HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-28-26 Supplemental Materials for Item F.1Motions remaining to charter
Submitted by Commissioner Campbell
May 28, 2026
1
Preamble
• I move to amend the Preamble of the draft charter to eliminate the repetitive phrasing of
“secure the benefits” by striking the phrase from the second sentence and replacing it
with, “By this action, we affirm the values of …”
o Reason: The phrase “secure the benefits” is used twice and is repetitive. This edit
removes redundancy while strengthening the text of the Preamble, transforming a
repetitive phrase into an active, intentional statement of governance.
Article I – Powers of the City
• I move to amend Section 1.03 to read: “The City of Bozeman may participate by contract
or otherwise with other governmental entities for lawful governmental purposes. Any
intergovernmental agreement, coalition participation, legislative advocacy position, joint
lobbying effort, or regional policy commitment that substantially affects the city’s
regulatory authority, land use authority, taxation authority, financial obligations, or
long-term governance responsibilities shall require approval by a majority vote of the
whole City Commission at a publicly-noticed meeting. No elected official, staff member,
or city representative shall have authority to enter into binding policy commitments or
represent the formal position of the city on such matters without prior approval of the
City Commission.”
o Reason: Significant policy commitments affecting the authority, finances, and
governance of the City of Bozeman should not be entered into administratively or
without transparent public review and formal approval by elected representatives.
Article II – City Commission
• I move to amend Section 2.04 of the draft charter by adding the following language to
the end of the section: “An itemized report of all such expenses for each commissioner
and the mayor shall be published on the city’s website quarterly to ensure full public
transparency.”
Motions remaining to charter
Submitted by Commissioner Campbell
May 28, 2026
2
o Reason: Regular, public disclosure of reimbursed expenses promotes
transparency, accountability, and public trust in local government. It ensures the
public has seamless, unhindered access to look at how public funds are utilized
by elected officials without needing to file formal public records requests.
• I move to amend the second sentence of Section 2.05 of the draft charter to clarify the
scope of prohibited employment by adopting the following language: “No commission
member shall hold any other city office or employment with the City of Bozeman during
the term for which the member was elected to the commission …”
o Reason: This amendment preserves the intent of the original language and
conflict-of-interest protections involving city employment while maintaining the
principle of citizen governance by allowing commissioners to maintain outside
employment and livelihoods independent of public office.
• I move to amend Section 2.06(b)(4) of the draft charter to clarify the attendance rules by
inserting the words “excused by a majority of the commission,” ensuring that excusing a
commissioner’s absence requires a collective action of the body.
o Reason: The current draft leaves ambiguity regarding who has the authority to
excuse a commissioner’s absence and prevents a situation where one
commissioner or the mayor unilaterally excuses an absence.
Article III – City Manager
• I move to amend Section 3.04(11) of the draft charter to clarify the city manager’s
operational focus by adopting the following language: “Assist in implementing the long-
term goals and policies established by the city commission.”
o Reason: The city commission, as the elected legislative body, should establish
long-term policy goals for the city. The city manager’s role should be focused on
implementation and administration rather than policy formation. This amendment
anchors the city manager’s role to execution rather than creation. This reinforces
that the legislative body sets the long-term vision and political direction for
Motions remaining to charter
Submitted by Commissioner Campbell
May 28, 2026
3
Bozeman, while the manager, as the leader of the executive branch, carries out
that vision.
• I move to amend Section 3.04(12) of the draft charter to clarify the city manager’s role in
intergovernmental relations by adopting the following language: “Provide administrative
support for intergovernmental cooperation authorized by the city commission.”
o Reason: The charter should permit intergovernmental cooperation where
appropriate, but it should not constitutionally direct future city managers to
actively promote regional governance relationships or policy alignment beyond
the direction established by elected representatives. By limiting the city manager’s
role to providing administrative support for cooperation authorized by the
commission, we protect local sovereignty and maintain clear elected oversight.
• I move to amend Section 3.04(13) of the draft charter to clarify the city manager’s role in
community outreach by adopting the following language: “Support the public
communicate and engagement processes established by the city commission and this
charter.”
o Reason: By anchoring the manager’s duty to supporting the processes established
by the city commission and this charter, we ensure that community engagement
strategies remain accountable to elected officials and the foundational rules of the
city.
