Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutXXX - Plan Review - Review Comments Response Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: 25723 Discount Tire SP SUP Workflow Started: 11/21/2025 5:20:10 PM Report Generated: 02/10/2026 09:08 AM Created in ProjectDox version 9.4.9.931 REVIEW COMMENTS REF # CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 1 CD Technician Sam Sagstetter 12/2/25 12:13 PM Checklist Item Please include the engineer's stamp on the title sheet of the stormwater design report. Responded by: Darian Murray - 1/5/26 2:57 PM Engineer's stamp has been added. Please see the updated report. Resolved 2 CD Technician Sam Sagstetter 12/2/25 12:16 PM Checklist Item Please include an ADA compliance note on sheet 017 - CV - 1.0 Cover Sheet Responded by: Darian Murray - 1/5/26 2:57 PM ADA compliance note has been added as directed. Please see updated Cover Sheet Resolved 3 CD Technician Sam Sagstetter 12/2/25 4:24 PM Checklist Item Missing owner signature on Development Review Application. Please upload the notification letter with the owner's signature obtained. The notification letter was sent to the applicant's email the day the application was submitted. Please check your spam folder if you do not find it in your inbox. Responded by: Darian Murray - 1/5/26 2:57 PM Please see the modified signed notification letter. Resolved 4 1 Solid Waste Russell Ward 1/14/26 3:26 PM Changemark Solid Waste 1. all doors must open a minimum of 180 degrees for each door. 030 - C-8.1 Paving and Site Details.pdf Trash enclosure relocated and gate configuration revised to provide 180 degrees of swing for all doors. Unresolved 5 1 Addressing Jenny Connelley 1/16/26 11:29 AM Comment This parcel has an address of 5889 E Valley Center Road which can be used for this structure. Any additional structures would require separate addresses. Address updated as directed. No additional structures proposed. Info Only 6 1 Forestry Division Alex Nordquest 1/21/26 11:46 AM Changemark Tree Spacing Recommendations Recommend broader spacing from tree-to-tree, to allow for full development into maturity. For example, standard street trees require a minimum of 30' spacing to allow for full height/width canopy development over time. 033 - L1.00 Landscape Plan.pdf Please see the updated landscape layout on plan sheet L1.00. Info Only 7 1 Stormwater Division Russ Smith 1/28/26 11:31 AM Changemark Stormwater Admin Item 1 SWPPP Montana Construction General Permit 2. Effluent Limitations, Monitoring and Reporting Requirements 2.1.3 Soil Stabilization a. Temporary soil stabilization measures must include: 1. Stabilization of disturbed areas immediately for any portion of the construction project that will remain inactive for 14 or more calendar days with erosion control BMPs. b. Final stabilization measures must include: 2. Use erosion control BMPs (including post construction BMPs) to stabilize disturbed areas within any portion of the project that have completed clearing, grading, excavation, or other earth disturbing 011 - Stormwater Drainage Report.pdf A SWPPP has been submitted to identify requirements related to effluent limitations, monitoring, and reporting requirements, as well as temporary and final stabilization requirements. Section 6 of the storm drainage report references the SWPPP for these requirements. Unresolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: 25723 Discount Tire SP SUP Workflow Started: 11/21/2025 5:20:10 PM Report Generated: 02/10/2026 09:08 AM Created in ProjectDox version 9.4.9.931 activities. https://deq.mt.gov/files/Water/WQInfo/Documents/2021%20Public%20Notices/PN- MT_21-31/FINAL/2023-FPER-MTR100000-S%20Sign.pdfe 8 1 Stormwater Division Russ Smith 1/28/26 11:31 AM Changemark Stormwater Admin Item 2 Sec. 40.04.850. - Inspections. A. The owner or other responsible party shall conduct annual inspections of the facilities and shall maintain records of such inspections for the life of the development. 011 - Stormwater Drainage Report.pdf Item 4 of Section 7 in the Storm Report has been updated to address this requirement. Unresolved 9 1 Stormwater Division Russ Smith 1/28/26 1:19 PM Changemark Existing Stormwater Facility Item 1 38.220.080.2.g Location, identification and dimension of the following existing and proposed data, on-site and to a distance of 100 feet (200 feet for PUDs) outside site plan boundary, exclusive of public rights-of-way, unless otherwise stated: (9 Grading and drainage plan, including provisions for on-site retention/detention and water quality improvement facilities as required by the engineering department, or in compliance with any adopted storm drainage ordinance or best management practices manual adopted by the city. Specifically, the inlet pipe invert elevation at this stormwater facility; please describe how this elevation and the facility shape can meet the needs of the southerly (up-gradient) neighboring property. Because this facility currently exists directly on a large sanitary sewer main, the City would encourage minimzing excavation depth, and favor a more linear bio-swale closer to the parking lot, that potentially meets similar treatment effectiveness. 