The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About003 City Informal Review - ResponsePlan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: 24325 TRS Management Studio INF Workflow Started: 6/27/2024 5:08:09 PM Report Generated: 08/06/2024 11:08 AM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 1 1 Addressing Jenny Connelley 7/17/24 1:23 PM Comment This property has an address of 2209 Iron Horse Road assigned to it for assessment purposes that would be used for a building built on it. Additional buildings or units inside this building would need additional addressing. Info Only 2 1 Engineering Alicia Paz-Solis 7/22/24 3:31 PM Comment BMC 38.220.080.A.2.g - Traffic Generation: The applicant must submit a peak hour trip generation value to the City to determine whether a traffic impact study (TIS) is required. Info Only 3 1 Engineering Alicia Paz-Solis 7/22/24 3:34 PM Library Comment BMC 38.410.130. Water Adequacy: The development will need to satisfy the water adequacy code requirement prior to a future site plan approval. If sufficient water rights cant be provided to offsets the development's annual demand then a cash-in-lieu of water rights (CILWR) payment will be required. The City assesses the CILWR fee at a rate of $6,000 per acre-foot. The fee determination will take place during the site plan review, however if there are any questions or if a preliminary review is desired please contact Griffin Nielsen with the Engineering/Utilities Department directly at gnielsen@bozeman.net or (406) 582-2279. The City encourages the use of groundwater wells to supply irrigation demands, which in turn will reduce the CILWR fee. Applicant must obtain a pre-determination from the DNRC demonstrating that a well groundwater well may be permitted under Montanas exempt appropriation or that provide the water right documentation if existing prior to finalization of the CILWR fee determination. Finally, the City would like to make the owner aware of an available CILWR rebate of approximately 20% for residential units if high- efficiency fixtures (toilets, washers, and shower heads) meeting the City Water Conservation Division standards are installed. The rebate would be released at occupancy and requires an agreement defining the terms and amount rebate be finalized and executed prior to final plan approval. If the owner is interested or has any questions please reach out to Griffin Nielsen. Info Only REVIEW COMMENTS PROJECT IS NOW LOCATED ON LOT 4, THERE WAS A LAND SWAP WITH A NEIGHBOR. THE NEW ADDRESS IS: 2225 IRONHORSE ROAD SEE NEW DOCUMENTS WITH THIS SUBMITTAL SEE NEW DOCUMENTS WITH THIS SUBMITTAL NOTES IN BLUE ARE BY PROOF ARCHITECTURE 06/03/2025 Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: 24325 TRS Management Studio INF Workflow Started: 6/27/2024 5:08:09 PM Report Generated: 08/06/2024 11:08 AM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 4 1 Engineering Alicia Paz-Solis 7/22/24 3:40 PM Comment Site Plan Requirements - For future site plan review, please refer to the City of Bozeman Design Standards and Specifications (DSSP) Section I.D for site plan submittal requirements. Items required on all plans include existing and proposed utilities and structures, including: •Line size and material where appropriate; •Water lines (main lines and service lines), valves, and hydrants; •Sanitary sewer lines (main lines and service lines) and manholes; •Storm sewer lines, manholes, and inlets; Info Only 5 1 Engineering Alicia Paz-Solis 7/22/24 3:49 PM Comment BMC 38.410.060.B.2 - The applicant must provide a ten (10) foot utility easement (power, gas, communication, etc.) along the development property frontage prior to Site Plan approval. A template may be found in the City Documents folder. Info Only 6 1 Engineering Alicia Paz-Solis 7/22/24 3:54 PM Comment Special Improvement District (SID) Waiver - City of Bozeman Resolution 5076, Policy 1: The applicant must provide and file with the County Clerk and Recorder's office executed Waivers of Right to Protest Creation of Special Improvement Districts (SID’s) on City standard form for the following: 1.Street improvements to Manley Road including lighting, signalization, paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage. 2.Intersection improvements to Manley Road and Griffin Drive. The document filed must specify that in the event a SID is not utilized for the completion of these improvements, the developer agrees to participate in an alternate financing method for the completion of the improvements on a