• I move to amend Section 3.04 of the draft charter by striking subsection (16) in its
entirety and inserting in its place a new subsection (16) to read as follows: “Provide the
city commission with a formal ‘Staff Capacity and Operational Impact Note’ prior to the
adoption of any new priority, policy initiative, or major project. This note shall explicitly
detail the required staff hours, necessary technological resources, and the specific
existing city services or projects that will be delayed or displaced if the new initiative is
approved.”
o Reason: This two-part amendment corrects to issues. First, it eliminates a
loophole that allows an un-elected manager to unilaterally form advisory
Motions remaining to charter
Submitted by Commissioner Campbell
May 28, 2026
4
committees behind closed doors, ensuring that all groups advising the commission
go through a public recruitment and appointment process. This will require other
changes later in the charter, which I will address at the appropriate time. The new
text creates a critical tool for fiscal and operational discipline, forcing a
transparent data-check on how new policies and priorities will impact baseline
city staff and infrastructure before a vote can occur.
Article VI – Financial Management
• I move to amend the draft charter by striking Article VI in its entirety and replacing it
with the original, existing text of Article VI from the current Bozeman City Charter.
o Reason: The proposed changes to Article VI fundamentally weaken the city’s
established financial guardrails by reducing mandatory debt disclosures,
obscuring long-term cost impacts, and replacing concrete financial metrics with
subjective narrative goals. The fiscal framework in the current charter has
successfully protected Bozeman’s taxpayers and maintained administrative
accountability for years. Reverting to the original text ensures that strict fiscal
discipline and total financial transparency remain in the charter.
• I move to amend Section 5.02 of the current city charter as follows: “The city manager
shall submit to the city commission a preliminary budget for the ensuing fiscal year, an
accompanying budget message, and a final budget in a timely manner as provided by
state law. All required budget publications and notices shall conform to state law and
shall be made electronically available to the public.”
o Reason: This language retains the intent of the original charter text while making
the language clearer and simpler to read.
• I move to amend Section 5.03 of the current city charter as follows:
“The city manager’s budget message shall explain the budget in both fiscal terms and in
relation to the work programs, organizational goals, and community priorities it
supports. The message shall:
Motions remaining to charter
Submitted by Commissioner Campbell
May 28, 2026
5
(a) Outline the proposed financial policies of the city for the ensuing fiscal year
and the projected impact of those policies on future fiscal years;
(b) Describe significant features of the budget;
(c) Identify major changes from the current year in financial policies,
expenditures, and revenues together with the reasons for such changes;
(d) Summarize the city’s debt position and factors affecting the city’s ability to
finance future obligations; and
(e) Include other material the city manager deems useful for public understanding
of the city’s financial condition and priorities.”
o Reason: By itemizing the list of things to include in the budget message, it
improves the readability of the section.
• I move to amend Section 5.07 to remove the December 15 annual deadline for the capital
program and replace it with general text that requires it to be submitted annually. This
would leave this section to read, “The city manager shall prepare and submit to the city
commission a multi-year capital program annually.”
o Reason: This amendment removes the inflexible, arbitrary calendar deadline from
the city charter, allowing the submission timeline to be aligned with the annual
spring budget cycle as recommended by Finance Director Melissa Hodnett. By
simply mandating that the program be submitted annually, the charter secures the
non-negotiable yearly requirement while giving staff and the commission the
flexibility to coordinate infrastructure planning with real-time revenue and cost
data.
o I do not support changing this requirement to a biennial process because if you
only update the CIP every two years, a sudden spike in supply chain or labor
costs, so an annual update forces the city to re-evaluate and adjust cost projections
every 12 months, which will help to prevent massive budget shortfalls down the
road.
• I move to amend Section 5.07(b)(1) of the current charter to read, “A summary of
proposed capital improvements and expenditures.”
Motions remaining to charter
Submitted by Commissioner Campbell
May 28, 2026
6
o Reason: This keeps it focused on the capital improvement plan.
• I move to amend Section 5.07(b)(2) of the current charter to read, “Identification of long-
term community infrastructure and facility needs.”
o Reason: This keeps the focus on the capital improvement plan.
