the amount calculated shall not include the amount calculated for the expansion of up to thirty percent as compared with its size on February 22, 1996, or two thousand square feet, whichever is less. 2. Unless an applicant requests that the City determine the amount of such fee pursuant to Subsection (B)(3) of this section, the City shall determine the amount of the required fire protection impact fee by reference to Table 3.24.060. a. If the type of development that a permit is applied for is not listed in Table 3.24.060, then the City shall use the fee applicable to the most nearly comparable type or land use in the table. b. If the type of development that a permit is applied for includes a mix of those uses listed in Table 3.24.060, then the fee shall be determined by adding up the fees that would be payable for each use ifit were a freestanding use pursuant to Table 3.24.060. c. If the applicant is applying for an extension of a permit issued previously, then the fee shall be the net increase between the fee applicable at the time of the current permit application and any fire protection impact fee previously paid pursuant to this chapter for the same structure. In the event that the fee applicable at the time of the current permit application is lower than the fire protection impact fee previously paid pursuant to this chapter for the same structure, there shall be no refund of fire protection impact fees previously paid. d. If the applicant is applying for a permit to allow a change of use or for the expansion, redevelopment, or modification of an existing development, the fee shall be based on the net increase in the fee for the new use as compared to the previous use. In the event that the proposed change of use, expansion, redevelopment, or modification results in a net decrease in the fee for the new use or development as compared to the previous use or development, there shall be no refund of fire protection impact fees previously paid. 3. An applicant may request that the City determine the amount of the required fire protection impact fee by reference to an independent fee calculation study for the applicant's development prepared at the applicant's cost by qualified professional fire protection experts and/or economists and submitted to the City Fire Chief. Any such study shall be based on the same service standards and unit costs for fire protection used in the fire impact fee study prepared by James Duncan and Associates dated October 1995 and as updated, and must document the economic methodologies and assumptions used. Any independent fee calculation study submitted by an applicant may be accepted, rejected, or accepted with modifications by the City as the basis for calculating fire protection impact fees. If such study is accepted or accepted with modifications as a more accurate measure of the demand for new fire protection facilities and equipment created by the applicant's proposed development than the applicable fee shown in Table 3.24.060, then the fire p.19 protection impact fee due under this chapter may be calculated according to such study. C. Payment of Fire Protection Impact Fees 1. An applicant required by this chapter to pay a fire protection impact fee shall pay such fee to the City prior to the issuance of any of the permits listed in Subsection (A)(I) of this section. 2. All funds paid by an applicant pursuant to this chapter shall be identified as fire protection impact fees and shall be promptly deposited in the fire protection impact fee fund described in Subsection D ofthis section. D. Fire Protection Impact Fee Funds 1. A single fire protection impact fee fund is created and such fund shall be maintained in an interest bearing account. 2. Such fund shall contain only those fire protection impact fees collected pursuant to this chapter and any interest which may accrue from time to time on such amounts. E. Use of Fire Protection Impact Fee Funds. The monies in the fire protection impact fee fund shall be used only: 1 To acquire or construct fire protection improvements within the city; or 2 To pay debt service on any portion of any future general obligation bond issue or revenue bond issue used to finance the acquisition or construction of fire protection improvements within the city; or 3 As described in Sections 3.24.090 or 3.24.100(0). F. Exemptions from Fire Protection Impact Fee 1. The following types of development shall be exempted from payment of the fire protection impact fee: a. Reconstruction, expansion, or replacement of a previously existing residential unit that does not create any additional residential units. b. Construction of unoccupied accessory units related to a residential unit. c. Projects that the applicant can demonstrate will produce no greater demand for fire protection from such land than existed prior to issuance of such permit. d. Projects for which a fire protection impact fee has previously been paid in an amount that equals or exceeds the fire protection impact fee that would be required by this chapter. 2. Any such claim for exemption must be made no later than the time when the applicant applies for the first permit of a type listed in Subsection (A)(I) of this section for the proposed development, and any claim for exemption not made at or before that time shall have been waived. 