Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout19111 Approval and Staff Report SignedBOZEMANPlanningMTOctober 17, 2019C&H Engineering and Surveying, Inc.1091 Stoneridge Dr.Bozeman, MT 59718RE: Manhattan Bank Site Plan; Application 19111Dear Applicant,The Site Plan for the above-referenced project has been approved. A staff report signed bythe Director of Community Development is enclosed for your records.As the applicant, you must comply with all provisions of the Bozeman Municipal Code,which are applicable to this project. All unmet code provisions, or code provisions that arenot specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver orother relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law.Future Impact Fees - Building permit applications will require payment of the requiredtransportation, water, sewer and fire impact fees according to the City of Bozeman adoptedimpact fee schedule in place at the time of building permit issuance. If you desire anestimate of the required impact fees according to current rates please contact theDepartment of Community Development.Please be informed that ANY changes from the final plan or final building elevationswill need to be reviewed by the Department of Community Development. This Directorof Community Development project decision may be appealed filing a notice of appeal withthe Clerk of the Commission for the City of Bozeman, within ten working days after the dateof approval as evidenced by the Director's signature, by following the procedures of Section38.250.030, BMC.If you have questions, or if the Department of Community Development can be of furtherassistance, plea^e^o not hesitate to contact me at 582-2260x5 or dgarber@bozeman.netRespectful]Danielle Garber, Associate PlannerDepartment of Community DevelopmentC: Manhattan Bank, PO Box 690, Manhattan, MT 59741FileEnc: Final Staff Report(A) 20 East Olive Street ® ^Sl^? 59771-1230 I ©406-582-2260 i ©406-582-2263 |www.bozeman.netTDD: 406-582-2301THE MOST LIVABLE PLACE. BOZEMANCommunity DevelopmentMTStaff ReportManhattan Bank Site Plan ReviewApplication 19111Thursday, September 5, 2019Application No.Project NameSummaryZoningOverlay District(s)Street AddressLegal DescriptionOwnerApplicantRepresentativeStaffNoticingAdvisory BoardsRecommendationDecision Authority19111TypeSite PlanManhattan Bank Site PlanSite Plan application for a proposed 14,936 square foot bank building with associated parkinglot and landscaping site improvements on a 1.28-acre lot.B-2 Growth Community Business District Parcel Size 1.28 acresPolicyNone1941 West Main Street, Bozeman, MTWest Park Manor 1s* Add, S11, T02 S, R05 E, Block 8, Lot 6a, Plat F-36-1, City of Bozeman,Gallatin County Montana.Manhattan Bank 124 S. Broadway Street Manhattan Bozeman, MT 59741Manhattan Bank 124 S. Broadway Street Manhattan Bozeman, MT 59741C & H Engineering and Surveying, Inc. 1091 Stoneridge Drive Bozeman, MT 59718Planner Danielle Garber Engineer Anna RussellPublic Comment Period Site Posted8/7/19-8/22/19 8/7/19Board DateN/AApprovalDirector of Community DevelopmentAdjacent Owners8/7/19RecommendationDateNewspaper Legal AdN/AFull application and file of record: Community Development Department, 20 E. Olive St, Bozeman, MT 59715Paae1 of 15 BOZEMANCommunity DevelopmentMTStaff ReportManhattan Bank Site Plan ReviewApplication 19111Thursday, Septembers, 2019FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPEAL PROVISIONS CERTIFICATEA) PURSUANT to Chapter 38, Article 2, Bozeman Municipal Code (BMC), and other applicable sections of Ch.38, BMC, publicnotice was given, opportunity to submit comment was provided to affected parties, and a review of the Site Plan described inthis report was conducted. The applicant proposed to the City a Site Plan (SP) to permit the construction of a 14,936 squarefoot bank building with associated parking lot and landscaping site improvements on a 1.28-acre lot. The purposes of the SitePlan review were to consider