HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-05-08 Minutes, City Commission, special
MINUTES OF THE AGENDA MEETING/WORK SESSION/SPECIAL MEETING
OF THE CITY COMMISSION
BOZEMAN, MONTANA
May 8, 2000
*****************************
. The Commission of the City of Bozeman met in agenda meeting, work session and
special meeting in the Commission Room, Municipal Building, on Monday, May 8, 2000, at
3:00 p.m. Present were Mayor Youngman, Commissioner Brown, Commissioner Frost,
Commissioner Smiley, Commissioner Kirchhoff, City Manager Johnson, Assistant City Manager
Brey, Staff Attorney Cooper and Clerk of the Commission Sullivan.
The meeting was opened with the roll call, Pledge of Allegiance and a moment of
silence.
Agenda Meeting - for regular meetina and Dublic hearings to be held on Mav 15. 2000
Since this is an agenda meeting, only those issues requiring staff action are contained
in the minutes.
City Manager Johnson briefly reviewed the background information which was
included in the Commissioners' packets.
(6) Assistant Planner Berger stated that Planning Director Epple determined this
application was for a minor subdivision, so no notice requirements are involved. She indicated
that, if agreeable to legal staff, this item could be moved from the 3:00 p.m. session to the
. 7:00 p.m. session, since notices were only mailed to adjoining property owners.
Staff Attorney Cooper stated that legal staff is still reviewing this issue, since it came
to their attention last Thursday that there was a potential of moving the entire Commission
meeting to the evening. He noted that legal staff also needs to review whether this is a first
minor subdivision and, thus, eligible for a summary review process. He indicated that, in any
event, new noticing will be needed prior to next Monday's meeting to move the review to the
7:00 p.m. session, and stated that moving consideration of this plat to the June 5 meeting
would help to make the process as clean as possible.
Responding to Commissioner Kirchhoff, Assistant Planner Berger stated that BRC
Investments LLC is the former Rajah and Associates, and that Roger Craft has an interest in
it; and this property is a portion of the former Cupola project. She stated that the purpose of
this plat is to get rid of the old lots and blocks platted in the late 1890s and to change the
boundary so the Alpine Motel can own the property which it is already using. She indicated
that, to develop Lot 1, additional reviews would be required, through the site plan process at
a minimum.
The Commissioners concurred this item should be moved to the evening session of
the June 5 meeting. As a result of moving this item, the Commissioners also concurred that
the Commission meeting be moved to 7:00 p.m., provided that notice of rescheduling of the
. preliminary plat review is published prior to Monday's meeting.
(13) Historic Preservation Planner Derek Strahn distributed revised drawings,
noting he received them late Friday afternoon. He reviewed the revised drawings, which
provide for separated structures, and briefly highlighted staff's initial findings. He noted that
a full blown staff report on the revised plans will be included in next week's packet. He
indicated that he has met with the neighbor to the north, who appreciates the revised plans but
is still uncomfortable with the apartment over the garage. He indicated that, because of the
two separate structures and dwellings now involved in the project, the applicant must also go
through the minor site plan review process.
05-08-2000
--
__..., __ .n _ .__ ____
- ------.-.-....---
- 2 -
(14) City Attorney Luwe indicated that a response to the questions which have
been raised regarding the appeal and the procedure will be included in next week's packet.
(15 and 16) Assistant Planner Jami Morris gave an overview of this application for
a conditional use permit and attendant variance. She stressed that, under the new zone code
revisions that become effective June 1, this application would not be required since community
residential facilities are permitted as a principal use.
. At Mayor Youngman's request, City Attorney Luwe reviewed the three criteria against
which variances must be reviewed, noting the Commission must find that all three have been
met to approve a request.
Responding to comments from Commissioner Frost, the City Attorney indicated that
issuing findings of fact for variances may be appropriate, since they will provide the needed
documentation for the Commission's decision, particularly if it varies from the staff
recommendation.
(17 and 18) Assistant Planner Jami Morris gave an overview of the application for
a conditional use permit and attendant variances. She also reviewed the recommended
conditions of approval, including a condition requiring screening of the bottom parts of the silos
by constructing a wall the height of the existing structure along the east side of the silos. She
identified several discrepancies in the site plan, noting those must be corrected on the final site
plan.
In response to comments from Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Kirchhoff stated
that, at the Design Review Board meeting, the applicant indicated an intent to come back in
the near future with a proposal for expansion of the building to accommodate the production
of milk jugs, and requested that some of the conditions proposed for this CUP be applied to
that expansion.