023 - C-2.0 Grading and Drainage Plan.pdf The swale has been reconfigured to minimize excavation depth above the sanitary sewer and allowing stormwater run-on from the adjacent property to continue flowing to the north. Unresolved 10 1 Parks Department Ross Knapper 1/29/26 9:43 AM Comment Commercial development. No park and recreation requirements. Understood. No action to be taken. Info Only 11 1 Engineering Simon Lindley 2/2/26 4:03 PM Comment BMC 38.410.070.B - The length of water services lines from the main to the structure may not exceed 150 feet in length unless approved in writing by the city. The applicant should request an administrative waiver with the subsequent site plan submittal. Please reference chapter 1.9 of the City of Bozeman Design and Construction Standards. Please note the city doesn't have a standard form. The request should be submitted in the form of a certified memo, and address the requirements in chapter 1.9.2 (administrative waiver review criteria) and chapter 4.2 (design criteria), as applicable. Water Service Deviation memo with responses to the referenced sections has been included with the resubmittal. Unresolved 12 1 Engineering Simon Lindley 2/2/26 4:33 PM Comment City of Bozeman Design and Construction Standards Chapter 3.2.1 - Water Design Report The water design report must include calculations for the average day demand and max day demand for the proposed project. Please refer to the City of Bozeman Water Facility Plan for design data, or use the best available data for the project (such as DEQ values or based on plumbing fixtures). The applicant may assume domestic water demand equals sewer demand for this project. The total water demand equals domestic plus irrigation water use. The City recognizes this project is not installing a new water main, however the proposed water demands are still required to be submitted in the certified water report with the site plan review Average day demand and max day demand have been provided as requested. Unresolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: 25723 Discount Tire SP SUP Workflow Started: 11/21/2025 5:20:10 PM Report Generated: 02/10/2026 09:08 AM Created in ProjectDox version 9.4.9.931 so the City can evaluate demands on the City system. Please revise the water design report with the subsequent site plan submittal. 13 1 Engineering Simon Lindley 2/2/26 4:47 PM Comment City of Bozeman Design and Construction Standards Chapter 3.2.2 - Sewer Design Report The sewer design report must include calculations for average daily flow and peak hour flow. Please reference the table 5.2.1 in the design standards, or use the best available data for the project (such as DEQ values or plumbing fixtures). The applicant may assume domestic water demand equals sewer demand for this project. The total water demand equals domestic plus irrigation water use. The City recognizes this project is not installing a new sewer main, however the proposed sewer demands are still required to be submitted with the site plan review so the City can evaluate demands on the City system. Please revise the sewer design report with the subsequent site plan submittal. Average day demand and max day demand have been provided as requested. Unresolved 14 1 Engineering Simon Lindley 2/2/26 5:04 PM Comment BMC 38.410.060 - Easements: The applicant must release the existing waterline easement around the existing fire hydrant and record a new 20 foot waterline easement. Please submit a draft release and reconveyance document, and a draft waterline easement document and exhibit from a Montana PLS for review with the subsequent site plan submittal. Signed hard copies of the easements must be submitted to the city prior to final site plan approval. The applicant may find the City Standard Easement Templates in the City Documents and Staff Reports folder. These templates represent the City's required easement. If the applicant chooses to request changes they must contact the development review engineer assigned to the project. If any changes are made to these templates the applicant must indicate in the document the specific changes when returned to the City. Proposed easement boundary is shown on sheet C-3.0. Draft easement documents have been included in the re-submittal. Unresolved 15 1 Engineering Simon Lindley 2/2/26 5:16 PM Comment BMC 38.710.070.C.7.h.