Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-07-12 Minutes, City Commission ,,-/"f~;o/':."'" -~..., ....... MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION/AGENDA MEETING/SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COMMISSION BOZEMAN, MONTANA July 12, 1999 ***************************** . The Commission of the City of Bozeman met in work session, agenda meeting and special meeting in the Commission Room, Municipal Building, on Monday, July 12, 1999, at 3:00 p.m. Present were Commissioner Smiley, Commissioner Rudberg, Commissioner Frost, City Manager Johnson, Assistant City Manager Brey, City Attorney Luwe and Clerk of the Commission Sullivan. Mayor Pro Tempore Youngman was absent. The meeting was opened with the roll call, Pledge of Allegiance and a moment of silence. Authorize absence of Mayor Pro TemDore Younqman from this meetina. in comDliance with Section 7-3-4322(2), M.C.A. It was moved by Commissioner Smiley, seconded by Commissioner Rudberg, that the absence of Mayor Pro Tempore Youngman from this meeting be authorized in compliance with Section 7-3-4322(2), M.C.A. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Smiley, Commissioner Rudberg and Commissioner Frost; those voting No, none. Selection of Temporary Chair . It was moved by Commissioner Rudberg, seconded by Commissioner Frost, that Commissioner Smiley be selected as the Temporary Chair for this meeting. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Rudberg, Commissioner Frost and Commissioner Smiley; those voting No, none. Work Session - (A) Presentation of Woodward Clyde feasibility study on Sourdouqh Creek Dam: (B) Presentation of Broad SDectrum Task Force recommendations (A) Presentation of Woodward Clyde feasibility study on Sourdough Creek Dam Included in the Commissioners' packets was a memo from Director of Public Service Forbes, dated July 8, 1999, forwarding selected pages from the final draft of the Feasibility Study Sourdough Creek Dam Project, dated January 1999, as prepared by URS Greiner Woodward Clyde. Director of Public Service Forbes stated that the feasibility study of a replacement for the Mystic Lake Dam was begun in earnest in August 1997, through a contract with URS Greiner Woodward Clyde. He noted that public involvement was sought, characterizing an . open house as rather unsuccessful, but the appointment of a task force as successful. He noted that a number of the members from that task force are present at this meeting and thanked them for their efforts over the past couple years. The Director of Public Service briefly reviewed the information included in today's packets, noting that a copy of the Table of Contents was included so the Commissioners could see the breadth of the report. He stated that, after today's meeting, Mr. Terry Arnold, URS Greiner Woodward Clyde, will finalize the report and make it available to the community. At Chair Smiley's request, the Broad Spectrum Task Force members introduced themselves, including: 07-12-99 --.--....--. - .-- - 2 - Skip Stuart, Southwest Montana Building Industry Association Gretchen Rupp, American Water Resources Association Scott Compton, Department of Natural Resources and Conservation Bruce Rich, Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks Steve Custer, MSU/hydrogeologist Buz Goldstein, rancher Randy Sullivan, Montana Power Company Late arrivals included: . Brenda Boyd, homeowner Joan Montagne, conservation representative Mr. Terry Arnold gave a brief overview of the technical information gathered while considering potential sites for a replacement dam. He noted that the consultants looked at ten sites. He identified the locations of those sites, which include six in the Sourdough drainage, one on Limestone Creek, two on Middle Hyalite Creek and one on South Cottonwood Creek. Through the use of overheads, Mr. Arnold showed the location of each of the sites and then gave a brief statement on the technical findings for each site. Mr. Arnold noted that Site 7, located on Limestone Creek, was determined to be technically suitable, but the platted and subdivided land, along with houses in the immediate vicinity, eliminated it as a preferred site. He noted that a conveyance system for the water was also necessary because of its location out of the Sourdough drainage. He stated that Sites 2 and 4, located in the Sourdough drainage, were determined to be technically feasible but, since the impoundment could back into the area of the old Mystic Lake, there were some concerns about the ancient landslide area. He indicated that Site 1 is the lowest in the drainage, which would provide direct storage and eliminate conveyance problems; and the site has no technical fatal flaws. He characterized Site 3, which is slightly higher in the drainage than Site 1, as having the same characteristics and being technically feasible. He stated that Sites 5 and 6, .. which are in