Responding to additional comments from Commissioner Frost, Assistant Planner Jami
. Morris indicated that the Sculpture Park does not extend very far to the west, and not requiring
the installation of a six-foot fence to screen the rear portion of the Darigold property will help
to give the illusion that the park is actually larger than it is.
In response to comments from the Commissioners, Assistant Planner Morris
acknowledged that review of this application is difficult because of the discrepancies on the
site plan and confusion about the exact location of proposed improvements.
(19) Associate Planner Chris Saunders gave an overview of the proposed
amendments, indicating that a copy of the staff report will be included in next week's packet.
Work Session - (A) Commission orientation: (8) Uodates ra 2020 clan and transcortation clan
(A) Commission orientation
Included in the Commissioners' packets was a memo from City Attorney Luwe, dated
May 5, forwarding copies of previously issued opinions and memos on a variety of issues. Also
included in the packet were copies of the City's organization chart and the rules of procedure
as established under Commission Resolution No. 3294.
. City Manager Johnson indicated that, in the future, staff will try to do a better job of
identifying on the agenda the diocuments that need to be held for future agendas.
City Attorney Luwe noted that, while some of the memos he attached to his cover
memo are quite old, they are still pertinent and accurate. He reviewed the issues of quasi-
judicial versus legislative hearings and actions, ex parte communication and abstentions. He
indicated that quasi-judicial decisions generally apply to a particular piece of property or a small
group of people, citing conditional use permits, appeals and preliminary plats as examples; and
noted that legislative decisions are policy decisions and apply to the community as a whole,
citing amendments to the subdivision regulations and the zone code as examples. He indicated
œ
05-08-2000
- 3 -
that decisions on quasi-judicial matters must be based on the record; and
ex parte
communications are not allowed after the public hearing is closed. He stressed that, if a
Commissioner receives input after the public hearing, it is important to report on that
communication during an open Commission meeting prior to making the decision.
Responding to Mayor Youngman, the City Attorney confirmed that, once an
application for a project has been filed, the Commissioners should not receive any input on that
item from the developer, proponents or opponents outside the formal procedure, since doing
. so precludes the opportunity for everyone to hear the information and respond to it.
City Attorney Luwe stated that if the matter is a legislative one, the Commissioners
may receive additional comment.
The City Attorney briefly reviewed the attorney/client privilege, noting that matters
between him and the Commissioners can only be released by the Commission. He cautioned
that having a Commissioner release information on a certain item could result in a blanket
release of all information on that item; and that could have a negative impact on the City's
position.
City Attorney Luwe reviewed the issue of abstentions, noting that under the
commission/manager form of government, the ayes and nays are recorded. He also noted that
the statutes require the affirmative vote of three Commissioners to either adopt or reject a
motion or take any action. He indicated that the courts frown on abstentions, except for a
conflict of interest, to ensure a definite and accurate record and to reflect the position taken
by the Commission. He also noted that voting makes a Commissioner responsible for his or
her actions. He stated that the doctrine of necessity can override the conflict of interest
provision in the event a Commissioner is the only one that can generate the third vote required
for a majority.
Responding to Assistant City Manager Brey, City Attorney Luwe stated that a
. Commissioner cannot be required to vote.
The Commissioners thanked City Attorney Luwe for his presentation.
Mayor Youngman turned the Commission's attention to the rules of procedure. She
suggested that the roll call be dropped, but that those Commissioners present continue to be
identified in 'the minutes; the Commissioners concurred. She then proposed that the Chair
approve the minutes as submitted or as amended if agreed to by all Commissioners, rather than
the Commissioners voting on them. Following discussion, in which some of the Commissioners
voiced concern about that approach, the Mayor indicated that the rules of procedure will remain
as they are, with the Commission voting on approval of all minutes.
Mayor Youngman noted that under Section XV, the Commission makes appointments
to the boards and commissions after advertising the vacancies. She stated, however, that
since the Commission has reduced the number of times the advertisements are run each year,
the result can be a board running with an unfilled position for several months. She suggested
that wording be added which reads something like "Between public solicitations for members,
appointments may be made to fill unexpected vacancies or vacancies not filled through the last
round of advertisements." She recognized the down side is not opening the process to the
public again. She then suggested that those unexpected vacancies occurring in mid-term be
advertised when they occur, so they can be filled more quickly.
. Commissioner Brown suggested that, to address those instances where applications
are not received by the deadline set in the advertisement, the language be revised to read like
the job advertisements, with an initial deadline date and a statement that it is open until filled.
