Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout006 Concept Plan Review Comment Responses Plan Review - Review Comments Report Workflow Started: 11/13/2024 1:29:04 PM Report Generated: 01/13/2025 10:16 AM REVIEW COMMENTS REF# CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 1 1 Solid Waste Changemark 003 C1.0-Site Plan.pdf Acknowledged.50'straight approach does not have any Info Only Russell Ward SLD Waste raised curb within the 24'width.See Site Plan drawing. 11/25/24 12:54 PM 1.no raised curbs are allowed within the 50 foot straight approach 2 1 Solid Waste Changemark 003 C1.0-Site Plan.pdf Acknowledged.Please refer to the Architectural Details, Info Only Russell Ward SLD Waste Sheet AS501 for refuse enclosure details. 11/25/24 12:57 PM 1.need detailed plan for refuse enclosures 2.refuse enclosures will need to be covered 3 1 Addressing Comment Acknowledged.Oak Park Drive extends south.See Site Info Only Jenny Connelley It appears that N 14th and Oak Park Drive will need to be extended so that the Plan drawing. 12/4/24 8:47 AM buildings can be addressed off of them. 4 1 Addressing Comment Acknowledged.Plat will be recorded before addressing for Info Only Jenny Connelley It also appears that a new plat will be recorded splitting this off from the new buildings can be finalized. 12/4/24 8:50 AM property to the south(1221 Durston Road).That will need to be done before addressing as that creates a new legal description that will be used in each of the new address records,as well as modifying the legal description of the existing building. Plan Review - Review Comments Report Workflow Started: 11/13/2024 1:29:04 PM Report Generated: 01/13/2025 10:16 AM 5 1 Building Division Comment Acknowledged.Please refer to the architectural design Info Only Kevin Bailey These comments are from the Building Division for the submitted primary plan sheets included in this submittal. 12/4/24 10:30 AM and not a complete plan review of the project.The following comments are general items which are required to be included in the plan set application for the required building permit.At that time a complete plan review will be completed.1.The submitted plans are required to be stamped and signed by the architect of record.2.Provide the required geotechnical report.3.Provide the energy design documents.4.Submit the fire sprinkler and alarm plans to the Bozeman Fire Department for review.5.Provide complete engineering supporting the projecYs design.6.Identify the type of occupancy it is.Is it R1 or R2 by the IBC.And relate their occupancy to table 705.5 for separation distances. 7.Identify the required accessible units and their locations throughout the complex with their paths to the public ways.8.Provide electrical load calculations for each building.9.Provide the water and DWV sizing calculations for each building and the complex as a whole.10.Provide a fire separation plan with all the listed assemblies,sections,how to build details and specific method for sealing penetrations in the fire partitions approved by the architect.Please pay particular attention to the tub/shower units to the fire partitions. 6 1 Water Conservation Comment Acknowledged.Please refer to the Landscape and Info Only Division The"City of Bozeman Landscape and Irrigation Performance and Design Irrigation Plans. Eric Neustrup Standards Manual"places limits on the amount of turfgrass allowed.These limits 12/6/24 8:10 AM are different based on the approval pathway selected by the applicant.See"City of Bozeman Landscape and Irrigation Performance and Design Standards Manual",Section 3.2.1 "Landscape Design Standards","Landscape Approval Pathways" 7 1 Water Conservation Comment Acknowledged.Please refer to the Landscape and Info Only Division Areas less than eight feet wide in any direction must be irrigated with drip Irrigation Plans. Eric Neustrup irrigation,either subsurface or above ground.See"City of Bozeman Landscape 12/6/24 8:10 AM and Irrigation Performance and Design Standards Manual",Section 3.3.1 "Irrigation Design Standards","Sprinklers/Overhead Irrigation",6). Plan Review - Review Comments Report Workflow Started: 11/13/2024 1:29:04 PM Report Generated: 01/13/2025 10:16 AM 8 1 Water�onservation Comment Acknowledged.Please refer to the Landscape and Info Only Division At least 60%of the landscaped area must be covered with plants.See"City of Irrigation Plans. Eric Neustrup Bozeman Landscape and Irrigation Performance and Design Standards Manual", 12/6/24 8:11 AM Section 32.1 "Landscape Design Standards","Landscape Area Coverage Requirements" 9 1 Water Conservation Comment Acknowledged.Please refer to the Landscape and Info Only Division Trees must be planted at a minimum rate of 1 per 1600 square feet of landscape Irrigation Plans. Eric Neustrup area.See"City of Bozeman Landscape and Irrigation Performance and Design 12/6/24 8:11 AM Standards Manual",Section 32.1 "Landscape Design Standards","Tree Requirements Outside of Parking Lots and Boulevards". 10 1 Water Conservation Comment Acknowledged.Please refer to the Landscape and Info Only Division Drip irrigation must be used for all landscaped areas other than turfgrass.See Irrigation Plans. Eric Neustrup "City of Bozeman Landscape and Irrigation Performance and Design Standards 12/6/24 8:14 AM Manual",Section 3.3.1 "Irrigation Design Standards","Drip Irrigation",1). 11 1 Water Conservation Comment Acknowledged.Please refer to the Landscape and Info Only Division Landscaped areas must have a minimum topsoil depth of 6".See"City of Irrigation Plans. Eric Neustrup Bozeman Landscape and Irrigation Performance and Design Standards Manual", 12/6/24 8:15 AM Section 3.2.1 "Landscape Design Standards","Soil Quality Requirements",1). 