(2) - Site Plan Submittal Requirements & BMC 38.710.120.A - Submittal Materials for Activities in or Adjacent to Wetlands and Watercourses With the subsequent site plan submittal, the applicant must provide the following information so the City has complete documentation with the application: 1) If wetlands or watercourses are not present on or adjacent to the subject property, a letter signed by a qualified wetlands professional must be submitted to the city certifying there are no wetlands or watercourses within the subject property or adjacent to the property and describing the methods used to determine that wetlands or watercourses do not exist on or adjacent to the property. or, 2) If a wetland or watercourse is present or adjacent to the property, a wetland and watercourse delineation report must be submitted to the city. When required to determine the wetland or watercourse location and function, the delineation report must consider land outside the boundary of the property proposed for development. A letter from a wetland scientist has been included in the submittal. Please see the document for he desired information. Unresolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: 25723 Discount Tire SP SUP Workflow Started: 11/21/2025 5:20:10 PM Report Generated: 02/10/2026 09:08 AM Created in ProjectDox version 9.4.9.931 16 1 Engineering Simon Lindley 2/3/26 9:16 AM Comment City of Bozeman Design and Construction Standards Chapter 6 Attachment D - Prior to final site plan approval, please provide a copy of the acknowledgement of stormwater facilities maintenance requirements signed by the owner. The developer is currently working on obtaining the site owner’s signature. This will be provided before site plan approval. Conditioned 17 1 Engineering Simon Lindley 2/3/26 9:21 AM Comment The Operation, Inspection, & Maintenance Manual in the stormwater report is missing several requirements from DCS Chapter 6.4.3 listed below. I understand this project might be in the early design stages. Please resolve these items with the resubmittal, or request these items from the maintenance plan to be conditioned prior to final site plan approval. The costs estimate doesn't have to be exact. All we're looking for is a general cost estimate for the stormwater inspection, maintenance and replacement. Comment #16 (acknowledgement form) may also be resolved or conditioned. 1. Expected design life and replacement schedule for each component of the facility. 2. Itemized cost estimates for recurring operation, inspection, and maintenance activities and planned facility replacement. 3. A financial plan and funding mechanism for funding the recurring operation, inspection, and maintenance activities and planned facility replacement. The plan shall include sinking fund calculations considering estimated inflation over the life of the system components and a determination of the annual funding to be set-aside for operation, inspection, maintenance, and replacement needs. Please see section 8 updated in O&M manual Unresolved 18 1 Engineering Simon Lindley 2/3/26 9:52 AM Changemark ENG Bozeman Rainfall Depth City of Bozeman Design and Construction Standards Chapter 6.5.3 - The applicant must use the Bozeman rainfall data to design stormwater facilities within the City of Bozeman. Please reference table 6.5.1 & table 6.5.2 in the design standards. The precipitation depth for Bozeman is higher during the 2-year and 10-year storm events than the values listed in table 4.2 of the stormwater report for this project. 011 - Stormwater Drainage Report.pdf Calculations and data in the chart have been updated to reflect the correct rainfall data. Unresolved 19 1 Engineering Simon Lindley 2/3/26 10:42 AM Changemark ENG Groundwater Separation City of Bozeman Design and Construction Standards Chapter 6.8.2.A - Seasonal high groundwater must be a minimum of two feet below the bottom of the proposed infiltration basin. The report generally specifies the depth of groundwater below existing grade but it's unclear whether the two foot requirement is met with the proposed design. The two foot requirement is not mentioned in the stormwater report. Please label the depth of seasonal high groundwater on the drainage sheet and add more detail to the drainage report so I can verify the two foot requirement is met for the proposed infiltration basin. 011 - Stormwater Drainage Report.pdf Note added to section 4 under “Infiltration Cell Bottom” heading. Infiltration area of the storm pond has been modified to provide necessary separation. Minimum required volumes have been maintained. Unresolved 20 1 Engineering Simon Lindley 2/3/26 10:51 AM Comment City of Bozeman Design and Construction Standards Chapter 1.4 - Plans, specifications, and submittals for public infrastructure (fire hydrant) and fire service lines must be submitted by the professional engineer to the City Engineering Department through the engineering Project Dox Portal for infrastructure/fire service line review. The site plan must reach adequacy according to Understood, materials are being gathered for submittal until site plan approval is attained. Info Only Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: 25723 Discount Tire SP SUP Workflow Started: 11/21/2025 5:20:10 PM Report Generated: 02/10/2026 09:08 AM Created in ProjectDox version 9.4.9.931 the review engineer prior to initial infrastructure submittal. Please see the infrastructure review fee schedule on the City Engineering website. 