fair share, proportionate basis as determined by square footage of property, taxable valuation of the property, traffic contribution from the development, or a combination thereof. The applicant must provide a copy of the filed SID waiver prior to site plan approval. Please select and fill out the appropriate template found in City Documents and Staff Reports folder. Info Only 7 1 Engineering Alicia Paz-Solis 7/22/24 3:56 PM Comment BMC 38.410.070, DSSP Section V.A & V.B - Water & Sewer Demand: Prior to a determination of adequacy, the applicant must provide an estimate of the peak-hour sanitary sewer demand as well as the average and max day demands of domestic water usage for the proposed site development. A professional engineer must certify the estimates. Please include relevant Glen Lake Commerce Subdivision Water & Sewer Design Report information/excerpts. Info Only SEE NEW SITE PLAN WITH THIS SUBMITTAL 10' UTILITY EASEMENT IS EXISTING, SEE PLAT MAP SEE NEW DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED WITH SITE PLAN APPLICATION SEE NEW DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED WITH SITE PLAN APPLICATION Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: 24325 TRS Management Studio INF Workflow Started: 6/27/2024 5:08:09 PM Report Generated: 08/06/2024 11:08 AM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 8 1 Engineering Alicia Paz-Solis 7/22/24 3:58 PM Comment BMC 38.410.060 - Drainage easements must be provided for drainage infrastructure and/or flow paths that cross property lines. Info Only 9 1 Engineering Alicia Paz-Solis 7/22/24 4:00 PM Comment Stormwater 1. DSSP Section II.A.4: The applicant must include a drainage plan with post-construction storm water management controls that are designed to infiltrate, evapotranspire, and/or capture for reuse the post-construction runoff generated from the first 0.5 inches of rainfall from a 24-hour storm preceded by 48 hours of no measurable precipitation. For projects that cannot meet 100% of the runoff reduction requirement, the remainder of the runoff from the first 0.5 inches of rainfall must be either: a. Treated onsite using post-construction storm water management control(s) expected to remove 80 percent total suspended solids (TSS); b. Managed offsite within the same sub-watershed using post-construction storm water management control(s) that are designed to infiltrate, evapotranspire, and/or capture for reuse; or c. Treated offsite within the same subwatershed using post- construction storm water management control(s) expected to remove 80 percent TSS. 2. DSSP Section II.C: The applicant must provide either onsite retention or on-site detention with release rates limited to predevelopment runoff rates. Retention ponds must be sized based on a 10-year, 2-hour storm intensity. 3. The applicant must demonstrate that seasonal high groundwater will not impact the function or maintenance of the proposed stormwater treatment facilities. Industry guidance recommends a three-foot minimum separation from the bottom of the proposed facility to the underlying groundwater table. The applicant is advised to verify local groundwater elevations and incorporate these levels into the drainage design report. 4. If stormwater runoff generated from the proposed development was accounted for within the Glen Lake Commerce Subdivision Stormwater Management Plan, the applicant must confirm this is the case and verify current standards will be met for the proposed development as part of the formal Site Plan submittal. 5. DSSP Section II.B.5 A storm drainage facilities maintenance plan shall: a. Identify ownership of all facilities; b. Establish a schedule for maintenance activities necessary to keep the system operationally effective; c. Identify the responsible party in charge of the specific maintenance duties. Info Only SEE NEW LANDSCAPE PLANS AND DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED WITH THIS APPLICATION SEE NEW DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED WITH SITE PLAN APPLICATION Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: 24325 TRS Management Studio INF Workflow Started: 6/27/2024 5:08:09 PM Report Generated: 08/06/2024 11:08 AM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 11 1 Engineering Alicia Paz-Solis 7/22/24 4:07 PM Library Comment DSSP Plans and Specifications Review Policy A. -Plans, specifications, and submittals for public infrastructure improvements including fire service lines must be submitted to the City Engineering Department through the