3. The City Manager or his designee shall determine the validity of any claim for exemption pursuant to the criteria set forth in Subsection (F)( 1) of this section. p.20 Table 3.24.060 FIRE PROTECTION IMP ACT FEE SCHEDULE TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT FIRE PROTECTION IMP ACT FEE RESIDENTIAL Single-Family Detached $178.61 per unit Single-Family Attached $149.99 per unit Duplex $112.49 per unit Multi-Family $ 81.90 per unit Mobile Home $ 81.90 per unit OFFICE/INSTITUTIONAL PER 1.000 SQUARE FEET Under 10,000 square feet $ 90.79 Between 10,000 and 49,999 square feet $174.66 50,000 square feet and over $350.31 COMMERCIAL/HOTEL PER 1.000 SQUARE FEET Under 10,000 square feet $174.66 Between 10,000 and 49,999 square feet $266.43 Between 50,000 and 99,999 square feet $441.10 100,000 square feet and over $524.97 INDUSTRIAL PER 1.000 SQUARE FEET Under 10,000 square feet $174.66 Between 10,000 and 49.999 square feet $350.31 50,000 square feet and over $524.97 *Compiler's Note: The Fire Protection Impact Fees listed in this formula shall be adjusted annually as per 3.24.110.K 3.24.070Water Impact Fees A. Imposition of Water Impact Fees 1. On or after March 23, 1996, any person who seeks to obtain a permit for connection to the city water system, or who is subject to subsection (B)(2)(b) and applies for a city permit to expand or add to the structure served by a previously approved water connection, or any extension of such a permit issued before the effective date of this chapter, is required to pay a water impact fee in the amount specified in this chapter; or 2. Any delayed payment of impact fees as specified and approved by the City Commission in accordance with the BMC Title 17, Chapter 2 for Workforce Housing Lots. 3. No permits for connection to the city water system shall be issued until the water impact fee described in this chapter has been paid, unless the development for which the permit is sought is exempted by Subsection F of this section. p.21 B. Computation of Amount of Water Impact Fee 1. The City shall determine the amount of the required water impact fee by reference to Table 3.24.070 unless the applicant chooses to submit an individualized calculation pursuant to subsection (B)(2)(a) or the City determines the application to be subject to subsection (B)(2)(b). If the applicant is applying for a replacement for a water connection permit issued previously, then the fee shall be the net positive difference between the fee applicable at the time of the current permit application and any water impact fee previously paid pursuant to this chapter for the same structure. In the event that the fee applicable at the time ofthe replacement permit application is lower than the water impact fee previously paid pursuant to this chapter for the same structure, there shall be no refund of water impact fees previously paid. 3. Individualized Calculations. a. An applicant may request that the City determine the amount of the required water impact fee by reference to an independent fee calculation study for the applicant's development prepared at the applicant's cost by a professional engineer and/or economist and submitted to the City Public Service Director. Any such study shall be based on the same service standards and unit costs used in the water impact fee study prepared by HDR Engineering dated May 2007, and as updated, and must document the economic methodologies and assumptions used. Any independent fee calculation study submitted by an applicant may be accepted, rejected, or accepted with modifications by the City as the basis for calculating water impact fees. If such study is accepted, or accepted with modifications, as a more accurate measure ofthe demand for new water facilities created by the applicant's proposed development than the applicable fee shown in Table 3.24.070, then the water impact fee due under this chapter may be calculated according to such study. b. The City may identifY a user as having extraordinary demands for water service which are not accurately represented by the average usage which was relied upon by the methodology which generated Table 3.24.070. In this circumstance the City shall prepare a customized calculation based upon the Large Meter calculation methodology in Exhibit 6 of the Water Impact Fee study. The impact fee paid for water meters larger than 3 inches as of the effective date of this ordinance may be adjusted based on actual usage. Ifusage is greater than 110% of anticipated volume during the 12 month period of time beginning 6 months after building occupancy is granted by the City, an additional impact fee may be charged, using the same techniques for calculating peak day and storage EDUs and multiplying by the peak day impact fee cost per EDU and the storage impact fee cost per EDU then in effect. The additional impact fee is the positive net between a previously calculated impact fee and the impact fee based upon the metered demand. p.22 C. Payment of Water Impact Fee 1. An applicant required by this chapter to pay a water impact fee shall pay such fee to the City prior to the issuance of a water connection permit. 2. All funds paid by an applicant pursuant to this chapter shall be identified as water impact fees and shall be promptly deposited in the water impact fee fund described in Subsection D of this section. D. Water Impact Fee Funds 1. A single water impact fee fund is created and such fund shall be maintained in an interest bearing account. 