the area of the old Mystic Lake and dam, are technically not feasible because of the old landslide. He then indicated Sites 8 and 9, in the Hyalite drainage, are technically feasible, although concerns were raised about the impacts that Site 8 might have on the campground, and the costs of building a tunnel for water conveyance would be high. He stated that Site 10, which is two drainages over from the Sourdough drainage, is too far away, and the costs of conveyance would be too great for this to be considered as a viable alternative. Mr. Arnold stated that once the initial assessment was completed, an aerial reconnaissance and geological reconnaissance were conducted, and Site 1 and Site 3, in the Sourdough drainage, were identified as the two preferred sites. He noted that holes were drilled in those locations, and it was determined the foundation conditions would be suitable at both sites. Mr. Arnold then reviewed the two types of dams being considered, which are a roller compacted concrete and a concrete faced rockfilled dam. He showed diagrams of both types of dams, noting the roller compacted concrete would take less space. He indicated that four significant ground faults were identified and, as a result, it was determined that a seismic acceleration factor of .35 to .4 would be necessary to ensure the stability of the dam in this fairly seismic area. He characterized this level of acceleration as high, but clearly feasible. Mr. Arnold concluded the section of the report pertaining to a replacement dam by reviewing the results of the environmental screening on the two preferred sites. . Mr. Terry Arnold then turned his attention to the potential of groundwater as a viable water resource. He stated the Bozeman Fan was discarded because the source is not continuous enough or substantial enough to support the City's needs. He noted, however, that the Belgrade area and the Gallatin Gateway area seem to provide some viable alternatives. He briefly summarized the findings for each of those areas, noting that the Belgrade area is approximately nine miles from the Bozeman city limits, and there are reports of wells yielding 200 gallons per minute or greater. He characterized the 100-foot well depth as moderate, and cautioned that the elevation of that area is lower than Bozeman. He then indicated that, in both this and the Gallatin Gateway area, the potential fatal flaws include the ability to obtain 07-12-99 - 3 - water rights, well head protection, the potential of groundwater contamination and impacts on existing wells. He stated that in the Gallatin Gateway area, the existing well depths are approximately 60 feet, and the yields are 10 to 60 gallons per minute. Mr. Arnold then reviewed the estimated costs of constructing either a roller compacted concrete dam or a concrete faced rockfilled dam at either Site 1 or Site 3 and the drilling of wells in either the Belgrade area or the Gallatin Gateway area, plus the estimated costs of operations and maintenance over a fifty-year period. He noted that the dam would cost $13.8 to $25 million while the wells would cost $7.7 to $8.9 million. He cautioned that the . Commission must also take into consideration the fact that, at the end of that fifty-year period, the dam will not require any great amount of maintenance while the pumps and lines for the groundwater supply will probably need to be replaced. He concluded by encouraging the Commission to look at the residual value of the dam versus the wells, comparing it to "buying a car or building a house". (B) Presentation of Broad Spectrum Task Force recommendations Included in the Commissioners' packets was a memo from the Broad Spectrum Task Force, dated July 1999, forwarding the executive summary and statement of recommendations for the City's future water needs. Mr. Bruce Rich, member of the Broad Spectrum Task Force, reviewed the information in the memo and the task force's recommendations. He noted that the information in the packet included the mission of the task force, along with their roles and goals and a description of the process used. He stated that the task force, comprised of approximately fifteen people, met five times over two years with their primary goals being to communicate to the public, bring ideas into the process and provide input to the Commission on various water resource issues and alternatives. Mr. Rich stated that the task force identified four categories into which all alternatives . were grouped. including conservation, water supply plan, storage and groundwater. Each of the alternatives was then evaluated against the criteria developed by the task force, which include recreation, conservation, economic, water rights, longevity, growth, environmental impact, technical and community involvement. Mr. Rich then read the executive summary into the record, noting the task force unanimously recommends that a comprehensive