21 1 Engineering Simon Lindley 2/3/26 10:52 AM Comment Ditch Noticing Checklist: BMC 38.310.010 - The applicant must fill out the Ditch Noticing Checklist found on the planning website and provide the relevant documentation with the subsequent site plan submittal. As of June 18, 2025, the checklist is required with all site plan reviews so the City has complete documentation with all site plan applications. If a ditch is not present on-site, within 100 feet of the exterior boundaries of the proposed development or a ditch is not impacted by an offsite improvement, the applicant should select the applicable box and the remainder of this checklist is not required to be completed. Checklist has been included with the resubmittal. Unresolved 22 1 Transportation Candace Mastel 2/3/26 10:58 AM Comment The Shared Use Path (SUP) along Valley Center Road shall be 8-feet in width (like the path on the property to the north and south). This is a transportation facility and as such should be in alignment with the adjacent road and not meander excessively. The CONR submittal (25528) was responded to in September 2025 with the acceptance of the current easement alignment but given this new Site Plan submittal, and considering comments from Engineering (Ref. #23) and Planning (Ref. #34) release and reconveyance of the easement and realignment of the SUP is prudent. Additionally, Applicant should utilize the PRAT Wayfinding Plan, the Design and Construction Standards document, and staff guidance to install active transportation-based signage for the Shared Use Paths. This would include signage for the SUP crossing at the shared egress with My Place Hotel. The path is 8’ as required previously and matches the path to the north and south. Path has been shown as following the adjacent road (E Center Valley Drive) and connecting the existing path to the south and north. Additional parking has been added per the city’s direction. Unresolved 23 1 Engineering Simon Lindley 2/3/26 11:17 AM Comment BMC 38.410.060 - Easements & BMC 38.400.110 - Transportation Pathways: Please see the shared use path alignment comment from transportation. The applicant must release the existing 12 foot pedestrian access easement across the property and record a new 25 foot trail easement. A 25 foot trail easement is required by the current code at the time of development for construction, maintenance and use of a class 1 trail. Please submit a draft release and reconveyance document, and a draft trail easement document and exhibit from a Montana PLS for review with the subsequent site plan submittal. Signed hard copies of the easements must be submitted to the city prior to final site plan approval. The applicant may find the City Standard Easement Templates in the City Documents and Staff Reports folder. These templates represent the City's required easement. If the applicant chooses to request changes they must contact the development review engineer assigned to the project. If any changes are made to these templates the applicant must indicate in the document the specific changes when returned to the City. Proposed easement boundary is shown on sheet C-1.0. Draft easement documents have been included in the re-submittal. Unresolved 24 1 Engineering Simon Lindley 2/3/26 2:41 PM Comment BMC 38.530.020.L - Snow removal storage areas: Please review the code section and provide the following information with the subsequent site plan submittal. Snow storage areas have been added to the plan per referenced code section. Unresolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: 25723 Discount Tire SP SUP Workflow Started: 11/21/2025 5:20:10 PM Report Generated: 02/10/2026 09:08 AM Created in ProjectDox version 9.4.9.931 All parking facilities containing 5 or more parking spaces must provide a snow management plan. The plan must contain the following: 1. Locations for snow storage, which may include on-site landscaped areas, and other open space for at least 15 % of the total area of the site used for parking, access drives, walkways and other paved surfaces; 2. Snow storage is not allowed: a. In the public right-of-way; b. Where it would obstruct line of sight or vision triangle; c. In a location where it blocks fire hydrants, emergency vehicle access or access to other properties; d. Where it will cause unmanageable freeze/thaw and icing of sidewalks, pathways and other paved surfaces; e. Where it obstructs on-site amenities, including but not limited to points of egress, mailboxes, storage areas, and trash enclosures; f. Within any access easement; g. Where placed in a manner which violates the Clean Water Act (CWA) and/or the Montana Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (MPDES), and/or any other federal, state or local law or statute; or h. Where it will cause damage to trees located in the public right-of-way. 25 1 Engineering Simon Lindley 2/3/26 3:19 PM Comment