all relevant evidence relating to public health, safety, welfare, and the other purposes of Ch. 38,BMC; to evaluate the proposal against the criteria of Sec. 38.230.100 BMC, and the standards of Ch. 38, BMC; and to determinewhether the application should be approved, conditionally approved, or denied.B) It appeared to the Director that all parties and the public wishing to examine the proposed Site Plan and offer comment wereprovided the opportunity to do so. After receiving the recommendation of the relevant advisory bodies established by Ch. 38,Art. 210, BMC, and considering all matters of record presented with the application and during the public comment perioddefined by Ch. 38, BMC, the Director has found that the proposed Site Plan would comply with the requirements of the BMC ifcertain conditions were imposed. Therefore, being fully advised of all matters having come before them regarding thisapplication, the Director makes the following decision.C) The Site Plan has been found to meet the criteria of Ch. 38, BMC, and is therefore approved, subject to the conditions listedin this report and the correction of any elements not in conformance with the standards of the Title. The evidence contained inthe submittal materials, advisory body review, public testimony, and this report, justifies the conditions imposed on thisdevelopment to ensure that the Site Plan complies with all applicable regulations, and all applicable criteria of Ch. 38, BMC.On this 2-<^> day of <:BEPTeM£'€-(2-,2019, Martin Matsen, Director of Community Development, approved withconditions this Site Plan for and on behalf of the City of Bozeman as authorized by Sec. 38.200.010, BMC.D) This Director of Community Development's project decision may be appealed by filing a documented appeal with and payingan appeal fee to the Clerk of the Commission for the City of Bozeman within 10 working days after the date of the final decisionas evidenced by the Director's signature, following the procedures of Sec. 38.250.030, BMC.DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT^^^___Dann 0 nf -1 R BOZEMANCommunity DevelopmentMTStaff ReportManhattan Bank Site Plan ReviewApplication 19111Thursday, September 5,2019CONDITIONS OF APPROVALPlease note that these conditions are in addition to any required code provisions identified in this report. Additional conditionsof approval and code corrections are required and will be included with the final report provided to the Director of CommunityDevelopmentRecommended Conditions of Approval:1. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed asconditions of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of theBozeman Municipal Code or state law.2. Prior to building permit approval the applicant must provide a copy of the executed and recorded Waiver of Rightto Protest Creation of Special Improvement Districts.3. Prior to building permit approval the applicant must a copy of the executed and recorded 10-foot Public UtilityEasement.4. Prior to building permit approval the applicant must provide a DNRC permit for the exempt irrigation well.5. Prior to occupancy, all grass seed must be financially guaranteed for a minimum period of two years or until fullyestablished.PanfiSnflfi BOZEMANCommunity DevelopmentMTStaff ReportManhattan Bank Site Plan ReviewApplication 19111Thursday, September 5, 2019Figure 1: Current Zoning Map»,%N-<"E{<0 <['^-.^i^ ^ ^m^:<t1t' ;^A.ta^y.t.'.^f%^»•s:s»*tt[*,-•,.«^^t»JI•^s,^?'<8itMS^1s,'t^fK*+^•3vm^•'.»v' !!»i7^«BUI1.aa^it.;t"i»^/s^^A...»*MWi^%^t-t^i.^%•y*..1»^w,"1;s<^^fn^•»%t9*JiSt#r»^%;tf!•t^ii'I"vtwI9rf-nt»^v:w^?^h%^ty-'^'H»'iWf^(>^^^f^I-w?w'e.T*ivf-i- . '\H^,".<•.".•I*,fs:4X;•^•«*.J?i«.o*^•••^I••„<=.A•^..%\B2«»s:trii~1*s^-.-ffy'<AXr.••»^K»^Mitji-.s-n^^v^>.^*.f^tWh*^Ir»19»IIli^Nl^••to,»>rI^I•»<^s»1.-I- fsIt3•*i'^i^^ • 0 t:stl^^lfrm..m"s'^.^»-l--^"" -.?•-'Vl>*;t»kK•^»M:'%^^'-...;s~f.a.WiBABCOCKLegendf~\ Selected Projac!City LimiisI 1 Zoning DtstnctsParcelsRoadsjr . ^%'ST^'% \~w\wJ IKsi•A^-*l^^s-f^tBfe.'