2. Such fund shall contain only those water impact fees collected pursuant to this chapter and any interest which may accrue from time to time on such amounts. E. Use of Water Impact Fee Funds. The monies in the water impact fee fund shall be used only: 1. To acquire or construct improvements to the city water system; or 2. To pay debt service on any portion of any future general obligation bond issue or revenue bond issue used to finance improvements to the city water system; or 3. As described in Sections 3.24.090 or 3.24.100(G). F. Exemptions from Water Impact Fees 1. The following types of development shall be exempted from payment ofthe water impact fee: a. Alteration or expansion of an existing building that does not require an additional or larger water meter; b. Replacement ofa building or structure of the same size that does not require an additional or larger water meter; c. The location of mobile home on a site for which a water impact fee was previously paid, and that does not require an additional or larger water meter. 2. The installation of fire lines for fire protection shall be exempted from payment of the water impact fee. 3. Any such claim for exemption must be made no later than the time when the applicant applies for the first permit of a type listed in Subsection (A)(1) of this section for the proposed development, and any claim for exemption not made at or before that time shall have been waived. 4. The City Manager or his designee shall determine the validity of any claims for exemption pursuant to the criteria set forth in Subsections (F)(l) and (F)(2) of this section. p.23 Table 3.24.070 WATER IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE* SIZE OF WATER METER COST PER METER 3/4 inch $ 3.310 1 inch $ 8.275 1 Y2 inch $ 16.550 2 inch $ 26.480 3 inch $ 52.960 Larger than 3 inch calculated *Compiler's Note: The Cost Per Meter Fees listed in this formula shall be adjusted annually as per 3.24.110. K. 3.24.080Wastewater Impact Fees A. Imposition of Wastewater Impact Fees 1. On or after March 23, 1996, any person who seeks to obtain a permit for connection to the city wastewater system, or who is subject to subsection (B)(2)(b) and applies for a city permit to expand or add to the structure served by a previously approved water connection, or any extension of such a permit issued before the effective date of this chapter is required to pay a wastewater impact fee in the amount specified in this chapter; or 2. Any delayed payment of impact fees as specified and approved by the City Commission in accordance with the BMC Title 17, Chapter 2 for Workforce Housing Lots. 3. No permits for connection to the city water system shall be issued until the water impact fee described in this chapter has been paid, unless the development for which the permit is sought is exempted by Subsection F of this section. B. Computation of Amount of Wastewater Impact Fee 1. The City shall determine the amount of the required wastewater impact fee by reference to Table 3.24.080 070 unless the applicant chooses to submit an individualized calculation pursuant to subsection (B)(2)(a) or the City determines the application to be subject to subsection (B)(2)(b). If the applicant is applying for a replacement for a wastewater connection permit issued previously, then the fee shall be the net positive difference between the fee applicable at the time of the current permit application and any wastewater impact fee previously paid pursuant to this chapter for the same structure. In the event that the fee applicable at the time of the replacement permit application is lower than the wastewater impact fee previously paid pursuant to this chapter for the same structure, there shall be no refund of wastewater impact fees previously paid. 2. Individualized Calculations. a. An applicant may request that the City determine the amount of the required wastewater impact fee by reference to an independent fee calculation study for the applicant's development prepared at the p.24 applicant's cost by a professional engineer and/or economist and submitted to the City Public Service Director. Any such study shall be based on the same service standards and unit costs used in the wastewater impact fee study prepared by HDR Engineering dated May 2007, and as updated, and must document the economic methodologies and assumptions used. Any independent fee calculation study submitted by an applicant may be accepted, rejected, or modified by the City as the basis for calculating wastewater impact fees. If such study is accepted or accepted with modifications as a more accurate measure of the demand for new wastewater facilities created by the applicant's proposed development than the applicable fee shown in Table 3.24.080, then the wastewater impact fees due under this chapter shall be calculated according to such study. b. The City may identify a user as having extraordinary demands for wastewater service which are not accurately represented by the average usage which was relied upon by the methodology which generated Table 3.24.080. In this circumstance the City shall prepare a customized calculation based upon the methodology in the Water Impact Fee study. When applicable an adjustment for high strength discharge will be applied. The impact fee paid for water meters larger than 3 inches as of the effective date of this ordinance may be adjusted based on actual usage. If usage is greater than 110% of anticipated volume during the 12 month period of time beginning 6 months after building occupancy is granted by the City, an additional impact fee may be charged, using the same techniques for calculating treatment and collection in EDUs and multiplying by the impact fee cost per EDU. The additional impact fee is the positive net between a previously calculated impact fee and the impact fee based upon the metered demand. C. Payment of Wastewater Impact Fee 1. An applicant required by this chapter to pay a wastewater impact fee shall pay such fee to the City prior to the issuance of a wastewater connection permit. 