Montana Department of Transportation (MDT) - East Valley Center Road is in under the jurisdiction of the Montana Department of Transportation. The applicant must work with MDT to determine if any permits will be required for access to the right of way at East Valley Center Road. Any work within MDT right-of-way must be approved by MDT prior to construction. Please contact Kristina Kilts, Butte District Traffic Engineer (kkilts@mt.gov) and Josh Ritchie, Bozeman Area Maintenance Chief (jritchie@mt.gov) to start the MDT permitting process. Please submit MDT approvals to the City as this project moves through the City review process. We have reached out to MDT and have received approval of the Approach permit. Info Only 26 1 Engineering Simon Lindley 2/3/26 3:27 PM Comment The applicant is advised that the proposed project falls within the Bozeman Solvent Site boundary. The applicant must contact the City's solvent site consultant, Jim Sullivan, the Principal Engineer at Tasman Geosciences, Inc. and the DEQ project manager, Katy Frye for additional information on construction requirements within the solvent site. Reached out to both contacts. Email correspondence has been included in the resubmittal. Info Only 27 1 Engineering Simon Lindley 2/4/26 10:04 AM Comment The subject property is located within the Solvent Site Payback district boundary. If the subject property did not participate in the original cost of construction of improvements, or previously pay the payback fees, the subject property will be accessed the payback charges prior to final site plan. Reference document: https://weblink.bozeman.net/weblink/0/doc/181705/Electronic.aspx Per the online calculator a fee of $16,249.32 is to be associated with this site. Fee will be paid before final site plan approval. Lot 1 = 2.503 acres = 109030.7 sq ft 109030.7 * 0.082 = $8,940.52 CPIA Calculator totals $16,249.32 Conditioned 28 1 Water Adequacy Division Griffin Nielson 2/4/26 1:51 PM Comment BMC 38.410.110. Water Adequacy: The preliminary estimate for the development's average annual municipal demand is 0.22 acre-feet, however, additional information is needed in order to finalize the estimate. Please see the items below. The demand must be offset prior to site plan approval. The applicant is advised that the City's current cash-in-lieu of water rights fee The water meter records for 3 years at 3 different locations have been provided. Unresolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: 25723 Discount Tire SP SUP Workflow Started: 11/21/2025 5:20:10 PM Report Generated: 02/10/2026 09:08 AM Created in ProjectDox version 9.4.9.931 rate is $6,000 per acre-foot. 1. Please provide the annual irrigation water requirement (volume) or direction to where this information can be found in the application. 2. If available, provide water meter records from other Discount Tire locations. Preferably, at least three locations and at least three years for each location. The meter data will be used to help to confirm the project's estimated average annual water demand. 29 1 Planning Zachary Moon 2/5/26 7:45 AM Comment Please be aware that this application did not achieve adequacy prior to the effective date of Ordinance #2025-12/2151, the updated/current Unified Development Code. As such, this application will be reviewed and must comply with all standards of the new code and changes may be required beyond what was discussed in the original Concept Review Application. Understood. Info Only 30 1 Planning Zachary Moon 2/5/26 11:53 AM Comment This request requires a Special Use Permit per Bozeman Municipal Code, Section 38.300.020. Please provide narrative responses to all criteria clarifying how this proposal complies with Special Use criteria listed in Section 38.740.100. as well as narrative responses to all criteria listed in Section 38.320.090.B. for Automobile fuel sales/repair, and all applicable fees for a Special Use Permit for further completeness review. Memo has been submitted with responses to each section. Unresolved 31 1 Planning Zachary Moon 2/5/26 1:50 PM Comment There is conflicting information between the submitted site plan, elevations, and floor plans. On the Site Plan, it shows a pedestrian entrance on the north side of the northwest corner of the building, the floor plans and elevations show the same entrance on the south face of the southwest corner of the building. Additionally, when comparing the site plan sheet and elevation sheet, it appears that the north and south elevations are swapped. On the elevation sheet, the south elevation shows garage door entrances for the cars while these doors are shown on the south elevation on the site plan. Please correct all continuity errors within the application for further completeness review. The building elevations have been updated to reflect the orientation of the building as identified on the Site Plan. Unresolved 32 1 Planning Zachary Moon 2/5/26 2:00 PM Comment The subject property is zoned B-2 which