conservation program be planned carefully and implemented soon, characterizing that as the immediate need. He noted that the City should also work to create a water supply plan which includes the possible use of groundwater sources, particularly in light of the controversy that could surround construction of a dam. Director of Public Service Forbes thanked Mr. Arnold and Mr. Rich for their presentations, noting the presentation portion of this work session is concluded. Responding to Commissioner Frost, the Director of Public Service stated he estimates the Bozeman's current population at 28,500, although he does not have information to substantiate that estimate. He then indicated that this feasibility study reflects the same population figures as the water facilities plan, which was recently completed. He stressed that the reliable yield of current water resources is the key issue and, given current usage patterns, those resources will support a population of 48,000 to 49,000. He stated that key milestones will be exceeding the average daily demand and the peak daily demand, and projected that . between the years 2020 and 2030, City action will be required to ensure an adequate level of water is provided. Commissioner Rudberg noted that she understands and supports the idea of using groundwater if it is available. She questioned, however, what impact this might have on downstream users, particularly those outside city limits. She also questioned whether the use of groundwater could impact the surface water levels. Mr. Steve Custer stated that the task force discussed this issue at length. He stressed that, if Bozeman wishes to consider groundwater as an alternative water source in the future, it is important to seek those water rights as quickly as possible. He recognized that this should 07-12-99 - 4 - be done in cooperation and interaction with the County, and cautioned that large pieces of available land will probably not exist in 2030, when additional water sources are needed. Further responding to Commissioner Rudberg, Mr. Scott Compton stated that the groundwaters belong to the State of Montana, and one must apply for the right to use that water. He then stated that the Montana Power Company claims all unappropriated water in the Upper Missouri, so obtaining rights can be extremely difficult. He cautioned that new rights for groundwater closely linked to surface water will probably be impossible to obtain in the next ten to twenty years. . Chair Smiley indicated an interest in additional discussion at another work session in a couple of weeks. She then thanked Mr. Arnold and the Broad Spectrum Task Force for their work and today's presentation. Aaenda Meetina - for regular meeting and Dublic hearings to be held on July 19. 1999 Since this is an agenda meeting, only those issues requiring staff action are contained in the minutes. City Manager Johnson briefly reviewed the background information which was included in the Commissioners' packets. (4) Assistant Planner Joni Killebrew provided a brief overview of this Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of a church at the corner of Thomas Lane and Baxter Lane. She stated that, because of the pending annexation and zone map amendment for this subject site, she has submitted a memo with an additional condition which states the annexation agreement must be completed and filed with the Clerk and Recorder prior to the applicant obtaining a building permit. . Responding to Commissioner Frost. City Attorney Luwe stated that the new proposed language pertaining to impact fees in future annexation agreements has not yet been acted on by the Commission. As a result, he has suggested that staff include the language in all annexation agreements and, if the applicant is willing to sign the agreement, it will then be forwarded to the Commission for consideration. Commissioner Rudberg expressed concern about staff's position, stating that the Commissioners decided, on a straw poll of 3 to 2, not to bring the proposed additional language forward. City Attorney Luwe stated it was his recollection that three of the Commissioners indicated an interest in discussing the proposed language during a work session. He then stated that, if the applicants are willing to sign the agreement with the additional language, then they should be allowed to do so. Commissioner Rudberg stated that, if the additional language is included in one annexation agreement, it should be included in all to ensure that everyone is treated the same. Chair Smiley stated that, following the Commission meeting at which the proposed additional language was initially discussed, she asked that language not be placed on a future agenda for discussion. . City Attorney Luwe stated that, based on this discussion, he will suggest that the additional language be held in abeyance until the Commission decides whether to include it. He noted, however, that staff is still advising applicants that they may proceed through the annexation process if they so desire, unless the Commission provides different direction. (5) Assistant Planning Director Debbie Arkell gave an overview of this Conditional Use Permit on behalf of Senior Planner Dave Skelton. She stated that the 113-unit congregate living unit is located along the north side of West Oak Street, west of North 19th Avenue, and is part of the StoneRidge PUD, a multi-phased development. She stressed that this is a living 07-12-99 n__.