•^*¥R>:?I.i".-»a...IS4t5I•It»^t--,-Dinn /( nf -1 R BOZEMANCommunity DevelopmentMTStaff ReportManhattan Bank Site Plan ReviewApplication 19111Thursday, September 5,2019Figure 2: Proposed site plan//r^\€irtifl£tf.BLOCK 6WBW WWtNX.""^•;. ^t*«•^/:^—==Y7"LOT 2ACW 19THMAIN GBH.'C^,tVf\\^>a »witM*sr\-»f3 0 »»««1« h »»<«.Ccntow /nttnt*!*: ; /»o<^e^•H4/^^^7"{.-y^-ss—^•^/r±^TJ n^..--ss»^1L-r<^-t/<w(.iKIT":»«• "«^S.n»({f^r-—-^ysa»1B*.i!5I*flTUKL^coitttocroK n ww^UKWWWr 2LOT6A;!LOI 6;s'1»$s'ri<W.)i'r128IHs*'',!i»m)•wrglur-;^^njv^^—vIt((A^12Ui.Ts.sr'1-VWi^I.1w»'XTWCK-kSa«ffZS"£££:t. f*Stt » k 1B*idTy-•^gas-c--K»W»___^-i»t.•yS30>^-fEBWB ont—aw^8fl^t^^"-rtWK«e»^l^^^wC.WSWC <UW (tuTTERWt _WMft0.» OWSZS)Mfwt Mwaw,Paae5of15 BOZEMANCommunity DevelopmentMTStaff ReportManhattan Bank Site Plan ReviewApplication 19111Thursday, September 5, 2019Figure 3-6: Conceptual Renderings•s.•B^LNUATIANBAWK.^.^I-:,'••»••ill d I^t^:;s•---"B5»:»tf.,:Kt-y<*^rrS£&-S1-fmII;a^<b^J^;%:NTO^ FRpy -HE E'\3T -NCH1s"^^A1.»•^^-r^fTSB;*Ali-!^fc-4-—,sh-i[T•I.»u^^I•rff&•^;<?-*•Ifr*-5i*-J<te.1-i»-T;vs^.<,u^ENTRyFSOMIHEy.S.TD^nn C nf -1 R BOZEMANCommunity DevelopmentMTStaff ReportManhattan Bank Site Plan ReviewApplication 19111Thursday, September 5, 2019'sttit •^^y:•it=r-y-teus^^'-1TTiSS^t5^€Bls'-'WSt-^< -\1 'K^s--i,ttst;«98^s-ia^p^i»-»"^es®^^IT»t-mu'EWFSOMSW"»wI.wM ^^•id.(BmSSR.B"I^'sT^«aiNBj^y^^II.1^IS3.U-Tr»:'sJf-LsM+3K^1ST-ffltf)>as.aa'~<a.¥•Es-•ii Im.*>?•msarflNif-.S!Vtwof-Lwr/::^0Paae7of15 BOZEMANCommunity DevelopmentMTStaff ReportManhattan Bank Site Plan ReviewApplication 19111Thursday, September 5,2019ANALYSIS AND FINDINGSAnalysis and resulting recommendations based on the entirety of the application materials, municipal codes, standards,plans, public comment, and all other materials available during the review period. Collectively this information is the recordof the review. The analysis in this report is a summary of the completed review.Plan Review, Section 38.230.100, BMCIn considering applications for plan approval under this title, the Director of Community Development shall consider thefollowing:1. Conformance to and consistency with the City's adopted growth policy38.100.040 BMeets Code?Growth Policy LandUseZoningCommunity Commercial Mixed UseB-2, Community Business DistrictYesYesComments: The uses are allowed within the zoning district. The property is within the City's municipal servicearea. The project is an infill redevelopment providing a mix of uses at urban densities. Staff finds that the projectdoes contribute to the goals of the growth policy.2. Conformance to this chapter, including the cessation of any currentviolations 38.200.160Current ViolationsNoneMeets Code?YesComments: There are no current violations on the subject property3. Conformance with all other applicable laws, ordinances, and regulations38.100.080Meets Code?ConflictsNoneCondominium ownershipNAYesNAComments: The proposed uses of the site are consistent with the allowed uses of the B-2 district. No specificconflicts identified. Additional steps will be required including but not limited recordation of the SID waiverand final plan documents and approval of building permits. The Building Division of the Department ofCommunity Development will review the requirements of the International Building Code for compliance atthe time of building permit application.4. Conformance with Plan Review for applicable permit types as specified inarticle 2 Section 38.230Site PlanMeets Code?YesComments: The site plan criteria are met with this project. The proposal is compatible and sensitive to theimmediate environment of the site and the adjacent neighborhoods. Architectural design, building mass,building materials and character are compatible to the immediate environment of the site andneighborhood.5. Conformance with zoning provisions of article 3 38.320.100Meets Code?Permitted uses 38.310OfficeForm and intensity standards 