has a minimum setback of 1-foot and a maximum setback of 20-foot. The building is currently setback well in excess of the maximum 20 feet allowed by BMC Section 38.220.030.A.5. Please adjust the location of the building to comply with setbacks for further completeness review. Note that the setback should be taken from the extent of the joint access easement which passes through the property. Building location has been determined to be placed in the most ideal location as permitted by site’s shape and the existing water main location and proximity to the right of way border. Location has been supported by Planning in subsequent communication. Unresolved 33 1 Planning Zachary Moon 2/5/26 2:03 PM Comment In relation to the minimum setback requirement, the B-2 zone requires that at least 70% of the facade be placed within the minimum and maximum setback lines along the primary street. when relocating the building, please show at least 70% of the width of the building facade within the required frontage and provide calculations showing that the site design complies with this standard for further completeness review. Building location has been determined to be placed in the most ideal location as permitted by site’s shape and the existing water main location and proximity to the right of way border. Location has been supported by Planning in subsequent communication. Unresolved 34 1 Planning Zachary Moon 2/5/26 2:05 PM Comment Per Section 38.510.050.C. and planning comments given on the Concept Review, please design the western portion of the joint access easement to match the parcels to the south which Parking is shown along west side of the joint access as directed. Unresolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: 25723 Discount Tire SP SUP Workflow Started: 11/21/2025 5:20:10 PM Report Generated: 02/10/2026 09:08 AM Created in ProjectDox version 9.4.9.931 provide parking along the shared use path, for further completeness review. In redesigning this area, please continue to provide a 5-foot-wide pedestrian connection to the shared use path in compliance with BMC Section 38.510.040. (see further corrections regarding non-motorized circulation) 35 1 Planning Zachary Moon 2/5/26 2:41 PM Comment Per BMC Section 38.220.030.B.5.F., the B-2 zoning district requires that at least 60% of the ground floor contain windows between an area between zero and 12 feet above the top of the finished floor of the ground story. Please ensure that the ground floor of the western facade meets this standard and that calculations are provided which evidence compliance with this standard for further completeness review. Please see sheets A.2 and A.3 which shows the calculation breakdown of the Western Façade and how it complies with code. Unresolved 36 1 Engineering Simon Lindley 2/5/26 2:46 PM Comment BMC 38.410.080 - Grading and Drainage - Stormwater retention or detention systems serving multiple lots under separate ownership must not be located on private lots without the necessary easements. The applicant acknowledged in the response to the concept comments that stormwater easement documentation will be required and completed for the existing stormwater swale which is located at the southeast corner of the property and receives runoff from the neighboring lot. The submitted application doesn't appear to show a drainage easement or documentation. This would be a private drainage easement between the applicable property owners. Please show the drainage easement on the site plan so staff can condition the final easement to be executed prior to final site plan approval. Drainage easement shown on site plan for drainage from adjacent property through site. Unresolved 37 1 Planning Zachary Moon 2/5/26 2:51 PM Comment Per BMC Section 38.220.030.B.5.F The B-2 zoning district requires that at least 15% of each upper floor contain windows between an area beginning at the finished floor to the top of the wall plate. Please ensure that the upper story(s) of the western facade meets this standard and that calculations are provided which evidence compliance with this standard for further completeness review. Please see sheets A.2 and A.3 which shows the calculation breakdown of the Western Façade and how it complies with code. Unresolved 38 1 Planning Zachary Moon 2/5/26 2:56 PM Comment Per BMC Section 38.220.030.B.4., on elevation sheets, please show that the proposed building complies with the minimum ground story height of 12 feet, for further completeness review. Please see the Architectural drawings. Unresolved 39 1 Planning Zachary Moon 2/5/26 2:58 PM Comment Per BMC Section 38.220.030.B.4., on elevation sheets, please show that the proposed building complies with the minimum and maximum ground story elevations required of -2 feet up to +5 feet from natural grade, for further completeness review. Please refer to Section 38.260.130. for expectations regarding where these heights are measured from. The finished floor elevation around the