2. All funds paid by an applicant paid pursuant to this chapter shall be identified as wastewater impact fees and shall be promptly deposited in the wastewater impact fee fund described in Subsection D of this section. D. Wastewater Impact Fee Funds 1. A single wastewater impact fee fund is created and such fund shall be maintained in an interest bearing account. 2. Such fund shall contain only those wastewater impact fees collected pursuant to this chapter and any interest which may accrue from time to time on such amounts. E. Use of Wastewater Impact Fee Funds. The monies in the wastewater impact fee fund shall be used only: 1. To acquire or construct improvements to the city wastewater system; or 2. To pay debt service on any portion of any future general obligation bond issue or revenue bond issue used to finance improvements to the city wastewater system; or 3. As described in Section 3.24.090 or Section 3.24.1 OO(G). p.25 F. Exemptions from Wastewater Impact Fees 1. The following types of development shall be exempted from payment of the wastewater impact fee: a. Alteration or expansion of an existing building that does not require an additional or larger water meter; b. Replacement of a building or structure of the same size that does not require an additional or larger water meter; c. The location of mobile home on a site for which a wastewater impact fee was previously paid and that does not require an additional or larger water meter; 2. Any such claim for exemption must be made no later than the time when the applicant applies for the first permit of a type listed in Subsection (A)(1) of this section for the proposed development, and any claim for exemption not made at or before that time shall have been waived. 3. The City Manager or his designee shall determine the validity of any claim for exemption pursuant to the criteria set forth in Subsection (F)(1) of this section. Table 3.24.080 W ASTEW ATER IMP ACT FEE SCHEDULE SIZE OF WATER METER COST PER METER* 3/4 inch $ 2.955 1 inch $ 7.388 I VI inch $ 14775 2 inch $ 23 640 3 inch $ 47 280 Larger than 3 inch calculated *Compiler's Note: The Cost Per Meter Fees listed in thisformula shall be adjusted annually as per 3.24. 110.K. 3.24.090 Refunds of Development Impact Fees Paid Refunds of development impact fees shall be made only in the following instances and in the following manner: A. Upon application to the Impact Fee Coordinator by the applicant, the City shall refund the development impact fee paid if capacity is available and service is denied. B. ]. Upon application to the Impact Fee Coordinator, the City shall refund the development impact fee paid and not expended or encumbered within ten years from the date the development impact fee was paid or spent in a manner not in accordance with this chapter or section 17-6-1602 of the Montana Code Annotated. Refunds shall be paid to the owner of the property p.26 at the time the refund is due. In determining whether development impact fees have been expended or encumbered, fees shall be considered encumbered on a first-in, first-out (FIFO) basis. 2. When the right to a refund exists due to a failure to expend or encumber development impact fees, the City shall publish written notice within thirty days after the expiration of the ten year period from the date development impact fee was paid. The published notice shall contain the heading "Notice of Entitlement to Development Impact Fee Refund." C. If an applicant has paid a development impact fee required by this chapter and has obtained any ofthe types of permits or extensions listed in Sections 3.24.050 (A)(1), 3.24.060 (A)(1), 3.24.070 (A)(I), or 3.24.080(A)(1), and the permit or extension for which the fee was paid later expires without the possibility of further extension, then the applicant who paid such fee shall be entitled to a refund of the fee paid, without interest. In order to be eligible to receive such refund, the applicant who paid such fee shall be required to submit an application for such refund within thirty days after the expiration of the permit or extension for which the fee was paid. D. A refund application shall be made to the Impact Fee Coordinator within one year from the date such refund becomes payable under Subsections A and B ofthis section, or within one year from the date of publication of the notice of entitlement of a refund under Subsection B of this section, whichever is later. Any refund not applied for within said time period shall be deemed waived. E. A refund application shall include information and documentation sufficient to permit the Impact Fee Coordinator to determine whether the refund claimed is proper and, if so, the amount of such refund. F. A refund shall include a pro rata share of interest actually earned on the unused or excess development impact fee paid. G. All refunds shall be paid within sixty days after the Impact Fee Coordinator determines that such refund is due. (Ord. 1418 ~ 7,1996; Ord. 1414 ~ 1 (part), 1996) H. Any refund payable pursuant to Subsections A and B of this section, shall be made to the record owner of property as of the date the refund was due. 3.24.100 Credits Against Development Impact Fees A. After the effective date of this chapter, mandatory or voluntary land or easement dedications for transportation, fire