HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-22-26 Public Comment - E. Cope - BID 12_21_26 Public Comment letterFrom:Emily Cope
To:eric@360commercialmanagement.com; eric@owenhouse.com; Erik Nelson; frescocafe317@gmail.com;
Ileana@delaneynco.com; mkehke@pacv.com; Randy Scully (randy@scullypartnergroup.com)
Cc:Ellie Staley; Douglas Fischer; Bozeman Public Comment
Subject:[EXTERNAL]FW: BID 12/21/26 Public Comment letter----Please submit at today"s meeting
Date:Wednesday, January 21, 2026 10:18:15 AM
Attachments:Bozeman. UDC height. petition. 1.13.26.pdf
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Good Morning,
Please see the email and attachment submitted for public comment.
See most of you in a little bit!
Emily Cope
Economic Development Director
Downtown Bozeman Partnership
222 East Main Street #302 | Bozeman MT 59715
406-586-4008 | www.downtownbozeman.org
The Downtown Business Improvement District and Downtown Urban Renewal District are City of Bozeman
entities administered by the Downtown Bozeman Partnership. City of Bozeman emails are subject to the
Right to Know provisions of Montana’s Constitution (Art. II, Sect. 9) and may be considered a “public record”
pursuant to Title 2, Chpt. 6, Montana Code Annotated. As such, this email, its sender and receiver, and the
contents may be available for public disclosure and will be retained pursuant to the City’s record retention
policies. Emails that contain confidential information such as information related to individual privacy may
be protected from disclosure under law.
From: David Loseff <dploseff@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2026 9:42 AM
To: Ileana Indreland (Ileana@delaneynco.com) <Ileana@delaneynco.com>; Emily Cope
<Emily@downtownbozeman.org>; Ellie Staley <ellie@downtownbozeman.org>; Randy Scully
<randy@scullypartnergroup.com>; randy@scullywestproperties.com
Cc: mike hope <mkwnhope@aol.com>; Cory Lawrence <coryl@offthebeatenpath.com>; Ashley Ogle
<ashleyogle@kenyonnoble.com>; harte14@yahoo.com; Jim Webster <jwebster587@gmail.com>
Subject: BID 12/21/26 Public Comment letter----Please submit at today's meeting
Dear BID Board,
As you should be aware, the recently approved new UDC which goes into effect on
February 1, 2026 was amended to increase allowed building heights in the B3 to
90'...which effectively adds 2 additional stories to the existing 70' level.....and buildings
can go up to 2 stories higher with affordable housing bonus density increases....ie. 10
story buildings. These changes will have a tremendous adverse impact on our already
congested downtown parking and traffic situation. Adding significant height and density
without any commensurate increases in parking will worsen our downtown
parking situation......simple and obvious math.
To the extent that the BID as a group and/or individual downtown property and business
owners are serious about addressing our challenging downtown parking situation, it
needs to proactively get engaged in opposing the B3 height increase. A Daines/Post
Office parking garage deal may or may not happen but adding density without increasing
parking will unquestionably exacerbate an existing problem for downtown property and
business owners.
While other community members are proactively opposing this pending B3 height
increase due to other significant adverse impacts arising from this height allowance
change.......eg. effectively gutting the City's affordable housing bonus density program
by giving away the extra height for free. and others opposing its adverse impacts on our
quaint downtown walkable ambience, viewsheds, sunlight impacts, etc (see attached
public petition letter which over 120 residents signed within 2 hours of issuance) my
reason for presenting this issue to the BID board is due to its looming adverse parking
impacts.
https://www.bozemandailychronicle.com/opinions/guest_columnists/michelle-osman-
city-commission-s-multi-million-xmas-gift-to-out-of-town-developers/article_c47a7fb9-
a7a4-4694-b92f-4140f279b8e8.html
The one reason provided by the City for allowing the increased building heights is that
taller buildings will result in increased property tax yields for the City. That was the same
rationale given for allowing Holloran to build his 140 room AC Marriott Hotel on the old
Straightaway Motors site without requiring his creation of one single new parking space
while also allowing him to avoid paying over $2.65 million in cash-in-lieu fees under city
rules at that time.
But while the City may benefit from reaping higher tax revenues, it comes at the direct
expense to downtown businesses and property owners in the form of reduced publicly
accessible parking downtown. As you may know, downtown properties (and its tenants
via NNN leases) pay 20-25x the property tax per square foot paid by other
properties/businesses in Bozeman outside of our downtown area. Part of the reason is
because other businesses such as Walmart own their own parking lots and pay lower
rates on their parking lots resulting in a lower average property tax bill for them.
Downtown properties and businesses can only afford to pay these huge premium
property taxes to the City with the City providing public parking......a simple symbiotic
relationship. To pay the City's high property taxes, we need customers and customers
need accessible parking spaces. However, when the City allows increased building
heights without addressing commensurate parking needs, the City tax revenues grow
while throwing downtown business and property owners under the bus. And the City's
next "solution" will be to further increase taxes on downtown customers by instituting
paid parking........while increasing the parking problem with increased building heights.
I have heard from various fellow downtown property owners that they "don't want to
make waves" or "want to get along, go along" or basically avoid becoming the proverbial
"fart in church." That's nice and comfortable but similar to many of you, I have invested
millions into my downtown property just like my tenants and many of my neighbors and
having accessible public parking for customers is fundamental to preserving the
economic vitality and viability of our downtown. Ironically, I am arguably less impacted
by the parking situation than my neighbors because the Baxter is a destination location
and we also own our own parking lot. Nonetheless this parking issue is critical to our
entire historic downtown, our smaller neighboring businesses, etc. and now is the time
to stand up and be counted. Hopefully the BID and its members will take a leadership
position, either as a group or as individual business leaders and engage on this issue of
utmost importance to our downtown.
Respectfully,
David Loseff
The Baxter and its operating businesses and employees.