HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-18-2026 Public Comment - M. Bateson - Saving Old Trees Might Save Lives - Attached NYT Article From: Mary Bateson
To: Bozeman Public Comment
Cc: BozemanTreeCoalition
Subject: [EXTERNAL]Saving Old Trees Might Save Lives-Attached NYT Article
Date: Tuesday,August 18,2026 1:28:50 PM
Attachments: NYT Climate_Saving Old Trees Might Save Lives.pdf
CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Bozeman City Commissioners and Bozeman Tree Coalition,
I applaud the City Commission taking the action of increasing the special assessment for tree
maintenance this year. Thank you!
Please find attached an article from today's New York Times "Climate Forward- Saving Old
Trees Might Save Lives". If taxpayers are unhappy about increased funding for tree
maintenance,you may be able to encourage them to support it with information from this
article which links human health to our tree canopy!
Cheers!
Mary Bateson, Bozeman Resident
Saving old trees might save lives
By Alexander Nazaryan
NYT Climate Forward August 18, 2026
When it comes to urban trees, old is gold.
Many cities across the country, including New York, have been planting trees in
neighborhoods where cooling shade has been sparse because of neglect in
decades past. But a new study has found that simply adding trees is not enough:
To get the most from tree cover, communities also have to preserve older ones.
"If we take care of trees, they take care of us, and might even help save our lives,"
said Harrison C. Garcia, a student at the Northwestern University Feinberg
School of Medicine and the lead author on the study. "They're not just a luxury.
They're not just something to look at."
For their research, published this month in the journal GeoHealth, Mr. Garcia
and his co-authors used satellite maps from the U.S. Forest Service National
Land Cover Database to track how tree canopies had changed in some of
Chicago's 77 neighborhoods between 2011 and 2021. Disparity in tree cover was
wide. Some of those areas, like Forest Glen, have canopies of close to 50 percent.
But some lower-income neighborhoods are practically barren of tree cover.
Archer Heights, an immigrant enclave on the southwest side, stands at 8 percent
tree coverage.
Instead of focusing on absolute numbers, the researchers matched changes in
tree canopy over the years with mortality rates in those neighborhoods. They
found that "each year-to-year percent increase in canopy was associated with
around a io percent reduction in mortality" and that a .03 percent year-to-year
increase in tree cover (roughly, 14,000 new trees) would theoretically result in
105 fewer deaths per year.
Decreases in deaths from chronic diseases — including respiratory and
cardiovascular conditions, as well as from mental illness — partly drove that
drop.
"The year-over-year piece is really, really fascinating," said Michelle
Stuhlmacher, an associate professor of geography at DePaul University in
Chicago, who also studies the city's tree canopy. "It shows longer-term
investments or disinvestments."
Dr. Stuhlmacher noted, though, that no study could fully account for the
complex forces at work in a city as large and complex as Chicago. She was not
involved in the GeoHealth study.
Studies have previously shown an association between tree cover and public
health outcomes. The new study is novel because it tracks how the tree canopy
expands or contracts in response to development, natural disasters and other
forces, and how those changes in turn appear to correlate to communitywide
health.
Mr. Garcia stressed that the study did not describe an explicitly causal
relationship between tree canopy and mortality. Nor did it investigate the
reasons behind canopy fluctuation.
In 2022, Lori E. Lightfoot, who was the Chicago mayor at the time, committed to
planting 75,000 new trees across the city, with an eye toward less wealthy
neighborhoods on the city's South and West sides. Last year, the current mayor,
Brandon Johnson, said that 68,000 trees had been planted.
But a sapling can take years to develop into a tree that becomes part of a canopy.
And the sapling might not make it at all, especially under the increasing stress of
climate change, which not only brings high temperatures but also more intense
storms.
"Increased heat stress likely makes it harder for newly planted saplings to
survive," Mr. Garcia said.
That's why it's important to protect mature trees, in addition to planting new
ones.
A study y Portland State University researchers published this year found that,
Of 33 American cities included in a survey, 73 percent were losing greenery.
Crucially, that loss was concentrated in neighborhoods that were the hottest to
begin with.
"We just keep seeing trees being lost in neighborhoods that are, in fact, the
places that we need the trees the most," said Vivek Shandas, a professor of
climate change adaptation at Portland State and an author on the university's
study.
"The preservation side of the ledger really deserves more attention,"he said.
Mr. Garcia said that the work of maintaining a tree canopy, whether by planting
new trees or preserving old ones, has to be ongoing in order to be successful.
"Our models point in the direction that only continuous work to expand tree
canopy could save lives," he said. "If we choose to do nothing, while climate
change worsens and canopy continues to decrease, the consequences could be
much more dramatic than the gains we see."