12 1 Water Conservation Comment Acknowledged.Please refer to the Landscape and Info Only Division The applicant will need to select a landscape design approval pathway when the Irrigation Plans. Eric Neustrup project is submitted for site plan review.See"City of Bozeman Landscape and 12/6/24 8:15 AM Irrigation Performance and Design Standards Manual",Section 3.2.1 "Landscape Design Standards","Landscape Design Approval Pathways". Plan Review - Review Comments Report Workflow Started: 11/13/2024 1:29:04 PM Report Generated: 01/13/2025 10:16 AM 13 1 Water�onservation Comment Acknowledged.Please refer to the Landscape and Info Only Division When completing the irrigation water requirement for submission refer to the Irrigation Plans. Eric Neustrup "City of Bozeman Water Conservation Division Plant LisY'to determine the plant 12/6/24 8:15 AM factor for the relevant plant materials. 14 1 Water Conservation Comment Acknowledged.Please refer to the Landscape and Info Only Division Irrigation zones must be separated based on hydrozone.See"City of Bozeman Irrigation Plans. Eric Neustrup landscape and Irrigation Performance and Design Standards Manual",Section 12/6/24 8:16 AM 3.3.1 "Irrigation Design Standards","Irrigation Stations/Zones",2). 15 1 Water Conservation Comment Acknowledged.Please refer to the Landscape and Info Only Division Irrigation stations that irrigate trees may not irrigate other plant types.See"City Irrigation Plans. Eric Neustrup of Bozeman landscape and Irrigation Performance and Design Standards 12/6/24 8:16 AM Manual",Section 3.3.1 "Irrigation Design Standards","Irrigation Stations/Zones", 3). 16 1 Water Conservation Comment Acknowledged.Please refer to the Landscape and Info Only Division Operating pressure of the irrigation system must meet the manufacturers Irrigation Plans. Eric Neustrup recommended operating pressure.See"City of Bozeman landscape and 12/6/24 8:16 AM Irrigation Performance and Design Standards Manual",Section 3.3.1 "Irrigation Design Standards","System",3). 17 1 Water and Sewer Changemark 003 C1.0-Site Plan.pdf Acknowledged.Parking has been removed from over the Info Only Division W/5 Sewer Manhole manhole.Manhole now located in landscape island. Nick Pericich This can't be in parking spots.Please eliminate the parking or move the manhole 12/17/24 8:44 AM out of the parking to the west. Plan Review - Review Comments Report Workflow Started: 11/13/2024 1:29:04 PM Report Generated: 01/13/2025 10:16 AM 18 1 Water and Sewer Changemark 003 C1.0-Site Plan.pdf Acknowledged.Insulation will be installed around sewer Info Only Division W/5 Sewer Main Depth services at locations where adequate cover can not be Nick Pericich I believe this sewer main is very shallow at four feet or less of cover.You will achieved. 12/17/24 8:48 AM need a plan with these smaller sewer services to make sure they are adequately insulated to prevent them from freezing. 19 1 Parks Department Comment Acknowledged.CILP is proposed for this project.A park is Info Only Ross Knapper CILP may be requested for this project.Please include a narrative that addresses located directly North,across Juniper Street. 12/18/24 8:55 AM the commission criteria for CILP requests.Please include a vicinity map showing existing parks within 0.5 miles of the project location that are accessible via pedestrian pathways or sidewalks.If you would like to propose any improvements to Oak Meadows Park,please contact Park Staff to discuss completing a park master plan for Oak Meadows Park. 20 1 Engineering Library Comment Acknowledged.Utility mains will run under the proposed Info Only Suzanne Ryan DSSP V.D.1 -Water mains,sanitary sewers,and storm sewers within the Oak Park Drive along the property's boundary line allowing 12/18/24 9:34 AM proposed development shall be arranged to allow the suitable development of connection access to the adjacent undeveloped property. any adjoining un-developed land,and shall be constructed to the boundary lines of the tract being developed,unless prevented by topography or other physical conditions,in which case a variance must be approved by the City of Bozeman. 21 1 Engineering Library Comment Acknowledged.SIDs waiver will be signed and recorded Info Only Suzanne Ryan The applicant must provide and file with the County Clerk and Recorder's office once provided by the City during Site Plan Review process 12/18/24 9:34 AM executed Waivers of Right to Protest Creation of Special Improvement Districts to insure all SIDs applicable are captured. (SIDs)on City standard record Form. Plan Review - Review Comments Report Workflow Started: 11/13/2024 1:29:04 PM Report Generated: 01/13/2025 10:16 AM 22 1 Engineering Library Comment Acknowledged.The CILWR Rebate of approximately 20% Info Only Suzanne Ryan BMC 38.410.130.Water Adequacy:The development will need to satisfy the for residential units with high-efficiency fixtures installed is 12/18/24 9:34 AM water adequacy code requirement prior to a future site plan approval.If being considered for this project. sufficient water rights cant be provided to offsets the developmenYs annual demand then a cash-in-lieu of water rights(CILWR)payment will be required. The City assesses the CILWR fee at a rate of$6,000 per acre-foot.The fee determination will take place during the site plan review,however if there are any questions or if a preliminary review is desired please contact Griffin Nielsen with the Engineering/Utilities Department directly at or (406)582-2279.The City encourages the use of groundwater wells to supply irrigation demands,which in turn will reduce the CILWR fee.Applicant must obtain a pre-determination from the DNRC demonstrating that a well groundwater well may be permitted under Montanas exempt appropriation or that provide the water right documentation if existing prior to finalization of the CILWR fee determination.Finally,the City would like to make the owner aware of an available CILWR rebate of approximately 20%for residential units if high- efficiency fixtures(toilets,washers,and shower heads)meeting the City Water Conservation Division standards are installed.The rebate would be released at occupancy and requires an agreement defining the terms and amount rebate be finalized and executed prior to final plan approval.If the owner is interested or has any questions please reach out to Griffin Nielsen. 