building is within the range from natural grade to maintain the compliance for this site. Unresolved 40 1 Planning Zachary Moon 2/5/26 3:07 PM Comment From the submitted plans, it is unclear weather the pedestrian crossing from the site to the shared use path complies with Section 38.510.040.C.3. which requires that a pedestrian walk crossing a drive aisle must utilize contrasting material. This section explicitly excludes the use of paint for demarcating a crosswalk. Please ensure that this walkway is designed in compliance Pedestrian Path is shown as concrete to contrast with the asphalt roadway. Unresolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: 25723 Discount Tire SP SUP Workflow Started: 11/21/2025 5:20:10 PM Report Generated: 02/10/2026 09:08 AM Created in ProjectDox version 9.4.9.931 with Article 5 and that the contrasting materials to be utilized are called out on the site plan, for further completeness review. 41 1 Engineering Simon Lindley 2/5/26 4:13 PM Comment Fire Hydrant Relocation Timing: I've discussed the timing of the fire hydrant relocation with the Fire Marshal, Shane Brandhorst. The applicant is advised the fire hydrant must be relocated and accepted by the city prior to the issuance of the building permit for this project. The existing city water main will not meet the fire hydrant spacing requirement per the city engineering design standards (DCS ch. 4.2) when the existing fire hydrant is removed. The fire hydrant has been deemed necessary to be installed by the Fire Marshal prior to building permit issuance. It is understood that the fire hydrant should be relocated and approved before the building permit will be approved due to fire safety concerns. Info Only 42 1 Planning Zachary Moon 2/6/26 7:51 AM Comment Elevation sheets indicate outdoor lighting, however no required sheets were provided relating to lighting. Please provide a lighting plan with all elements required within the Site Plan Checklist for Lighting Plans and Details, Items #1-5 must be submitted for further completeness review. Photometric plan provided as directed. Unresolved 43 1 Planning Zachary Moon 2/6/26 8:18 AM Comment Per BMC Section 38.520.040.B. for each facade, a building is required to provide a change in roofline with vertical modulation of at least 2 feet, every 60 horizontal feet of building width pursuant to the detailed requirements of Subsection F. All elevations need to provide this vertical articulation at least every 60 feet. Please design the structure to provide the minimum required facade articulation on all facades for further completeness review. Please see the updated design reflected on sheets A.2 and A.3 which show compliance with the vertical articulation as defined in the code. Unresolved 44 1 Planning Zachary Moon 2/6/26 11:21 AM Comment A critical element of the Special Use Permit review is determining that the proposed use will be served by adequate parking. It is well known that automobile oriented services like this require a large volume of parking. Please utilize the allowance listed in BMC Section 38.530.040.B.6. which allows relief to the maximum parking typically allowed. Please submit information required by subsections a.-d. showing the required parking load needed to accommodate this use for further completeness review. Parking calculations have been waived for the site due to the unique situation that this type of development creates. Instead, parking has been included on the site in locations as suggested by the jurisdiction. Unresolved 45 1 Water Conservation Division Eric Neustrup 2/10/26 8:02 AM Comment A signed copy of the Building Permit Landscape & Irrigation Self-Certification Form (Appendix E) is necessary to receive a building permit. See the "City of Bozeman Landscape and Irrigation Performance and Design Standards Manual" - 3.1.2 The owner signature is being obtained and will be submitted before the receipt of the building permit. Info Only 46 1 Water Conservation Division Eric Neustrup 2/10/26 8:04 AM Comment When the prescriptive pathway has been selected applicants may not install more than 20% of the landscaped area as turfgrass. There is no departure available to this requirement. Turf mixes which use grasses with a plant factor of 0.6 or less can be utilized with the performance pathway and may allow the applicant more flexibility in creating turf areas. See “City of Bozeman Landscape and Irrigation Performance and Design Standards Manual”, Section 3.2.1 “Landscape Design Standards”, “Prescriptive Landscape Design Pathway (percentage-based approach), 1). Please see sheet L1.00 for the updated landscape plan and layout Unresolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: 25723 Discount Tire SP SUP Workflow Started: 11/21/2025 5:20:10 PM Report Generated: 02/10/2026 09:08 AM Created in ProjectDox version 9.4.9.931 47 1 Water Conservation Division Eric Neustrup 2/10/26 8:04 AM Comment The requirement for 10% of the landscape area to vegetated with container