The Commissioners concurred with both of those revisions.
Commissioner Brown suggested that Section IV be changed to reflect the current
deadline for submittal of packet information, and that Section XII1.1.k. be changed to reflect
the deadline for submittal of public written comment.
05-08-2000
- 4 -
Commissioner Frost noted that, throughout the document, reference is made to being
recognized by the Chair. He suggested that if this requirement is more closely adhered to, side
discussions would not occur while a Commissioner is talking, and that could serve to speed up
the meetings.
(B) Updates re 2020 plan and transportation plan
. Associate Planner Chris Saunders noted that the major upcoming event is the charette
to be held on June 2, 3 and 4. He stated that flyers went out in the water bills, and they have
been getting a lot of attention. He noted that a considerable amount of effort is being devoted
to creating digital land use maps in conjunction with the GIS program, and they are to be used
in the charette. The City Planning Board is preparing for the first round release of goals to the
community in conjunction with the charette, so people can review both the map and the text
at the same time. He indicated a survey taken during BACC II revealed that 70 percent of the
respondents wish to learn more about the plan through the web site, so he is taking steps to
make sure it is up to date. He noted that one small computer security issue has been identified
and corrected, after someone broke into the site.
Included in the Commissioners' packets were copies of the colored maps from the
transportation plan update, as prepared by Peccia and Associates.
The Associate Planner turned his attention to the transportation plan update, noting
that on April 24, a meeting with the consultant was held at the Courthouse. Approximately
65 people were in attendance, 10 of whom were staff members of various governmental
agencies. Several different topics were discussed at that meeting, ranging from specific
neighborhood concerns to general concerns. He noted that a lot of maps were provided at that
meeting, along with standards and traffic counts. He indicated that a transportation survey
regarding transit use was also distributed at that meeting; and it was also sent out in the water
bills and is available at the Courthouse, Drivers' License Bureau, the Library and the Senior
Center.
. Associate Planner Saunders stated that another major activity is computer modeling,
which is part of the State's contribution. He showed the Commission maps of several models
completed to date, noting that the modifications are designed to not impact one another. He
indicated that there is no limit on the number of computer runs that can be done; however,
time is needed to assimilate the information.
The Associate Planner noted an alternative is to model growth management initiatives.
He indicated that the model covers the area from Three Forks to the county line to the east and
from Big Sky to the county line to the north. The model follows the census tract lines as
closely as possible, and it is designed to assist in determining where growth is desirable and
where it is not.
Responding to Commissioner Kirchhoff,
the Associate Planner indicated the
transportation plan is to address transportation demands and efficiency, routing at the least
expense for the maximum benefit, and alternatives to vehicles. He characterized it as a holistic
approach, recognizing that a good trail map is an important component of the overall plan.
Responding to Commissioner Frost, the Associate Planner stressed that this plan is
designed to look at the larger scale, rather than to micro-manage land use. He noted that some
. of the items considered may change the timing of improvements rather than changing the
network. He indicated, however, it is important to identify the major transportation system so
better neighborhoods can be built and people will know where the major roads are to be
located.
Responding to comments from Commissioner Kirchhoff, the Associate Planner
cautioned that, on a nationwide basis, 5 to 10 percent of the population uses a mass transit
system, and indicated that Bozeman does not have the population base to support one.
Responding to several questions from Mr. Bob Heebner, member of the audience,
Associate Planner Saunders noted that the properties under the City's control are zoned; those
05-08-2000
---...--... ----
- 5 -
not zoned lie in the county. He recognized that the Commission may raise or lower the level
of service in a certain area, depending on whether they wish to encourage or discourage
growth; however, that would require a change in the subdivision regulations.
The Associate Planner stated that the transportation plan is one of the backbone
documents upon which the 2020 growth plan is based. He noted it was staff's intent to have
the transportation plan update further along when the 2020 growth plan was undertaken; but,
at the present time, they are running simultaneously.
. City Engineer Craig Brawner stated that the levels of service are a policy decision, but
characterized that as a shorter term issue than the overall transportation plan. He also
cautioned that discussion of planning and regulating growth inside the city addresses only 50
percent of the pie, since growth outside the city limits also impacts the City's transportation
network.
The Commission thanked Associate Planner Saunders and City Engineer Craig Brawner
for the presentation and responses to questions.
Discussion - FYI Items
City Manager Johnson presented to the Commission the following "For Your
Information" items.
