HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-26-26 Public Comment - M. McHugh - Fw_ Bozeman Study Commission edits to the proposed City charter suggestions to improve the languageFrom:Mary Frances McHugh
To:Bozeman Public Comment
Subject:[EXTERNAL]Fw: Bozeman Study Commission edits to the proposed City charter suggestions to improve the
language
Date:Friday, June 26, 2026 10:23:02 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Please provide the memorandum below to the Mayor and Commission members. Thank
you.
Mary Frances McHugh
(530)598-7383
From: Mary Frances McHugh <m.f.mchugh@hotmail.com>
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2026 9:18 AM
To: govreview@bozeman.net <govreview@bozeman.net>
Cc: Mary Frances McHugh <m.f.mchugh@hotmail.com>
Subject: Bozeman Study Commission edits to the proposed City charter suggestions to
improve the language
Please provide the enclosed comments below to the Study Commission for consideration in
the Bozeman Study Commission's edits to the proposed City charter. These are suggestions to
improve the language.
Thank you.
Mary Frances McHugh
Date: June 26, 2026
To: The Study Commissioner, City of Bozeman / cc: Mayor and Commissioners, City of
Bozeman
Re: Regarding the Bozeman Study Commission edits to the proposed City charter
suggestions to improve the language
From: Mary Frances McHugh, Owner in Harvest Creek Subdivision, Bozeman, MT
Give Homeowners' Associations a voice in the Inter Neighborhood Council (INC) structure. I
propose the following specific line edits to the language of proposed Section 8.04 (see
highlighted proposal below):
Section 8.04 Neighborhood Associations
…
(b)
Recognition of neighborhood associations.
The city shall support the creation and maintenance of resident-led
neighborhood associations. The city commission shall establish by ordinance
minimum recognition requirements for neighborhood associations that support
participation, deliberation, and communication with residents and the city.
These requirements shall include, but not be limited to:
1. clear geographic boundaries developed in partnership
with the neighborhood and the Inter-Neighborhood
Council
or as fixed by the applicant association’s governing
document;
2. membership of a neighborhood association is
open to all residents, property owners, business owners,
and nonpartisan organizationslocated within a
neighborhood association’s boundary
or as established by the applicant association governing
document
;
3. A majority of the leadership, as defined by the
neighborhood association’s bylaws, should be residents
of the neighborhood and only residents of the
neighborhood may serve as the association’s Inter-
Neighborhood Council representative. Adherence to
established by-laws ensures democratic, voting
procedures, continuity of governance, and provide the
ability for a neighborhood association’s selected
representative to vote on INC recommendations;
a. Copy of the by-laws and all
amendments and applicant's governing documents to
filed with the city
;
4. periodic meetings, including an annual meeting;
5. demonstrating it has a means of regular, accessible, and
two-way communication with all residents in the
neighborhood.
6. capacity to develop and transmit advisory input on
neighborhood and citywide issues.
7. A homeowners’ association formed at the establishment
of a subdivision of land within the City shall be
permitted to apply as a Homeowners’ Association for
recognition under this provision.
a. If the
Homeowners’
association
was formed
prior to the
adoption of
this charter,
the
association
is presumed
to conform
with the
provisions
of (b)(1)-(6)
above for
recognition
as a
neighborhood
association
and shall be
recognized
as a
neighborhood
association.
b. If the
Homeowners’s
association
is formed
after the
adoption of
this charter,
the
association
shall comply
with
provisions
(b)(1)-(6)
above for
recognition
as a
neighborhood
association.
A neighborhood association shall maintain compliance with the minimum
standards established by ordinance to continue to be recognized by the city
and to be eligible to elect members to the Inter-
Neighborhood Council.
My suggested language will broaden, not limit public participation. This charter provision and
implementing ordinances (Bozeman Municipal Code Sections 2.05 and 4.06) are barriers to
public participation for citizens who are in HOAs, which is are structure already in place and
should be qualified.
The only distinction between an HOA and a neighborhood association (NA) appears to be the
“membership” requirement. Membership is defined by the City ordinance, not by the
charter. Section 2.05.1150 provides:
Sec. 2.05.1150. - Membership.
A. The membership of recognized neighborhood associations shall be open to
all residents, property owners, business licensees, and representatives of
nonprofit organizations within the defined neighborhood boundaries.
B. All eligible for membership in recognized neighborhood associations may
actively participate in neighborhood events, activities and meetings exercising
voting rights pursuant to neighborhood association bylaws, without regard to
race, national origin, religion, economic status, sex or physical ability.
C. A recognized neighborhood association will be responsible for maintaining
sign-in sheets and other records as required by the neighborhood association
bylaws.
Typically, an HOA is organized, has By Laws, regular meetings, posts notices, has an
identifiable membership, and an ability to communicate with that membership. In all respects
but one, an HOA would be recognized as an NA by the City. Yet, to apply for NA recognition all
residents must be members and all members must be able to vote. In an HOA, some
properties are occupied by non-owners, viz.., renters. An HOA founding document is usually a
recorded Declaration of Covenants, which establishes membership and voting rights in
property owners only. Generally an HOA cannot easily or readily change the terms of its
membership, frequently those terms were fixed decades ago, and require an insurmountable
percentage vote for amendments. Take, for instance, the HOA of which I am a member, there
are 500 households. They have no voice in INC, even though, in all respects but one the HOA
would qualify as an NA. Although the process and application for recognition of an NA was
clearly designed to serve as informal structures when there was no formal structure to meet
the interests of the citizens, it left behind those citizens who live in neighborhoods served by
formal structures, like HOAs.
This proposed modification would allow persons who are within the geographical area of an
HOA who are not members and feel they are not served by the HOA representation to form
their own association and likewise participate. Adoption of the suggested language would
address the lack of a rational basis for distinguishing organizations served by informal
structures and those served by formal structures. There is no rational basis for a law that
recognizes only neighborhood associations that fit the composition required by the City but
does not recognize existing, lawfully created neighborhood organizations serving similar
purposes, viz., HOAs. The result is disparate treatment of members of an HOA by their own
local government. It creates an impediment to participation of members of HOAs in vital city
affairs which are broached and discussed, preferentially, in the INC. This can be cured by the
proposed language above.
These comments are on my own behalf. I do not make any representations or comments on
behalf of any other person or any organization. Thank you.