Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-20-26 Public Comment - R. and P. West - We OPPOSE Appeal #25769 of Application #25238From:Patty Triplett West To:Bozeman Public Comment Subject:[EXTERNAL]We OPPOSE Appeal #25769 of Application #25238 Date:Friday, February 20, 2026 1:58:23 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. To Whom It May Concern, We are writing today to express our opposition to Appeal #25769 of Application #25238 and ask that this plan be rejected. It is our understanding that the proposed project blatantly does not follow the PUD and legally binding Master Plan, which call for a single, one-level building with less than 5,000 square feet of interior space and with no outdoor business use. We don’t understand how this plan can be allowed to move forward when it clearly violates setback and land use regulations, and Block Frontage Standards requirements. Application #25238 proposes two, two-story buildings totaling 10,000 square feet. Those buildings include a restaurant/bar with over 100 seats for patrons. The proposal also suggests a 2,500-square-foot health gym, a 1,200-square-foot retail space and a total of 4 second-story office suites in the two buildings. The proposed plan shows extensive outdoor seating for a restaurant/bar. Even more seasonal seating is possible in the grassy area adjacent to the proposed patio. This is a direct violation of our Master Plan which states that there should be no outdoor business allowed. In addition to these clear issues, there are other concerns to note: The proposed uses include businesses in two large buildings that - as designed - may at times need 150 or more parking spaces, and yet there are only 51 spaces provided on site. Our PUD prohibits on-street parking, yet this will cause our streets to become parking lots. This proposal creates major safety issues to drivers, bikers, and pedestrians because our narrow streets will become one-lane alleys, restricting safe access to homes and endangering us all with increased traffic, constricted traffic lanes and poor access for emergency vehicles. The proposal will flood destination traffic into our neighborhood from all over town. This is a quiet residential neighborhood, filled with children walking and biking to multiple nearby schools, hikers walking on trails, and teeming with wildlife. The commercial lots at the western entrance to our neighborhood are meant for neighborhood businesses, like how Kagy Corner businesses serve their nearby residents. It was not intended to be a cross-town attraction. Thank you for your time and consideration. Ryan and Patty West 4434 White Eagle Circle