protection, water, or wastewater improvements, and mandatory or voluntary acquisition or construction of capital improvements to the transportation system or the city fire protection, water, or wastewater systems by an applicant in connection with a proposed development may result in a pro rata credit against the development impact fee for the same type of service or facility otherwise due for such development, except that no such credit shall be awarded for: 1. Projects or land dedications not listed on the impact fee capital improvements program; or 2. Land dedications for, or acquisition or construction of, project-related improvements as defined in Section 3.24.040(G) or Section 3.24.040; or 3. Any voluntary land or easement dedications not accepted by the City; or 4. Any voluntary acquisition or construction of improvements not approved in writing by the City prior to commencement ofthe acquisition or construction. p.27 B. In order to obtain a credit against development impact fees otherwise due, an applicant must submit a written offer to dedicate to the City specific parcels of qualifying land or easements, or to acquire or construct specific improvements to the transportation system or the City fire protection, water, or wastewater systems in accordance with all applicable State or City design and construction standards, and must specifically request a credit against such development impact fees. Such written request must be made on a form provided by the City, must contain a statement under oath of the facts that qualify the applicant to receive a credit, must be accompanied by documents evidencing those facts, and must be approved not later than the initiation of construction of improvements or the acceptance by the City ofland dedications, or the applicant's claim for the credit shall be waived. The granting of credit shall be approved by the City Commission. The City shall approve a credit only after showing that the need for the dedication or construction is clearly documented pursuant to section 7-6-1602 of the Montana Code Annotated, and that any land dedication proposed for credit is determined to be appropriate for the proposed use. 1. Upon receipt of a complete application for impact fee credit the Impact Fee Coordinator shall coordinate review of the application for compliance with the requirements ofthis chapter and other relevant requirements. Upon completion of the review the Impact Fee Coordinator shall either: forward the application to the City Manager, or when required to the City Commission, for approval or; if the application is insufficient or otherwise does not conform to the City's requirements shall communicate in writing to the applicant the reason the credit request failed. If the application satisfies the requirements and is approved the credit may be provided in any of the allowed forms as described in Subsection G. a. Factors for Consideration (1) When credit is sought for an improvement listed in the second through fifth years of the CIP after the current fiscal year there shall be a rebuttable presumption that any credit shall be awarded as a credit balance and not as cash. (2) The final decision to approve a credit request in excess of $1,000,000 from a single impact fee fund shall be made by the City Commission. (3) In the event that the City Manager believes that a credit request may result in a significant effect on policy decisions the credit request may be referred to the City Commission for final action regardless ofthe dollar amount. (4) In the event that the City considers that award of a credit may negatively impact its ability to construct improvements listed sooner in time on the CIP they may decline to award a credit at that time without removing the item from the CIP. 2. Appeals relating to staff decisions on credit requests may be appealed to the City Commission per Subsection 3.24.110.1 C. The credit due to an applicant shall be calculated and documented as follows: 1. Credit for qualifying land or easement dedications shall, at the applicant's option, be valued at: p.28 a. One hundred percent of the most recent assessed value for such land as shown in the records of the City Assessor; or b. That fair market value established by a private appraiser acceptable to the City in an appraisal paid for by the applicant. 2. In order to receive credit for qualifying acquisition or construction of transportation, fire protection, water, or wastewater improvements, the applicant shall submit complete engineering drawings, specifications, and construction cost estimates to the City. The City shall determine the amount of credit due based on the information submitted, or, if it determines that such information is inaccurate or unreliable, then on alternative engineering or construction costs acceptable to the City. D. Approved credits shall become effective at the following times: 1. Approved credit for land or easement dedications shall become effective when the land has been conveyed to the City in a form acceptable to the City, and at no cost to the City, and has been accepted by the City Commission. When such conditions have been met, the City shall note that fact in the credit record maintained by the City Finance Department. Upon request of the credit holder, the City shall send the credit holder a letter stating the credit balance available to him (or her). 