____n____.. - 5 - facility, not a care facility; and, while each unit has cooking facilities, residents may choose to eat in a main dining room. Responding to Commissioner Rudberg, Chair Smiley stated that no specific population of the facility was mentioned at the City-County Planning Board hearing. (6) Fire Marshal Chuck Winn stated that staff was recently made aware of the fact that the County's open burning ordinance is not applicable within city limits. As a result, he stated that the only ordinances under which open burning can currently be addressed are the . nuisance ordinance and the solid waste ordinance, which are difficult to enforce. He indicated that this ordinance is based on the County's ordinance, with the same burn permits required and the same fee structure, but prohibits the use of burn barrels inside city limits. Chair Smiley suggested that, rather than outlawing burn barrels, they be allowed with requirements for supervision and extinguishing with water when not attended. Fire Marshal Winn responded that the burning of garbage within city limits is prohibited. He then indicated that the burning of organic products is not a problem; however, he noted that the burning of styrofoam and other similar products can create a slow, smoldering, noxious fire, which is not desirable. Responding to Commissioner Rudberg, City Attorney Luwe stated that, as a general rule, the County does not pass ordinances which interfere with a City's ability to regulate within its own corporate limits. (7) Associate Planner Chris Saunders noted that he has provided additional information on this item, in response to questions raised a couple of weeks ago. Responding to Commissioner Rudberg, the Associate Planner stated the estimated cost of improvements is $131,000; however, the financial guarantee is in the amount of 150 . percent of the estimated costs, as required in both the zoning ordinance and the subdivision regulations. Further responding to questions from Commissioner Rudberg, the Associate Planner recognized that several of the developers along Durston Road have signed waivers of right to protest the creation of an SID for the signal improvements at this intersection; however, their participation is not required under the process currently being considered. City Manager Johnson stated that those projects listed in the memo are the ones on which the condition was imposed under which the improvements must be constructed prior to either development or occupancy of the project. He stressed that there is a significant amount of confusion about North 19th Avenue at the present time, and the intersection of Durston Road and North 19th Avenue is one of those that must be addressed. Commissioner Rudberg stated it "does not feel fair" and, as a result, she is concerned about this issue. She then suggested that streets be put on paper, along with a listing of all the waivers and requirements to participate, and then, when the project is to be undertaken, those listed be required to pay their fair share. Assistant City Manager Brey stated that, while the City has obtained a significant number of waivers of right to protest the creation of SIDs for traffic issues, he suspects they will never be used. He cautioned that, since a project is responsible for only its prorata share . of the traffic generated, on a collector or arterial street, all of the percentages attributable to specific developments could result in funding only a few percent of the overall costs. Responding to Commissioner Frost, the Associate Planner stated it is difficult to assess impacts on the infrastructure when the land is vacant, so establishing a facility fee at annexation would be difficult, and noted that impact fees are designed to address that issue. ( 13) Historic Preservation Planner Derek Strahn distributed a memo addressing some of the issues that have been raised in conjunction with this "somewhat controversial" project. He stated the applicant is proposing the demolition of the rear vestibule and construction of a 07-12-99 - 6 - new addition. He noted the lot is only 38 feet wide, and the neighbor immediately to the north is concerned that the new addition will negatively impact the privacy in her rear addition, which houses her bedroom, particularly if windows are included in the dormer on the north side. He indicated that the