23 1 Engineering Library Comment Acknowledged.A concurrent construction plan and CCON Info Only Suzanne Ryan Concurrent construction has been an identified purpose of the initial project form is provided with this submittal.Additional concurrent 12/18/24 9:34 AM review.The applicant must complete the following concurrent construction form construction requirements will be acquired during site plan (https://www.bozeman.net/home/showpublisheddocument/11704/63776976195 review(approval from Fire Department)and with the 6630000)to apply for concurrent construction for on site or adjacent review of the infrastructure submittal. improvements associated with site development. Plan Review - Review Comments Report Workflow Started: 11/13/2024 1:29:04 PM Report Generated: 01/13/2025 10:16 AM 24 1 Engineering Library Comment Acknowledged.Applicable draft easements are induded in Info Only Suzanne Ryan BMC 38.410.060-Easements:All Easements indicated below must be provided this submittal.The applicant would like to note that this 12/18/24 9:34 AM on city standard easements templates.Drafts must be prepared for review and comment does not outline the which easements the city is approval by the city with site plan submittal.Signed hard copies of the requiring and the templates were not provided in the'City easements must be submitted to the city prior to site plan approval.The Documents and Staff Reports'folder. applicant may find the City Standard Easement Templates in the City Documents and Staff Reports folder.These templates represent the citys required easement. If the applicant chooses to request changes they must contact the development review engineer assigned to the project.If any changes are made to these templates the applicant must indicate in the document the specific changes when returned to the City. 25 1 Engineering Library Comment Acknowledged.Infrastructure design will be submitted Info Only Suzanne Ryan DSSP Plans and Specifications Review Policy A.-Plans,specifications,and following Site Plan adequacy. 12/18/24 9:34 AM submittals for public infrastructure improvements must be submitted to the City Engineering Department through the engineering Project Dox Portal (https://www.bozeman.net/services/development-center)for infrastructure review.(List Improvements). 26 1 Stormwater Division Changemark 003 Concept Plan Checklist.pdf Acknowledged.For stormwater information please refer to Info Only Adam Oliver No Storm Info the Grading and Drainage design drawing and the 12/18/24 6:43 PM The applicant has not provided any stormwater information or proposed Stormwater Management Report included in this submittal. topography for review. 27 1 Stormwater Division Changemark 003 C1.0-Site Plan.pdf Acknowledged.For stormwater information please refer to Info Only Adam Oliver Legend Entry Not Present the Grading and Drainage design drawing and the 12/18/24 6:45 PM "O"not found on this sheet.The drainage plan is also a preliminary plat Stormwater Management Report included in this submittal. requirement. Plan Review - Review Comments Report Workflow Started: 11/13/2024 1:29:04 PM Report Generated: 01/13/2025 10:16 AM 28 1 Stormwater Division Comment Acknowledged.For stormwater information please refer to Info Only Adam Oliver Several lots are proposed to have significant impervious area constructed and the Grading and Drainage design drawing and the 12/18/24 6:59 PM alter drainage patterns although no details have been provided to account for Stormwater Management Report included in this submittal. the quality and quantity of this increased runoff.Site plan submittals must include a full grading and drainage plan as well as stormwater design report showing the points of stormwater discharge and the ultimate destination of stormwater from across all parcels.BMC 38.220.080 will require existing and proposed contours to extend 100 feet beyond the project boundary.Based on the existing topography,it is not apparent that it will be possible to fit retention or detention features on the proposed site. 29 1 Fire Department Comment Acknowledged.Please refer to the updated civil and Info Only Scott Mueller Attached floor plans don't match building footprints on site plans.FDC/Horn- architectural drawings included in this submittal.Fire riser 12/23/24 9:07 AM Strobe shall not be located above landscaping beds.They shall have rooms have been given exterior access.A fire hydrant has landing/sidewalk to public way and not be obstructed with future growth of been added in the Southeast corner of the site off of Oak vegetation.Fire Riser Room shall have exterior access with sidewalk to public Park Drive and less than 100 feet away from the FDC in way and include the Fire Alarm Control Panel.2021 International Fire Code building 5. D103.5 Fire apparatus access road gates.Gates securing the fire apparatus access roads shall comply with all of the following criteria:1.Where a single gate is provided,the gate width shall be not less than 20 feet(6096 mm).Where a fire apparatus road consists of a divided roadway,the gate width shall be not less than 12 feet(3658 mm).2.Gates shall be of the swinging or sliding type.3. Construction of gates shall be of materials that allow manual operation by one person.4.Gate components shall be maintained in an operative condition at all times and replaced or repaired when defective.5.Electric gates shall be equipped with a means of opening the gate by fire department