2. Approved credits for the acquisition or construction of transportation, fire protection, water, or wastewater improvements shall generally become effective when: a. All required construction has been completed and has been accepted by the City; and b. A suitable maintenance and warranty bond has been received and approved by the City; and c. All design, construction, inspection, testing, bonding, and acceptance procedures have been completed in compliance with all applicable City and State procedures. However, approved credits for the construction of improvements may become effective at an earlier date if the applicant posts security in the form of a performance bond, irrevocable letter of credit, or escrow agreement, and the amount and terms of such security are accepted by the City. At a minimum, such security must be in the amount ofthe approved credit or an amount determined to be adequate to allow the City to construct the improvements for which the credit was given, whichever is higher. When such conditions have been met, the City shall note that fact in the credit record maintained by the City Finance Department. Upon request of the credit holder, the City shall also send the credit holder a letter stating the credit balance available to him (or her). E. Approved credits may be used to reduce the amount of development impact fees due from any proposed development for the same type of service or facility for which the applicant dedicated land or acquired or constructed improvements until the amount of the credit is exhausted. Each time a request to use credit from a mandatory or p.29 voluntary dedication, acquisition, or construction is presented to the City, the City shall reduce the amount ofthe development impact fee of the same type otherwise due from the applicant and shall note in the city records the amount of credit remaining, if any. In the case of a mandatory dedication, acquisition, or construction, any credit in excess of the amount of the development impact fee otherwise due under this chapter shall be deemed excess credit that is remaining and available for use by the applicant. In the case of a voluntary dedication, acquisition, or construction, any credit in excess ofthe amount of the development impact fee of the same type and applicable to the project, as shown in Tables 3.24.050, 3.24.060, 3.24.070, or 3.24.080, shall be deemed excess credit that is remaining and available for use by the applicant. Upon request of the credit holder, the City shall also send the credit holder a letter stating the amount of credit remaining to him (or her). F. Approved credit shall only be used to reduce the amount of development impact fees of the same type otherwise due under this chapter and shall not be paid to the applicant in cash or in credit against any development impact fees for a different type of facility or service or against any other monies due from the applicant to the City, except as described in Subsection G ofthis section. G. If the amount of approved credit for a mandatory dedication, acquisition, or construction exceeds the amount of the development impact fees of the same type otherwise due under this chapter, the applicant may request in writing that the City provide for reimbursement of any excess credit to the applicant in cash. Such written request must be approved not later than the initiation of construction of improvements, or the acceptance by the City of land dedications, or the applicant's claim shall be waived. Upon receipt of such a written request, the City may, at its discretion: 1. Arrange for the reimbursement of such excess credit from the impact fee fund for the same type of service or facility from development impact fees paid by others; 2. Arrange for the reimbursement of such excess credit through the issuance of a promissory note payable in not more than ten years and bearing interest equal to the interest rate paid by the City for its long-term debt; or 3. Reject the request for cash and provide credit. Such excess credit shall be valued at one hundred percent of actual developer costs for the excess improvements, or at the actual appraised value of such excess improvements, at the City's option. H. Credit may be transferred from one holder to another by any written instrument clearly identifying the credit issued under Subsection C ofthis section that is to be transferred, provided that such instrument is signed by both the transferror and transferee, and that the document is delivered to the City for registration of the change in ownership. I. In the event that land is annexed into the city from Gallatin County after the effective date ofthis chapter, and that road or fire impact fees have been previously paid to the County, an applicant proposing a development on the land may request in writing a credit against the transportation impact fee equal to the amount of any road impact fee paid to the County for the same land and may also request a credit against the fire protection impact fee equal to the amount of any fire protection impact fee paid to the County for the same land. Such written request must be filed not later than the time p. 30 when an applicant applies for the first permit of a type listed in Sections 3.24.050(A)(1) or 3.24.060(A)(1) that creates an obligation to pay the type of development impact fee against which the credit is requested, or the applicant's claim shall be waived. 