38.320ZoningB-2Setbacks(feet)StructuresYesYesFrontRearSideMixed-Landscaped105Parking /LoadingMixed-Landscaped108YesDnnn 0 „<: 11: BOZEMANCommunity DevelopmentMTStaff ReportManhattan Bank Site Plan ReviewApplication 19111Thursday, September 5,2019AlleyNANAComments: The proposed setbacks meet all B-2 zone district standards.Relationship to adjacent properties standards 38.520.030 (light and air accessand privacy) and angled setback plane 38.360.030NAApplicable zone specific or overlay standards 38.330-340NABuilding Height RequirementsLotcoverage9.5%38.320.010-.060YesAllowed100%Height34'8"Allowed38'YesComments: All rooflines are less than a 3:12 pitch and meet the height standard of 38' for the B-2 District.General land use standards and requirements 38.350YesComments: All encroachments are in conformance to standards.YesApplicable supplemental use criteria 38.360NASupplementaluses/typeNANAComments: NAWireless facilities 38.370NAAffordable Housing 38.380.010NANAAffordable housing planNAComments: NA6a(1). Conformance with the community design provisions of article 4:Transportation facilities and access 38.400Meets Code?Street visionSecondary accessYesYesYesTraffic Impact Study /LOSYesTransportation gridadequate to servesiteYesYesComments: The City Engineer reviewed the traffic impact study for compliance with standards.Street dedication I NA I YesDrive access locations and widthsYesNumber of drive accesses3Street easementsYesNASpecial Improvement DistrictsYesYesComments: Access is from West. Main Street and North 20th. Vehicular access complies with coderequirements. SID waivers for'street improvements is a condition of approval.Parking requirements of 38.540Required parking nonresidentialRequired parking residential26NAReductions nonresidentialReductions residential 1NANAProvided parking off streetOn street parking320YesComments: Required parking was calculated using the net method of subtracting incidental spacesdetailed in Section 38.540.010.A.1.a and was requested with the resubmittal received 7-23-19,6 bicyclespaces are also being provided.Paae9of15 BOZEMANCommunity DevelopmentMTStaff ReportManhattan Bank Site Plan ReviewApplication 19111Thursday, September 5,20196a(2). Conformance with the community design provisions of article 4:Pedestrian and vehicular ingress and egress 38.400Meets Code?Design of the pedestrian and vehicular circulation systems to assure thatpedestrians and vehicles can move safely and easily both within the site andbetween properties and activities within the neighborhood areaYesVehicle accesses to site3YesPedestrian access location(s)YesSite vision trianglesYesFire lanes, curbs, signage and stripingYesNon-automotive transportation and circulation systems, design features toenhance convenience and safety across parking lots and streets, including, butnot limited to paving patterns, grade differences, landscaping and lightingYesCrosswalksYesCurb rampsYesPedestrian lightingYesComments: A continuous walkway connects the front of the building and entrance along West Main throughthe site to North 20th with appropriate crosswalks and curb ramps.Adequate connection and integration of the pedestrian and vehiculartransportation systems to the systems in adjacent development and the generalcommunityYesAccess easementsYesYesDedication of right-of-way or easements necessary for pedestrian, shared usepathway and similar transporiiation facilitiesNAComments: A 26-foot wide access easement previously recorded under Document #286642 runsbetween the subject lot (6A) and Lot 5 to the east providing ingress and egress to Main Street and N. 20thAve.6a(3) Loading and Unloading areasMeets Code?Loading and unloading area requirements 38.540.080NALoading and unloadingNANAFirst Berth (min. 70 feetlength, 12 feet in widthand 14 feet in height)NANAAdditional Berths (min. 45feet length)NANAComments: NA. No off-street loading berths are required for this use.6b Community design and element provisions 38.410Meets Code?Lot and block standards 