personnel for emergency access.Emergency opening devices shall be approved by the fire code official.6.Methods of locking shall be submitted for approval by the fire code official.7.Electric gate operators,where provided,shall be listed in accordance with UL 325.8.Gates intended for automatic operation shall be designed,constructed and installed to comply with the requirements of ASTM F2200.D103.6 Signs.Where required by the fire code official,fire apparatus access roads shall be marked with permanent NO PARKING—FIRE LANE signs complying with Figure D103.6.Signs shall have a minimum dimension of 12 inches(305 mm)wide by 18 inches(457 mm)high and have red letters on a white reflective background.Signs shall be posted on one or both sides of the fire apparatus road as required by Section D103.6.1 or D103.6.2.Fire hydrant locations not shown on site plans.Proposed Building 5 will require due to Plan Review - Review Comments Report Workflow Started: 11/13/2024 1:29:04 PM Report Generated: 01/13/2025 10:16 AM 30 1 Engineering Comment Acknowledged.Please refer to the Traffic Impact Study Info Only Suzanne Ryan BMC 38.220.060 11 g.Since a TIS was not completed during the subdivision (TIS)included in this submittal. 12/23/24 9:46 AM review process,a TIS will be required for this site plan application.The applicant is advised that some mitigation may identified and required upon review of the TIS. 31 1 Planning Comment Acknowledged.The applicant understands that the final Info Only Danielle Garber The preliminary plat application#24533 to create the development lot is still in plat to create the development lost must be approved and 12/23/24 1:04 PM DRC review.The final plat to create the development lot must be approved and recorded prior to final plan approval and building permit recorded prior to final plan approval and building permit approval. approval. 32 1 Planning Comment Acknowledged.The HRDC Homes Lot and County lot will Info Only Danielle Garber A site plan application is required for entitlement.The site plan application will need to be reviewed under a separate site plan application 12/23/24 1:04 PM need to provide a phasing plan for the future pad site development of the when they are developed.The details of these lots are not proposed day care and HRDC homes.If no details surrounding these portions of a part of this Site Plan submittal. the development are included with the site plan application then they will most likely need to be reviewed under a separate site plan application depending on the proposed development of those areas and the thresholds of BMC 38.230.160. 33 1 Planning Comment Acknowledged.The desired incentives are outlined on the Info Only Danielle Garber Where incentives for affordable housing are sought with the formal application Architectural Sheets as well as in the Site Plan Narrative 12/23/24 123 PM please group the desired incentives in the application narrative.Please include included in this submittal. the affordable housing plan as well as the review memo from the Community Housing Division.BMC 38.380. Plan Review - Review Comments Report Workflow Started: 11/13/2024 1:29:04 PM Report Generated: 01/13/2025 10:16 AM 34 1 Planning Comment Acknowledged.The desired departures for housing Info Only Danielle Garber Where departures for housing creation are sought with the formal application creation are outlined on the Architectural Sheets as well as 12/23/24 124 PM please group the desired departures in the application narrative and provide in the Site Plan Narrative included in this submittal. analysis of the criteria utilized to determine departure approval for each departure requested.BMC 38.270.070.Where other departures from design standards are requested or necessary.Please group those departures in the narrative citing the specific code section and criteria utilized to determine departure approval per each individual code section. 35 1 Planning Comment Acknowledged.Specifics of the HRDC Homes lot will be Info Only Danielle Garber Apartments and apartment buildings are principal uses in the R-4 zoning district. outlined in a separate,subsequent site plan application. 12/23/24 126 PM Day care centers are principal uses in the R-4 zoning district.The future HRDC homes appear to be rowhouses.Townhouses and rowhouses are principal uses in the zoning district at two attached to 5+attached configurations.Townhouse and rowhouse dwellings are subject to the supplemental use criteria of BMC 38.360.250 including a different open space calculation. 36 1 Planning Comment Acknowledged.The HRDC Homes Lot and County lot will Info Only Danielle Garber The application is meeting minimum lot area,lot width,and lot coverage need to be reviewed under a separate site plan application 12/23/24 126 PM requirements as currently designed per the form and intensity standards in BMC when they are developed.The details of these lots are not 38.320.030.A-C.The applicant will also need to consider form and intensity a part of this Site Plan submittal.A density calculation per standards for the two future lots for the county daycare and the HRDC homes. net acre can be found on the Cover sheet drawing. Those lots will be required to meet setbacks,lot coverage,and minimum lot area from the proposed future lot lines per this section if the applicant wishes to subdivide.Please also provide a density calculation per net acre.The calculation for net acres is located in BMC 38.700.130 under N definitions.In that calculation commercial land area,streets and rights of way,and common open spaces are deducted. Plan Review - Review Comments Report Workflow Started: 11/13/2024 1:29:04 PM Report Generated: 01/13/2025 10:16 AM 37 1 Planning Comment Acknowledged.The elevations are noted are the Info Only Danielle Garber Providing the maximum allowable height on the elevations is helpful,but not architectural drawings and the maximum allowable height 12/23/24 127 PM required.The applicant must also show the maximum ridge height from grade is documented on the architectural site plan.Please refer to the highest point on the roof with formal submittal.BMC 38.320.030.0 The to the included narratives which outline the incentives four-story building is exceeding the maximum allowable height of 50-feet by taken. about 5-feet.Staff acknowledges that deep incentives are proposed to increase allowable height for the development.Please see comments above regarding incentive documentation in the project narrative. 