View in browser I nytimes.com
Ehe Attu Rork gimcs
Climate Forward
August 18,2026
1
i;
^9 tv
f a
C
-
r
- ®1 31Yu4�
Researchers working with satellite images of Chicago matched changes in tree
canopy in different neighborhoods over the years with mortality rates in those
areas.serhii Chrucky/Alamy
Saving old trees might save lives
By Alexander Nazaryan
When it comes to urban trees, old is gold.
Many cities across the country, including New York,have been planting trees in
neighborhoods where cooling shade has been sparse because of neglect in
decades past. But a new study has found that simply adding trees is not enough:
To get the most from tree cover, communities also have to preserve older ones.
"If we take care of trees, they take care of us, and might even help save our
lives," said Harrison C. Garcia, a student at the Northwestern University
Feinberg School of Medicine and the lead author on the study. "They're not just
a luxury. They're not just something to look at."
For their research, published this month in the journal GeoHealth, Mr. Garcia
and his co-authors used satellite maps from the U.S. Forest Service National
Land Cover Database to track how tree canopies had changed in some of
Chicago's 77 neighborhoods between 2o11 and 2021. Disparity in tree cover was
wide. Some of those areas,like Forest Glen, have canopies of close to 50
percent. But some lower-income neighborhoods are practically barren of tree
cover.Archer Heights, an immigrant enclave on the southwest side, stands at 8
percent tree coverage.
Instead of focusing on absolute numbers, the researchers matched changes in
tree canopy over the years with mortality rates in those neighborhoods. They
found that"each year-to-year percent increase in canopy was associated with
around a 10 percent reduction in mortality" and that a .03 percent year-to-year
increase in tree cover (roughly, 14,000 new trees)would theoretically result in
105 fewer deaths per year.
Decreases in deaths from chronic diseases — including respiratory and
cardiovascular conditions, as well as from mental illness — partly drove that
drop.
"The year-over-year piece is really, really fascinating," said Michelle
Stuhlmacher, an associate professor of geography at DePaul University in
Chicago, who also studies the city's tree canopy. "It shows longer-term
investments or disinvestments."
16
f� � �,i�l��r�� •try 1y 4�� �, �i F•
f �7 +'r
•r f 9 r
ti
late adtwv
I �HY�t rttlWtlYt\t r�
Cu
Isoots',, t'ei••ru
+ice; • h.,.i. -
Sal _ t.
es
O• � �q.:•iu•�
� Ib
- r
J
Yy
K�
1 -
e
Tree planting in the Irving Park neighborhood of Chicago in 2023. ZUMA Press,
Inc.,via Alanty
Dr. Stuhlmacher noted, though, that no study could fully account for the
complex forces at work in a city as large and complex as Chicago. She was not
involved in the GeoHealth study.
Studies have previously shown an association between tree cover and public
health outcomes. The new study is novel because it tracks how the tree canopy
expands or contracts in response to development, natural disasters and other
forces, and how those changes in turn appear to correlate to communitywide
health.
Mr. Garcia stressed that the study did not describe an explicitly causal
relationship between tree canopy and mortality. Nor did it investigate the
reasons behind canopy fluctuation.
In 2022, Lori E. Lightfoot, who was the Chicago mayor at the time, committed
to planting 75,00o new trees across the city,with an eye toward less wealthy
neighborhoods on the city's South and West sides. Last year, the current mayor,
Brandon Johnson, said that 68,00o trees had been planted.
But a sapling can take years to develop into a tree that becomes part of a
canopy.And the sapling might not make it at all, especially under the increasing
stress of climate change,which not only brings high temperatures but also more
intense storms.
"Increased heat stress likely makes it harder for newly planted saplings to
survive," Mr. Garcia said.
That's why it's important to protect mature trees, in addition to planting new
ones.
A study by Portland State University researchers published this year found that,
Of 33 American cities included in a survey, 73 percent were losing greenery.
Crucially, that loss was concentrated in neighborhoods that were the hottest to
begin with.
"We just keep seeing trees being lost in neighborhoods that are, in fact, the
places that we need the trees the most," said Vivek Shandas, a professor of
climate change adaptation at Portland State and an author on the university's
study.
"The preservation side of the ledger really deserves more attention,"he said.
Mr. Garcia said that the work of maintaining a tree canopy, whether by planting
new trees or preserving old ones, has to be ongoing in order to be successful.
"Our models point in the direction that only continuous work to expand tree
canopy could save lives,"he said. "If we choose to do nothing, while climate
change worsens and canopy continues to decrease, the consequences could be
much more dramatic than the gains we see."