(1 ) Notice of the annual meeting of the Gallatin County Council on Aging,
scheduled for 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, May 9, at Spring Meadows.
(2) Memo announcing that the Cemetery Board meeting scheduled for May 11
has been moved to June 8, at 2:00 p.m. in the Conference Room.
(3) Copy of a memo dated May 1, identifying the projects to be completed and
. the times for doing so under Phase II of the Courthouse remodel.
(4) Copy of an e-mail message from Commissioner Kirchhoff regarding traffic
loads on West Babcock Street and Durston Road.
Commissioner Kirchhoff briefly summarized his e-mail, expressing concern that the
latest traffic counts on Durston Road were taken in 1997 and the traffic projections for
subdivisions and developments since then are now three layers deep. He also noted that the
computer model does not include collector streets, so it has been modified to generate what
can only be viewed as a "best guess" at this time.
Commissioner Frost expressed concern that West Oak Street, west of North 19th
Avenue, is a shouldered two-lane road and, with the amount of development occurring in that
area, similar problems could be encountered with it.
(5) Copy of the Headwaters Recycling newsletter, announcing the next meeting
is scheduled for May 10 at Three Forks.
(6) Agenda for the Development Review Committee meeting to be held at 10:00
a.m. on Tuesday, May 9, in the Commission Room.
. (7) . Agenda for the Design Review Board meeting to be held at 3:30 p.m. on
Tuesday, May 9, in the Commission Room.
(8) Agenda for the County Commission meeting to be held at 9:00 p.m. on
Wednesday, May 10, at the Courthouse.
(9) Agenda for the Bozeman Area Transportation Coordinating Committee
meeting to be held at 10:00 a.m. on Wednesday, May 17, in the Commission Room.
05-08-2000
- --...- --..
- 6 -
(10) Commissioner Smiley announced that the last trails open house is scheduled
for 7:00 p.m on Wednesday at the Courthouse.
(11 ) Commissioner Brown stated he attended a meeting regarding the proposed
100-acre park on Wednesday night, noting it appears that project seems to be moving forward
quickly.
( 12) Commissioner Frost expressed concern that the Salvation Army is now
. located in two buildings, and is still encroaching onto the public sidewalks. He asked that this
issue be addressed before it becomes any worse.
Responding to Mayor Youngman, the City Manager indicated that the City is pursuing
enforcement of those violations. He then cautioned that they are "soldiers", and they view
enforcement as "declaring war".
(13) City Manager Johnson stated he received a call from one of the possible
consultants to conduct the economic impact study for WalMart. He suggested that, rather than
paying for the gentleman to come to Bozeman at this time, it may be more appropriate to have
him come after submitting the scope of work proposal, and suggested that WalMart should pay
that bill rather than the City.
Mayor Youngman stated that she anticipates receiving a proposal from another firm
with which WalMart does work, so there will be three to consider.
(14) The City Manager stated his recommendations for the upcoming budget will
be ready to print following tonight's review of the panel's recommenations on the capital
improvement program.
(15) Staff Attorney Cooper stated he attended a meeting on Friday to work on
model law enforcement policies that can be used throughout the state. He noted that, for the
. most part, Bozeman is on the leading edge, and has policies in place very similar to those being
developed through the Montana Municipal Insurance Authority and the Montana Association
of Counties.
Recess - 5:40 o.m.
Mayor Youngman recessed the meeting at 5:40 p.m., to reconvene at 7:00 p.m. for
the purpose of conducting the special meeting.
Reconvene ~ 7:00 O.m.
Mayor Youngman reconvened the meeting at 7:00 p.m. for the purpose of conducting
the special meeting.
Signing of the Notice of Soecial Meeting
Each of the Commissioners, in turn, signed the Notice of Special Meeting.
. Reauest for fundina for the Historic Preservation Advisorv Board
Included in the Commissioners' packets was a memo from Historic Preservation
Officer Derek Strahn, dated May 3, 2000, requesting that the Commission contribute $500
from its budgeted amount to support board requests toward activities associated with Historic
Preservation Days, scheduled for May 27 through June 11, 2000.
Mr. Jim Webster, Chair of the Historic Preservation Advisory Board, stated that
"Historic Preservation Week" has been expanded into "Historic Preservation Days", with
activities spreading over two weeks. The Board is reaching out to different segments of the
05-08-2000
- 7 -
community with a variety of events. He also noted that the activities undertaken over the
years have expanded significantly, from tours with five people attending to tours with 130
people attending. He stated that this year, they are working with Billings to bring in a speaker,
which increases the costs significantly. As a result, he requested that the Commission approve
the expenditure of $500 from the monies it has set aside to fund board requests, to assist in
defraying a portion of the $2,700 in anticipated costs for the "Historic Preservation Days"
activities.