38 1 Planning Comment Acknowledged.The project utilizes the incentive of a 10% Info Only Danielle Garber BMC 38230.030.0 provides setbacks.Juniper Street and Oak Park Drive have an reduction in required setbacks as indicated in the Site Plan 12/23/24 128 PM R-4 front setback of 15-feet.Per BMC 38.350.OSO.A ground level porches and narrative.The HRDC Homes lot will be subject to a patios may encroach 5-feet into the required 15-foot front setback,and 20-foot separate site plan review-requirements for the design of rear setback.Upper level patios may not encroach into required setbacks. lot will be established and met in said review. Apartment buildings along landscaped block frontages are also subject to a minimum setback of 10-feet.Since the apartment buildings are subject to block frontage standards,a minimum setback of 10-feet is required in lieu of the 15- foot R-4 setback.Per BMC 38.500.020.A where block frontage provisions conflict with other sections of the UDC,the block frontage provisions prevail.The proposed rowhouses or HRDC homes are subject to the 15-foot R-4 front setback.The applicant has indicated that affordable housing incentives regarding setbacks will be submitted,please see comments above regarding documentation of setback reductions per the incentives. 39 1 Planning Comment Acknowledged.Please refer to the Site Plan which includes Info Only Danielle Garber BMC 38.410.040.D—Rights of way for pedestrians.The applicant is required to the east-west pedestrian connection and 30'easement. 12/23/24 129 PM show the required east-west easement,currently proposed to the south of The applicant is aware of the requirement to build a Building 4 on the formal site plan submittal.Easements that are 10-feet wide pedestrian connection from the property South to Durston require 10-foot setbacks on either side.No buildings or parking may encroach Road,please refer to the architectural site plan.The into those setbacks.Per the meeting on Dec.12,staff suggests the applicant specifics of this north-south pedestrian connection are still swap the locations of the HRDC lot and building 1 with building 4 to allow room being discussed with the City and County as it crosses for the easement through the open space area without losing units or parking. property belonging to the County and the exact width of No continuous length of block may exceed 600 feet without intersecting a street the path and easement has not been determined.There is or pedestrian walk.The applicant is required to construct the pedestrian only a small strip of land for the proposed pathway that connection to Durston Road through the rest home parcel with site plan also includes a sewer main and overhead power lines so approval.This is considered a transportation pathway per BMC 38.400.110. the layout is not straight-forward and may require adjustments in the field during construction. Plan Review - Review Comments Report Workflow Started: 11/13/2024 1:29:04 PM Report Generated: 01/13/2025 10:16 AM 40 1 Planning Comment Acknowledged.For stormwater information please refer to Info Only Danielle Garber No surface stormwater ponds are currently proposed.If any surface stormwater the Grading and Drainage design drawing and the 12/23/24 129 PM ponds are proposed with the formal submittal,they must meet landscaping Stormwater Management Report included in this submittal. requirements in BMC 38.410.080.H.Drainage facilities that are 10%grade or less may be grassed and irrigated to blend into the adjacent landscaped area. Facilities over 10%grade require vegetation and boulders to create a functional and natural site feature. 41 1 Planning Comment Acknowledged.Requirements for the HRDC homes lot will Info Only Danielle Garber Juniper and Oak Park Drive are designated landscaped block frontages. be addressed in a separate site plan application. 12/23/24 1:33 PM Provisions for this designation are in BMC 38.510.030.C.Based on the submittal Transparency calculations are provided on the architectural the following provisions,in addition to the full standard,are required to be met design sheets. with the formal submittal: • Building Placement:10'minimum front setback is met for the apartment buildings.13.5 feet is proposed at both street frontages.However,the HRDC homes(if not considered apartment uses)are required to have 15-feet with.As discussed above incentives are available for reduced front setbacks. • Building Entrances:Building entrances must be visible and directly accessible from the street.This appears to be me by proposing two primary entrances accessible from Juniper Street. • Fa4ade Transparency:For residential uses,at least 15%of the entire fa4ade(all vertical surfaces generally facing the street).The applicant must demonstrate adequate fa4ade transparency at formal submittal but providing a calculation for the elevations facing Juniper and Oak Park Drive. • Weather Protection:Provide weather protection at least 3'deep over primary residential entries. • Parking Location:Private or shared garage entries must occupy no more than 50%of fa4ade width.Provide a 10'minimum buffer of landscaping between the street and off street parking areas meeting the performance standards