Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-18-25 Pulblic Comment - A. Craighead - bikefill-urban parks and forestry boardFrom:April Craighead To:Bozeman Public Comment Subject:[EXTERNAL]bikefill-urban parks and forestry board Date:Thursday, December 18, 2025 11:28:48 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Urban Parks and Forestry Board members, Addi Jadin, Mitch Overton, Bozeman City Commission, and Adam Johnson (GVLT), I would like to make a few comments regarding the Bikefill project prior to tonight’s meeting, which I plan to attend. I have been outdoor enthusiast for many years here in Bozeman and have greatly benefited from the increased trail building by GVLT and I applaud their new efforts in building the new Bikefill park. This land has been degraded in the past and new bike trails will be a benefit to the community however I do have some reservations about some of the trails GVLT has proposed within the complex. While this is a relatively small parcel of land it abuts undeveloped lands that wildlife utilize for daily and seasonal movements (to the North and East of Story Mill rd). Areas adjacent to the Bikefill area have been highlighted in Bozeman’s Sensitive Lands project as important to wildlife and both Churn Ck and portions of the intermittent creek on the northern portion of the property have been highlighted with riparian setbacks. Development of the high density of trails will definitely disrupt wildlife movements and utilization of the property. It is well established that mountain biking is very disruptive to wildlife movements and habitat usage. I would hope that at a minimum, that bird surveys be conducted on the property prior to construction and that any construction near streams or wetlands take place after the breeding season has concluded. Optimally a wildlife assessment should be conducted during the winter and spring to determine baseline wildlife data for the area. I hope that the city and GVLT will adhere to the newly adopted City of Bozeman Parks, Recreation, and Active Transportation plan, the Gallatin Valley Sensitive Lands Plan, the Wetlands Code Update, and the Bozeman Community Plan 2020 provide guidance for the incorporation of required setbacks and buffer zones for wildlife, watercourses, and wetlands. I would suggest the city and GVLT take into consideration the points I make below for the benefit of wildlife. 1. Elimination of the South side trail along Churn Creek to allow wildlife an untraveled space between the creek and property line fence. 2. Include Maximum setbacks or greater around Churn Creek ( best practices= 100- 150 ft setbacks)(City= 50 feet from creek, 25 from wetland ) 3. Eliminate the portion of the north perimeter trail closest to the unnamed northern intermittent stream and the western boggy area 4. Include maximum setbacks on unnamed northern intermittent stream 5. Mapping of wetland and watercourses to establish baseline data before construction: showing Sensitive Land designation, etc. Thank you for your considerations, April April Craighead Executive Director Wildlife Biologist Craighead Institute 201 So. Wallace Ave Suite B2D Bozeman, MT. 59715 406 585-8705 april@craigheadinstitute.org