38.410.040YesRights of way for pedestrians alternative block delineationNAComments: NAProvisions for utilities including efficient public services and utilities 38.410.050-060YesMunicipal infrastructure requirementsYesEasements (City and public utility rights-of-way etc.)YesWater, sewer, and stormwaterYesOther utilities (electric, natural gas, communications)YesCIL of waterYesD/inrt -in /^f -i c BOZEMANCommunity DevelopmentMTStaff ReportManhattan Bank Site Plan ReviewApplication 19111Thursday, September 5, 2019Comments: No CIL of water was required by Engineering.Site Surface Drainage and stormwater control 38.410.080YesLocation, design and capacityYesLandscaping per 38.410.080.HYesComments: A retention pond was proposed on the north end of the lot and was evaluated by Engineering fordesign compliance. Adequate and appropriate landscaping per 38.410.080.H is shown.Grading 38.410.080YesMaximum 1:4 slope requirements metYesComments: See previous comment.6c. Park and recreation requirements 38.420Meets Code?Enhancement of natural environmentNAWildlife habitat or feeding area preservationNAMaintenance of public park or public open space accessNAPark/Recreational area designNAParklandCash-in-lieu for maximum known density not to exceed12units/acre(ac.).ac. X _ units/ac. X 0.03 ac.=NACash donation in-lieu(CIL)Proposed use ofCIL approved, andpaidNAImprovements in-lieuNANAComments: NA commercial development7a-c. Conformance with the project design provisions of Article 5,Compatibility, Design and ArrangementMeets Code?Compatibility with, and sensitivity to, the immediate environment of the site and theadjacent neighborhoods and other approved development relative to architecturaldesign, building mass, neighborhood identity, landscaping, historical character,orientation of buildings on the site and visual integrationYesBlock Frontage Standards 38.510YesBuilding Design 38.530YesLocation and design of service areas and mechanical equipment 38.520.070YesComments: Block frontage standard for this project is Mixed-Landscaped and the proposed buildingplacement, landscaping, transparency and entrances meet the requirements of this section. Building Designstandards are met through the use of varied materials, structural expression creating a corner plaza facingthe southeast and window patterns. Service areas and utility meters are screened by a 24ga corrugatedmetal screen wall at the west elevation.Design and arrangement of the elements of the plan (e.g., buildings, circulation, openspace and landscaping, etc.) so that activities are integrated with the organizationalscheme of the community, neighborhood, and other approved development andproduce an efficient, functionally organized and cohesive developmentYesRelationship to adjacent properties 38.520.030YesNon-motorized circulation and design 38.520.040YesVehicular circulation and parking 38.520.050YesComments: Project conforms to requirements.Design and arrangement of elements of the plan (e.g., buildings circulation, openspace and landscaping, etc.) in harmony with the existing natural topography,YesPanp 11 nf1fi BOZEMANCommunity DevelopmentMTStaff ReportManhattan Bank Site Plan ReviewApplication 19111Thursday, September 5, 2019natural water bodies and water courses, existing vegetation, and to contribute tothe overall aesthetic quality of the site configurationSite Planning and Design Elements 38.520YesComments: Project conforms to requirementsLandscapingN/A7d. Conformance with the project design provisions of Article 5,Landscaping including the enhancement of buildings, appearance ofvehicular use, open space and pedestrian area and the preservation ofreplacement of natural vegetationMeets Code?Submittal requirements for landscape plans 38.220.100YesMandatory landscaping 38.550.050YesYardYesAdditional screeningParking lot screeningNAYesInterior parking lot landscapeOff-street loading spaces screeningYesNAStreet frontageStreet median islandYesNAAcceptable landscape