of division 38.550 of this chapter. • Landscaping:The area between the street and building must be landscaped,private porch or patio space,and/or pedestrian-oriented space.For setbacks adjacent to buildings with windows,provide low level landscaping that maintains views between the building and the street.Also provide plant Plan Review - Review Comments Report Workflow Started: 11/13/2024 1:29:04 PM Report Generated: 01/13/2025 10:16 AM 42 1 Planning Comment Acknowledged.For residences with ground floor living Info Only Danielle Garber spaces facing a sidewalk or pedestrian path,a ten-foot 12/23/24 1:33 PM setback landscaped area is proposed.The majority of This application also contains special residential block frontages per BMC ground floor residences also have a recessed porch 38.510.030.J.Demonstrate in the narrative and drawings in the formal submittal between the building and pathways to further create a how the application is meeting this code section: transitional space. For residences with ground floor living spaces facing a sidewalk or pedestrian path in a residential or mixed use development,the building must feature at least one of the public/private space transition elements described below.The objective of this standard is to ensure privacy and security for residents,and an attractive and safe pathway that complements the qualities of adjoining residences within a residential complex. 1. Raised deck or porch option. Provide at least a 60 square foot porch or deck raised at least one foot above grade.The porch or deck must be at least six feet deep,measured perpendicular to the building face.(The deck may be recessed into the unit floor plan so that deck does not extend from the building face a full six feet.)A low fence,rail or hedge,two feet to four feet high,may be integrated between the sidewalk or internal pathway and deck or porch. 2. Front setback options. Provide a minimum ten-foot setback between the sidewalk or internal pathway and the face of the residence.Design options for the front setback: i. Landscaped area,meeting the provisions of division 38.550. ii. Semi-private patio space screened by a low fence or hedge (see section 38.350.060). 3. Raised ground floor. If the residence's ground floor is a minimum of three `—`-'--_.�------'---'---.._.�_�...��.— `�--"--'---'------'---— 43 1 Planning Comment Acknowledged.Please refer to the architectural plans Info Only Danielle Garber Per BMC 38.520.030.B-Balconies alongside and rear property lines adjacent to included in this submittal. 12/23/24 1:34 PM residentially zoned properties.Balconies or rooftop decks within 15 horizontal feet of a side property line abutting a residentially zoned property must feature a railing system that is at least 50 percent opaque.Specifically,50 percent of the area below the railing must be a sight-obscuring structure.Departures from this standard will be allowed if the balcony will not cause visual or privacy impacts due to its location,orientation,design or other consideration. Plan Review - Review Comments Report Workflow Started: 11/13/2024 1:29:04 PM Report Generated: 01/13/2025 10:16 AM 44 1 Planning Comment Acknowledged The setbacks along the West and South Info Only Danielle Garber Per BMC 38.520.030.0-Light and air access and privacy alongside and rear property line are greater than 15 feet.The North and East 12/23/24 1:34 PM property lines.Buildings or portions thereof containing multi-household property lines border local streets have a setback of 13.5 dwelling units whose only solar access(windows)is from the applicable side of feet but are considered front setbacks. the building(facing towards the side property line)must be set back from the applicable side or rear property lines at least 15 feet.See figures 38.520.030.B and C.Departures will be allowed where iYs determined that,based on the unique site context,the proposed design won't create a compatibility problem in the near or long term. 45 1 Planning Comment Acknowledged.Please refer to the Site Plan.All three of Info Only Danielle Garber Per BMC 38.520.040.C.2—The middle trash endosure does not appear to have a the trash endosures are adjacent to a pedestrian area. 12/23/24 1:34 PM pedestrian connection.Pedestrian access is required to all services on the site. 46 1 Planning Comment Acknowledged.The crosswalks are consistent to what was Info Only Danielle Garber Per BMC 38.520.040.C.3-Crosswalks are required when a walkway crosses an om proposed on the concept plan,the crosswalks are 12/23/24 1:34 PM site paved area accessible to vehicles.Crosswalks must contain contrasting proposed to be painted.An additional crosswalk was added material(such as concrete)and/or patterns(such as stamped asphalt),excluding crossing Juniper Street and the intersection with Oak Park painted surfaces.The conceptual design appears to be meeting this standard. Drive.This crosswalk will facilitate pedestrian access to the park located on the other side of Juniper Street. 47 1 Planning Comment Acknowledged.The sidewalk connection has been updated Info Only Danielle Garber Per BMC 38.520.040.C.5-6—Connections to adjacent properties are required. in this site plan submittal. 