• I move to strike Section 5.07(b)(7) (“A commentary on how the plan addresses the
sustainability of the community and the region of which it is a part”) from the current
charter.
o Reason: Striking this section removes subjective narrative requirements from a
data-driven document, saves valuable staff hours, and keeps Bozeman’s capital
planning focused strictly on fiscal reality and core public services.
• I move to amend Section 5.09 of the current charter by striking the final sentence in its
entirety, thereby establishing an absolute prohibition against an auditing accountant or
firm performing other non-audit services for the city and removing the city commission’s
authority to waive this restriction.
o Reason: Allowing an independent auditor to simultaneously contract for other
paid work with the city creates an inherent, structural conflict of interest that
compromises the integrity of the city’s financial oversight. An auditing firm
should not be put in the position of reviewing financial systems or projects they
may have helped design or advise on. Furthermore, removing the waiver
provision ensures that a politically-motivated commission cannot set aside
standard accounting ethics for a preferred vendor.
Article VIII – Role of Public Engagement in Local Governance
• I move to amend Section 8.03(a) of the draft charter by striking the phrase, “The city
shall be proactive in outreach to bring in diverse voices, partner groups, and ideas,” and
replacing it with the following text: “The city shall encourage broad public participation
using a variety of engagement methods.”
Motions remaining to charter
Submitted by Commissioner Campbell
May 28, 2026
7
o Reason: The replacement language avoids vague and potentially ideological
terminology while still encouraging broad participation. The charter should use
neutral, precise language that applies equally to all members of the public without
creating arbitrary categories of preferred outreach.
• I move to amend Section 8.03(c) of the draft charter by striking the phrase “provide
opportunities for residents to influence decisions” and replacing it with the following
text: “provide opportunities for public input regarding decisions.”
o Reason: The original wording could create implied entitlements beyond advisory
participation and unintentionally expand legal expectations.
• I move to amend Section 8.03(c) of the draft charter by striking the phrase “while
allowing flexibility as conditions change” in its entirety.
o Reason: The phrase is legally vague, completely undefined, and fails to establish a
measurable or enforceable standard for city administration to follow.
• I move to amend Section 8.03(c) of the draft charter by adding the following closing
sentence to the subsection: “The city shall be clear about the purpose, scope, and how
input will be used.”
o Reason: Transparency regarding the use of public input improves accountability
and public trust. This amendment establishes an actionable, objective standard.
• I move to amend Section 8.04(b)(6) of the draft charter by striking the word “accessible”
and inserting the phrase “broadly distributed and available” to describe neighborhood
association communication standards.
o Reason: The term “accessible” carries strict guidelines and legal definitions.
Leaving this word in the charter inadvertently places a heavy, unfunded
compliance mandate on volunteer neighborhood associations, creating a technical
loophole where the city could de-recognize a small neighborhood association
simply for lacking the budget for professional translation or specialized web
Motions remaining to charter
Submitted by Commissioner Campbell
May 28, 2026
8
formatting. Replacing it ensures the focus remains on wide community outreach
without imposing unrealistic legal liabilities on volunteer groups.
• I move to amend Section 8.04(d)(5) of the draft charter by striking the phrase “when
practicable” in its entirety.
o Reason: The phrase weakens accountability by creating an undefined exception to
public engagement obligations whenever it is deemed inconvenient.
• I move to amend Section 8.04(d)(7) of the draft charter by striking the phrase “as
applicable” in its entirety.
o Reason: the phrase is legally vague and creates arbitrary ambiguity regarding
when the city’s specific obligations apply, making the standard difficult to
measure or enforce.
• I move to amend Section 8.04(d)(7) of the draft charter by striking the phrase “provide
reasons for divergence” and replacing it with the following: “provide formal, written
findings detailing the reasons for divergence, which shall be attached to the final action
and distributed to the related neighborhood association(s).”
o Reason: Verbal explanations provided during meetings are easily lost in hours-
long video recordings and do not create a clear, accessible public record for
residents. Mandating formal, written findings ensures true accountability, respects
volunteer time dedicated by neighborhood leaders, and guarantees that the city’s
justification for overriding local recommendations is permanently and
transparently documented.