3.24.110Miscellaneous Provisions A. Interest earned on monies in any impact fee fund shall be considered part of such fund and shall be subject to the same restrictions on use applicable to the impact fees deposited in such fund. B. No monies from any impact fee fund shall be spent for periodic or routine maintenance of any facility of any type or to cure deficiencies in public facilities existing on the effective date ofthis chapter. C. Nothing in this chapter shall restrict the City from requiring an applicant to construct reasonable project improvements required to serve the applicant's project, whether or not such improvements are of a type for which credit is available under Section 3.24.100. D. The City shall maintain accurate records of the development impact fees paid, including the name of the person paying such fees, the project for which the fees were paid, the date of payment of each fee, the amounts received in payment for each fee, and any other matters that the City deems appropriate or necessary to the accurate accounting of such fees, and such records shall be available for review by the public during city business hours, E. At least once during each fiscal year of the City, the City Administrative Services Director shall present to the City Commission a proposed impact fee capital improvements program for the transportation system, fire protection system, water system, and wastewater system, which identifies the capacity~adding capital improvements that will benefit new development subject to the terms of this chapter, exclusive of any improvements needed to correct existing deficiencies or for operation or maintenance purposes. Such capital improvements program shall assign monies from each impact fee fund to specific projects and related expenses for improvements to the type of facilities or services for which the fees in that fund were paid. Any monies, including any accrued interest, not assigned to specific projects within such capital improvements program and not expended pursuant to Sections 3.24.090 or 3.24.100(G) shall be retained in the same impact fee fund until the next fiscal year. The Impact Fee Capital Improvements Program shall be adopted by the City Commission as a supplemental document to the city budget. The Impact Fee Capital Improvements Program shall schedule the construction of capital improvements to serve projected growth and project capital improvement costs, expenditures and impact fee fund revenues for a five year period. The individual fee funds shall maintain a positive fiscal balance. The program may be amended by a majority vote of the City Commission. The City Manager shall adopt and revise, as needed, an administrative impact fee manual to carry out the purposes ofthis chapter. F. The City shall be entitled to retain not more than five percent of the development impact fees collected as payment for the expenses of collecting the fee and administering this chapter. G, If a development impact fee has been calculated and paid based on a mistake or misrepresentation, it shall be recalculated. Any amounts overpaid by an applicant shall p. 31 be refunded by the City to the applicant within thirty days after the City's acceptance of the recalculated amount, with interest at the rate of five percent per annum since the date of such overpayment. Any amounts underpaid by the applicant shall be paid to the City within thirty days after the City's acceptance of the recalculated amount, with interest at the rate of five percent per annum since the date of such underpayment. In the event the underpayment is caused by an error attributed solely to the City, the applicant shall pay the recalculated amount without interest. In the case of an underpayment to the City, the City shall not issue any additional permits or approvals for the project for which the development impact fee was previously paid until such underpayment is corrected; and if amounts owed to the City are not paid within such thirty day period, the City may also repeal any permits issued in reliance on the previous payment of such development impact fee and refund such fee to the then current owner of the land. H. In order to promote affordable workforce housing of the City, the City Commission may waive impact fees for Workforce Housing Lots approved by the City Commission pursuant to the BMC Title 17, Chapter 2 by paying some or all ofthe impact fee from other funds of the city that are not restricted to other uses. In order to promote the economic development of the city and the provision of affordable housing in the city, the City Commission may agree to pay some or all of the development impact fees imposed on a proposed development by this chapter from other funds of the city that are not restricted to other uses. Any such decision to pay development impact fees on behalf of an applicant shall be at the discretion of the City Commission and shall be made pursuant to goals and objectives previously adopted by the City Commission to promote economic development and/or affordable housing. I. Any determination made by any official of the city charged with the administration of any part of this chapter may be appealed to the Development Impact Fees Review Committee by filing: 1. A written notice of appeal on a form provided by the City; 2. A written explanation of why the appellant feels that a determination was in error; and 3. An appeal fee of five hundred dollars with the Impact Fee Coordinator within ten working days after the determination for which the appeal is being filed. The Development Impact Fees Review Committee shall meet to review the appeal within thirty working days of the date the written appeal was presented to the Impact Fee Coordinator. If the appellant is dissatisfied with the decision of the Development Impact Fees Review Committee, the appellant may appeal the decision to the City Commission by filing a written request with the City Clerk within ten working days of the Committee's decision. At the regular meeting following the filing of the appeal, the City Commission shall fix a time and place for hearing the appeal; and the City Clerk shall mail notice ofthe hearing to the appellant at the address given in the notice of appeal. The hearing shall be conducted at the time and place stated in such notice given by the City Commission. The determination of the City Commission shall be final. If the City Commission concludes that all or part of a determination made by an official p. 32 ofthe city charged with the administration of any part of this chapter was in error, then the appeal fee described above shall be returned to the appellant. 