12/23/24 1:35 PM The sidewalk connection along the Oak Park Drive extension must extend to the southern property line and connect to the required path. 48 1 Planning Comment Acknowledged.Please refer to the Open Space Plan Info Only Danielle Garber Per BMC 38.520.060—Usable residential open space per this section is required drawing included in this submittal.The sheet also includes 12/23/24 1:35 PM for the apartments in the development.With formal submittal provide a a breakdown of the open space calculations and breakdown of open space provided per open space area and type(shared open departures taken. space,private residential(ground level patios),balconies,and indooc For the open space reduction proposed provide a narrative for the departure as described in the comment above. Plan Review - Review Comments Report Workflow Started: 11/13/2024 1:29:04 PM Report Generated: 01/13/2025 10:16 AM 49 1 Planning Comment Acknowledged.Please refer to the induded design plans Info Only Danielle Garber specifically the architectural and landscaping plans for 12/23/24 1:36 PM proposed screening.Sheet AS501 details the proposed BMC 38.520.070 contains requirements for the location and design of service trash endosure. areas and mechanical equipment.The formal application must demonstrate compliance with: • Trash enclosure screening per section C.Structural enclosures must be constructed as outline in this provision and contain a horizontal cover.5-feet of landscaping is required around solid waste enclosures. • Utility meter screening per section D • Location and screening of any roof mounted mechanical equipment such as HVAC condensers.The elevations seem to indicate the use of wall mounted PTAC units.Please indude details for the cover or screening for the vents. 50 1 Planning Comment Acknowledged.Please refer to the induded architectural Info Only Danielle Garber design plans. 12/23/24 1:36 PM BMC 38.530 contains requirements for building design.The formal application must demonstrate compliance in the narrative and drawing for: • Massing and articulation for residential buildings.Including articulation and maximum fa4ade width mitigation. • Building details including articulated building entries. • Building materials including special limitations for certain materials(metal siding and cementitious wall board. • Blank wall treatments for any walls areas over 10-feet high and 15-feet wide without a transparent window or door. 51 1 Planning Comment Acknowledged.Please refer to Sheet AS501 for a detail of Info Only Danielle Garber BMC 38.540.050.4-5 provides standards for bicycle rack type,location,and the proposed bicycle parking.Bicycle parking areas are 12/23/24 1:37 PM parking area dimensions.Provide a detail with the formal submittal showing that denoted on the Site Plan sheet. each bicycle parking space meets these requirements,including a 2-foot wide by 6-foot long space with area for circulation. Plan Review - Review Comments Report Workflow Started: 11/13/2024 1:29:04 PM Report Generated: 01/13/2025 10:16 AM 52 1 Planning Comment Acknowledged.Please refer to the Landscape Plans Info Only Danielle Garber included in this submittal. 12/23/24 1:37 PM With the formal submittal the applicant must provide landscaping plans that meet the standards required in BMC 38.550 including mandatory landscaping provisions for: • Parking lot landscaping • Parking lot screening • Street frontage landscaping and other public landscaping including pedestrian crossings. • Required trees for residential adjacency • Irrigation standards The Water Conservation Division will also evaluate landscaping plans per the City of Bozeman Landscape and Irrigation Performance and Design Standards Manual.The applicant will be required to provide the required details to demonstrate compliance with the provisions in the manual. 53 1 Planning Comment Acknowledged.Please refer to the Photometric Plans Info Only Danielle Garber No lighting and photometric plans were provided.With the formal submittal included in this submittal. 12/23/24 1:39 PM provide plans for lighting that are compliant with BMC 38.570.040 including a photometric plan in footcandles that extend to the property line,and fixture details demonstrating full cutoff shielding for any building mounted lighting and site lighting. 54 1 Planning Changemark 003 C1.0-Site Plan.pdf Acknowledged.Please refer to the updated proposed Info Only Danielle Garber PLNG Curbing at HRDC Homes design which features full curb along the HRDC Homes 12/23/24 1:41 PM Please provide furtherjustification in the phasing plan for the curbing proposed Lot.As the specifics of this IoYs design are unknown at this to serve individual driveways for the HRDC homes.Since no timing for that time,a separate site plan will be submitted and subject to development is provided,the phasing phan should show a continuous curb its individual review. around the HRDC homes future lot and grass seeding for ground cover between phases. Plan Review - Review Comments Report Workflow Started: 11/13/2024 1:29:04 PM Report Generated: 01/13/2025 10:16 AM 55 1 Engineering Comment Acknowledged.For stormwater information please refer to Info Only Suzanne Ryan BMC 38.410.080 D.Stormwater retention or detention ponds may be located the Grading and Drainage design drawing and the 12/23/24 3:48 PM within public parkland,but such areas must not count towards the parkland Stormwater Management Report included in this submittal. dedication requirement.Any stormwater ponds located on parkland must be No stormwater ponds are proposed to be within parkland. designed,constructed and/or added to so as to be conducive to the normal use and maintenance of the park.Stormwater ponds serving multiple lots in separate ownership must not be located on private lots or public rights-of-way. Stormwater retention or detention ponds must be maintained by the property owners'association. 56 1 Engineering Comment Acknowledged.The design with non-municipal utility Info Only Suzanne Ryan BMC 38.410.050 Front setback utility easements.Front setback utility easements companies is still being coordinated,however a 10' 12/23/24 3:51 PM must be ten feet wide,and must always be provided unless written confirmation easement is proposed to be granted. is submitted to the community development department from all utility companies providing service indicating that front setback easements are not needed. 57 1 Engineering Library Comment Acknowledged.Please refer to the water design report Info Only Suzanne Ryan DSSP Section V.A.