materialsProtection of landscape areasYesYesIrrigation: plan, water source, systemtypeYesTrees for residential adjacencyNAPerformance points15YesCity rights-of-way and parksYesTree plantings for boulevard ROW, drought-resistant seedPublic ROW boulevard stripsYesYesIrrigation and maintenance provisions for ROWState ROW landscapingYesYesAdditionalNANAFencing and wallsNANAComments: Landscaping meets requirements. A combination of spruce trees and shrubs is employed toscreen the noriih parking lot from North 20th Ave. Street trees are proposed in the boulevard strip alongNorth 20th and along the south property line adjacent to MDT right of way. Condition of approval 5requires all grass seed to be financially guaranteed prior to occupancy for 2 years or until fullyestablished.Site planning and design required 38.520YesPedestrian area landscaping, including pathways and internal circulation 38.520.040YesInternal roadway landscaping 38.520.050NAOpen space landscaping 38.520.060YesService area and mechanical equipment landscaping and screening 38.520.070YesOpen spaceYesComments: Project meets requirements.7e. Conformance with the project design provisions of Article 5, OpenSpaceMeets Code?Open Space Section 38.520.060Yes-in -r -i r BOZEMANCommunity DevelopmentMTStaff ReportManhattan Bank Site Plan ReviewApplication 19111Thursday, September 5, 2019Total required2%YesTotal provided>2%YesComments: Commercial open space is proposed in the landscaped area at the north end of the lot withseating.7f. Conformance with the project design provisions of Article 5, Lighting38.570Meets Code?Building-mounted lighting (cutoff and temperature)YesSite lighting (supports, cutoff and temperature)YesMinimum light trespass at property lineYesComments: Building mounted and site lighting meets standards.7g. Conformance with the project design provisions of Article 5, Signage38.560Meets Code?Allowed (sq. ft)/buildingProposed (sq. ft)364.560YesComments: Applicant proposes 60 square feet of Manhattan Bank signage. A separate sign permit isrequired prior to placing any signage on the building.8a-c. Conformance with environmental and open space objectives in articles 4-6Meets Code?Enhancement of natural environment: Integrated stormwater, LID, removal ofinappropriate fillYesGradingYesOn-site retention/detentionYesComments: Project meets requirements.Drainage designYesStormwater maintenance plan 38.410.030.AYesStormwater feature: landscaping amenity, native species, curvilinear, 75% livevegetationYesComments: Surface stormwater facilities meet landscaping requirements.Watercourse and wetland protections and associated wildlife habitatsNAIf the development is adjacent to an existing or approved public park or public openspace area, have provisions been made in the plan to avoid interfering with publicaccess to and use of that areaNAComments: NA9. Conformance with the natural resource protection provisions of articles 4-6Meets Code?Watercourse setback 38.410.100NAWatercourse setback planting planNAFloodplain regulations 38.600NAWetland regulations 38.610NAComments: NA10. Other related matters, including relevant comment from affected parties38.220Meets Code?Public CommentNoYesComments: No public comment was received. Public notice dates and details are on page 1 of thisreport.Pans 1?nf1?i BOZEMANCommunity DevelopmentMTStaff ReportManhattan Bank Site Plan ReviewApplication 19111Thursday, September 5, 201911. If the development includes multiple lots that are interdependent forcirculation or other means of addressing requirement of this title, whether thelots are either: Configured so that the sale of individual lots will not alter theapproved configuration or use of the property or cause the development tobecome nonconforming OR Are the subject of reciprocal and perpetualeasements or other agreements to which the City is a party so that the sale ofindividual lots will not cause one or more elements of the development tobecome nonconforming. 