1. Updating of impact fee information. 1. The facility plans described in this chapter shall be reviewed by the City at least once every five years and if a revision of a facility plan to address changed conditions is deemed necessary, by the City, the plan shall be updated. 2. The development impact fees described in this chapter, fee studies, data and analysis relied upon and required by section 7-6-1602, MCA, and the administrative procedures and manual of this chapter shall be updated at least once every three fiscal years. 3. The impact fee capital improvement program shall be reviewed and updated as provided in section 3.24.11O(E) above. 4. The purpose of the review and updating of impact fee related documentation is to ensure that: a The demand and cost assumptions underlying such fees are still valid; b. The resulting fees do not exceed the actual cost of constructing improvements that are of the type for which the fee was paid and that are required to serve new development; c. The monies collected or to be collected in each impact fee fund have been, and are expected to be, spent for improvements of the type for which such fees were paid; and d. That such improvements will benefit those developments for which the fees were paid. K. The development impact fees shown in Tables 3.24.050, 3.24.060, 3.24.070, and 3.24.080 shall be adjusted annually to reflect the effects of inflation on those costs for improvements set forth in the impact fee studies. On January 1 st of each year unless and until the fees in Tables 3.24.050, 3.24.070, and/or 3.24.080 are revised or replaced, and then beginning in the subsequent calendar year, each fee amount set forth in each such table shall be adjusted by multiplying such amount by one(1) plus the value of the Construction Cost Index published in the first December edition of the current year. - Source: Engineering News Record. The right-of-way component of the transportation impact fee shall be adjusted by multiplying the value ofthe right-of-way component of the fee by one(1) plus the percentage value of the increase in taxable value from the preceding year. - Source: Montana Department of Revenue. Such adjustments in such fees shall become effective immediately upon calculation by the City and shall not require additional action by the City Commission to be effective. L. Violation of this chapter shall be a misdemeanor and shall be subject to those remedies provided in Bozeman Municipal Code Section 1.16.010. Knowingly furnishing false information to any official of the city charged with the administration of this chapter on any matter relating to the administration of this chapter, induding without I imitation the furnishing of false information regarding the expected size, use, or traffic impacts from a proposed development, shall be a violation of this chapter. In addition to, or in lieu of, any criminal prosecution, the City or any applicant for a permit ofthe types described in Sections 3.24.050(A)(I), 3.24.060(A)(1), 3.24.070(A)(1), or p. 33 3.24.080(A)(1) shall have the right to sue in civil court to enforce the provisions of this chapter. M. The section titles used in this chapter are for convenience only and shall not effect the interpretation of any portion ofthe text ofthis chapter. N. Any judicial action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside, or annul the reasonableness, legality, or validity of any development impact fee must be filed and service of process effected within ninety days following the date of imposition of the fee or the final determination of the City Commission, whichever is the later. Section 2 Repealer. All resolutions, ordinances and sections of the Bozeman Municipal Code and parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. Section 3 Savine:s Provision. This ordinance does not affect the rights and duties that matured, penalties that were incurred or proceedings that were begun befo~e the effective date of this ordinance. Section 4 Severabilitv. If any portion of this ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions of this ordinance which may be given effect without the invalid provisions or application and, to this end, the provisions ofthis ordinance are declared to be severable. Section 5 Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect on the 16th day of February 2008. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Commission of the City of Bozeman, Montana, at a regular session thereof held on the 10th day of December 2007. <:~d~jslC(~ ay p.34 ATTEST: '" PASSED, ADOPTED, AND FINALLY APPROVED by the City Commission of the City of Bozeman, Montana, at a regular session thereof held on the 14th day of January 2008. t~ KAARENJACOBSON Mayor - --. ATTEST: - 35 ~