It was moved by Commissioner Brown, seconded by Commissioner Frost, that the
. Commission approve the request from the Historic Preservation Advisory Board for $500.00
from the monies earmarked for board requests, to assist in funding of the Historic Preservation
Days events. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being
Commissioner Brown, Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Smiley, Commissioner Kirchhoff and
Mayor Youngman; those voting No, none.
Review of recommendations from CIP citizens review advisory Danel re CaDital ImDrovement
Proaram Workina Document for Fiscal Years 2001 through 2005
Included in the Commissioners' packets was a copy of the Recommendations from
the CIP Citizens' Review Advisory Panel for Fiscal Years 2001 through 2005.
Mayor Youngman noted that Steve Sparks is present from the panel. She indicated
that the panel members just recently received a copy of their draft recommendations for their
review, and the comments on the Commissioners' tables this evening are from one panel
member.
Mr. Steve Sparks characterized serving on the CIP Citizens' Review Advisory Panel
as an eye-opening experience as well as a positive one. He noted that the CIP document was
easy to read, while reflecting the intricacies of government financing. He stated the panel
found a need to prioritize the 100 acres of land to be dedicated as open space as very, very
. high, realizing that the monies are not available without a mill levy or some other type of
financing. He stated that a new City Shop Complex was also viewed as being very important,
recognizing that several different funds share in those costs.
Mr. Sparks noted that David Smith had some concerns about the 45-percent
wastewater surcharge, and those concerns are reflected in the written comments which the
Commissioners have just received. He noted the panel favored tying that surcharge to the
funding which Senator Burns has acquired for infrastructure improvements. He concluded by
stating the panel also recognizes the County should participate in funding those items needed
for joint programs, and the need to bridge the gap between the governmental entities to ensure
that occurs.
Responding to Commissioner Kirchhoff, Mr. Sparks stated a couple different
discussions surfaced over the acquisition of 100 acres. He suggested there may be some
creative ways of acquiring that land. He noted that, as a member of the Recreation and Parks
Advisory Board, he informed the panel a number of different factions are working on this idea.
He indicated the City has a small window of opportunity, and asked that the Commission
support the recommendations that may be forwarded by the committee working on it.
Mr. Sparks concluded by stating the panel had some lively discussion, with none of
it being negative. He stated the panel members now have information to pass along to other
. user groups and civic organizations, which he feels is part of their responsibility.
Commissioner Frost noted the panel suggested the City should not compete with
private companies through the use of roll-off containers; however, the Commission has recently
been informed that some of the roll-off containers were to be used at the landfill, since they
would be more economical and efficient than the dumpsters currently being used.
City Manager Johnson stated that the City staff also learned the importance of
communicating with the public, stating the two projects for which adequate information has
05-08-2000
-- .----- ---.-
- 8 -
not provided did not meet the approval of the review panel. He noted one of those was the
roll-off containers at the landfill while the other was the construction of a new swimming pool.
Responding to Mayor Youngman, the City Manager urged the Commissioners to
follow the panel's recommendations, indicating that staff will work on their presentation for
next year. He indicated that, to provide the desired efficiency at the landfill, however, he
would like to acquire those roll-off containers.
Mr. Steve Sparks noted that additional information has been provided this evening
. that the panel did not have. He stated the key issue for the panel was City versus private
sector competition; and he does not believe the panel members would have any problem in
using roll-off containers for efficiency in City operations. He indicated that, when discussing
the pool issue, panel members felt that additional park space was more important than another
swimming pool.
Street/Sanitation Superintendent Roger Sicz apologized for not having adequate
information available for the citizens' review panel to consider. He stated that the requested
roll-off containers will not only create efficiencies at the landfill, but were proposed to be used
for hauling snow and leaves and recycled glass. He indicated that, if the panel does not believe
the City should be in competition with the private sector, that issue can be revisited at a later
date. He concluded by stating he will honor the Commission's decision.
Commissioner Brown stated his real concern is to revisit the issue of inadequate
parking at the Swim Center, stating it appears the City's facility cannot be used efficiently
because of that lack of parking. He recognized that the City must work with the School District
to resolve the issue.
Mayor Youngman asked the Commissioners to identify any potential changes to the
Capital Improvement Program Working Document, so those changes can be incorporated into
the budget recommendations.