drawings submitted include no windows in the north dormer, in deference to those concerns, and other compromises have been discussed. He then indicated that the upper level is not to be used as living space, but is to be accessed via a pull down ladder and used for storage. The Historic Preservation Planner stated the neighbor to the north also raised a question about whether the site plan submitted is accurate. As a result, he and staff from the . Engineering Department reviewed the site on Friday and located two pins, one off the corner of Fridley Street and North Ida Avenue and one near Ms. Reichman's property line. He noted that, after measuring from both of those pins, the staff determined the site plan, as submitted, is essentially correct and that no additional deviations are needed. In response to questions from Commissioner Rudberg, Assistant City Manager Brey cautioned that, if no deviations were required, privacy considerations would be of no concern to the City. He then indicated that it is important to know if a deviation was received or needed for the addition on the house to the north, and requested that information be provided at next week's meeting. (14) Historic Preservation Planner Strahn stated that two letters were received today, and distributed copies of those letters to the Commission. He stated it appears an apartment has existed in the carriage house for quite some time and, under this application, that apartment is to be expanded. ( 15) Assistant Planning Director Debbie Arkell gave a brief overview of the requested variances to the sign code, to allow the number and total size of freestanding signs at the medical campus at the hospital to exceed the maximums allowed. She stated that 13 signs totalling 264 square feet are allowed and under this application, 16 signs totalling 421 square . feet are requested. She indicated that staff prefers not to limit the number to sixteen, since not all of the 50 + acre medical campus has been developed; rather, she suggested that additional directory signs be allowed but no additional signs on Highland Boulevard. She indicated that the new sign package is designed to replace all of the existing signage on the medical campus, noting that the existing signs vary in style and color. Responding to Commissioner Frost, Assistant Planning Director Arkell stated that the freestanding sign at the corner of East Main Street and Highland Boulevard will be replaced under this application. ( 16) Planning Director Andy Epple gave a brief overview of the interim zoning ordinance, noting that the changes reflect the Commission's direction in May. He stated that some conflicts in the code have also been addressed and changes have been made to reflect legislative changes. The Planning Director then indicated that an ordinance amending the subdivision regulations may also need to be added to next week's agenda, depending on the legal staff's determination. Assistant City Manager Brey stated the next step will be the appointment of a zoning commission, noting that the State statutes pertaining to city planning boards do not give the same authority as that available to city-county planning boards. . (16A) City Manager Johnson stated that, to be added to next week's agenda, is a public hearing to pledge the SID Revolving Fund for the sidewalk bonds to be sold the following week. ( 17) City Manager Johnson stated that the Recreation and Park Advisory Board's formal recommendation will be included in next week's packet. He then indicated that under this agenda item, staff is seeking direction from the Commission on whether to proceed with the five-space parking lot as recommended. 07-12-99 -.--.....---.- - 7 - ( 18) City Manager Johnson stated this item may be left at the end of the agenda or moved to the beginning of the agenda, whichever the Commission prefers. City Attorney Luwe stated the Commission must decide on the process for selecting a Mayor prior to making the selection. Responding to Commissioner Rudberg, the City Attorney cautioned that State law specifies the Mayor will be selected by lot from the remaining Commissioners. He acknowledged that, if all four Commissioners agree on who should be the next Mayor, that . could be construed as being selected by lot with all other potential candidates declining the position. After discussion, the Commissioners requested that this item be moved to the beginning of the agenda. Signing of Notice of SDecial Meetina Each Commissioner, in turn, signed the Notice of Special Meeting. Public hearing - variance from Section 18.50.030.D.1.. Bozeman MuniciDal Code. to allow aoolicant to emceed with construction using non-combustible materials for five multi-familv structures Drior to installation and utilization of central water system - Don Bockhahn for Carson Place (1304-1312 West Babcock Street) (C-9917) This was the time and place set for a public hearing on the