grown shrubs or perennials is no longer in effect. Please see sheet L1.00 for the updated landscape plan and layout Info Only 48 1 Water Conservation Division Eric Neustrup 2/10/26 8:05 AM Comment Current backflow device (double check valve) does not meet the 2024 Uniform plumbing code’s criteria for backflow prevention in a high hazard zone (irrigation and landscaping) – Table 603.2 and 602.3 2021 UPC. A backflow device compliant with the City’s currently adopted plumbing code (2021 Uniform Plumbing Code) for use in an irrigation system is required. See “City of Bozeman Landscape and Irrigation Performance and Design Standards Manual”, Section 3.3.1 “Irrigation Design Standards”, “Backflow Device and Controller”, 1). Please see sheet L2.00 for the updated irrigation plan and layout Unresolved 49 1 Water Conservation Division Eric Neustrup 2/10/26 8:05 AM Comment Hunter A2C requires a solar sync module(wired or wireless) to meet Watersense requirements and must be installed according to manufacturer specifications. Watersense labelled controllers are required per the “City of Bozeman Landscape and Irrigation Performance and Design Standards Manual”, Section 3.3.1 “Irrigation Design Standards”, “Backflow Device and Controller”, 2). Please see sheet L2.00 for the updated irrigation plan and layout Unresolved 50 1 Water Conservation Division Eric Neustrup 2/10/26 8:05 AM Comment Sensors (rain, freeze, wind, ET, soil moisture, etc.), either integral or auxiliary that suspend or alter irrigation operation during unfavorable weather conditions or when sufficient soil moisture is present are required. See “City of Bozeman Landscape and Irrigation Performance and Design Standards Manual”, Section “ 3.3.1 Irrigation Design Standards”, “Backflow Device and Controller”, 3). Please see sheet L2.00 for the updated irrigation plan and layout Unresolved 51 1 Water Conservation Division Eric Neustrup 2/10/26 8:06 AM Comment Overhead irrigation must use a 6” minimum riser. See “City of Bozeman Landscape and Irrigation Performance and Design Standards Manual”, Section 3.3.1 “Irrigation Design Standards”, “Sprinklers/Overhead Irrigation”, 4). Please see sheet L2.00 for the updated irrigation plan and layout Unresolved 52 1 Water Conservation Division Eric Neustrup 2/10/26 8:06 AM Comment Drip irrigation must be installed with the ability to easily flush the line. Add note to irrigation sheets that this practice will be followed during installation. See “City of Bozeman Landscape and Irrigation Performance and Design Standards Manual”, Section 3.3.1 “Irrigation Design Standards”, “Drip Irrigation”, 4) Please see sheet L2.00 for the updated irrigation plan and layout Unresolved 53 1 Water Conservation Division Eric Neustrup 2/10/26 8:06 AM Comment Trees must be drip irrigated. Trees are no longer required to be on separate, dedicated drip zones, but must be irrigated with drip irrigation. See the "City of Bozeman Landscape and Irrigation Performance and Design Standards Manual" - 3.3.1 - "Irrigation Stations/Zones" - Item 3) Please see sheet L2.00 for the updated irrigation plan and layout Info Only 54 1 Water Conservation Division Comment Irrigation Water Requirements for projects utilizing the prescriptive pathway must use the following assumptions when calculating their water use: Cool season turfgrass uses 18.4 gallons per square foot per year, drought-adapted woody plants and herbaceous perennials use 5.4 Please see sheet L2.00 for the updated irrigation plan and layout Unresolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: 25723 Discount Tire SP SUP Workflow Started: 11/21/2025 5:20:10 PM Report Generated: 02/10/2026 09:08 AM Created in ProjectDox version 9.4.9.931 Eric Neustrup 2/10/26 8:07 AM gallons per square foot per square foot per year, and drought tolerant plants use 1.8 gallons per square foot per square foot per year. For projects utilizing the performance pathway the water budget calculator may serve as the Irrigation Water Requirement. See “City of Bozeman Landscape and Irrigation Performance and Design Standards Manual”, Section 3.3.3 “ Irrigation Design Plan Requirements”, “Required Elements of the Irrigation System Design Plan for Final Plat and Site Plan” 1). 55 1 Water Conservation Division Eric Neustrup 2/10/26 8:07 AM Comment Identify connection point for winterization. See the "City of Bozeman Landscape and Irrigation Performance and Design Standards Manual" - 3.3.3 - "Required Elements of the Irrigation System Design Plan for Final Plat or Site Plan" - Item 3) h) Please see sheet L2.00 for the updated irrigation plan and layout Unresolved 56 1 Water Conservation Division Eric Neustrup 2/10/26 8:07 AM Comment Watering schedule is missing. See "City of Bozeman Landscape and Irrigation Performance and Design Standards Manual", Section 3.3.3, "Required Elements of the Irrigation System Design Plan for Final Plat or Site Plan", 4). Please see sheet L2.00 for the updated irrigation plan and layout Unresolved