38.410.060Meets Code?Subdivision exemptionNANARequired EasementsNANAReciprocal access andshared parking easementNANAMutual access easementand agreementYes#286642YesComments: A 26-foot wide access easement exists between lots 5 and 6A (subject property) to allowingress and egress between Main and North 20th.12. Phasing of development 38.230.020.B including buildings andinfrastructureMeets Code?PhasingNo# of phases1YesComments: One phase is proposed.13. Standards for certificate of appropriateness 38.340.050Meets Code?Certificate of appropriateness standardsNASecretary of the Interiors Standards for new constructionNAArchitectural appearanceNAProportion of doors and windowsNARelationship of building masses and spacesNARoof shapeNAScaleNADirectional expression, with regard to the dominant horizontal or vertical expressionof surrounding structuresNAArchitectural detailsNAConcealment of non-period appurtenances, such as mechanical equipmentNAMaterials and color schemesNAComments: The project is not within an overlay district.14. Conformance with the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District Design(NCOD) GuidelinesMeets Code?Overlay District ProvisionsNAComments: Project is not within an overlay districtIntroductionNAChapter 2: Guidelines for all propertiesNAChapter 4b: Guidelines for commercial areas outside of Main Street Historic DistrictNAAppendicesNAComments: NA15. NCOD Demolition 38.340.080 Review of Demolition of historic structures orsitesMeets Code? BOZEMANCommunity DevelopmentMTStaff ReportManhattan Bank Site Plan ReviewApplication 19111Thursday, September 5, 2019Historic Structure per 38.700.090NANAComments: NAApproval of the proposed subsequent development is required for all historicstructures proposed for demolition and for the proposed movement of any structureof site.NAPublic NoticeNACriteriaNA1. The property's historic significance. The property has historical significance as demonstrated bythe updated Montana Historic Property form. The proposed structure for demolition though isprimarily a grain elevator machine and associated grain storage bins that are not a habitablebuilding. The structure has no floor levels only a series of ladders and landings to access thedifferent areas and pieces of equipment. While the property has significance, there is not ahistoric district in place or planned for this area. The building cannot be structurally rehabilitatedto accommodate a new use that complies the zoning and other than the current use withouttotally dismantling the structure. Grain storage and transfer in this location is no longereconomically viable2. Whether the structure has no viable economic life remaining. This criterion is not applicable thisstructure is not a habitable building.3. Whether the subsequent development complies with Section 38.340.050 (standards forcertificates of appropriateness). Yes, this report finds the subsequent development incompliance with standards.4. Whether the subsequent development includes construction of new building(s) unless theexisting character of the area does not include buildings. Yes, the subsequent developmentincludes the construction of a new infill building in compliance with zoning.5. Subsequent development requires a building permit and does not include proposals which leavethe site without building(s) or structure(s). The subsequent development requires a buildingpermit and does not propose to leave the site without a building.Notwithstanding the above, for projects proposing the removal of a historic structure, which do not qualifyfor sketch plan review pursuant to 38.230.070, the review authority may determine the proposedsubsequent site development is more appropriate for the site based upon the criteria in 38.230.100 (planreview criteria).The Director determines that the proposed subsequent site development is moreappropriate for the site than the existing building and use based on the criterial in 38.230.100.Comments: NAPanp •1'inf 1?