. Commissioner Frost stated his concurrence with the panel's recommendations, except
for acquiring roll-off containers for the landfill and picking up leaves.
Mayor Youngman asked the Commissioners to address the comments in David
Smith's memo prior to taking action.
Responding to comments from the Commissioners, City Manager Johnson stated that
three years ago, the City did not know what its bonding needs might be, including possible
construction of a new pool, expansion of the library, a new jail and open space needs. He
suggested that an alternative for funding a new pool might be identified prior to next year's
capital improvement program.
Mayor Youngman stated her support for the panel's recommendations. She stated,
however, the library is concerned that their needs are not included in the capital improvement
program, since it was their impression the City's bonding capacity had been earmarked for the
library expansion.
Responding to Commissioner Brown, Administrative Services Director Gamradt stated
the City has $5.8 million in uncommitted bonding capacity.
Responding to questions from the Commission, City Manager Johnson indicated the
. initial cost estimates of the library expansion range from $9 to $12 million. He then
characterized this as a "cart and horse" issue, since there is some difference of opinion on
which entity should commit monies first.
Mayor Youngman noted the CIP Citizens' Review Advisory Panel has recommended
that capital items, as well as operations, should be funded jointly and, as a result, she
suggested the County be asked to participate in the capital costs of expanding the library.
It was moved by Commissioner Frost, seconded by Commissioner Smiley, that the
Commission follow the recommendation of the CIP Citizens' Review Advisory Panel, with the
05-08-2000
------.---------- ---
- ..-.-----..--
- 9 -
following revisions: (1) that the overpass on South 11th Avenue be stricken and (2) that the
roll-ofts for use at the landfill and for use during leaf pick-up, snow removal and hauling of
recycled glass be added. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting
Aye being Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Smiley, Commissioner Kirchhoff, Commissioner
Brown and Mayor Youngman; those voting No, none.
Authorization for particiDation in Dower comDanv acauisition
. City Manager Johnson handed out an announcement about a coalition of Cities who
are joining together to participate in possible acquisition of the distribution and transmission
lines from Montana Power Company, and indicated he is seeking possible endorsement to
become a partner in the group. He indicated the next step in the process will be to spend
monies to hire a firm that is good at mergers and acquisitions to advise the group on what it
. would be buying, the assets and potential liabilities. He indicated the consultant will also
identify potential pollution problems, particularly in light of the recent news about the Milltown
Dam being part of the acquisition.
Responding to Commissioner Frost, the City Manager aCknowledged that, if the Cities
involved decide to pursue acquisition, they will be on a very aggressive schedule.
Responding to Commissioner Kirchhoff, the City Manager indicated the Cities involved
include Billings, Bozeman, Butte, Great Falls, Helena, Missoula and Shelby. He noted that the
seven are to form a non-profit corporation called Montana Electric and Gas Alliance, Inc.
(MEGA), with the intent being to ultimately turn it into a publicly-owned utility. He stated that,
because of the aggressive timeframe, however, the non. profit company is needed for the initial
acquisition. He stated the assets of Montana Power Company have been estimated at $1 %
billion, although the Milltown Dam and other liabilities will be subtracted from that amount to
determine a possible purchase price. He concluded by stating the group ultimately envisions
an organization similar to the Montana Municipal Insurance Authority (MMIA), with an elected
board of directors and a hired utility manager to operate the company.
. During discussion, the Commissioners recognized the significant costs that could be
involved, but also recognized the benefit to consumers if the Cities become involved. As a
result, they determined it would be appropriate for the City to pursue this possibility.
It was moved by Commissioner Smiley, seconded by Commissioner Kirchhoff, that
City Manager Johnson be authorized to participate in possible acquisition of the power
company as part of the non.profit corporation, as described above. The motion carried by the
following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Smiley, Commissioner
Kirchhoff, Commissioner Brov:vn, Commissioner Frost and Mayor Youngman; those voting No,
none.
Adjournment - 8:15 D.m.
There being no further business to come before the Commission at this time, it was
moved by Commissioner Frost, seconded by Commissioner Smiley, that the meeting be
adjourned. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being
Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Smiley, Commissioner Kirchhoff, Commissioner Brown and
Mayor Youngman; those voting No, none.
. MAR~G~~
ATTEST:
~;/~
ROBIN L. SULLIVAN
Clerk of the Commission
05-08-2000
__.._______. ____._.u______._____.__ ..... ---- ...
..----