engineering Project Dox Portal (https://www.bozeman.net/services/development-center) for infrastructure review. Info Only 12 1 Engineering Alicia Paz-Solis 7/24/24 8:57 AM Comment DSSP IV.B.3 - All sidewalks shall have a minimum width of five (5) feet. Info Only 13 1 Engineering Alicia Paz-Solis 7/24/24 8:58 AM Comment BMC 38.410.060 - Drainage easements must be provided for drainage infrastructure and/or flow paths that cross property lines. Info Only 14 1 Planning Zachary Moon 7/24/24 11:13 AM Changemark PLNG- Design Materials BMC 38.530.060.2.a. Materials are shown to be 26 gauge. Metal siding is required to be at least 24 gauge. In submitting a formal application please ensure building materials meet the minimum standard. 004 A0.03 MATERIALS BOARD.pdf Info Only 15 1 Planning Zachary Moon 7/24/24 12:10 PM Changemark PLNG- Parking Standards BMC 38.540.010.A.1. Table is unclear as to the gross floor area and which standard of BMC is being utilized. Please delineate whether 85% of floor area or net floor area is being utilized. If utilizing 85%, please designate gross floor area and applicable calculations. If utilizing net, please submit site plan compliant with subsection a. with formal submittal. 005 A1.01 SITE PLAN.pdf Info Only 16 1 Planning Zachary Moon 7/24/24 12:10 PM Changemark PLNG- Bicycle Parking 38.540.050.A.4. It appears that bicycle parking would comply with the standard. In formal submittal, please show calculations that would confirm compliance with the code. 005 A1.01 SITE PLAN.pdf Info Only 17 1 Planning Zachary Moon 7/24/24 12:10 PM Changemark PLNG- Number of Parking Spaces Allowed BMC 38.540.050.A.2 Non-residential Uses The code limits the maximum number of parking spaces to 125% of the minimum requirement. Assuming minimum requirement calculations are correct at 9.65, the maximum number of parking spaces allowable would be 12. Please ensure parking complies with the code for formal submittal 005 A1.01 SITE PLAN.pdf Info Only 18 1 Planning Zachary Moon 7/24/24 12:29 PM Changemark PLNG- Building Massing and Articulation BMC 38.530.040B.10.b Code only requires one articulation feature for building facades within the M-1 district, proposed design appears to comply. 01 2024-07-01 Narrative & Questions.pdf Info Only SEE NEW DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED WITH THIS SITE PLAN APPLICATION. FIRE SERVICE LINE NOT REQUIRED PROPOSED SITE DESIGN MEETS THIS REQUIREMENT DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT OCCURS ON SITE AND DOES NOT CROSS PROPERTY LINES AKNOWLEDGED SEE ARCH AREA PLANS FOR CLARFICIATION OF AREA USED TO CALCULATE PARKING REQUIREMENTS SEE ARCH GEN INFO AND PARKING CALCULATIONS SHEET FOR BICYCLE PARKING CALCULATIONS SEE ARCH PARKING CALCULATIONS FOR REVISED AREA BASIS. (13) PARKING STALLS MEETS THE MAX LIMIT OF 125% OF THE MINIMUM REQUIRED NUMBER AKNOWLEDGED Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: 24325 TRS Management Studio INF Workflow Started: 6/27/2024 5:08:09 PM Report Generated: 08/06/2024 11:08 AM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 19 1 Planning Zachary Moon 7/24/24 12:29 PM Changemark PLNG- Blank Wall Treatments BMC 38.530.070.C A to-scale drawing of the design was not submitted, but from the narrative it would appear that all facades would meet code requirements. In a formal submittal, please provide a to scale drawing that can be reviewed to ensure compliance. Please ensure a formal submittal contains all General Plan Requirements: https://www.bozeman.net/home/showpublisheddocument/ 11706/637769768771330000 01 2024-07-01 Narrative & Questions.pdf Info Only 20 1 Planning Zachary Moon 7/24/24 12:31 PM Changemark PLNG- Off-site Parking Offsite parking must be approved via the provisions of BMC 38.540.070. Esp. subsection A.6. Please provide a draft easement with the formal application. The approval would be conditioned on providing a signed and executed easement before final plan approval 01 2024-07-01 Narrative & Questions.pdf Info Only 21 1 Planning Zachary Moon 7/24/24 12:31 PM Changemark PLNG- Encroachments 38.350.050.A.1 and A.2 Code allows for architectural features and awnings to encroach into the setback as long as they do not provide usable space for the building and as long as an awning does not encroach more than 5 feet into a front or rear setback and architectural features do not encroach more than 2 feet into a required side setback 01 2024-07-01 Narrative & Questions.pdf Info Only 22 1 Planning Zachary Moon 7/24/24 12:41 PM Changemark PLNG- Block Frontage, Facade Transparency Table 38.510.030.G Code requires varying degrees of transparency depending on use. In a formal site plan submittal, please ensure that all dimensions are given and calculations shown that ensure the requirements are met. Additionally, please ensure that window materials submittal meet transparency standards. 