• I move to amend Section 8.04(b)(8) of the draft charter by striking the subsection in its
entirety and transferring the text to our list of formal non-charter recommendations.
o Reason: This statement is advisory rather than foundational. Moving it to
recommendations prevents the charter from becoming overly prescriptive while
still preserving the policy intent for potential future implementation.
Motions remaining to charter
Submitted by Commissioner Campbell
May 28, 2026
9
• I move to amend Section 8.04(a) of the draft charter by striking the phrase, “and assist in
public education on matters within their purview.”
o Reason: The primary purpose of citizen advisory boards is to provide
independent, objective feedback to the City Commission, not to act as a public
relations arm to help build consensus for existing city policies.
• I move to amend Section 8.04(c)(1) of the draft charter by striking the phrase “not less
than twice annually” and replacing it with the following text: “by individually posting
each board vacancy across the city’s official digital and social media platforms for a
minimum of thirty (30) days prior to filling the position.”
o A generic, biannual advertisement fails to inform the public about specific
vacancies on boards when they actually occur. By posting every vacancy as they
become available, this ensures equitable engagement and guarantees that residents
are notified of opportunities to serve when they arise.
• I move to strike Section 8.04(c)(3) from the draft charter because it is now covered by
Section 8.04(c)(1).
o Reason: This item is no longer necessary if board vacancies are posted as they
arise.
• I move to amend what is currently Section 8.04(c)(5) of the draft charter by striking the
phrase “without public solicitation” and replacing it with the following text: “with public
notification and open application process for a minimum of thirty (30) days prior to any
appointments being made.”
o Reason: Public appointments should include open notification and solicitation
processes to encourage transparency and broader public participation. Ad hoc
committees can be tasked with handling high-impact and sensitive issues. If these
temporary positions can be filled behind closed doors without public notice, it
would allow the city commission through the city manager to hand-pick insular
groups to deliver a pred-determined outcome. Mandating an open application
Motions remaining to charter
Submitted by Commissioner Campbell
May 28, 2026
10
process ensures that transparency remains non-negotiable, regardless of whether a
committee is permanent or temporary.
• I move to amend Section 5.04(c) by adding an additional item that reads: “No member
shall serve more than two (2) consecutive four-year terms.
o Reason: Term limits on advisory boards prevent individual seats from becoming
permanently entrenched, which can inadvertently discourage new volunteers from
applying. Capping service at two consecutive terms ensures a healthy rotation of
community members, creates regular opportunities for fresh perspectives and
diverse expertise, and aligns the boards with the broader goals of open, dynamic
citizen participation.
• I move to amend the draft charter by adding a new subsection to the advisory board
provisions establishing advisory board eligibility and conflict of interest standards,
utilizing the text provided in the public comment submitted by The Gallatin Valley
Sentinel.
o Reason: Current city conflict-of-interest definitions are insufficient to prevent
individuals from serving on, or voting within, advisory boards that directly impact
their own financial interests or those of their employers.
• I move to amend article VIII of the draft charter by adding a new subsection establishing
the Neighborhood Impact Statement Process, using the language submitted as public
comment from The Gallatin Valley Sentinel.
o Reason: Establishing a Neighborhood Impact Statement process guarantees that
resident-led neighborhoods have a standardized, formal mechanism to document
localized impacts before major city actions are taken.
Article X – Charter Amendment
• I move to change the reference in Section 10.01(4) from “Article V” to “Section 7.03.”
Motions remaining to charter
Submitted by Commissioner Campbell
May 28, 2026
11
o Reason: The reference to Article V is supposed to be a reference to Initiative;
Citizen Referendum, and Recall.” This is now located in Section 7.03, so this
amendment simply corrects the reference.
Article XI – Transition and Severability
• I move to amend Section 11.04 of the draft charter to insert a specific transitional
timeline for the appointment of the first Vice Mayor under Section 2.03(c), mandating
that the initial appointment of the Vice Mayor shall occur in January 2028, coinciding
with Deputy Mayor Douglas Fischer’s move to the office of Mayor.
o Reason: Article XI handles the logistical transition from the old charter
framework to the new one. Because current Deputy Mayor Douglas Fischer is
scheduled to assume the office of Mayor in January 2028, a Vice Mayor will need
to be selected at that time.