variance from Section 18.50.030.D.1. of the Bozeman Municipal Code, as requested by Don Bockhahn under Application No. C-9917, to allow the applicant to proceed with construction of five multi-family structures, using non-combustible materials only, prior to installation and utilization of a central . water system. The subject project is known as the Carson Place Townhouses and is located at 1304 to 1312 West Babcock Street. Planning Director Andy Epple distributed a letter of withdrawal, dated July 12, submitted by Donald Bockhahn. He stated that staff had initially determined a variance was necessary; however, further review revealed that the applicant can proceed under the standard policy by which impact fee increases are assessed. He stated that the applicant may secure a building permit under the current fee schedule as long as that permit is picked up within six months. As a result, the applicant is withdrawing this application for variance and has requested a refund of the application fee. City Manager Clark Johnson stated that the applicant must reapply for a building permit or the existing fee schedule will not apply, characterizing this as simply a technical difference. It was moved by Commissioner Frost, seconded by Commissioner Rudberg, that the Commission acknowledge receipt of the letter of withdrawal from Mr. Bockhahn, dated July 12. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Rudberg and Commissioner Smiley; those voting No, none. Discussion - Commissioner oroiects . None of the Commissioners forwarded any comments under this agenda item. Discussion - FYI Items City Manager Johnson presented to the Commission the following "For Your Information" items. (1 ) Letter from Clerk and Recorder Shelley Vance, dated July 6, indicating she has determined no primary election is necessary. 07-12-99 ~C'I!I~,~,'r;."';,,:':':: - 8 - (2) Letter from the Gallatin County Planning Board, dated July 7, forwarding the list of upcoming community outreach meetings. (3) Memo from the Clerk of the Commission, dated July 8, forwarding the list of possible choices for the fifth Commissioner, as submitted by individual Commissioners. (4) Newsletter from the Headwaters Recycling Program, announcing the next meeting is to be held at 10:00 a.m. on July 14 in Bozeman. . (5) Agenda for the Development Review Committee meeting to be held at 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday, July 13, in the Commission Room. (6) Agenda for the Design Review Board meeting to be held at 3:30 p.m. on Tuesday, July 13, in the Commission Room. (7) Agenda for the County Commission meeting to be held at 1 :30 p.m. on Tuesday, July 13, at the Courthouse. (8) Commissioner Smiley stated that at last week's Recreation and Parks Advisory Board meeting, a number of items were discussed, including a proposal to amend the master plan for Kirk Park, to allow for construction of a skate park; a proposed master plan for Westfield Park; and the Burke Park parking lot proposal. (9) City Manager Johnson stated that a retreat has been scheduled for the City Commissioners and City Planning Board members from 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. on Wednesday, July 28, at the Wingate Inn. He noted this retreat is designed to allow for informal discussion and an opportunity for the Commission to give direction to the City Planning Board. Commissioner Smiley noted that this would also be a good time to identify the role of the City Planning Board, particularly since the Planning staff will be supervised by the City . Manager. She then suggested that Staff Attorney Cooper also be present at the meeting. Commissioner Frost asked that the City Planning Board also provide an update on where they are in the planning process. (10) City Attorney Luwe announced that Staff Attorney Patti Day-Moore is out of the office for two weeks. (11 ) Commissioner Rudberg submitted the following. (1) Stated her appreciation for the information from past Farmers' Markets, but still wants the information from the current Farmers' Markets. (2) Asked when someone will be hired to do fire inspections; the City Manager responded that Greg Megaard has been hired to do so. (3) Expressed her concern about the list of names submitted for the replacement Commissioner, noting it does not reflect a mix of conservatives and liberals and contains few who would emulate former Mayor Stiff. Adjournment - 5:43 D.m. There being no further business to come before the Commission at this time, it was moved by Commissioner Frost, seconded by Commissioner Rudberg, that the meeting be adjourned. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being . Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Rudberg and Commissioner Smiley; those voting No, none. 07-12-99 - 9 - SANDRA L. SMILEY, Tempor Chair ATTEST: · 9J:- J~ ROBIN L. sUtLlVAN Clerk of the .Cornmff!8ion . -" .. - -. ...... - - - . . 07-12-99