-A water design report must be prepared by a professional included in this submittal. 12/23/24 3:54 PM engineer for the proposed project.The water distribution system must be designed to meet the maximum day demand plus fire flow and the peak hour demand. 58 1 Engineering Library Comment Acknowledged.Please refer to the sewer design report Info Only Suzanne Ryan DSSP Section V.B.-A sewer design report prepared by a professional engineer included in this submittal. 12/23/24 3:54 PM liscenced in the state of Montana deomonstrating compliance with these requirements shall be submitted.Design parameters and the critical conditions shall be shown on an overall plan of the study area.An overall plan of the development,induding all areas outside of the study area which would naturally be served through the study area shall be included. Plan Review - Review Comments Report Workflow Started: 11/13/2024 1:29:04 PM Report Generated: 01/13/2025 10:16 AM 59 1 Engineering Library Comment Acknowledged.There is not a wetland on the property. Info Only Suzanne Ryan BMC 38.220.020 A.-The developer must provide the community development There is an irrigation ditch on the adjacent property along 12/23/24 3:58 PM department with a copy of all required streambed,streambank or wetlands the site's eastern boundary line.Please refer to the permits,or written notification from the appropriate agency that a permit is not correspondence from the Farmers Canal Company required,prior to the commencement of any work on the site and/or final plat included in the Documents portion of this submittal. approval,whichever is sooner.These permits include but are not limited to:(list permits) 60 1 Engineering Library Comment Acknowledged.Please refer to the previously submitted Info Only Suzanne Ryan The applicant is advised that the proposed project falls within the Bozeman Preliminary Plat application which addresses this comment. 12/23/24 3:58 PM Solvent Site boundary.The applicant must contact the Citys solvent site consultant,Jim Sullivan,the Principal Engineer at Tasman Geosciences,Inc.and the DEQ project manager,Katy Frye for additional information on construction requirements within the solvent site. 61 1 Engineering Library Comment Acknowledged.Please refer to the stormwater managemtn Info Only Suzanne Ryan DSSP 11.B.1 A Storm Drainage Plan shall include a map or plat showing building deisgn report included in this submittal. 12/23/24 3:58 PM site(s),open areas,drainage ways,ditches,culverts,bridges,storm sewers,inlets, storage ponds,roads,streets,and any other drainage improvements.The map shall also include identification and square foot coverage of the various ground surfaces(i.e.vegetation,gravel,pavement,structures). 62 1 Engineering Library Comment Acknowledged.For stormwater information please refer to Info Only Suzanne Ryan DSSP Section II A.4.-The applicant must include a storm drainage plan with the Grading and Drainage design drawing and the 12/23/24 3:58 PM post-construction storm water management controls that are designed to Stormwater Management Report included in this submittal. infiltrate,evapotranspire,and/or capture for reuse the post-construction runoff generated from the first 0.5 inches of rainfall from a 24-hour storm preceded by 48 hours of no measurable precipitation. Plan Review - Review Comments Report Workflow Started: 11/13/2024 1:29:04 PM Report Generated: 01/13/2025 10:16 AM 63 1 Engineering Library Comment Acknowledged.For stormwater information please refer to Info Only Suzanne Ryan Montana Post Construction Storm Water BMP Design Manual-The proposed the Grading and Drainage design drawing and the 12/23/24 3:58 PM project is located in an area that is known to have seasonally high groundwater. Stormwater Management Report included in this submittal. The applicant must demonstrate that seasonal high groundwater will not impact the function or maintenance of the proposed facilities.Industry guidance recommends a three-foot minimum separation from the bottom of the proposed facility to the underlying groundwater table.The applicant must provide local seasonal high groundwater elevations to support the proposed design. 64 1 Engineering Library Comment Acknowledged.For stormwater information please refer to Info Only Suzanne Ryan DSSP Section II C.-The applicant must provide on-site detention with release the Grading and Drainage design drawing and the 12/23/24 3:58 PM rates limited to predevelopment runoff rates.Retention ponds must be sized Stormwater Management Report included in this submittal. based on a 10-year,2-hour storm intensity. 65 1 Engineering Library Comment Acknowledged.Please refer to the Construction Info Only Suzanne Ryan BMC 38.270.020-Construction Routes:A construction route map must be Management Plan sheet included in this submittal. 12/23/24 3:59 PM provided showing how materials and heavy equipment will travel to and from the site. 66 1 Engineering Changemark 004 C1.1 -Dimension Plan.pdf Acknowledged.Please refer to the updated design which Info Only Suzanne Ryan ENG Crosswalk includes a painted crosswalk acrossjuniper street. 12/23/24 4:36 PM 38.400.010 The applicant must install a crosswalk across Juniper. 67 1 Engineering Changemark 004 C1.1 -Dimension Plan.pdf Acknowledged.The parking has been reconfigured to keep Info Only Suzanne Ryan Changemark note#02 the existing manhole outside of a parking space and within 12/23/24 4:37 PM The sanitary Sewer manhole must not be located in a parking spot. landscaped area. 68 1 Engineering Changemark 004 C1.1 -Dimension Plan.pdf Acknowledged.Snow storage is shown on site and Info Only Suzanne Ryan ENG denoted on the Site Plan.If additional snow storage is 12/23/24 4:37 PM Show snow storage on site plan. required,snow will be hauled off-site.