002 A0.01 PERSPECTIVES - EXTERIOR.pdf Info Only 23 1 Planning Zachary Moon 7/24/24 12:47 PM Changemark PLNG- Site Plan Requirements A to-scale drawing of certain design elements was not submitted, specifically regarding awnings/weather protection, architectural features, building height. Many of these aspects appear to comply, but difficult to discern without to-scale drawings. In a formal submittal, please provide to scale drawings that can be reviewed to ensure compliance. Please ensure a formal submittal contains all General Plan Requirements: https://www.bozeman.net/home/showpublisheddocument/ 11706/637769768771330000 005 A1.01 SITE PLAN.pdf Info Only SEE SCALED ELEVATIONS FOR BLANK WALL TREATMENTS. DESIGN MEETS BLANK WALL STANDARD SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENTATION OF PREVIOUS DISCUSSIONS AND APPROVALS ACKNOWLEDGED SEE TRANSPARENCY, WEATHER, AND SIGNAGE CALCULATION SHEET SEE TRANSPARENCY, WEATHER, AND SIGNAGE CALCULATION SHEET. SEE ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: 24325 TRS Management Studio INF Workflow Started: 6/27/2024 5:08:09 PM Report Generated: 08/06/2024 11:08 AM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 25 1 Engineering Alicia Paz-Solis 7/25/24 11:14 AM Comment *UPDATED COMMENT* Regarding Plat Note - Environmental Assessment: The applicant is advised that a Phase I Environmental Assessment was conducted on the subject property (Terracon Project Number #AJ167008, March 30, 2016). The assessment identified two soil piles with petroleum constituents above laboratory detection limits. In addition, a number of other soil piles were identified and not tested. The City does not have enough information on the current status of these piles or if any onsite mitigation has occurred. Prior to site plan approval, the applicant must provide written documentation and professional certification that any affected soil encountered has been removed from the site, properly characterized, treated/and or disposed of in accordance with applicable local, state, or federal regulations. The new "Phase I Environmental Site Assessment" report (Terracon Project No. 26237008, dated July 17, 2023) addresses the condition placed on the subdivision and described above. Please include this report with future site plan applications. A copy of the report can be found in the City Documents and Staff Reports folder. Info Only 26 1 Planning Zachary Moon 7/25/24 3:57 PM Changemark PLNG- Easements Section 38.410.060B.2.4 Encroachments into utility easements. If a project proposes an encroachment into a utility easement it must receive written approval from all the impacted utilities, which means those utilities who currently have infrastructure in the easement or who will be placing infrastructure in that easement for the project in order for the City to approve the encroachment. 01 2024-07-01 Narrative & Questions.pdf Info Only 27 1 Water Conservation Division Matthew Lee 7/26/24 9:16 AM Comment Informal Reviews have additional requirements to ensure projects will be compliant with the Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. See the Informal Review Checklist Items 15, 16, and 17. Info Only 28 1 Water Conservation Division Matthew Lee 7/26/24 9:17 AM Comment On June 15th, 2024, Ordinance 2155 and Resolution 5586 were adopted by the Bozeman City Commission as well as the associated City of Bozeman Landscape and Irrigation Performance and Design Standards Manual. Projects not deemed "adequate" by June 15, 2024 are now subject to these new code requirements. To familiarize yourself with these requirements, please visit https://www.bozeman.net/departments/utilities/water- conservation/new-development-standards-3620. Info Only THE "PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT" REPORT SUBMITTED WITH THIS APPLICATION INDICATES THAT NO ADDITIONAL ACTION IS RECOMMENDED. INCLUDED FOR REFERENCE SEE LANDSCAPING SUBMITTAL FOR WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPING SEE LANDSCAPING SUBMITTAL FOR WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPING SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENTATION OF NW ENERGY APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENT ENCROACHMENT